No 454 “En mi opinion” Agosto 10, 2013

No 454  “En mi opinión” Agosto 10, 2013.                                                                         Editor Lázaro R González Miño  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST” , 

Comentarios, enviar articulos o preguntas envielas a è,


So… Barack Obama Is Claiming He’ll Shut The Government Down Unless ObamaCare Is Fully Funded… We Say, Tell Him To Bring It On.

       As a matter of fact, Senators Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and nine other Senators have already sent a letter to Harry Reid saying that they will vote AGAINST ANY bill that contains funding for ObamaCare. [Emphasis Ours] 

       But there’s a problem… the GOP establishment isn’t just running for cover, they’re fighting Lee, Cruz, Paul and Rubio tooth-and-nail… they’re actually telling lies to the American people… and some have even reversed their positions and have gone so far as to say that defunding ObamaCare is “stupid”… all to AVOID ACTUALLY DEFUNDING OBAMACARE… and we’re not about to let them get away with it

       Why? Rush Limbaugh said it best on Monday: “I don’t think they were ever serious about repealing health care, the Republicans. I don’t think they ever were. I think that it has been lip service from the get-go.” 

       And now that Lee, Cruz, Paul and Rubio have called their hand, cut through the lip-service, and put a proposal on the table that can actually stop ObamaCare… they’re scrambling… they’re trying to hoodwink you… they’ll say anything… do anything… to give themselves political cover to avoid stopping ObamaCare

       So we’re going to put every Republican Member of the Senate on notice… stop the lies… stop the evasions… stop the surrenders… and do not authorize one thin dime for the implementation of ObamaCare… PERIOD

Lies… Lies… And More Lies. 
       Washington insiders reacted with glee on Monday over the erroneous reports that Lee was backing down on his promise to defund ObamaCare… but it was all political spin. 
       What Lee did was state an undeniable truth to Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday: “We all know that the government’s going to get funded. The question is whether the government gets funded with ObamaCare or without it.” 

       Lee didn’t back down. What Lee did was expose the scare tactic that was first used by Barack Obama, and is now being shamefully used by the Republican establishment, to the light of day. 
       The truth of the matter is that no politician in Washington, including Barack Obama, will allow the government to go unfunded for any significant amount of time. 
       Barack Obama knows it. Senators Lee, Cruz, Paul and Rubio know it. The GOP establishment knows it. 
       And now that you know it, it’s time to let them know that you refuse to allow them to use Obama’s hollow threat of a government shutdown as political cover to betray you
       Pay no heed to the scare tactics, the only question that remains, as Lee so aptly pointed out is “whether the government gets funded with ObamaCare or without it.” 

Speaking Of Lies… Here’s Another One. 
       Some of you may have heard Karl Rove bloviate on the O’Reilly Factor on Monday that refusing to fund ObamaCare won’t actually stop ObamaCare from being funded because“99% of the funding is mandatory and not discretionary.” 
       Rove isn’t the only one spreading this tall-tale, but Limbaugh, quoting an article from the Heritage Foundation, set the record straight. 

“‘Isn’t defunding ObamaCare impossible because most of the funding is ‘mandatory’ (or on ‘auto-pilot’) and cannot be amended via the annual appropriations process?’ Heritage Foundation says no, defunding ObamaCare is not impossible for the reasons that you’ve heard. ‘According to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the IRS…
“‘[W]hile ObamaCare provided $1 billion in mandatory implementation funding when it was enacted, HHS projects that this is largely spent. According to CRS, ObamaCare ‘administrative costs will have to be funded through the annual discretionary appropriations.’
“Can I translate this for you? What the Heritage Foundation is saying is that the implementation money has already been spent… ObamaCare’s administrative costs will have to be funded through the annual – that means every year – discretionary – means, don’t have to spend it – appropriations.”

       So what’s really behind this attempt to deceive the American people? 
       Limbaugh again: “Washington does not want it stopped, folks. Washington does not have a problem with ObamaCare. It’s government, after all, and they like government.” 
       Well… we’re going to make them stop it. It’s time to draw a line in the sand, right here and right now


Floyd Brownè Will Obama Bail Out 100 Cities?
 FLOYD BROWN, Chief Political Analyst The battle for bailout money is on. One side features the municipal bond holders. On the other are city pensioners, mostly senior citizens and even a few widows.
Of course, Detroit is ground zero for the battle. As we all know, the city’s liquidity crisis forced it into bankruptcy court. And everyone interested in government and big city finances is glued to reports from the court. Could the decisions made in Detroit set precedents for future cases?
It’s an important question, because more than 100 major cities are right behind Detroit. And anarchy could result if these cities don’t get more cash.
Click here to continue reading
The  Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed. 

The Center for Western Journalism
42104 N Venture Drive Suite B-122, Anthem, AZ 85086  (202) 370-6366

Cowardly Congressman Refuses Affidavit On Obama ID Fraud


Congressman Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) bristles and unloads on Miki Booth, a constituent (and friend of ours) asking about Obama’s fraudulent ID documents and irrefutable evidence of forgery, as proven by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s MCSO Cold Case Posse.


Alberto Perez  è Mary Anastasia O´Grady no sólo es la periodista de habla inglesa que en mi opinión demuestra un conocimiento extraordinario sobre Cuba y Latinoamérica, pero es la única periodista americana que creo que tiene un conocimiento comparable al de los medios de comunicación del exilio.

Esto es importante por el hecho de que María Anastasia es una columnista en el Wall Street Journal,  el periódico de más circulación en los Estados Unidos, y en el extranjero,  esto sin lugar a dudas ayuda a la causa cubana en círculos donde la prensa izquierdista tergiversa las noticias y trata de idealizar positivamente las figuras del comunismo cubano.

Un caso que es indicativo de esto es el caso del mes pasado, cuando descubrieron a un carguero cubano con armas y combustible de Corea del Norte.

Este caso como todos los que perjudica a Cuba, queda relegado a páginas interiores por un día y después no se comenta más. Ni siquiera en el exilio vimos darle la publicidad y la importancia que este caso se merece.   

Realmente como cubanos tenemos que darle las gracias a María Anastasia por su trabajo por la democracia y la lucha contra el comunismo del siglo XXI

The Castro Brothers Get Caught in the Act

News of arms shipments to North Korea rudely interrupts the happy talk about reforms in Cuba.


The news that Cuba was caught smuggling fuel and weaponry on a North Korean freighter through the Panama Canal surprised many who have bought the line that the Castro regime is reforming and eager to lose its reputation for criminality.

They are like the fabled frog that agrees to carry the scorpion on his back across the water. When the scorpion stings the frog midstream, the amphibian is confounded because it is clear that both will drown. But the scorpion explains that what he did was inevitable because “it’s my nature.”

The same goes for the Castro brothers. They are simply incapable of containing their beastliness.

A handout picture provided by Cubadebate on February 24, 2013 shows Former Cuban President Fidel Castro (L), and his brother, Cuban President Raul Castro (R), during a session of the Cuban National Assembly, in Havana, Cuba.

To pretend otherwise is to deny that the Castros, who lobbied the Soviets for nuclear war against the U.S. in 1962, are still dangerous. Yet denial is in fashion in some newsrooms and in the cloakrooms on Capitol Hill, which is why the weapons-smuggling story was so evanescent.

The scorpion nature of the Castros is hardly news to Cubans. They are not permitted to use the Internet, to watch independent news broadcasts, to earn dollars, to speak their minds, to send their children to private school or to worship freely. Something as basic as milk for children is hard to find.

Some Cubans who rebel languish for years in dungeons. Others are now victims of a new method of repression that observers call “catch and release.” The Council of Human Rights Rapporteurs in Cuba reported last week that “in the first six months of 2013 the Cuban government political police made more than 1,000 arbitrary arrests for political activity, the majority [of the arrests] violent and lasting on average between 12 and 24 hours.” The council counts more than 70 political prisoners serving multiple-year sentences.

Increased repression has accompanied recent efforts to bring in more foreign exchange by attracting American visitors through “educational” and “cultural” excursions that are permitted by the U.S. under its long-standing embargo. The movements of these visitors and their interaction with Cubans must be tightly controlled by the dictatorship to ensure that they don’t see too much of the real Cuba. They are supposed to go away singing the praises of the happy communist paradise, and many do.

A dictatorship is apparently an exotic curiosity for well-to-do Americans. They are being herded through selected parts of the country in large numbers to view firsthand what deprivation can inspire.

This week the elite Phillips Exeter Academy announced that it would join with Miss Porter’s School “on a weeklong exploration of the fascinating art and culture of Cuba.” There was no mention of whether the alumni from these prep schools would be visiting the jails where nonconformists—including artists, musicians and the black human-rights advocate Sonia Garro—reside. Nor was it clear whether they would learn about the dual-currency regime in which the military government pockets dollars from the visitors while it pays workers in almost worthless bits of paper. Somehow I doubt it.

‪Now comes the news of the arms shipment aboard the Chong Chon Gang headed for North Korea, a land of barbed-wire fences and starvation, a regime so dangerous to world peace that even the dithering United Nations Security Council, China included, agreed unanimously in March to heightened sanctions against it.

The Cuban foreign ministry immediately claimed that the weaponry, found hidden under 10 tons of sugar and undeclared, was obsolete and going abroad for repair. But José Otero writes in the Panamanian daily La Prensa that Panamanian officials found two MiG fighters and full tanks of jet fuel, along with “a mid-air refueling plane, two vehicles for towing radars, a rocket-launching platform, a radar antenna with platform and many cables” in the ship’s hold.

Experts say the story doesn’t add up. Weapons repairs are normally made by ordering parts and flying in technicians. What is more, since everything was made in the Soviet Union, sending it to North Korea doesn’t make sense.

Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe tweeted on July 18 that a reliable source told him that part of the shipment was destined for Ecuador. Colombian journalist Eduardo MacKenzie noted in an online column last week that “seven other North Korean ships had made trips to Cuba in the last four years with itineraries similar to the Chong Chon Gang.” A further mystery is what these ships may have brought to Cuba in the first place.

All of this smells bad. Cuba wants to shake off its international pariah status so that it can get World Bank and InterAmerican Development Bank handouts and credit from U.S. banks, thereby avoiding economic and political reform. Indoctrinating the girls at Miss Porter’s School is part of that effort. The arms-trafficking is, or should be, a wake-up call.

Write to O’

Alberto Perez è Un joven Israel Hernández en Miami Beach murió a consecuencias de un rayo taser de la policía cuando resistió arresto. y se dio a la fuga.

¿Qué conclusiones sacamos de esta lamentable muerte?.

1.’La hermana dice que Hernández era un “skateborder” o sea que patinaba en tablitas, y un artista de grafiti que quería “cambiar el mundo a través de su arte”. 

Si traducimos esto es que era un vago que se pasaba el tiempo patinando y pintando las paredes de los establecimientos, un vandalismo que costaba dinero a los dueños de negocios que como todos los gastos tiene que pasar a los consumidores. 

El mundo que quería cambiar era el del orden y el respeto a la propiedad ajena. quería cambiarlo a un mundo en que no hubiera ley que respetar en que los delincuentes son los héroes y los guardadores del orden son los villanos. 

No hablan de la asistencia a clase ni de los estudios que estaba cursando.  Un artista pinta en un lienzo que le pertenece, o con el permiso de los propietarios en la pared de un establecimiento, no pinta en la propiedad de otros sin su permiso.  Esto no es un artista, es un vandalizador.

2.’Que la policía es brutal y asesina. 

Lo peor es que a la policía no le importa la vida de los demás. (dijo la hermana)

Si Israel no hubiera violado la ley, si Israel no se hubiera dado a la fuga, si Israel hubiera estado en su casa estudiando, la policía no hubiera tenido que actuar. Más de una docena de policías, tuvieron que perder horas persiguiendo  a Israel.  El que se dedica a ser un oficial de la policía piensa en la comunidad. El pago de policía no está de acuerdo con los riesgos que corre. Además se trata de un accidente, los rayos tases son para hacer más fácil la detención, no se suponen que sean un arma de fuego o un arma mortal.  Si alguien no tenía respeto a la vida de las demás personas era Israel que dañaba las propiedades de otros, si alguien tiene la responsabilidad son los padres que ahora quieren culpar a los que trataban de evitar un vandalismo.

El convertir los delincuentes en héroes y los que cuidan de la ley en villanos, no puede traer más consecuencias que cada día la calidad de la delincuencia se incrementará y que cada día menos personas escogerán el trabajo de oficiales de la ley.

La conclusión a la que se hubiera llegado en la antigua cultura americana, esto ha sucedido porque Israel era un delincuente. Que es el deber de los padres el educar a sus hijos para que respetaran las leyes y no sucedieran incidentes como este.  

Pero la cultura americana ha cambiado como dice la hermana de Israel, él quería cambiar el mundo, ya Israel no lo cambiará, pero hay muchos Israeles que nos seguirán trantando de cambiar el mundo en que vivimos y los valores tradicionales bajos los que hemos vivido en esta nación.


Washington Post Writer Wrong about Religion, America, and the Constitution Posted 3 Hours Ago by Gary DeMar filed under Atheism, Congress, Constitution, Email Featured, History, Islam, Morality, Politics1 Charles C. Hayne has written

“Dispelling the myth of a ‘Christian nation’” for the Washington Post. The article begins: “Culture warriors, pseudo historians and opportunistic politicians have spent the last several decades peddling the myth that America was founded as a ‘Christian nation.’ “The propaganda appears to be working. “A majority of the American people (51 percent) believes that the U.S. Constitution establishes a Christian nation, according to the State of the First Amendment survey released last month by the First Amendment Center. America existed as a nation long before the Constitution was drafted and enacted into law. Every colony and state had as its foundation the Christian religion, some more specific than others, from the 1606 First Charter of Virginia and the 1643 Constitution of the New England Confederation to the 1778 Constitution of the State of South Carolina and the 1776 Constitution which stated in Article 32 the following: “That no person who shall deny the being of God, or the truth of the Protestant religion, or the divine authority of the Old or New Testaments, or who shall hold religious principles incompatible with the freedom and safety of the State, shall be capable of holding any office or place of trust or profit in the civil department within this State.” Hayne also writes: “Nowhere will you find [in the Constitution] mention of God, Christ or any intention to found a Christian nation.” In Article I, Section 7, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution, the following is found: “If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted)….” Sundays were set aside as a day of rest for the president because it was a distinctly Christian observance. If it was the purpose of the Constitution to remove all things religious, then why include this most particular Christian exception? Then there is this in Article 3: “No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.” The Wikipedia article on Article 3 has this: “This rule was derived from an older English statute, the Treason Act 1695.” The Treason Act got it from the Bible (Deut. 17:6; 19:15; Matt. 18:16; John 8:17; 2 Cor. 13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19; Heb. 10:28). Just above George Washington’s signature, the following is found: “Done in Convention, by the unanimous consent of the States present, the seventeenth day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty seven.” The use of “Lord” is a reference to Jesus Christ. The 1797 date tells us as much. Compare our Constitution to what the French did during their revolutionary period. They started their calendar with the year one and abolished the seven-day biblical week with a ten-day week. What about the “no religious test” clause in Article VI? At one level, the “no religious test” was designed to protect the states since some state constitutions required a religious test for office holders. The federal Constitution did not change what the states required. A national religious test would have been contentious since the states would have lost their right to set their own religious requirements. The First Amendment was designed to keep the national government out of the religious affairs of the states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . .” Constitutional scholar Daniel Dreisbach writes: “[M]any delegates to the state conventions were unwilling to grant the new national regime authority to implement a practice (i.e. religious tests) that was common at the state level precisely because they wanted to retain the state tests and they feared a federal test might displace existing  state tests.”[1] Luther Martin (1748-1826) The no religious test clause was controversial in the 18th century among those who saw the broader implications of its inclusion. Luther Martin (1748–1826) of Maryland, in a lengthy letter to the Speaker of the House of Delegates of Maryland, set forth his justification in leaving the Constitutional convention and in refusing to sign the Constitution. He wrote: “There were some members so unfashionable as to think that a belief in the existence of a Deity and of a state of future rewards and punishments would be some security for the good conduct of our rulers, and that, in a Christian country, it would be at least decent to hold out some distinction between the professors of Christianity and downright infidelity or paganism.”[2] Today, we are paying a heavy price for a secularized government by those who assumed that a vibrant 18th-century Christian worldview would be enough to maintain the moral and political sanity of a nation more than 200 years hence. Many of America’s founders believed that Christian morality was shared by all Americans regardless of faith, and that no particular religion was necessary for maintaining that morality. They were wrong. Read more:



Nosotros, los que seguimos las enseñanzas de Cristo, estamos siendo atacados desde hace algunos años.

¿Por qué hemos permitido que  los principios en que se ha basado la Nación desde su independencia se hayan debilitado tanto? Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson y otros patriotas  fueron los hombres que establecieron a América  como una Nación bajo Dios. 

Durante la década de los años 60, surgió la Sra. Madelyn Murray, liberal e izquierdista quien quiso obtener la ciudadanía soviética, la cual le fue denegada. Esta señora fundó  la asociación de americanos ateos y logro que la Corte Suprema decidiera la eliminación de la oración en las escuelas públicas.

Años después, el 22 de Enero de 1973, la Corte Suprema declara el aborto legal .A  esta petición también se sumaron izquierdistas y liberales. La pionera en esta demanda fue Margaret Sanger, infiel y promiscua, editora de un periódico titulado “La Mujer Rebelde” y cuyo lema era: sin Dios y sin dueño, esta señora tuvo grandes simpatías  por Hitler. Probablemente gran parte de los participantes en estas demandas, ignoraban  su comienzo.

Ahora, el  Sr. Presidente plantea que los costos de  la práctica del aborto, además de los anticonceptivos y esterilizaciones tienen que ser incluidos en los gastos de los seguros de salud pagados a los empleados de centros religiosos. ¿Quién ha dicho que el resultado  del acto sexual entre un hombre y una mujer, es un problema de salud? Eso es un acto de placer y de amor, fruto de una decisión personal. Esto no es una enfermedad.

Consideramos que esta decisión no es solamente contra una institución, va mucho más allá, esto es un ataque contra  los valores morales y principios religiosos  la cual está protegida por  la Constitución de los Estados Unidos en la Declaración de la Carta Magna. ¿Es que La Corte Suprema, para satisfacer los deseos del Sr. Presidente, también va a cambiar la Declaración de la Carta de los Derechos Humanos?

Usted, Sr. Presidente, esta complaciendo las exigencias ateas, totalitarias, usted nuevamente está a favor de una minoría que demanda tratos especiales, usted  está abandonando lo fundamental  y establecido para unirse a los marxistas, liberales y ateos, cuya agenda va contra la base de toda sociedad: la familia.

Usted, Sr. Presidente, al igual que lo hizo el presidente Carter, está siendo muy  tolerante con los enemigos de este país.

Por favor, recapacite y defienda nuestra cultura y respete nuestras LIBERTADES y DERECHOS.

Diego Quiros, Sr


Rand Paul: Hold Obama Accountable for Benghazi Cover-up

Wednesday, 07 Aug 2013 04:44 PM By Sen. Rand Paul

Did Hillary Clinton tell the truth? She appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January and testified that she had no knowledge of a CIA gun-running operation in Benghazi. 

Clinton’s exact words were, “You’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex,” and then she claimed that she did not know whether a gun-running operation was taking place.

In March, The New York Times reported that the CIA has been involved with secret shipments of weapons to Syria for over a year: “The airlift, which began on a small scale in early 2012 and continued intermittently through last fall, expanded into a steady and much heavier flow late last year, the data shows. It has grown to include more than 160 military cargo flights by Jordanian, Saudi, and Qatari military-style cargo planes landing at Esenboga Airport near Ankara, and, to a lesser degree, at other Turkish and Jordanian airports.” 

CNN now reports that at least 35 American agents were in Benghazi and the CIA is doing everything possible to prevent them from testifying to Congress.

Did Clinton lie because the CIA program was classified? Is it OK to lie to Congress about classified programs?

President Obama’s national intelligence director, James Clapper, lied to the Senate in March of this year when he testified that no American records were being collected by the NSA. He tried to explain his prevarication by saying that he responded in the least untruthful way he knew how because the program was classified.

It is a felony to lie to Congress. Individuals who lie to Congress can receive five to 10 years in prison. I know of no exception for lying about classified programs.

Clapper’s lie has seriously damaged the credibility of the intelligence community. The NSA initially claimed that terrorist plots were stymied by the suspicionless searches of phone records. However, on closer questioning, it admits that each of the foiled plots really began with other intelligence, not from information unique to searching American phone records.

Even more important than the details of the spying scandal is whether or not officials from the executive branch will be allowed to lie to Congress without repercussions.

Much has been made of the altered talking points in the aftermath of the Benghazi assassinations, but I think almost everyone has fallen for the president’s misdirection campaign. The altered talking points were never about trying to get anyone to believe that the attack was not perpetrated by terrorists. By its very nature the attack was an act of terrorism, and no thinking human ever doubted otherwise.

The misdirection campaign was always about the CIA annex and the gun-running operation. The administration feared an Iran-Contra-like scandal so close to the election. Many Republicans fell for the bait because they support arming the Islamic rebels in Syria.

As Fox News reported, “On the night of Sept. 11, in what would become his last known public meeting, Stevens met with the Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, and escorted him out of the consulate front gate one hour before the assault began at approximately 9:35 p.m. local time.” 

According to the Times of London, a Libyan ship “carrying the largest consignment of weapons for Syria … has docked in Turkey.” The shipment reportedly weighed 400 tons and included SA-7 surface-to-air anti-craft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades. 

A few months later, the Wall Street Journal reported that the State Department presence in Benghazi “provided diplomatic cover” for the now-exposed CIA annex. 

Does anyone really believe that Hillary Clinton, said to be the leading supporter of arming the Islamic rebels, did not know of the CIA operation?

There is only one way to find out. Chairman Issa should depose Hillary Clinton and bring her back before the House Oversight committee. He should ask: Did you have any knowledge of the CIA gun-running operation in Benghazi?

And he should also ask: Did you have any conversations with military personnel about not sending reinforcements to Benghazi from Tripoli or elsewhere? 

The American people have not forgotten about the Benghazi attacks and the innocent lives that were taken that day. We deserve real, honest answers from our president and his administration, not a cowardly misdirection campaign. 


Ricardo Samitierè¿Se Desplomara la economía En Diciembre?  

A quien creerle… Para ver los pronósticos… MALOS…

Esta película fue filmada hace 82 años.

Después de que vean este film, vean fotos de hoy y comparen estas con lo que ya existía en 1930. Los emplazo a que me digan cuantas ciudades de esa época en América podían compararse con nuestra Habana. Limpieza, elegancia, progreso, alegría, y un orden especial que quedó en el olvido.

Envíesela a un amigo o muéstresela a sus hijos, para que se sientan orgullosos de su herencia cubana.
AQUÍ >.>>>>>> 


Ricardo Samitier. Is Obama at War? With the American People? By Wes Walker

A great Churchill quote came to mind recently, and with all the “phony scandals” as a backdrop, I was struck by an unsettling notion.  Is Obama at War?

The Churchill buffs may know where this is going, but for everyone else, here is the quote.  “In wartime, the truth is so precious that she must be attended by a bodyguard of lies.”

In fact, even without remembering those first two words, it was still clear that the bodyguard of lies was intended to deceive his enemies, not his friends.

Looking at the handling of the unrelenting scandals it is glaringly obvious that POTUS & Co. are not telling the truth. Some of their evasions are even on literal life-or-death issues.

Now think of the public scrutiny his predecessor faced.  For all of that, which of the “Bush lied, people died” complaints resulted in torched Embassies, or the arming of murderous drug cartels with Mexican civilian casualties numbering in the hundreds?

Scandals like NSA’s billion-bullet shopping spree, privacy violations, email hacks, phone tracking, or cudgeling political rivals with the IRS are emphatically NOT the S.O.P. of any “free” society in peacetime.  So I ask again.

Is Obama at war?

As Churchill knew, there is no moral obligation to speak plainly to an enemy.  WWII has amazingly complex stories of the steps Allies took to deceive the Axis powers.

Who is being lied to?  Is it a rival nation in a Shooting War — or even a Cold War?  It turns out  that Obama is sometimes more candid with rival nations  than his own.  Remember his infamous “hot mic” moment with Russia?  “After my election I will have more flexibility.”  And this is despite Russia’s routine antagonism to American interests.

There is little doubt what threats animated earlier Presidents.  Sometimes it was a traditional war.  Others were — rightly or wrongly — committed in (relative) peacetime to domestic threats like “War on Terror” or even “War on Drugs”.

So what rouses the Peace-Prize-President’s animus?  In ‘08, Gitmo was an abomination, and must be closed in a year (per Executive Order).  The “abomination” lingers on. But Eastern Europe’s Missile Defense is gone!

Did the Commander-In-Chief (does he understand that role?) stand up and denounce the carnage at Fort Hood?  The shooter calls himself “mujahideen”, does POTUS call it Domestic Terror?  No, it’s “workplace violence” effectively denying the fallen of any honors they’d receive fighting that same ideology on foreign soil.

When the cost of his administration’s botched “Fast & Furious” program raised the Mexican civilian death toll well into three digits, did this alleged “defender” of immigrants and Hispanics do something about it?  Yes, absolutely he did.  He invoked Executive Privilege in a boilerplate CYA move.  Feel free to take a moment and contrast his reaction to the Sandy Hook hand-wringing “if even one child’s life can be saved, then we need to act.”

Read more at 



Aug. 8, 2013 8:52pm Jason Howerton

An unidentified IRS agent told members Congress that the embattled tax agency is still targeting conservative groups three months after the scandal came to light, according to testimony released Thursday by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.).

During closed-door testimony, the agent reportedly told members of the committee that requests for tax-exempt status by Tea Party groups are still being subjected to “secondary screening,” at least in his office.

When asked what he would do with an application from a Tea Party group even if there was no evidence of political activity, the IRS agent replied: “At this point I would send it to secondary screening, political advocacy.”

“So you would treat a Tea Party group as a political advocacy case even if there was no evidence of political activity on the application. Is that right?” a committee investigator asked.

“Based on my current manager’s direction, uh-huh,” the agent repeated.

The IRS official said the so-called “be on the lookout” or BOLO list has been suspended, but no further direction on how to process applications from conservative groups has been provided.

“If a political advocacy case came in today, I would give it — or talk about it to my manager because right now we really don’t have any direction or we haven’t had any for the last month and a half,” he said, according to the testimony.

Camp called the allegations of continued political targeting by the IRS “outrageous.”

The Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard provides the transcript of the IRS agent’s testimony:

Wednesday, August 1, 2013

Committee: Today, currently, how do you analyze advocacy cases. If, for example, Tea Party of Arkansas came in today, how would you handle it?

IRS agent: Well, the BOLO list doesn’t exist anymore.

Committee: Sure.

IRS: If a political advocacy case came in today, I would give it — or talk about it to my manager because right now we really don’t have any direction or we haven’t had any for the last month and a half.

Committee: If you saw — I am asking this currently, if today if a Tea Party case, a group — a case from a Tea Party group came in to your desk, you reviewed the file and there was no evidence of political activity, would you potentially approve that case? Is that something you would do?

IRS agent: At this point I would send it to secondary screening, political advocacy.

Committee: So you would treat a Tea Party group as a political advocacy case even if there was no evidence of political activity on the application. Is that right?

IRS agent: Based on my current manager’s direction, uh-huh.

El origen de la palabra “Anfitrión”enviado por Gustavo Rojas.
En la mitología griega, Anfitrión era el marido de Alcmena, la madre de Hércules. Mientras Anfitrión estaba en la guerra de Tebas, el dios Zeus se acostaba con Alcmena, noche tras noche, tras lo cual, ella quedó embarazada. Con el embarazo de Alcmena, se creó un gran alboroto porque, evidentemente, Anfitrión dudó de la fidelidad de su esposa. Al final todo fue aclarado por Zeus y entonces, Anfitrión se puso contento, por ser el marido de una mujer escogida por el dios Zeus para tener sexo.

De aquellas noches de amor nació el semi-dios Hércules. A partir de ese momento, el término “Anfitrión” pasó a tener el sentido de “aquél que recibe en su casa”. Por lo tanto, Anfitrión es sinónimo de cornudo,tranquilo, pendejo y feliz. Resumiendo:  Cuando alguien le diga que usted es un buen Anfitrión, mándelo a la mierda y por las dudas, esté atento y vigile a su vieja, no vaya a ser que algún “Zeus” estéatendiéndola y al rato, ande usted feliz de la vida manteniendo varios Herculit… perdón… pequeños Hércules en su casa.

Demasiada cultura puede ser un problema.


Enviado por Gustavo Rojas è Ya es Invierno …sabes? El tiempo tiene su manera especial de moverse rápido y tomarte desprevenido en el paso de los años.  Parece solo ayer que era joven, recién casado y embarcándome en mi nueva vida con mi pareja. Pero de cierta forma parece que fue hace mucho tiempo y ahora pienso, ¿adónde se fueron los años?

Sé que los he vivido todos. Tengo visiones de cómo fue entonces y de todas mis esperanzas y sueños.
Pero, allí está el invierno de mi vida y “me agarra de sorpresa”. ¿Cómo llegué aquí tan rápido? ¿dónde se fueron los años? ¿Adónde se fue mi juventud?  Recuerdo bien haber visto gente mayor a través de los años y pensaba que aquellas personas mayores estaban muy lejos de mi y que ese invierno estaba tan , tan lejos que no me podía imaginar cómo sería.

Pero aquí está, mis amigos están retirados y volviéndose “grises”, se mueven más lento y ahora veo a una persona mayor. Algunos están en mejor forma, otros peor que yo, pero veo el gran cambio. No como las que recuerdo que eran jóvenes y vibrantes, sino como yo, su edad se empieza a mostrar y ahora somos aquellas personas mayores que solía ver y que nunca pensé que sería.
Cada día ahora encuentro que solo el tomar una ducha es uno de los acontecimientos reales del dia!  Y que tomar una siesta ya no es algo agradable como era, es algo obligatorio! Porque si no lo hago por mi propia voluntad, simplemente me quedo dormido donde esté sentado.
Así que ahora entro en esta nueva etapa de la vida sin preparación alguna para todos los dolores y achaques y la pérdida de fuerza o habilidad para ir y hacer todas las cosas que quisiera haber hecho pero que nunca hice!! Pero, por lo menos sé, que aunque el invierno ha llegado y que no estoy seguro cuánto va a durar, esto si sé que cuando se acabe en esta tierra, se acabó. Otra aventura empezará!
Si, tengo arrepentimientos. Hay cosas que hubiese querido no haber hecho, cosas que debí haber hecho; pero, de verdad, hay muchas cosas de las que estoy contento que hice.  Así que, si todavía no estás en tu invierno, permíteme recordarte que estará aquí mucho más rápido de lo que piensas.  Por tanto, cualquier cosa que quieras lograr en tu vida, por favor hazlo rápido.  No lo pospongas por mucho tiempo.  La vida se pasa rápido.
Haz todo lo que puedas hoy, porque nunca estarás seguro si ya es tu invierno o no.  No tienes la promesa que verás todas las estaciones de tu vida, así que vive por el hoy y di todas las cosas que quieras, que tus seres queridos te recuerden con la esperanza que ellos lo aprecien y amen por todas las cosas que has hecho por ellos en los años pasados.
“La vida es un regalo que se te ha dado”
La forma en que la vives es un regalo para los que vienen después.
Haz de este viaje algo único y fantástico.
VIVE BIEN! Goza el día! Has algo agradable! Sé Feliz.
Recuerda, “Lo real es la salud y no las piezas de oro y plata.”
Finalmente, considera lo siguiente:

Hoy día es el día en que serás el máximo de Viejo, pero lo más joven que podrás ser.
Goza de tu día mientras dure.
Tus hijos se están convirtiendo en lo que tú eres, pero tus nietos son perfectos!
Salir a la calle es bueno, Regresar a la casa es mejor!
Te olvidas de los nombres, no importa; está bien porque otras personas se olvidan que siquiera te conocieron!
Las cosas que te importaban hacer, no te importan ahora, pero si te importa que no te “importe” que no las hagas más.
¿Duermes mejor en un sillón con la TV prendida, que en la cama? A esto se le llama “pre-dormir”.
¿Extrañas los días cuando todo se trabajaba con solamente un interruptor de “prendido” y “apagado”?
Ahora tiendes a usar más las palabras: “qué” …”dónde”
Lo que solían ser pecas, ahora son manchas del hígado.
Todo el mundo “susurra”.
Tienes tres tallas de ropa en el ropero, dos de las cuales nunca las volverás a usar.
Pero lo Viejo es bueno en algunos casos: Viejas canciones, Viejas películas, y lo mejor de todo, VIEJOS AMIGOS!!
“Que estés bien, viejo amigo”!
Envíalo a otros Viejos amigos y deja que se rían porque estarán de acuerdo.
No es lo que reúnes, sino más bien lo que repartes lo que dice la clase de vida que has vivido.
Confieso que no soy el autor.

HEY, SHARPTON: Black Teen Strangles White 12yr. Old, Dumps Body In Recycling Bin, Gets 17yrs [Another obama son or replica]

Little more than 10 feet separated Justin Robinson from Autumn Pasquale’s father in an open Gloucester County courtroom Wednesday morning when Robinson, now 16, pleaded guilty to choking the pre-teen to death in October.

“He sat there and listened,” said Doug Long, attorney and spokesman for Anthony Pasquale, Autumn’s father.

Days after Autumn, a Clayton Middle School student, went missing, the 12-year-old’s body was discovered — strangled — in a recycling container on an abandoned property next door to the Robinsons’ home.

Justin Robinson, then 15, and his 17-year-old brother Donte, were charged last fall with the girl’s murder.

Until Wednesday, all juvenile court proceedings in the murder case had been conducted behind locked courtroom doors. Donte Robinson’s charges are still pending in closed juvenile court in Gloucester County.



Read more at 

Comentarios, enviar articulos o preguntas envielas a è,


“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’      



Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )


Conectando a %s

A %d blogueros les gusta esto: