Archive for 31 enero 2014

No 582 “En mi opinion” Enero 31, 2014

enero 31, 2014

<No 582 “En mi opinión” Enero 31, 2014>


“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

La libertad no se mendiga, se conquista con el filo del machete.

General Antonio Maceo

Si no estás dispuesto a usar el machete entonces tendrás que

estar dispuesto a empezar a bajarte los pantalones.

Lázaro R González Miño   


Muy Importante abra el sitio de abajo,  léalo, fírmelo,  llene el formulario y cópielo y reenvíelo. Es para hacer una encuesta para eliminar el obama care.

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño



Will Obama Use Executive Orders To Act As a Dictator?


President Obama has played fast-and-loose with his executive powers since ascending to the presidency six years ago. However, recently, the president has startled constitutionalists as he repeatedly announces that he will act unilaterally on important issues with or without Congress.Such remarks have been uttered time and time again by kings, tyrants and dictators throughout the world. While the Commander-in-Chief does maintain some sovereign powers to protect the nation and to deal with foreign nations, the executive maintains no legislative power, no means by which President Obama could logically claim the right to raise the federal minimum wage with the stroke of a pen.To see how far Obama’s tyrannical tendencies have evolved in less than a year, we should examine what the president said a year ago and examine what he said Tuesday night during his State of the Union Address.

On March 1st, 2013, when asked why he didn’t simply make the two parties agree on key issues, the president chuckled and stated, “I’m not a dictator; I’m the president.”

However, the line between these two fundamentally different rulers seems to be eroding in Mr. Obama’s eyes as on Tuesday, he promised to unilaterally act on important issues with or without Congress. He stated,

Continue Reading on




Analisis de los puntos principales del Estado de la Unión de obama:





15 Dreadfully Treasonous Words In Obama’s Speech



Obama huffed… and he puffed… and he, well, blew nothing down.

He moved nothing forward.

All that our once-mighty leader’s State of the Union address showed was how completely irrelevant he’s become.

In fact, the president began by practically admitting that his legislation is dead on arrival because of how unpopular he is with Congress.

But the problem isn’t Congress… You see, if his agenda was popular with the voters, Congress would be falling all over itself to pass it. Congress follows the voters, and the voters don’t want any more of what Obama’s selling.

Heil, Obama!

During his first two years in office, Barack Obama controlled all three branches of government. He had unprecedented approval, and he used the opportunity to pass several highly unpopular bills. Unfortunately for the president, those bills have gone on to define his legacy.

The most destructive to middle class finances – and the president’s popularity – has been the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.

You see, the Affordable Care Act was a gigantic political mistake. Obama allied himself with then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senator Harry Reid to pass a bill with no Republican support whatsoever, rather than working toward a healthcare reform plan with bipartisan backing.

With that single act, Obama polarized the nation… and he hasn’t looked back since.

To this day, he continues to poison the body politic; and his newest plans – debuted to a national audience during the State of the Union – will cause even more division.

Since he can’t get anything done by working with others, Obama has decided to declare himself dictator and attempt to pass laws by executive order. His borderline treasonous words were, “Wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation…that’s what I’m going to do.”

I can’t help but be reminded of Hitler’s transition from the elected Chancellor of Germany to complete dictator, ruling by decree. Yet even that comparison isn’t entirely accurate. In 1933, the Reichstag passed a law and gave Hitler his power. Obama has simply decided to usurp his.

A Year of Inaction

Thankfully, though, the United States today isn’t like Germany in 1933. And despite Obama’s attempts to rule by executive order, I believe we’re actually witnessing the opposite – the disintegration of his power.

He can command all he wants; but without Congress’ backing, I doubt that states and local governments are going to listen to the president. In fact, his irrelevance may actually be highlighted by his decrees. But he’s going to try anyway.

Obama’s first decree will attempt to fix global warming. Amusingly, while he was speaking about global warming, nearly half of the country was huddled together fighting the abnormal cold.

Suffice it to say that the president’s rhetoric is badly out of touch with reality.

He actually stood before Congress and had the mendacity to call Obamacare a success! Just to recount, the first goal of the Affordable Care Act was to increase insurance coverage… and more people have lost insurance than have gained it under Obamacare.

The second goal was to make insurance affordable… yet insurance is more unaffordable now than at any time in our history.

Still, Obama blithely encouraged the people who were watching the State of the Union to sign up. Not surprisingly, he failed to mention the myriad problems with, including security and inaccuracy concerns that have been well documented.

His grand flourish was to call for a “year of action.”

But I predict that, one year from now, when we’re once again subjected to an excruciatingly painful address, no significant legislation will have been signed by Obama.

If he actually does try to rule by decree, the courts will annul his diktats, one by one, until anything without a basis in existing legislation will be ruled unconstitutional.

Because Obama doesn’t have the character, personality, and charisma to move the nation to action, 2014 is more likely to be remembered as the year of inaction. He is untrusted, untalented, and ineffective as Commander-in-Chief.

He will be even worse as Dictator-in-Chief.






Amenper: Demandas y Realidad

Vamos a tratar de tocar los puntos de Obama en el Estado de La Unión con respecto a la fuerza laboral.

Aparte de las maravillas que nos cuenta que ha logrado esta administración; con su habitual arrogancia, nuestro presidente ha hecho demandas sin condiciones.  Si no se hace lo que demanda, usará su pluma alegre para firmar las acciones ejecutivas.

Las demandas se basan en conjeturas ficticias que no tienen una base real, es como una novela mitológica que según él nos llevará a una era armoniosa de un estado idílico, como un Shangri-la.

Este es son las demandas de Obama, que según él solucionarán el problema, pero cuando la enfrentamos a realidad vemos que no viviremos en Shangri-la pero en un estado como Haití o Cuba.

• Demanda: El “sueño americano” de trabajo y a la mejora de las condiciones en la vida están muertas, asesinadas por el estancamiento de los salarios y la “desigualdad de ingresos”; Debemos “re-distribuir  la riqueza” aún más a través de programas de gobierno y una  mayor redistribución.

Realidad: “Movilidad”, es el término generalmente asociado para garantizar el avance de ingresos más altos, y esta movilidad se ha mantenido en los Estados Unidos durante los últimos 40 años.

Es la estructura de la familia (o su ausencia), no “desigualdad de ingresos”  lo que generalmente predice la movilidad. Premiar la destrucción de la familia sólo lleva al estancamiento del trabajo.

 Los ingresos de la familia estadounidense promedio han aumentado en un tercio en los últimos 30 años.

• Demanda: nosotros debemos extender beneficios de desempleo para ayudar no sólo a los desempleados a largo plazo pero para impulsar una economía aún a la zaga de la gran recesión.

Realidad: “Si usted paga la gente para que no trabaje, muchos responden en consecuencia,”  esto no los recuerda el célebre profesor de Economía Universidad de Ohio Richard Vedder, un erudito de economía laboral en este Instituto Independiente.

Un estudio realizado por la Universidad de Pennsylvania y el Banco de Reserva Federal de Nueva York, concluye:

“Los efectos negativos de las extensiones de beneficios de desempleo influyen en las decisiones de creación de empleo por los empleadores y neutralizan cualquier posible efecto de estímulo que algunos atribuyen a esas políticas,” dice el estudio.

Obama no ha declarado una guerra a la pobreza, ha declarado una “guerra al trabajo” sin trabajo no hay producción y sin producción sólo hay pobreza para un país.

Y recuerden que el desempleo parece que está disminuyendo sólo porque la fuerza laboral, los que están trabajando, es la más baja en los últimos 36 años. No se están contando los que han dejado de buscar trabajo.

• Demanda: aumentar el salario mínimo ayuda a los trabajadores más pobres.

Realidad: En realidad es sólo otro espejismo en lo que el profesor Vedder llama la “guerra al trabajo”. “El Nobel laureado con el premio George Stigler señaló en 1964 que las leyes de salario mínimo causaron desempleo y la posterior evidencia empírica muestra abrumadoramente que destruyen los empleos para los trabajadores más vulnerables, los de menos habilidad, que son los mayor en número”.  

Porque los trabajadores en puestos de poca habilidad, son los más, habrá más desempleados

“Ninguna nación ha logrado grandeza cuando vastas porciones de su fuerza laboral productiva están ociosas,” dice Vedder.

Esto es una referencia no sólo a desempleo extendido y los salarios mínimos sino también a la proliferación de sellos de comida, impuestos más altos sobre los trabajadores activos, mayores tasas de Seguro Social por incapacidad y ayuda financiera federal a estudiantes (que sólo produce una educación superior con un aumento de las matrículas) Se le hará más dificil estudiar a los que quieren estudiar y que ahora pagan por sus matrículas. Los que no pagan por sus matrículas por lo general no terminan sus estudios. 

América no recuperará su vitalidad económica hasta que termine esta guerra al trabajo,” dice Vedder. Y no es probable que mientras el Presidente Obama tan firmemente enjuicia su guerra contra la fibra de la ética de trabajo de la clase laboral estadounidense.






Lester Aviles: Submitted by Simon Black via Sovereign Man blog,

The REAL “State of the Union” in just 889 words…

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, fellow citizens:

This summer we will commemorate the 100th anniversary of the start of World War I.

This senseless, destructive war was started and championed by politicians who cared nothing for the 9 million people who lost their lives.

And in doing so, they began a century of warfare which continues to this day.

Our military industrial complex is larger than ever. We have nearly 2 million troops and national guardsmen, plus 3.5 million civilians employed in the defense sector.

With such awesome capabilities, we continue to resort to violence and death to exact political goals which benefit a tiny elite.

All of this has created a police state in the Land of the Free that is a far cry from the country we all grew up in.

Your government has spawned a culture of fear and intimidation. Nearly every federal agency, including the Fish and Wildlife Service, has its own gun-toting police force to pistol-whip citizens into submission.

And we’re stocking up. Your government has recently procured 1.6 BILLION rounds of hollow-point ammunition to supplement our existing supplies.

But frankly, we don’t need guns to harass citizens.

Our tax authorities have become more threatening than mafia warlords.

There are now dozens of federal, state, and local agencies and courts which have the power to confiscate your assets without any due process.

In addition to your house, your business, and your savings, we also have the authority to take your children away from you as if they are property of the state.

We are here to tell you what you can and cannot put in your own body, or whether you can collect rainwater that falls on own property.

In fact, on any given business day, the federal government issues hundreds of pages of new ‘rules’, proposed regulations, draft bills, executive orders, and/or regulatory notices.

And if you are not compliant with these rules, you may be committing a crime. Whether you know it or not.

When this nation was founded, there were four federal crimes on the books. Today there are THOUSANDS. Plus we have millions of government employees at all levels to enforce the penalties.

All of this, of course, is financed by you the tax slave.

You (plus unborn generations) are the poor suckers charged with paying off the national debt we politicians have created.

Officially the debt is just north of $17 trillion. But if you include Social Security and pension shortfalls, the figure is several times higher.

You’ll never know for sure because we have become masters of deceit regarding official statistics, whether inflation, unemployment, or our liabilities.

But the situation is so dire that the Congressional Budget Office projects the Social Security Administration’s disability insurance trust fund to RUN OUT by 2017.

We get by year after year by increasing the debt. And at well over 100% of GDP, we have truly reached the point of no return.

We are now in a position where we must default. Either we must default on our national debt, or we must default on our obligations to you the citizens.

We may end up stealing your savings. Robbing your Social Security. Taxing you to death. Or simply inflating away the value of our debt.

Naturally, we’re going to screw you in the process somehow… so be prepared for that. Especially the inflationary tidal wave that’s coming.

Our central bank has expanded its balance sheet at an unprecedented pace, creating massive asset bubbles in its wake. These asset bubbles have disproportionately benefited the ultra-wealthy at the expense of everyone else.

Such wanton money printing has also been tremendously destructive to our credibility. Other nations worry about our reckless irresponsibility. That’s why we keep spying on them.

Make no mistake: the consequences of our actions are here. And the days of the United States as the world’s dominant superpower are finished.

As the decline hastens, we will struggle to sell our debt to the world and to ship our dollars abroad. Fewer nations will be interested in our empty promises.

And without the generosity of other nations loaning us money at record low interest rates that fail to keep pace with inflation, you will really be screwed.

When this happens, you can absolutely count on us to clamp down even harder on the economy and control even more of your lives. For your own good, of course.

No, this may not be the country that you all grew up in. But it is the state of our union… whatever remains of it.

And so my fellow Americans, I urge you to grab your ankles and get ready for a little ‘shared sacrifice’.

But don’t worry about me, or my senior staff. We will leave government with cushy pensions, $750,000 speaking fees, board seats on public companies, and top positions in the industries that we have accommodated at your expense.

And of course I will be paid handsomely for the arrogant memoirs I will write in which I deny any responsibility for the shit I’ve gotten you all into.

So when I say “shared sacrifice”, I really mean “your sacrifice”.

Thank you. God bless you, and God bless these United States of America.





Amenper: Bush speechwriter accuses Obama of plagiarism in State of the Union

By Mike Krumboltz, Yahoo NewsJanuary 29, 2014 9:38 AM

A former speechwriter for President George W. Bush accused President Barack Obama of plagiarizing one of Bush’s speeches for the Tuesday evening State of the Union address.

Marc Thiessen, who served as Bush’s lead speechwriter for his 2007 State of the Union speech, told Megyn Kelly of Fox News, “Barack Obama has gone from blaming George W. Bush to plagiarizing George W. Bush.”

Politco reports:

Thiessen then read phrases from the 2007 speech which focused on the theme “hope and opportunity.” “It was eerily familiar. There were lines like ‘Our job is to help Americans build a future of hope and opportunity, a future of hope and opportunity begins with a growing economy, a future of hope and opportunity requires that all citizens have affordable and available health care, extending opportunity and hope depends on a stable supply of energy,’ all of that came from the 2007 State of the Union from George W. Bush,” Thiessen said.

Poliico writes that none of Obama’s lines “were directly lifted” from Bush’s 2007 address, though in both speeches the presidents repeatedly used versions of the word “opportunity” and both concluded with stories about veterans who had been wounded in combat.

A transcript of Obama’s speech is available here.  Bush’s 2007 speech can be read here.

This isn’t the first time Obama has been accused of plagiarism in a State of the Union address. In 2011, Alvin Felzenberg, presidential scholar and former spokesman for the 9/11 Commission, wrote an op-ed for U.S. News and World Report stating the Obama’s speech “contained enough recycled ideas and lines lifted from speeches of others to make historians wince.”

However, President Bush was not immune to similar accusations. In 2010, a Huffington Post reporter accused Bush of lifting passages of his memoir from the books of his advisers.

Follow Mike Krumboltz on Twitter (@mikekrumboltz).





  Another example of our current inept federal government! This short clip will make you laugh / and cry at the same time. Beyond sad …..






Two Videos: Obama in 2013: ‘I’m Not a Dictator.’ Obama in 2014: I’ll Act Without Congress. BY GREG CAMPBELL

President Obama has played fast-and-loose with his executive powers since ascending to the presidency six years ago. However, recently, the president has startled constitutionalists as he repeatedly announces that he will act unilaterally on important issues with or without Congress.

Such remarks have been uttered time and time again by kings, tyrants and dictators throughout the world. While the Commander-in-Chief does maintain some sovereign powers to protect the nation and to deal with foreign nations, the executive maintains no legislative power, no means by which President Obama could logically claim the right to raise the federal minimum wage with the stroke of a pen.

To see how far Obama’s tyrannical tendencies have evolved in less than a year, we should examine what the president said a year ago and examine what he said Tuesday night during his State of the Union Address.

On March 1st, 2013, when asked why he didn’t simply make the two parties agree on key issues, the president chuckled and stated, “I’m not a dictator; I’m the president.”

However, the line between these two fundamentally different rulers seems to be eroding in Mr. Obama’s eyes as on Tuesday, he promised to unilaterally act on important issues with or without Congress. He stated, (emphasis added)

“The cold, hard fact is that even in the midst of recovery, too many Americans are working more than ever just to get by – let alone get ahead.  And too many still aren’t working at all. Our job is to reverse these trends.  It won’t happen right away, and we won’t agree on everything.  But what I offer tonight is a set of concrete, practical proposals to speed up growth, strengthen the middle class, and build new ladders of opportunity into the middle class.  Some require Congressional action, and I’m eager to work with all of you.  But America does not stand still – and neither will I.  So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.”

2013: “I’m not a dictator.”

2014: “Wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation… that’s what I’m going to do.”

Emperor Obama can call himself whatever he wants; the title of the dictator is meaningless. What is important is how our executive maintains the rule of law. If he rules by abiding by his constitutional limitations, he is our president. If he rules in clear violation of our Constitution, he is a dictator. It’s really as simple as that. 

– See more at:






Dear Concerned American,

Hold on to your wallet! 

As you know, in 2010 Barack Obama succeeded in shoving through Congress a government-imposed health care system which will require massive new taxes and further balloon the national debt

That’s why I hope you’ll sign your emergency petition below to force a Senate vote to repeal ObamaCare right away. 

It’s vital that you do so at once. 

You see, most of my Democrat counterparts in the Senate are running scared. 

So just forcing a Senate vote on ObamaCare is a win/win situation. 

Either my colleagues and I repeal ObamaCare, or . . . 

. . . another group of big-government tax-and-spenders goes down to defeat in the next election. 

That’s why President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are feverishly defending it. 

But unless you and other opponents of ObamaCare join together, this bureaucratic monstrosity will irreparably damage our health care system and bankrupt America’s taxpayers and small businesses. 

Of course, Obama and his ilk originally promised ObamaCare would cost $900 billion. Now the Congressional Budget Office projects it to be twice as expensive, to the tune of $1.8 trillion of your taxpayer dollars

It takes a lot of government bureaucrats to spend $1.8 trillion. 

So many, in fact, that the Congressional Research Service says it’s “impossible” to estimate “the exact number of new organizations and advisory bodies that will ultimately be created” by ObamaCare

And considering it hasn’t even been fully implemented yet, I fully expect that number to increase, especially as Obama’s minions at the IRS continue to unroll new bureaucratic red tape and regulations. 

Our country is already well over $17 trillion in debt

Before long, the already burdened American taxpayer will be forced to dig even deeper to pay for President Obama’s program. 

But that’s just the beginning. 

ObamaCare’s employer mandate will force hundreds of thousands of small businesses to provide their workers with health insurance

If they refuse, they’ll be fined $2,000 per employee. 

The costs to comply will be huge. 

Many businesses are already being forced to postpone planned expansion, drop employee health coverage, cut other forms of compensation, or lay off workers

Some might not survive at all. 

And under ObamaCare’s so-called “individual mandate,” government bureaucrats will be able to force you and me to buy expensive health insurance plans we don’t want. 

Plans that include coverage for things that, for many people, don’t even apply to them, such as maternity care (even if they don’t have children), and substance abuse treatment(even if they’ve never touched drugs and alcohol).

But worst of all, under the government exchanges being mandated under ObamaCare, not only will they say what will be covered, they’ll also say what won’t. 

Under ObamaCare, bureaucrats will be making your medical decisions on what will be paid for instead of you and your doctor. 

We already know how government-run medicine works. In other countries, we’ve seen it end with disaster again and again.

As American taxpayers, you and I must ask ourselves the following:


Do we want to follow the “lead” of our northern neighbor, Canada, where a human patient has to wait two years for hip replacement surgery, while his dog can have it in 3 days?


Do we want to become like Great Britain and have our wives and mothers wait for over two months before receiving a follow-up exam after testing positive on a pap smear?


Do we want the kind of health care they have in Sweden where the wait for an ordinary diagnostic heart x-ray can take up to eleven months?


Do we want to pull our own teeth, like Jeff Miners from Brega, Australia, who languished on government dental waiting lists while his teeth rotted away?

The fact is, there will be no fixing of ObamaCare. It’s too big and too complicated. 

Which is why I’m hoping you’ll click here to sign your petition telling your U.S. Senators to do whatever is necessary to force a vote to repeal ObamaCare outright. 

The House of Representatives, of course, has already voted to repeal ObamaCare. 

Now, if enough Americans get behind repeal with their signed petitions, you can send a clear message to the Senate, that the American people will settle for nothing less than full repeal

If enough Americans contact their Senators to let them know they want ObamaCare repealed, lawmakers on both sides of the issue will know exactly where the country stands. 

Senators will be spurred to action, and ObamaCare’s backers will either think twice about risking their careers for a politically-toxic law, or be held accountable for their actions when they run for re-election

That’s why it’s vital that you click here to sign your petition to your U.S. Senators at once

And why, in addition to that, it’s vital that you help my friends at the National League of Taxpayers with a special contribution. 

The fact is, even though many Americans who receive this email will sign the petition, many won’t be able to contribute. That’s why it’s vital you give $10, $25, $50, $100, or even more if you can

Your special gift of $35 or even $100 or $500 could ultimately save taxpayers millions of dollars in the years to come. 

You should also know that a generous supporter has agreed to match your contribution, dollar-for-dollar, so there isn’t a better time to give

Your donations will help the National League of Taxpayers to organize:


An extensive internet, direct mail, and telephone campaign to generate at least one million petitions to Congress like the one accompanying this letter.


Extensive personal lobbying of key Members of Congress by rank and file National League of Taxpayers members and staff.


Hard-hitting TV, radio and newspaper ads to be run in targeted states and districts, detailing the disasters of ObamaCare and mobilizing the American people.

So after clicking here to sign your petition, please help with a contribution of at least $25 or $35.

Some people have already given as much as $500. Others have given $50 and $100.

But no matter how much you give, whether it’s chipping in with $10 or a larger contribution of $150, I guarantee your contribution is urgently needed and will be deeply appreciated.

And don’t forget that a generous supporter has agreed to match your contribution, dollar-for-dollar, no matter the amount. 

ObamaCare is bad medicine Americans can’t afford.

Bad for patients, doctors, small businesses and employees. With your help, we can stem the tide of Big Government and stop Obama’s government-run health care scheme from becoming a reality.


Steve Stockman
United States Congressman

P.S. Medical and insurance costs continue to skyrocket while our national debt continues to hit the roof.

As you know, the Senate will be the key.

That’s why it’s so vital that you sign your petition right away.



Amenper: ¿Se Podrá Salvar el Salvador?

El próximo domingo es el Super Bowl, pero quien gane no es realmente tan importante como quien gane  las elecciones que se celebrarán ese dia 2 de Febrero en El Salvador. 

Por Arena va Norman Quijano, la esperanza, por los comunistas del FMLN, va el comandante guerrillero Salvador Sánchez Cerén, que se ha declarado más comunista que el actual presidente Mauricio Funes, antiguo guerrillero que ha estado destruyendo la economía del Salvador por cuatro años. Y después esta el antiguo presidente Tony Saca, del nuevo partido GANA, que lo que tiene es ganas de joder porque sabe que no puede salir.

Para que se hagan idea de quien es el antiguo comandante guerrillero Sanchez Cerén  hay una foto de una entrevista alucinante de Radio Venceremos en los tiempos de la guerra civil salvadoreña en que aparece Sanchez Cerén con el Ché Guevara cuando este era joven, también hay una más reciente con Chavez, sin contar las múltiples fotos de sus visitas a Cuba.

Este pudiera ser el próximo presidente de El Salvador.

La esperanza es que ninguno tenga mayoría para ver si se puede ganar en la segunda vuelta.

Nunca he entendido a los Salvadoreños, es el lugar de Centroamérica que más he visitado y en el que más amistades tengo. En mis visitas vi como bajo ARENA, el país se estaba desarrollando, en cada visita estaba mejor, vi como habían mejores medios de comunicación, mejor infraestructura mejores carreteras, como la industria privada estaba floreciendo.  El dólar era y es la moneda que más de usa, nadie quiere el dinero Salvadoreño.  Hay 2 millones de Salvadoreños en los Estados Unidos y 4 millones en el Salvador, y si gana Sánchez Cerén, posiblemente se empaten los números, o quizás habrán más Salvadoreños en Estados Unidos que el Salvador.  Si algún país debiera tener relaciones cordiales con Estados Unidos, debiera de ser El Salvador, el mayor ingreso del El Salvador viene del dinero que los emigrantes envían a sus familiares. ¿Se imaginan? la mayor industria es la exportación de personas al país enemigo.

 Pero en una de esas cosas inexplicables de nuestros países, han decidido elegir gobernantes enemigos del sistema de libre mercado y que odian a los Estados Unidos.  ¿Como se puede explicar esto?.

Como era y es de esperar, la fuga de capitales en los últimos cuatro años se ha sentido en el problema económico, pero lo que hacen es lo que parece lógico a la mentalidad socialista, atacar a los ricos que están tratando de salvar el dinero y elegir a un comunista para que los acabe de joder.  Entonces todos se joderán.

Nosotros en Miami nos estamos salpicando ya con ellos, están locos por invertir dinero en Miami que es el país más cerca a los Estados Unidos, a todos le gusta vivir en nuestro país de Miami.

Nos salpicamos también con los Venezolanos, estamos bien.  Pero lo malo es cuando nos toque a nosotros, ¿Para donde nos vamos?




Amenper: Henninger: Obama’s State of Disunion

His operating method has been social and political division.

Daniel Henninger



The 2008 campaign phrase “hope and change” will haunt future histories of the Obama presidency.

Many Americans voted Barack Obama into the White House for that reason alone. That reason is gone. The notion that this president would unify the nation by allowing people to summon their better spirits, as he promised, faded fast.

Even Mr. Obama’s supporters see now that his operating method wasn’t unification, but political and social division. Support for the president among the independents who gave him 52% of their vote in 2008 has fallen into the 30s.

Dividing the nation in his first term so that some Americans would vote in anger against his opposition was clearly the game plan from the start. He repeatedly scapegoated “the wealthiest” and the “1 percent.” In 2012 when House Republicans published their deficit-reduction proposals, Mr. Obama dismissed the document as “laughable,” “social Darwinism” and “antithetical to our entire history.”

After four years of the politics of divide-and-conquer, Mr. Obama had stirred sufficient resentment in his political base to win a second term. What he has produced entering the sixth year of his presidency is a nation in a state of disunion.

The pollsters at Gallup wrote last week that Mr. “Obama is on course to have the most politically polarized approval ratings of any president.” Segments of the U.S. population see themselves not just in disagreement with the Obama administration, but as the target of its policies.

This includes not only the famous 1%, but also the upper-middle class, Southern states, charter schools, politically active conservatives, private businesses, the Catholic church, electric utilities, doctors driven out of ObamaCare’s health networks and those famous partisans, the Little Sisters of the Poor.

All have been vilified, investigated, audited or sued by the president himself, Eric Holder’s Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency and, not least, the Internal Revenue Service. Last year’s most remarkable polling number from Gallup said in December that 72% of Americans regard big government as the greatest threat to the U.S. They got the message.

Even ObamaCare has contributed. The law’s rules pit the healthy against the unhealthy by forcing them to pay higher premiums to subsidize the unhealthy. Catholics, some of whom might have supported ObamaCare, see their hospitals as singled out for retribution by their government.

The administration’s supporters dismiss complaints about the in-your-face tenor of the Obama presidency as conservative sour grapes. “We won,” they say, “get over it.” OK, you won, but what have you done with it? Where’s the upside?

The slow fade of hope is revealed in last week’s Fox News poll, with 74% saying the country feels as if it’s still in a recession, no matter that the real one ended in early 2009. It’s hard to pretend hope is coming when, five years after the 2008 election, December’s monthly jobs report said 347,000 Americans have given up looking for work. That’s your real income inequality—the legions of chronically unemployed Americans who now have no earned income whatsoever.

In his speech, Mr. Obama pitched the causes of weak employment back “more than three decades.” This 30-year-old problem has three major policy solutions available to him in 2014: tax reform, pending free-trade legislation and immigration reform. All require doing business with the other party in Congress. He can’t, and by personal disposition doesn’t want to. The speech made that clear.

Instead, Mr. Obama said his overdue promise of change is going to roll in on a cascade of unilateral executive orders and directives from his regulatory bureaucracies. (This includes sentencing Joe Biden to reforming all the federal job-training programs, another 30-year failure.)

Progressives justify coerced public policy with their belief that what they are doing is good. Setting aside several hundred years of unhappy world history with this notion, a glitch always occurs in the U.S.: Because the Founding Fathers designed an arduous system for producing progress, the far left has never been able to put its most purebred ideas consistently across the legislative goal line. Too many citizens resist. One might say the same of the far right, but they’re not running anything just now. In frustration—and Mr. Obama is nothing if not frustrated—the White House is defaulting, as the left does everywhere, to direct executive action. We are at the dawn of the Unilateral Presidency.

How can this be good, if the price is more national disunion than we have now? Disunion is a dangerous political virus that sends a nation as complex as the U.S. toward a state of permanent, embittered opposition, which can be difficult for mere politicians to set right. We’re about there.

Barack Obama could have allowed some accommodation to decompress the discord and political tension. For example, he could have lifted the economy with a bipartisan cut in the corporate tax rate in his first term. Instead, he raised taxes on “the wealthiest,” and defined them as people with before-tax incomes above $200,000. Instead, the IRS audited his opponents. Get over it? Not anytime soon.

Write to





Amenper: Se Acabaron Los Calvos


Científicos han declarado que pueden ser capaces de ofrecer un nuevo rayo de esperanza cuando se trata de revertir la calvicie, escuchen bien, no prevenir la calvicie pero revertir la calvicie, darnos pelos a nuestras calvas brillosas.

Realmente  nunca creí que había perdido el pelo de mi cabeza, siempre pensé que estaba ahí presente en mi cuerpo, pero que había cogido el camino equivocado y estaba creciendo para adentro, porque el pelo se me estaba saliendo cada vez más fuerte por las orejas,la nariz y en la espalda..

Todo era cuestión de educar al pelo para que volviera a la cabeza pero mi pelo es muy rebelde y nunca me ha hecho caso.

Pero ahora nos dicen que están más cerca de ser capaz de utilizar las células madre para el tratamiento de la restitución  del cabello en nuestras calvas–al menos en ratones, dicen investigadores de la Universidad de Pennsylvania.

No sólo del Ratón Miquito debe de tener una fiesta en Disney World, pero todos nosotros los calvos del mundo debemos de estar muy felices con la noticia.

“Esta es la primera vez que alguien ha hecho escalables cantidades de células epiteliales que son capaces de generar el componente epitelial de los folículos pilosos,” dijo el Dr. Xiaowei Xu, profesor asociado de dermatología en Penn Perelman School of Medicine, en un comunicado de prensa.

Sin lugar a dudas esta noticia confirma mi pensamiento que había esperanza de recuperar mi cabellera perdida. .

Yo no Xe Xi Xu Xabe o no Xabe lo que hay que hacer para que nos salga el pelo en nuestras brillosas calvas pero sería conveniente, no sólo por razones estéticas creadas por la percepción del buen lucir, pero el pelo en el cuero cabelludo protege nuestras cabezas del sol y el frío que creo que es la razón de que Dios nos dio el pelo en la cabeza.  Aunque también tengo la teoría de que Dios no dio una abundancia de una brillante substancia gris en el cerebro, y nos quitó el pelo de la cabeza dándonos una brillante calva, para compensar a otros a los que les dio poca substancia gris y a los que por compasión les dio mucho pelo. Dios es justo.

En otras palabras, Dios nos dio inteligencia a algunos y nos quitó el pelo, a otros les dio mucho pelo y les quitó la inteligencia.  Si no creen mi teoría, miren una foto de Evo Morales y una de Dick Cheney.

Pero bueno, no nos podemos quejar de los descubrimientos que Dios permita, y si permite que Xu invente la igualdad de los cueros cabelludos, no podemos protestar. También me gustaría que hubiera igualdad de materia gris dentro de la cabeza de todo el mundo, así no tendríamos socialismo en el mundo.




amenper: El Salario Mínimo y el Desempleo

Hay algo que no comprenden los que no conocen la economía de Mercado, y tenemos en la presente administración personas que nunca han operado un negocio en su vida.  Han pasado por la universidad con sus teorías económicas pero no saben cómo funciona el mercado en la vida real.  No hay un empresario en la cúpula de la administración, ni uno sólo.

Por eso tratan de decir que estamos equivocados cuando decimos que el salario mínimo crea desempleo.

El empresario cuya razón de existir está relacionada con la supervivencia de su negocio, trata de defender sus utilidades.  Si surge algo que disminuye o have desaparecer esas utilidades, es su derecho y su deber el compensar la pérdida con su ingeniosidad.

Mi edad cronológica no me ha impedido adaptarme a las técnicas nuevas, mi negocio está computarizado, y el personal que tengo es por lo menos la mitad de lo que tuviera que tener si utilizara los métodos antiguos.  El sistema de inventario, la facturación, la contabilidad, todo es más rápido y fácil.

Pero vamos a hablar de cómo se toman las órdenes y se facturan.  Con un iPad que sirve de catálogo y toma-ordenes los vendedores toman la orden en las tiendas sólo tiene que apretasr el artículo en la foto con el código de barras y la orden pasa a la computadora de la oficina, la cual automáticamente crea la factura que pasa a la computadora del almacén donde se despacha. El crear este sistema no cuesta tanto y el ahorro paga el gasto en poco tiempo.

Cuando Obama dice que el aumento del salario mínimo no afecta el desempleo, tiene que pensar en la industria gastronómica que suma millones de camareros en los Estados Unidos.  Con un iPad con el menú que se encuentra usted cuando se sienta en la mesa, que explica detalladamente los platos, especiales y precios, hasta foto del plato, usted mismo solo tiene que poner su dedo en el plato que quiera, esto va a la computadora de la cocina que lo despacha y lo pone en el mostrador con su nombre  donde usted lo recoge después de haberlo pagado con su tarjeta de crédito y presiona en el mostrador el número correspondiente a su pago según las instrucciones del iPad.

Los camareros, ayudantes y otros empelados, cajeros desaparecerán, esto no se ha hecho mucho hasta ahora porque el salario mínimo de los gastronómicos era poco porque se supone que este salario es compensado con la propina.  Pero si el salario mínimo sube más de  $3.00 la hora, a $10.50, los dueños de restaurants tendrán que reducir la plantilla y para no dar mal servicio se computarizarán, es la ley de la supervivencia, es lo que no entienden los burócratas. 

​m Politics Editors (

Newsletters To:
By Chris Stirewalt
Buzz Cut:
·        Obama dumps on Congress, a lot
·        Unions set to win, enviros set to lose on pipeline
·        War dance or kabuki on immigration?
·        A DeMint man for Oklahoma race?
·        New York declares war on the birds of the 1 percent
From President Obama’s interview with CNN: “Uh, the House Republicans, in particular, have had difficulty rallying around any agenda, much less mine.  And in that kind of environment, what I don’t want is the American people to think that the only way for us to make big change is through, uh, legislation… I mean, the truth of the matter is, is that every president engages in executive actions. In fact, we’ve been very disciplined and sparing in terms of the executive actions that we have taken. Uh, we make sure that we’re doing it within the authority that we have under statute.”
Congress too unpopular to resist him – “…it’s a tough argument for the other side to make that not only are they willing to do an — not do anything, but they also want me not to do anything, uh, in which case, um, I think the American people, uh, who’s, right now, estimation of Congress is already pretty low, uh, might, uh, might have an even lower opinion.”

Damning with faint praise – “[Republican support for an immigration overhaul], particularly in this Congress, is a huge, uh, piece of business, because, uh, they haven’t gotten a lot done over the last couple of years out of the House Republican Caucus.  They – they’ve been willing to say what they’re against, not so much what they’re for.”

But on legal pot, Obama passes the pipe to Congress – “Well, first of all, what is and isn’t a Schedule One narcotic is a job for Congress … It’s — it’s not — it’s not something by ourselves that we start changing.  No, there are laws under — undergirding those determinations…”

Pot may be okay, unless corporations get involved – “…because if we start having a situation where, uh, big corporations with a lot of resources and distribution and marketing arms are suddenly going out there, uh, peddling marijuana, then, uh, the levels of abuse that may take place are going to… are going to be higher.”

Go to the Olympics, even though there might be a terrorist attack – “I’d tell them that I believe that Sochi is safe and that there are always some risks in these large international gatherings…  if you want to go to the Olympics, you should go to the Olympics.  And, uh, you know, we’re not discouraging, in any way, Americans from participating in what is just always a — an amazing, wonderful event.”

[President Obama will sit down with Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly in a live interview Sunday at 4:30 pm ET.]
In a sign that President Obama’s dismissive words about Congress are part of the Democratic establishment’s midterm talking points, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi delivered the same message to Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart: “If you’re dealing with people who have no agenda – ‘Nothing is our agenda, and never is our timetable’ – It’s very hard to negotiate with them.”
[Josh Kraushaar notes that Nancy Pelosi, losing many of her most loyal lieutenants to retirement and likely to again fail to recapture the House majority, may be nearing the end of her career.]
Fox News: “The State Department is expected to release an environmental analysis on the Keystone XL oil pipeline as early as Friday that may disappoint environmentalists and opponents of the proposed project, according to individuals briefed on the matter. The release of the long-anticipated evaluation, known as an ‘environmental impact statement,’ sets the stage for a 90-day review period, during which the Obama administration must determine whether the project is in the national interest.”
[Ed. note: What do you want to bet that the final decision comes down just in time to help red state Senate Democrats save some of their skins?]
House Republicans leaders announced Thursday they will back a limited path to legal status for the country’s illegal immigrants.  At the annual House GOP retreat in Maryland, House Speaker John Boehner emphasized border security must come first. The speaker insisted his conference favors a “common sense, piecemeal” approach to fix the nation’s broken immigration system. The “standards for immigration reform” document, released Thursday, ruled out a special path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. More
Far from home – The Hill: “When you lay out a major policy initiative like immigration, I don’t know when it’s going to appear on the schedule,” said Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee. “My hunch is it doesn’t come up, you know, tomorrow. It’s probably months out.”
Isn’t that what they said about ‘defunding’ ObamaCare? – “Republicans are poised for an historic election this fall–a conservative tidal wave much like 2010. The biggest thing we could do to mess that up would be if the House passed an amnesty bill — or any bill perceived as an amnesty bill — that demoralized voters going into November.” – Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to Breitbart
The most important question -Washington Examiner’s Byron York gets it: “… [I]n the very last sentence of the principles, comes the key to the whole thing: ‘None of this can happen before specific enforcement triggers have been implemented to fulfill our promise to the American people that from here on, our immigration laws will indeed be enforced.’ It is not an exaggeration to say that the future of immigration reform in Congress depends on whether Republican leaders mean what they say in that single sentence.”
The Center for Health and Economy scores the leading Republican replacement to ObamaCare and finds the plan proposed by Sens. Richard Burr, R-N.C., Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Orrin Hatch R-Utah would lower premium prices and save $1.4 trillion while providing coverage to a similar number of people that ObamaCare promises to enroll. The group found the plan could lower premiums by 2 percent and would lower federal Medicaid spending.
[Watch Fox: Chief Congressional Correspondent Mike Emanuel considers GOP efforts to unify around an ObamaCare alternative.]
Cantor promises plan –  The Hill: ‘’’This year, we will rally around an alternative to ObamaCare and pass it on the floor of the House,” [House Majority Leader Eric Cantor] said during a presentation [at the House GOP’s issues conference] in which he outlined four areas — healthcare, jobs, helping the middle class and creating opportunities — where Republicans would offer ‘big, bold ideas.”’
[WTAE shares the story of the employees at one Pennsylvania small business hit hard by ObamaCare.]
Work it! – Fox News: Facing a $78 million budget shortfall, California’s ObamaCare exchange has spent $1.37 million to fund an outreach video featuring exercise guru Richard Simmons gyrating on the floor and hugging a contortionist who is kneeling with his buttocks in the air…. has thedetails.
Noonan – Meanwhile, Back in America: “All these things—the pushing around of nuns, the limiting of freedoms that were helping kids get a start in life, the targeting of conservative groups—all these things have the effect of breaking bonds of trust between government and the people. They make citizens see Washington as an alien and hostile power. Washington sees the disaffection. They read the polls, they know. They call it rage. But it feels more like grief. Like the loss of something you never thought you’d lose, your sense of your country and your place in it, your rights in it.”
Got a TIP from the RIGHT or LEFT? Email FoxNewsFirst@FOXNEWS.COM

Real Clear Politics Averages
Obama Job Approval: Approve – 43.1 percent//Disapprove – 51.6 percent
Direction of Country: Right Direction – 29.5 percent//Wrong Track – 63.0 percent 
Generic Congressional Ballot:  Democrats – 41.0 percent// Republicans 41.5 percent 
NYT: “Election victories have never come easy for Mary Landrieu, who has never drawn more than 53 percent of the vote; her biggest tally came when Mr. Obama was on the ticket in 2008, increasing black turnout. Her success will ultimately come down to her ability to retain enthusiasm among those blacks while attracting moderate white Democrats who increasingly vote Republican, many of whom are furious about [ObamaCare]… ‘Senator Landrieu has supported President Obama’s agenda 97 percent of the time,’ her likely opponent, [Republican] Representative Bill Cassidy, wrote in an email… In an interview, she played down the political threat of the health care law. ‘My opponents take a great risk with that, because I think voters really understand that to have a strong work force you have to have a healthy work force.”’
[To wit: Reuters – “As Senate campaigns begin, some Democrats flee Obama”]
Hey, Bubba! – Former President Bill Clinton will join President Obama to address Senate Democrats when they gather for their retreat next week at Washington Nationals Stadium. As the current president’s poll numbers continue sag, many vulnerable Democrats may sidle up to the biggest moon in Planet Hillary’s orbit.
[Listen to Fox: Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates joins Kilmeade and Friends in the 9 a.m. ET hour]
Roll Call: “Randy Brogdon, a conservative former state senator currently challenging Oklahoma Gov.Mary Fallin [R-Okla.], is considering running in the Senate special election instead. ‘He has got a lot of people inside of Oklahoma, probably eight or nine out of 10, that are urging him to run for Senate, and he is listening very intently to those urges,’ Brogdon senior adviser Louis Waller said when reached by CQ Roll Call. Brogdon’s potential entrance comes just after Rep. Jim Bridenstine, a favorite among conservative outside groups… A primary for the seat is scheduled for June 24, with a runoff scheduled for Aug. 26 if necessary.”
Republicans need to gain six seats to wrest control of the Senate away from Democrats. Which are the most likely to flip? The consensus from Fox News First readers (in order of times selected): Arkansas, Montana, Louisiana, South Dakota, North Carolina and Alaska.
Share your top six picks. Email them – just your top six, please – to FOXNEWSFIRST@FOXNEWS.COMor tweet @cstirewalt.
[Ed. note: Do you people really think North Carolina is an easier flip for the GOP than West Virginia, with an open seat in a state President Obama lost by 27 points? Color me skeptical.]
Longtime California Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman announced Thursday he will not seek reelection, becoming the latest architect of ObamaCare to quit. Waxman, who represents one of the most liberal districts in the nation, will have served 20 terms in Congress by the time of his retirement. Noted birth control activist Sandra Fluke told KPCC, “A number of folks I respect very deeply have reached out today and encouraged me to run [for Waxman’s seat].  I am strongly considering running.” But as LAT points out, so is everybody else.
[Gallup’s latest survey finds Washington D.C., is the most liberal part of America, while Wyoming is the most conservative state. Ideologically, the survey finds a majority of American’s to be center right, while moderates tend to be a large Democratic voting bloc.]
Sunshine State News: “Big names are being dropped — not in a good way — between the candidates battling in the special election for the open congressional seat left vacant by the death of U.S. Rep.Bill Young, R-Fla. The candidates spent Thursday trying to tie the other to leading political figures. Attorney David Jolly, a Republican, is hitting the airwaves with a new ad. Jolly, who worked for Young, is taking on former state CFO Alex Sink, a Democratic, and Libertarian Lucas Overby in the March 11 special election. Jolly showcased a new television spot Thursday where he goes on the attack against Sink for backing President Barack Obama’s health care law and contrasting their fiscal records. ‘Pinellas needs someone to look out for our interests, not President Obama’s,’ Jolly says in the ad, which can be viewed here.”
On “Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace” – Live from Super Bowl XLVIII, a conversation with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. Plus, Wallace calls the signals with Hall of Fame quarterback turned Broncos boss John Elway, and former New Orleans Saints quarterback and proud poppa Archie Manning. “Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace” airs at 2 p.m. and 6 p.m. ET on Fox News. Check local listings for air times in your area.
On “#mediabuzz” – Host Howie Kurtz interviews Fox Sports’ Erin Andrews about her stunning sideline encounter with Seattle Seahawk Richard Sherman. Howie also chats with former Giants’ sack specialist Michael Strahan – a finalist for the  NFL Hall of Fame – about his transition from player to pundit and television personality. Plus, Jim Pinkerton and Juan Williams will help Howie go deep on the news of the week. Watch “#mediabuzz” Sunday at 11 a.m. ET, with a second airing at 5 p.m.
The poultry elite is under siege in New York! From AFP: “The New York state department of environmental conservation says swans attack people, destroy vegetation, pose a threat to jetliners and damage water because their feces contain e coli… Now the New York state conservation department wants to expand the offensive and eliminate [an estimated 2,200] free-ranging mute swans by 2025, killing them or allowing ‘responsible ownership’ of the birds in captivity. ‘Lethal control methods will include shooting of free-ranging swans and live capture and euthanasia in accordance with established guidelines for wildlife,’ said the draft proposal. Nests would also be destroyed, and eggs oiled, punctured or sterilised to prevent hatching, it added.”
“Essentially, [President Obama] passed a law by executive order that the Congress had rejected – wouldn’t pass. That is unbelievably unconstitutional. It’s as if a Republican ran and said ‘I don’t like the capital gains tax.’ Congress rejects an abolition of that tax, and then he orders the IRS not to collect it.  People would be up in arms and would be impeaching.” Charles Krauthammer discussing Majority Leader Harry Reid’s opposition to the president’s trade agenda, on “Special Report with Bret Baier” Watch here. 
Chris Stirewalt is digital politics editor for Fox News. Want FOX News First in your inbox every day? Sign up here. To catch Chris live online daily at 11:30 a.m. ET, click here.





“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”


Para contribuciones con artículos, opiniones o sugerencias escriba a:, O


No 581 “En mi opinion” Enero 30 2014

enero 30, 2014

<No 581 “En mi opinión” Enero 30, 2014>


“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


Samitier: Los impuestos para el 2014

En Caso Que Ustedes Sean De Esos Que Solo Les Interesan Las NOVELAS Y Deportes Aquí Les Paso Lo Que Este Año Van A Pagar
> Happy New Year America

–Aqui Tienen Los Impuestos

A Partir De January 1st 2014: 

> Top Income tax bracket went from 35% to 39.6%

> Top Income payroll tax went from 37.4% to 52.2%

> Capital Gains tax went from 15% to 28%

> Dividends tax went from 15% to 39.6%

> Estate tax went from 0% to 55%


Hasta El New York Time Lo Reconoce

Even the left wing New York Times, considers the Obama administration the most secretive ever!

NYT Editor: Obama Administration ‘Most Secretive’ I’ve Seen

Obama is pursueing 7 criminal investigations against the Media for news leaks!!!




Amenper: La Ciencia Política de la Confusión

El país no está dividido, está confundido

La nueva división en este país, entre  liberales conservadores no es, ni tan simple, ni tan nueva.

La verdadera razón es la capacidad de los políticos liberales, por años, de enturbiar los conceptos sobre  temas que tradicionalmente eran considerados como parte de la identidad de los Estados Unidos.

Todas nuestras creencias básicas, morales y valores han sido enturbiadas y las personas están confundidas..

 Los políticos han logrado engañar el pensamiento tradicional acerca de los derechos individuales, las responsabilidades y la ética de trabajo que ha caracterizado a esta nación, y que la había convertido en la nación más rica del mundo, la meca de todos los pobres del mundo.

Han cambiado la manera de cómo considerábamos el papel del gobierno en nuestras vidas.

El país no está dividido, está confundido.

Ha perdido de vista nuestra creencia en el libre mercado y han llegado al convencimiento deque el gobierno tiene derecho a controlar cada vez más amplios sectores de la actividad económica.

Peor aún, algunas personas poderosas en Estados Unidos incluyendo al presidente Obama, parecen estar comprometidas en promover la guerra de la clase, tratando enfrentar a los ricos contra los pobres, los exitosos contra los débiles.

La única discriminación que ahora es socialmente aceptable es la intolerancia contra los exitosos.

Un número cada vez mayor de personas pobres de nuestra nación han sido engañados para votar contra sus propios intereses por personas poderosas, muchos de ellos políticos, cuyo verdadero propósito es mantener o ampliar su propio poder.

La justicia social no es sólo para sentir compasión por los pobres, compasión debe combinarse con una cuidadosa racionalización de en las cuestiones filosóficas relevantes de las situaciones económicas, políticas y sociales.

Otra razón de por qué es importante la atención a la economía es la clara evidencia que las leyes económicas que se han establecido con la intención de ayudar a los pobres en los últimos años han tenido precisamente el efecto contrario. Hoy hay más personas viviendo de la caridad pública que nunca en la historia de los Estados Unidos.

Cuando la “ayuda” para los pobres se basa en las malas decisiones económicas, generalmente hará peor la mala situación. Cuando una ayuda permanente se establece el pobre sigue en su pobreza porque abandona su responsabilidad y su ética de trabajo.

Un gran número de los libros y artículos en la prensa liberal que han aparecido desde 1960 han sido escritos por escritores que rechazan y condenan el conservadurismo político y económico como si fuera un movimiento insensible y cruel, totalmente fuera de paso con el verdadero punto de vista conservador.

Estos autores, que no son cristianos, que no creen en el cristianismo, sientan cátedra y nos insisten en que la obligación indiscutible del cristiano para demostrar el amor para los más necesitados, le obliga a adoptar la política liberal  para ayudar a los pobres, lo que conduce inevitablemente al enorme incremento en el tamaño y el poder del gobierno, que es el verdadero motivo que persiguen.

Lo triste es que este adoctrinamiento sistemático se ha filtrado en las instituciones religiosas.

Aunque los líderes religiosos que adoptan estas políticas liberales, de buena fe, pueden merecer elogios por su compasión, los medios que proponen adoptar para ayudar a los pobres, han producido mucho más daño que bien en todos los lugares en que se han adoptado.




Nelson Horta: Representantes Republicanos quieren emprender acciones legales contra Obama

• “El tiene su pluma y nosotros la Constitución”, dicen


MIAMI 30 DE ENERO DE 2013,—Un grupo de representantes Republicanos están empujando una resolución para emprender acciones legales contra el Presidente Barack Obama por estar sobrepasando su autoridad firmando órdenes ejecutivas.

La resolución nombrada STOP, está patrocinada por el representante por Carolina del Sur Tom Rice y tiene como objetivo parar “la ola de decretos presidenciales del presidente Obama”.

“El tiene una pluma y un teléfono, es cierto, pero nosotros tenemos la Constitución” declaro Rice ayer miércoles, “la prosperidad de este país surgió de las libertades y deben ser protegidos”, señaló.

Los Republicanos renovaron sus críticas sobre el Presidente sobrepasando sus límites constitucionales después del discurso sobre el estado de la Unión, donde Obama dijo que si no tenía la cooperación del Congreso, el lo haría por su propia cuenta.

Por su parte desde La casa Blanca respondieron diciendo que, “El presidente trabajara con el Congreso mientras pueda, pero cuando son recalcitrantes, no va a cruzar sus manos y no hacer nada”, señaló Eric Schulz, agregando, “en cambio, va a usar su autoridad legal para fortalecer la económica y la clase media, eso es lo que espera el pueblo estadounidense, y esos es lo que se merecen”.

Por su parte el patrocinador de la ley Tom Rice dijo que ha hablado con el liderazgo de la Cámara de Representantes republicano sobre la resolución—la cual no tendría que ser aprobada por el Senado—y ya se está programando una audiencia en el poder judicial y los comités de administración.

La resolución tiene 74 copatrocinadores republicanos, que van desde el más conservador hasta los miembros más moderados.






Dear friends,

Of course we all agree. Nobody among us, and certainly not Ambassador Polous is defending the regime or arguing that is criminal record provides any reason for the Europeans or anyone to trust them. But Polous has done something important about it. He has throughout the years been a persistent principled critic of the regime and supporter of the opposition. The Miami Herald article is not the first time he has spoken about Cuba.


 The bottom line is that there are member states of the EU that would like to ignore the Cuban tragedy and get along with the regime. Polous is saying that denouncing the regime is not everything that can be done. He is clearly calling on Cubans, both on the island and in exile to get to work. He says that those allowed to travel abroad should explain to European diplomats as many times as necessary what is involved, what has happened, what is happening in Cuba and what the consequences of the wrong European policy could be.


His analysis is not simple speculation. It is based on the knowledge he has about how the Czechs defeated Communism and his many years as a diplomat. He knows a lot about the European Union and European governments. I witnessed  how years ago he led the effort in Geneva –when many said it could not be done—to get the necessary votes to condemned the regime.


He explains that the change is not imminent. But his point is not that we can take comfort on that but that we and he includes the opposition in Cuba and the exiles and many friends of many countries, have a lot of work to do.


Some European leaders say Europe’s commitment to human rights in Cuba is part of the current position and will be part of a new position. It is incumbent for many of us to continue to remind the European about their stated pledges to make it very difficult for them to do otherwise.


Polous is smart enough, he was Charter 77 spokesman and a close adviser of Havel, and later deputy foreign minister and ambassador to Washington and the United Nations. He first takes note of  where we are now. All of us would like to see a more forceful anti Castro European policy, even a boycott. The issue is how to get there from here.


He also reminds us that the cause of a free Cuba has many friends around the world. We should listen because many exiles continue to believe and act as if we have no friends. But there are, there have been important, influential, principled men and women that have opposed tyranny in Cuba and helped its victims.  I have been fortunate to meet many of them; Spaniards who have taken computers and medicine for human rights activists on the island. Some were expelled or not allowed to go beyond the airport and put on a flight back home. Argentineans who have gone to Cuba not to have a good time in Tropicana, but to help the democratic opposition, the leader of CADAL just a few days ago travelled to the island to participate in a human rights forum coinciding with the CELAC charade and was not allowed to enter despite the fact that all his papers were in order.


I know  Germans, Dutch, Filipinos, Swedes, Slovaks, Poles, Hungarians, Uruguayans, and yes Czechs. A recent Czech foreign minister was expelled from Cuba for visiting with dissidents years ago.  President Havel many times stood up to the regime. Czech diplomats in Havana had been harassed, in one case a Cuban army truck slammed against a Czech embassy car taking the chief of mission’s wife on an errand a while after she and her husband had received dissidents at the embassy.


There is work to be done in Europe but also in Washington with the European embassies, in New York with their diplomats accredited to the UN, everywhere with their newspaper press bureaus.


We might want to start with the obvious. To visit foreign  ministries there will be a need for plane tickets, funds to pay for hotel rooms…  How many of us can make it our own personal project to talk to our friends and raise enough funds to pay for one round trip flight from the US to Europe?  How many such missions can we organize? 


Since a new European instrument on Cuba policy needs to be approve by every member of the EU, what we need is to identify half a dozen governments where se might have access, where there are human rights organizations who share our views and work with them. Polous is right just the talk about the talks provide us with an opportunity that we should not ignore.


In the meantime at the Center for a Free Cuba we are already working on a basic dossier that should be the basis of our approach to European governments.


It is not an easy effort, and there is enough work on all kinds of tasks to get lots of people involved.


If anyone wants to give me a call my cell phone is 202-427-3875






Jorge Aguiar: GOP Crafts Plan to Wreck the Country, Lose Voters. Ann Coulter | 


As House Republicans prepare to sell out the country on immigration this week, Phyllis Schlafly has produced a stunning report on how immigration is changing the country. The report is still embargoed, but someone slipped me a copy, and it’s too important to wait. 

Leave aside the harm cheap labor being dumped on the country does to the millions of unemployed Americans. What does it mean for the Republican Party? 

Citing surveys from the Pew Research Center, the Pew Hispanic Center, Gallup, NBC News, Harris polling, the Annenberg Policy Center, Latino Decisions, the Center for Immigration Studies and the Hudson Institute, Schlafly’s report overwhelmingly demonstrates that merely continuing our current immigration policies spells doom for the Republican Party. 

Immigrants — all immigrants — have always been the bulwark of the Democratic Party. For one thing, recent arrivals tend to be poor and in need of government assistance. Also, they’re coming from societies that are far more left-wing than our own. History shows that, rather than fleeing those policies, they bring their cultures with them. (Look at what New Yorkers did to Vermont.) 

This is not a secret. For at least a century, there’s never been a period when a majority of immigrants weren’t Democrats. 

At the current accelerated rate of immigration — 1.1 million new immigrants every year — Republicans will be a fringe party in about a decade. 

Thanks to endless polling, we have a pretty good idea of what most immigrants believe. 

According to a Harris poll, 81 percent of native-born citizens think the schools should teach students to be proud of being American. Only 50 percent of naturalized U.S. citizens do. 

While 67 percent of native-born Americans believe our Constitution is a higher legal authority than international law, only 37 percent of naturalized citizens agree. 

No wonder they vote 2-1 for the Democrats.

The two largest immigrant groups, Hispanics and Asians, have little in common economically, culturally or historically. But they both overwhelmingly support big government, Obamacare, affirmative action and gun control. 

According the 2012 National Asian American Survey, as well as a Kaiser Foundation poll, only 40 percent of the general public holds a favorable opinion of Obamacare, 42 percent unfavorable. Meanwhile, 51 percent of Asians have a favorable opinion of Obamacare, 18 percent an unfavorable one. Even Koreans support Obamacare by 57 percent to 17 percent. 

Overall, 69 percent of immigrants like Obamacare, according to a 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. 

That same survey showed that only 35 percent of native-born Americans support affirmative action, compared to 58 percent of immigrants, including — amazingly — 64 percent of Asians (suggesting they may not be as smart as everyone thinks). 

Also surprising, a Pew Research Center poll of all Hispanics, immigrant and citizen alike, found that Hispanics take a dimmer view of capitalism than even people who describe themselves as “liberal Democrats.” While 47 percent of self-described “liberal Democrats” hold a negative view of capitalism, 55 percent of Hispanics do. 

Pew also found that only 27 percent of Hispanics support gun rights, compared to 57 percent of non-Hispanic whites. According to Latino Decisions, large majorities of Hispanics favor a national database of gun owners, limiting the capacity of magazines and a ban on semiautomatic weapons. 

Seventy-five percent of Hispanic immigrants and 55 percent of Asian immigrants support bigger government — also according to Pew. Even after three generations in America, Hispanics still support bigger government 55 percent to 36 percent, compared to the general public, which opposes bigger government 48 percent to 41 percent. 

How are Republicans going to square that circle? It’s not their position on amnesty that immigrants don’t like; it’s Republicans’ support for small government, gun rights, patriotism, the Constitution and capitalism. 

Reading these statistics, does anyone wonder why Democrats think vastly increasing immigration should be the nation’s No. 1 priority? 

It would be one thing if the people with these views already lived here. Republicans would have no right to say, “You can’t vote.” But why on Earth are they bringing in people sworn to their political destruction? 

Republicans have no obligation to assist the Democrats as they change the country in a way that favors them electorally, particularly when it does great harm to the people already here. 

Yes, it’s great for the most powerful Americans to have lots of cheap, unskilled labor. Immigration definitely solves the rich’s “servant problem.” 

(Approximately 5 million times a day, MSNBC expresses bewilderment that any Republicans oppose amnesty when it’s supported by the Chamber of Commerce. Wow! So even people who profit by flooding the country with cheap labor are in favor of flooding the country with cheap labor!) 

It’s terrific for ethnic lobbyists whose political clout will skyrocket the more foreign-born Americans we have. 

And it’s fantastic for the Democrats, who are well on their way to a permanent majority, so they can completely destroy the last remnants of what was once known as “the land of the free.” 

The only ones opposed to our current immigration policies are the people. 

But are they going to give John Boehner a job when he’s no longer House speaker, as some big business lobbyist will? 

Will they help Marco Rubio run for president on the claim that, as a Cuban, he can appeal to Hispanics? (Fat chance.) 

Will they bundle contributions for Eric Cantor’s re-election, as well-heeled donors will? 

Will they be enough to re-elect Kevin McCarthy to Congress so he can keep his gold-plated government health insurance? 

Will they be the ones writing Darrell Issa’s flattering New York Times obituary? 

Sorry, Americans. You lose.




Samitier: Los Comunistas Dicen La Verdad… Sus Agentes Infiltrados Son Los Que Hacen Que No Los Creamos…

Ellos Bien Claro Dicen Que Todo Es Política, El Arte, Los Deportes, etc… ¿Porque Los Dejamos Actuar?

La idea del arte neutral es tan equivocada, como la idea del  PERIODISMO OBJETIVO – que nunca ha existido en toda la historia humana, y no deberíamos NI SIGUIERA MENCIONAR ESA PALABRA…   Si usted es uno de eso que piensa que todos los programas de TV están dando imágenes de los homosexuales por puro accidente, piense de nuevo… ESTÁN PREPARANDO EL CUADRO para la Nueva SODOMA… y la desintegración de los Estados Unidos… Que se está CAYENDO A PEDAZOS  



Amenper: Extraterrestrial Administration?

Now I understand our problem

TEHRAN (FNA)- Former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden revealed documents providing incontrovertible proof that an alien/extraterrestrial intelligence agenda is driving US domestic and international policy, and has been doing so since at least 1945, some media reports said.

Edward Snowden is a computer specialist, a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employee, and former NSA/CSS contractor who disclosed these classified documents to several media outlets in late 2012 and was granted temporary asylum in Russia in 2013 after his designation by the Obama regime as the “most wanted man on earth.”

This FSB report further states that Snowden, in December, 2012, contacted the highly respected American columnist, blogger, and author Glenn Greenwald by an email headed with the subject line stating, “I and others have things you would be interested in.?.?.?.”

In Snowden’s own words, this report continues, he outlined to Greenwald the reason for his highly secretive group obtaining and releasing these documents by warning that that there “were actually two governments in the US, the one that was elected, and the other, secret regime, governing in the dark.”

As to who is running this “secret regime” Snowden and his cohorts were warning about, FSB experts in this report say, was confirmed this past weekend by former Canadian defense minister Paul Hellyer who was given access to all of Snowden’s documents by Russian intelligence services and stated they were, indeed, “accurate.”

Even though Defense Minister Hellyer’s exact statements to the FSB in regards to Snowden’s documents remain classified, shortly after his “extensive electronic interview” by the FSB he was allowed to appear on Russia Today’s program SophieCo this past fortnight where he shockingly admitted that aliens have “been visiting our planet for thousands of years” and described several types of these extraterrestrials, including “Tall Whites” who are working with the US Air Force in Nevada. 

Of the many explosive revelations in this FSB report, the one most concerning to Russian authorities are the Snowden’s documents “confirming” that the “Tall Whites” (further revealed by Defense Minister Hellyer as noted above) are the same extraterrestrial alien race behind the stunning rise of Nazi Germany during the 1930’s.

In just one example of the many outlined in this FSB report, it shows that with this “alien assistance,” at the end of the 1930’s, when Nazi Germany possessed just 57 submarines, over the four years of World War II it built 1,163 modern technologically advanced submarines at its dockyards and even put them into operation.

Snowden’s documents further confirm, this report says, the “Tall Whites” (Nordic) meetings in 1954 with US President Dwight D. Eisenhower where the “secret regime” currently ruling over America was established.

Most disturbingly, this FSB report warns, is that the “Tall White” agenda being implemented by the “secret regime” ruling the United States calls for the creation of a global electronic surveillance system meant to hide all true information about their presence here on earth as they enter into what one of Snowden’s documents calls the “final phase” of their end plan for total assimilation and world rule.

Unbeknownst to the FSB, this report confirms, are those still in the US government backing Snowden, but whose presence Russian intelligence experts note is “unmistakable” and shows a cataclysmic power struggle is currently underway against this “secret regime” now headed by Obama by “forces unknown.”

Most to be feared by Russian policy makers and authorities, this report concludes, is if those opposing the “Tall White” “secret regime” ruled over by Obama have themselves aligned with another alien-extraterrestrial power themselves.






Choque de Opiniones, CNN -4 vs 1, Medalla de Cartón.Edgar Tamayo.  

El Pasado programa, Choque de Opiniones de CNN en Español,

sobre la pena de muerte al ciudadano mexicano Edgar Tamayo,

de choque de opiniones no tenia practicamente nada.


Su Presentador, Sr. Juan Carlos López, confeccionó un panel de 3 personas

entre ellos un abogado pero…lo increible fue , que tanto el Moderador como

los tres panelistas eran de la misma opinión y solo una Sra. que participó

desde Texas estaba de acuerdo con la ejecución del Sr. Tamayo.


Como podrán deducir a la Sra. casi no la dejaban hablar.  Por lo que

en ese programa “Choque de Opiniones” se ganó


                      La Medalla de Cartón .


Datos sobre los motivos de la ejecución del Sr. Tamayo :


El Sr. Tamayo fue arrestado por robo y mientras el policia Sr. Guy Gaddis

lo conducia hacia la estación , Tamayo que tenia una pistola escondida en su

pantalón y aunque esposado consigió darle 3 Balazos en la cabeza al

policia, matándolo ( 3 balazos ). Uno de los comentarios de Tamayo

sobre este crimen atróz  fue que estaba bravo con el policia porque

rehusó llevarlo a entregarle unas llaves a su esposa.


Hubo piquetes en contra de la ejecución, vi  un cartel donde  decia que

Tamayo era inocente, el Consulado Mexicano dijo que el no tener más

asistencia legal fue lo que provocó la condena a muerte y asi decenas

de comentarios, Y YO PREGUNTO : ¿ Cuantos de los que estaban piqueteando fueron al velorio o al entierro del Policia asesinado? ¿Cuantos

de los que hoy protestan denunciaron en su momento este brutal asesinato

a un policia en el cumplimiento de su deber?.


Y para completar este deplorable asunto, la Administración Obama, a través

del Ministro de Estado John Kerry escribio al Fiscal General de Texas, para

que demorará otra vezl la ejecución. Este vil asesinato fue cometido hace

20 años , basta ya de demoras. Yo estoy del lado del Policia y de su familia.

No creo que ni Obama , ni Kerry le hayan escrito a la familia de Guy Gaddis.


Así están las cosas en este País.


Sergio Gatria.






Samitier: Muestra de algunas de las personas que votan por obama…



Un hombre compró una nevera nueva y, para librarse de la vieja, la
dejó enfrente de su casa con un cartel que decía:
“Gratis. Si la quiere se la puede llevar”.
La nevera permaneció allí durante 3 días, sin que la gente que pasaba
se dignara mirarla.
El hombre llegó a la conclusión de que la gente no creía en la oferta.
Era demasiado buena para ser verdad, por lo tanto cambió el cartel:
“Nevera en venta por 150,00 €”.
¡Al día siguiente se la habían robado!
¡Cuidado! ¡Ese tipo de gente vota!

Mientras miraba una casa para alquilar, mi hermano le preguntó a la
chica de la inmobiliaria para dónde quedaba el Norte, ya que no quería
que el sol lo despertase todas las mañanas. La chica le preguntó:
“-¿El sol sale por el norte?”
Cuando mi hermano le explicó que el sol sale por el Este (cosa que
sucede desde hace un buen tiempo, además), ella le dijo:
“- Lo que pasa es que no estoy muy al tanto de ese tipo de cambios de
esas cosas”.
¡Ella también vota!

Mi colega y yo estábamos almorzando en el restaurante self-service de
la empresa, cuando oímos a una de las secretarias administrativas
hablando sobre las quemaduras de sol que había sufrido, al ir en auto
a la costa.
Estaba en un descapotable, por eso “no pensó que se iba a quemar, ya
que el auto estaba en movimiento”.
¡Ella también vota!

Mi cuñada tiene una herramienta salvavidas en el auto, diseñada para
cortar el cinturón de seguridad, si ella llegara a quedar aferrada a
él. ¡Ella guarda la herramienta en el maletero!
¡Mi cuñada también vota!

Esta es la mejor!
Salí con una amiga y vimos una mujer con un argolla en la nariz,
agarrada a un aro por medio de una cadena a la oreja .. Mi amiga
“- ¿No será que la cadena le da un tirón cada vez que ella gira la cabeza?
Le expliqué que la nariz y la oreja de una persona permanecen a la
misma distancia, independientemente de que la persona gire o no su
Mi amiga también vota!

No conseguía encontrar mis maletas en área de equipaje del aeropuerto.
Fui entonces hasta el mostrador de equipaje extraviado y le dije a la
señorita que atendía que mis valijas no habían aparecido.
Ella sonrió y me dijo que no me preocupara, porque ella era una
profesional entrenada y yo estaba en buenas manos.
“- Solamente dígame una cosa: ¿pero su avión ya llegó?”.
¡Ella también vota!

Y claro…… así nos va !






Samitier: La Crisis De Los Dos Partidos

Se Debe Porque Le vendieron La Ilusión Al pueblo Del

Bi –Partidismo… Cuando Los Dos partidos Son Iguales

En realidad, no existe ninguna diferencia en políticas entre los Demócratas y Republicanos.

Solo en materias superficiales, el aborto y matrimonio homosexual aparte de eso, todas las

políticas importantes, son iguales y no cambian con un cambio de poder…



Por lo tanto, cuando viene un cómico como Bepe Grillo en Italia, que sale de ser un total

DESCONOCIDO SIN RECURSOS… que no compra un solo anuncio y saca a la calle

Manifestaciones masivas las más grande de Italia y logra el voto popular más alto

demuestra lo debil que son los supuestos partidos mayoritarios.


En Grecia, el partido socialista bajo de 40% al 11% debido a que el partido de izquierda

quiso re-negociar la deuda!


Por lo tanto, no pueden permitir ningún partido “extremista” que pida LIBERTAD


TEA PARTY y por eso los millonarios infiltraron al Tea Party, para dar “AYUDA” y

Apoyaron a una persona que ES ADICTO A LA COCAÍNA… para mantenlo en línea


El Tea Party se fundó cuando el pueblo CASADO NO AGUANTA MAS…




Aquí Les Envió El Reportaje De La Fundación Del TEA PARTY…


la izquierda, tambien tiene su Occupy Wall Street, pero sus lideres, rapidamente, fueron comprados

con puestos en el gobierno y universidades.  Desde entonces, no se oye nada mas de ellos.


El sistema bi-partidista, es un plan de los Globalistas para mantenernos como los Ingleses mantenian

a los musulmanes y los hindu en la India.


No Hay Nada Nuevo En La Política…






Sergio Gatria: Obama…Presidente o Aspirante a Dictador???????????

Trata de poner al Congreso como enemigo .



   El discurso del Presidente Obama sobre el Estado de la Nación,

   fué Populista, lleno de falsedades, me recordó discursos del

   Dictador Fidel Castro, pero para mí lo más preocupante fue

   la amenaza disfrazada de que él es el unico que sabe lo que

   hay que hacer y si el Congreso no apoya todo lo que él quiera

   que se haga, entonces gobernará con ” Ordenes Ejecutivas ” o

   sea hará lo que quiera pasando por encima del congreso.


   ¿ Como es que gobiernan los Dictadores ? sencillo hacen lo que quieren

   y no necesitan aprobación de nadie. Desgraciadamente tiene el

   respaldo absoluto de casi todos los demócratas, que al parecer

   no se estan percatando del peligro.


   Recuerdo en los primeros meses del año 59, un dia apareció en

   todos los periodicos declaraciones de Castro diciendo, voy a

   renunciar porque el Presidente Urrutia no quiere respaldarme

   en lo que quiero hacer, de esa forma puso a Urrutia como un

   enemigo de las leyes que el queria hacer y si Urrutia no anda 

   rápido y se asila, Castro lo hubiera fusilado. El Presidente

   Obama esta tratando de poner la poblacion en contra del

   CONGRESO. Ademas, lo mismo hizo con los  periódicos, emisoras de radio,  ect.,ect., fue poniendo a todos los que trataron de frenarlo ,como enemigos que se oponian a todas “las maravillas” que decia que iba a hacer. Estos Liberales Izquierdistas trabajan así, primero discursos populistas, despues enfrentar a todos lo que no hagan lo que ellos quieran con la población.                        


   Ya cambió hace algunas semanas una ley que  el Senado

   tenia que tener 60 votos para pasar una ley y esta ley estaba desde

   la fundacion de este Pais, respetada por Demócratas y Republicanos,

   ahora como hay uno 53 o 54 senadores demócratas, solo Obama

   necesita 51 voto.


   Ya he oido varias veces decir que se debia de cambiar la ley para

   que Obama pudiera re-elegirse de nuevo y otras que Michelle debia

   de postularse para Presidente. 


   Todo lo que esta pasando en Washington ahora es muy preocupante.


    Sergio Gatria







Amenper: On Super Bowl food and Downton Abbey

The Super Bowl is an American tradition, millions of people tune in to the event and pollsters trying to predict about the game, who will be the winning team, and how will be the performance of the players. But beyond, they try to investigate how many people are going to watch the game and see where, how will the stadium, few in the house, few in bars and that thing is what to eat while watching the game.

What does America eat when watching Super Bowl Sunday? Some forecasters believe will eat 1.25 billion chicken wings (National Chicken Council) and 48 million of us will order in pizza and other cooked food in the house.

The National Association predicts that 10 Restaurants   food ingredients that are consumed in this order: Sauces with nachos or chips, followed by chicken wings, pizza, desserts, sandwiches, fried / baked / grilled chicken and burgers finally.  

This has worried those who try to tell us we should eat “healthy” mainly vegetables. This year polls people will eat less vegetables.   Why is that, despite the barrage of propaganda to eat vegetables?

Well, I have my own theory.  

Michelle Obama is the main spokesperson for people to eat vegetables.   The fact that Obama says that eating vegetables makes people have less credibility that vegetables are good, is the lack of credibility of the name “Obama” has made ​​people eat less vegetables.

Blacks who are the ones who can identify with Michelle, can not eat vegetables instead of fried chicken, which is the favorite food of black, it is not in their nature and tradition.  

The rest of us when we see Michelle tells us to eat vegetables gives us desires to eat a greasy hamburger with   fries.

Anyway personally this year even though I feel a bit diminished my manhood, I can not miss an episode of Downton Abbey, so I will not be able to watch the Super Bowl, I will see the result on the news later.





Samitier: Una Prueba Más de la Política Equivocada de Obama


La Política Equivocada De Obama… Mientras Obama Desarticula Y Desarma Al Ejército Americano Y Desea Eliminar 620 Bombas Atómicas… Ahora Nos Informan Que Rusia Sigue Haciendo Pruebas Para Mejorar Sus Equipos… Aquí tienen la noticia…








GOP Behind-Closed-Doors Amnesty Meeting Going On Right Now

The Western Center For Journalism.



John Boehner Will Unveil A Proposal To Grant Amnesty To 11-12 Million Illegal Aliens When Republicans Emerge From A Closed-Door Meeting This Weekend.

       You’ve already heard the news, but what you probably haven’t heard is that opposition to Boehner’s Amnesty scheme within the Republican caucus is starting to mount rapidly and grassroots pressure from patriotic American, like you, can stop this Boehner Amnesty scheme dead in its tracks.

And To Add Insult To Injury…

       Barack Obama has already jumped on Mr. Boehner’s capitulation to his radical Amnesty agenda. 

       Within days of word getting out that Boehner was on board with Amnesty, Barack Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson suddenly upped the ante and proclaimed that the approximately 11 million people who are in the country illegally have “earned the right to be citizens.” 

       You read that right, if you want to earn the “right” to be a citizen of the United States, all you have to do is violate our laws. 

       And the very second, Boehner announced his willingness to capitulate, Team Obama started working on the next capitulation. 

       But we shouldn’t be shocked. Barack Obama has been using his pen and his phone to violate the laws that he is sworn to enforce for years. 

       Case in point, Breitbart reports that a Syracuse University study indicates that deportation cases that are being closed due to“prosecutorial discretion” is up by over 70 percent. 

       In plain English, that means that the Obama Regime is choosing NOTto prosecute greater and greater numbers of illegal aliens for no apparent reason. 

       Considering Mr. Obama’s lawlessness when it comes to enforcing our nation’s immigration laws, Boehner’s Amnesty capitulation is a spit-in-the-face to patriotic Americans and it’s time to let our elected officials know exactly how you feel.

Betrayal Was Always The Name Of The Game.

       But if you’re thinking that Mr. Boehner is simply capitulating to Barack Obama… think again. In spite of his statements to the contrary, an Amnesty betrayal was always in the works. 

       According to TheBlaze, Republican leaders in the House “have all been working with Boehner behind closed doors on the principles since last year…” 

       And Erick Erickson with RedState even went so far as to say that Boehner was simply keeping his powder dry to ward off potential primary challengers from running against Republican incumbents: 

       “The threat of primary challenges well passed, they’ll get their amnesty deal done. … Republicans are so convinced you will turn out and vote for them in 2014 to spite Obama, they are perfectly happy to screw you over in this fight knowing how cheap a date the conservative movement has become.” 

       At the same time, Breitbart reported: “A new report from the Texas-based Quorum Report, published by longtime Texas journalist Harvey Kronberg, says that House Speaker John Boehner plans to push amnesty legislation through the House, after the primary filing deadline for candidates. The move would prevent Tea Party from challenging GOP lawmakers who support amnesty in 2014.” 

       But if you’re feeling discouraged… don’t let the scheming betrayals get you down. If Erickson and others are right – and we believe that these assessments are is correct – keep in mind that Boehner and Republican leaders only kept their powder dry because they fear your wrath

       And make no mistake, at this very moment, Republican leaders are only moving forward because they’re UNDER THE FALSE IMPRESSION THAT PATRIOTIC AMERICANS LIKE YOU YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS GOING ON

       That’s why we must disabuse them of their delusional notions, right here and right now. They may believe that the fix is in, but the righteous outrage of patriotic Americans will thwart their plans to grant Amnesty to 11-12 million illegal aliens.


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.



Floyd Brown




Samitier: Dos Suicidios De Dos Empleados De La Misma Compañía

En Dos Días… UUH Eso es Sospechoso… Parara Todos…

Pero No Para La Prensa Socialista y Pro Homosexual

Se Suicidaron Dos Banqueros Norte Americanos

En Londres Con Dos Días De Diferencia… Trabajaban

Juntos… Para El Banco Chase… El Que le Acaba De

Aumentar el Sueldo en $20 Millones al Presidente…

Después de pagar $2 Billones en Multa… Por acciones

INDEBIDAS… Pero Nada Esto Tiene De Sospechoso…  

Pero Todavía Escriben Sobre el Suicidio Hace 30 Años Del Banquero Del Banco Del PAPA… La pregunta es: ¿Por qué Sospechan Asesinato en Un Caso Y No Sospechan en el Otro?





“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”


Para contribuciones con artículos, opiniones o sugerencias escriba a:, O

No 580 “En mi opinion” Enero 28, 2014

enero 29, 2014

<<No 580 “En mi opinión” Enero 28, 2014>>

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


 “Cuantos traidores conoces tú en el Partido Republicano que están ahí descaradamente.  Cuantas veces exponiendo su apoyo a obama. Toda esa porquería hay que sacarla del partido Republicano.  Que seremos  pocos pero “SOMOS” No podemos cambiar el Honor por la vergüenza. No tenemos que conciliar con nadie, únicamente con los dignos ciudadanos Americanos. Fuera todos los canallas del Partido. Vamos a limpiar la casa y la vamos a limpiar ya” Todos a llamar a sus Senadores y Representantes para que se pongan a trabajar por el CONSERVADURISMO. No tenemos que buscar coro, lo que tenemos es que demostrar que somos decentes y no tenemos que congeniar. “EMO” LRGM




Amenper: Análisis del discurso de obama ayer noche…


Discurso del Estado de Shangri-la


Shangri-la es un lugar ficticio descrito en el 1933 novela Horizonte Perdido por el autor británico James Hilton.

Hilton describe Shangri-la como un valle místico, armonioso, guiado suavemente por un monje sabio y benefactor habitado por personas felices y contentas que vivían totalmente aislados de los problemas del resto del el mundo. 

Sin lugar a dudas la administración de Obama ha sido un Shangri-la para la nación. El desempleo ha bajado, el déficit ha sido cortado a la mitad, tenemos un seguro accesible para todos que ya ha salvado la vida de millones, la política exterior ha logrado la paz en Iraq y Afganistán, ya se pueden gobernar ellos mismos, las tropas se están retirando y el gobierno de Irán está abandonando sus ambiciones nucleares.

Esto es un Shangri-la, si no fuera por el pequeño detalle de que todo es una completa mentira, y es admirable la cara con que lo dijo.

El desempleo es rampante, hay más de 20 millones de desempleados y no se están contando los que han dejado de buscar trabajo. El Obamacare es un fracaso evidente que se empecina en continuar. Hay muertos en Afganistán y en Iraq diariamente, prácticamente están en estado de guerra civil, Irán se está burlando de los Estados Unidos y Obama dice que si el congreso aprueba más sanciones las vetará con la pluma alegre, la misma pluma alegre que dice que usará para firmar acciones ejecutivas si no lo apoyan en sus gestiones políticas.

Usó entre sus agendas oasis de patriotismo para la galería, cuando todos saben que existe un odio mutuo entre los militares y el ejecutivo.

Habló de la ayuda a los empresarios, cuando sabemos que la ayuda es selectiva a los empresarios aliados en su capitalismo de estado, mientras llena de impuestos y regulaciones a los pequeños empresarios.

Pero hay que ver como los demócratas lo aplaudían emocionados con Biden a la cabeza con su sonrisa Colgate.

Siempre hay una subida en la aceptación pública del presidente después del discurso del Estado de la Nación, aunque después vuelve a su nivel anterior. Pero me intriga el ver cuánto será el aumento, para ver el nivel de credibilidad de los ciudadanos del país. 



Amenper: Libertad de Empresa


La libertad de Empresa y libertad de Mercado no debe de confundirse con la empresa privada.

La empresa privada es posible por la libertad de mercado, pero mientras que la libertad de mercado es la filosofía que predica la independencia y la libertad del gobierno y no comulga con los impuestos y regulaciones del gobierno y no quiere ni necesita la ayuda del gobierno, un empresario privado pudiera ser todo lo contrario.

Este es un pensamiento que tuve cuando escuchaba al presidente Obama anoche hablando de la libre empresa, algo que no creo que él entiende ni realmente apoya.

La empresa privada es basada en la propiedad de un empresario, que como ser humano puede tener virtudes o defectos.  La propiedad privada es posible por la libertad de mercado, pero el empresario puede tener o no tener las filosofías de la libertad de mercado y puede ser cualquier cosa, desde un patrón explotador, un comerciante establecido para lavar dinero de drogas, una empresa para cometer fraude, un empresario honesto o un parasito cómplice que se beneficia del amiguismo con el gobierno 

Este último tipo de capitalista es lo que se denomina Crony Capitalism o capitalismo de amigos.

. El término capitalismo de amigos se refiere a las formas del capitalismo en el que ciertos empresarios  disfrutan estrechas relaciones personales con los políticos clave. Capitalismo de amigos a menudo se asocia con la corrupción política y se considera como un obstáculo al desarrollo del país, porque usa el dinero de los contribuyentes y la posición que le brinda el gobierno amigo para competir con otros empresarios que pagan sus impuestos.

Los comentaristas económicos siempre contrastan capitalismo de amigos con los modelos neoclásicos altamente idealizados del capitalismo porque es todo lo contrario, el ideal del capitalismo fruto de la igeniosidad y el trabajo del empresario no existe en el capitalismo de amigos que vende su libertad al gobierno. 

Lo que hay que hacer no es destruir el capitalismo para implantar el socialismo, que se ha demostrado que es peor, pero dentro del capitalismo combatir los elementos corruptos dentro del sistema.

En la actualidad, sin embargo, vínculos significativos entre las elites políticas y clases de negocios pueden encontrarse en casi todos los regímenes capitalistas y socialistas, y la verdadera tarea es identificar la variedad de formas en que esos vínculos facilitan o dificultan el desarrollo económico.

Pero esto no es realmente nada nuevo, lo veíamos en Cuba donde empresarios tenían como socios durmientes a figuras del gobierno para beneficiarse del dinero de los contribuyentes en sus negocios.  Se veía como contratistas de Obras públicas conseguían contratos sin más méritos que el amiguismo. Hasta vimos “empresarios” que traían mercancía de “contrabando” con sus socios del ejercito a través del aeropuerto militar de Columbia para competir en precio con los comerciantes honestos.

Esto también existía en los Estados Unidos, pero en menor escala de lo que es actualmente.

 El Crony Capítalism, el capitalismo de amiguismo, es mayor ahora que en cualquier etapa de la historia de Estados Unidos.  Vemos como los estímulos de Obama para las empresas de sus simpatizantes han dilapidado millones de dólares en empresas como Solyndra y otros negocios que han quebrado.

Pero esto no para a esta administración, donde millonarios apoyan a un gobierno socialista.

Lenin dijo que el capitalismo vendería al socialismo la soga para que los ahorcaran.  No sucedió entonces, pero puede suceder ahora, aunque la soga no es soviética pero hecha de bambú chino.






McCain: Arizona GOP censure fires me up

By United Press International 

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., says the formal censure he received from the Arizona Republican Party “fires me up” in his thoughts about running for a sixth term.

The state party approved a resolution Saturday censuring McCain for a Senate record it called “disastrous and harmful.”

It said he had a “long and terrible record of drafting, co-sponsoring and voting for legislation best associated with liberal Democrats.”

McCain, 77, told Politico the state party’s comments were “regrettable” but not politically damaging. He pointed to poll numbers that suggest strong voter backing.

“We’ve got polling data that shows overwhelming support. I’ve won every election in Arizona by very large margins, quite often with the opposition of that element of the party,” McCain said, referring to the state’s rightward flank, which he called a “very small portion” of Arizona voters.

“If anything, it fires me up,” he said of the censure.

McCain is considering a sixth Senate term in 2016. He first ran in 1986, succeeding longtime conservative Sen. Barry Goldwater on his retirement.

The state GOP censure cited McCain for funding the Affordable Care Act, informally known as “Obamacare.”

The senior senator from Arizona, who has strongly opposed the landmark healthcare legislation, called that hit to his record “bizarre.”

“I led the fight for 25 days on the floor of the Senate,” McCain said of his opposition to the healthcare law’s December 2009 Senate passage.

On March 22, 2010, the day before President Obama signed the legislation, he told an Arizona radio station he also opposed the way the measure had been handled in Congress.

“There will be no cooperation [with Democrats] for the rest of the year,” he said. “They have poisoned the well.”

McCain last year strongly went up against a conservative-led strategy of opposing any federal government spending bill that funds the healthcare law, predicting the tactic would result in a government shutdown that would be blamed on Republicans.

The government shut down Oct. 1-16. “I know how the movie ends: We don’t defund Obamacare until we have 67 Republicans in the United States Senate,” he said Sept. 30, 2 hours before the shutdown. “We can’t win,” he told reporters in the Capitol. “Republicans will be perceived as blocking and as shutting down the government,” he said. —- A service of YellowBrix, Inc.


Ted Cruz Interview that CBS Didn’t Want you to See. By Onan Coca /

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) is no shrinking violet, and if you watched his most recent interview with Bob Schieffer you probably noticed that. Schieffer didn’t hold back any of his contempt for the Texas Republican and his laser focus on the government shutdown that the Democrat Party enacted was proof of that. Cruz continually noted that he spoke out against the government shutdown time and again, but the Democrat Party chose to shut down the government rather than negotiate with Republicans on the budget.

But CBS and Schieffer didn’t actually show you the entire length and breadth of his interview with Cruz. In fact, they left out the very best part.

SCHIEFFER: Will you run for president?

CRUZ: Well, look, my focus is on the challenges facing this country right now, it’s on the senate. My focus, for example, is on the abuse of power from the president.

Let’s take something like the IRS scandal.

SCHIEFFER: So, do I take that as a yes or no? Or still thinking about it.

CRUZ: What you can take that as is that my focus is standing and fighting right now in the senate to bring back jobs and economic growth. Economic growth is my number one priority.

Let me tell you something that deeply concerns me. It’s the abuse of power from this administration, we’ve seen multiple filmmakers prosecuted and the governments gone after them. Whether it was the poor fellow that did the film the President blamed Benghazi and the terrorist attack on. Turned out that wasn’t the reason for the attack. But the administration went and put that poor fellow in jail on unrelated charges. Or just this week it’s been broken that Dinesh D’Souza, who did a very big movie criticizing the President, is now being prosecuted by this administration.

Bob, can you imagine the reaction if the Bush administration had went and gone and prosecuted Michael Moore, Alec Baldwin and Sean Penn. It should trouble everyone that this administration uses government power, and the IRS in particular, to target their enemies.You’re talking in a few minutes to Chuck Schumer…

It’s at this point that Bob Schieffer, who had been trying to cut off Senator Cruz for a few minutes finally succeeds and ends the interview.

It’s a wonder that they cut out the most important part of the interview… or maybe it’s just par for the course. The media once again covering for the Obama administration’s many sins…






Poll Says Pessimism Defines the State of the Union


As President Barack Obama enters his sixth year in the White House, 68 percent of Americans say the country is either stagnant or worse off since he took office, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

Just 31 percent say the country is better off, and a deep pessimism continues to fuel the public’s mood. Most respondents used words like “divided,” “troubled,” and “deteriorating” to describe the current state of the nation.

On the eve of Tuesday’s State of the Union address, more than six-in-10 Americans believe that the nation is headed in the wrong direction and 70 percent are dissatisfied with the economy.






House GOP Signals It Could Sue Obama for Executive Overreach

House Republicans are mocking President Obama’s plans to circumvent Congress to achieve key policy priorities and are not ruling out suing his administration for executive overreach.

House Republican leaders spoke during a Tuesday morning news conference, just hours beforeObama delivers his sixth State of the Union address. They argued that if Obama really wants to boost economic growth and living conditions for middle-class Americans, he should work with them — not around them — on bipartisan jobs legislation. Obama’s plan to rely on executive orders to push his agenda is expected to be a major theme of Tuesday evening’s speech.

Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, declined to rule out taking legal action against the White House if House Republicans determine that an Obama executive order unconstitutionally bypasses the legislative branch. Boehner said he does believe that Obama has the power to raise the minimum wage for employees hired to fulfill new government contracts, but said House Republicans would closely monitor the plethora of executive orders the president is vowing to pursue this year. Read More:




Rep. Steve King: Congress Needs to Restrain Obama from ‘Extraconstitutional Behaviors’


Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican, chastised President Obama Tuesday for ignoring Congress on big-ticket items — for example, a new executive order to raise the minimum wage for new federal contract workers — saying lawmakers on Capitol Hill need to act to rein in the Executive Branch.

“This Congress should lay out the violations that the president’s had, and there are many,” Mr. King said on CNN’s “New Day.” “He goes through the immigration piece, No Child Left Behind, welfare-to-work, many of those components — Obamacare itself is probably the clearest one. When the president extended the employer mandate for a year, clearly it’s unconstitutional because the law says that the employer mandate shall commence each month after December of 2013.”

“We need to lay that all out — I think we should bring a resolution to the floor and say so, and restrain this president from his extraconstitutional behaviors,” Mr. King said, while noting that he has declined to use the word “impeach.”

Read more:




McCain: Ariz. GOP Reprimand ‘Fires Me Up’ to Run Again


Sen. John McCain said “extremists” were behind his censure by the Arizona Republican Party but that it just fires him up to seek reelection.

McCain ‘s accusers say he is too tight with liberal Democrats and their positions, BreitbartNews reported.  McCain said it’s all about his support for Obamacare.

“It’s regrettable, but I think it’s a case where a lot of extremists have taken over the Republican Party and one of their complaints about me was that I support Obamacare. That’s unethical to say that,” McCain told the site.

McCain said the state GOP reprimand “fires me up” as he weighs whether to run for re-election in2016 when he would be 80 years old.

“We’ve got polling data that shows overwhelming support. I’ve won every election in Arizona by very large margins, quite often with the opposition of [the right flank] of the party,” Politicoreported.

Read More:





Hillary Clinton Calls Benghazi Her ‘Biggest Regret’


Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on U.S. facilities inBenghazi, Libya, that left four Americans dead the “biggest regret” of her diplomatic career.

“My biggest regret is what happened in Benghazi,” she said during a question-and-answer session that tailed her keynote address at the National Automobile Dealers Association convention on Monday, The Washington Post reported.

Among the four Americans killed in the terrorist attack was Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. The Obama administration for days after the attack played down the label of terrorism and put forth the formal line instead that the killings arose from an impromptu gathering of militants who were angered by what was perceived as an American-created, anti-Islamic video that made the YouTube rounds.

Mrs. Clinton later made national headlines when she famously addressed a Senate query about her role in the attacks with a heated response: “With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”

Read more:




Displayed here are the words and phrases poll respondents most commonly associated with where the country is headed in 2014, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

It’s not just Obama under fire. A whopping 81 percent disapprove of Congress and twice as many Americans now hold negative views about the Republican Party as positive ones.

Democratic pollster Fred Yang, whose firm conducted this survey with Republican pollster Bill McInturff, compares these findings to the 1993 movie “Groundhog Day,” in which the protagonist finds himself living the same day over and over.

“It seems like we’ve been re-living the same basic dynamics — a public that is anxious, dissatisfied and dismayed — in a continuous loop,” he said.

Read the full poll here

But Yang adds that Obama’s upcoming State of the Union address is his administration’s “best chance to try to achieve a reset with a focus on the economy after last year’s glitches” with the health care law.

Obama’s job rating stands at 43 percent

Ahead of the president’s Tuesday speech, the NBC/WSJ poll finds 43 percent of adults approving of his job and 51 percent disapproving — virtually unchanged from a month ago.

Continue Reading on






Samitier: ¿A Quien Debemos Creer???

¿Al New York Time… el periódico que más se ha equivocado… Miren que RECORD tiene:

Dijo que Castro era un demócrata… El periódico apoyó a Mao contra Chiang Kai-shek. 

Apoyó a los Ayatolas contra el Shah… Apoyó a los Sandinistas contra Somoza.

Apoyó a Chávez…

Dice Hoy, Que Erdogan En Primer Ministro Turco… debe de volver a gobernar como un demócrata… y permitir que una organización secreta gobierne su país. Erdogan ha descubierto y eliminado una “ORGANIZACIÓN SECRETA” infiltrada en la policía y el sistema judicial, sirviendo los intereses de la CIA e Israel.


Ya Los Globalitas Han Decidido Su Futuro. Quieren unaTurquía VERDADERAMENTE Musulmana…  

Erdogan esta AVISADO…puede Jubilarse (asilarse)  Con Vida en Londres, Suiza o Dubái o terminaran como Qadaffi o Saddam.

Vamos a Ver Cuánto Tiempo Dura El Gobierno De Turquía… 

¿No se si se debe llamar ataque o asalto? De Los Banqueros Al Gobierno De Turquía

Pero los resultados, son los mismos, Poco a poco, están devastando a Turquía, que es un

miembro de la OTAN y un aliado del occidente… Todo esto, es para aplicar presión al PRIMER MINISTRO Ergogan para que renuncie y se vaya y poner un mendigoen su lugar.

Como todos los países “modernos”, los turcos renunciaron a su soberanía y crearon un banco central, que controla su moneda y lo pusieron en manos de los banqueros (de los que saben y nunca han trabajado y desde luego algunos homosexuales) y el resultado es el CAOS.  

En una reunión de emergencia de AYER a media noche, (como les Gustan las madrugadas a los politiqueros… trabajan siempre Hasta TARDE… cuando el pueblo duerme) el comité, que no tiene nombres, decidió aumentar los intereses otra vez mas en una semana, casi el triple!!!

Veremos Lo Que Dura Erdogan???



Annie Gonzalez: Who is Saul Alinsky?


Saul David Alinsky, a writer, was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of the modern community organizing movement. He is most noted for his book Rules for Radicals.

Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA

Education: University of Chicago

Spouse: Irene Alinsky

Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals


Anyone out there think that this stuff isn’t happening today in the U.S.?  


In case you hadn’t noticed, all eight rules are currently in play
  Can we turn around the eight social state agendas that have been insidiously injected into our culture.  




How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky:


There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important.


1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people


2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.


3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.


4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.


5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)


6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.


 7) Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools


8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.


Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States?


Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin’s original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule. Stalin described his converts as “Useful Idiots.”  The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control. It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the U.S. It may be too late to reverse the decline.







To those that voted for a 700 million dollars for Jackson Hospital, here is the result of the enabling actions. While probably most people  work and pay for the healthcare insurance others use the ignorance and naive voter to obtain more privileged benefits. Not only that the present Affordable Healthcare Act is more expensive proposition now and will continue to cost more and more as adjustments for subsides are made for lots of people. Many now have very large deductions and co-pays in their insurance plans. Other have lost the benefit they had, like in the case of Walgreen, Co. Target and many local small business. Some people talk about inequality . This abuse of power creates huge inequality when people in government and public institutions can have privileges that people in the private sector must paid for. 


I have to admit that in the case of Jackson Hospital and free monthly healthcare benefit came at the hand of the Miami Dade County voter. I do blame the educated and the leadership of the community like the Miami Herald that most of the time endorses all forms of taxes if it is sugar coded with “is for the children or the poor, or the elderly”. The group  does not even propose alternatives or any other form of taxation other than increase property tax. 


Yes in this South Florida we have inequality . Is Miami-Dade County government and it’s worker force vs the common citizens.


Wait for year-end and the house which is the worker’s  family homesteads  is going to be the  cash register the Miami-Dade County Commission will ring for all of the voters approved Bonds and to pay for more lavish government benefits and specially free monthly healthcare benefit to all county workers. 


Jorge Aguiar

Doral, Florida



Healthcare break approved

› The Public Health Trust postponed a decision on bonuses for Jackson workers but voted to phase out a 5 percent healthcare contribution.


   A tentative labor deal with Jackson Health System employees lost some luster Monday when the board that runs Miami-Dade’s public hospital network agreed to phase out an unpopular pay concession but held off voting on performance bonuses for workers.

   After a heated discussion in which the board vice chairman accused his colleagues and staff of keeping him in the dark about the agreement, the Public Health Trust voted 5-1 to defer voting on the proposed bonuses for up to 30 days. But trustees unanimously approved the phase-out of employees’ pay contribution toward group health insurance.

   Jackson Chief Executive Carlos Migoya refused to back down from his push for the bonuses, calling it “the right thing to do” for workers who have gone four years without a raise.

   Under the agreement, which must be approved by Miami-Dade commissioners, Jackson would reduce employees’ pay contribution toward healthcare benefits, to 2 percent from 5 percent, retroactive to Jan. 1. The remaining 2 percent would go away at the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30.

   In addition, because the hospital system ended the last fiscal year with a better-than-expected $62 million surplus, Jackson administrators had proposed awarding one-time bonuses to employees amounting to 3 percent of their base pay.

   Calling the deal secretive and irresponsible, trustee Joe Arriola came out swinging against it.

   “This was not done openly,’’ said Arriola, a former Miami city manager. “I was never informed that there was going to be this adjustment.’’

   Arriola told his colleagues on the six-member board: “We all agreed that we were going to let the county decide, and let it ride. But no, we have taken the lead and stepped on a lot of toes, coming out with a deal that the county has not approved.’’

   Arriola directed his ire mostly at the bonus or so-called “gain sharing payment,” repeatedly asserting that he was never informed of it, although the other five trustees said they knew about the proposal months ago.

   “I knew about the gain sharing going back nine months, when I first came on the board,” said Irene Lipof, a Miami Dade College teacher appointed to the board by Jackson’s labor unions.

   The Jackson bonus was proposed publicly last week and quickly became a problem for Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez, who has struggled to resolve an impasse with the county’s employee unions over the disputed healthcare contribution, which has been in place for four years and was scheduled to expire Jan. 1.

   Jackson’s two unions, which represent about 10,000 employees, were among seven labor groups at an impasse with the county, and their agreement was expected to be a model for others.

   Gimenez said last week that he was taken by surprise about the bonuses. He said he had been considering a compromise that would phase out the 5 percent contribution that county workers have been required to pay toward their healthcare costs for the last four years.

   County commissioners twice have voted to end the contributions right away; Gimenez has vetoed the measure both times, most recently last week.

   The latest veto paved the way for Monday’s decision by the Public Health Trust to approve the tentative deal with Jackson’s physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals.

   Before the Jackson deal becomes official, however, Miami-Dade commissioners must let the mayor’s veto stand.

   They are scheduled to meet on Feb. 4.

   If commissioners attempt to override the mayor’s veto and prevail, then Jackson employees — along with all Miami-Dade workers — will no longer pay the healthcare contribution, and the deal trustees approved Monday becomes moot.

   Migoya and union leaders will meet over the next 30 days to discuss the bonus before coming back with another proposal for vetting by Jackson trustees.

   In arguing against the bonuses but voting in favor of ending the pay concession, Arriola and a fellow trustee, Rep. Michael Bileca, a Miami Republican, said the so-called gain-sharing payment was too large, and that it amounted to a “double dip” for Jackson’s employees.

   Bileca said he had expected any bonus would be in lieu of employees no longer paying the healthcare contribution.

   Phasing out the first 3 percent of the healthcare contribution for employees is projected to cost Jackson about $10.8 million next year.

   The remaining 2 percent would be applied to the 2015 budget.

   Giving Jackson employees the bonus, which would amount to an additional $17 million, seemed excessive, Bileca said.

   “To me, it becomes double dipping,” he said.

   Arriola argued that he doesn’t believe Jackson administrators can close the $10.8 million budget gap on the employee healthcare contribution through operating efficiencies, such as reducing length of stay for admitted patients, and cutting overtime for workers.

   He accused colleagues and hospital staff of being poor stewards of the estimated $350 million a year the public hospital system receives in local tax funds, and added that he expects Jackson to lose money next year — making the bonuses a public relations nightmare.

   “I cannot believe this is being presented to us,” he said. “I’m very upset about it.”

   But Migoya rejected Arriola’s accusations of back-room dealing, and defended the proposed bonus as an important tool for boosting employee morale.

   “Never, ever have we made any side deals with any organizations, labor unions or anyone else,” he said.

   He added that Jackson’s employees will go four years without a pay raise this September — a concession that the unions first acquiesced to during the financial crisis that threatened to bankrupt Jackson three years ago.

   Under Migoya’s leadership, Jackson also eliminated 1,115 jobs — affecting 920 people and 195 vacant positions — in March 2012.

   Martha Baker, president of SEIU 1991, said that by contributing to their health insurance, and by conceding pay raises, flex hours and other job benefits, Jackson employees have given an estimated $100 million a year to to the hospital system since 2010.

   Those concessions, she said, helped transform Jackson after the hospital system lost more than $400 million from 2010 to 2012.

   “Labor’s really done a lot of the turnaround,” she said.

   Migoya said he had always promised Jackson’s employees that they would share in any budget surplus above $35 million for 2013.

   The one-time bonuses, he said, were based on employee performance for 2013, and not a way of compensating the workers for their healthcare contribution.

   Migoya said Jackson administrators already set aside the $17 million for bonuses — which is why they previously reported only a $45 million surplus — but that the Public Health Trust would ultimately decide how that money is spent.

   “We still believe that gain sharing is the right thing to do,” he said.




Amenper: Oír o no Oír, esta es la cuestión


En los últimos años había evolucionado como una persona con limitada audición que emocionalmente negaba su corrección. Para que entiendan bien esta políticamente correcta descripción, lo que quiero decir  es que me había vuelto un sordo comemierda que no quería ponerme un aparatico de los oídos.

Una de mis decisiones en el nuevo año fue el resignarme a tener un aparato para oír mejor.  Hoy es el primer día de mi nueva audición corregida, y he tenido buenas experiencias, estoy experimentando sonidos que no oía antes, cosas como el sonido del chorrito de orine cuando cae en el agua del inodoro, el sonido me produjo nostalgia.

Mi posición reacia contra los audífonos, era el que mi perdida de oído es hereditaria, y fui testigo de cómo mi madre y mi abuela nunca pudieron soportar esos aparatos..

Pero espero que no sea así conmigo, hoy los audífonos son más sofisticados, tienen hasta wi fi y les han dado nombres políticamente correctos y espectaculares como “prótesis auditiva” y “Correctores de audición” pero en realidad siguen siendo esencialmente aparatos para sordos lo único que le pusieron esos nombres para poder cobrar más por ellos.

Tienen hasta control remoto, aunque eso puede ser es malo porque mi mujer me puede robar el control y bajar el volumen para que no la oiga hablando por teléfono mal de mí. 

Pero tengo el control del control en el trabajo y voy a enterarme si los empleados han estado hablando mal de mí. 

Ahora cuando alguien se tire un peo, antes sólo lo tenía que oler, pero ahora lo puedo oír también, eso es una ventaja, porque cuando lo oiga, puedo alejarme y evitar el olor.

También había veces que pensaba que una persona me estaba gritando y era que estaba bostezando.

Por lo general las personas que saben que tenía dificultades para oír, me gritaban, lo cual es inútil para la mayoría de las personas que tenemos este problema. El volumen no es lo esencial, la dificultad es para discernir la enunciación del que está hablando.

Esto me ha traído algunos problemas con los angloparlantes sobre todo en Miami donde hay tantas personas que no hablan inglés.  He llegado a un lugar y me han dicho algo que no he entendido de momento por mi problema, y automáticamente creen que no hablo inglés y me dejan con la palabra en la boca para buscar alguien que hable español.

Dentro de un rato voy a estrenar el aparatico para escuchar a Obama, esto es unas de las cosas malas de esto, pero siempre tengo la alternativa de apagar el televisor o bajar el volumen del instrumento de corrección de audición para no oír las incorrecciones del discurso.

Pero ya cumplí mi resolución del Nuevo año, tengo mi corrector de audición, y también indirectamente he cumplido otra resolución del nuevo año, que era bajar de peso.

No es que haya perdido libras todavía, pero he perdido pesos, porque el condenado aparatico me ha costado unos cuantos pesos.





Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino:  Les entrego este trabajo sobre el satélite “natural “ de la tierra. Sé que muchos de nuestros amigos son aficionados a estas cosas inespicables así que se las dejo para que la analicen y lo mediten. Que lo disfruten.

La Luna: Un Fenómeno Inexplicable

¿Qué hay de extraño con nuestra la Luna? Muchas cosas. Aquí está una colección de interesantes citas de científicos, autores, investigadores, expertos de la NASA y observadores de estrellas sobre la naturaleza enigmática y a menudo inexplicable de la Luna:

Isaac Asimov, escritor estadounidense, profesor y uno de los más prolíficos escritores de todos los tiempos.

“No podemos evitar llegar a la conclusión de que la Luna por derecho no debería estar allí. El hecho de que es, uno de los golpes de suerte casi demasiado bueno para aceptar… Pequeños planetas, tales como la Tierra, con campos gravitatorios débiles, bien podrían carecer de satélites… En general, cuando un planeta tiene satélites, esos satélites son mucho más pequeños que el propio planeta.”

“Por lo tanto, incluso si la Tierra tiene un satélite, habría muchos motivos para sospechar… que a lo mejor sería un pequeño mundo, tal vez de unos 50 km de diámetro. Pero eso no es así. La Tierra no sólo tiene un satélite, sino un satélite gigante, de 3476 km de diámetro. ¿Cómo es entonces, que la pequeña Tierra tiene una? Increíble”.

“La Luna, que no tiene atmósfera y ningún campo magnético, es básicamente un fenómeno de la naturaleza”

Irwin Shapiro, del Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

“La mejor explicación posible para la Luna es el error de observación — la Luna no existe.”

“La Luna es más grande de lo que debería, al parecer más vieja de lo que debería ser y mucho más ligera en la masa de lo que debería ser. Ocupa una órbita poco probable y es tan extraordinario que todas las explicaciones existentes para su presencia están plagado de dificultades y ninguno de ellos podría considerarse remotamente hermética”.

El eclipse Solar. ¿Cuáles son las probabilidades de que la Luna podría encajar – perfectamente..?

Christopher Knight y Alan Bulter, autores de “¿Quién construyó la Luna?”

“La Luna tiene sorprendente sincronía con el Sol. Cuando el Sol está en su punto más bajo y más débil, en pleno invierno, la Luna está en su punto más alto y más brillante, y el retroceso se produce a mediados del verano. Se establecen en el mismo punto en el horizonte en los equinoccios y en el punto opuesto en los solsticios.

“¿Cuáles son las probabilidades de que la Luna naturalmente se encontraría en una órbita tan perfecta que sería capaz de tapar el Sol en un eclipse y parecer de mismo tamaño desde la Tierra? ¿Cuales son las posibilidades que las alineaciones llegaran a ser tan perfectas en los equinoccios y solsticios?”

Farouk El Baz, NASA

“Si el vapor de agua saliendo del interior de la Luna es tan serio. Significa que hay una drástica distinción entre las diferentes fases del interior lunar — aquel interior es muy diferente de lo que hemos visto en la superficie.”

Mikhail Vasin, Alexander Shcherbakov, Societ Academy of Sciences, 1970.                                                    “Es la Luna una creación de una inteligencia extraterrestre?”

La Luna artificial ‘Estrella de la muerte’ de la película de Star Wars.
¿Nuestra Luna es una especie de nave interplanetaria?

Dr. Harold Urey, Premio Nobel de química

“Estoy terriblemente perplejo por las rocas de la Luna y en particular de su contenido de titanio.”

Dr S Ross Taylor, geoquímico del análisis químico lunar,

Dijo que el problema era que los ‘mares’ llanos del tamaño de Texas tuvo que ser cubierto con roca fundida que contienen titanio líquido. Dijo que no esperaría jamás titanio siendo lo suficientemente caliente como para hacer eso, ni siquiera en la Tierra, y nunca nadie ha sugerido que la Luna estaba más caliente que la Tierra:

“¿Qué podría distribuir titanio de esta manera? Tecnología altamente avanzada desarrollado y operado por entidades que son inmensamente más tecnológicamente avanzados que los seres humanos”.

Dr. Gordon MacDonald, NASA

“parecería que la Luna es hueca más que una esfera homogénea. Él conjeturó que los datos debieran haber estado incorrectos — pero no fue así.”

Carl Sagan, cosmólogo,

“Un satélite natural no puede ser un objeto hueco”.

Dr. Sean Solomon C, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

“Los experimentos del Orbitador Lunar han mejorado enormemente el conocimiento del campo gravitatorio de la Luna e indicado la posibilidad aterradora que la Luna podría ser hueca.”

Dr. Lon Hood, Universidad de Arizona

“Sabíamos que el núcleo de la Luna era pequeño, pero no sabíamos que era tan pequeño… Esto realmente añade peso a la idea de que el origen de la Luna es única, a diferencia de cualquier otro cuerpo terrestre.”

Científicos de la NASA

La misión del Apolo 12 a la Luna en noviembre de 1969 fue para configurar los sismómetros y luego estrellar intencionalmente el módulo Lunar, causando un impacto equivalente a una tonelada de TNT. Las ondas de choque continuaron durante ocho minutos, y los científicos de la NASA dijeron que la Luna ‘sonó como una campana’.

Maurice Ewing, geofísico estadounidense y oceanógrafo

“En cuanto a su significado, preferiría no hacer una interpretación en este momento, pero es como si alguien hubiera golpeado una campana, digamos, en el campanario de la iglesia dándole un solo golpe y encontrar que la reverberación de él continua durante 30 minutos.”

Ken Johnson, supervisor del Departamento de datos y Control de las foto durante las misiones Apolo

“La Luna no sólo sonó como una campana, sino toda la Luna se tambaleó en forma tan precisa que era casi como si tuviera unos gigantescos amortiguadores hidráulicos en su interior.”

Se han encontrado que las rocas lunares contienen metales procesados, incluyendo cobre y mica, y elementos de uranio 236 y Neptunio 237 que nunca se han encontrado en forma natural.

Dr. D L Anderson, profesor de Geofísica y director del laboratorio sismológico, California Institute of Technology

“La Luna está hecha desde adentro hacia afuera y sus composiciones internas y externas deberían ser al revés”.

Dr. Robin Brett, científico de la NASA

“Parece mucho más fácil explicar la inexistencia de la Luna que su existencia”.



Al ser fusilados ellos gritaban: “VIVA CRISTO REY”

Quisiera que todas las personas que sienten deseos de ver a Cuba Libre
me ayuden a propagar esta información.
La Junta Militar de Veteranos Cubanos ha iniciado un sitio en la web
para informar y acercar a todos los interesados en la
libertad de nuestra patria. Se puede encontrar en Facebook y Google:


Por favor compártanlo con sus familiares y amistades.

Muchas Gracias, Olga Grinán



“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”


Washington DC Navy Yard rodaje vinculado a la investigación CID e intento de detención de Obama por traición


Publicado por PRENSA Core Corrupción , noticias Mundo Jueves, 19 de septiembre 2013


investigación obama

“En política , nada sucede por accidente. Si sucede, usted puede apostar que fue planeado de esa manera ” – . Franklin D. Roosevelt. Contratistas civiles estadounidenses y policías militares fueron atacados y asesinados por Obama en el tiroteo Washington DC Navy Yard. ¿Por qué? Agentes del Comando de Investigación Criminal del Ejército EE.UU. ( CID) habían descubierto un complot para detonar un dispositivo nuclear en el corazón de la capital del país como parte de una falsa bandera del gobierno de Obama. Funcionarios de NCIS (Estados Unidos Naval Criminal Investigative Service ) y la Oficina de EE.UU. de la Provost (ambos con oficinas de campo en el interior del Washington DC Navy Yard) habían amenazado con arrestar a Obama para la planificación a Siria atacaron sin la aprobación del Congreso después de una detonación nuclear de falsa bandera planeado en Washington DC . La Oficina del Provost está en el segundo piso del edificio 34 , Uno First Avenue, Charlestown Navy Yard y el NCIS se encuentra en 716 SICARD CALLE SE, Suite 2000 , Washington Navy Yard , DC.

El Servicio Naval de Estados Unidos de Investigación Criminal (NCIS ) es la agencia de la ley primaria del Departamento de la Marina de los Estados Unidos. Investiga las actividades relativas a los delitos contra o de Marina de Estados Unidos y de los Estados Unidos Cuerpo de Marines de personal, junto con la seguridad nacional , contra-inteligencia , y los casos contra el terrorismo. Una falsa bandera es el delito de traición a la patria – hacer la guerra en contra de los Estados Unidos. Si se trata de personal de los Estados Unidos o de la Marina de Estados Unidos Cuerpo de Marines en la planificación y la preparación de un evento de bandera falsa en Washington DC o en cualquier otro lugar en los Estados Unidos, NCIS y sus agentes (agentes CID asignados a NCIS están normalmente vestidos con atuendo civil adecuado ) tienen el deber de investigar y tomar las medidas para contrarrestar los actos terroristas contra los Estados Unidos.

Según informes Antes del Washington DC Navy Yard disparar el Jefe de Estado Mayor y Provost Marshals estaban planeando y preparándose para detener a Obama por traición. Para hacer la guerra en contra de los Estados Unidos después de una falsa bandera planeado en Washington DC en el aniversario del 9 /11 – una detonación nuclear.

En los Estados Unidos la Oficina del Provost tiene la autoridad para arrestar al presidente si él o ella viola los términos de su / su empleo, o comete un acto que va en detrimento de los Estados Unidos. Él / ella puede ser responsable , detenido, encarcelado , etc , dependiendo de la profundidad de la violación , por el Provost Marshal .

Si se ha determinado que el presidente de los Estados Unidos ha cometido traición de una manera inconfundible a todo, el presidente del Estado Mayor Conjunto convoca una reunión encubierta (en este caso el Washington Navy Yard DC ) para obtener el voto de la Estado Mayor Conjunto . El Provost Marshall General del Ejército y / o infantes de marina por lo general será en la asistencia. Recuerde que un oficial del ejército hace un juramento de la oficina para hacer una cosa y sólo una cosa – “……. para apoyar y defender la Constitución de los Estados Unidos contra todos los enemigos, extranjeros o nacionales . “Ellos deben determinar por encima de toda duda razonable que el enemigo interno es el presidente traidor antes de que puedan tratar de detener a él o ella.

Una vez que los jefes del Estado Mayor Conjunto han determinado más allá de una duda razonable de que el presidente ha cometido traición a un convoy de 10 a 12 oficiales de alta graduación ( 13 asesinados en el Navy Yard ) Salida del Pentágono , acompañado por un gran contingente de la Policía Militar ( Provost Marshals , agentes del NCIS ) y todo el armamento y provisiones en el recinto de la Casa Blanca, por la fuerza si es necesario, y proceder a la localización del presidente y lo puso bajo arresto necesario. Luego , el presidente de los jefes de personal comunes aconsejaría al Presidente de la Cámara , el Presidente del Senado , el Fiscal General y el Secretario de Estado de sus acciones. La respuesta de Obama a la amenaza de arresto fue un asalto contra NCIS civiles vestidos de agentes que descubrieron el falso argumento de la bandera en contra de Estados Unidos y Provost Marshals que amenazó con arrestar a Obama en el Washington DC Navy Yard.

No se deje engañar por los informes que indican que el tirador específico y mató a civiles . Los muertos eran todos miembros del Comando de Investigación Criminal del Ejército EE.UU. ( CID) . La Casa Blanca (Obama ) a propósito dejó este hecho de los informes de incidentes e informes de medios de comunicación , ya que aumentaría las campanas de alarma en Washington DC debe saber el público del Estado Mayor Conjunto de los funcionarios, Provost Marshals y agentes del NCIS ( normalmente usar ropa civil ) fueron blanco y asesinados por investigar Obama y amenaza con arrestarlo por traición.

El 28 de septiembre de 2009, el History Channel estrenó una película titulada “El día después del desastre ” . Toda la película es acerca de ser Washington DC el objetivo y víctima de una detonación nuclear. La película también cuenta con Obama hablando de detonaciones nucleares en los EE.UU. Película 0,50 sello de tiempo – ” Un terrorista , un arma nuclear podría desatar una destrucción masiva ” ~ dice Obama. El año pasado PRESS Core escribió un artículo titulado “La planificación del COG para la preparación y Washington DC detonación nuclear evento de bandera falsa . ” Después de recibir información de que 30 de Septiembre 2012 fue el día ” Día tras desastres” fue ejecutado en tiempo real. Ataque de bandera falsa de Obama prevista para 30 de septiembre 2012 se evitó después de que el público se puso en conocimiento de la falsa bandera que comienza 18 de agosto 2012 .

9/11 aniversario bandera falsa de Obama se vio frustrado cuando el Jefe de Estado Mayor y los Alguaciles Provost de la Washington DC Navy Yard enfrentan Obama y amenazaron con arrestarlo por traición por planear detonar una o más armas nucleares en el capitolio de la nación – Washington DC .

La UE Times 27 de junio 2013 – “Obama Pide 15.000 tropas rusas para” ” Disaster” Upcoming En esa historia que dice que Obama ” ha solicitado al menos 15.000 tropas rusas capacitados en atención de desastres y ” funciones de multitudes ” [ es decir, control de disturbios ] ser pre- posicionado para responder a FEMA Región III durante una no especificada ” próxima” desastre. La Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias (FEMA ) Región III incluye Delaware, Washington, DC ( formalmente el Distrito de Columbia ) , Maryland , Pennsylvania, Virginia y zonas de Virginia Occidental.


Según este informe , esta petición sin precedentes fue hecha directamente al ministro Vladimir Puchkov por EE.UU. Departamento de Seguridad Nacional ( DHS) , Janet Napolitano, director (ahora retirado ), quien dijo que estas tropas rusas trabajarían ” directa y conjuntamente ” con su Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias ( FEMA ), parte de cuya misión es asegurar la continuidad del gobierno de los EE.UU. en el caso de catástrofes naturales o guerras .


Obama trae soldados rusos a la policía de EE.UU. después de bandera falsa

Este informe ha sido verificado. Los orígenes de este informe se puede leer en la página web del Ministerio de la Federación Rusa para Asuntos de la Defensa Civil , Emergencias y Eliminación de las Consecuencias de los Desastres Naturales – o internacionalmente como EMERCOM de Rusia – ” Las Situaciones de Emergencia de Rusia y los EE.UU. Ministerio Federal de Emergencia (FEMA ) van a intercambiar expertos durante las operaciones de rescate conjuntas en grandes catástrofes . Esta es proporcionada por un protocolo de la cuarta reunión del Grupo de Trabajo Bilateral de la Comisión Presidencial de Estados Unidos y Rusia sobre Situaciones de Emergencia y decimoséptima reunión del Comité mixto de cooperación EEUU-Rusia sobre Situaciones de Emergencia , que tuvo lugar en Washington el 25 de junio ” .

“Además , las partes aprobadas de la cooperación de Rusia EE.UU. en este campo en 2013-2014 , que prevé el intercambio de experiencias incluidas en la vigilancia y la previsión de situaciones de emergencia , la capacitación de los equipos de rescate , desarrollo de minas de salvamento y prestación de seguridad en eventos masivos . ” Fuente:


Soldados rusos estadounidenses entrenando juntos.

El ex secretario del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional, Janet Napolitano ABC News 27 de agosto 2013 : ” Un masivo y ” ataque cibernético grave ” en el territorio de los EE.UU. está llegando, y un desastre natural – del tipo que la nación jamás ha visto – También es probable que en su camino ” .

La única manera de que nadie podía saber que hay ” un desastre natural – del tipo que la nación jamás ha visto – es probable también que en su camino ” es que si usted es el que la planificación y preparación.

” Usted también tendrá que prepararse para la creciente probabilidad de un mayor número de episodios meteorológicos de carácter más grave como consecuencia del cambio climático, y seguir construyendo la capacidad de responder a los desastres potenciales en las regiones remotas del país se producen en al mismo tiempo.

” Usted va a necesitar una gran botella de Advil, ” Napolitano bromeó.

Napolitano está haciendo alusión a lo que el gobierno de los Estados Unidos ( Obama) es la planificación y la preparación para el uso de su arma de modificación del tiempo de destrucción masiva llamada HAARP.

No creo que el gobierno de EE.UU. tiene la intención de detonar una bomba nuclear en Washington DC? Ellos ya han planeado para él. DHS (fuerza posse comitatus posse ilegal) / FEMA Washington DC informe escenario detonación nuclear – completo con mapas de detonación nuclear , gráficos y fatalidad estima . NCR siglas de National Capital Region.

¿Por qué si secretario del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional, Janet Napolitano, de repente renunciar a su puesto ( anunciado su renuncia 12 de julio 2013 ) y dejar Washington DC para California ? Porque mientras que ella era secretaria del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional, Janet Napolitano, prevista para y se prepara para un gran evento de Washington DC . Se levantó de esquivar antes de que el ” ataque contra el territorio de los EE.UU. está llegando ” .

La renuncia de Janet Napolitano como secretaria del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional fue efectivo … 07 de septiembre 2013 – tan sólo 4 días antes del 11/9 aniversario dispositivo nuclear detonación falsa bandera planeado. Justo antes de dejar su cargo base de la Fuerza Aérea Dyess informa, movido ojivas nucleares a la costa este de los Estados Unidos en una transferencia de un secreto que no tenía ningún rastro de papel . El Dyess de la Fuerza Aérea Comandante supuestamente autorizó partes desconocidas para transferir las ojivas nucleares a un lugar desconocido en la costa este de EE.UU. , donde las cabezas y luego serían recogidos y potencialmente utilizados. Conspiración ?

Definición legal de la conspiración – Un acuerdo entre dos o más personas para participar de forma conjunta en un acto ilegal o criminal, o un acto que es inocente en sí misma , pero se vuelve ilegal cuando es hecho por la combinación de actores.

Una conspiración es codificada como un delito penal . Una conspiración no es ficción , compuesto , crea creencia o teoría. Una conspiración es un delito grave en el que – dos o más personas participan conjuntamente en un acto ilegal o criminal. La evidencia revela que Obama, el DHS , FEMA y otras agencias de los Estados Unidos están conspirando activamente para hacer la guerra contra los Estados Unidos por medio de una bandera falsa – un acto ilegal o criminal.


Washington DC Navy Yard shooting linked to CID investigation and attempted arrest of Obama for treason


Posted by PRESS Core    Corruption, World news Thursday, September 19th, 2013


obama investigation

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” – Franklin D. Roosevelt.  U.S. civilian contractors and military police were targeted and killed by Obama in the Washington DC Navy Yard shooting.  Why?  Agents from the U.S. military’s Criminal Investigation Command (CID) had uncovered a plot to detonate a nuclear device in the heart of the nation’s capitol as part of an Obama government false flag.  Officials from NCIS (United States Naval Criminal Investigative Service) and the U.S. Office of the Provost (both with field offices inside the Washington DC Navy Yard) had threatened to arrest Obama for planning to attacked Syria without Congressional approval following a planned nuclear detonation false flag in Washington DC.  The Office of the Provost is on the second floor of Building 34, One First Avenue, Charlestown Navy Yard and NCIS is located at 716 SICARD STREET SE, SUITE 2000, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC.

The United States Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) is the primary law enforcement agency of the United States Department of the Navy. It investigates activities concerning crimes against or by United States Navy and United States Marine Corps personnel, along with national security, counter-intelligence, and counter-terrorism cases.  A false flag is the crime of treason – levying war against the United States.  If United States Navy or United States Marine Corps personnel are involved in planning for and preparing a false flag event in Washington DC or anywhere else in the United States, NCIS and its agents (CID Agents assigned to NCIS are normally dressed in appropriate civilian attire) are duty bound to investigate and take action to counter those terrorist acts against the United States.

Prior to the Washington DC Navy Yard shooting the Joint Chief of Staff and Provost Marshals were reportedly planning and preparing to arrest Obama for treason.  For levying war against the United States after a planned false flag in Washington DC on the anniversary of 9/11 – a nuclear detonation.

In the United States the Office of the Provost has the authority to arrest the President if he or she violates the terms of his/her employment, or commits an act that is detrimental to the United States. He/she can be held liable, arrested, imprisoned etc., depending on the depth of the violation, by the Provost Marshal.

If it has been determined that the president of the United States has committed treason in a manner unmistakable to all, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff convenes a covert meeting (in this case the Washington DC Navy Yard) to get a vote of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  The Provost Marshall General of the Army and/or Marines will usually be in attendance.   Remember that a military officer takes an oath of office to do one thing and one thing only – “……. to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies, foreign OR DOMESTIC.” They must determine above a reasonable doubt that the enemy domestic is the treasonous president before they can attempt to arrest him or her.

Once the Joint Chiefs of Staff have determined beyond a reasonable doubt that the president has committed treason a convoy of 10 to 12 HIGH ranking officers (13 killed at the Navy Yard) depart the Pentagon, accompanied by a large contingency of Military Police (Provost Marshals, NCIS agents) and all necessary armament and provisions to enter the grounds of the White House, by FORCE if necessary, and proceed to the location of the president and put him under arrest.   Then, The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff would advise the Speaker of The House, The President of the Senate, The Attorney General and the Secretary of State of their actions.  Obama’s response to the threat of arrest was a assault against NCIS civilian clad agents who uncovered the false flag plot against the United States and Provost Marshals who threatened to arrest Obama at the Washington DC Navy Yard.

Don’t be fooled by reports stating that the shooter targeted and killed civilians.  Those killed were all members of the U.S. military’s Criminal Investigation Command (CID).  The White House (Obama) purposely left this fact out of incident reports and news media reports as it would raise alarm bells in Washington DC should the public know Joint Chiefs of Staff members, Provost Marshals and NCIS agents (normally wear civilian attire) were targeted and killed for investigating Obama and threatening to arrest him for treason.

On September 28,  2009 the History Channel released a movie titled “Day After Disaster“.  The entire movie is about Washington DC being the target and victim of a nuclear detonation.   The movie also features Obama talking about nuclear detonations in the U.S. Movie 0.50 time stamp – “One terrorist, one nuclear weapon could unleash massive destruction” ~ Obama says.  Last year PRESS Core wrote an article titled “COG planning for and preparing Washington DC nuclear detonation false flag event.” after receiving information that September 30, 2012 was the day “Day after Disaster” was to executed in real-time.  Obama’s planned false flag attack for September 30, 2012 was averted after the public was made aware of the false flag beginning August 18th, 2012.

Obama’s 9/11 anniversary false flag was thwarted when the Joint Chief of Staff and the Provost Marshals from the Washington DC Navy Yard confronted Obama and threatened to arrest him for treason for planning to detonate one or more nukes in the nation’s capitol – Washington DC.

The EU Times reported June 27, 2013 – “Obama Requests 15,000 Russian Troops For “Upcoming” Disaster“  In that story it claims Obama “has requested at least 15,000 Russian troops trained in disaster relief and “crowd functions” [i.e. riot control] be pre-positioned to respond to FEMA Region III during an unspecified “upcoming” disaster.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region III  includes Delaware,Washington, D.C (formally the District of Columbia) , Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia areas.


According to this report, this unprecedented request was made directly to Minister Vladimir Puchkov by US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Director Janet Napolitano (now retired) who said these Russian troops would work “directly and jointly” with her Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), part of whose mission is to secure the continuity of the US government in the event of natural disasters or war.


Obama brings in Russian soldiers to police U.S. after false flag

This report has been verified.  The origins of this report can be read on the website of Ministry of the Russian Federation for Affairs for Civil Defence, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters – or internationally as EMERCOM of Russia –  “The Russian Emergency Situations Ministry and the USA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) are going to exchange experts during joint rescue operations in major disasters. This is provided by a protocol of the fourth meeting of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission Working Group on Emergency Situations and seventeenth meeting of Joint U.S.-Russia Cooperation Committee on Emergency Situations, which took place in Washington on 25 June.”

“In addition, the parties approved of U.S. Russian cooperation in this field in 2013-2014, which envisages exchange of experience including in monitoring and forecasting emergency situations, training of rescuers, development of mine-rescuing and provision of security at mass events.“  Source:


U.S. Russian soldiers training together.

Former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano ABC News Aug 27, 2013:  “A massive and “serious” cyber attack on the U.S. homeland is coming, and a natural disaster — the likes of which the nation has never seen — is also likely on its way.“

The only way anyone could know that there is “a natural disaster — the likes of which the nation has never seen — is also likely on its way” is if you are the one planning and preparing it.

“You also will have to prepare for the increasing likelihood of more weather-related events of a more severe nature as a result of climate change, and continue to build the capacity to respond to potential disasters in far-flung regions of the country occurring at the same time.

“You will need a large bottle of Advil,” Napolitano joked.

Napolitano is hinting at what the United States government (Obama) is planning and preparing for using its weather modifying weapon of mass destruction called HAARP.

Don’t think the U.S. government is planning to detonate a nuke in Washington DC?  They’ve already planned for it.  DHS (illegal posse posse comitatus force) / FEMA Washington DC nuclear detonation scenario report –  complete with nuclear detonation maps, charts and fatality estimates.  NCR stands for National Capital Region.

Why else would Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano suddenly resign her post (announced her resignation July 12, 2013) and leave Washington DC for California?  Because while she was Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano planned for and prepared for a major Washington DC event.  She got out of dodge before the “attack on the U.S. homeland is coming“.

Janet Napolitano’s resignation as Department of Homeland Security Secretary was effective … September 7, 2013 – just 4 days before the planned 9/11 anniversary nuclear device detonation false flag.  Just before leaving her post Dyess Air Force base reportedly moved nuclear warheads to the East Coast of the United States in a secret transfer that had no paper trail.  The Dyess Air Force Commander allegedly authorized unknown parties to transfer nuclear warheads to an unknown location on the U.S. East Coast, where the warheads would then be picked up and potentially utilized.  Conspiracy?

Legal definition for conspiracy – An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself but becomes unlawful when done by the combination of actors.

A conspiracy is codified as a criminal offense.  A conspiracy is not fiction, made up, make belief or theory.  A conspiracy is an indictable offense wherein – two or more persons engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act.  The evidence reveals that Obama, the DHS, FEMA and other agencies  of the United States are actively conspiring to levy war against the United States through a false flag – an unlawful or criminal act.



Georgina Lopez: Asi son las cosas… hasta para Einstein.



Luego de graduado, a Einstein le costó cierto tiempo conseguir un empleo, situación que preocupaba al flamante científico. Su padre, percibiendo sin duda su estado de ánimo (Einstein se encontraba entonces con su familia en Milán), sé atrevió a escribir (el 13 de abril de 1901) una carta a Ostwald, un reconocido profesor académico. Estas fueron sus palabras….

Estimado Herr Professor:

Por favor perdone a un padre que es tan atrevido como para dirigirse a usted, estimado Herr Professor, en el interés de su hijo.

Comenzaré por decirle que mi hijo Albert tiene 22 años, que estudió en el Politécnico de Zúrich durante cuatro años, y que pasó sus exámenes para el diploma en matemáticas y física con magníficas notas el verano pasado. Desde entonces ha estado intentando, sin éxito, obtener un puesto de asistente, que le permitiera continuar su educación en física teórica y experimental. Todos aquellos en situación de dar su opinión al respecto elogian sus talentos; en cualquier caso, puedo asegurarle que es extraordinariamente estudioso y diligente y se apega con gran amor a su ciencia.

Mi hijo se halla, por consiguiente, profundamente infeliz con su actual falta de un puesto, y su idea de que ahora se encuentra fuera de órbita hace que se sienta cada día más arrinconado. Además, se siente oprimido por el pensamiento de que es una carga para nosotros, gente de medios modestos.

Como es a usted, altamente respetado Herr Professor, a quien mi hijo parece admirar y respetar más que a cualquier otro investigador de los activos actualmente en la física, es a usted a quien me tomo la libertad de recurrir con la humilde petición de que lea su artículo publicado en el Annalen Physik y que le escriba, si es posible, unas pocas palabras de ánimo, de forma que pueda recobrar su alegría de vivir y trabajar.

Si, además, pudiese procurarle un puesto de assistent para ahora o para el próximo otoño, mi gratitud no conocería límites.

Le pido una vez más que perdone mi imprudencia al escribirle, y también me tomo la libertad de mencionar que mi hijo no sabe nada acerca de este inusual paso.

Por lo que se sabe hasta hoy, la respuesta que obtuvo Hermann Einstein de Ostwald fue la misma que tuvo su hijo: ninguna.

En esta situación, algunos de sus amigos intentaron ayudarle.Michele Angelo Besso (1873-1898), un ingeniero suizo a quien Einstein había conocido en una velada musical celebrada en Zúrich en 1896, y la única persona a quien Einstein agradeció su colaboración en su artículo de la relatividad especial (que no contiene ninguna referencia a otros trabajos), buscó la ayuda de un tío suyo, profesor en Italia.

El 15 de abril de 1901. Einstein tenía buenas noticias que contar a su novia Maric. Por un lado, que el profesor Jakob Rebstein, del Politécnico de Winterthur, le había escrito preguntándole si quería sustituirlo del 15 de mayo al 15 de julio, fechas en las que tenía que cumplir con su servicio militar. «Puedes imaginarte con qué gusto hago esto! Tengo que dar unas 30 horas semanales, entre ellas incluso geometría descriptiva, pero el valiente suabo no se asusta». escribía a Mileva.

Por otra parte, acababa de recibir una carta de su amigo y compañero de estudios Marcel Grossmann (1878-1936), con quien en 1912-1913, siendo ambos profesores en la ETH, aprendió y desarrolló el aparato matemático (la geometríariemanniana) necesario para la relatividad general, en la que éste le comunicaba que probablemente recibiría pronto, con la ayuda del padre de Marcel, un puesto estable en la Oficina de Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual de Berna.


La libertad nunca es gratis

Para contribuciones u opiniones:

No 579 “En mi opinion” Enero 27, 2014

enero 28, 2014

No 579 “En mi opinión” Enero 27, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


“Si tu no peleas por tus derechos… El gobierno pensara que eres un miedoso y te tratara como tal”






Amenper: Joe Wilson Extrañaremos tu Verdad esta Noche

La vida no es fácil ni justa, esto lo sabe todo el que la está viviendo todavía.  Pero la otra alternativa no creo que la quiera nadie, todo el mundo quiere seguir viviendo.

Alguien que debe de tener hoy una sensación de la injusticia de la vida es Joe Wilson.

En el discurso del Estado de la Unión, igual que el que dirá Obama esta noche, el 9 de Septiembre del año 2009,  el presidente habló de la cobertura de salud bajo el entonces incipiente Obamacare y sus maravillas, a la vez que acusaba de que los ataques de los que se oponían eran falsedades.  O sea que estaba diciendo mentirosos a los que estaban en lugar que se oponían a la ley. En este punto, el representante republicano de Carolina del sur Joe Wilson gritó “¡Usted miente!”, interrumpiendo brevemente el discurso.

En los próximos días  Wilson fue la persona más vilipendiada de la nación, quizás del mundo. Tanto Demócratas como Republicanos incluyendo a John McCain lo censuraron violentamente por haber faltado el respeto a la oficina de la presidencia.  Wilson después emitió un comunicado disculpándose por su exabrupto diciendo que se había dejado llevar por sus emociones. El 15 de septiembre, el Congreso aprobó una “resolución de desaprobación” contra Wilson, en una votación partidista 240-179

Pero la vida no es justa, aunque ser víctima de la injusticia es triste.  Es triste el ser condenado por todos por decir una verdad evidente que después se ha comprobado hasta la saciedad.

Pero hay un consuelo, la aprobación que vale es la del pueblo, y Wilson fue re-electo en el 2010 por un margen confortable de un 9% y después fue re-electo sin oposición en el 2012 con el 96% de los votos.

Wilson tuvo la aprobación de lo que importa que es su pueblo. 

Pero el precedente hará que nadie le diga a Obama que nos está mintiendo otra vez esta noche, todo tendrán miedo que lo censuren hasta los de su propio partido, y Obama seguirá mintiéndonos. ¿Hasta cuándo?





By: George Will
1/27/2014 11:51 AM




As undignified as it is unedifying and unnecessary, the vulgar State of the Union circus is again at our throats. The document that the Constitutional Convention sent forth from Philadelphia for ratification in 1787 was just 4,543 words long, but this was 17 too many. America would be a sweeter place if the Framers had not included this laconic provision pertaining to the president: “He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union.”

“Information”? Not exactly.

The Constitution’s mild requirement has become a tiresome exercise in political exhibitionism, the most execrable ceremony in the nation’s civic liturgy, regardless of which party’s president is abusing it. You worship bipartisanship? There is not a dime’s worth of difference between the ways the parties try to milk partisan advantage from this made-for-television political pep rally.

Tuesday evening, Barack Obama probably will concentrate on inequality as a way of changing the subject from his inconvenient triumph, the Affordable Care Act. So he probably will again propose partial public financing of Democratic candidates’ campaigns, by again calling for “high-quality” universal preschool. This adjectival phrase is code for: Now we will do better because we will employ more certified — and unionized — teachers.

Studies of it strongly indicate that the cognitive and other effects of early preschool are slight and evanescent — gone by the third grade. The few studies of other state programs that indicate better results have possible methodological problems explained by George Mason University social scientists David J. Armor and Sonia Sousa in “The Dubious Promise of Universal Preschool” in National Affairs quarterly.

Even “high-quality” universal preschool would not measurably reduce inequality. It would, however, efficiently convey funds from the federal treasury to a new cohort of unionized teachers, then through union dues to Democratic candidates.

The president will probably again propose combating inequality with a 23rd increase (since 1938) of the minimum wage. This would have no measurable effect on inequality because few heads of household earn the minimum wage and most such earners are part-time workers from households with an average annual income of $53,000. Twenty percent are from households making $75,000 or more.

Obama probably also will urge measures to increase college enrollments. For several decades, both parties simply knew that not enough people owned homes. So federal policy — mortgage subsidies, lower lending standards — encouraged more homeownership than market rationality would have produced. One exciting result was the Great Recession. Now the federal government, which simply knows that not enough people are getting college degrees, has fueled a bubble in higher education by funneling billions in subsidies for student tuition aid. To the surprise of no one, except the government, schools have responded by raising their prices — they are up 23 percentsince Obama’s first election — to capture the subsidies.

The Center for College Affordability and Productivity (“Why Are Recent College Graduates Underemployed? University Enrollments and Labor-Market Realities”) reports that about 48 percent of those college graduates who are employed are occupying jobs that the Bureau of Labor Statistics suggests require less than a four-year college education. Thirty-seven percent are in jobs that require no more than a high-school diploma, and about 5 million are in jobs that require less than a high-school education. About 14 percent of waiters and waitresses, 16.5 percent of bartenders, 18 percent of telemarketers, 14.5 percent of counter and sales clerks and 24.6 percent of other retail salespeople have college degrees.

These details probably will not be information that Obama gives to Congress on Tuesday evening, when legislators from the president’s party will bray approval of his bromides and stillborn panaceas, legislators from the other party will be histrionically torpid or sullen and some moral exemplars in the House gallery will be applauded.

In 2010, Chief Justice John Roberts said: “The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the court — according to the requirements of protocol — has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling.”

Justice Antonin Scalia no longer attends what he calls “cheerleading sessions.” Justice Clarence Thomas, who says “there’s a lot that you don’t hear on TV — the catcalls, the whooping and hollering and under-the-breath comments,” will not be there Tuesday night. Will Roberts attend? No justices or senior military officers should stoop to being props at these puerile spectacles.





The Western Center For Journalism


John Boehner Will Unveil A Proposal To Grant Amnesty To 11-12 Million Illegal Aliens When Republicans Emerge From A Closed-Door Meeting This Weekend.

       You’ve already heard the news, but what you probably haven’t heard is that opposition to Boehner’s Amnesty scheme within the Republican caucus is starting to mount rapidly and grassroots pressure from patriotic American, like you, can stop this Boehner Amnesty scheme dead in its tracks

And To Add Insult To Injury…

       Barack Obama has already jumped on Mr. Boehner’s capitulation to his radical Amnesty agenda. 

       Within days of word getting out that Boehner was on board with Amnesty, Barack Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson suddenly upped the ante and proclaimed that the approximately 11 million people who are in the country illegally have “earned the right to be citizens.” 

       You read that right, if you want to earn the “right” to be a citizen of the United States, all you have to do is violate our laws. 

       And the very second, Boehner announced his willingness to capitulate, Team Obama started working on the next capitulation. 

       But we shouldn’t be shocked. Barack Obama has been using his pen and his phone to violate the laws that he is sworn to enforce for years. 

       Case in point, Breitbart reports that a Syracuse University study indicates that deportation cases that are being closed due to“prosecutorial discretion” is up by over 70 percent. 

       In plain English, that means that the Obama Regime is choosing NOTto prosecute greater and greater numbers of illegal aliens for no apparent reason. 

       Considering Mr. Obama’s lawlessness when it comes to enforcing our nation’s immigration laws, Boehner’s Amnesty capitulation is a spit-in-the-face to patriotic Americans and it’s time to let our elected officials know exactly how you feel.

Betrayal Was Always The Name Of The Game.

       But if you’re thinking that Mr. Boehner is simply capitulating to Barack Obama… think again. In spite of his statements to the contrary, an Amnesty betrayal was always in the works. 

       According to TheBlaze, Republican leaders in the House “have all been working with Boehner behind closed doors on the principles since last year…” 

       And Erick Erickson with RedState even went so far as to say that Boehner was simply keeping his powder dry to ward off potential primary challengers from running against Republican incumbents: 

       “The threat of primary challenges well passed, they’ll get their amnesty deal done. … Republicans are so convinced you will turn out and vote for them in 2014 to spite Obama, they are perfectly happy to screw you over in this fight knowing how cheap a date the conservative movement has become.” 

       At the same time, Breitbart reported: “A new report from the Texas-based Quorum Report, published by longtime Texas journalist Harvey Kronberg, says that House Speaker John Boehner plans to push amnesty legislation through the House, after the primary filing deadline for candidates. The move would prevent Tea Party from challenging GOP lawmakers who support amnesty in 2014.” 

       But if you’re feeling discouraged… don’t let the scheming betrayals get you down. If Erickson and others are right – and we believe that these assessments are is correct – keep in mind that Boehner and Republican leaders only kept their powder dry because they fear your wrath

       And make no mistake, at this very moment, Republican leaders are only moving forward because they’re UNDER THE FALSE IMPRESSION THAT PATRIOTIC AMERICANS LIKE YOU YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS GOING ON

       That’s why we must disabuse them of their delusional notions, right here and right now. They may believe that the fix is in, but the righteous outrage of patriotic Americans will thwart their plans to grant Amnesty to 11-12 million illegal aliens.


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.



Floyd Brown




Amenper: La Desigualdad Social

Ahora está de moda del problema de la igualdad, Obama no sólo habla de eso,  y esto es algo que para mí toda mi vida ha sido algo que me ha molestado y me ha preocupado.

Mi molestia con la percepción de la desigualdad socio-económica surge desde Cuba.  Mi posición económica en Cuba, en la economía paralela de Estados Unidos hubiera sido considerada como clase media baja, más cuando mi posición económica dependía de mi padre que era el dueño del negocio donde yo trabajaba. Pero como vivía en un pueblo relativamente pequeño, muchos consideraban mi posición como de un estrato económico superior, muchos me acusaban del delito de ser “rico”, un ente despreciable de la desigualdad social…

La desigualdad como la he visto en mi vida se reduce no tanto a la posición económica como a los sentimientos.

La meta principal no es que los pobres vivan mejor pero que se sientan mejor porque los ricos van a bajar a su nivel, castigar al rico.

El problema en la Cuba que era bastante rica y más en los Estados Unidos donde los pobres viven mejor que los ricos de otros países no es realmente un problema de desigualdad económica como de desigualdad social.

Preocuparse por esta igualdad social se encuentra en la raíz de nuestra preocupación falsa de igualdad económica.  Porque todos sabemos que la igualdad económica es imposible de alcanzar, sin embargo la igualdad social si pudiera ser controlada si se pudiera controlar la envidia..

El igualitarismo social es más preocupante que las diferencias en cuánto gana la gente.

Eso siempre me ha parecido una combinación de envidia con complejo de inferioridad.

Fue el igualitarismo social lo que generó la envidia clasista que fue el motor generador que utilizó Fidel Castro para implantar el comunismo.

El problema con la nueva guerra de los demócratas en la desigualdad (“el desafío definitorio de nuestra época,” como dice el Presidente Obama) es que hay dos clases de creciente desigualdad — y los demócratas están atacando a la desigualdad equivocada.

Mañana vamos a oír a Obama hablar de la igualdad en el Estado de la Unión.

Los Demócratas no proponen nada que se acerque a revertir la  esta tendencia de la desigualdad económica que es algo que existe y existirá en todas las sociedades, sin embargo están aumentando progresivamente la desigualdad social..

Aumentar el salario mínimo sólo afecta a una franja del mercado laboral. Simplemente afecta a la clase gastronómicas o trabajadores de escala baja de las factorías. Los trabajadores de otros estratos laborales ganan más que el salario mínimo que se está proponiendo.

Pero lo que logrará conjuntamente con el Obamacare es el aumento del desempleo. Lo mismo ocurre para la ampliación de compensación por desempleo que lo que logrará la dependencia de la compensación y aumento del desempleo.

 Incluso los aumentos de impuestos de. Obama tienen un bache. Sobre el papel acortará los ingresos de los estadounidenses muy ricos en un 6% — pero los ricos encuentran formas de evitarlos. Es la clase media con la supresión de la rebaja de Bush la que sufrirá las consecuencias.  Y hay que recordar que los pequeños negocios son los que producen empleos, los muy ricos por lo regular no producen tantos empleos.

Un plan mejor es preguntar por qué nos preocupamos por la desigualdad económica es preguntarse todos modos. ¿Si los pobres y la clase media fueron haciendo progresivamente más ricos, importaría que los ricos se están haciendo más ricos mucho más rápido?

Por ejemplo, podemos, honrar la virtud universal del trabajo por lo que el requisito previo para beneficios gubernamentales siempre que sea posible. Hay una razón cheques del Seguro Social son respetables y políticamente intocables — a diferencia de cupones para alimentos, que sólo van a los estadounidenses que no trabajan o que no se han superado en su trabajo.

El problema no es que haya pobreza porque realmente no hay pobreza extrema como en otros países en loe Estados Unidos, pero lo que quieren es que todos seamos iguales socialmente ante los ojos de los demás. En esa preocupación por la igualdad social se encuentra  la raíz de nuestra preocupación de la igualdad económica.

La igualdad social — “igualdad de respeto,” — es más difícil de medir que la desigualdad dinero. Pero la buena noticia es que si la igualdad social es lo que somos, después de que puede haber formas de lograrlo que no implique una cruzada para revertir la marea de la desigualdad económica Ronald Reagan dijo que en los Estados Unidos (de su época) se había logrado  una igualdad social sin tener en consideración el contraste económico.  La aristocracia económica en los Estados Unidos se mezclaba con el ciudadano común  esto ha sido algo América históricamente bueno, al menos hasta hace poco.


Los igualitaristas sociales siempre serán tentados o intimidados a abandonar su verdadera meta para un tipo concreto, economicista de la igualdad-.

Los demócratas ya han sacrificado su mayor victoria legislativa que es el fracasado Obamacare, persiguiendo la democracia superficial de lo que es, después de todo, sólo dinero. En resumen que la desigualdad del dinero siempre existirá, decir lo contrario es aumentar esa desigualdad que tanto me ha molestado siempre que es la percepción de la desigualdad social, que es la que crea la lucha de clases, el motor generador del Comunismo.

Pero al final quizás de eso se trata todo este asunto.






Miami-Dade County in a property tax increase spiral . Every property owner and yes renter will feel the tax burden come when next year budget is crafted. Small business and others will also feel the property tax pain. 

I will enumerate the issues and you decide . My writing is accurate and the reader can easily verify it using written articles of the past by local new media and or Miami-Dade County Commission meetings.

1. Miami-Dade County voter approved recently a very large bond package for Miami-Dade County Public Schools in the billions of dollars. This will translate into higher taxes against all properties. The bonds need to be retied at maturity and interest also needs to be paid. Money must start to be accumulated to retire the debt. 

2. Miami-Dade County voter approved a 700 million dollars bond for the Jackson Hospital. The bond issue is to be paid by a property tax increase . In order to retire the debt approved by the voters additional property tax must start being collected. 

3. Miami-Dade County Commission has been trying since 2013 to provide the county employee work force with free healthcare. That is, all county employees will not pay a monthly fee/deduction for their healthcare benefits. The cost of this benefit if approved I have read comes at a cost of 54 million dollars. 

4. Maimi-Dade County is also negotiating new union contracts that will exacerbate the property tax base with another possibly property tax increase. While property value has gone up and will create an automatic tax increase to all properties the generated property value increase will probably will not be enough to offset the size of the salary/benefits increase to all county employees.  Why one may ask. The cost of many services provided by the County goes up as well every year due to inflation and new cost of labor. Not to mention new services or programs approved by the Miami-Dade County Commission.

5. There is another property tax increase floating that has not gone into effect to my understanding. That is the “cats and dog” animal life protection . I will mention again that this new property tax increase was also approved by the Miami-Dade County voter.

Also other items that will add to exacerbate all of the above property tax issues.

The Affordable Care Acts begins taking it effects this year. Many have not seen an increase for their healthcare benefits. But some will. People working for Walgreen, Targets and others small businesses are dropping their traditional paid healthcare benefits. UPS is dropping spouses  from the their traditional healthcare plans. Also many people will have to deal with very large deductibles before their visit to the doctor is covered. Not to mention high co-payment for specialist . This include the traditional medicare where deductibles for hospitals and doctor visits when up as well. 

Property taxes will  automatically  increased due to the increase in property value through its normal process. This property tax increase appear to be substantial  as property have rebounded strongly in South Florida.

Interest rate for mortgages have gone up already by 0.50 basis points since its’ low. Prepare yourself if you are planning to buy a house as it will cost plenty more.

There is another very large item on the table when it comes to additional property cost for some. There is a new flood insure cost that has yet to be implemented although is already law. The increase as I know it is of the largest ever. So large that if implemented it will cause many in flood areas to sell their houses. Property value with flood insurance are already reflecting the decrease in value in many areas in Florida.

There are lots of new federal taxes also unraveling as well. Such as a new 3.8% for some people in a higher income bracket OR WHEN SELLING A HOME provided is over $250,000.00 in profits. There are many other new taxes but to lengthy and complicated  to mention in this email.

Consequence and my educated opinion that should be yours as well if you are well informed.

When dramatic new property taxes are levied and other rapid new and additional living cost happen disposable income decreases and therefore Miami-Dade County businesses will feel the reduction in their revenue. Such as less dinning out, gym subscriptions, newspaper subscriptions, smart cell phones etc. Properties will also pay a price as new taxes increases and fees, insurance and a mortgage rate increase will affect real estate in South Florida in a negative way. For now very thing looks fine. But comes year end and the tax/fee noose beings to tighten let see how all of the issues are work out. 





Liberals in the Room 

The US Military Does Have the Legal and Lawful Jurisdiction to Arrest Obama.  by Dylan

It is obviously clear. President Obama is a threat not only to the American people. He is destabilizing the United States every way he can. He did this paying for Treyvon protest trying to start race wars as one example. He is a threat to world peace. He has to be neutralized before he takes the world into an age of war and destruction. Now how can that be done? Congress can pass all the impeachment bills. The US Senate will not by two thirds vote him guilty removing him from office. Politically there is very little that can be done to interpose between Obama and him destroying the world.

So who will step in and take action to avert a disaster from  happening?  The usurper in the White House is the most lawless President in history that makes Nixon and Clintonlook like choir boys in comparison. President Obama does not respect the Constitution and international law. He is waging war against the American people economically and shredding our Bill of Rights daily.

He is waging war against Christianity on the domestic front attacking religious freedom by forcing people of conscience to pay for Obamacare the pays for abortions. He is attacking Christians in the military daring to say the name of Jesus forcing chaplains to marry homosexuals against the moral conviction of the clergy. At the same time erecting Pagan places of worship on military installations. For this matter I call on the Patriots to relieve officers of duty and command who attack the religious freedom of the men and women in uniform. I do not care if the commander is a Buddhist and gay. He must respect and defend all faiths and conscience. If he is willing to follow an unlawful, immoral order without question that will weaken the fighting strength. Then the commanders and officers who carry these immoral orders need to be relieved of command.

President Obama is waging war on Christians in Syria, Egypt and now in Kenya. He is waging war against Christians world wide. He is a threat to the faith. He is arming the enemies of Christianity who are murdering unarmed woman and children. His actions are bringing instability to the world. He does not regard public opinion at all when it comes to gun control when the people are buying guns in record numbers and the citizens reluctance to go to war with Iran and Syria. Obama is a dangerous loose cannon that must be stopped.

First, Obama may be a natural born US Citizen because he was born in Hawaii. But he renounced his US citizenship becoming an Indonesian citizen taking on the name Barry Soetoro. His records are sealed where we do not know his immigration and naturalization records documenting repatriation or if he is a US citizen. Therefore he might be ineligible to hold office. Obama by his actions says he is an agent of a foreign power working against the United States. He is a domestic enemy of the United States.

He is arming Al Qaeda. The same terrorist that killed and maimed soldiers and Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan. Obama’s half brother is being funded by the CIA to fund the Muslim brotherhood. Obama’s cousin Odinga is destabilizing Kenya. Odinga was given advice from Obama when he was a US Senator on how to cause havoc and destabilize Kenya for political gain.

Now with this massacre in Nairobi Kenya killing Christians in a Shopping mall. Now there are calls for the TSA to be in Shopping Malls that are another gun free zone. It would not surprise me if there are shootings in the malls in the states to further a police state here. Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri was calling for small scale attacks on US soil. Al Zawahri is a CIA backed operative who was behind the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. Obama is the head of the Muslim Brotherhood and backs AL Qaeda therefore must be taken down and brought to justice.

Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution written in Article 3 section 3 saying:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

President Obama is commiting treason daily against the Americans people waging war every way possible to weaken our republic. He is involved in insurrection and rebellion against the laws of the Union.

Under Article 6 section 3 of the US Constitution all branches in government are bound to the oath as outlined

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution.

If we took the oath. We are all duty bound to uphold that oath against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Those who are commissioned Officers in the Armed forces take the oath below:

Commissioned officers taken this oath:

I, _____, having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.”

(DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

Enlisted personal and Non Commissioned Officers take this oath:

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution ofthe United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the UnitedStates and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

(Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

That oath does not say to defend unconstitutional laws and illegal orders. It does not say defend a political agenda or corrupt politicians. It does not say defend the dictator. If the laws contradict the USMJ and the Constitution of these United States. The people in the Armed forces are duty bound not to carry out the order.

We are very unique because our oaths are not to a person. But to the US Constitution. The people who written the Constitution and requiring an oath of affirmation to support and defend the Constitution. Not a monarchy. They knew the British Redcoats were bound to the will of the King. Not to any morals. They had to follow the decrees of the King without question.   We do not serve a monarchy. We never swore to a dictator. We serve the cause of freedom defending and preserving our Constitution. Our oath to preserve, protect and defend out Constitution is a vital check and balance against tyranny and despotism. The UCMJ requires us to follow lawful orders and not illegal edicts that goes against the law of the land

President Obama through insurrection is working hard to overthrow the government ofthe United States. Obama is trying to find an excuse to declare a national emergency to place the USA under Martial law. He can announce the President is  suspending the Constitution so continuity of government declaring the President Dictator under PD-51 President Bush singed. This makes the President a Dictator under any national emergency the chief executive decides what is and what isn’t . Congress has no say to review. This is a classified document congress is not allowed to read.

Right now in Benjamin Fulford newsletter he says with much skepticism from a source inside the Pentagon. General Staff officers are making a list of 30,000 people who are New World Order thugs including the President. All to be arrested for treason and insurrection attempting to overthrow the Constitutional government. 

It has been rumored the Provost Marshal was going to arrest Obama for attempting to detonate a nuclear device in Washington DC on the 12th Anniversary of Sept 11th. The shooting in the Navy yard could be a smoke screen of the attempted arrest of Obama for treason. I can tell the Military is getting ready to act to defend this nation. When Secretary of State John Kerry signed the UN Small Arms Trade Treaty. That was an act of treason trying to repeal the Second Amendment by underhanded means using treaty law.

I do not see much of the Military going out to confiscate guns. It is not 2005 in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. It is a different world.

The Military is very awake now to the President’s treasonous ways. It is my hope the Military stands down instead  of carrying out illegal orders where Obama is crowned King Nothing.




Unaired Segment CBS Slashed: Ted Cruz’ Warning to the American People About Obama  Kyle Becker


Not only did Face the Nation‘s Bob Schieffer rudely interrupt Senator Ted Cruz, but CBS cut a major part of the interview from airing on Sunday – one that ‘just happened’ to be critical of President Obama ahead of his State of the Union address on Tuesday night.

Senator Cruz discussed the IRS’ targeting of the Obama administration’s political enemies, which NY Senator Chuck Schumer recently advocated while imploring the IRS to double down on its efforts.

This is no less than a call for legalized political suppression; the Democrats would leave radical groups like Organizing for America, the Open Society Institute, Tides Foundation, the Center for American Progress, and Media Matters unscathed while cracking down on their opposition.

Furthermore, anti-Obama filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza was indicted for what appears to be funnelling $20,000 to a friend for a political campaign. This would be illegal activity, but the $500,000 bond for the act appears to be highly disproportional to the gravity of the infraction, which raises questions of political motivation.

Senator Ted Cruz is right for alerting Americans that the Obama administration cannot be trusted with powerful agencies like the conservative-targeting IRS, the highly politicized Department of Justice, and the illegally snooping NSA.

But when confronted with a Senator who is informing the public, CBS News believes it best that we all remain ignorant and ready to gush over yet another “uplifting” Obama speech, one filled with false promises and empty platitudes, that we’ve all seen numerous times before.









The Black Sphere alert: “Center for individual Freedon”                   Barack Obama Is Demanding His Trillion Dollar ObamaCare Bailout for Private Insurance Companies And GOP Consent To Raise The Debt Ceiling… And Obama Is Demanding That GOP Leaders Comply With His Demands By February 7… In A Matter Of Days.  
       But Barack Obama’s arrogance is rivaled only by GOP spinelessness. Politico reported the following last week: “Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said Republicans are CONSIDERING getting rid of ‘insurance company bailouts’ WHEN they lift the nation’s borrowing cap.”[Emphasis Ours] 
       “CONSIDERING” it? … “WHEN” they lift the cap? … 
       With all due respect, GOP leaders should ALREADY HAVE TOLD the Obama Administration, in no uncertain terms, that WHEN he agrees to repeal his trillion dollar ObamaCare bailout, THEN – AND ONLY THEN WOULD THEY CONSIDER whether or not they’re even inclined to move to other issues, especially the debt cap
       That’s what real leaders would say… that’s what the American people want…that’s the message we’re sending right now and we need you to stand with us to drive that message home

Wait A Minute, Didn’t We Just Give Barack Obama A Debt Ceiling Increase?
       If you’re thinking that it feels like it was just yesterday when Republican leaders capitulated on the debt ceiling, you’re not too far off the mark. The last blank check they gave Obama in October was supposed to last, at least, until the end of March. 

       But, that was then, and this is now… Obama Treasury Secretary Jack Lew just penned a letter to Mr. Boehner that stated: “I respectfully urge Congress… to raise the debt limit before Feb. 7, 2014.” 

       But Obama and Lew are not the only culprits. D.C. pundits and liberals in the media are already castigating you and trying to tell you that the trillion dollar fat-cat ObamaCare bailout and raising the debt ceiling have nothing to do with each other. 

       Moreover, some of them actually have the audacity to say that patriotic Americans like you who are demanding that your government act fiscally responsible, are holding the full-faith and credit of the United States “hostage”… THAT’S COMPLETE HOGWASH

       To illustrate the ignorance inherent in that argument, imagine for a moment that a ne’er-do-well member of your extended family called you one day because he needed 300 dollars to avoid having his electricity cut off, and let us assume that, out of the goodness of your heart, you gave him the money. 

       Now imagine you found out that, the very same day, he went out and bought a new iPhone or some other high-end electronic device. 

       Question: How would you react if this ne’er-do-well person had the nerve to preach to you that the two transactions had nothing to do with each other and that you had no right to hold his new iPhone “hostage” to an electric bill? 

       It is time to set the record straight in Washington DC and the time to do it is now

ObamaCare Should At Least Be Allowed to Collapse of Its Own Weight.

       You’re sophisticated enough to know that ObamaCare will collapse under its own weight IF we can jettison ObamaCare’s massive trillion dollar insurance company handout; and that no repeal vote – that Harry Reid can simply block in the Senate or that Barack Obama can simply veto – will be needed to make it happen. 

       And Barack Obama knows it too. That’s why this fat-cat redistribution of wealth from you and your fellow taxpayers to private insurance companies is baked into the law, and that’s why it’s more than certain that Barack Obama will perpetually pick your pocket to prop up this failed government take-over of health care. 

       And that’s precisely why we stand with syndicated columnist and Fox News’ Charles Krauthammer who recently advocated: “Dare the president to stand up and say: ‘I’m willing to let the country default in order to preserve a massive bailout for insurance companies.'” 

       Congressman Tom Price (R-GA) has already started the ball rolling: “Nobody is interested, on our side of the aisle at least, in bailing out insurance companies. I would hope that the president isn’t interested in bailing out insurance companies…” 

       People WILL understand that argument; and here’s something else the people will understand: If our self-proclaimed leaders in Congress write Barack Obama another blank check and allow this bailout to stand, THEY will OWN ObamaCare as well. 

       And since so many of them are pinning their hopes for victory at the polls in November on appearing to be against ObamaCare, you need to tell them, right here and now, that the American people are not going to reward them for enabling this tyrannical law

Did You Hear The News? The Obama Regime Just Admitted That ObamaCare Could Bankrupt Insurance Companies… And Quite Possibly, The Country.

       It should have been a front-page story, but the Obama-media sat on a document that was just released, oh-so-quietly, by the Obama Regime’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

       Jim Angle with Fox News reports: “[T]he administration released documents… saying the problems with the website puts ‘the entire health insurance industry at risk’ … ‘potentially leading to their default and disrupting continued services and coverage to consumers.'” 

       And the HHS document went on to say that the problems with the website “will result in financial harm to the government” and “the entire health care reform program is jeopardized.” 

       The statements in the HHS document bear repeating because problems with ObamaCare are not simply confined to the website. 

       ObamaCare is riddled with problems, and we very respectfully submit that our government will never tire of telling us that each and every problem “will result in financial harm to the government” and jeopardize “the entire health care reform program” and these problems can only be resolved by allowing the government to dig even deeper in our pockets. 

       Let’s face facts, the HHS admission that “the ENTIRE health insurance industry [is] at risk” [Emphasis Ours] is an omen of things to come because the problem with ObamaCare is not that it was designed to fail, but rather, that it was designed to failOVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN

       Each and every ObamaCare failure will necessitate another bailout and each and every bailout will open the door to even more failures… and the vicious circle will only continue to perpetuity. 

       It took most of the nation’s social welfare programs generations to reach insolvency but ObamaCare is starting out in insolvency: That means it could, quite literally, ultimately break the bank. 

       There’s only one way to end this circle of madness. We must force our elected officials to do what needs to be done. They must stand up to Barack Obama and stop this insanity before it kills this great nation

And That Dire Prognosis Is Being Confirmed In Other Circles As Well.

       As a matter of fact, Aetna’s CEO Mark Bertolini hinted last Wednesday that Aetna could be forced to make coverage totally unaffordable or pull out of ObamaCare altogether. 

       Speaking of the massive and spiraling costs – costs that will be passed on to you in one form or another – of sustaining this dying white elephant, Bertolini said: 

       “Are they going to be double-digit [increases] or are we [Aetna] going to get beat up because they’re double-digit; or are we just going to have to pull out of the program? … Those questions can’t be answered until we see the population we have today. And we really don’t have a good view on that.” 

       And just because Bertolini posed the question, don’t believe for one moment that he doesn’t ALREADY know the answer or that he’s the only CEO who realizes what’s coming. 

       Moreover, don’t believe, for even the blink of an eye, that these problems won’t affect you if you’re not in a government-controlled exchange (although you eventually will be if Barack Obama and Harry Reid get their way)

       Just as Ronald Reagan said that a rising tide lifts all boats; we say to you now thatEVERYONE on a sinking ship with no lifeboats dies. 

       Perhaps that’s why Moody’s, one of the top-rated credit agencies in the world, just downgraded the ENTIRE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY on Thursday to “negative” based on the failed ObamaCare rollout. 

       Oh yes, its true. The Washington Times reports that Moody’s “downgraded its outlook for U.S. health care insurers from ‘stable’ to ‘negative,’ citing uncertainty stemming from ObamaCare.” 

       We’ll say it again; the problem with ObamaCare is not that it’s going to fail… IT HAS ALREADY FAILED and we need to cut the cord to the life-preserver and let it drown because IT WILL KEEP FAILING

       That’s the message that Congress needs to hear right now. It’s time for them to stop talking and stop enabling. It’s time for them to take real action and kill this failed and menacing law before it takes us all down; and the road to making that happen starts with them drawing a line in the sand and telling Barack Obama that he needs to give up his ObamaCare bailout BEFORE they even consider giving him one more thin dime

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the Leadership of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives. 

Send My Blast Faxes





The new face of food stamps in the Obama economy

By Associated Press January 27, 2014 6:50 am


Text Size: A A A

WASHINGTON – In a first, working-age people now make up the majority in U.S. households that rely on food stamps – a switch from a few years ago, when children and the elderly were the main recipients.

Some of the change is due to demographics, such as the trend toward having fewer children. But a slow economic recovery with high unemployment, stagnant wages and an increasing gulf between low-wage and high-skill jobs also plays a big role. It suggests that government spending on the $80 billion-a-year food stamp program – twice what it cost five years ago – may not subside significantly anytime soon.

Food stamp participation since 1980 has grown the fastest among workers with some college training, a sign that the safety net has stretched further to cover America’s former middle class, according to an analysis of government data for The Associated Press by economists at the University of Kentucky. Formally called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance, or SNAP, the program now covers 1 in 7 Americans.

The findings coincide with the latest economic data showing workers’ wages and salaries growing at the lowest rate relative to corporate profits in U.S. history.

President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night is expected to focus in part on reducing income inequality, such as by raising the federal minimum wage. Congress, meanwhile, is debating cuts to food stamps, with Republicans including House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., wanting a $4 billion-a-year reduction to an anti-poverty program that they say promotes dependency and abuse.

Economists say having a job may no longer be enough for self-sufficiency in today’s economy.

“A low-wage job supplemented with food stamps is becoming more common for the working poor,” said Timothy Smeeding, an economics professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who specializes in income inequality. “Many of the U.S. jobs now being created are low- or minimum-wage – part-time or in areas such as retail or fast food – which means food stamp use will stay high for some time, even after unemployment improves.”

The newer food stamp recipients include Maggie Barcellano, 25, of Austin, Texas. A high school graduate, she enrolled in college but didn’t complete her nursing degree after she could no longer afford the tuition.

Hoping to boost her credentials, she went through emergency medical technician training with the Army National Guard last year but was unable to find work as a paramedic because of the additional certification and fees required. Barcellano, now the mother of a 3-year-old daughter, finally took a job as a home health aide, working six days a week at $10 an hour. Struggling with the low income, she recently applied for food stamps with the help of the nonprofit Any Baby Can, to help save up for paramedic training.

“It’s devastating,” Barcellano said. “When I left for the Army I was so motivated, thinking I was creating a situation where I could give my daughter what I know she deserves. But when I came back and basically found myself in the same situation, it was like it was all for naught.”

Since 2009, more than 50 percent of U.S. households receiving food stamps have been adults ages 18 to 59, according to the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey. The food stamp program defines non-elderly adults as anyone younger than 60.

As recently as 1998, the working-age share of food stamp households was at a low of 44 percent, before the dot-com bust and subsequent recessions in 2001 and 2007 pushed new enrollees into the program, according to the analysis by James Ziliak, director of the Center for Poverty Research at the University of Kentucky.

By education, about 28 percent of food stamp households are headed by a person with at least some college training, up from 8 percent in 1980. Among those with four-year college degrees, the share rose from 3 percent to 7 percent. High-school graduates head the bulk of food stamp households at 37 percent, up from 28 percent. In contrast, food stamp households headed by a high-school dropout have dropped by more than half, to 28 percent.

The shifts in food stamp participation come amid broader changes to the economy such as automation, globalization and outsourcing, which have polarized the job market. Many good-paying jobs in areas such as manufacturing have disappeared, shrinking the American middle class and bumping people with higher levels of education into lower-wage work.

An analysis Ziliak conducted for the AP finds that stagnant wages and income inequality play an increasing role in the growth of food stamp rolls.

Taking into account changing family structure, higher unemployment and policy expansions to the food stamp program, the analysis shows that stagnant wages and income inequality explained just 3.5 percent of the change in food stamp enrollment from 1980 to 2011. But from 2000 to 2011, wages and inequality accounted for 13 percent of the increase.

Several economists say food stamp rolls are likely to remain elevated for some time. Historically, there has been a lag before an improving unemployment rate leads to a substantial decline in food stamp rolls; the Congressional Budget Office has projected it could take 10 years.

“We do not expect income inequality stabilizing or declining in the absence of real wage growth or a significant reduction in unemployment and underemployment problems,” said Ishwar Khatiwada, an economist for the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University who reviewed the Labor and Commerce departments’ wage data.

Full- and part-time workers employed year-round saw the fastest growth in food stamp participation since 1980, making up 17 percent and 7 percent of households, respectively. In contrast, the share of food stamp households headed by an unemployed person has remained largely unchanged, at 53 percent. Part-year workers declined in food stamp share

Associated Press writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.




Obama Energy Policy Causes Heating Shortages for Americans


Even NBC News has to report that global warming is not happening to such a degree that many in the middle of our great nation are paying extreme amounts for heating fuel.

We had the polar vortex freeze a few weeks ago, another front last week and this week – it will apparently be the coldest in decades yet again. See.. global warming, climate change, AGW, whatever you want to call it is to blame. That is why middle-income farmers in the mid-west are being forced to pay bankrupt level prices to heat their homes – or something.

Actually, President Obama has gone after energy company after energy company with regulations, fines, law suits… you name it. This administration promised that energy prices would “necessarily skyrocket.” Google that phrase and see who’s mug appears.

Continue Reading on






Rand Paul: War on women? Clinton behavior was predatory

By USA Today January 27, 2014 6:55 am


Text Size: A A A

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, countering Democratic charges of a Republican “war on women,” Sunday accused the news media of giving former president Bill Clinton a pass for what he called “predatory behavior” toward Monica Lewinsky.

The exchange on NBC’s Meet the Press was a reminder for Hillary Rodham Clinton, if she needed one, of some of the complications ahead if the former secretary of State decides to run for president in 2016.

“The Democrats, one of their big issues is they have concocted and said Republicans are committing a war on women,” Paul said. “One of the workplace laws and rules that I think are good is that bosses shouldn’t prey on young interns in their office.

“And I really think the media seem to have given President Clinton a pass on this. He took advantage of a girl that was 20 years old and an intern in his office. … That is predatory behavior.”

He went on, “Now, it’s not Hillary’s fault … but it is a factor in judging Bill Clinton in history.”

Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives in 1998 on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice in an investigation into his sexual relationship with Lewinsky. He was acquitted by the Senate.

Asked by moderator David Gregory whether Hillary Clinton should be judged on the scandal if she runs in 2016, Paul replied: “No, I’m not saying that,” but he added, “Sometimes it’s hard to separate one from the other.” Paul is weighing running for president in 2016.

Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin pushed back.

“The issues … have been litigated in the public square for over a decade,” the Illinois senator said in a separate interview on NBC. “For goodness sakes, let’s judge Hillary Clinton based on her talents and her vision of America.”

J. Scott Applewhite, AP




·         New Home Sales See a 7% Drop in December



A key indicator of new-housing construction dropped 7% in December to a considerably weaker level than economists forecast.




Samitier: El Espionaje Creado Por Google…

El Cual Todavía No ha Sido Desactivado…

Cualquier Jefe de un Departamento Que Espié a Sus Empleados

Es ENCAUSADO AUTOMATICAMENTE… Google lo hace… Nada Pasa.

Here is even more proof, that the Obama Government and

Giant Corporations are refusing to respect the law!

The Back Door programs, permit anyone to access your computer.

All American Software, is compromised.

This did not occur by accident!

It was put into the software, to permit NSA to spy on us, the People.

Not to spy on Terrorists!

Those of you, who trust the Government, deserve the Fascist Police State

you are helping to create.

By voting for security, instead of Liberty

you are entering the Maximum Security Prison of your own making!

By the time you realize where you are, it will be too late!

Welcome to Prison Planet…

Here is more proof:

Developer finds Chrome eavesdropping bug


Gerogina Lopez: La Timba: Una villa miseria rodea la Plaza de la Revolución

Posiblemente Cuba sea el único país con semejante espectáculo al lado mismo de la sede de gobierno





Cuarterías de La Timba, al lado del Comité Central del Partido de los degenerados. En Habana Cuba.


LA HABANA, Cuba, enero, -Una prueba  del desinterés del  gobierno  cubano hacia su pueblo lo constituye  el barrio La Timba,  en El Vedado, muy cerca a la Plaza de la Revolución,  centro del poder comunista. La Timba sufre una terrible marginalidad,  incluso  por encima de otros barrios de La Habana.

Las ventajas que debiera suponer para una comunidad colindar con el Consejo de Estado y con la  avenida Paseo, -vía expedita para el traslado de los jefes de la revolución-, no  existen para La Timba. Irónicamente,  la pobreza que encierra en sus entrañas es tapiada con planchas de zinc durante  las realizaciones de actos conmemorativos y desfiles, a fin de esconderlos de las cámaras.

Los vecinos de allí se quejan de que nada  se ha hecho en favor de esta comunidad. Al contrario, varios centros que en el pasado desempeñaban funciones sociales importantes, han sido escindidos al convertirlos en albergues para damnificados,  pero no para los propios residentes del barrio, donde muchas casas se caen a pedazos por la falta de materiales y recursos.

Ahí están, convertidos en refugios, la otrora posada (casa de citas) de las calles 2 y 31,  y la Casa de la Cultura de 37 y Paseo, donde viven hoy más de  treinta familias que desde hace años esperan por un hogar. La posada, desde hace tiempo dejó de ser una alternativa para las necesidades sexuales de parejas sin hogar, y el otro lugar, entre otras cosas, vio truncas las clases de danza, ensayo de comparsas, y juegos de mesa (dominó) para personas de la tercera edad. Ni qué decir del proyecto socio-cultural contra el alcoholismo que allí tuvo lugar en su día.

Un nativo del barrio que vive desde hace mucho tiempo en uno de estos albergues, porque su casa se derrumbó, y que prefirió el anonimato para este reportaje,  dijo:

-Más  allá de promesas que terminaron en alguna pintura para enmascarar, jamás las autoridades de este Municipio se han preocupado en lo más mínimo por el deterioro de este barrio y mucho menos por la prosperidad de la gente. Mis abuelos y mis padres vivieron aquí antes de 1959; eran trabajadores, no ricos, pero no vivieron un infortunio tan grande como el que padecemos ahora.

En los últimos años,  en este barrio se han incrementado las construcciones de solares, utilizando los más increíbles materiales que la pobreza obliga, sin que las autoridades brinden algún apoyo. Solo los militares han sido beneficiados con la construcción de, al menos, dos edificios en esta zona: Uno  en la esquina de 6 y 39,  cercano al Consejo de Estado, compuesto por 32 apartamentos, pero solo  doce asignados a  pobladores de  La timba, a los que se les había derrumbado el solar. Los otros veinte, cedidos a oficiales de la policía.

La otra edificación de cinco plantas fue construida en la esquina de 35 y 4,  entregada  íntegramente  a  militares de la Dirección de Cárceles y Prisiones del Ministerio del Interior.

Si algún barrio de la capital cubana tiene razones suficientes para no agradecer nada al poder revolucionario, es La Timba. 55 años después de aquella “nacionalización” que se apoderó de todas las bellas edificaciones que rodean el centro de poder de Cuba, La Timba se erige hoy como testigo  de la infertilidad del régimen comunista, que nunca ha mirado hacia allí a pesar de tenerlo tan cerca.





Samitier: ¿Han Oído Hablar De Los Sobrevivientes

Del Accidente Aéreo En Los Andes?

Una Historia Que Debes Leerla…

De las 45 personas que iban en el avión, 12 murieron en el accidente (entre ellas la madre de Fernando Parrado); 5 murieron al otro día, y a los 8 días muere Susana Parrado (hermana de Fernando)debido a sus lesiones.

A los 16 días, una avalancha se llevó la  vida de ocho más, y dos jóvenes murieron a mediados de Noviembre por las infecciones de sus lesiones.

Los demás, completaron 72 días en la montaña, hasta que fueron rescatados.
¿Qué conferencista logra hoy colmar un auditorio de 2,500 ejecutivos y empresarios, muchos con sus mujeres e hijos, y hablar durante una hora y media sin que nadie pierda detalle del tema ? 

Fernando Parrado, uno de los 16 sobrevivientes de la tragedia de los Andes, a 36 años de aquella historia que asombró al mundo, consiguió hace algunos meses más que eso: Conmover a un foro de negocios y capacitación empresarial al transmitir las simples moralejas que le dejaron vivir 72 días en plena Cordillera sin agua ni comida. 

Esta es la conferencia que dio:
Su presentación, un monólogo sin golpes bajos acompañado por vídeos e imágenes de la montaña, tuvo dos etapas bien diferentes. 

En la primera narró, con un relato íntimo repleto de anécdotas, los momentos que lo marcaron de aquella odisea a 4000 metros de altura en la que perdió a buena parte de sus amigos, además de su madre y su hermana. 

‘¿Cómo es posible sobrevivir donde no se sobrevive?’, 
se preguntó.

‘Sobrevivimos porque hubo liderazgos, toma de decisiones y espíritu de equipo, porque nos conocíamos desde mucho antes’, dijo. 

Y arrojó un primer disparador. 
“En la vida el factor suerte es fundamental” 

Cuando llegué al aeropuerto de Montevideo no daban número de asiento para el avión.

A mí me tocó, de casualidad, la fila 9, junto a mi mejor amigo. 

Cuando el avión chocó en la montaña, se partió en dos. 

De la fila 9 para atrás no quedó nada. 
Los 29 sobrevivientes al primer impacto viajaban en la parte que quedó a salvo.’  De ellos, dijo, 24 no sufrieron un rasguño.

Así, los menos golpeados empezaron a ayudar, actuando como un verdadero equipo. Administramos barritas de chocolate y maní al punto de comer un grano por horas cada uno. 

Marcelo, nuestro capitán y líder, asumió su rol para contenernos cuando le preguntábamos qué pasaba porque no llegaba el rescate. 

Decidimos aguantar.’ Pero días después el líder se desmoronó.

La radio trajo la noticia de que había concluido el rescate. 

‘¿Cómo hubieran reaccionado ustedes? 
El líder se quiebra, se deprime y deja de serlo. 

Imagínense que yo cierro esta sala, bajo la temperatura a  -14 grados sin agua ni comida a esperar quién muere primero.’ 

se hace un Silencio estremecedor de la primera a la última fila. 
‘Ahí me di cuenta de que al universo no le importa qué nos pasa. 

Mañana saldrá el sol y se pondrá como siempre. 
Por lo tanto, tuvimos que tomar decisiones. 

En la noche 12 o 13 nos dijimos con uno de los chicos: 
«¿Qué estás pensando?» 

«Lo mismo que vos. Tenemos que comer, y las proteínas están en los cuerpos.» Hicimos un pacto entre nosotros, era la única opción. 

Nos enfrentamos a una verdad cruda e inhumana.’ 

Desde la primera fila, decenas de chicos llevados por sus padres escuchaban boquiabiertos. 
Parrado apeló a conceptos típicos del mundo empresarial. 

‘Hubo planificación, estrategia, desarrollo.

Cada uno empezó a hacer algo útil, que nos ayudara a seguir vivos: zapatos, bastones, pequeñas expediciones humanas.

Fuimos conociendo nuestra prisión de hielo.’ 

‘Hasta que me eligieron para la expedición final, porque la montaña nos estaba matando, nos debilitaba, se nos acababa la comida. 

Subí aterrado a la cima de la montaña con Roberto Canessa. 

Pensábamos ver desde allí los valles verdes de Chile y nos encontramos con nieve y montañas a 360 grados. 

Ahí decidí que moriría caminando hacia algún lugar.’ 

Entonces sobrevino el momento más inesperado.  
Pero…. “Esta no es la historia que vine a contar”,avisó.

Y contó que su verdadera historia empezó al regresar a su casa, sin su madre ni su hermana, sin sus amigos de la infancia y con su padre con una nueva pareja. 

‘¿Crisis? ¿De qué crisis me hablan? 

¿Estrés? ¿Qué estrés?

Estrés es estar muerto a 4000 metros de altura sin agua ni comida’, enfatizó. 

Hay que pasar por una cosa así para darse cuenta de la diferencia entre lo importante y lo que no lo es. 

En general, me siento distinto en la percepción de los problemas del día a día: la gente se complica, yo me volví bastante simple

Recordó un diálogo fundamental que tuvo con su padre, que le dijo: 

‘Mira para adelante para adelante, anda tras esa chica que te gusta, ten una vida, trabaja.Yo cometí el error de no decirle a tu madre 
tantas cosas por estar tan ocupado, de no compartir tantas festividades con tu hermana, no darme el tiempo de platicarcon ellas mis 
vivencias, no decirles cuanto las amaba’. 

Y cerró, determinado:

‘Las empresas son importantes, el trabajo lo es, pero lo verdaderamente valioso está en casa después de trabajar: la familia
Mi vida cambio, pero lo más valioso que perdí fue ese hogar que ya no existía al regresar.

No se olviden de quien tienen al lado, porque no saben lo que va a pasar mañana.

Una interminable ovación lo despidió de pie …… 

Si TU tienes un calido hogar, piensa que al igual que Yo: 

Eres una persona con Suerte !!!  Te tocó de la fila 9 hacia adelante, y créeme…. 

La mayoría viaja de la 9 para atras.


“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”

No 577 “En mi opinion” Enero 26, 2014

enero 26, 2014

No 577 “En mi opinión” Domingo, Enero 26, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor





Amenper: La Sabiduría


Uno de ustedes me mandó unos pensamientos apócrifos de Confucio que aunque realmente nunca los dijo los debía de haber dicho porque están cómicamente sabios.

Pero esto me trajo a colación el asunto de la sabiduría. Cuando hablamos de sabiduría pensamos en Confucio.

La sabiduría es alcanzable para todos, pero todos no la tienen.

Cuando hablan del Presidente Obama tanto los partidarios como los detractores, dicen que Obama es inteligente, listo, con educación académica.

Sin embargo, al Presidente Obama nunca se le describe como sabio. La sabiduría es una cualidad especial reservada para unos pocos individuos raros. Y la sabiduría es la característica más importante que diferencia a los líderes ordinarios de los líderes extraordinarios.

La nación tiene un déficit monetario, su presidente tiene un déficit de sabiduría.

En el déficit de Obama la sabiduría no es necesariamente una falla o defecto en su carácter.

Es simplemente una cualidad que no existe dentro de él porque está bloqueada como en todos los que se fanatizan por las doctrinas incrustadas en su pensamiento. Desde su niñez, sus padres, abuelos, maestros y amigos han considerado la doctrina comunista como el único camino, el sentido común de la sabiduría está atrofiado.  
Pero hay otros que si pueden adquirir sabiduría, son los que votaron por él, como los jóvenes que ahora con el caso del Obamacare han comprendido los errores del socialismo. Es el viejo adagio de consejos “con la edad viene la sabiduría” que la sabiduría toma tiempo para adquirir, esperamos que mientras más tiempo pasa más adquieran sabiduría.

En el caso de los cubanos, siempre mido su sabiduría por el momento en que descubrieron que aquello no servía. 

¿Hay una fórmula para alcanzar la sabiduría?  Aquí es donde tenemos que ir al sabio Confucio.


Confucio dijo: “podemos aprender sabiduría por tres métodos: primero, por la reflexión, que es más noble; En segundo lugar, por imitación, que es más fácil; y en tercer lugar por experiencia, que es la más amarga”. 


La reflexión es la que hizo que algunos descubrieran años antes que otros la realidad de Cuba, esa fue la sabiduría más conveniente, después otros que vieron a los que partieron antes vivir mejor que ellos, adquirieron la sabiduría por imitación, otros adquirieron la sabiduría demasiado tarde por la experiencia que vivieron y viven bajo el sistema comunista.

Los cubanos somos los mejores exponentes de este pensamiento de Confucio.

La inteligencia es la capacidad de aprender y todos tienen esa capacidas a mayor o menor grado o por su mayor o menor esfuerzo.

En la computadora en que estoy escribiendo  esto sería llamado capacidad de almacenamiento o memoria. El conocimiento es la acumulación de datos de muchas fuentes. Esto incluiría la educación formal así como libros, revistas, conversaciones y hasta televisión–la acumulación de datos combinada alimentamos nuestras mentes sobre una base diaria.

Pero el ingrediente final, aplicación práctica, de estos conocimientos es el aspecto abordado por Confucio. 

La sabiduría puede ser adquirida por cualquiera o todos de los métodos que Confucio destacó, la inteligencia o la acumilación de conocimientos,  facilita la fundación para la sabiduría. Pero el grado de sabiduría será directamente proporcional a la manera el cerebro humano del individuo es capaz de reunir y analizar estos elementos. 

Todavía hay muchos seguidores honestos del Presidente Obama que llegaron, pero están atascados, en el tercer nivel de Confucio, la experiencia.

Convencidos de que su inteligencia y educación (conocimiento) les proporcionó un atajo a la sabiduría, se han empecinado en no reconocer lo que le debiera enseñar su sabiduría,y es que estamos ante un Presidente comunista que puede destruir la nación.

Estos son los equivalentes a los que ayudaron a Fidel Castro a comunizar a Cuba.

Estamos a tiempo en los Estados Unidos,  este es un país en que la educación del ciudadano medio y su experiencia en el sistema democrático es mucho mayor que la del cubano medio de la época en que Castro tomó el poder, es posible  llegue a obtener la sabiduría a tiempo. 

Sólo nos queda el consuelo, que la fórmula de Confucio trabaje y que los votantes adquieran la sabiduría por reflexión y voten de acuerdo con su sabiduría.





¿Es obama COMUNISTA?



Obama Blames Fox News For His Failures By Justin Sink

President Obama said that gridlock on Capitol Hill stemmed from an inability to “penetrate the Republican base” and convince voters there that he’s “not the caricature that you see on Fox News or Rush Limbaugh,” rather than his oft-questioned willingness to socialize with lawmakers.

In bonus excerpts from an interview with The New Yorker’s David Remnick, Obama conceded that there was “no doubt that personal relationships matter at the margins and can tip something over the finish line,” and admitted that he “wasn’t in a position to work the social scene in Washington” as the father of two young girls.




Betty: Abuse of Executive Orders issue by obama.

For the SHOCK of your life, take 1 minute to comprehend what you read below. During our lifetimes, all Presidents have issued Executive Orders. For various reasons, some have issued more than others. These things will directly affect us all, in years to come. Question is: Do YOU care enough to send this, ‘shocking info,’ to people you love and others?

NUMBER OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS ISSUED by U.S. Presidents in the last 100 years:


Teddy Roosevelt – 3


All Others until FDR – 0


FDR – 11 in 16 years


Truman – 5 in 7 years


Ike – 2 in 8 years


Kennedy – 4 in 3 years


LBJ – 4 in 5 years


Nixon – 1 in 6 years


Ford – 3 in 2 years


Carter – 3 in 4 years


Reagan – 5 in 8 years


Bush – 3 in 4 years


Clinton – 15 in 8 years


George W. Bush – 62 in 8 years


Obama – 923 in 3 1/2 years! More than 1000+ and counting Executive Orders in 6 years…

Read some of them below – unbelievable!

Next step -dictatorship. (Looks like we are there already!)If you don’t get the implications, you’re not paying attention. How come all the other presidents in the past 100 years have not felt it necessary to INCREASE GOVERNMENT’S POWER OVER THE PEOPLE with more than 1,000 Executive Orders? This is really very scary. And most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.

YES, THERE IS A REASON THAT THIS PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED TO TAKE CONTROL AWAY FROM THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE. Even some Democrats in the House have turned on him, plus a very small number of Democrat Senators have questioned him. Rightfully so. – 


WHAT IS OBAMA REALLY TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH????Remember what he told Russia’s Putin: “I’ll be more flexible after I’m re-elected”.

Now look at these:


EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 — allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 — allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 — allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 — allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 — allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 — allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 — designates the registration of all persons. Postmaster General to operate a national registration.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 — allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 — allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 — allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 — assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 — specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 — grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 — allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. Financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.Feel free to verify the “executive orders” at will…..and these are just the major ones. I’m sure you’ve all heard the tale of the “Frog in the Pot”…Watch Obama’s actions, not his words! By his actions he will show you where America is headed.Obama has issued executive orders that seek to “harmonize” U.S. Economic regulations with the rest of the world. These executive orders are yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a North American Union and a one world economic system.Obama used the stage at the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s I have a dream speech to announce two new executive orders infringing on your second amendment rights.. The first bans the importation of antique military firearms for sale to sportsman and collectors.. He intentionally mislabels them military grade weapons to deceive the sheeple, but make no mistake . . . the order was written specifically to ban the importation of surplus M1 carbines, M1 Garands, 1903 Springfields and other antiques coveted by collectors and sport shooters. This order is the death knell for the civilian marksmanship program. Congress had previously passed the sportsman protection act in 1986 which among other things guaranteed that the importation of the historic relics for collectors and the CMP would not be impeded by unreasonable regulations..But Emperor Obama does not bend to the will of the people or the rule of law.. He will impose on his subjects what he wishes, when he wishes. Kind of like Papa Joe Stalin or the short Austrian with the funky mustache!Unfortunately, most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.


The American people need to understand that Barack Obama is constantly looking for ways to integrate the United States more deeply with the rest of the world.The globalization of the world economy has accelerated under Obama, and this latest executive order represents a fundamental change in U.S. economic policy. Now federal regulators will be required to “harmonize” their work with the international community.





Amenper: El Abono Orgánico está llegando al techo

La bolsa reaccionó a la rebaja de los estímulos, que es la que lo mantiene artificialmente en alza, bajando más de 500 puntos la semana pasada.

Posiblemente se recuperará la semana que viene porque Bernanke ya ha filtrado la noticia de que va a poner a funcionar la imprenta para producir 10 billones de dólares más para parar la subida de la marea de abono orgánico para que no explote y se salga del techo y nos bañe a todos. 

Aunque no es conveniente que la marea baje mucho, porque entonces vamos a ver que han estado nadando desnudos.

Hay hoy un artículo en el Wall Street Journal, que titulan “La marea de Bernanke” que comenta esto.

La noticia de la baja de la bolsa esta pasada semana, se ha reportado de diferentes maneras.  La prensa cómplice ha dicho que es algo global, como si los problemas de otros países ha sido la causa, pero es lo contrario, el problema de los Estados Unidos es el que ha causado los problemas de los mercados en otros países. La pregunta que se hace el editorialista  es cuánto daño se hará como lleva a cabo este ajuste global.  Se ajustará la semana que viene. Pero hasta cuando la ingenua política  de la época de Bernanke que ha sido que la política monetaria de Estados Unidos sólo necesita preocuparse por economía doméstica de los Estados Unidos. El resto del mundo se encargaría de sí mismo. Esto siempre fue una ilusión.

No puede pensarse que imprimiendo un dinero sin respaldo domésticamente, puede resolver el problema, creo que todos tienen que estar conscientes de esto, pero la economía del país está ahora dirigida a ocultar la realidad económica, la cual no es muy agradable.

La pregunta que nos preocupa es hasta cuando este ajuste por la fantasía de un estímulo con dinero sin respaldo pueda mantenerse antes de que el abono orgánico explote saliéndose del techo y bañándonos a todos.

Abajo pueden ver el artículo de hoy del Wall Street Journal.  El WJS es el periódico de más circulación en el mundo, lo llaman de derecha y que responde a Wall Street, pero la realidad es que lo que hace es informar al inversionista de la realidad de la economía, este es su trabajo, y por eso podemos aprender más leyendo el Wall Street Journal, que la prensa que reporta las noticias de acuerdo con su agenda política.



La marea de Bernanke

Lo que la Fed da a los mercados emergentes que también se quita.

24 De enero de 2014 6:41 PM ET

En la formulación famosa de Warren Buffet dice que sólo cuando baja la marea llegas a ver quiénes han estado nadando desnudos.

Así podemos ver cómo es que van desnudos los flojos  mercados emergentes cuando la Reserva Federal se afina su compra de bonos.

Es la historia de la semana en los mercados financieros mundiales, hace evidente que algunos de los nadadores necesitan un mejor régimen de ejercicio. Los últimos años han sido buenos para países como Brasil, Turquía e Indonesia como políticas de bajas tasas de interés de la reserva federal han producido que los inversionistas busquen rendimiento alrededor del mundo. Cualquier país semi respetable sin Hugo Chávez o el Ayatollah Khamenei como jefes de gobierno, pueden atraer capitales extranjeros. Pero no todo ese dinero fue para uso productivo. Y ahora que la Fed parecía decidida a terminar su política prendido bajando la era QE, los inversores cubren sus apuestas y volviendo al dólar y el euro activos.

Los más afectados son los países con políticas menos capaces de soportar sin el apoyo de la Fed. Eso incluye a Argentina, que ha dirigido la camarilla de Kirchner como Venezuela pero sin el encanto populista. La Lira de Turquía ha tomado un baño en medio del enfrentamiento político sobre corrupción, un gran déficit de cuenta corriente y la política monetaria que ha sido demasiado fácil durante demasiado tiempo. El Rublo de Rusia también está golpeando con nuevos mínimos frente al euro,  su economía cada vez más se parece a una obra de un solo acto (Petróleo).

China es un caso especial porque su nerviosismo de crecimiento tiene más que ver con el retiro de su propio estímulo financiero interno. Pero toques de China de desaceleración y la probabilidad de una cuenta grande para limpiar las malas deudas, han espantó a los inversionistas en otras partes preocupados que se pueda afectar por la caída del crecimiento global.

Estos casos son una  lección de que los países van a tener que mejorar sus políticas para atraer capitales. Corea del sur está en mejor forma que la mayoría en parte porque ha golpeado los acuerdos de libre comercio que han hecho más globalmente competitiva. Los medios energéticos de México y otras reformas tienen inversionistas optimistas sobre sus perspectivas de crecimiento y una creciente clase media.

Al final de la marea de Ben Bernanke Fed  pudiera tener algún uso  si estimula al tipo de reformas fiscales, el comercio y la inversión que se han hecho en muchos lugares.

La pregunta es cuánto daño se hará como lleva a cabo este ajuste global. Uno de la ingenuidad  de la época de Bernake ha sido que la política monetaria de Estados Unidos sólo necesita preocuparse por economía doméstica de los Estados Unidos. El resto del mundo se encargaría de sí mismo. Esto siempre fue una ilusión.

El presidente del banco central de un país que tiene la moneda de reserva mundial es también el Presidente del banco central del mundo, como lo han demostrado los cambios groseros en los flujos de capital. Los giros de la última semana y sus tipos de cambio son una repetición de lo que pasó el verano pasado cuando el Sr. Bernanke dejó claro que quería comenzar disminuyendo la compra de bonos de la Fed.

Unas semanas malas en los mercados mundiales al tiempo causaron el jefe de la Fed a parpadear en septiembre y posponer el comienzo del estrechándose hasta diciembre.

Ahora la Fed está filtrando que en la reunión la semana próxima, probablemente por otros $10 billones, y los mercados se están moviendo otra vez.

¿La Fed parpadeará otra vez? Este será el encuentro final del Sr. Bernanke como Presidente y es poco probable que el Comité de mercado abierto tirará una sorpresa después de las recientes filtraciones.

El Sr. Bernanke va a salir habiendo establecido la Fed en un curso de ahusamiento.

Pero el mercado continuo Español pondrá la presión sobre el nuevo Presidente Janet Yellen, especialmente si se derraman las acciones norteamericanas y afecta la confianza de empresas y los consumidores estadounidenses.

Todavía tarde o temprano el mundo tendrá que ajustarse a una política monetaria normal. QE y tasas de interés cercanas a cero no puede durar para siempre sin correr riesgos de más capital inadecuado y las distorsiones del mercado. Al final de la marea de Bernanke siempre habrá alguien que va aparecer desnudo y cuanto antes se vistan, mejor.





Amenper: Guerra contra las Mujeres

Los liberales han tenido un ataque de histeria porque Mike Huckabee dijo en su programa lo que todos sabemos, que la llamada guerra contra las mujeres de los republicanos es una falacia, algo fabricado por la media liberal..

Tanto el no querer que el dinero de los contribuyentes se use tanto para el aborto como para los anticonceptivos no es más que la política fiscal de los conservadores, no es un ataque contra las mujeres.

El decir que los Republicanos están negando la accesibilidad a los anticonceptivos de las mujeres, es algo tan ridículo que no se debiera reproducir en ningún medio serio y responsable.

Lo único que tiene que hacer una mujer si no quiere pagar los $7.00 mensuales por sus pastillas anticonceptivas, lo cual es ridículo por lo bajo del precio, es ir a una clínica de planificación familiar que se los provee de gratis.

En querer que se incluya en el seguro es algo secundario y sin consecuencia mayor, pero si una organización por sus creencias religiosas no quiere hacerlo, la mujer no se verá afectada porque puede adquirirlo por otro medio ¿Donde y como pueden argumentar falta de “accesibilidad”? y mucho menos falta de compasión o un ataque de guerra.. 

Entonces ¿Cuál es el problema?  Donde está la aterradora guerra impidiendo que las pobres mujeres puedan tener tabletas anticonceptivas cuando, número uno, pueden comprarlas, número dos pueden obtenerlas de gratis, y número tres, sólo las instituciones de una denominación religiosa, la Iglesia Católica Romana no quiere servir los anticonceptivos en sus seguros el resto que es la mayoría no tiene objeción.   Y esto, simplemente el que Católicos y no católicos como Huckabee, consideremos que es del derecho a una persuasión religiosa el ser fiel a sus creencias, algo que está protegido por la constitución, lo consideran una guerra contra las mujeres.

Lo que dijo Huckabee, y yo lo oí en su programa es lo que explico arriba, es algo evidente y que no tiene discusión.  Nadie se opone a que las mujeres que quieran obtengan anticonceptivos, pero como en el caso del aborto, lo que nos oponemos es que se use nuestro dinero para pagar por algo que no es un artículo que no pueden obtener por otros medios.

La guerra verdadera no es la de los conservadores contra las mujeres, es la de los liberales contra los conservadores, y es legítima, pero por favor no insulten la inteligencia de las personas usando estos argumentos estúpidos.




Enrique Enriquez: Trending Topics: ‘McDonnell’s day of reckoning’ Obama’s pricey vacations ‘Misery index

Wall Street adviser: Actual unemployment is 37.2%, ‘misery index’ worst in 40 years. By Paul Bedard | 


40 years ago, former President Ford issued “WIN” buttons, short for “Whip Inflation Now.” The…

Don’t believe the happy talk coming out of the White House, Federal Reserve andTreasury Department when it comes to the real unemployment rate and the true “Misery Index.” Because, according to an influential Wall Street advisor, the figures are a fraud.

In a memo to clients provided to Secrets, David John Marotta calculates the actual unemployment rate of those not working at a sky-high 37.2 percent, not the 6.7 percent advertised by the Fed, and the Misery Index at over 14, not the 8 claimed by the government.

Marotta, who recently advised those worried about an imploding economy to get a gun, said that the government isn’t being honest in how it calculates those out of the workforce or inflation, the two numbers used to get the Misery Index figure.

Sign Up for the Paul Bedard newsletter!

Please enter your email address below to begin receiving the Paul Bedard newsletter.

You must enter a valid email address in the field above!


Thank you for signing up for the Paul Bedard newsletter! You should receive your first newsletter very soon.

We’re sorry, there was an error processing your newsletter signup. Please click here to visit our Newsletter Signup Center to register for this newsletter.

“The unemployment rate only describes people who are currently working or looking for work,” he said. That leaves out a ton more.

“Unemployment in its truest definition, meaning the portion of people who do not have any job, is 37.2 percent. This number obviously includes some people who are not or never plan to seek employment. But it does describe how many people are not able to, do not want to or cannot find a way to work. Policies that remove the barriers to employment, thus decreasing this number, are obviously beneficial,” he and colleague Megan Russell in their new investors note from their offices in Charlottesville, Va.

They added that “officially-reported unemployment numbers decrease when enough time passes to discourage the unemployed from looking for work. A decrease is not necessarily beneficial; an increase is clearly detrimental.”

Then there is the Misery Index, which is a calculation based in inflation and unemployment, both numbers the duo say are underscored by the government. He said that the Index doesn’t properly calculate how Uncle Sam is propping up the economy with bond purchases and other actions.

“These tricks, along with a host of other dubious accounting schemes, underreport inflation by about 3 percent,” they wrote, adding that the official inflation rate is just 1.24 percent.

“Today, the Misery Index would be 7.54 using official numbers,” they wrote. But if calculations tabulating the full national unemployment including discouraged workers, which is 10.2 percent, and the historical method of calculating inflation, which is now 4.5 percent, ‘the current misery index is closer to 14.7, worse even than during the Ford administration.”

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner’s “Washington Secrets” columnist, can be contacted at Web

Iran says they did not agree to dismantle anything. By United Press International 

The United States has improperly described Iran’s commitments in an interim nuclear deal, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Thursday.

Zarif said the manner in which the White House has described the agreement differs from the text agreed to by Iran and other countries, CNN reported in an exclusive interview.

He told CNN Iran “did not agree to dismantle anything.”

“The White House version both underplays the concessions and overplays Iranian commitments” in the agreement. Zarif said.

A White House fact sheet issued after the agreement said Iran would have to dilute its stockpile of uranium that had been enriched to 20 percent. Iran also was mandated to halt all enrichment above 5 percent and “dismantle the technical connections required to enrich above 5 percent.”

The 5 percent enrichment level is enough to generate electric power, but not enough to create nuclear weapons.

Speaking from Davos, Switzerland, where he is attending the World Economic Forum, Zarif said the White House language “tries to portray it as basically a dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program. That is the word they use time and again. If you find a single, a single word, that even closely resembles dismantling or could be defined as dismantling in the entire text, then I would take back my comment.”

Responding to Zarif’s comment, a White House official said, “we expected that the Iranians would need to spin this for their domestic political purposes, and are not surprised they are doing just that.”

A statement by the White House last week did not use the word dismantle.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said Wednesday his government would not destroy any centrifuges but that “we are ready to provide confidence that there should be no concern about Iran’s program.”



Sheriff Joe Arpaio Mulls Run for Arizona Governor

24 January 2014 / 58 Comments


Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the law enforcement local known nationwide for his tough treatment of inmates and illegals alike, said that he’s mulling a run for governor of Arizona.

The Elect Sheriff Joe Arpaio committee put out a press release this week, saying the six-term sheriff raised more than $3.5 million last year for his re-election to the local office at a time when his critics were pushing the hardest.

“We continue to be blown away by the depth and breadth of support for Sheriff Joe,” said Chad Willems, Mr. Arpaio’s campaign manager, in the release reported by the Huffington Post. “These members tell the story that the sheriff and his policies are more popular than ever.”

Read more:



Judge rules sperm donor to lesbians owes child support

By Associated Press TOPEKA, Kan. – A man who provided sperm to a lesbian couple in response to an online ad is the father of a child born to one of the women and must pay child support, a Kansas judge ruled Wednesday.

Topeka resident William Marotta had argued that he had waived his parental rights and didn’t intend to be a father. Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi rejected that claim, saying the parties didn’t involve a licensed physician in the artificial insemination process and thus Marotta didn’t qualify as a sperm donor, The Topeka Capital-Journal ( reported.

“In this case, quite simply, the parties failed to perform to statutory requirement of the Kansas Parentage Act in not enlisting a licensed physician at some point in the artificial insemination process, and the parties’ self-designation of (Marotta) as a sperm donor is insufficient to relieve (Marotta) of parental right and responsibilities to the child,” Mattivi wrote.

The Kansas Department for Children and Families filed the case in October 2012 seeking to have Marotta declared the father of a child born to Jennifer Schreiner in 2009. The state was seeking to have Marotta declared the child’s father so he can be held responsible for about $6,000 in public assistance the state provided, as well as future child support.

Marotta opposed that action, saying he had contacted Schreiner and her partner at the time, Angela Bauer, in response to an ad they placed on Craigslist seeking a sperm donor. He said he signed a contract waiving his parental rights and responsibilities.

Attorneys for the state contended the contract was moot because the parties didn’t follow a 1994 Kansas law requiring a licensed physician to perform the artificial insemination when donors were involved.

During oral arguments at a hearing in October, Timothy Keck, co-lead counsel for the state, said the case focused on child support. Marotta’s attorney, Benoit Swinnen, cited several court rulings he said support the argument that Marotta is legally a sperm donor and not required to pay child support.

Swinnen also argued that the Kansas statute doesn’t specifically require the artificial insemination to be carried out by a physician.

Court documents show Schreiner indicated she didn’t know the name of the donor or “have any information” about him in her application for child support. However, a sperm donor contract between Marotta and the couple includes his name, and the agency noted the couple talked about their appreciation for him in an interview with The Capital-Journal.

A filing Wednesday by the DCF argues the sperm donor contract overlooks “the well-established law in this state that a person cannot contract away his or her obligations to support their child.”

The right for support belongs to the child, not the parents, the filing says.

The agency said it also received different versions of the donor contract from Marotta and Schreiner, suggesting that the document “may be invalid on its face.”

“We stand by that contract,” Swinnen said. “The insinuation is offensive, and we are responding vigorously to that. We stand by our story. There was no personal relationship whatsoever between my client and the mother, or the partner of the mother, or the child. Anything the state insinuates is vilifying my client, and I will address it.”



·         Carlos Bringuier: Chinese adquisitions… Interesante‏

In the near future, China will employ millions of American workers and dominate thousands of small communities all over the United States. Chinese acquisition of U.S. businesses set a new all-time record last year, and it is on pace to shatter that record this year.
              The Smithfield Foods acquisition is an example. Smithfield Foods is the largest pork producer and processor in the world. It has facilities in 26 U.S. states and it employs tens of thousands of Americans.
              It directly owns 460 farms and has contracts with approximately 2,100 others. But now a Chinese company has bought it for $ 4.7 billion, and that means that the Chinese will now be the most important employer in dozens of rural communities all over America.
              Thanks in part to our massively bloated trade deficit with China, the Chinese have trillions of dollars to spend. They are only just starting to exercise their economic muscle.
              It is important to keep in mind that there is often not much of a difference between “the Chinese government” and “Chinese corporations”.  In 2011, 43 percent of all profits in China were produced by companies where the Chinese government had a controlling interest in.
              Last year a Chinese company spent $2.6 billion to purchase AMC entertainment – one of the largest movie theater chains in the United States. Now that Chinese company controls more movie ticket sales than anyone else in the world.
              But China is not just relying on acquisitions to expand its economic power. “Economic beachheads” are being established all over America. For example, Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc. recently broke ground on a $100 million plant in Thomasville, Alabama. Many of the residents of Thomasville, Alabama will be glad to have jobs, but it will also become yet  another community that will now be heavily dependent on communist China.
              And guess where else Chinese companies are putting down roots?
              Detroit. Chinese-owned companies are investing in American businesses and new vehicle technology, selling everything from seat belts to shock absorbers in retail stores, and hiring experienced engineers and designers in an effort to soak up the talent and expertise of domestic automakers and their suppliers.
              If you recently purchased an “American-made” vehicle, there is a really good chance that it has a number of Chinese parts in it.
              Industry analysts are hard-pressed to put a number on the Chinese suppliers operating in the United States.
              China seems particularly interested in acquiring energy resources in the United States. For example, China is actually mining for coal in the mountains of Tennessee. Guizhou Gouchuang Energy Holdings Group spent 616 million dollars to acquire Triple H Coal Co. in Jacksboro, Tennessee.  At the time, that acquisition really didn’t make much news, but now a group of conservatives in Tennessee is trying to stop the Chinese from blowing up their mountains and taking their coal.
              And pretty soon China may want to build entire cities in the United States just like they have been doing in other countries.
              Right now China is actually building a city larger than Manhattan just outside Minsk, the capital of Belarus.                                                                     Are you starting to get the picture? China is on the rise. If you doubt this, just read the following:             

#  When you total up all imports and exports, China is now the number one trading nation on the entire planet.
              #  Overall, the U.S. has run a trade deficit with China over the past decade that comes to more than 2.3 trillion dollars.
              #  China has more foreign currency reserves than anyone else on the planet.
              #  China now has the largest new car market in the entire world.
              #  China now produces more than twice as many automobiles as the United States does. After being bailed out by  U.S. taxpayers, GM is involved in 11 joint ventures with Chinese companies.
              #  China is the number one gold producer in the world.
              #  The uniforms for the U.S. Olympic team were made in China.
              #  85% of all artificial Christmas trees the world over are made in China.
              #  The new World Trade Center tower in New York is going to include glass imported from China.
              #  China now consumes more energy than the United States does.
              #  China is now in aggregate the leading manufacturer of goods in the entire world.
              #  China uses more cement than the rest of the world combined.
              #  China is now the number one producer of wind and solar power on the entire globe.
              #  China produces 3 times as much coal and 11 times as much steel as the United States does.
              #  China produces more than 90 percent of the global supply of rare earth elements.
              #  China is now the number one supplier of components that are critical to the operation of any national defense system.
              # In  published scientific research articles China is expected to become number one in the world very shortly.
              And  what we have seen so far may just be the tip of the iceberg.
              For  now, I will just leave you with one piece of advice =  learn to speak Mandarin… You are going to need it !






By: David Limbaugh

At a time when more and more Americans are coming to an awareness of how evil abortion is, President Barack Obama, the most fiercely pro-abortionist president in our history, is digging his heels in further.

This week, he made his annual statement glorifying this hideous practice on the anniversary of the infernal 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, which greatly restricted abortion laws.

Obama’s statement was as unapologetic as it was grotesque, celebrating an abominable procedure that ought to be outlawed — not glamorized, as the left does with it. Before you accuse me of hyperbole, be advised that Democratic National Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz wished Roe v. Wade a happy 41st birthday. “Happy”?

Obama said, “Today, as we reflect on the 41st anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, we recommit ourselves to the decision’s guiding principle: that every woman should be able to make her own choices about her body and her health.

“We reaffirm our steadfast commitment to protecting a woman’s access to safe, affordable health care and her constitutional right to privacy, including the right to reproductive freedom.

“And we resolve to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, and continue to build safe and healthy communities for all our children, because this is a country where everyone deserves the same freedom and opportunities to fulfill their dreams.”

No one is trying to interfere with women’s autonomy over their own bodies, except when another body and life is involved. It is sheer sophistry and misdirection to argue that abortion opponents are on a crusade against women’s liberty. This formulation conveniently — and repugnantly — factors out of the equation the innocent child involved.

It is dishonest for Obama to couch this issue in terms of women’s health. Most pro-lifers, in fact, acknowledge an exception in those rare cases when the mother’s life is in danger. Women’s health isn’t the issue, and pro-abortionists know that. The only thing interfering with a woman’s “choices about her … health” these days is Obamacare. If maximizing health care choices were what is driving Obama, he would repeal Obamacare.

Nor does abortion have anything to do with privacy under any stretch of the English language; I don’t care what the misguided Supreme Court said to the contrary in 1973. No amount of rhetorical legalese on “emanations” and “penumbras” can pollute our common sense into believing that a woman has a right to terminate the life of an innocent child she is carrying as a matter of constitutional privacy. No wonder some people have contempt for lawyers.

Obama has the audacity to talk about safe and healthy communities for all our children? Aborted babies are children, and Obama and his pro-abortionists are not making any of them safe. Indeed, since Roe, an estimated 55 million babies have been snuffed out in the name of women’s choice and health and now children’s safety? Now that’s chutzpah! The number of babies killed in abortions in New York City in 2010 (83,750) would fill the seats in MetLife Stadium, where the Super Bowl is scheduled to be played this year.

But perhaps the most offensive sentence in Obama’s statement was the last one, in which he attempted to fold the right to abortion into the American dream. Has he no shame? No amount of presidential spin will alter the irreversible fact that 55 million Americans were never given an opportunity to fulfill their dreams. How could any human being believe that preserving legal protection for other human beings to terminate the lives of yet other human beings is giving them an “opportunity to fill their dreams”? Are some people so dark-hearted that they consider killing babies an opportunity to fulfill dreams?

It is high time that people who can still find their moral compass through the nihilistic morass that is corrupting our culture start speaking out and quit allowing the left to turn our values, our language and, yes, our sanity on their heads. Postmodernism and moral relativism will lead to the destruction of all three, as the late Malcolm Muggeridge prophetically observed.

Some other civilizations, Muggeridge noted, were destroyed by external forces, but Western man has “had the unique distinction of training its own destroyers at its own educational institutions, and then providing them with facilities for propagating their destructive ideology far and wide, all at the public expense. Thus did Western Man decide to abolish himself, creating his own boredom out of his own affluence, his own vulnerability out of his own strength, his own impotence out of his own erotomania, himself blowing the trumpet that brought the walls of his own city tumbling down, and having convinced himself that he was too numerous, labored with pill and scalpel and syringe to make himself fewer. Until at last, having educated himself into imbecility, and polluted and drugged himself into stupefaction, he keeled over — a weary, battered old brontosaurus — and became extinct.”

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book, “The Great Destroyer,” reached No. 2 on the New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction. 




Parece que el problema es que hay una gran division en el partido democrata y no quieren que nos enteremos para que no lo usemos a favor nuestro.


The Clintons’ Two-State Strategy

April 2, 2008 · Posted in Election 2008 · Comments Off 

I won’t call it racism. Racism takes a lot of forms, but I’m going to give the Clintons the benefit of the doubt about their latest claim and soften the judgment to ‘racial bias’. How can this be interpreted any other way?

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos Reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and former President Bill Clinton are making very direct arguments to Democratic superdelegates, starkly insisting Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., cannot win a general election against presumptive Republican nominee, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

I’m sure they’re citing the poll numbers released earlier today that seem to indicate that Clinton would win Ohio and Florida in a general election. Of course, this argument is silly, because right now Clinton and Obama are opponents. If Clinton would outperform Obama today, would Obama outperform Clinton tomorrow after her endorsement?

But more to my point about racial bias, consider this report from TPM:

In a reference to Wright’s controversial views, Ickes continued: “Nobody thinks that Barack Obama harbors those thoughts. But that’s not the issue. The issue is what Republicans [will do with them]…I think they’re going to give him a very tough time.”

Well, duh. And do the Clintons think that they’re immune from stories like this one where a former boss publicly stated that he had fired 27-year old Hillary Clinton and refused to give her a letter of recommendation for her unethical efforts in the Watergate investigation?


“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

The Clinton campaign is desperately engaging in voter suppression (he’s not electable in November, don’t vote for him in the primaries), and the direct statements that he cannot win.

Further, instead of answering the call to have a dialogue about race and begin to elevate the discussion to the issues and pivot away from politics-as-usual, the Clintons are essentially saying that the American electorate will reject a candidate who has demonstrated integrity, honesty and leadership on the question of race, but if a white woman runs, she will capture those states and somehow win the election.

In the end, it’s less about what will be thrown at Obama or Clinton by the Republicans, but how they’ll deal with it. If you look to their history, it seems clear to me that the one who has dealt most effectively and honestly with it is Barack Obama, which is consistent with what voters seem to be saying at the polls.

If Hillary Clinton thinks she’d win on the two-state Florida/Ohio strategy, she’s really reached the lowest point of the denial phase of grief. Let’s hope she moves through the rest of the stages rapidly.

Technorati Tags: floridaohioelectionracial biasracegender

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: 2008Barack ObamaHillary Clintonprimaries

Worms, Trojans and Clinton

March 28, 2008 · Posted in Barack ObamaElection 2008 · 19 Comments 

The first item in my news feed this afternoon was this clip of an Al-Jezeera interview with Barack Obama’s Kenyan step-grandmother. Lots of mentions of his “Muslim family” origins, nice shot of his father’s headstone (who shares his name) and of course, much pride from step-grandma about how a ‘native son’ has made good in America.

None of it is bad. None of it paints Barack Obama in a negative light. On its face, it’s all light and sweetness. Sort of like that helpful popup window telling you that there might be a virus on your computer. But when you click on that helpful message, it infects your computer with an insidious virus, worm or trojan that chews your system files from the inside out, spewing all sorts of spam, your credit card numbers, and other personal data into the hands of criminals.

Stay with me here. Another report just popped up saying that of the anti-Obama Democrats, 25% of them believe he is a Muslim.

The Al Jazeera video was posted by Link TV, which on its face, looks like a solid progressive organization. Obama aide Susan Rice was once a director of Internews. Internews is LinkTV’s partner and sponsor of LinkMedia, the non-profit organization that runs LinkTV. Think of this interwoven organizational structure relationship as the helpful popop ad, lying to you.

The obvious question is this: Why would an organization seeking to do good, solid, progressive things post a video from February 6th which subtly reminds the audience that: a) Barack Obama is a black guy; and b) Barack Obama has African family with Muslim-in-name-only associations?

David Michaelis is the Director of Current Affairs at Link TV. David Michaelis is the board liason between Internews and LinkTV too.

David Michaelis is a hefty contributor to Hillary Clinton and has been for some time.

Reviewing the bidding here for a minute:

  1. 1.   Big Clinton donors send extortion letter to Nancy Pelosi. (Be sure to read that link, lots of great info about those donors)
  2. 2.   Clinton revives the Jeremiah Wright dead horse, reinforcing the “he’s a black guy, be afraid” vulnerability in Pennsylvania voters.
  3. 3.   On the other side, Clinton donors release the backdoor trojan, an interview slyly giving rise to the fears of those anti-Obama Democrats that are sure he’s Muslim.
  4. 4.   Clinton stands at a rally and reassures the entire country that we will reunite once the nominee is selected, firmly placing herself right in the middle of two opposite fears.

Barack Obama a Muslim or a Black Extremist? Doesn’t matter to Clinton, because she’s right in the middle of either position, like any good moderate should be.

This is why Hillary has lost the nomination, and it is why she deserved to lose the nomination. This is triangulation, the art of creating two extremes and then appearing moderate, while watching the worm work its way through the press slowly, subtly, first slowing them down a bit before the payload hits, and they go off, shredding and melting down any fact while feeding the ignorance of the electorate lapping at the Limbaugh trough.

All of this goes to prove that Samantha Power was right. Hillary Clinton is a monster. Or perhaps more to my metaphor, malware.

Technorati Tags: ClintonMichaelisLinkTVtrojanviruswormmalwaremoneyextortion

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: 2008Barack ObamaDemocratsHillary Clinton

Clintons Waterboard Their Constituents

March 26, 2008 · Posted in Election 2008 · Comments Off 

I’m breaking my own pledge to ignore the Clintons today. Today’s Bill Clinton statement just shouted to me:

“If a politician doesn’t wanna get beat up, he shouldn’t run for office,” he said. “If a politician doesn’t wanna get beat up, he shouldn’t run for office. If a football player doesn’t want to get tackled or want the risk of an a occasional clip he shouldn’t put the pads on.”

First note: He speaks the language of old politics, not the new politics.

Second note: At this point, it’s not about politicians being beat up. It’s about the systematic torture of the electorate, drip by drip, slowly choking off any room to breathe, think, or react. Their goal is absolute submission, even if it means waterboarding the very people they expect to cast a vote for them.

When the Clintons lie to and waterboard the voters, they send several messages:

  1. 1.   They don’t trust the strength of their own message to stand on its own.
  2. 2.   They don’t trust the voters to accept their message without being forced to reject the PERSON who opposes them.
  3. 3.   They don’t trust democracy, which is clearly the most insidious message of all.

When the Clintons sink to the level of pandering to Richard Mellon Scaife, the man who made it his life’s work to ruin them, and shortly after that meeting, distributing an American Spectator article claiming to prove that Obama and his advisor Merrill McPeak are anti-semitic, they are not fighting. They’re pouring the water right down our nose.

I repeat, this isn’t a fight. They are not smearing Barack Obama, but they are engaging in systematic voter abuse and torture. There ought to be a law. Oh wait! There IS a law. Oops, there WAS a law but John McCain voted against it and George Bush vetoed it.

Just so we’re clear about the difference between the two: Fighting can be fair; torture never is.

Update: My spouse likens the Clinton tactics to the 9/11 bombers — they will do anything within their reach to harm the voters. If they had some way to annihilate the Obama nomination even if it meant the collapse of the Democrats in the process.

Technorati Tags: waterboardingtortureBillHillaryClintonObamaScaifesmearstorturevoters

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: 2008Barack ObamaDemocrats

Focus on Dobson

March 26, 2008 · Posted in Uncategorized · 1 Comment 

Or, “Liberal” ain’t no swear word…

James Dobson has fired the first evangelical salvo of the upcoming national campaign between Barack Obama and John McCain.

Sen. Obama was recently named the most liberal U.S. Senator, based on the annual voting analysis by the non-partisan and highly respected National Journal. If he emerges as the Democratic nominee, one of the critical jobs of Focus Action will be to uncover the real Barack Obama—not the feel-good orator who speaks of “change” and “hope,” but the man who would be the most left-wing president in our nation’s history.

Throughout our history, great Americans have stood up to grave challenges of all sorts. As this latest wave of secular liberalism threatens us, I look forward to standing shoulder to shoulder with you in prayer and action – in defense of the family.

These are really scary words coming from a pastor who is practically canonized by the Religious Right.Focus Action is their attempt to keep the tax exemption in place for Focus on the Family by pretending that the actions of this group have no impact on the tax-exempt group. Here are some more notable excerpts:

On the Judiciary

Activist judges who manufacture new constitutional rights out of whole cloth and legislate their own social policy preferences from the bench have infuriated Americans for far too long, bringing the subject of selection of judges to the forefront of the current culture war and political debate. This section will explore the selection of our state and federal judges, from state judicial voter guides to Senate confirmation proceedings. It will discuss judicial philosophies such as “living Constitutions” and “originalism” that guide judges in making their decisions, and highlight specific judges, good and bad, in an attempt to educate and inform.

On Abstinence/Public Policy

There have always been elements within society that have wanted an anarchic, ungoverned social approach to sexual behavior. From the 1960s?the dawn of the ?sexual revolution??until the late 1990s, the sexual anarchists largely had their way in influencing society through legislation and education. Sexual anarchists controlled congressional purse strings for sex education funding. The results were disastrous.

Notably missing from this website is any kind of “moral” or biblical defense for waging war on a nation that did not attack us, lying in order to do it, spying on the citizens of this country, and torturing prisoners, all of which are antithetical to the message of Christ.

Yet, Dr. Dobson would have us think that the term ‘liberal’ means some sort of craven, wanton, out-of-control political bent that will forever corrupt the morals of our country. In fact, liberals are much more in line with the biblical principles that Dr. Dobson has forgotten in his zeal to become the moral guardian of our country; namely, caring for the poor, the sick, the elderly, reaching out to the disenfranchised and bringing them into society’s mainstream, according them rights and respect.

Liberal values are not craven. They are formed out of a compassionate desire to meet the needs of those who are in need, and to form a society that is much more compassionate and tolerant. Folks like Dobson would sacrifice compassion for dogma, love for judgment.

Moreover, Dobson does not reflect true conservative values. His organization doesn’t advocate for limited government; it advocates for MORE government, set in place to enforce the Dobsonian moral agenda. True conservatives believe the first place for education is within the family, not within the schools, and they don’t rely upon the government to provide that education, yet Dobson would like to control the courts, the schools, the curriculum, and the agenda of our schools, which I view as a lack of effectiveness in his efforts to use his pulpit to educate families and churches.

Dobson is simply a theocrat. Look no further than his endorsement of Mike Huckabee during the primaries for evidence of it. He is as anti-conservative as he is anti-liberal. In an election which will pivot on the question of whether we are willing to continue to wage a war we had no business beginning, losing even more young men and women in the process, the question of

 Barack Obama’s ‘liberalism’ is moot.

If this is the best he can do to smear Barack Obama, there’s not much to worry about.

Technorati Tags: James DobsonFocus on the FamilyFocus Actionliberalconservativetheocrattheocracy,extremist

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: 2008Barack Obamaprimaries

The Old Politics, Described and Acted

March 24, 2008 · Posted in Election 2008 · Comments Off 

David Brooks:

Why does she go on like this? Does Clinton privately believe that Obama is so incompetent that only she can deliver the policies they both support? Is she simply selfish, and willing to put her party through agony for the sake of her slender chance? Are leading Democrats so narcissistic that they would create bitter stagnation even if they were granted one-party rule?

The better answer is that Clinton’s long rear-guard action is the logical extension of her relentlessly political life.

Frank Schaeffer:

Going on Fox is like going on pretend TV, but the problem is that Fox viewers seem to mistake Fox News for reality. This wouldn’t matter, except for the fact that Fox News and their cohorts on right wing talk radio and blogs manage to set the agenda for the rest of the news media. For instance, borrowing “facts” direct from the a right wing hate blog, Fox commentator William Kristol goofed in his NY Times column about Obama attending the infamous Rev. Wright church service — Obama had told the truth, he hadn’t been there — then Kristol had to take it all back when corrected by actual real live journalists. But of course by that time the lie had done the rounds and become another “fact.”

Jon Robin Baitz

As the day goes on, you start to feel insane, if you keep MSNBC on. Bill Clinton inferred or didn’t infer that Obama was not a patriot. Discuss. Discuss some more. ( I think “who is getting paid for this debate?”) Because the same stuff is rehashed in a sisyphusian cacophony from dawn to midnight, with some breaks for shows about prisoners and their tattoos. On MSNBC I think the vice president of the United States just shrugged again about the dead children of America. You can see the blood slowing and thickening in his arteries, occluding and blocking all the impulses that are responsible for decency.

Media Matters – Fox News panel ponders significance of Richardson’s beard:

Summary: While discussing on Fox News’ The Live Desk New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson’s endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama, Philadelphia radio host Dom Giordano said of Richardson’s beard: “I don’t know if it’s playing into the ethnic card, or whatever.” Host Martha MacCallum stated, “[Richardson] said, you know, ‘It’s hard for me,’ he said to me once, ‘people don’t even know I’m Hispanic,’ ” and then asked, “So is that part of what he is … cultivating here?” Giordano replied, “I think so.”

Hannity #1, (Rule #6)

HANNITY: Reverend Lawson, with all that we’ve heard from Reverend Wright, do you support everything he has said?

LAWSON: Of course not. I don’t support everything anybody says, even members of my own family. But I do recognize him as a friend, as a prophetic preacher and as a person who has been extremely valuable, not only in Chicago but nationwide, almost globally. He is a good man.

HANNITY: He is a good man that says G.D. America, the U.S. KKK of America, all of these statements. Do you think that’s coming from a good man?

Hannity #2

HANNITY: I’m sure you’re perfect in your life and that you’ve never made any mistakes.

HITCHENS: I’ve never committed treason like that. I don’t believe in the sincerity of his apology…

HANNITY: I knew Reverend Falwell, Christopher. I know the good work that this man has done.

HITCHENS: Tell me about it.

Bill Clinton:

“I must say that this new strategy of denying and disempowering and disenfranchising the voters in Florida and Michigan is, I believe, a terrible mistake. Hillary believes their votes should be counted. And I don’t know how we’re gonna go to those people in the general election and say you gotta vote for us even though we dumped all over you in the primary,” Clinton told a crowd at the Westside Democratic Club in South Bend.

Technorati Tags: old politicspolitics as usualcampaign 2008

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: 2008Barack ObamaDemocrats

New Politics, New Rules?

March 24, 2008 · Posted in Uncategorized · 0 Comments 

Instead of focusing on the incessant pundit prattle that’s polluting the airwaves today, perhaps it would be worth looking at the rules for those of us who want to be part of “The New Politics“. Everyone is having difficulty with the idea of a different level of discourse, but I think that’s because we’re so entrenched in the old rules, so here are some new ones to try.

  1. 1.   Define our ideals. If we hate smear politics, are we willing to give them up? Are we willing to forego references to candidates’ old scandals and focus on the issues? Will we decide to go forward with discussions of issues undistracted or continue to ignore them in favor of the ‘hot headlines’?
  2. 2.   Choose caring over cynicism. Can we confront our worst fears and lay them aside, or will they continue to dominate the conversation? Reactions to Obama’s speech last year are an example. Many saw it as an historic example of how to deal with the difficult and hard issues of our time in an adult manner. Inside of that speech, Barack Obama made it clear that he understood the resentments on all sides of the race issue, not just a single side, and came at it compassionately.
  3. 3.   Refuse to accept mainstream media’s impressions as true This probably should have been rule number one. The mainstream media has a vested interest in creating conflict where none need exist, and they do so with alarming regularity. As an example, the mortgage crisis is still huge, 4,000 American soldiers are dead in Iraq, violence has increased and an uneasy truce may be broken soon, yet major news outlets and talk shows are still hammering each other over the Jeremiah Wright non-controversy. This proves two points: one, their primary concern is stirring controversy, not reporting news; and two, they are not researching their stories before taking them to air. If they were, they’d be focused on reporting the MISreporting originally done with regard to this story. Participating in The New Politics means beginning with the understanding that the political reporting and commentary is by necessity slanted, not factual, and often erroneous. New Politics participants have to choose to use their own heads and hearts to research and form opinions on the facts, rather than the opinion of an overpaid pundit.
  4. 4.   Be courageous. The time for sitting idly by in our living rooms is over. Get out and talk to the neighbors, encourage a new style of political discourse, one that’s based on facts, common values, and a desire for the best for our country rather than the expedient.
  5. 5.   Find common ground. Rather than figuring out what divides us, why not try finding the areas of agreement and trying to branch out into a debate of areas of disagreement on a common foundation? Rather than attacking someone’s patriotism, maybe acknowledge that we’re all patriotic, but have different ways of demonstrating patriotism? It seems like a more productive way to approach political discourse and after hearing everyone scream at each other, might even be welcome.
  6. 6.   Choose to be intellectually honest. No spin, honesty. Probably the hardest to attain.


“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE” “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”

No 574 “En mi opinion” Enero 22, 2014

enero 22, 2014

No 574 “En mi opinión” Miercoles, Enero 22, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


“Me llenan de ira los actos de los enemigos en contra de  Estados Unidos pero me entristece más la pasividad de muchos buenos”

Lt. General McInerney Confirms Muslim Brotherhood Inside White House

JANUARY 14, 2014 BY NEWSEDITOR 55 COMMENTS                                                                                                    A Washington political insider, retired US Air Force General Tom McInerney, has confirmed that the Muslim Brotherhood has a major presence in the White House inner circle.




Obama Proclaims ‘Religious Freedom Day’ While Fighting 91 Religious Liberty Lawsuits. 18 January 2014 / 


On Wednesday, Pres. Obama declared today “Religious Freedom Day” – even as his administration continues its court fights against those seeking religious liberty.

While fighting 91 different lawsuits against his HHS mandate requiring employers to provide coverage for abortifacients and contraceptives, Obama even vowed to “remain committed to promoting religious freedom” in his proclamation:

“America proudly stands with people of every nation who seek to think, believe, and practice their faiths as they choose. In the years to come, my Administration will remain committed to promoting religious freedom, both at home and across the globe. We urge every country to recognize religious freedom as both a universal right and a key to a stable, prosperous, and peaceful future.

Read More:





Amenper: ¿Soy un Gusano Depreciable?

Hay algo que llaman  “Déjà vu”, un término francés que quiere decir que es el sentimiento de algo “ya visto” una sensación subjetiva de familiaridad.

Me siento con “Déjà vu”,  

Me siento como me sentía cuando los comunistas empezaron a imponer sus doctrinas en Cuba, cuando me convertí en un Gusano Despreciable. 

Vemos que políticos como Obama y el alcalde de New York nos están tratando como entes despreciables por nuestros pensamientos.  Ya no se trata de algo que hemos hecho, es por nuestra manera de pensar.  Bill de Blasio ha llegado a decir como su amigo Fidel Castro que los que no piensan como él no deben de vivir en New York.

Que se vayan los gusanos, que clase de “Déjà vu” sentimos.

Creo que el aborto es un crimen, que el matrimonio debe de ser entre un hombre y una mujer, que la constitución da al ciudadano el derecho a portar armas. Es mi pensar, creo que los que piensan diferentes están equivocados, pero también creo que es su problema, no el mío y que tienen el derecho a pensar diferente, no creo que sean despreciables, son mis enemigos políticos y estaré frente a ellos pero parte de mi persuasión política es defender la libertad que tienen de pensar diferente.

Pero según estos liberales soy un extremista despreciable que no tengo el derecho a vivir junto a ellos, que por lo visto a pesar de ese pensamiento extremo, no son extremistas pero una élite sofisticada que no quieren contaminarse con nosotros.

Somos escoria, que clase de “Déjà vu” sentimos 

Creo que quizás De Biasio decida dejar a los conservadores en New York pero en un campo de trabajo en Ellis Island, será apropiado si le tapara los ojos a la Estatua de la Libertad.

“Déjà vu” se produce porque el hombre es el único animal que tropieza dos veces con la misma piedra en el camino. Hace años alguien me dijo que eventualmente veríamos a Fidel Castro desfilar por la Calle Ocho, lo miré con escepticismo, en estos momentos tampoco creo que Fidel desfilará por la Calle Ocho, pero cada día pienso que pronto veremos a Raúl desfilar por la Calle Ocho, aunque quizás no lo veremos porque estaremos en un campo de concentración en los Everglades por gusanos.  




Amenper: El Cumpleaños de la Máxima Dama

Compañeros… nuestra amada Máxima Dama cumple 50 años hoy, o mañana o un día de  este fin de semana.

Pero siempre, sea lo que sea, podemos hacer todos los días su cumpleaños haciendo exactamente lo mismo que hace.

Aunque tu invitación se haya perdido en el correo por culpa de que los Republicanos del congreso han evitado que pudiéramos estimular con más fondos a esta eficiente institución que nos sirve puntualmente nuestra correspondencia, y aunque la  gran celebración de la Casa Blanca planeada por el Máximo Líder, nuestro Presidente Obama, no es hasta el sábado, eso no significa que debes esperar para celebrar.

Lo que debes de hacer es celebrar identificándote con nuestra líder, imitando las cosas que ella hace,  haciendo algunas de sus cosas favoritas, desde vestidos elegantes a comer tus verduras haciendo el “perrito” (Dougie), preferiblemente con Jimmy Fallon.

Vamos a sugerirle algunas de las cosas que puedes hacer para ponerse en contacto espiritual con Michelle y sentirte como que estás celebrando su cumpleaños, como que eres parte de ella misma.


Sale de compras, visita todas las tiendas, compra en todas sin limitaciones, hasta enTarget y no te preocupes por que los hackers te roben tu información de crédito. Después de todo, no es como si estás gastando tu propio dinero es parte del dinero del pueblo americano que te lo debe por los años de segregación racial.

Siempre ponte un vestido sin mangas, y ni pienses en la gente que está pasando frío en Washington o New York, tu siempre puedes subir tan alto como quieras tu termostato. O quedarte en Hawái un par de semanas más. 

Come un bisté filete con langosta pero diles a las otras personas que coman verduras. 

Diles a otros hermanos negros que te planten un jardín y que después te lo cuiden. Nunca hagas tu misma este trabajo porque se te estropean las manos manicuradas, al no ser que haya periodistas y las cámaras están rodando. 

Cómprate unos zapatos de $450 de piel rosa brillante mientras que posas para una foto en un albergue para desamparados. 

Viaja a las instalaciones militares para preparar su cierre, pero aprovecha el viaje para hacer discursos sobre cómo realmente te preocupas por las familias de militares. 

Aprovecha una entrevista para decir que por primera vez en su vida, estas orgullosa de tú país porque finalmente eligieron a un presidente basado en su color de piel en lugar de sus calificaciones. 

Siéntate entre su marido y la primera ministra danesa para impedirles que sigan coqueteando  

Ve a los talk shows de todas esas mujeres tontas que te alaban y rinden reverencia, y habla de todas las cosas que sueñas con hacer después vuelvas a ser un ciudadano privado en 2017 — ninguna de los cuales parece distinta a lo que estás haciendo ahora. 

Quéjate acerca del gran sacrifico que es ser la mujer más privilegiada en América. 

Sigue bailando, vacacionando, comprando, siempre de juerga, gastando sin límites, con el dinero de otras personas.


Ser Michelle es un Vacilón






Amenper: Cuando veamos balseros norteamericanos arriesgando sus vidas para llegar a Cuba entonces yo creeré en lo aterrador que es el capitalismo.

El Paraíso de Los Trabajadores

Siempre he tenido admiración hacia aquellos trabajadores emprendedores que se convierten en  empresarios, hasta en las etapas de mi vida en que era un simple empleado.

Será porque por mis venas corre la sangre empresarial y porque he vivido de cerca lo que cuesta y la satisfacción inigualable que te brinda la vida cuando se lleva a cabo un proyecto.

Es como un hijo que nace, crece y sabes hacerlo vivir con el propósito de que perdure en el tiempo y como recompensa al esfuerzo que te da unos beneficios. Eso es la empresa.
Empresario es aquel que individualmente o de forma colectiva, fija unos objetivos y toma las decisiones con estrategia sobre metas y fines para hacer realidad un proyecto con ánimo de un legítimo lucro-

Invierte un capital para crear la empresa, da un servicio a sus clientes, trabaja intensamente desde el inicio. Es un trabajador, aunque no lo reconozcan como tal.

Es el capitán de un barco que sin horas ni descanso lucha con y por él hasta que empieza a navegar. Transcurrido un tiempo y con altas dosis de tesón y paciencia el proyecto navegará por las agitadas aguas del mercado.

El empresario vivirá de las ganancias, que pueden ser muchas o pocas, obtenidas fruto del esfuerzo que pudiera ir o no en aumento a medida que pueda expandir o incrementar el número de clientes-

Pero el trabajo nunca acaba. Tendrá que preocuparse de dar un servicio impecable, innovador y mimar a todos y cada uno de esos clientes sin pensar en lo que va a ganar, porque eso espera que ya vendrá  como recompensa y fruto de haber hecho bien los deberes.

El que piense que el dueño de un negocio no tiene jefe no conoce que un buen empresario es un servidor incondicional de sus clientes.

El empresario también cumple con una labor social y económica para la comunidad.   Por su interés en el progreso de su negocio, brinda un servicio mejor que el de las agencias del gobierno, y es el principal generador de trabajos en una economía de mercado.

No es tarea fácil, tiene recompensa pero también tiene incertidumbres, cada año cientos de empresarios se declaran en bancarrota y cierran cientos de empresas

El riesgo está presente y si sucede lo peor, le será difícil recuperarse.

Entonces ¿Por qué los socialistas tildan de explotadores a los empresarios?, ¿por qué  en nombre de la desigualdad tratan de poner en peligro los años de trabajo y esfuerzo del empresario con impuestos y regulaciones?

Si cierran la empresa, se termina el empleo para los empresarios y para los que trabajan en la empresa. 

Pero mientras exista la libre empresa la ventaja del empleado es que si es capacitado y trabajador puede encontrar un trabajo similar en otra empresa.

Esta es la estructura económica de las personas en la economía de libre mercado.

Pero si con la demagogia de la redistribución de la riqueza acaban con el sistema empresarial, entonces el único empresario es el gobierno el único proveedor es el gobierno. Y con la falta de motivación empresarial los burócratas que administran las empresas estatales bajan la producción y prestan un servicio rudo y arrogante a los clientes.

En este sistema en que todos son empleados, estos dedican toda la vida al servicio del empresario único que es el Estado, y cuando tienen que comprar en las empresas estatales reciben un mal servicio y un precio fijo que no se puede discutir.

Para el trabajador es una vida llena de inseguridad, de incertidumbre. Si se pone a mal con el patrón único que es el estado te mandan a invernar al trabajo que te asigne el funcionario de turno, trabajo que como enemigo del estado será de un desempeño denigrante o tendrás que vivir de la limosna que recibas del estado como desempleado.

El que no se doblegue al estado, no puede tener ni siquiera un sueño o esperanza de una vida mejor como la tiene el empleado de un país con la economía de libre mercado.

Pero tenemos que aceptar el oír que es el paraíso de los trabajadores.

Pero trabajadores son los empresarios que perderán sus empresas, trabajadores son los obreros que serán esclavos del peor patrón del mundo que es el estado. Esto no es el paraíso pero el infierno de los trabajadores, que ya conocemos en Cuba o dondequiera que se implante el sistema..

 Y los únicos patrones serán los burócratas cómplices de los nuevos ricos, los políticos de las cúpulas, que son los verdaderos explotadores del trabajador..

Betty: Joe’s Plumbing-2017


Having left office,Barack Obama discovers a leak under his sink, so he calls Joe the Plumber to come and fix it.


Joe drives to Obama’s house, which is located in a very exclusive neighborhood where all the residents make more than $250,000 per year.  Joe arrives and takes his tools into the house. Joe is led to the room that contains the leaky pipe under a sink. Joe assesses the problem and tells Obama, who is standing near the door, that it’s an easy repair that will take less than 10 minutes.


Obama asks Joe how much it will cost. Joe immediately says, “$9,500.”  “$9,500?” Obama asks, stunned, “But you said it’s an easy repair!  “Yes, but what I do is charge those who make $250,000 per year a much higher amount so I can fix the plumbing of poorer people for free,” explains Joe. “It’s always been my philosophy.  As a matter of fact, I lobbied government who passed this philosophy into law.  Now all plumbers do business this way. It’s known as ‘Joe’s Fair Plumbing Act of 2014.’ Surprised you haven’t heard of it.”


In spite of that, Obama tells Joe there’s no way he’s paying that much for a small plumbing repair, so Joe leaves. Obama spends the next hour flipping through the phone book looking for another plumber, but he finds that all other plumbing businesses listed have gone out of business. Not wanting to pay Joe’s price, Obama does nothing and the leak goes unrepaired for several days.


A week later the leak is so bad that Obama has had to put a bucket under the sink. The bucket fills up quickly and has to be emptied every hour, and there’s a risk that the room will flood, so Obama calls Joe and pleads with him to return. 


Joe tells Obama that he can set up an appointment in about 6 months from now because he has so many people getting their plumbing work done for FREE.  “The demand for plumbing work for those who get it for free is skyrocketing!!!  There’s a long waiting list of those who need repairs.  “Let’s see – this repair will cost you about $21,000 now.”


“What!!! A few days ago you told me it would cost $9,500!” Obama quickly fires back.  Joe explains,

“Well, because of the ‘Joe’s Fair Plumbing Act,’ a lot of rich people have hired their own “personal plumbers” to fix their plumbing, so there are fewer payers.  As a result, the rate I have to charge my wealthy paying customers keeps rising.  This has put a lot of my fellow plumbers out of business, and they’re not being replaced – nobody is going into the plumbing business because they know they won’t make any money. I’m hurting too – all thanks to greedy rich people like you who won’t pay their fair share.”


“Joe! This could be bad. If all the rich people have their own plumbers and you can’t charge the poorer people, you’ll go broke.  What will you do then?”


Joe immediately replies, “Run for president!”





Samitier: Fíjense como la Historia se repite…

La Conferencia De Los TRES GRANDES En Yalta Fue La Repartición De Europa Acordada Con Stalin Por La USSR y El Nieto Del Traficante de Opio Llamado Roosevelt Quien Con El Dinero Del Abuelo… Tapó Las Bocas De Los Periodistas… y Aun hoy 100 años después nadie la conoce… y Hasta Wikipedia… solo dice que el SEÑOR DELANO tenía negocios en Hong Kong… Lo comprendo… ese traficante es el abuelo de uno de los presidentes de USA más venerado…  

Veamos Como Obama Quiere Repetir La Historia Stalin acordó hacer elecciones en los Países y gobernar democráticamente… LO  CUAL SE SABIA QUE NO HARÍA… Pero ese documento era para el consumo del pueblo Norte americano…  

Ahora Obama y Kerry Hacen Los Mismo Con La Conferencia Sobre Siria…

La propuesta de los Estados Unidos ha sido que el presidente  al-Assad de Siria, debe respaldar públicamente el Mandato De La Conferencia, que se resume en un comunicado de la reunión del 2012 en Ginebra…

Ese mandato dice que el propósito de la conferencia es para negociar el establecimiento de una GOBIERNO DE TRANSICIÓN que gobernaría Siria con el  “CONSENTIMIENTO MUTUO” del gobierno de Assad y  la oposición siria… y darían elecciones… HONESTAS…  

En otras palabras le están ofreciendo Al-ASSAD que Deje el gobierno; se asile en algún país… y después En unas elecciones… como las que hizo Stalin…pero Ahora HECHAS POR LOS MUSULMANES… se establezca El gobierno que GANE…  

Bravo Obama… y Kerry…  TODOS SABEMOS cómo se Hacen esas elecciones… ya toda LATINO AMÉRICA TIENE COMUNISTAS ELECTOS… en elecciones LIBRES…

Obama dice que la mariguana es como el alcohol.  Aparentemente Obama No Sabe Leer… En La Guerra De 1967 Entre Judíos Y Egipcios Los Israelitas Destruyeron Casi Todos Los Tanques Egipcios… Debido A Que Los Árabes Estaban EnMariguanados…

Del 5 al 8 de junio, en cuatro días de guerra relámpago, las operaciones llevaron a la destrucción del cuerpo de batalla egipcio en el Sinaí… después de la guerra… se comenzó a investigar el motivo de la falta de respuesta de los tanques rusos manejados por los egipcios… Para la sorpresa de LOS INVESTIGADORES… dentro  De los destruidos tanques se encontró HASHISH es decir MARIGUANA y aparentemente el uso de esa droga esta Extendida en el ejercito musulmán… DEBIDO A ESO… Los musulmanes en los tanques tenían un LENTO o un RETARDO en sus acciones… que los llevaron a ser DERROTADOS…


Un Ejercito De Fumadores De MARIGUANA Es Un Ejercito Derrotado De ANTE MANO…

¿Quién Le Gustaría Participar En Una Guerra En Que Sus Compañeros Estuvieran EnMariguanados?  

COMO esas DECLARACIONES del SR Obama…Son DIFÍCILES DE CREER… Aquí las tienen…




Samitier: ¿Que VA A Pasar? Cuando Los Griegos No Paguen La Deuda…

El Partido Que Aparece Ganador En Las Encuestas En Las Próximas Elecciones… Promete Anular La Deuda… De Todos Los Acreedores…

Las encuestas de opinión griegas, dan ahora a la oposición del  Partido Radical de Izquierda, Syriza que significa: “a las raíces”  en griego, a la cabeza.  

El punto principal de la plataforma de este partido, es repudiar  la deuda y la revocación de las medidas de austeridad impuestas por la troika (UE , FMI , BCE) .  

Pasok , el antiguo Partido Socialista del clan Papandreu ahora ha caído en cuarto lugar!  

Ahora será muy difícil para el partido conservador de Gobierno mantenerse en el poder .  

La encuesta de Pulso puso el partido de la oposición en el 22,5 % y los conservadores el 20%. Los ultra- extremistas de extrema derecha llamados “Amanecer Dorado” se mantuvo en tercer

lugar con un 11,5%, recuperándose rápidamente después de caer con fuerza a raíz del asesinato del antifascista para las que uno de sus seguidores, fue detenido.      Significativamente, una clara mayoría de los griegos cree que SYRIZA va a ganar las próximas elecciones, según la encuesta.   

¿Qué Significa Esto Para La Unión Europea? Grecia no es sólo un miembro de la UE, sino que también utiliza el euro como su moneda oficial. Grecia no ha estado pagando, incluso los intereses de sus  325 mil millones de € de préstamo.  Según el acuerdo, Alemania es responsable de 211 mil millones de € de la deuda griega.

Lo que crea un problema para el gobierno de coalición de Ángela Merkel. Pase lo que pase en Grecia, Merkel no va a abandonar el euro.  

Así que, ¿Cómo el pueblo alemán va a reaccionar cuando TENGAN  QUE PAGA LA FACTURA PARA LOS GRIEGOS? ? ? Parece que MÁS LA IMPRESIÓN DE DINERO ESTÁ EN CAMINO!  El Banco Central Europeo imprimirá más dinero y pasar por alto el hecho De que Grecia no está pagando su deuda.  

Entonces, ¿qué pasa con los otros países deudores ? ? ? Si Grecia no paga, ¿Por qué tienen ellos que pagar? ¿QUÉ PASA SI TODOS DEJAN DE PAGAR?  

No importa cómo se mire, la verdad es que nadie quiere pagar! Todo el mundo quiere la JUBILACIÓN ANTICIPADA.

Servicio de salud Universal, educación gratuita, Seguro de Desempleo y las vacaciones pagadas…


Aparentemente no RECORDAMOS… Que la Primera revolución contra El sistema establecido… fue en Estados Unidos Cuando quiso el REY AUMENTAR LOS IMPUESTOS para pagar los GASTOS… a esa revolución Le llamamos ESTABLECIMIENTO DE UNA REPUBLICA…  

La Segunda si le llamamos REVOLUCIÓN FRANCESA… En ese caso el REY Para no aumentar los impuestos… ordeno IMPRIMIR DINERO… hasta que el dinero de compraba NADA… La Tercera fue el advenimiento de Hitler… tanto dinero  Imprimió la Republica Alemana de WEIMAR que era más barato quemarlo Para calentarse en invierno que comprar carbón… esa situación le dio Entrada al NAZISMO

La Pregunta que se desprende de todo esto… ¿CUANDO EL EURO SE DERRUMBA? ¿Cuánto tiempo más, puede continuar con este esquema?  ¿QUÉ SUCEDE, Cuando Ningún País Pague? ? ? Aquí tiene las noticias de las elecciones en Grecia

Hay Un Dicho Que Todos Conocemos…

“La Historia Se Repite”

Este informe y los videos demuestran que la opinión


LOS BANQUEROS… que tienen comprados a todos

Los POLITIQUEROS electos… Igual Que en 1933

Cuando simultáneamente (DÍAS DE DIFERENCIA)

llegaron Al Poder Con Una Denuncia SIMILAR…

En USA Franklin DELANO Roosevelt y HITLER…


Lean la información y vean los discurso de los


Si No Es Lo Mismo En Europa Que En USA…

Putindice la verdad: Desde Que El Hombre Aprendió A Escribir…

Claramente Nos Comunicó Que Los Que

Practicaban La Homosexualidad Buscaban

el Amor de Un Jovencito… Ningún Escrito

De La Antigüedad Dice Que Los Jovencitos

Buscaban Adultos… Nos Quieren Tupir…

Uno de los errores es creer que existen homosexuales ACTIVOS

(que hacen el papel de hombres) y PASIVOS (que hacen el papel

De mujer)… según todas las encuestas publicadas… INCLUYENDO




Putin solo está diciendo y haciendo lo que se debe… Dicen ellos

Que se nace homosexual y por eso son NORMALES… eso es

FALSO… la homosexualidad es INDUCIDA a los jovencitos siempre

Por un adulto…

Esta situación va a continuar hasta que el abuso de niños en

La pubertad sea tan grande que todos los padres COJAN MIEDO que

Un enfermo aberrado sexual Le violen a sus hijos…


AQUÍ en USA estamos viviendo bajo la dictadura de los HOMOSEXUALES…

si no estás de acuerdo con ellos… PIERDES EL EMPLEO y te persiguen y

Esto comenzó con ANITA BRYANT… que anunciaba el jugo de

Naranja de la florida… y de eso hace ya 30 años… Para leer la información de Putin:



Fue El Todo Poderoso Nieto Del Traficante De Opio

Franklin Delano Roosevelt y Los Comunistas Quienes

Crearon la ONU… Para Establecer El Gobierno Mundial

Hay Que Aplicarles El Viejo Refrán:

Cría Cuervos y Te Sacaran Los Ojos

Ayer la ONU Invitó A Irán A Participar En las Conversaciones De Paz

En Siria… Contra el Voto De USA… 

Al Final Todo Esa Organización Va a Terminar Como La “Torre De Babel”


Aquí tienen la noticia en el NYT

ESTO SI ES UN HOMBRE,,  FALTAN JUECES  CON ESTE VALOR=======================================

“No voy a descolgar ninguna Cruz” porque soy católico y ella “es símbolo de la piedad” de Dios, fue la respuesta del juez argentino Luis María Rizzi a la campaña lanzada por la Asociación Pensamiento Penal (APP) y la Asociación por los Derechos Civiles (ADC), para que se retiren los símbolos religiosos de las salas de audiencias de los tribunales aduciendo la neutralidad religiosa del Estado.


Así lo expresó Rizzi, integrante del Tribunal Oral Criminal Nº 3º de la Capital Federal, en una carta enviada a Mario Juliano, presidente de la APP y juez del Tribunal en lo Criminal Nº 1 de Necochea.

En su misiva, el magistrado Rizzi manifestó que tampoco dispondrá que otra persona retire el crucifijo, “porque creo en Dios y porque soy católico. Porque tengo reverencia por la Cruz de Cristo, el inocente crucificado por los hombres y el más inocente de los condenados, que representa, además, la fe mayoritaria y la identidad de nuestro pueblo”.

El juez señaló que “la Cruz no ofende a nadie, sea o no creyente, ni nadie puede sentirse agredido, inquieto, molesto y menos discriminado por su presencia. Porque contrariamente a lo que ustedes suponen o creen, la presencia de la Cruz es símbolo de piedad, de consuelo, y de misericordia; es símbolo de que quienes se desempeñan frente a ella, tienen temor de Dios, y por ello mismo, inspiran más confianza en que actuarán de acuerdo a la justicia y a la verdad, con buena voluntad y con la máxima imparcialidad”.

“Porque finalmente, la libertad religiosa que ustedes dicen pregonar y defender, es precisamente para que quienes quieran hacerlo, cuelguen, lleven o exhiban la Cruz, y no para que nos obliguen a quitarla, ocultarla o disimularla”, añadió.

“Soy consciente no obstante, de que ustedes están embarcados en una triste misión en la que muy probablemente lograrán los fines que los desvelan. Tal vez porque la Cruz es incompatible con este mundo en el que se confunde el bien con el mal, en el que se privilegian supuestos derechos de la mujer a costa del derecho a la vida de los niños; en el que impera la deslealtad, la mentira, la corrupción; en el que ya no interesa la protección de la familia y de la infancia, y se las supone independientes de la protección del matrimonio”, indicó Rizzi.

El juez argentino dijo que “la Cruz parece no tener más lugar en una nación desolada, ciega y sorda a las leyes eternas que no son de hoy ni de ayer, que huye de la Verdad y de la Belleza, y que se empeña en ignorar y abandonar a Cristo”. Sin embargo, aseguró, “Cristo no nos abandonará, aún cuando repudien y quiten su Cruz”.




¿La marihuana es más o menos perjudicial que el alcohol?

Por Jen Christensen y Jacque Wilson, CNN

(CNN) — “Fumé marihuana cuando era un muchacho, y lo veo como un mal hábito y un vicio, no muy distinto a los cigarrillos que fumé cuando era joven y a lo largo de gran parte de mi vida adulta”.

No creo que sea más peligrosa que el alcohol“, dijo el presidente de Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, al editor de The New Yorker, David Remnick.

Si estás viendo esta nota en tu móvil, mira aquí la galería.

El alcohol es una sustancia adictiva legal para las personas de 21 años o más en Estados Unidos.

Por otro lado, la marihuana es ilegal en casi todo el mundo.

Si comparamos sus efectos secundarios, este es el balance:


Las cualidades adictivas del alcohol están bien documentadas. Las personas con síndrome de abstinencia por el alcoholismo pueden presentar ansiedad, depresión, dolores de cabeza, insomnio, náusea, fiebre e incluso convulsiones.

Las cualidades adictivas de la marihuana aún no se entienden completamente. El Instituto Nacional de Abuso de Drogas de Estados Unidos (NIDA) estima que el 9% de las personas que usan marihuana se volverán adictas a esta sustancia. Para efectos de comparación, la cocaína engancha a aproximadamente el 20% de quienes la consumen.

“Hay una clara evidencia de que, en algunas personas, el consumo de la marihuana puede conducir a síntomas de abstinencia, incluidos insomnio, ansiedad y náusea”, escribió el corresponsal médico de CNN, el médico Sanjay Gupta.

“Incluso al considerar esto, es difícil defender que tenga un alto potencial para el abuso”.

Conducir bajo su influencia

Incluso los conductores ligeramente “tocados”; conductores con un nivel de alcohol en la sangre de 0.01%, lo que significa que bebieron no más de un trago, son 46% más propensos a ser culpados por un accidente cuando chocan con un conductor sobrio, según un nuevo estudio.

Aún se delibera sobre el impacto de las personas que consumen marihuana y conducen. En los primeros estudios se mostró que la marihuana tenía un ligero impacto en las habilidades psicomotoras necesarias para conducir, pero estos estudios fueron vistos como limitados debido a que se realizaron en situaciones de laboratorio.

Las personas que conducen bajo la influencia de la marihuana tienen casi el doble de probabilidad de causar un accidente que los conductores sobrios, según una revisión reciente de un estudio publicada en la revista British Medical Journal. Las personas que consumen marihuana en combinación con otras drogas o con alcohol también presentan un mayor riesgo de choque, según investigaciones.

El ‘monchis’ y la barriga cervecera

Parece lógico pensar que el alcohol te hará ganar peso. Un trago de licor tiene aproximadamente 100 calorías y una cerveza, 150. Además, el alcohol reduce tus inhibiciones, lo que te alienta a comer pizza y nachos sin ninguna vergüenza.

También se supone que la marihuana provoca mucho apetito por alimentos ricos en carbohidratos, un fenómeno conocido como “monchis”.

Sin embargo, algunos estudios sobre si el alcohol o la marihuana realmente causan aumento de peso son contradictorios.

En un estudio con más de 19.000 mujeres en un periodo de 12 años se mostró que quienes bebían alcohol con moderación en realidad pesaban menos que quienes no lo hicieron. En otros se vinculó a la obesidad con el alcoholismo: los bebedores frecuentes parecen tener un mayor riesgo.

Los fumadores de marihuana parecen ser más delgados que quienes no fuman. Las tasas de obesidad son menores en aproximadamente un tercio de las personas que fuman marihuana al menos tres veces a la semana, comparadas con las que no consumen marihuana en lo absoluto, según un estudio publicado en la revista American Journal of Epidemiology.

El deseo está ahí…

Beber reduce tus inhibiciones y ciertamente puede hacerte sentir más relajado en situaciones sociales. Pero esta desinhibición también puede conducirte a participar en comportamientos sexuales riesgosos, según estudios. El sexo sin protección puede aumentar tu riesgo de contraer una enfermedad de transmisión sexual (ETS) y aumentar tus probabilidades de un embarazo no planeado.

Y aunque sirve como lubricante social, beber alcohol en realidad te deshidrata. El cuerpo necesita cierto nivel de hidratación y flujo sanguíneo para la excitación sexual, así que beber demasiado dificulta la erección en los hombres y la lubricación natural en las mujeres.

La marihuana puede tener un impacto similar al alcohol en reducir tus inhibiciones y tu ansiedad, pero en algunos estudios se mostró que los hombres bajo su influencia tienen mayores dificultades para encontrar placer en el sexo.

En un par de estudios se encontró que los hombres que consumen marihuana regularmente tenían más problemas con la disfunción eréctil y necesitaban medicamentos para contrarrestar ese efecto secundario. No hay estudios similares en los que se analice la satisfacción sexual de las mujeres cuando consumen marihuana.

Riesgos de salud a largo plazo

Con el paso del tiempo, beber puede conducir a desarrollar enfermedades hepáticas, problemas neurológicos, problemas psiquiátricos y puede aumentar tu riesgo de varios tipos de cáncer.

Fumar marihuana es más peligroso que fumar cigarrillos, según especialistas. El alquitrán en los porros contiene una concentración mucho mayor de los químicos vinculados con el cáncer de pulmón, en comparación con el alquitrán del tabaco. Y fumar marihuana deposita cuatro veces más alquitrán en los pulmones que el tabaco, según el NIDA.

Las altas dosis de marihuana también pueden causar reacciones psicóticas, como alucinaciones y paranoia, en algunas personas. Las personas más jóvenes con un historial familiar de esquizofrenia tienen un mayor riesgo de desarrollar el trastorno después de consumir marihuana, según se mostró en siete estudios.


El consumo de alcohol provoca 2.5 millones de muertes en todo el mundo al año, según la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Algunas de estas muertes son por enfermedad hepática, intoxicación y accidentes vehiculares.

La marihuana afecta tus reflejos y dificultar tus habilidades motoras, así que puede provocar muertes por accidentes automovilísticos.

En un estudio se encontró que los consumidores de marihuana tienen un aumento de 4.8 veces de riesgo de un infarto en la primera hora después de fumar, debido al efecto de la droga en tu ritmo cardíaco.

Pero los científicos creen que una sobredosis de marihuana es altamente improbable. En un estudio se encontró que era seguro que los animales consumieran aproximadamente un 30% de su peso corporal en cannabis 

 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”

No 573 “En mi opinion” Enero 21, 2014

enero 21, 2014

No 573 “En mi opinión” Martes, Enero21, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


“En un mundo de mentiras defendemos la verdad”

Samitier: barak husein obama desaparece 1,687,000 trabajos…


La Magia de Obama y Los Socialistas… La Noticia Debajo La Dio CNN Empresa Que Favorece A Obama

Como Todos Sabemos La Población Aumenta Año Tras Año… 

Ahora CNN Nos Dice Que Hay 1,687,000

Menos Trabajado Que En El Año 2007

Como Es Posible Que Obama Diga Que

Ahora Tenemos Solo Un 6.2% Desempleados

Esto son los NÚMEROS:

Los 144.586 millones de estadounidenses que tenían puestos de trabajo en diciembre de 2013 fue de 1.687 millones menor que los 146 273 000, que tenían trabajo hace seis años, en diciembre de 2007. – Ver más en




Samitier: Documento Oficial Desclasificado Que Describe Como

Los Estados Unidos Forzaron A Somoza a Renunciar…

No es nada nuevo… el mismo sistema lo usaron con Chiang KaishekEn China…

Al que le EMBARGARON EL ENVIÓ DE ARMAS… después lo usaron con Batista…

después con Vietnam… (que no fue oficial) pero dejaron de enviarles piezas de

repuesto para los helicópteros, aviones y tanques… después lo mismo le hicieron




Gobierno De USA El Que Traiciona e Instala En

Los Países A Los Enemigos De Occidente y Las

Democracia… Es Porque No Quiere…

Aquí tienen los cables secretos del embajador de entonces de USA en Nicaragua…

El MR. Pezullo diplomático de carrera que fue NOMBRADO con la MISIÓN ESPECIFICA

De hacer RENUNCIAR A SOMOZA…  sus declaraciones secretas de entonces… debajo

tiene el enlace por si las quieren Leerlas todas…

Esto Lo Considero Suficiente Para ABRIRLES LOS OJOS


Estaba intentando empujar el conteo regresivo, el conteo regresivo

de las 72  horas antes de la salida de Somoza…


Habíamos votado en la OEA que Somoza debía de lograr un alto

Al fuego… y una solución negociada…  presentada por Venezuela

Costa Rica y otras…


Habíamos cortado el abastecimiento a la Guardia. Habíamos detenido algún 

abastecimiento que venía de Israel; lo detuvimos en alta mar; desviamos

los barcos.  Le estábamos diciendo a sus antiguos proveedores en

Centroamérica —Guatemala y   otros—, ‘córtales el abastecimiento’.

Ellos lo hicieron. Por eso, su material estaba  terminando. Lo sabíamos…


También sabíamos que se estaban organizando las fuerzas de la oposición.

Por eso,   sólo podíamos percibir un sentido de cierre. No había forma de

saber cuándo iba a haber un colapso. Creo que hubo mucho de espejismo por parte

de Washington, en cuanto a  lo que se podía hacer dadas las circunstancias.

Y quizás sea natural, que estando sentado en Washington, uno crea tener

más opciones que las que realmente tiene. 


Fue un período intenso, apasionante. Nunca he visto tantos cables altamente

confidenciales que iban y venían. Yo estaba enviando de tres a cuatro cables

por día  y recibía entre seis y siete de regreso. Era sencillamente… increíble.

Era una  embajada en estado de sitio. No teníamos mujeres ni familias.

Teníamos una Sección   de Seguridad de Panamá, por emergencia, para una



En otros de los cables Pezzullo dice:  

“Somoza está claramente tratando de  obtener lo más que pueda, a cambio de su renuncia.

Él todavía piensa que podemos  hacer más para proteger a la Guardia, el Partido Liberal… 

Sin duda el State Department y NO FIDEL CASTRO… propicio la caída de Somoza… usando la misma forma que lo hicieron desde 1948 con Chiang Kaishek,Batista, Vietnam… y no se Cuantos mas…  ojo… fíjense… que todos los TRAICIONADOS fueron antes ALIADOS de USA…






Amenper: Redistribución de la Injusticia





Como Obama y todos los nuevos gurús de la resucitada doctrina socialista nos siguen hablando de la justicia socio-económica de la redistribución de la riqueza, y como todos debemos de ser iguales terminando con la desigualdad de los ingresos; creo que tengo el derecho de yo también seguir hablando de la injusticia socio-económico de la redistribución de la riqueza.

Hablemos de nuestras experiencias diarias.  Hay personas que viven en casas mejores que otras, y esto es parte de la diferencia socio-económicas que produce envidia.  Esto es complicado porque a las personas con las casas peores es muy fácil convencerlas de que es injusto que otros tengan mejores casas.

Pero vamos a no entrar en las casas y quedarnos en césped del frente de las casas en que vemos que no importa el tamaño de la casa, hay algunas que tienen un césped mejor que otras. Quizás así se puede llegar a  entender por qué hay algunos que tienen mejores casas que otros. 

Hay céspedes bien cuidados en casas y hay céspedes abandonados en otras.

¿Por qué? Esto si es evidente, no hay que ahondar mucho sobre esto, todo el mundo tiene que estar de acuerdo en que es el interés y el cuidado que el dueño de la casa se toma en el césped y el jardín de la casa produce el resultado de cómo luce el patio no importa realmente el status económico del dueño de la casa.. 

Es una decisión de cada individuo. Lo que sería injusto es que la persona que cuida su césped se le obligue a que también cuide el césped del vecino que no ha querido cuidar el suyo para que todos tengan un césped bien cuidado. 

Porque lo que sucederá es que al que cuando se obliga a que cuide el césped del otro, se cansará de estar cuidando el césped suyo y del otro y no cuidará ninguno y todos los patios estarán abandonados.

No vamos a hablar de las diferencias socio-económicas en los trabajos y empresas, porque es fácil lograr crear la envidia en las personas por la diferencia de ingresos y es posible pero largo de explicar los motivos.

 Vamos a simplificarlo en los deportes.  Hay personas que tienen más condiciones físicas que otros, son más fuertes o más rápidos, ya sea por su naturaleza o porque han dedicado su vida para lograr con ejercicios y dietas especiales unas condiciones físicas y habilidades deportivas superiores a otros.  Hay otros que tienen naturalmente buenas condiciones físicas, pero que llevando una vida disoluta pierden esas condiciones, y hay otros que nunca han tenido condiciones para ser superiores en el deporte.  Cuando seguimos este deporte, tenemos que estar de acuerdo, y nadie discute esto que los mejores reciben mejores salarios que los que no ejecutan el deporte tan bien como ellos.  Es un hecho indiscutible y aceptado, no se puede redistribuir el ingreso de los jugadores a partes iguales, porque entonces los buenos no rendirían como los inferiores, y el juego perdería en interés y calidad.

Todos a diferente nivel fuimos estudiantes, los exámenes determinaban los grados que recibíamos. Unos estudiaban más duro o tenían habilidades superiores para entender la materia.  Esos sacaban mejores notas, y a nadie se le ocurría decir que todos debían de sacar las mismas notas.


Los casos arriba determina la desigualdad de la vida. Lo mismo es en las castas socio-económicas

Lo único que se puede hacer para que las personas que por diferentes razones se encuentran en las castas inferiores, es lo que se ha hecho en los Estados Unidos.  Las personas que están en las castas económicas superiores pagan impuestos, los que están por debajo del nivel de la pobreza, no sólo no pagan impuestos pero reciben beneficios sociales, como alquiler de casa a bajo costo o sin costo, sellos de alimentos cheques para la supervivencia y acceso a los servicios médicos por el Medicaid. Esto reduce el nivel de pobreza del individuo y lo eleva a un estado de bienestar comparable al de la clase media de otros países.

Entonces, ¿De qué igualdad nos hablan?  Lo que nos están hablando es que por envidia le quitemos las riquezas y los ingresos a los que producen, eso fue lo que vimos en Cuba. La igualdad de los países socialistas como Cuba. La igualdad de la pobreza la pobreza de la nación. En esta sociedad en que la casta pobre es realmente pobre, y no puede salir de la pobreza, mientras hay una nueva clase que por su posición política se convierte en los nuevos ricos. 

Cuando en una sociedad de libre mercado,  las clases productoras que son los que pagan los impuestos para ayudar a los pobres, dejen de cortar césped, el césped de ellos y el de los pobres, y todo el césped de la nación estará abandonado y no se producirá más riquezas para nadie.

Esto es un análisis que no es resultado de algo muy elaborado, es algo evidente en cada país donde se ha establecido el comunismo.





Amenper: Distribución justa es el justo resultado de la habilidad individual

La tenencia de las riquezas o la desigualdad de ingresos es algo que he determinado en mi vida como algo natural, no por algún estudio o lectura sino de una manera instintiva, por lo que siempre me ha parecido una discusión absurda.

Me pareció así cuando se discutía en Cuba antes del comunismo, y me pareció más aberrante cuando se implementó el comunismo paulatinamente después del triunfo de Fidel Castro y me parece absurdo

ahora cuando Obamas nos martilla esta idea en la cabeza en la nación donde la riqueza ha estado merjor distribuída en la historia del mundo.

Lo único que puedo entender como razonable sobre esta doctrina socialista es que es un sistema efectivo para obtener beneficios políticos. La mayoría de lo que se dice sobre la desigualdad de los ingresos o la tenencia de riqueza es estúpido o a lo sumo tergiversado o producto de una planificada mala información. 

Lo que determina los beneficios recibidos justamente, no se limita a la economía pero es algo natural en todas las facetas de la vida, como en los deportes, los juegos de azar o los estudios.

Si una persona gana más que otra en un juego, no se puede establecer redistribución de ganancias porque el resultado de ganar el juego es parte del juego en sí, al no ser que uno de los jugadores esté haciendo trampa.  Lo mismo en las notas que los alumnos reciben en los exámenes o en un juego de pelota, football o un certamen de belleza.   

En una sociedad libre, en su mayor parte, en el mercado es todavía menos posible hacer una redistribución justa, porque el  ingreso es el resultado de la capacidad de servir a su prójimo y el valor de sus congéneres coloca a ese servicio.  Desde los empresarios hasta los que nos cortan el césped las personas reciben sus ingresos por la capacidad y por el servicio que sirvieron a los otros, es como si por servir mejor a sus semejantes mucho más eficazmente que yo, han recibido muchos más “certificados de rendimiento,” que le permite reclamar mayor de lo que produce sus semejantes, como aviones, coches, casas grandes o dulces sabrosos. ¿Cómo voy yo a protestar?

Bill Gates creó riqueza mediante la producción de servicios en el internet que mejoraron las vidas de millones y millones de personas alrededor del mundo. ¿Debe el congreso  confiscar parte de su riqueza en nombre de la equidad y la redistribución del ingreso?

Excepto en muchos casos al gobierno arregla el juego con el capitalismo amiguista, el “Crony capitalism” que es equivalente al que hace trampa en un juego, el  ingreso es principalmente el resultado de la productividad y el valor que la gente de que la productividad.

Mucho más importante que la desigualdad de ingresos es la desigualdad de la productividad. Eso sugiere que si hay algo que hacer sobre la desigualdad de ingresos, debemos centrarnos en cómo dar a la gente mayor capacidad para servir a sus semejantes, es decir aumentar su productividad.

No veo cómo se puede pensar de otra manera, y cuando veo que lo hacen, no me queda más remedio que aceptarlo como que ellos han sido más habilidosos que nosotros, y han recibido el premio de la ganancia por su habilidad en engañar a los pueblos.





Amenper: These are the words from President Obama’s speech on Fridayoutlining reforms for the National Security Agency’s surveillance program, I really don’t understand what he means, but somehow I have this estrange familiar feeling that we is going to screw us again.

. . . I believe critics are right to point out that without proper safeguards, this type of program could be used to yield more information about our private lives, and open the door to more intrusive bulk collection programs in the future. They’re also right to point out that although the telephone bulk collection program was subject to oversight by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and has been reauthorized repeatedly by Congress, it has never been subject to vigorous public debate.

For all these reasons, I believe we need a new approach. I am therefore ordering a transition that will end the Section 215 bulk metadata program as it currently exists, and establish a mechanism that preserves the capabilities we need without the government holding this bulk metadata.

This will not be simple. The review group recommended that our current approach be replaced by one in which the providers or a third party retain the bulk records, with the government accessing information as needed. Both of these options pose difficult problems. Relying solely on the records of multiple providers, for example, could require companies to alter their procedures in ways that raise new privacy concerns. On the other hand, any third party maintaining a single, consolidated database would be carrying out what is essentially a government function with more expense, more legal ambiguity, potentially less accountability—all of which would have a doubtful impact on increasing public confidence that their privacy is being protected.

During the review process, some suggested that we may also be able to preserve the capabilities we need through a combination of existing authorities, better information sharing, and recent technological advances. But more work needs to be done to determine exactly how this system might work …….?????????????????????????????????????





Amenper: ¿Cuál es el Problema de las Medicinas en U.S.A.?

Hace unos días, uno de ustedes me preguntó ¿Por qué las mismas medicinas son más baratas en otros países que en los Estados Unidos?  Estuve tratando de explicarle que el alto costo es en las nuevas drogas solamente y  que todo se trata de la burocracia del FDA, que hace tan costosas las investigaciones para aprobar una nueva droga que los laboratorios para poder recuperar los fondos tiene que cobrar más caro, y que si no lo hacen entonces no tienen fondos para seguir con nuevas investigaciones y se frena el progreso.

Muchos no entienden esto y es difícil de entender, así que no creo que haya podido convencer a muchos con lo que dije. 

Sin lugar a dudo el celo de que la droga no vaya a hacer más daño que beneficios es bueno.  De hecho las leyes vigentes surgen de un caso en los años 50s de una droga llamada Talidomida,  una sustancia química que durante un programa en Alemania se estaba desarrollando como un antihistamínico para el tratamiento de las alergias, pero al encontrarse que no era muy efectiva en este campo, se determinó que tenía un efecto hipnótico y sedante. Con apenas dos años de ensayos clínicos realizados con animales, decidieron aprobar y poner en las farmacias el producto, en medio de una agresiva campaña publicitaria. La nueva droga era a la vez tranquilizante y somnífera, y fue presentada como la solución contra los malestares del embarazo, se dijeron maravillas de este nuevo fármaco. El resultado, lo mayores de ustedes quizás lo recuerde, esas madres dieron a luz niños sin extremidades y deformes.

Así que como todo en la vida, hay una justificación para que en los Estados Unidos existan regulaciones estrictas para aprobar una droga.

Pero esos es como cuando pedimos a alguien que nos llene una copa de vino y cuando está llena sigue echando vino, lo que pasa es que se derrama y mancha el mantel.

Hoy salió un escrito  en el Wall Street Journal, de dos científicos del Hudson Institute y Ramgeley Capital Invests, que son compañías investigadoras que han estado trabajando por 20 años en el desarrollo de  una droga para la Múltiple Esclerosis llamada Lemtrada.

Esta droga ya fue aprobada para tratar el mal de la Esclerosis Múltiple en 30 países, incluyendo Canadá, Australia y miembros de la Unión Europea.  Pero el día 27 de Diciembre el FDA rechazó de nuevo la aplicación para usar la droga en los Estados Unidos.

Eventualmente, esta droga será aprobada, no sé cuándo.  Entonces es justo que las personas del Ramgeley recuperen sus más de 20 años de investigación de los que otros en Europa, que no tienen el tipo de regulaciones del FDA, ya se han estadi beneficiando.

Mientras tanto, las victimas de esta terrible enfermedad no pueden usar la droga, que no puede venderse en los Estados Unidos. Tienen que viajar al extranjero y si no tienen los medios sufrir las consecuencias que no tener una calidad de vida mejor en lo que le queda de su existencia en este mundo.

Aquí vemos la respuesta a la pregunta que me hicieron, por esto es que las medicinas nuevas son más caras en Estados Unidos que en Europa.  No es por la libre empresa, porque las medicinas sin patentes son más baratas en Estados Unidos que Europa, el precio es causado por la burocracia del FDA. O sea que tenemos que pagar por el salario de los burócratas y después tenemos que pagar por las consecuencias de su burocracia.

Esto es la realidad en la medicina y es igual en todas las facetas del gobierno, y por desgracia los reguladores están en el poder y tendremos que seguir sufriendo las consecuencias.

Abajo pueden leer el artículo de hoy en el Wall Street Journal sobre la droga Lemtrada.

The FDA Nixes a Pathbreaking Drug for MS

Thirty developed nations have approved Lemtrada. The U.S.



Jan. 16, 2014 7:12 p.m. ET

Alemtuzumab is used today as an intravenous treatment for a form of leukemia. But 20 years of research centered at Cambridge University also has shown that the action of this drug—depleting immune cells that become misdirected and attack one’s own body—is effective in treating multiple sclerosis.

Under the brand name Lemtrada (a product of Sanofi SAN.FR +0.57% and its U.S. subsidiary Genzyme), the drug has been approved in recent months for treating MS in 30 countries, including Canada, Australia and all members of the European Union. But on Dec. 27, Food and Drug Administration reviewers at the division level (subject to a final decision by top officials) rejected an application to use the drug here to combat MS.

Enlarge Image


David Klein

We are invested in Lemtrada through a partnership that one of us manages—and we still think the investment will do well. European authorities have called Lemtrada a “step change” in treating MS, and it will promptly become an important therapy at the intermediate”relapsing-remitting” stage of the disease. This is the stage when patients still have periods of normal life before permanent brain and nerve damage sets in.

It was sickening to watch the FDA deny an obviously effective and important therapy to those afflicted with a terrible disease. For as long as the decision stands, much needless suffering will result (and much needless foreign travel). The agency’s action is also a vivid example of the serious problems besetting U.S. drug regulation.

The primary reason FDA reviewers gave for rejecting Lemtrada was that the studies demonstrating the drug’s efficacy did not conform to the agency’s standard requirement of double-blind, placebo-controlled drug trials—where some patients, unbeknownst to themselves and their doctors, receive placebo treatments. There are excellent reasons for the standard approach, but only up to a point. Lemtrada and many established MS treatments have immediate side effects, such as nausea and headaches, that are well known to doctors and patients. A double-blind trial would not really be blind. Patients on a placebo would promptly discover that they were the “controls,” and many would decline to participate further—scrambling the statistical comparison with patients receiving real treatments.

The Lemtrada investigators therefore designed “active control” trials that matched it against a leading MS therapy (a branded version of beta interferon) that would be its primary clinical alternative. The trials found that Lemtrada patients relapsed into active MS symptoms at rates 50% lower than patients taking the alternative. These results were buttressed by MRI and other objective measures that found, for example, highly significant reductions in brain atrophy and new brain lesions.

FDA officials turned their backs on these powerful results. Drug regulators inhabit a complex world that mixes strong political pressures, abstract questions of biological science and statistical inference, and practical trade-offs between the benefits and risks of new therapies. In these circumstances, the agency elevated the double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to the level of dogma. It simplifies the reviewers’ work and reduces the need to make case-by-case judgments about an appropriate trial design. Most of all, it leaves the agency with wide discretion, at the end of years of development and evidence, to say “no” or “tell us more.”

For Lemtrada, the FDA reviewers announced that the trials were not “adequate and well-controlled.” They are now demanding another round of trials, with somewhat different procedures, that would take years and cost at least $100 million. Given the magnitude of the results of the already completed trials, the additional trials could add nothing to answering the regulatory question of whether Lemtrada is suitable for clinical use against MS.

The Lemtrada application was one of a growing number of cases where progress in biological science is upsetting FDA doctrine. The drug was developed through decades of “clinical science” that combines scientific method with continuously recalibrated clinical treatments. The research, conducted by world-leading academic neuroscientists, encountered and solved many biological and clinical puzzles along the way, enlarging scientific understanding of MS’s underlying mechanisms.

By the time alemtuzumab entered regulatory review, its properties and effectiveness in treating relapsing-remitting stage MS were already well understood. In rejecting a therapy widely known to be highly effective, the agency’s reviewers were sending a defiant message to the medical community: The advance of biological research and development must conform to FDA institutional prerogatives rather than the other way around.

FDA reviewers raised an additional concern. Lemtrada, they said, presents serious health risks to patients that may exceed its health benefits. Lemtrada treats aberrations in the immune system, and that intervention does present risks, mainly of thyroid and blood disorders. But the risks of the drug are well known from the Cambridge research and from a decade of clinical use, in much higher doses, treating leukemia. In almost all cases when the disorders do appear, they are much less severe and more easily treated than MS itself.

There is no reason to deny doctors and patients the choice of Lemtrada over other therapies that have risks of their own. For many with MS, the choice will be an easy one—as the fervent petitions of MS patients and advocacy groups during the FDA review attest.

Lemtrada is administered just twice—in one-week intravenous regimens, one year apart—compared with established therapies that are administered continuously on a monthly, weekly or daily basis. And a significant number of Lemtrada patients find themselves free of MS debilities after just the first session. These are enormous benefits. Yet at a public meeting in November, one FDA reviewer warned an agency advisory committee that because Lemtrada patients would have less need to see their physicians constantly, it could be more difficult for physicians and the FDA to monitor them.

This objection is revealing. At some point, regulatory command-and-control needs to make room for the welfare of patients and the skills and professionalism of their doctors.

If Lemtrada does no more than postpone progressive, irreversible paralysis for a few years, permitting patients to live normal lives, that is a great blessing even if some of them fall off the FDA grid. But the therapy is also slowing the progression of the disease—some patients have remained free of clinical disease activity for up to 14 years.

With experience and learning, these successes may point the way to averting MS damage to the central nervous system at the earliest, asymptomatic stages. Medical progress is iterative; it must be free to pursue the logic of the problem at hand at each incremental step.

The cascade of Lemtrada approvals outside the U.S. demonstrates that vigilant public regulation can adapt to, and make use of, modern biological science. It should be adopted here. FDA reform will not be achieved in a single decision, but it will certainly require decisions, and correcting the stark mistake made about Lemtrada would be an excellent step in the right direction.

Messrs. DeMuth are, respectively, a distinguished fellow at Hudson Institute and a managing partner of Rangeley Capital LP. Rangeley Capital invests in a Lemtrada-specific security that is publicly traded.



Amenper: La Falsa Bondad

Mi mejor amigo es aquel que cuando me desea bien, lo desea para mí.


Esta frase de Aristóteles, parece extraña a simple vista, bueno, decimos,  si alguien te desea bien este bien es para ti ¿para quién puede ser?

Pero la filosofía de Aristóteles, que como filósofo tenía muchas coincidencias con el cristianismo, implicaba un vasto conocimiento en la conducta del ser humano.

Podríamos decir que el equivalente en el cristianismo de esta frase de Aristóteles  es cuando Pablo dice en Romanos.

 “Y si por obras te glorias, ya no es gracia; de otra manera la obra ya no es obra” 

Lo que también es bastante confuso.  Pero de lo que ambos tanto Pablo como Aristóteles están hablando es de la falsa de sinceridad en nuestras obras. Cuando como dice Aristóteles le deseamos lo mejor a alguien de la boca para afuera, pero lo estamos haciendo para que otros crean que somos muy buenos, es como dice Pablo, ya no tiene gracia porque la obra la hiciste para ti mismo no para el que dices que le estás deseando bien y la gracia te la adjudicaste tú mismo.

Pudiera parecer complicado pero lo vemos todos los días, no hay más que abrir la televisión y ver las personas congraciándose para con ellos mismos por lo magnánimos que son con las contribuciones que hacen, pero no la hacen en silencio, la anuncian, entonces eso no tiene gracia o en otras palabras la gracia se la están adjudicando para ellos mismos.

La vemos en los políticos liberales como se presentan como redentores de los pobres cuando todos ellos son millonarios y lo que quieren es que otros paguen por su gloria a la vez que tratan de mantener cautivo a los pobres con la dependencia.  Ya ellos tienen su gracia, al menos por el momento, mientras los pobres no se den cuenta de que quiere decir Aristóteles, que cuando le desean bien a los pobres, no para el beneficio de los pobres pero para su propio beneficio.  

De lo que hablan tanto Aristóteles como Pablo es de algo que vemos diariamente “La Falsa Bondad”




Amenper: Moralidad del Teísmo Vs Moralidad del Ateísmo


Hay algo que yo que reconocí en mi viaje de ateísmo al teísmo.  

Aunque todavía creo como creía antes que se puede tratar de ser moral sin ser cristiano.

La realidad es que para tener una conducta tratando de ser moral hay que tener una fuente razonable de lo que es moral o no.

Las verdades morales son maleables y subjetivas si ellas no están cimentados en una fuente trascendente (como Dios).

Un ateo puede tener la buena intención de ser moral y recto, y lograrlo hasta cierto nivel.

Pero supongamos que se deja llevar por la propaganda del mundo de hoy. 

“El aborto no es malo, lo que es malo es impedir que la mujer pueda ser la dueña de su propio cuerpo”.

Esto es “moral”, el aborto es “moral” nos dicen en muchos medios del mundo de hoy.

Y un ateo que quiere ser moral puede creer que es moral  estar a favor del aborto. 

Lo mismo se puede decir del matrimonio homosexual y de muchas otras situaciones que no son tan evidentes y que hoy en día nos dicen que son morales.

O sea que para un ateo como la moral es subjetiva, en muchos casos aunque crea que está realizando un acto moral, no lo está haciendo si la referencia objetiva del mundo que lo lleva a este acto es contraria a los principios morales en la realidad de la fuente de la moralidad (Dios) Entonces  la moralidad del acto se convierte en relativa. En realidad ni el mismo está seguro que el acto es moral o no, porque no tiene una fuente transcendente que se lo determine.

El teísmo proporciona, al menos, suficiente arraigo de las leyes morales objetivas del cristianismo como para voluntariamente afirmar con nuestras palabras (o revelar involuntariamente con nuestras vidas) lo que es moral.

Los escépticos objetan,  los que sostienen esta objeción hacen la siguiente afirmación:

Si Dios es la fuente de la moralidad y decide lo que es “correcto” o “malo”, la relación entre Dios y la verdad moral puede ser descrita en que un acto está mal porque tu religión condena el acto.


Pero lo que uno aprende cuando acepta la realidad de Dios, es que es Dios, no la religión la que condena el acto, y por tu relación directa con Dios es por la que determinas que Dios condena el acto porque es malo.

En otras palabras la verdad moral es un reflejo de la naturaleza de Dios.

Desde la visión cristina, Dios NO nos dice lo que es justo, él es justicia y cuando venimos de Él también nosotros somos justos.  Nos desviamos, nos corrompemos, pero cuando lo hacemos, durante ese acto de corrupción,  si miramos a Él, en nuestro subconsciente sabemos que estamos haciendo mal. 

Esta es la objetividad del teísta que no tiene el ateo.

Las verdades morales objetivas son simplemente un reflejo del ser eterno de Dios.

No son reglas o leyes que Dios ha creado (y por lo tanto podrían alterar imprudentemente), pero en cambio son cualidades inmutables y fiables de su naturaleza reflejadas en nuestro universo. Existen porque Dios existe (no porque Dios las creara o reconociera más tarde) , siempre son coherentes con su naturaleza moral y lógica; nunca se propone hacer algo contrario a quién es Él  como Dios.

El cristianismo es aún una explicación más razonable  para las verdades morales objetivas.

Cuando los escépticos argumentan en contra de un Dios trascendente, hay que recordar sin embargo, que ellos también han reconocido las verdades morales trascendentes.  Hasta hace poco todas las leyes de los países occidentales estaban basadas en las moralidad cristiana.

Y en todos los tiempos en esos países habían ateos, ellos con este préstamo del cristianismo hicieron  un caso a favor del teísmo.

Por eso ahora están tratando de presentar una visión objetiva en situaciones contrarias al cristianismo para justificar lo que saben que está mal.

Tanto el cristiano como el ateo actúan contra las verdades morales en su vida, porque esta es la naturaleza humana.  La diferencia es que el teísta reconoce la fuente de la moral y reconoce su inmoralidad, arrepintiéndose y tratando de volver a la moralidad cristiana, mientras el ateo se puede tratar de justificar clasificando su inmoralidad como moral.




Amenper: Redistribución de la Injusticia

Como Obama y todos los nuevos gurús de la resucitada doctrina socialista nos siguen hablando de la justicia socio-económica de la redistribución de la riqueza, y como todos debemos de ser iguales terminando con la desigualdad de los ingresos; creo que tengo el derecho de yo también seguir hablando de la injusticia socio-económico de la redistribución de la riqueza.

Hablemos de nuestras experiencias diarias.  Hay personas que viven en casas mejores que otras, y esto es parte de la diferencia socio-económicas que produce envidia.  Esto es complicado porque a las personas con las casas peores es muy fácil convencerlas de que es injusto que otros tengan mejores casas.

Pero vamos a no entrar en las casas y quedarnos en césped del frente de las casas en que vemos que no importa el tamaño de la casa, hay algunas que tienen un césped mejor que otras. Quizás así se puede llegar a  entender por qué hay algunos que tienen mejores casas que otros. 

Hay céspedes bien cuidados en casas y hay céspedes abandonados en otras.

¿Por qué? Esto si es evidente, no hay que ahondar mucho sobre esto, todo el mundo tiene que estar de acuerdo en que es el interés y el cuidado que el dueño de la casa se toma en el césped y el jardín de la casa produce el resultado de cómo luce el patio no importa realmente el status económico del dueño de la casa.. 

Es una decisión de cada individuo. Lo que sería injusto es que la persona que cuida su césped se le obligue a que también cuide el césped del vecino que no ha querido cuidar el suyo para que todos tengan un césped bien cuidado. 

Porque lo que sucederá es que al que cuando se obliga a que cuide el césped del otro, se cansará de estar cuidando el césped suyo y del otro y no cuidará ninguno y todos los patios estarán abandonados.

No vamos a hablar de las diferencias socio-económicas en los trabajos y empresas, porque es fácil lograr crear la envidia en las personas por la diferencia de ingresos y es posible pero largo de explicar los motivos.

 Vamos a simplificarlo en los deportes.  Hay personas que tienen más condiciones físicas que otros, son más fuertes o más rápidos, ya sea por su naturaleza o porque han dedicado su vida para lograr con ejercicios y dietas especiales unas condiciones físicas y habilidades deportivas superiores a otros.  Hay otros que tienen naturalmente buenas condiciones físicas, pero que llevando una vida disoluta pierden esas condiciones, y hay otros que nunca han tenido condiciones para ser superiores en el deporte.  Cuando seguimos este deporte, tenemos que estar de acuerdo, y nadie discute esto que los mejores reciben mejores salarios que los que no ejecutan el deporte tan bien como ellos.  Es un hecho indiscutible y aceptado, no se puede redistribuir el ingreso de los jugadores a partes iguales, porque entonces los buenos no rendirían como los inferiores, y el juego perdería en interés y calidad.

Todos a diferente nivel fuimos estudiantes, los exámenes determinaban los grados que recibíamos. Unos estudiaban más duro o tenían habilidades superiores para entender la materia.  Esos sacaban mejores notas, y a nadie se le ocurría decir que todos debían de sacar las mismas notas.


Los casos arriba determina la desigualdad de la vida. Lo mismo es en las castas socio-económicas

Lo único que se puede hacer para que las personas que por diferentes razones se encuentran en las castas inferiores, es lo que se ha hecho en los Estados Unidos.  Las personas que están en las castas económicas superiores pagan impuestos, los que están por debajo del nivel de la pobreza, no sólo no pagan impuestos pero reciben beneficios sociales, como alquiler de casa a bajo costo o sin costo, sellos de alimentos cheques para la supervivencia y acceso a los servicios médicos por el Medicaid. Esto reduce el nivel de pobreza del individuo y lo eleva a un estado de bienestar comparable al de la clase media de otros países.

Entonces, ¿De qué igualdad nos hablan?  Lo que nos están hablando es que por envidia le quitemos las riquezas y los ingresos a los que producen, eso fue lo que vimos en Cuba. La igualdad de los países socialistas como Cuba. La igualdad de la pobreza la pobreza de la nación. En esta sociedad en que la casta pobre es realmente pobre, y no puede salir de la pobreza, mientras hay una nueva clase que por su posición política se convierte en los nuevos ricos. 

Cuando en una sociedad de libre mercado,  las clases productoras que son los que pagan los impuestos para ayudar a los pobres, dejen de cortar césped, el césped de ellos y el de los pobres, y todo el césped de la nación estará abandonado y no se producirá más riquezas para nadie.

Esto es un análisis que no es resultado de algo muy elaborado, es algo evidente en cada país donde se ha establecido el comunismo.






Samitier: obama NSA mensaje… If you like your freedon you can keep it… If you like your personal liberties you can keep it… You can keep thouse too… TRUST ME


Obama Pide Nuevamente UN VOTO DE CONFIANZA

Y Predica… Lo Mismo Que Con El Obama Care…  
“Trust Me!” (Just as you did with Obamacare).
I promise “Change You Can Believe In!” (You can believe all you want, but there won’t be any changes).



No Se Puede Opinar Diferente


Ya Son El “Poder ABSOLUTO


Los más intolerantes… Son los homosexuales.

Echaron a un reverendo protestante, en Escocia

Por escribir en Facebook, que la homosexualidad,

es un “Desorden” Y Una “Perversión.”


Están Como En Cuba… El Que No Opina Como Ellos

PIERDE EL TRABAJO…Aunque sea un Pastor







Samitier: Deflacion. Todos Sabemos Que La Inflación Es El

Aumento De Precios… Causado Por Un

Aumento Del Dinero Circulando… y La

Deflación Es Lo Contrario!


Hay algo que no me cuadra… todos los reportes de TODOS

LOS GOBIERNOS dicen que no hay INFLACIÓN… ¿Como es posible?


Todos los países, están imprimiendo dinero como nunca antes…


¿Porqué No Circula?

Primero, el dinero va la los bancos primarios del Fed.

Que han hecho estos bancos con todo el dinero???

Que Esperan? O Que Planifican??


Pregunto.. Por Qué No Soy Banquero…



Aquí tienen Al Señor Legarde declarando, que hay que

imprimir más dinero.

Pero nada va a cambiar, mientras le den el dinero a los

bancos! Y los bancos aparentemente no lo prestan…

Hay solo un camino.

Repudiar las deudas fraudulentas y prestar directamente

a todas las empresas con menos de 49 empleados

y con empleados a tiempo completo. en 6 meses, se acaba la crisis.




Samitier: Lo Que Todo El Mundo Sabe Sobre

Los Exiliados Españoles Llamados

“Republicanos” Al Final De La

Guerra Civil Española…


Al final de la guerra, lo que reportó la prensa es que se había

REFUGIADO en Francia cruzando la fronteras más de  500.000

Españoles (algo más de un 2% de la población total del país)

Otros 15.000 consiguieron llegar a Argelia en barcos (entonces

colonia francesa) en ambos casos fueron internados en campos

de concentración, en espera de que la fueran relocalizados y

aceptados por otros países….


Lo Que NO SE SABE… Es Como

Termino Ese Enorme Exilio…

LA MAYORÍA MAS O MENOS  300,000 decidieron pocos meses

después… REGRESAR A ESPAÑA…  Habían huido por miedo y

Precaución a los horrores de la guerra… pero no eran políticamente

Culpables De Ningún Crimen… NI PERSEGUIDOS POLÍTICOSy

REGRESARON…  La mayoría era población civil, que no había

participado en la guerra  (mujeres, niños, ancianos); también había

hombres que NO HABÍAN OCUPARON cargos de importancia en

el gobierno, ni en el ejército… Otros eran soldados que por miedo

a rendirse… marcharon juntos con los oficiales culpables a Francia…


Pasados los PRIMEROS MESES… Creían que nada podían temer a su

regreso…  todos fueron encarcelados e investigados y algunos tuvieron

que pasar un juicio; aparte de encontrar dificultades para encontrar trabajo…

pronto se integraron a la sociedad española…


Los Malos Los Culpables… Los Comprometidos

215.000 Se Quedaron En Territorio Francés…

En los primeros meses según la propaganda comunista murieron unos

15.000 a causa de las malas condiciones  en las que vivían en los

campos de concentración… lo cual NO DEBE DE SER CIERTOpues

equivale al 6% de los internados y superaría todos los  RECORDS

inclusive los de los campos alemanes al final de la II Guerra Mundial…


Esos 215,000 españoles se refugiaron e infiltraron en HISPANO AMÉRICA

y fueron una fuerza comunista secreta… No sé; como se comportaron en

otros países… pero esos exiliados y sus hijos en su GRAN MAYORÍA fueron

NEFASTOS en Cuba… y aun los tenemos solapadamente en el Exilio Cubano…

hablando de que los que defendían la “REPUBLICA” no eran comunistas…

estuvieron metidos en todas las organizaciones revolucionarias… y

especialmente fueron colocados en puestos gubernamentales “BOTELLEROS” 

trabajando para los Politiqueros de la “GENERACIÓN DEL 30”que aun existen

algunos en el exilio cubano… y sus hijos y nietos son la mayoría de “Cubanos

Americanos” politiqueros electos en Miami… 


Para refrescar la memoria… solo mencionare DOS participaciones… Los

Fundadores de “NEFASTA LEGIÓN DEL CARIBE” fueron“Republicanos Españoles”


que están acusados de ENORME CANTIDAD DE CRÍMENES EN ESPAÑA y les

mencionare Dos nombres que son bien conocidos… Menoyo…Y Bayo… el que

entrenó a los revolucionarios del Gramma…


En Cuba teníamos MILES de “Republicanos Españoles” que inmediatamente se

Integraron al gobierno de Castro… inclusive el PRIMER JEFE DE PRISIONES…

Fue uno de ellos… 







Wednesday January 15 2014





IMF head Lagarde warns of growing threat of deflation


“With inflation running below many central banks’ targets, we see rising risks of deflation, which could prove disastrous for the recovery,” said Ms Lagarde, in a speech at th National Press Club in Washington on Wednesday. “If inflation is the genie, then deflation is the ogre that must be fought decisively.”




Samitier: El Fracaso.

En el Mundo capitalista Hay Compañías Que Fracasan… Como Aparentemente Nosotros Elegimos Congresistas Que Nunca Han Trabajado… No Lo Saben… Hasta Ahora Obama Care es Un Fracaso Total


They need young, healthy people to subsidize the care of older, sicker people.


When the Obamacare exchanges were rolled out last fall, the feds were hoping enrollees age 18-34 would make up 40% of the total. They need young, healthy people to subsidize the care of older, sicker people.

Alas, young people are on to the scam. According to figures released yesterday, the 18-34 cohort makes up only 24% of enrollees. Fully one-third are age 55-64… and more than half are older than 45.


Samitier: En el Mundo capitalista Hay Compañías

Que Fracasan… Como Aparentemente

Nosotros Elegimos Congresistas Que

Nunca Han Trabajado… No Lo Saben…

Hasta Ahora Obama Care es Un

Fracaso Total


They need young, healthy people to subsidize the care of older, sicker people.


When the Obamacare exchanges were rolled out last fall, the feds were hoping enrollees age 18-34 would make up 40% of the total. They need young, healthy people to subsidize the care of older, sicker people.

Alas, young people are on to the scam. According to figures released yesterday, the 18-34 cohort makes up only 24% of enrollees. Fully one-third are age 55-64… and more than half are older than 45.






Samitier: Para los que todavía defienden la REPUBLICA ESPAÑOLA 

Los Socialistas y Comunistas Gustan De Exagerar Los Muertos…

Cuantas Veces No Hemos Oído decir:

UN MILLÓN Murieron En La Guerra Civil Española…

Este Informe Oficial Esta En La Red


Muertos En Acción De Guerra: 160.000 (de ellos 15.000 civiles).

Muertos en la revolución y en su represión, 131.000:

58.000 en la zona nacional (Franco)

73.000 en la zona republicana (entre ellos muchos izquierdistas asesinados por otros izquierdistas, sobre todo comunistas pro soviéticos). También no pudieron asesinar más derechistas, católico y sacerdotes… al perder la guerra el Frente Popular… pues hasta en la retirada huyendo hacia Francia… siguieron matando..,



En La Zona Nacional, La Mayoría De Los Muertos No Fueron Asesinados, sino juzgados y ejecutados, lo cual no es lo mismo, aun si las normas aplicadas fueron  muy duras y las garantías escasas, pero muy superiores a las de los “Tribunales Populares” del bando REPUBLICANO del Frente Popular. Desde luego que en la represión nacionalista  cayeron bastantes inocentes, pero otros eran conocidos asesinos y se les juzgó y condenó. 


En los juicios de la posguerra se produjeron 27.966 ejecuciones de condenados a muerte. A otros 80.000 se les conmutó la pena de muerte por la prisión. Los encarcelados fueron más de 200.000 que fueron siendo indultados. En 1943, Solo 3 Años Después De Finalizar La Guerra… fueron indultados los que habían sido condenados a menos de 20 años de prisión…


Entre los 73.000 Muertos En La Zona Republicana, destacan los asesinatos por ser religiosos, es decir, asesinados por el solo hecho de ser católicos y no por ser considerados partidarios del enemigo o sospechosos de serlo: fueron unos 20.000 laicos (seglares) Y 6.832  (4.184 Sacerdotes Del Clero Secular, Incluidos 12 Obispos Y Un Administrador Apostólico De Una Diócesis; 2.365 Religiosos Y 283 Monjas). El primer mártir fue precisamente un seglar: el hijo del sacristán de la parroquia de San Ramón en el puente de Vallecas, asesinado a sangre fría en el interior del templo el sábado18 de julio de 1936. (el día que comenzó la sublevación de Franco)


A 6.500 de los 6.832 clérigos y religiosos los mataron en el primer año. Andreu Nin, jefe del Partido Obrero de Unificación Marxista (POUM), dijo el 8 de agosto de 1936:

“Había muchos problemas en España. El problema de la Iglesia nosotros lo hemos resuelto totalmente, yendo a la raíz: hemos suprimido los sacerdotes, las iglesias, los cultos”.

Este Andreu Nin, de ideología marxista, trotskista, fue asesinado por sus rivales los marxistas pro soviéticos de la Brigada Abraham Lincoln, donde militaron 1,108 cubanos… entre ellos Masferrer , los cuales, tras aplicarle la tortura seca, que fracasó con Nin, lo desollaron, es decir, le arrancaron la piel, y le dieron muerte, haciendo desaparecer el cadáver, porque presentaba huellas de la tortura. Parece ser que en las fosas encontradas en 2008 en Alcalá, podría estar su cadáver, pero se ha echado tierra al asunto porque se ve que aún es POLÍTICAMENTE INCORRECTO que se comprueben históricamente los hechos.





Samitier: ¿Que sabes del ROBESPIERRE el #1 de los revolucionarios SANGUINARIOS

Estos Datos Espero Les Hagan Pensar…

El “Libro De Texto Aprobado”

Es El Verdadero Maestro…

A finales del siglo IXX se difundió la idea de enseñar  en

ACADEMIAS había academias de todos las ciencias…

Eran una institución cultural que estaba fuera del ámbito

de la escuela y de la universidad,  pues ambas ya entonces

habían quedado anquilosadas en los libros de TEXTO y la

academia posibilitaba el contacto e intercambio de ideas

NO OFICIALES entre la multiplicidad  de participantes

comenzando por el LÍDER o maestro que abría las

discusiones… haciendo la enseñanza MUY AMENA…


Así en esas clases se podía aprendía a ESCUCHAR y DISCUTIR

sin MIEDOS  no ser “Políticamente Correctos”


Hoy es IMPOSIBLE encontrar en un LIBRO que se use como

De TEXTO que por ejemplo se SEÑALE  que Robespierre era

SOLTERO… y NO SE LE CONOCIÓ NOVIA… mucho menos que

compartía  su vivienda con un AMIGO… 


También Robespierre tiene el apoyo de los SOCIALISTA y

COMUNISTA quienes no se atreven a criticarlo… porque


cuando dijeron:

“Los jacobinos eran de hecho los bolcheviques de la Revolución

francesa al igual que los bolcheviques fuimos los jacobinos de la

Revolución Rusa.”

Esa afinidad fue conscientemente reconocida por Lenin y Trotsky,

y por esa razón… las nuevas generaciones NO SABEN LO PELIGROSO

que son los hombres sin mujeres… y esto aplica a las mujeres sin

hombres… quienes todos sabemos a simple juicio que tiene una

DUALIDAD que resulta SIN NECESIDAD de ser psiquiatra; ANORMAL

La cual fue siempre hasta hace solo 50 años reconocida como

“MORBOSO-A en lo personal Y SÁDICO-A en sus relaciones con sus



Como en la actualidad la enseñanza no es ACADÉMICA… es decir No

Es COMPARTIDA de persona a persona… no encontraras ninguna nota

O información sobre la soltería de ROBESPIERRE pues ningún editor de

libros tendrá EL VALOR DE IMPRIMIRLO… y mucho menos los ELECTOS

Comisionados de Educación… El valor de aprobar un libro de texto para

ser usando en las escuelas…


Creo que quizás las academias quedaran ELIMINADAS… pues

Próximamente no dejaran enviar estos tipos de mensajes ni siguiera

por correo Electrónicos…


Si seguimos comiendo de lo que PICA el POLLO… nos vamos a despertar

Con la dictadura TOTAL…  





On January 2, General Mills (GIS) announced that it would stop using any genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in its most popular brand, Cheerios.

The change has been heralded as a major victory by anti-GMO and food activist groups, such as Food Democracy Now and GMO Free USA. But it left me wondering: What exactly have they “won,” and ultimately, what are they fighting for?

It’s easy to see why activists are so thrilled with General Mills’ decision. Cheerios is one of the most ubiquitous brands in America. Better yet, the move to eliminate GMOs from the breakfast cereal seems to imply that General Mills has the consumer’s best interest at heart.

Makes you feel all fuzzy inside, doesn’t it?

But even a cursory look at statements from General Mills’ spokesman, Tom Forsythe, quickly dispels that heartwarming illusion…

“It’s not much of a change at all,” Tom wrote in a posting on the company website.

And he’s right – it’s not. 


What Would YOU Ask the World’s Top Investment Experts?

If you were given the chance to pick the brains of some of the world’s top investment editors, analysts and researchers, what would you ask them? Would you want to know the best piece of investment information they ever received… their single best investment ideas for the next six months… or their best income ideas for the next five years? We recently posed these questions to 21 all-star investors. That includes our own Co-Founder and Chief Investment Strategist, Louis Basenese, and our Director of Energy and Resources, Karim Rahemtulla. Click here now for details on how you can get their surprising answers.

You see, Cheerios are made of oats, and there are no genetically modified oats. All General Mills has done is use different corn starch (now made from non-GMO corn) and different sugar (non-GMO pure cane sugar).

Tom added: “It’s not about safety. Biotech seeds, also known as genetically modified seeds, have been approved by global food safety agencies and widely used by farmers in global food crops for almost 20 years.”

All true. Genetically modified seeds are FDA approved and have been in use for decades. In fact, 90% of commodity crops in America (including soy beans, corn and sugar beets) are grown from genetically modified seeds, according to National Geographic.

So why did General Mills feel the need to acquiesce?

“We did it because we think consumers might embrace it,” says Mr. Forsythe.

Or, more accurately, because the company thought its bottom line might suffer if it didn’t make the change. Meanwhile, General Mills has no plans to remove GMOs from any other line of cereal because it would be “difficult, if not impossible,” according to a recent statement from the company.

The Biggest Loser

So let’s tally up the points here. Non-GMO advocates have scored a major win because a national brand has ostensibly turned its back on biotech seeds. And General Mills has protected its bottom line while making nothing more than trivial changes.

That leaves us with the loser, which in this case is science. Oh, and the nearly 900 million people around the world suffering from undernourishment (according to the World Hunger Education Service).

You see, the shortsighted and ignorant push to eliminate GMOs from food does come with a cost. It casts an ominous shadow on a technology that doesn’t deserve quite so much vitriol, and it hampers progress toward stemming third-world hunger.

It’s unfortunate that all of the recent press about GMOs ignores their numerous benefits. According to UC Santa Cruz, these benefits include greatly increased crop yields, foods with more complete nutritional value, foods with a longer shelf life for easier shipping and, ultimately, the promise of more sustainable agriculture worldwide.

Food activists will be quick to point out that there are concerns over testing (or a lack thereof). Do we really know that GMOs produce food that’s safe for consumption? At this point, the majority of the research (including a majority of independent critical reviews) says that GMOs are harmless.

In fact, Jon Entine, a Forbes contributor, writes that, “Every major scientific body and regulatory agency in the world has reviewed the research about GMOs and openly declared crop biotechnology and the foods currently available for sale to be safe.”

It’s that kind of information that gives the anti-GMO movement the same self-righteous stink as, say, the Occupy Wall Street movement (body odor not withstanding).

Considering we live in a world where a child dies every two seconds from hunger, should anyone really be concerned about the GMO corn starch in his or her Cheerios?

In Pursuit of the Truth,

Christopher Eutaw


“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”

No 572 “En mi opinion”Enero 16, 2014

enero 16, 2014

No 572 “En mi opinión” Jueves, Enero 16, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


“En un mundo de mentiras defendemos la verdad”

Amenper: La Hora del Supositorio

Los titulares de la prensa hoy dicen que hay “temor” de que haya un “Bailout” de la industria de seguros por el Obamacare.

No creo que nosotros los contribuyentes, conscientes de lo que el Obamacare representa, tengamos “temor”. Desde que se aprobó la ley lo que tenemos es “resignación”.

Todos sabemos que el Obamacare es una mala ley por diseño, todos saben que no iba a funcionar. De hecho creo que se creó para que no funcionara.  El Obamacare es simplemente una ley que no puede funcionar y que fue creada como un paso hacia la socialización del sistema del cuidado de la salud.

Un “bailout” es simplemente que los contribuyentes que pagan sus impuestos y que pagan por sus seguros, financien temporalmente el programa y paguen por los seguros de los que no quieren pagar por los suyos, hasta que eventualmente el gobierno sea el pagador único por los servicios de salud.

Sabíamos que todo era cuestión de tiempo, lo único sorprendente es que está llegando más pronto de lo que nos imaginábamos.

No hay nada nuevo bajo el sol, no hay nada que los que conocemos el sistema socialista nos sorprenda, y tanto la oposición como el gobierno saben que es lo que significa el Obamacare, las discusiones son una cuestión de semántica demagógica por parte del gobierno.

Por el costo de los seguros de salud del Obamacare, considerando el costo de las primas y las deducciones de los seguros, los asegurados de poco riesgo no van a comprar las pólizas, los asegurados de alto riesgo que compren las pólizas, crean un desnivel que no es costeable a las compañías de seguros. Esto no deja más disyuntiva que el “bailout” o la quiebra de las compañías de seguros. 

Esto en conjunto con las pólizas que fueron canceladas, más de 5 millones de personas sin seguros, hace una situación insostenible.

El resultado es que progresivamente llegaremos a un punto en que el gobierno nos tendrá que “resolver” el problema con una nacionalización del sistema de salud.

Esto es lo que el Hillarycare nos ofreció, y esto es lo que el Obamacare será. 

Es cuestión en que en el caso del Hillarycare era una píldora difícil de tragar, y el Obamacare es un supositorio lubricado que no lo están introduciendo con lentitud pero más fácilmente.


Senate report: Benghazi attackers tied to Al Qaeda groups. Published January 15, 2014

A comprehensive report by the Senate Intelligence Committee definitely declared that individuals tied to Al Qaeda groups were involved in the Benghazi attack, challenging recent claims that the terror network was not a factor.

The report was released Monday, nearly one year after then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, under congressional questioning over the nature of the attack, shouted at lawmakers: “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

The administration initially claimed the attack sprung out of a protest, but has since given a more complicated assessment. Still, administration officials all along have downplayed Al Qaeda involvement, recently seizing on a New York Times report that supported those claims.

While the report does not implicate Al Qaeda “core” — the leadership believed to be in the Pakistan region — it does blame some of the most influential Al Qaeda branches, including Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).

“Individuals affiliated with terrorist groups, including AQIM, Ansar al-Sharia, AQAP, and the Mohammad Jamal Network, participated in the September 11, 2012, attacks,” the report said. The militant Ansar al-Sharia was, separately, labeled by the State Department as a terror group last week, in part over its alleged involvement in the Benghazi strike.

The Senate committee report stressed that the intelligence still suggests the attack was not “highly coordinated,” but rather “opportunistic” – possibly put in place in “short order” after protests over an anti-Islam film elsewhere in the region.

“It remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attacks,” the report said. The report, though, reiterated that there was no protest in Benghazi before the attack.

The Senate panel report also dove extensively into what went wrong at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before the attack. The committee determined the attack was “preventable” and the administration failed to respond to “ample” warnings that security was deteriorating before Sept. 11, 2012.

The report faulted the State and Defense departments. It also cited the failure of the Obama administration to “bring the attackers to justice.”

Specifically, the report said the intelligence community provided “ample strategic warning” that security in eastern Libya was deteriorating and U.S. personnel “were at risk.” The report said multiple “tripwires” were crossed signaling security problems, and the State Department should have increased its security posture in response. This included an Aug. 16, 2012, cable from Ambassador Chris Stevens raising security concerns, and prior attacks on westerners in Benghazi.

The report also detailed a possible failed ambush, where attackers tried to lure the CIA into the hospital where Stevens’ body was being held.

The CIA did not take the bait.

“The committee worked on a bipartisan basis to investigate the various allegations that have come out since the terrorist attacks in Benghazi in September 2012 and to get to the truth about what happened leading up to, during and after the attacks,” Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said in a statement, adding she hopes the report puts “conspiracy theories” to rest.

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., top Republican on the panel, also said the report provides “needed and deserved answers.”

“In spite of the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi and ample strategic warnings, the United States Government simply did not do enough to prevent these attacks and ensure the safety of those serving in Benghazi,” he said.




Illinois Signs Up For Obamacare! Well, Only 61,000 out of 12.8 Million.


A little more than 61,100 Illinoisans selected new health insurance policies created under President Barack Obama’s health care law through Dec. 28, as a last-minute surge in enrollment helped the marketplaces recover from an embarrassing Oct. 1 launch.

The Illinois enrollments are up nearly nine-fold from November, when little more than 7,000 selected policies, according to federal data released Monday. Nationwide, nearly 2.2 million selected a plan, with the vast majority coming in December.

But early data suggest the marketplaces are far more popular among older and potentially less healthy consumers, a trend that threatens to push up premiums in the future unless the law’s supporters can persuade more young, healthy Americans to sign up for insurance.

About 58 percent of those who signed up for coverage in Illinois were age 45 or older, and women outnumbered men, according to the new data, the first time demographic information about people signing up for coverage has been made available.

Just 23 percent in Illinois and about a quarter nationally were between ages 18 and 34 — well below the 40 percent goal set by administration officials — a key demographic that will help offset the cost of insuring older, sicker consumers who tend to ring up more health care costs. The numbers underscore the challenge that remains to drive more so-called young invincibles into coverage with 11 weeks remaining in open enrollment.

Nonetheless, officials expressed optimism that more young people will sign up in the months ahead and said the early figures squared with their expectations rooted in experience from Massachusetts, which launched its health insurance expansion in 2006.

“We think more and more young people will sign up,” said Gary Cohen, who is overseeing the new marketplaces at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

That seems realistic, given that many young people would be unlikely to sign up right away, said Larry Levitt, senior vice president at the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation who studies insurance markets.

“I would expect enrollment to surge in second half, particularly in March,” he said.

Coverage started Jan. 1 for those who selected plans before Christmas. But Americans have until the end of March to choose a plan before they risk being penalized under the new law for not having coverage.

Continue Reading on





Amenper: ¿Problema Migratorio, Realidad, Xenofobia o Xenofogia?

Cuando viajábamos entre nuestro país y los Estados Unidos, antes de Castro, notábamos la diferencia, a pesar de los adelantos que teníamos en Cuba. 

Todavía cuando viajamos al extranjero vemos la diferencia entre otros países y los Estados Unidos.

El tiempo nos hace olvidar de ciertas cosas que establecen esas diferencias.

Cuando hoy nos escandalizamos porque encontramos una hormiga en el paquete de celofán con la carne, y llamamos rápidamente al encargado del departamento para quejarnos, nos olvidamos de la plaza del mercado de nuestro pueblo.. 

Cientos de moscas volaban y se posaban en nuestra carne, y no nos preocupábamos.

Cuando vemos unas latas de cerveza en el cuidado césped de la salida de la carretera, nos escandalizamos, y no recordamos de las cunetas llenas de malezas y basura de todo tipo en nuestras carreteras.

No es chauvinismo, es una realidad que el sistema americano es más pragmático y eficiente que el de nuestros países. 

Esto no sólo es hace cincuenta años, todavía cuando vamos a una plaza de mercado en países de la américa latina y hasta en países Europa, como Grecia, nos recuerda a las de Cuba en los años cincuenta.

No es tampoco xenofobia el pensar que este sistema americano está siendo minado por la influencia extranjera en masa. 

Cuando la inmigración es controlada, el inmigrante en la minoría se ajusta a la nueva sociedad. 

Pero cuando los inmigrantes entran en oleadas y sin control, infiltran por su número la cultura del país que invaden sobre todo cuando la cultura de los inmigrantes que se infiltran es diferenta a la cultura infiltrada como en el caso de la inmigración de Méjico,o de la degradada cultura de la Cuba de hoy entrando a Estados Unidos.

El orgullo de la higiene y limpieza en la comunidad desaparece paulatinamente.

Vemos en nuestros parques públicos como a pesar de haber suficiente recipientes para la basura, tiran los desperdicios en el suelo, y hasta vemos residuos de “trabajos de santería”. 

¿Xenofobia? bueno puede culparme de esto, pero no me pueden negar lo que mis ojos ven o mis oídos oyen en las calles con el sonido de claxon que antes eran usados por ley únicamente en casos de emergencia.  Hoy no podemos estar parados en una intersección ni por una fracción de un segundo en un semáforo que cambia sin sentir el largo sonido de un claxon. 

Y no me digan que es una costumbre también de los americanos, porque esto no existía antes y sólo tienen que ir a la costa oeste de la Florida, simplemente a unas horas de distancia para que puedan apreciar la diferencia.

Cuando se oye a las estaciones de televisión en español continuamente hablando sobre inmigración, y cambia a una estación en inglés, pueden notar que en la última no se habla mucho sobre el tema. 

Es que es una realidad, el americano promedio, no importa la persuasión política no quiere más inmigrantes a pesar de ser una nación de inmigrantes.

 La xenofobia aumenta por el abuso de la inmigración ilegal, y  pagamos justos por pecadores. 

Los liberales hablan de que los republicanos son anti-inmigrantes y dicen que ellos son compasivos con los inmigrantes. 

Pero tenemos la administración más liberal de la historia americana, y las deportaciones están al nivel más alto de la historia.  La matemática de la demagogia no cuadra.

Para que se resuelva el problema migratorio todo está en cumplir las leyes de la nación, en cuanto a cómo se entra al país y cómo se comportan cuando estén residiendo en la nueva cultura.

No importa las manifestaciones, exigiendo “derechos” migratorios,  y menos si las manifestaciones tienen símbolos y rótulos anti-americanos, porque esto lo que hace es crear más xenofobia, no resolver el problema.

Los políticos tienen que adaptarse a las demandas de la mayoría.  Puede decir demagógicamente que apoyan a los inmigrantes, los liberales esconden su xenofobia bajo una “xenofogia” una xenofobia escondida bajo la demagogia.  Pero hasta que no desaparezca esta xenofobia, creada por la conducta de la inmigración y los inmigrantes, no se puede resolver el problema.





Amenper: Chris Christie Is an Amateur

The left’s political methods make Gov. Christie look like Little Bo Peep.By DANIEL HENNINGER Jan. 15, 2014 7:16 p.m. ET

There haven’t been so many reporters chasing a story in Trenton, N.J., since Washington crossed the Delaware. But compared with the methods the Democratic Party is using now to take down its opponents, Chris Christie looks like Little Bo Peep.

Gov. Christie’s hyper-political aides ordered traffic jams in neighborhoods near the perpetually backed-up George Washington Bridge to annoy the mayor of Fort Lee. And they may have canceled meetings with the mayor of Jersey City because he wouldn’t endorse Mr. Christie. Oh my.

The Christie bonfire has burned for a week. In that same week, The Wall Street Journal reported that the FBI found nothing in the IRS’s targeting of conservative political groups that warrants criminal charges.

This conclusion struck lawyers Jay Sekulow and Cleta Mitchell as fairly amazing. Both represent conservative groups targeted by the IRS, and they say the FBI only recently got in touch with a few of their clients.

Thus, two of the most powerful public institutions in the U.S.—the FBI and the IRS—have concluded no harm, no foul, and the memory hole swallows the Obama administration’s successful kneecapping of the GOP’s most active members just as they prepared to participate in the 2012 presidential campaign. Many—ruined or terrified by the IRS probes—shut down. Mr. Obama won.

One may be thankful that corners of the U.S. judiciary remain intact and unintimidated. Late last week, a judge in Wisconsin slowed down what was essentially a Democratic prosecutor’s star-chamber investigation of conservative groups that supported Republican Gov. Scott Walker. A special prosecutor armed with subpoena power had been poring over the groups’ finances, while a gag order stopped the groups from saying they were his targets.

On Friday, a court quashed some of the subpoenas for lack of probable cause. That’s good, but don’t expect to see Friends of Scott Walker going on offense any time soon. Legal pistol-whippings by state prosecutors can have that effect, win or lose.

Worth noting is what the IRS’s political audits and the attempted takedown of the pro-Walker groups have in common: Both took place essentially out of public view.

An event like Chris Christie’s traffic jam is the Internet’s version of bread and circuses. What the Democrats’ left-wing activists have learned is that most of the time the Web’s political media beasts are sleeping. It’s most opportune during those periods of non-attention to use modern media technology not just to hit one’s opponents, but to drive them from politics.


ALEC is the American Legislative Exchange Council, a right-of-center group of state legislators who gather to compare notes on public-policy issues. The group’s ultimate goal is to create templates for bills to enact their policy ideas, such as reforming state public-pension obligations.

Because this process gets laws passed, the left has created organizations whose job is to take down ALEC by frightening its financial supporters.

In December, articles appeared on progressive websites attacking GoogleGOOG -0.07%Facebook FB -0.24% and Yelp for participating in ALEC’s annual conference last year. The Web giants wanted to explore various Internet legal issues with the state legislators.

A coalition that included the Sierra Club, RootsAction and the Center for Media and Democracy said it outputted 230,000 petition signatures in a “Don’t Fund Evil” drive to separate Google from “right-wing extremists” at ALEC, whose sin is “climate denial.” The Sierra Club’s site says Kraft, GE and McDonald’s MCD +0.25% pulled away from ALEC in the past under pressure. To date, none of the Web companies have done so.

In coverage of the effort on a FastCompany website, one activist remarked: “It’s definitely a reputational risk for these forward-looking companies like Google and Facebook and Yelp to keep their membership in ALEC.”

Reputational risk? That’s right.

In 2012, when ALEC got caught up in the controversy over the Trayvon Martin shooting and stand-your-ground laws, progressives saw a chance to brand the legislative group’s corporate supporters as anti-black.

Here’s the audio transcript of a radio ad created by ColorOfChange about CVSCVS -0.29% pharmacies, which supported ALEC: “CVS, when you hear that name, do you think of the law that protected Trayvon Martin’s killer? Or laws that suppress the black vote.” The ad never ran. But copies of the ad were mailed to CVS, John Deere, HP,WalgreensWAG -0.85% Best BuyBBY +1.40% BP and a dozen others. All disassociated from ALEC.

This is the Democratic left’s modus operandi. In early December, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) sent a letter to the heads of J.P. MorganJPM +3.03% Bank of America,BAC +2.27% Goldman SachsGS +1.22% CitigroupC +1.93% Wells FargoWFC +1.78% and Morgan StanleyMS +3.60% asking them to reveal any contributions to “private think tanks.” Her goal, she said, was “transparency.”

No, the purpose is to surface any such association so the cadres can move in and use the Web, mass Twitter TWTR +5.77% feeds, shareholder resolutions and media campaigns to drive private companies out of the political arena, leaving politics in the control of public-sector interests—i.e., the state rules.

Threatening companies that participate in politics with reputational destruction is the American left’s version of Maoist shaming sessions. Modern Red Guards don’t hang signs around your neck. Their weapon of choice is modern media. In this league, a political traffic jam is the work of amateurs.

Write to





Amenper: How Big Government Drives Inequality. Stifling economic growth and benefiting insiders with Washington access do not help the middle class. By DAVID MALPASS Jan. 15, 2014 7:11 p.m. ET

Inequality is the wedge issue that Democrats hope will carry them through the 2014 and 2016 elections, neutralizing the ObamaCare fiasco. The issue has popular appeal because median incomes (after inflation) have been falling throughout the recovery, while high-end incomes are increasing rapidly.

For progressives, this situation seems made to order: If you want a flatter income distribution, don’t you need bigger government to get it? Yet experience shows the opposite: Washington’s increased size and power has concentrated income and wealth in fewer hands. Making government bigger will exacerbate this problem—it is already too big, intrusive and expensive to allow a robust economy that benefits everyone.

President Ronald Reagan rejected class warfare, advocating sound money and lower tax rates to boost growth and living standards. His policies worked. The economy grew faster than 7% in real terms for five quarters in a row starting in the second quarter of 1983. Gross domestic product grew on average 4.6% per year in real terms during the 1983-88 expansion, while real median incomes grew 2.1%. His policies were such an economic success that appeals to class warfare gained relatively little political traction for 25 years.


Since the Reagan years, growth policies have faded while the government has increased its control over the economy and national income. Top marginal federal income-tax rates have risen to nearly 44% today from 28% in 1988. The dollar has weakened while consumer prices have doubled in 25 years. Federal nondefense spending has nearly quadrupled to $2.8 trillion in 2013 from $750 billion in 1988, adding a huge burden on taxpayers as national debt grows.

Today, almost five years after the recession officially ended in June 2009, job growth from new business formation is running one-third below average, according to the Labor Department’s Employment Dynamics report. Real GDP growth has averaged a weak 2.3% over the past three years, while real median incomes have fallen 0.6% per year. This disastrous economic result sets up a political confrontation between those who believe that a bigger government makes things better and those who believe that it concentrates power and income in fewer hands, undercutting the middle class.

Progressives may concede the weakness of the economic recovery. Yet they urge more government spending and higher taxes, claiming that their policies will achieve higher growth and a fairer distribution of income.

Conservatives need to champion economic growth as Reagan did, but they also need to make a more forceful connection between the government’s centralization of power and income inequality.

Big government expansions in recent years have harmed individuals with modest incomes while exempting or benefiting people with higher incomes. These include the federal takeover of the mortgage industry, and the Federal Reserve’s decisions to keep interest rates near zero and buy some $3 trillion in bonds. Both of these expansions channel credit to the government and the well-connected at the expense of savers and new businesses.

Middle-income earners used to be the primary beneficiary of the rise in the value of their houses. Housing gains now lift Washington, allowing the government to pay itself huge “dividends” from Fannie MaeFNMA +0.32% Freddie Mac FMCC -0.33% and the Federal Reserve, which owns nearly $1.5 trillion in the government’s housing-related bonds. The government promptly spends the windfalls, fueling a further accumulation of wealth and income for those with Washington access.

The financial industry is making billions in profits fueled by the government’s provision of zero-rate loans for those with connections and collateral. Wall Street’s upper crust is the epicenter for financing the contractors, lobbyists and lawyers that help the government spend money. Meanwhile, government grabs a huge share of the profits generated by small businesses. It piles on opaque regulations, complex tax rules and countless independent agencies, producing a system that works against small businesses and the middle class. The Affordable Care Act takes pains to exempt Congress, government, corporations and unions, but leaves the rest severely exposed, adding to inequality.

This week’s congressional budget deal saw a narrow group of Washington’s elite legislators and lobbyists working over the weekend to divvy up nearly $1.1 trillion in discretionary spending for 2014. Much of the spending and all of the lobbying and debt underwriting costs will benefit those with high incomes while the extra debt falls heavily on the middle class.

There is nothing wrong with an appropriate level of government services—it’s necessary. But we are long past that level. Growing the government shrinks the rest of the economy and after-tax paychecks.

The next debt limit increase is approaching fast, probably in March. Fiscal conservatives are likely to argue along traditional lines for a few spending cuts or some votes to highlight the ObamaCare calamity. That leaves Democrats with the inequality argument to use as a bludgeon against Republicans.

The debt-limit debate should be a national referendum on the size of the federal government and the need for new controls on its growth and power. That will be a critical step in restoring income growth, but as currently written, the debt-limit law forces votes in favor of more debt.

I’ve advocated strengthening the debt limit by adding a declining debt-to-GDP ceiling that, when exceeded, triggers extra controls on spending and a hair shirt for Washington. Extra debt should trigger a slowdown in automatic entitlement growth, pay cuts for senior officials and reductions in their subsidized benefits until they resolve the spending crisis.

A new debt law offering spending restraint would boost confidence among investors and entrepreneurs. Most important, it would allow median incomes to begin rising again once Washington leaves private enterprise more room to breathe and grow.






Samitier: La historia es el mejor maestro…

Los Que No Aprenden De La Historia Son Los Tontos

Los “Pieles Rojas” Entregaron Las Armas Y El Gobierno A Cambio Los “Mantendría.”  La Mayoría Fueron Felices En El Otro Mundo… El 98% Murieron…






“The Democratic National Committee (DNC) sent out a paranoid email… urging supporters to vote for Democrats so that Republicans can’t impeach President Obama. … The email, subject line ‘Impeachment,’ was sent to Obama for America supporters…” -Daily Caller

       Pay no heed to the media blackout. The far left knows that the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama is on the table. As WorldNetDaily (WND) notes: “Suddenly, millions of Americans talking about ousting [Barack Obama].” 

       But whether or not impeachment happens sooner, rather than later, is up to you and we want to start the New Year off on a country-saving note and send the spineless, self-proclaimed leaders in Congress a message from grassroots Americans like you. The American people want Barack Obama removed from officeNOW

It’s Not A Question Of “If” Obama Will Be Impeached… It’s A Question Of “When” Obama Will Be Impeached.

       The implementation of ObamaCare is a man-made disaster. A dictatorial imposter has usurped the constitutional authority an office he should not hold one too many times and he plans to keep usurping the authority of the highest office in the land. 

       Tyranny and insanity reign. We now live in a country in which an illegal alien is allowed to practice law in the State of California. It’s now “legal” to smoke marijuana in Colorado and a dictatorial regime fights tooth-and-nail to force an order of nuns to either violate their religious convictions and support abortion or close up shop and go out of business. 

       Make no mistake, the law has been turned on its head and is becoming a farce. A tyrannical regime is out of control and their is only one constitutional remedy for restoring our great Republic. 

       And this solution is inevitable. As the “paranoid” email from the DNC illustrates, even Barack Obama’s allies see the handwriting on the wall; and, at some point, our elected officials are going to be forced to face the eventuality that Barack Obama must be removed from office, and they must face that eventuality sooner, rather than later

       Aaron Klein with WND points out: “The White House and progressive machine clearly have failed in their attempt to paint the impeachment movement as fringe and out of touch with reality. The general American public views with increasing concern Obama’s illicit extension of executive authority, his repeated bypassing of Congress and the many serious scandals that have plagued this administration from Fast and Furious through Benghazi through the IRS fiasco and now ObamaCare.” 

       Klein added: “The time has come for the country and our elected representatives to have a serious discussion about the constitutional ramifications of Obama’s highly questionable actions.” 

How Long Must We Wait?

       How long must we wait… how long should we sit back and permit Barack Hussein Obama to continue to rip apart the fabric of this country before we take action? 

       You don’t have to wait. Starting right now, you can fire a shot across the bow… a shot that will be heard around the world… and send Barack Hussein Obama a clear and unmistakable message that he does not have carte blanche to ruin the United States of America

       Like so many on the far-left before him, going all the way back to Karl Marx, Barack Hussein Obama believes that it’s his mission to promote “equality of outcome” (in a just world, the misery of the few must be shared by all) over “equality of opportunity” even if Americans must learn to live in chains to make it happen. 

       And that worldview makes Barack Hussein Obama a very dangerous man and one of the greatest threats to your personal liberty today. 

       What can we do to stop this monomaniac… this American dictator? There’s only one answer

       Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” 

       ObamaCare is only a symptom. The Obama presidency is the disease, and Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, is the cure

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. 


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.

Can We Actually Remove Barack Obama? Should We Remove Barack Hussein Obama?

       To answer those questions, we really need to address the often misunderstood subject of what exactly constitutes an removeable offense, in order to illustrate that Barack Hussein Obama’s actions are grave enough to warrant removal. 

       As former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, put it: a removeable offense is,“whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.” 

       Let’s look at Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution again:“The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” 

       The key phrase here is “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a phrase grounded in English Common Law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age. 

       “High crimes and misdemeanors” essentially means bad behavior. 

       Here’s a passage from which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” in the Constitution: 

       “‘High crimes and misdemeanors’ entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough… so Mason then proposed ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a ‘misdemeanor’ meant ‘mis-demeanor,’ or bad behavior.”[Emphasis Ours]

       In other words, “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not refer to a ‘high’ or ‘lofty’ criminal act (as some would lead you to believe)

       It refers to a misdeed committed by a person occupying a high office and the Founders fully intended to allow for the removal of the President for actions which were… well… simply put… egregious… grossly incompetent… grossly negligent… outright distasteful… or, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show malevolence toward this country, which is unabated. 

       Make no mistake, for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that removing Barack Hussein Obama would be a simple matter of “playing politics,” our Founders not only intended that the removal of a sitting President be a “political act” but set the bar extremely low for the removal of a sitting president

       As notes: “The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment.” 

       The Obama Administration exemplifies maladministration. It qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior. Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history, andremoval, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this

       It could be easily argued that we have a duty to remove Barack Hussein Obama. Of course, our elected officials won’t have the back-bone to go it alone. That’s where you come in. 

       Help us spread the word far-and-wide and our elected officials will come to know that the removal of Barack Hussein Obama is the will of the American people and that if they ignore the will of the people. they do so at their own political peril

       The question is not whether we should remove Barack Hussein Obama. Rather, the question is, can we remove Barack Hussein Obama before it is too late? 




Fresh Ink: Class warfare is the liberal election strategy in 2014. By Washington Times (DC) January 15, 2014 6:54 am

President Obama has all but announced that this fall’s House and Senate campaigns should focus not on the collapse of American influence abroad, or on the continuing disaster that we know as Obamacare, or even on the apparent inability of his policies to create jobs, but on “income inequality.”

The mantra from the administration, like the rantings of the “Occupy” crowd and the new finger-pointing quasi-Marxist mayor of New York City, is that in today’s United States, it is impossible to get ahead unless one is born rich, works on Wall Street or finds some other way to profit from the misery of others. Their rhetoric and proposed policies play on envy and remind one of the class warfare that has dominate European politics for so long.

Historically, betting on class warfare as a way to win a U.S. election is a bad bet. The United States is not Europe, and Americans have never been envious of the success of others. Americans have always believed in what almost from the beginning has been known as the American dream. The president is betting this is no longer true.

The belief that a political focus on “income inequality” and the politics of class envy will work is, in reality, a challenge to the very concept of the American dream. Class envy and class warfare have never appealed to many Americans for the simple reason that most Americans of every background have always believed that through hard work, they or their children and grandchildren would achieve a freer, happier and more prosperous life than that enjoyed by their parents and grandparents.

It is this perception that attracts immigrants to the United States. They come seeking opportunity – economic opportunity and the freedom to make both economic and non-economic choices for themselves and their families. They come from countries that offer little in the way of social mobility. Class is the great determiner in most of the world. Working-class and peasant parents produce working-class and peasant children. Those fortunate enough to be born into the upper classes are coddled, largely secure and uncomfortable with the specter of men and women with ambition, drive and talent joining them at the top.

It’s been different in the New World. Class has always counted for far less. Sure, the wealthy had a head start, but yeoman farmers, folks who came as indentured servants and who arrived penniless believed in their bones that their dreams could come true. For millions over two centuries, they did. As a result, Americans didn’t envy the family down the block or in the next neighborhood for their nicer homer or better car. They applauded its success, because they knew that sooner or later, they too would have a house as nice and a car as comfortable as they desired – all it would take would be hard work, discipline and the optimism of a people looking forward to a better and more prosperous tomorrow.

The politics of class worked in the countries from which many of these families came because it was extremely difficult in their native countries to rise on the basis of merit and hard work. The affluence of one’s neighbors wasn’t something to which one could reasonably aspire. It was out of reach to most because of a system that virtually forced generation after generation to accept the fate of those who came before. Under such circumstances, envy and even hatred of those who were born into better circumstances became almost natural and could be exploited by politicians of the left and right.

Democrats this year are betting that they may today be able to exploit envy in ways that have never worked here in the past. They are betting, in effect, that the average citizen’s belief in the American dream has weakened and, unfortunately, there is evidence to suggest that they might be right. A number of recent studies have concluded that it is more rather than less difficult to rise to the top or even to escape what we call poverty for the comfort of the middle class in the United States than it is in Canada and many nations of Old Europe. Some recent polls indicate that this reality has led many Americans to doubt the reality of the American dream. A 2013 poll, for example, found that 41 percent of Americans think it is now “impossible for most to achieve the American dream.” If Americans come to believe that the hope and optimism that have been a part of the American psyche since the nation’s founding are no longer justified, many will respond to the populist redistributionism championed by Mr. Obama and others.

The irony is that it has been the policies of these “progressives” that have made it more and more difficult to succeed in America. Individual initiative is stymied by regulations that make it more difficult to start or grow a small business. Tax policies are designed not to grow the economic pie, but to divide up the wealth already created and make it difficult for business to expand or create jobs.

If the American dream is in trouble, it is because of the policies advanced by those who now argue that it is no longer valid. Lengthy unemployment benefits that actually encourage people to drop out of the workforce and minimum-wage laws that make it more difficult for the young and poor to reach for the first step on the ladder of success are, like the rhetoric of progressive populists, attacks on the American dream.

To counter the politics of envy, Republicans must urge breaking down the barriers blocking upward mobility by encouraging policies that free the initiative and optimism of a people unique in world history. To do less would amount to the acceptance of a fundamental change in what this nation represents.

David A. Keene is opinion editor of The Washington Times. A service of YellowBrix, Inc.





“The Democratic National Committee (DNC) sent out a paranoid email… urging supporters to vote for Democrats so that Republicans can’t impeach President Obama. … The email, subject line ‘Impeachment,’ was sent to Obama for America supporters…” -Daily Caller

       Pay no heed to the media blackout. The far left knows that the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama is on the table. As WorldNetDaily (WND) notes: “Suddenly, millions of Americans talking about ousting [Barack Obama].” 

       But whether or not impeachment happens sooner, rather than later, is up to you and we want to start the New Year off on a country-saving note and send the spineless, self-proclaimed leaders in Congress a message from grassroots Americans like you. The American people want Barack Obama removed from officeNOW

It’s Not A Question Of “If” Obama Will Be Impeached… It’s A Question Of “When” Obama Will Be Impeached.

       The implementation of ObamaCare is a man-made disaster. A dictatorial imposter has usurped the constitutional authority an office he should not hold one too many times and he plans to keep usurping the authority of the highest office in the land. 

       Tyranny and insanity reign. We now live in a country in which an illegal alien is allowed to practice law in the State of California. It’s now “legal” to smoke marijuana in Colorado and a dictatorial regime fights tooth-and-nail to force an order of nuns to either violate their religious convictions and support abortion or close up shop and go out of business. 

       Make no mistake, the law has been turned on its head and is becoming a farce. A tyrannical regime is out of control and their is only one constitutional remedy for restoring our great Republic. 

       And this solution is inevitable. As the “paranoid” email from the DNC illustrates, even Barack Obama’s allies see the handwriting on the wall; and, at some point, our elected officials are going to be forced to face the eventuality that Barack Obama must be removed from office, and they must face that eventuality sooner, rather than later

       Aaron Klein with WND points out: “The White House and progressive machine clearly have failed in their attempt to paint the impeachment movement as fringe and out of touch with reality. The general American public views with increasing concern Obama’s illicit extension of executive authority, his repeated bypassing of Congress and the many serious scandals that have plagued this administration from Fast and Furious through Benghazi through the IRS fiasco and now ObamaCare.” 

       Klein added: “The time has come for the country and our elected representatives to have a serious discussion about the constitutional ramifications of Obama’s highly questionable actions.” 

How Long Must We Wait?

       How long must we wait… how long should we sit back and permit Barack Hussein Obama to continue to rip apart the fabric of this country before we take action? 

       You don’t have to wait. Starting right now, you can fire a shot across the bow… a shot that will be heard around the world… and send Barack Hussein Obama a clear and unmistakable message that he does not have carte blanche to ruin the United States of America

       Like so many on the far-left before him, going all the way back to Karl Marx, Barack Hussein Obama believes that it’s his mission to promote “equality of outcome” (in a just world, the misery of the few must be shared by all) over “equality of opportunity” even if Americans must learn to live in chains to make it happen. 

       And that worldview makes Barack Hussein Obama a very dangerous man and one of the greatest threats to your personal liberty today. 

       What can we do to stop this monomaniac… this American dictator? There’s only one answer

       Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” 

       ObamaCare is only a symptom. The Obama presidency is the disease, and Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, is the cure

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. 


If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.

Can We Actually Remove Barack Obama? Should We Remove Barack Hussein Obama?

       To answer those questions, we really need to address the often misunderstood subject of what exactly constitutes an removeable offense, in order to illustrate that Barack Hussein Obama’s actions are grave enough to warrant removal. 

       As former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, put it: a removeable offense is,“whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.” 

       Let’s look at Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution again:“The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” 

       The key phrase here is “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a phrase grounded in English Common Law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age. 

       “High crimes and misdemeanors” essentially means bad behavior. 

       Here’s a passage from which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” in the Constitution: 

       “‘High crimes and misdemeanors’ entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough… so Mason then proposed ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a ‘misdemeanor’ meant ‘mis-demeanor,’ or bad behavior.”[Emphasis Ours]

       In other words, “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not refer to a ‘high’ or ‘lofty’ criminal act (as some would lead you to believe)

       It refers to a misdeed committed by a person occupying a high office and the Founders fully intended to allow for the removal of the President for actions which were… well… simply put… egregious… grossly incompetent… grossly negligent… outright distasteful… or, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show malevolence toward this country, which is unabated. 

       Make no mistake, for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that removing Barack Hussein Obama would be a simple matter of “playing politics,” our Founders not only intended that the removal of a sitting President be a “political act” but set the bar extremely low for the removal of a sitting president

       As notes: “The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment.” 

       The Obama Administration exemplifies maladministration. It qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior. Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history, andremoval, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this

       It could be easily argued that we have a duty to remove Barack Hussein Obama. Of course, our elected officials won’t have the back-bone to go it alone. That’s where you come in. 

       Help us spread the word far-and-wide and our elected officials will come to know that the removal of Barack Hussein Obama is the will of the American people and that if they ignore the will of the people. they do so at their own political peril

       The question is not whether we should remove Barack Hussein Obama. Rather, the question is, can we remove Barack Hussein Obama before it is too late? 




Negotiating With Space Nazis. By Ben Shapiro January 15, 2014 6:55 am

On Tuesday, the Iranian government announced that it had reached a secret agreement with the West on its nuclear development. The details of the agreement were not released, but suffice it to say that the Iranians could not contain their glee. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani celebrated the deal with an English-language tweet claiming that the “world powers surrendered to Iranian nation’s will”; Iranian Army Commander Maj. Gen. Ataollah Salehi said the diplomatic breakthrough resulted from American military “weakness”; and the Iranian foreign minister laid a wreath at the tomb of the Beirut Marine barracks bomber.

Meanwhile, President Barack Obama urged the United States Congress to “give peace a chance.” After weeks of sending out his pacifist minions, including faux pro-Israel group J Street, to tell Americans that support for sanctions meant support for war, Obama himself echoed that message. “My preference is for peace and diplomacy,” the apparent flower-child-in-chief stated. “And this is one of the reasons why I’ve sent the message to Congress that now is not the time for us to impose new sanctions. Now is the time for us to allow the diplomats and technical experts to do their work.” He said that a rational, reasonable Iran would be “willing to walk through the door of opportunity that’s presented to them.”

Only Iran is not rational or reasonable. It is delusionally anti-Western and anti-Semitic, which means that America is now in negotiations not just with a terror-supporting state but radicals with more than a hint of insanity.

To prove this point, on Sunday, the Iranian semiofficial news agency FARS, which bills itself as independent but is effectively regime-run, ran a news article explaining that since the end of World War II, America had been run by a shadow government of Nazi space aliens. Seriously.

Basing its report on documents supposedly culled from National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, FARS reported that there was no “incontrovertible proof” that the American foreign policy agenda was driven by an “alien/extraterrestrial intelligence agenda.”

Not “alien” as in foreigner. “Alien” as in little green men from Mars. FARS quotes Snowden as stating that there “were actually two governments in the U.S., one that was elected, and the other, secret regime, governing in the dark.” This shadow regime had been run by space aliens — also known as “Tall Whites” — who were operating their regime from Nevada after emigrating from Nazi Germany after World War II. These space aliens, FARS stated, built the Nazi war machine’s submarines.

This would be hilarious were it not part of a piece. Large swaths of the Islamic world also buy the myth that Jews use the blood of non-Jewish children in both their Passover matza and Purim hamentashen. “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” remains a best-seller throughout the Islamic world. Iranian television routinely broadcasts Holocaust denial, while Iranian press outlets proclaim that the Zionist regime is producing another Hitler.

Assume for a moment that the Iranian regime actually believes the propaganda it spouts. Why, then, would it negotiate in good faith with space alien Nazis who drink Muslim blood?

Many pacifists in the West, including Obama, apparently assume that no one rational would continue to develop nuclear weapons in the face of world opposition, especially when offered a way out. What Obama fails to recognize is that Iran is far from rational — and, more importantly, Obama’s own assumptions about Iranian intentions put America and the West in a position of weakness. This weakness will be on display for all the world to see when Iran goes nuclear.

Ben Shapiro, 30, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, a radio host on KTTH 770 Seattle and KRLA 870 Los Angeles, Editor-in-Chief of, and Editor-At-Large for Breitbart News. He is the New York Times bestselling author of “Bullies: How the Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences America.” To find out more about Ben Shapiro and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



Damas de Blanco golpeadas. La Iglesia Católica calla | Cubanet

La Iglesia calla porque ellos tampoco tienen moral.  QUE VERGUENZA!!!
Un día, no muy lejano, ellos también les tocara rendir cuentas…






Los Rockefeller y Todos Los Magnates CAPITALISTAS…

Envidian A Estos Magnates Cubanos

Pues Tienen Además Del Disfrute De Las Riquezas… El

Poder De Matar… Esa Es La Razón; Por La Cual Los

Magnates Capitalistas Están A Favor Del Comunismo…


Lista De Los Magnates Cubanos

Military in the Communist Party’s Politburo (15 members – 9 military)

  General Raúl Castro (1931- ): 82 year old Commander-in-Chief of the Armed forces, First Secretary of the Politburo and President of the Council of Ministers and Council of State. He has developed an inner circle of power; loyal and trusted military veterans.

  Jose Machado Ventura (1930- ): 83 year old Second Secretary of the Politburo of the Communist Party and Sierra Maestra veteran. A hard line Marxist and member of the inner circle of power.

“Comandante Histórico” Ramiro Valdés (1932- ):the 81 year old participated in the Moncada attack, disembarked in Granma, guerrilla warfare veteran, founding member of State Security, member of the Politburo, Vice-President of the Council of Ministers and Council of State.

  General Abelardo Colome “Furry” (1939- ): the 74 year old is Minister of the Interior (MININT), member of the Politburo, Council of Ministers and Council of State. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African wars veteran. The most trusted and powerful member of Gen. Castro’s inner circle.

  General Leopoldo Cintras Frias (1941- ): the 72 year old is Minister of the Armed Forces (MINFAR), member of the Politburo, Council of Ministers and Council of State. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African wars veteran. Member of Gen. Castro’s inner circle of power.

  General Álvaro López Miera (1943- ): the 70 year old is First Vice-Minister of the MINFAR, Chief of the General Staff, member of the Politburo, Council of Ministers and Council of State. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African wars veteran. Raised by Raul Castro and Vilma Espin like a family member. López Miera is the second most powerful figure in Gen. Castro’s inner circle.

  General Ramón Espinosa (1939- ): the 74 year old is a member of the Politburo, Vice-Minister of the MINFAR. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African wars veteran. Member of Gen. Castro’s inner circle of power.

  Jorge Marino Murillo (intelligence officer, retired) (1961- ): member of the Politburo, Vice-President of the Council of Ministers, President of the VI Party Congress’ Commission for the Implementation of Economic Policies.

  Adel Onofre Yzquierdo (retired military) (1945- ):member of the Politburo, Minister of the Economy, Vice-President of the Council of Ministers and Council of State. African wars veteran.



Important FAR Members

  General Joaquín Quinta Solas (1938- ): the 75 year old is the MINFAR Vice-Minister. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African wars veteran. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee. Member of Gen. Castro’s inner circle of power.

  General Luciano Morales Abad (1946- ): Chief of the Western Army (includes Special Troops and Armored Division). African wars veteran. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee.

  General Raúl Rodríguez Lobaina: Chief of the Central Army (includes Tank Regiment La Paloma Base). African wars veteran. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee.

  General Onelio Aguilera Bermúdez (1953- ): Chief of the Eastern Army (includes Division 50 and Border Brigade at Guantanamo’s Naval Base). African wars veteran. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee.

  General Ramón Pardo Guerra (1939- ): the 74 year old is the Civil Defense National Chief of Staff. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African wars veteran. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee. Member of Gen. Castro’s inner circle of power.

Note: The Air and Naval force have been extensively reduced due to the economic crisis. Their units are under the Armed Forces.


Intelligence and Security Services

  General Carlos Fernández Gondin (1938- ): the 75 year old is MININT’s First Vice-Minister, Chief of State Security. African wars veteran. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee. Member of Gen. Castro’s inner circle of power. He oversees the various intelligence departments such as Latin America (M-2)Europe (M-32)Solidarity Movements (M-18)Industrial Espionage (M-6)Florida (M-19) designed to infiltrate the Cuban exile’s political groups and news agencies; United States (M-1) which includes federal agencies, academic centers, congressional offices and military intelligence. Notable operatives of the MININT’s Intelligence are the five spies in the “Wasp Network” and Ana Belen Montes, who infiltrated the highest levels of the Pentagon.

  Vice Almirante Julio Cesar Gandarilla: Chief of Military Counter-Intelligence. In charge of Cuban State Security and counterespionage in the Armed Forces. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee

Alcibiades Muñoz Gutierrez: Director General of Intelligence for the MININT. Former Chief of MININT’s Database Bank. He has been a MININT prominent officer since the early 1980s, when he held the rank of Colonel.

  General Eduardo Delgado (1955- ): former Director General of Intelligence for the MININT (1994-2013). He was the Chief Investigator during the Arnaldo Ochoa trial and execution. Presently Delgado is the Director of the “Instituto Superior del MININT.”

  General Humberto Francis Pardo (1947- ): Chief of MININT Personal Security Division. He commands the elite troops.

  Colonel Alejandro Castro Espin (1965- ): Chief of Intelligence Coordination for the MINFAR and MININT. Son of Raul Castro and Vilma Espin.


Military Involved in Economic Activities

Currently, the military holds the highest positions in vital sectors of the economy and politics, dominating over 65% of the island’s economic activities. The military officers involved in the economy manage the means of production, economic institutions and financial activities.

  General (retired) Ulises Rosales del Toro (1942- ): the 71 year old Vice-President of the Council of Ministers in charge of agriculture and the food industry. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African wars veteran. Former MINFAR Chief of Staff. He has clashed with Gen. Colomé in the past. He is still trusted by Gen. Raul Castro.

  General (retired) Samuel Rodiles (1932- ): the 81 year old is the Chief of Physical Planning (urbanization- industrial installation, military zoning, etc.), President of the War Veterans Association. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African veteran. Member of Gen. Raul’s inner circle of power.

  General (retired) Antonio Enrique Lusson (1930- ): the 83 year old is the Vice-President of the Council of Ministers in charge of transportation and its infrastructure. Cuba’s guerrilla warfare and African wars veteran. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee and of Gen. Raul’s inner circle of power.

  General Salvador Pardo Cruz (1947- ): Minister of Heavy Industry. He held various responsibilities in the Anti-Aircraft Missile units in Africa. Former Director of state companies in the Union of Military Industries. African wars veteran.

  General Ricardo Cabrisas Ruiz (1937- ): the 76 year old is the Vice-President of the Council of Ministers. Former Minister of Foreign Trade.

  General Maimir Mesa Ramos (1962- ): Minister of Communications. Former President of ETECSA- state owned company with monopoly over communication services. Graduated from the FAR’s Academy in Communication.

  General Homero Acosta Alvarez: Secretary of State Council. Started his law career in the FAR. Former Military Judge in the MINFAR’s Military Tribunals. Graduated from the FAR’s Academy in Communication.

  Colonel Manuel Marrero (1964- ): Minister of Tourism (MINTUR). Architect and former Director of Gaviota S.A.

  Colonel Luis Alberto Rodríguez López Calleja (1960- ): Raul Castro’s son-in-law. Director of the Ministry of Defense’s GAESA (Enterprise Administration Group, S.A.). GAESA controls and supervises different sectors of the Cuban economy. Responsible for the Port of Mariel project and investments. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee.

  General Leonardo Ramón Andollo (1945- ): Second Chief of General Staff, Chief of Operations for the MINFAR, Second Chief of the VI Party Congress’ Commission for the Implementation of Economic Policies, in charge of reorganizing government structures. African wars veteran. Member of the Communist Party Central Committee.

Colonel Héctor Oroza Busutin: in charge of CIMEX S.A., company under GAESA’s control since 2011, that oversees more than 80 businesses (operating in US dollars and Cuban Pesos) including banks and jewelry stores.

  General Luis Perez Rospide (1940- ): Veteran of the guerrilla wars. Director of Gaviota Group S.A., business that manages the most luxurious hotels in Cuba, over 13,000 hotel rooms, 150 restaurants and thousands of employees.


Businesses Operated by Cuba’s FAR and GAESA S.A.

• Gaviota S.A.: hotel and tourism industry marketing and sales.
• CIMEX (Comercio Interior, Mercado Exterior): largest commercial corporation in Cuba. Manages businesses in the areas of real estate, banks, retail stores (over 250), shopping centers, fast food restaurants, gas stations, etc. 
• Servicio Automotriz S.A.: car rental services for tourists, car repair and gas stations.
• Aero Gaviota: manages tourism and airlines.
• Tecnotex: import/export of technology and services.
• Almacenes Universal: warehouses located in Wajay, Mariel, Cienfuegos and Santiago.
• Almest: real estate and tourism services.
• Antex: customer service and commercial operations in Africa.
• Agrotex: agriculture and livestock.
• Sermar: exploration of Cuban waters and naval repair (shipyard).
• Servicio la Marina: provides security and support to GAESA (some employees are operatives of the MININT’s Intelligence department M-6).
• Geocuba: geodesy and cartography. 
• Cubanacán: tourism.



Principal Government Institutions

Cuba’s Communist Party: according to Cuba’s 1992 Constitution, Chapter I, Article 5 “the Communist Party of Cuba, a follower of Marti’s ideas and of Marxism-Leninism, and the organized vanguard of the Cuban nation, is the highest leading force of society and of the state, which organizes and guides the common effort toward the goals of the construction of socialism and the progress toward a communist society.”

Communist Party Politburo: 15 member committee. The Politburo is the State and society’s highest power as designated by the Communist Party supremacy. The First and Second Secretary of the PPC represents maximum authority.

Council of Ministers: according to Cuba’s 1992 Constitution, Chapter X, Article 95, “The Council of Ministers is the highest ranking executive and administrative body and constitutes the government of the Republic.” Article 96 points out that: “the Council of Ministers is composed of the head of state and government, as its president, the first vice president…and the other members that the law determines.

Council of State: according to Cuba’s 1992 Constitution, Chapter X, Article 74, “the National Assembly of People’s Power elects, from among its deputies, the Council of State, which consists of one president, one first vice president, five vice presidents, one secretary and 23 other members.”

National Assembly of the People’s Power: Cuba’s congressional body approves, without dissent, laws and decrees issued by the Council of State.





PARANOID PRESIDENT: Obama Was ‘Suspicious’ of Military Leaders, Gates Says By Clash Daily 

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates says he always felt President Obama was respectful of senior military leaders, but at the same time was “suspicious of their motives” and seemed to feel pressure to from them to adopt their recommendations.

However, Gates said he also admired what he called Obama’s “courageous” decision to order the troop surge in Afghanistan in 2010, saying the president did so against the advice of all of his advisers because Obama believed it would work.

In an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity Tuesday night the former Pentagon boss spoke at length about his time serving under Obama and President George W. Bush, on the same day his controversial memoir “Duty” hit stores.

Gates said on “Hannity” he felt there was a difference between how Obama and Bush viewed meeting with senior military leaders. Bush, he said, seemed to genuinely enjoy meeting with them, but Obama did not seem to feel the same.

“He always gave the military leaders as much time as they wanted, listened carefully, was never nasty to them,” Gates said. “But I always had the feeling with him, that first of all he was suspicious of their motives and second that time spent with them was an obligation rather than something he enjoyed…




FOX NEWS: Investigate the investigators? GOP lawmakers urge probe of IRS scandal review. Published January 16, 2014


Republican lawmakers, frustrated by the Justice Department’s slow-moving probe into the IRS targeting scandal and “conflict of interest” concerns, are now calling for the investigators to be investigated. 

Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, on Wednesday formally requested that the Justice Department’s inspector general launch his own probe into the department’s review of IRS activities. 

The request marks a serious escalation of their complaints about the department’s conduct and, specifically, a decision to have a President Obama backer lead the investigation. 

“The Department has created the appearance that it is not taking seriously its responsibility to conduct a thorough investigation of IRS misconduct,” Issa and Jordan wrote in a letter to Inspector General Michael Horowitz. 

Such complaints have come to a head this week, as conservative groups and lawmakers worry that the investigation is fizzling — eight months after the agency first acknowledged it singled out conservative groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status. 

In their letter, Issa and Jordan cited a litany of concerns, including recent claims from administration officials that criminal charges in the case are unlikely. But they centered on the decision to appoint Barbara Kay Bosserman to lead the FBI probe. Campaign finance records show Bosserman has given more than $6,000 to Obama’s two presidential campaigns. 

“Publicly available information suggests that Ms. Bosserman may have a conflict of interest in this matter,” they wrote, also citing a Fox News report that she attended a bill-signing ceremony at the White House in 2009. 

Separately, the lawmakers wrote to Labor Secretary Thomas Perez asking him about any possible involvement, given his prior position as Bosserman’s boss in the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department. 

The Justice Department, though, has pushed back hard on those questioning Bosserman’s fitness for the role. 

One official said last week that simply because a trial attorney exercised her constitutional right to make a political donation does not mean she’s not acting professionally. Officials stressed that they cannot consider political affiliation when handing out case assignments. 

“It is contrary to Department policy and a prohibited personnel practice under federal law to consider the political affiliation of career employees or other non-merit factors in making personnel decisions,” the department said in a statement. 

On Monday, a DOJ official also said that the ceremony Bosserman attended in 2009 — for the signing of hate crimes legislation — was attended by the Civil Rights Division team, which was described as “typical” given their “technical support” on the bill.




WND: Is the biggest Obama scandal yet about to hit? Major new development in eligibility case promised by investigators

Every day brings a new shocking headline: 

• Is Obama misleading U.S. on NSA surveillance? 

• The Obama administration states it can launch a strike on Syria without congressional approval. 

• The Obama administration provided U.S. firearms to the drug cartels in Mexico, resulting in the deaths of two U.S. law enforcement agents and countless American and Mexican citizens, apparently in an effort to make a political case for gun control. 

• The Obama administration covered up a debacle in Benghazi that cost the lives of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and other Americans. 

• The Obama administration used the Internal Revenue Service as an attack dog against its political adversaries, including, but not limited to, the tea party movement. 

• The Obama administration even targeted its friends in the media by spying on journalists at the largest news-gathering operation in the world, the Associated Press, along with a reporter from Fox News.

Could this be just the tip of the iceberg? 

Have the media begun to turn? 

Why are even some of Barack Obama’s most loyal supporters beginning to have their doubts? 

Why did the first post-scandal poll show some 50 percent of Americans supporting impeachment of Obama? 

What would happen, in this climate, if Obama’s biggest secret ever were blown wide open for the public to see? 

What is that biggest secret? It’s that Obama’s Hawaii “birth certificate” is, beyond any shadow of a doubt, a forgery – a fraud. 

That scandal, too, is about to break wide open, according to investigators working within Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse. They say some new earth-shattering developments will soon be announced. 

***But the Cold Case Posse investigation, headed by Mike Zullo, desperately needs financial support to complete its work. ***

“To the public, it may appear that we dropped off the radar screen – that we went silent,” said Zullo. “It’s true that we did. But we did this out of strategic necessity. We went silent because the investigation needed silence to continue its work.” 

Zullo says that work has progressed to the point that the investigation believes it can prove to any unbiased authority that Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent – which suggests he may not even be constitutionally eligible to serve in the White House. 

Would that be the ultimate shocker? 

Would that not send a shockwave through Washington and the rest of the country?

***There’s just one problem: The Cold Case Posse needs private contributions to complete its groundbreaking work.***

The Zullo and the Cold Case Posse have prepared an exhaustive affidavit that will be introduced for the consideration of the Alabama Supreme Court in a case brought by attorney Larry Klayman on behalf of behalf of 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish, who are seeking to force Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve. 

The case, dismissed at a lower level, is now before the Alabama Supreme Court, where strict constitutionalist Roy Moore was elected chief justice last November. The case becomes all the more intriguing because Moore is on record previously questioning Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president. 

Last year, Arpaio held a press conference at which he and Zullo outlined their initial findings. 

“At that time, we announced that we had concluded that there was probable cause that forgery and fraud had been committed in respect of two documents: 1) the long-form or original birth certificate computer image presented by Mr. Obama, which contained multiple errors and anomalies, many of them serious and: 2) the selective-service document for Mr. Obama, which contained a two-digit year-stamp. This was contrary to specifications issued by federal regulations to the effect that the year of issue should be expressed as four digits on the stamp, and also contrary to any other selective-service registration document that we had been able to examine,” Zullo wrote in his affidavit to the Alabama court. 

The result of the evidence, he said, is one conclusion. 

“Accordingly, Sheriff Arpaio continues to recommend that the Congress of the United States open an immediate investigation, including the appointment of a select committee, as regards to the authenticity of Mr. Obama’s documentation, whether any crimes have been committed, and to determine Mr. Obama’s eligibility for the office of president of the United States,” he said. 

Zullo continues: “Mr. Obama has in fact not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event.” 

At issue is the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen,” something a foreigner likely would not be able to qualify as, he said. 

“One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources,” Zullo wrote. 

Are you among the millions of Americans who think Obama has so far gotten away with defying the constitutional requirements of his office? 

Would you like to see this matter adjudicated once and for all? 

Will you support Zullo and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse as they pursue justice in the courts and before Congress? 



“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”

No 571 “En mi opinion” Enero 15, 2014

enero 15, 2014

No 571 “En mi opinión” Miercoles, Enero 15, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


“En un mundo de mentiras defendemos la verdad”

Floyd Brown: The Western Center for Journalism.

 “The Democratic National Committee (DNC) sent out a paranoid email… urging supporters to vote for Democrats so that Republicans can’t impeach President Obama. … The email, subject line ‘Impeachment,’ was sent to Obama for America supporters…” -Daily Caller

       Pay no heed to the media blackout. The far left knows that the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama is on the table. As WorldNetDaily (WND) notes: “Suddenly, millions of Americans talking about ousting [Barack Obama].” 

       But whether or not impeachment happens sooner, rather than later, is up to you and we want to start the New Year off on a country-saving note and send the spineless, self-proclaimed leaders in Congress a message from grassroots Americans like you. The American people want Barack Obama removed from officeNOW

It’s Not A Question Of “If” Obama Will Be Impeached… It’s A Question Of “When” Obama Will Be Impeached.

       The implementation of ObamaCare is a man-made disaster. A dictatorial imposter has usurped the constitutional authority an office he should not hold one too many times and he plans to keep usurping the authority of the highest office in the land. 

       Tyranny and insanity reign. We now live in a country in which an illegal alien is allowed to practice law in the State of California. It’s now “legal” to smoke marijuana in Colorado and a dictatorial regime fights tooth-and-nail to force an order of nuns to either violate their religious convictions and support abortion or close up shop and go out of business. 

       Make no mistake, the law has been turned on its head and is becoming a farce. A tyrannical regime is out of control and their is only one constitutional remedy for restoring our great Republic. 

       And this solution is inevitable. As the “paranoid” email from the DNC illustrates, even Barack Obama’s allies see the handwriting on the wall; and, at some point, our elected officials are going to be forced to face the eventuality that Barack Obama must be removed from office, and they must face that eventuality sooner, rather than later

       Aaron Klein with WND points out: “The White House and progressive machine clearly have failed in their attempt to paint the impeachment movement as fringe and out of touch with reality. The general American public views with increasing concern Obama’s illicit extension of executive authority, his repeated bypassing of Congress and the many serious scandals that have plagued this administration from Fast and Furious through Benghazi through the IRS fiasco and now ObamaCare.” 

       Klein added: “The time has come for the country and our elected representatives to have a serious discussion about the constitutional ramifications of Obama’s highly questionable actions.” 

How Long Must We Wait?

       How long must we wait… how long should we sit back and permit Barack Hussein Obama to continue to rip apart the fabric of this country before we take action? 

       You don’t have to wait. Starting right now, you can fire a shot across the bow… a shot that will be heard around the world… and send Barack Hussein Obama a clear and unmistakable message that he does not have carte blanche to ruin the United States of America

       Like so many on the far-left before him, going all the way back to Karl Marx, Barack Hussein Obama believes that it’s his mission to promote “equality of outcome” (in a just world, the misery of the few must be shared by all) over “equality of opportunity” even if Americans must learn to live in chains to make it happen. 

       And that worldview makes Barack Hussein Obama a very dangerous man and one of the greatest threats to your personal liberty today. 

       What can we do to stop this monomaniac… this American dictator? There’s only one answer

       Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” 

       ObamaCare is only a symptom. The Obama presidency is the disease, and Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, is the cure

Can We Actually Remove Barack Obama? Should We Remove Barack Hussein Obama?
       To answer those questions, we really need to address the often misunderstood subject of what exactly constitutes an removeable offense, in order to illustrate that Barack Hussein Obama’s actions are grave enough to warrant removal. 

       As former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, put it: a removeable offense is,“whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.” 

       Let’s look at Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution again:“The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” 

       The key phrase here is “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a phrase grounded in English Common Law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age. 

       “High crimes and misdemeanors” essentially means bad behavior. 

       Here’s a passage from which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” in the Constitution: 

       “‘High crimes and misdemeanors’ entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough… so Mason then proposed ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a ‘misdemeanor’ meant ‘mis-demeanor,’ or bad behavior.”[Emphasis Ours]

       In other words, “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not refer to a ‘high’ or ‘lofty’ criminal act (as some would lead you to believe)

       It refers to a misdeed committed by a person occupying a high office and the Founders fully intended to allow for the removal of the President for actions which were… well… simply put… egregious… grossly incompetent… grossly negligent… outright distasteful… or, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show malevolence toward this country, which is unabated. 

       Make no mistake, for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that removing Barack Hussein Obama would be a simple matter of “playing politics,” our Founders not only intended that the removal of a sitting President be a “political act” but set the bar extremely low for the removal of a sitting president

       As notes: “The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment.” 

       The Obama Administration exemplifies maladministration. It qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior. Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history, andremoval, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this

       It could be easily argued that we have a duty to remove Barack Hussein Obama. Of course, our elected officials won’t have the back-bone to go it alone. That’s where you come in. 

       Help us spread the word far-and-wide and our elected officials will come to know that the removal of Barack Hussein Obama is the will of the American people and that if they ignore the will of the people. they do so at their own political peril

       The question is not whether we should remove Barack Hussein Obama. Rather, the question is, can we remove Barack Hussein Obama before it is too late? 




Política Exterior de Obama

Sobre el acuerdo alcanzado entre las 6 potencias con Irán, este tiene una cantidad de contenido secreto que permitirá a los iraníes continuar “investigación y desarrollo” de su programa nuclear.

El acuerdo de 30 páginas, en su totalidad, en el presente, es un secreto  Sólo partes de él se espera que sea liberado. Al parecer, los políticos no desean que se sepa cuánto han cedido a las demandas de los iraníes para que puedan continuar enriqueciendo uranio.

El presidente iraní Hassan Rouhani se jactó en Twitter que los Estados Unidos y otras potencias mundiales con eficacia “se han rendido” a Teherán con el acuerdo nuclear recién firmado.

Acerca de negociación de Kerry con los palestinos, esta es la opinión del Ministro de defensa israelí.

“En realidad, no ha habido ninguna negociación entre nosotros y los palestinos durante todos estos meses,  sino más bien entre nosotros y los norteamericanos,” Moshe Ya’alon, ministro de defensa Israelí dijo en comentarios publicados en las páginas de  Yediot Aharonot. “La única cosa que puede ‘salvarnos’ es que John Kerry gane un premio Nobel y nos deje en paz”.

Alon agregó que Kerry, el diplomático estadounidense está “actuando con una obsesión extraviada y un fervor mesiánico”, y que el proyecto se presenta como un documento que “no vale la pena el gasto del papel en que se ha escrito”

Acerca de la nueva información con las transcripciones de Bengasi  surge la pregunta: ¿Exageró las preparaciones la Casa Blanca sobre la preparación para el aniversario del 9/11? Y después ¿Negaron la realidad de que se trataba de un ataque terrorista?

CBS en el programa 60 minutos revisitando el ataque terrorista en Bengasi presentó pruebas que el ataque fue orquestado por al-Qaeda en el aniversario del 9/11. Fue “un ataque planificado, sofisticado” por AQ, y dos consejeros de seguridad que se han ofrecido a decir la verdad de como ambos en varias ocasiones trataron de avisar sobre el peligro antes del ataque

El segmento, dirigido por Lara Logan, se centra en lo que pasó en Bengasi antes y durante el ataque. Lo hace, planteando la pregunta sobre por qué fueron enviadas fuerzas militares para rescatar a los norteamericanos a pesar del ataque tuvo varias horas de duración en el anexo. Gregory Hicks, uno de los denunciantes que sacó los puntos de la administración Obama fuera del agua en su testimonio ante el Congreso, diciendo que aún no puede entender por qué Estados Unidos no estaba dispuesto a proteger sus activos en Bengasi.

Esto debe servir como un trampolín para una demanda de más respuestas de la casa blanca y también de la entonces secretaria de Estado Hillary Clinton.


Quizás se hable un poco de esto en las noticias de la mediática complaciente, pero será en las páginas interiores porque todas las primeras planas están ocupada por un tranque provocado en un puente de New Jersey








Estimado Sr. Director,


De acuerdo con el Sr. Mauricio Claver-Carone, director ejecutivo de Cuba Democracy Advocates citado por Wilfredo Cancio Isla en su reportaje “Polémico viaje del senador Bob Graham a Cuba” (4A, 1/14/14) sobre la visita del ex senador y ex gobernador floridano a Cuba para cerciorarse de cuestiones de “petróleo y cambio climático”.


?Acaso hará demasiado tiempo que Graham (otrora de vasto aprecio y cierta vez precandidato a la nominación de su partido Demócrata para presidente del país) se ve apartado de los titulares?  Los pozos secos “revolucionarios” que les interesan al señor y a la dama del Council On Foreign Relations que lo acompaña (Julia Sweig, ?una “mamacusa” de izquierda?) hacen eco en cocos huecos.


Sospecho que pronto hemos de ver “drones revolucionarios” (fabricados a base de la chatarra de los nuestros que la Hillary* alegremente dejó esparcida por el desierto libio, recogida afanosamente por Rusia y China comunista) en nuestros cielos para “medir el cambio climático”, fantasía y ficción de Fidel y del obamoclintonismo.  Cuando no en nuestras clínicas a esos “medicolucionarios” (-!?Reválidas para qué!?-).


*Este…ciertos países de la OTAN y ciertas monarquías árabes del golfo Pérsico.


Philip V. Riggio






“EMO” Miren que cosa mas bonita. LRGM





Kerry visits Vatican, asks for help in Cuban case

The U.S. Secretary of State lobbies the church to help free an American detained in Cuba since 2009.  Other concerns » 

Kerry asks Vatican to help win release of American jailed in Cuba. By Warren Strobel

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday asked the Vatican to help win the release of an American contractor who has been in jail in Cuba since 2009.

Kerry, the first Catholic U.S. secretary of state in more than 30 years, stopped at the Vatican on his way to Kuwait to hold talks with Pope Francis’ top aide, Secretary of State Archbishop Pietro Parolin.

The talks mostly centered on the Middle East and efforts to bring an end to the Syrian civil war ahead of a peace conference in Geneva later this month.

“We talked also about Cuba and the need for respect for freedom of religion and freedom of, and respect for, human rights,” Kerry told reporters after the meeting.

“I raised the issue of Alan Gross and his captivity, and we hope very much that there might be able to be assistance with respect to that issue,” he said.

Gross was sentenced to 15 years in prison for installing Internet networks for Cuban Jews in a U.S. program Cuba considers subversive.

His arrest in late 2009 and sentencing in March 2011 stalled a brief period of detente in U.S.-Cuba relations after President Barack Obama took office and quickly loosened restrictions on travel and remittances to the island for Cuban Americans with relatives in Communist-run Cuba.

The Vatican has relatively good diplomatic relations with Cuba. Former Pope Benedict and the late Pope John Paul both made major visits there.

The position held by Parolin, who will be elevated to the rank of cardinal next month, is the second most senior in the Vatican hierarchy after the pope and its holder is sometimes called the “deputy pope”.

“We talked at great length on Syria. I was particularly appreciative for the archbishop’s raising the issue and equally grateful for the Holy Father’s comments … yesterday regarding his support for the Geneva 2 process,” Kerry told reporters.

Pope Francis called for renewed political will to end the conflict in Syria in an address to diplomats at the Vatican on Monday and said he hoped the Geneva 2 conference due onJanuary 22 under U.N. auspices would be the start of a peace process.

Kerry said he briefed Parolin on the broader Middle East process between Israel and Palestinians.

“Obviously, there are issues of enormous concern to the Holy See, not just about peace, but also about the freedom of access for religious worship in Jerusalem for all religions, and appropriate resolution with respect to Jerusalem that respects that,” Kerry said.

Israel captured East Jerusalem in the 1967 Middle East war and declared all of Jerusalem its “united and eternal capital” in 1980 in a move that has not won international recognition. Palestinians want East Jerusalem to be the capital of a state they seek to establish in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The Vatican wants any peace settlement to guarantee free access to all religious sites in the city, which is sacred to all Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

Kerry is the first Catholic U.S. Secretary of State since Edmund Muskie in the early 1980s and said the visit was very moving for him.

“On a personal level, it was a thrill for me … as an altar boy, as a young kid, I would never have imagined that I would have been crossing the threshold of the Vatican to meet, as Secretary of State, with the Secretary of State of the Holy See,” he said.

(Reporting By Warren Strobel, writing by Philip Pullella)





The more I read and examine the “FACTS” the more I think that President Obama has made toilet paper out of the constitution. Today I read that the FBI is closing the investigation of the IRS scandal where one top administrator refused to testify to a congressional committee. Several people also in the IRS administration spoke of the improprieties and abuse for political reasons. Also the IRS scandal victims were not even called by the FBI investigators to get their testimony.

The case of Benghazi is back in news with more revelations of cover-up and corruption. But President Obama with the help of his judicial political gangster Attorney General Eric Holder runs the country at will. Today President Obama gives a speech and talks about more presidential directives. Take the case of the Obamacare website debacle . The President never fires or investigate. Is like a clan of gangsters running the country. It is clear that for as long as you do as he says and give him loyalty “legal protection is available”. There are lots of scandal from where to draw conclusions and the actions and results are always the same. The administration clan is above the law.

I my wildest dream I ever thought that a President could run the country as President Obama does. Moreover, I never thought that the American people will have put up with this kind of behavior much less a free press provide cover to this kind of activity. While I think that Governor Chris Christie actions must be scrutinize and be held accountable he at list fired and reprimanded publicly the wrong doers . President Obama in contrast  “ ignores the problems and provides cover-up”. The President is at the top of all the government agencies. From the NSA to IRS his political appointees run these agencies and by law answer to the President. The general media is totally bias and I have to conclude that it appears to be an extension of President Obama administration hardline agenda. YES THE CONSTITUTION IS NOW TOILET PAPER WITH THE HELP OF MOST IN THE MEDIA.

Jorge Aguiar

Doral, Florida






Una De Las Leyes Barbarás Musulmana

Es La Que Obliga A Las Mujeres Violadas

A Casarse Con Su Violador…

Esto Debe De Ser Conocido… y Debemos

Evitar Que Los Musulmanes Se Sigan

Extendiendo En USA… Como Ya Lo Están

En Toda Europa…

Gracias por actuar para aumentar el conocimiento de la

VERDAD sobre la Religión Musulmana…

violencia contra las mujeres en Marruecos

Envía el correo de abajo a tus amigos y familiares y pega

este enlace en tu muro de Facebook.

En Brasil, Millor Fernández (humorista, dramaturgo y escritor) lanzó un desafío

público con la siguiente pregunta: 
– ¿Cuál es la diferencia entre un Político y un Ladrón? 
Le llamó mucho la atención la respuesta de un lector: – “Estimado Millor, después

de una larga búsqueda llegué a esta conclusión:

La diferencia entre un político y un ladrón es que el primero lo elijo yo, y el segundo

me elige a mí.

¿Estoy en lo cierto?”

Esta fue la réplica de Millor: 

– “Apreciado señor, usted es un genio.”   Es el único que logró encontrar









Look out. The gloves have finally come off, and a very famous Republican is officially spilling the beans on the president.

This legend is calling Barack Obama the “most vile and disgusting racist.” And that’s just for starters …

Read the latest now on


‘How long will it be before ‘you people’ realize’  BOB UNRUH 

War hero and former U.S. Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., is questioning how long it will take for “you people” – white Americans – to realize that their president “abjectly despises” them.

In a commentary posted Tuesday on his own website, West, who represented Florida in Congress after an extended career in the U.S. military, confronted head on the issue of racism.

Citing Obama Attorney General Eric Holder’s warning that schools have to drop policies that “disproportionately punish minorities,” West suggested it’s not racism to punish blacks more when members of that minority cause trouble more.

“I taught high school for one year in Deerfield Beach, Fla., and in the end, it was such an enjoyable experience breaking up fights daily, that I decided to return to the combat zone of Afghanistan,” West wrote. “Teachers are already disrespected and attacked, not feared. There were students at Deerfield Beach who steered clear of the lunchroom for fear of being picked on or engaged in a fight …

“Yes, this violence on campus was perpetrated eight out of 10 times by black students, male and female, but it had nothing to do with racial disparity. It had everything to do with a lack of discipline and control,” he wrote.

He said Obama’s and Holder’s advocacy for leniency for those to cause trouble essentially makes them racist.

“This is my clear and succinct message to white Americans. How long will it be before ‘you people’ realize you have elevated someone to the office of president who abjectly despises you – not to mention his henchman Holder. Combined they are the most vile and disgusting racists – not you,” he wrote.

Read all about those who advise, mentor and operate behind the throne of the 44th president, Barack Obama, in “Barack Obama and the Enemies Within.

The commentary was prompted by Holder’s recent demand that schools “rethink ‘zero tolerance’ disciplinary policies” because they “disproportionately punish minorities.”

A Hill report on the issue charged that “alarming numbers of young people are suspended, expelled or even arrested for relatively minor transgressions like school uniform violations, schoolyard fights or showing ‘disrespect’ by laughing in class, Holder said during a speech.”

West noted that the accompanying new federal guidance from the departments of Justice and Education “encouraging (i.e. threatening) schools to adopt disciplinary policies that are ‘fair, nondiscriminatory, and effective’” is simply a threat from the Department of Justice.

“So now [the department] … will use its power to enforce ‘civil rights protections’ in school disciplinary actions. In fact, the DOJ and DoEd are putting schools on notice that they are prepared to use their authority to investigate the claims of racial disparity in the punishment of students,” he wrote.

“Not to be outdone by Holder in the ‘stuck on stupid’ category, Education Secretary Arne Duncan stated, ‘Positive discipline policies’ can actually foster safer school environments. … Schools also must understand their civil rights obligations and avoid unfair disciplinary practices.”

“When a young man took a swing at me while I broke up a beat down that he and three others were giving a young man already on the ground, it had nothing to do with civil rights. It had everything to do with a criminal behavior which does not belong in a learning environment – and he was expelled. Now imagine under these new guidelines and rules, DoJ and DoEd would initiate an investigation,” West said.







Pedro García de nuevo al frente de la oficina del Tasador de la Propiedad?

• Pudiera ocupar el puesto al ser López Cantera nombrado Teniente Gobernador

“EMO” No creo que el alcalde pueda nombrar un sustituto para Lopez-Cantera al frente del departamento de taxes condales porque ese cargo es un cargo para una persona electa. Si el se va pues hay que hacer elecciones para ocupar esa vacante. LRGM


MIAMI 14 DE ENERO DE 2014,—Fuentes del condado Miami Dade le han dicho a que el ex tasador de la propiedad del condado Miami Dade Pedro García, pudiera regresar a su puesto,  perdido por escaso margen en las últimas elecciones frente Carlos López Cantera.

Todo apunta a que en las próximas horas López Cantera será nombrado por el gobernador Rick Scott para Teniente Gobernador de la Florida.

López Cantera de 40 años, sería el primer hispano en sostener el trabajo de Teniente Gobernador de la Florida y su presencia en la candidatura para la gobernación de la Florida junto a Scott este año seguro que agregaría diversidad y daría un gran apoyo a Scott dentro de los votantes hispanos, especialmente en Miami Dade.

López Cantera sirvió como representante entre los años 2004 y 2012 siendo los dos últimos años líder de la mayoría, y es considerado parte del círculo de íntimos amigos del senador Marco Rubio, quien derrotó al ex gobernador Crist en el 2010.

Según las fuentes que contactó anoche, el Gobernador Scott planea hacer el anuncio esta mañana.

El pasado año, Scott se quedó sin Teniente Gobernadora después  de la dimisión de la ex vicegobernador Jennifer Carroll.

Nuestras fuentes en el condado, le dijeron anoche a, que es muy posible que el alcalde Carlos Giménez nombre al ex Tasador de la Propiedad Pedro García para que ocupe la oficina hasta las elecciones, aunque las fuentes confesaron desconocer cuál es el procedimiento en este caso.

Pedro García gozó de mucha popularidad mientras estuvo al frente de la oficina del Tasador, por eso es “que si está en las manos de Giménez es posible que sea nombrado ya que tiene la experiencia necesaria para el puesto”, nos concluyó la fuente.

Read More

Descubren “Lista Negra” en manos de asesores de Hillary Clinton

• Aunque ocurrió en el 2008, pudieran usar las mismas tácticas en próximas elecciones


MIAMI 14 DE ENERO DE 2014,—Con el advenimiento de las elecciones presidenciales de Estados Unidos en 2016, ya se empiezan a sentir los ataques y controversias y a los potenciales candidatos a sacar las uñas, según le dijo un analista político a el pasado fin de semana.

De acuerdo con la fuente, los Clinton que son conocidos por sus rencores contra sus enemigos políticos se han valido de sus asistentes para “pasarle la cuenta a sus enemigos”.

Algunos de sus asistentes en el 2008, nos dijo la fuente, “construyeron un archivo para saber quiénes eran sus amigos y enemigos”, y esto pudiera ocurrir de nuevo.

“La llamada lista negra fue realizada en un programa Microsoft Excel a finales de la fracasada campaña presidencial de Hillary en el 2008”, la misma fue  guardada secretamente y se le ha ido añadiendo nuevos “blancos políticos ya que será usada en su próxima campaña presidencial.”

Según las fuentes que contactaron a, ocurrió a finales de junio del 2008 dentro de una pequeña oficina en el tercer piso donde estaban las oficinas de la campaña   presidencial de Hillary en el barrio de Ballston en Arlington, Virginia, donde Kris Balderston y Adrianne Elrod dieron los toques finales a la lista de “objetivos políticos”.

Esto ocurrió cuando la candidatura de Hillary había caído y se gritaban obscenidades entre los trabajadores de la campana y muchos de sus ayudantes habían contactado con la campana del entonces senador Barack Obama, pasándose al bando de este.

De acuerdo con las fuentes, Balderston, quien da la apariencia de ser un profesor de inglés, es una de las personas en que los Clintons mas confía, ya que ha estado con ellos desde la época en que Bill era presidente y luego fue director legislativo y subjefe de persona en su oficina  del Senado en Nueva York y es descrito como uno de los “fabricantes de chismes políticos”, preferidos por Hillary.

Los que han tenido acceso a la lista, dicen que, “durante meses habían actualizado meticulosamente un tablero tipo pizarra escolar donde colocaban símbolos codificados por colores, azules y rojos, letras y flechas para marcar a sus blancos políticos, legisladores que se inclinaban por Hillary y por los que se inclinaban por Barack Obama. Por ejemplo, las letras LO en rojo, indicaban que apoyaban a Obama, mientras que BD, en azul indicaba que él o ella era miembro de la centrista coalición Blue Dog del Capitolio”.

El analista político nos dijo que es muy posible que en las próximas elecciones esos mismos asistentes serán visto envueltos en la campana de Hillary y “seguramente abriendo la lista negra”.

Reaparecerá hoy el mentor del presidente Barack Obama

• Jeremiah Wright, se une al sindicato de maestros de Chicago

MIAMI 15 DE ENERO DE 2014,—Los que acostumbran a ver los canales de noticias por cables, CNN, FOXNEWS,MSNBC, etc, pronto verán la reaparición del siniestro Reverendo Jeremiah Wright, según le dijo una fuente a

“El sindicato de maestros de Chicago necesita una voz más potente en el mundo político para poner en marcha una campaña que favorezca a los candidatos que apoyen a los maestros”, nos dijo la fuente.

Wright por supuesto es el pastor de Chicago que fuera el mentor espiritual del presidente Barack Obama hasta la campaña electoral del 2008, en que el presidente decidió alejarse de su mentor después que saliera a la luz pública un video de Wright gritando desde el pulpito, “maldita sea América”, en aquel “sermón” Wright sugería que Estados Unidos había cometido terrorismo y por lo tanto los ataques del 11 de Septiembre fueron realizados por el propio gobierno.

En aquel sermón también opinó  que el gobierno americano había creado el SIDA para matar a negros. Ante el descubrimiento del video, Obama denuncio  a su mentor declarando que “nunca había escuchado esos sermones  del pasor”, Wright se alejó gradualmente de los titulares.

Ahora regresa, dicen nuestras fuentes.

Wright dará un discurso hoy miércoles en un desayuno convocado por la unión de maestros de Chicago y en honor del líder negro Martin Luther King Jr.

El sindicato ha invitado a los pastores locales para el desayuno con la esperanza de construir una coalición de clérigos de Chicago para apoyar sus causas, dijeron nuestras fuentes.

Los dirigentes del sindicato de maestros de Chicago, particularmente están buscando aliados para luchar contra el cierre de escuelas algo que ha ocurrido en los últimos meses.

Se espera que Wright vuelva a repetir algunos de sus comentarios controversiales y reiterar posiciones controvertidas como, “estar de acuerdo con las opiniones antisemitas de Louis Farrakhan”.

En estaremos al tanto de la re-aparición del pastor Jeremiah Wright.



“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”

No 570 “En mi opinion” Enero 14, 2014

enero 14, 2014

No 570 “En mi opinión” Martes, Enero 14, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor


“En un mundo de mentiras defendemos la verdad”

Supremes May Tell Us To Fix Stupid Legislators Ourselves. JANUARY 10, 2014 BY FRED WEINBERG 


God Bless Associate Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor!

When she was nominated, my guess, studying her previous decisions and her life’s story, was that eventually she might become the Justice he regretted appointing the most.

Yes, she’s a liberal Democrat. And, yes, she usually votes with the liberal wing of the Court.

But her order delaying a provision of the Obamacare law on New Year’s eve in favor of the Little Sisters of the Poor set some boundaries on her liberalism.

To recap that argument, The Little Sisters are an order of Nuns that runs nursing homes for seniors who cannot afford such niceties as getting old.  They do not wish to sign a piece of paper authorizing the Government to force an insurer in their name to make contraception available with the health insurance they are obligated to provide their employees, since that goes against their religious beliefs.

Now Barack Obama thinks that the government should force health insurers to pay for birth control irrespective of the employer’s religious beliefs.  And while the optics of beating up on an order of Nuns running nursing homes for the poor aren’t good, he wants to (pardon the phrase) stick to his guns.

Fortunately, Sotomayor was willing to listen to the Nuns and their lawyers, and she has issued injunctive relief until the full Court can decide what to do. I expect that is because she has a very healthy respect for the First Amendment and is not willing to bow to political expediency.

She also, last week, facilitated a temporary halt to homosexual marriages in Utah and has, in doing so, probably precipitated the final decision the Court has been avoiding, which is whether or not two males or two females have a constitutional right to be married to each other.

While you may think of it as the ultimate social values case, in truth, it is the ultimate state’s rights case. It is the biggest test yet of the 10th Amendment, which says:“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

One would observe that the word “marriage” is neither found in the Constitution nor in the Bill of Rights.

The current Court has essentially said in both the Obamacare individual mandate case and the previous homosexual marriage case overturning the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, “Don’t blame us when you elect crappy legislators. Fix it yourselves.”

In the case of the Obamacare case, the Court said that, in point of fact that the “fine” for not having health insurance was indeed a tax, and the Constitution allows the Federal Government to levy such a tax.  Whether or not you agree is irrelevant.  You elected these clowns; and you can, if you don’t like the law, un-elect them.  In the past, this nation has even rewritten the Constitution when it has been provoked enough, as in the case of prohibition.  So it CAN and HAS been done.

In the DOMA decision, the Court decided that when a state says homosexual marriage is legal, the Federal Government CANNOT un-recognize the state’s action, which is what the Defense of Marriage Act did.  Contrary to what the mainstream media gushed, it did NOT endorse homosexual marriage; but it DID, resoundingly, endorse the 10th Amendment.

The more I read her opinions and the more I look at her legal history, I see her as the future swing vote from the left as Anthony Kennedy and, occasionally, Chief Justice John Roberts have been from the right.

By the time a case gets to the Supreme Court, from a legal standpoint, the emotion is gone.

It is up to each Justice to interpret the law as the Chief once told the Senate, by acting as an umpire calling balls and strikes.

The truth is, whether or not you agree with each member’s individual politics, there are no political hacks on that bench.

If the referral from Sotomayor sets up the 10th Amendment smackdown that is widely anticipated, remember that it could just as easily be an argument abut the legalization of marijuana or a speed limit of 110 miles per hour.  The important part is not whether or not homosexuals can marry, but what the boundaries of the 10th Amendment are.

Whichever way both decisions go, it will probably just be the Court saying what it has said in the past: If you want better laws, elect better legislators. It is not up to us to bail you out of your stupid electoral decisions.






Why John Roberts (Likely) Is Protecting Obamacare… JANUARY 9, 2014 BY DR. KEVIN “COACH” COLLINS 

On Monday, without comment (because he could not make a coherent one),  Chief Justice John Roberts denied a request by the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons and the Alliance for Natural Health USA for a stay in the implementation of Obamacare. The groups had made their application last Friday, arguing that since the bill had been declared a tax by the Supreme Court (with Justice Roberts himself the deciding vote), and it had originated in the Senate (the Constitution says revenue bills may not originate), the law was therefore unconstitutional; and implementation of Obamacare  should at least be stayed pending further examination.

While there are other minor issues attached to the application that were also not addressed, the truth of the matter is clear: John Roberts will never do anything to derail Obamacare, no matter what arguments against it are brought before him.

There is very good reason to believe that regardless of the media’s skillful smothering of the story, John Roberts is being blackmailed to make certain Obamacare never falls in a Supreme Court case. The basis of this charge surrounds the fact that a series of strange (and probably felonious) acts are attached to the adoption of his two children.

In 2005, when they thought they were doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited, as are private adoptions.

Apparently, when the Democrats realized they could control a Supreme Court Justice’s vote through blackmail over his having committed a number of international crimes, the Times pulled back and dropped its investigation. The Democrat paper of record pulled back because it didn’t want to “ break the seal of an adoption case” – as if violating laws ever means anything to Democrats in their quest for power. Keep in mind Barack Obama’s violation of his opponents’ “sealed” divorce records propelled him to a US Senate seat.

What does the Roberts problem mean for the average American who looks to Washington for relief from Democrat oppression? It means we won’t be getting any relief from the Roberts Court, period. Read more at


Watch Incredible Video Of The Plane Crash That Killed Fuddy


Email39 Share9.3K 10 Share9.7K Tweet144

The single-engine plane crash that killed Hawaii’s Public Health Director sparked a nationwide debate last month. Loretta Fuddy, the woman who authenticated Barack Obama’s disputed birth certificate, was the only passenger of nine to die in the Dec. 11 offshore crash near Honolulu.

One passenger, Ferdinand Puentes, recently released his own video of the emergency landing. The footage reveals a very calm environment just prior to the crash. Correspondents on ABC’s Good Morning America released the footage, with George Stephanopoulos remarking there was “not a single scream,” noting passengers were “so methodical, all getting out in time.”

When he was reminded that Fuddy perished in the crash, he responded, “Sad – but, boy, that is incredible stuff we saw right there.”

Puentes described the ordeal, saying “Time stopped and everything you remembered in your past, your loved ones and everything, I didn’t say goodbye to them. Your life just goes in front of you.”

He recorded the entire crash and kept his camera on as passengers escaped to wait for rescue. The slow response of emergency crews, along with other perceived inconsistencies in the crash report, led to a lawsuit seeking additional information.

After the crash, a number of skeptics suggested Fuddy’s death was suspicious in such a relatively minor crash. Passenger C. Phillip Hollstein described the incident as almost smooth.

The pilot “set it up for the best crash-landing you could do,” Hollstein said. “There wasn’t panic or anything. It was very orderly. It wasn’t like any of the movies or the TV shows.”

The crash has been blamed on engine failure.

While an individual could undoubtedly die from injuries sustained in such a crash, the fact that Fuddy played such an integral role in Obama’s continuing birth certificate debacle opened the crash up to speculation.

No matter the ultimate cause of Fuddy’s death, the reaction to this incident illustrates the distrust many Americans have of this administration.



Amenper: No se debe perder la oportunidad…

No Se Debe Perder la Oportunidad

Los Demócratas han tenido la habilidad con la complicidad de los medios noticiosos de lograr elegir de presidente de los Estados Unidos a una persona exclusivamente por su raza.

 Jugando con la culpabilidad del pueblo americano por su racismo durante los años de la segregación, los convencieron de votar por el primer presidente negro de la nación. No hubiera sido algo tan malo si este negro hubiera estado capacitado, pero Obama no tenía las credenciales para ser presidente de los Estados Unidos.  Nunca ocupó una posición productiva durante su vida, y estuvo solamente dos años como senador sin penas ni glorias antes de ser electo presidente. Sus amigos y familiares eran comunistas declarados, enemigos de los Estados Unidos, y uno de ellos fue hasta un terrorista confeso. 

Después su gestión de gobierno ha sido funesta a pesar de lo mucho que los medios para tapar sus errores 

Ahora quieren hacer lo mismo para elegir a la primera mujer presidente.  Han ungido a Hillary Clinton para ser candidata en las próximas elecciones del 2016.  Este es un error que si lo cometen se debe de aprovechar.  Hillary es una mujer sin carisma, popular entre las mujeres feministas pero no entre las mujeres femeninas que son las más. Tiene un cementerio de esqueletos que no alcanzan los meses de campaña para sacárselos.  Durante la presidencia, como primera dama se ganó numerosos enemigos dentro del partido demócrata.

Si hacemos un análisis de la derrota de Romney vemos que fue solamente por un 2% del voto popular. Si bien es verdad que lo que cuenta es los delegados de los estados, lo que tenemos que tener en consideración es que cualquier candidato republicano frente a Hillary puede hacer un mejor papel, y muchos estados que cayeron dentro del azul pasarán al rojo.

Los ciudadanos blancos puros, todavía son un 70% de la población y si sólo votaron por Romney por una diferencia de un 6% con Hillary deben de votar por mucha más diferencia.

Los negros no pueden votar más por Hillary que por otro candidato porque votaron un 97% por Obama

Con el Obamacare, hemos visto como la juventud se le ha virado a Obama, ya no es el ídolo, algunos hasta han pedido que se impugne.  Los jóvenes votaron por Obama 62-38.  Con Hillary y sus antecedentes de Hillarycare cuando era primera dama, no creo que obtenga esa cantidad de votos entre los jóvenes.

Los hispanos a pesar de la percepción sólo votaron por una diferencia de 57-43, algo que se debe de poder mejorar.

Los independientes también volverán al partido Republicano después del desgaste de ocho años de Obama y los liberales demócratas.

Y como dije arriba, los demócratas moderados no van a votar por Hillary por sus antecedentes, o sea que no será 95-5 como fue por Obama en las pasadas elecciones.

Los Republicanos en estas elecciones están para ganar y si pierden es por su culpa, por las luchas intestinas interminables.    

Lo pueden hacer si Hillary es la candidata y sería una avalancha ganadora si el candidato es Kerry.  Todo depende del candidato que se escoja por los republicanos y de que los ataques entre los candidatos en las primarias no sean rirreversibles.  Que no se convierta en el partido de Chacumbele que el mismito se mató.  Es hora de votar con la cabeza no con la emoción.

Hay que establecer una diferencia entre una crítica constructiva a un Republicano que vote en contra de nuestra manera de pensar en un asunto y declarar que la persona a pesar de tener coincidencia en otros asuntos queda eliminado y atacarlo como un enemigo. 

Hay infiltrados y tenemos que pensar no con nuestras emociones pero con el pragmatismo del enemigo que nos ha ido ganando hasta cambiar la cara de la nación.

Cuando alguien que se dice que es conservador, hace de un conservador una crítica que vemos que no es constructiva pero destructiva, debemos rechazarlo.  No verán a un liberal atacar a otro liberal como un conservador o alguien que se hace pasar como conservador ataca a otro conservador.  La oportunidad para ganar está presente y después se pueden discutir las diferencias intestinas.

No es fantasía, no es ilusión, estudien los números abajo.



Amenper: La Mariguana…


La legalización de la Mariguana es una proposición política, no tiene nada que ver con el uso médico de los canabinóides como el THC y el CBD. Estas drogas se pueden desarrollar en laboratorios para productos farmacéuticos como sedantes y analgésicos en pacientes que lo necesiten.  Es igual que la codeína y el opio y otras drogas.

El elixir paregórico, que es un elixir de anís opiado, es popular y muy usado como antiespasmódico y analgésico, así como la codeína y hasta la morfina, metadona y otros opiaceos.

Estas drogas han sido usadas como fármacos desarrollados en laboratorios y bajo receta médica

En ningún momento se consideró legalizar el fumar una pipa de opio. ¿Cómo vamos a considerar el cigarro de mariguana como algo para uso médico?  ¿Dónde está el control de la dosificación? ¿Dónde está el control de calidad de la elaboración de la planta como droga médica?

Es más honesto el decir que se quiere aprobar la legalización de la mariguana para uso recreativo, que es el verdadero objetivo. Entonces sin la excusa hipócrita del uso medicinal, pudiéramos entrar en una discusión sin que insulten nuestra inteligencia.

Lo del uso medicinal es una pobre excusa para que nuestra juventud use el producto como un estupefaciente para ponerse en “tono”, y es parte de la degradación de la juventud que comenzó en los años 60 y que se quiere completar ahora.

No se puede comparar al alcohol, una copa de vino o una cerveza no producen el efecto de un pitillo de mariguana y cuando un policía detiene a un conductor errático, no puede detectar el nivel de mariguana como lo puede hacer del alcohol porque el efecto de la mariguana comienza de la primera inhalación..

Aparte del deterioro moral que produce la legalización de una droga del tipo de la mariguana, los que no la usamos y estamos conduciendo en la calle y tenemos que enfrentarnos a conductores intoxicados por la droga, tenemos motivos para protestar que nuestros derechos están siendo violados.

Nos siguen martillando con el alcohol, y sin lugar a dudas hay abuso de alcohol, pero es más controlable que el uso de la mariguana o de otras drogas como la cocaína y las drogas analgésicas de codeína abusadas que necesitan receta médica.

Es una hipocresía cuando mencionan esto, si consideran que el abuso de esas drogas es algo malo,

¿Por qué entonces quieren introducir una nueva droga y legalizarla?

Pero la situación es que los mariguaneros de los 60 están en el poder, Obama, Hillary Cinton, Kerry y otros en posiciones de poder fumaron o quizás todavía fuman mariguana. No cuento a Bill Clinton porque Slick Billy que siempre tiene una buena respuesta para todo ya nos dijo que el fumó pero no inhaló la mariguana.



Amenper: Desigualdad entre Indigentes y Delincuentes.

 Antes del siglo 18, ya se había establecido en Norteamérica un sistema formalizado de ayuda al indigente, de bienestar infantil, e inclusive de salud mental. Estos sistemas tenían el doble propósito de ofrecer compasión, protección y de ayuda a buscar trabajo… En los albores del siglo 19 los estados de la unión empezaron a responsabilizarse por la distribución de beneficios sociales en poblados y condados. En 1930, el sistema estadounidense para el bienestar social, Welfare, comprendía un conjunto de agencias benéficas locales y estatales sin coordinación entre ellas, con fondos y recursos módicos provenientes de los contribuyentes locales, organizaciones caritativas de Iglesias, y ciudadanos privados- En casos de catástrofes naturales o de otro tipo, el gobierno federal ayudaba a los estados, como fué el caso con el programa de los refugiados cubanos…

A principio de los años 1960 se instituyeron diversos programas federales para ayudar a los estados con el Welfare y se instituyó el programa de ayuda médica para indigentes que era como se llamó el programa más conocido como Medicaid, y se estableció el Programa de Estampillas para la Comida (Food Stamp Program) para asegurarse que todos los indigentes tuvieran acceso a la alimentación y al sustento diario.

Creo que lo que ha sucedido en este país es que la indigencia se ha politizado, las personas de bajos recursos se han visto perjudicados por personas que no sólo no necesitan estos servicios pero que ingresan en los programas con la premeditación de cometer fraude.

Estos servicios se instituyeron como una ayuda temporal para que durante un período de trastornos de salud o económica recibieran ayuda mientras se recuperaban.  De hecho el instrumento principal de la “Guerra a la Pobreza” de los 60 fue el Acta a la Oportunidad Económica (EOA, Economic Opportunity Act) que incluía programas como “las Brigadas de Trabajo” (Job Corps), Rumbo Arriba (Upper Bound), las Brigadas Juveniles del Vecindario (Neighborhood Youth Corps), y Acción Comunitaria todos encaminados a una búsqueda de trabajo a la vez que se prestaba ayuda.

Siempre en esta historia de compasión del pueblo americano, estaba implícito en que era algo temporal, no una dependencia de por vida dando ayuda para una persona que no estuviera imposibilitado física o mentalmente de una manera permanente y a veces por generaciones. Nunca cuando empezaron estas ayudas se pensó en el indigente profesional, esto es algo de nuestros tiempos modernos.

Pero todo el que ha estado de una manera u otra asociado a los programas de ayuda puede testificar del fraude institucionalizado de la mayoría, y no exagero cuando digo mayoría.

Estoy leyendo hoy en el periódico unos casos de un estudio sobre el número de personas que recibían cheques del welfare y visitaban por lo menos dos veces al año Disney World. 

Nosotros los cubanos ya sabíamos esto. Hay personas que reciben cheques de ayuda como indigentes, y viajan regularmente a Cuba. 

A ellos no le gusta la palabra indigente, pero está en el documento que firman para recibir estos programas de ayuda, tienen que declarar que por sus bajos ingresos son indigentes.

Según el diccionario “se entiende por indigencia cuando el ingreso es insuficiente para cubrir una canasta básica de alimentos y vestimenta para un individuo o un hogar.”

 Pero no les gustan que le llamemos indigentes porque no llevan realmente una vida de indigentes lo que llevan es una vida de delincuentes-, Porque todo el que comete el delito de fraude es un delincuente. No sólo son unos ladrones del dinero de los contribuyentes, pero roban de los que verdaderamente necesitan la ayuda.

Lo vemos en las farmacias, cuando convencen a su médico que les recete una medicina que no necesitan para cambiarla por artículos que no son de primera necesidad no aprobados para la ayuda a indigentes o enviárselo o llevárselo a sus familiares a Cuba.  Lo vemos en los mercados cuando hacen lo mismo, comprando con los cupones de alimentos, bebidas alcohólicas y cigarros. Lo vemos a mayor escala cuando se descubre ocasionalmente a una empresa cometiendo fraude al Medicare o al Medicaid.  Una empresa no puede cometer fraude sin la complicidad de los beneficiarios. Pero cuando vemos en el periódico que detienen a los dueños de las empresas que cometieron el fraude, no detienen a los beneficiarios que fueron cómplices del fraude.

Si sólo que controlara el fraude, habría suficiente dinero para mantener a todos los verdaderos indigentes de los Estados Unidos y sobraría dinero para balancear el presupuesto-

Pero esto no es popular entre los políticos ni entre los periodistas, porque el fraude es a todos los niveles y hemos llegado a un momento en que los que contribuyen con los impuestos son menos que los que no pagan ningún impuesto.  Y la matemática es fácil, hay más votantes de los beneficiarios que de los contribuyentes.  Por eso vemos una batalla por la desigualdad tergiversada.  Los desiguales son los contribuyentes, las personas que con trabajo y lucha logran honradamente sus ingresos, para cada vez ver más estos ingresos atacados con nuevos impuestos para mantener a delincuentes. Y los que están pasando por un momento de pobreza también están siendo perjudicado por estos delincuentes y los delincuentes como nuestro presidente que por motivos políticos no sólo los protegen pero los estimulan en su delincuencia. 

Hay que ayudar a los indigentes para que no sufran necesidad, pero no se puede pedir que igualen a los que simplemente tienen menos con los que tienen más por su trabajo, porque esto no es justicia social, es comunismo, y el comunismo nunca ha traído beneficios a la sociedad donde se implanta.

La mayoría de los que se están inscribiendo en el Obamacare son bajo el Medicaid, o sea que no pagan primas, los jóvenes y personas saludables que tienen que pagar, no se están inscribiendo. Y siguen hablando de una nueva lucha para la pobreza para instituir nuevos programas de beneficio.   ¿Por dónde se romperá la soga? Es fácil, por los contribuyentes que tendrán que pagar mayores impuestos, mas redistribución de la riqueza..

Por eso es buena la internet, porque no hay periodista que quiera denunciar esto, no es conveniente atacar a la mayoría.  Los que descargamos en la internet no tenemos intereses políticos creados, simplemente descargamos nuestras angustias. Nosotros no tenemos que preocuparnos por perder nuestro trabajo de periodistas porque no somos ni escritores ni periodistas-  Cómo unos simples descargadores que no dependemos de un periódico o de una estación de radio o televisión.

Aunque a veces nos preocupamos un poco de recibir una visita del IRS



Amenper:  La Izquierda Americana y el Islam

Lo que copio abajo es un párrafo de “El libro negro de la izquierda americana” (2013), por David Horowitz que aparece en el Wall Street Journal de hoy. Lo encuentro muy interesante, porque a un verdadero conservador, lo critican por su falsa de compasión.

Es injusto que ataquen a un conservador por no tener compasión, un conservador es simplemente un pragmático, que no quiere arreglar el mundo pero conservarlo, conservar la tradición socio-económica cuando vive en un país donde esta tradición ha creado la nación más poderosa del mundo y la sociedad más rica en la historia de la humanidad, donde los pobres viven como los ricos de otras naciones.

¿Hay un sistema mejor? Si lo hay, pero no es real, no existe, está en la mente de los santones que quieren cambiarnos. Realmente no existe la utopía marxista del comunismo, ni la utopía de los santones religiosos,  todos no somos iguales, somos creados iguales, pero después no crecemos iguales, lo siento, pero es así. Siempre habrá diversidad entre los seres humanos.

 Pero igual que como las novelas de caballería enajenaron a Don Quijote, así la prensa izquierdista y los santones religiosos enajenan la mente de los que se quieren dejar enajenar y los vemos cargando contra gigantes demoniacos cuando son unos simples molinos.

Horowitz hace una comparación entre el Islam y el comunismo, y es muy apropiado. Ambas son doctrinas basadas en lo que en su mente han pensado que es la redención del ser humano, una por la religión, la otra por el materialismo humanístico, Ambas son utopías, pero están dispuestos a destruirnos para lograr su pensamiento sobre el nuestro.

Pocas veces vemos que alguien explica en tan pocas palabras tan bien esto como Horowitz

Aquí sus palabras

Para ser que un conservador lo primero es comprender que no hay solución a los dilemas de la condición humana. En segundo lugar, es entender que para escapar de estos dilemas, por su naturaleza los seres humanos inevitablemente se embarcarán en misiones desesperadas para redenciones en esta vida. Estas redenciones, requerirán a su vez, las guerras santas para purgar el mundo de los infieles — aquellos que no comparten su fe, y quienes se interpongan en su camino.– En este sentido, el Islam totalitario realmente no es diferente en su corazón de socialismo totalitario o progresismo, aunque estas últimas son seculares y el anterior se lleva a cabo en nombre de un Dios vengativo y maligno. Ambos buscan limpiar la humanidad de sus imperfecciones irreparables.Para seguir siendo seres libres, continuamente estamos obligados a defender nuestro espacio para respirar, contra los esfuerzos de los redentores de la perfección, nosotros y sólo nosotros mismos — contra los ejércitos de los santos que están decididos a hacer del mundo un lugar mejor de lo que alguna vez pudiese ser. Eso es cómo veo las guerras políticas que nos enfrentamos, y por qué nunca terminarán. 



Samitier: La Decadencia De La TV… y la Radio…

He Aquí La Diferencia Entre Hoy…

Y Los Programas De Hace 50 Años…  

Cuando un programa… alcanza hoy una audiencia de UN MILLÓN

Es CONSIDERADO UN ÉXITO… En la actualidad la mayor audiencia

De acuerdo con Nielsen, la tiene el Súper Bowl del 2013 el cual

atrajo 108,7 millones de espectadores. fue visto en 53 millones de

hogares con un 46,4 de rating…


“I Love Lucy” en TV como “Tres Patines” en la radio NO han sido

SUPERADOS HASTA EL DÍA DE HOY… El episodio de “Lucy Va

Al Hospital”, que se estrenó  el lunes 19 de enero de 1953 obtuvo

un récord de 71,7 rating, lo  que significa el 71,7% del total de todos

los hogares con TV en el momento estaban sintonizados para ver el



un 25,3 mas De rating que el “Súper Juego De Futbol”

de Hoy… con 80 Millones Menos de Habitantes…


La Verdad Es Aunque lo Nieguen… que la chusmeria, la

Chabacanería, las groserías, los hombres vestidos de mujer y los

homosexuales actuando TODOS PARTIDOS en TODAS las novelas…


los homosexuales en CONTROL de las estaciones las siguen poniendo…

la mejor prueba es que después de 69 años… se siguen viendo los

Programas de “I Love Lucy” en la misma forma que también se siguen

oyendo en la radio los programas de “TRES PATINES” en muchos países

de América Latina… con una audiencia que NO ALCANZAN LOS CÓMICOS

que solo dicen MALAS PALABRAS y GROSERÍAS…  

Los Productores De Los “Golden Globes” Lograron Una Audiencia De

21 Millones… Después De Gastar $12 Millones De Dólares En Anunciarlo…

Están De Fiesta…Aquí tiene la noticia… dada como TREMENDO ÉXITO…

Samitier: La Mayoría Ignora La Historia… Por Eso

Cometen Los Mismos errores…


Les Envió Una Serie De Datos Sueltos

Que Dejan Mucho Que Pensar…

        Hay que recordar que la RELIGIÓN CATÓLICA estuvo prohibida en

o   Inglaterra hasta 1828… Año en que los ingleses la volvieron a legalizar…

        En 1830 fue que los ingleses abolieron la esclavitud y ALARDEAN

o   DE ESO como si hubieran sido el primer país…. Pero fueron los portugueses de la isla de Madiera los primeros en abolir la esclavitud en 1774…  

        La gran MAYORÍA IGNORA que la esclavitud era IGUAL PARA BLANCOS Y NEGROS…LA MAYORÍA de los descendientes de europeos tenemos DIRECTAMENTE UN TATARABUELO QUE FUE ESCLAVO…. en aquellos tiempos existía la “DESIGNACIÓN”  de “FIDALGO” más tarde convertida en Hidalgo que significaba persona nacida de “Vientre Libre”  que nunca había sido “SIERVO”

        Muchos ignoran que los negros americanos recibieron el DERECHO A VOTAR 60 años antes que las mujeres suecas Y Suizas.

         Nadie habla hoy del sufragio femenino… Que históricamente tiene menos de 90 años. En Cuba que fue uno de los primeros países en concederlo, fue en las elecciones de 1940…

        En los tiempos feudales… SOLAMENTE VOTABAN LOS NOBLES lo cual lo hacían PÚBLICAMENTE y tenían que poner una mano en la ESPADA… en señal que estaban dispuestos a defender su voto… y LEVANTABAN la otra para que se contara…

        En la historia del mundo SOLAMENTE se han CONTADO LOS VOTOS de las personas que están dispuestos a defender sus votos… POR ESO ES QUE NO VOTABAN LAS MUJERES… tampoco votaban los PLEBEYOS pero era porque NO TENÍAN OBLIGACIÓN de ir a la guerra… el Plebeyo que participaba en las guerras era reclutado por un noble… y peleaba bajo sus ordenes… la paga era casa y comida… y una recompensa después de la batalla… si se unía a la guerra con un caballo… después de la batalla era nombrado “Caballero”  a los que quedaban vivo por lo regular se les pagaba de acuerdo a su participación en la batalla… así los que habían participado con un caballo se les daban una cantidad de “CABALLERÍAS DE TIERRA”

        Los TÍTULOS NOBILIARIOS se ganaban en batallas… y empresas peligrosas…Colón no era noble… se convirtió en EL GRAN ALMIRANTE después del descubrimiento   tampoco lo era Hernán Cortes… Después de que él derrotó el imperio azteca, Cortés fue galardonado con el título de Marqués del Valle de Oaxaca, mientras que el más prestigioso título de virrey se le dio a un noble de alto rango, Antonio de Mendoza.

        El Casco que aparece arriba del escudo de los nobles indica como fue adquirido el título NOBILIARIO… si el casco en la cara esta de FRENTE y ABIERTO… quiere decir que el titulo fue ganado por el HOMBRE por meritos propios… si el casco aparece CERRADO… fue obtenido el título por una VENÍA DEL REY… es decir si meritos de guerra…  

        Existieron  en la historia mujeres con voz, mando y voto… pero solo las que lo defendían como hombres… hay muchos casos pero voy a mencionar dos casos bien conocidos… Juana de Arcos y Agustina De Aragón…

        El voto otorgado a la mujer… a mediados del siglo XX… fue una obra comunista muy bien planificada… NO ES UN SECRETO… que la socialización actual de todos los países de occidente… es producto del voto de las mujeres… Ya que las mujeres son la mayoría de los votantes en todos los países occidentales… y aplican sus NATURAL amor maternal a las política… como resultado votan por una enorme cantidad de causas CONTRADICTORIAS… pensando como madres… así la mayoría de las mujeres apoyan los derechos de los homosexuales… pensando en la madre del enfermo… en las encuestas la mayoría de las mujeres han contestado: “A cualquiera le puede nacer un hijo así”

Samitier:Enfermos Mentales Están Dirigiendo Nuestro País… Aquí Hay Otra Prueba El New York Time Hoy Defiende El Derecho De Una  Mujer Que  Se Ha MUTILADO VOLUNTARIAMENTE Eliminándose Quirúrgicamente Los Senos E Inyectándose Testosterona Para Tener Barba y Bigote… A Ser Atendida Por Los Médicos Para Inseminarse ARTIFICIALMENTE Para Traer Niños Al Mundo… El Medico se Negó… Es Su DERECHO… Ya no somos Libres… Lo quieren obligar a atender a esta LOCA…

Amitier: El Ex Gobernador Y Ex Senador

Bob Graham Otro Socialista Que

Salió Del Closet… Viaja A Cuba



TRAIDORES a las REPUBLICAS…  como todos debíamos de saber

La familia Millonaria Graham… en su tiempo fueron dueños del

Washington Post, La Revista Newsweek y el Canal 10 De TV en

Miami… que lleva las letras del Nombre del Hermano que se


Ahora Graham anuncio que viaja a Cuba Con una delegación del

Concil of Foreighn Relation  a hacer investigaciones para desarrollar

La industria petrolera…  







Bounty Placed On Chris Christie’s Head

JANUARY 11, 2014 BY FLOYD BROWN 9 COMMENTS. “EMO” …and he deserved it and more!!! LRGM


The media gets under my skin. They trumpet and boast about honesty and truth; but in reality, they’re about as dishonest as the politicians.

Compare, for instance, the way they’ve handled Obama’s scandals to Chris Christie’s latest debacle.

The latter, “Bridge-gate,” has given Big Media a scandal they can really sink their teeth into. Bridge-gate is being blasted from coast to coast in above-the-fold banner headlines.

The coverage on cable TV and even the network news shows is so detailed, it’s nauseating. (And I say that as a seasoned critic of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, the media’s primary target.)

In fact, according to a report from the Media Research Center, Bridge-gate has received approximately 17 times more coverage in one day than the Obama IRS scandal received in months.

RINO on the Loose!

Bridge-gate centers on allegations that, during the month of September 2013, Governor Christie’s staff encouraged the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to close several lanes of the George Washington Bridge leading out of Ft. Lee, N.J.

Now, as I said above, I’m no fan of Christie. There are plenty of reasons to dislike him, including his status as the darling of a GOP establishment that’s betrayed the American middle class time and time again. They want Christie as the GOP candidate precisely because they know he won’t change things in D.C.

Additionally, he’s a RINO (Republican in Name Only) who helped Barack Obama win the last presidential election by locking arms in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Christie was at Obama’s side during a critical news cycle, and Obama’s support soared during the run-up to the presidential balloting.

Christie has also been a critic of Congressional and Tea Party initiatives to reign in out-of-control government spending and growth, which are initiatives close to my heart.

But Christie did exactly what should be done when a scandal erupts. He’s disclosed all that he knows, apologized, and fired the offending aides for lying to him. He labeled the incident as “stupid” and “deceitful.” He denied any knowledge of it, and he took responsibility for falling short.

Additionally, Christie announced that he asked Bill Stepien to withdraw his nomination to lead the New Jersey Republican Party. He also asked Stepien to resign his consultancy with the Republican Governors Association, which Christie runs.

Finally, during Governor Christie’s 107-minute news conference, he was honest and contrite. I’ve never seen Obama be contrite about anything.

The Obama-Friendly Media

In fact, in dealing with his own scandals, Obama has done the complete opposite of Christie at every juncture. And the president has a list of scandals that are much more serious than Bridge-gate.

Sadly, the media has continually whitewashed and pooh-poohed Obama’s crimes.

Take the Benghazi cover-up, which was followed with an intense media barrage to convince America that our Libyan ambassador was murdered over a video. Meanwhile, the source of most of the lies, Susan Rice, was given a big promotion for her spin doctoring.

With Fast and Furious, the scandal in which the U.S. Department of Justice put guns in the hands of Mexican drug cartels, well… nothing has happened. Attorney General Eric Holder lied about his involvement, yet he still has a job. I guess the repeated calls for his removal fell on deaf ears.

So when it comes to Christie’s scandal, the media is showing its true colors. It will happily go to bat for Obama but won’t pull any punches for the Governor of New Jersey.

Personally, I won’t lose any sleep if Christie’s political career ends here in a traffic jam on the roads to New York City.

I just wish the news media would be honest enough to hold Obama to the same standards.





The Daily Caller News Foundation: WHERE ARE THE LIBERALS?’ Ted Cruz blasts left for ignoring Obama’s abuses [VIDEO]Brendan Bordelon

Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz is dismayed that “every single Democrat senator goes in line and docilely agrees” with the Obama  administration, claiming the president’s abuse of authority and ever-expanding powers should be challenged by lawmakers in both parties.

Cruz spoke with Fox News’ Shannon Bream on Sunday about President Barack Obama’s increasing authority at the expense of Congress, particularly after Senate Republicans were blocked from filibustering judicial nominees through the “nuclear option.” Bream asked the senator if “stacking courts” is a presidential right and whether Republicans would be objecting if one of their own was in the White House .

“Every one of those points is objectively false,” Cruz retorted. “For one thing, these two issues, the nuclear option and the president’s lawlessness, are very interrelated. The reason that [Senate Majority Leader] Harry Reid broke his word — repeatedly he said he wouldn’t exercise the nuclear option and then he just broke his word, just like President Obama did when he said if you like your plan you can keep it — the reason he did that is because the Democrats are very concerned about courts holding this administration accountable for their lawlessness… This is all about wanting to pack the D.C. Circuit with judges that President Obama and the Democrats think will rubber stamp the president’s lawlessness.”

Cruz said it was “striking” that so few liberal Democrats have pushed back against executive overreach — something that angered many leftists during the Bush years.

“There have been Republican presidents, unfortunately, who’ve overreached, who’ve exceeded their executive authority,” he said. “And when they’ve done that, there have been Republicans who stand up and call the Republican president to account , saying the Constitution matters and no president, no man is above the law.”

“One of the things that I found most disappointing: Where are the Democrats? Where are the liberals?” he continued. “Where are the journalists and the media calling President Obama to account for disregarding the law? Right now as we look at these fights, as we look at the president picking and choosing, saying, ‘I’m not going to follow this law; I’m not going to follow that law; I’m not going to follow this other law.’ There are virtually no Democrats who will even speak up a word of criticism… You know, in prior years there would be Democrats speaking up to protect the Senate. It is amazing to me that every single Democratic senator just — just goes in line and docilely agrees with the Executive usurping the power of the Senate.”

The Texan senator noted that the framers of the Constitution intended the three branches to “resist” each other in order to protect the liberty of the people. “The Senate is failing in its job,” Cruz claimed, “when it doesn’t resist against the president usurping power. All of us should be concerned — listen, if this was a Republican president, I promise you I would be every bit as vocal against a Republican president usurping power and violating the Constitution. And we really need to see some Democrats and some liberals standing up against an imperial president.”




Communist Chinese Manchurian President Barack Obama. BY KRIS ZANE 20 COMMENTS

A Chinese general who threatened the U.S. with nuclear annihilation was fêted as the guest of honor at the Pentagon last year. This while state-run media in China was showing video animation of their newly developed mobile land-based DF-41 nuclear missile wiping out the majority of the United States.  And now China has openly published a map of U.S. cities they will target from their submarine-based nukes, bragging about how many people they will kill with one missile—twelve million Americans!

So what is our President, Barack Obama, doing about this Chinese nuclear threat? Calling for an increase in defense spending? Building up our nuclear arsenal? Putting our military on alert?

None of the above.

Instead he’s covering up Chinese spy rings. Allowing high-tech defense secrets to be passed to the Peoples Republic of China. And putting Chinese troops on American soil!

Only under the corrupt Communist-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama—who may in fact be a Manchurian President.

Watch Western Center for Journalism’s video for all the exclusive details.




Ariel Sharon Passes, Leaves a Legacy of Fighting For Israeli Peace


Ariel Sharon, Israel’s 11th prime minister, was eulogized on Monday as a fighter and pragmatic politician whose life was intertwined with the land of Israel whose security he defended relentlessly.

“Like all historic leaders, all real leaders, he had a north star that guided him,” Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. said at a 90-minute memorial on a plaza in front of Israel’s Parliament building. “His north star was the survival of the state of Israel and the Jewish people wherever they resided.”

Though Mr. Sharon’s “actions earned him controversy and even condemnation,” Mr. Biden said, “he seemed never in doubt.” Calling him “a complex man,” Mr. Biden noted that “he also lived in complex times in a very complex neighborhood.”

Mr. Sharon died Saturday at 85 after eight years in a state of minimal consciousness following a stroke that aborted his prime ministership when, some analysts said, he seemed on the brink of historic moves to end Israel’s intractable conflict with the Palestinians. But he was long criticized internationally for his aggressive military endeavors and building of Jewish settlements in occupied Palestinian territory.

Nicknamed in life both “the bulldozer” and “the butcher,” he was remembered Monday not only for his bravery and boldness, but for his sense of humor and sensitivity by fellow leaders and also by his former soldiers and secretary.

The modest service was attended by family and old friends, ministers and members of Parliament, its 750 seats not quite filled. A military cantor recited the memorial prayer, and Sarit Hadad, a popular Israeli singer sang a mournful ballad remembering the casualties of war, “We Are Both From the Same Village,” said to be a Sharon favorite.

Shimon Peres, the 90-year-old Israeli president who recalled meeting Mr. Sharon when the younger man was a history student with big ideas about the state’s defense in the early 1950s, called him “the shoulder on whom Israel’s security rested,” saying he “turned things that seemed impossible into levers of possibility.”

“Israel loved him and he loved Israel’s children and soil,” Mr. Peres said of a man who had been, at turns, both rival and ally. “Arik was a man of the land – the fragrance of it appealed to his senses, and its mounds he tilled, sowed and reaped. He defended and protected it as a lion,” he said, referring to Mr. Sharon by his nickname.

He added, “He never halted from his aspiration to envision the day Israel would be at peace.”

Continue Reading on




Will Supreme Court Reign In Obama’s Executive Power This Week? BY B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE 


The Obama administration has proven itself keen on issuing unilateral decrees and ruling by fiat. Naturally, this philosophy has earned significant scorn among those who believe in the balance of power guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution.

One of Obama’s most contended decisions related to his first term recess appointment of three National Labor Relations Board members – an overstep lower courts ruled unconstitutional. While the chief executive is permitted to make recess appointments, Obama’s detractors pointed out that Congress was not in recess, but a “pro forma” session defined by frequent short adjournments.

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear testimony in the case before issuing its own decision. Justices will either uphold or overrule the appellate court decision that recess appointments may only be made between congressional sessions, and only in the event there is a new vacancy during that period.

The case, initiated by Oregon bottling company Noel Canning, will have major implications regarding a president’s power to make recess appointments. In its early stages, the case revolved around the effects Obama’s appointments might have in strengthening labor unions.

Now, the scope of the Supreme Court’s involvement is limited to defining a president’s ability to use executive power.

Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz of the Georgetown University Law Center will present the case against Obama. He said he is confident that those on the other side of this issue will be unable to prove their points.

“I don’t think this is a close case,” he said, indicating he foresees a unanimous decision in favor of Noel Canning.

Rosenkranz explained that, in order to uphold Obama’s appointments, justices would have to believe he is constitutionally permitted to make appointments whenever Congress is adjourned, and that he may do so to fill existing vacancies. Furthermore, he said the court would need to rule that pro forma sessions are not really sessions at all.

While Obama shows no signs of scaling back his imperial presidency, a Supreme Court ruling against him in this matter would at least send the message that people are paying attention.

–B. Christopher Agee

Read more:






Para Los Que Deseen Saber Quienes

Eran Los Que Controlaban El Negocio

Del Tráfico De Esclavos Negros…

Fue a finales del siglo XVIII que se liberó el tráfico de esclavos, antes

Era un MONOPOLIO concedido por los gobiernos… aunque siempre

Hubo capitanes que comerciaban directamente con los CACIQUES


El primer monopolio de fue concedido a una compañía genovesa),

Después los portugueses, la Real Compañía Francesa de Guinea la

Cual en 1701 consiguió permiso para 42000 esclavos durante 10


En 1713 a consecuencia del Tratado de Utrecht, se concedió el

monopolio a los ingleses (Compañía Inglesa del Mar del Sur).

En 1748 se renovó el contrato entre España  e Inglaterra.En 1750 se

Anuló el acuerdo.

En 1765 se concedió el permiso a la Compañía Gaditana de Negros.

Entre 1766 y 1780, los barcos que conducían los esclavos a América eran naves con bandera y tripulación francesa o inglesa. Esta empresa fracasó por no cumplir lo estipulado en cuanto al número de esclavos y porque pesaron mucho los intereses de los préstamos para poder mantenerse. Fue disuelta en 1779.

A Finales Del Siglo XVIII Se Liberalizó El Tráfico De Negros.

Como puedes deducir estas empresas buscaban dinero (la inglesa era Muy conocida y sus acciones cotizadas en la Bolsa de Londres), por lo que habría que investigar quiénes  fueron sus accionistas, para ver  de que nacionalidad y quienes se enriquecían en la bolsa con el trafico de negros…  

Hay un libro que Se llama:


Durán. Ecobook Editorial de Economía.2011.  

Lo que si se… es que la persecución que hizo la marina inglesa al tráfico de negros

NO FUE POR BUENAS INTENCIONES… el verdadero motivo es que los ingleses

Deseaban arruinar la industria azucarera en América… IMPIDIENDO QUE LE LLEGARÁ LA MANO DE OBRA… mientras ellos podían producir el azúcar en la INDIA (que ya la controlaban)  que era también productora de azúcar y donde

les SOBRABA LA MANO DE OBRA… los ingleses poblaron las Bahamas con los negros capturados a bordo de barcos negreros… a los que llevaban a cualquiera de las Islas de la Bahamas y los dejaban en Libertad… pues no los podían regresar a sus países… pues el Cacique los volvería a vender…



“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor “IN GOD WE TRUST”