No 650    “En mi opinión”    Mayo 1, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


Hillary Clinton: Source of the Benghazi Video Lie.By: streiff (Diary)   

Yesterday we reported on the revelation that the White House made a conscious decision to blame the sacking of our Benghazi consulate on a silly and sparsely distributed internet video called Innocence of Muslims. In an email distributed by Ben Rhodes, senior policy makers, among them Susan Rice, are told to 1) blame the internet video for the violence, 2) deflect attention from greater policy failures (one presumes he’s talking about everything the Obama regime had touched), and 3) emphasize Obama’s cool and collected leadership.

[It was noted in the post yesterday that Ben Rhodes is the brother of CBS News David Rhodes and this might explain some of the difficulty former CBS reporter Sharly Atkisson had in getting Benghazi stories aired on CBS.]

Now that we know that the White House was actively involved in pushing a blatant lie about the genesis of the Benghazi attack in order to deflect blame it is only fair to ask who came up with the story to begin with.

What we know

A two minute clip of the Innocence of Muslims video was shown on Egyptian television on September 9.

On September 11, an Egyptian mob (actual or astroturf, no one knows because astroturf mobs were the norm in Egypt under the Muslim Brotherhood) demonstrated outside, and on, the US Embassy in Cairo.

From a timeline produced by, we know that there were no demonstrations in Benghazi on September 11, the day of the attack.

2:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (8:30 p.m. Benghazi time): U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens steps outside the consulate to say goodbye to a Turkish diplomat. There are no protesters at this time. (“Everything is calm at 8:30,” a State Department official would later say at an Oct. 9 background briefing for reporters. “There’s nothing unusual. There has been nothing unusual during the day at all outside.”)

The attack began at around 4pm, EDT, by 8:30pm our ambassador was dead, at 10pm Hillary Clinton issued this statement:

I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.

This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet [my emphasis]. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.

On September 14, Ben Rhodes drafted the talking points for Susan Rice and others.

While Rhodes was helping the lie get its trousers on for its ride around the world, Hillary Clinton was at Dover AFB to witness the return of the coffins of the Americans killed in Benghazi. She had this to say:

This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with. It is hard for the American people to make sense of that because it is senseless, and it is totally unacceptable.

On September 15, the man who produced Innocence of MuslimsNakoula Basseley Nakoula, was arrested on parole violations.

Hillary as Ground Zero for the Internet video lie

The State Department was keenly aware of the Innocence of Muslims video, its airing on Egyptian television, and the demonstrations at the US Embassy in Cairo. One presumes Susan Rice might have known about the video, if staff communications between State and its Ambassador the UN, Susan Rice, existed, however, that presumption might be a stretch:

Rice has been consistently silent on other important issues and ineffective when she does engage. She skipped Security Council meetings when Israel needed defending and even failed to show up for the emergency session on the Gaza Flotilla incident.

Rice didn’t even show up for the first two emergency Security Council meetings on the unfolding Arab Spring revolution last year.  Rice stayed silent when Iran was elected to the U.N. women’s committee, she didn’t call out Libya when it was elected to the Human Rights Council, she was absent from the Haiti crisis meeting and was a no-show for the last open meeting scheduled before the planned UN vote to recognize Palestinian statehood.  When she actually does show up, she is a miserable failure.

We also know that the State Department was aware that there were no demonstrations in Benghazi and all had been calm when the mission there closed for the day.

The attack on Benghazi occurred around 4pm, Washington time. This means that Hillary, Rice, and all of State and the NSC were at their desks receiving reports in near real time. The statement Hillary released was not something cobbled together in the middle of the night. It was drafted with the full complement of staff at their desks and represents a deliberate distortion of the facts known to Hillary at the time she released the statement. At the time, the Obama regime was under a lot of criticism for turning what had been a friendly nation, Egypt, over to our enemies. The sugar high of overthrowing the hapless and frightened Muammar Qaddafi and seeing him replaced by al Qaeda along with Obama’s incomprehensible Syrian strategy was calling into question the competence of the regime. Hillary had to have known how damaging it would be for al Qaeda franchises, enabled by Obama’s policy to carve out training areas in Libya, to be blamed for the attack. Hence the original statement issued shortly after our ambassador was killed.

Sometime after 10:30 pm on September 11, the official policy of the United States became the lie of the internet video. It was repeated when Clinton went to Dover to welcome home the remains of the slain Americans. Now, though, the gravity of the lie seems to have been weighing on Clinton. If you were alive during the Clinton regime, you learned to carefully parse each and every word uttered by both Bill and Hillary. Their parsimony with the truth became encapsulated in the statement “it depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”

Here you will note that while Hillary seems to blame Innocence of Muslims video… but does she?

 We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with.

In the context of what was being said and the occasion, the listener could not help but understand her as blaming the video for the deaths. In reality, her statement shows she made two disconnected statements, both of which were factually true. There was an attack on Benghazi. There was rage and violence directed against at least one embassy. She doesn’t link them as she did the night of September 11.


From the beginning, Hillary Clinton knew there were no protests in Benghazi. When the consulate was attacked a decision was made, ultimately okayed by Hillary, to blame Innocence of Muslims for the attack. She did this because the regime’s foreign policy in the Arab world was in shambles and the attack in Benghazi was made possible by that foreign policy. She knew that as Secretary of State she couldn’t blame anyone else and this would kill her chances of winning the presidency in 2016. Despite having time to think about it and walk the statement back as something drafted based on incomplete information, she pushed the lie forward. The regime had adopted this lie as its version of events by September 14 and sent it out in talking points.

There is no other conclusion to reach other than Hillary Clinton was the author of the lie about what caused the attack in Benghazi and she must be held accountable for that.



Reportero Ross Palombo, descubre gastos excesivos en salarios autorizados por el alcalde Carlos Giménez

• El reportero del Canal 10 hace interesantes revelaciones

MIAMI 1 DE MAYO DE 2014, nhr,com—La investigación llevada a cabo por el periodista del canal 10 de Miami, Ross Palombo sobre el derroche millonario de la administración de Miami Dade  pagando salarios a empleados, sin trabajar, ha preocupado al comisionado Xavier Suarez quien en las últimas horas envió un memorándum al alcalde Carlos Giménez pidiéndole todos los documentos que presentó Palombo en sus reportajes especiales.

De acuerdo con la investigación, los números son impresionantes, millones de dólares han sido pagados a empleados del condado que ni siquiera trabajan en los puestos que han sido asignados. La mayoría han sido aprobado por el alcalde Carlos Giménez, y cuando se le preguntó al alcalde si esto había sido derrochador, solo dijo, “de ninguna manera”, absolutamente no”.

Los documentos obtenidos demuestran que $21’046,916 dólares fueron gastados en “licencias administrativas” en el año 2013, Las reglas del condado definen  esas licencias administrativos como “permiso de ausencia del trabajo con sueldo”.

Algunas de estas ausencias eran simplemente para asuntos personales como ir a un funeral o actividades del sindicato, la mayoría de los salarios “gratuitamente”—alrededor de $11’261,073–fueron pagados y utilizados a discreción del alcalde Giménez.

De acuerdo con Giménez “este tipo de licencia con pago, generalmente es dada a aquellos empleados que realmente han trabajado por adelantado, trabajando horas extras sin haberlas cobrado”.

El alcalde profundizó mas en el tema diciendo que “Si alguien que, en otras palabras, que trabaje 60 horas en una semana y no se le paga extra por eso, luego se le da algún tiempo libre para equilibrar su trabajo”.

Sin embargo, los registros del condado demuestran que Giménez autorizó $2’518,120 el pasado año 2013  por ausencias los días antes de la navidad y año nuevo y no por pago de horas extras. Adicionalmente autorizó  los nueve días feriados del año que legalmente se les otorga a esos empleados.

A la pregunta de por qué ordenó pagar por los días feriados, Giménez respondió que ha sido una política del condado y no cree que se trata de un desperdicio de los fondos, “absolutamente no”, respondió.

Giménez no cree que es un derroche de dinero, pagarle al vice alcalde Ed. Márquez quien ha sido el que más pago sin trabajar ha recibido por licencias administrativas en su equipo. Los registros demuestran que Márquez recibió 168 horas de licencia  pagadas durante los años 2012 y 2013 equivalente a $21,566 dólares, además de su salario anual de $267,000 dólares, más dos semanas de vacaciones.

En el memorándum el comisionado Xavier Suarez le pide al alcalde Giménez,

“Por favor, identifique todos los documentos obtenidos por el Canal 10, utilizados en su reportaje investigativo,  en el que se menciona el pago total de $21, 045,916 millones por concepto de pagos de “Licencia Administrativa” a empleados del Condado Miami-Dade.

Tengo entendido que las cifras fueron proveídas en una hoja de cálculo (spreadsheet), titulada “Licencia Administrativa” del año calendario 2013.

Le agradecería la respuesta a estas preguntas antes de la Sesión Ejecutiva pautada para el Jueves, 8 de mayo del 2014.” Concluye texto.

Según, otros comisionados están molestos con este derroche de fondos a los miembros del equipo del alcalde Giménez, mientras que el mismo quiere cerrar bibliotecas y amenaza con hacer recortes  a programas sociales y cesantías.

“EMO” ¿Hasta cuando los votantes de Miami van a seguir eligiendo a este tipo de funestos gobernantes para que hagan estas mamarrachadas? ¿Es que no se cansan que se rían de ellos o es que les gusta, que usen su dinero festinadamente? LRGM




AMEMENPER: Documento Secreto Revelado. Un vocero del Departamento de estado ha filtrado la noticia de las duras medidas de contingencia que la administración implementará contra Rusia en caso de que haga una acción directa contra Ucrania.

(Documento secreto)


Plan de Contingencia en el caso de que Rusia tome acción contra Ucrania.

1. No se servirá ensalada Rusa en las recepciones de la Casa Blanca

2. También se prohibiría el uso de Caviar Beluga en las comidas de Michelle y Barry.

3.Se quitaría a Vladimir Putin de “amigo” en Facebook

4, El presidente Obama anunciaría que no consideraría  a la Universidad de Moscú cuando se presenten los juegos del torneo de la NCAA en el 1915.

5, En todos los futuros discursos del Secretario Kerry, declarará que no le importa si Sebastopol se inunda por la alza de los niveles del mar.

6.Ni el presidente Obama ni ningún oficial estadounidense jugará en un campo de golf de Moscú.

7. El internet del personal del gobierno será reprogramado para no permitir que los empleados hagan cita con muchachas rusas.

8.Todas las líneas rojas del presidente para Rusia serán hechas en arena negra en vez de arena blanca.

9,La primera dama Michelle Obama cancelará los viajes a Rusia durante sus giras mundiales.

10. Se prohibirá a los soldados estadounidenses jugar a la ruleta rusa con sus pistolas

Las mismas fuentes que informaron de estas 10 importantes medidas, han dicho que el Presidente Putin se haya profundamente preocupado por las repercusiones de las vigorosas acciones del documento de contingencia  de Kerry y Obama.

LUIS CARRIL: LE ZUMBA EL AGUACATE PODRIDO… A esta hora y con estos muertos. Qué clase de cotorra entro en la jaula.

Publicado: Sab Abr 19, 2014 4:38 pm

El gobierno de los Estados Unidos acaba de concederle el asilo político a Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada.  Más conocido como “Cara de Escroto” 

El destacado político cubano arribó a la ciudad de Miami en horas de la madrugada de hoy 19 de abril y llegó para no volver. Ricardo Alarcón, quien protagonizara uno de los enfrentamientos más populares en Youtube contra el joven cubano, por aquel entonces izquierdista, ahora disidente, Eliecer Ávila, planteó que su deseo de comenzar una nueva vida desde cero en los Estados Unidos, no responde a un problema político, sino cultural. 

Ricardo desea darle rienda suelta a los sueños frustrados que siempre tuvo de ser músico y por tanto, se une al convenido de intercambio cultural para de esta forma abrirse camino como pianista. 

En el aeropuerto de Miami fue recibido por Hugo Cancio quien prometió hablar con el director musical de Timba Live a ver si se le puede hacer un hueco a Ricardo y darle un empujoncito. 

Los canales más importantes de Miami le ofrecieron al ex-político cubano, ahora músico, la posibilidad de unirse a su elenco como comentarista, así como el pago por su participación en los programas dedicados a la lucha anti- castrista. En estos momentos se manejan ofertas entre los 300USD y 600 USD por entrevistas de una hora. 

Alarcón afirmó que aunque no desea vincularse con la política, pues ya su carrera como político terminó, bien le haría falta reunir algún dinerito para comprarse un piano nuevo. 

En breve ampliaremos la noticia.




AMENPER: Soto-Mayor-Estupidez

 Si tratamos de analizar el razonamiento de Sotomayor la  conclusión es que si somos neutrales, si aceptamos que todas las personas son iguales sin importar la raza o el origen, entonces este es un concepto racista, entonces suponemos que también tenemos que pensar que la propia Constitución es constitucionalmente racista, porque dice que todos somos iguales.

Nos da un dolor de cabeza el tratar de razonar esto.

Esta es una rara disidencia  de la jueza Sonia Sotomayor en la sentencia del Tribunal Supremo de la semana pasada sobre la acción afirmativa .

“La izquierda está tratando de institucionalizar la acción afirmativa para hacer imposible que cualquier legislador o cualquier referéndum nunca para abolirla – nunca en la historia del país – en esencia a decir que es una parte intrínseca de la Constitución; preferencias raciales son para siempre ”  dijo este martes  Charles Krauthammer , en Fox News , en respuesta a la reacción de la izquierda a la decisión este martes la Corte Suprema sobre la acción afirmativa.  Como siempre Krauthammer ha dado en el clavo.

Para los que pertenecemos a la primera generación en Cuba en que el negro, el español y el chino eran considerados como iguales en la escuela, aunque la sociedad todavía tenía sus prejuicios, esto nos resulta raro.

No somos racistas, así que sabemos que el considerar a todos iguales no puede de ninguna manera ser considerado como racista.  Racista si es la institucionalización de las razas, para dar preferencia a una raza sobre otra.

Sabemos lo que es racismo porque lo vimos en nuestros mayores y sus prejuicios, pero sabemos lo que es racismo porque no lo sentimos en nuestra manera de ser.

Podemos atacar a Barack Hussein Obama no porque es negro, pero a pesar de que es negro, porque no tenemos una mente institucionalizada para vetar el poder atacar a un negro porque es negro.  Se ataca o se halaga a una persona o institución por sus acciones  no por el color de su piel o su origen.  Si se ataca al Islam es por razonamiento de que por su creación de origen y acciones pasadas, hacen que no se pueda considerar una religión, sino una organización militar disfrazada de religión para radicalizar a sus miembros.  Cuando atacamos a Obama lo hacemos porque creemos que es el peor presidente que ha tenido los Estados Unidos desde que tenemos uso de razón, y por el uso de esa razón lo atacamos, no porque es negro.

Esto lo razona también Clarence Thomas, y para ser negro no hay que ser tan prieto como Thomas, su negrura es incontestable, pero quizás por eso mismo votó en contra de acción afirmativa. 

No hay que ser negro o carmelita (que es como le decimos los cubanos al color castaño) como la Sotomayor, para poder razonar como Thomas, lo que hay que tener es un poco de sentido común que es lo que le falta a la Sotomayor.



June 6, 2013, the 69th anniversary of “D Day”

The largest invasion ever attempted, where 200,000 Americans stormed the beaches at Normandy to begin the final push to defeat Nazi Germany in WWII. D-Day marked the turning point in WWII in Europe, where the Nazis were engaged in mass murder of Jews and minorities by the thousands.


Today, European heads of state make it a point to recall and honor the sacrifices of those who landed in Normandy, as do our Presidents….well, most of them….


In the 69 years since D-Day, there are four occasions when the President of the United States chose not to visit the D

Day Monument that honors the soldiers killed during the Invasion.


The occasions were:


1. Barack Obama, 2010


2. Barack Obama, 2011


3. Barack Obama, 2012


4. Barack Obama, 2013



For the past 69 years, every American President except Obama has taken the time to honor the memory and sacrifices of the 6,000 American soldiers killed on D-Day. ….Except Obama!


June 6 2010, Obama had no events scheduled.


June 6, 2011, Obama met with the National Security team and was interviewed by WEWS Cleveland and WDIV in Detroit about the auto industry – FAR too busy to visit the D-Day memorial.


June 6, 2012, instead of honoring our fallen soldiers, Obama made a campaign trip to California on Air Force 1 (at our expense) to raise funds for (his) upcoming election.


June 6, 2013, Obama was doing ANOTHER fund raiser with the multimillionaires in the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in Palo Alto CA, once again at our expense.


America – Aren’t you proud?


I’ll forward it. 



Every American, regardless the color of his skin or the language he speaks, needs to know this!  The only American thing about Obama is the white side of his family, and they were communist sympathizers!   His disdain for our country is abominable. 




Sources: Sebelius Now Refusing To Testify Before Senate Panel. Caroline May

Outgoing Health and Human Services Sec. Kathleen Sebelius is now refusing to testify before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies, a Senate aide told The Daily Caller Tuesday.

Sebelius had originally been set to testify before the subcommittee about the department’s 2015 $70 billion budget request on April 2.

According to another aide, however, several weeks after confirming the hearing date, she requested a date switch with the National Institutes of Health budget hearing on May 7. The committee accommodated her request.

Now, after announcing her resignation on April 11, she is refusing to testify according to the two aides, even though she is still the sitting secretary — remaining at the post until her successor, OMB Director Sylvia Mathews Burwell is confirmed.

“It appears that Sec. Sebelius has unilaterally decided that she is no longer accountable to Congress,” the first aide said.

The other aide explained that HHS has not given the committee any reason for her refusal and that Sebelius has not suggested anyone to testify in her place.

That same aide noted subcommittee Chairman Tom Harkin planned to call Sebelius Tuesday about the hearing.

The last time Sebelius appeared in front of a committee was April 10, before news of her resignation broke. She testified before the Senate Finance Committee about the HHS budget. Read more:



Georgina López: No más Moringa, La quinúa el alimento “salvador”

¿Se acuerdan de la moringa? Pues vayan preparándose, si Fidel, en un rapto de lucidez, ordena producir empanadas, brebajes y ungüentos a base de pulpa de quinúa, la vamos a sembrar hasta en macetas.


LA HABANA, Cuba –Debemos estar preparados. Otro producto ajeno a nuestros hábitos culinarios pudiera irrumpir en las estanterías de los agro mercados, desde los altiplanos andinos o a partir de su siembra y cosecha en las montañas del Escambray. Se trata de la quinua, un fruto seco de aproximadamente 2mm, con muchas propiedades nutritivas y medicinales.

Conocer que posee los ocho aminoácidos esenciales para el ser humano, además de las posibilidades de convertirlo en harina y cerveza, invita a pensar en la articulación  de una agresiva campaña promocional que despierte el interés de los cubanos por un producto cuyo origen se remonta a 5000 años.

Su uso para la curación o alivio de abscesos, hemorragias, luxaciones junto a las cualidades cosméticas, cierran el círculo para que surja alguna idea, casi seguro que infelizmente descabellada, de producciones masivas sin estudios de mercado que traerían más pérdidas que beneficios.

A través del diario Granma supe que la quinua es “el alimento del futuro”. La fuente citada por el órgano oficial, fue el presidente peruano Ollanta Humala. Este país y Bolivia son los principales productores. ¿Qué mejor asesor que Evo Morales si Fidel Castro, en un rapto de lucidez, emite la orden para que en tiempo record comience la producción de empanadas, galletas, lociones para el cutis, brebajes y ungüentos a base de pulpa de quinua autóctona o importada?

Parece un chiste, pero algo parecido sucedió con la moringa. Esa planta exótica multipropósito para la cual se destinaron considerables extensiones de tierra y que a la postre resultó un fiasco. Casi nadie la consume.El hecho de que Fidel no esté apto para poner en práctica sus “geniales ideas”, no aleja el peligro de que algún  imitador haga de las suyas y convenza a Raúl. Nada es descartable en un sistema que no se ha cansado de cubrir la ruta que va de la improvisación al disparate.

Ejemplos sobran de la ineptitud y la mediocridad de los principales dirigentes en su afán por alcanzar la gloria por medio de proyectos económicos que han causado daños irreparables al medioambiente y trastornos psicosociales que superan el marco generacional en que ocurrieron.

La zafra de los diez millones de toneladas de azúcar, la superproducción de leche y café, el aumento de las cabezas de ganado bovino, las fabulosas cosechas de arroz y las extracciones de miles de toneladas zeolita, el llamado mineral del siglo, integran la larga lista de proyectos fallidos desde los primeros días de la revolución hasta la actualidad.

Es cierto que esa tendencia a obrar de manera tan poco razonable ha mermado con el retiro del comandante en Jefe, pero hay que estar alertas.Cualquiera puede alzarse con un legajo de teorías que avalen la necesidad de incluir la  quinua en los venideros planes agrícolas.

Quizás Evo Morales sea la pieza principal de un plan a gran escala. Ollanta Humala sería la coartada para despistar a los lectores.  Se sabe que no es un tipo de confianza en el eje bolivariano y sin embargo Granma lo utiliza para promocionar las bondades del producto andino.



SAMITIER: El Publico Cansado De Ver BASURA

En La TV… Esta Dejando De Verlas…

No existe un programa que no tenga un MARICON

O una TORTILLERA  más un  miembro de la Tercera

Minoría… Los Negros pero siguen excluyendo a los


millones… pero las organizaciones DEMÓCRATAS

y los politiqueros solo hablan de los ILEGALES…

Upfront Forecast: Broadcast Will Dip, Cable Will Rise 5%





Outrage as Public School Recites Pledge of Allegiance in ARABIC. By Onan Coca


As if our public schools don’t have enough on their plate, now Principal Tom Lopez at Rocky Mountain High School in Fort Collins, Colorado, has decided that they need to force our students to pledge in Arabic. Why? WHO KNOWS. Some weird attempt at empathizing or sympathizing with the Islamic world?

Here’s the school’s excuse.

The school recites the Pledge of Allegiance weekly, on Mondays. Last Monday, a member of their “Cultural Arms Club” led the student body in an Arabic version of the pledge, replacing the words “under God” with “under Allah.”

Principal Tom Lopez denies any attempt to push an Islamic agenda, saying, “These students love this country. They were not being un-American in trying to do this. They believed they were accentuating the meaning of the words as spoken regularly in English.”

Principal Lopez doesn’t make any sense. Speaking unintelligible words in Arabic in some way accentuates their meaning? That is an extremely weak argument in defense of an ill-advised decision.

He said the cultural clubs seeks to “destroy the barriers, embrace the cultures” that exist within the high school.

That would translate into “destroy the barriers to Islam and embrace it,” correct, Mr. Lopez?

The Poudre School District communications director, Danielle Clark, said they understand why parents are upset. She told Fox News, “We understand not everybody would agree with the students’ choice. We’ve heard there are some who are upset.”

Let’s put his into perspective for the feeble-minded Clark and Lopez. It is not the student’s choice. They do not control the public address system. It was a school choice.

Her simplistic defense included a reference to “one” supportive email and a reference to a similar mistake last year which drew controversy when the pledge was recited in Spanish. Somehow not learning from and expanding upon your previous mistakes is perceived as a viable defense for these educators.

An abdication of responsibility is also part of their defense. Clark attempted to pass the buck of responsibility to the students, saying, “This is a student-initiated and student-led club. There is no school sponsor or advisor. It doesn’t come under the umbrella of the district.”

Actually, the activity of reciting the pledge does come under the district. Choosing to put it into the hands of a group not regulated by their administrators does not provide absolution.

This entire story has a deeper root issue running through the entire thread. What is really at the root of this little controversy is another episode of liberal “white guilt.” Liberals are constantly seeing racism, persecution, hatred and evil where it does not actually exist. The media, driven by liberal emotionalism, is constantly searching for evidence of American hatred of Islam. It’s just not there.

The media hand-wrings over violence against Muslims after every terrorist attack against us – when in reality, any backlash is usually an isolated incident that has other issues at play. There have never been waves of violence or angst against Muslims in America. Even after 9-11, Americans were able to keep their cool and there was no rash of violence against American Muslims.

While liberals are constantly worried about our response to Islam’s assault on our nation and our values, they miss the truly important thing – we are constantly under attack by Islam. They are worried about offending the world’s Muslim population when they should be worried about helping us defend western values and ideals.

Here’s a helpful little hint for the spineless liberals who are constantly worried about what everyone else thinks of us: Wake Up! While you are whining about feelings our enemies are killing children, persecuting Christians, and dreaming of ways to make us suffer.



Almost Blast from the Past: Nuclear Explosion in North Carolina. Written by Gary North 


The CBS news show, 60 Minutes, reported that shortly after JFK was inaugurated, a bomber with a nuclear bomb accidentally dropped it on North Carolina. It came close to going off.

Close, but no exploding cigar.

The show said that we have 400 nuclear missiles in the ground. They did not mention MIRVed warheads: 10 warheads per missile. So, it’s one bomb per missile, if we are to believe the story. Yet to keep these armed and ready, it will cost the government $25 billion a year to upgrade them. Some of the equipment was deployed in the Nixon administration.

Will they be upgraded? Don’t count on it. Missile command is more like Missile Command than they admit: old and forgotten.

The phones barely work. They will be fixed . . . in a few years. They are analog phones.

They will keep the 8-inch floppy disks. They are immune from cyber attack. They are too old for the Internet hacks to get too them.

Where do they buy them? Not Radio Shack.

Why not just deploy nuclear missiles on submarines and bombers? You can at least call back a bomber, unless it’s Dr. Stragelove.

Can you call back a sub-launched missile? No one asked.

The land-based missiles are targets. Why not switch to train-based cruise missiles? They can be called back. They are slow: about 600 mph. Because they are slow, they are defensive weapons only — launched after a first strike on the U.S. They cannot be targeted: mobile.

I recommended this 30 years ago. The technology was there. It is better now. It gets land-based missiles off anyone’s radar. But no. We stick with the old systems.

Why? Infrastructure. Human infrastructure. Bureaucracy. Careers. “Better to be inside a missile target than to be inside a shut-down branch of the Air Force.”

Like floppy disks, bureaucracies persevere. But upgrades are very expensive.

Continue Reading on

Samitier:Se Ha Hecho Usted La Pregunta…

¿Por Qué Estados Unidos Es El Único

Que Persigue A Sus Antiguos Aliados?

Todos los meses leemos sobre la DEPORTACIÓN de un antiguo aliado militar de Los Estados Unidos quien había recibido asilo… después de la llegada al poder de las llamadas“DEMOCRACIAS” todas ellas con la ayudaDIRECTA DE EL GOBIERNO DE USA


No olvidemos que para convencer a Pinochet que hiciera el PLEBISCITO… la CIA encontró TRES UVAS CON CIANURO y USA declaró un EMBARGO DE FRUTAS DE CHILE que causo un derrumbe de $350 millones y las uvas chilenas se regalaban en Santiago…


Pinochet que era un PATRIOTA… PREGUNTO; ¿QUE HAY QUE HACER PARA QUE SE LEVANTE EL EMBARGO?  La contestas fue clara: UN PLEBISCITO… y los Estados Unidos por medio de la CIA gasto más de $100 MILLONES en las elecciones para derrotar a Pinochet…


Pero, ¿Por que USA DEPORTA a los militares que les concedió asilo??? Los politiqueros comunistas globalistas que gobiernan USA… lo hacen para darle un EJEMPLO a los militares de que ellos TIENEN QUE OBEDECER A LOS GLOBALISTAS… y que ellos son los

Únicos que pueden dictar a QUIEN SE PERSIGUE y a QUIEN NO…


Recuerden que el Golpe de Estado Contra Chávez Fue desautorizado por Bush… También el de Honduras por la CLINTON y OBAMA…


¿Por Qué No Se Juzga Y Persigue A Los Antiguos Gobernantes Comunistas?

En ningún país comunista, han encarcelado a los criminales?  Por qué?

Porque los comunistas son todos Globalistas!En el campo comunista le llaman INTERNACIONALISTAS… Los Globalistas odian a todos los países! Muchos de los que fueron miembros de los gobiernos comunistas, están ahora en Bruselas como “PARLAMENTARIOS”de la Unión Europea.

Incluyendo 8 alemanes de la ALEMANIA DEL ESTE!!!  Que siguen chupando de los trabajadores.

Siguen borrando la historia y repitiendo las mentiras en la Prensa y por las Instituciones y sobre todo por profesores universitarios… Pero no hay que ir lejos para eso… La Universidad Internacional de la Florida en Miami… es UN NIDO DE GLOBALISTAS…

Su plan, es borrar las fronteras, para gobernar el mundo. Este plan, es tan VIEJO que aparece en la BIBLIA como la Torre de Babel, un planINSPIRADO POR SATANÁS.


Desde la Caída de la Unión Soviética La Supuesta “Madre del Comunismo En 1989

Según los PERIÓDICOS… Estados Unidos LE HA DADO LA ESPALDA a los países de LATINO AMÉRICA ya que NADIE PUEDE NEGAR que los que hoy gobiernan son los antiguos TERRORISTAS DE LOS 60 y 70 que eran entonces los amigos de FIDEL CASTRO…


La Verdad Es Otra…CASTRO SOBREVIVIÓ la caída de la URSS gracias a la ayuda Norte Americana y los gobiernos DE TERRORISTAS llegaron al poder GRACIAS A LA PERSECUCIÓN que USA hizo de los militares y sus ALIADOS en todos esos países…


En Que Niegue Las Anteriores VERDADES

Es Un BURÓCRATA Mantenido Por La CIA…




Bombshell: Declassified Emails Reveal Massive Benghazi Cover-Up!


Dear Conservative,

I have said it all along: Every fiber of my being believes that the Obama administration coached Susan Rice after the Benghazi terror attack to make sure she portrayed the President in a good light during her multiple Sunday-morning talk show appearances.

There was just too much at stake for the White House not to be involved in drafting the talking points. Remember that when asked who crafted the talking points, White House officials tried to blame the FBI and CIA, who immediately reminded us that these agencies create intelligence estimates, not partisan political talking points.

Everything pointed to a deliberate attempt to deceive the American people during a contested election, but there was still no evidence to prove that… until now!

The organization Judicial Watch does an excellent job of filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and taking the administration to court when they try to stonewall. The latest batch of 100+ administration emails from one of these FOIA requests actually shows that top advisors in the White House were directly involved with coaching Susan Rice on how to make the President look as good as possible during her post-Benghazi interviews.

Her job should have been to inform the American people of what happened in Benghazi, Libya to cause four brave Americans – including my personal friend, Ambassador Chris Stevens – to lose their lives. Susan Rice should have provided us with the most up-to-date declassified information about the attack.

She did none of these things. Instead, she perpetuated a lie to the American people in order to make Barack Hussein Obama appear tough-on-terrorism before an election. She blamed the “spontaneous attack” on an inflammatory, low-budget YouTube video even though she knew this to be a lie!

Tell Congress that it MUST get to the bottom of the Benghazi cover-up to bring justice to these four brave Americans and their families!

At the center of this new discovery is a man by the name of Ben Rhodes. Mr. Rhodes is an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications. Essentially, he takes foreign policy events and crafts talking points in order to paint the president in the best-possible light.

On September 14, 2012, Mr. Rhodes emailed Susan Rice instructing her on what to include when speaking that weekend on the Sunday morning political talk shows. The email’s subject line read “RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET” and it was sent to a number of White House officials including Press Secretary and perpetual-liar Jay Carney.

At the top of the list of talking-points, this email directs Susan Rice to “underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”

The Congressional investigations into this cover-up have shown that long before this September 14 email was drafted, the intelligence community knew that the YouTube video narrative was never accurate. People don’t spontaneously gather in protest with rocket-propelled grenades in their back pockets.

Additionally, Rice was instructed to tell the American people that the administration “find[s] it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence.”

The email chain ends with another White House staffer planning a conference call for that Saturdayafternoon to “help prepare Susan for her interviews.”

Remember when the Obama administration claimed that the CIA was responsible for pushing the idiotic YouTube video narrative? This email proves that was a LIE!

Remember when the Obama administration promised that there was never an effort to mislead the American people during an election year? This email proves that was a LIE!

Remember when the Obama administration claimed it had no involvement in coaching Susan Rice to lie on camera in front of the American people? The damn email’s subject line reads “PREP call with Susan”! This was a complete LIE!

The problem is that the line between national security and reelection duties is often blurred or non-existent all together. That explains why a national security adviser would encourage a sitting Ambassador to the United Nations to deliver incorrect and false talking points on national television!

This is truly despicable. Rather than doing their jobs and providing the best declassified intelligence to the American people, these rats in the White House put partisan politics above national security!

This is the smoking gun! This proves, beyond a doubt, that not only did the Obama administration coach Susan Rice prior to her television appearances but they coached her to deliberately mislead the American people!

Tell Congress that it MUST get to the bottom of the Benghazi cover-up to bring justice to these four brave Americans and their families!

These released emails show that the White House had one goal and it was not to disseminate credible information to the American people. The White House’s single goal was to make the president look good while blaming the violence on a low-budget YouTube video.

This makes me sick to my stomach, but there is nothing in these released emails that I didn’t already suspect. We have known for a while just how low the Obama administration will stoop to come out on top, but I guess part of me desperately wanted to believe that the President of the United States wouldn’t play politics with the lives of four Americans… I was wrong.

The Democrats call the Benghazi investigation nothing but a “GOP witch hunt.” Democrats in Congress are doing everything in their power to derail these Congressional committees because every new document brings the corruption closer and closer to the President himself.

We cannot allow the Democrats to get in between the American people and the truth! They want nothing more than to silence us and force us to just accept their narrative. That is something that we cannot do! We cannot stop until every ounce of corruption behind the Benghazi cover-up is revealed and those responsible for deceiving the American people are put behind bars!

Tell Congress that it MUST get to the bottom of the Benghazi cover-up to bring justice to these four brave Americans and their families!


Joe Otto

Conservative Daily



Dick Morris: Yes, Rick Perry Can; Krauthammer: Media Will Ignore Benghazi Exposé; NYT’s Dowd to Obama: Stop Whining

Peter Martori:

Charles Krauthammer: Benghazi Email Is Cover-Up ‘Smoking Gun’

Wednesday, 30 Apr 2014 11:08 AM

By Nick Sanchez

Pulitzer-prize winning columnist Charles Krauthammer said that a White House email revealed through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit is “the smoking document” that proves the administration intentionally covered up the truth about the 2012 attacks in Benghazi. 

Krauthammer appeared on Fox News’ “Special Report with Bret Baier” Tuesday   to discuss in specific a Sept. 14, 2012, email from deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes to then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and White House press secretary Jay Carney. 

The email sought to prep Rice for her appearance on Sunday news shows where she would explain to the public for the first time the details of what happened when over a hundred gunmen attacked the American diplomatic mission, killing four of its members. 

The email advises Rice to explain the attack as a response to an anti-Muslim YouTube video created by an Egyptian-born Coptic Christian living in Los Angeles. 

In the email, Rhodes tells Rice “To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.” He says her job is, “To reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges,” two months ahead of the Presidential election. 

Krauthammer explained to the show’s panel that, “We now have the smoking document, which is the White House saying, ‘We’re pushing the video because we don’t want to blame it on the failure of our policies,’ which is what anybody who looked at this assumed all the way through.” 

Editor’s Note: Weird Trick Adds Up to $1,000 to Your Social Security Checks 

He continued, saying, “Before an election, Obama is saying GM is alive, Al-Qaida is dead. He’s running essentially the foreign policy issue, on which the whole campaign is based, is one that says he killed bin Laden, Al-Qaida is on the run.” 

The email from Rhodes was revealed Tuesday after Judicial Watch won its 2013 Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the U.S. State Department. 

In a statement released Wednesday, the Obama administration responded: 

“Unlike those who insist on politicizing the events in Benghazi, our focus remains on ensuring that a tragedy like this isn’t repeated in Libya or anywhere else in the world. In our view, these documents only serve to reinforce what we have long been saying: that in the days after September 11, 2012, we were concerned by unrest occurring across the region and that we provided our best assessment of what was happening at the time.” 

Concluding, Krauthammer said the document isn’t likely to make waves in the media. “I know what’s going to happen. The mainstream media will say ‘Oh, it’s so complicated,’ and they are not going to look into this.” 






“Battered President Barack Obama is fighting desperately for his political life as a tidal wave of anger, distrust and resentment sweeps America, resulting in a growing crusade for his impeachment.”

       That’s right, in addition to dozens of elected officials… and Hollywood celebrities… a major nationwide publication is now openly speculating that Barack Obama is headed for impeachment. 

       And other sources are saying that politicians are finally starting to talk behind the scenes… in hushed whispers… and yes, they’re talking about impeachment. There is no denying it. We are on the verge of something huge. 

       And we must strike again while the iron is still hot. Congress must receive a flood of faxes and calls right now and we’re not just taking our demands to the so-called GOP Leadership, but to the 50 Members of the House and Senate who are bona-fide Tea Party Members. 

“We Must Have The Support Of The American People In Order To Have Impeachment.” -Rep. Michelle Bachmann

       Michele Bachmann hit the nail on the head when she recently uttered those words. 

       As a matter of fact, we can say without reservation that the only thing prohibiting Congress from removing Barack Obama from office right now is their delusion that you won’t support it

       But you are starting to change that delusion. The quote at the top of the article, by the way, comes from The Globe and this tabloid also claims that the realization that impeachment is close at hand is driving Obama “to the brink” and that he’s “crazed by the way things are spiraling out of control.” 

       They’re not the only one. The National Enquirer, recently went so far as to report that fears of impeachment are taking a toll on Obama’s marriage and that Barack Obama roams the halls of the White House late at night and talks to a portrait of Abraham Lincoln for guidance. 

       Now, we know what you’re thinking… but in spite of the fact that the tabloids are actually right more often than not when it comes to political dish… we’re not asking you to rely upon reports from supermarket tabloids. 

       Instead, we’re asking you to rely on what Bachmann says… and we’re asking you to rely on what scores of elected officials and public figures, who have recently started talking about impeachment, are saying. 

       And know that if you really want Barack Obama gone… know that the time is close at hand but that there’s only one way to make him go… DIRECT ACTION

And Yes… Others Are Openly Talking About Impeachment.

       You already know what Bachmann said, so here’s just a few examples of what others are saying: 

        “Never in my life did I ever believe that our country would be taken over by people, like the people who are running it at this day… I don’t think that this man [Obama] will make it through his term. I THINK HE WILL BE IMPEACHED.”– Movie Actor Steven Segal 

        At the fourth annual Statesman of the Year dinner that was hosted by the Sarasota Florida GOP, a man in the audience yelled out to Senator Ted Cruz;“What does it take to impeach him?” When the massive applause finally died down, Cruz boldly stated: “It takes 218 votes in the House of Representatives.” 

        “Barack Obama should be impeached… The man has committed crimes that do not warrant his staying in office.” – Texas Lt. Governor David Dewhurst 

        “The case for impeaching and removing President Obama grows stronger each week… His abuse of power has become so frequent and brazen that it is becoming recognized as the trademark of his presidency.” -Former Congressman Tom Tancredo 

        Congressman Steve Stockman stated recently that he’s considering filing Article of Impeachment because “Obama defiantly vowed not only to radically expand the reach of government from cradle to grave, but to smash the Constitution’s restrictions on government power while doing it. His goal is to eliminate our constitutional republic.” 

       We’ve been waiting for impeachment to gain this level of traction for far too long, and now that the issue is gaining traction so fast, there is only one option… we must push and build on this momentum because the impeachment of Barack Obama may be at hand and it’s up to each and every one of us to make it happen

Even The DNC Has Jumped On The Impeach Obama Bandwagon.

       Well… sort of… Believe it or not, the DNC is so afraid that Obama may be impeached very soon, they’re actually raising money to stop it

        After listing a number of GOP notables who have gone on record as“supporting” impeachment, a panic-stricken email sent out to Obama for America supporters by the DNC issued the following call to action: “Remember, if we win just 17 more seats, we’ll take back the House, and put an end to this kind of asinine behavior.” 

       Here’s more: 

        The folks at WND compiled a list of elected officials who are talking about impeachment: “Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa; Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas; Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas; Rep. Bill Flores, R-Texas; Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.; Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.; Rep. Kerry Bentivolio, R-Mich.; Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas; Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.; Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah; Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla.; and Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla.” 

        And the list is growing daily. Add Congressman Paul Brown (R-GA) who is well positioned to take the Senate seat that is being vacated by retiring Senator Saxby Chambliss and former Congressman Bob Barr (remember him… he was one of the men at the forefront of the Clinton impeachment) who is running and has an exceptionally good chance of returning to Congress very soon. 

       And here’s another respected voice: 

        “Quietly a tide is rising in favor of taking the necessary constitutional steps to remove the danger by impeaching and removing Obama and his cohorts from office. … Nothing stands in your way except the shackles of the mind that are, in the end, the most effective bonds of tyranny. … The answer is in our own hands.” -Dr. Alan Keyes 

       Bachmann is right. Keyes is right. In spite of what you are not hearing from the lame-stream media, removing Barack Obama from the office he usurped is finally gaining major traction in Washington D.C. and the one force that can make it happen is you. Removing Barack Obama is in your hands and your hands alone

The Time To Impeach Barack Obama Is Upon Us… It Is Now!

       And here is the message that we’re sending to our spineless GOP leaders and the 50 Tea Party members who presently serve in Congress. Remember, it only takes one to file Articles of Impeachment. 

       “With each passing day, increasing numbers of elected officials are finally starting to come to the inescapable conclusion that our great nation has run out of options and that the only solution to what is ailing this great country may well be the Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama; and it’s well past time for the rest of you to get with the program.” 

       “Far too many maladies are eating away at the fabric of this great nation. A usurper has determined that the Constitution is nothing more than a worthless piece of paper and that he alone can decree which laws must be enforced and which laws need not be enforced. This usurper, in direct violation of the Constitution, changes laws as he sees fit and has repeatedly declared that Congress is irrelevant. 

       “What must Barack Obama do — how many offenses and derelictions of duty must he commit — before you begin to understand that removing Barack Obama from office will not bring about a Constitutional crisis because Barack Obama has already forced America into a Constitutional crisis, and that the people of this great nation can no longer tolerate Barack Obama’s subversion of the Constitution or his willful violations of his Oath of Office? 

       “Serious scandals such as; Benghazi-gate, IRS abuses of patriotic Americans, Fast and Furious, rampant voter fraud and the fraudulent implementation of ObamaCare have become festering sores on the body of this great nation; and yet, too many of you simply posture, pontificate and hold feckless hearings. The American people are continually told that the purpose of these hearings is to obtain ‘answers’ on why these aforementioned maladies are afflicting this great nation; but the American people don’t need ‘answers.’ The American people already have the “answers” and are demanding immediate action. 

       “The American people know that the affliction that is killing this nation, in all the above cases, is Barack Hussein Obama. He is the problem. He is a cancer that is attacking the body of this great nation and, for the good of the nation, the cancer must be removed. Draft Article of Impeachment against Barack Obama, and do it today. The American people are tired of waiting for you to act.” 

       Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” 

       Barack Obama is a disease that is afflicting the United States and there is only one cure. The time is upon us to invoke that Constitutional remedy for what ails us… It is NOW

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives. 


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.


Floyd Brown






“En mi opinión”    Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

Para contribuir con artículos, opiniones, sugerencias o recibir “En mi opinión”

e-mail a:, o,



Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )


Conectando a %s

A %d blogueros les gusta esto: