Archive for 28 noviembre 2014

No “En mi opinion” Noviembre 28, 2014

noviembre 28, 2014

 No 806 “En mi opinión”  Noviembre 28, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

 

BOOM: Milwaukee Police Chief Explodes on Black Protesters for Ignoring Crime’s ‘Greatest Racial Disparity’

Wow. He let them have it. Enjoy.

Earlier this month, Milwaukee Police Chief Edward Flynn was verbally attacked by protesters in his community for being on his cellphone during a Fire and Police Commission meeting related to the officer-involved shooting death of Dontre Hamilton, 31. When reporters confronted Flynn about the cellphone incident after the meeting, he not only revealed that he had a good reason to be on it, but he also went on a tirade about the “greatest racial disparity in the city of Milwaukee.”

“Well I was on my phone, yes. That is true. I was following developments about a 5-year-old girl sitting on her dad’s lap who just got shot in the head by a drive-by shooting,” Flynn said angrily. “If some of the people gave a good goddamn about the victimization of people in this community by crime, I’d take some of their invective more seriously.”

“The greatest racial disparity in the city of Milwaukee is getting shot and killed — hello!” he added.

“Now, they know all about the last three people who have been killed by the Milwaukee Police Department in the course of the last several years. There’s not one of them that can name one of the last three homicide victims we’ve had in this city,” Flynn said. “But this community is at risk alright, and it’s not because men and women in blue risk their lives protecting it. It’s at risk because we have large numbers of high-capacity, quality firearms in the hands of remorseless criminals who don’t care who they shoot.” http://clashdaily.com/2014/11/boom-milwaukee-police-chief-explodes-black-protesters-ignoring-crimes-greatest-racial-disparity/

 

 

PHARRELL: Michael Brown was a Bully, He was ‘Asking For Trouble’

Pharrell Williams, one of the biggest black figures in the music industry, has spoken out about the shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown, saying he is ‘troubled’ a grand jury decided not to indict the white police officer responsible.

But the ‘Happy’ singer also sparked heated debate by calling Brown’s behavior leading up to his August 9 death ‘bully-ish’.

Before he was shot dead, Brown was caught on surveillance camera stealing a handful of cigarillos from a convenience store in Ferguson, Missouri, and intimidating the shop owner.

While Pharrell says that was no excuse for Officer Darren Wilson to use lethal force against the unarmed teen, he thinks Brown’s actions are being overlooking in the national discussion about the tragedy.

‘It looked very bully-ish; that in itself I had a problem with,’ Pharrell told Ebony magazine. ‘Not with the kid, but with whatever happened in his life for him to arrive at a place where that behavior is OK. Why aren’t we talking about that?’

‘The boy was walking in the middle of the street when the police supposedly told him to “get the f*** on the sidewalk.” If you don’t listen to that, after just having pushed a storeowner, you’re asking for trouble,’ he added.

However, Pharrell said that Brown’s behavior in the convenience store did not warrant his death, and that he believes Officer Wilson should have been charged in the death.

After the story was published on Tuesday, Twitter was flooded with comments calling out Pharrell’s interview.

One Twitter user said: ‘Mike Brown was a bully says Pharrell Williams. So do we get a pass to shoot bullies in society? Way to go Pharrell.’

 

 

 

Amenper: Obama ordena a la policía… Qué se refrenen

 

Había un dicho eminentemente racista en nuestra Cuba, que decía “El negro si no lo hace a la entrada lo hace a la salida”.  Claro que no creo que eso se pueda tomar como algo real, pero los discursos de Obama antes los acontecimientos cómo inmigración y los sucesos de Ferguson, me hacen recordar el dicho. 

Ambos discursos, en la entrada, empezaron muy bien coordinados y razonables, y al final del discurso, en la salida, cambia el mensaje. 

No creo que esto sea por el pigmento que produce cantidad de melanina de la piel de Obama, que no es tan intenso.

No tiene nada que ver con eso que llaman ser negro, ojala lo fuera, porque entonces sería una situación ajena a la política, sería un problema de ADN o genético que afectaría la conducta del individuo, cómo piensan los racistas, entonces el problema sería resuelto fácilmente una vez que no tengamos a un negro de presidente.

Pero el problema de Obama no es su raza, si en algo afectaría la raza sería por algo cultural o por el ambiente, pero Obama no es un negro americano, nunca lo ha sido, nunca realmente se crió, se educó o fue parte de la cultura de los guetos negros.

El problema de Obama es su filosofía política, que es compartida con muchos blancos, que se presenta con una agenda que una vez establecida será difícil de cambiar, y el daño queda permanentemente establecido. Sobre todo si lo que le sigue, el próximo presidente, sea una dama blanca como un lirio del campo que aunque no sea negra, continuaría la misma agenda, sería la misma desgracia con diferente cantidad de melanina.

El discurso sobre los sucesos de Ferguson, la entrada, comenzó de la manera que se podía esperar en un presidente constitucional de los Estados Unidos. 

Dijo que éramos un país de leyes que había que aceptar la decisión del Gran Jurado, y que cualquier motín violento sería ilegal y castigado. 

Pero después viene la otra parte, la salida, donde dice que se seguirá investigando a la policía y los supuestos abusos y le pide a la policía que se refrenen (Restraint)??? . 

En las pantallas de televisión divididas, mientras en una parte aparece el presidente, hablando de investigar a la policía, y pidiéndoles que se refrenen, en la otra se está viendo la destrucción de los amotinados. Los policías llenos de temor por las ordenes de su comandante en jefe se refrenan, se mantienen defensivamente,  paralizados, tratando de defenderse con gases lacrimógenos, pero sintiéndose impotentes para detener a los culpables que impunemente destruyen la infraestructura de la ciudad y las propiedades de los dueños de negocios, negros, chinos y blancos, personas que ven como su trabajo de toda una vida se destruye entre las llamas y los robos sin la protección de las autoridades.

Si la autoridad mayor de la nación, presenta al final a la policía como la causa del problema, en vez de la solución, no podemos esperar que la ley y orden se pueda establecer. 

Y vemos como un oficial absuelto por un gran jurado, enfrentará nuevas luchas legales que drenarán su economía personal y terminarán con su carrera.

Todo dentro de la madeja de una agenda que está destruyendo a esta nación.

 

 

Obama Admits To Violating The Constitution

Obama knows that nothing will happen to him.
Check it out:

Obama, whose approval rating has fallen below 40 percent, close to an all time low, was responding to a heckler who interrupted his speech by shouting “You have been deporting families.”

“What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law, so that’s point No. 1,” Obama responded.

“Point No. 2, the way the change in the law works is that we’re reprioritizing how we enforce our immigration laws generally.” he added.

“The point is that though I understand why you might have yelled at me a month ago, although I disagree with some of your characterizations, it doesn’t make much sense to yell at me right now when we’re making changes,” he said.

Sycophantics in the audience thunderously applauded this outright admission by the President that he has violated the Constitution.

Just last week both Obama and his staff were insistent that the President is not changing the law and cannot do so without a bill being passed in Congress. Indeed, Obama has said repeatedly that he cannot change the law.

“This notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true,” Obama said at a Hispanic Roundtable meeting in the White House in 2011, adding “We are doing everything we can administratively.”
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/11/obama-admits-violating-constitution/

 

 

Amenper: ANITA LA HUERFANITA…..NEGRITA????

Anita la huerfanita (Little Orphan Annie) es una tira cómica creada en 1924 por el estadounidense Harold Gray. Trata sobre Anita, una huérfana cuya vida cambia cuando es adoptada por el acaudalado empresario Papá Diamantino (Daddy Warbucks en el inglés original) y que entre aventura y aventura, ambos aprenden grandes lecciones del otro.

Durante mi niñez disfruté de las aventuras de Anita la Huerfanita, en los muñequitos de Cuba, y mi mujer le leía a mis hijos antes de que supieran leer los muñequitos de Little Orphan Annie, a mi mujer le gustaba mucho el personaje y mis hijos y nietos se han familiarizado mucho con el personaje en las tiras cómicas en inglés y con la película Annie.

En 1977 se estrenó en Broadway “Annie“, un musical basado en la tira cómica y fue un éxito inmediato, con dos adaptaciones: una para el cine en 1982 con Albert Finney, Carol Burnett y Tim Curry y una producida por Disney en 1999.  Hube de ver la obra de Broadway en un viaje a New York, la música era muy buena y la canción “Tomorrow” fue un hit por años, es un clásico popular que todavía oímos.

He visto la película varias veces en el cine y en la televisión.

Así que cuando anunciaron que iban a poner una nueva versión de Annie, busqué los teatros y las fechas para verla.  Pero mi sorpresa es que ahora mi Anita se volvió negrita, y Papá Diamantino es negro, hasta el perro de Anita, Sandy, ya no es gris, es más negro..

Los negros tienen sus personajes y me gusta ver algunas películas de ellos, pero lo que han hecho es robarme la memoria de mi Anita, y eso no es justo.

La politización de las razas se ha extendido a todos los confines, y para mí esto es un boomerang que me produce un golpe en la cabeza. 

Los negros, en su afán por imponer su cultora sobre los blancos están afilando cuchillo para su cabeza.  Oigo los comentarios de personas que habían sido proponentes de la asimilación de los negros en nuestra cultura, pero ahora se sienten resentidos porque los negros están imponiéndonos su cultura sobre la nuestra, a la fuerza. 

Anita es un icono de generaciones, es blanca y rubia, y Papá Diamantino es blanco, calvo y rico, esa es la historia, siempre ha sido la historia desde el 1924, en las tiras cómicas hasta en los 80´s con los musicales y la película..  .

Cambiarla por corrección política es cambiar la historia.  La historia es una sucesión de hechos, y los hechos no se pueden cambiar.

Se han hecho películas sobre la segregación, series de cultura negra como “Roots”, que han sido un éxito  todas las películas y sitcoms de la televisión tienen facetas de la cultura negra, y lo encuentro bien, la historia de los negros es parte de nuestra cultura.

¿No es esto suficiente? ¿Por qué si les aceptamos su cultura, quieren incursionar en la nuestra? Segregación quiere decir separación, ¿Por qué ese afán, de diversidad, de separación cultural? ¿Por qué no se incorporan a la cultura tradicional de la nación en vez de tratar de imponer una nueva cultura?

No me parece algo racial, no me parece algo racional, me parece algo político.

Por eso no voy a ver la película Annie, porque me imagino el mensaje político que me van a enchuflar en la trama.

Ya se habla hasta de hacer una película de un Jesucristo negro, me imagino que el actor se parecerá a Obama. 

Por favor, Jesús (Joshua) era un judío de Israel, no de Etiopía, podría haber escogido nacer en Etiopía,  el escogió nacer así, blanco y en Israel,

Hasta los antisemitas aceptan esto, Hitler aceptó esto, no intentó cambiarlo diciendo que había nacido en Alemania, lo que me lleva a pensar que estos son más recalcitrantes que Hitler..

Por favor yo escucho su cultura, pero no me cambien la nuestra.

 

 

 

 

Republicans Can Cut The Funding For Obama’s Amnesty

Congress has the power to defund President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty order, the Congressional Research Service announced Wednesday. This, after a week of bipartisan declarations that Congress was powerless to stop the order.

“In light of Congress’s constitutional power over the purse, the Supreme Court has recognized that ‘Congress may always circumscribe agency discretion to allocate resources by putting restrictions in the operative statutes,’” reads a report from the Congressional Research Service. The report was sent to Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions’ office, first reported by Breitbart News, and has since been obtained by The Daily Caller.

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is an “authoritative, confidential, objective and nonpartisan” congressional analysis outfit that operates out of the Library of Congress.

The analysis stands in stark contrast with a previous analysis by the Republican-dominated House Appropriations Committee, which issued a Thursday statement saying that the agency tasked with executing the order, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ”is entirely self-funded through the fees it collects on various immigration applications. Congress does not appropriate funds for any of its operations, including the issuance of immigration status or work permits, with the exception of the ‘E-Verify’ program. Therefore, the appropriations process cannot be used to ‘defund’ the agency.
Read more at
http://minutemennews.com/2014/11/republicans-can-cut-funding-obamas-amnesty/

 

 

IRS Gave White House Thousands of Taxpayer Documents

By Andrea Billups

The IRS improperly turned over thousands of confidential tax documents to the White House for review, according to information obtained from a lawsuit filed against the U.S. Treasury Department’s inspector general by the legal advocacy firm Cause of Action, exposing a pipeline of communication between the two, the Daily Caller reports.

“[T]he Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) informed Cause of Action that there exist nearly 2,500 potentially responsive documents relating to investigations of improper disclosures of confidential taxpayer information by the IRS to the White House,” Cause of Action noted, according to the Daily Caller.

Special: Climatologist Warns of 30-Year Freeze, Economic Disaster

Such documentation, including the exchange of confidential information between White House policy adviser Jeanne Lambrew and former IRS official Lois Lerner, came to light after it was revealed that the the IRS had likely targeted conservative groups for review, including one that had sought in a 2012 lawsuit to overturn Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate, the Daily Caller noted.

The Justice Department has asked for a longer window under which to review the newly found documents before releasing them publicly, the Daily Caller said.

The Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard, in his “Secrets” column, called news of the leaked documents a “shocking revelation.”

VOTE: Do You Support Obama’s Gun Control Plan? Vote Here.

“This disclosure, coming only after Cause of Action sued TIGTA over its refusal to acknowledge whether such investigations took place, and after the court ordered TIGTA to reveal whether or not documents existed, signals that the White House may have made significant efforts to obtain taxpayers’ personal information,” Cause of Action wrote in a statement to the Examiner.

The new document release comes a month after a similar lawsuit by True the Vote got tossed by a federal judge. The conservative group, based in Houston, had alleged that the IRS targeted them and delayed their application for a 501(3)(C) nonprofit status,breitbart.com reported.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/irs-taxpayer-documents-white-house/2014/11/27/id/609925/#ixzz3KNI3cszw
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

 

White, Black, or Other: Give Thanks for Privilege

by Mark Horne 

Whether it is White privilege or any other kind, you should feel grateful to God for it, not guilty.

An African American pastor wrote, “My sons have far more to fear from making bad choices than they have to fear from the police.”

At first I thought he might have a naïve view of what happens in some cases with the police. As anyone who reads this blog knows, abuse of authority and unjustified violence should be a big concern to conservatives. But when I read the whole essay by Pastor Voddie Baucham, it is patently obvious that he has learned about abuse of authority. (He simply refuses to stereotype all police officers—which sounds pretty reasonable in a media culture that condemns “profiling.”)

[See also, “Grateful TO WHOM? Atheists & The Thanksgiving Holiday.”]

And the fact is, when it comes to raising our children, his statement is so true. In fact, we should extrapolate a bit as “Tea Party Conservatives” or whatever:

Our children have far more to fear from making bad choices than they have to fear from the NSA, the mainstream media, the TSA, and even a Democrat majority.

As a friend recently wrote to me are poor assayers of risk… “Which of the following are more likely to ruin your life?

  • Equine Encephalitis vs. the Flu
  • Government overreach vs. Terrorism
  • Air Travel vs. Automobile
  • National Security Agency vs. Sexual immorality
  • Racist Cops vs. 80% illegitimacy rate in black families

It is much easier to get worked up over those things that are further away from us. The closer the risk, the harder it is for us to see the danger.”

That’s exactly right. We really can and do destroy ourselves. And the easiest path toward that end is to be naive about our own power to do so—or to be distracted by monsters in the world so that you don’t watch the one closest to you.

[See also, “Thanksgiving: Time To Reflect How Easily Liberty Dies.”]

Our children need to learn our values not only at the level of seeing the political problems they face, but also being able to navigate their lives. If resentment of injustice leads them to destruction, how does that help them or society?

And, likewise, we need to teach children of all colors to be thankful for what privilege they have rather than to feel guilty about it or resentful of others. Pastor Baucham also wrote:

I don’t care what advantages my white neighbor may or may not have. If he does have advantages, God bless him! I no more fault him than I fault my own children who have tremendous advantages due to the fact that they were raised by two educated, Christian parents who loved, disciplined, and taught them. Ironically, when I think about THAT advantage, I am filled with joy and gratitude to God for his faithfulness. People are supposed to bequeath an advantage to their children and grandchildren (Prov. 13:22). Why, then, would I be angry with my white neighbor for any advantage he is purported to have? And what good would it do? How does that advance the gospel? Especially in light of the fact that growing up with the gospel is the ultimate privilege/advantage! It is the advantage that has granted us all “American privilege”! Are we guilty for being citizens of the wealthiest republic in the history of the world? I think not!

This may explain why Liberals don’t like Thanksgiving anymore. It celebrates what they think we should feel guilty about. It institutionalizes thanking God for things that they insist justify rioting for others.
Read more at
http://politicaloutcast.com/2014/11/white-black-give-thanks-privilege/#4m66Ko7wCaU14kRX.99

 

 

Michael Brown’s Mom Is A Ridiculous Blame Shifting Rabble Rouserily Caller

Yeah, she’s right, they’ve incited no violence whatsoever…

The family of Michael Brown appeared on NBC’s “Today” show, during which they were confronted with video of Michael Brown’s stepfather telling Ferguson protesters to “burn this bitch down.”

“That he was just emotional,” McSpadden said. “I don’t feel that he stirred the crowd. The crowd was already stirred. It’s been stirring since Aug. 9.”

Instead, she blamed Missouri Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon. “I hold — I wouldn’t hold him accountable for that. That comes from a higher power, elected official and it’s called the governor… They stirred the pot. they had everyone on edge. They had everyone in the uproar and had the city on edge, basically, since Aug. 9.” http://clashdaily.com/2014/11/michael-browns-mom-ridiculous-blame-shifting-rabble-rouser/

 

Public Records – Now Online

as told to Jessica Ruane

Been issued a speeding ticket? Failed to stop at a stop sign? What about your family members? And friends? If you are like most of us, the answer to at least one of those questions is “yes”—the vast majority of us have slipped up at least once or twice.

An innovative new websiteInstant Checkmate is now revealing the full “scoop” on millions of Americans.

Instant Checkmate aggregates hundreds of millions of publicly available criminal, traffic, and arrest records and posts them online so they can easily be searched by anyone. Members of the site can literally begin searching within seconds, and are able to check as many records as they like (think: friends, family, neighbors, etc. etc.).

Previously, if you wanted to research someone’s arrest records, you might have had to actually go in to a county court office—in the appropriate county—and formally request information on an individual. This process may have taken days or weeks, or the information might not have been available at all. With websites like Instant Checkmate, however, a background check takes just a few clicks of the mouse, and no more than a minute or two.

While preparing this article I decided to run a quick search on myself to give the service a real-world test. To my dismay, the search revealed several items I’d long forgotten—one of them being for the possession of a fake ID I was (embarrassingly) issued back in college when I was just 18 years old.

“possession of a fake ID I was (embarrassingly) issued back in college when I was just 18 years old”

After searching myself and finding those records, my curiosity was piqued, and I began researching family members—apparently my aunt Susanne isn’t a very good driver, judging by the numerous traffic citations that showed on her record.

One of the most interesting aspects of Instant Checkmate is that it shows not only criminal records, but also more general background information like marriage records, divorce records, various types of licenses (medical, firearm, aviation, etc.), previous addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, estimated income levels and even satellite imagery of known addresses—it’s really pretty scary just how much information is in these reports.

In addition to giving information on the specific person you search for, the report also includes a scrolling list of “local sex offenders” for whatever region you’ve searched—along with a map plotting out the locations of those offenders. I started perusing the ones that showed up in my report, and I was absolutely blown away when I stumbled upon my junior high school wrestling coach’s mug shot.

I was absolutely blown away when I stumbled upon my junior high school wrestling coach’s mug shot.

His crime was listed as “Out of state offense,”” so I wasn’t able to get the specifics (you usually can—this was an unusual case), but he was definitely a registered sex offender. Scary stuff.

I would definitely recommend this tool to friends and family. Anyone can start running background checks on Instant Checkmate within a few seconds—just click this link to get started.

– See more at: http://www.instantcheckmate.com/pr?src=SLKA&mdm=NETWORK&cmp=SLKA&cnt=NSMXHDLNE112714ICM1&affid=73&campid=36&sid=SLKA&s1=NSMXHDLNE112714ICM1&lp=pr#sthash.FrAutAhJ.dpuf

 

 

 

Gatria: Me gustaria agregar otra muerte y esta muy importante por la confabulación al parecer de casi todas las Cadenas Noticiosas del Pais.

En Agosto 9/14 muere en Ferguson Mike Brown, 2 dias despues en Salt Lake City, Utah, un Policia Negro recibe una llamada sobre un robo que esta ocurriendo en un 7/11. En el momento de llegar el Policia salian tres jovenes de esa tienda, dice el policia que les dio el alto y que este joven no se detuvo por lo que le disparo y lo mato.  Datos: Nombre Dillon Taylor, 20 anos y estaba desarmado. Mientras que las principales Cadenas de Noticias reportaban la muerte de Brown cientos de veces , ninguna reporto la del ciudadano blanco. Mientras Obama y el Ministro de Justicia Eric Holder viajaban a Ferguson los dos ignoraron la muerte del joven blanco y entre tanto el “REVERENDO” Al Sharpton seguia su labor de agitador.

Si la Prensa hubiera reportado la muerte del joven blanco probablemente los disturbios en Ferguson se hubieran evitado. Que Raro que ningun noticiero reporto esto…Se Habran Puesto de Acuerdo?????????????????.

Cuba Libre: Personas de la raza blancas asesinadas por personas negras y nunca se hizo público nacionalmente.

¿Porque ese racismo y esa diferencia?
Angela Ghiraldi Allison 7/18- Jimmie Norman, white male murdered by black male. No national news.

7/18- Terry Taylor, white male murdered by black male. No national news.

7/17- Cindy Raygoza, white female murdered by black male. No national news.

7/11- Luis Aguilar, 91 year old hispanic male murdered by black male. No national news.

 7/10- Brittany Simpson, white female murdered by black male. No national news.

7/6- Sarah Goode, white female murdered by black male. No national news.

7/6- Jeffrey Westerfield, white male murdered by black male. No national news.

7/5- Perry Renn, white male murdered by black male. No national news.

7/3- Laurey Kennedy, white female still in coma from beating by black male. No national news

7/3 Eric Mollet, white male murdered by black male. No national news. 7/2 Rupert Anderson, white male murdered by black male. No national news.

7/2 Jennifer Kingeter, white female murdered by black male. No national news.

6/30 Jim Brennan, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/29 Paul Shephard, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/27 Shirley Barone, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/27 Penelope Spencer, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/27 Inga Evans, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/26 Jake Rameau, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/25 Gina Burger, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/24 Nathan Dasher, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/22 Jonathan Price, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/20 John Whitmore, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/18 John Yingling,white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/17 Allyn Reeves, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/15 Michael Beaver, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/11 Angela Cook, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/11 Nathan Hall, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/7 Harry Briggs, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/5 Laura Bachman, white female, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/2 Robert Mohler, white male, murdered by black male. No national news.

6/1 William Headley, white male, murdered by black male. No national news Just saying!!

COPY AND POST Lets be heard!

Y posiblemente estos no sean todos los casos de asesinato de blancos por negros.

 

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

En mi opinión”

No 806 Noviembre 28, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

Anuncios

No 804 “En mi opinion” Noviembre 26, 2014

noviembre 26, 2014

 No 804 “En mi opinión”  Noviembre 26, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

Cuando los hombres malvados INTRIGAN, los hombres buenos deben de APACIGUAR.

Cuando los hombres malvados QUEMAN y PONEN BOMBAS, los buenos hombres deben CONSTRUIR Y UNIR.

Cuando los hombres malvados gritan las feas palabras del ODIO, los hombres buenos deben comprometerse con las glorias del AMOR.

Donde los hombres malvados pretenden perpetuar un statu quo INJUSTO, los buenos hombres deben de buscar traer a la existencia un orden de JUSTICIA.   

                                     MARTIN LUTHER KING

 

Amenper: RACISMO A LA INVERSA

Se habla mucho del racismo a la inversa, o sea que ahora los negros son los discriminadores contra los blancos cuando antes los blancos discriminaban contra los negros durante la segregación y la esclavitud.

Hay evidencias que presentan los que piensan que esto es una realidad. 

Primero que no vivimos bajo la segregación, y el Presidente de la República es negro, y también lo es el Fiscal General por lo que no es necesario privilegios porque no hay racismo ni opresión.

Además, las leyes para proteger a los negros como en los beneficios sociales y económicos y acción afirmativa, al proteger a los negros perjudica a los blancos que pierden oportunidades de estudio y trabajo que pasan a los negros. Esto en sí es algo discriminatorio contra los blancos.

Pero algo que es curioso es la similitud inversa de la situación, que se hace evidente cuando vemos las cosas del pasado y las comparamos con los problemas raciales del presente.

Estas palabras de Martin Luther King que copio arriba, fueron dichas en una época en que las sociedades de supremacía blanca ponían bombas y quemaban las iglesias negras, en que atacaban violentamente a los negros que se atrevían a protestar, en que el tenían un constante discurso de Odio contra los negros, en que la justicia siempre favorecía al blanco. A esta situación se refería Martin Luther King en sus palabras.  Estaba declarando que esto es algo malo y que no debía suceder.

Pero vamos a leer de nuevo el pensamiento de Martin Luther King, pensando en la sociedad actual,  y vemos que sus palabras cobran vigencias, con la peculiaridad de  que ahora los que intrigan, los que queman, los que destruyen, los que tienen un mensaje de odio, y los que quieren una justicia tramitada, son los negros contra los blancos.

Es curioso, no creo que a Martin Luther King  le hubiera pasado por la mente, que estas palabras se pudieran aplicar en la sociedad a las personas de su raza que él quiso ayudar.

Y que el otro pensamiento que dijo en la marcha a Washington

“Yo tengo un sueño: que mis cuatro hijos vivirán en una nación donde no se les juzgará por el color de la piel sino por sus cualidades”.

 Lo siento Martin, pero tu sueño no es una realidad, y no lo es porque es porque los negros han escogido odiar a las gentes por el color blanco de la piel.

 Y decir que lo hacen porque antes estuvieron discriminados, no tiene validez, porque, fueron sus abuelos, no ellos los que sufrieron la discriminación.

Y todavía no he visto a un grupo de blancos en este tiempo que le quemen la propiedad a un negro.

 

Ferguson Racists Burn American Flag

I have zero respect for these racist fools who are burning the American flag in protest over a thug. Absolutely disgusting.
Check it out:

Last night the long awaited Grand Jury decision in the case of Michael Brown and Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson was released. According to the decision, there was no probable cause to file charges against Officer Wilson and therefore he is exonerated and will not face indictment.

As a result of the Grand Jury decision not to indict Wilson, rioters took to the streets last night burning down dozens of buildings, looting, throwing rocks and molotov cocktails at police, burning American flags, burning cars, and smashing windows. Small businesses were completely destroyed and burned to the ground.Twenty-nine people were arrested by police. The good news is nobody was killed.

“It’s really unfortunate this evening because we had really planned…and talked about the fact that we were really hoping for peaceful protests and I mean that,” St. Louis Police Department Chief Jon Belmar said during a press conference early this morning.
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/11/ferguson-racists-burn-american-flag/

 

Amenper: ¡RACISTAS!

Qué cantidad de racistas estamos viendo gritando en las calles.  Lo peor es que ni se dan cuenta de que son racistas y dicen que están protestando en contra del racismo.

Si alguien es racista es que juzga a otro por el color de su piel. 

Están protestando por un incidente en que un policía mató a un delincuente que lo estaba atacando. 

Esto es lo que sucedió, simplemente eso es lo que sucedió si no eres un racista. 

Pero si eres un racista lo que ves es un policía BLANCO que mató a un hombre NEGRO, lo ves así porque estás pensando en la raza no en seres humanos, o quizás lo ves así porque discriminas a la policía porque las vez como la autoridad desde el punto de vista de un delincuente. 

De cualquier manera poco puedes gritar JUSTICIA, de una manera racional, cuando lo que pides es INJUSTICIA, porque injusticia sería condenar a un inocente por racismo.

¿Quieren ver que racismo más criminal estamos viviendo? 

El New York Times publicó la dirección del oficial Wilson en la tirada de ayer.

En nombre del racismo estamos viendo cómo impunemente una publicación oficial incita a la violencia y pone en peligro a una persona y su familia, todo a nombre del racismo.

Nunca he sido racista, siempre he tratado de controlar mis prejuicios, ya sea por raza, status social o económico, nacionalidad, o cualquier otra cosa, siempre esperando a conocer al individuo y su carácter antes de juzgarlo.  Porque de esto estamos hablando, de que se está tratando un hecho que sucede a diario y se está tratando desde un punto de vista racial.

¿Pero qué podemos esperar? Por desgracia a pesar de la indiscutible grandeza del pueblo y el sistema americano, el racismo siempre ha sido un problema en la nación, Hasta las nacionalidades fundidas en el crisol americano, cada una tuvo que sufrir el racismo y discriminación es su primera etapa al fundirse en la nación americana.

El racismo, una reacción de autodefensa del ser humano hacia lo  que es diferente a él, siempre ha existido y existirá, per es más controlable cuando se reconoce por la persona.

Pero si no se reconoce el racismo es una de las bajas pasiones que más daño ha producido a la humanidad y estamos viendo a estos seres humanos desbocados en su racismo, y ni siquiera se dan cuenta que son racistas.

Cuando equivocadamente el pueblo americano pensó que eligiendo a un presidente negro, demostraban que no eran racistas, lo que hicieron es demostrar que eran racistas, y están pagando las consecuencias.

Porque fueron racistas cuando eligieron un presidente por su color, no por sus cualidades para ejercer la primera magistratura de la mayor nación del mundo.

No voté por Obama, no porque era negro, pero porque era una persona con antecedentes que no me merecían la confianza para darle mi voto.  Racistas son los que votaron por Obama porque era negro.

Una vez que pones la raza por el medio de tu relación con esa persona o para juzgar a una persona eres racista.

Sólo si sinceramente no eres racista, puedes ver el problema de lo injusto del racismo.

Pero esos que están gritando en las calles no lo pueden ver, porque son racistas..

Watch: This Woman’s Incredible Journey To Honor The USA Ends With A Bang Before Thousands

“For 90 seconds, no matter who we voted for, or what team we want to win – we are as one…”

HEATHER LASKIN  NOVEMBER 24, 2014

On August 28th, standing in a downpour on Nashville’s LP Field, Janine Stange took the microphone and led the stadium in “The Star-Spangled Banner,” completing what had been a two-year long journey.

The Long Island native began singing the national anthem at events during high school and had always loved the spirit of the song and what it represented.

“One day, I thought, ‘You know what, I’ve sung in a couple of states, I should sing in every state,’” Stange said. That led her on a journey around the country, beginning on July 3, 2012 at the Tampa Yankees vs Dunedin Blue Jays MiLB game. Without the help of a booking agent, and paying for her travels out of pocket, Stange sometimes visited more than six states a month to reach her goal of singing in every state before the 200th anniversary of the patriotic song.

On September 14th, 2014, after completing her mission, Stange was taken to the “Star-Spangled Buoy,” which marks the location of Francis Scott Key when he saw “that our flag was still there,” where she sang “The Star Spangled Banner”–200 years to the day since it was penned.

Stange, known in the media and on her Facebook and Twitter pages as The National Anthem Girl, reflected on what the anthem means to her:

“For 90 seconds, no matter who we voted for, or what team we want to win – we are as one. When we stand with our hands over our hearts, we are singing ‘our song.’ That is always to be regarded as a privilege, not a formality. I hope this mission brings a renewed awareness, honor and respect for those who have fought and sacrificed their time, well being, families…and lives for our freedom.”

At each event Stange sings at, she sets up a booth where she encourages fans to write thank you notes to active duty and veteran military. She then gives those cards to Operation Gratitude, where they are put into military care packages.

“I believe gratitude is the core of patriotism,” Stange said. “Giving others the opportunity to personally thank those who keep us free to sing our nation’s anthem is an honor. Seeing parents explain what the word ‘patriotism’ or ‘veteran’ means to their children as they write out a thank you note together is priceless.”

Though her record-breaking journey is over, Stange says she will continue singing the national anthem and is now focused on promoting patriotism and sharing the stories of the Americans she has met along the way. She wrote on her IndieGoGo page that she would be surprised when she looked out into the audience and saw kids who didn’t seem to know why they were standing and adults talking to their friends and ignoring the singing of the anthem.

“There is a real risk of current and future generations becoming numb to the reality that someone – someone’s dad, brother, husband, sister, wife or mother…made a sacrifice so we could enjoy the freedoms we have,” she wrote. “I don’t want that to happen.”

When asked what her takeaway from the whole experience has been, Stange, who maintains that the song never gets old or tired for her and that she still gets teary-eyed every time she sings it, said there are two things:

“America is beautiful, and Americans are beautiful.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/woman-sings-national-anthem-every-state-uses-opportunity-promote-patriotism-american-spirit/#wPmsmHmCmTUcBL8x.99

13 Facts About Ferguson the Media Will Never Tell You

By Jim Meyers

According to protesters who erupted in violence after a grand jury declined to indict Officer Darren Wilson in the shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., this was the case of a white policeman shooting an unarmed black teenager with his hands in the air in a community plagued by racial tension.

That’s an account promoted by many in the mainstream media as well. But here are several facts about the case that are harder to find:

1. Surveillance video showed that shortly before the confrontation, 18-year-old Brown stole cigarillos from a convenience store and shoved a clerk who tried to stop him.

2. The autopsy report showed that Brown had marijuana in his system when he died.

3. Officer Wilson, driving to the call of a medical emergency, first encountered Brown walking in the middle of a street and told Brown and his friend to walk on the sidewalk. Brown responded with an expletive.

4. Wilson chose to confront Brown only after he saw the cigarillos in his hand and recalled the radio report of a robbery at the convenience store.

5. Wilson said when he tried to open his car door, Brown slammed it back shut, then punched Wilson in the face.

6. Fearing another punch could knock him out, Wilson drew his gun, he told the grand jury, and Brown grabbed the gun, saying “you are too much of a pussy to shoot me.”

7. An African-American witness confirmed that Brown and Wilson appeared to be “arm-wrestling” by the car.

8. Another witness saw Brown leaning through the car’s window and said “some sort of confrontation was taking place.”

9. After Wilson fired a shot that struck Brown’s hand, Brown fled and Wilson gave chase. Brown suddenly stopped. An unidentified witness told the grand jury that 6-foot-4, 292-pound Brown charged at Wilson with his head down. Wilson said Brown put his hand under the waistband of his pants as he continued toward Wilson. That’s when Wilson fired.

10. A witness testified that Brown never raised his hands.

11. Gunpowder found on the wound on Brown’s hand indicated his hand was close to the gun when it fired. According to a report, the hand wound showed foreign matter “consistent with products that are discharged from the barrel of a firearm.”

12. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist who reviewed the autopsy for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, said the gunpowder “supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun, if he has particulate matter in the wound.”

13. Wilson said Brown was physically uncontrollable and “for lack of a better word, crazy.” He said that during the confrontation, he was thinking: “He’s gonna kill me. How do I survive?” Legal experts say police officers typically have wide latitude to use deadly force when they feel their safety is threatened.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com 
http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/ferguson-shooting-13-facts/2014/11/25/id/609483/#ixzz3K78rMgDO 

Dems worried about Obama going to jail

The Democrats know that Obama has pushed his weight around about as much as any skinny Kenyan can, and soon his day of reckoning may come.

Many are worried that Obama’s posturing will land him behind the rock, and them behind the hard place.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) sent an email to Obama supporters, and the email suggested that unless liberals show that they are “still standing with President Obama,” he could end up where he should have been for at least two years: in prison.

The email (shown below) has the subject line, “Impeachment? Prison??? — Sign now, stand with President Obama.”

 

The Democrat’s official campaign arm for Congress claims that the Republicans are attempting  “to destroy the President.” From this vantage point, I’d say Obama is attempting to destroy himself, and unfortunately for the Democrats, he’s scuttling the ship, wrecking the car, plunging the plane…pick your metaphor.

Their claim, however is the Republicans want retribution for Obama’s “Constitutionally granted power to take bold steps to overhaul our nation’s broken immigration system.”

Because of the GOP “threatening lawsuits, shutdowns [and] impeachment,” and one congressman’s suggestion that “Obama be thrown in jail,” the DCCC implores Democrats to show they’re “still standing with President Obama” and “have his back.”

Given the fact that most Americans do not support Obama’s power-grab, and even members of his own party disapproveimpeachment should be on the table.

Regrettably, it’s not. Fresh out of overwhelming mid-term victories, the GOP is once again moving tepidly. Even on the issue that arguably provided their margin of success – Obamacare – leadership has stated that a vote on repeal will not even be held.

Do the Democrats really believe Obama will go to jail?  Of course not. This is but a fund-raising gimmick, and of course an attempt to test the water on Obama’s waning popularity.

The Democrats may have unwittingly unleashed a bit of karma into the universe, and I for one will be hopeful that justice gets served to Obama

It’s FINALLY HERE!
Kevin Jackson’s hilarious take onRace-Pimping: The Multi-Trillion Dollar Business of Liberalism!

Enjoy this excerpt from the book:

“In actuality, black people will go to substandard hospitals, wait in long lines behind illegal immigrants, and be treated like non-citizens, as there simply won’t be enough healthcare to go around. There will be the occasional lucky few who will receive treatment, and we will parade them around like championship rings, thus continuing the ruse. As you can see, we’ve left out nothing. We touch more on this in Chapter 10: Promise Everything, Deliver Nothing. If for some reason we happen to run out of blacks, we will be able to apply our trade to the Mexicans with little disruptions. Plans are already underway for our next edition in this “How To” series: How to be a Latino “Race Pimp for Fun and Profit…even if you’re Illegal.”

FERGUSON RIOTS: SHOTS FIRED, STORES LOOTED, CARS AND BUILDINGS BURNED

By: John Hayward

Owner of looted store shares confusion, heartbreak

The vaunted agreement about “rules of engagement” Ferguson’s mayor reached with protesters didn’t amount to much, as the city was promptly sacked after a grand jury declined to indict Officer Darren Wilson on any charges in the death of Michael Brown.  Happily, and somewhat miraculously, no one appears to have been killed.  Fox News surveys the wreckage:

There were more than 80 arrests made in the St. Louis area overnight as protesters fired more than 100 gunshots, burned and looted as many as 25 buildings and vandalized police cars in Ferguson, Mo. after a grand jury did not indict a police officer who shot and killed an unarmed black teenager in August, authorities said Tuesday morning.

St. Louis County police released records early Tuesday showing 61 people were arrested in Ferguson on charges including burglary and trespassing. And St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay said 21 people were arrested in the city.

Heavily armed police fired pepper spray and smoke canisters to disperse the crowds of protesters. Police seized a .45 mm automatic handgun as well.

“We have no loss of life, but I am disappointed the night turned out this way,” St. Louis Police Department Chief Jon Belmar said.

Belmar said he heard more than 150 shots ring off in the night.

“What I’ve seen tonight is probably worse than the worst night we had in August,” Belmar said.

Gov. Jay Nixon ordered more Missouri National Guardsmen to provide security at the Ferguson Police Department.

Where were all the National Guard units and riot response troops while the city was being burned down?  Firefighters actually fell back from battling the blazes because they were taking fire from looters.  All the hand-wringing about the insensitivity of “militarized police” deprived law-abiding citizens, and especially shop owners, of their protection at a time when it was most needed: a carefully-orchestrated, well-organized, media-fueled crisis everyone knew was coming.  The only people with a legitimate grievance worth protesting about today are the hard-working shop owners who saw their businesses go up in smoke, and the employees who just lost their jobs.  They paid exorbitant taxes to the multiple layers of flabby, useless government tottering over us – from local authorities to Barack Obama’s worse-than-useless federal apparatus – and their reward was getting to watch their property looted and destroyed, with scarcely a thought given to protecting them.

Once again, Obama had absolutely nothing to say to the People Who Work Hard and Play By the Rules.  He gave a little statement that began with praise for the “rule of law” that should have come with a laugh track, given who was speaking, and rather mildly advised the protesters to eschew violence – advice they completely ignored.  His entire brief appeal to the better angels of the rioters’ nature – delivered tepidly so as not to jeopardize his useful political connection with them – rested on the moral authority of Michael Brown’s parents and the self-interest of the rioters, not respect for the law itself:

First and foremost, we are a nation built on the rule of law. And so we need to accept that this decision was the grand jury’s to make. There are Americans who agree with it, and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It’s an understandable reaction. But I join Michael’s parents in asking anyone who protests this decision to do so peacefully. Let me repeat Michael’s father’s words:  “Hurting others or destroying property is not the answer. No matter what the grand jury decides, I do not want my son’s death to be in vain. I want it to lead to incredible change, positive change, change that makes the St. Louis region better for everyone.”

Michael Brown’s parents have lost more than anyone. We should be honoring their wishes.

A robust defense of the rule of law requires a lot more than merely saying it’s important and the nation was built on it.  You have to explain what it means right now.  But as his own actions have amply demonstrated, the “rule of law” is an entirely abstract concept to Obama – something to be discussed in a classroom or used as a rhetorical prop during a speech, not something to be embraced and lived.

After spending an equal amount of time admonishing the police to show restraint, Obama delivered a windy homily to the “lessons that we draw from these tragic events,” assuring us “there are good people on all sides of this debate.”  Really?  Including the side that insists on pretending Officer Wilson is a racist killer who murdered Brown for fun, no matter what the forensic evidence and hundreds of hours of testimony say?  The moral equivalence Obama engages in to make it look like he’s down with The Struggle are grotesque and disgusting.  This was a moment when a real leader, a real President, would have stood tall and made it clear that there was nothing to protest, no good reason to keep a bloody myth alive because a wagonload of political issues can be hitched to it.  Such a declaration would have meant a lot at this moment, coming from the First Black President.  Alas, it would have crimped his poll numbers with one of the few groups that still ardently supports him, so instead of emphasizing that the “hands up, don’t shoot” stuff was a fairy tale, he went along with the idea that a long list of simmering grievances give the agitators a license to promote whatever hateful garbage they think is necessary to hold the media spotlight and keep people fired up.

Instead we got this:

But what is also true is that there are still problems, and communities of color aren’t just making these problems up. Separating that from this particular decision, there are issues in which the law too often feels as if it is being applied in discriminatory fashion. I don’t think that’s the norm. I don’t think that’s true for the majority of communities or the vast majority of law enforcement officials. But these are real issues. And we have to lift them up and not deny them or try to tamp them down. What we need to do is to understand them and figure out how do we make more progress.  And that can be done.

That won’t be done by throwing bottles. That won’t be done by smashing car windows. That won’t be done by using this as an excuse to vandalize property.  And it certainly won’t be done by hurting anybody. So, to those in Ferguson, there are ways of channeling your concerns constructively and there are ways of channeling your concerns destructively. Michael Brown’s parents understand what it means to be constructive. The vast majority of peaceful protesters, they understand it as well.

Those of you who are watching tonight understand that there’s never an excuse for violence, particularly when there are a lot of people in goodwill out there who are willing to work on these issues.

On the other hand, those who are only interested in focusing on the violence and just want the problem to go away need to recognize that we do have work to do here, and we shouldn’t try to paper it over. Whenever we do that, the anger may momentarily subside, but over time, it builds up and America isn’t everything that it could be.

“America isn’t everything that it could be?”  Such inspiring leadership!  The lawful, hard-working people of this country feel just great knowing that you’ve got their backs, Mr. Obama.  Notice again that his entire case against violence is premised not in the slightest on the notion that rioting is absolutely wrong and would be met by a justifiably aggressive response from law enforcement and the military, if necessary.  No, the entire weaksauce argument he offered is that rioting is counter-productive to the fine and noble cause of the rioters, and might turn off people otherwise inclined to take their side.  Does anyone remember Obama displaying even a microscopic portion of this sympathy for the issues, causes, and moral authority of the entirely peaceful, neat-as-a-pin Tea Party?

As for the moral authority of Brown’s parents, while it’s true, and helpful, that they called for a non-violent response, they’re also doing nothing to dispel the ugly mythology that drove these protests.  “We are profoundly disappointed that the killer of our child will not face the consequence of his actions,” said a statement from the Brown family. “While we understand that many others share our pain, we ask that you channel your frustration in ways that will make a positive change. We need to work together to fix the system that allowed this to happen.”  That would be the system that “allows” a police officer to defend himself against a violent assailant who tries to gain control of his weapon.  Unless you want to live in a bloody scrum of unending gang violence without the protection of armed law enforcement, I strongly suggest you do not change that particular system.

Monday night in Ferguson offered a little glimpse of what that police-free world might look like.  From local news station KSDK:

Officers reported heavy automatic gunfire in the area of W. Florissant and Canfield, police said. A University City police officer was shot at the intersection of Canton Avenue and Lamb Avenue, according to police.

Asst. Fire Chief Steve Fair with the Ferguson Fire Department said they found structure fires along the corridor of Florissant, West Florissant, and Halls Ferry roads.

“We have been fighting approximately 25 structure fires tonight, along with a car dealership where we lost 10 cars that were burned up,” said Fair.

The department had help from all over St. Louis and St. Charles counties, but said it was difficult to make offensive attacks because they were run out by gunfire.

“Not just a little bit of gunfire, a lot of gunfire,” said Fair. “We do everything that we can, and we’ll continue to do everything we can, but we are limited to what we can do.”

Around 3:30 a.m. Fair said crews were still battling five or six active fires. They were still putting out hot spots and mopping up the scenes at others.

An elderly man was carjacked and run over with his own car in the name of “social justice.”  Social justice was also pursued by burning and looting a variety of stores, including Little Ceasar’s Pizza, Federal Express, Toys R Us, the St. Louis Bread Company restaurant, a pawn shop, and a Metro PCS cell phone store, at which the looters paused to take a few selfies:

 

Another cell-phone store owner, an Israeli immigrant named Sonny Dayan, stood in the ruins of his looted shop and expressed his disappointment in both rioters and the police to the L.A. Times:

Looters shattered both of his front windows, he said when he got off the phone. “They took everything — phones, cases, everything.”

Bystanders told him police had stood by and watched.

Earlier, he said, “I talked to people on the street and they said not to worry. They said this time the focus will be on  institutions, not businesses.”

Unlike most merchants on West Florissant, Dayan didn’t cover his windows.

“I didn’t want to be another boarded-up store on this strip,” he said, adding that customers had thanked him for staying open as the grand jury worked.

Looters also ransacked a liquor store they also struck in August, during the last round of major vandalism. At least five major fires were burning along the street, including another cellphone store, a public storage business, an auto parts store and a title company.

Dayan said police had promised him there would be more security this time, more protection.

“They told us they would try to root that kind of violence out. I don’t know how much success they had,” he said Monday. “They had promised to eliminate this but it happened right across from them.”

Dayan said he figured that by not boarding up the windows, he would demonstrate his trust in the community and not be targeted. As he drove to the store after being alerted to the looting, he said he realized he had underestimated the criminal element in the area.

“An opportunity like that arises, they’re going to take it,” he said, his voice calm as he mused, “Maybe we’ll learn something from this.

“It’s hard. It’s just a tough kick to your gut – you’re trying to do the right thing, and you know there’s so much good in the area,” he said.

The good in any given area has no chance to flourish without the unapologetic and absolute defense of the law.  Accept no substitutes, especially not vague promises from prospective rioters.

The enduring image of the night for me wasn’t the images of buildings coming down in flames and looters running wild in the streets, but Natalie DuBose, the owner of a cake shop in Ferguson, weeping helplessly as her livelihood was destroyed.

 

Over the weekend, DuBose – a single mother with two children – begged the mob to spare her little shop: “If I can’t open my doors every morning, I can’t feed my kids in the evening.  Just don’t burn my shop down.  Don’t destroy it.”  She shouldn’t have needed to plead with the thugs who ignored her.  That’s what the “rule of law” means.  That’s what real “justice” means.  The government she spent her working life paying for was supposed to protect her, and Sonny Dayan, and the rest of them.

But the ruling elite was too busy playing footsie with the rioters, feeling them out for useful political connections, playing into their paranoid fantasies in the hopes of goosing them to the ballot box to vote Democrat, preserving the influence of the organizers, and peddling an ideology of helpless victimization that relieves even violent assailants of responsibility for their actions.  There were also violent demonstrations in California, plus a more peaceful march in Times Square that nevertheless violated New York City ordinances, which were of course waived without comment.  What were any of those people “protesting ” for?  The right of people with a certain skin color to assault police officers of a certain skin color, without repercussions?  What they need, more than anything else, is for some people they respect to tell them they’re acting like fools.

We’ll get plenty more of the lawlessness our ruling elite and their sensationalist media indulge (and, as the Ferguson prosecutor pointed out in his statement Monday night, cultivate.)  Things were only hideous on Monday night because of all the indulgence and cultivation given to previous outbursts and false narratives.  This thing was allowed to fester for a long time before it blew up.  Whatever progress we might have made on various issues in America, our political and media class, and their favored constituencies, are still a long way from growing up.  Many of them will spend the days to come showing us just how dangerously infantile they can be.

Cada segundo La Nación Americana se sigue empeñando en millones de dólares más por una pésima administración. Este es El Reloj Oficial de la Deuda Externa. Que no deja de aumentar gracias a obama:

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

 

 

Racists Destroy Ferguson

The evidence did not support charging the police officer with anything. But the racists want him charged because the criminal is black. It is disgusting that this is where race relations are in our country.
Check it out:

There were more than 80 arrests made in the St. Louis area overnight as protesters fired more than 100 gunshots, burned and looted as many as 25 buildings and vandalized police cars in Ferguson, Mo. after a grand jury did not indict a police officer who shot and killed an unarmed black teenager in August, authorities said Tuesday morning.

St. Louis County police released records early Tuesday showing 61 people were arrested in Ferguson on charges including burglary and trespassing. And St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay said 21 people were arrested in the city.

Heavily armed police fired pepper spray and smoke canisters to disperse the crowds of protesters. Police seized a .45 mm automatic handgun as well.

“We have no loss of life, but I am disappointed the night turned out this way,” St. Louis Police Department Chief Jon Belmar said.

Belmar said he heard more than 150 shots ring off in the night.

“What I’ve seen tonight is probably worse than the worst night we had in August,” Belmar said.


Read more at
http://conservativebyte.com/2014/11/racists-destroy-ferguson/

 

 

‘BURN THIS B*TCH DOWN’: Michael Brown’s Stepfather Changes his Tune After Grand Jury Decision

So much for peaceful protesting.

Michael Brown’s stepfather last night repeatedly urged protesters to “Burn this bitch down” after a prosecutor announced that no criminal charges would be filed against the Ferguson, Missouri police officer who killed the unarmed teenager.

Louis Head, an ex-con who is married to Brown’s mother, Lesley McSpadden, was with McSpadden outside the Ferguson Police Department headquarters Monday evening as prosecutor Robert McCulloch disclosed that a grand jury declined to vote an indictment against Officer Darren Wilson in the August 9 shooting.

After consoling a weeping McSpadden, the 38-year-old Head–who was standing atop a platform in the middle of the agitated crowd of several hundred protesters–began screaming “Burn this bitch down!”

He did this at least ten times, and at one point yelled for a microphone so that he could broadcast his incendiary messagebeyond the range of his unamplified voice.

While trying to incite the crowd, Head (pictured above) was wearing a commemorative t-shirt with the words “I Am Mike Brown” and a beanie, both of which bore a silkscreened photo of Brown in his high school cap and gown.

 

 

 

Obama Just Gave Americans A Thanksgiving Surprise That Is The Last Thing Most People Wanted

…the Obama administration has released its…

  1. PETER BROWN

The White House is now focused on releasing its massive regulatory agenda– the fifth time the Obama administration has released its regulatory agenda before a holiday.

Matt Schudtz, Executive Director of the Center for Progressive Reform, said:

“It’s become an unfortunate tradition of this administration and others to drop these regulatory agendas late on a Friday and right before a holiday.”

The group of regulations is called the Unified Agenda, and it lays out thousands of regulations to be finalized in the coming months.

The White House’s Unified Agenda for fall 2014 contains some 3,415 regulations, 189 of which will cost more than $100 million.

According to the released agenda, the EPA rules to limit greenhouse emissions from new and existing power plants will be finalized in 2015.

Incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said:

“The president said his policies were on the ballot, and the American people spoke up against them. It’s time for more listening, and less job-destroying red tape. Easing the burden already created by EPA regulations will continue to be a priority for me in the new Congress.”

The most fought-over rule to be finalized in 2015 will probably be the “Waters of the United States” bill under the Clean Water Act.

Louisiana Republican Senator David Vitter said: “The ‘waters of the U.S.’ rule may be one of the most significant private property grabs in U.S. history. They want to take another step toward outright permitting authority over virtually any wet area in the country, while at the same time providing a new tool for environmental groups to sue private property owners.”
Read more at
http://www.westernjournalism.com/white-house-releases-plans-for-3415-regulations-ahead-of-thanksgiving/#eUp6GwIIPkHlBKIs.99

 

 

“Very important information”

Big Banks Conspire with Gov’t to Confiscate Accounts

Written by Damon Geller

Think your money is safe in the bank?  Think again.  A new bombshell from the New York Times exposes that the nation’s biggest banks have willingly turned bank accounts over to the government for total confiscation.  It’s all done in secrecy, often initiated by the bankers. Tragically, bank account holders don’t even know they’re being targeted until after the money is seized from their accounts.  The banks’ deplorable actions have resulted in millions of dollars stolen from U.S. citizens without a shred of due process.  And in 80% of the cases, no criminal charges were ever filed. Even more alarming — in a matter of just a few years — these cases of unconstitutional bank account seizures have risen over 500%! Experts advise that you have only ONE choice if you want to protect your savings and retirement from corrupt banks.

Government on the Brink of Disaster

The U.S. government and the Fed pumped trillions of dollars of YOUR money into the banks and stock market over the last several years, catapulting the U.S. debt to $28 trillion by 2018. But now, the U.S. government and the Fed are completely out of ammo, with the Fed no longer able to buy U.S. treasuries.  They desperately need money to maintain their own power, and taxes are not enough.  So government officials are doing everything they can to keep the Ponzi scheme going, such as seizing the public’s money through inflation, deficits, and outright confiscation.  And now they have enlisted their old pals — the bankers — to help them get unfettered access to YOUR money without due process.

The 4th Amendment under Siege

The 4th Amendment of the Constitution reads clearly:  “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.”  But according to this shocking New York Times report, the 4th Amendment is under siege.

By law, banks are required to report cash deposits over $10,000 to the IRS.  But now, banks are voluntarily — without any requirement from the government — reporting millions of cash deposits under $10,000.  From there, the IRS is arbitrarily deeming these deposits suspiciousand seizing all the money in these accounts — without any evidence of a crime, without filing criminal charges, and without allowing the account holder to fight the confiscation in court.

As the New York Times reported, the big banks are allowing over 100 multiagency task forces to comb through your bank reports on a daily basis, looking for accounts to seize. Under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks filed more than 700,000 suspicious activity reports last year alone! So do you really think you can trust your local bank?

The number of IRS seizures has increased over 500% in just a few years, and in 80% of the cases the IRS never files a criminal complaint against the individual being seized.  The median amount seized by the IRS is $34,000, while legal costs can easily mount to $20,000 or more.  Individuals who are the victims of seizure often cannot afford to fight.

How big are the accounts the bankers turn over to the government for seizure?  The following are just a few of the horrifying cases exposed by the New York Times:

  • The government confiscated $447,000 from a family business in New York
  • The government confiscated $33,000 from a small restaurant owner in Iowa
  • The government confiscated $66,000 from an army sergeant in Virginia who was saving the money for his daughter’s college education

This giant asset forfeiture program gives the government the authority to confiscate your money without due process, even if you’ve committed no crime!  And the bankers are more than happy to aid the government in this outright THEFT.  Bankers and the government have gone after run-of-the-mill business owners and wage earners without so much as an allegation that they have committed serious crimes. The government just takes the money without ever filing a criminal complaint, and the owners are left to prove they are innocent. Many give up and never get their money back.

The Banker-Gov’t Conspiracy Goes Much Further

The banker-government conspiracy to confiscate citizen wealth doesn’t stop with seizures by the IRS, Justice Department and local police.  As was recently reported, the U.S. government has conspired with the banks to nationalize retirement accounts like IRAs, 401Ks, pensions, 403Bs, as well as savings accounts worldwide:

  • FATCA requires foreign financial institutions such as banks, stock brokers, hedge funds, pension funds, insurance companies, and trusts to report all U.S. citizens’ accounts directly to the IRS.  FATCA even requires reporting to the IRS by foreign private companies on any income made by a citizen of the U.S. whether they live here or not.
  • Obama announced the creation of the MyRA – your retirement money will now be used to pay for U.S. debt.  MyRA is nothing more than an investment scam being sold to the American people as a you-can’t-lose, zero-risk investment by the pitchman-in-chief himself.
  • The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which oversees how investments are sold, proposed what it calls CARDS – Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System – which is an electronic system that will regularly collect data on balances and transactions in all 4100 brokerages nationwide.

So for the first time ever, the U.S. government is directing you where to invest your savings & retirement and has gained full access to the activity in every single citizen’s bank accounts, retirement accounts, brokerage accounts and trading accounts.  The IRS will also have full visibility on any oversees accounts, income, equity or other earnings, effectively giving them access to all the wealth of every American citizen no matter where they reside on earth.

Protect Yourself from Gov’t Confiscation Now

With our desperate government leaning on their banker friends to gain unprecedented access to your money everywhere in the world, you need to take action NOW to protect your savings & retirement.  But when can’t trust your local bank, and when the government has its hands in your bank accounts, retirement accounts, brokerage accounts, and even the cash in your pocket – is any place safe?

Absolutely. There’s ONE asset class this sits outside the financial system and is completely secure from banker corruption, government confiscation and global economic collapse:  Gold & Silver.  Gold & Silver have been the best wealth protectors for over 5,000 years and have survived every government & currency collapse in history.  And when you own PHYSICAL gold & silver, the banks and the government CANNOT seize your savings with a click of a button.

So with the government spending way beyond its limits and seizing control of your financial accounts, the time is now.  Protect your savings & retirement with physical gold & silver before you have nothing left to protect. (Call 800-226-8106 to receive your free copy of Damon Geller’s popular book, “Rescue Your Money from the National Debt Disaster,” or see below)

 

 

Constitution Check: Who is getting in line to sue President Obama?

 by Cowboy Byte

Lyle Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s constitutional literacy adviser, explains why there may be no early constitutional resolution to lawsuits against the Obama administration for everything from Obamacare to immigration.

THE STATEMENT AT ISSUE:

“I believe that judicial review is needed to rebalance the powers of the branches in our system after years of erosion of legislative authority….The Executive is barred from usurping the Legislative Branch’s Article I powers, no matter how politically attractive or expedient it is to do so. Unilateral, unchecked Executive action is precisely the danger that the framers sought to avoid in our constitutional system. This case represents a long-overdue effort by Congress to resolve fundamental Separation of Powers issues.”
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/35019/cconstitution-check-getting-line-sue-president-obama/

 

 

 

Jesus Marzo Fernandez:  Esto no es solo un chiste, sino es lo que realmente sucede.                                             !QUE LA PINTE EL SUIZO! El alcalde de Miami pide cotizaciones para pintar la
fachada del Ayuntamiento, y le entregan 3 ofertas
(de un suizo, un gringo y un cubano).

La del suizo asciende a 3 millones de dólares, la del gringo a 6 millones, y la del cubano a 9 millones.

 

Ante tales diferencias, se entrevista con los ofertantes, por separado, para que justifiquen su estimado de costo.

 

El suizo dice que él usa pintura acrílica para exteriores en dos capas,
y que cuesta 1 millón; en andamios, brochas, equipos y seguros se va otro millón, y el otro millón restante es la mano de obra.

 

El gringo justifica su estimado diciendo que él es mejor pintor,
que usa pintura de poliuretano con tres capas, cuyo costo asciende a 3 millones.
En andamios, otros materiales, equipos y seguros se gastan otros 2 millones, y el millón restante es la mano de obra.

 

El último, que es el que finalmente gana la licitación ya que el alcalde asegura que es el presupuesto mejor justificado, resulta ser la del cubano que le dijo:
Mire Alcalde, 3 Millones son para usted, otros 3 para mí,
y los 3 restantes se los damos al suizo para que nos pinte la fachada

 

 

Chuck Schumer: Passing Obamacare Was a Mistake

(Mike Theiler/UPI/Landov)

Democrats made a mistake by passing President Barack Obama’s health-care law in 2010 instead of focusing more directly on helping the middle class, third- ranking U.S. Senate Democrat Charles Schumer said today.

“Unfortunately, Democrats blew the opportunity the American people gave them” in electing Obama and a Democratic Congress in 2008 amid a recession, Schumer of New York said in a speech in Washington. “We took their mandate and put all our focus on the wrong problem — health care reform.”

Schumer said Democrats should have addressed issues aiding the middle class to build confidence among voters before turning to revamping the health-care system. He said he opposed the timing of the health-care vote and was overruled by other party members.

Special: Al Gore Attacks Scientist for Exposing Global Warming Lie

“The plight of uninsured Americans and the hardships created by unfair insurance company practices certainly needed to be addressed,” the senator said. “But it wasn’t the change we were hired to make” in the 2008 election.

Schumer’s comments represent an unusual public intra-party critique of the way Obama’s signature legislative achievement was enacted. The senator spoke at the National Press Club to analyze the results of this month’s election, when Republicans took control of the Senate and increased their majority in the U.S. House of Representatives.

High Ground

Democrats’ pro-government posture “has the natural high political ground” when the middle class is frustrated as voters were before this month’s congressional election, Schumer said. At the same time, he said, Republicans were encouraging distrust toward government.

“That doesn’t mean we always win,” he cautioned. “When we don’t present a coherent, believable pro-government plan and message — when we allow government to mess up — we can easily lose.”

To win in 2016, “Democrats must embrace government, not run away from it,” Schumer said. Voter discontent will continue until one of the political parties convinces middle-class Americans that it has an agenda for helping them, he said.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/chuck-schumer-passinghealthcare-mistake-obamacare/2014/11/25/id/609490/#ixzz3K7BBoRVL
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

 

 

http://clashdaily.com/2014/11/black-thugs-wanted-excuse-violence-17-head-slapping-pics-thugs-trashing-ferguson/

BLACK THUGS WANTED AN EXCUSE FOR VIOLENCE: 17 Head Slapping Pics Of Thugs Trashing #Ferguson

Posted on November 25, 2014

Unreal. Thanks for ‘healing the nation’ Obama. The cops should’ve started waving job applications at them. That would’ve sent them running back home to their double-wide.

(h/t Western Journalism)

 

We Will Not ENGAGE: Michele Bachmann Reveals GOP Plans to Ignore Executive Amnesty – Breitbart

By Robert Wilde-Nov 22, 2014

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn) revealed on Saturday that Republican leadership, led by Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Oh), has no intention of resisting President Obama’s executive amnesty that he ordered on Thursday.

Breitbart News Executive Chairman Steven K. Bannon asked the congresswoman, who was a guest on Breitbart News Saturday Sirius XM Patriot channel 125, “Has there been any firm commitment from the leadership of the Republican party saying that this amnesty is not going to happen?” Bachmann replied with a question, “Do you want the truth? Okay, I’ll tell all of Breitbart listeners what happened this week. I was floored!”

In the weekly meeting called “Republican Conference” in the House of Representatives, “we all knew that the big issue for the week was going to be the president announcing his amnesty,” she explained. Bachmann recounted that all of the leadership went to the microphone, including John Boehner.

“They acted as though the amnesty issue wasn’t even an issue. They said that the President is going to do what he’s going to do, and we are not going to get down in the mud with him. We are not going to engage, and what we are going to do is to talk about our positive solutions on jobs, the economy, education, and manufacturing,” Bachmann said.
She added that each congressman who spoke reiterated that not engaging Obama and staying positive was a “brilliant strategy.”

“We will not engage,” she reiterated with disgust.

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

En mi opinión”

No 804 Noviembre 26, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

No 798 “En mi opinion” Noviembre 19, 2014

noviembre 19, 2014

 No 798 “En mi opinión”  Noviembre 19, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

Amenper: GOP HAS SECRET WEAPON TO STOP AMNESTY.  AMENPER@aol.com

ESTE ESCRITO DE GARTH KAND SOBRE LA TEORÍA DEL NUEVO SENADOR REPUBLICANO DE OKLAHOMA JAMES LANKFORD, TIENE ALGO QUE HE MENCIONADO MUCHAS VECES.

EL ELECTORADO DEMÓCRATA NO ESTÁ DE ACUERDO CON LOS ULTRALIBERALES DEL PARTIDO CON RESPECTO A INMIGRACIÓN. HAY QUE RECORDAR QUE HASTA RELATIVAMENTE HACE POCO, LOS DEMÓCRATAS DEL SUR ERAN EL PARTIDO DE LA SEGREGACIÓN. TENGO AMIGOS SUREÑOS DEMÓCRATAS QUE ESTÁN COMPLETAMENTE EN DESACUERDO CON UNA AMNISTÍA. 

 ADEMÁS ES UN HECHO CONOCIDO, LAS UNIONES Y LOS NEGROS TEMEN A LA INMIGRACIÓN QUE PUEDA AFECTAR SUS EMPLEOS. CREO QUE OBAMA ESTÁ COMETIENDO UN ERROR DE CALCULO CON SU LEY EJECUTIVA.

ESO LE DA FUERZA A LOS OFICIALES ELECTOS QUE AHORA HACEN UNA MAYORÍA EN LAS CÁMARAS LEGISLATIVAS PARA ANULAR LA LEY, O QUIZÁS OBAMA REACCIONE ANTES, Y LO PIENSE DOS VECES ANTES DE EJECUTAR UNILATERALMENTE UNA LEY QUE ES IMPOPULAR HASTA EN SU PROPIO PARTIDO.

GOP HAS SECRET WEAPON TO STOP AMNESTY

Congressman reveals why shutdown isn’t the only option

 GARTH KANT About | Email Archive

 

WASHINGTON – The walls were bare and the office was in boxes, but Rep. James Lankford, R-Okla., isn’t just moving out, he’s moving up – all the way up to the Senate.

As a conservative on the rise, his opinion is in increasing demand, and the Oklahoman was repeatedly grilled on national television the day before as to whether the GOP would be willing to risk a government shutdown to stop a presidential executive order granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.

In an interview with WND, Lankford presented an intriguing alternative scenario in which a shutdown may not be even necessary, making talk of it premature.

He suggested President Obama’s executive order could turn out to be more talk than action and might have very little actual effect on immigration policy.

“My suspicion on this is the president is going to cobble together a bunch of stuff they’ve already done. They are going to change titles and some things and find a way to make this look like a big package. He doesn’t have the legislative authority, actually, to make a lot of decisions. He’s done executive orders in the past that have had big titles but didn’t actually make big changes,” the senator-elect told WND..

And, in that case, he said a shutdown would be a massive overreaction.

“So, we’ll see what this is,” he said. “I’m kind of keeping my powder dry until I see exactly what this is.”

Lankford also implied the GOP may have a secret weapon in the battle to stop amnesty: Democrat voters.

He noted that any unilateral move by the president to grant amnesty is unpopular with most voters. In fact, an exit poll showed 74 percent of voters would disapprove of it.

And if it is unpopular with two-thirds of voters, that means it is unpopular with Democratic voters as well.

That means amnesty is cause for Democrats in elected office to be wary, too.

Lankford mentioned an untold story, so far, was how many Democratic lawmakers were “very nervous” over the prospect of a voter backlash among their supporters over amnesty, especially after the landslide that just gave the GOP control of the Senate.

That’s why, before even discussing a shutdown, the GOP is hoping public opinion will persuade Democrat lawmakers, and perhaps even the president, to change their minds.

Some conservatives see a shutdown as the only option to stop amnesty, if Obama does issue an executive order. GOP leaders are particularly wary that the public would blame Republicans.

The GOP-controlled Congress could send the president a series of short-term spending measures, called continuing resolutions, or CRs, before a Dec. 11deadline. The CRs could fund everything but the tools he would need to implement amnesty, perhaps including such things as the printing millions of new Social Security cards.

If Obama refused to sign such bills, the government would then be unfunded after Dec. 11 until either the president or Congress changed course.

The GOP was blamed by the mainstream media over the 15-day government shutdown in the fight to stop Obamacare in 2013. But the GOP then went on to a huge election victory in 2014.

So, WND asked Lankford, what was the political risk of another shutdown, if it was that important to stop amnesty?

“People don’t see the budget connection to this (amnesty). So, that will be difficult, just convincing people why you need a government shutdown to deal with it,” he replied, while noting it was an easier connection for voters to make in the Clinton presidency when the issue was welfare reform.

“People understood how shutdowns were connected to that issue – it was entitlement reform and budget related.”

Soon-to-be Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has flatly said there will be no shutdown this year.

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said he did not think a shutdown should be taken off the table.

When asked if GOP leaders would back efforts to use CRs to stop amnesty, risking a shutdown, Lankford succinctly replied, “I don’t know yet. We’re about to find out.”

While Lankford wants Obama to show his cards before the GOP reacts, Republicans may have an important ace up their sleeves: public opinion.

“The president, in whatever he proposes, doesn’t have full public support. If he had full public support, we would have already passed something, because people would have risen up and said this is what we want. But that’s not where people are,” said Lankford.

He said it was significant to note, “When Oregon votes and says we don’t want illegal driver’s licenses, its pretty clear that the American people are not opposed to immigration. They are opposed to illegal immigration.”

The senator-elect also pointed out the irony in Democrats’ unwillingness to see what was good for the goose as good for the gander.

“I’ve told some of my Democratic colleagues, tell you what, when the next Republican president comes in, he’ll just give amnesty to everyone on Obamacare, and just do a unilateral waive and say, ‘I’m not going to enforce the individual mandate, I’m not going to enforce anything on businesses, I have that authority, is that OK?’” Lankford said with a mischievous smile.

He added, “And, of course, they all say, ‘No, that’s not OK.’ Because, of course, they want to protect Obamacare. So why is it suddenly OK with amnesty? The president can’t just wave a wand and ignore the law and just change it unilaterally. It’s not legal.”

 

 

Experts: Scope of Obama’s Amnesty Order Would Be Unprecedented

By Melanie Batley

As early as next week, President Barack Obama is expected to issue an executive order to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, a use of power that would be unprecedented in U.S. history.
According to 
The Washington Post, presidents for the last 40 years have had broad authority over how the country deals with illegal immigration.
But Obama’s intent to bypass Congress and make new laws could be an outright violation of his constitutional oath to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” the Post said.
“Can a president who wants tax cuts that a recalcitrant Congress will not enact decline to enforce the income tax laws? Can a president effectively repeal the environmental laws by refusing to sue polluters, or workplace and labor laws by refusing to fine violators?” wrote  Robert Delahunty, a law professor at the University of St. Thomas, and University of California Berkeley law professor John Yoo in the

Special: Does Obama Belong to This Secret Society? (Shocking)

Texas Law Review.
In 2011, Obama effectively admitted he was prohibited to act, saying in an interview, “This notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true … We are doing everything we can administratively.
“But the fact of the matter is, there are laws on the books that I have to enforce.”
Since then, however, the president took executive action to prevent the deportation of 1.7 million immigrants under the age of 30 who were brought to this country as children, giving them the power to apply for temporary work permits.
It is expected that Obama’s next step will be to expand the policy to include the parents of child immigrants, giving permission to as many as 6 million undocumented immigrants to temporarily stay in the country and be protected from the threat of deportation.
The move stops short of granting them legal status and is therefore well within his rights, one expert said.
“The notion that the president cannot use his authority to grant temporary reprieve is patently absurd,” David Leopold, a Cleveland immigration lawyer, told the Post.
Since the mid-1970s, the Immigration and Naturalization Service has been using prosecutorial discretion for “both practical and humanitarian” reasons, and administrations have used their discretion to varying degrees since then.

Special: Colon Cancer Warning Signs: If You Have Any of These . . .

In 1986, President Ronald Reagan granted amnesty to 3 million people who had come to the United States before 1982, and he subsequently decided to allow 1.5 million spouses and children stay. Their exemption from deportation was ultimately made law under former president George H.W. Bush, according to the Post.
But no president has ever exercised his discretion as broadly as Obama is expected to do, the Post said, prompting the question about whether the scale of the move is the distinguishing factor that makes his use of authority materially different from previous presidents.
Regardless, it appears the president is banking on the fact that Congress will do little to stop him, the Post said.
Congress has few tools at its disposal to stop the president’s action from going into effect. It has the ability to pass legislation that would cancel any executive action or prevent funding to implement the new regulations.
The idea of launching a lawsuit has also been floated, but it is unclear what role, if any, the judiciary would play in potentially arbitrating a dispute between Congress and the executive branch.
A third unlikely option would be impeachment, requiring a majority vote in the House and a two-thirds vote in the Senate.
“I think the president wants a fight,” GOP Rep. Tom Cole said on ABC’s “This Week,” according to the Post. “I think he’s actually trying to bait us into doing some of these extreme things that have been suggested. I don’t think that we will.”
The debate about the president’s authority comes as

Special: Al Gore Attacks Scientist for Exposing Global Warming Lie

a new poll by USA Today shows that most Americans oppose any executive action, with 46 percent saying the president should wait for the new Republican-controlled Congress to act, and 42 percent saying he should take action now. Another 10 percent are unconvinced either way.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/illegals-executive-action-amnesty-immigrants/2014/11/18/id/608017/#ixzz3JWTiTm34
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

Amenper: Pensando en 2016

Grover Norquist: 2016 será el campo presidencial más fuerte del partido Republicano desde 1980.

No podemos saber lo que pasará en el 2016, al no ser que tuviéramos un espejo como el del cuento de la Reina de la historia de Blanca Nieves que nos diga cuál será el próximo presidente.

Pero a falta del espejo en la pared, no nos queda más remedio que tener que escuchar lo que nos tienen que decir los analistas, y hoy estamos leyendo lo que nos dice Grover Norquist.

Grover Glenn Norquist es un analista político y activista Republicano que es fundador y Presidente de los norteamericanos para la reforma tributaria.

Un republicano de tendencia libertaria, Norquist fue uno de los coautores del “Contrato con América” de 1994 es muy respetado dentro del partido republicano por su larga trayectoria con el partido y su conocimiento probado.

Norquist dice que el campo primario republicano para la Presidencia en el año 2016 incluirá la línea más fuerte  de candidatos desde 1980, cuando Ronald Reagan venció a George H.W. Bush para reclamar la nominación del partido.

El grupo de candidatos del partido republicano de 2016 “va a ser el campo más fuerte que los republicanos han tenido desde Reagan corrió,”  dijo el miércoles en una conferencia de Washington

Norquist no estaba muy impresionado con el campo republicano del año pasado.

En 2012, “tenías 10 republicanos en el escenario. Tres de ellos estaban aspirando para Presidente, los otros siete estaban aspirando para un programa de entrevistas radiales o para vender libros, “dijo.

“Esta vez mira alrededor, y observa quienes están sobre la mesa”.

Entre los potenciales candidatos republicanos 2016, Norquist enumeró cinco gobernadores actuales o anteriores y un senador solitario.

Su lista de sólidos contendientes  incluye el gobernador de Wisconsin Scott Walker, el gobernador de Nueva Jersey, Chris Christie, el ex gobernador de Florida Jeb Bush, el gobernador de Texas Rick Perry, gobernador de Luisiana Bobby Jindal y Kentucky el senador Rand Paul.

Dijo que los gobernadores tienen generalmente una base más sólida para ejecutar que los senadores porque pueden citar los logros específicos en sus Estados, mientras que los senadores “tienen simplemente discursos que pueden dar”.

Lo bueno es que  “todos corren como Republicanos tipo Reagan” dijo Norquist.

Que así sea, digo yo.

 

 

Revealed: Obama Met Secretly With Ferguson Protesters And Told Them Something Unbelievable

“A number of the high-profile protesters met secretly with President Obama…”

NORVELL ROSE 

Tensions in and around the troubled town of Ferguson, Missouri, are rising sharply in anticipation of the release any day now of the grand jury report on the police shooting that left Michael Brown dead of multiple gunshot wounds.

Responding to calls from protest organizers, many outsiders have been gathering in the St. Louis area, planning their response to what some believe is the likely outcome of the grand jury’s lengthy investigation — no indictment of police officer Darren Wilson.

Now it’s been revealed that on November 5th — the day that Democrats fully realized the midterm elections were a blowout of their party — a number of the high-profile protesters met secretly with President Obama and MSNBC host Al Sharpton. From The Daily Mail:

“It was a meeting the Gateway Pundit notes was not included on the president’s daily schedule.

“Sharpton told the [New York] Times that Obama urged the group to ‘stay on course.’”

While that previously undisclosed meeting may have been the first time Obama himself met with protest organizers — in a role reminiscent of his community organizer days — it certainly wasn’t the only time a top-level Obama official made a point of getting together with those demanding an indictment of white cop Darren Wilson.

In August, Attorney General Eric Holder personally went to Ferguson with top Justice Department officials to talk with community leaders protesting the Brown shooting. As reported on time.com:

“Holder, who was joined in Ferguson by Acting Assistant Attorney General Molly Moran and other Justice Department officials, expressed gratitude to those working in the area to keep tensions cool amid the daily protests.

“During brief statements on Wednesday, Holder said he understands the mistrust for law enforcement the people of Ferguson have expressed while also sharing personal interactions he has had with officers throughout his life.”

The county seat of Clayton, Missouri, where the grand jury is considering the case, has been targeted by protestors who vow to shut down the city should Wilson not be indicted on criminal charges for the Brown killing.

“Many residents and officials in the region fear another wave of rioting similar to the one in August that led to the burning out of multiple businesses if the grand jury decides not to charge Wilson.

“‘We are bracing for that possibility. That is what many people are expecting. The entire community is going to be upset,’ if Wilson is not indicted, said Jose Chavez, 46, a leader of the local Latinos en Axion group.

And as noted at thegatewaypundit.com, agitators getting ready to take to the streets once again are not ruling out more violence and looting of the kind that followed Michael Brown’s shooting death.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/revealed-obama-and-sharpton-met-secretly-with-ferguson-protestors-had-this-message/#2F148hadXJ48IZTl.99

 

 

Amenper: Adorando en La Catedral de Washington…

La Catedral Nacional en Washington, D.C. — es una de las más importantes iglesias Episcopales en América — y es la Iglesia tradicional donde en algún momento, todos los presidentes han ido como un símbolo de aceptación de que éramos una nación cristiana- Incluyendo al actual presidente Barack Hussein Obama.-

Quizás alguno de los presidentes no fuera de esa denominación, pero lo hicieron como un acto simbólico de lo que los valores judeo-cristianos representaban en la fundación de esta nación.

Bueno, esta iglesia fue el viernes el anfitrión de un servicio de oración musulmana a Alá y Mahoma su profeta.

El servicio de oración musulmán, llamado “Jummah” o el viernes a la oración, fue conducido por Ebrahim Rasool, el Embajador sudafricano en los Estados Unidos, quien es musulmán, y el reverendo Canon Gina Campbell, párroco de la Catedral, en cooperación con la toda la sociedad musulmana del área.

Los musulmanes, en dos grupos separados, hombres y mujeres, despojado de sus zapatos, (espero que algunos se hayan lavado los pies, aunque seguramente no todos) Extendieron sus alfombras de oración, se arrodillaron y oraron mirando al este hacia la Meca, dando la espalda al Crucifijo delante de la capilla, enseñando su trasero a Cristo.  .

El reverendo Campbell dijo que la Catedral era un “lugar de oración para todas las personas,” añade, “nos permite estirar nuestros corazones y busquemos profundizar misericordia para nosotros adoramos al mismo Dios.”

Perdón, reverendo Campbell, pero eso es una reverenda mentira, y una reverenda estupidez en alguien que dice representar al cristianismo.

Nosotros no adoramos al mismo Dios, nosotros adoramos a un Dios de paz, que murió en la cruz por los pecados del mundo, un Dios de amor, que nos enseña a perdonar, no a un Dios de odio que nos enseña a matar y a decapitar a los que no piensan como nosotros.

Si ellos quieren adorar a Alá, el vengador itinerante, el enemigo asesino de cristianos y judíos,  pueden hacerlo, se les  ha permitido construir sus mezquitas en este país algo que ellos no nos permiten a nosotros en sus países como Irán.. ¿Por qué no adorar en sus mezquitas y dejar tranquilas a nuestras iglesias? Somos un país fundado sobre principios cristianos”.

No podemos ni queremos ir a sus países y orar en sus mezquitas, ni siquiera nos dejan en sus países orar en nuestras iglesias, si siquiera permiten a los cristianos existir en sus países..  ¿Se imaginan que pidamos a ellos que nos dejen orar a Cristo en una de sus mezquitas?

Sencillamente, somos diferentes, no podemos cohabitar ni en los países ni en los templos, no por las creencias de ellos, no la nuestra.

Cuando, como turista hube de visitar a una mezquita, tuve que quitarme mis zapatos, tuve que hacer lo que me pidieron sobre el respeto a sus creencias. Cuando he tenido que visitar a una sinagoga, lo mismo, he tenido que cubrir mi cabeza y hacer como lo que me indicaron.  Es lógico, estoy en su casa. Pero lo que ellos han hecho es darle la espalda a Cristo en su propia casa. Es cómo decir, yo hago en tu casa lo que me venga en ganas, porque no te tengo ningún respeto.

La diferencia entre las relaciones de musulmanes y cristianos solamente se puede cambiar si ellos cambian, no podemos cambiarlos claudicando, porque eso significarían renunciar nosotros a nuestras creencias.

El reverendo Gary Hall, decano de la Catedral, dijo a the Washington Times, “si nos podemos inspirar a aquellos de nosotros que no son extremistas para encontrar una manera de estar juntos… podríamos empezar a construir algo que nos bendiga, Dios bendiga a nuestros hijos, bendiga a todos los pueblos de la tierra.”

Por favor, en primer lugar, está llamándonos extremistas a los que creemos en Cristo, y que el Alá que ellos predican no es Dios, que Cristo es Dios, por eso somos cristianos, y se supone que esa sea nuestra iglesia.  Está llamando extremista a los cristianos, ¿Entonces resulta que nosotros somos extremistas y ellos no?  ¿No me diga reverendo? ¿Ellos no son extremistas? Bueno le sugiero que se dé una vuelta por Irán y trate de predicar a Cristo en una mezquita.  Mientras tanto, por favor, mida sus palabras, mida sus acciones.

Hubo una mujer que gritó algo sobre Cristo durante el culto, fue agarrada violentamente y sacada de la de la Catedral y entregado a la policía, que la dejaron Ir sin cargos.

Menos mal, porque hubiera sido algo curioso ver que le ponen cargos criminales a alguien por hablar bien de Cristo en una iglesia cristiana durante un culto musulmán.

El reverendo Campbell le dijo al Times, “aquí en la Catedral hemos adoptado un desafío empinado para crecer en nuestra identidad como una casa para la gente. Esta oración marca un momento histórico. Esta oración simboliza una gran esperanza para nuestra comunidad. Como llegar a conocerse, se construyen puentes más y hay menos espacio para el odio y los prejuicios se interponga entre nosotros.”

Primero reverendo, si, es un momento histórico, pero un momento históricamente infame.

No simboliza una esperanza para la comunidad, significa una rendición incondicional de nuestros valores cristianos.  No nos tenemos que conocer, por desgracia los conocemos bien, los conocemos por nuestros muertos, los conocemos por los crímenes cometidos por los musulmanes en nombre de ese Alá que hoy se adora en su iglesia de espaldas a la cruz de Cristo.

Cuando estos liberales hablan de odios y prejuicios, siempre se lo achacan a la parte que es el recipiente del odio y los prejuicios.  Vivimos en tiempos interesantemente aberrantes, son muy difíciles de razonar.

 

 

Obama Still Refuses To Admit ISIS Is Islamic

“The president is living in an alternate reality.”

MONA CHAREN  

The Islamic State beheaded another American this week. The Obama administration’s response revealed its stubborn determination to deny reality.

Peter Kassig was a former Army Ranger and emergency medical technician who was moved by the suffering of Syria’s civilians and returned to the region after his discharge to provide aid. He helped some of the one million Syrian refugees who have fled into Lebanon, using his own funds to buy supplies like diapers and other necessities and driving an ambulance into Syria. He was kidnapped in October of 2013.

According to those who analyze such things, something went wrong with the video of Kassig’s beheading. It wasn’t caught on tape. We can speculate that the former Ranger had enough strength left to fight back. Perhaps his was not the only blood on the sand. In any case, ISIS felt obliged to offer video of Syrian soldiers’ beheadings instead, together with a tutorial on the history of the Islamic State, which began as an al-Qaida cell. The Islamic State executioner joked over Kassig’s severed head, “He doesn’t have much to say.”

President Obama condemned the atrocity, saying that Kassig “was taken from us in an act of pure evil by a terrorist group.” He continued, “While ISIL revels in the slaughter of innocents, including Muslims, and is bent only on sowing death and destruction, Abdul-Rahman was a humanitarian who worked to save the lives of Syrians injured and dispossessed by the Syrian conflict.”

Hold on. Kassig converted to Islam and took the name Abdul-Rahman — but only in captivity. Obama’s insistence upon using his Islamic name reflects his continuing belief that by denying Islamic extremism, he can promote peace. “ISIL’s actions represent no faith,” he said, “least of all the Muslim faith, which Abdul-Rahman adopted as his own.”

When someone converts at the point of sword, in hopes of saving his life, is that “adopting the Muslim faith as his own”? Who is Obama respecting by using the Islamic name: Kassig or his executioners?

The New York Times explained it this way: “The president used the Muslim name that Mr. Kassig adopted after his capture, making the point that the Islamic State had killed a fellow Muslim.” If that’s the motive for using the Islamic name, it raises this question: Who does Obama imagine is unaware that the Islamic State kills Muslims? Certainly in the very tape confirming the beheading of Kassig, ISIS provided graphic and high-definition evidence of the execution of 13 Syrian soldiers. They weren’t Baptists. A recent UN report depicts widespread ISIS terror and horror across Syria and Iraq. “Executions have been recorded in Aleppo, Raqqa, Idlib, Al-Hassakeh and Deir Al-Zor provinces,” according to a Reuters account. “Witnesses saw scenes of still-bleeding bodies hanging from crosses and of heads placed on spikes along park railings.”

But Obama is still at pains to protect the good name of Islam. He condemns the barbarism of ISIS and other terrorists, but feels the need to quickly add that their crimes “represent no faith, least of all” Islam.

Least of all? The president is living in an alternate reality. Throughout the Muslim world, extremism is in full bloom. Only a minority of Sunni extremists travel under the name al-Qaida. Others are called al-Nusra (Syria) and AQIM (North Africa) and IS (Iraq and Syria) and Wahhabi (Saudi Arabia) and Boko Haram (Nigeria) and Abu Sayyaf (Philippines) and Taliban (Afghanistan and Pakistan) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (Pakistan) and al-Fatah (Palestinian territories) and Hamas (Gaza). The Shia extremists include the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hezbollah (Lebanon), and the Mahdi Army of Iraq.

Most Muslims worldwide doubtless want only to be left in peace. They are the first, but far from the only victims of a movement that has taken the Islamic world by storm, and that Barack Obama thinks he can wish away by denying.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-still-refuses-admit-isis-islamic/#BBIwyVU2WfBhU9Ye.99

 

 

 

Amenper: Keynesianismo

No podemos decir que John Maynard Keynes, fuera comunista, pero su filosofía económica viene muy bien en el período de implantación del comunismo, y la aceptación de su doctrina tiene un generador común con el comunismo que es la envidia al que tiene más que uno y el considerar que tenemos el derecho a recibir del gobierno algo que no hemos obtenido con nuestro trabajo.

Keynes fue personalmente en su época  y es ahora por los gobernantes seguidores a su filosofía el mayor enemigo del libre mercado, el cual denuncia como algo perjudicial a la economía. 

La teoría antes de Keynes,era la de los conservadores Burke y Adam Smith de que la economía de mercado era la generadora de empleos, y que dejándola operar libremente a corto o mediano plazo automáticamente proporciona pleno empleo.

Keynes introduce al gobierno en la economía del libre comercio, .

Según la economía keynesiana, la intervención del estado es necesaria en ciclos de baja actividad económica. Abogó por el aumento de los impuestos y su uso en forma de estímulos y beneficios para mitigar los efectos adversos de la economía.

Esto fue adoptado durante períodos de recesión por diferentes gobiernos  pero en la década de los 70s ya se vio el resultado adverso en las economías que lo habían adoptado.

La elección de Obama y la crisis financiera del 2008, ha causado un resurgimiento en el pensamiento Keynesiano, y los resultados han sido tan adversos como antes. 

La recuperación que siempre ha seguido a una recesión en los Estados Unidos, ha sido bajo el Keynesianismo de Obama lenta e incompleta. 

En Japón, el keynesianismo lo ha llevado a prácticamente una recesión, está en todas las noticias hoy, y ya están tomando medidas para volver el sistema anterior 

Unos de los problemas de Keynes es que su filosofía no se preocupa por las generaciones futuras.  Para Keynes, impuestos y préstamos, es la solución, no importa que el país como hoy los Estados Unidos se mantengan con una deuda de trillones de dólares subiendo diariamente sin control ni final a la vista
Filosofía famosa Keynes de interés sólo por el presente, se presenta frente a la filosofía económica de Edmund Burke y Adam Smith, quienes creían que había un contrato social entre los vivos como los muertos.

El no pensar en lo que viene atrás y tratar de solucionar el problema con dinero prestado es algo que es muy común en las personas y en los gobiernos.  Pero tarde o temprano tanto en lo personal como en los gobiernos, la burbuja explota. 

Keynes. era homosexual y estaba casado con una bailarina, con la que él probablemente habló de la “poesía” y de “ballet” más bien que de “procrear” y no tuvo hijos, realmente nunca tuvo una familia ni una vida tradicional.

Quizás esa manea de ser lo hizo crear una doctrina que resuelve de momento y deja los problemas para la próxima generación.

Los gobiernos como los que abrazan el socialismo del Siglo XXI que son notablemente influenciados por Keynes, promulgan estímulos a las empresas compinches, y provocan grandes déficis durante los períodos económicos débiles. Esta no es la solución, es como esconder la cabeza en la tierra como el avestruz. Sólo creando nuevas riquezas se logra estimular la economía, y son los pequeños negocios los que crean nuevos empleos, no el gobierno.

No se puede estimular la economía tomando riquezas de unos para dárselos a otros, porque esto no aumenta la riqueza de la nación, sino que la destruye cuando los productores de las riquezas no puedan producir para darles más a los otros. Es algo sencillo pero no es popular pensar así.

La envidia es un motor generador tanto para la filosofía de Keynes como para la filosofía comunista, porque la envidia no es la envidia del pobre al rico, puede ser la envidia de un pobre hacia otro menos pobre, y de un menos rico hacia uno más rico.  La envidia no hace distinciones ni tiene fronteras. 

Es más fácil si tienes problemas creer que tienes derecho a tomar de otro, esto es mas “sabroso” que producir con tu trabajo.

Una frase de Keynes es que a la larga todos estaremos muertos, pero la realidad es que a la larga nuestros hijos, nietos y bisnietos estarán vivos y tendrán que lidiar con las consecuencias de nuestras acciones y decisiones económicas.

Abajo les estoy enviando un artículo del Wall Street Journal sobre el problema económico de Japón cuando abrazó el Keynesianismo. 

Otro fracaso más de la filosofía de Keynes, pero no será el último, porque el Keynesianismo como el comunismo renace de sus cenizas por el estímulo de la envidia.

Japan’s Keynesian Recession

The familiar advice to spend more and raise taxes fails again.

Nov. 17, 2014 7:28 p.m. ET

Shinzo Abe has made little secret of his plans to postpone next year’s consumption-tax increase and call a snap election. Monday’s third-quarter GDP statistics show why the Japanese Prime Minister may be rediscovering his political backbone. Japan’s economy contracted at a 1.6% annual rate, meaning the country is officially in recession.

The numbers surprised analysts, who had predicted a bounce after the April 1 consumption-tax increase tanked the economy in the second quarter. Instead consumption barely budged and is still down 4.7% since April. Companies chose to play it safe and drew down inventories rather than increase production. The real economy contracted more severely than the GDP numbers suggested, since a fall in imports inflated the trade surplus.

The third quarter continues a depressing pattern. This is Japan’s fourth recession since 2008, and even when the economy is technically growing it remains on life support. Annual growth has averaged 0.85% since 1992.

This year’s contraction is much worse than that of 1997, the last time Japan increased the consumption tax. That recession was dismissed by the Ministry of Finance mandarins as a fluke or the result of the Asian financial crisis. They were wrong.

Now they warn that if Mr. Abe postpones next year’s planned consumption-tax increase to 10% from 8%, Japan’s fiscal credibility will suffer and financial markets will punish the country. That is belied by the stock market’s positive response this month to rumors that Mr. Abe is about to announce a delay.

The Prime Minister desperately needs to re-establish his economic-policy credentials as growth slumps and his popularity declines. Mr. Abe raised hopes in 2012 that he could reinvigorate Japan, and voters gave him a large majority in parliament. So far he has squandered that opportunity by setting the wrong priorities.

Mr. Abe overcame resistance within the Ministry of Finance and Bank of Japan to appoint BOJ Governor Haruhiko Kuroda, who has pursued aggressive monetary bond-buying. But inflation has barely budged and lending is flat; businesses complain that they’ve been hurt by the weakening yen. Mr. Kuroda doubled down on Oct. 31, but so far he has only delivered more proof that monetary policy alone can’t sustain economic growth.

If there’s a silver lining, it’s that Mr. Abe challenged the Finance Ministry’s power over elected politicians. If he cancels the consumption tax increase and wins an election as a result—more than 70% of the public opposes the increase—he will have sent a useful message.

Meanwhile, the Prime Minister is reported to have acquiesced to another classic Finance Ministry blunder, a supplementary budget of five trillion yen ($43 billion). Since Japan’s bubble economy burst in 1990, Tokyo has tried to spend its way back to prosperity. Government expenditure has risen to about 40% of GDP from 30%, and national debt has swelled to 227% of GDP. (See the nearby chart.) The additional spending provides only a temporary growth blip, but debt rises and then taxes rise to finance it, harming growth and further increasing debt.

In the snap election, voters are likely to trim Mr. Abe’s 61% majority in the lower house of the Diet. But he should get a second chance to turn an electoral mandate into national revitalization. To do so, he has to deliver on the most important part of his economic program, the stalled “third arrow” of reform to liberalize the domestic economy and cut tax rates.

More than Japan’s future is at stake. Since 2008 the U.S. and most of Europe have copied Japan’s strategy of government-driven growth, and the result has also been bigger governments with less growth. Having tried everything else, Mr. Abe will have to embrace supply-side reform if he wants to fulfill his growth promise.

 

 

 

Keystone Vote Falls Short in Senate. BY FRANK THORP V, CARRIE DANN AND ANDREW RAFFERTY

Senators supporting the Keystone XL pipeline on Tuesday came up one vote short of securing approval for the controversial project after days of intense lobbying from some of the pipeline’s biggest supporters in the upper chamber.

Fourteen Democrats joined all 45 Republican senators in voting for the pipeline, which needed 60 votes to pass. The finally tally was 59-41.

Senator Calls Keystone XL the ‘Extra Lethal’ Pipeline

NBC NEWS

Endangered Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu aggressively backed the bill and spent the past week attempting to convince colleagues to support the project. She pushed for the vote during the lame duck session of Congress after her re-election race in Louisiana advanced to a December 6 runoff. Because the Keystone project is popular in their home state, Landrieu and GOP challenger Rep. Bill Cassidy have jostled for credit for supporting the bill.

Landrieu rarely left the Senate floor in the lead up to the vote, passionately making the case for what she called a common-sense jobs project that will make oil more affordable.

“There is no blame, there is only joy in the fight,” Landrieu said after the vote. “Where I come from, we just never talk about quitting. And we dont talk about whining.”

Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California led the opposition to Keystone’s approval, which she called the “Extra Lethal” pipeline because of the harm it would do to the environment. But Boxer credited Landrieu for her leadership in bringing the bill to a vote.

Republican Sen. John Hoeven of North Dakota, another chief backer of the bill, predicted Monday they would be able to get enough votes to send the bill to the president’s desk. But independent Sen. Angus King’s announcement Tuesday afternoon that he would not support it was a troubling sign for Hoeven and Landrieu.

“Congress is not – nor should it be – in the business of legislating the approval or disapproval of a construction project,” King said in a statement. “And while I am frustrated that the President has refused to make a decision on the future of the pipeline, I don’t believe that short-circuiting the process to circumvent his Administration is in the best interest of the American people.”

Even if the vote had passed, it appeared headed for a presidential veto. Environmental activists have decried the impact of its construction. The Obama administration has said that it wants to wait for a full State Department review of the project’s effects – and it has been skeptical that the project would create the long-term job gains touted by the pipeline’s backers.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest reiterated Tuesday that Obama doesn’t support the bill. “It certainly is a piece of legislation that the president doesn’t support because the president believes this is something that should be determined through the State Department and the process that is in place to evaluate projects like this,” he said.

The House passed their version of the bill on Friday, 252-161-1, with 31 Democrats joining Republicans to pass it.

 

 

Obama on Synagogue Attack: ‘Too Many Palestinians Have Died’3KShare 175Tweet 35 3Reddit 21

I’m sure this will be comforting to the innocent Americans who died while you encouraged terrorists around the world.
Check it out:

President

 Obama has responded to today’s terrorist attack on a synagogue in Jerusalem in which four Israeli Jews attending morning prayers condemning the attack, and stating that “the majority of Palestinians” want peace.

In a statement delivered to the White House press pool, President Obama responded to the attack by declaring that “too many Palestinians have died,” as well as Israelis, in the struggle between the state of Israel and the terrorist group Hamas and its affiliates, including the internationally active Muslim Brotherhood. “At this difficult time,” the President told reports, “I think it’s important for both Palestinians and Israelis to try to work together to lower tensions and reject violence.”

“We have to remind ourselves that the majority of Palestinians and Israelis overwhelmingly want peace,” the statement concludes, before the President begins remarks on the Ebola crisis in West Africa. The President did not take questions.

The President’s remarks follow Secretary of State John Kerry’s response to the terrorist attack, in which he called “on Palestinian leadership at every single level to condemn this in the most powerful terms.” Palestinian Authority head Mahmoud Abbas, on his end, nominally condemned the attack while “stressing the need to end the causes of such attacks like tensions over what Jews call the Temple Mount and Palestinians call al-Aqsa Mosque.” Such a dismissal of the increasingly out-of-control terrorist activity by Palestinian extremists received the typical benefit of the doubt from mainstream media.
Read more at http://patriotupdate.com/2014/11/obama-synagogue-attack-many-palestinians-died/

 

Estimado Amigo. Actions  anmadus@aol.com

To: lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com

Hola Lázaro!

Las críticas de Bakunin al Marxismo, son de suma importancia para mi. Porque el democídio del siglo XX fue siempre, por las ideologías de izquierdas.

El comunismo, fascismo, nazismo, todas, son socialistas.

Bakunin, como buen anarquista, fue el primero en reconocer el gran fallo del Marxismo. Está dirigido por hombres y no por ángeles!

El identificó, primero que nadie, que el Marxismo iba terminar en una dictadura.

Cuando públicó sus críticas, fue hostigado, atacado y trataron de desprestigiarlo. El anti-semitismo de Bakunin, es el mismo que el de Lord Byron, Bismarck, Lindbergh y muchos más.

Finalmente, todo ser pensante llegamos a la misma conclusión.

No somos nosotros, los anti-semitas.

Son los Semitas, los genocidas de los Gentiles!

Porque no respetan la vida humana, de los no-judios.

La Robolución Bolchevique fue un plan Masónico-Judió que demoró 100 anyos en preparar.

El Congreso de Viena en 1815 selló el destino del Czar ruso, porque fue el único que no entregó su sístema monetaria al banco Rothschild.  Habia que destruir a Rúsia, porque fue capaz de marchar

desde los Urales, hasta París!  Habia que destruir al Czar.  Las otras potencias, ya estaban en sus manos.

El Plan Globalista de los Rothschild, era usar a la Unión Soviética para esclavizar al mundo entero.

Casí lo logran!

El invento de la bomba atómica y la muerte de FDR, cambió la dinámica, pero no la meta.

Los líderes soviéticos despues de Stalín, todos, erán “comunistas” de traje y corbata!

Ni Stalín, ni Mao, ni Castro (hasta hace poco) se vestían de uniforme, porque estabán siempre de lucha!!

Con la caida del muro de Berlín, empezó la nueva fase de 100 anyos.

Los Globalistas tienen tiempo, porque tienen todo el dinero, casi todos los recursos primários y controlan

todos los bancos y los medios.

Pero lo que controlan mejor que nada, son a los partidos políticos!

Comprar al hombre vago, pero hábil, es muy barato y ellos crean el dinero.

En USA, ambos partidos son organos de los Bancos de Wall Street.

Luchar por nuestros derechos, dentro de estos marcos, es inútil.

Por eso, hay tantos “independientes”!

Ningún Republicano, a echo nada por Qba!

Los politiqueros qbanos, incluyendo Rubio y Cruz, son voceros de Israel.

Traicionan a sus raices, diariamente, con cada voto!!

Qba y USA son por razones históricas, geográficas y socialmente,

hasta por razones familiares y deportiva, una sola entidad económica inseparable!!!

Lo que sucede, es que tenemos una conección íntima con el Pueblo americano, pero una lucha a muerte, con el Gobierno secreto americano.

Por eso, el verdadero qbano, es Americanista!

Necesitamos a los americanos, para poder ser libres!!

Nuestro gran problema, es que el buen Pueblo Americano,

tiene un Gobierno, completamente ocupado por los intereses bancarios de Wall Street y la mafia sionista de Hollywood.

Su trabajo, no puede prosperar, porque estás completamente dentro del campo Republicano.

El Partido Republicano, en su cima, es igualito al partido Demócrata!

No discuten ideologías, sinó políticas!!

La mejor prueba, es el aborto…

Los Demócratas quieren asesinar bebés, en cualquier momento del embarazo y alegan que es un derecho de la mujer, el infanticidio.

Los Republicanos, quieren asesinar a los bebés, en caso de violación, malformidad y la salúd de la madre.

Eso, no es una cuestión de ética, ni moralidad!

Para ellos, es solo, el mejor camino al poder!!

No hay, ni un solo Republicano que diga…

El Partido Republicano, defiende el derecho a la vida de todos!

Primero, porque no lo creen.

Segundo, lo que quiere un politiquero es ganar.

No tienen principios, solo políticas!!

No son capaces, ni defender los derechos de los bebés prenacidos!!!

Tendrían mucho más apoyo popular, si fueron éticos de verdad.

Con la imigración, son iguales!

Ningúno, quiere defender la frontera!! Ilegal, es ilegal.  Basta!

Que no comprendes?

Si entraste ilegalmente, no eres imigrante.  Eres ilegal.

EEUU es igual que una casa privada.

Hay que tener puertas o se convierte en un mercado público.

Que es lo que quieren, los Globalistas!

Pero, que es lo que desea el Pueblo Americano??

Nadie quiere vivir en un mercado público!

Menos, con Ebola!!

Por lo tanto, querido amigo y compatriota, estamos luchando contra dós frentes!

En favor del Pueblo americano, en contra de sus Partidos!!

Porque detrás de ambos partidos, está la mano oculta,

que puso y mantiene a los Castros. Yo estoy desesperado por regresar, pero no como vencido!

Qba, nunca será libre, si no liberamos primero a Washington DC.

1saludo y que Diós le bendiga!!!

“Nota: No creo que los miembros de ISIS, Hamas y otros árabes terroristas, cuando combaten con bombas y cohetes tengan respeto por la vida  de Los Judios.” Lázaro R González Miño  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Four Killed in Jerusalem Synagogue Complex

The New York Times

JODI RUDOREN, ISABEL KERSHNER11 hrs ago

© Ronen Zvulun/Reuters Israeli police at the scene of an attack at a synagogue complex in West Jerusalem on Tuesday morning. The attack left four worshipers dead.

JERUSALEM — Two Palestinians armed with a gun, knives and axes stormed a synagogue complex in an ultra-Orthodox Jewish neighborhood of West Jerusalem on Tuesday morning, the Israeli police said, killing four men in the middle of their morning prayers.

The police killed the assailants in a gun battle at the scene that left one officer critically wounded. It was the deadliest attack on Israeli civilians in more than three years, and the worst in Jerusalem since 2008. Witnesses and Israeli leaders said the site and the fact that the victims were slain while wearing prayer garments were reminiscent of long-ago pogroms.

“To see Jews wearing tefillin and wrapped in the tallit lying in pools of blood, I wondered if I was imagining scenes from the Holocaust,” said Yehuda Meshi Zahav, the veteran leader of a religious emergency-response team, describing the ritual straps and prayer shawls worn by the worshipers. “It was a massacre of Jews at prayer.”

The 7 a.m. attack on a synagogue complex that is at the heart of community life in the Har Nof neighborhood shattered Israelis’ sense of security and further strained relations with Palestinians at a time of soaring tension and violence. Six people, including a baby, a soldier and a border police officer, have been killed in a spate of vehicular and knife attacks fueled in large part by a dispute over a holy site in the Old City known to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary and to Jews as the Temple Mount.

The four victims were all rabbis, one born in England and three in the United States, including Moshe Twersky, 59, part of a celebrated Hasidic dynasty.

Relatives identified the attackers as two cousins, Odai Abed Abu Jamal, 22, and Ghassan Muhammad Abu Jamal, 32. They were described as being motivated by what they saw as threats to the revered plateau that contains Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock. Although Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has repeatedly asserted that he will not alter the status quo at the site, where non-Muslims can visit but not openly pray, President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority has called on his people to protect the area and has warned of a “holy war” if it is “contaminated” by Jews.

“They carried out this operation because of the fire in their hearts — they were under pressures, pressures, pressures and in one ripe moment, the explosion took place,” said a relative who gave his name as Abu Salah, holding photographs of the men. “I say in full mouth, it is a religious war which Netanyahu has started,” he added. “It will end the way we like.”

Mr. Netanyahu called Tuesday’s attack “the direct result of the incitement” led by Mr. Abbas and Hamas, the militant Palestinian faction, and vowed to “respond with a heavy hand to the brutal murder of Jews who came to pray and were eliminated by despicable murderers.”

Secretary of State John Kerry of the United States called the attack “a pure result of incitement.”

“The Palestinian leadership must condemn this,” Mr. Kerry said in London, after speaking by telephone to Mr. Netanyahu, “and they must begin to take serious steps to restrain any kind of incitement that comes from their language, from other people’s language, and exhibit the kind of leadership that is necessary to put this region on a different path.”

Mr. Abbas responded to Mr. Kerry’s demand, offering his first denouncement of any Palestinian attack during the recent escalation.

“We condemn the killing of civilians from any side,” he said in a statement published by Wafa, the official Palestinian news agency. “We condemn the killings of worshipers at the synagogue in Jerusalem and condemn acts of violence no matter their source.”

But other Palestinian leaders praised the attack as a response to what they see as a threat to the holy site, and to the recent death of a Palestinian bus driver in Jerusalem. Relatives and friends of the driver, Yousef al-Ramouni, who was found hanged in his bus Sunday night, insisted he had been lynched by Jews, though the Israeli police said an autopsy on Monday ruled that his death was a suicide.

Mustafa Barghouti, a member of the Palestine Liberation Organization’s central committee, said on Al Jazeera early Tuesday that the attack on the synagogue complex was “a normal reaction to the Israeli oppression.”

Mushir al-Masri, a Hamas spokesman, wrote in a Facebook post: “The new operation is heroic and a natural reaction to Zionist criminality against our people and our holy places. We have the full right to revenge for the blood of our martyrs in all possible means.”

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine took credit for the attack, though Micky Rosenfeld, a spokesman for the Israeli police, said the authorities were still investigating whether the assailants were affiliated with any group.

“We’re also looking to see why they targeted this synagogue, were they familiar with this neighborhood,” Mr. Rosenfeld told reporters in a conference call, though he declined to confirm news reports that one of the suspects worked in a nearby grocery store. “They came in from the local areas, took advantage of that they had work purposes to roam freely around Jerusalem.”

Within two hours of the attack, scores of Israeli security forces had stormed Jabel Mukaber, the Palestinian neighborhood of East Jerusalem where the suspects lived, spraying tear gas at their family home and into hills of olive trees.

Relatives said the younger assailant’s parents, three sisters and a brother were arrested, along with the wife, mother and five brothers of the older attacker, who had three children, ages 6, 5 and 3.

“I salute Odai and Ghassan for this heroic operation,” said a cousin, Huda Abu Jamal, 46. “Every Palestinian should strike. Our conditions are too bad. These men have no jobs. Al Aqsa is in danger. The settlers brutally hanged Yousef. We raise our heads high.”

Witnesses at the synagogue complex where the assault took place said the attackers were wearing jeans and T-shirts, and no masks, and shouted “God is great” in Arabic as they burst inside.

In addition to Rabbi Twersky — a son of Isadore Twersky, a Harvard scholar known as the Tolner Rebbe of Boston who died in 1997, and a grandson of Joseph Dov Soloveitchik, the Orthodox philosopher and teacher who died in 1993 — those killed, according to the police and local news organizations, were Rabbi Avraham Shmuel Goldberg, 68, a British-born father of six; Rabbi Aryeh Kopinsky, 43; and Rabbi Kalman Levine, 55. Like Rabbi Twersky, Rabbi Kopinsky and Rabbi Levine, were both American immigrants to Israel.

At least a dozen worshipers were injured, several of them seriously, in the attack on Kehilat Bnei Torah, a complex that houses several prayer groups and a large community hall on a quiet street in Har Nof. Several residents said the building was a center of life for Jews of Eastern European descent, with the hall serving as a popular spot for weddings, film screenings and speeches.

Yossef Pasternak, who was praying at the synagogue, told Israel Radio he had heard gunshots at the height of the morning service.

“I turn around and I see a man with a pistol who starts shooting point blank at people next to him,” Mr. Pasternak said. “Immediately after, someone enters with a knife, a butcher-type knife, and also goes on a rampage in all directions.” Mr. Pasternak said he had hidden under a chair.

Rabbi Shmuel Pinchas said his 13-year-old grandson had done the same. “He crouched under a chair, blood spattered on him from the person who sat in front of him, he fainted,” Rabbi Pinchas said. “People were in the middle of prayer and people could not respond. There is nowhere to hide as the synagogue is closed on all sides.”

Joyce Morel, a doctor who lives in Har Nof, said she had treated a man at the scene who was hit in the back with an ax and also shot, and the police officer, who was shot in the head. Another man had slipped on blood and fallen down a flight of stairs, breaking his leg.

“Everybody in the neighborhood is in a state of shock,” Dr. Morel said. “My son-in-law prays there regularly, his father prays there, my grandchildren are there frequently, my husband studies across the street from there every single day. It’s really a center for the community.”

Avi Nefoussi, a volunteer medic who lives a few blocks from the synagogue, said he arrived before the shooting stopped. He said he had helped evacuate some of the injured on stretchers, “then, unfortunately, we saw some bodies lying on the floor.”

One face looked familiar. It was a man in his 40s who Mr. Nefoussi “knew personally, very well,” though he declined to identify him pending notification of his family.

The man, like the others, was wearing the traditional fringed tallit used in prayer, as a wedding canopy, and sometimes as a funeral shroud. Mr. Nefoussi said he had covered the body with it before leaving.

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

En mi opinión”

No 792 “En mi opinión” Noviembre 11, 2014

noviembre 11, 2014

No 792 “En mi opinión”  Noviembre 11, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

“Saludos a los Veteranos en su día. Gloria a los héroes bravos americanos que han servido y sirven en las Fuerzas Armadas de los Estados Unidos. Gloria a nuestros héroes”

¿25 veteranos se suicidan diariamente en los Estados Unidos?  ¿Por qué? ¿No reciben apoyo del gobierno que los envio a la guerra? ¿Tendra algo que ver con el pésimo servicio que ha estado dándoles Los Hospitales para veteranos? 25 veteranos sicuidandose diariamente es mas que las bajas de una guerra…

“EMO” Quién fue el engendro diabólico y abusivo que creo La Autoridad de carreteras que ha puesto ilegalmente  todos esos “TOLLS” que le están acabando con la vida de los Ciudadanos, que les está robando una gran parte de sus salarios. Eso es un descaro y un abuso, e ilegal porque ya usted paga un impuesto en la gasolina y cuando paga la chapa del carro. Es ilegal que les estén cobrando tres veces. Todos a protestar contra estos abusos de los politicastros del Condado Miami Dade. En cualquier momento les ponen un tol para sentarse en su propia tasa del inodoro de su casa. “PROTESTA” “PROTESTA” “PROTESTA” “PROTESTA” Lázaro R González Miño.

 Is The Man In The White House Mentally Ill? President Obama is a sick, dangerous man.

COACH DAVE DAUBENMIRE  

I am not asking this with my tongue in my cheek. I am as serious as a judge. As I sit here and write, I am listening to Mr. Obama’s press conference. Something is very wrong with this guy.  He is either mentally ill or demon-possessed.  Either is a possibility. But something is definitely wrong with him.  He seems somehow inhuman.

I’ve lived my entire life in a world of athletic competition.  I understand the human emotion that is associated with winning and losing.  I grew up with the opening theme of ABC’s Wide World of Sports continuously playing in my head.  (If I close my eyes, I can hear the voice of Jim McKay bouncing around the corners of my brain.)

Spanning the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports… the thrill of victory… and the agony of defeat… the human drama of athletic competition… This is “ABC’s Wide World of Sports!”

The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat brings with it emotions. That is why we watch sports. We love the human drama of athletic competition. That’s why we have press conferences after games.  We love to hear the emotional reaction to winning and losing.

President Obama is a hollow man. He has no feelings. He feels no emotions.  The human drama of competition seems to have no outward effect on him.

Can I be blunt? He got his butt kicked. Every talking head on the tube is pointing the finger at his unpopularity.  “The bloom is off of the rose.  It is a direct repudiation of his policies.  The era of Obama is over.” It is as if everyone knows it but him.

Politics is nothing more than a beauty contest, and Obama has been voted off of the island. But he acts as if he still owns the island. There seems to be no agony in his defeat. It is not normal. His emotions do not line up with reality. He is either sick, or he is possessed.  I’m not laughing. I am serious.

His party rejected him. The American people rejected him. His fawning media has turned their affections in a different direction; yet he shows no emotion. I watch him on the TV. I watch him in his press conference. I watch his eyes as he responds to the media’s questions. I believe he is a sick, dangerous man.

I Googled the word ‘sociopath’. Here’s what I found: “A person with a psychopathic personality whose behavior is antisocial, often criminal, and who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.”

Bingo. That’s him. That’s the guy living the life of President of the United States.

I went a bit further and Googled “Characteristics of a Sociopath.” Read it for yourself.  Permit me to summarize. You will recognize his mental illness by these traits:

-An oversized ego.

-Lying and showing manipulative behavior.

-Incapable of showing empathy.

-No lack of shame or remorse.

-Staying eerily calm in dangerous situations.

-Behaving irresponsibly or with extreme impulsivity.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/man-white-house-mentally-ill/#bJPrF1j296FdkAY0.99

 

 

Amenper: Obamacare Architect: Yeah, We Lied to The “Stupid” American People to Get It Passed

Katie Pavlich |

Meet Jonathan Gruber, a professor at MIT and an architect of Obamacare. During a panel event last year about how the legislation passed, turning over a sixth of the U.S. economy to the government, Gruber admitted that the Obama administration went through “tortuous” measures to keep the facts about the legislation from the American people, including covering up the redistribution of wealth from the healthy to the sick in the legislation that Obamacare is in fact a tax. The video of his comments just recently surfaced ahead of the second open enrollment period for Obamacare at Healthcare.gov.”You can’t do it political, you just literally cannot do it. Transparent financing and also transparent spending. I mean, this bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes the bill dies. Okay? So it’s written to do that,” Gruber said. “In terms of risk rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in, you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed. Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really really critical to get for the thing to pass. Look, I wish Mark was right that we could make it all transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not.”

A few points. 1. Notice how lying to the American people is completely justified by Obama administration standards so long as the ends justify the means. Gruber would “rather have this law than not,” and therefore purposely lying about what the law actually is in order to get it passed is completely acceptable. regardless of the negative effects it has on the lives of Americans. 2. Lack of transparency might be a huge political advantage in the short term, but long term there are consequences from voters, which is exactly what we saw last week during the Democrat blood bath at every level of government across the country. 3. Insulting Americans as stupid and deceiving them is a really good way to lose your power on Capitol Hill, which is again exactly what we saw last week in the 2014 midterms. Twenty-eight Senators who voted for Obamacare are now out of the Senate for one reason or another. 4. Obamacare in its entirely was “sold” on lies. From the promise to keep your doctor to claims insurance rates would go down, not up — to hiding that the legislation was in fact a tax until of course it was necessary to argue it was a tax to save the legislation at the Supreme Court. Government bureaucrats promising an expansion of care knowing care under Obamacare would be limited, etc. Hell, even the official name for Obamacare, “The Affordable Care Act,” is a lie. Obamacare isn’t affordable. 5. The process through which Obamacare was shoved through and down the throats of the American people happened as a result of Harry Reid changing Senate rules and without the support of voters. The legislation didn’t receive a single Republican vote in the House or the Senate. Also, remember this?

Or this?

“Absolutely not a tax increase.”

er:

Amenper: Hablando en Chino

BEIJING —Con su influencia en la Casa Blanca, rápidamente deteriorándose, el presidente

Barack Hussein Obama está mirando a China, la parada de una gira por tres países es para

 tratar de hacer ver ante el mundo que él tiene  capacidad para desempeñar un papel

dominante en el escenario mundial durante sus últimos dos años de su administración-

Una vez considerado como una superestrella mundial, Obama llegó el lunes en Pekín bajo

 circunstancias muy diferentes, con sus días más poderosos evidentemente llegados a su fin.

En casa, los republicanos siguen regocijados  de haber golpeado partido político de Obama

 en las elecciones legislativas, relegando a los demócratas a la minoría en ambas cámaras

 legislativas.

Sus homólogos en Asia sin lugar a dudas lo han notado y están posicionados para tomar

 ventajas de un atribulado Barack Obama que va a enfrentarse con un seguro de Xi Jinping

A su llegada a la capital China, Obama caminó del Air Force One y sobre una alfombra roja,

 con una guardia de docenas de soldados chinos alineados en su camino a una limusina

 que lo esperaba.

Más bien parecía que estaba siendo tomado prisionero que recibido como un dignatario.

 Lo primero que hizo fue ir a una reunión con Presidente Joko Widodo de Indonesia,

 donde Obama vivió de joven.

Widodo, quien juró su cargo el mes pasado en medio de una victoria izquierdista con

 la promesa de un gobierno socialista, dijo que su elección demuestra que el Islam y

el socialismo pueden ir juntos y se comprometió a seguir luchando por el extremismo

 islámico y socialista en su país.

Obama fue efusivo, en su reunión con Widodos, llamando a su elección una “afirmación

 de la transición completa de que Indonesia ha hecho a una próspera democracia y un

modelo para la clase de tolerancia y pluralismo que queremos que todo el mundo”.

 ¿Qué quiso decir, que quiere ese tipo de gobierno para Estados Unidos?

Obama sugirió que Widodo incluso podría visitar a Washington el año que viene.

Para revivir una fase de su juventud, Obama se dirigió a los periodistas allí reunidos en

Bahasa, la lengua oficial de Indonesia.

Más tarde, Obama fue a dar un discurso el lunes sobre lazos de Estados Unidos y China

 en una cumbre de cooperación económica al más alto nivel-

El viaje marca una de las oportunidades finales de Obama para tratar de cumplir un

objetivo de ampliar la influencia estadounidense en Asia.

“Esto va a ser un viaje difícil para el Presidente,” dijo Ernest Bower, un experto de Asia

en el centro para estudios estratégicos e internacionales en Washington. Dijo que los

 líderes asiáticos estaban viendo el viaje de Obama con una pregunta clave en mente:

¿Quién es este Barack Obama después de las elecciones legislativas?

“¿Podrá ser capaz de discernir si tiene un compromiso a seguir? y ¿podrá ahora tener

 el poder político para cumplirlo?,” dijo Bower.

En casa los empresarios simplemente quieren que se pueda contrarrestar la creciente

 influencia de China en el mercado de Estados Unidos.

La misión de Obama  se encuentra empañada con la débil posición contra el grupo estado

 islámico y la respuesta de Ebola de su gobierno hechos que han desviado recursos de

 Estados Unidos militares y financieros en otros lugares sin obtener resultados.

“El Presidente sigue profundamente comprometido con China y su plan y su

 implementación seguirá siendo una prioridad durante el segundo mandato,”

dijo la asesora de seguridad nacional de Obama, Susan Rice.

Obama está sumergido en problemas causados por su administración ahora,

durante sus dos últimos años en la oficina, cuando el foco en la próxima carrera

presidencial agota la energía de sus propios esfuerzos nacionales.

A raíz de las elecciones de la semana pasada, algunos  de los  funcionarios de

casa blanca aparentemente se mostraron optimistas sobre las perspectivas de

 Obama para el comercio que gestiona en China y otros lugares a pesar de que

ahora  los republicanos se establecen para controlar el Congreso y el Senado en Enero.

Pero otras naciones y sobre todo domésticamente, todos están cautelosas con

respecto a la capacidad de Obama para empujar un eventual acuerdo en el Congreso,

 donde los demócratas han sido extremandamente sensibles a las preocupaciones

de los sindicatos.

Los republicanos están en una posición de poder, las perspectivas de Obama son

tan complejas y débiles como han sido sus seis años en su administración, sin lugar

 a dudas en una posición de minoría en las cámaras legislativas, no pueden mejorar,

  así que un argumento diferente no tiene validez ni substancia.

Los republicanos tienden a apoyar los acuerdos de comercio como una manera de

 impulsar la economía de Estados Unidos, y los líderes del partido Republicano han

 hablado positivamente de algún tipo de acuerdo, pero han declarado en diferentes

 ocasiones que cualquier acuerdo se sometería  a una votación de arriba o abajo,

evitando las enmiendas de último minuto que podrían cambiar el tono del asunto.

 Además, los líderes chinos han visto enfoque de los Estados Unidos en Asia con

suspicacia, temiendo un intento de contener el crecimiento de China e influencia

en la región.

En una muestra del clima político que enfrenta Obama en China, y el poco respeto

 que los chinos le tienen, son los comentarios en los medios de comunicación estatales

 que han sido burlarse de él en los días antes de su visita.

“Obama siempre dice ‘Sí,’ para complacer las  expectativas que tienen de él, la gente”

 lee un editorial en el idioma inglés del Global Times. “Pero ha hecho un trabajo insulso,

 ofreciendo casi nada a sus partidarios.  La sociedad estadounidense se ha  cansado de

 su banalidad”.  (Hasta los chinos lo han notado).

“En sus reuniones con Xi, Obama también planea abordar cuestiones de derechos

humanos, dijeron las autoridades, incluyendo el tratamiento de los periodistas, así

como las protestas pro-democracia en Hong Kong que estalló en septiembre para consternación de las autoridades chinas. El cambio climático — una preocupación clave en Beijing lleno de smog — y el comportamiento agresivo de China hacia sus vecinos también están en la agenda de Obama”

 Esta agenda para salvar cara, será recibida con el mismo humor y falta de respeto

que tuvieron las agencias de noticias de la prensa controlada de Beijing.

En otras palabras, el presidente de los Estados Unidos es tratado y considerado

como un payaso, pero cuando se trata de Obama, no podemos ofendernos, no se

trata de la nación, se trata que tengamos a un payaso de presidente.

Esto es un hecho evidente no importa cómo se diga, en Español, en inglés y hasta

hablando en Chino.

Bienvenida la mosca

Amenper: “Nature & Nurture”and the Cuban Phenomenon

The popular discussion about nature and nurture relates to the relative importance of an individual’s innate qualities (“nature” in the sense of nativism or innatism) as compared to an individual’s personal experiences (“nurture” in the sense of empiricism or behaviorism) in causing individual differences in physical and behavioral traits.

Until some years ago, I was and advocate of nurture, I believed only in  the environment and culture influence in the individual character. But watching some cases in persons close to me, in relation to adopted children, I somewhat have changed my perception.  I think that the genetic tracks and genes, also have to do with the character of the individual.  But I still think that the nurture, the culture in which the individual is raised, has a lot to do with what the individual becomes in his or her adult life.     I have to accept this as a fact, especially when we notice how many Cubans have raised from a minority among  minorities, to important positions in the public life, scientific and economic establishment.

When my first grandson celebrated his marriage in Chicago, Illinois last August, I was surprised when I noticed how small the Cuban community was, compared with the number of other sub ethnic Hispanic residents of Illinois.  But I also noticed that these few Cubans have prominent positions in the state.  I met people like Eliot Montenegro, owner of Genesis, the larger home Healthcare institution in the state, I met Ivan Fernandez, owner of one of the most important  Food and Pharmaceutical company in the state, I learned of several prominent citizens of Cuban origin that had raised to prominent positions in the state.  Among those Cubans there was a woman, Evelyn Sanguinetti. 

Last Tuesday, “a day that will live in glory“, the citizens of Illinois elected Evelyn the first ever Hispanic  Lieutenant Governor of Illinois.,  

 

 

Losing The Senate Is The Least Of Harry Reid’s Worries After What Just Happened In Nevada

“…has some Republicans writing Reid’s political eulogy.”

JAMES BEATTIE 

 

Last week’s election might signal the beginning of the end for Harry Reid.

While Nevada Republican Governor Brian Sandoval was re-elected in a landslide last week, his pick for Lieutenant Governor, Mark Hutchison, was also elected, defeating Democrat Lucy Flores 59 to 33 percent. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor run separately in the Silver State.

Flores has been described as Reid’s “hand-picked candidate for lieutenant governor” by the Las Vegas Review Journal.

What this means for Nevada is that Sandoval, a former federal judge, has been given the green light to challenge the outgoing Senate Majority Leader for his seat, which is up in two years. Defeating Reid would assure that Nevada’s governor’s mansion would stay in Republican control through 2018; and Hutchison did not rule out a run for the top job four years from now, according to the Reno Gazette-Journal:

“That’s a long way away and I am going to just to just do the very best I can to be lieutenant governor and work as hard as I can for the people of Nevada.”

In March, Jon Ralston wrote for Politico that Sandoval, a governor who has high approval ratings, would be the “anti-Harry Reid if he chose to run for Senate”:

“Which is why the prospect of Sandoval facing off against the occasionally dyspeptic, sharply partisan and manifestly unpopular Senate majority leader in the 2016 U.S. Senate race has some Republicans writing Reid’s political eulogy.”

Although The New York Daily News reported Wednesday that Reid does not expect to seek re-election in 2016, veteran Nevada GOP strategist Jim Denton told Western Journalism he disagrees with that assessment:

“There was a great deal of speculation that he would not run in 2010, too. I expect that Senator Reid will seek re-election just as I expected him to in 2010. Nothing in conversations I have had with him would lead me to believe otherwise.”

Reid brushed off a challenge from Sharron Angle four years ago.

Still, Sandoval is no stranger to the Reid family, defeating son Rory to win his first term in 2010. Reid recommended Sandoval to the U.S. District Court in Nevada in 2004, and he was confirmed in 2005.

Mark Peplowski, professor of Political Science at the College of Southern Nevada, acknowledges that even though Republicans are a “poorly organized party” in the Silver State, it would take something big to bring down the popular governor.

“The only thing that would seriously hurt Sandoval’s bid would be if: he screwed up [or] if a very strong woman candidate steps forward as a Democrat and runs along with Hillary. [That] could muster some moderate movement to the left.

Peplowski continued:

“Sandoval is not undefeatable, but it will take a major policy flub, [a] meltdown or second coming of FDR to slow down his momentum.”
Read more at
http://www.westernjournalism.com/republican-victory-nevada-last-week-mean-end-harry-reid-2016/#rA6X8WY7eMoUhuq0.99

 

 

 

Losing The Senate Is The Least Of Harry Reid’s Worries After What Just Happened In Nevada

“…has some Republicans writing Reid’s political eulogy.”

JAMES BEATTIE  

Last week’s election might signal the beginning of the end for Harry Reid.

While Nevada Republican Governor Brian Sandoval was re-elected in a landslide last week, his pick for Lieutenant Governor, Mark Hutchison, was also elected, defeating Democrat Lucy Flores 59 to 33 percent. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor run separately in the Silver State.

Flores has been described as Reid’s “hand-picked candidate for lieutenant governor” by the Las Vegas Review Journal.

What this means for Nevada is that Sandoval, a former federal judge, has been given the green light to challenge the outgoing Senate Majority Leader for his seat, which is up in two years. Defeating Reid would assure that Nevada’s governor’s mansion would stay in Republican control through 2018; and Hutchison did not rule out a run for the top job four years from now, according to the Reno Gazette-Journal:

“That’s a long way away and I am going to just to just do the very best I can to be lieutenant governor and work as hard as I can for the people of Nevada.”

In March, Jon Ralston wrote for Politico that Sandoval, a governor who has high approval ratings, would be the “anti-Harry Reid if he chose to run for Senate”:

“Which is why the prospect of Sandoval facing off against the occasionally dyspeptic, sharply partisan and manifestly unpopular Senate majority leader in the 2016 U.S. Senate race has some Republicans writing Reid’s political eulogy.”

Although The New York Daily News reported Wednesday that Reid does not expect to seek re-election in 2016, veteran Nevada GOP strategist Jim Denton told Western Journalism he disagrees with that assessment:

“There was a great deal of speculation that he would not run in 2010, too. I expect that Senator Reid will seek re-election just as I expected him to in 2010. Nothing in conversations I have had with him would lead me to believe otherwise.”

Reid brushed off a challenge from Sharron Angle four years ago.

Still, Sandoval is no stranger to the Reid family, defeating son Rory to win his first term in 2010. Reid recommended Sandoval to the U.S. District Court in Nevada in 2004, and he was confirmed in 2005.

Mark Peplowski, professor of Political Science at the College of Southern Nevada, acknowledges that even though Republicans are a “poorly organized party” in the Silver State, it would take something big to bring down the popular governor.

“The only thing that would seriously hurt Sandoval’s bid would be if: he screwed up [or] if a very strong woman candidate steps forward as a Democrat and runs along with Hillary. [That] could muster some moderate movement to the left.

Peplowski continued:

“Sandoval is not undefeatable, but it will take a major policy flub, [a] meltdown or second coming of FDR to slow down his momentum.”
Read more at
http://www.westernjournalism.com/republican-victory-nevada-last-week-mean-end-harry-reid-2016/#YW0VVzwzoF0sFImd.99

 

 

 

Is Obama Looking to Burn Down the House?

President Obama is a sore loser. He lost big on election-day 2014, even though he has said that it was not a rejection of his policies.

Everybody but those in the Democrat leadership and media sycophants knows better.

Obama, however, being the sore loser and narcissist that he is, will not stop with his unconstitutional and damaging policies.

He will use what’s left of his presidency to push through his agenda. The most dangerous period is the time before the new Congress is sworn in.

Obama would rather “burn down the house” than follow the will of the people and the Constitution. He’s never had neither the nation nor the American people in view. He’s only had himself. Even the Democrat Party is of no concern to him. There’s a good chance that he is a self-realized Manchurian Candidate. He has it in for America.

Before he leaves office, he wants to burn down the house that’s America:

Watch out you might get what you’re after
Cool babies strange but not a stranger
I’m an ordinary guy
Burning down the house

Hold tight wait till the party’s over
Hold tight we’re in for nasty weather
There has got to be a way
Burning down the house.

 

200 Years Ago: Burning of the White House (1814)

He will move ahead in the destruction of the coal industry. He’s lost West Virginia to the Republicans. The state is no use to him.

He fought energy independence. The Keystone Pipeline is a no-brainer, and yet he opposed it at every turn.

Obama will go ahead with amnesty. This is the best way to dilute America’s founding principles. La Raza – “The Race” – will supplant what made America the envy of the world.

He’s going to do what he wants to do, and the 2014-mid-term election be damned:

“President Obama repeated Sunday that he intends to change U.S. immigration law through executive action, over Republican leaders’ repeated requests to wait and dire warnings about the consequences of sidestepping Congress.

“‘I’m going to do what I need to do,’ Obama told CBS’ ‘Face the Nation,’ in an interview taped on Friday.”

If burning down the house is the objective, objections have no relevance.

This is not to denigrate all immigrants, but our existing welfare system, created by unconstitutionalists from both political parties, will turn the United States into a breeding ground for government dependency. America will become another socialist State. “A record 20% of American households, one in five, were on food stamps in 2013, according to data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).” That’s more than 23 million households.

“In the past five years alone, the number of households on food stamps has greatly increased. In fiscal year 2009 – Oct. 1, 2008 through Sept. 30, 2009 – the number of households on food stamps was 15,232,115. Five years later, in 2013, that amount had increased by 51.3% to reach 23,052,388 households.”

I suspect that even Democrats are dismayed at the direction President ObamaEric Holder,  has taken. His radical agenda has sullied the Democrat Party. They now realize that he never had the Party’s long-term future in mind.

Obama has a vendetta against America.

Obama’s choice to replace Eric Holder may be a change in style, but it’s not a change in policy.

“In a speech given at Long Beach earlier this year, President Obama’s new nominee for Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, specifically called out voter ID laws as racist and schools as disproportionately using zero tolerance policies against minorities.”

Voter ID laws apply to everybody equally. If everybody is required to show an ID before voting, like every person has to show an ID at a bank or to get on an airplane, then how is that those who are voting to put people in power don’t have to show an ID? This makes no sense unless there is a political agenda in view.

Don’t think this latest election changes everything. Not only do we have to deal with the lame duck Congress, executive action by the President, but a Republican Party in transition.

We need to stay engaged. One battle does not mean the war has been won.

Update: we’ve just learned that President Obama is going to pursue “Net Neutrality,” which in government terms means regulation of the Internet to force equality. Once the government gets its hands on something, its grip will be on everything.
Read more at
http://godfatherpolitics.com/18358/obama-looking-burn-house/#IUr0ZkUTmc8buR0F.99

 

 

 

 

Border Patrol: Obama Amnesty Talk Fuels Illegal Immigration

By Melanie Batley

President Barack Obama’s insistence that he will sign an executive order that will allow as many as 6 million illegal immigrants to stay in the country will only create a new surge of illegal migrants across the U.S. border, says the National Border Patrol.

“We definitely see increases in illegal aliens coming across the border when there is national talk of an amnesty,” Shawn Moran of the National Border Patrol Council told Newsradio 1200 WOAI.

Special: Steve Forbes Slams the Fed in This Video

He said that Mexican and Latin American smuggling cartels seize on messages from the administration to recruit people who may be desperate to escape poverty and violent crime in their own countries.

“Under President Bush there was talk of immigration reform, and they would say, ‘we’re coming here for the amnesty,'” Moran said, adding that changes in the administration’s immigration policy will create a new surge.

Moran used as an example the recent influx of minors from Central America.
“That was largely fueled by the idea that we were not enforcing our immigration laws, and if you got to this country, you could stay here,” he said, according to WOAI.

President Barack Obama told congressional leaders at a meeting on Friday that he intended to take executive action on immigration even though he had been warned against the move by the GOP in the aftermath of their electoral victories.

Special: What This Soldier Did When He Came Home From Iraq . . . (Surprising)

Before the announcement, House Speaker John Boehner said the president would“poison the well” if he changes immigration policy without waiting for Congress to act, and incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said executive action on immigration would be like “waving a red flag in front of a bull.”

On Sunday, Obama defended his decision to act and said he was not trying to circumvent Congress, but that he had waited long enough for it to take action.

“The minute they pass a bill that addresses the problems with immigration reform, I will sign it and it supersedes whatever actions I take,” Obama said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

“And I’m encouraging them to do so . . . on parallel track we’re going to be implementing an executive action.

“But if in fact a bill gets passed, nobody’s going to be happier than me to sign it, because that means it will be permanent rather than temporary.”

Just days before the election, the chairman of the Republican National Committee,Reince Priebus

Special: These 7 Things Activate Alzheimer’s in Your Brain

, promised that if the GOP won control of the Senate the party would do “everything we can do to stop” executive amnesty for illegal immigrants.

 

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/Amnesty-Illegal-Immigration-Executive-action/2014/11/10/id/606442/#ixzz3IlhdYcQ7
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

 

 

 

President Obama to FCC: Reclassify Broadband Service as Title II to Protect Net Neutrality

President Obama is urging the FCC to reclassify consumer broadband service — to open it to broader government oversight and regulation — with the goal of protecting the net neutrality principles that his administration has long supported.

In a lengthy statement that also included a video, Obama asserted “there is no higher calling than protecting an open, accessible and free Internet.” He urged the FCC to reclassify broadband service as a Title II telecommunications service but with caveats that would shield it from some aspects of regulation for such services.

Special: Steve Forbes Slams the Fed in This Video

“The time has come for the FCC to recognize that broadband service is of the same importance and must carry the same obligations as so many of the other vital services do. To do that, I believe the FCC should reclassify consumer broadband service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act — while at the same time forbearing from rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband services. This is a basic acknowledgment of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone — not just one or two companies,” Obama said in a statement.

Story continues below.

FCC chairman Tom Wheeler has previously said the agency would consider reclassifying broadband under Title II — a move staunchly opposed by Comcast, AT&T, Verizon and other Internet service providers as an unnecessary step that would impose undue burdens and decrease investment in high-speed networks.

ISPs oppose the reclassification of broadband under Title II, because it would give the FCC leeway to impose price regulations, conditions on wholesale access and other controls.

In response to Obama’s statement Monday, Verizon said Title II would “apply 1930’s-era utility regulation to the Internet,” calling it “a radical reversal of course that would in and of itself threaten great harm to an open Internet, competition and innovation.” The telco also suggested such a regulatory change wouldn’t withstand legal challenges from ISPs and argued that the “light-touch regulatory approach” has been central to the Internet’s growth over the past two decades. Verizon challenged the FCC’s previous set of net neutrality rules, and the D.C. Circuit Court earlier this year struck down rules banning Internet providers from blocking or discriminating against certain types of content.

Comcast EVP David Cohen, at an investment conference in May, argued that Title II doesn’t prohibit paid prioritization — one of the hot-button issues in the FCC’s revised net neutrality rules it proposed earlier this year. “The whole history” of Title II is that carriers are allowed to provide different levels of service at different prices, Cohen said.

Such an approach also would run into a buzzsaw of Republican opposition on Capitol Hill, where the incoming GOP Senate majority can be expected to place pressure on the FCC even though it is an independent agency. The commission includes three Democrats and two Republicans.

Urgent: Save $1,000 on Medicare Before Open Enrollment Is Over

The National Cable and Telecommunications Assn., the lobbying group that represents the cable industry, said that it was “stunned that the president would abandon the longstanding and bipartisan policy of lightly regulating the Internet and calling for extreme Title II regulation.

The NCTA said that “this tectonic shift in national policy, should it be adopted, would create devastating results.” It called on the FCC to leave the issue to Congress, which it said can “easily unravel the legal and jurisdictional knot that has tied up the FCC in crafting sustainable open Internet rules, without resorting to the rules of the rotary dial phone era.”

Netflix has been among the most vocal content companies calling for broadband to be regulated under Title II. In a filing with the FCC this summer, the company argued that Title II provides the FCC with “a solid basis to adopt prohibitions on blocking and unreasonable discrimination by ISPs. Opposition to Title II is largely political, not legal.”

Obama’s announcement was greeted by public interest groups, which have been pressing the FCC to reclassify broadband.

“The president wasn’t kidding when he said he’d take a back seat to no one on net neutrality,” said former FCC commissioner Michael Copps, who is not serving as an adviser to Common Cause.

“As someone who has been pushing for Title II since 2002, when the FCC wrongly classified broadband, I am thrilled. Now the FCC must show the same kind of leadership and courage.”

Demand Progress, which has led a vocal campaign for reclassification, also praised Obama’s announcement.

“This is a huge victory for the millions of Americans who have called for Title Ii reform, and a huge blow for the cable companies that seek to establish fast and slow lanes on the Internet,” said David Segal, executive director of Demand Progress.

In a statement, FCC chairman Tom Wheeler called Obama’s statement “an important and welcome addition to the record of the Open Internet proceeding.

“As an independent regulatory agency we will incorporate the president’s submission into the record of the Open Internet proceeding,” he said. “We welcome comment on it and how it proposes to use Title II of the Communications Act.”

Wheeler has been working on a “hybrid” approach to net neutrality — which would reclassify the so-called “back end” of broadband service while applying a lighter regulatory touch to retail service. News of the proposal was greeted with skepticism by public interest groups, who argued that it still wouldn’t prevent Internet providers from giving priority to certain types of content, like big media companies that pay for speedier access to the consumer.

Special: Does Obama Belong to This Secret Society? (Shocking)

“The reclassification and hybrid approaches before us raise substantive legal questions,” Wheeler said. “We found we would need more time to examine these to ensure that whatever approach is taken, it can withstand any legal challenges it may face.”

Wheeler’s original proposal in April set out to establish rules that would survive legal challenges yet still would not reclassify the Internet. Public interest groups sounded the alarm over such an approach, saying that they would be too weak to prevent so-called “fast lanes,” or paid prioritization by Internet providers.

After the outcry, Wheeler asked for public comment on his proposal as well as other approaches, like reclassification or banning paid prioritization outright.

The FCC has been inundated with more than 4 million comments, a record for an agency proceeding, with groups like the Writers Guild of America calling for reclassification. But there also has been a counter campaign by groups urging the FCC to take a lighter approach to regulation.

In his statement, Obama also said that the FCC should ban paid prioritization, saying that “kind of gatekeeping would undermine the level playing field essential to the Internet’s growth.” “No service should be stuck in a ‘slow lane’ because it does not pay a fee.” he said. Wheeler also has said that he opposes Internet “fast lanes.”

Obama also said that the rules should apply to mobile services as well. The previous set of net neutrality rules, passed in 2010, spared such services from some of the more significant restrictions.
Read Latest Breaking News from
Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/internet-broadband-service-obama/2014/11/10/id/606378/#ixzz3Ii0gGT6F
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

 

Obama: ‘I’m going to do what I need to do’ on immigration

 by Cowboy Byte  Warming up his pen…..
Check it out: President Obama repeated Sunday that he intends to change U.S. immigration law through executive action, over Republican leaders’ repeated requests to wait and dire warnings about the consequences of sidestepping Congress.

“I’m going to do what I need to do,” Obama told CBS’ “Face the Nation,” in an interview taped on Friday.

As he has said before, the president said he would prefer that reform legislation come through Congress, but that he has waited for more than a year for House Speaker John Boehner to pass a bill like the Democrat-controlled Senate has done.
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/34679/obama-im-going-need-immigration/

 

 

Olga Griñan: A TRABAJAR…‏

To: Lazaro Gonzalez,

Amigos de FB debemos llamar a Marco Rubio (Phone: (305) 418-8553 // 202-224-3041)  y a Curbelo (en Facebook) .  Curbrlo dice estar de acuerdo con una ley migratoria “limitada.”   En nombre de quien esta hablando?  Y Marco Rubio ha dicho en Colombia que EEUU necesita profesionales que “no tenemos en EEUU”  Como es eso?  Y la cantidad de graduados universitarios sin trabajo?  Los politicos estan para hacer la voluntad de los votantes y no lo que les de la gana.  Hay que parar las visas de trabajo mientras tengamos el desempleo por encima del 3%.  Hay que proteger la frontera y fortalecer las leyes de inmigracion ya existentes. Todos los trabajos deben ser controlados por el E-Verify.  Quien contrate ilegales debe ser multado con mas de $10,000 por cada ilegal.  Ningun ilegal que haya recibido beneficios sociales debe ser premiado con licencia, estatus legal y mucho menos con ciudadania, y todos los que hayan cometido crimenes deben ser deportados inmediatamente.  El que quiera permanecer aqui tendra que estar limpio y someterse a un largo proceso.  Nunca tendra ventajas sobre los que esperan para entrar legalmente, ni siquiera los llamados dreamers.  Si no les gusta es su problema.  Los americanos tienen que respetar las leyes en todos los paises adonde van o pagar las consecuencias. Recientemente un soldado americano entro POR ERROR a Mexico y estuvo mas de 7 meses preso, hasta fue golpeado y torturado.  Basta ya de hacer el papel de tontos.  Nosotros, los taxpayers y los que hemos trabajado exigimos que los politicos nos pregunten antes de gastar nuestro dinero.  Son 13 billones de dolares invertidos anualmente en personas que con placer violan nuestras leyes y que no agradecen nada que hagamos por ellos. Toda persona que reciba ayuda social en dinero, alimento u otro y envie remesas al extranjero, debera suspendersele para siempre la ayuda.  Exigimos que se atienda primero a nuestros veteranos, a nuestros soldados, a los ancianos que han trabajado y a las familias de ciudadanos legales que han cumplido sus obligaciones ciudadanas trabajando y sosteniendo a sus hijos.  Cuando volvamos a tener un super-habit, entonces tal vez podriamos ayudar a los hijos del vecino. Ahora es tiempo de ayudar en nuestra casa…


 

Evelyn Sanguinetti

Lieutenant Governor of Illinois

Evelyn is the living embodiment of the American dream. A first-generation citizen, Evelyn’s been beating the odds her entire life. Evelyn’s father legally immigrated to the United States from Ecuador, and her mother entered the country as a Cuban refugee. Her parents were still teenagers when she was born in Miami, Florida, and Evelyn grew up with Spanish as her first language. Her parents often struggled to make ends meet, and her family moved frequently, whenever they could no longer afford rent. Evelyn found her way through her love of playing the piano and was able to attend a top public school for fine arts in Miami. Through this opportunity, she developed a love of learning and decided to attend college and pursue a better life. Evelyn received her bachelor’s degree in piano performance from Florida International University. She soon moved to Chicago to attend The John Marshall Law School, fell in love with Illinois and plans to never leave. Following law school, Evelyn worked as an Assistant Attorney General in the Illinois Attorney General’s Office under Jim Ryan before transitioning to private practice. She is also an Adjunct Professor of Law at The John Marshall Law School. In another turning point in her life, Evelyn suffered a slip and fall accident a few years ago and when being checked by doctors discovered that she has multiple sclerosis. Evelyn hasn’t let it slow her down. After being given the green light from her doctor, she ran for City Council of Wheaton, and won in 2011. Evelyn currently lives in Wheaton with her husband, Raymond, and their three children. She has been involved in Franklin Middle School, Lowell Elementary School and Jefferson Preschool PTA’s. Evelyn is also a member of the Wheaton Chamber of Commerce and the Du Page County Bar Association. Evelyn and her family are active in Cub Scouts, the Community School of the Arts, Wheaton Briarcliffe Youth Baseball, and sports within the Wheaton Park District. Born into a family of immigrants with little means, Evelyn has combined talent, hard work and self-determination to achieve great things for herself and give back to the local community. She is committed to making sure all the people of Illinois have a similar opportunity to succeed.

 

Bruce Rauner picks Evelyn Sanguinetti to be Lieutenant Governor

“Evelyn is the perfect partner to shake up Springfield,” Bruce Rauner said. “She’s achieved the American Dream and will fight so more in Illinois can reach it too. She grew up in poverty, relying on public assistance, and worked hard to become an Illinois Assistant Attorney General, a City Councilmember, and a teacher at the very law school that gave her the opportunity to work for this state.”

“She has the talent and guts to take on the lobbyists, special interests, and career politicians that are destroying this state and eliminating opportunities for the next generation,” Rauner said.

“I’m proof that with hard work, a good education and an opportunity anyone from anywhere can make it,” Evelyn Sanguinetti said. “Unfortunately, too many in Illinois who have backgrounds that look a whole lot like mine aren’t being given access to a quality education or that opportunity to succeed. I understand firsthand how the policies pushed by the career politicians are failing us and that’s why I’m excited to bring back and transform Illinois.”

Vamos a sacudir, y  traer de vuelta a Illinois,” Sanguinetti concluded.

 

Your 2nd Amendment Rights, Fact Sheet and Video

KrisAnne Hall (thepastorjchall@gmail.com)

To: Lazaro R Gonzalez

LIBERTAD FIRST BY KRINANNE HALL.Hi Lazaro,

Okay, I really hope you liked the videos and fact sheets on the 1st and 4th amendments. If you didn’t get a chance to watch them here are the two links for your convenience:

Feel free to bookmark these pages if you want to go back and review later and print out the PDF. Make as many copies as you want. Carry them with you too. 

The 3rd video in our series and it’s all about the 2nd amendment. You can watch the video and download the PDF fact sheet from this page. 

http://krisannehall.com/2nd-amendment-rights/

 

KrisAnne Hall

8229 25th Drive
Wellborn FL 32094
USA

MAPA DEL RESULTADO DE LAS ELECCIONES EN ESTADOS UNIDOS NOVIEMBRE 4, 2014 La Nación. Jesús Angulo To: jangulo22@aol.com

VER ADJUNTO Y

 GUARDELO PARA EL FUTURO
Saludos,
Jesús Angulo
Periodista , Presentador del programa ENTÉRESE,
WLRN TV 17, domingo 6:00 PM y
Productor y Director de TV PARA CUBA http://www.youtube.com/user/TVparaCUBA/videos

 

 

CUANDO UNA MOSCA CAE EN LA TAZA DE CAFÉ

 

1.- El italiano – tira la taza al suelo, grita a todos y se va lleno de rabia a tomarse un café en otra parte

2.- El francés – saca la mosca con dos dedos y se toma el café.

3.- El chino – se come la mosca y tira el café.

4.- El ruso – se toma el café con mosca y todo, siempre que no cobren por la mosca.

5.- El israelí – le vende el café al francés, la mosca al chino, se compra una nueva taza de café y con el saldo que le queda inventa y desarrolla un aparato para evitar que las moscas caigan en los cafés.

6.- El palestino – mira su taza, le echa la culpa al judío por la mosca en su café, protesta ante las Naciones Unidas por el acto de agresión israelí, toma un

préstamo de la Unión Europea para comprarse otro café, usa ese dinero para comprar explosivos y revienta la cafetería. Mientras el italiano, el francés, el

chino y el ruso tratan de convencer al israelí, de que él tiene la obligación moral de darle su nueva taza de café al palestino.

Pero para completar el cuento.  Hay moscas que le caen en el café a algunos políticos arrogantes que conocemos. Creo que esas moscas son necesarias, las debemos tratar de que ese político haga como el ruso del cuento, que se tenga que tragar la mosca y  el café, que es como si la mosca y el café lo botaran a él.

¿Que haría usted personalmente con esta mosca en este café?… 

 

 

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

En mi opinión”

No 792  Noviembre 11, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

No 791 “En mi opinion” Noviembre 10 2014

noviembre 10, 2014

No 791 “En mi opinion” Noviembre 10 2014.

No 785 “En mi opinion” Noviembre 4, 2014

noviembre 4, 2014

No 785 “En mi opinión”  Noviembre 4, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño   EDITOR

lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com.   http://twitter.com/@lazarorgonzale2

“Cuando los gobernantes hacen todo lo posible para beneficiarse y beneficiar  a sus compinches y actúa maléficos e indolentemente haciendo que se destruya la nación tú tienes la obligación de defender a tu patria como sea necesario. El primer paso es ir a botar en contra de esa porquería de gobierno. Y si eso no resulta el Segundo paso es la insurrección. Hoy puedes dar el primer paso… Estos sinvergüenza han convertido las elecciones en  “El Día del descaro” Hagamos con nuestros botos que sea el día del honor y de un Mejor Comienzo… Lázaro R González Miño

 

Ciudadanos del Condado Miami Dade, estimados amigos: Acabo de venir del colegio electoral donde deposite mi sufragio. Les pido a todos ustedes que hagan lo mismo. Botar no es una opción, Botar es un deber ciudadano, quizás el más grande deber con la patria después del de defenderla con las armas contra los enemigos externos e internos si es necesario.  Hoy es el último día para botar en estas elecciones de medio término. Hasta hoy han botado solamente unos 20,000 electores. El condado tiene más de 2 millones de personas.  Es algo deprimente que tan pocas personas hayan usado su derecho a elegir a quien les va administrar la vida.

Todos nos quejamos de que los políticos que tenemos sean UNA MIERDA pero la culpa es nuestra porque solo un grupo bota y estos son los que eligen a los comemierdas y a los ladrones para que dirijan el destino de nosotros. Queda el día de hoy para cerrar las elecciones. En mi opinión tenemos un gobierno que es una basura. Tenemos la oportunidad de poner personas mejores en el congreso y sacar a toda la metralla que tantos problemas han causado apoyando al presidente africano. Salga de su anquilosamiento moral, enajenante y político y bote, BOTE quítese la morriña y el desencanto BOTE. Lázaro R González Miño. Nota: aquí debajo tienen la forma que yo voy a botar (Muy conservadora)  Usted hágalo, como le de la gana, pero HAGALO!!!

Elecciónes de Noviembre Mañana Martes 4 de Noviembre 2014

Yo botare así:

Este mensaje estará aquí hasta el día Martes 4 día de las elecciones.

  1. Para gobernador y vicegobernador: Rick Scott y Carlos López Cantera.  
  2. Para fiscal general: Pam Bondi
  3. Para Funcionario Principal de Finanzas:  Jeff Atwater
  4. Para Comisionado de Agricultura:  Adam Putnam
  5. Representante ante el Congreso, Distrito 23:  Joseph “Joe” Kaufman
  6. Representante ante el Congreso, Distrito 24:  Carlos Curbelo.  
  7. Representante Estatal, Distrito 100:  Martin a. “Marty” Feigenbaum
  8. Representante Estatal, Distrito 103:  Manny Díaz, Jr.  
  9. Representante Estatal, Distrito 105:  Carlos Trujillo
  10. Representante Estatal, Distrito 110:  Jose Oliva
  11. Representante Estatal, Distrito 111:  Votar por uno 
  12. Representante Estatal, Distrito 112:  Daniel Díaz Leyva
  13. Representante Estatal, Distrito 114:  Erik Fresen
  14. Representante Estatal, Distrito 115:  Michael Bileca
  15. Representante Estatal, Distrito 116:  Jose Felíx Díaz/Carmen Sotomayor
  16. Representante Estatal, Distrito 118:  Frank Artiles
  17. Representante Estatal, Distrito 119:  Jeanette M. Nuñez

18: Tasador de Inmuebles:  Pedro J. García

  1. Enmienda #1-Water and Land Convervation-Conservación de Aguas y Tierras:  No.  
  2. Enmienda #2-Marihuana:  No.  
  3. Enmienda #3-Nombramiento Eventual para Ciertos Cargos Judiciales Vacantes:  No.  
  4. Preguntas del Condado-Enmienda para permitir bibliotecas en parques:  No.
  5. Preguntas del Condado-  Eximir al Parque Regional de Fútbol de Miami-Dade del Articulo 7:  No.  
  6. Preguntas del Condado-  Permitir terrenos para acampar y alojamientos/cabañas en el Parque de Matecumbe:  No.
  7. Enmienda para eximir del Articulo 7  la ampliación de la Universidad Internacional de la Florida en los predios de la Fería de la Juventud:  No.
  8. Imponer otro impuesto a la propiedad para cubrir el gasto de construir una Corte que reemplaze el edificio del Cielito Lindo:  No.  
  9. Juez del Condado, Grupo 19:  Frank Bocanegra
  10.  ¿Se deberian retener en sus cargos los tres jueces del Tribunal de Apelaciones:  Thomas Logue, Barbara Lagoa, y Vance E. Salter?  Si.

La decisión es suya.  Compartan cualquier información que piensen que es importante con sus familiares y amigos.  Pidanles que voten por cualquiera de los candidatos que ellos merecen que se merecen su voto, pero que voten.

 

 

AMENPER: Hoy se Rompe el Corojo.

 

El corojo es un árbol africano trasplantado a América de la familia de las palmas, cuyos frutos son del tamaño de un huevo de paloma, y de ellos se saca, cociéndolos, una sustancia grasa empleada como manteca que usan los santeros de las religiones afrocubana en sus rituales.  El arte de partir el corojo es algo importante en los rituales de la religión Lucumí y Yoruba.

 El término corojo ha dado lugar a varias frases coloquiales de uso común entre nosotros, los cubanos

Entrar en negociaciones con otra persona o ponerse de acuerdo con alguien se dice partir el corojo

Por lo que por  último, romperse el corojo es dar inicio a una actividad, labor, o empresa

Y hoy vamos a dar inicio a algo muy importante en la historia de esta nación, hoy o rompemos el corojo o la nación se va para el carajo.

Hoy  se determina si vamos a vivir en una democracia representativa o en una democracia de mentiras, en una tiranía.

La palabra democracia está muy abusada, sobre todos por los comunistas que llamaban a sus satélites repúblicas democráticas (y que no eran ni repúblicas ni democracias)

La opinión generalizada es que la democracia es la mejor forma de gobierno pero todo depende, hay muchos factores que corrompen la democracia.

Platón, quien fundó su academia en Atenas alrededor de 400 A.C., donde la democracia se originó, escribe, “La dictadura naturalmente surge de la democracia”.

Y por lo menos algunos de los que escribieron la constitución estadounidense en el siglo XVIII eran bien conscientes de los peligros de la democracia y que ninguna democracia se había mantenido durante cualquier período de tiempo. John Adams escribe, “recuerda, la democracia nunca dura mucho tiempo. Pronto las basuras, surgen y la democracia se asesina a sí misma.”

Pero los escritores de la Constitución americana persistieron, y pudieron construir una nación que evita las fallas que habían destruido las democracias anteriores- 

Entonces crearon la mejor democracia representativa que ha existido en el mundo. 

Pero como dijo proféticamente John Adams, la  basura surge en la democracia, y la basura la tenemos ahora.

La basura ha sido por algunos años la agenda de los demócratas de contaminar la democracia representativa, tratando de emboscar a las cámaras legislativa ya sea por la toma de los asientos, el filibusterismo brutal o el usar al poder judicial como legislativo.

Si no se les para en seco mañana, en el futuro cercano veremos un tribunal supremo que con un Senado Demócrata que apruebe todas la nominaciones de Obama, que se llenaría de liberales con Eric Holder a la cabeza, tomando el poder de las cámaras legislativas que serían también cómplices, y creando leyes que le darían al ejecutivo el poder de un tirano.

La forma de gobierno que nos legaron los fundadores de esta nación es un estado en el cual el poder supremo es investido en la gente y ejercido por ellos directa o indirectamente a través de un sistema de representación generalmente involucran elecciones periódicas libres.

Pero hay que aprovechar  este regalo que nos dejaron los padres de la patria, utilizando el poder del voto. 

Si te ofrecen un regalo y no lo tomas, no tienes ningún regalo.

 El concepto de la democracia representativa  ha llegado a entender y aplicar los conceptos del sufragio universal, la capacidad para ejercer la oficina, la libertad de expresión y de la prensa y el estado de derecho

“Democracia Representativa” ha llegado a significar una forma de gobierno en el cual el gobierno deriva su energía de la gente y es responsable ante ellos para el uso de ese poder.

En lo que Obama y sus acólitos nos quieren convertir es en una tiranía, una tiranía disfrazada en una forma sofisticada de oligarquía, que no es bajo ningún concepto la democracia representativa tradicional que ha hecho grande a esta nación.

Hoy, ahora mismo, levántate y anda a tu colegio electoral y bota. Bota porque  tenemos que partir el corojo y sacarle la manteca de la libertad.

 

{EMO} Y si no lo haces prepárate porque la inundación de mierda que  será de la magnitud del diluvio universal… LRGM.

 

Amenper: ¿Elecciones para qué?

Uno nunca se debiera asombrar de la manera de razonar de estos liberales socialistas.

No debiéramos de asombrarnos nosotros los cubanos que sufrimos el razonamiento de Fidel Castro en Cuba.

Pero es curioso el ver el absurdo razonamiento en estos momentos en que se esboza la derrota de los liberales en las elecciones de medio término.. 

David Schanzer y Jay Sullivan, escribiendo en el New York Times, dicen en un editorial que ellos creen que las elecciones legislativas han sobrevivido a su utilidad y deben abandonarse.

O sea si ellos van a perder las elecciones, el razonamiento es que se deben de suprimir las elecciones. Fidel Castro no hubiera podido tener una mejor idea.

Esto es lo que nos dicen:

“Hubo un tiempo cuando tenía sentido elecciones de medio término, en la Fundación de nuestra nación, que la Constitución representa una nueva forma de gobierno de la república, y que era importante para al menos para que un cuerpo del Congreso rindan cuentas al pueblo. Pero especialmente en un momento cuando la confianza de los estadounidenses en la capacidad de su gobierno para abordar las preocupaciones urgentes está en un mínimo histórico, términos de casa dos años ya no tiene sentido. Deberíamos deshacernos de elecciones legislativas federales enteramente.

 En la edad moderna, no necesitamos una elección cada dos años para comunicar deseos de los votantes a sus funcionarios electos. Pero el ciclo de dos años no sólo innecesario; es perjudicial para la política estadounidense.”

Pero el verdadero problema, según este dúo, es que hay mucha gente blanca votando en las elecciones y que los negros no votan en las primarias.

Otra peculiaridad que mencionan es que, durante las elecciones de mitad de período, el electorado ha sido de más blancos, más ricos, más viejos y más educados que durante las elecciones presidenciales.  

¿Pero de quién es la culpa que los negros, las minorías,los jóvenes (según ellos), los pobres y los brutos no votan en elecciones legislativas?

Y ¿por qué deberíamos cambiar la Constitución porque esos ciudadanos se niegan a ejercer el derecho que ha sido comprado con sangre y protegido durante 238 años?

Bueno, ya que estamos jugando con la Constitución, ¿por qué no empezar por quitar otras partes del inconveniente que hacen difícil para los pobres y las minorías integrarse a la sociedad?  ¿Tal vez la Constitución hay que cambiarla porque no está configurada para protegerse contra las tetas que le dan a mamar a las pobres minorías para mantenerlas en la pobreza, de una manera incompetente, como hace el hombre en la casa blanca, cuya agenda está dirigida a perpetuar la dependencia, a perpetuar la pobreza?

Estos tipos no piensan mucho en  democracia representativa, o sea no quieren que podamos elegir a las personas que nos representan, y cambiarlos cuando no nos representan, lo antes posible.

Ellos preferirían que Washington se convierta en algo en aún más poderoso y los hombres y mujeres elegidas estén aún más seguras por tiempo indefinido, quizás por 55 años o algo así.

Estos  idiotas no se dan cuenta de su esquema absurdo. O sea que para avanzar la democracia según ellos, hay que suspender las elecciones. 

¿Elecciones para qué? ¿No les parece que han oído esto antes?

Nos los dijo alguien que no ha permitido a su pueblo unas elecciones libres en más de 55 años y sumando.

Nos los dijo Fidel en su discurso a los seis meses de tomar del poder y de haber prometido celebrar elecciones

“Nuestros enemigos, nuestros detractores, preguntan por las elecciones, ¿Elecciones para qué?”  .

Esperamos que David Schanzer and Jay Sullivan no tengan el mismo éxito que Fidel, todavía podemos votar, y por cosas como esta tenemos que estar conscientes de cuál es la importancia de estas elecciones de medio término.

 

 

Amenper: Escogiendo a nuestros empleados…

Hoy hay que elegir a no a los que nos van a gobernar, no vamos a elegir a nuestros jefes o dueños, vamos a elegir a los que nos van a representar, a los que serán nuestros servidores.

Esta diferencia es la que muchos no reconocen tanto  los oficiales electos como algunos de los ciudadanos.

No sé si ustedes han tenido la necesidad de escoger a alguien para un trabajo, de seleccionar quien será su empleado

Empecé mi negocio como un hombre orquesta, lo hacía todo. Según me faltaba el tiempo y la fuerza fui empleando a personas para que hicieran lo que yo no podía hacer físicamente.  De eso se trata la necesidad de escoger un empleado y de tener que escoger a alguien que nos represente en la administración del país.

Lo que busco en un servidor público que me represente, es lo mismo que busco en un empleado.

Primero busco sus referencias, quienes son sus conocidos sus amigos, en qué ambiente se desenvuelven. Si anda con ladrones, drogadictos, personas que consideran que mi propiedad no me pertenece y que es legítimo tomarla de mí, pueden estar seguros que no le voy a dar el puesto.

Segundo es su credibilidad.  La credibilidad  se compone de su reputación y su carácter. Su credibilidad es la calidad individual más importante de ti en términos de obtener el trabajo o mi voto.  Esto lo aprendo de las recomendaciones de sus contactos, las investigaciones de su vida y la entrevista personal. Tengo que ver que esa persona  es consistente con los más altos estándares éticos. Tengo que observar que esa persona no me dice o hace algo que pudiera considerar como algo distinto a un comportamiento y conducta excelente.  Que no es un mentiroso o un ladrón.

Tercero, que es bueno en lo que hace y que tiene conocimientos y capacidad para el cargo.

Esto es muy importante, y muchos consideran esto como el único factor para darle el trabajo a alguien o votar por un candidato.  Pero observen que lo he dejado para tercero, porque no importa la capacitación si el tipo es un ladrón y un atorrante.

Cuarto es la competencia.  En definitiva es lo bueno que es y lo bien que ha estado en sus empleos anteriores eso determinarán, más que nada, lo bueno puede ser en el trabajo bajo consideración. Junto a su carácter, su nivel de competencia será el factor más importante en la determinación de su éxito en el trabajo para que lo escogiéramos.

Quinto es la inteligencia, también es considerado más alto para algunos, pero la inteligencia está sobre estimada, una persona aunque sea inteligente puede ser un fracaso si no tiene la honradez, la reputación o la competencia para el trabajo.

Pero, claro la inteligencia es buena en un empleado. En cada estudio, se ha encontrado que completamente el 76 por ciento de la productividad y la contribución de un empleado serán determinados por su nivel de inteligencia. Inteligencia en este sentido significa la capacidad para planificar, organizar, establecer prioridades, para resolver problemas y para hacer el trabajo. Inteligencia se refiere a su nivel del sentido común y su capacidad para enfrentar los retos cotidianos del trabajo práctico. La clave para encontrar la  inteligencia de un candidato es la capacidad para responder las preguntas de una manera inteligente. No me gusta escoger a un bruto para que me represente en el trabajo.

La sexta es el liderazgo, observen de nuevo, no estamos buscando un “máximo líder” que nos maneje a nosotros, estamos buscando a un empleado, a un servidor público que haga en el puesto lo que nosotros no podemos hacer físicamente.  El liderazgo es bueno, pero no lo más importante pero el liderazgo no significa ser mandón. El liderazgo es la voluntad y el deseo de aceptar responsabilidad por resultados. Es la capacidad de hacerse cargo, para ser voluntario en las tareas y aceptar responsabilidad para alcanzar los resultados requeridos de esas asignaciones. La marca del líder es que él o ella no integrable. Usted demostrar su voluntad de ser una empresa líder en la organización ofreciendo hacerse cargo de la empresa objetivos y luego comprometerse a realizar en niveles altos.

La séptima y última es la integridad.  Es probablemente la calidad individual más importante para el éxito de largo plazo en la vida y en el trabajo. Integridad comienza por ser fiel a uno mismo. Esto significa que eres honesto contigo mismo y en sus relaciones con los demás. Usted está dispuesto a reconocer sus fortalezas y debilidades. Estás dispuesto a admitir que se han cometido errores en el pasado. Sobre todo, demostrar lealtad.  Que no dice cosas negativas o críticas de un empleador anterior o de otro posible candidato, que se valore a si mismo por sus méritos no por lo negativo o crítico de los demás.

Recuerde, la gente que usted escoja es su responsabilidad, tenemos que investigar y ser selectivo cuando empleamos a alguien ya sea para un trabajo en una empresa y todavía más importante si lo elegimos para que nos represente en el gobierno de la nación.  Tenemos que estar consciente de elegir a personas que no nos hagan sentirnos idiotas por haberlos escogidos para el puesto.

Cada empleador ha tenido cierta experiencia con empleados buenos y malos, todos nos hemos equivocados al escoger.  Pero también por esta razón debemos de aprender de la experiencia de nuestros errores. Tenemos que mirar a los puntos que determinamos arriba, y pensar el por qué estamos votando, el por qué estamos escogiendo a estos candidatos.

Antes de marcar en la boleta, piensen si esa persona hará lo mismo que usted harían en su puesto.

 

 

Undercover Video Exposes Possible North Carolina Voter Fraud

“…seems to have failed on a massive scale.”

NORVELL ROSE  NOVEMBER 3, 2014

Here’s another black eye for the integrity of the voting process in a key swing state in the midterms on Tuesday — North Carolina.

Conservative activist James O’Keefe, whose undercover work last week showed Democrat campaign workers readily condoning voter fraud, as Western Journalism reported, has released another incriminating video that suggests the potential for voter fraud in the Tarheel State is widespread.

According to the Daily Mail, O’Keefe’s Project Veritas now has visual evidence that North Carolina election officials repeatedly offered ballots to an impostor who arrived at polling places with the names and addresses of “inactive” voters who hadn’t participated in elections for many years.

Now O’Keefe has strolled into more than 20 voting precincts in Raleigh, Durham and Greensboro, N.C., proffering the names of people who seldom vote in order to test the integrity of the election process. It seems to have failed on a massive scale.

“I just sign this and then I can vote?” he asked one poll worker. “Yep,” came the reply.

In a series of undercover videos over the years, O’Keefe has repeatedly exposed misbehavior, fraud, and even potential criminal activity involving ACORN, lax border security, and even the illicit trade in taxpayer-provided “Obama” phones.

But he told the Daily Mail that this latest undercover work at various North Carolina polling places was unique.

“Of all of the undercover investigations I’ve conducted, this was by far the easiest,” he said Monday.

“They were willing to pass out fraudulently obtained ballots like it was Halloween candy.”

Questions about the integrity of the ballot process in North Carolina are especially critical because of the hotly contested Senate race between incumbent Democrat Kay Hagan and GOP challenger Thom Tillis.

You can watch O’Keefe’s latest work suggesting that the ballot process may be compromised by clicking on the video above.

Image Credit: dailymail.co.uk
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/new-undercover-video-just-exposed-point-voter-fraud-key-swing-state/#LPXsC2HEMsGi4QYj.99

 

 

We Must Defeat The Destructive Left This Election! We Are Americans!

http://conservative50plus.com/blog/we-must-defeat-the-destructive-left-this-election-we-are-americans/?utm_source=Conservative+50+Plus&utm_campaign=577d2eb4d2-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_be457ca6cc-577d2eb4d2-3328961

 

Luis Carril: www.nuevoaccion.com
LISTA DE CONTRIBUYENTES COMPROMETIDOS CON LA TIRANÍA FIDELISTA DE CUBA A LA CAMPAÑA DE JOE GARCÍA
Posted on October 17, 2014 by “Nuevo Accion
Tomada del Blog de Emilio Ichikawa.

En la página oficial de la Federal Election Commission se pueden seguir las contribuciones que ha recibido el Rep. Joe García en el ciclo 2013-2014 para lograr su reelección en el Distrito 26 de Florida ( Miami-Dade County & Monroe County ) el próximo 4 de noviembre del 2014.
La WEB aporta datos sobre donaciones realizadas tanto a título individual como por Comités de Partidos. También se pueden observar los préstamos solicitados y reembolsados por el político; 
entre otras informaciones.
 
Voy a limitarme a compartir unos pocos pero reveladores datos que se pueden encontrar en las 113 páginas del título “Itemized Individual Contributions”.
Entre los años 2013 y 2014 las companías de viajes a Cuba han realizado ( al menos ) las siguientes contribuciones al Congresista Joe García:

  • (1)  COMPAÑIAS DE VIAJES A CUBA 1-CUBAMAX,en Hialeah: A través de su Director Giraldo Acosta:$1,000 (9/25/2013)
  • (2)  XAEL CHARTERS INC.,en Miami: A través de su CEO Xiomara Almaguer-Levy: $1,000(3/20/2014) NOTA: También aparecen dos contribuciones a nombre de una Xiomara Levy, que como Self-Employed dio a la campaña del Rep. Joe García: $2,500el 3/31/2013 y otros $1,000el 9/26/2013.
  • (3)  ABC CHARTERSen Miami: Hizo cuatro contribuciones a nombre del CEO/General Manager María Aral:$500 (3/27/2013), $500(6/30/2014), $900(9/25/2013) y $2,100 (9/25/2013)
  • (4)  J. PEREZ ASSOCIATION, en Newport Coast, California.A nombre de Michael Zuccato, aparecendos contribuciones de $2,500el mismo día 9/3/2013. Y otra de Lisa Zuccato, por J. PEREZ ASSOCIATION en Newport Beach, California, por $2,000el 5/18/2014. NOTA: Joe Pérez es el Presidente de la compañía de vuelos CUBA TRAVEL SERVICES (CTS); su hija Lisa Zuccato es casada con el empresario Michael Zuccato, el principal ejecutivo de CTS.
  • (5)  CUBA PUENTES, Inc. Miami.No se trata de una charteadora pero sí de una suerte de “facilitadora” de viajes. Su WEB oficial define: “CubaPuentes, Inc. was created to act as a facilitator for purposeful travel to Cuba. We specialize in providing expansive and unique cultural and travel experiences for individuals or groups searching for enriching opportunities to visit Cuba under the present S. TRAVEL TO CUBA POLICY.”  Su Presidenta, Silvia Wilhelm, hizo tres contribuciones a la campaña del Rep. Joe García: $500(9/25/2013), $250(11/30/2013) y $500(2/24/2014)
  • (6) Además de estos aparecen otros datos de interés; como donaciones a la campaña de reelección del Rep. Joe García de firmantes de la referida“Carta Abierta al Presidente Obama” como el empresario Andrés Fanjul, el Embajador Paul Cejas y el empresario Carlos Saladrigas:
  • (7) Son también contribuyentes a la campaña del Congresista Joe García el empresario Jorge Mas Santos y otros directivos de MAS TEC; 
  • (8) El empresario Serafín Blanco de las tiendas“¡Ño, qué barato!”; 
  • (9) El empresario Carlos de la Cruz( EAGLE BRANDS );
  • (10) El empresario Nicolás Estrella(ESTRELLA INSURANCE)… 
  • (11)Y otras personalidades de la comunidad.

Posted in Articulos
Tagged Agencias de viaje a cuba comunista contribuyen a campaña de Joe garcíaCarloos Saladrigasdonaciones a Joe García de amigos del castrismo,Ely Levy y Xiomara almaguerempresarios que buscan negocios con tiranía cubana dan dinero a Joe GarcíaLos FanjulPaul Cejas
MÁS DE LA INFILTRACIÓN DE CASTRISTAS EN EL EXILIO
http://www.nuevoaccion.com/

 

Benjamin Fulford: Desperate cabal loots Japanese pension funds to buy time

Mon, November 3, 2014 http://benjaminfulford.net/ Posted by benjamin

Strange financial market and geopolitical maneuvers last week make it clear the end days of the cabal are fast approaching. The clearest sign was the wholesale looting of Japan’s national pension fund by the Japanese slave government on behalf of the cabal. This bought the cabal some time by propping up the US government bond and stock markets but it failed to change the fundamental picture.

Here is what happened last week in the markets: First, the Federal Reserve Board, under new management, announced last week it would no longer buy US Treasury Bonds. Then Singapore, the largest financial market in Asia, follows London, Frankfurt, Seoul, Paris, Luxembourg, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao in allowing free trade in Chinese Yuan. Next Japan’s government announces an 80 trillion yen money printing splurge as well as the looting of the 127 trillion yen government pension investment fund. The Japanese money is being poured into US government bonds and cabal owned stocks causing the ongoing crack high in the markets.

It has also started a currency war because the Chinese have responded to the yen printing splurge with a yuan printing splurge.

Make no mistake though of which side will win the financial and economic war, the numbers do not lie. China produces 11 times more steel than the US, has the world’s greatest foreign currency reserves, has the most gold, accounts for a bigger share of global trade and has a massive cumulative trade surplus with the US. The most telling sign is that the biggest Chinese export to the US is computer equipment while the biggest US export to China is “scrap and trash.” Finally, the BRICS alliance that China is a part of controls 188 nations, the far greatest proportion of the world economy and more than 80% of its people. Looting Japan only buys time, it will never buy victory.

The Japanese slave government is also cracking down on dissidents. Last week Chodoin Daikaku, head of the world’s martial arts societies, was arrested on trumped up charges in an attempt to pre-empt the overthrow of the Abe slave government. This comes on top of the ongoing imprisonment of

of illuminati grandmaster Alexander Romanov (real name Sasa Zaric) at the Inagidai mental hospital. This writer may also soon be arrested on trumped up charges by the Abe slave government.

The Abe regime is controlled by a group known as the Seiwa Kai which is ostensibly headed by former prime minister Yasuhiro Nakasone but in reality reports to George Bush Senior and the Nazionists.

The Japanese also announced last week via their proxy North Korea that they have nuclear missile carrying submarines. The message is that the soon to emerge unified Korean and Japanese nation of Kopan will be nuclear powered.

http://rt.com/news/201603-north-korea-missile-submarine/

This is all part of a big showdown taking place worldwide against the Nazionists and their allies. The Nazionists are now mounting what could well be their last offensive before final defeat. The most obvious symptom of that is Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu using the phrase “grassy knoll” in a speech, referring to the location of the Kennedy assassination. This has been widely interpreted as an assassination threat against US President Barack Obama.

The threat follows Obama officials’ refusal to meet with the Israeli Defense Minister as well as references by US officials to Netanyahu as “chickenshit.” There was also a cartoon in the Israeli daily Haaretz portraying Netanyahu as a pilot flying a plane into the world trade center building. The implicit message is that a lot of people are going to be hung from lamp-posts soon unless the Nazionists back down.

Israeli and US troops have been fighting each other using proxies in Syria since ISIS is run by Mossad and the US airforce is bombing them and losing planes in the process.

There will also be evidence presented next week at a criminal trial in London that the 311 tsunami and nuclear disaster in Japan was a deliberate act of mass murder and that Netanyahu was one of the instigators.

The US mid-term elections now taking place are also using paper ballots instead of rigged electronic voting in a move that will help purge Washington D.C. of Nazionist controlled politicians.

The situation is also changing in Europe to the detriment of the Nazionists. The French are going ahead with their plan to start buying oil in Rubles and not US dollars despite the recent murder of the head of the French oil company Total. This has resulted in unmarked drones being seen flying around French nuclear power plants. The message is “we will sabotage your nuclear facilities if you abandon the petrodollar.” The French are now sending mixed messages about whether or not they will hand over to Russia the two helicopter carrying battleships they built for them.

The British are also moving away from the Nazionists with their ongoing purge of pedophiles and their overall move to distance themselves from the EU. They have also been pioneers in acknowledging the Chinese yuan was taking over from the petrodollar as the world’s reserve currency.

In the Ukraine, the parallel elections in the East and West of the country have now pretty much formalized the permanent split of that country. The Russians are now expected to mount, via proxies, an offensive to clear out the last of the foreign mercenaries still trying to provoke war in the Ukraine. The Eastern part of Ukraine is already de facto once again part of Russia. The Russians are also sending their nuclear bombers in all directions to underline the fact they mean business and are ready for nuclear war if they are pushed too far by the cabal controlled countries.

There is also a sign the Canadians are finally waking up to the Nazionist nature of the Stephen Harper government. Harper’s Nazionists were originally planning to use the recent staged “terrorist” shooting incidents to pass a law that would allow the arrest of people who had never committed a crime. That would have taken Canadian human rights back more than 1000 years to pre-Magna Carta levels.

Here is proof sent by a reader the recent shooting incident at the Canadian Parliament was staged. It is a photograph showing huge numbers of police cars at the Parliament 15 minutes before the “shooting incident.”

http://2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com/2014/10/25/anonymous-photos-taken-15-minutes-prior-to-ottawa-shooting/

Now that a reaction against the Nazionists has begun, Harper suddenly decided he would not cancel his planned attendance at the APEC summit meeting in China due to the “terrorist attack.” Hopefully he will be removed from power soon after he returns to Canada.

The APEC summit will be followed a few days later by a G20 meeting in Australia that may result in some sort of surprise announcement of a plan to replace the current dysfunctional global architecture. This may be what all the jockeying is about.

There is also stuff going on at a more esoteric level. Vincenzo Mazzara of the Italian P2 Freemason lodge and a source at MI5 both say a new temple to the black sun is being built in Italy. The temple is supposed to replace the Vatican as the center of the Monotheistic world, they say. Marco Di Mauro from the P2 lodge also says the pope has recently sold all of the Vatican’s gold to give money to the poor. They sound as if they expect some earth changing apocalyptic event.

 

http://galacticconnection.com/benjamin-fulford-desperate-cabal-loots-japanese-pension-funds-buy-time/

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

En mi opinión”

No 785 “En mi opinión” Noviembre 4, 2014