Archive for 30 junio 2014

junio 30, 2014

No 670     “EN  MI  OPINIóN”    Junio 28, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST”    Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

 El precio de no involucrarse es perderlo todo cediéndolo a los canallas…  “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño

 

Amenper: FILOSOFÍA GRIEGA

Los filósofos Griegos son ignorados en nuestra vida diaria.  Quizás porque pensamos

 ¿Cómo puede alguien que haya vivido siglos atrás,  en un entorno tan diferente al moderno, puede enseñarnos algo en este siglo?

Pero las ideas no tienen edad ni época.  La claridad de pensamiento y la sabiduría son eternas. 

Si…tenemos mucho que aprender de los errores y las virtudes de la cuna de nuestra civilización Greco-Romana.

Platón nos dijo algo hace más de 2400 años que tiene una vigenciaque mejor analizamos con cuidado.

Es un pensamiento que nos tiene que interesar en los que vivimos en un país en que la democracia y la libertad más extrema ha sido ejemplo para el mundo.

 

“La dictadura surge naturalmente de la democracia, y la forma más agravada de la tiranía y la esclavitud de la libertad más extrema”.

 Plátōn,

 

El precio de no involucrarse.Es demasiada la gente que se queja. La paradoja es que son los mismos que hacen bastante poco por cambiar el curso de los acontecimientos. A ellos les molesta mucho lo que ocurre a diario, pero a la hora de participar, despliegan una interminable lista razones por las cuales no serán de la partida y delegarán en otros esa vital tarea.

Muchos prefieren ser solo espectadores de lo que sucede y de ningún modo tomar la responsabilidad de asumir el protagonismo necesario que les permita modificar la realidad. A Edmund Burke se le atribuye aquella frase que dice que “lo único que necesita el mal para triunfar es que los hombres buenos no hagan nada”. Una descripción casi perfecta de la actualidad.

Una sensación generalizada invade a la sociedad y es que la política no ofrece a los mejores. Se dice que son mediocres, que no tienen ideas y que abundan los deshonestos en esa labor. No menos cierto es que esas características son más que frecuentes también en otras áreas del quehacer cívico. Es que la dirigencia en general no es muy diferente en promedio. Los que lideran las organizaciones de la sociedad civil, los clubes, las comisiones barriales, los consorcios de los edificios, los sindicatos, las entidades empresarias, las colegiaciones profesionales, no escapan a esta regla casi universal y en todo caso no hacen más que confirmarla.

Obviamente que también están las excepciones. Existe gente fuera de serie, especial, con grandes aptitudes. Pero el problema es justamente que no es un hecho habitual y frecuente, sino bastante inusual y por lo tanto escaso.

Es evidente que los mejores no ocupan los lugares claves de conducción y queda claro que no es casualidad. Existe una deliberada decisión individual de no ser parte. Eso es innegable. Los más capaces parecen haber elegido premeditadamente no participar, no integrarse, ni cooperar en lo mínimo.

Muchos afirman que no quieren ensuciarse, que la política implica embarrarse y que entonces la determinación pasa por no entrar a ese mundo infinitamente ingrato. Otros creen que solo han optado por dedicarse por completo a lo profesional, a los negocios, a la actividad propia, suponiendo que así se puede progresar.

Cualquiera sea la razón que lleve a estas personas a no sumarse al necesario proceso de cambio, lo que es indudable, es que el sendero seleccionado no resulta gratuito. Esta decisión tiene un enorme costo directo en la vida de cada ciudadano y en el de la comunidad toda.

Ser gobernado por mediocres, o inclusive por los peores, tiene consecuencias que están a la vista. Solo así se puede explicar que naciones con abundantes riquezas naturales, con tantas posibilidades de desarrollo, hayan sido pésimamente administradas y convivan con la pobreza.

Hay que poner mucho ahínco para lograr tan malos rendimientos, en tan poco tiempo. La ineptitud es la verdadera madre de estos infinitos fracasos y de los innumerables desaciertos que pueden recordarse.

Como los incompetentes no pueden gobernar con habilidad, orientan sus energías a construir ingeniosos mecanismos para saquear a los ciudadanos y quedarse con el fruto de su esfuerzo. Hay que reconocer que han demostrado una notable destreza y que han sido inmensamente eficaces para generar corrupción. Sin ellos, este presente no sería posible.

Los más sobresalientes suelen ser excelentes en lo suyo, pero tal vez no sean tan inteligentes como parecen. Ellos creen estar a salvo de todo haciendo lo suyo, lo que saben, siempre en el ámbito de lo privado. Después de todo, para eso se han preparado a lo largo de sus vidas. No han percibido que no alcanza con ser exitosos. Eso no sirve, al menos no en sociedades como estas, en las que el poder lo pueden ejercer los peores.

Nadie espera que los mejores ingresen masivamente a los partidos políticos. Solo sería deseable si pudieran garantizar que disponen de la fortaleza moral suficiente para no claudicar frente a las múltiples tentaciones que propone el poder. Las agrupaciones políticas pueden ser el instrumento apto para cambiar el estado de cosas y corregir el rumbo.

Pero existe otra alternativa. Los partidos configuran una variante, la más habitual, pero no la única. Tampoco se puede pretender que individuos con un colosal talento, abandonen sus profesiones y oficios. Pero si al menos pudieran integrarse a la sociedad civil en cualquiera de las diversas oportunidades existentes, si le dedicaran solo parte de su tiempo, dinero y sacrificio a ser protagonistas en serio y comprometerse, tal vez se podría escribir el futuro de otro modo y soñar con una sociedad mejor.

Lamentablemente son pocos los que lo han comprendido. No participar es oneroso. Es descomunalmente caro. Algunos ya lo entendieron y están intentando ser parte a su manera. Otros, ni siquiera eso. Siguen sin percibir el elevado costo que pagan por no participar. Se trata del precio de no involucrarse.

Alberto Medina Méndez.
albertomedinamendez@gmail.com

 

AMENPER: Las Dictaduras

Para nosotros los que hemos tenido el dudoso privilegio de haber aprendido sobre la democracia y su desaparición por la experiencia vivida, nos es muy fácil identificar los diferentes tipos de dictadura, y las progresivas acciones que llevan a su implementación.

A la persona común, no importa su grado de educación, pero que no ha pasado por nuestras experiencias le es muy difícil distinguir la diferencia entre una dictadura autoritaria, como la que vivimos durante Batista o una dictadura totalitaria como la dictadura que vivimos durante el Castro-comunismo.

Pero lo que diferencia a estas dictaduras no quiere decir que una dictadura autoritaria debe de ser aceptada.

Desde que se fundó la dictadora en la democracia Romana, con todas sus buenas intenciones, lo que hemos visto es que, si se lo permiten, el dictador autoritario se puede convertir en dictador totalitario

Por lo general la dictadura totalitaria se implementa progresivamente pasando de la democracia al autoritarismo hasta pasar al totalitarismo.

La manera más utilizada por los dictadores autoritarios para establecer su dictadura es terminar con la división de poderes, erosionando a los otros poderes hasta obtener la autoridad completa en su cúpula.

Enrique VIII, en 1539 obtuvo la autorización del Parlamento para hacer las leyes a través de proclamas, Hitler, después de haber sino elegido canciller de Alemania, comenzó a erosionar al parlamento hasta que logró la aprobación de establecer poderes especiales sin autorización del poder legislativo. 

Sabemos cómo estos gobernantes autoritarios terminaron en dictaduras totalitarias.

Cuando eso sucede, durante la transición, somos testigos de cómo el poder ejecutivo, no sólo en el uso del ejecutivo del poder administrativo para crear una nueva ley, sino también de sus intentos para anular los actos legislativos

La prerrogativa ejecutiva gana con demasiada frecuencia. Se queja de que “la” deferencia “a los administradores jueces a las interpretaciones de los estatutos” es un abandono de la oficina judicial. “

Pero, los jueces tienen el derecho y el deber constitucional de diferir de las interpretaciones de las agencias del gobierno, del legislativo y hasta del ejecutivo, cuando se apartan de la constitución.

El poder ejecutivo se ha incrementado, en parte porque las legislaturas han dejado de ejercer su propio poder con decisión. Los estatutos del Congreso han proporcionado agencias federales con un poder casi ilimitado, y la discreción inherente conferida a los administradores ha dejado “Los estadounidenses inseguros en su libertad”.

Para los que vivimos la implantación de las dictaduras, tanto la totalitaria como la autoritaria, vimos como el primer paso fue terminar con la división de poderes, dejando las leyes a ser dictadas por el ejecutivo.

Nunca en la historia habíamos visto el desbocado camino hacia una dictadura autoritaria usando el poder del ejecutivo sobre los otros poderes, como en la presente administración..

Un ejemplo importante es la Internet. La semana pasada, Francia se unió a los regímenes autoritarios en la búsqueda para reemplazar Internet autorregulado con un nuevo sistema de un solo país, el control de un solo voto,  Rusia y China también se están aprovechar ando de la rendición de América,

 -Era de esperar, si el país que se supone que es el líder del mundo libre comienza a establecer la regulación autoritaria del internet, que podíamos esperar.

Pero el establecimiento de la fuerza de las órdenes ejecutivas es más importante que cualquiera consecuencia negativa que esto pudiera traer.

Además la Internet se había convertido en parte esencial de la libertad de expresión, y esto es parte del camino hacia la dictadura.  Una vez obtenido el poder absoluto, el dictador no admite pensamientos divergentes y la libertad de expresión desaparece.

Esto nos es familiar a los que vivimos el proceso.  Pero no es familiar a los que nunca lo han vivido y aceptan los sofismos y los minuendos que utilizan para justificar el proceso evolutivo hacia la dictadura.

 En este proceso evolutivo para combatir la división de poderes. Estos progresistas nos quieren hacer creer que “comisiones” de expertos mejorarían sociedad mucho más rápido y mejor que un gobierno desaceleró por los derechos individuales y la separación de poderes.  Por eso la propaganda de decir que las cámaras legislativas no resuelven nada, no funcionan.  Este es el primer paso que dan los aspirantes a dictadores para implementar el ´poder absoluto.

No sé por qué la situación actual me trae ese sentido de Déjà vu, que es como los progresistas llaman a algo que nos parece que hemos visto ya antes. 

Pero observen a los que me critican porque siempre estoy mencionando el nombre del presidente, que no lo he mencionado ni una sola vez.  Y la foto del dictador no se puede identificar, si ustedes piensan que  esa es su foto es su imaginación, no es mí falta, no quiero que me cancelen la internet.

INFECTADO EXILIO no solo de cubanos sino de todos los latinos.

Por Cástulo Gregorisch

 

3/23/13

 

 

Brilliant: Here’s Why This Group Wants You To Mail Your Underwear To Obama

In a statement posted to its website, ALIPAC President William Gheen…

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 27, 2014

 

The relentless influx of illegals crossing America’s southern border on a daily basis has put anundue burden on those tasked with processing these international lawbreakers. As the Department of Homeland Security recently announced, the occupation has also resulted in a huge drain on other resources – specifically underwear.

According to a recent request, the DHS is asking the government for an enormous supply of cotton briefs up to size XXXXXXL to meet the clothing needs of the illegal border-crossers. One group has responded to that solicitation with an idea of its own.

Amnesty opponents in the Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) put out a call this week for citizens to mail their used underwear to the White House in an effort to assist in the collection effort.

In a statement posted to its website, ALIPAC President William Gheen complained that America’s embrace of amnesty over border security “only brings more unwanted and destructive illegal immigration!”

He then laid out the group’s call to action.

“Instead of using our tax money to buy illegals 42,000 pairs of new underwear, we would like to send the illegals and DC politicians a message by mailing them our used underwear, and some of our pairs are in really bad shape due to the bad economy and all of the jobs illegal immigrants are taking from Americans.”

The statement went on to discourage Americans from sending unwashed donations, asserting “DC is already full of dirty laundry.”

ALIPAC criticized leaders in both parties who refuse to adequately address America’s immigration problem. The Obama administration’s use of taxpayer money to support illegals when they arrive, only to release them into the population a short time later, is a disastrous policy, the group noted.

House Speaker John Boehner, the statement suggested, is hardly an encouraging voice of Republican opposition.

“Americans who want to help the illegals and Americans who are upset that John Boehner and Barack Obama are throwing the future of American children under the bus along with their Oaths of Office, the US Constitution, the outcome of our elections, and the current laws of Congress,” the group wrote, “are encouraged to mail their used underwear to Barack Obama at The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500, and John Boehner at Office of the Speaker, H-232 The Capitol, Washington, DC 20515.”

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/brilliant-heres-group-wants-mail-underwear-obama/#alA4wOz1MdyLwUlg.99

 

Epic Rant: It Took Just 82 Seconds For Megyn Kelly To Utterly Destroy Obama

“Our president assures us not to worry…” Yeah but…

JUSTIN KOSKI — 

“Is Barack Obama’s presidency imploding? Al-Queda is resurging, Iraq is disintegrating, and now we may look to Iran to help us stop it.” Megyn Kelly iterated. “Iran. A terrorist regime responsible for thousands of deaths of Americans. What could possibly go wrong?”

“We have a president who lost the trust of the American people by repeatedly misleading them.”

The Obama administration has come to a point where one of the most respected liberal law professors in the country has called our president “the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid.”

Just imagine if she chose to talk about the Taliban exchange, the IRS coverup, the state of the economy, and the Fast and Furious scandal…
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/boom-megyn-kelly-puts-obama-blast/#tQCOoEMlMhJ66WoC.99

 

 

 

Amenper: ¿El Perfecto Candidato Demócrata a la presidencia?

Como es imposible ocultar el pasado de Hillary Clinton y sus errores durante la administración de su esposo (Recuerden Hillarycare, más radical que Obamacare) y sus errores como secretaria de estado de Obama, ahora el candidato que se está presentando como puntero es Joe Biden.

El vicepresidente Joe Biden, presenta como el atributo más valioso para ocupar la presidencia es describirse como un mendigo ha dicho que “es el hombre más pobre en el Congreso”, esto es los que considera su mejor calificación para  buscar la nominación presidencial del partido en 2016.

Lo sorprendente de su ambición es que no sólo no se avergüenza de su ineptitud financiera, parece casi genuinamente orgulloso de ello.

En el pasado, la falta de un candidato para lograr el éxito financiero habría sido considerada un obstáculo para su consecución de una aspiración a la presidencia. Pero gracias a la atención que se centró en la desigualdad de ingresos en el país por parte de grupos socialmente militantes como Occupy Wall Street y Organizing for America, estar ahora en bancarrota se considera un activo.  Mitt Romney no tuvo un chance a la presidencia por haber sido un empresario triunfador.

Este cambio de actitud tiene a muchos políticos luchando para restar importancia a su riqueza en un intento sincero de identificarse con las clases bajas, como si dijeran: “¿Cuál es la diferencia?” Pero para VP Biden, sin disimulo se rebaja: “Realmente no es un candidato tan pobre como se presenta”, dijo un amigo y colaborador.

Biden informó de patrimonio neto de $ 900.000, esto no es realmente un salario pobre, ya quisiéramos muchos ganar la mitad de esto,  pero se considera  modesto en un Congreso donde los miembros son generalmente millonarios. Es más que el salario que Obama solía ganar cuando él era un organizador de la comunidad, claro sin  contar las contribuciones de ciertos oscuros contribuyentes. Ahora los ingresos anuales Obama se cuentan por millones por los ingresos de sus libros escritos por otros

En una reciente cumbre en la Casa Blanca para las familias trabajadoras, el Sr. Biden dijo a la audiencia embelesada en un alarde de payasearía “Estoy tan quebrado que ni siquiera puedo darme el lujo de prestar atención!”

“Mi esposa Jill siempre se queja porque uso el periódico de la mañana para limpiar de mis zapatos antes de que tenga la oportunidad de leerlo!”

“Yo llevo traje ligeramente caro”, señaló el Sr. Biden. “He tenido que donar cuatro pintas de sangre para obtener el dinero para ello en vez de mi habitual tres.”

“Ahora comiencen a comer, amigos, tengo que recoger las mesas antes de volver a mi oficina. Muchas gracias, voy a estar aquí toda la semana!”

Si sale electo, sin lugar a dudas no vamos a tener un buen presidente, pero vamos a tener un buen payaso.  Quizás sea lo indicado en el circo en que se ha convertido Washington.

Esta imagen “hombre promedio” de Biden se pule aún más en 2009 cuando el senador Biden se convirtió en Vice Presidente bajo Barack Obama, un organizador de la comunidad humilde de medios tan modestos que una vez tuvo que dormir en bancos de la iglesia los domingos, mientras que su pastor despotricó diatribas obscenos.  Pero como estaba dormido, nunca los oyó.

“En el pasado, los estadounidenses buscaron el éxito, la competencia, el talento para guiarlos.” La gente quería un líder que podían admirar.

“Pero Barack Obama cambió todo eso. Ahora los estadounidenses se han acostumbrado a tener un líder que comete errores y culpa a alguien más para ellos. Alguien que se escapa de sus obligaciones en un juego de golf en Hawái y carga sus gastos con el dinero de los contribuyentes para volar a Brasil y darle a su esposa y sus hijas vacaciones continuadas por todo el mundo. 

En otras palabras, los estadounidenses se han acostumbrado a un líder que trata de colocarse para que lo vean como uno de ellos.  No quiero uno como yo de presidente, quiero alguien con más capacidad, pero quieren hacernos ver que mientras menos capacitado mejor es el candidato.

Más que cualquier otra persona parece que, Joe Biden es este hombre:

Hola, señor Biden nuestro futuro Presidente.

 

 

INFECTADO EXILIO  

Vivo un exilio infectado por las hordas del castrismo, de exilados disfrazados, aprovechan beneficios que este país les ha dado, utilizando los fondos que los viejos exilados, por años contribuimos con nuestro esfuerzo y trabajo. Ya vienen bien entrenados, dirigidos y educados, en el arte de obtener beneficios no ganados, pues nunca contribuyeron con un mísero centavo, a la caja de retiros ni a planes hospitalarios. Tan pronto transcurre el tiempo, vuelven a Cuba cargados, con ropas y otros enseres comprados con un dinero por el cual no han trabajado. ¿Son exilados políticos o son buenos descarados? Que no quepa menor duda, son grandes aprovechados. El trato tan especial que a los cubanos se ha dado, justificable al principio, debiera ser eliminado, un exilado político, desde el momento que vuelve a su país de maltratos, sin que su vida peligre, es solo un simple emigrado. Dentro de ese grupo infértil hay espías infiltrados, también hay estafadores que a través de multiclínicas mucho roban al estado, para después refugiarse con sus robados millones en las barbas del tirano. Vivo un  exilio infectado por las hordas del castrismo, de exilados disfrazados. . .  

Estos buenos ya aprovechados de los que trabajan, El gobierno no da nada somos nosotros, con nuestros impuestos los que pagamos. ¡BASTA YA!

Jorge Alberto Villalón Y.

 

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

Anuncios

junio 27, 2014

No 699    “EN  MI  OPINIóN”   Junio 27, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

REVEALED: Top Secret Memo Gives Obama Authority To Kill American Citizens

We are now truly living under a dictatorship.

KRIS ZANE — 

top secret memo written in 2010 gives Obama the authority to kill U.S. citizens without due process. Released on June 23, 2014, mandated by a court order, the forty-one page memo ostensibly provided the legal basis to kill al-Qaeda propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki and his sixteen-year-old son in Yemen in 2011.

The memo, however,  according to insiders, gives Obama the authority to kill any American citizen anywhere in the world, including the United States! 

Obama can legally, without due process, fire a hellfire missile on a Tea Party rally—as long as he calls it a terrorist event. And there is no court in the land, according to Obama’s reasoning, that will challenge him.

When a President acts as judge, jury, and executioner, we call him a dictator. As this video shows, as shocking as it sounds, we are now truly living under a dictatorship. Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/revealed-top-secret-memo-gives-obama-authority-kill-american-citizens/#rWVzqcFoZdCiAMB1.99

 

 

 

OBAMA’S ENFORCER: ERIC HOLDER. By: John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky

In our new book, “Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s Justice Department,” we provide the first investigative look at the Justice Department under the tenure of Attorney General Eric Holder. Holder is at the center of a growing list of scandals and congressional investigations, and is the first attorney general in history to be held in contempt for refusing to turn over information to Congress about Operation Fast & Furious. That is probably the most reckless law enforcement operation ever conducted by the Justice Department and led directly to the death of an American border patrol agent and hundreds of Mexican citizens.

In the middle of the recent revelations about the destruction of two years of emails of Lois Lerner and six other key IRS employees, notice what was not reported – any involvement by the FBI and the Justice Department in trying to obtain those records or trying to reconstruct the supposedly destroyed files. Yet Eric Holder announced that he had supposedly opened a criminal investigation in May of 2013 that was put under the charge of an Obama campaign donor and he is has resisted all calls to appoint a special counsel to investigate IRS wrongdoing. A year after the investigation had been “opened,” neither the FBI nor the Justice Department had yet spoken to the victims of the IRS targeting.

This is just another example of how Holder has completely politicized the enforcement process at the Justice Department. In fact, one DOJ veteran who was hired during the Clinton administration told us that Holder is the worst attorney general since John Mitchell under Richard Nixon, when most Justice Department observers believe the Department reached its nadir.

An unprecedented contempt for the rule of law pervades today’s Justice Department. Attorney General Eric Holder considers himself a member of President Obama’s political team first, and attorney general a distant second. Unlike past attorney generals who have upheld the highest ethical and professional standards, and have understood that their first duty is to the Constitution and the rule of law, Holder has demonstrated that he is driven by progressive ideology and loyalty to Barack Obama, not the interests of fair and impartial justice.

We have covered the Justice Department since the start of the Obama administration. But even we were shocked by the behavior of the Department we uncovered, including numerous accusations of prosecutorial abuse by federal judges. This included Justice Department employees posting anonymous blogs attacking defendants and their lawyers in a DOJ prosecution, as well as the intimidation and bullying of employees perceived as conservatives.

We catalogue everything from how Holder got to the Justice Department to his transformation of DOJ into a stronghold of progressive legal activism. This includes abusing federal environmental laws to pursue frivolous lawsuits like the unjustified prosecution of Gibson Guitar and the settlement of the second Pigford claim against the Department of Agriculture, which an employee of the Department called the biggest scam perpetrated on American taxpayers in our history.

Holder has selectively prosecuted national security leaks, going after low-level employees and reporters while studiously ignoring leaks of classified information coming out of the White House obviously intended to make President Obama look tough on terrorism and help his election prospects. Holder has exhibited a contemptuous attitude towards the oversight responsibilities of Congress, refusing to turn over information and documents and misleading and lying to Congress on numerous occasions.

In the area of civil rights, Holder has attacked the exercise of religious freedom, abused federal law to restrict the free speech of pro-life activists, gone after school districts for having dress codes that don’t allow boys to come to class in drag or for implementing voucher programs to help poor students get out of bad schools, and waged  a war on election integrity. A current employee of the Department told us that Holder has “racialized and radicalized” the Civil Rights Division “to the point of corruption.” As in other areas of Justice, he has “embedded politically leftist extremists in the career ranks who have an agenda that does not comport with equal protection or the rule of law; who believe that the ends justify the means; and who behavior unprofessionally and unethically.”

It has been Eric Holder who has advised and counseled the president on how to ignore, twist, break, and change the law, ignoring the constitutional requirements that devolve on both the president and the attorney general. In essence, Eric Holder has acted as Obama’s enforcer and his heat shield, protecting the president’ flank on numerous occasions and pushing his dream of transforming America into a progressive utopia .

John Fund is the national affairs correspondent at National Review Online and Hans A. von Spakovsky is a former Justice Department official and contributor at National Review Online.  This is excerpted from their recently released book “Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s Justice Department” (HarperCollins/Broadside  2014).

 

 

Marco Rubio Delivers “Game Changing” Speech

By Onan Coca

Ever since Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) ill-considered foray into immigration reform he has been a bit of a pariah with the conservative wing of the Republican Party. Since the failure of the Gang of Eight’s immigration reform attempts, Rubio has been working hard to get back into the good graces of conservative voters. He’s worked hard on pro-life issues, he’s pushed back against President Obama’s many scandals, and he’s even apologized for his part in the Gang of Eight (with Republicans John McCain (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Jeff Flake (R-AZ). For many conservatives however, he still can’t be trusted.

But a recent speech he gave at Hillsdale College has many conservatives paying attention to the young Florida Senator again. He recently delivered the kind of speech that folks on the right have been waiting for; some called it “excellent” and others might even say it was a “game-changer.”

So it should be no surprise that disapproval of our government and pessimism about the direction of our country have reached an all-time high. Because the inability of our leaders to respond to the challenges and the opportunities of the 21st century is denying a growing number of people access to the American Dream…

To restore the American Dream, we need a new policy agenda designed specifically for the 21st century. A limited government and free enterprise movement that applies the principles of our founding to the challenges and opportunities facing Americans in their daily lives.

Transcript of prepared remarks:

Both of my parents were born into difficult circumstances. My father lost his mother as a young boy and had to quit school so he could go to work. My mother was raised by a disabled father who struggled to provide for his seven daughters.

When they were young, they had dreams for their future. My father wanted to be a successful businessman. My mother wanted to be a famous movie star. But like most people who have ever lived, they were born into societies where the dreams of people like them didn’t stand a chance.

They felt trapped in their circumstances, frustrated by the inability to improve their lives. And so they came to the one place on earth where how you start out in life does not determine how you end up: the United States of America.

They never became wealthy here either; they worked service jobs at hourly wages. They never had a maid at their house; my mother was one for a living. And they didn’t have fancy cars; my father drove the same ‘73 Chevy Impala for 20 straight years. Yet I consider my background to be one of great privilege.

I was privileged to be raised in a stable family. Privileged that my parents had jobs that allowed them to provide for their children. And I was privileged to be born in a land of equal opportunity, the one place on earth where the son of a bartender and maid could achieve the same things as a son of a president or a millionaire.

I come from privilege because – while the hope of a better life is a universal one – it is also one few people ever get the chance to achieve. We are blessed to live in a country on whose cornerstone is etched the principle that all people have a God given right to go as far as their talent and effort will take them. And because here, so many people have been able to achieve the universal dream of a better life, this dream has come to bear our name: The American Dream.

For most, this Dream has never been about becoming rich or famous. It is about having a good job that pays enough to own a home, feed your family, and save for retirement; the flexibility to work and spend time with your family; the freedom to worship as you please and live without fear for your family’s safety; and ultimately, it’s about giving your children the opportunity to have a life better than your own.

The American Dream holds us together as one people. It defines us as a special nation. We can overcome bad presidents, tough economies and divisive issues. But if we lose the American Dream, we will lose our identity. There cannot be an America without the American Dream. That is why the greatest crisis before us today is that millions of our people feel that this Dream is slipping away.

The American Dream is still attainable. But it has gotten increasingly difficult to achieve for far too many. Wages have stagnated; everyday costs have risen; industries that once flourished have dried up, their jobs shipped overseas or lost to automation; and millions go to sleep each night overcome with the sense that they are one bad break from financial ruin.

Over the last six years, this insecurity has coiled itself around people from all walks of life. 

You can read the rest of Marco Rubio’s Hillsdale speech “Finding Economic Security in an Insecure Time” at Rubio’s Senate website.

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/7015/marco-rubio-delivers-game-changing-speech/#xMXPaGG5XEudFA9M.99

 

 

 

AMENPER: El Servilismo de la Prensa y los Centros Educacionales

Estoy leyendo la historia de la dictadura de Stalin.  Este quizás sin proponérselo,  divulgó el peligro para la libertad de medios de comunicación serviles. “La Prensa”, dijo, “es el arma más afilada y más fuerte de nuestro partido”.

Los periódicos controlados por el partido, para a Stalin, eran como armas. Un tirano tenía más posibilidades de mantener una población esclavizada y dócil si el gobierno controla tanto las armas como el flujo de ideas.

El mensaje de la censura y el control central sobre la información era el mismo también en el líder comunista chino Mao Zedong. ¿Por qué dejar leer algo más que el libro rojo a las masas? “Leer muchos libros, explicó Mao, “es perjudicial”- Fidel Castro comenzó con el semanario Zigzag, porque la sátira es un arma efectiva contra las dictaduras, pero antes del año ya había intervenido la totalidad de los medios de comunicación controlando la información y adoctrinando a las masas..

Lamentablemente, el problema en América es más profundo y más ancho- Por la historia de libertad de expresión en la tradición Americana, Obama no puede hacer declaraciones como esos dictadores de pueblos que nunca habían conocido la democracia. Pero sutilmente implementa una excesiva obediencia y uniformidad que claramente, por desgracia, va más allá,  no se limita a los medios de comunicación.

Parece haber una igualdad y precaución en educación superior en América, unos profesores tan serviles al socialismo, como lo es la prensa servil — En un sector donde uno esperaría encontrar una apreciación de la diversidad intelectual, paradigmas no convencionales y la libertad de pensamiento, donde se debieran celebrar características innovadoras, pero lo que vemos represión a los profesores y estudiantes que tratan de exponer sus ideas, y un adoctrinamiento brutal en las clases, donde el estudiante que quiera tener ideas propias son suspendidos en sus exámenes y no pueden avanzar en sus carreras..

Los comunistas son profesionales de la política, dedican su vida a ella, así que no debemos sorprendernos como de una manera sucinta, pero efectiva, hayan superado el control de los medios de comunicación y los centros de educación a un nivel superior al de sus antecesores, para tratar de crear una población dócil, con ideas preconcebidas por ellos, manteniéndola esclavizada en la dependencia y docilidad

Los pocos medios de comunicación que se mantienen independientes son incesantemente atacados por la prensa servil al gobierno…

Cuando pensamos en Cuba que la rebeldía del cubano no aceptaría la docilidad de la población esclavizada por los dictadores totalitarios, subestimamos la capacidad política de la efectiva doctrina comunista.  El cubano no se callaba ante los dictadores autoritarios, pero ante la dictadura totalitaria comunista, ha sucumbido a la docilidad que crea el control total de los medios de comunicación y la educación.  Esto es mucho más efectivo que las armas, y es el camino que estamos viendo en Estados Unidos

 

 

 

 

NELSON HORTA REPORTA… Entre 500 y 600 menores entran ilegalmente diariamente a Estados Unidos. • La alarmante cifra fue dada a conocer en una Conferencia sobre migración celebrándose en Nicaragua.

MIAMI 27 DE JUNIO DE 2014, nhr.com—Las cifras dadas a conocer sobre la migración de menores de edad que  diariamente pasan hacia los Estados Unidos, son alarmantes.

En el XIX Conferencia Internacional de Migración celebrándose en Managua, Nicaragua,  se reveló que entre 500 y 600 menores de entre un año  a 17 años ingresan ilegalmente todos los días en Estados Unidos, según afirmó la viceministra para los Salvadoreños en el Exterior, Liduvina Magarín.

Por su parte el comisionado nacional de los Derechos Humanos, Roberto Herrera Cáceres, exhortó a las familias hondureñas a abstenerse de promover y a evitar la migración de niños y niñas no acompañados porque se ha demostrado que la ruta de la migración está plagada de peligros que los convierten en víctimas de abusos de autoridades o delincuencia común u organizada, actos de extorsión, abuso físico y sexual, secuestro, trata de personas, explotación, discriminación y otros.

“Tenemos entre 500 y 600 niños entrando a la frontera todos los días en las últimas 4 a 5 semanas, y que estamos atendiendo con nuestro cuerpo consular”, dijo Liduvina Magarín a periodistas.

El secretario de Seguridad Nacional estadounidense Jen Johnson anunció recientemente que los niños centroamericanos que crucen ilegalmente la frontera del país norteamericano serán deportados.

Sin embargo la Viceministra salvadoreña Magarín aparentemente no esta de acuerdo con las declaraciones de Johnson, ya que dice que las autoridades de los países centroamericanos esperan que “se respete el debido proceso legal que tiene Estados Unidos para que se privilegie la reunificación familiar”, señaló la funcionaria. Al contrario de los adultos, los menores no viajan ilegalmente a Estados Unidos en busca del sueño americano , sino que aspiran a reencontrarse con sus padres o escapan de la violencia, afirmó Magarín

“EN MI OPINION” DE ACUERDO CON LOS HECHOS. LA FRONTERA MEJICO-USA. TIENE MAS HUECOS QUE UN COLADOR. APARENTEMENTE O LOS GUARDA FRONTERAS SE ESTAN COMIENDO LOS MOCOS O TIENEN LA ORDEN DEL GOBIERNO AMERICANO DE DEJAR PASAR A TODO EL QUE LE SALGA DE ENTRE-TELAS. QUE CLASE DE RELAJO Y DE INMORALIDAD. BUENO MIRA LO MEJOR QUE HACEN ES QUITAR A LOS GUARDIAS Y AHORRARNOS ESTE DINERO QUE SON UN BURUJON DE DOLARES. ES QUE SE HA PERDIDO LA VERGÜENZA, EL HONOR Y HASTA LA MADRE. LAZARO R GONZALEZ MINO.

 

 

Enrique Enriquez: Ted Cruz to Eric Holder: Appoint Prosecutor for IRS Scandal or Face Impeachment

By Greg Campbell

On Thursday, Tea Party Senator Ted Cruz called for the impeachment of Attorney General Eric Holder if he refuses to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the IRS’ targeting of Tea Party and other conservative groups. 

Sen. Cruz called for unanimous consent to demand that the Department of Justice (DOJ) appoint a prosecutor to investigate the IRS scandal, the years-long campaign of harassment aimed at suppressing Tea Party influence in politics by delaying tax-exempt status to nonprofits by requiring the submission of multiple invasive questionnaires and information that far surpassed any reasonable requests for tax-exempt considerations. 

“Americans need a guarantee that the IRS will never be used again to target an Administration’s political enemies,” Sen. Cruz said. “It saddens me that there is not one Democrat in this body who has had the courage to stand up to his or her own party and say that using the IRS to target citizens for their political beliefs is wrong. We need a special prosecutor with meaningful independence to make sure justice is served and our constitutional rights to free speech, assembly, and privacy are protected.” 

“If Attorney General Eric Holder does not appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the IRS,” Cruz added, “the House should use its power to impeach him. Impeding justice is intolerable and he should not be permitted to refuse the American people a true investigation into the actions of those who used the machinery of government to target, intimate, and silence them for politically driven reasons.” 

The constitutional scholar-turned senator claimed that should Holder refuse to appoint a special prosecutor, the Attorney General’s crime would make him guilty of a high crime or misdemeanor, which would allow for his impeachment. 

A press release from Sen. Cruz’s office concluded, 

The failure to fully investigate and prosecute individuals for the illegal targeting of political organizations is just one of many offenses committed by Attorney General Holder. While he has been Attorney General: 

DOJ was at the center of the Fast and Furious gun-walking scandal that led to the death of a U.S. Border Patrol agent. The House of Representatives voted him in contempt of Congress two years ago.

 

DOJ has refused to enforce federal immigration laws, federal healthcare laws, federal welfare laws, and federal drug laws as written by Congress. 

DOJ attempted to bring the 9/11 terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to Manhattan to be tried on U.S. soil.

DOJ gave the Obama Administration the green light to transfer detainees from Guantanamo Bay without giving proper notice to Congress.

DOJ helped secretly obtain the phone records of journalists at Fox News and the Associated Press. 

On Wednesday, TPNN reported that the IRS scandal includes the targeting of more than Tea Party citizens, but that Lois Lerner, the head of the department at the center of the scandal, had called for an IRS investigation into conservative Senator Chuck Grassley after obtaining an invitation meant for Grassley to a speaking event.

 

 

 

 

Trey Gowdy Brings the Thunder at the IRS Hearings

By Onan Coca

Who doesn’t love watching Trey Gowdy (R-SC) get all fired up? I know I do.

Well, the fiery prosecutor from South Carolina was in full display a couple of days ago when he took on the head of the IRS, Commissioner John Koskinen.

In his questions and comments for the IRS head, Gowdy continually pushes the theory that some kind of criminal action seems to likely be taking place at the IRS. An assertion that IRS head Koskinen repeatedly denies. But Koskinen’s denials only aggravate Rep. Gowdy further – because Koskinen has no way of knowing whether a crime has taken place or not… he can only hope that it hasn’t!

Gowdy seemed especially fired up when he delivered these lines…

When Koskinen said that nothing illegal had happened Gowdy shouted,“You don’t have any idea of criminal wrongdoing or not!”

When Koskinen implied that any conspiracy was simply a Republican fantasy, Gowdy fired back, “You’re repeating a talking point by our colleagues on the other side!”

Trey Gowdy was not pleased with John Koskinen.

The internet was also not pleased with Koskinen… but they sure did love Gowdy’s performance!

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/7017/trey-gowdy-brings-thunder-irs-hearings/#KLWwuLOzcFTf849C.99

 

 

 

 

 

AMENPER: Me Gusta la Vagina porque soy Cavernícola.

La verdad absoluta es que me gusta la vagina, y es algo natural porque soy un hombre casado con una mujer con vagina y  formamos una familia..

Este pensamiento antes era una cosa normal y una verdad absoluta por muchos años. Era algo que no había ni siquiera necesidad de mencionarla por lo obvio que era.  Pero ahora no es así.

Un artista de género ambiguo dijo ayer  en un escenario  dijo que no le gustaba la vagina, y su público respondió con un estruendoso aplauso que parecía que no iba a terminar. 

Para el que no piensa como ellos, es triste ver el punto a que ha llegado la degeneración o mejor dicho la desaparición de los valores.  No hay valores, todo es relativo, todo es aceptable

La verdad absoluta no existe, la verdad es relativa, es potestad de cada persona, cada persona tiene su verdad, y no importa lo que sea, por muy absurda o aberrante  es la verdad privada de él y tiene que ser respetada como verdad.

El que a una persona que es hombre tenga que gustarle la vagina, no es natural.  Lo natural es que pueda escoger por su estilo de vida si le gusta otro órgano sexual o si escoge como familia una alternativa que no incluya a una persona del sexo opuesto eso es la nueva normalidad. 

Puede crear una fantasía de familia comprando hijos para dar aspecto de familia tradicional, pero esto se supone que sea bueno, sin considerar el futuro de esos niños.

Es aceptable que escogan su estilo de vida, pero es aberrante que en su afán de crear un matrimonio donde no lo hay, envuelvan a inocentes en sus fantasías..

 Pero es lo correcto, segun muchos que incluyen a nuestro presidende.  Oponerse a esto es ser cavernícola.

Si uno expresa algo contrario a estas ideas, entonces uno es un cavernícola vetusto.. 

Bueno, hasta cierto punto es verdad. Yo estoy seguro que al hombre de las cavernas le gustaba las vaginas.   Me acuerdo que Trucutú tenía una novia que no recuerdo como se llamaba.  Pero yo no iría tan lejos, mi pensamiento aunque antiguo se remonta solamente hasta el principio de la civilización Greco-Romana.  Los filósofos de la antigüedad estaban de acuerdo que había una verdad absoluta, que existía, y que era nuestro deber para nosotros mismos y para la sociedad, buscarla y seguirla.  La familia era el núcleo de la sociedad, y el matrimonio era entre un hombre y una mujer procreando de una manera “natural” los hijos que perpetúan la especie.

Pero llegaron los Hippies, primero como subcultura y ahora como gobernantes, y nos imponen su cultura hippie por arriba de la cultura tradicional primero de la civilización Greco-Romana y después de la Judea-Cristiana que fue la evolución cultural sin variar los valores.

Ellos dicen que tienen razón, que los nuevos valores son los naturales, porque son si hipocresía.  Pero en los valores tradicionales, lo que ellos llaman hipocresía es el respecto por el semejante.  No me creo hipócrita porque no me ponga a mearme o cagar en la calle como fueran mis instintos primitivos, no lo hago por el respeto que me merecen mis semejantes.

Pero veo que en las sociedades en que se implanta estas filosofías, la vida empeora y la sociedad degenera en algo sub-humano.  

Cuando uno visita Ámsterdam y visita a Tel-Aviv en Israel, es como si estuviéramos en dos planetas de diferentes galaxias.  Creo que para mí vivir en Ámsterdam sería un castigo como vivir en una cárcel de inmundicia y abuso.

Saludos de Trucutú

 

 

Obama Will Act Unilaterally on Immigration Reform?

Posted on June 27, 2014 by Cowboy Byte

More executive orders to come…
Check it out:

Top Senate Democrats are sick of waiting for the House to take up comprehensive immigration reform. If Republicans don’t act in July, President Obama will, they warn. After all, he still has a pen and phone, right?

Via The Hill:

“We’re at the end of the line,” Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) said Thursday during a press briefing in the Capitol. “We’re not bluffing by setting a legislative deadline for them to act.

“Their first job is to govern,” Menendez added, “and in the absence of governing, then you see executive actions.”

Continue Reading on townhall.com.
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/31476/democrats-warn-obama-will-act-unilaterally-immigration-reform/#E22BZ0KU3VsjgrVi.99

 

 

 

Obama’s Effort to Dismiss IRS Scandal Backfires. Peter Wehner

The Internal Revenue Service headquarters stands in Washington, D.C., on April 9, 2014. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)

Bloomberg News

President Barack Obama assured us earlier this year that the IRS targeting of conservatives has “not even a smidgen of corruption.” The American people, in overwhelming numbers, disagree.

According to a new Fox News poll, more than three-quarter of voters –76% — think the emails missing from the account of Lois Lerner, the ex-IRS official at the heart of the scandal, were deliberately destroyed. Broken down by parties, we find 90% of Republicans believing the emails were intentionally destroyed, 74 % of independents saying that’s the case, and fully 63% of Democrats saying Ms. Lerner’s emails were destroyed. (Only 12% of voters believe the emails were destroyed accidentally.)

In addition, nearly three-quarters of those surveyed – 74%–say lawmakers should investigate the IRS “until someone is held accountable.” (Among Democrats, 66% feel that way.)

These numbers are quite problematic for the president for several reasons. One is that the effort to dismiss this scandal as a conspiracy thought up in the fevered minds of Republicans just isn’t working. The amassing circumstantial evidence is simply overwhelming: What we’re seeing is a criminal coverup done to hide the abuse of power by the government’s most feared agency.

A second problem for the president is that this kind of thing will eat away at his credibility and trustworthiness, two of the most important qualities a president must retain. When they go — when the public begins to think the chief executive sits atop an administration that is duplicitous and mendacious — the entire presidency begins to collapse on itself.

Peter Wehner is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He served in the last three Republican administrations and blogs regularly for Commentary magazine.

Obama’s Effort to Dismiss IRS Scandal Backfires – Washington Wire – WSJ

Obama’s Effort to Dismiss IRS Scandal Backfires – Washin…

Americans disagree with President Barack Obama’s assurances that the IRS scandal has “not even a smidgen of corruption.”

 

 

 

 

Supreme Court unanimously slams down Obama’s illegal “recess” appointments‏.Mark Mix. To: Lazaro R Gonzalez

Dear Lazaro, 

“This is a constitutional crisis,” I warned when Barack Obama announced his illegal “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in January 2012.
Your National Right to Work Foundation has fought back against Obama’s egregious violation of the U.S. Constitution ever since.
Foundation staff attorneys filed the first legal challenge against the power grab, and later filed an amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court for a Rhode Island nurse. 
Today, the High Court unanimously ruled the “recess” appointments were invalid.
You see, Article II of the Constitution requires the President to obtain the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate for appointments to most critical positions in the executive branch. 
The Advice and Consent Clause allows the Senate to ensure that Presidential appointments are qualified and not beholden to special interests like Big Labor. 
But when Congress is “recessed” — not in session — the President may fill vacancies to ensure the continued functioning of government. 
There is just one problem with President Obama’s NLRB appointments: Congress was still in session! 
But Obama was determined to fill the NLRB with handpicked forced-dues allies, the United States Constitution be damned, candidly proclaiming, “I refuse to take no for an answer.” 
The U.S. Constitution, and now the Supreme Court, say otherwise.
Our country’s constitutional balance really was in jeopardy, and I’m proud we were able, with your help, to be a part of this vital fight to defend the Constitution. 
But the fight is far from over. 
Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed with Foundation attorneys that the “recess” appointments were constitutionally invalid, any of the more than 1,000 orders and decisions the NLRB released during that time can be challenged!
That includes the case of Jeanette Geary, the nurse I mentioned earlier.
In Geary’s case, the rogue Obama NLRB blatantly IGNORED the Supreme Court’s Foundation-won 1988 Beck decision, which states that union bosses cannot force workers in non-Right to Work states to pay for union lobbying or political activities.
Foundation staff attorneys must be prepared to keep up the fight — and be ready to re-litigate any null and void cases.
That’s why I hope you’ll consider chipping in with a tax-deductible contribution of $10 or more today.

Our Founding Fathers brilliantly devised a system that empowers the different branches of government to hold each other in check — a system Barack Obama defiantly violated to pay back his Big Labor benefactors.
Today, that system prevailed.
Thank you again for helping us fight to preserve the Constitution.

Sincerely,
 
Mark Mix

 

 

Liberals Hate Indians

By David Lawrence

The Washington Redskins are convinced that they will overturn the ruling against their trademark.  Why is it that liberals hate Indians so much that they don’t want to allow them to have an identifying trademark? They feel the same way about blacks.

On the one hand the liberals are your friends.  On the other they despise you and don’t want to allow you to be who you are.

No one has been able to figure out what percentage of Indians are against the name “Redskins.”  But based on numbers it seems that the Democrat liberals are the main complainers.

Federal trademark law does not allow registration of trademarks that “may disparage” individuals or groups. But removing the name Redskins disparages them more by stripping them of their pride and their identity.

Liberals hate any race different from them, even though they put up a big, fake song and dance about how accepting and all-encompassing they are. Bigots are prejudiced people dressed in the Klu Klux Clan robes of academia and hipster jeans.  They are hatred hidden beneath false love.

I asked a black friend of mine at Gleason’s Gym why people are against “Redskins.”  He said it’s like blacks being against the “N” word.  But the “N” word has a long tradition of being demeaning and insulting, whereas redskins does not have the same negative connotations.

The cancellation of the Redskin’s trademark will not hold.  What’s wrong with Redskin’s identifying themselves with Indians.  Do liberals want to put yarmulkes on Indians’ heads and represent them as genteel liberal Jews?

Let the Indians be Indians.  Let them be proud in being a strong football team.  Let the liberals get off their backs and quit being ideological shoulder pads against rationality.

Liberals feel that the Washington Redskins disparages North American Indians.  That’s because liberals can’t accept their identities and won’t allow them to be what they are.

I’d rather be a proud Redskin than a Panther or a Bull.  Should we now be worried about animal pride?

I have two tattoos.  One of boxing gloves and one of rap music.  I was both.  I want to be what I want to be.  If Indians represent a strong race, let them be used as an identity for a football team.

Give me a break.  Whatever happened to that saying, “Sticks and stones will break my bones but names will never harm me.”  Especially when they are friendly names like Redskins.

Celebrate the warrior Redskins; don’t demean them as if they were never courageous.

Shame on liberals.  They did produce the greatest failure as President, Obama. Now if we called him chief, that would be an insult.  Commander is a joke.  He is the perfect failure.

And all the little progressives are changing the language because they are afraid that it will somehow ricochet and hurt their failed leader.

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/7010/liberals-hate-indians/#5MDiOIzJCBE5AbYQ.99

 

 

GOP Spends $9.7 Million to Attack Republicans – But Only $3.7 Million to Attack Democrats

If you needed more proof that the Establishment is hell-bent on attacking Tea Party candidate, a report on campaign expenditures confirms it. Or as comedian Bill Engvall says, “Here’s your sign.”

A recent study by the Center For Public Integrity revealed that from January 1 through May 6, Republican PACs and outside groups have spent about $9.7 million attacking Republican candidates in advertisements and other communications, and only around $3.7 million to attack Democrats. Democratic groups have only spent $67,000 attacking other Democrats.

What’s caused this turbocharged increase in campaign spending? Political animosity between the Tea Party and GOP Establishment and a Supreme Court decision. In January 2010, the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling allowed corporations and labor unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on ads and other communication to advocate for the election (or defeat) of a political candidate. Campaign spending was ruled to be a form of speech, protected by the Constitution for both individuals and corporations.

The decision didn’t affect contributions, as it’s still illegal for unions and corporations to make direct contributions to candidates for federal office. However, it’s opened the financial floodgates for SuperPACs and other groups to raise money and make independent expenditures for federal races across the country.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has spent $1 million on attack ads targeting Tea Party challengers. This includes $500,000 against Chris McDaniel, the opponent of six-term Mississippi Senator Thad Cochran and $200,000 against attorney Bryan Smith, who’s taking on incumbent Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho.

The U.S. Chamber spent another $300,000 targeting attorney Woody White, who lost his race against former state Senator David Rouzer in North Carolina’s 7th Congressional District primary.

It’s also spent another $3.6 million through early May on ads to boost the image of several GOP Establishment candidates, including McConnell, Simpson and North Carolina primary winner Thom Tillis who faced, or are facing, competitive primaries.

SuperPACs Club For Growth Action and FreedomWorks for America targeted Thad Cochran in Mississippi, bashing his record on taxes and financial matters.

While Republican groups will most likely rally to defeat Democrats in November, the intra-party attack ads and spending will continue through the final GOP primaries in September.

 

 

 

Steve Forbes Predicts U.S. Will Return to Gold Standard

The U.S. has not used the gold standard since the Nixon Shock of 1971 when the gold window was officially closed. Since that time, the U.S. dollar has been a pure fiat currency.

But Steve Forbes seems to believe the U.S. willreturn to the gold standard out of necessity…

Business mogul Steve Forbes says that not only is a return to the gold standard a realistic option, but “circumstances” in our economy will necessitate it.

“We were on the gold standard for 180 years in this country’s history — did very well with it,” Forbes told J.D. Hayworth, John Bachman and Miranda Khan on “America’s Forum” on Newsmax TV on Monday.

“Gold gives money… stability just like the ruler measures length, the clock measures time, a scale measures weight,” Forbes added. “A dollar measures value and when the value is stable, you get a lot more investment, a lot more growth, a lot more opportunity.”

Forbes claims there is enough gold in U.S. vaults to return to the gold standard right now. On that point, I strongly disagree. The evidence indicates the U.S. government has little gold left.

In January 2013, Germany’s Bundesbank announced their intent to repatriate 300 tons of gold that they had deposited at the Federal Reserve. Rather than return all of it at once, the Fed said they would send back 37.5 tons a year until 2020.

A year later, the Fed had managed to return just 5 tons. And even more disturbing, the bars they returned were not the original ones that Germany had deposited.

Why so long? And why different bars? Because the Fed doesn’t have Germany’s gold anymore. It’s gone.

This problem does not just affect Germany, but many other countries that have deposited gold with the Fed.

Furthermore, some experts say gold paper derivatives exceed the amount of gold that could be delivered by 10 to one. That means for every one ounce of gold, there have been 10 paper contracts sold against it. Technically, 10 different people all have a legitimate claim to that one ounce of gold.

This is the reason why so many investors believe gold will eventually surpass its previous highs by a large margin. When all the smoke and mirrors disappear, the price of gold will have nowhere to go but up.

But getting back to Forbes’ belief that the U.S. will return to a gold standard… will it actually happen?

At some point, I believe it will. But the U.S. isn’t going to make this change voluntarily. The Powers That Be have grown accustomed to creating money out of thin air whenever they want. They will not give up this power easily.

But eventually they’ll be dragged back to the gold standard when Russia and China begin backing their own currencies with gold.

Russia and China are aggressively pursuing honest money policies. Some believe they’ll switch to gold-backed currencies within the next 1-2 years. The U.S. would then be forced to back the dollar with gold to preserve their economic power on the world stage.

TIP: One of the best ways to invest in gold (or silver) is to buy it incrementally over timeusing a service like Silver Saver.

 

Supreme Court Supports ATF in Strange Anti-Gun Decision that Hurts Guns Owners Everywhere

Build Your Own AR-15 ‘Off The Books’?

Watch this. Click now.

 Gun Owners of America suffered a loss in the Supreme Court when they attempted to reverse a decision that forbids law-abiding citizens to buy guns for other law-abiding citizens.

When former police officer James Abramaski went to buy a gun for his elderly uncle, he wanted to make sure he was within the law to buy a gun for his relative.

Two separate FFL dealers said that he was.

And when he went to purchase the firearm, both he and his uncle passed a NICS background check, which meant they were both allowed to own weapons.

But the ATF claimed that Abramski lied on his Form 4473 when he claimed he was the “actual buyer” of the firearm.

This kind of purchase — the legal purchase of a firearm and then the legal transfer of said firearm to another individual — is included in “straw purchase” doctrine.

Though straw purchases are not a crime as defined by the Congress, the ATF and courts have ruled them to be in violation of law.

Gun Owners of America wrote on their website:

This case involves one of the greatest instances of regulatory and prosecutorial abuse that we have ever seen.

The concept of a “straw purchase” is a “doctrine” created by ATF and the courts, rather than a “crime” enacted by Congress.

The Abramski decision throws gun laws into great confusion. After all, even Sarah Brady has admitted — on pp. 223-224 of her book, A Good Fight (2002) — that SHE BOUGHT a hunting rifle for her son for Christmas one year.

She did exactly the same thing that James Abramski did, who has been viciously prosecuted by an anti-gun Obama administration!

Maybe the Obama Administration should now open a case against Sarah Brady, who is the founder of the Brady Campaign — an organization which is, ironically, championing yesterday’s Supreme Court decision.

They should prosecute her, too, but don’t hold your breath.

The Supreme Court and most others in Washington D.C. are obviously out of touch with the true desires of American citizens.

Obama has done gun owners no favors and has actually added two more new anti-gun judges to the Supreme Court bench.

And not to be outdone, even some Republicans have helped to elect anti-gun politicians, including Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

 

 

 

Gracias a Jose Noda:
Al Profesor de Derecho Luis Marín quien me envía sus correos desde Caracas, lo conozco hace tiempo a través de la Red. Sus opiniones son de extraordinario interés y su percepción de eventos históricos es siempre analítica y brillante. Espero disfruten este ensayo de su autoría.
Saludos cordiales,

Hugo Byrne: GOLPES DE ESTADO:La expresión se atribuye a Gabriel Naudé por su obra “Consideraciones políticas sobre los golpes de Estado”, Roma, 1639. Irónicamente, su edición castellana implica una suerte de “golpe de estado”, visto que la muy respetable editorial Tecnos de Madrid nos informa que “en castellano no ha habido ninguna edición anterior a la presente”. Enfatizando: “La presente traducción, primera en lengua castellana”, data del año 1998. No obstante, expresión idéntica puede leerse en una humilde edición de la Imprenta Universitaria de la UCV de septiembre de 1964, ¡un tercio de siglo antes! Naudé no hace una teoría sobre los golpes de Estado, sino que expone una larga serie de ellos para mostrar con el ejemplo; no obstante, siguiendo sus palabras, podríamos definirlos como acciones audaces y extraordinarias ejecutadas por el soberano o sus ministros, contrarias el derecho común, sin guardar ningún orden ni forma de justicia, arriesgando el interés particular por el bien general. Con el transcurso de los siglos, la idea se restringió a las acciones violentas que tienen como finalidad la conquista, conservación o ampliación del poder soberano. Finalmente, por razones que deben ser idiosincráticas o históricas, particularmente en el ámbito latinoamericano, se reducen aún más a las intentonas militares para tomar el poder, deponiendo por la fuerza al gobierno establecido.Como se ve, la idea original era más amplia, abarcando desde el veneno y la puñalada, a los ardides y triquiñuelas para engañar o confundir al pueblo, pasando por toda clase de emboscadas y perfidias para deshacerse de rivales políticos, que no involucran necesariamente una intervención militar. La idea es el zarpazo, la acción súbita que sorprende al enemigo y le impide toda respuesta, el rayo que cae antes de que se oiga el trueno, el ataque fulminante. El golpismo es la médula del régimen impuesto en Venecuba, los integrantes del comando supremo de la revolución son golpistas y sus ejecutorias, golpes de Estado.

 

GOLPES DE CASTRO 

Fidel Castro puede prestarnos un excelente muestrario para dar una idea bastante aproximada de lo que se considera golpe de Estado en sentido clásico. 

Un ejemplo, la desaparición de  Camilo Cienfuegos el 28 de octubre de 1959. El hecho es que le ordenaron someter a Huber Matos que criticaba en Camagüey la interferencia comunista en las Fuerzas Armadas, con el cálculo muy maquiavélico de ponerlo en el dilema de traicionar al amigo o exponerse a que lo acusaran de traicionar la revolución. Si alguno de los dos resultara muerto en un posible enfrentamiento, sería ganancia para Castro.

Como quiera que haya resuelto el dilema, no le gustó la solución: Huber Matos estaba vivo y Camilo de regreso a La Habana, en un trayecto corto, con un experimentado piloto. Entonces, el avión desapareció sin dejar rastros, presumiblemente derribado por un caza de la Fuerza Aérea en un confuso incidente nunca esclarecido. Todas los relacionados directa o indirectamente con el caso desaparecieron en forma violenta. No sobreviven testigos, nadie vio, nadie oyó, nadie dice nada.

Quizás el error de Camilo fue subirse al carro en que Fidel Castro entraba triunfante en La Habana, como se dice, robar cámara y aparecer en el primer plano eclipsando en alguna medida la imagen única del gran líder; quizás su origen popular, la influencia que se le atribuye entre el pueblo y la tropa; quizás el afán de corregir a Castro que lo llevó a preguntarle sardónicamente en medio de un discurso: “¿Voy bien, Camilo?”

Otro, el ajusticiamiento del Che Guevara el 8 de octubre de 1967 en Bolivia. Para este caso basta detenerse en la carta de despedida del Che leída por Castro en un discurso exactamente dos años antes: “Hago formal renuncia de mis cargos en la dirección del partido, de mi puesto de ministro, de mi grado de comandante, de mi condición de cubano. Nada legal me ata a Cuba…”. Y más adelante: “Digo una vez más que libero a Cuba de cualquier responsabilidad…”.

En ese momento Guevara se encontraba perdido en el Congo de donde logró evacuar al personal cubano y salvarse milagrosamente en lo que consideró el mayor desastre de su vida. Execrado por la URSS después de su discurso de Argel criticando al bloque soviético, la lectura de aquella carta sin fecha, que se suponía podría ser usada sólo en caso de muerte, la consideró como una puñalada por la espalda.

El hecho es que estaba despedido, botado, en desgracia. No podía volver a Cuba sino clandestinamente, de la misma manera en que luego ingresó a Bolivia. Allí lo alcanzó la proscripción del Partido Comunista Boliviano que lo consideraba un aventurero y el anatema a sus teorías foquistas por el comunismo científico soviético. 

Guevara fue entregado por agentes estalinistas del PCB y luego ajusticiado. Al igual que en el caso anterior, todos los participantes y testigos sufrieron una muerte violenta. Un dato curioso es que incluso extremistas europeos creyendo que estaban vengando al Che eliminaron a los únicos que podían desenredar la tramoya que lo expulsó de Cuba y lo llevó a un cerco del que no pudo escapar. 

El hecho imprevisto fue que se convirtiera en un ícono revolucionario mundial, una impactante imagen propagandística, que los comunistas han explotado hasta el día de hoy, dejando sin despejar los oscuros nubarrones que eclipsaron su trágico destino.

Último, el general Arnaldo Ochoa, fusilado el 13 de julio de 1989. También vinculado a la aventura cubana en África; pero al contrario de Guevara, su maldición no fue la condena soviética sino ser el elegido como hombre de Moscú para la sucesión en Cuba. 

Él hizo lo que le mandaron a hacer, alinearse con la URSS en todo, como correspondía a un comunista obediente y disciplinado. Lo que no podía preverse es que Moscú tomara el camino de la perestroika, el glasnost y que La Habana no lo siguiera, se rebelara y optara por seguir la ruta en solitario, algo absolutamente impensable segundos antes de que ocurriera. ¿Cómo es posible que los Castro se atrevieran a desafiar a la URSS?

Lo cierto es que los cubanos en el exterior se acostumbraron a decir que si Castro se ponía “chocho” habría que sustituirlo en la dirección del partido y del Estado. Ochoa era una de las pocas personas de la nomenklatura que tenía el privilegio de tutear a Castro. En una oportunidad, viendo que buscaba infructuosamente un tabaco, tuvo la osadía de decirle que se estaba poniendo “chocho”: esas fueron sus verdaderas últimas palabras.

 El juicio de Arnaldo Ochoa es un modelo de lo que significa la justicia revolucionaria y muestra gráficamente en qué ha devenido la justicia en Venecuba. Se llama “tribunal de honor” a un monumento a la deshonra. Los abogados defensores eran de inferior jerarquía militar que jueces y fiscales, en sentido estricto, sus subordinados. Lo más patético es que reclaman más reconocimiento para sí porque la tarea que se les había  impuesto era más difícil, teniendo que defender a estos traidores, su sacrificio por la revolución era mayor que el de todos los demás. 

Las autoinculpaciones de AO son más devastadoras que las acusaciones de la fiscalía; admite todos los supuestos crímenes, exculpa expresamente a Fidel Castro y al gobierno de sus actividades criminales y pide la pena de muerte para sí mismo.

La lógica estalinista sigue funcionando: un comunista debe adherir en forma irrestricta las decisiones del partido, sino es un traidor. Si el partido decide que él es un traidor, entonces tiene que aceptarlo porque sino confirma que lo es. Si lo admite, es un leal comunista, pero está condenado, mejor  aún, auto condenado.

AO murió gritando: “¡No soy un traidor!” Fidel Castro, que observaba su ejecución en circuito cerrado de televisión sólo comentó: “Murió como un hombre”. 

Podríamos agregar el caso de Oswaldo Payá, pero eso nos llevaría a otro terreno.

 

EL ASESINATO DE CHÁVEZ 

¿Quién puede decir semejante cosa? Su sucesor, que lo siente en su corazón. El cáncer, dice, se puede “inocular”; pero, ¿cómo? Si HC estuvo todo el tiempo en manos de los cubanos, incluso mucho antes de caer supuestamente enfermo, ¿quién podía tener acceso a él para inocularle el cáncer? Aquí el dilema obvio es: o los círculos de seguridad cubanos no funcionan o fueron ellos mismos quienes le inocularon el cáncer.

¿Qué dice Fidel Castro luego de la muerte de HC? Silencio. ¿Qué dice el gobierno cubano? Nada, en absoluto. ¿Qué hace el gobierno venecubano? ¡Condecora a los médicos cubanos que supuestamente atendieron al paciente hasta su muerte!

¿Por qué no los condecoran sus jefes en Cuba? Se vería mal, muy mal. La pregunta es: ¿Por qué condecorarlos si el paciente murió? ¿Será que esa era la verdadera “misión cumplida”? Si la misión hubiera sido curarlo o mantenerlo con vida, no la cumplieron,      entonces no cabe el premio porque universalmente se condecora a quien va más allá del simple cumplimiento del deber. Pero el régimen cubano cuando esconde los cachos muestra el rabo: ellos autorizan a sus nacionales para recibir condecoraciones de otros  países, luego, consienten en que estos supuestos médicos cumplieron su tarea más allá de lo que era razonablemente exigible, son héroes. Pero, ¿por qué? ¿Qué hicieron?

Eva Golinger, que se sepa, es la única que brinca al ruedo a respaldar esta teoría ultra conspirativista de la inoculación; pero como le corresponde, acusando a EUA, su país de origen. Esta es una de esas cosas extrañas que los americanos y sólo los americanos pueden hacer sin consecuencias, desde que desapareció el Comité Investigador de Actividades Antiamericanas. 

En una larguísima reláfica que no resiste el menor análisis de estilo y que más parece redactada por el comité que fabrica las “Reflexiones” del comandante, EG suscribe la tesis de la inoculación del cáncer, pero se desbarranca hacia la idea de que podría ser una consecuencia lateral de actividades de espionaje electrónico, mediante radiaciones de microondas y cosas así. 

Pero como la competencia técnica de Eva Golinger en física nuclear es equivalente a su virtud moral, la única credencial que le resta es ser gacetillera a sueldo del chavismo, así, lo único rescatable de sus numerosísimas y fatigantes intervenciones es que nunca es desmentida, refutada, corregida, ni descalificada por el interesado directo que es el gobierno de Cuba, ni por su filial en Venecuba. 

Lo único bueno del totalitarismo es que cuando uno habla ya puede saberse lo que han convenido todos, puesto que su aspiración más celebrada es la unanimidad. 

El gobierno de Cuba, el único directamente implicado en el asesinato de HC se delata con su silencio. Nunca hablan directamente sino a través de otros, conocidos empleados. 

Pero, ¿por qué hacen tanta bulla con el tema? Parece que si ellos no lo hacen, otros podrían hacerlo y se dirigirían hacia el único sitio donde tendrían que ir las sospechas, entonces sólo se anticipan acusando, como siempre, a Estados Unidos. 

Como en todos los ejemplos anteriores, quizás el error de HC fue pretender volverse el sucesor de Fidel Castro en la revolución continental; éste sería el móvil: Fidel Castro no tiene ni puede tener sucesores y todos los que lo han intentado han tenido el mismo fulminante final.

Buen ejemplo de Golpe de Estado, de estilo clásico, digno de Gabriel Naudé.

 

 

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

junio 26, 2014

No 698    “EN  MI  OPINIóN”   Junio 26, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court limits president’s recess appointment power‏

Actions 

FoxNews.com

Newsletters

To: lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com

Supreme Court limits president’s power to make temporary appointments to high-level government posts, ruling unanimously that President Obama went too far in naming members to a labor board during a brief Senate recess. 
More on this story http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/26/supreme-court-limits-president-recess-appointment-power/ 

For more news, please go to FoxNews.com and watch Fox News Channel. 

AMENPER: ¿Que significa ser Presidente de los Estados Unidos?

 

No sé las veces que latinoamericanos me han dicho que mis críticas de Obama son una falta de respeto y que no tengo derecho para criticar al presidente.  Que Obama es el presidente electo y tiene el derecho a mandar y hacer lo que quiera. 

No quiero acordarme de cuantas veces he oído esto pero son muchas.  Como esto es algo común en nuestros países, hacen un tipo de alteridad, una transferencia de nuestra cultura a la cultura tradicional americana.

Pero en un país como los Estados Unidos, que desde su fundación en que la separación de poderes, este el fundamento de la república.

Existen tres poderes que deben de ser autónomos e independientes.  Si un presidente trata de apropiarse de tener el poder legislativo, judicial y ejecutivo bajo su poder, esto es la típica descripción de un dictador bananero.

Dicen que la demanda de John Boehner es por motivos políticos, para congraciarse con el Tea Party.

Decir esto es darle todavía más méritos al Tea Party de los que tiene. 

Boehner precisamente es el típico político profesional, si hace esto, es porque está seguro que no está haciendo el ridículo que las cortes desestimen como frívola su demanda.  

Tiene que haber deliberado con sus consejeros los méritos de su demanda. Realmente esto es algo que no hay que ser muy observador para ver el hecho.  Obama se no ha violado la separación de poderes, simplemente ha ignorado la separación de poderes como si no existiera.

Hoy en el Wall Street Journal, en su editorial principal, hace una reflexión sobre esto.  No es nada partidista, es simplemente la defensa del sistema que ha dado la nación más próspera y libre de la historia de la humanidad.  Y lo ha hecho como una república constitucional con un Presidente ejecutivo, unas cámaras legislativas y unas cortes del poder judicial.  Una república con un presidente bajo la división de poderes, no un emperador o un dictador con todos los poderes bajo sus órdenes.

Abajo el editorial de Journal.

Boehner Stands Up

The House will sue the President for trampling the separation of powers.

All due credit to John Boehner, who told his House colleagues on Wednesday that the institution will sue the executive branch to defend the Constitution’s separation of powers. The Speaker is showing more care that the laws be faithfully executed than is President Obama.

In a memo to the House, Mr. Boehner detailed the institutional injury Congress is suffering amid Mr. Obama’s “aggressive unilateralism,” which is as good a description as any of his governing philosophy. When the executive suspends or rewrites laws across health care, drugs, immigration and so much else, elected legislators are stripped of their constitutional role.

The Beltway press is portraying Mr. Boehner as merely serving carrion to the tea party vultures, and no doubt he hopes in part to sate the political appetites of the backbench. But we doubt he’d wager the House’s reputation, and his own, on a novelty lawsuit that the courts wouldn’t hesitate to toss as frivolous. From what we know of the Speaker’s deliberations, he’s been persuaded on the merits.

We’d prefer that Congress and President resolve their disputes through the normal political rough and tumble. The Constitution anticipates that the two ends of Pennsylvania Avenue will be in tension as they balance each other’s power. But the major reason to involve the judiciary in this case is Mr. Obama’s flagrant contempt for regular political order. For example, he has unilaterally revised, delayed or reinterpreted ObamaCare no fewer than 38 times.

Far from a partisan caper, this implicates the foundation of the U.S. political architecture. The courts generally presume that individual Members of Congress lack the “standing” to make a legal challenge, but Mr. Obama is stealing inherent Article I powers that no party other than Congress can vindicate. Mr. Boehner said he will seek a House vote authorizing the lawsuit and put it under the direction of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group.

Constitutional litigator David Rivkin and Florida International University law professor Elizabeth Foley, who devised the theory that Congress has the institutional standing to sue the President, are thus asking a constitutional question that hasn’t been joined at the courts. We first encouraged such a lawsuit in an editorial seven weeks ago.

More than a few judges and Supreme Court Justices seem to be concerned that Mr. Obama’s conduct is undermining the rule of law and political accountability. Already this week the Supreme Court whaled the Environmental Protection Agency for defying the plain language of the law in the name of anticarbon policy, and more rebukes may be coming in the next week on recess appointments and ObamaCare’s contraception mandate.

This is the President, after all, who last summer proclaimed that “in a normal political environment” he’d ask Congress to fix laws such as ObamaCare, but since the House disagrees with his priorities he’ll go ahead and “tweak” statutes himself without legislative consent. Thanks to Mr. Boehner, the courts will get a chance to weigh in on whether Mr. Obama, or his successors, can exercise such imperial powers. 

 

 

 

Did These 2 Comedians Just Call Obama’s Bluff About God?

“You know who’s a liar about this?”

TOM HINCHEY

 

On Monday night, two of the most popular liberal comedians got together to compare notes on religion and politics. Bill Maher of Real Time with Bill Maher joined Jon Stewart on The Daily Show. When they were discussing Hillary Clinton’s recent comment about the Bible being her favorite book,  Maher took a shot at Obama (surprisingly) when he told Stewart “You know who’s a liar about this? Obama.  Obama is always spouting spiritual bulls**t and I don’t believe it for a second.  He’s a drop-dead atheist, absolutely!”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/maher-obama-drop-dead-atheist-absolutely/#eWdgYIF6qEfi8ob6.99

 

VISION TO AMERICA:If Clintons Are Worth 50 Million – Why Do They Get Nearly A Million A Year From Taxpayers?

Since leaving the White House, the Clintons have earned at least 100 million dollars and currently have a net worth of up to 50 million dollars. So why in the world do the taxpayers need to give Bill Clinton $944,000 to fund his extravagant lifestyle in 2014? If ordinary Americans truly understood how much money many former politicians are being handed every year they would go bananas. According to a Congressional Research Service report that was published earlier this year, the federal government has given a total of nearly 16 million dollars to Bill Clinton since 2001. Each one of those dollars is a dollar that some U.S. taxpayer worked really hard for or that we had to borrow. Yes, we don’t want our former presidents to go broke for a whole bunch of reasons, but it is absolutely absurd that we are showering them with millions upon millions of dollars.
Read more at http://visiontoamerica.com/17969/if-clintons-are-worth-50-million-why-do-they-get-nearly-a-million-a-year-from-taxpayers/#xtF2hYokGRhmTTxL.99

 

Check out Obama’s new 30% tax

 

Dear Reader,

You may have heard about a new currency law coming to America. 

On July 1st of this year, Title V of the Obama Administration’s HR Bill #2847, known as FATCA, goes into effect. 

And after collectively spending more than 100 hours reading the actual legislation and its associated news coverage, we found 4 concerns we think you need to be aware of…

1. Most people mistakenly think they’re not affected by FATCA. If you are a U.S. citizen… or if you hold any of your money in U.S. dollars, this new law definitely affects you.

 

2. The more you trade and invest, the more likely you are to get hit hard by this new bill.

3. It is not difficult for an American tax payer to be labeled “recalcitrant” as part of this new law. And as soon as you are…you potentially become subject to a 30% tax. 

4. The implementation of FATCA has been delayed several times, but now the IRS says it will not be delayed anymore. It will go into full effect on July 1st of this year. 

In fact, on April 2nd of this year, the new IRS commissioner said, “Whatever else we are going to do, we are going to implement the non-discretionary legislative mandates we have been given: the Affordable Care Act and FATCA” 

We think every American needs to learn about this law. 

Get the facts, and learn how to protect yourself.

To help, we’ve put together a slide show presentation on our website, which you can access free of charge. 

Click here to learn more about this new law

Sincerely,

 

Mike Palmer

Senior Researcher, Stansberry Research

 

 

Gov’t Seizes Control of All Your Financial Accounts

Written by Damon Geller

Everyone knows that the United States has gone bankrupt.  As the U.S. government and the Fed poured trillions of dollars of YOUR money into the banks and markets after the 2008 economic collapse, this unprecedented level of money-printing is catapulting the U.S. debt to $28 trillion by 2018.  But now, the U.S. government and the Fed are completely out of ammo.  They desperately need money to maintain their own power, and taxes are no longer enough.  So in order to keep the Ponzi scheme going, the U.S. government has made several highly controversial moves to be in position to seize control of all your financial accounts.   And it’s becoming clearer by the day, if you want to protect your savings and wealth from government confiscation, you only have ONE choice.

The Bankrupt State. By Damon Geller…

What happens when America goes bankrupt?  The $17 Trillion question?  Let’s be clear, America is already bankrupt.  “Bankrupt” is defined as “any insolvent debtor” – a debtor whose liabilities exceeds its assets.  The U.S. government, by its own admission, is a bankrupt entity.  Not bankrupt “soon,” bankrupt NOW.  To the tune of just OVER $17 trillion.  In an attempt to fabricate the illusion of “growth,” the Fed and their bank-owned politicians poured trillions of dollars of YOUR money into big banks and the markets in order to prop up stocks, bonds and real estate after the 2008 economic collapse.  The idea was to “fix” the economy by pouring 1,000 gallons of high-octane debt-gas on an already ragging debt-fueled bond fire.

Of course, REAL growth never materialized.  Instead, all that these criminals managed to accomplish with their money-printing was to blow up new bubbles, widen the income divide, and dramatically increase the wealth of a select few at the expense of the rest of us.  The tragic result:  the USA’s liabilities now exceed its assets by an amount so astronomical it’s almost incomprehensible.  And by its own admission, that hole will be getting deeper each year until we reach $28 trillion in debt by 2018.  Or until the Ponzi scheme blows up.

What Now?

The questions now are, what happens now that America is already bankrupt?  How do broke governments survive as long as they can?  What are they capable of doing when they know their fate is at hand?  How do the Ponzi masters keep the Ponzi scheme going?

The answer to all these questions may shock you:  The U.S. government has made several highly controversial moves to be in position to seize control of all your financial accounts!  They’re using legislation and authoritarian power in collusion with the modern financial system to gain access to your private assets in the name of “protection”, “security” or “national emergency.” But in reality, your savings & wealth have become a prime target for confiscation.

How can they do this?  Well, the “beauty” of the modern financial system – to a banker or an insolvent government – is the ease at which they can access your wealth with the stroke of a computer or a new law or tax.  When you combine the digital banking & financial system with the overreaching legislative power of an insolvent government, we citizens don’t stand a chance.  Unlike English soldiers breaking into the homes of colonists, today’s government can be far more subversive.  Just take a look at these government regulations & initiatives that are right now in the process of taking effect:

FATCA:  As everyone has heard by now, the July 1st FATCA provision requires foreign financial institutions such as banks, stock brokers, hedge funds, pension funds, insurance companies, and trusts to report all U.S. citizens’ accounts directly to the IRS.  The government can’t put its paws on your money if it doesn’t know where it is.  The more information a government has on the movement, location & size of global citizen wealth, the more efficiently and effectively it can create legislation & systems to control that wealth.  FATCA even requires reporting to the IRS by foreign private companies on any income made by a citizen of the U.S. whether they live here or not.  And FATCA, once implemented, will negatively impact the U.S. dollar, the global economy, and our international relationships.

MyRA:  In the State Of The Union Address – and coincidentally just as soon as the Fed started tapering their endless QE treasury-buying experiments – Obama announced the creation of the MyRA – your retirement money will now be used to pay for U.S. debt. The MyRA is nothing more than an investment scam being sold to the American people as a you-can’t-lose, zero-risk investment by the pitchman-in-chief himself.  The reality is, since the Fed can’t conjure up money from thin air to buy the debt anymore, and our foreign friends don’t want our debt anymore, Obama needs to sell it to John Q. Public.  Since the federal government has done so well at everything from delivering mail to affordable healthcare, what could possibly go wrong with jumping into the investment advisory business?  Where do I sign up?

CARDS:  The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which oversees how investments are sold, proposed what it calls CARDS – Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System – which is an electronic system that will regularly collect data on balances and transactions in all 4100 brokerage accounts nationwide. CARDS is disguised as a way to “protect” investors, but the system is clearly designed to have detailed information on the structure & location of every citizens’ investments.  Since the government needs us to support its debt (because outside interests no longer do), wouldn’t it be convenient to know and control the structure or every investment portfolio in America?

So for the first time ever, The U.S. government is directing you where to invest your savings & retirement and has gained full access to the activity in every single citizen’s bank accounts, retirement accounts, brokerage accounts and trading accounts.  The IRS will also have full visibility on any oversees accounts, income, equity or other earnings, effectively giving them access to all the wealth of every American citizen no matter where they reside on earth.  So now that we know what they’re doing and why they’re doing it, the question for you is:  what are you doing to safeguard your savings & wealth?

 

There’s Only One Place to Hide

With our desperate government gaining unprecedented access to your financial accounts everywhere in the world, you need to take action NOW to protect your savings & retirement from possible capital controls.  But if the government has its hands in your bank accounts, retirement accounts and brokerage accounts, is any place safe?

  1.  There’s ONE asset class this sits outside the financial system and is completely secure from government confiscation and global economic collapse:  Gold & Silver.  Gold & Silver have been the best wealth protectors for over 5,000 years and have survived every government & currency collapse in history.  Today, physical gold & silver are selling in record numbers around the world.  Central banks around the world and nations like China are stockpiling gold as a hedge to any possible collapse of all the dollars they hold.

The government has spent way beyond its limits.  And now you know that the government is seizing control of your financial accounts.  So the time is now.  Protect your savings & retirement with physical gold & silver before you have nothing left to protect. (Call 800-226-8106 to receive your free copy of Damon Geller’s popular book, “Rescue Your Money from the National Debt Disaster,” or see below)

 

FOX NEWS POLL: Three-quarters of voters think IRS emails were deliberately destroyed‏

Actions 

FoxNews.com

 Newsletters

To: lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com

 

A Fox News poll finds more than three-quarters of voters — 76 percent — think the emails missing from the account of Lois Lerner, the ex-IRS official at the center of the scandal over targeting of conservative groups, were deliberately destroyed. 

More on this story: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/24/fox-news-poll-voters-think-irs-emails-were-deliberately-destroyed/ 

 

 

Boehner to Sue White House Over Executive Orders

 by Cowboy Byte

Impeachment sounds better but at least it’s something.
Check it out: Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, House Speaker John Boehner announced he will be filing a lawsuit in the coming days against the White House in an effort to stop President Obama’s continuing executive overreach. “This is not about impeachment — it’s about him faithfully executing the laws of this country,” Boehner said during the announcement.
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/31456/boehner-sue-white-house-executive-orders/#JiKiT01kor3s75jD.99

Boehner to Sue White House Over Executive Orders

Katie Pavlich | 

Here’s more background from Roll Call:

 The lawsuit could set up a significant test of constitutional checks and balances, with the legislative branch suing the executive branch for ignoring its mandates, and the judiciary branch deciding the outcome.

Boehner told the House Republican Conference during a closed-door meeting Tuesday morning that he has been consulting with legal scholars and plans to unveil his next steps this week or next, according to sources in the room.

Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said further action is necessary because the Senate has not taken up bills passed by the House targeting executive actions. The House has passed a bill expediting court consideration of House resolutions starting lawsuits targeting executive overreach and another mandating that the attorney general notify Congress when the administration decides to take executive action outside of what has been authorized by Congress.

“The president has a clear record of ignoring the American people’s elected representatives and exceeding his constitutional authority, which has dangerous implications for both our system of government and our economy,” Steel said. “The House has passed legislation to address this, but it has gone nowhere in the Democratic-controlled Senate, so we are examining other options.”

President Obama has not been shy about his contempt for Congress. His most recent proclamation included his announcement that he has a pen and a phone that he’ll use in whatever ways he can to push through an agenda.

 

 

 

 

Enviado por OLGA GRINAN: ¡MIERDA ERES

Y A LA MIERDA REGRESARÁS!

Por Andres Pascual La Crónica USA

Le queda bien la frase “quia pulvis es et in pulverem reverteris” a Estados Unidos de hoy (y a una parte de siempre), solo que no es al polvo bíblico de la famosa frase en latín, que destacaba en la bóveda de mármol rojo italiano de Monseñor Manuel Cardenal Arteaga en el cementerio de Colón; porque estamos ante un monstruoso mutante de la seriedad al relajo; del compromiso obligatorio con la solidaridad a la violación abyecta de cualquier regla patriótica; de la clase ética inigualable, a la pestilencia de un cadáver que los traidores mantienen sin enterrar para que apeste más.

 Sin embargo, vivimos un momento en que la Administración Obama se desprestigia cada segundo, muy grave que su media, la media comunista “que ha logrado cimbrar el poder político”, (cada vez que le ha interesado) de la ex nación más poderosa de la historia, no tiene cómo defenderlo: cuando existen tantos frentes abiertos traidores e infames, tanta mentira, tanta corrupción y tanta debilidad, es un peligro intentar justificaciones, porque el alud puede barrer la ladera con el comentarista envuelto. Ahora mismo, a pesar del poder que tiene este individuo, se está quedando sin municiones ¿Cómo seguirá esta fiesta? Mejor ¿Dónde terminará? Ya no caben una acción antiamericana ni una mentira más…

 

 El último “secreto bien guardado” con respecto a Cuba, como todo lo que tiene que ver con el castrismo y Obama, no es objeto de estudio y análisis por los comentaristas conservadores y, debo decirlo, me he comunicado personalmente con un buen número de ellos, desde Megyn hasta Bill O’Relly, incluso les he dado datos que conozco y nunca he dicho en la prensa, pero, los problemas, la tragedia de nuestra patria no existe para nadie de nuestros supuestos aliados en la media (porque nos da la gana de reconocerlos como tales, no porque nos acepten ni porque su comportamiento hacia nosotros lo merezca) sin embargo, nuestros enemigos comunistas, desde el presidente hasta una tía que Obama esconde en la ex Choza presidencial, manejan bien el asunto y mantienen el aliento de triunfo en los castrocomunistas de la comunidá, que desean al castrismo en total armonía con los EUA más traidores e infieles de su historia: la súplica del califa a Raúl por intermedio del guerrillero comunista que eligieron en Uruguay para que los dirija al abismo, no forma parte de la noticia para los conservadores ni en titular ni en interiores (aunque, a veces, entrevisten a Ileana, a Bob, a Mario o a Rubio como sucedió hace un par de días con la congresista), aun cuando se sabe que no cae en el saco periodístico “perro que muerde a un hombre…”

 ¿Qué queda para el cubano que no es castrocomunista ni obamista ni demócrata? ¿Cuándo van a superar la actitud de hastío y lejanía de sentimientos, acaso provocados por 55 años de tiranía, y se decidirán a colocar la defensa de nuestro país en agenda? Hay una Cuba que se resistió y que se resiste a morir ¿Eso no cuenta para FOX, para The Patriot y los demás defensores del conservadurismo americano? El castro-obamismo es tan peligroso para EUA como ALQEDA o cualquier otra organización de ratas terroristas del desierto…las pruebas existen, solo tienen que poner interés y escarbar, que no están profundas.

 Sin embargo, hay que reconocer que los americanos “se lo saben todo” y, quizás, nuestra “preferencia noticiosa” esté en control de cosas que conspiran contra la inversión de ideas para ayudar a quienes, según algunos, no lo merecemos. Los viajes de hombres nuevos a la Isla y las monumentales remesas, el apoyo al show deprimente del paquete que zumban pa’cá como intercambio cultural, la asistencia a actos oficialista en Cuba, bajo cualquier pretexto, dejan mucho que desear.

 Los viajes y las remesas son una fuente importante en la mantención del comunismo en tiempos precarios, lo sabe todo el mundo, sin embargo, los opositores no plantean nunca que las suspendan, porque se les afectaría la entrada salvadora, por el contrario, exigen que la mantengan y, quien piense así y lo apoye, también está contra el embargo, que haría más fácil este tipo raro de “pueblo a pueblo” desde la oposición aparente, si no lo dicen tal vez sea por no “destacarse”, aunque a algunos opositores le aguantan todo otros por este lado y sobran pruebas ¿Cómo es posible que una parte del exilio, de organizaciones y grupos, se proyecten contra esta forma de alivio al castrismo en ciertos lugares, mientras la incumplen “ayudando al luchador” pacifista que, de antemano, se sabe que no va a ningún lugar?.

 La lucha por la libertad no puede ser pagada, es acción desinteresada, de sacrificio hasta la última consecuencia, no hacerlo así, no comportarse así, la etiqueta de mercenaria y oportunista, solo se debe cooperar con la resistencia al castrismo con las armas (como con el PRC de Martí) que utilicen para combatirlo, pero no con dinero para alimentar a nadie, no es bueno ver fotos de la cantidad de gente que se retrata desde allá con ropa americana, bien vestidos y mejor comidos, como la esposa de Biscet. (foto de mi esposa Marta durante un momento de mi época preso)

 Pero, porque siempre hay peros, dentro de esta maraña, hay algunos que quedaron sin defensa por el Sur de la Florida, por ejemplo, la FNCA y el Puerco Joe, que apoyan los viajes, las remesas y los intercambios, pero han tenido mucho cuidado de no incluir en ese paquete de beneficios a la tiranía la plena restauración de relaciones.

 ¿Cómo pudieran responder a una pregunta al efecto Jorge Mas, el Joe, Pepe Hernández y cía, relacionada con la petición de Obama al Reformador? Los demás, como Elena Freyre, Andrés Gómez o Max Lesnick no, de esos se conoce qué dirán, pero, los otros ¿Seguirán apoyando la línea obamista con respecto a Cuba de la forma como han hecho hasta ahora? ¿No habrá aunque sea una crítica?

 Refrescar es bueno, desde hace rato que no creo en ninguno de los dos partidos con respecto a la solución a la tragedia cubana, como tampoco creo en buena parte del exilio, sobre todo en algunas de sus caras representativas, de las que veo un número generoso “metalizadas” con lo de las ayudas a la disidencia (grants por encima de todo), amoral de arriba abajo, al exigírsele a quien tiene la madre en Cuba que no lo haga, sabiéndose que ambas cantidades tienen un depositario único y final; aunque no vayan a Cuba, metan mítines de rechazo que organicen como banderas, o porque estén en shows de primetime “boxeando” contra comunistas encubiertos.

 El 1er intercambio no fue tal, porque, de un solo lado, un barco con artistas americanos fondeó en la Bahía de La Habana y los trasladaron a una sola actuación en el Blanquita: BILLY JOEL, RITA COOLIDGE, KRIS KRISTOFERSON Y LA FANIA ALL STARS MENOS CELIA, actividad solo PARA DIRIGENTES E HIJOS DE ESTOS. EN ACCIÓN ALLÁ EL TIRANO; EN INACCIÓN AQUÍ UN MANISERO COBARDE, QUE DESTAPÓ LA CAJA DE PANDORA CUANDO PROVOCÓ LA CAÍDA DEL SHA DE IRÁN, desarmó a Somoza y por poco lo logra con Pinochet; además, los soviéticos le metieron a los mercenarios castristas en Angola y en Etiopía; por su parte, el hoy coma-andante le disparó el marielazo primero en 1980.

 El complemento a la “primera visita fraternal” como embajada artística, con el objetivo de abrir puertas y fundirse en un abrazo de costa a costa, lo efectuó el tirano a mediados de los 80′s, verdad que en esa época no podían venir a provocar a Miami, pero eso no cuenta con respecto a lo que quiero refrescar o darle a conocer a quien no lo sabe: cuando en la década que cité visitaron Nueva York Los Papines, La Aragón y Elena Burke, y Puerto Rico parte de la Nueva Trova, el presidente que autorizó esas visas fue…tan tarantan, tan tarantantán: EL GRAN COMUNICADOR, MR RONALD REAGAN, al que se le escapó Radio Martí, que puso bravo a Castro y frustró el restablecimiento de relaciones bilaterales hace más de 30 años. Estos detallitos también deben manejarse “a la hora de los mameyes…” Publicado por Maura Barrabi en martes, junio 24, 2014 CRAP CRAP AND YOU come back!

 

 

 

La sangrienta batalla de Bahía de Cochinos.                                                            JUAN O. TAMAYO

El jefe de la invasión de Bahía de Cochinos, José Pérez San Román, se arrodilló y besó la arena con alegría cuando desembarcó en Playa Girón, en la costa sur de Cuba. Dos días después, sus 1,500 hombres habían sido derrotados.

“Estamos combatiendo en la playa y no tenemos munición. Por favor, envíen ayuda”, pidió San Román por radio a sus asesores de la Agencia Central de Inteligencia (CIA). En su última transmisión, dijo: “No tengo con qué combatir. Nos vamos al monte”.

El intento más directo y potente de Estados Unidos por derrocar a Fidel Castro comenzó en medio del optimismo hace 50 años un 17 de abril. Y terminó en un oprobioso desastre dos días después.

Julio González Rebull, entonces de 24 años y ahora publicista semiretirado de Miami, tiene una explicación muy clara sobre los motivos que le arrancaron la victoria de las manos a los brigadistas.

“La brigada no se rindió, se quedó sin munición”, dijo en una de las entrevistas que The Miami Herald y El Nuevo Herald hicieron a varios veteranos de la brigada para esta nota. “Estados Unidos nos entrenó y después nos abandonó”.

El presidente John F. Kennedy y la CIA quedaron marcados para siempre por este revés histórico. Castro se convirtió en el David del Caribe que derrotó al Goliat del norte. Su control sobre las riendas del poder aumentó significativamente. Dieciocho meses después, la Crisis de los Misiles colocó al mundo al borde de la guerra nuclear.

Castro calificó de mercenarios a los miembros de la fuerza invasora de la Brigada 2506 y exigió un rescate por su liberación: $500,000 por San Román y cada uno de los otros dos líderes de la invasión, y $25,000 por cada soldado.

Pero los sobrevivientes de la Brigada recuerdan hoy los tres días de combate y los 20 meses que pasaron en las terribles prisiones de Castro como un momento histórico para ellos y luminoso para la lucha por la democracia en Cuba.

Cinco hombres rana y un oficial de la CIA, Grayston Lynch, fueron los primeros en desembarcar horas antes del amanecer el 17 de abril de 1961. Su misión era colocar luces en la playa para guiar al resto de la fuerza de asalto anfibio.

Unos 1,300 combatientes exiliados debían desembarcar y establecer una cabeza de playa de 40 millas de ancho en la orilla este de Bahía de Cochinos, desde Playa Larga en el norte hasta Playa Girón en el centro y Caleta Verde en el sur.

Durante las primeras horas la invasión pareció marchar bien.

“Repelimos tres ataques durante el día, entre ellos uno por la tarde por parte de más de 1,000 milicianos y soldados”, escribió Erneido Oliva, jefe de las operaciones en Playa Larga y segundo jefe militar de la brigada.

Paracaidistas de la brigada capturaron dos vías clave para la invasión, estrechos terraplenes construidos sobre la mayor zona pantanosa en el Caribe, la Ciénaga de Zapata. Su infantería tomó una pista necesaria para recibir suministros. Por esta pista también llegaría un gobierno “civil” que solicitaría reconocimiento internacional.

Seis bombarderos B-26 de la brigada lanzaron bombas de 250 libras sobre el primer y último vehículo de un convoy de policías y milicianos en un terraplén, y ametrallaron al resto con sus ocho ametralladoras calibre .50 emplazadas en sus narices. Cuba reportó después 1,800 muertos y heridos sólo en ese combate.

“Esos 15 o 20 minutos me parecieron una hora. Para los que estaban en tierra, debió parecer una eternidad”, recordó Gustavo Villoldo, quien estuvo en uno de los B-26.

En otro sangriento combate, los brigadistas mantuvieron por tres días el control de la carretera de San Blas, bajo fuego casi constante de la artillería pesada de Castro y olas de ataques de infantería y tanques soviéticos T-34.

Mario Martínez-Malo, miembro de una escuadra de morteros, recordó que en un momento el número de milicianos y civiles capturados en una zona era el doble de los invasores.

En el tercer día de hostilidades, Martínez-Malo disparó 405 morteros contra la columna de milicianos en la carretera, dijo, sin tiempo para alejarse y taparse los oídos.

“Al final estaba sordo”, relató.

La brigada perdió 67 hombres en combate y Cuba reconoció posteriormente haber sufrido 1,250 muertos y casi 3,000 heridos.

“Luchamos con el amor a nuestro país en el corazón. Y al principio estábamos ganando”, dijo Santiago Jont, entonces un pescador pinareño de 23 años convertido en soldado.

También combatieron con la convicción de que el poderoso gobierno estadounidense los había entrenado y armado, y vendría a rescatarlos si tenían problemas. Por esa razón estaban el portaaviones USS Essex y media decena de destructores en el horizonte.

González recuerda que otro brigadista le dijo: “Nosotros estamos con John Wayne, y John Wayne nunca perdió una pelea”.

Pero para el anochecer del 17 de abril la invasión estaba condenada al fracaso.

Castro había movilizado rápidamente entre 40,000 y 60,000 hombres para un contraataque, en su mayoría policías y milicianos con poco entrenamiento pero más que suficiente munición, así como 20 cañones pesados y 40 tanques soviéticos que descargaron más de 2,000 proyectiles durante los tres días de combate.

Castro sólo tenía un puñado de aviones: dos jets T-33 de entrenamiento, un par de aviones de combate de hélice Sea Fury y bombarderos B-26. Pero fueron suficientes para tomar el control del aire sobre Bahía de Cochinos y sellar la suerte de la fuerza de asalto.

Mientras los aviones de Castro sólo necesitaban 20 o 30 minutos de vuelo para llegar a las playas, los pilotos de la brigada tenían que volar siete horas de ida y vuelta desde su base en Nicaragua, con el combustible suficiente para sólo 20-40 minutos de vuelo sobre la zona de combate.

A pesar de los obstáculos, la brigada realizó 36 misiones aéreas, perdió 10 pilotos y la mitad de sus B-26. Con las ametralladoras traseras desmontadas para poder cargar más combustible, fueron una presa fácil de los ataques por la retaguardia. Cuatro pilotos estadounidenses de B-26, contratados por la CIA, perecieron en la operación.

Los aviones cubanos hundieron rápidamente el Río Escondido, que llevaba combustible y munición para 10 días de operaciones, y dañaron el Houston, que cargaba armas, munición y combustible para otros 5,000 hombres.

Ya hundido, el Río Grande seguía ofreciendo un espectáculo de luces.

“El barco estaba hundido, pero seguía disparando cohetes desde el agua”, dijo Esteban Bovo, un piloto de la brigada que lo sobrevoló.

El capitán Luis Morse encalló el Houston mientras todavía estaban a bordo unidades del segundo y quinto batallón de infantería, cuyos elementos tuvieron que desembarcar agarrados de sogas amarradas a tierra, bajo el fuego de ametralladoras de los aviones cubanos. Un hijo de Morse estaba entre los brigadistas.

Otros dos barcos, el Atlántico y el Caribe, que transportaban más suministros y hombres, incluido el equipo médico, recibieron la orden de abandonar la zona de combate el 17 de abril para evitar los ataques aéreos y regresar por la noche.

Eduardo Zayas-Bazán, del equipo de hombres rana, recordó que los dos barcos con tripulaciones civiles “se fueron y nunca regresaron”. Otro barco de suministro, el Oratawa, no llegó a la zona hasta varios días después.

Tres de los cinco tanques ligeros M-41 de la brigada estaban dañados y hubo que usarlos como piezas de artillería. Los artilleros del Houston cañonearon una de sus propias barcazas de desembarco en el caos del combate.

El 18 de abril, algunos de los tripulantes de los B-26 de la brigada se negaron a volar desde Nicaragua alegando que estaban cansados. Uno de ellos saltó de la cabina en el momento en que el avión estaba a punto de despegar.

Una fuerza de 168 brigadistas a bordo del barco Santana debía desembarcar entre Santiago de Cuba y Guantánamo en una operación de distracción. Pero no encontró la playa asignada la primera noche. Para la segunda noche la zona estaba llena de soldados de Castro.

Algunas unidades de la brigada comenzaron a replegarse el 18 de abril, mientras los milicianos de Castro dejaban los terraplenes y se acercaban a través de la ciénaga.

“Salían de los pantanos como si fueran hormigas”, dijo Martínez-Malo.

La noche del 18 y la mañana del 19 se impuso el caos en las cabezas de playa cuando se agotaron las municiones, recordaron veteranos de la brigada.

San Román dio la orden de destruir todo el equipo de comunicación y dispersarse por los pantanos.

“Nunca abandonaremos a nuestro país”, declaró, unas palabras que los brigadistas repiten hoy como un lema.

El gobierno de Castro anunció la derrota oficialmente la tarde del 19 de abril: “El ejército mercenario invasor, que ocupó territorio cubano por menos de 72 horas, ha sido completamente aplastado. La revolución ha triunfado”.

Al final, fueron capturados 1,174 elementos de la Brigada 2506. Sesenta y nueve murieron en combate. Nueve se asfixiaron cuando los encerraron en una rastra para un viaje de unas 10 horas a La Habana; 10 fueron fusilados por supuestos delitos no vinculados con la invasión; y otros 10 murieron de hambre cuando escaparon en una embarcación de vela que estuvo perdida dos semanas en el mar.

Pero algunos brigadistas lograron evadir la captura varios días, incluso semanas.

Arturo Cobo estuvo escondido en una cueva hasta el 22 de mayo. Eli César y cinco más se ocultaron en la ciénaga infestada de mosquitos y cocodrilos con el agua por la cintura. Martínez-Malo dijo que prepararon una sopa de lagarto. A balazos, le abrieron huecos a una concretera para conseguir agua.

Juan Clark, veterano profesor del Miami Dade College, recordó que su grupo, con un hambre atroz después de varios días en los pantanos, estranguló un cochinillo para evitar que hiciera ruido. Uno de ellos comentó: “¡Perdóname, Dios mío! ¡Mira lo que Fidel Castro me ha hecho hacer!”. Bebieron la sangre del animal mezclada con mermelada de guayaba, entonces lo hirvieron y se comieron la carne.

Unos 20 brigadistas lograron salir de la ciénaga y refugiarse en embajadas en La Habana o en la Base Naval de Guantánamo. Hubo uno que llegó hasta el Hotel Internacional, el mejor de Varadero en ese momento, donde encontró una embarcación que lo trajo a Miami.

Como la mayoría de los soldados en cualquier guerra, los miembros de la Brigada 2506 no conocían ningún detalle del plan general de la invasión. Pero desde 1961 el fracaso de Bahía de Cochinos se ha explicado en miles de libros, artículos y conferencias.

El presidente Dwight Eisenhower aprobó en 1960 la invasión de una fuerza de 1,500 hombres, llamada Brigada 2506 por el número de identificación de su primera baja, Carlos Rodríguez Santana, quien pereció en un accidente mientras se entrenaba en Guatemala. Otros centros de entrenamientos estaban en Florida, Panamá, Puerto Rico y Louisiana.

Kennedy aprobó inicialmente el plan de invasión tras asumir la presidencia el 20 de enero de 1961. Después lo fue cambiando poco a poco hasta garantizar el desastre.

Primero vetó el plan para desembarcar cerca de Trinidad, alegando que haría mucho “ruido” político. Los planificadores de la CIA cambiaron la zona de desembarco a Bahía de Cochinos, ciertamente con menos ruido geográfico pero sin líneas fáciles de retirada si la invasión enfrentaba problemas.

Entonces Kennedy insistió en un peligroso desembarco de noche y redujo los planes de bombardeo de aeropuertos cubanos, que tenían por fin eliminar la Fuerza Aérea de Castro y dar a los invasores el control aéreo de la zona de operaciones. Inicialmente, el plan contemplaba 38 ataques, que fueron reducidos a 22, después a 16 y finalmente a ocho.

El piloto de uno de los T-33 cubanos, Rafael del Pino, escribió posteriormente que, de haberse realizado todos los ataques planeados, “probablemente” hubieran sido “barridos”.

Robert Gray, secretario de Eisenhower y ahora un hombre de 89 años que vive en Miami Beach, dijo que Kennedy no debió haber cambiado los planes.

“Como Eisenhower era general de cinco estrellas, él hubiera reconocido un mal plan militar”, dijo Gray.

La información de inteligencia de la CIA también probó ser un desastre. Manchas de “nubes” o “algas” flotantes en las fotos de reconocimientos resultaron ser arrecifes coralinos que destrozaron el fondo de algunas de las barcazas de desembarco, que eran de aluminio. Esto provocó demoras, en algunos casos hasta el amanecer, cuando los aviones de Castro podían detectar y ametrallar a los brigadistas.

En comparación, la información de inteligencia de Castro era excelente. Uno de sus espías se había infiltrado en la brigada y diplomáticos soviéticos en México informaron a Moscú a principios de abril que la invasión ocurriría el 17 de abril.

Las fuerzas anticastristas clandestinas, que debían iniciar un levantamiento en coordinación con el desembarco —seis barcos llevaban suficiente armamento y munición para que 25,000 hombres combatieran por lo menos 30 días— nunca recibió la alerta del desembarco por temor a que agentes de Castro hubieran penetrado los grupos de oposición.

Las fuerzas de seguridad de Castro arrestaron a más de 100,000 sospechosos de apoyar a la oposición y los mantuvieron en campos deportivos, cines y escuelas bajo la amenaza constante del paredón de fusilamiento.

Castro dijo posteriormente que 29 miembros de la oposición clandestina fueron ejecutados por esos días.

Algunos historiadores de Bahía de Cochinos afirman que Kennedy vaciló debido a su juventud y falta de experiencia. Otros sostienen que el desembarco no podía haberse demorado o cancelado porque los brigadistas estaban impacientes y unos 100 pilotos cubanos enviados a entrenarse con cazas MiG en Checoslovaquia estaban a punto de regresar a la isla. Otros creen que Kennedy tenía la esperanza de que un plan de la CIA para asesinar a Castro triunfara antes de la invasión y creara el caos en la isla.

Cualquiera que haya sido la razón, Jack Hawkins, el coronel de la Infantería de Marina que dirigió el personal paramilitar de la CIA en la invasión, calificó las decisiones de Kennedy de “una traición vergonzosa a los combatientes cubanos”.

Castro dijo que los prisioneros eran hijos de la oligarquía, oficiales de la policía y las fuerzas armadas que habían apoyado al dictador Fulgencio Batista y mercenarios contratados por la mafia norteamericana para retomar el control de los casinos de La Habana.

De hecho, eran una muestra amplia del pueblo cubano, unidos por la convicción de que Castro había roto su promesa de democracia y había colocado a Cuba en el camino de una dictadura comunista.

Un estudio indicó que 173 brigadistas eran de clase alta y 361 de clase trabajadora, entre ellos 11 albañiles, cuatro barberos y un lechero. La mayoría tenía entre 17 y 40 años; el más joven con 15 años y el mayor con 61. Unos 240 eran estudiantes y 135 habían servido en las fuerzas armadas de Batista o Castro.

Había 13 miembros de la familia Fuentes y por lo menos cuatro capellanes, todos ciudadanos españoles.

Todos los prisioneros, vistiendo camisetas blancas y sentados en el patio de la prisión del Castillo del Príncipe, una fortaleza de la era colonial en La Habana, fueron hallados culpables de traición en un juicio televisado en abril de 1962, cargo que implicaba la pena de muerte. Pero ninguno de los brigadistas se arrepintió en público ni criticó al gobierno de Estados Unidos.

Clark recuerda que Castro visitó a algunos de los prisioneros después del juicio y les dijo: “Tengo buenas noticias, muchachos. No van a fusilar a nadie”.

En su lugar, fueron sentenciados a 30 años de trabajos forzados, a menos que pagaran una “indemnización”: $500,000 por San Román y otros dos altos líderes; $100,000 por otros 228 prisioneros importantes y de $50,000 a $25,000 por cada uno del resto.

Dirigido por Berta Barreto, una cubana cuyo hijo fue prisionero, y el abogado John Donovan, que participó en el juicio a los criminales de guerra nazis en Nuremberg, se formó el Comité de Familias Cubanas para impulsar el esfuerzo de liberación de los presos.

Castro también liberó a unos 60 heridos a partir del 14 de abril de 1962 a fin de ayudaran en la campaña para recaudar los $53 millones, que debían venir de donaciones privadas y no del gobierno estadounidense.

El resto de los brigadistas fue enviado a notorias prisiones. Los 231 más importantes acabaron en Isla de Pinos; el resto en las celdas subterráneas, conocidas como leoneras, del Castillo del Príncipe.

Veteranos de la brigada como Juan Evelio Pou recuerdan que los guardias con frecuencia hacían cumplir las órdenes a punta de bayoneta.

“Nos trataron muy mal, pero nunca lograron vencernos”, dijo Pou.

Había una letrina para cada 100 prisioneros. En una ocasión fue necesario llamar a un camión de bomberos para que limpiara el lugar con agua a presión. Muchas veces les prohibían hablar entre ellos, pero se comunicaban por la “telenaranja”, mensajes que colocaban dentro de naranjas y las lanzaban de una celda a otra. Un brote de hepatitis mató a tres prisioneros.

Jont, el pescador, dijo que lo trataron especialmente mal porque es negro, y Castro había prometido eliminar el racismo.

“La pasé mal. Los milicianos me miraban con odio, especialmente los milicianos negros”, dijo.

Algunos de los guardias también le hacían el gesto de que lo iban a degollar.

En el caso más cruel, los guardias dinamitaron ambas prisiones durante la Crisis de los Misiles en octubre de ese año, listos para volar a todos los brigadistas capturados si Estados Unidos atacaba la isla.

Los veteranos de la brigada tienen pésimos recuerdos de la comida de la prisión. Algunas veces espaguetis para el desayuno y la cena. Otras veces un guiso misterioso que los guardias sacaban de un tanque de 55 galones y que los prisioneros jocosamente llamaban Patria o Muerte, el lema favorito de Castro.

Pou dijo que pesaba 200 libras cuando fue capturado, pero sólo 134 cuando al momento de su liberación. Martínez-Malo comentó que estaba tan delgado cuando lo liberaron que su padre no lo reconoció.

Cinco de los brigadistas que desembarcaron fueron ejecutados y a otros nueve los mantuvieron en la cárcel por supuestos delitos cometidos antes de la invasión. Los últimos dos fueron liberados en 1986, 25 años después de los hechos.

El resto fue liberado entre el 22 y el 24 de diciembre de 1962. Los trasladaron por avión a la Base de la Fuerza Aérea en Homestead antes de reunirse con sus familiares en Dinner Key, en Miami

“Poco a poco fuimos descubriendo la verdad’’ de las razones del fracaso espectacular de la invasión, dijo Clark.

Durante el resto de su vida, San Román sufrió de prolongados ataques de depresión, hasta que finalmente se suicidó en un parque de casas móviles de Hialeah en 1989. Un amigo le dijo a un reportero en ese momento:

“El murió el 19 de abril de 1961. Nunca se sobrepuso a esa pérdida”.

La reportera de The Miami Herald Luisa Yanez contribuyó a este artículo.

Read more: http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2011/04/06/v-print/922680/la-sangrienta-batalla-de-bahia.html#

 

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

junio 24, 2014

No 696    “EN  MI  OPINIóN”   Junio 24, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

Petition to Demand the Resignation of President Obama.

Sign now!

To join the call to demand that President Obama resign, submit your email address (and, optionally, your name) and click the button when done. Once our petition reaches 100,000 signatories, we will present our petition to the U.S. Congress. We will also keep you in the loop on this and other important stories by sending you newsletters from Minutemen News andThe Black Sphere; don’t worry, you can unsubscribe at any time if you find that’s not for you.

Email Address 

Full Name (optional)

This is an unprecedented time in our nation’s history. The American people are outraged by the display of unconstitutional, corrupt, immoral, and criminal actions by President Barack Obama and his Administration. We, the people, demand justice. We, the people, demand that President Barack Hussein Obama resign immediately.

We, the people, present the following:

The IRS Scandal:

  • Whereas: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) intentionally abused their power by targeting conservative organizations; and
  • Whereas: These actions demonstrate that the IRS was being used as a tool for partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
  • Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to knowledge of the actions of his Administration, deeming him either ineffective or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the American people; and
  • Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against the American people and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
  • Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full disclosure of the matters concerning the IRS scandal; and swift, expedient action against all offenders, including the President of the United States, to the fullest extent of the law.

The Benghazi Scandal:

  • Whereas: Key members of the Obama Administration, seemingly with President Obama’s knowledge, willfully denied support to the American ambassador and other brave Americans while they were under attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012; and
  • Whereas: The ensuing cover-up, including the intent to deceive the American people about the nature of the attack, was politically motivated for the advancement of Barack Obama’s re-election campaign; and
    Whereas: The truths uncovered to date, which are too many to list, prove that the death of four Americans was exploited as a tool for partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
  • Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to knowledge of the actions of his Administration, deeming him either ineffective or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the American people; and
  • Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against the American people and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
  • Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full disclosure of the matters concerning the Benghazi scandal; and swift, expedient action against all offenders, including the President of the United States, to the fullest extent of the law.

The Associated Press Scandal:

  • Whereas: The Obama Administration’s Department of Justice secretly obtained private telephone and fax records of Associated Press reporters and editors; and
  • Whereas: The communicated intent, once this seizure was revealed, was to search for government leaks; the perceived intent was an attempt by government officials to intimidate and manipulate freedom of the press; and
  • Whereas: The Department of Justice violated its own regulations which recognize the importance of freedom of the press, and exceeded their authority for the purposes of partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
  • Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to knowledge of the actions of his Administration; deeming him either ineffective or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the American people; and
  • Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against the American people, and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
  • Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full disclosure of the matters concerning the Associated Press scandal; and swift, expedient action against all offenders, including the President of the United States, to the fullest extent of the law. Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/petition-to-demand-the-resignation-of-president-obama/#ixzz35UEowOTI
    Read more at http://minutemennews.com/petition-to-demand-the-resignation-of-president-obama/#d3PEuUxT45cu8Y4M.99

 

  • Hillary Presses the Self-Destruct Button Again

Hillary Clinton’s weird inferiority complex about money is doing in her potential presidential campaign. Only a couple of weeks ago she lamented being “dead broke” when leaving the White House, evoking gales of laughter and waves of scorn over the self-pity displayed. In a nation with scores of millions of people actually dead broke, with a net worth at or below zero, the spectacle of a woman set to collect millions of dollars in speaking fees and publisher’s advances bemoaning her financial plight bespeaks a bizarre detachment from the lives of ordinary people.

Now, she’s done it again. In an interview with the Guardian, as friendly a publication as one could imagine, she’s gone and stuck her foot in her mouth again.

She has claimed that despite the reported hundred million dollars she and her husband have raked in since the time since they were “dead broke,” they are not “truly well off.”

…with her huge personal wealth, how could Clinton possibly hope to be credible on this issue when people see her as part of the problem, not its solution?

“But they don’t see me as part of the problem,” she protests, “because we pay ordinary income tax, unlike a lot of people who are truly well off, not to name names; and we’ve done it through dint of hard work,” she says, letting off another burst of laughter. If past form is any guide, she must be finding my question painful.

For 99.9% percent of the public, receiving a hundred million bucks over the course of 14 years, even if you pay half of it in income taxes, makes one “truly well off.”
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/06/hillary-presses-self-destruct-button/#wuQJbyjuYKpzi3OZ.99

 

·  Top Polish Politician Quoted As Saying Alliance With U.S. Is ‘Worthless’

In News & Politics / 

Poland’s government has long been uneasy about the Obama administration’s “reset” of relations with Moscow and its scaling down of a Bush-era missile defense plan, but private comments allegedly by Warsaw’s foreign minister have cast […]

 

·  Herman Cain Urges Uninformed Voters To Stay Home: ‘Stupid People Are Ruining America!’

In News & Politics / 10 CommentsFormer Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain lambasted low-information voters who still participate in elections, urging them to stay home and declaring that “stupid people are ruining America!” Cain spoke at the Faith and Freedom Coalition’s […]

 

·  South Dakota GOP Passes Impeachment Resolution on Obama

In News & Politics /As far as many South Dakotan Republicans are concerned, President Obama should be impeached. The state GOP passed a resolution over the weekend saying Mr. Obama “violated his oath of office in numerous ways” and […]

 

·  Bill Clinton Says His Death Would Help Elect Hillary Clinton, New Book Reveals

In Breaking NewsNews & Politics /5 CommentsFormer President Bill Clinton has been busy writing “playbooks” for his wife, Hillary, to use in her likely 2016 presidential campaign including how to “take maximum advantage of my death,” according to a new book […]
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/category/newspolitics/#eD25iyOrOgE7c1yd.99

 

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BUDGET SHORT FALL ARE FUEL BY COMMISSIONERS AND VOTERS EXCESS

JORGE AGUIAR

 The Miami Herald and the Miami-Dade County Unions and specially the police union and Rivera will not tell the current budget facts and history of the budget overrun .

 

When writing about the proposed Miami-Dade County budget cuts and specific Mayor Gimenez police cuts is important to cover the “complete story”. Most of what I read in the Miami Herald is only a one sided argument of the story to promote an agenda.

 

It is most important to explain how did the Miami-Dade County budget increased and what are some of the extraordinary items that fuel the existing short comings.

 

I cannot remember all of the items BUT I do remember some. The first one that comes to mind is the free monthly healthcare for all Miami-Dade County Unions approved by the Commission over the strong objection of Mayor Carlos Gimenez. This outrageous benefit gift that the commission provided to all Miami-Dade County employees while the average Miami-Dade County family of three pays $300.00 to $ 400.00 for their healthcare in the private sector is most outrageous. The passing of this benefit for the Miami-Dade County Unions was done with ruthless indifference and disregard to the average working family in the private sector . 

 

The Commission proposed and voter approved a  property tax increase for the benefits of “cats and dog” and their sheltering. Credit Commissioner ‘Pepe Diaz” for the idea. While the elderly or the needy could use more housing and benefits Commissioner Pepe Diaz ideas  is let provided better accommodation for cats and dogs. 

 

Voters also approved a 700 million dollar bond for Hospital Jackson strongly endorsed by the Miami Herald disregarding the many union excess and fraud that were reported and committed by some ranking administrators. 

 

There is also the issue of billions of dollars also voter approved for Miami-Dade County Schools that while I think it does not weigh in with the Miami-Dade County budget it does come to exacerbate the Miami-Dade property tax base. Also there are issues to be resolve with Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer system in need of hundred of millions to upgrade the sewer system.

 

IF all of the taxing issues fall on the property tax base there will consequences. Renter will pay much higher rent as property owners will pass the increase not only of the rented property but the renter will pay for the owners house as well and of that I am sure. Real Estate will continue to be more difficult for the average Miami-Dade County family. Others like retired people will struggle to pay for the increased property taxes. The disposable income that feeds many of the local business will feel it as well for the obvious reasons.

 

Also what is most clear to many and me is that Property tax increases cannot continue to be the “ONLY’ source of government funds. There are other ways that are more fair and less taxing to the Miami-Dade County family. Such as taxing second homes or fuel tax, or increase sales tax, luxury boat licenses registration and many other ways that revenue can be increased. But property tax should not always be the solution to all the unnecessary tax excess that many commissioners create.   

 

Jorge Aguiar

Doral, Florida

 

 

Republicans In This State Just Took Steps To Impeach Obama

“I’ve got a thick book on impeachable offenses…”

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE  

 

According to recent reports, South Dakota Republicans joined together to pass a resolution demanding Barack Obama be impeached. Among the reasons listed is the recent release of five dangerous terrorists in a deal with the Taliban to return Bowe Bergdahl, a hostage described by his fellow soldiers as an Army deserter.

The state’s Republican Party drafted the resolution to convince “our U.S. Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president of the United States.”

In a relatively close 191-176 vote, party delegates approved the resolution sponsored by Sioux Falls Republican Allen Unruh. In addition to the Taliban trade, the document listed allegedly impeachable offenses including the misrepresentation of ObamaCare and the Environmental Protection Agency’s targeting of America’s coal-fired power plants.

“I’ve got a thick book on impeachable offenses of the president,” Unruh asserted.

Butte County resident Larry Klipp also supported the measure, saying he “will pray for” anyone who failed to see the “traitorous scandals” that have defined this administration.

It remains to be seen whether the resolution will have any bearing among the state’s legislators. South Dakota has but one U.S. Representative, Kristi Noem, who has not been receptive to the idea of pursuing impeachment.

A spokesperson for the congresswoman indicated that she “believes the best way for Congress to hold the president accountable is to continue aggressive committee oversight and investigations” into the aforementioned scandals.

She is far from the only state Republican unwilling to support the idea. David Wheeler, one of the dissenting delegates in the resolution vote, contended that pursuing impeachment would essentially be a political move that would ultimately only damage the GOP.

“By doing this, we would look petty,” he concluded, “like we can’t achieve our political goals through the political process.”

Larry Eliason also disagreed with the move, though he admitted he has disagreed with every decision Obama has made during his presidency – with the exception of his pet adoption.

While this resolution might ultimately fail to gain traction in any definable way, it is yet another example of the growing trend among experts and elected officials who believe Obama’s actions as president warrant a criminal investigation.

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republicans-state-just-took-steps-impeach-obama/#UWtIIXw4BIbgBYlQ.99

 

Is Obama Copying Putin’s Tactics In Controlling The Political Opposition?

It looks to me like our Dear Leader is being more than flexible, just like he promised Medvedev.

L. TODD WOOD — 

 

PAGES: 1 2

We all remember the hot mic quote from Obama when speaking to the Russian number-two Medvedev: “Please tell Vladimir I can be more flexible after the election.” It looks to me like our Dear Leader is being more than flexible; he is mirroring Putin’s tactics to control the political opposition.

Putin is well known for sending his political opponents to the far corners of Siberia in order to punish them for standing in his way, and to frighten any potential adversaries into thinking twice about confronting him.  The most famous case is Mikhail Khordorkovsky, who upon challenging Putin on corruption (and on the way the rule-of-law was routinely trampled upon by those in power in Russia) found himself in prison for almost ten years in Siberia.  The Kremlin has shut down opposition political websites, placed opposition leaders under house arrest, and is now openly talking about shutting down popular social media sites used to spread opposition information–such as Twitter.  A popular tactic by the powers-that-be in Moscow is to use the tax police to raid the headquarters of opposition figures and charge them with fraud.  These tactics have been highly successful in Russia, as the political opposition to Putin has been greatly diminished since these aggressive measures have been implemented.

Has Obama learned from Putin’s success in destroying the democratic principles laid out in the Russian constitution? Let’s look at the evidence. The most obvious example of this is the IRS scandal, where Obama used our federal tax authority to harass and silence voices of the conservative movement arrayed against him prior to his reelection. This corrupt effort included multiple visits by armed personnel in some cases, and delays in granting tax-exempt status–which prevented them from being active in spreading their message.  In any case, it was an abuse of governmental authority from the highest levels–and a tactic that would have made Stalin proud.  Now, as we see email evidence mysteriously disappearing from IRS hard drives and accused bureaucrats taking the fifth amendment, the plot is only thickening.

Although less immediately detrimental to those involved, let’s discuss the recent revocation of the trademark status of the Washington Redskins.  Although no one is being threatened or having their opinion silenced, the case nonetheless is frightening in its own right.  The fact that the United States government, with all of its power, can unilaterally get what it wants via executive fiat when people do not follow its politically correct commands is truly disturbing and should frighten all Americans.  The Redskins issue is not one of political activity, but an issue of opinion.  So now we have the U.S. government dictating what opinions are acceptable in today’s society. This is straight out of a novel by George Orwell.

In addition, we all know how Obama has, on his own, decided not to enforce laws passed by Congress.  He has also changed laws, selectively not enforced certain provisions, or enforced his agenda illegally by executive order when Congress would not go along with his wishes.  This is also straight from Putin. Judges and law enforcement authorities in Russia routinely wait to hear what Putin has to say about a subject before deciding which way to rule in a court case or other judicial proceeding.

PAGES: 1 2

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-copying-putins-tactics-controlling-political-opposition/#bv5XktwRiubjrSBS.99

 

 

For The Last Time, Freedom Isn’t Free

Are you willing to make the same sacrifice?

TIM POWERS  

 

PAGES: 1 2

Since the dawn of time, mankind has been instilled with the God-given spirit of free will. He was given the freedom to choose to either follow God or Satan. Following God came with a price of being faithful and following His commandments, whereas the price for following Satan was deceit, death, and destruction.

All through the ages, man has developed that yearning desire for freedom, such as the Pilgrims did. They paid a dear price by traveling months across the ocean in hopes of finding the new land in order to have the ability to exercise religious freedom. The greatest examples of the manifestation of God-given freedom can be found in the Federalist papers, the US Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Bill of Rights. Our Founders, being God-fearing people, chose to pledge the lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor in order to be truly free–and to guarantee that freedom for many generations to come.

In the early 20th century, the world was faced with the onslaught of Fascism and Communism. These ideologies were an attempt to deceive, enslave, and destroy the masses. Those of our ancestors who had enjoyed natural, God-given freedom responded to the call to arms in defense of the rest of the world and made the ultimate sacrifice, laying down their lives in order to give oppressed people a taste of true freedom for the first time. This is why they are known as the greatest generation.

Since the time of the great wars, there are still people who embrace the tenants of Fascism and Communism and have been hard at work in the highest levels of government. America has been infiltrated. The infiltrators have changed the rules of engagement to a point that war is no longer winnable. They target their political opponents using the IRS. They spy on every aspect of the average American’s life using the NSA. They illegally run arms into foreign nations and to terrorist groups, while leaving Americans to die either in a foreign land or in a VA hospital. Now, they have recently released five top terrorist commanders back into the battlefield, while leaving a decorated Marine to rot in a Mexican jail for a simple misunderstanding. His cries for help to the American government have fallen on deaf ears.

While the size of government grows, our freedoms are eroded. Take the standoff at the Bundy ranch, for instance. The government went in and set up “free speech zones”. The last that I knew, the entire United States of America was a free speech zone. Currently, there are groups seeking to have every reference to God removed from all municipal buildings, including schools and state houses under the guise of “separation of church and state”.  I have been unable to find this phrase in my copy of the US Constitution. Is it in yours?

Our nation’s schoolteachers are having the freedom to teach individual classes and children based upon their abilities taken away from them under the new government-imposed education standards known as Common Core. The government is seeking to turn our children into faceless zombies, a product of the Liberal/Communist indoctrination centers that our public schools have become.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/last-time-freedom-isnt-free/#pFJeAFGqjXqV5gYG.99

 

They Tried To Censor This Principal, But What He Just Did Made The Crowd Erupt In Applause

Will there be consequences for this principal’s actions?

TOM HINCHEY — 

 

During a commencement speech at Lebanon (Missouri) High School on May 23rd, Principal Kevin Lowery urged his graduating students to remember that “God is still important,” even though prayer has been banned from high school graduations.

Principal Lowery opened his speech with the famous sentence from the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”  He remarked that “This passage has come to represent a moral standard to which the United States should always strive.  And even though God is reflected in the very fabric of our nation, we are told that it is inappropriate and even illegal to mention God at high school graduations, let alone say a prayer.”

Lowery opted to observe a moment of silence rather than risk being “politically incorrect” by leading the room in prayer.  Yet after the silence, he offered the gathering his thoughts during that moment: “I gave thanks to God for these great students, their parents, their teachers, and for this community.”

The crowd erupted in cheers and applause from those who understood how the high school principal had just circumvented the prohibition on graduation prayer.

At least one prominent atheist contacted the district to lodge a complaint after learning about Lowery’s speech at the Cowan Civic Center in Lebanon.  Yet many more people have expressed appreciation for the principal’s boldness to stand up for his beliefs.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/mo-principal-bypasses-prayer-ban-graduation-god-still-important-speech/#AUJIgYytLv7YrMag.99

 

 

AMENPER: Tenemos que recordar que el Cristianismo es una Droga

La famosa frase de Marx que la religión es el opio de los pueblos es un concepto real con una desviación ideológica.  La ideología marxista quiere decirnos que la religión degradada de su tiempo alienaba al ser humano y no satisfacía su verdadera necesidad, lo cual tiene cierta validez.  Pero aunque la comparación de la religión a una droga es válida,

Marx olvidaba una realidad, y esta es:

Todas la drogas son buenas, lo malo es el mal uso y abuso de las drogas.

No existe droga que sea mala, hasta el peor veneno del mundo que es el arsénico tiene propiedades medicinales. El opio al que se refería Marx es una droga que correctamente dosificada es muy beneficiosa como antiespasmódico y sedante.  Muchos hemos tomado la medicación conocida como  Elixir Paregórico que es un licor anisado de alcohol con Opio, este es posiblemente el antiespasmódico más antiguo conocido.  Pero no podemos culpar a las drogas del abuso que el hombre le da y todo sabemos los daños que producen el uso de las drogas, en este caso específico el Alcohol y el Opio.

Si…. tiene razón Marx, el cristianismo es una droga. 

Es la droga divina que regaló Dios al mundo para curarnos de nuestro peor mal que es el pecado.

¿Pero qué puede hacer Dios cuando el hombre usa el Cristianismo para en su nombre, degradarlo y, abusarlo?

¿Qué culpa tiene Dios de las guerras que se han librado bajo la excusa del Cristianismo?

 No podemos culpar a Dios del abuso del cristianismo como no podemos culpar a Dios del abuso de las drogas que él nos ha regalado-

Cuando dicen que los cristianos somos la sal de las tierra.  Están comparando a los cristianos con una droga, el Cloruro de Sodio.  La sal es un condimento que da mejor sabor a las comidas, también es bueno como medicación en casos deshidratación. 

Pero cuando abusamos de la sal, esta puede ser una droga mortífera. 

El abuso de la sal trae consigo una retención de fluidos con edemas y otras afecciones que pueden causar la muerte.  Por eso los médicos nos recomiendan que comamos bajo de Sal.

No existe droga que sea mala por sí, es su abuso lo que la hace mala. Cuando tomamos café, la cafeína es un diurético y estimulante que nos puede ayudar, pero su abuso es malo para la salud.

El alcohol es una de las drogas más utilizada en medicaciones en forma de Elixir y Jarabes, tiene propiedades antisépticas como uso externo y ha sido usada como antihelmíntico para los parásitos intestinales desde tiempos inmemorables.  El apóstol San Pablo recomienda as su alumno Timoteo que no tome agua, que en aquellos tiempos estaba contaminada de parásitos, y le dice que tome vino (alcohol) para que se alivie de su dolencia. Pero todo sabemos los daños que puede causar el abuso del alcohol en el individuo y la familia.

Un dicho popular es que “No se puede ser más papista que el papa”.  Como todos los dichos tiene la sabiduría popular.

 No se puede ser más cristiano que Cristo, tenemos que imitar a Cristo, pero no podemos atribuirnos la autoridad de Cristo.

Esto es lo que hacen algunos de los profesionales de las instituciones religiosas para mantener a los miembros cautivos. Tratan de  imponer sus tradiciones humanas que convierten en doctrinas, contaminan a las Droga Divina del cristianismo.  Complican el divino plan de Dios para su propio beneficio.

Como vemos diariamente el diabólico abuso de las drogas por el hombre, así vemos al hombre contaminar el cristianismo. Los políticos usan palabras de la Biblia y  conceptos del cristianismo sacándola de contexto, con interpretaciones privadas, para  también abusar las doctrinas cristianas. Nos están imponiendo, a nombre de la caridad cristiana un estado de dependencia que está destruyendo la sociedad y haciendo del trabajo que es un mandamiento de Dios, un anatema, y de la vagancia una virtud,  para mantener a sus “feligreses” que son los votantes, esclavos de su droga.

Y nos acusan de ser malos cristianos porque no compartimos sus abusos.

Dios creó las drogas, cubiertas en su creación, y permitió que el hombre a través de los años descubriera estas drogas, Dios crea y el hombre descubre la creación.  Pero es la conducta del hombre desde Adán, el abusar de los regalos de la creación que Dios nos da.

El cristianismo esa droga divina que nos regaló Dios, hay que usarla siempre usando la dosificación que se encuentra en su libro de instrucciones, que es la Biblia, no de las instrucciones que viene de la boca de los hombres.

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

junio 23, 2014

No 695    “EN  MI  OPINIóN”   Junio 23, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

AMENPER: Pieles negras de Washington Vs Pieles Rojas de Washington… ¿Pieles negras de Washington quieren acabar con los Pieles Rojas de Washington?

 

La decisión para declarar ilegal nombre e imagen de las inscripciones de los Pieles Rojas de Washington  de la NFL es una nueva presentación de  la corrección política  con un celo que caracteriza a la desenfrenada y desbocada ambición de poder de esta administración.

Pero esta ambición es selectiva, es parte de la campaña tratando de consolidar el apoyo de la izquierda, usando un equipo de football popular, buscando protagonismo y publicidad

Si la corrección política fuera sincera, entonces tendrían que actuar de una manera similar en los siguientes casos:

• pondría en entredicho de manera similar la marca comercial de Dago Swagg, una línea de ropa cuyo nombre es despectivo de los italianos.  Llamar Dago a un italiano es como llamar nigger a un  negro o piel roja a un indio  (Perdón….. a un nativo americano)

• No permitirían la marca para Cracka Azz Skateboards, una línea del monopatín, longboard y la ropa que es un insulto contra los blancos-Llamar cracker a un montañero es igual que llamar nigger a un negro o piel roja a un nativo americano.

• Se opondrían  al registro de la cerveza White Trash,  Blanco Basura significa “basura blanca” y es un insulto a los blancos igual que llamar a un negro nigger o piel roja a un nativo americano..

•No se pone en entredicho la marca de Home Cookin Biscuit Head. El término “cabeza biscuit” tuvo sus orígenes en la Guerra de Corea, y se utiliza como insulto para describir la forma de las cabezas de los coreanos. Decirle “cabeza biscuit” a un coreano es como llamar nigger a un negro o piel roja a un nativo americano.

Y hay algunos otras, marcas comerciales registradas o para las que han sido aplicadas las marcas, que simplemente no pudieran ser permitidas porque para la corrección política serían ofensivas para cualquier segmento de la población. El whiskey etiqueta negra tendría que cambiar su nombre a etiqueta oscura, y la cerveza negra a cerveza oscura. Los cubanos no podríamos tomar la cerveza Hatuey.

¿Entonces “Pieles Rojas” es “ofensivo”, pero lo anterior no son? ¿Por qué dicen falsamente que la multitud y los indios se sienten agraviados?  ¿Por qué el gobierno, utilizando su poder y falseando una inexistente  oposición pública al apodo, y acosa a un equipo de fútbol?

Si lo logran estarían creando un precedente, desaparecerían los Bravos de Atlanta, los Seminoles de Florida State University entre otros. Hasta quizás los Marlins, los Dolphins y otros equipos con nombre de animales tengan que cambiar su nombre bajo demanda de que sus nombres son ofensivos para la sociedad protectora de animales.

Pero debido a que su arrogancia es superada sólo por su ignorancia, buscando refugio bajo el paraguas de su hipocresía no creo que puedan cometer esta injusticia.

Creo que como dice el dicho “se les fue la mano”, o mejor dicho en este caso “se les fue la garra”

 

 

ALBERTO MEDINA PEREZ:Desmesurada complacencial

La sociedad se enfada a menudo con la política. La corrupción crónica, la impericia serial, las permanentes contradicciones discursivas, la ausencia de ideas para gobernar, las internas despiadadas, los reiterados exabruptos, la abundancia de privilegios y el despilfarro de los dineros públicos, son solo parte de una larga nómina de detestables cualidades que molestan, con sobrados méritos, a buena parte de la ciudadanía.

Eso no podría darse sin la complicidad de una comunidad que se enoja, pero no lo suficiente, que se incomoda pero no reacciona jamás. La bronca dura poco, para luego naturalizar lo inadmisible y aceptarlo todo como parte de una realidad que duele pero se soporta.

En algunas democracias más maduras, simples actitudes individuales incorrectas de los líderes políticos o meras declaraciones inapropiadas, dejan fuera de la carrera política a cualquiera que pretenda postularse a un cargo. En esas sociedades los niveles de exigencia son muy elevados.

Hay que hacerse cargo de que no todo lo que acontece es exclusiva responsabilidad de la política. Si la sociedad tolera la corrupción, con liviandad, no puede esperar que esta se extinga por arte de magia. Cuando los mecanismos más básicos no funcionan mínimamente, no es razonable creer que algo cambiará. Eso ya no es culpa de la política, sino de la patética conducta cívica de absoluta pasividad frente a cada despropósito.

Es importante asumir el presente, no solo para recriminarse la acción u omisión, sino para intentar modificar el futuro actuando en consecuencia. Una sociedad que no despierta, que prefiere la apatía, que se queja sin eficacia y no utiliza las herramientas que tiene a mano, es cómplice y no un mero observador externo.

Los ciudadanos son participes necesarios de mucho de lo que acaece. Los políticos de hoy no identifican estímulos suficientes para obrar correctamente. Cuando desvían fondos del Estado para hacer proselitismo o para su propio patrimonio personal, lo hacen no solo por su inmoralidad manifiesta, sino también porque no existe sanción efectiva por cometer esos delitos. No solo no responden ante la justicia por sus faltas, sino que tampoco pagan costos electorales, ya que muchos de ellos permanecen en el centro de la escena por décadas siendo nuevamente apoyados por ciudadanos que conociendo sus atributos e historias, los vuelven a votar.

Es posible que esta realidad tenga que ver con la carencia de opciones. La ciudadanía cree que todos son iguales y se siente empujada a elegir entre dirigentes corruptos e ineptos. Todos los sistemas que restringen la competencia promueven esta escasez de alternativas y eso impacta sobre la cantidad y calidad de la oferta política, debilitando el porvenir.

Para disponer de mayores alternativas resulta imprescindible que las barreras de acceso sean las mínimas. Sin embargo, la legislación vigente consagra con categórica convicción el monopolio de los partidos políticos.

Esto no es casual. La corporación política ha cerrado las puertas de modo intencional. No quieren contendientes en su camino. Desean forzar a los ciudadanos a seleccionar entre los que ya están en el juego, a los que diseñaron estas reglas a su medida, justamente para que el estándar de exigencia sea diminuto y puedan alcanzar sus propios objetivos personales.

Las leyes imperantes establecen múltiples restricciones para crear un nuevo partido político, bajo la perversa visión de que es mejor para la democracia tener pocos y fuertes, que muchos y débiles. Las normas complican además la chance de mantener activo un partido, dejándolos al borde de la precariedad formal, con la indisimulable intención de eliminar alternativas viables para los votantes.

El financiamiento de la política es un capítulo que se agrega, ya que más allá de lo dice la legislación, a la hora del ejercicio cotidiano, la evidencia demuestra que, el que controla la “caja” estatal, la usará sin disimulo, para hacer política con absoluto descaro e impunidad y sin rendir cuentas.

La inexistente transparencia en el funcionamiento del sistema, favorece a los más inescrupulosos e invita insolentemente a ser parte de la cofradía para así acceder a los espacios de poder. Un ciudadano cualquiera, por capaz, honesto, e inteligente que sea, no puede postularse como candidato a un puesto público si no pertenece a un partido político o, al menos obtiene previamente una convocatoria y aval de una agrupación para hacerlo.

Es paradójico que estas formalidades se cumplan con tanta rigurosidad, mientras no funciona del mismo modo cuando un funcionario se apropia del dinero de los contribuyentes apelando a indisimulables prácticas.

Lo que sucede en el presente tiene muchas explicaciones. Pero también queda claro que, gran parte de lo que ocurre se produce porque una ciudadanía bastante hipócrita lo respalda con una desmesurada complacencia.
Alberto Medina Méndez.albertomedinamendez@gmail.com

 

The year was 1947… The year was 1947. Some of you will recall that on July 8, 1947  , a little more than 66 years ago, numerous witnesses claim that an Unidentified Flying Object, 

(UFO), with five aliens aboard, crashed onto a sheep and mule ranch

just outside Roswell , New Mexico . 

This is a well-known incident that many say has long been covered-up by the U.S. Air Force, as well as other Federal Agencies and Organizations. 

However, what you may NOT know is that in the month of  April

1948, nine months after the historic day, the following people were born: 

Barrack Obama Sr. 

Albert A. Gore, Jr. 

Hillary Rodham

William J. Clinton

John F. Kerry

Howard Dean 

Nancy Pelosi

Dianne Feinstein

Charles E. Schumer

Barbara Boxer 

Joe Biden

This is the obvious consequence of aliens breeding with sheep  and

jack-asses. I truly hope this bit of information clears up a lot of things

for  you. It certainly did for me.

“EMO” For any coincidence Carlos Gimenes and other locals specimen like commissioners were born at that date? LRGM

 

 

GEROGINA LOPEZ: Cocaína y metanfetamina: Las drogas ilícitas contaminan el agua potable de Nueva York – RT

http://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/view/131715-drogas-contaminar-agua-potable-nueva-york

 

 

WATCH Bergdahl’s Platoon Mate Annihilate Him In Front Of Congress. http://www.westernjournalism.com/

Says he needs to be charged with desertion

TOM HINCHEY — 

Bowe Bergdahl’s former platoon mate, Army SPC Cody Full (Retired), testified before the House Middle East and North Africa Terrorism & Nonproliferation Subcommittee regarding Bergdahl’s state of mind and actions leading up to his desertion from his unit.

“It is clear to me that he had a plan and executed it,” said SPC Full.  “Knowing that someone you needed to trust deserted you in war and did so on his own free will is the ultimate betrayal.”  He continued with his prepared statement: “You should not be able to desert your fellow Americans without consequences.  Bowe Bergdahl should not be characterized as having served with honor and distinction.”

Full concluded his comments with a list of charges including “desertion, missing movement, disrespect towards a superior commissioned officer, insubordinate conduct towards a non-commissioned officer, failure to obey order or regulation, misbehavior before the enemy, and misconduct as a prisoner.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/bergdahls-platoon-mate-says-needs-charged-desertion/#01OeIPzFgPfFiykb.99

 

‘Nobody Believes You’… Paul Ryan Obliterates The IRS Commissioner In This Hearing. http://www.westernjournalism.com/

House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) on Friday laid into IRS Commissioner John Koskinen for failing to keep Congress informed about the lost Lois Lerner emails.

JUSTIN KOSKI —

House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) jumped all over IRS Commissioner John Koskinen this morning for failing to alert Congress about the Lois Lerner emails.

The emails in question were previously announced by Koskinen to have been deemed unretrievable, and the hard drives they were housed in destroyed three years ago.

Ryan put the screws to Koskinen in his rant when he accused the IRS of purposely keeping Congress in the dark about the hard drives and emails in question.

“You are the Internal Revenue Service. You can reach into the lives of hardworking taxpayers; and with a phone call, an email, or a letter, you can turn their lives upside down,” Ryan exclaimed. “You ask taxpayers to hang onto seven years of their personal tax information in case they’re ever audited, and you can’t keep six months of employees emails?”

“This is not being forthcoming; this is being misleading, again. This is a pattern of abuse, a pattern of behavior that is not giving us any confidence that this agency is being impartial,” said Ryan. “I don’t believe you. This is incredible.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/paul-ryan-puts-screws-irs-commissioner/#ZimkVK4P0cfkujhf.99

 

http://www.westernjournalism.com/: CEO: What Obama Is Doing Is Illegal And Will Destroy People On Fixed Incomes

“…this is a very dangerous situation”

JUSTIN KOSKI — 

Murray Energy CEO Robert Murray says Obama is illegally using the EPA and the Clean Air Act to take over the US Electric Power Grid–and in the process, destroying low-cost energy.

According to Murray, “Coal is a four cents per kilowatt hour energy, and wind and solar are a 22 cents per kilowatt hour energy…And that’s if the wind is blowing and the sun is shining.”

Murray would later in the interview go on to say, “this is a very dangerous situation and I don’t know if the average American, whose electric rates are already going up, will [know] it will go up a whole lot more with this.”

“The people who are on fixed incomes or are poor, poverty stricken people are gonna be hurt the worst,” Murray added. “And [they] better be scared to death about what Mr. Obama and his EPA are doing.”

“It can’t be done, it’s unachievable, and it’s illegal!”

This is just another example in which Obama is continuing his illegal actions and policies.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-obama-trying-illegally-raise-energy-costs-30-percent/#rIL2Elum846okWCX.99

 

 

Watch: Trey Gowdy Reveals The Details Of A Dream He Had, But It’s Not What You Think. http://www.westernjournalism.com/

This dream may scar you for life, or more likely leave you laughing out loud

TOM HINCHEY — 

Trey Gowdy (R-SC) was giving a speech in Maryland when he told the crowd about a “dream” he had.

It starts off with John Boehner, Lindsey Graham, and Maryland Republican Congressman Andy Harris all dying and going to heaven on the same day.

“It could happen, I guess…for two of them for sure.”

Rather than spoil the punchline, just watch it for yourself.  It will give you a laugh
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/trey-gowdy-dream/#Qqdla51pzHtbsDJD.99

 

 

CEO: What Obama Is Doing Is Illegal And Will Destroy People On Fixed Incomes. http://www.westernjournalism.com/

“…this is a very dangerous situation”

JUSTIN KOSKI — 

Murray Energy CEO Robert Murray says Obama is illegally using the EPA and the Clean Air Act to take over the US Electric Power Grid–and in the process, destroying low-cost energy.

According to Murray, “Coal is a four cents per kilowatt hour energy, and wind and solar are a 22 cents per kilowatt hour energy…And that’s if the wind is blowing and the sun is shining.”

Murray would later in the interview go on to say, “this is a very dangerous situation and I don’t know if the average American, whose electric rates are already going up, will [know] it will go up a whole lot more with this.”

“The people who are on fixed incomes or are poor, poverty stricken people are gonna be hurt the worst,” Murray added. “And [they] better be scared to death about what Mr. Obama and his EPA are doing.”

“It can’t be done, it’s unachievable, and it’s illegal!”

This is just another example in which Obama is continuing his illegal actions and policies.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-obama-trying-illegally-raise-energy-costs-30-percent/#7pohHvlxwhCK0whw.99

 

 

This Gorgeous Conservative Perfectly Sums Up How Americans Feel About Obama

“There’s a lot of things that I think have…”

TOM HINCHEY — 

Ellison Barber of the Washington Free Beacon appeared on Fox News’ Real Story to discuss Congress’ record low poll numbers.

Guest host Jenna Lee asked Barber if the mistrust of Congress can be repaired in light of all the “issues” involving agencies that are supposed to be apolitical. Barber said, “There’s a lot of things that I think have over the past few months that we have seen consistently and repeatedly erode the trust of the American public.”

She went on to say that these latest polls reflect most Americans’ opinion that they “don’t trust Congress in general to do the job that they’re set out to do.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/ellison-barber-congress-repeatedly-erodes-trust-americans/#ltBJE6SVliuzRHjI.99

 

IMPORTANTE – IMPORTANT.

Dear Friend:

Obama wasn’t kidding when he said, “Change has come to America.”

Today – this is a country that’s very different from the original idea of America.

The shining beacon of freedom has been replaced by dimly lit rooms filled with NSA agents snooping on your calls, your emails, every step you take online.

Soon, some 30,000 domestic drones could fill American skies. It’s likely your local police department will get one if they haven’t already. (Paid in large part by Homeland Security grants.)

There are now more Americans in jail than there were people in the Soviet Union’s concentration camps.

Most government agencies, including the Department of Education have their own SWAT team. Since the ‘70’s there were a few hundred SWAT raids annually. Now that number has swelled to more than 50,000 SWAT raids per year – most of these raids are for non-violent crimes.

A 961-page law called Obamacare that 54% of Americans oppose – now dictates how you and your doctor are allowed to treat your body.

The way we invest has changed too.

That’s because the Federal Government reworks statistics to give the appearance of an economic recovery.

Did you know, for instance, that the government doesn’t actually count all unemployed in their unemployment numbers?

Or that they exclude certain rising food costs when they report their rosy inflation statistics?

Or that they manipulate interest rates to make the stock market look like it’s going up?

Most people haven’t a clue this manipulation exists. And they recklessly put their money – their happiness – at risk by not knowing the truth.

My point is simple – if it feels like you’re being squeezed from every angle by the government in your pursuit of the American dream – it’s because you are!

That’s why what worked for your grand-parents to attain the American dream now only gets you to the 30-yard line. It’s not enough.

 

Hello, my name is Doug Hill.
I’m the director of the Laissez Faire Club

You, like me, are probably sick of “government creep” into every area of your life.

It’s this intrusion that strips you of your privacy, over-taxes you, hinders your investment returns, threatens your healthcare, and reduces your quality of life.

Instead of just complaining about it … my team of experts and I have done something about it by creating a blockbuster book that’s loaded with solutions that could advance you in life and empower you to escape free from government creep.

This book is aptly titled, A Man’s Right to Happiness.

It’s likely the only book of its kind that shows you how to reclaim your privacy … lower your tax burden … build wealth through shrewd investment opportunities … better manage your money and credit … succeed in business … and bolster your health and more.

But here’s the thing …

This book is not for sale. You can’t buy a copy. Not for any price. But in a moment, I’ll show you why I’d like to send you a copy absolutely FREE.

Yes, I said FREE. As in no charge. Complimentary.

But I don’t think I’m going to have those copies for much longer. Here’s why …

Forbidden Secrets that Obama,
Congress, and Corporate America
Hope You’ll Never See!

Open up your copy of this book, and you’ll betreated to forbidden secrets that the people in power would prefer you never see. Why is that? Two words

– PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT! –

Your personal empowerment threatens their control over your life.

That’s because a well-educated, lucid, and observant populace keeps politicians accountable. It’s to the advantage of politicians that people are dumbed down, phlegmatic, distracted by celebrities … and dependent on government programs.

It’s all part of the system they’ve established. It’s why disgraced politicians, embroiled in scandal with a lousy track record keep winning elections.

But none of that matters … because I’m going to show you a way to break free from their system and advance in life … no matter what “regime” runs the government.

This is the new playbook for succeeding in every area of your life.

And it epitomizes the goal of our organization The Laissez Faire Club which stands for “leave it be.”

Now I’m about to show you some shocking stuff that will absolutely amaze and startle you. So turn your phone off, lock the door, and listen closely because this will be absolutely life-changing for you … that I certainly promise.

After that, I’ll show you how to get your FREE copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness. I’ll even pay the shipping cost for you.

So let’s talk about this brave new world we’re in where Big Brother is spying on your every move …

And then I’ll show you some shockingly simple things you can do to keep your private life … private

.

Get off the Surveillance and Control Grid
Without Moving to a Cabin in the Woods

(By the way, this isn’t some guns and bunkers organization. 
Most of my staff and I live in normal suburbs.)

The America we all grew up in and loved offered the blessing of privacy. Now that has changed due to the National Security Agency’s (NSA) domestic spying program.

I’m going to show you how to make yourself virtually invisible to the NSA as well as other agencies that snoop on citizens. So why is this necessary?

Perhaps you’ve heard politicians say of the NSA spy program, “If you have nothing to hide or you’re not doing anything wrong then there’s nothing to worry about.”

At first glance, that seems reasonable. But did you realize, that same propaganda was broadcast by Hitler’s Nazi party to cow German citizens into submission and fear?

Fact is, every week you’re probably breaking one or two laws whether you realize it or not, according to a study.

In particular …

Something you’ve said over the phone, in an email, a text, or online posting could one day be construed as hate speech, subversive, or give a government agency probable cause to send a SWAT team bursting through your door at 1:30 am in the morning.

Now, I realize that may sound unbelievable. But remember, there were close to 50,000 SWAT raids last year alone. Many of which were due to “non-violent crimes.”

So even though it may sound strange to you now, something you may have said in the past could be used against you as evidence of some obscure law that you broke.

That’s why it’s critical you keep your life as private as possible. I’ll show you a few simple ways to do that in a moment.

First, here’s something else I want you to think about.

A simple Google search by an employee or friend on your computer could cause the police to pay you a visit … just like what happened to a Long Island, New York couple weeks after the Boston bombings.

The wife searched for information on pressure cookers for cooking lentils and not long after that, her husband searched for backpacks online for their kids.

Soon after a SWAT team had their house surrounded.

Stop for a moment and think about the implications of that.

You now live in a world where a Google or Bing search can easily trigger the attention of law enforcement … or at the very least put you on some “list.”

That’s the bad news. The good news is A Man’s Right to Happiness will show you several work-arounds that could make sure the NSA and other Federal Agencies aren’t tracking you.

And don’t worry, you don’t need to be a techy or computer expert to put these tips to work. We’ve designed all of these to be incredibly easy to implement.

You’ll learn …

  • The single biggest privacy mistake most people make every single day, opening themselves up for hackers and prying eyes… without ever realizing it. (See page 39.)
  • Why logging onto your computer the way the software companies want you to log in actually exposes your computer to being hacked by NSA snoops. (See page 40.)
  • The one simple and easy move you must make when you log onto your computer. This tip allows you to build castle like walls around your emails and private browsing activity. (See page 40.)
  • A surprisingly cheap mobile phone app you can use to block the NSA from listening in on your calls! (See page 35.)
  • A brilliant online tool that works on the same concept as blending into a giant crowd of people, and throws the NSA snoops off your online trail completely. (See page 36.)
  • A laughably simply way to use your cell phone without your location being tracked. (See page 38.)
  • Why your anti-virus program and firewall isn’t enough to stop hackers from snooping inside your computer… or inserting dirty pictures and fake web search history that you would never want to be associated with.
  • An “every-man’s” do it yourself way to put an impenetrable wall around your computer. (See page 39.)

Of course, these simple tips to increase your privacy in an increasingly prying America are just one the many chapters you’ll find inside your copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness.

Here’s something else I think you’ll find useful …

Obama’s Plans To Spread Your Wealth Around… Here’s How to Keep More of
Your Hard-Earned Money!

Most people don’t know this, but according to the Office of Management and Budget, 62 percent of the federal budget goes to entitlements.

Entitlements are just a fancy way to say food stamps, Obamaphones (a free cell phone plan for low income people which includes 250 free minutes a month) and the various other welfare programs.

Now, I have no problem with providing for people in need. But I don’t think it’s the government’s role to force you and I to do so.

And what really gets my blood-boiling is that it’s you and I that are footing the bill for well-abled people to receive free rent.

That’s absolutely outrageous don’t you agree?

Listen, my point is this – with Obama’s administration in office, the welfare programs show no signs of slowing down. And with more than half of America receiving handouts, how can we ever expect to vote these policies out of power?

That’s why we’re going to continue to be financially raped in an effort for the government to provide for those in “so-called” need.

We’ll be taxed, regulated, fined – you name it. That’s on top of already high taxes.

Consider that, on average, you and I work an entire week each month just to cover the taxes the Federal Government demands.

You, like me, probably don’t want to just hand your money away like that.

Fortunately there are some tax dodges and tricks you can do to slash your taxes to the absolute legal minimum.

I believe it’s your duty to do this, for the future success and legacy you leave to your family.

And don’t worry; these tips are all “by the book,” and won’t get you in trouble with any regulators.

We show you what they are, and how to take advantage of them in your free copy of A Man’s Right To Happiness. Let me show you some of these right now…

  • The THREE investment vehicles that could stuff your bank account with tax-free cash – running in the $1,000s — every month! (See page 85.)
  • The “early inheritance” tax dodge that legally lets you transfer property to your children without it being taxed. (See page 81.)
  • How to write off a couple hundred dollars off your tax bill with something we call “the man’s best friend trick.” (See page 82.)
  • How living with a “significant other” can allow you to legally write off $2,500 on your taxes. (See page 84.)
  • How to turn your baby-sitter costs into a tax deduction – savings you $100s — using this little-known loop-hole. (See page 84.)
  • How if you’re in the 28% tax bracket you may be able to write off as much as $840 from a common medical expense that 11% of Americans have done each year. (See page 85.)
  • Why installing a single household feature could turn into a handsome tax deduction if you use a little known medical expense loop-hole. (See page 86.)
  • The amazing secret of how you can turn your favorite past-time into a tax deduction worth several hundred dollars a year in write offs! (See page 87.)
  • How “becoming the bank” for your friends and family could turn into a nice tax deduction for you. (See page 87.)
  • How something we call the “driving Ms. Daisy secret” can turn into a small tax write-off worth $100 or more for you – each year. (See page 87.)
  • Do you take care of an elderly or sick relative? If so, you may qualify for this special tax deduction most people overlook. (See page 88.)
  • Discover how you can take advantage of this little-known “charity tax trick” that could shave as much as $750 off your tax liability. (See page 88.)
  • A special real estate trick you can use every five years that could mean huge deductions… running in the $1000s! Few people even realize this secret loophole exists. (See page 90.)
  • The five-step way government computers select tax returns for audits and how to forever disappear from their lists, completely ending any anxiety you have when you file your taxes. (See page 80.)
  • An aggressive but 100% legal exemption that allows you to legally never have to pay into Social Security. Saves you an average of $345,000 over the course of your working career. (See page 82.)

Added up, you’ll find more than two dozen ways to save $5,290 or more this coming tax-season.

Imagine what you’d do with an extra $5,000, or more. Would you use it to take the vacation you and your spouse deserve? Would you save it, storing it away for a rainy day?

The good news is that you can do anything you want. It’s your money. You earned it. It’s not the government’s money to take.

But unfortunately, most people miss these easy deductions and tips.

Not you. Not anymore.

This book and the tax slashing ideas inside could mean a fat refund check instead of a tax bill for you!

Again, everything you’ll see is 100% legal, for now.

It’s as simple as thousands of dollars back in your pocket, legally, for following the tax code to the letter.

I can’t stress this enough – this is YOUR money. Don’t you have a moral obligation to you and your family to keep as much of it as possible?

This book lays out a detailed blueprint for how to save thousands, legally.

As you can imagine, this is dangerous information in the eyes of the Federal Government whose goal is to extract as much money out of you as they can.

That’s why I wouldn’t be surprised to see a “cease and desist letter” arrive in my office any day now – forcing me to pull this letter offline.

And that’s also why I’m standing by to reserve your FREE copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness.

I’ll show you how at the end of this presentation.

Now here’s something that may seriously shock you …

You Might Live in a
“No-Constitution Zone”
Where Your Rights Have Been Suspended!

Chances are, you never saw this on your local news.

If you live anywhere in the U.S., including Alaska or Hawaii and live 100 miles from the border be it the Pacific Ocean, the Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico, the Great Lakes, Canada, or Mexico … Homeland Security says you are currently in a “Constitution Free Zone.” Your 4th Amendment rights in particular may no longer be active according to them.

Since 2008, the ACLU has been digging into this matter trying to find out more through the Freedom of Information Act. So far, various law enforcement agencies, politicians, and Federal agencies are keeping this on the down low.

 

Think about what this means to you for a moment.

For us, it unfortunately means our Baltimore-based office is in this zone. So it looks like First Amendment rights can be re-interpreted here on the whims of Federal employees.

If you get a copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness and you live in one of these no Constitution zones and this book becomes banned, may I suggest that you don’t let anyone know you own this book?

There’s more “HOT” information in this book.

Take for instance this little-known way to privately build wealth and “go off the grid.”

Secret Currency

In 2003, our Laissez Faire Club president – a three time NYT best-selling author and Sundance award winning filmmaker – predicted the collapse of the U.S. Dollar.

Since then, there have been a lot of famous economists riding our coattails. When the dollar loses its status as the reserve currency of the world, it could become nearly worthless overnight.

And when that happens you’ll be paying $8 a gallon for gas – perhaps much more and you’ll wipe out most of your pay-check just to buy groceries every week. It’ll be utter financial chaos for all Americans.

So it’s no secret that you must get some of your wealth OUTSIDE the dollar. Owning some gold and silver is a good place to start.

Here at the Laissez Faire Club we recommend everyone hold at least 5-10% of their wealth in gold or silver.

But did you know that there is a new form of currency that’s growing in popularity and traded world-wide?

Many of our members of the club have already diversified into this new currency as a way to protect themselves in the event of a U.S. dollar collapse.

Since its inception, this new currency has increased 800% in value, and if trends continue it could turn everyone’s phone into a private off-shore money shelter just like the ultra-rich have.

What’s more, this new type of currency allows money to pass from one party to another without a paper trail because there’s no third party involved. Hence it saves you on fees associated with transaction costs as seen with credit cards or PayPal.

Additionally, this new type of currency cannot be frozen by your bank, yet it’s perfectly legal. As an added benefit, it can’t be stoleneither.

We reveal the name of this currency, how to safely buy it, where to store it, and everything you need to immediately take advantage of it on page 91.

You can see this and so much more is in your free copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness.

Stay tuned and we’ll show you how to get your copy mailed to you. (I’ll even cover the shipping cost.)

For now, I urge you to listen closely to this…

Getting Richer is the Best Revenge
Here are Investment Opportunities that
Offer Juicy Returns and Could
Enable You to Retire Sooner!

We all know how big of a role psychology plays in the stock market.

But now one appearance by Ben Bernanke or Obama on TV can instantly set off a ripple that rolls right through the stock market pushing it up or all too often, downward.

Just this past June, for example, Bernanke told us that the Federal Reserve would begin pulling back its support for the economy.

Stocks fell more than 4% in the two days that followed. Billions of dollars in stock market wealth vanished instantly.

Then, in his speech a month later, Bernanke reversed his course. He told investors he’d continue to prop up the economy … and stocks rallied by a whopping 200 points.

If you’re like me, you don’t want your wealth manipulated up and down on the whims of what some central banker says in his monthly speech.

And it doesn’t stop there …

A few months ago the government decided to recalculate the way it measures the total American economy. The “old” way had been around for nearly 100 years.

But it’s not good enough anymore, says our elected officials.

The government also manipulates unemployment figures to look lower than they are. And they fudge the price inflation statistics to make it look like prices aren’t going up.

Yeah, right.

I remember 50 cent per gallon gasoline. 25 cent movies. 10 cent cartons of milk.

Yet, according to our government, prices are “stable.” Ha!

Listen, what I’m saying is this – you need to protect yourself from their lies, manipulated statistics, and distractions.

We show you how. By sharing with you the best investment opportunities that work in today’s changed America.

  • The TWO diversification strategies that could allow you to make thousands (or more) no matter if the market see-saws up or down. (See page 146.)
  • THREE little-known but potentially mega-profitable tax-free investment opportunities that pay you monthly. (See page 85.)
  • The best investment opportunities in real estate during good times and bad. (See page 130.)
  • Hot, overlooked foreign investment opportunities that could make you a bundle of money, while further diversifying you away from the U.S. Dollar. (See page 131.)
  • A simple and easy way to buy, store, and sell precious metals without getting scammed. (See page 128.)
  • “Non-Wall-Street” alternatives to the traditional IRS or 401(k) retirement plan that build your wealth 100% tax-free! (See page 85.)
  • The THREE best investment vehicles for generating monthly dividend checks. (See page 85.)
  • How to make upwards of $25,000 per year, in the stock market, without buying a single stock. (See page 128.)
  • How to best potentially profit from the current U.S. energy boom that’s making everyone from everyday farmers to oil rig workers radically rich. (See page 129.)
  • The FIVE best stocks you should buy and hold forever, and why this could be the safest and easiest way to grow your wealth. (See page 130.)

If this has gotten your attention, wait till you see what comes next!

During this special message I have been mentioning that I’ll show you how to get your FREE copy of this book, A Man’s Right to Happiness.

I plan on doing this in just a moment. But here’s another way this book could profoundly help you …

Career. Money. Credit.
What You Need to Know to Get Ahead

It used to be, that hard work and a good idea was all it took to achieve the American dream. But in today’s changed America, that’s not the case anymore. Here’s why:

For starters … your dollars are nearly worthless because 98% of their value has been erased due in part to inflation. During the 70’s a bottle of soda pop cost about 45 cents. Things have changed so much that if you’ll look at your computer keyboard, there is no longer a cent symbol.

To get a high-paying job, most people would agree that you should get a good college degree. But it may be time to rethink college due to the fact that student loan debt in America is the second largest debt owed by Americans next to mortgages.

In fact, an NBC News report showed that the college graduate class of 2011 owes a whopping $26,000 on student loans.

Even with a college degree, that job market doesn’t look so good.

According to The Weekly Standard, the average American now earns less income than he or she did before the end of the Great Recession.

Now with Obamacare going LIVE, many companies are shedding jobs or converting existing full-time positions into part-time positions.

This being the case, you’ve got to employ new ways of managing money to get ahead. Your FREE copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness shows you how.

Inside you’ll learn …

  • Should you send your kids and grandkids to college or not – is it worth it? What are their job alternatives for higher income and pay? We reveal the shocking answers. (See page 121.)
  • Top 10 high growth industries for long term employment. (See page 122.)
  • What insiders are quietly doing to pick up world-class insurance for a fraction of the price you’re currently paying, and how you can too. (See page 133.)
  • THREE steps for maintaining good credit so you can drive off the dealership lot in whatever new car you choose. (See page 123.)
  • THREE little-known tricks that help you repair your credit, even if you’ve previously filed for bankruptcy. (See page 124.)
  • The secret debt snowball strategy for melting away your debt till you’re completely debt free! (See page 125.)
  • How to cut your cable bill to $0 and still watch the TV shows you love! (See page 126.)
  • How you can make as much as $1,350 per month in “the underground market.” (See page 128.)
  • Secrets for getting up to 25% off on your next appliance or big ticket purchase (See page 127.)
  • How to generate and spend unreported income that’s 100% free of federal taxes. (See page 88.)

Now, as you can see, this book contains many secrets – more than 100 in total.

They all come from a panel of experts we’ve developed here at the Laissez Faire Club.

On our board of experts we have a three-time best-selling author and filmmaker, one of the world’s leading privacy attorneys, and a billionaire publishing icon.

We also have one of America’s most trusted tax experts – a man that’s helped more than 26,000 people slash their taxes to the lowest legal minimum.

And we have one of the most cutting-edge healthcare entrepreneurs, whose ideas and help have literally saved the lives of more than 10,000 people.

All told, our expert panel has written three best sellers. They’ve appeared in television more numerous times. And they’ve written hundreds of articles, all devoted to showing people like you and me how to live an independent life.

Now, for the first time ever, we’ve compiled ALL their best ideas into one place. It’s all in your FREE copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness.

As far as I know there’s nothing else like this book on the market. As great as this is … there’s even more exciting secrets waiting to be discovered!

Secrets of How to Position
Yourself for Success in Business …
Even When Taxes, Regulations, and
Society are Against You

While there are many new exciting business opportunities there are also many new challenges for the entrepreneur.

Starting and running a business has become increasingly difficult. Listen to this …

A Wells Fargo/Gallup survey reports that 72% of small business owners believe regulations and red tape hurt them.

The government wants more revenue, as such taxes are being increased on businesses. This adds another set of problems for the entrepreneur who may already be struggling.

According to CNN Money, America has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. But it gets worse.

If you hire employees, it can mean never-ending headaches for you. That’s because some politicians are pushing for policies that demand you pay a “living wage” to low level workers.

Just recently there was a nationwide fast food strike by workers demanding higher pay to flip burgers.

Fortunately, your free copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness shows you actionable solutions that could help you succeed as an entrepreneur in spite of these problems.

Take a look at what you’ll find inside…

  • TWO BUSINESS IDEAS that require very little money to start … that don’t require employees, yet can instantly start you down the path to generating $50,000 a year in additional income (See page 163.)
  • If you have a business that requires staff, here’s how to get the help you need without technically hiring employees. (See page 165.)
  • The fastest and easiest online business you can start where you won’t be competing against giants like Amazon.com. (See page 164.)
  • The fastest and easiest offline business you can start where you won’t be competing against franchises and giants like Wal-Mart or Target. (See page 164.)
  • A negotiating trick that works like a charm to get your way. Great for saving money and establishing lucrative business deals. (See page 165.)
  • How to create multiple streams of income, so you never have to worry about out-living your savings. (See page 166.)
  • An easy way to increase the probability you’ll become wealthy. (See page 166.)
  • How to set up your business so Obamacare regulations won’t hammer it. (See page 164.)
  • High growth niches and trends that are perfect for starting a new business in. (See page 122.)

It’s all in your FREE copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness.

Now please pay close attention to what comes next as it literally could mean the difference between life and death for you.

How to Survive Obamacare:
Avoid Death Panels, Treatment Rationing,
and Sub-Par Service and Instead
Receive Better Health Care Than 90
Percent of the U.S. Population

Congress is supposed to be bound by the same laws as you are, right? But did you realize that Congress just got an exemption on Obamacare?

If you haven’t heard, Senators, House members, and their staffers were up in arms because they didn’t want to exchange their current health coverage for Obamacare. They threw a fit about it, and Obama granted them a waiver.

That says almost everything you need to know about the cost and quality of healthcare under The “Affordable” Care Act. And you and I will be stuck with it.

It’s going to be an absolute nightmare.

Industry insiders and health professionals all agree that you can expect to wait two to three times longer than you currently do just to see your doctor.

This means your lab test visits will be delayed as well as visits to your specialist even if you’re in pain.

Some experts expect a mass exodus of doctors and other healthcare professionals – leaving fewer experienced physicians to care for you when you will need it most.

And then there’s the rising cost …

According to Forbes.com, “Obamacare will increase individual-market premiums in California by as much as 146 percent.” And ABC News reports that “the overwhelming majority will see double-digit increases in their individual health insurance markets.”

Luckily, we have one of the world’s leading experts on health-care in our club.

He’s dedicated his life to showing more than 10,000 Americans how to receive everything from hip-replacements to life-saving treatments – outside the government and corporate controlled healthcare system.

Over his 10 year career, he’s discovered a set of work-arounds that promise you get top-notch healthcare while potentially saving – depending on your specific coverage — thousands of dollars per year.

It’s crucial for your health that you take these steps immediately. And they’re all waiting for you in your FREE book. Some of what you’ll discover includes …

  • How to claim a $130,000 surgical procedure for just $18,500, even if you’re uninsured, or on a high-deductible plan. (See page 10.)
  • Three places you can get life-saving surgery at 50% to 80% less than what you’d pay in the U.S. yet the quality of the surgery is on par, if not far better than you’ll find at your local hospital. (See page 10.)
  • A surprisingly affordable way you can take charge of your own health in the prevention and early detection of disease by getting medical tests without a physician’s referral or needing to involve your insurance. (See page 12.)
  • How for as little as $50 a month you can get one-on-one access to a physician that includes their cell phone number, 24/7 access, same day appointments, and even home visits. (See page 21.)
  • A personal healthcare plan you should consider that will protect you and your loved ones, no matter what form of Obamacare is thrust upon us. (See page 25.)

Proven Health Hacks that Enhance
Your Health So You can 
Avoid Having to See a Doctor

Forbes article highlights how Obamacare will result in rationing of drugs and treatments. (That same article mentions that Obamacare backers actually claim rationing is a good thing!)

If you should find yourself needing special treatments – you sure as heck don’t want to hear “REQUEST DENIED.”

To make sure you don’t find yourself in this scenario where diabetes, cancer, or heart disease treatments are rationed … it’s imperative that you engage in preventative care.

We have a special chapter in A Man’s Right to Happiness that will arm you with superb solutions to bolster your health and help prevent the onset of catastrophic disease.

You’ll find out …

  • A secret pressure point trick that you can do anywhere, using nothing more than the palm of your hand. This trick takes only seconds to do, and almost instantly it perks you up and gives you plenty of energy to be more productive! No need to gulp down cups of coffee or rely on energy drinks. (See page 151.)
  • The FOUR best exercises you can do without weights at home or in a hotel room to stay in shape. (See page 152.)
  • How to reduce stress and relax without drugs or alcohol. (See page 153.)
  • The most important over-the-counter medications and medical supplies you should have in stock, at all times. (See page 154.)
  • THREE tricks for stopping a heart attack. (See page 155.)
  • FOUR natural secrets for lowering your blood pressure. (See page 155.)
  • The FIVE best remedies for fighting a cold. (See page 156.)
  • How to banish migraines and bad headaches. (See page 157.)
  • FIVE foods that enhance your intelligence. (See page 158.)
  • The SEVEN healthiest foods you should have stocked in your pantry or fridge at all times. (See page 158.)
  • FIVE best ways to help prevent the onset of heart disease, cancer and diabetes. (See page 159.)
  • SEVEN secrets that help you drop unwanted inches and pounds. (See page 160.)
  • How to drink pure, clean water without having to stockpile bottled water. (See page 162.)

Next, let’s look at a weird way the government destroys your day to day productivity…

Why is the Government Interested in
Your Toilet and Showerhead?

Although most people don’t know this, many of the items in your home are highly regulated by the government.

And because of it, they don’t work as well and they actually cost you more.

Case in point …

Recently Obama has made an aggressive push to have your home appliances redesigned to meet the Energy Department’s harsh new energy-efficiency standards which covers 20 different products with more on the way.

At first glance, this might seem reasonable.

But the problem is, these regulations will raise the price of appliances by more than consumers are ever to likely earn back in the form of energy savings! On top of that, it could mean these products break down more often or don’t work as well.

Based upon Energy Department estimates, new water heaters and furnaces could have price hikes from $67 to $974 depending on the size and type.

This comes at a time where most Americans still can’t find a job, or afford to pay their monthly mortgages.

So how on earth can they afford an even higher cost of living?

And that’s just the start …

Clothes washers were hit with a regulation in 2007 that Consumer Reports claimed “left our stain-soaked swatches nearly as dirty as they were before washing” and that “for best results, you’ll have to spend $900 or more.”

Back in January 2001, a last-minute Clinton regulation stipulated a new energy efficiency standard for AC units that increased their prices. They later admitted that many homeowners won’t recoup the added up-front costs.

Inside your free book, A Man’s Right to Happiness, you’ll discover loop-holes, hacks, and work-arounds that make your appliances last longer and work more effectively like they were meant to.

Already, readers of the Laissez Faire Letter have written in to say:

My quality of life has just shot up 1000%. I have learned how to HACK MY SHOWERHEAD. Seriously life changing. I mean Seriously. Life. Changing.~ Shana Davidson

You’ll discover how to “Hack Your Showerhead” on page 45. There’s more, too. For example …

  • A simple water heater trick that gives you cleaner dishes, clothes that feel cleaner and it even helps you sleep like a baby at night. (See page 48.)
  • Discover how one simple step (which is completely safe) can instantly make you more productive and rid your home of lingering smells … while saving you $259 or more on plumbing fees. (See page 51.)
  • A non-bleach solution found in the paint section of your hardware store that cleans your clothes and whitens them – making stains disappear in a single wash (See page 53.)
  • Why if you have a toilet that’s from 1980 or earlier, you definitely don’t want to replace it with a new one! (See page 59.)
  • A simple trick that adds years to the life of your overworked AC unit, saving you the hassle of finding an expensive AC repair man on those hot and sweaty days. (See page 63.)
  • An easy to purchase, but surprisingly strange drain clog buster… and how it can enhance the sanitation and free flow of water in your home. (See page 65.)
  • The single best “Old School” pesticide for ridding yourself of pests, and why you’d better stock up on it before it’s banned. (See page 66.)
  • How a legal over-the-counter health product became regulated under the Patriot Act and if purchased incorrectly, could trigger a SWAT team raid to your home. Here’s the work around to avoid the knock on the door. (See page 68.)

Now, chances are you will never use ALL these tips and tricks. But even if you use just a handful, my guess is that you could save hundreds of dollars this year.

That’s on top of the $2,500 you could legally save in taxes this same year.

And it’s also on top of the $52,000 in healthcare savings.

But if you made it this far, you know this book is bigger than just money saving tips.

This book could save you frustration. It could give you peace of mind, knowing that you’re in control of your life.

And that’s something we can’t put a price tag on. Wouldn’t you agree?

All these secrets, and more, are in your free copy A Man’s Right to Happiness.

But here’s some potentially bad news…

As I’ve explained, this book is NOT for sale. You can’t buy it anywhere. At any price.

Luckily, I’ve worked out a way to put a copy into your hands FREE. Here’s how…

Your Last Chance to Claim
This FREE Book Before All Copies are
Given Away… And Before the Government
Issues Us a “Cease and Desist” Letter

When I say the secrets inside A Man’s Right to Happiness is something the politicians don’t want you to see, I’m not even remotely kidding.

Remember earlier how I showed you that our office is in the “No Constitution Zone”?

Through that policy this book could likely soon be banned as amendment rights may be stifled.

Consider what we’re dealing with here …

If the government wants to silence you – they will. Recently a man was visited by FBI agents for posting on his Facebook page that the U.S. is a police state. Obviously the visit was to shut him up.

Now don’t you think the government would want to censor a book like this that offers legal tax-saving secrets … info about new currencies … and secrets on how to become invisible to the NSA?

The order to stop giving this book away could come tonight.

It’s not unusual for books to be banned in the US. Many books have been banned from school library book shelves. Some of these include great American literature classics such as The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Gone With the Wind.

If someone in Homeland Security catches wind of A Man’s Right to Happiness, they may deem it as something that needs to be restricted under the context of subversive literature.

It’s not subversive literature in any way of course. But if they did consider it subversive — it wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

This is why you better move fast to claim this free book before it’s no longer available.

Here’s How to Claim Your FREE Book

To claim your 100% free copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness, (we’ll even cover the shipping) simply agree to a trial subscription to the Laissez Faire Letter.

The Laissez Faire Letter features experts on topics that matter to you most.

Topics like ways to legally lower your tax bill … free alternatives to public education … strategies for a safe and secure retirement … ways to protect your family during a crisis … how to customize your health insurance that fits your exact needs … and more.

All are focused on how to help you live a happier, healthier and financially independent life.

Only the Laissez Faire Letter is about providing you little-known tricks that could super-charge your success in life while freeing you from the burden of government intrusion.

Each month you’ll have the advantage of knowing how to …

  • Grow your wealth outside of Wall Street schemes.
  • How to obtain great healthcare and save money during the age of Obamacare.
  • How to give yourself a “health make-over.” Even if you’re 40, you’ll feel like you’re 20 again. Fit and full of vitality and in glistening good health.
  • You’ll learn fascinating hacks that make you so much more productive and more effective in your life.
  • New ways to cut your tax bill so you only pay what you owe, and not a penny more.

Plus, there’s so much more up to the minute material that you’ll see every month.

And best of all … as a proud subscriber to the Laissez Faire Letter, you won’t fear what “regime” holds the scepter of power in the White House or Congress.

It won’t matter as you’ll have this “black bag full of tricks” to enjoy your life to the fullest and become more successful.

I invite you to subscribe to the Laissez Faire Letter today. Once you do so, you’ll be entitled to receive …

  1. Your free copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness. This is a 166-page hard copy book that we’ll mail out to you. It’s loaded with actionable solutions that can show you how to reclaim your privacy, reduce your taxes, increase your investment returns, plus it includes shrewd money management tricks, strategies for succeeding in business and career, as well as how to survive Obamacare, and bolster your health. As a subscriber you’ll get a copy mailed to your doorstep as soon as we hear from you.
  2. And of course, you’ll receive The Laissez Faire Letter which is a full-color newsletter that’s e-mailed to you every month. It’ll cover a variety of topics with enlightening commentary and actionable solutions … presented by our team of renowned experts.
  3. Instant access to Future Special Reports. We will continue to create new books and reports similar to A Man’s Right to Happiness and you’ll receive them free as well!

As you can see, you’re getting a ton of actionable ideas that will absolutely upgrade your life.

So now I’d like you to imagine a few things for me …

Imagine living a live where you’re fully in control, rather than feeling like the mouse in some perverted government game …

Imagine controlling, building, growing and saving enough wealth to provide a legacy for your family, long after you’re gone …

And imagine immediately implementing some small things that instantly protects your privacy, slashes your taxes, and helps you amass more wealth.

After today you won’t have to imagine it … it can be reality once you claim this FREE book I’d like to send to you.

Here’s how to get your hands on the next release of the Laissez Faire Letter along with your FREE book, A Man’s Right to Happiness.

For a Limited Time Get
Half off the Regular Subscription Price!

Considering the tips, tricks, and insider info you’ll be given that covers your personal privacy, reducing taxes, success in investing, career, and business, as well as surviving Obamacare, and bettering your health … you’re looking at saving thousands … possibly tens of thousands of dollars.

Just one of the healthcare savings tricks could save you $52,000 … and one of the tax savings tricks could save you $2,500.

You’re also looking at potentially making thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars in extra yearly income as well. (Not to mention the benefits you’ll see in your health and day-to-day quality of life.)

That said, you could easily justify pricing the Laissez Faire Letter at $197 a year, or more.

After all, some people pay CPA’s thousands of dollars for just the tax-savings advice alone.

But today through this special offer…

You will have access to a TEAM OF EXPERTS who specialize in providing solutions for multiple areas of your life … for pennies on the dollar comparatively.

So, how much would you expect to pay for the research you’ll receive with your Laissez Fairesubscription?

$150? $125?

Well, here’s the good news…

You won’t pay anywhere near that price, for two reasons.

First, our costs are divided across thousands of subscribers all over the world.

Second, we have made it our mission to share our ideas on health, wealth, and living a happy life with 100,000 people.

“I just joined the ‘club.’ This must be, without a doubt, the most remarkable thing I’ve ever had the pleasure to be a part of. Well done!”— Member, G.H.

“LAISSEZ FAIRE is a real GOD-SEND !”— Member, B.D.

“It has been a great experience to actually think and discuss philosophical and economic issues with people from around the globe. I think I have learned more in the past month then I had learned in the past 10 years. Keep it coming!”— Member, D.R.

But today, even though you might be happy to join at the regular price, you won’t pay that. Let me explain …

To reach our goal of 100,000 subscribers, we’re offering a huge discount on the subscription fee.

So here’s the bottom line…

It costs just $49 for a year-long subscription to the Laissez Faire Letter.

This includes your free copy of A Man’s Right to Happiness.

And it includes 12 monthly issues of the Laissez Faire Letter, each packed with urgent tips you can immediately take advantage of.

Here’s what I suggest you do today…

Put our claims to the test over the next thirty days by agreeing to a trial subscription.

If the letter isn’t everything I’ve explained here, and more, you can cancel anytime during the next thirty days and I’ll send you every single cent of your trial subscription fee back.

You keep everything you’ve received during that time.

That’s more than fair, wouldn’t you agree?

So act now and claim your free FREE copy of Man’s Right to Happiness and free gifts. To get access, Simply click the link below.

Welcome aboard …

Subscribe Now

You Can Review Your Order Before it’s Final

Sincerely,

Doug Hill
Director, The Laissez Faire Letter
October 2013

P.S. Now here’s a new reason to subscribe to the Laissez Faire Letter. I have another special report I’m offering you FREE … immediately today … that if put into action … could save you hundreds or thousands of dollars.

Listen, I don’t have to tell you that bureaucrats sitting in Federal offices aren’t the only ones burying you under a mountain of ridiculous laws and inconveniences that put a wet blanket on your day to day quality of life.

State bureaucrats are in on the micro-managing action too. And sometimes, they can be worse than the Federal government, banning your collection of rain water, fining you for cutting a tree that’s about to fall on your home, or prohibiting the selling of large soda drinks. (Places like Oregon, California, and New York City especially come to mind.)

“The 5 Best States to Find Fortune and Felicity” which you can download right now.

Our experts researched all 50 states to determine which seven states treat you like an adult … and have the highest levels of freedoms, the lowest tax burden, and have the least burdensome regulation.

We found those states. Our report shows you which states are the worst to live in (maybe you live in one now!) and it shows you which seven made the cut and why, and what it means for you. You don’t want to miss this eye-opening report that’s not available anywhere else.

I think you’ll agree, it’s the perfect complement to A Man’s Right to Happiness … and it’s could be yours absolutely free.

The clock is ticking … don’t delay another moment, reserve your FREE copy of this book along with your free gifts now before all advance copies are taken.

You’ll be so glad you did!

Subscribe Now

You Can Review Your Order Before it’s Final

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

junio 18, 2014

No 691     “En mi opinión”    Junio 18, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

<o> Christian Student Shakes His Proverbial Fist When School Tells Him Not To Mention God At Graduation

By Emily Hulsey 3 days ago

When Brooks Hamby learned that he was his class’s salutatorian and would be giving a speech at graduation, school officials gave him one condition: He could not mention his faith at any point during the ceremony.

Fortunately, Brooks knew his rights – and cared about his faith – enough to stand up to the illegal policy. This is what he said during his speech, fromTheBlaze:

“In coming before you today, I presented three drafts of my speech, all of them denied on account of my desire to share with you my personal thoughts and inspiration to you: my Christian faith,” Hamby said. “In life, you will be told, ‘No.’ In life you will be told to do things that you have no desire to do. In life, you will be asked to do things that violate your conscience and desire to do what is right.”*

As the crowd started to murmur, Hamby gave his advice: “No man or woman has ever truly succeeded or been fulfilled on the account of living for others and not standing on what they knew in their heart was right or good.”*

He then quoted from “the biggest best-selling book of all-time in history” — the Bible.

Brooks has learned at an early age what many people never do: The only way to beat oppression is to stand up to it.

We admire this teen for taking such a brave stand and hope his example will inspire others to do the same. http://www.ijreview.com/2014/06/147849-christian-student-shakes-proverbial-fist-school-tells-mention-god-graduation/

 EXECUTIVE

Sources: Benghazi attack suspect captured, en route to US

By Justin FishelFoxNews.com

31

DEVELOPING … 

EXCLUSIVE: A suspected terrorist linked to the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that killed four Americans has been captured inside Libya by U.S. forces and currently is en route to the United States, Fox News has learned exclusively. ADVERTISEMENT:

Sources tell Fox News that the suspect, who was captured during a joint U.S. military and law enforcement operation, will face prosecution in the United States. on BREITBART TV 16 Jun 201

On Monday’s broadcast of “The O’Reilly Factor,” host Bill O’Reilly used his opening “Talking Points Memo” segment to urge President Barack Obama to take a more hawkish approach in dealing with the unfolding situation in Iraq. According to O’Reilly, it is necessary take military against the al Qaeda affiliated ISIS because of the cost already incurred for the United States in Iraq and it will a message to ISIS that the United States is a force with which to be reckoned. 

“We are not going to be be able to solve the internal problems of the Iraqis,” O’Reilly said. “That being said, I fully expect President Obama to begin bombing the al Qaeda army very soon. If he does not do that, it would be an enormous dereliction of duty. He is the commander-in-chief. Al Qaeda wants to kill us, so he must send a message to them and to the largely cowardly world. We will not allow savages to disseminate the world. That is the message that must be sent.” 

AMENPER: ¿Que importancia tiene eso?

 

Hillary “¿que importancia tiene eso?” Clinton, agrega una nueva frase a su perfil personal.

Ahora podemos llamarla Hillary “no puedo comentar sobre eso” Clinton.

Esta frase es la que usó cuando los periodistas le preguntaron lo que pensaba sobre el oleoducto de Keystone.   Hillary parece que está siendo asesorada por su consorte “El resbaloso Willy”,  y está dando las mismas respuestas resbalosas de Willy.   Las respuestas de Clinton cuando era presidente pasarán como un legado de resbalones.  Dijo “oigan bien, nunca he tenido sexo con esa mujer”,  después con esa cara no tan dura como lubricada, dijo que lo que lo que él quiso decir era que no consideraba el sexo oral como sexo. 

Como diría Cantinflas, “si estás bien achaparrado no cuenta lo mamado”

Volviendo a Hillary, ella no es secretaria de estado más, es simplemente una ciudadana que tiene la libertad para expresar su opinión.  Pudiera ser aceptado con respecto a alguna información que hubiera adquirido durante su mandato sobre algo de seguridad nacional.   ¿Pero qué carajo tiene que ver lo que ella piensa sobre el oleoducto con la seguridad nacional? ¿Cual es el secreto que no se puede comentar?

Yo creo que yo sé el secreto, y es que ella todavía no ha decidido qué posición tomar en este caso durante la próxima campaña presidencial. Tampoco quiere hablar sobre Bengazi porque “¿que importancia tiene eso?” Creo que Hillary no volverá a Canadá por el momento, ella prefiere las preguntas de los periodistas de la prensa tramitada, las entrevistas con montaje agradable, todo lo que le pavimente su camino a la presidencia que ella considera que le pertenece.

 

Western Center for Journalism. This Is Why Judge Jeanine Is Worried (And Thinks You Should Be Afraid)

If you don’t think that what happens there matters to you, you’re wrong!

TOM HINCHEY  

Judge Jeanine Pirro warned Americans that we should be worried over the crisis in the Middle East, regardless where you live.  “You know me, I’m fearless.” said the Judge in her opening statement. “I’ve spent my life fighting, investigating, prosecuting, and sentencing the worst of the worst. But tonight, I’m worried. If you don’t think that what happens there matters to you, you’re wrong! You need to be afraid.” Judge Pirro went on to blame Obama’s lack of foreign policy andpolitical decisions for minimizing our nation on the world stage to the point of being “neither respected nor feared.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/judge-jeanine-america-need-worried/#xi6C6FwuqmAJV6AY.99

Western Center for Journalism. Sheriff Joe Arpaio Reveals A Surprising Reason Why He Thinks Border Guards Aren’t Doing Their Job

Arpaio revisited the issue Monday evening during an interview on the Fox News Channel.

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 17, 2014

 

As the Obama administration’s lax attitude toward America’s immigration laws has led to a marked increase in illegal border crossings, critics – especially throughout the southwest – have expressed their outrage. Few have been as outspoken as the man often billed as America’s toughest sheriff, Maricopa County, Ariz., lawman Joe Arpaio.

He recently weighed in on the influx of unaccompanied minors and other illegals being transported to his state under the direction of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Not only did Arpaio chastise government officials whose policies encourage repeat offenders, he called to task those illegals with the audacity to complain about their treatment upon arriving in the U.S. as criminals.

Arpaio revisited the issue Monday evening during an interview on the Fox News Channel. He explained that, with the sharp rise in children crossing the border, agents assigned to protecting America are suffering from misplaced priorities.

“The Border Patrol is too busy changing diapers and not going after dope peddlers and illegal immigrants,” he said.

Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Gil Kerikowske seemed to bolster Arpaio’s position with a recent statement regarding the border situation.

“I have been watching them do absolutely heroic efforts,” he said of border agents. “Not only rescuing children but taking care of them, way beyond some of the skill sets. They are doing everything from making formula to bringing in their own children’s clothing to taking care of these kids in a multitude of ways.”

With nearly 50,000 minors having illegally crossed the border without adult supervision in just the past eight months, authorities are scrambling to find temporary housing for them. In Arpaio’s estimation, this result was all part of Barack Obama’s ultimate goal of achieving amnesty.

“I think the president knew this was going to happen,” he said, “so it’s going to help him on his executive orders if Congress doesn’t take this mission up.”

Judging from reports of overcrowding and generally inhospitable environments within these housing facilities, however, Arpaio concluded the scheme could likely backfire.

He said that, if they were inclined to do so, U.S. authorities could put a stop to the relentless assault on our immigration laws.

“This is a great country,” he said. “You’re trying to tell me we can’t keep people from coming into our country if we really had the desire to do it? I don’t buy it.”

Tom Horne, Arizona’s attorney general, has also gotten involved in the controversy by sending the Border Patrol official notice that they are violating federal law.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/heres-sheriff-joe-thinks-border-guards-arent-job/#HRyBpQ2KWysyPep7.99

 

Western Center for Journalism.IRS Chairman Compelled To Testify About Missing Emails

“We are simply not going to accept the IRS claim…”

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 17, 2014

 

After initially admitting it somehow lost two years’ worth of emails sent by former IRS official Lois Lerner, the agency announced this week that at least six other employees’ correspondences similarly vanished. Documentation of these communications, congressional investigators contend, could have added much-needed context to a look at the IRS’s systematic targeting of conservative groups.

Among the emails missing are communications between Lerner and White House sources as well as other key Obama administration agencies. The widespread data loss has been blamed on a hard drive crash about three years ago.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, along with House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, has joined the growing chorus of critics who claim such a result is suspicious. Many wonder why, if the crash truly led to the obliteration of so many integral emails, the IRS failed to notify anyone until this week.

Issa recently announced he issued a subpoena compelling IRS Commissioner John Koskinen to testify regarding the ongoing controversy.

“I will not tolerate your continued obstruction and game-playing in response to the Committee’s investigation of the IRS targeting,” Issa wrote.

He concluded that agency officials have “promised to produce requested – and, later, subpoenaed – documents, only to respond later with excuses and inaction.”

According to Issa, even now “the IRS still insists on flouting constitutional congressional oversight.”

Camp has continued to express his belief that there is more to the story than agency officials are reporting.

“We are simply not going to accept the IRS claim that these documents are not recoverable,” he said.

As for Koskinen, he expressed his willingness to testify before two House committees regarding the missing emails. Furthermore, he took issue with allegations that his agency is trying to purposely disrupt the investigation.

“I spent three weeks trying to restore [missing data] back in 2011,” he asserted. “We’ve got 24,000 emails from that period, so nobody’s hiding anything.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/irs-chairman-compelled-testify-missing-emails/#o7g3LoFFloSuG4IQ.99

 

Western Center for Journalism.Obama Announces He Is Sending Troops To Iraq

“This force will remain in Iraq until the security situation becomes such that it is no longer needed.”

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 17, 2014

 

As terrorists aligned with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria make their way through the northernregion of Iraq, capturing cities along their way to the capital of Baghdad, many have called on Barack Obama to send American troops to aid in a war he previously declared was over.

According to a letter he sent to congressional leaders this week, Obama plans to send soldiers to the embattled nation; however, they will not be deployed specifically for combat duty.

“Starting on June 15, 2014,” the letter stated, “up to approximately 275 U.S. Armed Forces personnel are deploying to Iraq to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.”

He explained that troops will be equipped for combat, should it become necessary.

“This force will remain in Iraq until the security situation becomes such that it is no longer needed.”

The announcement came just days after Obama confirmed he was weighing his options regarding how to deal with the devolving situation between Iraqi soldiers and ISIS militants. He stated unequivocally, however, that sending in combat troops was not an option.

In his latest correspondence with Congress, Obama wrote that the move to send in troops was based on his “responsibility to protect U.S. citizens both at home and abroad, and in furtherance of U.S. national security and foreign policy interests” related to his constitutional responsibilities.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest released a statement indicating that the soldiers’ responsibilities will include providing “assistance to the Department of State in connection with the temporary relocation of some staff from the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad to the U.S. Consulates General in Basra and Erbil and to the Iraq Support Unit in Amman.”

While hundreds of individuals instructed to leave the embassy last week, the White House statement confirmed it “remains open, and a substantial majority of the U.S. Embassy presence in Iraq will remain in place and the embassy will be fully equipped to carry out its national security mission.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-breaks-sends-troops-iraq/#efsHgdacqOMDo5ll.99

 

Western Center for Journalism.Caught On Tape: Hillary Laughs About Her Role In Child Rapist’s Release

“It was a fascinating case.”

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 16, 2014

As the 2016 election cycle approaches, an increase in partisan rhetoric will predictably lead towidespread criticism of frontrunners in either party. For expected Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, however, the most effective method of offense might just be using her own comments against her.

After a series of myopic interview responses, a video surfaced this week revealing an introspective look at her legal career. Reportedly recorded about 30 years ago, audio of a conversation between Clinton and author Roy Reed focuses on the former’s defense of a suspected child rapist. Instead of suggesting her client was innocent of the horrific charges against him, Clinton instead celebrated and joked about his successful plea bargain.

Reports indicate Clinton served as a court-appointed attorney during the 1975 trial.

“It was a fascinating case,” she explained. “It was a really interesting case. This guy was accused of raping a 12-year-old who was the daughter of the family he was living with in Springdale – the other side of the tracks in Springdale.”

She stated in no uncertain terms that she believed her client was guilty.

“He took a lie detector test! I had him take a polygraph, which he passed,” she continued, “which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.”

She burst into laughter at the prospect of a child rapist beating the system.

Clinton then detailed the evidence against the defendant, noting “the prosecutors had evidence, among which was his underwear … which was bloody.”

She explained that the crime lab cut the blood stain out of the garment, tested it, and returned the remainder.

“I said, ‘What kind of evidence is that?’ You know, a piece of underpants with a hole in it,” she said.

She then recalled securing the support of a Nobel Prize-winning blood expert to help make her case.

“And he had taken a real interest in forensics work,” she noted; “and so he would analyze blood stains if he got interested in the case. And so, sort of the story through the grapevine was if you get him interested in the case, you know, you had the foremost expert in the world willing to testify so that it came out the way you wanted it to come out.”

In the end, she confirmed, her client received virtually no punishment for the violent crime.

“Oh, he plea bargained! Got him off with time served in county jail,” she said. “He’d been in the county jail about two months.” Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/caught-tape-hillary-laughs-role-child-rapists-release/#V4jrI0D26mcpFkBa.99

 

Western Center for Journalism.Here’s Why America Needs To Stay Out Of Iraq And Afghanistan

America needs to understand this simple concept

JOYCE SINGHA — JUNE 17, 2014

 

PAGES: 1 2

Yes, it’s an understood fact that wars are never won by withdrawing; but this is an entirely new era of war where countries are not fighting with each other, but with hardcore radical Muslim groups. Obama withdrew troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, not for altruistic reasons, but to pander to his ridiculous liberal anti-American thinking. Nonetheless, this could perhaps be the only sane thing Obama would have done for the country because unbeknownst to him, there was no way America could have made fig of a difference in the hearts and minds of Muslims in Islamic lands.

All the groups that have emerged and re-grouped were just like dormant volcanoes, ready to erupt at an opportune moment. This is happening now. These groups are terrorists, and their only aim is to destroy anything and anyone that does not conform to their way of life. Needless to say, their life consists only of establishing Islam globally through violence, death, and destruction. Their only aim is to establish the 7th century way of life when Islam reigned supreme. With their ears, eyes, and head covered, it is impossible to explain that the world has moved on ahead of Islam’s barbaric and primitive ways.

What is currently happening in Iraq was bound to happen; it is the way in this part of the world or wherever Islam is. There is nothing nice, kind, or humane about this religion simply because this is not a religion per se. It is a way of life that believes in subjugating all by threats or killings. There is no action in these lands that is bereft of ‘beheading,’ and that is practiced with equality for all. In addition, there is brutality for all along with no rights and no freedom for anyone, alive or dead. Firstly, like in other Muslim lands, its two main groups (Sunnis and Shias) will never stop fighting each other; America needs to understand this simple concept. Secondly, nobody in Muslim lands recognizes the concept of democracy or wants it. Islam is a political thought, and democracy is anathema to its operation. America needs to believe this.

Obama, a man who is a sham through and through, foolishly announced to all terrorists-in-waiting in Afghanistan and Iraq the exact time of departure of American troops. Sure enough, groups like the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS lay low till it is time to move in with their black hoods. To all discerning eyes, this is how warring entities should behave; if they cannot take the enemy head-on, they wait till their time is ripe. Time is what they have plenty of. With no other distractions (i.e. wine, women, and song), Islamic groups remain committed to their twisted ideology: women have been shoved underground; wine has been banned; and song, porn, and sports are forbidden under Islam (or so they pretend!) Those who cannot pretend are beheaded and left to rot in the streets of Baghdad or the ruins of Kabul. These soldiers of Islam don’t have to find an enemy; everybody is their enemy. All they have to do is choose which one they would like to destroy first! It is truly a bloodthirsty way of life.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/america-needs-stay-iraq-afghanistan/#W4Tv0As2xJm5zMrT.99

 

Western Center for Journalism. Who Are The Real Psychopaths, Mr. Obama?

And who are the real honorable people?

ROSEANN SALANITRI — JUNE 17, 2014

 

PAGES: 1 2

Lewis Carroll’s sequel to Alice’s Adventures in WonderlandThrough the Looking-Glass – and What Alice Found There, bears an uncanny resemblance to life in America today where up is down and down is up.

Who can forget the iconic White Rabbit and his memorable chant: “I’m late! I’m late! For a very important date! No time to say hello, goodbye! I’m late! I’m late! I’m late!” His urgency led Alice straight down the rabbit hole that was fraught with illogic and mind-bending adventures seemingly normal in an abnormal world. To draw a modern day comparison to the White Rabbit, one does not have to look any further than the nation’s White House. The man now occupying the oval office often uses urgency as a means of rushing us into unwise decisions – like Obamacare. However, those living in Wonderland had an excuse.  Many were high on smoking strange mushrooms and drinking strange concoctions (hmmm – perhaps there is an excuse for our Alice-in-Wonderland-types today who admittedly indulged in hallucinatory drugs in the past.)

Illogic is one explanation for today’s news. However, the rabbit hole we are being led down may be the path designed by those with a more sinister scenario in mind.

For example, Mr. Obama and those who serve at his pleasure, such as Susan Rice, have made the seeming illogical statement that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl served with honor and distinction while implying that those troops that served in his company were psychopaths. We can dismiss these statements as being illogical; but when perceived as the worldview of those harboring anti-America ideologies, the statements make perfect sense.  In their world, Islamic Terrorists are the heroes; and American troops are the villains – or the psychopaths. While this is also indicative of those with an upside down worldview; it is also indicative of those who call evil good and good evil.  These personalities are more than just confused; they are despicable and a danger to those who live under their authority. The Bible has something to say to them: “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Isa 5:20.) “Woe” to those in leadership positions should not be taken lightly. As was the case with King David, who sinned with Bathsheba, the “woes” that deservingly fell upon him as a result of his sin also fell upon the whole nation of Israel.

The definitions of the words Susan Rice uttered bring clarity to understanding the worldview of Ms. Rice and those who share her ideology.

Psychopath: A person with an antisocial personality disorder, manifested in aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse

Honorable: A person with a high position, worthy of respect or with high morals

Distinction: An honor given to someone who has achieved a very high standard in their work or who has helped many people, an unusual achievement or feature that makes someone or something different from other people or things. 

So, Susan Rice, on behalf of this Administration, is saying that Bowe Bergdahl, who deserted his command in search of the Taliban (with which he sympathized), is someone with high morals and worthy of respect and honor because he has achieved a very high standard in his work and/or in the process has helped many people through an unusual achievement that makes him different from other people or things? This is not an illogical statement if Ms. Rice and the Administration she represents are also Taliban sympathizers.  This revealing worldview is supported by further statements made by representatives of the Administration that categorize our fine men and women serving in harm’s way as possible “psychopaths.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/looking-glass/#LCkborv6RVol4zKT.99

 

Western Center for Journalism. The Manchurian Duck

Obama is indeed one of the very ‘useful’ scoundrels…

DAVE MERRICK — JUNE 17, 2014

 

PAGES: 1 2

“If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, acts like a duck and quacks like a duck – it’s most likely a duck.” (I quote the whole worn-out axiom, for the benefit of the last four or five people on the planet who may not have already heard that.) But, let’s take a closer look at just one particular duck, Barry Obama, and the obvious mentoring influences that gave the bird his feathers. ….

Back in the 50s an anti-American, communist look-alike, Saul Alinsky, said: “True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.” (An obviously liberal ‘Snopes’ is quick to point out that Obama never actually hung out with Saul Alinsky. To which I respond, “So what?”)

Sociologists Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven (spawned from our president’s Alma mater) advocated almost precisely every pre-revolutionary economic overload that is now – courtesy of our spendthrift, golf-meister president – beating the guts out of our capitalist system.

Marx’s ten ‘plank’ Communist manifesto lays out foundational, easy-to-follow recipes for flipping unfettered free-trade economics into Jack-booted socialism. They include: crushing and ever-burgeoning taxation on what’s left of our middle class, controlling personal inheritance rights, effectively recreating and undergirding the Federal Reserve Bank, state-controlled and overseen domestic communication, increased control of free enterprise, state-controlled education, etc., etc. We’re right in the middle of Barry’s vivifying all of that; from reading our emails and gun confiscation – to tracking our medical records, personal habits and every dime we make or spend.

Of course all the aforementioned names and their respective political doctrines are not new – but they nevertheless bare repeating as our president has done so much of their bidding; so visibly and by the numbers. How much larger a ball bat, slammed to the head, is it going to take to seize Congress’ attention enough to begin investigating this charlatan?

Meanwhile, in addition – and again I say (for those of you who follow my ongoing rant), “He sends money to aid and abet our terrorist enemies. He allows our Benghazi diplomat and staff to be butchered by more haters of America and then makes excuses for their assassins’ behavior. He installs the guaranteed ruin of any hope for a sound economic future for this nation (fulfilling the avowed goal and vision of Osama bin Laden) … (and) his official acts of VIOLENCE against our country are innumerable and will take years to fully comprehend.”

That was just last week’s news. Now, as we are still reeling from the fiat trade of the five Gitmo scum in exchange for a single deserter/traitor, he’s been napping and golfing while a real soldier who deserves our help, Sgt Andrew Tahmooressi, languishes in irons in Mexico following complications from a minor traffic violation. And – on the other side of the globe – America’s security is once more compromised by a mob of the absolute worst terrorists on an unchecked rampage in Iraq, enjoying the carte blanche of ‘safe passage’ given them by their now conveniently pacifist, Muslim brother – our president. When even a RINO like John McCain sights down on his favorite president over this issue, we must realize it’s time for some significant alarm.Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/manchurian-duck/#TBD0fyhvRswEmXl2.99

 

Western Center for Journalism.Obama Does As Obama Is

Will Congress decide it is time for Barack Obama to go?

LAWRENCE SELLIN — JUNE 17, 2014

 

PAGES: 1 2

First and foremost, Barack Obama is a congenital liar whose lies, the number and magnitude of which are produced to match the scale of his sweeping narcissism.

That type of behavior is no surprise because Obama’s character was incubated in the low expectations biosphere of political correctness, where the amount of ineptitude is excused in proportion to one’s racial genetics, ethnic purity, or whatever victim categories the liberal canon dictates.

Obama has had no incentive to change because throughout life and during his time in the White House, lying has gotten him what he has wanted, while escaping responsibility and any negative consequences.

America’s elite universities and the media, desperately wanting to validate their own ideological predispositions, have overlooked Obama’s obvious weaknesses and willingly accepted his excuses and political spin in order to avoid their own accountability for facilitating and advancing the career of an amoral and intellectually vacant individual.

For the Democratic Party, Obama was the textbook Affirmative Action Presidential candidate, the manifestation of a liberal fantasy. Senate Majority leader Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), wowed by Obama’s oratorical gifts, said privately that Obama, as a black candidate, could be successful, thanks in part to his “light-skinned” appearance and speaking patterns “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”

Obama’s appeal is based entirely on his mastery of the teleprompter-delivered platitude, a banal or meaningless statement either emotionally satisfying to his ideologically committed base or soothing to the uninformed, easily misled voter desperately in search of a political tranquilizer.

Obama, who never intellectually matured beyond the clichés of fashionable and comfortable college Marxism, received his political baptism in the leftist, gangster-style Chicago political machine, experiences neither of which prepared him for any office beyond the capabilities of inner city alderman.

Ill-prepared for high office, Obama has orchestrated an unprecedented series of policy failures and political scandals.

That happens when decisions are not based on a logical analysis of what course of action is best for the country, but on a calculus of what best meets certain political or electoral objectives.

Obama is an ideologue, whose fundamental transformation of the United States includes goals that are incompatible with American values and national interests. His approach is not unlike pounding a square political peg into a round political hole.

The ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness of his conduct is whether he achieves an important ideological aim. Thus, “right” outcomes for Obama often necessitate actions considered illogical or harmful by mainstream Americans.

Obama is incompetent, not because he is stupid, but because his intellectual rigor mortis drives an ideological “analysis” that inevitably leads to inaction or the wrong action.

Stated simply, Obama is mentally and emotionally incapable of making the right decisions for America.

Obama’s reaction to his policy debacles is invariably the same. He lies or blames others because his narcissism cannot accommodate failure and any perceived loss of public adulation.

Enough is enough. We are a nation, not a political playground for megalomaniacs. Soaring rhetoric is no substitute for competence, honesty, and resolute action.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-obama/#3l2F3ptSoG6dPJPl.99

 

    This Hero With A Gun Just Proved Why We Need The 2nd Amendment (And Not More Gun Control)

A gun-wielding man rushed into the crowded Peoria eatery…

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 17, 2014

 

When police responded to a shooting at an Illinois sports bar, the bloody scene could have been far worse.

A gun-wielding man rushed into the crowded Peoria eatery and fired at his ex-wife and her boyfriend over the weekend. Before he could go on to target other patrons, including nearby guests celebrating a high school reunion, an off-duty federal agent drew his handgun and fatally shot the gunman.

All three individuals ultimately died from their injuries; however, the incident could have easily escalated into a much deadlier situation.

“After a brief moment inside the bar,” East Peoria Police Chief Dick Ganschow said, the gunman “pulled out a weapon and shot a female and a male.”

Police are now looking at security footage of the shooting, which occurred around 8 p.m. Saturday at the Fifth Quarter Sports Bar and Pizzeria. Witnesses confirmed the shooter was the female victim’s ex-husband.

According to reports, 33-year-old Lori Moore filed for divorce from Jason Moore more than a year ago. The divorce was finalized in May 2013. Jason Moore was pronounced dead at the scene, while his ex-wife died about an hour later at a nearby hospital.

The third individual, an unnamed local man, died of a gunshot wound to the head just minutes after Lori Moore was pronounced dead.

As restaurants across American continue to ban firearms on their premises, the inherent danger of gun-free zones has become an increasingly common topic of discussion. When fast food chain Jack in the Box banned guns from its locations, for example, a sudden spike in gun-related crimes were reported.

Fortunately for the patrons at this bar, a law enforcement officer was prepared.

For those eating at restaurants like Chipotle or stopping at a Starbucks for a cup of coffee, new policies preclude law-abiding gun owners from entering with their weapons. Therefore, unless an officer happens to be in the same location during a shooting spree, customers will be at the mercy of a maniac who, by definition, has no regard for the gun ban in effect.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/armed-patron-didnt-hesitate-stop-sports-bar-shooter/#qfIUIKrU1dUR2sUd.99

 

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

junio 14, 2014

No 687     “En mi opinión”    Junio 14, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

CON MUY BUENOS DESEOS FELIZ DIA DE LOS PADRES LRGM.

 

AMENPER: Mañana domingo es Día de los Padres

Mañana domingo es Día de los Padres.  Algunos irán a la iglesia, donde les hablarán de Dios y los deberes y la honra de ser padre. Otros matarán un lechón y celebrarán con sus hijos.

En la iglesia y en las publicaciones, les hablarán de versículos de la Biblia, porque en días como estos a la gente le gusta hablar de los designios de la vida y de un ser supremo…

Creo que todos los que somos padres, cuando nos convertimos en padres por primera vez tuvimos una sensación extraña y diferente.

Habíamos contribuido a traer una existencia nueva en el mundo.  No importa si éramos creyentes o como en mi caso incrédulos, en el subconsciente sabíamos que habíamos hecho algo que contribuía a la humanidad, que estábamos cumpliendo con algo que había sido diseñado por un ser supremo.  El subconsciente nos estaba diciendo que habíamos hecho lo que Dios quería de nosotros algo que era para lo que habíamos sido creados.

Hoy en día creo que la Biblia es la palabra de Dios, pero todavía tengo problemas con las religiones institucionales.  Creo que como Dios no quiso que recibiéramos todo el mensaje sino lo importante y necesario para nuestra vida. Hay mucha alegoría en la Biblia, igual que Cristo habló mucho con parábolas durante su estancia en este mundo.

Este interés en interpretar las alegorías que no son tan importantes, para discusiones teológicas que mantengan a la feligresía fiel y ocupada, hace que hay veces que nos enfrasquemos en discusiones vanas, que pasemos tiempo discutiendo si el mundo fue creado hace 6000 años o 6000 millones de años. Tomando prestadas las palabras de la sacerdotisa Hillary Clinton “¿qué importancia tiene esto ahora?”.  Lo que importa es que todo fue creado y fue creado por Dios. 

Este énfasis de las instituciones religiosas en los detalles para doctrina hace que muchas veces pasemos por alto el mensaje claro y conciso que si se encuentra en la Biblia.

No debemos de hacer como ese conclave que se puso a discutir cuantos ángeles podían bailar en la cabeza de un alfiler mientras el enemigo tomaba la plaza.

Lo que dios hizo y para qué lo hizo es lo que importa, no cuándo y cómo lo hizo.

La Biblia está clara en el cómo y para qué Dios hizo al hombre.

Génesis 1:26 Entonces dijo Dios: Hagamos al hombre a nuestra imagen, conforme a nuestra semejanza; y señoree en los peces del mar, en las aves de los cielos, en las bestias, en toda la tierra, y en todo animal que se arrastra sobre la tierra. 
1:27 Y creó Dios al hombre a su imagen, a imagen de Dios lo creó; varón y hembra los creó. 
1:28 Y los bendijo Dios, y les dijo: Fructificad y multiplicaos; llenad la tierra, y sojuzgadla, y señoread en los peces del mar, en las aves de los cielos, y en todas las bestias que se mueven sobre la tierra. 

Creo que esto está claro, no tiene discución. Dios hizo al hombre varón y hembra, nada más, y le dio dominio sobre la tierra y los animales, fue un mandamiento de Dios a los hombres bien determinado “fructificar y multip´licaos” “llenar la tierra y sojuzgarla y señorear sobre los animales”

Tenemos la responsabilidad de cuidar de la tierra y los animales que Dios nos dio para nuestra alimentación, es nuestro deber para con Dios, pero tenemos el derecho sobre la tierra y los animales por designio de Dios, pero ante todo tenemos el mandamiento de Fructificar y multiplicarnos. No hay realmente que leer la biblia para saber esto, simplemente el subconsciente nos enseña que esto es la realidad y que pensar diferente es absurdo.  Sin esta primicia el mundo no podría existir.

Podemos dejar que ahora nos quieran decir que es diferente,  nos dicen que el hombre está constituido creado con múltiples opciones de género, que además de ser varón y hembra tiene otros sexos suplementarios y que la constitución anatómica con que nacimos no tiene que ver nada con la unión de dos personas y que debe permitirse el matrimonio del mismo sexo aunque no sirvan para procrear y multiplicarse como manda Dios.  Nosotros podemos aceptarlo como un sistema de vida que han elegido, pero no podemos aceptarlo como la verdad, no podemos ir contra lo que Dios nos dice, y nuestro razonamiento nos confirma.  Tenemos una constitución anatómica que determina el sexo, y nuestro deber es procrear de acuerdo con los atributos genitales que tenemos, no podemos ir contra la naturaleza y los designios de la voluntad de Dios.

Si esto  es la creencia y la conducta privada de ellos en su mundo,  pueden tenerla, tienen su derecho ante Dios y ante su mundo,  porque para eso hizo al hombre con libre albedrío para su que tuviera libertad de perderse o salvarse, pero no pueden ni deben imponernos sus creencias sobre las nuestras.

Si seguimos leyendo la Biblia, no explica esto cuando la creación de Adan y Eva.  Cuando después del diluvio queda una familia sobreviviente, la familia de Noé, se ratifica y explica de nuevo la razón del hombre sobre la tierra:

Génesis 9:1 Bendijo Dios a Noé y a sus hijos, y les dijo:

Fructificad y multiplicaos, y llenad la tierra.
9:2 El temor y el miedo de vosotros estarán sobre todo animal de la tierra, y sobre toda ave de los cielos, en todo lo que se mueva sobre la tierra, y en todos los peces del mar; en vuestra mano son entregados. 
9:3 Todo lo que se mueve y vive, os será para mantenimiento: así como las legumbres y plantas verdes, os lo he dado todo

Nosotros sabemos, por las escrituras y por nuestro sentido común que es nuestro objetivo en esta vida por la voluntad de Dios de ser padres y madres, cuidar la tierra y los animales que Dios nos dio, educar en los valores cristianos a los hijos que hubimos procrear por la voluntad de Dios, estos hijos que serán los que continuarán manteniendo la tierra llena como no los pide Dios. 

No importa lo que nos puedan decir algunas instituciones religiosas o las instituciones políticas, somos varón y hembras, por eso pudimos hacer hijos, y cualquier otra cosa que nos quieran decir contrario a esto, es más absurdo que la discusión de cuantos ángeles pueden bailar en la cabeza de la aguja.

Esto es lo que honramos en este día, el deber cumplido de ser padre por mandamiento de Dios.

Ya sea si vamos a la iglesia o si nos quedamos en la casa y matamos a ese sabroso animal  que es el lechón con el permiso y la autoridad que nos dio Dios

Feliz día de los Padres por haber cumplido con su deber honrosamente.

 

 

OBAMA ES THE DISEASE: EMPEACHMENT IS THE CURE

“Ladies and gentlemen, I submit that Barack Hussein Obama’s unilateral negotiations with terrorists and the ensuing release of their key leadership without consult — mandated by law — with the U.S. Congress represents high crimes and misdemeanors, AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.” 

-Former-Congressman Allen West

WESTERN CENTER FOR JOURNALISM

FLOYD BROWN

       And West went on to issue the following call to action: “So I call upon the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives; Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to draft articles of impeachment as no one is above the law in America. The failure to do so speaks volumes.” 

       And it’s up to each and every one of us, as patriotic Americans, to stand with Lt. Col. West and add our voices to his call to action. The American people are sick and tired of Barack Hussein Obama’s lawless and seditionist actions and the time to draft Articles of Impeachment is now. 

The Media Calls It A Negotiation. We Call It Sedition.

       In a direct violation of the law, Barack Obama “negotiated” for the release of a deserter who may have actively collaborated with our enemies and, in exchange, he released five high-value Taliban militants. 

       That’s not a negotiation… THAT’S AN ACT OF SEDITION; and the fact that Barack Hussein Obama calls Bowe Bergdhal a hero speaks volumes. 

       And just in case there is any doubt as to whether or not Bergdhal may have been collaborating with the enemy, consider what CNN’s Jake Tapper reports from his interview with former Army Sgt. Evan Buetow, Bergdhal’s former team leader. 

       “Within days of his disappearance, says Buetow, teams monitoring radio chatter and cell phone communications intercepted an alarming message: The American is in Yahya Khel (a village two miles away). He’s looking for someone who speaks English so he can talk to the Taliban. I heard it straight from the interpreter’s lips as he heard it over the radio,’ said Buetow. ‘There’s a lot more to this story than a soldier walking away.'” 

       And Tapper goes on to report: “At least six soldiers were killed in subsequent searches for him, according to soldiers involved in those operations.” The insinuation is clear, it’s very much within the realm of possibility that Bergdhal gave our enemies information that led to the deaths of soldiers who were attempting to recover him. 

       Don’t be fooled by the media fog, Barack Obama knows what happened and he knows exactly what he’s doing, and that contention is bolstered by the fact that Tapper also reported that a number of the service members in Berghdhal’s unit were forced to sign non-disclosure agreements… a highly unusual occurrence. 

       So why would Obama violate the law – which requires him to consult with Congress 30 days before releasing detainees from Guantanamo Bay – and give our enemies five top field commanders in exchange for a potential collaborator? 

       One thing is certain, Barack Hussein Obama’s actions border on sedition and it is more than clear, Barack Obama is the disease and impeachment is the cure. 

And Now… To Add Insult To Injury… The Obama Regime Is Attacking The Soldiers Who Were In Bergdahl’s Unit.

       It’s beyond disgusting. It appears that the Obama Regime’s response, now that the facts surrounding this impeachable offense are coming to light, is to attack the brave and selfless men and women in uniform who are daring to speak the truth. 

       According to the Washington Examiner“White House aides have accused members of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s unit of ‘swift-boating’ the 28-year-old Idahoan for claiming that he deserted his post in Afghanistan nearly five years ago, MSNBC’s Chuck Todd reported.” 

       It’s clear. Barack Hussein Obama is trying to run away from this latest scandal, but he can’t hide. In addition to Allen West, Andrew McCarthy also says that Barack Obama’s actions are grounds for impeachment. The Daily Mail UKreports: 

       “Barack Obama broke a federal law that he signed just six months ago when he authorized the release of five high-ranking Taliban terror targets from the Guantanamo Bay detention center in exchange for the return of U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, senior congressional Republicans claimed today.” 

       “And the president may also have written a new chapter in the case for his own impeachment, according to a former federal prosecutor who helped bring the 1993 World Trade Center bombers to justice. 

       “‘The return of senior terrorists to the Taliban [is] … a ‘high crime and misdemeanor’, author Andrew C. McCarthy told MailOnline.” 

       The calls for Barack Obama’s impeachment are growing and Congress must act… but only you can force them to act. It’s time to draw a line in the sand. Barack Obama’s lawless usurpations and anti-American activities must come to an end and only you can force Congress to do what must be done. 

 

When Two Thugs Took Their Daughter Hostage, This Dad Took Matters Into His Own Hands… Thanks to the Second Admenmend …http://www.westernjournalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/tomo.jpg

Around 11 p.m. Monday, a pair of armed thugs reportedly seized a 17-year-old girl… B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 12, 2014

A St. Louis couple handled a nightmare scenario with quick action to protect themselves and their two children. Those who meant to bring harm to the family, however, did not fare so well.

Around 11 p.m. Monday, a pair of armed thugs reportedly seized a 17-year-old girl outside of her home. Police say the duo then forced their way into the residence, using the teen as a human shield.

Her father witnessed the entire incident; and as they approached his door, he grabbed a gun and began firing – quite accurately – in the direction of the intruders. The girl’s mother also fired, though reports indicate she did not hit either intruder.

Terrell Johnson was fatally wounded in the shooting and died on the family’s living room floor. The second captor, Cortez McClinton, was able to hobble away with gunshot wounds to both legs and his chest.

McClinton was hospitalized in critical condition and has several serious charges to face upon his recovery.

Aside from the obvious damage done to their home, the family was safe thanks to the decisive action of a father determined to protect his family. Reports indicate that, in addition to the teenage girl and her parents, a five-year-old boy was at home during the incident.

As for the threat posed by this gun-wielding duo, previous charges against McClinton indicate murder was a distinct possibility. About four years ago, he was charged with shooting into a vehicle and killing a 28-year-old passenger.

While that charge was ultimately dropped because of an uncooperative witness, he has had plenty of other run-ins with the law, including vehicle tampering and drug distribution convictions.

Second Amendment advocates have often cited the self-evident truth that criminals are, by nature, undeterred by laws prohibiting gun ownership. If the apparently law-abiding parents of this teenager had been precluded from protecting her, one can only imagine how this story could have had a much more tragic conclusion.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/two-thugs-took-daughter-hostage-parents-responded-perfectly/#z0kjamfsB2DDPIpa.99

 

 

XAVIER SUAREZ: MLS Orange Bowl Soccer Stadium Location‏

Dear Friend,

 

Please consider signing this online petition, and passing along to your contacts.

 

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/562/748/048/support-beckham-soccer-stadium-at-former-orange-bowl-site-and-bring-um-football-back-home/

 

SUPPORT BECKHAM SOCCER STADIUM AT FORMER ORANGE BOWL SITE, AND BRING UM FOOTBALL BACK HOME!

There’s a heated debate underway in our community about the location of a potential soccer stadium for David Beckham’s new team. It’s an important discussion with many points of view, but one clear choice is emerging. By selecting the former site of the Orange Bowl, our community can accomplish many things at once, including the creation of a place wherefutbol and football can live side-by-side!

We believe in the following principles:

 

  • We DO want professional soccer in Miami and believe David Beckham will make a great owner for our community. We should roll out the red carpet for this global icon, just not at the expense of other key constituencies.

 

  • We’re a community of Canes fans, with tremendous pride in our football team. That said, we’re tired of driving an hour to catch a game and miss the days when we could root for the home team in the heart of our community. University of Miami has expressed interest in the potential to play home games on the very land it built an iconic history of success.

 

  • We believe in fiscal restraint, and this site would save the taxpayers up to $125 million in impact fees due to already-existing infrastructure, parking, water and power base.

 

  • We envision a booming entertainment central combining two beautiful stadiums, symbiotically connected and attracting amazing performances from across the globe.

 

Please sign this petition to encourage Beckham to choose the former Orange Bowl site, support something that finally makes sense, and bring a winner back to our community.

 

Thank you in advance for your support. 

 

Sincerely,

 

Xavier L. Suarez

Miami-Dade County Commissioner

District 7

 

 

EXCELENTE: ES VERIDICO Y GENIAL
>> Una canadiense pacifista escribió a las autoridades de su país quejándose del trato que se da a los terroristas, detenidos en  Afganistán.  Le contestó el ministro de Defensa del Canadá:

>> Estimada ciudadana:
>> Gracias por su carta en la que expresa la preocupación por
>> el trato que damos a los terroristas talibanes y de Al Qaeda
>> en manos de las Fuerzas Armadas Canadienses.
>> En atención a las quejas que recibimos de ciudadanos
>> comprometidos como usted, hemos creado un nuevo programa de
>> pacifismo e integración para los terroristas.
>> De acuerdo con ese programa, hemos decidido seleccionar un
>> terrorista y colocarlo bajo la dependencia de la familia de
>> usted.
>> El próximo lunes tendrá usted en su casa a Alí Mohamed
>> Amé Ben Mahmud (puede llamarlo simplemente Amé).
>> Espero que puedan tratarlo amablemente, tal como exigía
>> usted en su carta de protesta, lo más probable es que
>> necesite usted contratar a algunos ayudantes para esa
>> misión.
>> Cada semana nuestro departamento le va a hacer una visita de
>> inspección para comprobar que se tienen en cuenta los
>> principios de buen trato que exigía usted en su carta.
>> Debo advertirle que Amé es un psicópata extremadamente
>> violento, pero confiamos en que, con la sensibilidad que
>> usted manifestaba en su carta, logrará superar ese
>> inconveniente.
>> Insistimos en que su huésped resulta extremadamente
>> eficiente en el combate cuerpo a cuerpo y que puede matar
>> con un lápiz o un cortaúñas, además, Amé es un experto
>> en fabricar artefactos explosivos con productos caseros;
>> así que tenga bien guardados esos productos,
>> a menos que en su opinión esa decisión pueda ofender a
>> Amé. 
>> El terrorista no querrá relacionarse con usted o con sus
>> hijas (excepto sexualmente) puesto que él considera a las
>> mujeres como meros objetos, ese es un aspecto muy sensible,
>> puesto que se le han observado tendencias violentas respecto
>> a las mujeres que no
>> cumplen con el atuendo islamista. Así pues, confío en que
>> a usted no le moleste llevar el burka; de ese modo
>> contribuirá usted a respetar la cultura y las creencias que
>> manifestaba en su carta.
>> Gracias otra vez por su preocupación, estamos reconociendo
>> a las personas como usted
>> e informaremos a nuestros conciudadanos de su
>> cooperación.
>> Buena suerte.

 Atentamente
Gordon O’Connor   Ministro de Defensa.

 

 

 

MARLEIN: ¿SE RECUERDAN DE LA TRAGEDIA DE ELIAN GONZALEZ?   EL CASO DE ELIAN GONZALES vs LA OLEADA DE NIÑOS EN ARIZONA Y TEXAS‏

 LEYES INTERNACIONALES DICTARON QUE ELIAN GONZALEZ REGRESARA A CUBA A VIVIR CON SU PADRE Y NO AQUI EN TIERRAS DE LIBERTAD DONDE SU MADRE QUISO.  ESO FUE LO QUE LA ADMINISTRACION DE BILL Y HILLARY CLINTON, GREG CRAIG Y JANET RENO HICIERON CON EL (SE ACUERDAN?)  “LO SUMBARON PARA EL CORRAL DE FIDEL CASTRO” Y LO HICIERON UN HOMBRE COMUNISTA SIN LIBERTAD EXPRESION NI RELIGION.  

 

ENTONCES POR QUE TANTO DILEMA EN QUE HACER CON LOS JOVENES QUE HAN ENTRADO ILEGALMENTE A TEXAS Y ARIZONA ?  NO SERIA LO JUSTO APLILCAR LA MISMA LEY? 

 

POBRECITOS, YO SIENTO MUCHA LASTIMA POR ESTOS NIÑOS Y JOVENES PUES SON VICTIMAS DE LA POBREZA Y ABANDONO DE SUS PADRES, PERO AQUI EXISTE UNA CUESTION DE COMO SE INTERPRETAN LAS LEYES; LOS DEMOCRATAS LAS INTERPRETAN SEGUN LES VENGA EN GANA.  ESTO ES SENCILLAMENTE UN “DOUBLE STANDARD” DE PARTE DE ESTA ADMINISTRACION Y ELIAN DEBIO HABER PERMANECIDO AQUI. 

 

ELIAN NO REPRESENTABA UNA CARGA PUBLICA PARA ESTE PAIS, SIN EMBARGO, ESTOS NIÑOS HAN SIDO DESGARRADOS DE SUS FAMILIAS Y HAY MUCHAS NIÑAS QUE YA VIENEN EMBARAZADAS.

 

 

 

 

La situación pinta caótica en Irak ¡ESTAMOS EN ALERTA!‏

Maria Argelia Vizcaino

 

MARIA ARGELIA VIZCAINO: ¡ESTAMOS EN ALERTA!
La situación pinta caótica en Irak. Hice todo lo posible por realizar una traducción lo más auténtica posible a la información de FoxNews, aunque es muy extensa y solo me limité a lo más importante. Los terroristas van camino a Baghdad, están tomando provincias y sus ciudades y Obama aún no ha decidido que hacer. Analicen ustedes la posición ambigua del Presidente ante una situación de extrema emergencia. Si Al Qaeda toma Irak, tendrá todos los recursos posibles para hacer lo que desee dentro de este país. ¡Dios bendiga a Estados Unidos!

Ahmed Martel

 

http://ahmedmartel.com/la-nueva-actitud-de-obama-ante-el-avance-de-alqaeda-hacia-bagdad/

La nueva actitud de Obama ante el avance de Alqaeda hacia Bagdad

Fragmentos traducidos de la noticia)

Barack Obama urge a líderes iraquíes “resolver sus problemas” mientras éstos enfrentan la invasión de la red Al Qaeda sobre ciudades iraquíes y en marcha sobre Baghdad; aunque manifestó que estaba revisando alguna respuesta por parte de Estados Unidos.

Sin embargo, antes de su partida hacia Dakota del Norte, Obama precisó que “no enviaría tropas estadounidenses al combate.”

Y aunque el presidente admitió que los disturbios en Irak, representaban un peligro para el pueblo iraquí y una amenaza a los intereses de Estados Unidos en ese país; dejó claro que cualquier participación de Estados Unidos sería limitada, y estaría encaminada a presionar al gobierno de Irak para desarrollar un plan político y hacer un esfuerzo sincero para resolver las divisiones sectarias. No podemos hacerlo por ellos”, dijo Obama.

El informe de Fox News continúa diciendo que los legisladores y analistas militares están instando a la administración a involucrarse más en el conflicto -el propio Obama pareció abrir el jueves pasado una puerta a la posibilidad de iniciar ataques aéreos, pero aún no ha tomado una decisión. Kerry dijo el viernes que Estados Unidos ha “examinado una variedad de opciones, incluyendo la acción militar para brindar apoyo al gobierno iraquí.” El predijo decisiones oportunas del presidente.

Mientras tanto, los militantes sunitas continúan su marcha a  través de las ciudades del norte del país, derribando las fuerzas frágiles de seguridad y amenazando con sitiar la ciudad capital de Baghdad.

Los republicanos del Congreso expresaron que el gobierno de Maliki está lejos de estar libre de culpa, después de haber alimentado las tensiones sectarias por alinear a la minoría suní -lo que alimenta a su vez la insurgencia-, pero que es necesaria la intervención de Estados Unidos.

“El gobierno iraquí está lejos de ser perfecto”, dijo el representante Ed Royce, presidente del Comité de Asuntos Exteriores de la Cámara, Republicano por California. Pero si no queremos ver grandes extensiones de territorio iraquí bajo control de los militantes, y no debemos, deberíamos responder a las peticiones iraquíes para responder a los terroristas de Al Qaeda con aviones no tripulados”.

Las fuerzas fuertemente armadas del Estado Islámico de Irak (ISIS) y Levante/Syria, incursionaron el viernes dentro de una provincia al norte de Baghdad, capturando dos ciudades después de haber derribado otras al norte del país.

Las autoridades policiales dijeron que las fuerzas de ISIS condujeron camionetas con armas de fuego e hicieron su entrada en dos ciudades en la provincia Diyala el jueves en la tarde: a Jalula, a 80 millas al noreste de Bagdad, y en Sadiyah, a 60 millas al norte de la capital iraquí.

Los soldados iraquíes abandonaron sus respectivos puestos sin ofrecer resistencia, informaron los funcionarios a The Associated Press.

Hubo informes de que la carretera principal que va desde el norte hasta Bagdad, estaba llena de cuerpos decapitados pertenecientes a las fuerzas de seguridad del gobierno, y que las fuerzas de ISIS conducían y exhibían vehículos blindados capturados. […]

 

 

AMENPER: “Yo se los dije”

Soy fanático de los Marlins, esto me hace un verdadero fanático porque hay que ser muy fanático para ver a mi equipo desmantelado por los dueños y teniendo que soportar temporadas con equipos ripieras que son la vergüenza del deporte y seguir apoyando fielmente a ese equipo.

Políticamente, no creo que sea fanático, aunque me acusan de eso. Dicen que estoy obsesionado con Obama, que no encuentro nada bien. No es verdad, si no encuentro nada bien en Obama es porque hay que buscar mucho para encontrar algo bueno que haya hecho.

El único galardón que puede atribuirse Obama fue el ajusticiamiento de Osama Bin Laden, fue algo que se gestó por la información de un prisionero de Guantánamo, que si por Obama hubiera sido no estaría allí, hubiera sido libertado.  Después la operación demorada y casi sin realizarse por Obama, se hizo por los operativos que ahora están bajo recortes de la administración de Obama.

Voté dos veces por Nixon, creo que tuvo una administración doméstica no buena pero adecuada y una mala administración en cuanto a política exterior, pero si recordamos que la alternativa era el socio de Fidel Castro, Eugene McCarthy, me siento orgulloso de haber votado por Nixon.,

Pero cuando la administración de Nixon-Kissinger hicieron en Vietnam lo que Obama hizo en Irak y Afganistán, critiqué a Nixon igual que critiqué a Obama.   Nunca he sido fanático partidista, no creo que esto es algo inteligente, son los individuos no el partido en que nos gobiernan y los que votan en las cámaras legislativas y toman las decisiones administrativas en la presidencia son los individuos no el partido.

Lo que dije sobre Nixon y Obama que fue lo mismo, y vimos el mismo resultado, vimos al enemigo de los Estados Unidos consolidarse en esos países.

¿Quién es el fanático? ¿ Los que dicen que lo que yo digo que pasará, no pasará, el que dice que lo digo por fanatismo,  o los verdaderos fanáticos que apoyan el entreguismo de la nación porque dice que es lo mejor para los Estados Unidos.

Si lo que pasa, si el resultado final es lo que yo digo no lo que ellos dicen creo que es evidente por los hechos que yo soy un racionalista realista y ellos unos fanáticos irrazonables.

 “Yo se los dije” es una expresión que he tenido que usar muchas veces en la vida, desde mi juventud en Cuba hasta mi vejez en Miami. 

No me produce satisfacción el usar esa expresión, pero tengo que usarla otra vez cuando veo los titulares de esta mañana “Tropas terroristas avanzan en Bagdad”

“Yo se los dije” 

Pero tengo que darle la razón también a ellos.  Cuando dijeron que la política del medio oriente será el legado de la administración de Obama, hay que reconocer que tenían razón.

PERO QUE CLASE DE LEGADO.

 

RICARDO SAMITIER:Santos “El Infiltrado” En El Gobierno De Uribe… Está Recibiendo El Apoyo De Washington… Una Vez Mas Washington “Oficialmente Abstiene” De Apoyar La Facción Conservadora Y Constitucionalista… En Colombia

En La Misma Forma Que Lo Ha Hecho En Todos Los Países De Latino América Y Paso A Paso Han Entregado A Los Terroristas La Mayoría De Los Países…

Esa Política De Washington: Comenzó En Cuba Hace 56 Años Al Apoyar Eisenhower A Castro… Después Vino La Traición De Bahía De Cochinos… Seguida Por Las Traiciones De  Carter… En Irán y Nicaragua…  Por 15 Años

Mantuvieron a Chávez… y Cuando Le Dieron Un Golpe De Estado… Bush

Oficialmente lo REPUDIO… Y Lo Devolvieron al PODER…

No Apoyan A Los Estudiantes Venezolanos…

Al Contrario… recomiendan “NEGOCIAR” Para Mantener al Partido de Chávez En El Poder… Mientras Apoya A Santos Para Que Triunfe “La Paz De Los Sepulcros”… Y  “Negociando” Lleven a La Farc Al Poder En Colombia…

La Creación De Un Gobierno Mundial… Feudal… Solo Es Posible Con Los “Internacionalistas” Ahora Llamados “Globalistas”

No Debemos De Olvidar Que EL MAS DESTACADO CREADOSdel “NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL”  Fue

BUSH PADRE… Ahora Para DIVIDIR y hacer perder al Partido Republicano están EMPUJANDO

Al OTRO BUSH… quien NO TIENE EL MENOR CHANCE de ser electo y de esa forma GARANTIZAR

LA ELECCION DE LA HILARY… o también piensan formar unTERCER PARTIDO para hacer triunfar a

Los Demócratas… así fue como llegó CLINTON… cuando financiaron a PEROT… Para DIVIDIR el

VOTO CONSERVADOR…  ASI también llegó WILSON en 1912…

http://www.economist.com/blogs/americasview/2014/05/colombias-election

Muy Interesante… La IZQUIERDA No Respeta La Constitución… y Mucho Menos La Tradición

¿Cuál Es La Razón El Gobierno Está ARMANDO A Todos Los BUROCRATAS???

Estamos Tan Divididos… Como Los Sirios y Los Ucranianos… En Otras Palabras…

Listos Para Una Guerra Civil…

El Pew Research Center acaba de publicar los resultados de una investigación que revela que hoy… en el 2014, los Estados Unidos están polarizados políticamente más que en los pasados 20 años.

Adjunto la información, para aquellos ciudadanos pensantes que la quieran analizar y también el link… por si prefieren entrar en el.  

http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/ 

Al final. como es lógico, la pregunta a responder será…

 ¿Quién… o quiénes son los responsable de esta polarización?

 

 

 

 

Washington Insider: Obama Member of Chicago Gay Man’s Club

http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2010/05/27/washington-insider-obama-member-of-chicago-gay-mans-club/

Posted on May 27, 2010 by Dr. Eowyn | 237 Comments

Design by BKeyser: http://www.cafepress.com/RTKArtistry

The Wayne Madsen Report (WMR) is a mainly subscription news site ($7/month for “individual reader” subscribers) that claims to provide news ”from deep inside the Washington beltway.” Its editor is Wayne Madsen, a former US Navy officer, Washington, DC-based investigative journalist, author and syndicated columnist, with an impressive c.v.   

On May 24, 2010, WMR had a blockbuster report for subscribers only, which claims that Obama is a long-time member of a gay man’s club in Chicago, of which his Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is also a member.

I first saw this story 3 days ago on Rense.com in an article titled “Madsen Is Vindicating Larry Sinclair.” [Note: Sinclair is a gay man who claims he had 2 sexual encounters with Obama in Chicago.] The article had a short excerpt from the WMR. I did not post it here on Fellowship at the time because I wanted to think about it. 

I went back to Rense for the article today, but when I clicked “Obama’s Gay Club,” the article is no longer there, no doubt because its excerpt from WMR violated WMR’s pay-for-view policy. Instead, clicking “Obama’s Gay Club” brought me to the website of the man’s bath house club referenced in the WMR article – Man’s Country club in Chicago. Located at 5015 N. Clark St
Chicago, IL 60640 (phone: 773-878-2069), the club describes itself as:

“a private membership club for men 18 years and older. Man’s Country Chicago is a clean, safe place to hang out, meet guys who share the same interests as you, socialize, make friends, watch porn and play! Man’s Country Chicago / Where real men meet.”  

The club’s motto “Play hard, Play safe” and logo (below right) leave little doubt that it’s a gay club. If you still have doubts, take a look at the club’s “Photos” page, with 8 photos of “the hottest dancers in Chicago” — all men, such as this one (below left):   

Fortunately, thanks to alert Fellowship memberTina, the entire WMR article is now posted on The JagHunter blog. Here it is!  

OBAMA AND EMANUEL: MEMBERS OF SAME GAY BATH HOUSE IN CHICAGO

President Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel are lifetime members of the same gay bath house in uptown Chicago, according to informed sources in Chicago’s gay community, as well as veteran political sources in the city.  

The bath house, Man’s Country, caters to older white men and it has been in business for some 30 years and is known as one of uptown Chicago’s “grand old bathhouses.” WMR was told by sources who are familiar with the bath house that it provides one-year “lifetime” memberships to paying customers and that the club’s computerized files and pre-computer paper files, include membership information for both Obama and Emanuel. The data is as anonymized as possible for confidentiality purposes. However, sources close to “Man’s Country” believe the U.S. Secret Service has purged the computer and filing cabinet files of the membership data on Obama and Emanuel.  Members of Man’s Country are also issued club identification cards. WMR learned that Obama and Emanuel possessed the ID cards, which were required for entry.  Obama began frequenting Man’s Country in the mid-1990s, during the time he transitioned from a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School to his election as an Illinois State Senator in 1996. Emanuel, reportedly joined Man’s Country after he left the Clinton White Hosue and moved back to Chicago in 1998, joining the investment firm of Wasserstein Perella and maintaining his membership during his 2002 campaign for the U.S. 5th District House seat vacated by Rod Blagojevich, who was elected governor.  

Man’s Country appears to be a “one stop shopping” center for gay men. The club’s website advertises steam rooms, “fantasy rooms,” bed rooms, male strippers, adult movies, and lockers. However, Man’s Country was not the only location for Obama’s predatory gay sex activities. The Chicago gay community is aware that Obama often made contacts with younger men at his famous “pick-up basketball” games. It was at these “pick up” matches where Obama first met Emanuel and a young Democratic campaign worker and senior bank vice president named Alexi Giannoulias. Currently running for Obama’s old U.S. Senate seat now occupied by Roland Burris, Giannoulias successfully ran for Illinois Treasurer in 2006 after being drafted for the run by Chicago’s Democratic machine. The Blagojevich trial: “Sex, Lies, and Audio tapes” — Fitzgerald’s US Attorney’s Office part of White House cover-up of gay sex in the Second City  Giannoulias was a vice president and senior loan officer for his father’s bank, Broadway Bank, from 2002 to 2006. Broadway Bank made real estate loans to Antoin “Tony” Rezko, the chief of Rezmar Corporation. On May 13, 2008, Rezko was found guilty, after being indicted by a grand jury at the behest of the U.S. Attorney for Northern Illinois Patrick J. Fitzgerald, of six counts of wire fraud, six counts of mail fraud, two counts of corrupt solicitation, and two counts of money laundering. Rezko has been in solitary confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center at Van Buren and Clark in Chicago since June 2008. However, Rezko has not yet been officially sentenced to a federal prison. A Syrian-American, Rezko is considered to be a flight risk, even though his one-time fortune of $50 million has been reduced to zero.  One Republican politician in Chicago told WMR that Rezko will be a prime witness for Blagojevich’s defense. “Figure it this way, Rezko’s been in solitary confinement in the city jail since June 0f 2008 . . . if he is released to appear at Blagojevich’s trial as the primary witness, everyone expects him to squeal like a pig,” said the Republican politico.  In 2005, Rezko reportedly engaged in a complicated real estate “flip” through which his wife Rita and Obama agreed to split an empty lot adjoining a home that Obama bought in Chicago’s Kenwood district. The deal saw Obama buy the home for $1.65 million, which was $300,00 below market value. Obama then bought a strip of the adjoining property from Mrs. Rezko, a speculative deal that stood to make Obama a handsome profit. Since Rezko’s conviction, the property has has reportedly gone into bankruptcy. Giannoulias’s Broadway Bank was seized by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation on April 23, 2010, reportedly as Secretary of Treasury Tim Geithner was on his way to Chicago to present the bank with a bailout check. Geithner quickly changed his plans.  

Giannoulias, Broadway’s then-senior loan officer, has denied being involved in the decision to loan money to Rezko.  Last month, Blagojevich’s trial judge, U.S. District Court judge James Zagel, a crony of former Illinois Republican Governor Jim Thompson, ruled that all 500 hours of phone calls intercepted and taped by Fitzgerald could not be played during Blagojevich’s trial as demanded by Blagojevich and his defense lawyers. Blagojevich demanded that Fitzgerald “show up in court and explain to everybody . . . why you don’t want those tapes that you made played in court.”  WMR has learned that the tapes may contain salty references Obama’s and Emanuel’s private lives.  WMR attempted to interview Blagojevich’s senior defense lawyer Sam Adam to no avail but other informed sources told us that the tapes, if played, would highlight the corruption of not only Obama, Emanuel, and other member of Obama’s Chicago “brain trust” but also Fitzgerald himself. WMR was told that Fitzgerald’s tactics have included providing sex and drugs to imprisoned felons to get them to provide perjured testimony at federal trials.  It is exactly the type of federal prosecutorial misconduct by Fitzgerald that former Republican Governor said was used by state prosecutors when he commuted the death sentences of Illinois’s death row population. Ryan was indicted by Fitzgerald for fraud and he is currently serving out a federal prison sentence.  Blagojevich’s trial is scheduled to begin on June 3 and Fitzgerald’s main interest is to keep the trial focused on Blagojevich, especially after he managed to “flip” Blagojevich’s former chief of staff John Harris to testify against the impeached and ousted governor. WMR learned from informed sources that one lawyer on Harris’s defense team is involved in a gay partner scandal that was discovered by the attorney’s wife.  Some of the wiretaps may reveal that it was not Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s longtime friend and current White House policy adviser who was Obama’s top candidate to fill his U.S. Senate seat, but the young 32-year old “pick up basketball” friend of Obama, Giannoulias, then serving his second year as state Treasurer. However, Obama has avoided campaigning for Giannoulias in Illinois and there are indications that the president has “thrown Giannoulias under the bus,” according to some Democratic political circles in Chicago. Mutiple Chicago sources report that Republicans who see Giannoulias’s Obama connections as providing an edge in his Senate race this year should not celebrate prematurely. Giannoulias’s GOP opponent, U.S. Representative Mark Kirk, a Naval Reserve intelligence officer, has also been identified as a closeted gay man. Kirk divorced his wife last year after an eight-year marriage. They had no children.  

In addition, U.S. Representative Aaron Shock, who took over the House seat vacated by Obama’s Republican Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, is, according to Chicago Boy’s Town sources, a habitué of Minibar, a noted gay bar in Chicago’s gay district. For an extremely young first term member of the House, observers were surprised when GOP Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia named Shock as a Deputy Minority Whip.   

Man’s Country, one of Chicago’s “grand old bathhouses” and located at 5015 North Clark Street in Chicago’s “Boystown,” was a frequent hangout for State Senator Obama and Rahm Emanuel  

Sources in Chicago’s gay community report that Obama was attracted to Man’s Country’s older white clientele because he generally enjoys being fellated by older white men. Obama would regularly be seen at Man’s Country on Wednesdays.  Obama reportedly has never engaged in reciprocal activity. The sources also confirm the allegations made during the 2008 campaign by Larry Sinclair, a Chicago visitor who revealed that in 1999 he engaged in such oral sex activity and crack cocaine use with then-State senator Obama on two occasions, once in the back of a Chicago limousine operated by Five Star Limousine Service, and the other at a Chicago area motel, the Comfort Suites in Gurnee, Illinois. After revealing details of the encounter at a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, Sinclair was arrested by Washington Metropolitan Police on a fugitive warrant issued by Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, the son of Obama’s vice presidential running mate, Senator Joe Biden. Sinclair was charged with a misdemeanor count of theft of money orders, however, the state of Delaware declined prosecution. Beau Biden later declined to run for his father’s old Senate seat because of his duties to prosecute a major pedophilia case involving Lewes, Delaware pediatrician Dr. Earl Bradley. There are reports that Biden’s office helped to cover up Bradley’s activities, including failing to authorize search warants for Bradley’s office and computer.  

Chicago’s “DLC” — not the Democratic Leadership Council but the “Down Low Club” — a gay matchmaking service  

WMR spoke to several well-placed sources in Chicago who reported that Jeremiah Wright, the pastor of Obama’s former church of 20 years, Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC) on Chicago’s south side, ran what was essentially a matchmaking service for gay married black professional members of the church, including lawyers and businessmen, particularly those with children. The matchmaking club was called the “Down Low Club” but references to it over the phone and email simply referred to the group with the code phrase “DLC.” The ruse, according to our sources, was to make anyone who was eavesdropping on the communications believe that the references were to the Democratic Leadership Council, also known as the DLC.  

The gay DLC’s services were intended to keep ensure TUCC’s gay members avoided posting solicitations on web services like Craig’s List and refrain from cruising gay bars. The strategy was to protect them from getting busted and being “outed.”  

Among the members of the gay “DLC” were Obama and TUCC’s choir director, Donald Young, an openly gay man who reportedly had a sexual relationship with Obama. Two other gay members of the church were Larry Bland and Nate Spencer. Young and Bland were brutally murdered, execution style, in late 2007. Bland was murdered on November 17, 2007 and Young on December 24, 2007. The latter was killed by multiple gunshot wounds. Spencer reportedly died on December 26, 2007, official cause of death: “septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV.”  

“DLC” members often went on camping trips arranged by TUCC. Wright reportedly was the head of the “DLC” matchmaking services and ensured that its members protected each other.  

The “DLC’s” clientele included Obama and other gay members of TUCC, including, reportedly Young, Bland, and Spencer. Fox 32 Chicago reported that Bland’s mother, Josephine Bland, was so upset at her son inviting men into their home as a result of contacting them through gay web sites like “Adam4Adam,” she moved out.  

The gay community in Chicago knows to keep away from the TUCC and “DLC” stories because of the “creepiness” of the operation and the suspicious deaths of the three TUCC gay black men.  

Although Obama protected his alternate life style through the secretiveness of the “DLC,” he was not so careful when he proclaimed he was a state senator while frolicking at Man’s Country in uptown Chicago.  

Love: Obama’s personal trainer  

Reggie Love, a former Duke basketball and football player and unsuccessful National Basketball hopeful, currently serves as Obama’s personal trainer and White House “special assistant” — he has been called Obama’s “body man” — who receives a salary of $104,000 a year. Love is also reportedly one of Obama’s regular gay sex partners. Love joined Obama’s Senate staff in a senior staff position in 2006.  

Media General’s tabloid, the National Enquirer, proffered a story last year about Michelle Obama being furious about the relationship between her husband and his “body man.” TheEnquirer’s sister tabloid, The Globe, later floated a story about Obama having a relationship with a Democratic campaign official named Vera Baker. WMR has been told that this relationship was a clever ruse to throw off speculation about Obama’s actual past sex partners. Baker has apparently left the United States for relatively more obscurity in Martinique. Media General’s tabloids have scooped the mainstream media on sex scandals involving Bill Clinton and Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky, Tiger Woods, and John Edwards and Rielle Hunter.  

WMR’s Chicago sources believe the Secret Service records of presidential candidate Obama’s activities in Chicago would show that Obama regularly arrived at Love’s Chicago residence at 9:00 am and departed at 9:15 am. Sources told WMR that while 15 minutes is much too short for a personal training exercise, it is ample time for fellatio.  

Bill Frist, “Brokeback Mountain,” and Obama  

In 2006, after Obama became the junior senator from Illinois, WMR’s sources in the Congressional Black Caucus reported that there were persistent rumors of gay trysts between Obama and then-GOP Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee. The allegations at the time seemed unbelievable.  

However, based on Obama’s penchant for receiving fellatio from older white men, a column written by The Washington Post’s “In the Loop” columnist Al Kamen on April 7, 2006, some four months into Obama’s Senate term, may have expanded relevance. Kamen reported he received an invitation to attend Frist’s “5th Annual VOLPAC ’06 Weekend” in Nashville from April 21st to 23rd and that the invitation card required one to “unbuckle the cowboy’s pants and look inside to see what this was all about.” Kamen opined that the invitation seemed “a bit too ‘Brokeback Mountain.’”  

The invitation advertised that the shindig would feature “one-of-a-kind music and special friends,” although Kamen said there was no indication what made the “friends” so “special.” Kamen then wrote, “The back of the card shows the cowboy from behind with a red flowered handkerchief sticking out of his right pocket. Wait a minute — wasn’t there something about how this used to be some kind of code in the gay community years ago? A way to signal each other in crowded, noisy bars? So we checked the GayCityUSA.com’s Hanky Codes. Sure enough, there it was in the chart explaining what they mean: red hanky in right pocket. Oh, dear.”     

Rumors about Obama and Frist ran amok in Congressional Black Caucus circles in 2006.  

Although Frist ran on the pledge of only serving two terms, he became Senate Majority Leader with all the perks of the office. WMR’s sources in Chicago’s gay community revealed that Frist’s Majority Leader predecessor, Senator Trent Lott of Mississippi, was also known to seek the services of male prostitutes. Frist, who said he planned to run for President in 2006, decided against a run for the White House and also declined a run for Tennessee governor in 2010.  

With the rumor mill running at full speed in 2006, it is obvious why Frist abandoned politics so quickly for the medical business. Frist later endorsed Obama’s health care proposals. A year later, when GOP Senator Larry Craig was arrested while soliciting for sex in a men’s toilet stall at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, he changed his mind about immediately resigning his Senate seat. Knowing about his colleagues’ behavior, he dug in his heels and completed his term in January 2009.  

Rahm the “Sugar Daddy”  

Obama’s chief of staff Emanuel, who won a scholarship to the Joffrey Ballet but turned it down to attend college, is married and, like Obama, has children, in Emanuel’s case, a son and two daughters.  

However, Emanuel, who is 50, also travel frequently with a male companion, a wealthy Chicago real estate developer, some five to six years his senior. WMR has learned from Chicago’s gay community as well as political sources that Emanuel and his friend have gone together on a trip to India, skiing vacations, and soon plan a vacation in Florida, sans Mrs. Emanuel and the kids.  

In Chicago’s gay community, Emanuel is known as “sugar daddy,” promising young men with perks and lucrative positions if they sleep with him. On occasion, Emanuel has been with older men, such as his travel companion, but his preference is young, according to WMR’s sources. Emanuel also often uses bicycling and basketball venues to make his approaches. Being an Emanuel “basketball buddy” is a key to professional success.  

WMR spoke to one member of the gay community in Chicago who had first hand knowledge of one of Emanuel’s bed partners, an older man who runs a non-profit symphony organization.  

Obama’s other sex partners  

WMR has previously reported on Obama’s past trysts with Alabama Democratic U.S. Representative Artur Davis, a current primary candidate for governor of Alabama. Although not in the same class, Obama and Davis attended Harvard Law School during an overlap of their attendance at the law school.  

The information on Davis and Obama was gathered by opposition researchers for former Alabama Representative Earl Hilliard, who Davis defeated in the 2002 Democratic primary. Recently, WMR was informed by sources in Alabama that Attorney General Eric Holder traveled three days ago to Alabama to inform Davis that if he loses his primary race, he would be nominated by Obama to fill the job of U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, a position still held by Bush-appointee Leura Canary, one of the main prosecutors of convicted and jailed former Alabama Democratic Governor Don Siegelman.  

Chicago sources also informed WMR of another past gay partner of Obama, Massachusetts Democratic Governor Deval Patrick.  

Men who have reportedly had sexual relations with Barack Obama  

  • Donald Young, TUCC Choir director 
  • Larry Sinclair, gay escort 
  • Reggie Love, White House presidential assistant and Obama’s “body man” 
  • Artur Davis, US Representative from Alabama and gubernatorial candidate 
  • Bill Frist, former GOP Senate Majority Leader 
  • Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachusetts 

The Clear and Present Blackmail Threat   

Leading secret alternate life styles, Obama and his chief of staff provide classic blackmail threats. Considering Obama’s choice for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, who is reputedly a semi-open lesbian, the question must be posed how much Obama’s and Emanuel’s own covert life styles led to the decision to nominate Kagan, someone with no experience on a judicial bench.   Similarly, the fact that so much is known about Obama’s and Emanuel’s trysts in Chicago begs another important question. If politicians, gay community activists, and journalists in the Windy City are aware of Obama’s and Emanuel’s highly blackmailable gay life styles, the same can certainly hold true for the executives of one of Chicago’s corporate headquarters — that of BP America’s Production Operations.  

Throw in the intelligence agencies of America’s allies, friends, enemies, and the situation becomes a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States.  

***END OF ARTICLE FROM JAGHUNTER BLOG***  

Obama is leaving today for an extended Memorial Day weekend vacation in Chicago, returning to Washington, D.C. on Monday. No doubt it is a mere coincidence that the Man’s Country club will have a special event during the weekend: an International Mr. Leather 2010 contest!  

If you live in Chicago and find yourself in Man’s Country this weekend, be sure to say “hi” to the Commander Teabagger-in-Chief!  

 

When Two Thugs Took Their Daughter Hostage, This Dad Took Matters Into His Own Hands…http://www.westernjournalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/tomo.jpgAround 11 p.m. Monday, a pair of armed thugs reportedly seized a 17-year-old girl… B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 12, 2014

A St. Louis couple handled a nightmare scenario with quick action to protect themselves and their two children. Those who meant to bring harm to the family, however, did not fare so well.

Around 11 p.m. Monday, a pair of armed thugs reportedly seized a 17-year-old girl outside of her home. Police say the duo then forced their way into the residence, using the teen as a human shield.

Her father witnessed the entire incident; and as they approached his door, he grabbed a gun and began firing – quite accurately – in the direction of the intruders. The girl’s mother also fired, though reports indicate she did not hit either intruder.

Terrell Johnson was fatally wounded in the shooting and died on the family’s living room floor. The second captor, Cortez McClinton, was able to hobble away with gunshot wounds to both legs and his chest.

McClinton was hospitalized in critical condition and has several serious charges to face upon his recovery.

Aside from the obvious damage done to their home, the family was safe thanks to the decisive action of a father determined to protect his family. Reports indicate that, in addition to the teenage girl and her parents, a five-year-old boy was at home during the incident.

As for the threat posed by this gun-wielding duo, previous charges against McClinton indicate murder was a distinct possibility. About four years ago, he was charged with shooting into a vehicle and killing a 28-year-old passenger.

While that charge was ultimately dropped because of an uncooperative witness, he has had plenty of other run-ins with the law, including vehicle tampering and drug distribution convictions.

Second Amendment advocates have often cited the self-evident truth that criminals are, by nature, undeterred by laws prohibiting gun ownership. If the apparently law-abiding parents of this teenager had been precluded from protecting her, one can only imagine how this story could have had a much more tragic conclusion.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/two-thugs-took-daughter-hostage-parents-responded-perfectly/#z0kjamfsB2DDPIpa.99

 

 

WND EXCLUSIVE

‘DON’T TAKE 1 OF OURS. WE’LL DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT’

Bikers rally to confront Mexico about jailed Marine

 BOB UNRUH 

 

U.S. Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi

A team of bikers plans to rally Saturday at the Southwest border in support of a U.S. Marine in custody in Mexico and to deliver a message to the world.

“We’re proclaiming that the occupant of the White House … no longer speaks for us. The American people will speak for themselves,” John Harrington, president of gun seller Shield Tactical, told WND Friday.

Harrington said the activists want to “remind the world, one citizen at a time, that we are still the greatest nation.”

“We are still the No. 1 superpower,” he said.

Some, however, are apologizing for America, insisting it’s no longer great.

“More and more, the people are deciding it is time for us to pick up the mantle of freedom,” he said. “‘We the People’ of America, not talking heads reading teleprompters.”

The issue at hand is the detention in Mexico of U.S. Marine Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi, 25, who has been in prison since his arrest April 1 after he took a wrong turn and ended up over the border with his guns, which are legal in the United States but not in Mexico.

The controversy has reached a fever pitch for many in light of the Obama administration’s release of five Taliban terror leaders from the Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who had been held in the Middle East.

There have been no known moves on the part of the Obama administration to have Tahmooressi returned to the U.S., his supporters charge.

Harrington, who is updating the “very fluid” rally plan on Facebook, told WND he wants to make it clear that the bikers joining in the rally are not fools.

He debunked Internet rumors that the rally is some sort of raid on the Mexican prison to free Tahmooressi. Instead, he said, the Mexico government will be warned that there will be a cost should it keep the Marine.

“Don’t take one of ours,” he said. “We’ll do something about it.

“We will find ways … to choke your money off. There are many different ways to do it. That’s the message.”

Harrington told WND the bikers at some point Saturday will make the trip to the border to deliver a written proclamation.

The timing of the events and actual plans depend on a number of factors, such as the arrival of other bikers and the turnout.

He discussed his plans earlier in a video report:

In the report, Harrington said members of Riders USA were joining the “ride to the border,” which was drawing a lot of support.

“It’s time we start fighting fire with fire,” he said. “Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi back in March made a wrong turn, ended up in Mexico … he actually was up front with Customs and told them he had guns in the car.

“Now he’s in a Mexican jail.”

Harrington, who said he was still drafting his statement for the rally, criticized Obama for his lack of action.

He said Obama left “four behind” in Benghazi, the four Americans killed by terrorists, and went to extraordinary lengths to retrieve a solder detained in the Middle East by exchanging him for five terror leaders.

He pointed out the Mexican military “crosses the U.S. border daily.”

“We turn around and let them go home.”

WND reported earlier when Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he was speaking only partly tongue-in-cheek when he suggested President Obama send five Democrats, including Secretary of State John Kerry, former Sen. Hillary Clinton and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to Mexico in exchange for the U.S. Marine.

WND columnist Gina Loudon also wrote about the Tahmooressi case.

“In my backyard, Sgt. Tahmooressi, who served ‘with distinction’ on two tours of duty, waits for Obama to make a phone call to Mexico on his behalf. Patriots fought to get more than 100,000 signatures at WhiteHouse.gov to ensure that Obama had to respond, but so far, crickets,” she said.

Earlier, Jill Tahmooressi, the mother of the jailed Marine sergeant, said her son was encouraged by people who are pressing for his freedom.

“He fought for them, and now it is so nice to see so many are willing to fight for him,” she told WND in an interview.

Hear Loudon’s comments:

Andrew Tahmooressi graduated with honors as a Florida Bright Scholar and was a pilot by the age of 17.

“He could have chosen any public university in the country,” his mother said, “but he knew he wasn’t sure what he wanted to do yet, and he told me he didn’t want to waste the government’s money, or mine. That’s the kind of person he is.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/dont-take-1-of-ours-well-do-something-about-it/#VUVcrSDATjJz5lsY.99

 

 

 

Georgina Lopez: ¿Como es la vida en Cuba? Video: http://www.todoelmundohabla.com/2014/06/video-como-es-la-vida-en-cuba.html?m=1

 

 

Watch: It Only Took 3 1/2 Mins. For McCain To Prove Obama Has Created A Nightmare

“The question is ‘Could All Of This Been Avoided?’ The answer is absolutely YES 

John McCain (R-AZ) gave a passionate speech on the Senate floor on the emerging crisis in Iraq, saying that the political decision to pull our troops out of the region has left it wide open for the ISIS terrorist group to take over one-third of the Iraqi territory.

Senator McCain said, “It’s time the president got a new security team that knows what it is to succeed in conflict.”

McCain went onto say that just “because the president of the United States declares that a conflict is over does not mean, in the eyes of the enemy, that it’s over.”

The Arizona Senator showed great frustration with the current administration’s decisions in the Middle East when he emphatically said, “I believe that history will judge the president’s leadership with the scorn and disdain that it deserves.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/mccain-history-will-judge-obamas-leadership-scorn/#FECmpz6LIB7ojlEO.99

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

Washington Insider: Obama Member of Chicago Gay Man’s Club

junio 13, 2014

Washington Insider: Obama Member of Chicago Gay Man’s Club.

junio 11, 2014

No 684     “En mi opinión”    Junio 11, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

 <O> AYER PUDE OIR Y VER POR TV LA NOTICIA DE QUE EL CONGRESO HABIA APROBADO A obama $2,000’000,000.00 O SEA DOS MIL MILLONES DE DOLARES,  PARA LOS NINOS QUE ESTAN HOSPEDADOS EN ESTADOS UNIDOS DESPUES DE CRUZAR LA FRONTERA DESDE MEXICO HACIA LOS USA.

Estuve buscando información y encontré muy poca, casi ninguna. Y por el artículo que está debajo encontré que los niños en la frontera son 1,800. O sea que de acuerdo con lo que le otorgo el congreso a estos pobres niños indocumentados, a cada uno les toca 111 millones. Porque si mi matemática está bien Dos mil millones entre 1,800 ilegales toca a 1.11 millones a cada uno. Oye esto es tremendo premio y además un estímulo para todo el que quiera entrar en los USA “Clandestinamente” o sea ilegal especialmente a los niños y las mamas y papas que los traen con la complicidad del gobierno descarado de México y el gobierno descarado de los USA. También dicen que anualmente entran “ilegalmente” son 60,000 cada año, a ese ritmo habra que otorgarles $66,600’000,000.00 cada año por el congreso de USA.

¿Pero qué cosa es esta, Yo estoy loco o el congreso y el presidente también o es que son un bando de irresponsable? Señores ustedes no se han dado de cuenta que México y los países de Centro América les ha declarado la guerra secreta a los USA y el congreso y el presidente obama la está sufragando esta guerra donde se pone en peligro la vida de estos niños. Y nosotros los que pagamos los taxes estamos haciendo nuestro mejor papel de comemierdas que hemos hecho en nuestras vidas.  El gobierno americano no puede ser estúpido, o por lo menos en este gobierno debe haber alguno que no sea estúpido y darse cuenta que los han cogido de “mingo” Miren si el gobierno de Mejico permite esto es que él está alentando todo este flujo delincuental, si delincuental, porque estos no son ilegales son delincuentes masivos que invaden a los Estados Unidos MASIVAMENTE Y CONTANTEMENTE Y EL GOBIERNO AMERICANO O ES COMPLICE O ES ESTUPIDO. Ustedes se imaginan 60,000 niños con sus padre atravesando todo el país de Mejico desde la frontera sur hasta la frontera norte con USA y que Mejico no haga nada??? Oye el que no vea esto tiene que estar ciego. Es por eso que Mejico permite que entren millones de libras de drogas por la frontera, porque las drogan son uno de los renglones económicos que maneja el gobierno para poder mantener y enriquecerse el gobierno de Mejico y los Capos de los narcotraficantes y traficantes de delincuente ilegales. Y si son delincuentes porque el que comete una ilegalidad es un delincuente, asi que si son delincuentes. Son delincuentes todos los que hacen esto y son delincuentes los que permiten esto. Tanto los guardias Mejicanos como los guardias Americanos TODOS son delincuentes y culpables. La frontera sur de USA se ha convertido en un prostíbulo de entrada de ilegales y de drogas. SI ES UN PROSTIBULO QUE NOS LLENA DE VERGÜENZA PORQUE NOS HACEN PARECER IDIOTAS Y LOS IDIOTAS SON USTEDES ADEMAS DE DELINCUENTES. DESDE LA ENTREGA DE ARMAS NORTEAMERICANA POR PARTE DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE JUSTICIA EN SU OPERACIÓN “RAPIDO Y FURIOSOS” DONDE TODO EL MUNDO SE METIO LA LENGUA EN EL CULO Y LOS MUERTOS A ENTERRARLO Y LOS DEMAS “CALLADITOS QUE ASI SE VEN MAS BONITOS” La frontera sur de los USA es lo mismo que tenía la prostituta “María Camión en su prostíbulo en la calle que pasaba por debajo del puente del Rio Sagua.  Pues bueno ya no está ahí, ahora esta en la frontera sur de Los USA y en la Norte de Mejico. Esta es MI OPINION LAZARO R GONZALEZ MINO Y ¿CUAL ES LA TUYA?

 

Crisis humanitaria en centros de ayuda en EE.UU. por el aumento de indocumentados

(CNN Español) – El aumento del número de inmigrantes indocumentados que cruzan la frontera sur de Estados Unidos causa problemas no solo a las autoridades de inmigración, que buscan soluciones para albergar a quienes llegan.

También, es un inconveniente para los centros de ayuda, que apenas dan abasto para responder a lo que ya se considera una emergencia humanitaria.

El gobierno de EE.UU. enfrenta así una crisis generada por el aumento de niños inmigrantes que cruzan solos la frontera, que se calcula en más de 60.000 al año.

El Pentágono anunció este lunes que ha abierto temporalmente tres bases militares, en Oklahoma, Texas y California, para acoger a 1.800 niños indocumentados debido a la crisis humanitaria provocada por la avalancha de menores sin acompañar, provenientes en su mayoría de Centroamérica.

El número de africanos que entran por la frontera sur también va en aumento, reportan funcionarios de los centros de asistencia.

Los centros de detención ahora cuentan con condiciones poco óptimas para tal cantidad de personas, por lo que envían cada vez más indocumentados a albergues, que a su vez se ven agobiados frente a la demanda de ayuda.

Muchas de esas personas son madres con niños pequeños.

 

 

 

 

ESTE SR. SI ES UN VERDADERO PATRIOTA VENEZOLANO: Leopoldo López: “La esencia de la democracia es el derecho a disentir”

Conclusiones emitirá el miércoles 11 de junio la segunda parte del audio de Leopoldo López en la corte. Sintoniza CNN en Español a las 9:30pm Venezuela / 10pm ET

(CNN Español) – Conclusiones revela en exclusiva el audio de la audiencia de Leopoldo López, en el que el líder opositor venezolano ejerce su propia defensa la semana pasada en un tribunal de Caracas.

López, acusado de promover hechos violentos en la capital venezolana el 12 de febrero, será enjuiciado y permanecerá preso, según lo determinó la madrugada la semana pasada la jueza 16 de Control de Caracas, Adriana López.

“Lo que plantea el Ministerio Público, señora juez, honorable juez de la República, es querer precisamente cortar la esencia de la democracia que es el debate y el derecho a disentir”, dice López en la grabación.

“Eso es lo que está planteando el Ministerio Público con la acusación que me hace. ‘No, usted no puede acusar, usted no puede señalar al gobierno de corrupto, usted no puede señalar al gobierno de ineficiente, usted no puede decir nada contra Maduro’. ¿Cómo se le va a plantear en democracia a alguien que no pueda criticar a quien ejerce el poder?”.

Además, López dice que es “insólito” y “lamentable” que el Ministerio Público no haya hablado en el caso sobre las muertes de Bassil Da Costa y de Juancho Montoya —fallecidos el 12 de febrero—, mientras se les privó a la libertad a jóvenes venezolanos que fueron torturados.

Según López, para la Fiscalía “ellos no existieron”. El opositor dijo que las muertes de estos jóvenes fueron previas a las manifestaciones frente al Ministerio Público y sugiere que la reacción en la calle fue respuesta a esos homicidios.

López dice que “nadie tiene duda” que recibieron impacto de bala de efectivos del Sebin.

“¿No habrá sido la reacción de los jóvenes al asesinato cometido por funcionario público? Allí hubo un homicidio y una respuesta de jóvenes indignados”.

En entrevista con Fernando del Rincón, los abogados penalistas Alberto Arteaga y Carlos Ramírez analizaron el audio y sus implicaciones.

Para Arteaga, el discurso de López puso en evidencia la carencia de fundamento de las acusaciones en su contra. El abogado explicó que pedir la renuncia de un mandatario —como lo hizo Hugo Chávez con Carlos Andrés Pérez— es un derecho, y no puede considerarse un delito.

Por su parte, Carlos Ramírez aseguró que vale la pena destacar que López señaló que los asesinatos de Da Cosra y Montoya fueron silenciados. Ramírez además manifestó que es claro que no hay razón para que López esté preso y que es “obvio que se trata de una persecución política en su contra”..

Conclusiones obtuvo el audio de una fuente confiable y que estaba en el recinto de la audiencia. Por razones de seguridad la fuente es anónima. Los abogados de López certificaron la autenticidad del audio.

 

Ralph Nader: Obama Should “Most Definitely” Be Impeached

“The reason why Congress doesn’t want to do it is because…”

F. PETER BROWN 

Ralph Nader recently wrote a book entitled, “Unstoppable: The Emerging Left-Right Alliance to Dismantle the Corporate State.”  Nader regards such an alliance as not a fantasy, but rather as actually emerging.”On Capitol Hill, I’m seeing more and more in Congress, left and right,” said Nader.

“It was a vote in the House over a year ago over the NSA snooping, it almost broke through … so we’re beginning to see formulations that once they click together, they’re unstoppable.”  The measure Nader is referring to, known as the Amash amendment, narrowly failed by 12 votes after a White House lobbying effort to halt the bill in its tracks.

The often outspoken Nader, political activist and five time Presidential candidate,  advocates the full decriminalization of drugs, saying “Tobacco leads to the deaths of over 400,000 Americans; hard drugs lead perhaps to 8,000.”

Nader went on to say that the success of his envisioned alliance is dependent upon strong leaders. He cites Rand Paul as a potential strong leader for the alliance, but then discusses what he sees as Rand Paul’s shortcomings: “He’s a mixed bag, you know, he’s evolving. He’s broadening his issues that he’s talking about and they’re beginning to resonate. On the other hand.. he has problems dealing with people.”

Nevertheless, Nader views Rand Paul as the strongest contender in the 2016 GOP Primary.

One thing is clear: Ralph Nader does not want to see a match between the following two Establishment candidates, Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton.“You want a dull campaign? Try Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton in 2016,” Nader states. “It’ll only be exciting for people who are interested in dynasties and personalities.”

Nader goes on to say about Clinton, “She’s turned into an international militarist. She’s far more hawkish than Obama.”
Nader puts forward a list of twenty billionaires that he’d would like to see run for President. “That’s where we’re at now: 20 billionaires with some enlightened background and I said run. Run! Run as an independent,”  Nader states. “Just to shake up this two-party tyranny … So maybe one of them will run. We certainly have enough of them, don’t we?”

Nader believes that Obama has violated the Constitution and deserves impeachment. “Oh, most definitely,” he replied when asked whether Congress should put forward articles of impeachment on Obama. “The reason why Congress doesn’t want to do it is because it’s abdicated its own responsibility under the Constitution.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/ralph-nader-obama-definitely-impeached-libertarians-liberals-unite/#MGJOM8kbGcPBYPAS.99

 

 

TRES  UTILIDADES ESCONDIDAS EN LOS   CELULARES

EMERGENCIA. I :

El número universal de emergencia para celulares es 112

Si usted estuviera fuera del area de cobertura de su operador y tuviera una emergencia

marque 112 y el celular irá en busca de conexión con cualquier operador posible para

enviar el número para usted, y lo más interesante es que el 112 puede ser digitado lo

mismo si el teclado está bloqueado.  Experimente!

 

EMERGENCIA. II : *3370#

Vamos a imaginar que la bateria de su celular estuviera baja, para reactivarla,

presione las teclas *3370#

El celular accionara su reserva y usted obtendra el 50% de carga de su bateria,

esa reserva será recargada la próxima vez que usted recargue la bateria de su celular

(esa función es interna, no se ve en la pantalla del celular)

 

EMERGENCIA. III :*#06#

Para conocer el número de serie interna de su celular, presione los siguientes dígitos : *#06#

Aparecerá un codigo de 15 ó más dígitos. Este código es único, anote y guarde en un lugar seguro.

Si su celular fuera robado , comunique este código a su operador, así ellos conseguirán bloquear su celular

y el ladrón no podrá usarlo de ninguna forma, tal vez usted se quede sin su celular. Pero, por lo menos, sabrá

que nadie más podrá usarlo.

SI todos hicieran éso, no habria más robos de celulares

PS: Estas informaciones no son conocidas, por eso pásela a sus familiares y amigos.

 

 

CLEMENTE SANCHEZ:Clásicos a lo Cubano… Haz click en la letras azules

 

Por razones ajenas a su voluntad, Strauss, Beethoven, Mozart, Bizet, Bach, Tchaikosvky y otros grandes compositores nacieron fuera de Cuba.  De lo contrario, sus obras “Danubio Azul”, “La 5ta. Sinfonía” y sus otras piezas cumbreshubieran sonado de la siguiente forma:

(Para escucharlas, haz clic en el nombre)

Danubio Cubano: An der shönen blauen Donau

Quinta Sinfonía: Beethoven’s 5th arr: Sverre Indris Joner

Basilón: Eine kleine nachtmusik – Mozart

Habanera en Habana: Bizet Carmen-suites

Salsaria: Air Bach arr: Sverre Indris Joner

Cuban Sugar: Sugarplum Fairy from Nutcracker.

 

 

 

Parents Of Soldier Killed Searching For Bergdahl Ask Obama This One Simple Question

The parents of one of Bergdahl’s platoon mates who had been killed while on a mission to locate Bergdahl appeared on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace. TOM HINCHEY — 

 

 

The parents of one of Bergdahl’s platoon mates who had been killed while on a mission to locate Bergdahl appeared on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace. Army PFC Matthew Martinek is one of the soldiers who was killed searching for Bergdahl, yet Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel claims that he doesn’t know of any “specific circumstance of U.S. soldiers dying as a result of efforts to find and rescue Sgt. Bergdahl.”  Ken Luccioni, Martinek’s step-father, stated, “The American people know that this is not being handled properly. The Army knows what went on, and what’s frustrating is, why not tell the truth?….The truth is not that bad.”Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/parents-soldier-killed-searching-ergdahl-ask-white-house-one-thing/#RZwHGomfLi37TJBq.99

 

 

The Endless Invasion Of America

How goes the Third World invasion of the United States? PATRICK BUCHANAN — 

 

PAGES: 1 2

For 10 days, Americans have argued over the wisdom of trading five Taliban senior commanders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.

President Obama handed the Taliban a victory, critics contend, and imperiled U.S. troops in Afghanistan when the five return to the battlefield. Moreover, he has inspired the Haqqani network and other Islamists to capture more Americans to trade.

But which represents the greater long-term threat to the safety and security of our people and nation: sending those five Taliban leaders to Doha, and perhaps back to Afghanistan, or releasing into the U.S. population last year 36,000 criminal illegal aliens with 88,000 convictions among them?

According to a May report from the Center for Immigration Studies, of the 36,000 criminal aliens who, while awaiting deportation, were set free by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 193 had been convicted of homicide, 426 of sexual assault, 303 of kidnapping, 1,075 of aggravated assault, 1,160 for stolen vehicles, 9,187 for possession or use of dangerous drugs, and 16,070 for driving drunk or drugged.

Those 36,000 criminal aliens are roughly equivalent to three-and-a-half divisions of felons and social misfits released into our midst.

And this does not include the 68,000 illegal aliens against whom ICE declined to press criminal charges last year, but turned loose.

How goes the Third World invasion of the United States?

According to the AP, the U.S. Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley sector made 148,017 arrests from Oct. 1 to May 17, while 62,876 were caught in the Tucson sector, the second-busiest crossing point.

That is almost 211,000 illegal aliens caught in just over half a year in just two sectors of the border. And that figure only tells us how many were caught, not how many got in, or how many of those caught were released and now reside among us.

Among those caught crossing into Texas these last seven months were 47,000 unaccompanied children. Border Patrol estimates that by Sept. 30, apprehensions of children and teenagers in this fiscal year could reach 90,000.

According to Gov. Jan Brewer, the feds have begun shipping illegal aliens (adults as well as children) from Texas to Arizona, “dumping” them into her state.

“This is a humanitarian crisis and it requires a humanitarian response,” says Maryland Sen. Barbara Mikulski of the surge in children from Central America across the U.S. border.

Attorney General Eric Holder has risen to the crisis. The U.S. will now provide lawyers for children who enter illegally, to fight their battle in U.S. courts to stay.

“We’re taking this historic step,” says Holder, “to protect the rights of the most vulnerable members of our society. How we treat those in need — particularly young people who are fleeing violence, persecution, abuse or trafficking — goes to the core of who we are as a nation.”

Somehow, the core contention of James Burnham’s “Suicide of the West,” out 50 years ago this year, comes to mind.

“Liberalism,” wrote Burnham. “is the ideology of Western suicide.”

America and the West must face up to what is happening to our countries and our civilization. Or we are going to lose them both forever.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/endless-invasion-america/#uogw2UbicJYvQfuX.99

 

 

AMENPER: El Costo de la Educación Superior

La educación universitaria en los Estados Unidos, nunca ha sido un paseo.  Siempre después de la primaria y la secundaria, sólo las personas con motivación, interés y responsabilidad personal seguían los estudios superiores.   No era como dicen los comunistas imposible para una persona pobre tener estudios universitarios.  Los comunistas dicen y repiten sus mentiras, y los que no viven en el sistema, pueden creer sus sofismas. Pero igual que no puedo creer en la mentira que en la economía de libre mercado el rico se vuelve más rico y el pobre se vuelve más pobre, porque en Cuba y aquí vi como hubo pobres que se hicieron ricos y ricos que pasaron a la pobreza, y fueron muchos, así la posibilidad de completar una educación superior siempre fue posible en un sistema de libre mercado.

Pero no era un regalo, había que tener la responsabilidad, tanto los padres como los estudiantes, de con su trabajo e interés tomar las oportunidades que el sistema le ofrecía.

Cuando mis hijos llegaron a la edad universitaria, era un momento de mi vida que se pudiera considerar como extrema pobreza.  Mi ingreso no me permitía pagar por las matrículas y el mantenimiento de mis hijos mientras estudiaban. Estudiamos las oportunidades que se ofrecían en aquellos tiempos.  Mis hijos eran buenos estudiantes, pero su nivel no los hacia elegibles para becas especiales.  Lo que ofrecían era planes conjuntos, un “´package” que incluía “grants” que eran regalos de filántropos y compañías privadas, “work study” que era trabajo para el estudiante, en la librería, la cafetería o en otros trabajos en el campus de la universidad.  Después para completar el “package” estaba los préstamos que garantizaba el gobierno a los bancos y que había que pagarlo al completar la carrera.

Esto era accesible para todo el que se tomara el trabajo de hacerlo.  No te lo empujaban, tenías que trabajar para pedirlo, pero estaba a la disposición de todos sin importar el color o el origen.  Estabas a la disposición de un negro de Liberty City, un cracker del Panhandle o un refugiado de Cuba.  Nadie puede culpar el sistema porque pida un mínimo de responsabilidad. Mis hijos completaron su carrera y pagaron su préstamo completo.  Si no hubieran pagado no hubiera habido dinero para los que venían despues de ellos ¿Por qué esto es tan difícil de entender?.

Pero caímos en la revolución de los 60, la revolución de los hippies  que no querían la responsabilidad ni de bañarse, y en su mundo de piojos, drogas y gonorrea, consideraban que no tenían que pagar las deudas de los préstamos para los estudios.   El sistema comenzó a fallar, no había dinero para los préstamos, la generación del “me” había cambiado la responsabilidad personal que era realmente lo que había creado el sistema americano.

El mesías Obama ha salido as rescate, un rescate que costará 7 billones a los contribuyentes, expandiendo el plan de emergencia que ya se había establecido de “pague según gane” que en realidad era “no tienes problemas no pagues nada”.  Ahora todavía es más flexible, es un welfare, y veremos las universidades llenas de turistas que van a gozar el ambiente no realmente para completar la carrera, de todos modos pasear por el campus por un par de años con los gastos pagados es mejor que trabajar.  Los costos de los estudios aumentarán al aumentar los estudiantes más los pseudo estudiantes y recibir los beneficios y los altos salarios los profesores adoctrinadores de la izquierda que se encuentran en una élite de la burbuja intelectual que se han creado.  Los profesores y los gobernantes de hoy son los hippies de ayer, una clase que está ahogando a la nación

Esto simplemente es un microsoma del problema social que tenemos, el punto común y total es la pérdida de la responsabilidad personal. 

Dame, dame, dame más, este es el nuevo lema de la sociedad, y cada día serán menos los que produzcan para dar.  Cuando se acabe el jugo de la naranjas que dan el jugo, se comerán los hollejos, y después se comerán las cáscaras, después las matas de naranjas, las hojas y el tronco, y terminarán como han terminado en Cuba y en todos los países socialistas, comiendo lo que queda que es la tierra.  Pido a Dios que mis nietos no tengan que comer tierra en este país.

 

 

Paul Krugman vs. Reality: The VA Hospitals. Written by Gary North 

 

This is reality: a report by the VA, as summarized by the Washington Post.

The Department of Veterans Affairs on Monday shed light on the depth of the VA scheduling scandal and substantiated claims that rank-and-file employees were directed to manipulate records.

The agency said more than 57,000 new patients have waited at least 90 days for their first appointments and that about 13 percent of VA schedulers indicated they were told to falsify appointment-request dates to give the impression that wait times were shorter than they really were.

The information comes from the agency’s internal audit of 731 VA medical centers, which the VA released Monday.

The report said that complicated scheduling practices created confusion among clerks and supervisors, contributing to the problems. It also said the VA’s goal of providing an initial appointment within 14 days of a request was unattainable because of the growing demand for care among veterans.

Here is the assessment by Nobel Prize winning Keynesian economist, Paul Krugman. He offered this assessment in 2011. The article was “Vouchers for Veterans,” in which he attacked a variant of Milton Friedman’s voucher plan for government-run schools, but applied to medicine. (The public has never adopted Friedman’s voucher idea for government-supplied services.) Krugman prefers socialized, government-run medical care. He likes his socialism straight, not some sugar-coated “Let’s make coercion workable” version from Friedman. This appeared in the New York Times.

What Mr. Romney and everyone else should know is that the V.H.A. is a huge policy success story, which offers important lessons for future health reform.

Many people still have an image of veterans’ health care based on the terrible state of the system two decades ago. Under the Clinton administration, however, the V.H.A. was overhauled, and achieved a remarkable combination of rising quality and successful cost control. Multiple surveys have found the V.H.A. providing better care than most Americans receive, even as the agency has held cost increases well below those facing Medicare and private insurers. Furthermore, the V.H.A. has led the way in cost-saving innovation, especially the use of electronic medical records.

What’s behind this success? Crucially, the V.H.A. is an integrated system, which provides health care as well as paying for it. So it’s free from the perverse incentives created when doctors and hospitals profit from expensive tests and procedures, whether or not those procedures actually make medical sense. And because V.H.A. patients are in it for the long term, the agency has a stronger incentive to invest in prevention than private insurers, many of whose customers move on after a few years.

And yes, this is “socialized medicine” — although some private systems, like Kaiser Permanente, share many of the V.H.A.’s virtues. But it works — and suggests what it will take to solve the troubles of U.S. health care more broadly.

In the choice between Nobel Prize-winner Milton Friedman’s voucher system and Nobel Prize-winner Paul Krugman’s socialist medicine, count me out. I prefer Nobel Prize-losing economist Murray Rothbard’s assessment in 1994, the year before he died.

We have to remember a crucial point about government as against business operations on the market. Businesses are always eager for consumers to buy their product or service. On the free market, the consumer is king or queen and the “providers” are always trying to make profits and gain customers by serving them well. But when government operates a service, the consumer is transmuted into a pain-in-the-neck, a “wasteful” user-up of scarce social resources. Whereas the free market is a peaceful cooperative place where everyone benefits and no one loses, when government supplies the product or service, every consumer is treated as using a resource only at the expense of his fellow men. The “public service” arena, and not the free market, is the dog-eat-dog jungle.

Want proof? The VA hospitals are the poster child.

Continue Reading on www.nytimes.com
Read more at
http://teapartyeconomist.com/2014/06/10/paul-krugman-vs-reality-va-hospitals/#0JA5zPzB7LKlEdyl.99

 

 

 

WATCH: Hillary Blames Benghazi Victim In Boneheaded ABC News Interview

She is facing significant backlash as a result of comments she made during an ABC News interview…B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — 

The ballyhooed favorite among many Democrats looking toward the 2016 presidential election is facing significant backlash as a result of comments she made during an ABC News interview with Diane Sawyer this week.

On Monday, an advance clip of the interview aired in which Hillary Clinton claimed she and her husband were “dead broke” upon leaving the White House as she attempted to justify charging up to $200,000 for a single speech.

The fact that the couple received a $1.7 million loan from current Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe and went on to earn more than $100 million between 2000 and 2007 naturally struck many Americans as incongruent with her assertion.

When the entire interview aired, Clinton faced even more criticism – specifically for her allegation that Ambassador Chris Stevens played a part in his own death during the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack. She stated he was at the embassy “of his own choosing” and would not confirm whether there was anything she could have done that might have changed the outcome.

“I take responsibility,” she said of her response as Secretary of State; “but I was not making security decisions.”

To top it off, Clinton claimed the Benghazi ordeal is the primary reason people should vote for her. Beyond that, she had little compelling evidence suggesting she would be an effective president.

Clinton did, however, manage to interject some talking points into the conversation – including her apparent assumption that the world is full of sexist men. She used questions stemming from the fact that she will be a grandmother during the 2016 election cycle as a catalyst for her diatribe.

Suggesting she could have been more effective in combating the supposed hurdles women face in politics, she said that “men have been serving [as president] as fathers and grandfathers since the beginning of the Republic.”

Furthermore, she used the opportunity to criticize Russian President Vladimir Putin for comments he made recently that many individuals considered sexist. She concluded that he was “not the first” influential man to make such statements.

Clinton also subtly attacked the belief by some that she is too old for the presidency by seizing on the fact that her interviewer is even older, concluding that it is “good to be our age.”

Sawyer brought up the Monica Lewinsky scandal that ultimately led to impeachment proceedings against her husband. While Clinton said she is “not going to comment on what I did or did not say in the late ‘90s,” she ultimately concluded that she would likely not repeat her claim that the entire controversy was the result of a “vast right-wing conspiracy.”

She did, however, confirm her suspicion that a “concerted political effort” exists against both her husband and Barack Obama.


Read more at
http://www.westernjournalism.com/hillary-blames-benghazi-victim-boneheaded-abc-news-interview/#4qVMh7PjZBHZ8Grw.99

 

 

Poll Of Black Americans Absolutely Destroys This Liberal Talking Point

Liberals’ efforts to drive a racial wedge didn’t work… LA SHAWN BARBER — 

 

Despite liberals’ efforts to drive a racial wedge between Americans, it hasn’t been completely successful when it comes to showing a government-issued form of photo identification before voting. According to a recent Fox News poll, 51 percent of black Americans support voter ID.

One might think blacks would resent the implication that they’re too “poor,” lazy, or dumb to go down to the DMV like everybody else and obtain a driver’s license or non-driver’s photo ID. But that’s exactly the way Democrats present the issue…minus the politically incorrect words, of course.

Project 21, a black conservatives policy group, issued statements on the poll.

“This poll shows there may be strong black support for Obama as a politician, but not necessarily as a policymaker,” said Cherylyn Harley LeBon, Project 21 Co-Chairman and former senior counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. “And a prime example are voter ID laws. Although the Obama Administration, its legislative and judicial supporters, the media and left-wing activists continue to oppose voter ID laws and claim they marginalize minorities, the black community is still quite supportive of efforts to protect polling place. After relentless warnings they could be denied the right to vote, a majority of black Americans in this particular poll still recognize the need to protect legal voters against identity theft.”

A majority of Americans in general supports voter ID. Proving identity is a common-sense measure to ensure the integrity of the voting process. And it’s not a hardship. People use some form of photo ID in personal and business dealings all the time. Why is it suddenly a hardship when it’s time to vote?

“A majority of black Americans in this poll found nothing inherently racist about showing an ID to vote. It discredits the progressive talking point that black Americans uniformly see voter laws as racist and an attempt at voter suppression,” said Kevin Martin, a Navy veteran and small business owner. “It also shows that progressives who claim to represent the black community are not listening to us on this issue. Perhaps it is because they only seek to use our community to further their own agenda.”

Editor’s note: This article first appeared at Black Community News
Read more at
http://www.westernjournalism.com/wow-turns-majority-black-americans-support-voter-id/#3Tm0ZB4KqSOOVBuq.99

 

 

Rand Paul: Mr. President, Instead of 5 Taliban, Let’s Trade 5 Democrats

“Mr. President, you love to trade people…”DANIEL NOE — 

At the Texas GOP convention in Fort Worth on Friday, Senator Rand Paul got some laughs with this line.

“Mr. President, you love to trade people. Why don’t we set up a trade. But this time, instead of five Taliban, how ‘bout five Democrats?”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/rand-paul-mr-president-instead-5-taliban-lets-trade-5-democrats/#RiHqX8BYmgyI2lsS.99

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

junio 7, 2014

No 680     “En mi opinión”    Junio 7, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*__*_*_

Ya encontré a quien encargarle que termine con todos los problemas de Los Estados Unidos. Es un hombre blanco, rubio, con experiencia,  perfectamente instruido en las debilidades y los vicios de los hombres y su infinita maldad. Tiene mucha experiencia en esto porque hace algún tiempo, después que les enseño la verdad. Ellos se aferraron a la mentira, como ahora, y lo traicionaron, encarcelaron y torturaron hasta asesinarlo clavándolo en un madero. Pero resucito y no se rindió tiene fe y yo también,  el regreso para completar la obra de redención. Regresa para que los hombres sean buenos y trabajen para hacer este mundo mejor. Tendremos ahora la oportunidad de demostrarle a ese hombre que ahora sí que no le fallaremos que ahora si sacaremos a los mercaderes, los fariseos  y los falsos líderes de LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA y los enviaremos al infierno de donde nunca debieron ni volverán a salir y allí pagaran por todos sus pecados. AMEN. “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño

_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*__*_*_

 

AMENPER: Los extremos del Péndulo Racial

Todas las carreras no son iguales. De hecho, algunas son simplemente mejores que el resto.

En EE.UU. según las estadísticas los mejores trabajos de 2014 ofrecen un mosaico de oportunidades de seguridad  que facilitan situaciones manejables que ofrecen conciliación de la vida laboral y seguridad en el trabajo.   Lo que nos dicen las estadísticas es que los mejores trabajos son nuevas posiciones relacionadas con las modernas metodologías de mercado, como analistas, contadores y ejecutivos de mercadeo.  

Pero lo que no dicen las estadísticas es que en la nueva sociedad americana la mejor carrera es ser…NEGRO.

Este pudiera parecer un comentario racista, pero me tienen que creer, no soy racista, todo lo contrario. 

Como testigo de la absurda discriminación hacia los negros en el sur de los Estados Unidos en los años cincuenta, no puedo tener en mi persona la actitud de discriminar a nadie por su raza o color. 

Pero este mismo concepto adquirido en cuanto a la individualidad de la persona sin considerar el color o raza, me hace rechazar la situación actual de péndulo, en que se considera intocable a una persona de una raza determinada porque una crítica supone racismo.

En los Estados Unidos de los años cincuenta los blancos tenían un margen de oportunidades inmensamente superior al de cualquier negro sin considerar la educación la decencia  o la inteligencia del negro. 

Pero un blanco no era excusado por ser blanco si cometía un acto fuera de la ley, o no podía avanzar en su trabajo por el solo hecho de ser blanco. 

Un blanco no podía recibir privilegios especiales por simplemente ser blanco.

Al girar el péndulo social al otro extremo, de lo que soy testigo hoy es una diferencia racial aberrante, en esta nueva sociedad el negro se encuentra tan protegido por su raza que se ha creado una burbuja aislante racial. 

Un negro no puede cometer un delito sin que la raza lo haga tener una ventaja judicial.

Aunque en todas las posiciones profesionales y políticas el negro ha logrado obtener posiciones de acuerdo con su capacidad, ingeniosidad y trabajo individual existe un sector de negros cuyas oportunidades y privilegios existen sólo por el hecho de ser negros.

La excusa es la discriminación que existió y que no existe hoy en día, pero que todavía se usa para obtener privilegios sin responsabilidades o habilidades personales.

Los méritos individuales por hechos del pasado, recibir privilegios por algo que sucedió a un antepasado, no se ajusta a le realidad que debe imponer en una sociedad democrática. 

Los méritos y los privilegios en una república democrática se obtienen por el esfuerzo individual, no por tu linaje o raza.,

Tenemos un presidente, un organizador comunitario, sin más valor ni capacidad para el puesto que el hecho de ser negro.   La negrura también se mide por la importancia que el individuo le da a la raza.  Hay negros que hubieran podido ocupar la presidencia, que son más capacitados que Obama, pero que no eran racialmente militantes.

No ha existido un presidente en los Estados Unidos durante su historia que haya cometido los desmanes que ha cometido Barack Hussein Obama. Simplemente el hecho de haber liberado cinco enemigos combatientes considerados los peores criminales de guerra entre los prisioneros de Guantánamo, hubiera sido suficiente para impugnar a cualquier presidente. Pero la burbuja racial protege a Obama.

En este entorno socio-racial no es concebible que el primer presidente negro que ha tenido la nación sea impugnado.  ¿Por qué?  Porque somos una nación tan racista como lo eran los Estados del Sur en los años cincuenta.  Por desgracia para América, el péndulo se ha desbocado.

 

30 Years Later, Reagan’s Normandy Speech Still Resonates

By Cathy Burke

President Ronald Reagan was the first sitting president to attend a D-Day anniversary observance in Normandy, and his emotional remembrance on the 40th anniversary on June 6, 1984, has been described as one of his most memorable speeches. 

Joining him, 30 years ago Friday, were surviving members of an Army Rangers team that had scaled cliffs at Pointe du Hoc to silence German guns protecting the Normandy beaches.

Story continues below video.

Here are Reagan’s remarks to the veterans at Pointe du Hoc:

We’re here to mark that day in history when the Allied armies joined in battle to reclaim this continent to liberty. For 4 long years, much of Europe had been under a terrible shadow. Free nations had fallen, Jews cried out in the camps, millions cried out for liberation. Europe was enslaved, and the world prayed for its rescue. Here in Normandy the rescue began. Here the Allies stood and fought against tyranny in a giant undertaking unparalleled in human history.

We stand on a lonely, windswept point on the northern shore of France. The air is soft, but 40 years ago at this moment, the air was dense with smoke and the cries of men, and the air was filled with the crack of rifle fire and the roar of cannon. At dawn, on the morning of the 6th of June, 1944, 225 Rangers jumped off the British landing craft and ran to the bottom of these cliffs. Their mission was one of the most difficult and daring of the invasion: to climb these sheer and desolate cliffs and take out the enemy guns. The Allies had been told that some of the mightiest of these guns were here and they would be trained on the beaches to stop the Allied advance.

The Rangers looked up and saw the enemy soldiers — the edge of the cliffs shooting down at them with machine guns and throwing grenades. And the American Rangers began to climb. They shot rope ladders over the face of these cliffs and began to climb over the face of these cliffs and began to pull themselves up. When one Ranger fell, another would take his place. When one rope was cut, a Ranger would grab another and begin his climb again. They climbed, shot back, and held their footing. Soon, one by one, the Rangers pulled themselves over the top, and in seizing the firm land at the top of these cliffs, they began to seize back the continent of Europe.

Two hundred and twenty-five came here. After 2 days of fighting, only 90 could still bear arms.

Behind me is a memorial that symbolizes the Ranger daggers that were thrust into the top of these cliffs. And before me are the men who put them there.

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. These are the men who took the cliffs. These are the champions who helped free a continent. These are the heroes who helped end a war.

Gentlemen, I look at you, and I think of the words of Stephen Spender’s poem. You are men who in your “lives fought for life . . . and left the vivid air signed with your honor.”

I think I know what you may be thinking right now — thinking “we were just part of a bigger effort; everyone was brave that day.” Well, everyone was. Do you remember the story of Bill Millin of the 51st Highlanders? Forty years ago today, British troops were pinned down near a bridge, waiting desperately for help. Suddenly, they heard the sound of bagpipes, and some thought they were dreaming. Well, they weren’t. They looked up and saw Bill Millin with his bagpipes, leading the reinforcements and ignoring the smack of the bullets into the ground around him.

Lord Lovat was with him — Lord Lovat of Scotland, who calmly announced when he got to the bridge, “Sorry I’m a few minutes late,” as if he’d been delayed by a traffic jam, when in truth he’d just come from the bloody fighting on Sword Beach, which he and his men had just taken.

There was the impossible valor of the Poles who threw themselves between the enemy and the rest of Europe as the invasion took hold, and the unsurpassed courage of the Canadians who had already seen the horrors of war on this coast. They knew what awaited them there, but they would not be deterred. And once they hit Juno Beach, they never looked back.

All of these men were part of a rollcall of honor with names that spoke of a pride as bright as the colors they bore: the Royal Winnipeg Rifles, Poland’s 24th Lancers, the Royal Scots Fusiliers, the Screaming Eagles, the Yeomen of England’s armored divisions, the forces of Free France, the Coast Guard’s “Matchbox Fleet” and you, the American Rangers.

Forty summers have passed since the battle that you fought here. You were young the day you took these cliffs; some of you were hardly more than boys, with the deepest joys of life before you. Yet, you risked everything here. Why? Why did you do it? What impelled you to put aside the instinct for self-preservation and risk your lives to take these cliffs? What inspired all the men of the armies that met here? We look at you, and somehow we know the answer. It was faith and belief; it was loyalty and love.

The men of Normandy had faith that what they were doing was right, faith that they fought for all humanity, faith that a just God would grant them mercy on this beachhead or on the next. It was the deep knowledge — and pray God we have not lost it — that there is a profound, moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest. You were here to liberate, not to conquer, and so you and those others did not doubt your cause. And you were right not to doubt.

You all knew that some things are worth dying for. One’s country is worth dying for, and democracy is worth dying for, because it’s the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man. All of you loved liberty. All of you were willing to fight tyranny, and you knew people of your countries were behind you.

The Americans who fought here that morning knew word of the invasion was spreading through the darkness back home. They fought— or felt in their hearts, though they couldn’t know in fact, that in Georgia they were filling the churches at 4 a.m., in Kansas they were kneeling on their porches and praying, and in Philadelphia they were ringing the Liberty Bell.

Something else helped the men of D-day: their rockhard belief that Providence would have a great hand in the events that would unfold here; that God was an ally in this great cause. And, so, the night before the invasion, when Colonel Wolverton asked his parachute troops to kneel with him in prayer he told them: Do not bow your heads, but look up so you can see God and ask His blessing in what we’re about to do. Also that night, General Matthew Ridgway on his cot, listening in the darkenss for the promise God made to Joshua: “I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.”

These are the things that impelled them; these are the things that shaped the unity of the Allies.

When the war was over, there were lives to be rebuilt and governments to be returned to the people. There were nations to be reborn. Above all, there was a new peace to be assured. These were huge and daunting tasks. But the Allies summoned strength from the faith, belief, loyalty, and love of those who fell here. They rebuilt a new Europe together.

There was first a great reconciliation among those who had been enemies, all of whom had suffered so greatly. The United States did its part, creating the Marshall plan to help rebuild our allies and our former enemies. The Marshall plan led to the Atlantic alliance — a great alliance that serves to this day as our shield for freedom, for prosperity, and for peace.

In spite of our great efforts and successes, not all that followed the end of the war was happy or planned. Some liberated countries were lost. The great sadness of this loss echoes down to our own time in the streets of Warsaw, Prague, and East Berlin. Soviet troops that came to the center of this continent did not leave when peace came. They’re still there, uninvited, unwanted, unyielding, almost 40 years after the war. Because of this, allied forces still stand on this continent. Today, as 40 years ago, our armies are here for only one purpose — to protect and defend democracy. The only territories we hold are memorials like this one and graveyards where our heroes rest.

We in America have learned bitter lessons from two World Wars: It is better to be here ready to protect the peace, than to take blind shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost. We’ve learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments with an expansionist intent.

But we try always to be prepared for peace; prepared to deter aggression; prepared to negotiate the reduction of arms; and, yes, prepared to reach out again in the spirit of reconciliation. In truth, there is no reconciliation we would welcome more than a reconciliation with the Soviet Union, so, together, we can lessen the risks of war, now and forever.

It’s fitting to remember here the great losses also suffered by the Russian people during World War II: 20 million perished, a terrible price that testifies to all the world the necessity of ending war. I tell you from my heart that we in the United States do not want war. We want to wipe from the face of the Earth the terrible weapons that man now has in his hands. And I tell you, we are ready to seize that beachhead. We look for some sign from the Soviet Union that they are willing to move forward, that they share our desire and love for peace, and that they will give up the ways of conquest. There must be a changing there that will allow us to turn our hope into action.

We will pray forever that some day that changing will come. But for now, particularly today, it is good and fitting to renew our commitment to each other, to our freedom, and to the alliance that protects it.

We are bound today by what bound us 40 years ago, the same loyalties, traditions, and beliefs. We’re bound by reality. The strength of America’s allies is vital to the United States, and the American security guarantee is essential to the continued freedom of Europe’s democracies. We were with you then; we are with you now. Your hopes are our hopes, and your destiny is our destiny.

Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: “I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.”

Strengthened by their courage, heartened by their value [valor], and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died.

Thank you very much, and God bless you all.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.comhttp://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Reagan-D-Day-Normandy-anniversary/2014/06/05/id/575497#ixzz33t7ncs3v

 
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

 

AMENPER: Obama no debe de ser Impugnado por las cámaras legislativas.

 

Siempre había pensado que las actitudes de Obama durante su presidencia, son causa de impugnación.  He cambiado de opinión.  Obama no debe de ser impugnado por las cámaras legislativas, obama debe de ser juzgado en Corte Marcial por un tribunal militar, como comandante en jefe insubordinado que ha cometido actos criminales.

Corte marcial es la denominación usada para designar a los tribunales militares  que determinan las sanciones penales aplicables a los miembros de las fuerzas fuerzas armadas conforme al derecho militar

Leyes militares son el conjunto de disposiciones legales que regulan la organización, funciones y mantenimiento de las instituciones armadas, para el cumplimiento de sus fines, en orden a la defensa y servicio de la patria, incumplimiento de estas leyes son causa de Corte Marcial

Barack Obama se convirtió en un símbolo para los anti guerrerista, en gran parte por que se presentó como un político contra la guerra. Sería la altura de la ironía si este presidente “contra la guerra”  pudiera terminar siendo acusado de crímenes de guerra, acusado de su conducta en la guerra, o una corte marcial por abandono del deber. El desenlace de su narrativa de Bengasi, que costó la vida a soldados estadounidenses, y la liberación de cinco talibanes con grado equivalente a mariscales de guerra, culpables de crímenes contra las fuerzas armadas y el pueblo de Estados Unidos, cuya libertad  pone en peligro la vida de miembros de las fuerzas armadas  todos son crímenes de guerra que presentan precisamente las posibilidades frente a él de ser acusado como criminal de guerra.

Las responsabilidades de la oficina de la presidencia tienen que tener consecuencias cuando en su cumplimiento afecta a una nación y a sus fuerzas armadas.  Es como cuando entramos a esas tiendas de artículos de cristal que tienen un rótulo que dice “si rompe algo, tiene que pagarlo” sin lugar a dudas cuando un comandante en jefe rompe con su conducta la vida de los miembros de las fuerzas armadas que defienden a esta nación tiene que pagar por su conducta. 

El presidente posee todos los poderes que se otorgan por el derecho internacional a cualquier comandante supremo. En ausencia de intentos por parte del Congreso para limitar su poder, podrá establecer y prescribir la competencia y procedimiento de las comisiones militares, el Presidente es el tribunal de última instancia para la aplicación de las normas y reglamentos que adopte el Congreso para el gobierno de las fuerzas, y que se hacen cumplir a través de los consejos de guerra.  

En el caso de Obama simplemente se limpia su trasero con el congreso, actúa no sólo como un comandante en jefe, pero como un emperador.

Artículo II, sección 4 de la Constitución establece que “El Presidente, [Vicepresidente], y todos los funcionarios civiles de los Estados Unidos serán separados de sus puestos al ser acusados ​​y declarados culpables de traición, cohecho u otros delitos y faltas graves, por un juicio de impugnación de las cámaras legislativas, pero en el caso de Obama que actúa como un jefe militar autoritario, sin consultar al  congreso, se trata de un caso definido como insubordinación militar y debe de ser juzgado bajo una Corte Marcial.

 

 

 

Ta that, jerks: McMillan Merchant Solutions, PistolPay offer pro-gun alternatives to anti-gun banks and payment companies

Posted by BearingArms.com Staff on September 25, 2013 at 6:53 am           

We all enjoy talking about guns, but the fact of the matter is that if dealers, distributors, and manufacturers don’t get paid, we don’t have a gun industry.

It appears that this was precisely the plot of a number of anti-gun financial companies (that just happen to donate millions to anti-gun Democrats) that started several years ago during the first term of “hope and change.” The April 2012 showdown between anti-gun Bank of America (BOA) and Kelly McMillan of McMillan USA that resulted from this behind-the-scenes battle quickly became legendary. He spent 5 minutes talking about how McMillan has changed in the last 5 years and has become more of a firearms manufacturer than a supplier of accessories.

At this point I interrupted him and asked, “Can I possible save you some time so that you don’t waste your breath? What you are going to tell me is that because we are in the firearms manufacturing business you no longer want my business.”

“That is correct,” he said.

I replied, “That is okay, we will move our accounts as soon as possible. We can find a 2nd Amendment-friendly bank that will be glad to have our business. You won’t mind if I tell the NRA, SCI, and everyone one I know that BofA is not firearms industry friendly?”

“You have to do what you must,” he said.

“So you are telling me this is a politically motivated decision, is that right?”
Mr Fox confirmed that it was. At which point I told him that the meeting was over and there was nothing let for him to say.

There was, however, plenty for the shooting community to say, especially Kelly McMillan.

When Bearing Arms spoke with Kelly McMillan last week he said that he still fields emails and phone calls every day about the BOA snub, more than a year and a half later, from other gun industry companies that have been similarly targeted.

The sad fact of the matter is that BOA and other financial services merchants such as Intuit and PayPal have treated other firearms industry companies and customers just as poorly. The difference between Kelly McMillan and most others that these anti-gun companies have discriminated against is that Kelly McMillan had the means and the determination to do something about it.

That “something” is the just-launched McMillan Merchant Solutions (MMS) a company established with Merchant Services Limited, which now offers credit card processing services to gun companies from a company that will never turn them down for political reasons.

“Yeah, but what does that mean to me?”

Whether you buy online or in the store, roughly 90-percent of sales are conducted with credit or debit cards. By refusing to do business with gun companies, anti-gun banks and processing services were attempting to gut the firearms industry from underneath, making it difficult, if not impossible, for gun dealers to process sales. MMS is coming in to partner with dealers as their credit card processor to key both gun stores and their customers happy.

A third-generation firearms industry figurehead, Kelly McMillan is adamant that McMillian Merchant Solutions is designed first and foremost to give back to and support the gun industry by giving it a sound financial footing, and he’s showing that in unique way. A small percentage of every dollar of revenue that MMS goes to gun rights and conservation groups in order to keep up the fight to defend our Second Amendment rights, and the dealers that use MMS get to pick which one of these organizations that their processing fees supports.

MMS is great for full-time gun shops, but smaller FFLs and accessory makers might not need their kind of service, and they aren’t set up to handle the customer side of transactions the way Paypal is. Paypal is actively shutting down payments for firearms-related transactions, but there is an alternative that is starting to gain traction.

PistolPay is a PayPal replacement made for shooters, by shooters. Ira Goodstadt is a retired firefighter, avid 1911 junkie, home AR-15 builder, and online forum dweller who was attempting to use PayPal to process a forum group-buy from AIM Surplus, when Paypal locked down his account, then his wife’s account, and then finally his daughter’s, because they didn’t approve of what he was attempting to buy.

Tired of being treated as a second-class citizen just for exercising his constitutional rights, Ira and Chapman Ducote, a trigger-pulling friend with financial services background, went to work, and soon afterward PistolPay was born.

The first few months of PistolPay’s existence was slow, due in part to the meltdown of GPal/GunPal, which is either described as being Ponzi scheme or simply incompetent, depending on who you talk to. The GPal/GunPal meltdown made many in the firearms community leery of dealing with a new brand, fearing a scam.

Unlike GPal however, PistolPay operates though a major bank as the depository and Merchant Services Limited handles the card processing (as they do for McMillan Merchant Solutions). After partnering to handle the financial ends of raffles for a number of pro-gun groups ( including the 1911 Addicts forumand One Million Moms Against Gun Control), PistolPay started to gain momentum mostly by word of mouth, and is starting to build relationships within companies within the industry.

You might soon start to see PistolPay appear as a payment option on prominent industry web sites as a payment option.

Financial companies aligned with anti-gun Democrats are trying to hamper or shutdown the firearms industry. Thanks to companies like McMillan Merchant Solutions and PistolPay, their desire to infringe on our Constitutional rights just go that much harder.

 

 

RICARDO SAMITIER: NSA Mantuvo Secreto Un Virus Informático, Para Poder Usarlo… y espiar a los ciudadanos…

Los virus informaticos son usados por criminales ciberneticos para robar

los datos de personas inocentes

Ahora sabemos que el NSA de Obama supo de un virus criminal y lo mantuvo secreto…

para poder usarlo!!!

Osea, dejaron a los criminales seguir usando este virus por anyos,

para tambien usar el mismo virus y poder espionar americanos.

El NSA no es una agencia federal fuera de control.

Es otra agencia federal que está haciendo exactamente, lo que le pide el gobierno de Obama!

Por eso el IRS investiga al Tea Party.

Por eso el BLM le roba las vacas a Bundy.

Por eso el VA deja morir a los veteranos.

Por eso dejaron morir a los americanos en Benghazi.

Nada de eso, fue accidental.

Todo fue la politica oficial de Obama

y solo despues de ser descubierto, 

es explicado como unos agentes fuera de control.

No!  Basta Ya De MENTIRAS, Una ´Tras Una!

NSA Said to Exploit Heartbleed Bug 

for Intelligence for Years

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-11/nsa-said-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-consumers.html

7 “Lideres Europeos” + Obama Contra Putín…

Que Grupo Tan Distinguido Se Reune Para Darle A Putín Otra Amenaza.

¿Cual Es La Amenaza Contra Putín?

No dicen, pero si dijieron que ya informaron a Putín.

Que si no retira su ayuda a los Separatistas en Ucránia

van van aplicar mas sanciones sobre Rúsia.

Cual es la queja de los Globalistas contra Putín?

Simple!  Putín Es Un Nacionalista RUSO y no un Globalista

Ese es su crimen.  Los Globalistas quieren borrar las naciones, para poder gobernar COMO

EN LOS TIEMPOS FEUDALES….  Cualquiera que no se doblega, es destruido.

Obama dijo que las sanciones van a pegar mas fuertes a Rúsia que a Europa!

Los líderes europeos, todos sonrientes, aparentemente no saben que con esas mismas sanciones

tambien sufre el Pueblo europeo!

Cualquier sacrificio para el Gobierno Mundial es buena.Entre copas de champagne y platos de pato l’orange,

nadie recordó el Pueblo… El que paga la cuenta siempre! 

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/06/world/group-of-7-condemns-its-absent-partner-russia.html?emc=edit_th_20140606&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=33845260&_r=0

Los Intereses A Los Banqueros Por

Debajo de “CERO” PORCIENTO…

El estafador más grande del mundo, Mario Draghi director del monopolio financiero, conocido como el Banco Central Europeo

acaba de hacer história!

Regala el dinero a su amigotes!!

Por que?

Draghi, siendo un economista, bien sabe que el Capitalismo, necesita Capital.

El Capital, es producto de los Ahorros!

Para atraer Ahorros, hay que pagar un interés mas alto que la inflación!!

Pero que hace Draghi?  Exactamente lo contrario!!!

Garantiza la destrucción de los Ahorros, pagando intereses negativos.

De contra, facilita dinero-crediticio (osea falsificado) a los bancos primarios.

Estos bancos, todos ellos quebrados, no los prestan a los Pequenyos y Medianas Empresas.

Al contrario, juegan en el gran Casino conocido como las bolsas de valores.

Siguiendo los pasos, de todos los Imperios del pasado que han destruido sus paises con dinero falso!!!

Sr. Draghi papel impreso no son Ahorros.

Quebrastes a Grecia, cuando trabajabas para Goldman-Sachs

y ahora quieres quebrar a toda Europa.

Eso, ya es claro!

Lo Que Deseo Saber, Sr. Draghi, Es Que Si Te Pagan Por Hacerlo O Eres Un Idiota???

 

 

Thursday June 05 2014

 

 

BREAKING NEWS

 

ECB cuts deposit rate below zero

 

The European Central Bank has cut interest rates to a fresh record low, lowering one of its benchmark rates below zero in a radical move that policy makers hope will help the currency bloc stave off the threat of deflation. 
The ECB cut its main refinancing rate to 0.15 per cent, from 0.25 per cent, and its deposit rate from zero to -0.10 per cent, becoming the first major central bank to venture into negative territory.

Nos Burlamos Cuando Chávez Pidió La Devolución Del Oro… Ahora Lo Han Pedido… Los Grandes países…

La Manipulación Es Ya Tan Descarada Y Tan Obvia

Que Todos Los Países Están Reclamando La

Devolución De Su Oro!… Esta Vez, Fue Austria.

¿Por qué?

Porque saben, que el dólar no vale nada!

Cuando colapse el dólar, el que tenga oro, plata y petroleo

va a sobrevivir bien durante EL REAJUSTE DE CUENTAS.

Los que tengan sus ahorros en dolares,

van a sentirse que se han mudado a Mexico,

el Peso y el Dólar van a valer lo mismo!!!

Ya lo verán…

http://www.goldreporter.de/austria-to-audit-gold-reserves-at-the-bank-of-england/gold/42400/

 LECCIONES HISTORICAS

Ucrania tiene un grave problema.

Los Separatistas reciben ayuda y armas de Rúsia.

El control de la frontera era necesario para los Separatistas

pero los rusos, no podian intervenir.

Los Separatistas han destruido todos los controles fronterizos.

Ya no existe fronteras en los cruces mas importantes.

El flujo de ayuda puede pasar libremente.

Putín a logrado esto, sin perder un solo soldado!

Ahora, comparemos esto, con las costas de Cuba,

y con el Exilio Cubano.

Las costas son una frontera natural.

Pero es imposible costodiar toda una frontera marítima

y aún más dificil, defender todas las costas!

La prueba de esto, es que decenas de miles de balseros 

han cruzado en balsas, sin ser detectados, ni por los Americanos!!

Pero en los 55 anyos de los Castros, nada efectivo se a podido hacer.

Por qué?  Ustedes que piensan?

Son los Separatistas mas valientes que los cubanos?

Tienen mas voluntad??

o será que ellos tienen a un Putín de su lado y nosotros, solo traidores???

Mejor prueba no existe.

Ningún presidente Americano a querido liberar a Cuba!!!

Si hubieran querido, el estrecho de la Florida,

se hubiera convertido en la Normandia Cubana.

Vean lo que han hecho los Separatistas en Ucránia:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/world/europe/rebels-in-eastern-ukraine-capture-government-posts.html?emc=edit_th_20140605&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=33845260&_r=0

Increíble, Pero Cierto!:

 

Corruptos en Washington, compraron a los corruptos

“Generales Sin Victorias” en el Pentágono

(Si… No Se Deje Engañar… El País más Poderoso

NO HA GANADO Ninguna Guerra DESDE 1945

Siempre Se “Retira”… Dejando las Cosas Peor…

Ahora Nuestros “GENERALES” Son Burócratas…

De Contra… Administran Un Presupuesto Millonario…

El Ultimo Negocito… De Los Generales Burócratas

Del Pentágono… Fue Darle Un Contrato A Una

Compañía Canadiense… para Proteger Las Computadoras

Del Pentágono…

Aquí tienen la Noticia…

 

Indeed, the Department of Health and Human Services kicked CGI Federal to the curb in February for making a hash of HealthCare.gov. But the Department of Defense seems unconcerned.

CGI Federal is a division of publicly traded CGI Group (GIB). While Obamacare has delivered GIB a mild hit in recent months, the firm’s overall performance since the start of the stock market rally in 2009 has crushed the S&P 500…

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/10/16/meet-cgi-federal-the-company-behind-the-botched-launch-of-healthcare-gov/

 

 

 

Teen’s Simple Question Makes Nancy Pelosi Look Ridiculous

 

 

How sad is it that it takes a teenager to ask Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) a real question? Sure, if you watch the video it seems that a child has completely flummoxed the ancient Representative from Californai, but don’t judge her too harshly. The media is constantly treating the Democrat Party with kid gloves – so when somebody asks a Democrat a real question they get very flustered.

In an effort to not make any Democrat angry, folks in the media hardly ever ask questions as straightforward as teenager Andrew Demeter does here. Perhaps they should start, or we may begin turning to High School children for the news…

Watch Nancy get her hat handed to her by a child… it’s a lot of fun.


Read more at
http://visiontoamerica.com/17787/teens-simple-question-makes-nancy-pelosi-look-ridiculous/#9W41gbkJXLvMo1cG.99

 

 

Teen Unemployment In Major U.S. Cities Tops 50%

 

Old timers often say that the young people in the U.S. today don’t have the work ethic of their predecessors. This may be true, but is this perceived weakness a symptom of a greater problem? Has the opportunity for many young people to find employment diminished, and thus made it harder for them to learn the necessary work ethic on the job?

Before we try to answer that question, let’s examine some evidence from a new analysis by the Employment Policy Institute (EPI) that shows unemployment among teens without a high school diploma is greater than 50% in two very large cities. CNS News reports:

Using U.S. Census Bureau data from May 2013 to April 2014, the analysis reveals that in Riverside-San Bernardino area of Southern California, the unemployment rate for teenagers 16 to 19 years old who don’t have a high school diploma is 54.2 percent.

In the Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, Ore., metropolitan area, the unemployment rate from that population is 53.8 percent.

“These numbers are staggering,” Michael Saltsman, director of research at EPI told CNSNews.com. “Teens across the country this summer are missing out on valuable work experience as they continue to suffer through an extended period of high unemployment and difficult job prospects.”

The national average for this age group and skill level is 21.6%, but the high unemployment rate for the least skilled young people is not contained to the west coast. Rounding out the top ten on the list are Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa An, CA (39%), San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA (37.5%), San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA (35.2%), Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE (33.2%), Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IN-IN-WI (33%), Pittsburgh, PA (32.9%), Sacramento-Arden-Arcade Roseville, CA (32.1%), and Baltimore-Towson, MD (31.4%)

The issue of teen unemployment is a complex one that has grown worse over the years. Often, people point to minimum wage laws as a driving force behind these disappointing employment numbers. Minimum wage is certainly partially to blame for the issue. Minimum wage laws reduce opportunities for employment by making low paying jobs for unskilled teenagers illegal. Companies are forced to lump those job functions in with a higher wage earner’s job duties, replace the duties with automation, or stop providing the services.


Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2014/06/07/teen-unemployment-major-u-s-cities-tops-50/#sPIImiyoeyicWF51.99

 

 

 

HEALTH CARECOMMENTARY

Surprise! The Government Now Can’t Even Guess How Much Obamacare Ultimately Will Ultimately Cost

Genevieve Wood @genevievewood / 

COMMENTARY BY Genevieve Wood@genevievewood

Genevieve Wood advances policy priorities of The Heritage Foundation as senior contributor to The Daily Signal.

It’s no secret Obamacare is unaffordable. But now we also know that even the Congressional Budget Office can’t predict how much more this disastrous law will cost.

According to a footnote from a Congressional Budget Office report released in April but reported this week by Roll Call, the law’s true costs and long-term fiscal impact are simply impossible to track.

That’s a change in tune for the CBO, which originally reported in 2010 that Obamacare would pay for itself and over the course of a decade would decrease the deficit.

So what’s changed?

Well, thanks to the constant modifications to the law, the only thing predictable about Obamacare’s provisions is that they’re unpredictable.

Many of the “savings” and “revenue” (read: mandates and tax increases) originally proposed to pay for this redesign of one-sixth of the U.S. economy, whether Medicare cuts or employer mandates, have been waived, stalled or simply not implemented, making a defensible revised forecast impossible. The changes occurred because it became clear such measures were both politically unpopular and realistically unaffordable.

There are other reasons that it’s virtually impossible to even guess how much Obamacare will ultimately cost.

We learned this week that more than 2 million people—a whopping quarter of those enrolled in Obamacare—who  signed up for insurance via Obamacare’s health care exchanges have discrepancies in their records and paperwork.

Apparently the government has inaccurate or inadequate information regarding the income levels of more than 1 million people who signed up and can’t verify the immigration or citizenship status for more than 900,000. That means some current enrollees may not be eligible for Obamacare subsidies and may lose their coverage or may have been given too generous a subsidy and eventually will have to pay the government back.

Serco, Inc., a government contractor hired to track down and verify the missing information, released a statement saying, “Current system access and functionality … limits the ability to resolve outstanding inconsistencies.”

That means the government’s website again was not up to par and much of the work to resolve the data discrepancies will require hands-on work to figure out who among these 2 million people should be getting insurance and subsidies through the exchange and who should not. In other words, there will need to be a significant number of extra staffers brought onto fix this mess.

Guess the Obama administration finally is delivering on those “job creation” promises—too bad it’s at the taxpayers’ expense.

Not all the bad news regarding the spending train wreck that is Obamacare emanates from Washington. Many of the statesthat chose to set up their own exchanges spent hundreds of millions of federal dollars to do so—and yet ended up with exchanges that don’t work.

As we approach the next enrollment period in November, lawmakers in those states are frantically trying to figure out whether they can get more dollars from Washington to fix their problems or if they are going to have to use their own state funds. State Rep. John Delaney, a Democrat in Maryland, worries his state will have to divert dollars from education, fixing potholes and other programs to address its broken exchange. “You can’t just print money in the states,” he said.

That’s right. But the printing presses in Washington have been overused for some time as well—and  states that gladly jumped on the Obamacare bandwagon and took the bait shouldn’t be let off the hook by Congress.

So to sum up, the CBO can’t calculate Obamacare’s future costs, confusion about enrollees’ actual salaries could lead to wildly varying numbers on how much it costs this year, and there’s no telling how much money some states ultimately will weasel out of Washington to set up Obamacare.

Talk about a monstrosity of a government program.

What we do know for sure is that Obamacare will cost far more than President Obama and all those who voted for it in Congress told us it would. Which most of us realized all along.

_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*__*_*_
“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”~Abraham Lincoln

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”