Archive for 31 agosto 2013

No 472 “Enmi opinion” Agosto 31, 2013

agosto 31, 2013

No 472  “En mi opinión” Agosto 31, 2013.
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  “IN GOD WE TRUST”
Image  
Envie sus Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios a  lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

RICARDO SAMITIER: Obama Está DESESPERADO Por Ayudar A La Hermandad Musulmana…
Con Un PRÉSTAMO DE LA ARTILLERÍA DE USA…
Para beneficiar el triunfo de los enemigos de OCCIDENTE y el mundo CRISTIANO…
¿Hasta Cuando El Congreso Va A Seguir Ayudando A Obama y Sus Planes???
Los Congresistas en el limbo comiendo “hunga de vaca’ de Vacaciones…
Los “PACIFISTAS”… Desenfrenados
Tratando De Iniciar Una Guerra…
Obama, “Premio Noble De La Paz” Por sus Buenas Intenciones
Y Kerry “Pacifista Contra Todas Las Guerras” hasta que logró
Ser MINISTRO DE ESTADO… Alegan… que se mataron niños con
Gases tóxicos… y que es obligatorio PROTEGER A TODOS CONTRA
FUTUROS ATAQUES… enviando cohetes que matan inocentes…
Entre ellos a NIÑOS…
 
Creerán Obama, Kerry y los carneros que los siguen… que todos los
Ciudadanos somos IMBÉCILES…  Han llegado al poder con los mismos
Engaños que llegó Fidel Castro…  Y TAL PARECE QUE EL REFRÁN
TIENE RAZÓN… “La Historia Se Repite”
Los “PACIFISTAS”… Desenfrenados
Tratando De Iniciar Una Guerra…
Obama, “Premio Noble De La Paz” Por sus Buenas Intenciones
Y Kerry “Pacifista Contra Todas Las Guerras” hasta que logró
Ser MINISTRO DE ESTADO… Alegan… que se mataron niños con
Gases tóxicos… y que es obligatorio PROTEGER A TODOS CONTRA
FUTUROS ATAQUES… enviando cohetes que matan inocentes…
Entre ellos a NIÑOS…
Creerán Obama, Kerry y los carneros que los siguen… que todos los
Ciudadanos somos IMBÉCILES…  Han llegado al poder con los mismos
Engaños que llegó Fidel Castro…  Y TAL PARECE QUE EL REFRÁN
TIENE RAZÓN… “La Historia Se Repite”
Los “PACIFISTAS”… Desenfrenados
Tratando De Iniciar Una Guerra… Obama, “Premio Noble De La Paz” Por sus Buenas Intenciones
Y Kerry “Pacifista Contra Todas Las Guerras” hasta que logró
Ser MINISTRO DE ESTADO… Alegan… que se mataron niños con
Gases tóxicos… y que es obligatorio PROTEGER A TODOS CONTRA
FUTUROS ATAQUES… enviando cohetes que matan inocentes…
Entre ellos a NIÑOS…
Creerán Obama, Kerry y los carneros que los siguen… que todos los
Ciudadanos somos IMBÉCILES…  Han llegado al poder con los mismos
Engaños que llegó Fidel Castro…  Y TAL PARECE QUE EL REFRÁN
TIENE RAZÓN… “La Historia Se Repite”
¿Quien ha utilizado las armas químicas en Siria?: Los islamistas que apoya Obama
Como venimos avisando, parece evidente a cualquier observador imparcial que el ataque químico en Siria lo han realizado los terroristasislamistas y no su gobierno. Y no sería el primero:
Hace meses (en mayo de este año), la policía turca ya detuvo a 12 islamistas del “ejército rebelde sirio” que llevaban gas sarín y confesaron que era para utilizar en Siria. Esta noticia se intentó ocultar y los medios generalistas de todo el mundo la silenciaron tanto como pudieron, siguiendo los dictados del Nuevo Orden Mundial ¿Por qué? Porque apuntaba claramente a la autoría de las fuerzas islamistas,contrarias a Damasco.
El Gobierno Turco es Sunita y Siria es aliada de los chiitas, sus enemigos ancestrales con los que se disputan el dominio del Islam. Además, mientras el Gobierno islamista de Turquía (vinculado a los radicales Hermanos Musulmanes de Egipto) ha estado acusan do al Gobierno de Siria (socialista y relativamente laico) de haber utilizado gas sarín contra la población civil y por ello exige que se bombardee Siria, la propia oposición democrática turca lleva meses insistiendo en que el Gobierno Turco esta entrenando a los asesinos islamistas que pretender derrocar al Gobierno Sirio… incluso utilizando gas sarín.
Evidentemente, Obama , Cámeron, Hollandee, Israel y las dictaduras mahometanas que apoyan el derrocamiento del Gobierno de Siria, sabían perfectamente que los rebeldes tenían gas sarín, pero TODOS deseaban y siguen deseando ocultarlo a la opinión pública, para culpar de cualquier ataque químico al Gobierno de Siria y que Siria terminase cayendo y siendo un nuevo estado islamista sunita, porque lo que no soportan es que sea, como hasta ahora, un estado aliado de Iran (debo recordarles que Irán es el único gran estado chiita del mundo, enemigo a muerte de todos los estados musulmanes Sunitas que, encabezados por Arabia Saudita, son aliados de EUA y principal fuente del petróleo que consumimos en Europa).
De momento y gracias especialmente a la posición contraria al ataque a Siria sostenida por la Iglesia y por el Santo Padre, Obama está retrasando el ataque ha que se conozcan los resultados de la investigación realizada por los agentes de la ONU. ¿Y qué dicen los observadores?
Aun no se conoce el informe, que parece sesgado dado que no se ha querido estudiar el uso de armas químicas acaecido anteriormente en Aleppo y que una de las altas funcionarias de la ONU ya señaló a las fuerzas islamistas contrarias al Gobierno Sirio y aliadas de Obama como autoras.
En esa línea el Washington Times aseguraba que uno de los funcionrios de la ONU desplazados a Siria, acusa a los rebeldes de ser los causantes del ataque con armas químicas.
Aun así, visto que hasta medios supuestamente católicos en España se permiten contradecir la opinión del Santo Padre y se pliegan a los intereses del Nuevo Orden Mundial, parece que la suerte está echada: Se atacará a Siria. Contra ello solo podemos difundir la verdad y rezar por Siria.
 
En Cristo Rey
Efrén Pablos
Presidente de la asociación Cruz de San Andrés
Reagan Y lo que pensaba de Martin Luther King

Esta INFORMACIÓN la envió Para: Los “HABITANTES” Los Que Viven
Pues Respiran… Pero Desinformados… Regan Era Presidente Cuando El Congreso Estableció El “Día De Martin Luther King” 
Gobernar es DIFÍCIL Cuando El Presidente lo hace con un Congreso En que ambos partidos Están INFILTRADOS POR ENEMIGOS… Del Sistema Republicano…
Ronald Reagan, dejó pasar la ley estableciendo el día de Martin Luther King SIN SU FIRMA… Decidió NO VETAR LA LEY, para no lastimar las relaciones con Los republicanos socialistas del congreso, a los que él consideraba Sin valor y sin valores…
GUINES EMERGENCIA = COLERA = GRAVE
En 1897 Durante La Concentración De Weyler Fue la Última Vez Que Hubo Cólera En Cuba… Ahora Después de 54 Años De Estar Aplaudiendo Al TIRANO COMUNISTA… Apoyando todo tipo de INJUSTICIAS Y Directamente
Contribuyendo a La Destrucción De Cuba… Les llegó “El Cólera”   
“El Cólera Es: Resultado Directo De las Marchas Del Pueblo pidiendo
PAREDÓN  Para el VECINO… y aplaudiendo o quedándose CALLADOS
Antes Las injusticias… En estos 54 años el pueblo aprendió a cagar
en Cartuchos y tirarlos los excrementos a la calle… a NO LAVARSE
LAS MANOS… pues para aplaudir no se necesitan manos limpias… 
El viejo REFRÁN DICE: “Uno Recibe Lo Que SIEMBRA”… 
De todas maneras les paso esta petición de los Guineros…
quienes no saben quién fue el “PIPERO” Guinero que fue fusilado
por estar contra el régimen…
Tenemos que orar por nuestro pueblo de Güines, ya que hay un número elevado de casos de cólera y alarma, comenzó al parecer por el pozo de la Alejandría, pero ya también hay casos en otras partes del pueblo. Allá están circulando ambulancias que dicen ”emergencia nacional”, parece que los casos de pacientes adultos se van a quedar en Güines, los niños los están remitiendo para La Habana, están habilitando la sala de fisioterapia en la calle Alvarez entre calle Habana y calle Trujillo para los adultos. Lo más importante de todo es evitar que los pacientes se deshidraten, parece que el medicamento de elección es la Doxiciclina (un tipo de Tetraciclina). Hay una cola afuera del hospital para que los clasifiquen, por la parte que era de ortopedia antes, la gente con fatiga…es deprimente. Vamos a pedirle a Dios que se logre controlar el brote. Para poder entrar al hospital el que lo necesite tiene que pasar los zapatos por unas cajas que tienen dentro una sustancia (debe ser cloro), lavarse las manos con jabón, enjuagarse y les echan agua con cloro. Está movilizado el Nivel Central de Salud Pública en el hospital por la preocupación de esta situación de salud que se ha presentado. Todos están muy preocupados y tomando las medidas de prevención lo mejor que se pueda, sobre todo hirviendo el agua y echándole Hipoclorito de Sodio. Aunque se tratara de agua purificada, para más seguridad la deben hervir y echarle el Hipoclorito.
Los “Guerreristas De Hoy” antiguos“PACIFISTAS”
Condenaban Que USA Fuera El Policía Del Mundo…
Ahora…
Se han preparando para UNA ACCIÓN POLICIACA en un país, que no nos ha atacado y no nos amenaza! 
¿Cómo es posible que el ganador del PREMIO NOBEL DE LA PAZ, POR SUS BUENAS INTENCIONES, tenga el poder para hacer una guerra?   De Contra… DICEN QUE NO ES GUERRA… pues no van a usar soldados…
Es SIMPLEMENTE UN PRÉSTAMO DE LA ARTILLERÍA DE USA…
a la HERMANDAD MUSULMANA… Para beneficiar el triunfo de los enemigos de OCCIDENTE y el mundo CRISTIANO…
Pero ¿Qué Hacen Los POLITIQUEROS Electos A Washington?
Están De Vacaciones de Verano…   
Acaso no han leído la Constitución?
Acaso no han visto el video del ACTUAL VICE-PRESIDENTE… pidiendo la DESTITUCIÓN DE BUSH… por las misma razones de atacar un país sin la aprobación del congreso????
Aquí TIENEN EL VIDEO POLITIQUEROS QUE ESTÁN DE VACACIONES… EN VEZ DE ESTAR EN WASHINGTON
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dRFJ6CF2Mw
Obama ni ninguno de los ANTIGUOS PACIFISTAS… pueden ordenar ese ataque…sin la aprobación del congreso… y si votan a FAVOR DEL ATAQUE les vamos a pasar la cuenta…  
Estos Tres Mapas Muestran ¿Cuánta Potencia Occidental Rodean Siria Ahora
No puedo creer que esto fue publicado en el New York Times
El Fracaso Económico De La India…
Es Similar A Los Planes De Obama
El actual gobierno, que asumió el cargo en 2004, ha hecho dos errores fundamentales.En primer lugar, supuso que el crecimiento económico es manejado por un piloto automático y no se ocupó de los problemas estructurales graves. En segundo lugar, a pesar de tener menores ingresos, inició importantes programas de redistribución,desatendiendo sus consecuencias: MAYOR DÉFICIT FISCAL Y COMERCIAL.
La reacción en la India ha sido igual que en USA… Para protegerse de la inflación y la incertidumbre general, los consumidores con capital disponible…han adquirido furiosamente oro, haciendo que el país depende del capital extranjero para financiar su déficit comercial.
 
La India como USA están siempre en CAMPAÑA PRE-ELECTORAL hasta el próximo año. Las elecciones aumentan las presiones DE LOS SOCIALISTAS para gastar y retrasar la reforma necesaria… para salir electos y mantenerse en el PODER…
Las similitudes son tan grandes que sigo ANONADADO… que el periódico “Vocero del Comunismo y el OBAMISMO” En USA lo publicara… 
Así que la debilidad y la turbulencia de la India y de USA pueden persistir hasta después de las elecciones… PARA ENTONCES LOS DAÑOS VAN A SER ENORMES… 
Para los que quieran leer todo el artículo:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/31/opinion/why-indias-economy-is-stumbling.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130831&_r=1&
August 30th, 2013
MICHAEL KELLEY, GEOFFREY INGERSOLL AND MIKE NUDELMAN
businessinsider.com
The U.S., despite lack of U.N. approval and growing demands for legal justifications, is determined to strike Syria in response to an Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack attributed to the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Earlier we posted a Reuters map that listed the U.S., British, and French forces and bases that are positioned near Syria. But that doesn’t tell the whole story, since it does not illustrate what those assets are threatening.
So we added to it with information from maps created by Foreign Policy, Agence France-Presse, the Institute for the Study of War, The Telegraph and two via BBC in addition to highlighting U.S. military bases in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
Here’s what the Western assets in the arena currently look like:
Europa Esta en PICADA…
El Desplome Inmobiliario, Sigue Sin Tocar Fondo En Europa…
Éstos son algunos aspectos destacados de una traducción de los artículos sobre lasHipotecas de La Vanguardia:
1. El número de hipotecas para la compra de vivienda en junio cayó un 42,2%respecto a junio de 2012
2. Las nuevas hipotecas se han reducido cada mes durante los últimos 38 meses. Junio ??firmó sólo 14.053 hipotecas de viviendas, la cifra mensual más baja de los últimos diez años.
3. El total de seis meses a partir de enero-junio, 2013 era 115.895 hipotecas firmadas. Eso es menos que el total de un mes de mayo de 2007, que tuvo 118.669 hipotecas firmadas.
4. El importe medio de las hipotecas se redujo, un 9% más que hace un año a € 97.495.
5. Este fue el peor semestre desde que comenzó la serie de datos para este indicador, en 2003.
Cuando Veas Las Barbas De Tu Vecino Arder… Pon Las Tuyas En Remojo…
Ayer el Miami Herald Anuncio Que el 38% De Las Casas De Miami… Están “Bajo el Agua” Es decir que pagan hipotecas más altas que el “Valor Que Tiene La Casa” y los propietarios siguen pagándolas como verdaderos
“Carneros”
Otro bochorno de la justicia de USA y la Florida
Como Se llega A Juez… La Gran Mayoría… Son Nombrados Por El Gobernador Para Llenar El Puesto Vacante Por Lo Regular La Persona Es
“Un Activo Miembro” Del Partido Del Gobernador… Después La Persona Se Postula Para Retener el Puesto… La Elección De Los Jueces Los Convierte En Politiqueros… Estamos acostumbrados a leer y oír la noticia que la FISCALÍA HIZO UN ACUERDO CON EL ACUSADO… es decir; SE NEGOCIO LA CONDENA… El 90%  de los casos criminales son NEGOCIADOS y los que tienenPADRINO CONSIGUEN CONDENAS LIGERAS… de la misma forma los que tienen neighs Son FUERTEMENTE CONDENADOS…
Hoy el Caso de Zimmeman es la mejor prueba de cómo la JUSTICIA es
Manejada por los POLITIQUEROS… Comenzando por OBAMA… que no DEBE ni TIENE DERECHO A METERSE EN CASOS JUDICIALES…
Hoy Se Anunciaron DOS Noticias Sobre Zimmeman:
1.      No habrá juicio por perjurio de Shellie Zimmerman. El cargo de perjurio CRIMEN ATROZ se convierte en un DELITO MENOR, que se borrado de su registro después de un año. Esta fue otra acusación política que nunca debió haber sido hecha… El acusado aunque INOCENTE… PREFIERE UN ARREGLO… PUES NUNCA se SABE que puede determinar un jurado de imberbes…
2.      La Esposa después de todos los sufrimientos pasados desde que Zimmerman en DEFENSA PROPIA mató a Trevon Martin… ahora se está pensando DIVORCIAR…
Ese matrimonio en CRISIS… es consecuencia directa de Obama y todos los politiqueros…y de la falta de carácter del gobernador de la Florida… que para complacer a Obama y a los NEGROS… nombró un fiscal especial para enjuiciar a Zimmerman… 
Me llegó del Nuevo Patria dirigido por Eladio Armesto…
Lo paso pues establece la verdad…

OBAMA VIOLA LA CONSTITUCIÓN  Y 
LAS LEYES INTERNACIONALES SI ATACA A SIRIA
El Nuevo Patria dirigido por Eladio Armesto…
Un ataque contra el pueblo y la nación de Siria por parte del gobierno de Barack Obama fuera una violación criminal de la Constitución de Estados Unidos y una agresión clara al Estado de Derecho y las leyes internacionales, señalan expertos. 
El gobierno de Obama estará actuando completamente fuera de la ley y exponiendo a los ciudadanos norteamericanos en peligro de cualquier respuesta justa por parte de Siria o cualquier país del mundo civilizado.
Esta mas que comprobado que los mercenarios anti-sirios armados y apoyados por el gobierno de Barack Obama son los responsables de uso de armas químicas en Siria. 
Obama y sus aliados sinvergüenzas en el Partido Republicano vienen apoyando a los terroristas de la Hermandad Musulmana y al Qaeda en Siria, tal como se los ha pedido el gobierno de Israel.
El senador John McCain apoya histéricamente a su amigo Obama, mostrando nuevamente que los conservadores que lo rechazaron como candidato republicano a la presidencia tenían toda la razón en hacerlo. Con republicanos tramitados como McCain, ¿quien necesita a demócratas liberales?
Vea este mensaje revelador en inglés:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvmXbFxdaAc
El gobierno de Obama y sus aliados sinvergüenzas en el Partido Republicano están destruyendo todo respeto a la Constitución y la Ley en Estados Unidos. ¿Qué quedará de Estados Unidos? 
Sólo Rusia bajo el liderazgo del presidente Vladimir Putin está defendiendo a Siria y el honor de la comunidad internacional contra el criminal apoyo de Barack Obama al terrorismo islámico.
Otros videos super informativos en ingles: 
  ¿Cual es la diferencia entre Vladimir Putin y Barack Obama?   
What’s the Difference Between Putin and Obama? 
http://youtu.be/Vs6Prp6Q0_k
  ¿Quienes son los verdaderos amos de Estados Unidos?   
Who Are the Real Rulers of America?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jaUZCks7CA&list=PL57CF031B7D887289
  ¿Como es mofado Jesucristo?  
How Jesus Christ is Mocked? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yle_qeeOIMA&list=TL4EPUToMgP0o 
¿Existe un conflicto entre Dostoevsky y los judíos?   
Is There a Conflict Between Dostoevsky and the Jews? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=030_rR1JN9I

MARZO FERNANDEZ: EL TIEMPO ES CORTO

No hay que ser un especialista en el tema cubano, para saber que estamos en la etapa TERMINAL l de la dictadura castrista.
No es un secreto, que los comunistas se vienen preparando de forma acelerada. Ya tienen de forma oficial, nombrado al sucesor, Miguel Diaz Canel.  Todas las actividades rentables y que producen divisas “”ya tienen dueno”” los cros del II Frente, han ido asumiendo la direccion de las principales actividades economicas del pais. En mi opinion, la Transicion Economica, ya esta muy adelantada.
practicamente terminada.
 
Se ha venido siguiendo con bastante rigor y de forma muy ordenada, los modelos de transicion Rusos, Chinos e incluso Vietnamitas;  de cada uno se han tomado especificaciones muy precisas, para garantizar una permanencia economica, para cuando se empiece a aplicar la Transicion Politica.  Tienen  previsto, permanecer en el pais.  El exilio o la fuga , no esta en sus planes.  Acuerdense de la pinata Sandinista y la vuelta al poder de Daniel Ortega.
 
Una de las acciones que mejor se ha preparado, por parte de los que detentan el poder real -economico y politico- es la de garantizar que no haya sustitutos u opisicion capaz de tomar el poder por medios propios.  Si analizamos a cada uno de los opositores, que realmente se han tolerado y que son autorizados a viajar al extranjero, vemos que son personas de extrema calidad moral y realmente comprometidos con la lucha en contra de la dictadura.  De eso no hay dudas, pero en realidad “no son residenciables”
 
Si a mi me preguntan, quienes realmente son presidenciales, diria sin titubeos,  OSCAR ELIAS BISCET, ademas de ser un profesional ha pagado un precio muy alto por sus ideas politicas.  Merece un apoyo icondicional. Pero tambien viraria la vista , para este paisdonde hay cubanos verdaderamente extraordinarios,que han dedicadosu vida, a luchar por la libertad de la Patria, sin ningun tipo deaspiracion personal.  Son nuestros mambises del exilio.
 
Aqui hay hombres de la talla como JORGE SANGUINETTI, de un altisimo
nivel profesional, cultural y politico, que ha dedicado toda su existencia, su bienestar personal, a la lucha por la patria.  Para mi seria un candidato excepcionaL, y que el pueblo cubano tiene que conocer.
 
Tambien hay figuras de la talla de Carlos Alberto Montaner, Lincon Diaz Balart, Alfredo Cepero, Lazaro R Gonzalez, que no hay minuto del dia, que no esten luchando por nuestra verdadera independencia. Y nuestra dama de hierro Remedio Diaz Oliver una luchadora a tiempo completo.  Son verdaderos heroes de la patria. Quizas haya mas, y seria muy bueno.  Pero estos son los que conozco.
 
Traigo a colacion estas notas, como ya mencione,  EL TIEMPO ES CORTO
y tenemos que prepararnos, tenemos que pasar de la DEFENSIVA A LA
OFENSIVA.   Conozco muy bien a estos personajes y de su infinita 
modestia, siempre han trabajado incansablemente, sin esperar mimgun tipo de recompesa.   Senores no podemos esperar y soportar que los dictadores nos impongan una nueva generacion para continuar esclavizando la Patria.  Asumimos el reto o nos resignamos.Es hora de organizarnos y pasar  a la accion para evitar que nos impongan el continuismo, que nuestros enemigos  han planificado. Hay que luchar para garantizar unas elecciones verdaderamente “libres”de que los derrotamos, de eso no hay dudas, tenemos que erradicar el comunismo de nuestra Patria.  No hay derecho ni justificacion para continuar esperando “el milagro” que nos de la LIBERTAD.

Patton: Middle East Mess May Be Exactly What Obama Wants By Doug P August 30, 2013 6:55 am  
 
Barack Hussein Obama is either the most inept president ever to sit in the White House or he is an enemy of the Republic. He could be both, but I defy anyone to suggest a logical third alternative.
For the last ten years, I have watched this man’s uncanny rise to the pinnacle of power and vacillated between those two choices. His inexperience suggested the former, but his ideology made me wonder what he would do when the international chips were down. I have come to the conclusion that ideology trumps inexperience. His ego is so massive, and his leftist beliefs and Muslim upbringing are so strong, that he is willing to throw our country as we have known it — not to mention any inconvenient allies — under the big international bus.
Let’s review our Middle East policy since Obama took office in January 2009. He made it his top priority to go to the region and prostrate himself before the Islamic world, bowing before Saudi sheiks and telling outrageous lies about the great and glorious history of a religion rooted in 7th Century barbarism in his now-infamous speech in Cairo.
Since then, he has unilaterally withdrawn from Iraq while perpetuating a semi-war in Afghanistan that is doing nothing but getting our troops killed a few at a time.
And, of course, he has proceeded to do everything in his power to place as many crazy Muslim zealots in power as he possible can.
So now what do we have? We have Egypt, formerly a solid U.S. ally whose leader kept the peace with Israel for thirty years, in flames and in danger of becoming a Russian ally, at best, or imploding into Islamist chaos, at worst.
Next door, in Libya, where every terrorist in the area is still laughing at us after the fiasco in Benghazi, we have replaced a tinhorn tyrant with a truly dangerous al-Qaida-run government, a scenario we are about to repeat in Syria.
Meanwhile, the calculating Shiite Ayatollahs in Iran are watching our every move and threatening to “rain down missiles on Israel” if we attack the government of their friend in Damascus, Bashar al-Assad.
Hard as it may be, try to look at the Middle East through Obama’s eyes. He thinks the United States is the problem in the region. He has stated so repeatedly, beginning with that speech in Cairo. He obviously believes the same canard George Bush kept repeating about the “religion of peace.” The difference is that Obama cannot or will not differentiate between so-called moderate Muslims and radical Islamists. Bush at least knew that when people attack us, they probably are not our friends. He also was willing retaliate against them when they proved themselves hostile.
Obama hates Israel, and he no longer has any need for the naïve liberal Jewish vote that helped put him in office — twice — so he feels emboldened to do what he wants to the tiny Jewish state. If Iran attacks Israel in promised retaliation for a U.S. strike on Syria, Israel will be forced to defend itself, possibly with nuclear weapons. Given Obama’s willingness to twiddle his thumbs and pretend to agonize over his decision to make any moves against the Syrian regime, thereby giving every terrorist mullah in the Middle East time to plot revenge, one has to wonder, will he do anything to defend Israel?
And if you think that lofty entity known as “The World Community” gets up in arms over the use of a few canisters of chemical or biological weapons, wait until you see the ginned-up outrage that will arise against Israel when they defend themselves with nukes. After all, America is still getting flak from the Left for using them on Japan 68 years ago. Such a scenario would provide Obama — not to mention a lot of cowards in Congress on both sides of the aisle — with the excuse he has long sought to abandon our only real ally in the Middle East.
Add to that the fact that the chaos this president has encouraged all across the region could drive the cost of gasoline in the United States to double digits — another Obama dream come true — and one more piece in his radical environmental puzzle slides into place.
If I could name more than a handful of statesmen in Congress, I would begin to wonder when the word “impeachment” might seriously be spoken there.

Obama vs. House Republicans: “Nuclear War” Written by Gary North on August 30, 2013 Sometimes,

I get excited. What if this plays out? The House of Representatives may decide to let Obama’s immigration reform bill die. The House doesn’t kill it. It just lets it sit. This caught my attention: an article with the catchy title, “Obama’s Immigration Nuclear Option: Stopping Deportations Unilaterally.” When it comes to the idea of a political nuclear war between the President and the House of Representatives, I get all tingly. If that happens, advocates of immigration reform have another idea: They’ll push Obama to press the button on the immigration-reform nuclear option. The option commonly referred to by immigration reformers as “Plan B” would see the president take executive action to prevent undocumented immigrants from being deported — along the lines of the deferred-action program the administration created for “Dreamers” last year. It wouldn’t be a panacea, and it wouldn’t give them citizenship. But such an action could at least spare some from the constant threat of deportation. And perhaps just as important, it could exact major political revenge on Republicans, galvanizing the Hispanic electorate against them and further hurting their image with the fastest-growing segment of voters. By now, you know the phrase “undocumented immigrants” is MediaSpeak for “illegal aliens.” Obama does not have to enforce the deportation law. He can just sort of forget to enforce it. That would be round one of the “nuclear option.” But that might not end it. Spending bills must originate in the House of Representatives, according to the U.S. Constitution. (You remember the Constitution, don’t you? That’s the document that says that Congress must declare all wars.) The House might sort of forget to provide any funding for the laws that President Obama decides to enforce. What would be President Obama’s nuclear response? How could he force the House to provide the funding? He could get out his teleprompter and deliver a speech against the House for not funding the laws of the land. Then Boehner could do a YouTube video on enforcing the laws against illegal aliens. Then Obama could threaten to tell the Secretary of the Treasury to stop cooking the books and admit that the debt ceiling was breached on June 1 — something the President has refused to do. Then the federal government would shut down. That’s why I get all  tingly. I don’t think it will come to nuclear war. One side or the other will surrender. Obama and Boehner are both very good at strategic capitulations. It’s President Sequester vs. Congressman TARP. Both of them are willing to eat a mud sandwich or two.
Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/08/30/obama-vs-house-republicans-nuclear-war/#rpurPQhovryfKOtM.99
Obama Wants Your Children’s Data:

August 29, 2013 at 9:33 pm / by Macey France
President Obama is very interested in your kids. He wants to know virtually everything about them. We found this out while researching the Common Core Standards. We saw that in order for states to apply for the Race to the Top grants; a “competition” of sorts for states to put on their best faces and vow to do anything and everything, including giving up their children for a little extra money, they had to beef up their data collections systems on the children in school. The assurance that states would indeed set these State Longitudinal Data Systems for collecting data in place allowed them to be able to qualify for federal funds. The other requirement for the grant was to adopt the Common Core Standards. As soon as a kid hits Kindergarten everything about their life will be tracked. Data will be collected on every aspect of their learning abilities, their families, their health and many other factors and then stored in this massive SLDS that will then share the information with just about anyone who “needs” to see it. Any information gathered before was protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, where parents had to give signed permission for their child’s information to be shared. Obama gutted the FERPA in December of 2011 essentially stripping parents’ rights to guard their children’s information. But, wait, apparently Kindergarten is not early enough to get to know every move your child makes. Let’s roll that back a couple years…in fact, we’ll go to pre-natal, shall we? States are receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in discretionary spending, to fund universal preschool through Race to the Top early learning grants and the biggest boondoggle in American history; the Affordable Care Act. In case you’re wondering, this is how Obama got by the Congress; he didn’t need to ask for the money that would likely not be forthcoming. This allows states to be able to carry out their plans to their Pre-K and early childcare plans. It sounds good, right? We can really make sure to get data and information on small children and be able to “intervene” with health problems, socioeconomic problems, and educational problems before they actually have a problem. We just love kids and we want to be able to see everything that affects them and step in and take the place of their parents. That’s not so bad, right? It’s for the children! Recently my colleagues and I began searching through the Oregon Department of Education to see just what the early learning initiative would involve. First, we found that Oregon passed SB909 in 2011 which would allow the governor to implement early childhood education programs and make sure to get the departments providing help to all families and children in Oregon to be more “streamlined.” Upon passage we found was an 80 page document outlining how the system for keeping track of children, especially children in low income, minority, or “high risk” situations was not adequate. As it is Oregon has all kinds of government programs in place to monitor early childhood care and education. Also included in this document are all programs in place that currently keep records on children and families. The organizations include, but may not be limited to: Oregon Health Authority Oregon Department of Education Oregon Commission on Children and Families Oregon Department of Human Services Oregon Employment Department Federal Agencies Most of these agencies have at least one office in each county. In a section marked State Alignment Recommendations it reads in part: “Oregon has a wide range of programs, services, and organizations focused on early childhood care and education. In addition mental health, healthcare, and addiction services overlap the work of early learning. Although some of these programs and services are delivering what we believe to be good results, Oregon does not consistently track results or make investment decisions based on results. In addition, these systems do not work in concert, and are largely disconnected from the K-12 education system. We need an integrated system to ensure results for children and families and for the citizens of Oregon. All systems and services should share the goals of getting children ready for school at kindergarten and reading by the end of first grade…” In a separate but related Oregon document under the section entitled: Vision for the Early Childhood Integrated Data System the goal is stated as: “An integrated data system that brings together data from early learning, health, and human services at the level of the child (0-5), provider, and community to improve coordination and streamlining of services, guide resource allocation, and provide accountability for early childhood investments. The data system will interface with the Oregon Department of Education Longitudinal Data System, thus providing data on children from birth through higher education. As the early learning data system evolves it will integrate with the applicable health and human service data systems.” This is what I see here. A massive effort to connect all of these governmental agencies, county by county, state by state and then linked to the federal government. Any and all of these things will be in the system, where any government agency in the state will have access to and the data from all other state agencies. And let us not forget that the data can be sold to a third party. It will be funneled to the federal government. Although Arne Duncan has said that any state data will not be connected to and collected by the federal government, it appears as though this is a flat out lie. Here is what Duncan stated earlier this summer about the data collection that will take place: “Critics…make even more outlandish claims. They say that the Common Core calls for federal collection of student data. For the record, we are not allowed to, and we won’t.” Pardon me while I scroll back up and re-read a paragraph…yes, here it is: The data system will interface with the Oregon Department of Education Longitudinal Data System, thus providing data on children from birth through higher education. As the early learning data system evolves it will integrate with the applicable health and human service data systems.” And above that we name all the agencies we are collating…the last one mentioned is…Federal Agencies. Now indulge me as I see a child who is a little behind his peers in reading and math but not exceptionally far behind. What about a kid whose parents have been in the military? How about the kid whflu a couple times this year. And Lord, please protect any child who might live with a smoker! What’s going to happen to them? “Well meaning” government bureaucrats, under this nightmarish Big Brother scenario, who work for Health and Human Services, can do invasive “home health visits” for those in “high risk” categories. Those categories include: Families where mom is not yet 21; Families where someone is a tobacco user; Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities, and Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States. HHS says that the visits fall under what is called the “Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program” allegedly designed to “help parents and children,” and could impact millions of Americans. In the above linked article, Constitutional attorney and author Kent Masterson Brown says that even though the government claims it is voluntary, it is not. Here are 2 scenarios he outlines: “The eligible entity receiving the grant for performing the home visits is to identify the individuals to be visited and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks,” he said. “A homeschooling family, for instance, may be subject to ‘intervention’ in ‘school readiness’ and ‘social-emotional developmental indicators.’ A farm family may be subject to ‘intervention’ in order to ‘prevent child injuries.’ The sky is the limit.” “Intervention,” he added, quoting Brown, “may be with any family for any reason. It may also result in the child or children being required to go to certain schools or taking certain medications and vaccines and even having more limited – or no – interaction with parents. The federal government will now set the o has had the standards for raising children and will enforce them by home visits.” So we have massive amounts of information that will be collected under the new early learning initiative. Virtually everything about your child, and yourself, will be included. It all funnels through the myriad governmental agencies and goes straight to the fed. They will even collect information on all of your sources of income and where it comes from. In case we need further proof that all of this is coming down through the early learning debacle read this last little bit of information: One very important area that is emphasized by HHS is the “development of comprehensive early childhood systems that span the prenatal-through-age-eight continuum.” Add that with the P-20 system that collects data on kids from Pre-K through college and you have, literally, cradle to career nanny over site on a child’s life. In fact, it’s before cradle. It’s pre-natal. All in the name of helping children? I think not. All in the name of power and control. The federal government wants to know everything about you and your child. And this is how they’re doing it. A sneaky, underhanded, backdoor way of starting an “educational reform” program that when broken down and looked at from all sides, is a way of implementing the federal government into your everyday life. Even if the Common Core were the best education standards ever implemented and was proven to be the best standards on the planet, we would still have to reject it and all of its data tracking nightmares. Because just like the Patriot Act that gave the government permission to monitor phones in the United States, where people said, “Just because they CAN spy doesn’t mean they WILL,” well…we all know how that turned out. We can all recall the governmental giant, the IRS, who used and abused their power to threaten and break down conservative groups. That is a scary thought…what happens to the child whose parents are Republicans? Or, under a different regime, Democrats? You open that door and someone, some administration; some force will go through it. You know that old saying that “You can’t un-ring a bell?” This leaves me to wonder exactly when they will start requiring stool samples. I know quite a large handful of people who would be more than happy to oblige.
Read more at http://politichicks.tv/column/obama-wants-childrens-data-common-core-early-learning-initiative/#prIQh761YrzKYwzt.99

Newsmax.com : New top secret information Leaked: How will the president react?

Fellow Patriot,
There’s a huge (and hushed-up) conspiracy going on, that’s about to turn your lives upside down in the coming few months.
Unbelievably, even the media are keeping quiet about this. I’m sure they know it, but they probably understood that revealing it on TV will generate mass hysteria and chaos.
But I believe you should be informed about it, because when the sinister agenda is finally accomplished and everything unravels…only those who know this secret information will survive and thrive. It has already given me nightmares for 4 days straight…and it’s something “top secret”….. 
>>Click here to get the inside scoop on this conspiracy<<
It also connects the dots on the “terrible incidents” that happened just when Obama is after the biggest gun-control push in decades. 
This has nothing to do with just mass murders, or preparing for war……or merely attempting to “dry up the market” for gun-owning citizens, depriving them their right to keep and bear arms.
Their real agenda is something much more sinister than that. It’s something that will make even the most tough-minded  patriot’s blood curl. 
The truth is fast unraveling, and you can get the full scoop below:
>>Click here to get the REAL truth about the gun-grabbing 
conspiracy<<
P.S. More than 325,123 people watched the video, and some are now screaming on Facebook that it’s THE “Conspiracy of the Century”.

Tras las armas químicas en Siria, ¿qué quieren los países involucrados?

(CNN) – El efecto dominó después del supuesto ataque con armas químicas en Siria se siente en el mundo: La retórica se agrava con la propuesta de castigar a Siria, aunque el régimen ha negado el uso de armas químicas, y mientras los aliados del presidente Bachar al Asad acusan a las fuerzas rebeldes del ataque químico.
Entre tanto, las fuerzas rebeldes —que también niegan responsabilidad por el ataque—- informaron que 1.300 personas murieron en los ataques a las afueras de Damasco.
Los corresponsables de CNN y los expertos explican las diferentes posiciones de algunas naciones clave involucradas, algunas preparándose o advirtiendo en contra de los ataques militares internacionales en Siria.
Estados Unidos
EE.UU. tiene que hacer algo después del uso prolongado de armas químicas, después de haber reconocido que el régimen de al Asad es responsable de los ataques.
Pero también se enfrenta a un dilema: Lanzar el tipo de campaña de gran escala necesaria para derrocar el régimen sirio sería prolongado, y el remplazo de Bachar al Asad podría ser incluso peor debido a que los grupos más exitoso de la oposición están alineados con al Qaeda.
Así que la intervención militar tiene que ser lo suficiente grande para castigar a Asad pero no tanto como para derrocarlo. Para los expertos, esta es la decisión menos mala que se puede tomar.
China
Es un aliado antiguo de Siria y quiere mantener su influencia. China ha dicho que se opone firmemente al uso de armas químicas y apoya a los inspectores de armas de la ONU; quiere que sean capaces de hacer su trabajo y ha advertido sobre el posible prejuicio en los resultados.
También ha dicho que quiere la paz y ha sugerido continuar con la Segunda Conferencia de Ginebra en Siria, una iniciativa que actualmente se encuentra en duda.
“Una solución política siempre es la única manera real de resolver el tema de Siria”, dijo el ministro de Relaciones Exteriores, Wang Yi.
Rusia
No quiere repetir Libia o Iraq. Mucho se ha dicho acerca de Rusia tratando de proteger al gobierno de Siria por su interés militar y económico en el país, pero el objetivo principal de la política rusa es bloquear los esfuerzos de EU para darle forma a la región.
El gobierno ruso no cree que las revoluciones, guerras y cambios de régimen puedan llevar a la estabilidad y la democracia. Casi siempre apunta a la Primavera Árabe y a la guerra que condujo Estados Unidos en Iraq como la evidencia.
Rusia tampoco confía en las intenciones de EE.UU. en la región, sino que las preocupaciones humanitarias son casi siempre usadas como una excusa para perseguir los intereses políticos y económicos de Estados Unidos.
Ha mantenido su influencia a través del conflicto usando su veto en el Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas para blindar a Siria de la presión internacional. Pero no está claro si EE.UU. y sus aliados se apoyarán en un mandato de la ONU para lanzar un ataque militar.
Irán
Para Irán, Siria es un aliado estratégico. Su postura, como lo dibujó el ministro de Relaciones Exteriores, Javad Zarif, y el nuevo presidente, Hassan Rouhani, es que el gobierno de Siria es víctima de complots internacionales.
El gobierno iraní cree que el Occidente y casi todos los países árabes están confabulados en un intento para implementar un cambio de régimen en Siria. Ha dicho que el objetivo principal de este complot es convertir a la región en un lugar más seguro para Israel.
Siria también fue el único aliado arábigo de Irán durante su guerra de ocho años contra Iraq y Siria junto con las áreas controladas por Hezbollah de Líbano están consideradas la primera línea de defensa de Teherán en caso de un ataque en Irán por Israel o el Occidente.
Así que el interés de Irán en Siria está motivado por su larga amistad, así como la importancia estratégica de Teherán.
Gran Bretaña
El primer ministro David Cameron está empujando un voto en el Parlamento para fomar parte de la acción militar en respuesta a los ataques de Siria. El político ha dicho que cualquier respuesta necesita ser proporcionada, legal y dirigida a disuadir el uso de armas químicas.
Gran Bretaña también ha tomado un rol prominente en los esfuerzos para asegurar una resolución de Naciones Unidas en el asunto.
“Es tiempo de que el Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas asuma sus responsabilidades en Siria, que por más de dos años y medio ha fallado en hacer”, dijo el secretario de relaciones exteriores, William Hague.
Hague ha advertido, sin embargo, que incluso si China y Rusia bloquean una resolución del consejo de seguridad, Gran Bretaña y otras naciones “de cualquier manera tiene una responsabilidad” para actuar.
Jordania
Quiere mantenerse lejos de problemas. Jordania quiere una solución diplomática pero también quiere llevar a cabo un encuentro militar que involucre a Estados Unidos, las naciones europeas, Arabia Saudita, Turquía y Qatar.
A pesar de este encuentro, Jordania no quiere verse como el país que sea anfitrión de un encuentro en el que se decida que habrá una intervención en Siria.
El gobierno jordano ha manifestado que esto los pondría en una situación peligrosa con posibles ataques de misiles de Siria y ataques de terror precipitados del régimen sirio.
Es un secreto a voces que Arabia Saudita está usando a Jordania para contrabandear armas a Siria para los rebeldes. Jordania ha dicho que está haciendo todo lo posible para prevenirlo.
Jordania está vulnerable, zarandeada por la Primavera Árabe y las tensiones internacionales como las acusaciones de corrupción de las autoridades y un rey poco popular… solo quiere mantenerse lejos de problemas.
Francia
El president Francois Hollande ha dicho que Francia tiene un deber de proteger a los civiles en Siria y quiere incrementar la ayuda militar a los grupos de la oposición. El político también ha dicho que Francia está “listo para castigar a aquellos que han tomado la decisión de lanzar gas a esta gente inocente”.
Pero el viernes, el presidente de Francia Francois Hollande le dijo al periódico francés Le Monde que la intervención debería ser limitada y no debería de incluir el derrocamiento de al Asad.
Israel
El Primer Ministro Benjamin Netanyahu ha dicho que está listo para cualquier escenario y está advirtiendo a Siria que responderá con fuerza si Israel es atacado.
Arabia Saudita
El Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores de Arabia Saudita Al Faisal dijo que el gobierno sirio ha perdido la identidad arábiga y ha llamado a tomar “acción firme y seria”.
 
IRS continues to hound Tea Party Patriots
By Washington Times (DC) August 30, 2013 12:25
The initial firestorm surrounding the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups may have subsided, but tea party leaders say the situation has only become worse and may lead to more lawsuits against the embattled agency.
New documents show the depth of information the IRS is seeking from Tea Party Patriots, a leading conservative group that first applied for 501(c)(4) tax-exempt status in late 2010 and one of many organizations singled out for extra scrutiny by the Obama administration.
An IRS letter sent to the group last week and obtained by The Washington Times contains a laundry list of requests related to virtually all the group’s activities, including its involvement in the 2012 election cycle and its get-out-the-vote efforts, fundraising activities, all radio and TV advertising, and other information.
The IRS also is asking for detailed financial records, including “the amounts and percentages of your total expenses that were for fundraising activities in the tax year 2011, 2012 and 2013.”
The Aug. 20 request came as a shock to Tea Party Patriots, which said it already has provided to the IRS extensive information on all of its activities and thinks it is long past time to receive a “yes” or “no” answer.situation as a “phony scandal,” conservative organizations still are targets, said Cleta Mitchell, a Washington, D.C., lawyer representing the Tea Party Patriots and several other conservative groups.
“This is tantamount to an audit. This is the continuation of the same thing they’ve been doing for four years. They have not stopped,” she said Thursday. “Tea Party Patriots has responded to all of the requests of the IRS to date, but that has gotten us nowhere. They just keep asking more questions. We are now looking at potential legal remedies, but that’s not easy. Congress has made it quite difficult to sue the IRS.”
The letter, according to the IRS, is simply an attempt to gather information necessary for the agency to determine whether the Tea Party Patriots is eligible for tax-exempt status under current law. Meeting the tax-exempt criteria requires that a group’s “primary” function and activities not be political in nature.
Since news of the IRS targeting scandal broke this spring, the agency also argues that it has made significant progress in sifting through a backlog of groups — including the Tea Party Patriots — that have been waiting years for a decision.
As of last week, the IRS said, it has closed 64 percent of outstanding cases and approved 65 of 85 organizations for 501(c)(4) status.
But for the groups still awaiting approval, last week’s letter represents nothing more than a delaying tactic, said Jenny Beth Martin, president and co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots.
Reviewing information on the group’s activities in the 2012 election cycle pushes an IRS decision even farther down the road. It also raises the possibility that the organization’s future efforts, including in the upcoming 2014 political contests, also will be subject to detailed review as part of a never-ending approval process.
“What that letter said to me is, ‘We got away with discriminating against you and we’re not stopping.’ [The letter] comes as a complete surprise,” Ms. Martin said.
On Thursday, the IRS said it couldn’t comment specifically on the Tea Party Patriots case, but did defend its information-gathering efforts and argued that it has made great strides in its tax-exempt approval process.
The letter also is proof that, while President Obama and other liberals have referred to the
“There are instances when IRS must seek more information before we can determine if an organization’s application for tax-exempt status meets the necessary legal requirements,” the agency said in a statement. “Effort and care has been taken to limit the number and nature of these follow-up questions to focus only on the information that we need in order to properly evaluate the application.”
The agency also referred back to an Aug. 9 statement from acting IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel, who said that political campaign intervention will be reviewed without regard to specific “labels,” indicating that tea party or other conservative groups no longer will face extra scrutiny.
In its attempts to clear the backlog of agencies awaiting tax-exempt status, the IRS in June — after news of its political targeting had come to light — offered a deal to organizations such as the Tea Party Patriots.
In exchange for agreeing that no more than 40 percent of its “spending and time” would be related to political campaigns, a group’s tax-exempt application would be expedited.
The Tea Party Patriots has yet to accept that deal, and Ms. Martin said it has no intention of doing so.
“I’m being punished because I didn’t take them up on their made-up expedited process,” she said.
Twenty-nine applicants have taken part in that process in recent months, according to the IRS

KRAUTHAMMER: IS ‘HUMILIATED’ OBAMA BEING ‘SHAMED’ INTO WAR? Fred Lucas
Britain’s rejection of taking action against the Syrian regime is a “complete humiliation” for President Barack Obama, syndicated columnist and Fox News commentator Charles Krauthammer said Thursday.
Obama has been in consultation with several heads of state, including British Prime Minister David Cameron, about a military strike against Syrian President Bashar Assad, who the government believes to have been behind the chemical weapons attack that killed hundreds near Damascus last week. A United Nations investigation has not made a determination.
“It is a complete humiliation for the Obama administration,” Krauthammer said on Fox News. “Forget about the merits of what Obama wants to do which I think it’s a bad idea. But let’s assume it’s a good idea. This involves the elementary conduct of international diplomacy, trying to get some allies aboard so you don’t act unilaterally.
“So who’s the main ally in the world who’s been with us in every trench for the last 100 years? The British. And now the British have voted against us,” Krauthammer continued. “The other supposed ally was the French, President Hollande, and now he’s saying we got to wait for the report from the U.N. inspectors which will be early next week.”
He pointed out that Democrats, including Obama, previously ridiculed the Bush administration for supposedly taking unilateral action in Iraq.
“So here is Obama and the Democrats who railed against the Bush administration for its supposedly unilateral invasion of Iraq where we had 48 allies for a mission that involved boots on the ground, a real invasion, a real war. And here’s Obama trying to gather an ally or two for a pinprick and he gets nothing.”
In his Washington Post column published earlier Thursday, Krauthammer said the Obama administration was being “shamed into action.”
“Want to send a message? Call Western Union. A Tomahawk missile is for killing. A serious instrument of war demands a serious purpose,” Krauthammer said, later adding, “Moreover, a mere punitive pinprick after which Assad emerges from the smoke intact and emboldened would demonstrate nothing but U.S. weakness and ineffectiveness.”
Watch Krauthammer on Fox News, via NewsBusters:
In his column, Krauthammer explained what in his view would be a better solution.
“Depriving Assad of his total control of the air and making resupply from Iran and Russia far more difficult would alter the course of the war. That is a serious purpose,” he wrote.
The White House has consulted Congress on the matter, including in a conference call between key administration officials such as Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and National Security Adviser Susan Rice, with 15 members of the House and Senate, including leaders, chairs and ranking members of the germane committees.
Houser Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) this week sent a letter to Obama that was widely viewed as implied consent for action, while also a request that the administration provide more information to Congress. However, other members of Congress, on both sides of the aisle, have said the administration must have congressional authorization before taking action.
Krauthammer thought there should be a greater role from Congress.
“It’s rather shameful that while the British prime minister recalled Parliament to debate possible airstrikes — late Thursday, Parliament actually voted down British participation — Obama has made not a gesture in that direction,” Krauthammer wrote. “If you are going to do this, Mr. President, do it constitutionally. And seriously. This is not about you and your conscience. It’s about applying American power to do precisely what you now deny this is about — helping Assad go, as you told the world he must. Otherwise, just send Assad a text message. You might incur a roaming charge, but it’s still cheaper than a three-day, highly telegraphed, perfectly useless demonstration strike.”

Envie sus Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios a lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ 

 

Anuncios

No 471 “En mi opinion” Agosto 30, 2013

agosto 30, 2013

No 471  “En mi opinión” Agosto 30, 2013.  
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  “IN GOD WE TRUST”   
Envie sus Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios a  lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

NBC poll: Nearly 80 percent [Plus 1 me LRGM] want congressional approval on Syria
By Mark Murray, Senior Political Editor, NBC News
Nearly 80 percent of Americans believe President Barack Obama should receive congressional approval before using force in Syria, but the nation is divided over the scope of any potential strike, a new NBC News poll shows.
The nation loses a key ally in its consensus building efforts, as Britain’s parliament votes against supporting any U.S. strikes in Syria. NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reports.
Fifty percent of Americans believe the United States should not intervene in the wake of suspected chemical weapons attacks by Syrian President Bashar Assad, according to the poll. But the public is more supportive of military action when it’s limited to launching cruise missiles from U.S. naval ships – 50 percent favor that kind of intervention, while 44 percent oppose it.
Read the full poll here (.pdf)
The two-day survey was conducted as the Obama administration weighs launching strikes against Syria for the alleged use of chemicals weapons in its violent civil war, as well as amid growing demands by U.S. lawmakers that Congress should have a voice in any debate to authorize force.
On Thursday night, the Obama administration briefedcongressional leaders in its effort to make the case for military intervention.
Saul Loeb / AFP –
Demonstrators march on Aug. 29 near the White House to protest possible U.S. military intervention in Syria.
Also on Thursday, Britain’s parliamentrejected a motion urging an international response to the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government.
In this new NBC poll, 50 percent of respondents oppose the United States taking military action in response to Syria’s suspected use of chemical weapons, compared with 42 percent who support it.
And 58 percent agree with the statement that the use of chemical weapons by anycountry violates a “red line” that requires a significant U.S. response, including the possibility of military action.
Still, a whopping 79 percent of respondents – including nearly seven-in-10 Democrats and 90 percent of Republicans – say the president should be required to receive congressional approval before taking any action.
The poll also finds that only 21 percent think taking action against the Syrian government is in the national interest of the United States. By comparison, 33 percent disagree and 45 percent don’t know enough to have an opinion.
And just 27 percent say that U.S. military force will improve the situation for Syrian civilians, versus 41 percent who say it won’t.

NBC poll: Nearly 80 percent want congressional approval on Syria
By Mark Murray, Senior Political Editor, NBC News
Nearly 80 percent of Americans believe President Barack Obama should receive congressional approval before using force in Syria, but the nation is divided over the scope of any potential strike, a new NBC News poll shows.
The nation loses a key ally in its consensus building efforts, as Britain’s parliament votes against supporting any U.S. strikes in Syria. NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reports.
Fifty percent of Americans believe the United States should not intervene in the wake of suspected chemical weapons attacks by Syrian President Bashar Assad, according to the poll. But the public is more supportive of military action when it’s limited to launching cruise missiles from U.S. naval ships – 50 percent favor that kind of intervention, while 44 percent oppose it.
Read the full poll here (.pdf)
The two-day survey was conducted as the Obama administration weighs launching strikes against Syria for the alleged use of chemicals weapons in its violent civil war, as well as amid growing demands by U.S. lawmakers that Congress should have a voice in any debate to authorize force.
On Thursday night, the Obama administration briefedcongressional leaders in its effort to make the case for military intervention.
Saul Loeb / AFP – Getty Images
Demonstrators march on Aug. 29 near the White House to protest possible U.S. military intervention in Syria.
Also on Thursday, Britain’s parliamentrejected a motion urging an international response to the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government.
In this new NBC poll, 50 percent of respondents oppose the United States taking military action in response to Syria’s suspected use of chemical weapons, compared with 42 percent who support it.
And 58 percent agree with the statement that the use of chemical weapons by anycountry violates a “red line” that requires a significant U.S. response, including the possibility of military action.
Still, a whopping 79 percent of respondents – including nearly seven-in-10 Democrats and 90 percent of Republicans – say the president should be required to receive congressional approval before taking any action.
The poll also finds that only 21 percent think taking action against the Syrian government is in the national interest of the United States. By comparison, 33 percent disagree and 45 percent don’t know enough to have an opinion.
And just 27 percent say that U.S. military force will improve the situation for Syrian civilians, versus 41 percent who say it won’t.
Slideshow: Syria uprising
A look back at the conflict that has overtaken the country.
Launch slideshow
Obama’s job approval at 44 percent
The NBC poll also shows that President Obama’s overall job-approval rating has dropped one point since last month to 44 percent, which is tied for his lowest mark in past NBC News/Wall Street Journal surveys.
He gets even lower marks on foreign policy: Just 41 percent approve of his handling of the issue – an all-time low.
And only 35 percent approve of his handling of the situation in Syria.
The NBC poll was conducted Aug. 28-29 of 700 adults (including 210 cell phone-only respondents), and it has a margin of plus-minus 3.7 percentage points.

RICARDO Samitier: Cagalera en grande en WASHINGTON
1.     Como Todos Sabemos Los POLITIQUEROS Están De Vacaciones De Verano… El Capitolio de Washington esta VACIO…
2.     Obama En Contra de la Constitución Desea ordenar Un Ataque A Siria…
3.     ¿Qué Hacen Los Politiqueros Republicanos???…SEGUIR DE VACACIONES…
4.     Debían estar  TODOS en el CAPITOLIO de WASHINGTON para ABRIR
UN DEBATE acusando a Obama de “Planear Violar La Constitución”…
5.     Pero NO… SIGUEN DE VACACIONES… cuando la patria está en PELIGRO…
6.   VÁYANSE AL CARAJO… TODOS… incluyendo los 3 cubanos…
ESTADOS UNIDOS SIN CREDIBILIDAD EN EL MUNDO.
Los Politiqueros De Estados Unidos Destruyeron Toda La Credibilidad…
De Las Republicas Democráticas… Usa Es Considerado El País Más Hipócrita…
Obama Es Considerado Un Socialista… Que Fue Puesto En La Presidencia Para Realizar Una “Agenda Secreta” De Destruir Los EE.UU.
Ha Sido Una Meticulosa Obra De Los Comunistas De Los USA En Acuerdo Con Los De Fuera… Por Ejemplo: La “Misión Carter” De Supervisar Las Elecciones En Todos Los Países; Exige Que Los Carnets De Votantes Tengan Foto… Todo Lo Contrario en USA; El Gobierno Acusa A Los Estados Que Exigen Fotos…
Usa Ya No Tiene Ni Siguiera El Apoyo Incondicional De Inglaterra…  
La ONU… Dentro De Poco Va A Poder Condenar A Estados Unidos… Como País Agresor…

Buchanan to Newsmax: Obama’s Syrian Strike Would be Impeachable
Thursday, 29 Aug 2013 02:39 PM
By Jim Meyers and Kathleen WalterAny attack on Syria without Congressional approval would be an impeachable act, political commentator Pat Buchanan has told Newsmax in an exclusive interview.
The former presidential candidate and best-selling author also says he prefers “the devil we know” in Syria — Bashar Assad — to the al-Qaida elements he asserts are leading the rebellion against his regime.
Buchanan has been a senior advisor to three presidents, a two-time candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, and the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000.
President Obama has signaled that he is considering a strike on Syria amid administration claims the Assad regime has used chemical weapons. 
In an exclusive interview with Newsmax TV on Thursday, Buchanan says his chief concern about a potential strike is that “the president of the United States is threatening a war and planning a war he has no right to wage. The Congress of the United States alone has the power to authorize war or declare war and it has not done so.
“President Obama is usurping the authority of the Congress first and foremost and he appears about to launch an unconstitutional and unnecessary war. So the President should be called to account by the Congress and told: no war without our approval. That’s the way the Constitution works.

“The key figure is Speaker of the House John Boehner, who should call the House of Representatives back into session on Monday and instruct the president directly: Mr. President, you have no authority and no right to launch acts of war against Syria against whom we have not declared or authorized any war. We are calling on you not to engage in what would clearly be an impeachable act – starting a war against a country without the approval of the Congress when you are asked directly not to do so.

“If the president launched an unnecessary and unconstitutional war, striking a country against whom we have not declared war and has not attacked us, that is de facto an impeachable act that could lead to an open-ended war, the consequences of which we cannot even see.”

The White House has talked about the moral justification for a strike. Asked if there is also a legal justification, Buchanan responds: “There’s no constitutional justification right now in my judgment for a strike on Syria. The U.N. Security Council has not authorized a war, the Congress of the United States has not authorized a war.

“I do agree that the use of poison gas by the Syrian government — if it was President Assad who authorized it — is an obscene act which the international community and the Security Council should take up. But we don’t know who ordered it; we don’t know how it was delivered; we don’t know if Assad knew about it; we don’t know if Assad ordered it.

“But if he did, this is an issue that ought to be taken up by the international community and the Security Council, not the United States of America unilaterally and certainly not the president of the United States based on the flimsy evidence we have seen to date.”

Obama declared unequivocally on Wednesday that the Syrian government was responsible for the chemical attacks on. However, several U.S. officials are now using the phrase “not a slam dunk” to describe the intelligence picture. 

Buchanan comments: “I would not understand or comprehend if Assad, no matter how bad a man he may be, would be so stupid as to order a chemical weapons attack on civilians in his own country when the immediate consequence might be that he would be at war with the United States.

“But what the United States should do is quite clear: Gather all the evidence through the U.N., gather all the evidence through our intelligence, take this to the Security Council the same way President Kennedy through Adlai Stevenson took the [evidence] during the Cuban Missile Crisis. We had our photographs, we showed the world what we had, we proved the missiles were in Cuba.
“That is the constitutional and legal way to do this. It is not to act in panic because John Kerry is shocked at the pictures he saw on YouTube.”
Buchanan said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid should call the Senate into session and “if he believes we should go to war, authorize it.”

“That is what George H. W. Bush did before he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait. That is what George W. Bush did. I was against that war on Iraq but the president won the authority from Congress so it was a constitutional and legitimate war no matter that I did not like it.”
If Obama does attack Syria without approval, “it is a clear, unconstitutional, illegal act,” Buchanan reiterated. “If the president did this, he would be a rogue president.”
Buchanan says he disagrees with former ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton’s assertion that we should seek to take out Assad.
“Look who is on the other side of this war,” he tells Newsmax. “We have al-Qaida elements that are murderous, that have tortured people, that have killed Christians, and they’re the leading force in the elements that are fighting against Assad.
“Behind Assad we have the Iranians and Hezbollah and the Russians. It is not our war. Quite frankly, I would prefer the devil we know, which is Assad, to the devil we don’t know, which is that crowd in the rebels who are torturing and killing people and engaging in atrocities of their own.”
Buchanan also says the Republicans have “the power of the purse” and should block spending by those agencies that would implement Obamacare.
And regarding immigration reform, Buchanan doubts that the GOP-controlled House will go along with the amnesty that President Obama wants and the Senate has approved.
He adds: “I believe and hope that the House of Representatives will deny amnesty, deny legal rights to people who’ve broken into our country and broken our laws.”© 2013 Newsmax.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/buchanan-obama-syria-impeachable/2013/08/29/id/522972?s=al&promo_code=14B1C-1#ixzz2dPVS9ql7 
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Obama: “Prez Can’t Deploy Military W/O Congress”. Obama: “I’m Deploying Military W/O Congress”
In a recent article by educator Thomas Sowell, he stated: “Like other truly talented phonies, Barack Obama concentrates his skills on the effect of his words on other people — most of whom do not have the time to become knowledgeable about the things he is talking about. Whether what he says bears any relationship to the facts is politically irrelevant.” Talented phony is a gross understatement when speaking about Barack Hussein Obama.  We still have no proof of his birth and citizenship, his Social Security Number is fraudulent along with his Selective Service registration form.  There is strong reason to believe that he was enrolled as an Indonesian citizen who received federal aid while attending Occidental College.  Everything about him reeks of being a phony, an imposter and a usurper. As Sowell stated, Obama concentrates on his skill of his words.  So let’s look at his own words when it comes to the legal right of the President of the United States to take military action without the approval of Congress. In 2007, when Obama was launching his presidential campaign, he told the Boston Globe: “The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.” “It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action.” He went on to say that the only legal way the president can take military action without the consent of Congress is in instances of self-defense when the US is being directly threatened. In 2011, Obama took military action in Libya without the consent of Congress and the US was not in any immediate threat of danger or attack.  This is typical of someone who cares little about living up to their own words as only a phony would do. Obama’s side-kick, Joe Biden is just as bad.  In 1998, then Sen. Joe Biden spoke on the Senate floor, stating: “Given this, the only logical conclusion is that the framers intended to grant to Congress the power to initiate all hostilities, even limited wars.” In 2007, Biden stated: “The president has no constitutional authority to take this country to war… unless we’re attacked or unless there is proof that we are about to be attacked,” In 2011, Biden supported Obama’s actions using our military in Libya without the consent of Congress. Now, Obama is contemplating using military force in Syria because of their civil war and use of chemical weapons. He does not have the approval of Congress, yet and I heard Biden on the news fully supporting Obama if he does get us involved without first going through Congress. How can a nation trust its leaders if they continually say one thing and do the opposite?  It’s not just a one-time thing either, as it seems to be the norm with both Obama and Biden.  I know that many politicians, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, etc. make campaign promises that they never keep and probably never intended to keep, but next to Lyndon B. Johnson, Obama is the most lying and deceiving president in my life time.  And like Johnson, Obama is guilty of high crimes against the US, however, like Johnson, he will never be held accountable for those crimes, while the American people and our military personnel pay the consequences and live with the aftermath.
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/12323/obama-prez-cant-deploy-military-wo-congress-obama-im-deploying-military-wo-congress/#zwr7uySs3SdpV7MM.99

If Attacking Iraq Was So Wrong, Why Is Attacking Syria Right? 29 August 2013 / Marilyn Assenheim Remember the explosion of pitchforks and torches, brandished by an infuriated, leftist mob over George W. Bush’s handling of Iraq? The screeching from the lap-dog media and politicians that spun in the wind of public sentiment, as to whether they were for or against U.S. military action, was incessant. Now, The Lyin’ King has waggled his flaccid fist at Syria. He is in the process of committing the United States to unilateral military action. No consent from Congress. No U.N. authorization. Ah, how quickly libs forget. Or, rather, how quickly they expect the rest of us to. The Lyin’ King’s Secretary of State declared that there is “undeniable evidence” that Bashar al-Assad used weapons of mass destruction on his own people. No evidence for this assertion has been offered by the regime. Weapons of mass destruction? Haven’t we been to this rodeo before? The left still flagellates Bush for alleging “non-existent” weapons of mass destruction as the basis for an “illegal” war. Except that it wasn’t illegal. Both houses of Congress and the U.N.  passed resolutions in favor of the act. Aerial photographs of Soviet trucks shifting cargo from Iraq into Syria were widely circulated at that time. Could those deliveries to Syria have been the same weapons of mass destruction that John Kerry denied existence of back then? Yet insists on now? The U.K. Independent points out that by taking up the cudgel against Bashar al-Assad, The Lyin’ King is joining forces with al-Qaeda against a common enemy: “The men who destroyed so many thousands on 9/11 will then be fighting alongside the very nation whose innocents they so cruelly murdered almost exactly 12 years ago. Quite an achievement for Obama…This, of course, will not be trumpeted by the Pentagon or the White House – nor, I suppose, by al-Qa’ida – though they are both trying to destroy Bashar. So are the Nusra front, one of al-Qa’ida’s affiliates.” It won’t be trumpeted by the MSM either. The MSM won’t ask “if attacking Iraq was so wrong, why is attacking Syria right? What is it The Liar-In-Chief stands to gain?” Instead of furious denouncements and insistence upon years more fact finding heaped upon George Bush by the U.N. they are now pleading with The Lyin’ King to hold off on taking any action… for four more days. According to The Weekly Standard, the U.N. doesn’t know who-did-what-to-whom-with-what and they are begging for a few more days to find out. Then, presumably, the Nobel Peace Prize recipient–In-Chief will be free to inflict whatever damage he can with our truncated military might. If one has never considered the question before, now might be a really good time to ask “why is America is still funding the United Nations?” They haven’t had a democratic majority in decades yet America is still the United Nations’ largest contributor. What the U.N. clearly expects from America is our real estate, money, acceptance of their abuse and for us to take over military activity anywhere they can’t keep the peace…which is everywhere. The Lyin’ King’s Arab Spring has become the winter of the world’s discontent. As liberals always do, The Lyin’ King waves a loaded gun around trying to look tough. Now he’s stuck with his “red-line” threat against the al-Assad regime in Syria. Despite a slavish media, frantically trying to extricate his feet from his mouth, The Lyin’ King is on stage, front and center. And it isn’t just a PC-whipped America that is monitoring the action. The Lyin’ King is being carefully observed on the world stage, by enemies and friends alike. And he is openly joining our enemy. The world’s onlookers don’t care about his historic presidency, his easily-bruised ego or what color he is. They just want to see how far The Great Satan can now be pushed. Right off the edge of the cliff, apparently.
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2013/08/attacking-iraq-wrong-attacking-syria-right/#7QzTwTu7uryrCS9Z.99

British Opposition Voting Against Cameron’s Syria Strike Plan.
Thursday, 29 Aug 2013 11:00 AM
 LONDON — British Prime Minister David Cameron faced an uphill struggle on Thursday to secure parliament’s approval for military intervention in Syria after the main opposition party said it would vote against the motion.
Opening the debate to lawmakers recalled from their summer recess, Cameron said what was at stake was “one of the most abhorrent uses of chemical weapons in a century.”
He insisted that taking action against the Syrian regime’s chemical weapons capability was “not about taking sides in the Syrian conflict.”
But the outcome of the vote hung in the balance after a party source said the center-left opposition Labour Party had been having “increasing doubts about the opaque nature of the government’s motion.”
The motion that lawmakers are being asked to approve “does not mention anything about compelling evidence” that a suspected chemical attack last week outside the Syrian capital was launched by President Bashar al-Assad’s forces, the source said.
The Syrian regime strongly denies it was responsible and blames opposition fighters for the attack.
Under growing pressure from Members of Parliament who feared Britain was rushing into action, the government was forced to agree late Wednesday that Britain would not take part in any military strikes before United Nations inspectors report back on the gas attacks believed to have killed hundreds near Damascus.
While the political temperature rose, Britain dispatched six Typhoon fighter jets to its Akrotiri base on Cyprus as a “protective measure,” although the defense ministry said the planes will not take part in any direct military action.
Cameron’s government was said to be outraged by the decision of Labour leader Ed Miliband to change his stance on Wednesday — having previously offered the government conditional backing for military action.
The government has been forced to dilute the vote to one on merely the principle of military action.
The motion to be debated says that a final vote should only take place after U.N. inspectors report on the use of chemical weapons in Syria.
U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon said Thursday the investigators would leave Syria by Saturday and report to him immediately.
Cameron does not have a clear majority in parliament and his Conservative party is forced to rely on the far smaller Liberal Democrats to rule in a coalition.
With British lawmakers now facing the prospect of having to vote for a second time on a different day — possibly early next week — it raises the possibility that the United States will go it alone with missile strikes, without involvement from Britain, its main military ally.
Muddying the waters, the government also said it had received legal advice that under international law, Britain could still launch military action even without a mandate from the U.N. Security Council.
Miliband is pushing ahead with his own amendment that calls for a greater U.N. role before any military action is authorized, and has not said whether the party will support the government if that is rejected.
He said: “I’m clear that this is a very grave decision to take military action that the House of Commons would be making and I didn’t think that that decision should be made on an artificial timetable when the House of Commons wouldn’t even have seen the evidence today from the U.N. weapons inspectors.
“I’m determined to learn the lessons of the past, including Iraq, and we can’t have the House of Commons being asked to write a blank check to the PM for military action.”
Cameron will try to convince that targeted strikes would punish the Assad regime for its alleged use of chemical weapons and deter any further attacks.
He will also insist that any strikes would not drag Britain into a wider conflict.
Haunted by their experience of the war in Iraq, a growing number of MPs — including some within Cameron’s own center-right Conservative Party — are reluctant to back British military involvement.
In 2003, parliament gave then Prime Minister Tony Blair a mandate to join the U.S.-led offensive in Iraq on the basis of allegations that dictator Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
The weapons never materialized and Britain became embroiled in the war for years.
© AFP 2013
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmaxworld.com/GlobalTalk/syria-conflict-britain-debate/2013/08/29/id/522894?s=al&promo_code=14B1C-1#ixzz2dPVyZY2B 
Alert: What Is Your Risk for a Heart Attack? Find Out Now

[?] JOE BIDEN THREATENS TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT [?]
By: John Hayward  8/28/2013 04:24 PM
It may seem shocking to hear Vice President Joe Biden threatening to begin impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama, but Biden is clearly a man of principle.  As you’ll hear him explain about five and a half minutes into this clip, he assembled a team of Constitutional scholars to buttress his own experience with teaching classes about the separation of powers in the United States government.  He knows the threat of impeachment is extremely serious, which is why he doesn’t make it lightly.
“The president has… no…. Constitutional… authority to take this nation to war against a country of 70 million people unless we’re attacked, or unless there is proof that we are about to be attacked,” Biden declared, loud and clear.  ”And if he does, I would move to impeach him.  The House, obviously, has to do that.  But I would lead an effort to impeach him.”
“This Administration has damaged us to a degree that no other Administration has in American history,” Biden declared.  ”We have no credibility.”  He called President Obama’s effort to unilaterally declare war on Syria without Congressional approval “unconscionable,” and stressed the importance of finding ways to “make it more difficult for these cowboys to go to war.”
The host of the segment, Chris Matthews, agreed with Biden’s attitude, expressing contempt for Obama’s loose talk about “weapons of mass destruction” and “regime change” as causes for military action.
This is an absolutely stunning development.  I can only assume that Biden’s determination to enforce the lawful Constitutional separation of powers will give President Obama pause as he prepares to unilaterally…
Oh, wait, sorry.  This clip’s from 2007, and two-fisted Constitutional scholar Joe Biden was talking about impeaching George Bush to stop him from attacking Iran to halt its nuclear program.  Everything’s different now, because we have Barack Obama as President, some “red lines” are redder than others, and we don’t have a Constitution any more.

John Boehner Is Ordering Republicans To Fund ObamaCare! The Western Center for Journalism.
       Boehner has thrown down the gauntlet and now that John Boehner has played his hand, we – the American people – must play ours. 
       Our elected officials must make a choice, and they need to make it now. Let them know that they can either do what Mr. Boehner wants, or they can do what the American people want and DEFUND OBAMACARE. 
Is The Federal Government Really Hiring “An Army Of ObamaCare Detectives.” 
       You’ve already heard the news that government agents will be given the authority under ObamaCare to barge into your home, and you already know about the “ObamaCare Navigators,” … the Obama-bots and so-called “Community Organizers” (and potentially even people with criminal records) who will be given access to your most private financial information. 
       But now the Daily Mail UK is reporting that the “Feds are building a detective squad to target consumers and companies that don’t follow Obamacare’s rules.” 
       Their words, not ours… 
       The Daily Mail goes on to say: “More than 1,600 new employees hired by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources in the aftermath of ObamaCare’s passage include just two described as ‘consumer safety’ officers, but 86 tasked with ‘criminal investigating’ – indicating that the agency is building an army of detectives to sleuth out violations of a law that many in Congress who supported it still find confusing.” 
       John Boehner’s political schemes be damned. If he believes that keeping ObamaCare around, so he can pretend to fight it, is “good politics,” then our elected officials must be disabused of that idiotic notion here and now. 
       The insanity must end today. Simply put, unless we stop ObamaCare in the next 30 days, it will likely be here to stay and all of the nightmares that they told you could never happen will come true in short order. 
Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. 
If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.
More Shoes Are Dropping. Medicaid For Everyone Is Just Around The Corner. 
       Not only have health insurance premiums risen, on average, by more than $3600.00 since 2008, but major employers like UPS, the University of Virginia, and a number of local governments have just announced that they’ll be dropping coverage. They aren’t the first, they won’t be the last… and millions of people will be forced into the socialist single-payer pool. 
       Conservative icon Gary Bauer summed up what is going on: “This growing trend highlights another of the perverse incentives in ObamaCare: it encourages companies to end health care coverage entirely and dump entire families into ObamaCare’s exchange programs. This shouldn’t surprise anyone.” 
       “Barack Obama has spoken openly about his support for a socialist single-payer system, adding, ‘But I don’t think we’re going to be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately. There’s going to be potentially some transition process.'” 
       “ObamaCare is that ‘transition process’ of ‘eliminating employer coverage,’ one giant step in the ‘fundamental transformation’ of America into a European-style, socialist welfare state.” 
       But our fight to maintain the American way of live is winnable. Senator Ted Cruz recently said: “Republicans have the votes to make defunding possible,” and he’s right. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. If Republicans didn’t have the votes, Boehner wouldn’t be throwing down the gauntlet. 
       Boehner has made his move and now we must make ours. Win, lose or draw, we must make it clear to our elected officials that they must now make a choice. They can either side with John Boehner and Barack Obama, and fund ObamaCare, or they can side with the American people and defund it. 
       They have the votes… they can do it… it’s that simple. 
Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. 
If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.

Floyd Brown 
Pentagon Classifies Evangelical Christians, Catholics as “Extremists” Aug 28, 2013 By Todd Starnes
The Department of Defense classified Catholics and Evangelical Christians as religious extremists similar to Al-Qaeda, according to training materials obtained by the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty.FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK FOR CONSERVATIVE NEWS. CLICK HERE TO JOIN!The Pentagon also considered the Southern Poverty law Center’s “hate group” list a “reliable source” for determining extremism and labeled “Islamophobia” as a form of religious extremism.The revelations come just days after Judicial Watch discovered a separate Pentagon training document that depicted the Founding Fathers as extremists and conservative organizations as hate groups.The Chaplain Alliance uncovered in more than 1,500 pages of documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request after a U.S. Army training instructor told a Reserve unit based in Pennsylvania that Catholicism, Evangelical Christianity, Al Qaeda, Hamas, Sunni Muslims, and the Ku Klux Klan were examples of extremism.PENTAGON CALLS FOUNDING FATHERS EXTREMISTSCHECK OUT THE ARMY’S LIST OF DOMESTIC HATE GROUPS“The materials we obtained establish that the U.S. military violated its appropriate apolitical stance and engaged in a dishonorable mischaracterization of multiple faith groups,” said Ron Crews, executive director of the Chaplain Alliance, an organization that represents thousands of military chaplains.The documents show an unknown number of equal opportunity officers were trained at Fort Jackson, SC, using information obtained from the SPLC.The training material was made public after a soldier who attended the briefing alerted Chaplain Alliance.“He considers himself an Evangelical Christian and did not appreciate being classified with terrorists,” Crews said. “There was a pervasive attitude in the presentation that anything associated with religion is an extremist.”The soldier “produced the slides based on EO Leader’s Course Program of Instruction obtained from the Soldier Support Institute at Fort Jackson, South Carolina,” the document reads.In addition to the slide presentation, the Reserve unit was also shown a video provided by the SPLC and Teaching Tolerance. The trainer told her superior officers she showed the video because it was part of the “EO Advisor course curriculum.”Crews is calling on the Pentagon to stop relying on the Southern Poverty Law Center or any other group that considers mainline religious organizations to be extremist or terrorist groups.“Men and women of faith who have served the military faithfully for centuries shouldn’t be likened to those who have regularly threatened the peace and security of the United States,” Crews said. “The materials we have received verify that the military views the Southern Poverty Law Center as a reliable source for Equal Opportunity briefings.”The Pentagon did not return calls seeking comment. Last April, spokesman George Wright told Fox News the training briefing in Pennsylvania was an “isolated incident not condoned by the Department of the Army.”“This slide was not produced by the Army and certainly does not reflect our policy or doctrine,” he said. “It was produced by an individual without anyone in the chain of command’s knowledge or permission.”The Army said the slide was removed, the presenter apologized and they considered the matter closed.“Mr. Wright’s response is accurate but incomplete,” Crews told Fox News. “Yes, the one offensive slide was deleted, but how many other EO officers continue to use the SPLC as a source for training materials?”SARAH PALIN SAYS YOU NEED TODD’S LATEST BOOK – DISPATCHES FROM BITTER AMERICA. CLICK HERE TO GET YOUR COPY! Related posts:
Pentagon Labels Founding Fathers, Conservatives as Extremists
Army Labeled Evangelicals as Religious Extremists
Pentagon Grilled About Christians in Military
Lawmakers Want Army to Apologize for Attacks on Christians
Pentagon Blocks, Says it Will Free Access to Southern Baptist Website

America Assists al-Qaeda in Removing Bashar al-Assad
Posted 2 Hours Ago by Marilyn Assenheim filed under Email Featured, Middle East, National Security, Politics, Terrorism, War5 New Rule in Florida: (AUG 2013): If You Pay For Car Insurance You Better Read This… 1 Strange Tip for White Teeth Miami: Mom Publishes Free Teeth Whitening Secret that Angers Dentists Banks Lower Refi Rate Fannie Mae Launches Refi Plus Program Refinance Rates From 2.50% APR. Share11 Tweet6 0 Share22 Remember the explosion of pitchforks and torches, brandished by an infuriated, leftist mob over George W. Bush’s handling of Iraq? The screeching from the lap-dog media and politicians that spun in the wind of public sentiment, as to whether they were for or against U.S. military action, was incessant. Now, Obama is in the process of committing the United States to unilateral military action. No consent from Congress. No U.N. authorization. Ah, how quickly libs forget. Or, rather, how quickly they expect the rest of us to. The U.K. Independent points out that by taking up the cudgel against Bashar al-Assad, Obama is joining forces with al-Qaeda against a common enemy: “The men who destroyed so many thousands on 9/11 will then be fighting alongside the very nation whose innocents they so cruelly murdered almost exactly 12 years ago. Quite an achievement for Obama… This, of course, will not be trumpeted by the Pentagon or the White House — nor, I suppose, by al-Qa’ida — though they are both trying to destroy Bashar. So are the Nusra front, one of al-Qa’ida’s affiliates.” It won’t be trumpeted by the MSM either. The MSM won’t ask “if attacking Iraq was so wrong, why is attacking Syria right? What is it Obama stands to gain?” Instead of furious denouncements and insistence upon years more fact finding heaped upon George Bush by the U.N. they are now pleading with Obama to hold off on taking any action … for four more days. According to The Weekly Standard, the U.N. doesn’t know who-did-what-to-whom-with-what, and they are begging for a few more days to find out. Then, presumably, the Nobel Peace Prize Recipient-In-Chief will be free to inflict whatever damage he can with our truncated military might. If one has never considered the question before, now might be a really good time to ask “Why is America is still funding the United Nations?” They haven’t had a democratic majority in decades yet America is still the United Nations’ largest contributor. What the U.N. clearly expects from America is our real estate, money, acceptance of their abuse and for us to take over military activity anywhere they can’t keep the peace … which is everywhere. Obama’s Arab Spring has become the winter of the world’s discontent. As liberals always do, Obama waves a loaded gun around trying to look tough. Now he’s stuck with his “red-line” threat against the al-Assad regime in Syria. Despite a slavish media, frantically trying to extricate his feet from his mouth, Obama is on stage, front and center. And it isn’t just a PC-whipped America that is monitoring the action. Obama is being carefully observed on the world stage, by enemies and friends alike. And he is openly joining our enemy. The world’s onlookers don’t care about his historic presidency, his easily-bruised ego or what color he is. They just want to see how far The Great Satan can now be pushed. Right off the edge of the cliff, apparently. Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/08/america-assists-al-qaeda-removing-bashar-al-assad/#ixzz2dNqgbabx
Read more at http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/08/america-assists-al-qaeda-removing-bashar-al-assad/#lZJm1arA5U3DMv4b.99

Evangelical Christians Labeled as ‘Extremists’ by Pentagon  By Bobby Eberle 
The Pentagon is the nation’s hub for military activity. One would think this nerve center would be hard at work training the next generation of leaders to fight terrorists and other extremist groups. They are… except you might be very surprised at what the Pentagon is classifying as an “extremist” group.
According to a report by Todd Starnes, “The Department of Defense classified Catholics and Evangelical Christians as religious extremists similar to Al-Qaeda, according to training materials obtained by the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty.”
The revelations come just days after Judicial Watch discovered a separate Pentagon training document that depicted the Founding Fathers as extremists and conservative organizations as hate groups.
The Chaplain Alliance uncovered in more than 1,500 pages of documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request after a U.S. Army training instructor told a Reserve unit based in Pennsylvania that Catholicism, Evangelical Christianity, Al Qaeda, Hamas, Sunni Muslims, and the Ku Klux Klan were examples of extremism.
What is going on here? Why are these types of characterizations allowed in Barack Obama’s Department of Defense?
In the training manual, which was obtained by Judicial Watch, it is noted that “many extremists will talk of individual liberties, states’ rights, and how to make the world a better place.” Wow… does that sound extremist to you? The manual actually states that “the colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule” are an example of “extremist ideologies and movements.”
And here’s one thing to note: The military training manuals use the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a reference! Are you kidding me? As Starnes reports in another column, the SPLC is “a leftwing organization that has a history of labeling conservative Christian organizations like the Family Research Council as ‘hate groups.'”
“Men and women of faith who have served the military faithfully for centuries shouldn’t be likened to those who have regularly threatened the peace and security of the United States,” Ron Crews, executive director of the Chaplain Alliance, said. “The materials we have received verify that the military views the Southern Poverty Law Center as a reliable source for Equal Opportunity briefings.”
With al Qaeda continuing to plan attacks against America, what in the world is the Pentagon doing focusing on Christians and using the SPLC as a reference? Something is definitely going wrong with our government, and I guess by saying that, I will now be labeled an extremist. Oh well.

FEMA Approves Russian Troops on US Soil? July 2, 2013 Oli Fischer 
At a time when President Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin appear to be clashing over the extradition of Edward Snowden, it’s hard to imagine signing an agreement that allows Russian troops to provide security at events on US soil… but that’s exactly what the Obama Administration did this week. According to an agreement signed in Washington, DC last week between FEMA and the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry, Russian troops can now be deployed to provide security at so-called “National Special Security Events,” such as the Super Bowl and G8 summits.This is a perfect example of the smoke and mirrors tactic that the Obama ?Administration has been using throughout his presidency. Their motto is:?”Never let a crisis go to waste.”In this case, they’re simply using the NSA crisis to distract Americans as ?they adopt disastrous measures to weaken American sovereignty.?? How can this possibly be anything but a blatant effort to erode US ?sovereignty and move the nation further down the road toward global ?government?Read more from the Moscow Times:“Russian officials will provide security at mass events in the U.S. as part of a deal signed last week between the Emergency Situations Ministry and its U.S. equivalent, the Federal Emergency Management Agency.Representatives of both agencies arrived at an agreement during last week’s 17th Joint U.S.-Russia Cooperation Committee on Emergency Situations, but the move has been met with some concern from those wary of foreign troops operating on U.S. soil, Infowars.com reported Monday.“The parties approved of U.S.-Russian cooperation, which envisages the exchange of experience including in monitoring and forecasting emergency situations, training of rescuers, development of mine-rescuing and provision of security at mass events,” the ministry said in a statement.Under the terms of the new deal, Russian troops could be deployed at ”National Special Security Events,” as determined by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.Events that have been awarded this status in the past include the Super Bowl, international summits such as the G8 and presidential inaugurations.Russian troops trained on U.S. soil for the first time last year when 22 army paratroopers visited Colorado for a fortnight’s training with the 10th Special Forces Group at Fort Carson.”Exercise like this are supposedly aimed at improving emergency response capabilities. As an American, I can’t think of anything more disastrous than allowing foreign military troops to provide security in a disaster scenario. With the language barrier, unfamiliar customs, and differences in property rights, this isn’t disaster response… it’s a disaster.What do you think of this trans-national agreement? Should any military troops (foreign or domestic) be allowed to provide security at civilian events? Or does that violate the Posse Comitatus Act?https://patriotcaller.com/fema-approves-russian-troops-on-us-soil/

CLEMENTE SANCHEZ: LIMÓN CONGELADO
Un joven en la Universidad de Kirche tiene un tumor en el pulmón y su hermana, que es enfermera, le envió un e-mail acerca del limón. Empezó a beber limonada desde hace algún tiempo, y sus tumores eran más pequeños. Su oncólogo le dijo que continuara.
Creo que este sorprendente descubrimiento es muy útil para nuestra salud.
Todo lo que necesitamos es: un limón congelado.
Muchos profesionales de la hostelería, ya utilizan el limón entero, nada se descarta , las cáscaras de limón hasta el momento se han desechado y contiene de cinco a diez veces más vitaminas que el mismo jugo.
¿Cómo podemos utilizar el limón entero sin perder nada?
Simple, lava bien el limón y colocalo en el congelador.
Cuando se congela, utilice el rallador y rallarlo entero (con la cáscara), y espolvorear sobre los alimentos esta rayadura.
Rocíe sus bebidas, helados, sopas, cereales, pasta, salsas,
arroz, sushi, pescados, whisky … la lista es interminable.
Esta es la Clave mágica para hacer su comida más sabrosa y saludable. Ud vivirá más tiempo.
Este es el secreto de limón, que ahora acaba de ser revelado, el cancer dificilmente se desarrolla en un ambiente alcalino
Usted puede ayudar a un amigo para hacerle saber que el jugo de limón es ventajoso en el tratamiento del cáncer.
COMPARTA ESTA INFORMACION, PUEDE SALVAR VIDAS.
También se considera un espectro de infecciones antimicrobianas
Bacterianas y hongos. Es eficaz contra los parásitos internos y los gusanos,
Regula la presión arterial cuando es demasiado alto, es un antidepresivo, combate el estrés y los trastornos nerviosos.

Is Obama Ready to Go It Alone on Syria?
Thursday, 29 Aug 2013 07:53 PM By Cathy Burke
The White House signaled Thursday that President Barack Obama is ready to go it alone to strike Syria despite the British parliament’s rejection of military action and the lack of a UN mandate.
Aides said Obama believes that Syria must pay a price for breaking taboos on the use of chemical weapons, action which he sees as posing a grave threat to US national security.
US plans to build an international coalition for a “limited” strike on Syria suffered a devastating blow when the House of Commons in London voted against the use of force to punish a chemical weapons attack last week outside Damascus.
US officials signaled earlier Thursday that Obama would take unilateral action if necessary, but the possibility became a reality with the vote, which reverberated immediately across the Atlantic.
“We have seen the result of the parliament vote in the UK tonight,” National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said. “The US will continue to consult with the UK government — one of our closest allies and friends. 
“As we’ve said, President Obama’s decision-making will be guided by what is in the best interests of the United States.
“He believes that there are core interests at stake for the United States and that countries who violate international norms regarding chemical weapons need to be held accountable.”
Thursday’s 272-285 nonbinding vote in the U.K. was a major blow to the president’s efforts to build an international coalition in advance of a strike against the regime of President Bashar Assad afer its suspected use of chemical weapons in a deadly attack last week.
The vote was also a sharp rebuke to Prime Minister David Cameron.
“It’s clear to me that the British parliament and the British people do not wish to see military action,” Cameron said in a statement.
Earlier Thursday, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said his country would remain on the sidelines of any military action as well.
“This is a very big risk and we do support our allies who are contemplating forceful action to deal with this,” Haper said, according to The Daily Star, in Toronto.
“That said, at the present time the government of Canada has no plans, we have no plans of our own, to have a Canadian military mission.”
And Italian Foreign Minister Emma Bonino also said Thursday her country wouldn’t join the military action without a United Nations mandate, The Hill reported. 
Russia has said it’ll block any attempt to secure a Security Council vote for intervention.
“We have been trying to get the U.N. Security Council to be more assertive on Syria even before this incident,” deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes told The New York Times.“The problem is that the Russians won’t vote for any accountability.”
The Times reported the White House intelligence that will be presented to congressional leaders Thursday night doesn’t tie Assad directly to the deadly attack outside Damascus.
But the administration believes the information is compelling enough to justify a limited strike, the newspaper said.
Only hours before the British Parliament’s stunning rejection, White House spokesman Josh Earnest had thanks top politicians there for their “strong words” following the alleged chemical weapons attack, The Hill reported.
“You’ve heard both the prime minister and the foreign secretary articulate their strong objection and condemnation of the use of chemical weapons,” Earnest said. “We’ve heard them talk about their desire to see the Assad regime be held accountable for its actions in carrying out this chemical weapons attack.”

But British Foreign Secretary William Hague sounded a cautious note Wednesday, saying the U.Sl would “make their own decisions” about intervention, The Hill reported.
“We will remain closely coordinated with them and in close in touch with them, as we are every day,” Hague said. “I speak to my counterpart Secretary Kerry every day and have done so this evening.” 
The Associated Press contributed to this report
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Syria-conflict-US-intelligence/2013/08/29/id/523039?s=al&promo_code=14B3A-1#ixzz2dT5KJ4XU 

LA INQUISICIÓN DE OBAMA. Por Alfredo M. Cepero
Director de www.lanuevanacion.com Sígame en: http://twitter.com/@AlfredoCepero

Allá por al año de 1482, un oscuro sacerdote devenido funcionario de la Corona de España creo la máquina de represión religiosa y política más eficaz de la historia: la Inquisición Española. Su legado de intolerancia y fanatismo ha llegado macabramente vivo hasta el siglo XXI. La prensa anticlerical y secularista que nos gastamos por estos días se ha encargado de mantener viva aquella barbaridad perpetrada por Fray Tomás de Torquemada contra 400,000 judíos que vivían en la España de los Reyes Católicos, la mitad de los cuales se convirtieron al catolicismo no por convicción sino por terror.
Andando el tiempo, Torquemada tendría imitadores en el fanatismo y la intolerancia. En este caso en el campo de la ideología política. Porque no hay nada que se parezca más a un fanático religioso que un ideólogo político. Ninguno ve el mundo que lo rodea en sus dimensiones reales sino según los parámetros dentro de los cuales quiere modificarlo. Están demasiado ocupados en cambiarlo según sus percepciones del bien y del mal como para perder tiempo en analizarlo. En 1971, el agitador comunitario, Saul D. Alinsky, publicó “Reglas para Radicales” un prontuario para agitadores disfrazados de organizadores comunitarios encaminado a unificar a ciudadanos de bajos recursos en una lucha contra los sistemas políticos y económicos predominantes en el Chicago de la década de 1970.
En el primer párrafo de su libro, Alinsky se dirigió a las juventudes que se proponía reclutar diciendo: “Lo que sigue es para aquellos que quieren cambiar el mundo de lo que es en la actualidad a lo que ellos consideran que debe ser”. La perfecta definición de intransigencia incubada en la mente de un fanático ideológico. Como buen discípulo de Alinsky, Obama perfeccionó el dominio del arte de la intimidación y de la calumnia para neutralizar a sus adversarios. No está interesado en negociar sino en imponer su voluntad. Por eso les dijo a los republicanos después de su triunfo en el 2008: “yo gane y ustedes perdieron”. Únicamente un hombre cegado por la ideología y dominado por la arrogancia ha podido cometer tantos errores e incurrido en tales barbaridades.
Esa total renuencia a reconocer la realidad e imponer su voluntad ha llevado a Obama a incurrir en extremos inauditos de hipocresía y mentira en su misión de transformar a los Estados Unidos de una nación de ciudadanos independientes en una nación de parásitos mantenidos y manipulados por el gobierno. De una republica constitucional en una falsa democracia manipulada utilizando métodos totalitarios por un ejecutivo que se arroga funciones del poder legislativo e intimida a los funcionarios del poder judicial. Desde un principio, Obama dijo que se proponía transformar radicalmente a la sociedad norteamericana, no solo a su gobierno. Como a todos los ideólogos de izquierda aspirantes a tiranos la constitución le molesta y, por lo tanto, la viola cada vez que sus clausulas constituyen obstáculos a sus designios de ampliar su poder.
Cuando el Presidente afirma con sarcasmo que los republicanos están inventando escándalos para obstaculizar su plan de gobierno está aplicando las enseñanzas de Alinsky sobre la destrucción despiadada de los adversarios. Pero el número extraordinario de escándalos que rodean a su administración, tales como corrupción y abuso de poder, sugiere que los mismos no son un invento de los republicanos sino las características que definen su desastroso desempeño en el cargo.
Una lista parcial de los más notorios escándalos tiene que incluir la persecución por el IRS de grupos conservadores y proisraelíes durante las elecciones del 2012, el encubrimiento del asesinato de cuatro norteamericanos en Benghazi con fines electoreros, la violación de la privacidad y las acusaciones contra periodistas que hacían su trabajo informando objetivamente y manteniendo a los gobernantes bajo el escrutinio de la prensa y la operación de venta de armas a traficantes de drogas mexicanos conocida como “Rápido y Furioso”.
Y la lista sigue con los dos actos de perjurio del Procurador General, Eric Holder, ante el Congreso con motivo del espionaje de periodistas y la operación “Rápido y Furioso”, la negativa de éste último a procesar a miembros de las Panteras Negras que intimidaron a votantes blancos en Filadelfia durante las elecciones del 2008 y las exigencias de la Secretaria de Salud, Kathleen Sebelius, a corporaciones reguladas por su secretaría para que donaran fondos con los cuales financiar las primas a ciudadanos de escasos recursos.
Al igual que su jefe, los funcionarios de la Administración Obama se consideran por encima de la ley. A principios de este año, James Clapper, Director de la Agencia de Seguridad Nacional, una institución hasta ahora ajena a luchas partidistas, mintió al Congreso en un esfuerzo por proteger a su jefe. Cuando el senador demócrata por Oregón, Ron Wyden, le preguntó si su agencia recopilaba informaciones de inteligencia (espiaba) sobre millones de norteamericanos, Clapper contesto con un NO rotundo. Pero cuando fue presionado dijo: “No intencionalmente. Habrá casos en que se recopile, pero no intencionalmente”. Cuando días más tarde lo agarraron en la mentira tuvo que pedir perdón.
Y cuando ya pensábamos haber tenido conocimiento de las más flagrantes violaciones de la ley por éste gobierno, el Centro Legal de Pobreza Sureña denunció la semana pasada las actividades subversivas del funcionario del Departamento de Seguridad Interna, Ayo Kimathi, apodado “el genio irritado”. Este personaje, entre cuyas responsabilidades se encuentra la adquisición de armamentos y municiones para la Oficina de Inmigración y Aduanas (ICE), se pasa los fines de semanas promoviendo la supremacía negra y vomitando su odio contra los blancos. En su página digital, “Guerra en el Horizonte”, Kimathi afirma: “La guerra es inminente y, si los negros queremos sobrevivir en el Siglo XXI, vamos a tener que matar a muchos blancos”. Aún después de haber sido denunciado, esta repulsiva versión negra del Ku Klux Klan sigue devengando un sueldo pagado por los contribuyentes norteamericanos.
Regresando a Obama, el presidente no puede culpar a nadie más que a sí mismo del fracaso de su gestión de gobierno. Los gobernantes que ponen el servicio a sus gobernados por encima de su ideología como Johnson, Reagan y Clinton toman decisiones, aceptan responsabilidad y negocian con sus adversarios. Los fanáticos que ponen su ideología por encima del servicio a sus gobernados como Barack Obama se hacen las víctimas, culpan a los demás de sus fracasos y se niegan a negociar con sus adversarios.
Cuando Lyndon Johnson se dio a la tarea de hacer justicia a los americanos negros con la Ley de Derechos Civiles de 1964 y la Ley de Derechos Electorales de 1965 confrontó la hostilidad de miembros de su propio partido como el Senador Al Gore, padre del actual demagogo que se dice defensor del medio ambiente y les habla en jerigonza a los demócratas de piel negra cuando reclama su apoyo electoral. El demócrata Johnson recurrió entonces al senador republicano Everett Dirksen para lograr los votos republicanos que aseguraron la aprobación de ambas leyes.
Cuando Ronald Reagan, gobernando con un poder legislativo totalmente en manos del partido opositor, emprendió la tarea de poner en vigor la Ley de Reforma Tributaria de 1986 para salvar al país de la depresión económica desatada por la ineptitud de Jimmy Carter, no agredió a los demócratas sino negoció con ellos para obtener su apoyo. El republicano Reagan y el demócrata Tip O”Neill trabajaron juntos para echar los cimientos de una prosperidad económica que se prolongó por más de veinte años.
Y hasta el inmoral y perjuro de Bill Clinton tiene cualidades de gobernante que ya quisiera tener Barack Obama. Aprendió la lección de la derrota sufrida a manos de los republicanos en las parciales de 1994 y, en vez de denigrar a sus adversarios, opto por aliarse al recién electo Presidente de la Cámara de Representantes, el republicano Newt Gingrich. Ambos cooperaron en la aprobación de la Ley de Reforma de Bienestar Social de 1996 que redujo el desempleo, balanceó el presupuesto y creo prosperidad económica.
Obama, la prensa complaciente que lo ensalza y sus defensores de la izquierda vitriólica podrán culpar a los republicanos hasta el cansancio por el nudo gordiano en que se ha convertido Washington. Pero cinco años de un desastre moral y económico que ya no puede seguir siendo atribuido a George W. Bush ni a los republicanos de la Cámara de Representantes, así como la historia previa de cooperación entre ambos partidos restan credibilidad a sus argumentos. Sobre todo, dejan al Mesías desnudo de excusas para explicar sus fracasos.

 

Envie sus Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios a lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ 

No 470 “En mi opinion” Agosto 29, 2013

agosto 29, 2013

No 470  “En mi opinión” Agosto 29, 2013.  
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  “IN GOD WE TRUST”   
Enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

“En mi opinion” Se acuerdan del Solar del Reverbero o El Solar de la Chancleta? Bueno pues en eso es que se convirtio la reunion del alacalde de goma con los ciudadanos de Miami Dade. Aquello fue “un solar” En un area de Guerra donde todos los dias hay noticias de inmoralidad entre los alcaldes de las ciudades ayer fue el de Homested y dias atras el de Sweetwater y el de Miami Lakes. La historia de Miami esta llena de casos asquerosos de corrupcion pasando por Miller Doking que se suicido en el loby del Miami Herald (?), Miriam Alonso y numerosos otros folkloricos casos y este gobierno no es la ecepcion. Al contrario este es el peor porque ha acallado major dicho enterrado inespicablemente “El Boletera Gate” Tanto aqui como en Broward John Rivera se despacho con la chuchara grande y puso al “alcaldedegoma” como un “culo” La gente del pueblo hizo lo mismo. Alguien dijo que el esta dispuesto a cerrar las bibliotheca o cualquier cosa menos tocarle un centavo a ninguno de los Vireyes del alcaldedegoma. ?Creen ustedes que algo va a pasar? Nahhhhhhhhh.
LRGM.

Russia: US Syria Intervention Will Lead to ‘Catastrophic Consequences’

Wednesday, 28 Aug 2013 03:58 AM By Hiram Reisner
Perceived imminent Western military action in Syria is not only illegal but also could lead to possible “catastrophic” intervention into the affairs of a sovereign state and destabilize the region as a whole, Russian leaders warn.
 Moscow has indicated it would not interfere with Western military action against Syria, but it has stressed Western nations are making a mad dash before all is known about the alleged nerve gas attack in a Damascus suburb that has reportedly  killed more than 1,000 people, according to The Christian Science Monitor.
The Russians are also stressing that the expected imminent attack without United Nations imprimatur is charging into dangerous territory.
“Attempts to bypass the Security Council, to once again create artificial, unproven excuses for an armed intervention in the region, are fraught with new suffering in Syria and catastrophic consequences for other countries in the Middle East and Northern Africa,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said in a statement posted on the ministry’s website Tuesday.
Lukashevich also pointed to the cancellation of a scheduled meeting between Russian and U.S. officials on how to resolve the Syrian crisis as a sign that an attack is imminent, the Monitor reports.
“Moscow perceives Washington’s decision to postpone this meeting literally on the eve of the agreed-upon date with serious disappointment,” he said.
Georgy Mirsky, an expert with the Center for Development and Modernization with the official Institute of World Economy and International Relations, said,  “There’s nothing Russia can or should do to stop Western military intervention in Syria.”
“Syria isn’t Libya. Battles are going on everywhere, and it will prove impossible to set up a secure zone. There is zero chance that Western forces will launch a ground war. So, it will be limited cruise missile attacks from ships; that might weaken [President Bashar Assad], but will not likely be decisive,” he said.
“Russia can sit and watch. A propaganda war will rage, and Moscow will be able to say that we wanted peace, we were working for the Geneva-2 conference, but it didn’t happen because they opted for military force instead,” Mirsky said.
“As things stand, developments will play into Moscow’s hands. The U.S. will compromise itself with another war in another Arab country, and look more than ever like a neo-colonialist power. Why would Obama want this?” Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmaxworld.com/GlobalTalk/syria-russia-intervention-catastrophic/2013/08/28/id/522579?s=al&promo_code=14AC9-1#ixzz2dNG7rP1w 

CLEMENTE SANCHEZ:  Principio de no Intervención 
El no intervencionismo es la doctrina en política exterior adoptada por las Naciones Unidas que indica la obligación de los Estados de abstenerse o intervenir directa o indirectamente en los asuntos internos de otro Estado.  Se deriva de un Derecho Internacional Público, el principio de no intervención que establece la independencia de las naciones. Este principio de no intervención equivale al de no injerencia en los asuntos internos de otro país
El problema es que este principio se aplica según la conveniencia entre los Estado en cuestión.
Si a ciertas naciones les es conveniente se ignora este principio, si les es conveniente, lo aplica.  
Por lo general los países con dictaduras de izquierda o musulmanas están cubiertos por este principio, pero si a dictadura es de derecha o no se ajusta a ciertas conveniencias políticas o económicas se ignora y se aplican sanciones interviniendo abiertamente en los asuntos internos del país.
Como cubano exilado, he vivido la corrupción de este principio, el cual ha sido usado como excusa en el caso de Cuba para establecer relaciones comerciales y diplomáticas con el gobierno de la dictadura más larga del mundo.
Pero como ya es un hecho el usar este principio como excusa según convenga, quiero montarme en el tren de los excusados, (viene bien ese nombre por el olor a esterquero de esa conducta en el caso de Cuba).
Me monto en ese tren en el caso de Siria.  Creo que si la actual administración tuviera una política exterior coherente, sin lugar a duda se acogería al principio de no intervención y no tomaría parte en la guerra civil de ese país
El actual gobierno de Siria esta aliado con nuestro mayor enemigo, Irán, y tiene el apoyo de nuestro amigo más insincero, Rusia.  Por el otro lado los insurrectos están dominados por nuestros enemigos de la Hermandad Musulmana y Al Qaeda que nos han declarado un Yihad o guerra santa.
Así que como quiera que te pongas, tienes que llorar, recibiremos palos porque bogas y palos por que no bogas.
No se sabe qué cosa es peor, si sigue el actual gobierno, o si la Hermandad Musulmana añade una ficha más en su camino al Califato Mundial.
Todos son nuestros enemigos. Así que lo mejor es acogerse al Principio de no Intervención, y que se maten las mayor cantidad de personas de ambas partes, a mayor muertos, menos enemigos tenemos.
Pero la actual administración se está gastando millones de dólares de nuestros impuestos para defender a nuestros enemigos porque sin lugar a dudas todos son nuestros enemigos.
Como en el caso de Egipto, la democracia nunca se establecerá en Siria, la cuestión es cuál de los enemigos  quedará como ganador y nos hará mayor daño.

Oliver North: Cruise Missile Attacks Make ‘A Weak President’ Feel Powerful
Wednesday, 28 Aug 2013 10:00 PM By Greg Richter
There is no history of success using cruise missiles without follow-up, Lt. Col. Oliver North says, and U.S. action against Syria may end up putting Americans in danger.

Syrian President Bashar Assad “has got allies like Russia. He’s got allies like Iran. They are capable of doing things to us that could be very injurious — not just to Israel,” North said Wednesday on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity.”

Both Syria and Iran have said they will attack America’s ally Israel if the United States launches missiles into Syria.

The White House has signaled it will launch missiles at Syria after the country killed more than 1,000 of its own citizens with poison gas. President Barack Obama drew a “red line” a year ago that such an attack would force American action, but members of Congress in both parties are split over whether such action would help or make matters worse.

North said Assad wouldn’t change his actions over a few missiles hitting his country. Cruise missiles serve only two purposes, the retired colonel said.

“They’re good for setting the pace for shock and awe for a real campaign that’s going to continue,” North said. “And No. 2: making a weak president feel powerful. That’s what Bill Clinton did, that’s what Barack Obama’s doing.”

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/north-history-cruise-missiles/2013/08/28/id/522796?s=al&promo_code=14AE3-1#ixzz2dNKpKU3B
6 claves para entender qué pasa en Siria
Por Kyle Almond [En mi opinion” La verdad esta arriba, en el articulo de Clemente Sanchez. LRGM.]
(CNN) — Violencia en las calles de Damasco. Una creciente crisis de refugiados. Llamados a la intervención internacional. Al leer los sombríos titulares sobre Siria, es fácil olvidar cómo llegamos a este punto.
Este es un recordatorio para ponerte al tanto.
1. Panorama general
El régimen de Siria, encabezado por el presidente Bachar al Asad, inició el año pasado una violenta represión contra los activistas que exigían prosperidad económica, y libertades políticas y civiles.
Esto desencadenó un levantamiento nacional y finalmente una guerra civil contra los rebeldes armados, de los cuales muchos habían desertado de las fuerzas armadas.
Se calcula que para julio, el conflicto se había cobrado la vida de 17.000 personas, la mayoría civiles, según las Naciones Unidas. Más de 170.000 habían escapado de la nación de Medio Oriente para buscar refugio en países vecinos como Iraq, Turquía y Jordania.
Durante el levantamiento, el gobierno sirio ha tildado a la oposición de terroristas que tratan de desestabilizar al país. Los líderes de la oposición dicen que solo es la justificación para los ataques del régimen.
El presidente de Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, y muchos otros líderes mundiales, han exhortado a al Asad a ceder el poder que su familia ha tenido desde 1970. También impusieron sanciones económicas sobre Siria mientras tratan de encontrar una solución diplomática a la crisis.
2. Cómo empezó todo
En enero de 2011, la revolución en Túnez marcó el inicio de la llamada Primavera Árabe.
El levantamiento exitoso de Túnez inspiró una inestabilidad similar en los países a lo largo del norte de África y Medio Oriente que, como Túnez, experimentaban un desempleo elevado, corrupción y represión política de parte de dictadores.
En marzo de 2011, la violencia se desató en Daraa, Siria, luego de que un grupo de niños y adolescentes quedara arrestado por pintar un grafiti con motivos políticos. Docenas de personas murieron cuando las fuerzas de seguridad se enfrentaron a los manifestantes.
Los manifestantes pronto pidieron que al Asad dejara el cargo al igual que Hosni Mubarak, de Egipto, y Zine el Abidine Ben Alí, de Túnez. Al Asad prometió hacer cambios y levantó el estado de emergencia  en el país, que durante 48 años le dio al régimen el poder de detener a cualquier persona por tiempo indefinido sin levantarle cargos.
Sin embargo, solo cuatro días después de que se levantara el estado de emergencia, en abril de 2011, el régimen sirio envió miles de soldados a Daraa para emprender una campaña de represión, de acuerdo con los testigos.
Desde entonces, la violencia ha empeorado y se ha esparcido por todo el país; se ha convertido en una guerra civil total entre el régimen y la resistencia armada. Para mediados de 2012, los enfrentamientos habían llegado a Damasco, la capital, y a Alepo, la ciudad más grande.
3. ¿Quién es al Asad?
Bachar al Asad ha sido presidente desde que su padre, Hafez, murió en 2000. Hafez gobernó Siria por casi 30 años y se suponía que lo sucedería su hijo mayor, Basel, quien murió en un accidente automovilístico en 1994.
Cuando Bachar asumió la presidencia, a los 34 años, las naciones occidentales esperaban que fuera más moderado que su padre, un aliado acérrimo de los soviéticos. Bachar, un joven con educación occidental, estudió Oftalmología en Londres.
La familia al Asad es alauí, una rama del islam chiita que es minoría en un país en el que casi las tres cuartas partes de la población son sunitas. Bachar designó a sus familiares cercanos a puestos clave en el gobierno y muchos de sus simpatizantes son alauíes o pertenecen a otras minorías que temen que ocurra algo si los sunitas llegan al poder.
4. ¿Quiénes son los rebeldes?
La oposición ha crecido, está mejor organizada y mejor armada desde que inició el levantamiento. Muchos de los combatientes son exsoldados que desertaron de las fuerzas armadas, pero también hay civiles que han tomado las armas contra el régimen de al Asad.
“Voy a la guerra por mi familia, por mi país”, dijo Soukrot Amin, voluntario de 23 años con el Ejército Libre de Siria. “Porque (al Asad) ha matado a todos. Mató a mi primo. Destruyó mi aldea. Destruyó mi hogar”.
El Ejército Libre de Siria, el principal grupo de oposición, surgió en julio de 2011 y se atribuyó un ataque contra una base de inteligencia aérea. No es la única milicia que se opone a al Asad y existen dudas sobre la verdadera unión de la oposición.
En general, los rebeldes han demostrado que pueden atacar eficazmente al régimen, pero no han podido conservar el control de las grandes ciudades por mucho tiempo y con frecuencia se retiran bajo la presión de un Ejército sirio mejor preparado y con capacidad de acción aérea.
5. Intervención internacional
Estados Unidos y muchos de sus aliados occidentales han impuesto sanciones económicas contra Siria, condenaron a al Asad y exigieron que abandonara el poder. Sin embargo, no han persuadido al Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU a que haga lo mismo. China y Rusia, dos de los socios comerciales de Siria, vetaron varias de las resoluciones propuestas respecto a Siria.
Sin el consenso internacional, la mayoría de los países ha dudado en intervenir militarmente. Se cree que Arabia Saudita y Qatar, dos países en Medio Oriente bajo el mando de los sunitas, están enviando armas a la oposición. Sin embargo, Estados Unidos solo está proporcionando asistencia no letal y humanitaria.
Irán apoya a al Asad y al régimen sirio, a la vez que Hezbolá, un aliado chiita en Líbano.
La ONU, a través de su ex secretario general, Kofi Annan, propuso un plan de paz este año y envió un equipo de observadores al país para implementar una tregua que se supone que entraría en vigor. Sin embargo, persistió la violencia, los observadores se retiraron y Annan renunció a su cargo como enviado especial.
6. ¿Cuál es la importancia de Siria?
Siria sufre una crisis humanitaria: la gente está muriendo, pasan hambre y necesitan ayuda. La ONU señala que la violencia ha dificultado el acceso al agua, alimentos, energía eléctrica y suministros médicos a muchos sirios, lo que ha obligado a miles a abandonar el país.
Sin embargo, el rol crucial de Siria en el corazón de Medio Oriente implica que también habrá consecuencias políticas a largo plazo.
Muchos analistas creen que el conflicto es una guerra entre Irán y sus rivales árabes sunitas en la región, entre Irán y Estados Unidos e incluso entre Estados Unidos y Rusia; este último enfrentamiento gira alrededor de “quién tendrá mayor influencia en el futuro de la región y en qué términos intervendrá la comunidad internacional en conflictos como el de Siria”, dijo Nader Mousavizadeh, director ejecutivo de Oxford Analytica.
Como el régimen sirio es alauí y la mayoría del país es sunita, también existe el riesgo de que el conflicto en Siria derive en una sangrienta batalla sectaria, como ocurrió en Irán, que podría desestabilizar aún más a la región.
Siempre que se habla de inestabilidad en Medio Oriente, surge la preocupación de que al Qaeda y otros grupos militantes de línea dura llenen los posibles vacíos de poder o suplan a los Estados fallidos.
Hay que tomar en consideración el problema árabe-israelí. Siria ha sido un aliado clave de los palestinos a lo largo de los años y ha apoyado activamente a Hamas y a Hezbolá mientras comparte fronteras con Israel. ¿Cuáles serán las implicaciones de los hechos en Siria para la paz en Medio Oriente?
Como dijo alguna vez Henry Kissinger, un antiguo diplomático estadounidense, “Los árabes no pueden hacer la guerra sin Egipto y no pueden lograr la paz sin Siria”.
David Ariosto, Rima Maktabi, Ivan Watson y Fareed Zakaria colaboraron con este reportaje.

Glenn Beck Shocking Video – This Is Who We Are Helping In Syria!
http://www.westernjournalism.com/glenn-beck-shocking-video-helping-syria/

RICARDO SAMITIER: La Guerra En Siria…
Solo El 9% La Apoya…
Obama el Ganador de Un Premio Nobel de la Paz Por Tener “BUENAS INTENCIONES” Han Incendiado 3 Países… Todos los “PACIFISTAS COMUNISTAS” durante la guerra de Vietnam, comenzando
Por el actual ministro de estado de USA John Kerry…están a favor de la GUERRA…
Los preparativos, COMENZARON EN Mayo cuando el INCAPAZ de hablar sin leer
En un telepronter y SIN EXPERIENCIA, “NEGRO” Y MUSULMÁN PRESIDENTE
OBAMA declaró que si se usaban armas químicas Estados Y Unidos entraría en
La “GUERRA CIVIL DE SIRIA” a partir de ese momento la CIA comenzó la entrega
De Bombas De Gas A Los Rebeldes Para Que Las USARAN…
Ahora Tenemos la Sexta Flota. Los radares en Jordania e Iraq, Los Aliados Turcos
de la Otan y supuestamente… la inteligencia Israelí…
Los comunistas y socialistas  Franceses apoyan la agresión a Siria, pero el pueblo NO… Los ingleses siempre aliados de USA ofrece sus bases en Chipre… Todo ESTA LISTO…, ¿Para Lograr Que? Sacar a Assad y poner a la HERMANDAD MUSULMANA?
Cuál Es La Lógica??? Solo la guerra!  Qui Bono!!  $$$
Cuando Los Políticos, No Sabe Qué Hacer Con La Mala Economía, Siempre Distraen Al Pueblo, Con Una Guerra… Pero esta es DIFERENTE… Obama la usa para instalar en El poder a la HERMANDAD MUSULMANA…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqr_osrktnE
Obama (Premio Nobel De La Paz) Se Equipara Con Hitler y Mussolini Ambos Líderes Atacaron Países Sin Razón…
Pero ellos lo hicieron para ocupar los territorios… Obama lo hace para que la HERMANDAD MUSULMANA Sea la que los ocupe… Eso En Todos los Idiomas y países Se llama TRAICIÓN… Obama Pone a USA a la PAR con Hitler y Mussolini.
Mc Cain Un Traidor a Su Padre y A su Abuelo Mc Cain El “NIÑO TRAVIESO” En La Marina Por Ser Hijo Y Nieto De Almirantes…
Es Ahora Un Colaborador De Obama… Traidor A Los Principios De La Constitución…
Apoya el ataque a Siria… Para Ayudar a La Hermandad Musulmana…
La Estatua de Batista… En Columbia…
Tiene que haber sido removida con una grúa… pues tenía más de 20 pies
Quizás lo hicieron de NOCHE como esta de Stalin…
¿Cual fue el DESTINO DE ESA ESTATUA???
Tiene que existir alguien que DIRECTAMENTE estuvo envuelto en esa
Remoción… o un hijo o intimo amigo que sabe…
¿Por Qué La Revolución Ha Mantenido En SECRETO Su Existencia???
La remoción fue hecha a mediados De Octubre DE 1958… es DECIR 2 MESES ANTES
DEL TRIUNFO DE LA REVOLUCIÓN… sin duda fue LA SEÑAL o la firma del acuerdo
Batista y Fidel por medio del General Cantillo…
En ese acuerdo Batista aceptaba irse el 6 de Enero de 1959… para dar tiempo  que la
revolución avanzara tomando pueblos hasta llegar a las afueras de la Habana…
para hacer LUCIR EL TRIUNFO DE LA REVOLUCIÓN AUN MAS GRANDE…cuando en
Realidad era una ENTREGA… una TRAICIÓN…  
Sin duda al ver el MONUMENTO SIN LA ESTATUA… los soldados y Oficiales
se DESMORALIZARON… la remoción fue otro acto más de Batista y sus allegados…
\para darle a los comunistas el triunfo…
Lo más intrigante es que: Fidel Nunca Ha Mencionando La Estatua…

‘Offended’ Atheists Bomb 9/11 Memorial Cross 28 August 2013 / 
The atheist 9 11 memorial cross outrage in New Jersey is disgusting and pathetic. But it is also a sign that a fringe group is getting more extreme and militant. Are they are now acting like terrorists? In Coos Bay, Oregon, a veteran’s memorial cross was bombed by an atheist group known as the FFRF, or the Freedom From Religion Foundation. The violent atheist organization had sent letters demanding they take the cross down.
The monument is small in comparison to many, and its symbolism far outweighs anything that a bunch of atheist bullies would deem offense. But the very sight of a cross is offensive. To atheists, Muslims, homosexuals, and others who hate the symbol of the cross. When the cross becomes offensive, it is a sign of complete societal failure.
The FFRF in their hate attempted to destroy the cross in Oregon, but they didn’t completely destroy the memorial. They merely damaged the cement structure. But in Princeton, New Jersey, atheist 9 11 Memorial Cross opposition is crossing a line. Jewish Deputy Fire Chief Roy James wants to put up a 9/11 memorial using a Christian cross.
It’s a proper and loving tribute to the people who lost their lives on 9/11. Those who died so senselessly at the hands of Muslim terrorists determined to destroy the infrastructure of our country. And it is the only fitting tribute for a memorial that happened on the soil of a Christian nation. At least, we used to be a Christian nation.
Enter the American Atheists , the late Madelyn Murray O’Hair’s organization founded in 1963. O’Hair’s venom sparked the national debate over prayer in schools, and because of her, prayer in public schools was deemed a violation of the Establishment Clause of the Constitution in 1963.
If O’Hair was alive today she would be gleeful that her band of godless heathens have turned into outright domestic terrorists. For it is the American Atheists that are up in arms about the Memorial 9/11 cross because it was created out a beam that was salvaged from the ruins of the World Trade Center. A cross was carved out of the ruins. What a beautiful and appropriate tribute. The Cross is life in the face of death.
But an atheist sees an affront. “This particular beam has a religious symbol on it,” American Atheists president David Silverman told Fox News. “They have a beam with a religious symbol and that makes it a religious icon.”
Read more at http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/08/offended-atheists-bomb-911-memorial-cross-grossly-offensive-patriotic-americans/#owOosyqSHRXtdSOz.99 

Obama To Americans: “I Adore Incompetent People!”
AUGUST 28, 2013 BY FLOYD BROWN 
As a candidate, Barack Obama offered to govern as the most “open and honest” administration in history. Sadly, we’ve learned at great expense that these empty words are just another example of the corruption of Obama’s tenure.
“” style=”margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom;”
I was reminded again of Obama’s dishonest and fraudulent conduct last week when the Justice Department released details of its case against John C. Beale.
Beale is the disgraced deputy assistant administrator in the Office of Air and Radiation at the EPA. He stands accused of stealing $886,186 between 2000 and 2013. You see, Beale had schemed a way to pay himself the nearly one million he stole in the form of salary bonuses.
Beale most recently worked for Gina McCarthy as her top deputy. This is the same Gina McCarthy who was recently promoted by Obama to run the entire EPA.
But you have to ask yourself why McCarthy wasn’t held accountable for her subordinate’s criminal activity. Is it now standard operating procedure to promote managers who can’t spot theft and crime right under their noses?

I’m old enough to remember a time when the top boss was held accountable for corruption within his or her team.
A Long, Dark History
“” style=”margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom;”
Now, the Beale corruption is really small potatoes compared to other government corruption. In fact, I’m beginning to believe the Obama administration is so corrupt that it’s impossible to keep track of it all. So I decided to reflect a little.
Right out of the gate, Barack Obama nominated a tax cheater to be Treasury Secretary. That’s right… Obama actually put Timothy Geithner in charge of the agency he attempted to defraud. When you reflect on the chutzpah of this appointment, it’s easy to see how the IRS has become a rogue agency that targets Obama’s political opponents with audits, penalties, and litigation.
Next came the outrageous $825 billion stimulus bill. It was supposedly going to create jobs and get the economy moving. Instead, it was a maze of profiteering and crony capitalism. Obama swore the “green economy” would produce no less than millions of jobs and one million electric vehicles. The Energy Department alone dished out $35.2 billion in stimulus money. But then Solyndra went bankrupt, and taxpayers lost nearly half a billion dollars on that swindle alone.
And let’s not forget Operation Fast and Furious, when the U.S. Justice Department lawlessly placed thousands of guns in the hands of criminals in Mexico. The Obama administration actually ordered gun storeowners to illegally sell thousands of guns to known criminals.
During the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy, Obama bagged the Fifth Amendment along with well-established bankruptcy law by illegally stripping secured bondholders of their rights. These bondholders consisted of pension funds for retired teachers and policemen. In fact, there’s a word for this lawless behavior: theft.
Or how about the military action in Libya? Obama had no congressional approval to carry out this unlawful intervention. Even George W. Bush didn’t overthrow Saddam Hussein until he asked Congress for permission.
Then Obama had four U.S. citizens obliterated by drones without legal due process. Ron Paul, who was then in Congress, said Obama’s actions might be impeachable offenses. This led to a chorus in Congress that accused Obama of violating the U.S. Constitution; yet no follow-up has occurred.
This is by no means an exhaustive list, but it shows that the corruption is neither recent nor isolated. Maybe we were naïve to have expected a politician from Chicago, infamous as a corrupt and crony-governed city, to be a fair and honest man.
But now that we know his administration is riddled with corruption, we have to ask a deeper question about the rule of law. If Obama and his underlings can engage in this much criminal activity with no accountability, has the culture of honest governing permanently come to an end?

Obama is Like a ‘Monkey With a Hand Grenade’ — U.S. Policy in Mideast It’s just convenient — awfully convenient. That’s all I’m saying. It’s convenient for U.S. Mideast policy that after three years of covert support for the al-Qaeda mercenaries who lead the Syrian “rebels,” the Obama Administration should suddenly be gifted with an attack on civilians, attributed to the Syrian government, by means of one of the most despised weapons ever devised by mankind: poison gas. This attack by the Syrian government comes with good timing, just as support was wavering for a publicly acknowledged U.S. military presence in the region. It also takes attention off the Administration’s mess in Egypt, in which it supported the Nazi-spawned, terrorist Muslim Brotherhood against the Egyptian majority, despite broad evidence of a stolen election. Now that the military has taken over, the Administration has compounded its errors by cutting funding for what may be the best hope for a reasonably moderate democracy in the land of the Pharaohs. Stepping up the rhetoric about Syria also serves as yet another distraction to keep America from thinking about Benghazi, an attack that occurred not because of an anti-Muslim YouTube video but because the Administration was once again collaborating with terrorists and smugglers to get heavy weapons and personnel into Syria by way of Turkey. Something went sour on that deal, and we wound up with four dead Americans. As Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said, the U.S. is like “a monkey with a hand grenade” in the Mideast. It’s strange to think, after what happened to Saddam Hussein in neighboring Iraq after the world thought he used nerve gas against Kurds, that the Syrian government that has been wrapped up in civil war for three years would suddenly throw caution and international opinion to the wind. The Syrian government had to know that chemical weapons would be a guaranteed way to get the nations of the world to beat a path to its door. It’s curious that the Syrians would invite such trouble. On the other hand, anybody who had an ax to grind with Syria but who wanted to appear worthy of his unearned Nobel Peace Prize would have a lot of incentive to stage a phony attack. … Perhaps someone with delusions of carving out a reinvigorated Muslim caliphate under his personal control. Yes, such an attack would be very convenient indeed.
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/12310/like-monkey-hand-grenade-u-s-policy-mideast/#bSpUZsbQeq8rAMTi.99

RICARDO SAMITIER: Los Negros “Pro Obama” Están Poniendo Las Cosas Peor
DECLARA “GUERRA CONTRA LOS BLANCOS”
FUNCIONARIO DE DE SEGURIDAD INTERNA
Hay que recordar que La organización llamada “Poder Negro” en
Los años 1960-70 Preconizaba la “Guerrilla Urbana” 

PAGING MR. SHARPTON: Black Teen Rapes and Robs 93yr. Old Woman, I Say ‘Death Penalty’
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/paging-mr-sharpton-black-teen-rapes-robs-93yr-old-woman-say-death-penalty/#OD2hJ6KdQdEmq6hj.99
Penalty’ By Clash Daily / 28 August 2013 / 18 Comments Share30 Tweet24 1 Share86 * Doug Giles –  This was all over the national news yesterday. Oh, wait. No it wasn’t.  I forgot.  The media doesn’t run stories where black thugs rape old white women. ANDERSON, INDIANA – Police announced formal charges against a 17-year-old suspect in connection with the July rape of a 93-year-old Anderson woman. According to Anderson Police Chief Larry Crenshaw, the suspect lived closed to the victim. Crenshaw said police collected DNA samples from several people and connected the suspect to the crime through a DNA match. Charges against Iquise V. Taylor include rape, burglary, criminal confinement and strangulation police announced during a news conference Monday. He’s been charged as an adult. Crenshaw called it a “horrific and unimaginable attack” and said the department was satisfied to bring some kind of closure to Amelia Rudolf and her family. He said he’d met with Rudolf and told her the department would “bring justice in this life or the next.” Crenshaw said the teen lived close to the victim but didn’t know if Rudolf was specifically targeted. The victim’s daughter described her mother as “brave” and “strong” and described her as a hero. “The fact that the Anderson Police Department caught the criminal (that) he will be off the streets… that’s one less criminal because of her surviving and enduring that,” said Tresa Hale. “He won’t be able to hurt anyone else.” Hale said the teenage suspect would eventually face punishment for the crime. “Judgment Day will come for him,” she said. “I know in my heart that if he lived life in prison that it will be terrifying for him
.”PAGING MR. SHARPTON: Black Teen Rapes and Robs 93yr. Old Woman, I Say ‘Death
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/paging-mr-sharpton-black-teen-rapes-robs-93yr-old-woman-say-death-penalty/#OD2hJ6KdQdEmq6hj.99

GATRIA: No se donde @%+?@estan Erick Holder,AlSharpton,Jessy Jacson and Obama.
Wake-Up  America.                                                                                              
Sobrevivió 2 viajes a Irak pero lo asesinaron aquí.
Pero ninguno de los racistas ha mencionado esto, tampoco la Prensa seha interesado mucho. Si hubiera sido al reves estariamos viendo este csaso cada 5 minutos, y el Presidente hubiera dicho podria haber sido su hijo, perohay un silencio completo.  Joe Biden podria decir que este marine podriahaber sido su hijo. A ninguno de ellos le interesa este caso. ¿Por qué los racistas no enseñan las estadisticas de cuantos negros han sido asesinados por blancos y cuantos blancos han sido asesinados por negros ?
  
Four Georgia black men  arrested for ‘beating to death’ former Marine who survived  TWO tours of duty in Iraq
Police have arrested four suspects in  connection with the beating death of a former U.S. Marine who was found  unconscious outside of a party at a Cobb County, Georgia, apartment complex in  March. According to the Atlanta  Journal-Constitution, Arthur  Batchelor, 37, Tarell Secrest, 36, and Jason Hill, 35, were taken into custody  on Tuesday for allegedly killing 34-year-old Zachary ‘Zach’ Gamble.  Another suspect, 38-year-old Sean Hall, of Atlanta, was arrested on  Monday. Hall is also accused of violating his  probation stemming from a DUI conviction in 2009, according to the Marietta Daily  Journal.
Nabbed: Arthur Batchelor, top left, Tarell Secrest, top  right, Jason Hill, bottom left, and Sean Hall, bottom right, are accused of  killing ex-Marine Zachary Gamble
All four suspects have been charged with  felony murder, aggravated assault and aggravated battery. They are being held  without bail in the Cobb County Adult Detention Center, police say. On Tuesday, the victim’s mother, Tina  Robbins, told the Marietta Daily Journal that she was ‘elated’ that  arrests  have been made in her son’s killing. Gamble, of Acworth, Georgia, was  attending a  friend’s birthday party in the Concord Chase Apartments near Smyrna on March 25  when he got into an altercation with a group of men  in the parking lot,  according to investigators. Police would not explain what happened next,  only saying that they received a call from a taxi driver at 6am who reported  having struck Gamble.

GEORGINA LOPEZ: El aumento de documentos cubanos falsos pone en alerta a Inmigración http://www.elmundo.es/america/2013/08/26/estados_unidos/1377537367.html

 

DECLARA “GUERRA CONTRA LOS BLANCOS” UN FUNCIONARIO DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE SEGURIDAD INTERNA Por Abby Ohlheiser El Centro Legal de Pobreza Sureña denunció la semana pasada las actividades subversivas del funcionario del Departamento de Seguridad Interna, Ayo Kimathi, apodado “el genio irritado”. Este personaje, entre cuyas responsabilidades se encuentra la adquisición de armamentos y municiones para la Oficina de Inmigración y Aduanas (ICE), se pasa las noches y los fines de semanas promoviendo la supremacía negra y vomitando su odio contra los blancos. En su página digital, “Guerra en el Horizonte”, Kimathi afirma: “La guerra es inminente y, si los negros queremos sobrevivir en el Siglo XXI, vamos a tener que matar a muchos blancos”. Aún después de haber sido denunciado, esta repulsiva versión negra del Ku Klux Klan sigue devengando un sueldo pagado por los contribuyentes norteamericanos. Según el Centro Legal de Pobreza Sureña, empleados del Departamento de Seguridad Interna como Kimathi tienen que recibir permiso de sus supervisores para realizar actividades como la publicación de una página cibernética. Después de leer el contenido de la página, la supervisora de Kimathi le dijo a investigadores del Centro Legal de Pobreza que había quedado consternada por las expresiones de violencia. Agregó que si la agencia hubiera tenido una verdadera descripción de la página jamás le habría dado a Kimathi el consentimiento para publicarla. Kimathi, por otra parte, no exime de su veneno ni siquiera a muchas personalidades de la raza negra. Entre ellas, el Presidente Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Woopi Golberg y Condolezza Rice a quienes llama “mulatos traidores que nacieron y crecieron en cuarterías”. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/08/homeland-security-employee-moonlights-race-warrior/68600/

Para leer la información… http://www.lanuevanacion.com/articles.aspx?art=3781

 

Envier Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ 

 

No 469 “En mi opinion” Agosto 28, 2013

agosto 28, 2013

No 469  “En mi opinión” Agosto 28, 2013.  
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  “IN GOD WE TRUST”   
Enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

“En mi opinion” El alcalde de Miami Dade, Carlos Gimenez dijo ayer 8/28/2013 en el noticiero de las 11 pm en canal 23 de la cadena Univision que el Secretario del sindicato de la policia Rivera era un MENTIROSO Y UN DESCARADO. Por una reclamacion sobre tergiversacion (?) de unos 50 millones en el presupuesto. Parece que se empiezan a llamar por sus titulos los politicos de Miami Dade. LRGM.

“En mi opinion” Sign the petition to Force obama his family, the senators and the representant to use Obamacare… LRGM.
OBAMACARE FOR OBAMA PETITION   Share9Tweet00Share9 If Obama loves ObamaCare so much, then he and his family should be forced to accept the same insurance coverage middle class Americans will receive! The bureaucrats too many times set up a system for US but not for THEM. Let’s FORCE these elitists to submit to the same laws they want for us! Sign the Petition: Sign the petition by including your email address below. The ObamaCare Health Insurance Exchanges are set to open on October 1, 2013, to begin offering health plan benefits, as mandated by the Patient Privacy and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Against all reports to the contrary, Barack Obama continues to state that health care costs and insurance rates will decrease in the new, “competitive” market; and that benefits will be better, i.e. – “better benefits, stronger protections, more bang for your buck.” We provide the following, as evidence that Mr. Obama’s claims are false, and demand that he and his family be required to accept the same, basic-level health insurance coverage that the majority of Americans will, undoubtedly, have no choice but to accept; because their existing plans will be unaffordable. Bottom Line: If ObamaCare is so great, then Mr. Obama and his family should happily accept the same level coverage that middle class America will inevitably receive. Whereas: According to a report by the Society of Actuaries, Health insurance costs are expected to increase; because ObamaCare regulations are causing medical claims costs to become more expensive to process; Whereas: A report released by the House Energy and CObamaCare occurs. It is expected to increase individual health insurance premiums by an average of nearly 100 percent. In some cases, premiums could rise by 400 percent; Whereas: ObamacareFacts.com, reports that a basic “bronze” level health care plan will cover only 60% of out of pocket health care costs and offers basic coverage. Plans range from the basic “Bronze” (60%) to “Silver” (70%) more expensive “Gold” (80%) and “Platinum” (90%) level plans. High-end plans carry a 40% excise tax which helps pay for the program; Whereas: Because of sky-rocketing premiums and health care costs, many Americans will not be able to maintain their existing “silver,” “gold,” or “platinum” level health care coverage; or they may be penalized for doing so through an excise tax. Some customers are already receiving letters from their health insurance providers notifying them of increased, unaffordable premiums. At best, Americans may be able to afford “bronze” level coverage, or be forced to hold out for Medicaid expansion; despite the fact that Barack Obama has touted that ObamaCare will “deliver the security of quality, affordable health care”; Whereas: Many details about premiums, out-of-pocket costs, benefits; and which doctors, hospitals and drugs the plans will cover remain up in the air, less than two months before enrollment is scheduled to begin Oct. 1; Therefore: We demand and expect that if Barack Obama insists on moving forward with his indefensible “Affordable Health Care Act,” that when the health insurance exchanges open on October 1, 2013, Barack Obama be required to take advantage of the basic, bronze level health insurance coverage that the majority of Americans will most likely be financially forced to accept. If the Patient Privacy and Affordable Care Act includes all of the wonderful benefits that Barack Obama has claimed, then this bronze level coverage should be quite sufficient to provide his family with quality, affordable health care that delivers “more bang for his buck.”
Read more at ommerce Committee, chronicles the massive premium increases awaiting Americans when full implementation of http://patriotupdate.com/obamacare-for-obama-petition/#ggWpsZXcrK5fI3sr.99

 

Palin Backs Effort to Defund ‘Unaffordable Care Act’ Posted on August 28, 2013 by Cowboy Byte On Tuesday, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin signed the petition to defund Obamacare, throwing her support behind the efforts of Senators like Mike Lee (R-UT) and Ted Cruz (R-TX). She said the “time for rhetoric” and “ceremonial” votes in Congress was over. “Forced enrollment in Obama’s ‘Unaffordable Care Act’ is weeks away,” Palin said in a statement. “This beast must be stopped–not funding it. Today, Todd and I joined with many of our fellow citizens to urge those in the U.S. Senate to not fund Obamacare.” Palin added that “We The People must continue to make our voices heard and hold those elected to serve this great nation accountable.” “Those in the Senate and those seeking to serve there must stand strong against this devastating program before it reveals its true face now recognized by both sides of the aisle as the bureaucratic and economic beast that will deny our families, our businesses, and our sick the ability to access health care,” she said. “The time for rhetoric and ceremonial votes in Congress is over. The time to take serious action to stop Obamacare is now. Join us in urging Senators–Don’t Fund Obamacare! Just remember–if you fund it, you own it!”
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/24113/palin-backs-effort-to-defund-unaffordable-care-act/#juLzIDVm4IK9uKzt.99

IRS finalizes penalty for ObamaCare mandate
Posted on August 28, 2013 by Cowboy Byte Federal tax collectors have finalized a rule to penalize individuals who do not obtain health insurance under ObamaCare. The regulation from the IRS formally codifies the fine charged to people without insurance under the healthcare law’s individual mandate. Under the law, most Americans must either be covered by health insurance or pay a penalty. For the first year, the charge for not obtaining health insurance is $95 or 1 percent of household income. The penalty will increase, though, to $695 per person or 2.5 percent of household income in 2016 and then according to a cost-of-living formula for following years. There are, however, a number of exemptions to the penalty. For instance, Americans who qualify for Medicaid coverage but live in states that have not taken part in the law’s expanded Medicaid will not be charged. Neither will people who are temporarily uninsured while between jobs, those who are opposed to having insurance coverage for religious reasons or members of Indian tribes.
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/24095/irs-finalizes-penalty-for-obamacare-mandate/#hbyylghV8hxHUTlz.99

John Boehner Has Just Ordered Rank-And-File House Republicans, During A Private Conference Call, NOT To Defund ObamaCare!
       National Review is reporting that “Boehner strongly hinted on a conference call with rank-and-file House Republicans that the upcoming continuing resolution will not be a do-or-die fight over Obamacare spending. ‘Our intent is to move quickly on a short-term continuing resolution [CR] that keeps the government running…'” 
       Don’t be fooled by the Washington weasel-speak. Boehner and others are throwing down the gauntlet, essentially saying to rank-and-file House Republicans: Don’t listen to the pesky demands of the American people… move to defund ObamaCare and you won’t just invite Barack Obama’s wrath… YOU’LL INVITE MY WRATH. 
       Make no mistake, Boehner is trying to herd cats and is issuing veiled threats precisely because the calls and faxes from patriotic Americans are starting to be heard loud-and-clear in Washington… And now that John Boehner has played his hand, we – the American people – must play ours. 
       Our elected officials must make a choice, and they need to make it now. Let them know that they can either do what House Leadership wants, or they can do what the American people want and DEFUND OBAMACARE.

PHILIP V RIGGIO: SORPRESA REVOLUCIONARIA
Sigue en los titulares el brote del cólera en Cuba, pese al fatídico empeño revolucionario de encubrirlo, por una parte, y de enriquecerse cínicamente el desgobierno facturándoles en dólares a los extranjeros que allá lo contraen, por otra. [Primera plana 27-VIII]  ?Bajará del avión en el Brasil con los médicos internacionalistas?  ?Está ya en “Barrio Adentro” y los arrabales deBolivia??Cuándo lo desembarcarán en Miami los vuelos?  ?Acaso ya campea por el “mall”?   ?Se responsabilizarán la presidente brasileña Dilma Rousseff y el Itamaraty (cancillería), el pajaritismo de quien sea y el presidente Evo Morales, el presidente norteamericano Barack Obama y el Departamento de Estado, la ONU y la OPS, y el arzobispo local?

QUE TRAE EN LA BOLA HOY RICARDO SAMITIER: LA VERDAD OCULTA……. COMO LOS CUBANOS AYUDAN A FIDEL==Y DICEN NO SON COMUNISTAS ???? La Excusa Que Usaron Los ALEMANES…   Ahora La Usan Los Cubanos…
Los Alemanes eran el país más DESINFORMADO en tiempos de Hitler… Después de la guerra… Inclusive los que Vivian a dos kilómetros de los Campos de Concentración…
“Declararon Que No Sabían Lo Que Allí Se Hacia…”  
Los cubanos según dicen: NO SABEN NADA… van a las MARCHAS PIDIENDO PAREDÓN o APOYANDO AL TIRANO…”OBLIGADOS”  
Tienen las manos llenas de CAYOS de APLAUDIR…  
pero NO PUEDEN EXPLICAR cómo se conocen las MARCAS DE LA ROPAS CARAS… y el nombre de la tiendas…  
Para esos cubanos de allá y de aquí “NO ENTERADOS” quiero decirles que desde el envió de Paquetes a Cuba a partir de que se suspendió el correo directo… es UN NEGOCITO  de los CASTRO… todo lo que se mueve en Cuba…Es del MAYORAL…

John Boehner Is Ordering Republicans To Fund ObamaCare!
      Western Center for Journalism.
Boehner has thrown down the gauntlet and now that John Boehner has played his hand, we – the American people – must play ours. 
       Our elected officials must make a choice, and they need to make it now. Let them know that they can either do what Mr. Boehner wants, or they can do what the American people want and DEFUND OBAMACARE. 
Is The Federal Government Really Hiring “An Army Of ObamaCare Detectives.” 
       You’ve already heard the news that government agents will be given the authority under ObamaCare to barge into your home, and you already know about the “ObamaCare Navigators,” … the Obama-bots and so-called “Community Organizers” (and potentially even people with criminal records) who will be given access to your most private financial information. 
       But now the Daily Mail UK is reporting that the “Feds are building a detective squad to target consumers and companies that don’t follow Obamacare’s rules.” 
       Their words, not ours… 
       The Daily Mail goes on to say: “More than 1,600 new employees hired by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources in the aftermath of ObamaCare’s passage include just two described as ‘consumer safety’ officers, but 86 tasked with ‘criminal investigating’ – indicating that the agency is building an army of detectives to sleuth out violations of a law that many in Congress who supported it still find confusing.” 
       John Boehner’s political schemes be damned. If he believes that keeping ObamaCare around, so he can pretend to fight it, is “good politics,” then our elected officials must be disabused of that idiotic notion here and now. 
       The insanity must end today. Simply put, unless we stop ObamaCare in the next 30 days, it will likely be here to stay and all of the nightmares that they told you could never happen will come true in short order. 
More Shoes Are Dropping. Medicaid For Everyone Is Just Around The Corner. 
       Not only have health insurance premiums risen, on average, by more than $3600.00 since 2008, but major employers like UPS, the University of Virginia, and a number of local governments have just announced that they’ll be dropping coverage. They aren’t the first, they won’t be the last… and millions of people will be forced into the socialist single-payer pool. 
       Conservative icon Gary Bauer summed up what is going on: “This growing trend highlights another of the perverse incentives in ObamaCare: it encourages companies to end health care coverage entirely and dump entire families into ObamaCare’s exchange programs. This shouldn’t surprise anyone.” 
       “Barack Obama has spoken openly about his support for a socialist single-payer system, adding, ‘But I don’t think we’re going to be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately. There’s going to be potentially some transition process.'” 
       “ObamaCare is that ‘transition process’ of ‘eliminating employer coverage,’ one giant step in the ‘fundamental transformation’ of America into a European-style, socialist welfare state.” 
       But our fight to maintain the American way of live is winnable. Senator Ted Cruz recently said: “Republicans have the votes to make defunding possible,” and he’s right. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. If Republicans didn’t have the votes, Boehner wouldn’t be throwing down the gauntlet. 
has made his move and now we must make ours. Win, lose or draw, we must make it clear to our elected officials that they must now make a choice. They can either side with John Boehner and Barack Obama, and fund ObamaCare, or they can side with the American people and defund it.
 
Floyd Brown 

Departing FBI Director Warns: Jihadists in America Are Most Serious Concerns
Departing FBI chief Robert Mueller gave Catherine Herridge an interview last night on FOX Special Report. When asked who and what posed the greatest threat to America — Al Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula, Al Qaeda in Iraq, Al Shabab, etc. — Mueller answered unhesitatingly: terror in the homeland, homegrown terror.
Devout Muslims in America are our gravest security concern.
“Departing FBI chief worries terrorists will again target planes or pull off a WMD attack” FOX News
The nature of terrorism has changed in Robert Mueller’s dozen years as FBI director, but his concerns for the future are much the same as when terrorists struck on Sept. 11, 2001, merely a week after he’d taken over the bureau.
As he wraps up his FBI tenure, Mueller (MULL-er) worries that terrorists will once again target planes or finally pull off an attack using a weapon of mass destruction.
Mueller sees terrorism as a shifting landscape, evolving from Osama bin Laden’s global brand in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks to the splintering threats arising in the fallout from the Arab Spring across the Middle East. Mueller says newly emerging cadres of violent extremists will present threats down the road.
Mueller spoke to reporters at FBI headquarters.
Read more at http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/08/departing-fbi-director-warns-jihadists-america-serious-concerns/#Kdfe49U7lwTr7G7B.99 

 

CLEMENTE SANCHEZ: UN BUEN POLITICO
Un buen político, es el que tiene bien estudiado el Plan de Campaña y de gobierno Solamente 3 Pasos o Etapas.
Primera, Sera Prometer lo Imposible;
Segundo, Al final de su mandato, explicar con lujos de detalles, cual fue la razón de no haber cumplido su Plan, o sus promesas.
Tercero, Echar toda la culpa al que anteriormente tenia ese cargo por elección popular. Y es ahora cuando se va a consolidar como POLÍTICO, pues con suma frecuencia, dará Conferencias y aparecerá como un Gran Estadista.

Me he dado cuenta de que las cosas son mas fáciles de lo que pensamos y que quizás puedas solucionar tus asuntos en dos sencillos pasos.
* Baja de Peso en dos pasos: 
1 – Cierra la boca, y 
2 – Ponte a hacer ejercicios.  
* Curso de Administración en dos pasos: 
1 – No gastes lo que no tienes, y
2 – Deja de pedir prestado.   
* Mejora tu autoestima en dos pasos: 
1 – Quierete mucho así como estás, y
2 – Que te importe un bledo lo que piensen los demás.  
* Superación personal en dos pasos: 
1 – Deja de hacerte la victima y
2 – Ponte a trabajar.    
* Curso de autosanación en dos pasos:
1 – Corrige tus posibles errores y
2 – Perdona las estupideces de los demás.  
* Hablar en público en dos pasos: 
1 – No tengas miedo a decir tonterias, y 
2 – Si ya las dijiste, no te calles; sigue hablando.  
* Curso de Mejoramiento de Imagen: 
1 – Bañate, peinate y lávete los dientes, y 
2 – Luego cuando salgas de tu casa,
camina siempre DERECHO!!!!!.  
* Modales y Etiqueta en dos pasos: 
1 – Saluda siempre y 
2 – Mastica con la boca cerrada.  
* Curso de Liderazgo en dos pasos: 
1 – Pide las cosas con educación, firmeza y sin miedo
2 – Siempre da el ejemplo.  
* Curso de Valores en dos pasos: 
1 – No fastidies a tu prójimo y 
2 – Siempre que puedas, ayúdalo.  
* Autoconocimiento en dos pasos: 
1 – Siempre mírate bien en el espejo, y
2 – Dí tus verdades aunque te duelan.  
* Matrimonios de Éxito en dos pasos: 
1 – No pongas los cuernos, y
2 – Cumple con tus obligaciones, se feliz.  
* Crecimiento Emocional y Espiritual en dos pasos:
1 – Deja de tenerte lástima y
2 – Deja de echar la culpa a los demás de tus fracasos. 
ENTENDIDO ?…..¡Shh! ¡No se lo cuentes a nadie!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WND: Does the Federal Reserve control Washington?
Find out why names and faces change, but policies don’t Where does the money come from? Where does it go? 
They’re talking about raising the debt limit again in Washington – $16.7 trillion and counting. 
The National Debt has continued to increase an average of $2.06 billion per day since September 30, 2012!1

If you want to understand the scam of the Federal Reserve system, you won’t get a better inside look than G. Edward Griffin’s “The Creature from Jekyll Island” – a modern-day classic work on the smoke, mirrors, pulleys, cogs and wheels that create the grand illusion Americans call money. 

Rep. Ron Paul calls it a “superb analysis.” 

Banking and the Federal Reserve … a dry and boring subject? Don’t believe it! Once you pick up this book you’ll be hooked in five minutes. This book reads like a detective story – which it really is; but it’s all true. “The Creature from Jekyll Island” is about the most blatant scam of all history. You’ll find it all here: the cause of wars, boom-bust cycles, inflation, depression, prosperity and more. 

“The Creature from Jekyll Island” will change the way you view the world, politics, and money. After you finish this book, your world view will have changed forever. You’ll never trust a politician again – or a banker. 

Corruption in the VA’s Office: Veterans Affairs workers reap bonuses despite claims backlog By GJWHG / 26 August 2013 / 10 Comments The report said that in 2011, more than two-thirds of claims processors received a total of $5.5 million in bonuses. FOLLOW GIRLS JUST WANNA HAVE GUNS ON FACEBOOK! That same year, the backlog of claims swelled by 155 percent. The bonuses reportedly created a perverse system, where workers were encouraged to stick to simple cases in order to meet certain performance benchmarks — in turn ignoring claims that required additional attention. “At the beginning of the month … I’d try to work my really easy stuff so I could get my numbers up,” Renee Cotter, a union steward for a Reno, Nev., chapter, reportedly said.
Read more at http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/2013/08/corruption-in-the-vas-office-veterans-affairs-workers-reap-bonuses-despite-claims-backlog/#s2tKpsr0r8Hwusas.99

Enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ 

No 468 “En mi opinion” Agosto 27, 2013

agosto 27, 2013

No 468  “En mi opinión” Agosto 27, 2013.  
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  “IN GOD WE TRUST”   
Enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

QUE DICE HOY RICARDO SAMTIER: Aumenta las personas que tienen que cortar el cable y el satélite
La Situación Económica Fuerza A Cortar Los Contratos de Televisión Por Cable
Son Tantos Que Radio Shack Anuncia Que Vende antenas… Lo Que No Se
Hacía Por Lo Menos Por 20 años…
Para leer la noticia http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/207795/radioshack-promotes-cord-cutting-with-digital-tv-a.html?edition=63850#axzz2dAcWZzS1
Donde Quedaron Las Buenas Intenciones De Obama Por La Paz…
No se Hagan Ilusiones… Las Guerras Solo Se ganan Con Botas en la Tierra…
Daba VERGÜENZA Ver Al Pacifista De 1960 Que Pedía La Retirada De Vietnam… Pedir Bombardear Siria Y Matar Niños… Hacer Lo Que El Criticaba Entonces…
Este Articulo Vale La Pena Leerlo… PERO ANTES creo conveniente para las NUEVAS GENERACIONES y mis amigos NO CUBANOS introducirles al escritor;  de esa forma van a AQUILATAR mucho mejor este articulo…
Comenzare por un viejo adagio: “Padre Bodeguero… Hijo Millonario… Nieto Pordiosero”
 
Fidel Castro y su generación llegaron al poder en el TERCER PAÍS MAS RICO DE LATINO AMÉRICA… hecho por gente muy trabajadora y limitada educación… (Bodegueros, campesinos, etc.) Sus hijos educados… estaban llenos de buenas ideas…
Raúl Rivero Castañeda; el escritor del articulo nació en 1945 en Morón, Camagüey, al triunfo de la revolución tenía 14 años… Fue miembro de la PRIMERA GENERACIÓN DE PERIODISTAS creados “LIBRE DE INFLUENCIAS CAPITALISTAS”después del triunfo de la Revolución… se convirtió en un ferviente seguidor de Fidel Castro y la Revolución Cubana. Escaló posiciones y en 1973-1976 era el jefe de corresponsales de la prensa oficial cubana en Moscú. También se desempeñó como presidente de la Unión Nacional a favor del régimen de Escritores y Artistas (UNEAC). Posteriormente, fue conocido como “El Poeta De La Revolución”, y se asocia con las principales figuras culturales de la Cuba comunista…
Raúl Rivero… un ejemplo de cómo los hombres INTELIGENTES mientrasVIVEN BIEN no usan la inteligencia para PENSAR y COMPRENDER… 
Raúl Rivero vivió como el “Hijo RICO” del adagio por 30 años… bajo el régimen comunista… su INTELIGENCIA Se DURMIÓ… Y no se percata que seGASTARON LAS RIQUEZAS… que Cuba se estaba destruyendo… tampoco se percata que Gorbachov está tratando de salvar la Unión Soviética de la MISERIA desde 1985… Con un conjunto poco coherente de reformas enfocadas a levantar la economía…
En esas condiciones: ARRUINADO Y PORDIOSERO… su inteligencia seDESPIERTA en 1989  y abandonó la Unión Nacional de Escritores y Artistas Cubanos.
El 2 de junio 1991 firmó la llamada “Carta De Los 10 Intelectuales”, una petición para la liberación de los presos políticos y la celebración de elecciones democráticas. Desde entonces, Rivero ha sido un paria en la sociedad cubana. En 1995, fundó Cuba Press, y se convirtió en miembro activo del movimiento periodismo independiente cubano, publicando sus trabajos en los periódicos en los Estados Unidos y otros países.
Fue Condenado a 20 AÑOS de Prisión… según dicen; la paso mal… pero supongo… que debido a sus 30 años de “VIDA SOCIAL COMUNISTA”  sus camaradas consiguieron BENEVOLENCIA por parte de Castro… Quien lo “INDULTO” a los 20 meses… a cambio que cumpliera con algunas CONDICIONES… la única que se hizo pública es que le dieron un año… para que abandonara el país… en otras palabras… lo trataron igual que EN TIEMPOS DE ROMA trataban a las familias ARISTÓCRATAS…  que los enviaban al exilio…  
Conocido el personaje ahora lean el artículo que dice la verdad… de “LOS CAMBIOS DE RAÚL CASTRO.”
Todo lo anterior no quita que Raúl Rivero sabe escribir y casi siempre es genial…
Misión de bueyes –
Raúl Rivero | Madrid | 24 Ago 2013
La jerarquía del régimen cubano, afanada siempre por ofrecer una imagen de originalidad y soberanía a los inversores y a las viudas del comunismo, aparenta que no busca salir de las ruinas de su sistema hacia un capitalismo de Estado como lo han hecho, alumbrados por el fuego de los manuales marxistas leninistas, sus camaradas de China y Viet Nam.
No. El gobierno de la Isla, en sus encrucijadas, se inclina a veces por una etapa superior del feudalismo.
El primer paso importante lo dieron hace unos años cuando liberaron a miles de empleados de las empresas estatales y los lanzaron a las calles para que vivieran la precariedad y la miseria por cuenta propia. Eran libres, podían aspirar a conseguir trabajos donde quisieran, solo que allí no existen compañías privadas y tuvieron que salir a forrar botones, fregar automóviles, vender agua de azúcar y pan con nada o remendar zapatos.
Con esa medida el Estado le transfirió la responsabilidad de su pobreza al individuo y, por otra parte, privilegió al sector de la población que recibe apoyos de sus familiares en el extranjero.
Ellos viven la ilusión de que son comerciantes porque venden y compran los chirimbolos y baratijas que les llegan desde las tiendas de rebajas de Miami. Los panfletos oficiales ya comenzaron a fustigar a los llamados nuevos ricos. Los viejos ricos están en el poder. No hay tinta para tocarlos.
Esta semana se produjo un anuncio que demuestra que los jefes no miran por el parabrisas, usan el retrovisor. El ministerio de Agricultura prepara un plan de adiestramiento de 20 mil bueyes para realizar labores en el campo. El programa se propone garantizarles atención veterinaria y pastos a los animales. Un especialista del sector dijo a los periodistas que los bueyes “tienen la misión” de ayudar a la siembra, el cultivo y el transporte de semillas.
En ese cuadro, donde tropiezan escorias feudales y esclavistas, retoños de un capitalismo primitivo y el desconcierto social, lo más auténtico que queda del socialismo es el casco y la mala idea.
Y se usa para reprimir, darle palizas y encarcelar a los opositores pacíficos y a las Damas de Blanco.
El grupo de compadres que está al mando no quiere que se mueva nada. Si hay que hacer movimientos por compromiso ellos seleccionan el rumbo. La velocidad, ya se sabe, es la del paso de una carreta tirada por bueyes.
TODO DEPENDE DEL PUTIN: Putin Es El ARBITRO… Aun Sin Fuerzas… Si Veta La Guerra Contra Siria En La ONU Y Retira El Embajador De Washington… Y Acusa A USA De Estar Promoviendo
Otra Guerra… HAY CAGALERA EN EL MUNDO
Los Estados Unidos No Tienen Credibilidad…
Los Politiqueros Socialistas De Ambos Partidos Son Los Responsables Y Han Creado Las Condiciones Para Un Golpe Tipo Cromwell… Nadie está de acuerdo en cómo se está manejando el país… TODO ES UNA FALTA DE RESPETO A LA INTELIGENCIA DE LOS CIUDADANOS… de USA y También del Mundo entero…

QUIERO MORIR DIGNAMENTE: Eniado por Angel Gonzalez.
Anoche mi mujer y yo estábamos sentados en la sala hablando de las muchas cosas de la vida… Entre otras… estábamos hablando de la vida y de la muerte…y dije..
” tina, nunca me dejes vivir en estado vegetativo, dependiendo de máquinas y líquidos de una botella. Si me ves en ese estado, desenchufa los artefactos que me mantienen vivo y bota los líquidos de los cuales dependa, prefiero morir”. 
Entonces, mi mujer se levantó y me miró con una cara de admiraciónque yo nunca le había visto … 
Y me desenchufó :El Televisor,El DVD,El Computador,El iPod ,El Teléfono,El Internet y despues botó el Aguardiente, el Tequila, el Whisky, el Ron, y todas las cervezas …
 ¡a la  gran puta , ……… CASI ME MUERO!

John Boehner Is Ordering Republicans To Fund ObamaCare! Boehner Betraying Us On ObamaCare… Strike Back?
       Boehner has thrown down the gauntlet and now that John Boehner has played his hand, we – the American people – must play ours. 
       Our elected officials must make a choice, and they need to make it now. Let them know that they can either do what Mr. Boehner wants, or they can do what the American people want and DEFUND OBAMACARE. 
Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. 
If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.
Is The Federal Government Really Hiring “An Army Of ObamaCare Detectives.” 
       You’ve already heard the news that government agents will be given the authority under ObamaCare to barge into your home, and you already know about the “ObamaCare Navigators,” … the Obama-bots and so-called “Community Organizers” (and potentially even people with criminal records) who will be given access to your most private financial information. 
       But now the Daily Mail UK is reporting that the “Feds are building a detective squad to target consumers and companies that don’t follow Obamacare’s rules.” 
       Their words, not ours… 
       The Daily Mail goes on to say: “More than 1,600 new employees hired by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources in the aftermath of ObamaCare’s passage include just two described as ‘consumer safety’ officers, but 86 tasked with ‘criminal investigating’ – indicating that the agency is building an army of detectives to sleuth out violations of a law that many in Congress who supported it still find confusing.” 
       John Boehner’s political schemes be damned. If he believes that keeping ObamaCare around, so he can pretend to fight it, is “good politics,” then our elected officials must be disabused of that idiotic notion here and now. 
       The insanity must end today. Simply put, unless we stop ObamaCare in the next 30 days, it will likely be here to stay and all of the nightmares that they told you could never happen will come true in short order. 
Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. 

More Shoes Are Dropping. Medicaid For Everyone Is Just Around The Corner. 
       Not only have health insurance premiums risen, on average, by more than $3600.00 since 2008, but major employers like UPS, the University of Virginia, and a number of local governments have just announced that they’ll be dropping coverage. They aren’t the first, they won’t be the last… and millions of people will be forced into the socialist single-payer pool. 
       Conservative icon Gary Bauer summed up what is going on: “This growing trend highlights another of the perverse incentives in ObamaCare: it encourages companies to end health care coverage entirely and dump entire families into ObamaCare’s exchange programs. This shouldn’t surprise anyone.” 
       “Barack Obama has spoken openly about his support for a socialist single-payer system, adding, ‘But I don’t think we’re going to be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately. There’s going to be potentially some transition process.'” 
       “ObamaCare is that ‘transition process’ of ‘eliminating employer coverage,’ one giant step in the ‘fundamental transformation’ of America into a European-style, socialist welfare state.” 
       But our fight to maintain the American way of live is winnable. Senator Ted Cruz recently said: “Republicans have the votes to make defunding possible,” and he’s right. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. If Republicans didn’t have the votes, Boehner wouldn’t be throwing down the gauntlet. 
       Boehner has made his move and now we must make ours. Win, lose or draw, we must make it clear to our elected officials that they must now make a choice. They can either side with John Boehner and Barack Obama, and fund ObamaCare, or they can side with the American people and defund it. 

Floyd Brown 

Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies
Contrary evidence arises as U.S. considers punishing Assad regime         
 NEW YORK – As the U.S. considers a response to what it calls a chemical weapon attack by Syria’s Bashar al-Assad regime that killed hundreds of civilians, reliable Middle Eastern sources say they have evidence the culprits actually were the rebel forces trying to take over the government. Secretary of State John Kerry accused the Assad government Monday of covering up the use of chemical weapons in “a cowardly crime” and a “moral obscenity” that shocked the world’s conscience. Kerry claimed the Obama administration had “undeniable” evidence “that the Assad government was culpable in the use of chemical weapons on civilians” in the Aug. 21 attack in Damascus suburbs. Reports that the Obama administration is considering a military strike against the Assad government continued to circulate Monday. Meanwhile, U.N. weapon inspectors in Syria were fired upon by snipers as they attempted to investigate the site of the Aug. 21 attack. Assad has rejected charges that his government forces used chemical weapons as “preposterous” and “completely politicized,” the Los Angeles Times reported. He argues Syrian forces were in the targeted area. “How is it possible that any country would use chemical weapons, or any weapons of mass destruction, in an area where its own forces are located?” Assad asked in the interview with Izvestia, according to a translation provided by Syria’s official news agency and published by the Los Angeles Times. “This is preposterous! These accusations are completely politicized and come on the back of the advances made by the Syrian Army against the terrorists.” Rebel attack? With the assistance of former PLO member and native Arabic-speaker Walid Shoebat, WND has assembled evidence from various Middle Eastern sources that cast doubt on Obama administration claims the Assad government is responsible for last week’s attack.A video posted on YouTube, embedded below, shows Free Syrian Army, or FSA, rebel forces launching a Sarin gas attack on a Syrian village. Another video posted on YouTube shows what appears to be Syrian rebel forces loading a canister of nerve gas on a rocket to fire presumably at civilians and possibly government forces.As seen below, a screen capture from the video shows rebel civilian forces placing a suspicious blue canister on top of a rocket-launching device.A separate YouTube video from Syrian television shows a government-captured arsenal of what appears to be nerve gas weapons seized from a rebel stronghold in Jobar, Syria.The image below shows canisters in the seized rebel arsenal from Jobar that appear to resemble the canister launched by rebel forces in the first image above. Syrian TV news report of rebel weapons seized in Jobar, SyriaA close-up from the Syrian television news report, seen below, shows a chemical agent identified as having been made by a “Saudi factory.”Syrian TV news report showing chemical agents identified as manufactured in Saudi Arabia   
A report from the Russian Arabic-language channel RT Arabic shows captured rebel arsenals apparently with chemical agents manufactured in Saudi Arabia and gas masks, supporting Russian claims that the rebels are the culprits in the alleged chemical attack.           On Aug. 23, LiveLeak.com hosted an audio recording of a phone call broadcast on Syrian TV between a terrorist affiliated with the rebel civilian militia “Shuhada al-Bayada Battalion” in Homs, Syria, and his Saudi Arabian boss, identified as “Abulbasit.” The phone call indicates rebel-affiliated terrorists in Syria, not the Assad government, launched the chemical weapons attack in Deir Ballba in the Homs, Syria, countryside.The terrorist said his group, which comprises 200 terrorists escaped from al-Bayadah to al-Daar al-Kabera through a tunnel, needed to buy weapons to attack Homs.The Saudi financier, who was in Cairo, asked the Syrian terrorists to give details about his group and how it will receive the money. The Saudi admitted his support to terrorists in Daraa and the Damascus countryside. The Syrian terrorist told him that one of the achievements of his “battalion” was the use of chemical weapons in Deir Ballba.The recorded phone call disclosed the cooperation between two terrorist groups in Syria to bring two bottles of Sarin Gas from the Barzeh neighborhood in Damascus.Russian media sources have consistently reported Syrian military have discovered rebel warehouses containing chemical weapons agents and have documented rebel chemical weapons attacks on the Syrian civilians the military.http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/video-shows-rebels-launching-gas-attack-in-syria/

Russia warns of ‘catastrophic consequences’ if Syria hit – La WWIII muy buscada por la Elite?            
Russia on Tuesday warned a military intervention in Syria could have “catastrophic consequences” for the region and called on the international community to show “prudence” over the crisis.”Attempts to bypass the Security Council, once again to create artificial groundless excuses for a military intervention in the region are fraught with new suffering in Syria and catastrophic consequences for other countries of the Middle East and North Africa,” foreign ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said.”We are calling on our American partners and all members of the world community to demonstrate prudence (and) strict observance of international law, especially the fundamental principles of the UN Charter,” he said in a statement.Earlier, Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said that Moscow regretted Monday’s decision by the US to postpone a meeting on the Syria crisis, as Western powers mulled military action over last week’s chemical attack in Syria.The scrapping of the meeting, which was due to take place at The Hague later in the week, is the latest sign of a new peak in tensions between Moscow and the West over the possibility of strikes against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.”It arouses regret that our partners decided to cancel the bilateral meeting,” Gatilov said on Twitter.”Working out the parameters of a political solution in Syria would have been especially helpful right now, when military action is hanging over this country.”In such a climate, it was especially important to work in concert to try to organise the repeatedly postponed peace conference bringing together the Damascus regime and the rebels, Lukashevich added.”However, the United States’ decision to postpone the meeting in The Hague is sending precisely the opposite signal to the opposition, encouraging their intransigence as they await outside intervention,” he said.Lukashevich added convening the peace conference was the “most urgent task.”Western countries led by the United States are considering their response to an alleged chemical weapons attack by Assad’s regime on August 21.View gallery.”Map of Syria locating suspected chemical attacks in Damascus, suspected stocks of chemical weapons a …Russia has said it believes rebels were behind the incident and has warned any military action without UN approval would violate international law.On Monday Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov condemned the “hysteria” over the claimed chemical attack and said the West had yet to come up with proof that Assad’s regime was behind it.He also said Russia would not get involved in a military conflict in Syria.Russian President Vladimir Putin told British Prime Minister David Cameron in a telephone call on Monday there was no evidence yet that the Syrian regime had used chemical weapons against rebels, Cameron’s office said.Pro-Kremlin Russian newspaper Izvestia published Monday an interview with Assad who ridiculed as “nonsense” the idea his regime used chemical weapons and warned the United States of failure if it attacked Syria.Russian officials are now comparing the possible use of force against Syria to the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, which was vehemently opposed by Moscow as based on flawed intelligence that Saddam Hussein’s regime possessed weapons of mass destruction.”Deja-vu,” Alexei Pushkov, the head of the lower house of Russian parliament’s foreign affairs committee wrote on Twitter.”It feels like in the White House it’s still (George W.) Bush, (Dick) Cheney and (Donald) Rumsfeld and in Downing Street Tony Blair,” he said, referring to the former US president, vice president, defence secretary and British premier during the Iraq war.The Interfax news agency quoted a diplomatic source who derided US Secretary of State John Kerry’s most recent statement on Syria, saying it was “pompous”.Kerry called the use of chemical weapons against civilians “a moral obscenity”.A military diplomatic source also told the news agency the possible use of force would not lead to “an easy victory” because Syria had enough air defence systems to rebuff attacks.http://news.yahoo.com/russia-warns-catastrophic-consequences-syria-hit-100720291.htmlhttp://news.yahoo.com/russia-warns-catastrophic-consequences-syria-hit-100720291.html

FOX News First: Aug. 27 By Chris Stirewalt
·        Putin shoves back on Syria 
·        Lew starts debt derby 
·        Rubio in for Cuccinelli 
·        New Fox poll: Republican workaholics
·        Record-setting birthday 
 
PUTIN PUSHES BACK AS OBAMA EDGES TOWARD SYRIA STRIKE
As America edges closer to a retaliatory strike against Syrian government forces in the wake of a deadly chemical attack, Russia is digging in against international intervention. Russian PresidentVladimir Putin has been increasingly dismissive of President Obama’s policy demands — offering asylum to NSA leaker Edward Snowden and brushing off Obama’s insistence that gay athletes be included in the 2014 Winter Olympics set for Sochi, Russia. Putin’s government agrees that chemical weapons were used in Syria, but not with the U.S. assessment that they were deployed by government forces rather than Islamist rebels. News that the Obama administration scrapped plans to meet with Russian diplomats on Syria options reaffirms the new chill in the already icy U.S.-Russia relationship.
 
Coalition of the unwilling – Obama has yet to reach out himself to House Speaker John Boehner to secure congressional support for U.S. intervention, but domestic politics are the least of his concern. With U.N. weapons inspectors bogged down, an expected Security Council vote will be further delayed. And with Russia expected to block any strike, will probably be a dead end. The call for a NATO-led attack like the one that helped Libyan Islamists topple their government is also dimming as British Prime Minister David Cameron, faces new pressure to win approval from Parliament before proceeding with any military plan. Cameron talked with Putin late Monday, and his office’s readout of the call showed Putin far from obliging.
 
“Our concern should be those chemical weapons, preventing them from falling into hands of Hezbollah, that should be guiding our action, not expressing moral outrage from university faculty lounges” — Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, on “Hannity”
 
Obama doctrine on the line – The Navy has four warships ready to strike Syria at a moment’s notice, but the political game looks far from over. Obama’s past promises of extensive dialogue and coalition-building before action create one obstacle, but so too do the other American-backed Islamists in the region. The collapse of Egypt’s government and the rising power of Muslim militias in Libya (as well as the deadly 2012 raid in Benghazi) have led to public frustrations with Obama’s Middle East doctrine. The concurrent collapse in Russian relations adds just one more complication to Obama’s Syria bind.
 
Editorial agreement on Syria strike- WaPo: “It remains in the United States’ interest now as two years ago to see more moderate forces prevail. This can’t be achieved with one or two volleys of cruise missiles.”// WSJ: “The worst response would be lobbing in a few cruise missiles from a standoff distance.”//NYT: “Presidents should not make a habit of drawing red lines in public, but if they do, they had best follow through.”
 
Baier Tracks: Understanding Syria… “As the president makes his decision about a strike in response to the use of chemical weapons in Syria, experts are hoping that whatever it is has strategic importance on the ground and can help turn the tide in that country’s civil war. If you missed “Special Report” last night, watch military analyst Elizabeth O’Bagy explain the composition rebel opposition here. We will have another expert tutorial tonight.” – Bret Baier.[Watch “Special Report with Bret Baier,” 6 p.m. ET.]
 
UN Aid linked to Assad – Fox News Exclusive: While United Nations inspectors are struggling to reach areas of Syria where the Assad regime allegedly has used chemical weapons, U.N. humanitarian officials are renewing calls for aid to be donated to their domestic Syrian operations, which are run under the close control of the same brutal regime.

LEW SETS DEBT DEADLINE
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew told lawmakers that the federal government is set to exceed its debt limit in mid-October. In a letter, Lew urged Congress to act quickly when it returns to find a way to allow more borrowing. This starts the clock on what are expected to be bitter negotiations between the Republican House and President Obama on debt and spending. By setting the deadline after the start of the federal fiscal year on Oct. 1, however, Lew has increased the chances for a full-year deal on debt, taxes and spending rather than the short-term patches that have characterized the past two years.

[Watch FOX: Fox Business Correspondent Rich Edson looks at the upcoming budget fight and what will happens when the debt limit is reached.]

KEYSTONE PIPELINE DECISION DELAY
Washington Examiner: “The State Department’s decision on the proposed Keystone XL … pipeline is in danger of being bumped to next year, as the agency’s internal watchdog says it needs more time to finish an ongoing investigation of the project.”

CRUZ, PAUL TEAM UP FOR ANTI-OBAMACARE RALLY
Republican Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Rand Paul of Kentucky, plus Mike Lee of Utah,  plan to hold an “Exempt America from ObamaCare” event Sept. 10. The event is being organized by Tea Party Patriots, ForAmerica, and other conservative groups. The Senators have been at the forefront of a campaign to defund the healthcare bill.
“We can’t treat ourselves as a separate governing class. We’re supposed to be serving the American people.  So I’m going to file legislation when we get back to basically stop that.” – Rep.Ron DeSantis, R-Fla. “On the Record with Greta Van Susteren” discussing the congressional ObamaCare exemption. 

ObamaCare death spiral? – According to a new study from the conservative National Center for Public Policy Research, nearly 3 million Americans will save $1,000 by forgoing ObamaCare’s exchanges, another 3 million will save close to $500. The study finds such a trend could put the federal program in “a death spiral.”

[Watch FOX : Mark Carter, father Of Medal Of Honor recipient Staff Sgt. Ty Carter shares about his son’s remarkable heroism in the 9 a.m. ET hour]

CHAFFETZ WANTS ANSWERS ON ASYLUM REQUEST SPIKE
Chief Congressional Correspondent Mike Emanuel reports Rep. Jason Chaffetz R-Utah, wrote Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano concerning potential abuses of the department’s asylum program. In the letter, Chaffetz questions the 400 percent increase in asylum requests from Latin American countries and whether or not they are being coached to falsely seek sanctuary in the U.S..

HOLDER’S BID TO BLOCK SCHOOL VOUCHERS BLASTED
The WSJ editorial board offers harsh criticism of Attorney General Eric Holder for seeking to block a Louisiana plan that would offer school vouchers to minority students on the grounds that it will decrease diversity in underperforming schools: “A black Attorney General ought to be applauding this attempt to fulfill MLK’s dream of equal educational opportunity.”

UP IN SMOKE: OBAMA’S PRE-K PLAN
The Daily Caller reports President Obama’s plan to fund universal pre-k education through increased cigarette taxes may not be economically feasible in the long-term, experts estimate, due to decreasing smoking rates.

DEMS WANT TAX ON GUNS, AMMO
Fox News-  The “Gun Violence Prevention and Safe Communities Act,” sponsored by William Pascrell, D-N.J., and Danny Davis, D-Ill., would nearly double the current 11 percent tax on handguns, while raising the levy on bullets and cartridges from 11 percent to 50 percent.

BLACK CONSERVATIVE: WE’VE TAKEN A BACK SEAT TO GAYS, IMMIGRANTS 
WaPo: At a luncheon to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream Speech,” GOP leaders discussed the struggles currently facing the black community.Bob Woodson, the head of the Center for Neighborhood Enterprises charged that black Americans have taken a back seat to gays and immigrants.

WITH YOUR SECOND CUP OF COFFEE…
Ahead of the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, Juan Williams compares modern day hip-hop culture to the popular culture of 50 years ago when Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech. From Williams’ WSJ OpEd: “..words celebrating tattooed thugs and sexually indiscriminate women as icons of ‘keeping it real’—is a sad reminder of how long it has been since the world heard the sweet music of the March on Washington.”

Got a TIP from the RIGHT or LEFT? Email FoxNewsFirst@FOXNEWS.COM

POLL CHECK
Real Clear Politics Averages
Obama Job Approval: Approve – 44.0 percent//Disapprove – 50.7 percent
Direction of Country: Right Direction – 29.6 percent//Wrong Track – 62 percent 

OFF TO THE RACES
Biden, Cruz to address American Legion – Vice President Joe Biden will address the 95th American Legion Convention today in Houston, Texas. Senators Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. will address the gathering on Wednesday.

GOP hopefuls to converge for N.Y. fundraiser – Politico: “Six of the Republican Party’s stars and potential 2016 nominees — including New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Sens. Marco Rubioand Rand Paul and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker — will jointly headline a fundraiser for the Republican National Committee in New York next month.”

Rubio to stump for Cuccinelli – Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., will stump next month for Virginian Republican gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli. A campaign spokeswoman told the WaPothat details are still being worked out. Polls show Cuccinelli slightly behind in the November election.

Realtors back McAuliffe – After supporting Republicans in the previous two contests, the Virginia Association of Realtors has endorsed Democrat Terry McAuliffe for governor.

Liz Cheney untangles fishing snag – Wyoming Senate hopeful Liz Cheney, daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney and a former State Department official, will appear in court in the Cowboy State today over making a false statement to procure a fishing license. She claimed in-state residency before she was eligible. Officials concluded it was an honest mistake, but the charges have proven fodder for Republicans skeptical of the lifelong Virginian’s sudden adoption of her parents’ native state ahead of announcing her primary challenge of Republican Sen. Mike Enzi.

[Trending today: House Committee on Energy and Commerce Chairman, Fred Upton R-Mich., outlines the Republican vision and proposals for Health Care Reform on Fox News Opinion.] 

REPUBLICAN WORKAHOLICS
A Fox News poll out this morning shows Americans divided on how to deal with work email while on vacation. But one thing is for sure: Getaways aren’t what they used to be. From Fox polling maven Dana Blanton: “Some 18 percent say they check in ‘a few times a week.’ The number touching base with the office at least daily during their vacation is up 10 percentage points from 14 percent in 2005. Republicans (16 percent) are nearly twice as likely as Democrats (9 percent) to check in with their office ‘several times a day.’” See the full poll here.

TALK ABOUT A DOCUMENT DUMP
The U.S government’s Office of Surface Mining has announced that it lost 18,000 documents sought by coal miners as part of a suit to block new federal restrictions on mining. Environment and Energy has the story (subscription only).

RAISE A GLASS FOR GUINNESS
“The Guinness book of World Records” was first published on this date in 1955 by twin editorsNorris and Ross McWhirter. It is now the world’s fourth best-selling book. Guinness Brewery Managing Director Sir Hugh Beaver came up with the idea as a promotional tool, one that has settled and spurred an untold number of bar bets since. The Telegraph features some of the more unique editions in 2013, including the world’s youngest drummer and the world’s oldest gymnast.

AND NOW A WORD FROM CHARLES…
“Is the biggest issue in African-American life today the voter I.D. law?  Is that going to alter the course of society, black America, the inner cities, the terrible standard in the schools, the breakdown of the family, and all of that?  It’s nostalgia of a movement that’s intellectually bankrupt.” – Charles Krauthammer, on “Special Report with Bret Baier”

Chris Stirewalt is digital politics editor for Fox News. Want FOX News First in your inbox every day? Sign up here. To catch Chris live online daily at 11:30 a.m. ET, click here.

REDSTATE Morning Briefing For August 27, 2013
1.  The Meatloaf Caucus # Defund It
Congressman Rob Woodall (R-GA HAFA Score 78) was a great sport this past Friday. He joined me for my radio show in Atlanta, which is on WSB, the nation’s most listened to talk radio station.
During the course of our conversation, Congressman Woodall said the fight against Obamacare is “the biggest issue of our generation.” He also said of the Republicans in Congress “there is nothing we won’t do in order to see this President’s health care bill repealed.”
Got that? It is “the biggest issue of our generation” and “there is nothing we won’t do in order to see this President’s health care bill repealed.” Got it?
But he and the Republican leadership won’t support defunding it with a continuing resolution.
They are the Meatloaf Caucus. It’s like the old Meatloaf lyrics that he will do anything for love, but he won’t do that.
The Meatloaf Caucus will do anything to defeat Obamacare, but they won’t defund it.
Interestingly enough, if you listen . . . please click here for the rest of the post ?
2.  Coerced Sterilization In California Prisons
In 1924, a young Virginia woman named Carrie Buck was involuntarily committed by her foster parents to the ominously named Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded in Lynchburg, VA. While there is was decided based on her declared status as incorrigible, feebleminded, and promiscuous that after she gave birth to the child she was carrying (oddly enough, the pregnancy that resulted in her being termed promiscuous was the product of her rape by a relative of her foster parents ) that she would be involuntarily sterilized.
Her guardian sued to prevent the action and eventually the case wound up in the United States Supreme court. By an 8-1 vote, the sole dissenter was the Court’s lone Catholic, Joseph Pierce Butler, the court ruled that Buck could be sterilized. . . . please click here for the rest of the post ?
3.  Twerking towards Gomorrah
Viewers of the MTV Video Music Awards on Sunday night were treated to a bizarre dance routine from former Disney child actress Miley Cyrus, which CBS News describes as “one performance that won’t be forgotten very quickly….
If you’re unfamiliar with the term, “twerking” is a dance move that dispenses with all the other subtleties of dance to deliver pelvic thrusts and butt wiggles.  If a cell phone set to “vibrate” magically became human and started dancing, it would twerk.  CBS left out the part where young Miley grabbed a foam finger from a member of the audience and began rubbing it against her crotch.  She wound up simulating a bit of anal penetration with Ms. Loring’s son, who was singing with her on stage.  And the “bears” in the act were dancers dressed like children’s teddy bears, adding a lovely touch of pedophilia chic to the proceedings. . . . please click here for the rest of the post ?
 

Enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ 

No 466 “En mi opinion” Agosto 24

agosto 24, 2013

No 466  “En mi opinión” Agosto 24, 2013.  
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  “IN GOD WE TRUST”   
Enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
RICARDO SAMITIER: BOYCOTT “THE BUTLER” AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THIS TRAITOR BOYCOTT THIS MOVIE
What a disgrace to Mrs. Nancy Reagan! Boycott this movie!
America we must not forget 
JANE FONDA as NANCY REAGAN?
This cannot go around too much. Those of us that were living
in those years will never forget that she was a traitor and did
a lot of damage to our boys.
She has now been chosen to play Nancy Reagan in her life story.
I am sending this one out because so many do not know this truth…and
also because she was on 3 times this week talking about her new book…
And how good she feels in her 70’s. She still does not know what she
did wrong. Her book just may not make the best seller list if more people knew…
also…
Barbara Walters said:
Thank you all. Many died in Vietnam for our freedoms. I did not like
Jane Fonda then and I don’t like her now.
She can lead her present life the way she wants and perhaps
SHE can forget the past, but we DO NOT have to stand by
without comment and see her “honored” as a “Woman of the Century.” 
(I remember this well) For those who served and/or died….

NEVER FORGIVE A TRAITOR. SHE REALLY WAS A TRAITOR!!
and now President OBAMA wants to honor her……!!!!
In Memory of Lt. C. Thomsen Wieland who spent 100 days
at the Hanoi Hilton [Famous North Vietnam Prison]
IF YOU NEVER FORWARDED ANYTHING IN YOUR LIFE PLEASE
FORWARD THIS SO THAT EVERYONE WILL KNOW!!!!!!
A TRAITOR IS ABOUT TO BE HONORED. KEEP THIS MOVING ACROSS AMERICA
This is for all the kids born in the 70’s and after who do not know
and didn’t have to bear the burden that our fathers, mothers and
older brothers and sisters had to bear.
Jane Fonda is being honored as one of the ‘100 Women of the Century.’
BARBARA WALTERS WRITES:
Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others have
never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country,
but specific men who served and sacrificed during the Vietnam War.
The first part of this is from an F-4E pilot.
The pilot’s name is Jerry Driscoll, a River Rat.
In 1968, the former Commandant of the USAF Survival School
was a POW in Ho Lo Prison the ‘Hanoi Hilton.’
Dragged from a stinking cesspit of a cell, cleaned, fed,
and dressed in clean PJ’s, he was ordered to describe for a
visiting American ‘Peace Activist’ the ‘lenient and humane
treatment’ he’d received.
He spat at Ms. Fonda, was clubbed, and was dragged away. During
the subsequent beating, he fell forward on to the camp Commandant ‘s
feet, which sent that officer berserk.
In 1978, the Air Force Colonel still suffered from double vision
(which permanently ended his flying career) from the Commandant’s
frenzied application of a wooden baton.
From 1963-65, Col. Larry Carrigan was in the 47FW/DO (F-4E’s). He
spent 6 years in the ‘Hanoi Hilton’…the first three of which his family
only knew he was ‘missing in action’.
His wife lived on faith that he was still alive. His group, too, got the
cleaned-up, fed and clothed treatment in preparation for a ‘peace
delegation’ visit.
They, however, had time and devised a plan to get word to the world
that they were alive and still survived. Each man secreted a tiny piece
of paper, with his Social Security Number on it, in the palm of his hand.
When paraded before Ms. Fonda and a cameraman, she walked the line,
shaking each man’s hand and asking little encouraging snippets like: ‘Aren’t
you sorry you bombed babies?’ and ‘Are you grateful for the humane
treatment from your benevolent captors?’

Believing this HAD to be an act, they each palmed her their sliver of
paper. She took them all without missing a beat…At the end of the line
and once the camera stopped rolling, to the shocked disbelief of the
POW’s she turned to the officer in charge and handed him all the little
pieces of paper…Three men died from the subsequent beatings.

Colonel Carrigan was almost number four but he survived, which is
the only reason we know of her actions that day.

I was a civilian economic development adviser in Vietnam, and was
captured by the North Vietnamese communists in South Vietnam in
1968, and held prisoner for over 5 years.

I spent 27 months in solitary confinement; one year in a cage in
Cambodia; and one year in a ‘black box’ in Hanoi. My North Vietnamese
captors deliberately poisoned and murdered a female missionary, a
nurse in a leprosarium in Banme Thuot, South Vietnam, whom I buried
in the jungle near the Cambodian border.

At one time, I weighed only about 90 lbs. (My normal weight is 170 lbs). We
were Jane Fonda’s ‘war criminals…’

When Jane Fonda was in Hanoi, I was asked by the camp communist
political officer if I would be willing to meet with her. I said yes, for I
wanted to tell her about the real treatment we POWs received…and
how different it was from the treatment purported by the North
Vietnamese, and parroted by her as ‘humane and lenient.’

Because of this, I spent three days on a rocky floor on my knees, with
my arms outstretched with a large steel weight placed on my hands, and
beaten with a bamboo cane.

I had the opportunity to meet with Jane Fonda soon after I was released.
I asked her if she would be willing to debate me on TV. She never did answer me.

These first-hand experiences do not exemplify someone who
should be honored as part of ‘100 Years of Great Women.’ Lest we forget…
‘100 Years of Great Women’ should never include a traitor whose hands are
covered with the blood of so many patriots.
There are few things I have strong visceral reactions to, but Hanoi Jane ‘s
participation in blatant treason, is one of them.
Please take the time to forward to as many people as you possibly can. It
will eventually end up on her computer and she needs to know that we
will never forget.
RONALD D. SAMPSON, CM Sgt,
USAF 716 Maintenance Squadron,
Chief of Maintenance DSN: 875-6431 COMM: 883-6343
PLEASE HELP BY SENDING THIS TO EVERYONE IN
YOUR ADDRESS BOOK. IF ENOUGH PEOPLE SEE THIS
MAYBE HER STATUS WILL CHANGE.
La decadencia de los MILITARES NORTE AMERICANOS
La Oficialidad Del Ejercito Norte Americano EstaTEMBLANDO…
PUES NO LES QUEDA MAS REMEDIO QUE CONDENAR A MUERTE AL
ASESINO MUSULMÁN QUE ASESINO A 13… E HIRIÓ 35…
Pero NO VEREMOS SU FUSILAMIENTO… Las apelaciones tomaran años.
Les Tomó 3 Años Llevar A Juicio Al Espía Homosexual…
Todo para no tener problemas con los Homosexuales… Le Quitaron Los
Cargos De “Ayudar Al Enemigo…”  Aparentemente… ahora los espías
Ayudan a “Los Amigos”… La Verdad es otra… el cambio lo hicieron para
NO TENER QUE PEDIRLE LA PENA DE MUERTE… pues no se puede fusilar
A un homosexual… aunque sea un espía…
Para Ocultar Su “Decadencia” Los Militares Lo Condenaron
A 35 Años… Pero Solo Tiene Que Cumplir 9 Años… Ya Tiene 3
El Espía “Enemigo de USA” Estará en Libertad dentro De 6 Años
Como MUJER Pues Pide Que Le Paguen La Operación Mientras
Esta Preso Para “SALIR FELIZ Convertida En Mujer…”
La Codena DEMUESTRA Que Los Militares Están Decadentes.
El Tren de la Vida  recibí esta oración y la consideré que debía de pasarla… pero con las modificaciones que aparecen en rojo…
He aquí la misma oración como mis cambios…
 
Vamos a orar rapidito… Señor, te agradezco por este día tan maravilloso, por el frío, por la lluvia, por mi familia, por mi alimento, por un techo donde descansar, por un día más de trabajo y principalmente por un día más de vida junto a las personas que más amo.
Bendice, Señor, a mi familia, a mis amigos y a quienes no lo son, y piensan como yo… porque ellos también necesitan de ti… a los enemigos CONVIÉRTELOS para que dejen de combatirnos antes que los derrotemos y le apliquemos la justicia de los hombres… y seas tú, que todo lo entiendes. el que los juzgue… 
Señor Aleja Tantos Virus Protégenos de las enfermedades, Señor Bendice al que está leyendo este mensaje ahora, cumple sus sueños, cuida sus pasos e ilumínalo. ¡Amén! Pasa este mensaje, de prisa, lo máximo que puedas y, en instantes, muchas personas estarán orando
La Prensa SOCIALISTA Y PRO HOMOSEXUAL Consideró Que La Declaración De “CULPABLE” AL Musulmán Que Asesino 13 e Hirió 35… Es Noticia De Primera Plana…
Declaración De “CULPABILIDAD” Que Obama No Pudo EVITAR… Todos Estamos De Acuerdo El Gobierno de Obama Ha Demorado el Juicio 3 AÑOS Le ha estado Pagando su sueldo… Lo ha mantenido en el Hospital y le ha dado TERAPIA… (lo que no
hacen por el pueblo al que obligan a abandonar el hospital en cuanto se restablece )
La Condena A Fusilamiento Es La Única Posible… Pero Del “Dicho Al Hecho… Hay Mucho Trecho…”
No Vamos A Ver El Fusilamiento… Van a mantenerlo apelando la sentencia 25 años…
Esperando el TRIUNFO MUSULMÁN… Y entonces tratarlo
COMO UN HÉROE… Hay Que Pedir El Fusilamiento Inmediato…
La Prensa De Los Países Cristianos Dirigida y Escrita Por Socialistas Partidarios de la Homosexualidad… No Considera Noticia Lo Que Hacen… Los Musulmanes “DEMOCRÁTICOS” Apoyados Por OBAMA y Mc Cain
La Quema De Las Iglesias Cristianas En Egipto… 
Turbas Quemaron En Egipto Las Iglesias Y Vuelcan
Su Rabia Contra Los Cristianos 
Hala Jaber Publicado: 18 de agosto 2013
La Iglesia de San Jorge, del Cairo, en llamas. Muchas iglesias han
sido atacadas (Mustafá Hussein)
Cuando la turba de musulmanes furiosos irrumpieron en la zona de
mayoría cristiana en torno a su casa en Minya, a 150 kilómetros al sur
de El Cairo, Alexander TAWSS, de 60 años, un peluquero, cogió su
pistola y disparó al aire para tratar de ahuyentarlos.
Fue un error fatal, tirar al aire… lo lincharon… y asaltaron su casa y
su cuerpo fue hecho pedazos… Youssef Ayoub, de 40 años, un
sacerdote cristiano copto, dijo ayer… el gobierno NO NOS PROTEGE.
Para leer mas… http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/world_news/Middle_East/article1301898.ece
La Constitución de USA es VIOLADA DIARIAMENTE… igual que en Venezuela…
Los Militares De USA… Están Temblando…
Están “DESMORALIZADOS”… Pues Cada Día…
Que Pasa Sus Acciones Se Parecen Más A Las
De Hitler, Stalin, Mao, y Hasta Fidel Castro… 
Analicemos las declaraciones en el Juicio De Nidal Hasan…
El MUSULMÁN Que Asesino A 13 E Hirió A 35… 
Su defensa… se basó en el Grave Problema Constitucional…
Que tenemos los norte americanos… dijo:
“No lo hice bajo el calor de una súbita pasión religiosa… No hubo provocación – lo hice porque esos soldados se iban a embarcar y participar en una GUERRA ILEGAL”.
 
Y Es Verdad…
 
La última guerra “DECLARADA” LEGALMENTE” por el Congreso, de acuerdo a las LEYES AMERICANAS, fue la Segunda Guerra Mundial!!!
 
De acuerdo a la constitución, solo el Congreso puede declarar una guerra!
POR LO TANTO, NIDAL HASAN, en su defensa TIENE RAZÓN!!
 
Corea, Viet Nam, Granada, Panamá, Iraq I, Somalia, Bosnia, Afganistán, Iraq II
Todas han sido guerras “PRESIDENCIALES” o sea, ILEGALES!!!
 
Cada oficial militar toma un juramento a la constitución, NO A UN PRESIDENTE!
Los oficiales de Hitler, Stalin, Mao… juraban fidelidad a los LIDERES…
Ojo esto es IMPORTANTE… En los juicios de Núremberg…
Se Cambió RETROACTIVAMENTE EL CÓDIGO MILITAR… hasta entonces era ACEPTADO
que los militares Cumpliendo Órdenes Superiores… Cometieran CRÍMENES…   
En los juicios contra los oficiales NAZIS se acordó que NINGÚN OFICIAL,
debe OBEDECER UNA ORDEN ILEGAL… y se ahorco a los oficiales Nazis…
En Cuba… los tribunales revolucionarios… siguiendo los acuerdos de Núremberg… NO
ACEPTARON LA DEFENSA DE LOS SOLDADOS QUE ALEGARON QUE CUMPLÍAN ORDENES DE
LOS OFICIALES… y se les fusiló…
En USA… de acuerdo a la constitución…Cualquier guerra NO DECLARADA por
el congreso, que no sea DEFENSIVA, ES ILEGAL…
Todo esto, es bien conocido, por todos los politicos y militares!
Por lo tanto, son complices en el crimen de hacer la guerra criminal!!
Desde Núremberg… los politiqueros y militares Norte Americanos son como los Nazis, Stalin y Mao…
Verdaderos Criminales De Guerra!!!
Pero, nadie se atreve a CONDENAR estas guerras”PRESIDENCIALES”. 
Lincoln, tuvo que usar las leyes contra “ENEMIGOS DOMÉSTICOS” 
para poder atacar los rebeldes!
PERO Lincoln era el PRESIDENTE  y tuvo el apoyo del congreso de los
ESTADOS NO REBELDES!  Si OFICIALMENTE durante la Guerra… USA
eran DOS PAÍSES…
Pero ningún Presidente desde Pearl Harbor, ha tenido la autoridadCONGRESIONAL
PARA HACER LA GUERRA!
Si perdemos una guerra… todos nuestros GENERALES… de acuerdo a las leyes
Que Estados Unidos, Rusia, Francia e Inglaterra… ESTABLECIERON PARA JUZGAR
A LOS NAZIS… SERÁN JUZGADOS y son CULPABLES…
Despierten!!!! Ahora aparentemente están preparando OTRA GUERRA ILEGAL contra
SIRIA… Es Ilegal enviar soldados a la muerte, sin el permiso de los representantes
del pueblo… QUE ES EL CONGRESO…??
Somos Una Republica O Una Monarquía???

DEPENDE DE usted que estas noticias se divulguen Hay noticias que no se divulgan por la PRENSA SOCIALISTA que están a favor de la homosexualidad… depende de USTED… y la INTERNET… Usted decide si pasa la noticia… o espera “TRANQUILAMENTE”CONVERTIRSE EN SIERVO…de los modernos “SEÑORES FEUDALES”
Traducido por google y la versión en ingles esta abajo…
Un “Cristiano” Está Condenado A Diez Años De Prisión Por Difundir Copias Del Evangelio En Irán
23 de agosto 2013
“Teherán (Agencia Fides) – Un hombre iraní, convertido del Islam al cristianismo, fue condenado a diez años de prisión por “crímenes contra la seguridad del Estado”: el acusado es culpable de distribuir copias del Evangelio en el país.
Mohammad-Hadi BordBar, conocido como Mustafá, natural de la ciudad de Rasht, fue acusado de conspiración y condenado. Informó a la Agencia Fides, los documentos de la corte el hombre Que confesó “haber abandonado el Islam para seguir el cristianismo” y “evangelización considerando su deber, distribuidos 12.000 Evangelios de bolsillo.”
Después de haber recibido el bautismo, Mustafá había establecido una “iglesia en casa”, una asamblea de adoración casa, con reuniones de oración en el hogar, que se consideran “ilegal”. Mustafá fue detenido en Teherán el 27 de diciembre de 2012, después de una redada policial en su casa. Los agentes de seguridad detuvieron e interrogaron a todos los presentes en la reunión para la hora, unos 50 cristianos iraníes. En su casa, la policía encontró los materiales y publicaciones cristianas, tales como películas, libros, CDs y más de 6.000 copias del Evangelio.
Mustafá ya había sido detenido en 2009 para la conversión al cristianismo, fue declarado culpable de apostasía, luego puesto en libertad bajo fianza.
En otro caso reciente, informó a la Agencia Fides por la agencia iraní cristiana “Mohabat News”, un tribunal de la ciudad de Robat-Karim, al sur de Teherán, condenó al joven Ibrahim Firouzi, otro cristiano iraní a un año de prisión y dos años de el exilio, por “actividades de evangelización y distribución de Biblias,” considera “, en oposición al régimen de la República Islámica de Irán.” En la sentencia, el juez describe Ebrahim Firouzi de ser “culpables de actos delictivos es la celebración de reuniones de oración en el hogar y se extiende entre los jóvenes que tienen dudas acerca de los principios islámicos”. El joven fue arrestado en marzo de 2013.
La recordada por la ONG “El equipo de Bernabé” y “Christian Solidarity Worldwide”, comprometida con la defensa de los cristianos en el mundo, en los últimos años el interés de los jóvenes iraníes hacia el cristianismo ha hecho la conversión al cristianismo un problema preocupante para las autoridades iraníes.
Muchas de las iglesias de lengua farsi han cerrado en Teherán y en otras ciudades, mientras que la presión sobre los cristianos convertidos del Islam va en aumento. El nuevo presidente iraní, Hassan Rouhani, habló de un posible “la reforma de los derechos civiles” recientemente pidiendo clérigos religiosos islámicos que “deje de interferencia del Estado en la vida privada de las personas.”
 
A “Christian” is sentenced to ten years in prison for spreading copies of the Gospel in Iran
August 23rd, 2013
aleteia.org
“Tehran (Agenzia Fides) – An Iranian man, converted from Islam to Christianity, was sentenced to ten years in prison for “crimes against state security”: the defendant is guilty of distributing copies of the Gospel in the country.
Mohammad-Hadi Bordbar, known as Mostafa, a native of the city of Rasht, was accused of conspiracy and sentenced. As reported to Fides Agency, the court documents show that the man confessed to “having abandoned Islam to follow Christianity”, and “considering evangelization his duty, he distributed 12,000 pocket gospels”.
After having received baptism, Mostafa had set up a “house church”, an assembly of home worship, with prayer meetings at home, which are considered “illegal”. Mostafa was arrested in Tehran on December 27, 2012, after a police raid at his house. The security officers detained and interrogated all those present at the meeting for hours, about 50 Iranian Christians. In his home the police found material and Christian publications, such as movies, books, CDs and over 6,000 copies of the Gospel.
Mostafa had already been arrested in 2009 for conversion to Christianity, found guilty of apostasy, then released on bail.
In another recent case, reported to Fides by the Iranian Christian Agency “Mohabat News”, a court in the city of Robat-Karim, south of Tehran, sentenced the young Ebrahim Firouzi, another Iranian Christian to one year in prison and two years of exile, for “evangelization activities and distribution of Bibles”, considered “in opposition to the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran”. In the ruling, the judge describes Ebrahim Firouzi of being “guilty of criminal acts for holding prayer meetings at home and for having spread among the young doubts on Islamic principles”. The young man was arrested in March 2013.
As recalled by the NGO “Barnabas team” and “Christian Solidarity Worldwide”, committed to the defense of Christians in the world, in recent years the interest of young Iranians towards Christianity has made conversion to Christianity a disturbing problem for the Iranian authorities.
Many churches of Farsi-language have been closed in Tehran and in other cities, while the pressure on Christian converts from Islam is on the rise. The new Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, spoke of a possible “reform of civil rights” recently asking Islamic religious clergy to “stop state interference in the private lives of people”.

 

HATE CRIME: 88yr. Old WWII Vet Dead After Brutal Beating by Black Teenage Thugs. By Clash Daily / 23 August 2013 / 
A World War Two veteran nicknamed ‘Shorty’ who served in the Battle of Okinawa was brutally beaten by two men and left to die outside his regular bar in Spokane, Washington, on Wednesday.
Delbert Belton, 88, who was shot in the leg during the pivotal battle of the Pacific campaign, passed away from serious head injuries on Thursday at Sacred Heart Medical Center in the city.
Witnesses to the attack said that Belton was walking inside the Eagles Lodge to play pool at around 8pm when two male suspects set upon him.
Police hurriedly responded to the sickening attack with K-9 units to track the two men but have not yet located them.
‘It does appear random. He was in the parking lot, it appears he was assaulted in the parking lot and there was no indication that he would have known these people prior to the assault,’ Spokane Police Major Crimes Detective Lieutenant Mark Griffiths said.
On Thursday evening, police released surveillance photos of the two suspects, who they describe as African-American males between the ages of 16 and 19.
Delbert ‘Shorty’ Belton was taken to the Intensive Care Unit of Sacred Heart after the assault at the Eagles Ice-A-Rena near Lidgerwood, but succumbed to his wounds.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/hate-crime-88yr-old-wwii-vet-dead-after-brutal-beating-by-black-teenage-thugs/#C2qpe0CwX7X2S7Ke.99 

Insult to Injury: Wounded warriors snubbed at Walter Reed dining hall
By Justin Fishel, Jennifer Griffin
Published August 15, 2013FoxNews.comFacebook7671 Twitter1403 LinkedIn101″” style=”box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: transparent; font-size: 14px; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”
ADVERTISEMENT
In a disturbing revelation about the treatment of America’s most severely wounded troops, Fox News has learned the military earlier this month decided to invalidate meal tickets and reduce hours for the sole dining facility in the Walter Reed building where they are recovering. 
The decision affects the Warrior Cafe located inside building 62, home to all multiple amputees and long-term, recovering patients at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md. 
The decision would mean wounded warriors who would normally have a government-funded meal just down the hall would have to walk, wheel or limp nearly a half-mile across the Walter Reed campus to the temporary “food trailer” for breakfast, lunch and dinner. 
“I mean it’s called the Warrior Cafe, you would think it is for us,” said Sgt. Josh Wetzel, who lost both his legs when he stepped on a pressure plate IED outside Kandahar, Afghanistan in May 2013. He’s been recovering at Walter Reed since and has been a daily customer at the cafe. 
The status of the military’s decision may be in flux. 
After Fox News submitted multiple inquiries with senior military officials earlier this week, the Pentagon responded late Wednesday. Lt. Col. Catherine Wilkinson, a Pentagon spokesman, told Fox News that Dr. Jonathan Woodson, assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs, has decided to reverse the changes. 
Yet so far, no patients at Walter Reed have been notified of that decision and there has been no formal announcement. 
“It makes a lot of people mad that they can’t get into their wheelchair and wheel down to the Warrior Cafe,” Wetzel said. “Now they have to wheel all the way across base to use their meal cards.” 
‘It’s called the Warrior Cafe, you would think it is for us.”
– Sgt. Josh Wetzel, who lost both legs in Afghanistan
Wetzel’s wife Paige is nine months pregnant with their first child and is due this coming Monday. She says she’s worried about how much time and effort her husband will have to spend seeking food between appointments, while she is in the maternity ward. 
“In my opinion it’s a total independence thing,” Paige said. “If I were to leave for a day or two I would know Josh could go right down the hall, feed himself and he’d be fine. Now the only alternative is to leave our building.” 
Walter Reed has already closed the cafe on weekends. Paige says the Army offered to have Josh order his meals in advance. “They explained that we could use our squad leaders to order meals for the weekend, but it has to go through the squad leader (and then) through the first sergeant,” Paige said. “So how do you plan for that to make sure you get what you need for the weekend?” 
In addition to the weekend closure, the base also decided to reduce the cafe’s hours from 60 to 50 a week. Instead of closing at 8 p.m. it now closes at 6 p.m., making it difficult for those getting occupational therapy to get there in time. 
The patients of building 62, many of whom have endured 50 surgeries or more and are expected to spend up to two years recovering at Walter Reed, were told of the decision to end meal tickets at the Cafe in an Aug. 7 text message from their squad leader. The message explained that the changes to the meal tickets will take place on Sept. 3. That message was followed by a heated town hall meeting last week. 
“I was very upset,” said Carolee Ryan. She is the mother of Marine Staff Sgt. Thomas McRae, a triple amputee, partially blinded, single father whose wife left him after he sustained his injuries in January of 2012 in Sangin, Afghanistan. 
She was one of the mothers who made her voice heard during that town hall meeting. 
“I felt it was a slap in my son’s face as a service member. As many times as he has been deployed — what they were doing to him was a disservice,” she said. 
Paige Wetzel said the families felt the decision was made without their input and for reasons that are hard to understand.  “It felt like the money had been deemed appropriate somewhere else and I don’t see how that could happen,” Wetzel said. 
Officials in the Pentagon and at Walter Reed did not respond to questions about why the changes were made, but congressional sources with knowledge of the decision say it was based on concerns that government funds for the warrior meals were being misappropriated. They said that because the cafe is listed as a “self sustaining” business, it is not allowed to receive government subsidies, such as the meal tickets and appropriated funds. So the military decided the cafe could no longer accept the government meal cards. 
The families and patients have a slightly different take. Many of them who spoke to Fox News are under the impression that the government doesn’t like paying for the higher prices that come with the better food. 
“The food quality is not nearly as good (at the trailer) as it is at the Warrior Cafe,” Josh Wetzel said. “The Warrior Cafe has something for everyone like a grill, hot food, salad bars, sandwiches and drinks.” 
Carolee Ryan says the trailers specialize in “processed food.” 
Walter Reed plans to eventually replace the trailers with a new cafeteria, though it’s not expected to be completed for months. But even the new cafeteria will be a haul for the wounded occupants of building 62. For now, Josh’s best options are to pay for a meal using his modest Army paycheck or to walk on his prosthetics to the trailer. 

Obama’s Repulsive One-Night Stands
AUGUST 23, 2013 BY FLOYD BROWN 1 COMMENTinShare1
During the summer, the USA television network runs a show about a young spy who travels the world, engaging in “covert affairs.”
“” style=”margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom;”
True to the title, actress Piper Perabo jumps into bed with a Russian and then hops to the bed of an Israeli Mossad agent. A new assignment for her means a new romantic affair somewhere around the globe.
While watching an episode recently, it hit me…
The character in the show is just like Barack Obama. United States foreign policy lies in tatters, and our president wants to sleep with the latest leader who walks in the door, with no understanding for how it will impact the country in the morning.
In my 30 years of watching U.S. foreign policy, I’ve never seen a time when our relationships with both allies and enemies have been more confused and unsettled.

For example…
The U.S.-Russian “Reset”
“” style=”margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom;”
Remember the big reset with Russia?
Back in 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, a “reset” button. It symbolized Obama’s hope for improved relations with Moscow.
In short, Obama wanted to reboot US-Russian relations in the same way you might reset a crashed computer. But the policy consisted of the United States groveling to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and spending a year ignoring the usual Russian bad behavior around the world.
For example, during the time of the reset, Russia continued to protect and provide assistance to Iran’s nuclear weapons program.
The country moved to protect the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad from United Nations censure, as it aggressively attempted to stamp out a domestic insurgency.
Finally, Russia provided sanctuary to Edward Snowden, the NSA whistleblower who had the audacity to expose how the United States spies on its citizens and its allies.
When Obama couldn’t take it anymore, he declared the reset over.
But he couldn’t stop there. Like a jilted lover, he insults Putin, not just by canceling a summit, but by calling him a slouching schoolchild, too.
By this point, Senator John McCain had seen enough.
On Fox News Sunday, he unloaded on Obama saying: “The president comparing him to a kid in the back of a classroom, I think, is very indicative of the president’s lack of appreciation of who Vladimir Putin is. He’s an old KGB colonel who has no illusions about our relationship, does not care about a relationship with the United States, continues to oppress his people, and continues to act in an autocratic fashion.”
The result? U.S.-Russian relations are at their lowest ebb since the Cold War.
As for our relations in the Middle East…
Backing the Loser
Obama began his first term in office with a much-trumpeted outreach to Islam.
Remember how he toured Arab countries and spoke passionately of his desire for close and cordial relations, even bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia?
Then came the “Arab Spring.” It actually should’ve been called the “Arab Winter.” Al Qaeda, our one-time enemy, became our new-found friend as the United States gave a helping hand to radical Islamists when they captured the governments of Tunisia, Libya, and then Egypt. When the revolution made its way to Syria, the old governing forces of the Arab world turned back the tide.
Now the insurgency in Syria is wracked with internal strife, as Al Qaeda seeks to dominate the insurgency, and we’re left in the embarrassing position of supporting what looks to be the losing side in Syria.
In an unstable region of the globe that already looks like a house of cards, we’ve deeply damaged stability even more.
The Mess in Egypt
In Egypt, Obama was complicit in throwing America’s strongest Arab ally, Hosni Mubarak, under the bus. We actually facilitated the takeover of Egypt, as it was collapsing, by the Muslim Brotherhood – the terrorist organization that murdered Anwar Sadat and has terrorized Coptic Christians in Egypt for decades.
After the Brotherhood controlled the government, they were slowly consolidating power and were creating an Islamic dictatorship with the overt help of the Obama administration.
The Egyptian military watched as much violence and ethnic cleansing as they could abide. Everyday Egyptians and the Saudi Royal family backed the military, as they threw the terrorists of the Brotherhood out and have aggressively moved to restore order.
Relations with Egypt are currently so bad, and we have so little influence, that Anti-Americanism pervades the daily protests. Egyptians who should be our friends are now chanting for the Egyptian military to ally with Putin and Russia.
After sleeping with the enemy, our foreign relations have gone from bad to worse; and our world is like a gas truck around a box of matches. To put it plainly: Obama is a foreign policy disaster of unparalleled proportions.
“I would say it’s close to half a mile … for guys who are on their wheelchair or using prosthetic legs — you know that is a long way to go,” he said. 
Adding insult to injury, there are only two handicap-accessible tables in the trailer, and neither the bathroom nor the exit doors has push-button access. 
“It’s quote unquote handicap accessible, but for guys who have serious mobility injuries — like they can’t use their hands that well — you know it is tough for them,” Josh Wetzel said. 
Thomas McRae’s mother says the whole situation breaks her heart. She said her son told her he would consider going hungry before wheeling himself to the trailers. 
“Now I get it,” Ryan said. “Back in the Vietnam War when all the men and women were coming home (I understand) how they felt … and I didn’t think it would come to this.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/15/insult-to-injury-wounded-warriors-snubbed-at-walter-reed-dining-hall/#ixzz2cou9jHyx

6 Alarming Stats that Prove Democrats are Out of Touch with the American People. Emily Hulsey | 1. Health Care
Nancy Pelosi described the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as something that “captures the spirit of our founders” and will “put money back in the pockets of America’s patients” (WSJ, House.gov). However, only 46% of Americans had a favorable view of the ACA when a Democrat-controlled Congress voted it into law. Since then, approval has decreased to7% 
Even a blind monkey with half a brain could tell you that there’s a disconnect between the current administration and the public. Just how big is this disconnect? As you probably expect, massive. On the major issues that dominate interviews and debates each year, Democratic leaders are increasingly distancing themselves from the views of the majority of American people.
The President is taking multi-million dollar vacations while regular Americans are decreasing their number of paid off days just to keep their jobs. Legislators are enrolling their children in elite private schools while the rest of us are volunteering personal time and money to help our local public school systems. The NSA is defending its right to access public phone records, though we are adamantly calling for it to stop.
Take a look at these slides to see just how out of touch the Democratic party is today. Select the left/right buttons (or use your arrow keys) to view the next slide.

Enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/
http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/
http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/
https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/
http://contracandela.blogspot.com/
http://lamisinguillaperipendica.blogspot.com/
http://lazarorgonzalezformiamidademayor.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ Image

No 465 “En mi opinion” Agosto23, 2013

agosto 23, 2013

No 465  “En mi opinión” Agosto 23, 2013.  
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  “IN GOD WE TRUST”   
Enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

“En mi opinion: Hoy es el Aniversario del buckhorns escandalo DE LAS BOLETERAS en Miami Dade y gracias al alcalde de goma NADA HA OCURRIDO NI VA A PASAR NADA. Es como cuando el gato caga en el jardin y despues le hecha tierra a la mierda. La solucion fue erradicar la fuerza anti corrupcion O SEA BORRAR A LOS QUE DESCUBRIERON EL FRAUDE. Lázaro R González Miño  

80 House members: Shutdown better than ‘Obamacare’?
WASHINGTON (AP) — More than a third of House Republicans urged their leader Thursday to trigger a government shutdown rather than fund the implementation of the health care overhaul they call “Obamacare.” 
A letter from 80 Republicans asked Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, to resist any spending bills that would accommodate the new health care law, which is nearing a critical stage of signing up millions of Americans for health coverage. 
Because it’s virtually certain that President Barack Obama and the Democratic-controlled Senate would reject such demands, leaders of both parties say the standoff likely would result in a partial shutdown of the federal government, similar to those that occurred in 1995 and 1996. 
The letter is mixed news for Boehner and other GOP leaders who view a government shutdown as politically unwise. 
With 80 of the House’s 233 Republicans signing the letter, a solid majority of 153 has refrained from trying to limit Boehner’s options. That presumably would allow the speaker to push a bipartisan bill that funds the health law and is supported by a “majority of the majority” of his fellow Republicans, which Boehner says is essential. 
However, he would need more than 60 Democratic votes to pass such a bill. That would give Democrats a major voice in its details. 
The federal 2013 fiscal year ends Sept. 30. New money must be appropriated by then to avoid a shutdown of countless government offices and agencies.Voters chiefly blamed congressional Republicans for the mid-1990s shutdowns, and the fallout boosted Democratic President Bill Clinton. Ever since, many establishment Republicans have urged the party to avoid using shutdown threats as a bargaining tool. 
But a new generation of tea party-backed conservatives rejects the advice. They say “Obamacare” — officially the Affordable Care Act — is so unpopular and unworkable that it justifies extraordinary tactics to block it. 
A possible solution to the budget impasse, often used in past years, would involve a “continuing resolution” to keep funding the government at current levels. Many top Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, say it’s impossible to carve out money for “Obamacare” in any appropriations measure.The House letter was authored by Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C. It urges Boehner “to affirmatively de-fund the implementation and enforcement of Obamacare in any relevant appropriations bill,” including “any continuing appropriations bill.” 
At least a dozen Senate Republicans have signed a similar letter. 
In recent years, Democrats and Republicans in Congress repeatedly have failed to reach major compromises on spending. A string of secret negotiations with the White House, a bipartisan “super committee” and various threats of economic calamity have all proved fruitless. 
The impasses led this year to automatic, across-the-board spending cuts known as sequestration, which have hampered some federal agencies and helped shrink the deficit. 
Some House Republicans want deeper cuts still. But others revolted this summer when popular programs were targeted.Senate Democrats want to replace the sequester cuts with a more generous spending plan, but House Republicans vow to block it. 
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/80-house-members-shutdown-better-105538794.html

ALIPAC Endorses Scott DesJarlais for Supporting Current Immigration Laws Instead of Amnesty August 23, 2013

CONTACT: Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) (866) 703-0864 / Press@alipac.us

America’s largest political action committee seeks toendorse candidates who support our nation’s existing border and immigration laws instead of any form of Amnesty for illegal aliens. ALIPAC is pleased to announce the endorsement of Congressman Scott Desjarlais (R-TN-4) because of his courageous comments to illegal alien supporters, which was caught on video at a town hall style meeting last week.

In the video that has gone viral on the web (view here), Scott DesJarlais explains to an 11 year old girl who asks what she can do to keep her illegal alien father in the United States.”This is a big intimidating crowd and I appreciate you coming forward and asking your question, but the answer still kind of remains the same, that we have laws, and we need to follow these laws and you know, that’s where we’re at.”

Illegal alien supporters moved quickly to criticize Scott DesJarlais for supporting America’s current laws and upholding penalties of deportation for illegal immigrants.

ALIPAC moved quickly to defend Scott Desjarlais and to criticize the contrived actions of illegal immigration& Amnesty supporters taking place at town hall meetings across America.

“First and foremost it is inappropriate for foreign nationals to become illegal aliens in America and then in turn try to influence our elected officials to accommodate them with Amnesty legislation and benefits,” said William Gheen, President of ALIPAC. “Second, it is despicable that the Amnesty supporters are using children as political pawns to push their unpopular agenda. In America, we don’t use and abuse children like this to try to mislead Americans into allowing an Amnesty to pass.”

ALIPAC opposes any form of Amnesty or path to citizenship for illegal aliens because such a law would devastate any hopes for future border and immigration law enforcement in American, thus leaving the United States without borders and with none of the enforcement credibility needed to deter or thwart future waves of tens of millions of additional illegal aliens from third world areas.

ALIPAC was founded on 9/11 of 2004 in honor of the victims of 9-11 who were killed because of inadequate immigration security measures and enforcement of existing immigration laws. ALIPAC’s goal has always been to unite Americans of all races, parties, and walks of life behind candidates who support America’s current borders, immigration laws, and the US Constitution instead of any nation destroying form of Amnesty for illegal immigrants.

ALIPAC is known nationwide because of its regular appearances in the national media, and currently endorses 151 federal candidates with the addition ofScott Desjarlais at http://www.alipac.us/campaign/.

ALIPAC’s more than 40,000 national supporters and more than 130,000 social media supporters are encouraged to vote, donate, and volunteer for the endorsed candidates. For more information or to schedule interviews with William Gheen, please visitwww.alipac.us.
Rand Paul: Obama ‘Flouting the Law’ by Continuing Aid to Egypt
Thursday, 22 Aug 2013 06:54 PM By Bill Hoffmann
President Barack Obama is “directly flouting the law” by not immediately cutting off financial aid to Egypt following the ouster of President Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky says.
Paul pointed to the federal law that says the United States will not give money to countries operating under a coup — a designation the Obama administration has not given.
“There never should have been any debate. The law’s explicit. If you have a military coup or a military takeover, the aid has to end unless you want a president who disobeys the law,” Paul told “The Steve Malzberg Show” on Newsmax TV.
“This president is directly flouting the law and he’s in direct disobeyance of the law. So, no, there’s no question. The aid has to end.”
Story continues below video.
Paul, who is considering a run for president in 2016, said following the law of the land is not up for debate.
“You can debate whether aid’s a good idea and it’s a bad idea, but the law you don’t get to debate. You have to change the law if you don’t like the law,” he said.
“All of these Republicans who stand up and beat their chest and say, ‘Oh, we’re the party that’s the rule of law and we criticize the Muslim Brotherhood for not obeying the rule of law.’
“Well, it’s a valid criticism only if you obey the rule of law. … Our law says when an elected government is toppled, there’s no wiggle room. You have to end the aid.”
Rand likened the coup debate to a fight among youngsters.
“It’s more like third-grade playground. … People say, ‘Well, yeah, it’s a coup, but you can’t make me say it’s a coup.’ So it’s a bunch of third-graders on the playground saying you can’t make me,” he said
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Rand-Paul-obama-aid/2013/08/22/id/521844?s=al&promo_code=149F7-1#ixzz2coAP2LPt 

Sen. Coburn: Obama ‘Perilously Close’ to Impeachment Thursday, 22 Aug 2013
President Obama is moving “perilously close” to impeachment, Sen. Tom Coburn told a town hall crowd this week, two reports said Thursday.
The Oklahoma Republican noted he was “a personal friend” of the president during the Muskogee town hall event, but said the administration suffers from incompetence.
Coburn repeatedly called the president’s administration “lawless,” telling the crowd of 300 at the Muskogee Convention Center there should be a national constitutional convention to counter it – and to cut down an oversized federal government, the Tulsa World reported. 
“I used to have a great fear of constitutional conventions,” he said. “I have a great fear now of not having one.”
On the issue of the president’s accountability, Roll Call reported Coburn told the crowd, “What you have to do is you have to establish the criteria that would qualify for proceedings against the president, and that’s called impeachment.” 
“That’s not something you take lightly, and you have to use a historical precedent of what that means,” he said. “I think there’s some intended violation of the law in this administration, but I also think there’s a ton of incompetence, of people who are making decisions.
“I believe [an impeachment charge] needs to be evaluated and determined, but thank goodness it doesn’t have to happen in the Senate until they’ve brought charges in the House,” Coburn said. “Those are serious things, but we’re in a serious time. I don’t have the legal background to know if that rises to high crimes and misdemeanor, but I think they’re getting perilously close.”
To back his claim of administrative incompetence, Coburn cited the example of Obama’s 15 picks for top Homeland Security vacancies, saying “a general portion of the nominees are absolutely incompetent,” Roll Call reported.
Coburn has been a leading voice against trying to shut down the government over funding Obamacare, and said the proposal championed by conservative special interest groups such as Freedomworks and the Heritage Foundation would be “childish” and “intellectually dishonest,” the newspaper reported.
” . . . I quite frankly think he’s in a difficult position he’s put himself in and if it continues, I think we’re going to have another constitutional crisis in terms of the presidency,” Coburn said.
© 2013 Newsmax.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/coburn-obama-impeachment-close/2013/08/22/id/521847?s=al&promo_code=149F7-1#ixzz2co8FD9P3 

RICARDO SAMITIER: Obama ordena mantener el FRAUDE ELECTORAL EN USA
Mientras Por Los Últimos 30 Años USA Ha Pedido A Los Países Bananeros Que Pongan Foto En Los Carnet De Votantes… Para Evitar el Fraude…
Obama Ordena Vetar La Ley De Texas Que Exige Que Identificar Con Una Foto A Los Votantes… Para Mantener el Fraude…
¡Despierten!!!… Todo lo que sucede es un ASCO…

KILL WHITEY: This Homeland Security Employee Is Preparing for a Coming Race War By Clash Daily / 22 August 2013 / 
A Department of Homeland Security employee who works on, among other things, the procurement of guns and ammunition for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, spends his nights and weekends preparing for a coming race war and advocating for anti-gay causes, according to a new report from theSouthern Poverty Law Center. Meet Ayo Kimathi, a.k.a. “the Irritated Genie,” who told his bosses at the DHS that his anti-white, anti-gay site, “War is on the Horizon,” was just an entertainment site that sells concert and lecture videos.
You see, DHS employees, even those with office jobs like Kimathi’s, have to get outside activities approved by their supervisors, according to the SPLC. Kimathi’s former supervisor told the watchdog group, which tracks hate speech and groups in the U.S., that despite her former employee’s banal description of his extracurricular activities, the actual content of the site left her “stunned.” She continued: “To see the hate, to know that he is a federal employee, it bothered me.” She added that had Kimathi’s site been accurately described to the agency, there’s no way the DHS would have signed off on it. Possibly to keep his bosses from looking up his work, Kimathi used only the site’s acronym, WOH, in his permission request. In addition to his involvement in the purchase of ICE supplies, Kimathi also had a public profile for the agency, speaking at vendor events. As “Irritated Genie,” Kimathi also has a public profile as a black supremacist advocate…
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/kill-whitey-this-homeland-security-employee-is-preparing-for-a-coming-race-war/#Wyr7Tj1yLStUyCfD.99 

McCain: US Should Intervene in Syria Without ‘Boots on the Ground’
Thursday, 22 Aug 2013 12:18 PM By Dan WeilThe
United States should intervene militarily in Syria, given evidence that the government attacked its people with chemical weapons Wednesday, Sen. John McCain said Thursday.
And, in an interview with CNN, he criticized President Barack Obama for not reacting strongly enough. 
The United States doesn’t have to take risks in Syria, McCain said. “There would be no boots on the ground. We would use standoff weapons just as the Israelis have four times as they’ve taken out targets inside Syria,” he said. “We would not put a single life at risk.”
The U.S. could neutralize Syrian runways and battle planes in a “matter of a couple of days,” McCain said. “We can supply the right kind of weapons to rebels and to establish a no-fly zone by moving patriot missiles up to the border. This can be done very easily,” he said. 
“When does the United States, with very little cost stand up for these people and stop this horrific — you can’t look at the pictures without being deeply moved. Are we just going to let that go on?”
Shocking pictures emerged from Damascus suburbs on Wednesday of dozens of people said to have been killed by poison gas attacks. 
McCain criticized Obama for taking no action to back up his year-old threat that the use of chemical weapons by President Bashir al-Assad’s regime would be seen as a red line that would spur action. Instead, he said Assad “now sees that as a green light.”
“The word of the president of the United States can no longer be taken seriously — as it isn’t throughout the entire region,” McCain said.
© 2013 Newsmax.Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/mccain-obama-syria-military/2013/08/22/id/521750?s=al&promo_code=149F2-1#ixzz2co1VImE4 

Rep. Ros-Lehtinen: Administration’s Handling of Benghazi ‘Unconscionable’
Tuesday, 20 Aug 2013 05:42 PM By Cathy Burke and Kathleen Walter
The Obama administration’s callous handling of the 2012 attack on the embassy in Benghazi has been “unconscionable,” Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen tells Newsmax TV in an exclusive interview.

“It is unconscionable for this whole administration to have called that . . . a phony scandal,” the congresswoman said. “There’s nothing phony about the deaths of four innocent American lives.”

She said former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton merely “reshuffled the deck of chairs on the Titanic” with her demotion of four State employees in the wake of the tragedy.

“And now they’re back,” she said. “It is unbelievable. No one has paid a price at all for the terrorist attacks in Benghazi resulting in the deaths of four American citizens, including our ambassador.”

Ros-Lehtinen said she wholeheartedly supports the appointment of a select committee to investigate the Sept. 11, 2012 attack — and charged the administration’s “intimidation” has kept Congress from learning the truth.

“We have seen that they’ve kept witnesses away from us,” she said. “There’s a feeling of intimidation in the State Department and throughout the agencies. ‘Don’t come forward, don’t come testify, you will suffer, your career will suffer.'”

She charges it was the administration’s “false narrative,” that fostered the fear.

“They want to convince the people . . . that these radical Islamic terrorists are not out to destroy Israel and the United States,” she said. “That was a political agenda and it was a political response to a real security threat and that’s why this level of intimidation continues throughout this administration.”

The administration generally has no coherent anti-terrorism policy, she added.

“The Obama administration believes that having a drone policy is a solution,” she said. 

“That is not a military readiness capability and in 10 years, in 15 years down the road we’re going to be paying the price for not being . . . military ready in the way that we should be.

She also decried the Obama administration’s previous support of Egypt President Mohammed Morsi and said the U.S. should cut off aid and “stop pouring money down a rat hole.”

“This administration has tried to sell the American public on this philosophy that the Muslim Brotherhood, they’re made up of all kinds of people and individuals and there’s just not one guiding philosophy,” she said. ” Oh there is a guiding philosophy and it’s anti-US, it’s anti-democracy, it’s anti-Christian, and it’s anti-female, and it’s anti-everybody who doesn’t agree with their dogma. 

“So we should cut off the spigot. It’s time to stop the money drain that we’re just wasting our money giving it to governments that don’t support democracy.”

Ros-Lehtinen, chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on North Africa and Middle East, said as far as diplomacy goes, Kerry is clueless.

“His Department of State is concentrating on a peace treaty between Israelis and Palestinians at the expense of everything else,” she said. “The Israeli-Palestinian peace issue is an important issue but not when the whole Middle East and North Africa is blowing up.

On the contentious issue of immigration, Ros-Lehtinen said she’s “cautiously optimistic” for passage of a reform bill.

“If we do nothing, what we’re accepting is the status quo and the status quo is that we have over 11million people here who already are illegally here and that is a form of amnesty,” she said, adding that securing the nation’s borders are a “number one” priority.

But she said the nation must also respond to the “dreamers” who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children by creating a bill that would allow them to become citizens, serve in the military, and go to universities.

The congresswoman insisted Republicans are increasingly in support of immigration reform.

“We’ve seen the changing demographics of the United States and we see that the Republican Party can really be the home for this Hispanic community because we’re a family-centered community, we’re a faith-centered community, we believe in small businesses, we believe in limited government, and these are the kind of issues and values that the Hispanic community believes in and those are the values of the Republican Party,” she said.

On the healthcare front, Ros-Lehtinen said the Affordable Care  Act is sure to be “an economic disaster,” noting she voted “40 times to defund, dismantle Obamacare.” But she said she hoped Congress would find a way to stop the health law without a government shutdown.

“People don’t want the government to shut down but, at the same time, there’s a great sense of anxiety in our small business community and young people who are going to be paying a lot of money for their insurance premiums,” she said.

The Cuban native said she’s still hopeful Democracy will come to the island nation, but blasted the administration for the “windfall” they have allowed there.
“They don’t deserve the breaks that the Obama administration is giving them,” she said. 
“It’s been a windfall for the Castro regime these years that Obama has been president. What a shame. Democracy is going to come but it’s going to come because we’re going to get tough on the regime and help the Cuban people rid themselves of this dictatorship.”
© 2013 Newsmax
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/benghazi-lehtinen-handling-unconscionable/2013/08/20/id/521392?s=al&promo_code=14978-1##ixzz2cdHuCgyh 

Obama’s 13 Impeachable Offenses
AUGUST 21, 2013 BY CLEANTV 37 COMMENTSinShare10
Adapted from an article titled “Lawless in the White House,” written by former GOP Congressman from Colorado, Bob Beauprez – Monday, August 19, 2013.
Paraphrased video commentary, with permission of the author, by Jerry McGlothlin
“” style=”margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom;”
Article 2, Sec. 3 of the Constitution charges the President “shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It doesn’t say that he “should” execute the laws of the United States; it uses the imperative “shall.”
Nor does the Constitution say that the President can pick and choose to enforce some of the laws, or just the ones he likes.
Nor does the Constitution give the President the authority to create new laws. Article 1, Sec. 1 is clear on that point; “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”
The editors at Investor’s Business Daily picked up on the issue, too. Following is what they call “just a small sampling” of a “Lengthy Legacy of Lawlessness.”
Aug. 14, 2013: The Obama administration delayed the provision in ObamaCare to cap out-of-pocket health care costs, picking and choosing parts of the law to enforce, which is to exceed its authority.
“” style=”margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom;”
July 17, 2013: The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals joined the federal appeals courts in D.C. and Philadelphia in ruling President Obama’s National Labor Relations Board recess appointments — who by law must be approved by Congress — were unconstitutional. Thus far, the president has ignored the ruling.
July 1, 2013: The Obama administration unilaterally decided to delay the employer mandate provision of ObamaCare for a year, which is to provide information to the feds about the extent of an applicant’s insurance. Never mind that the law states the mandate must go into effect on Jan. 1, 2014 — they are now relying on the “honor system” from applicants to determine if they are qualified for subsidies.
June 25, 2013: The Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. Eric Holder that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is “unconstitutional” and that “the formula can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdiction to preclearance.” Instead of complying with the ruling, Holder filed suit to order Texas to submit to preclearance, in defiance of Congress’ authority to legislate and the Supreme Court’s authority to rule on the constitutionality of the law.
June 15, 2012: The Obama administration announced it will stop deporting illegal immigrants under the age of 30 in a “deferred action” policy to circumvent immigration laws. This comes after Congress rejected a similar measure about a year ago. Since then, more than 500,000 illegals have received the deferment and only 20,000 have been rejected. As for the law-abiding applicants who have been waiting in line, well, that’s Obama’s idea of “lawfulness.”
May 20, 2013: A Washington Post article revealed that Fox News reporter James Rosen was investigated by the DOJ, which subpoenaed his phone records and emails in direct contravention of the First Amendment under the pretense of a leak investigation.
(plus 7 more offenses in original article)
Original article: Lawless in the White House by Bob Beauprez, former GOP Congressman from Colorado, Bob Beauprez – Monday, August 19, 2013:

Employers dropping coverage for thousands of spouses over ObamaCare costs
Published August 21, 2013FoxNews.com
Republican lawmakers are raising new concerns about ObamaCare after several large employers announced they are dropping health coverage for some employee spouses due to rising costs under the new law.
Both the University of Virginia and UPS told their employees recently they are no longer offering spousal coverage to those able to obtain insurance elsewhere; meaning thousands of Americans will no longer be able to choose the benefits they prefer.
UVA said Wednesday this is only one of many “major changes” coming to their health plans as a result of ObamaCare. The university says the changes are necessary because the law is projected to add $7.3 million to the cost of the university’s health plan in 2014 alone.
“The modified plan will provide new options and reward those who participate in wellness programs,” UVA’s Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer Susan Carkeek said in a press release. “But we must make adjustments or face millions of dollars in rising costs, fees and taxes that would be passed along to employees.”
Similarly, UPS partially blamed the new health law for the change, which is estimated to affect roughly 15,000 employee spouses.
The rising cost of health care “combined with the costs associated with the Affordable Care Act, have made it increasingly difficult to continue providing the same level of health care benefits to our employees at an affordable cost,” UPS said.
The trend has drawn the ire of Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who cite it as a clear example the Obama administration is not following through on its promise that, “if you like your plan, you can keep it.”
“American families who are already grappling with higher health care costs under the law are also coming face-to-face with the stark reality that they will lose the coverage they have and like,” their office said in a statement Wednesday.
The Obama administration would not respond when asked for comment on the UPS’ new policy by Kaiser Health News, but said when Massachusetts implemented a similar health overhaul, employer coverage actually increased.
“The health care law will make health insurance more affordable, strengthen small businesses and make it easier for employers to provide coverage to their workers,” said Joanne Peters, spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services.
Republican lawmakers say this trend is only one of the concerning effects of ObamaCare, amid reports some companies are citing the law when they reduce employees to part-time hours.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/21/employers-dropping-coverage-for-thousands-spouses-over-obamacare-costs/?cmpid=NL_morninghl#ixzz2ckMBg9f1

RICARDO SAMITIER: Obama, La Prensa SOCIALISTA y Politiqueros
Están EMPEÑADOS En Hacernos Creer Que La Economía Está Mejorando… Y Leemos Casi A Diario… Noticias En Ese Sentido… La De Hoy en el Miami Herald
POR MARTHA BRANNIGAN MBRANNIGAN@MIAMIHERALD.COM 
Los contratos para futuras construcciones en el sur de la Florida aumentaron un38 por ciento en julio a 597.3 millones dólares de $ 431,3 millones del año anterior, según McGraw Hill Construcción.
Lo Que No Dicen… Aunque LO SABEN:
Históricamente el gasto del consumidor representa alrededor del 70% del crecimiento en los EE.UU. (Fuente: Bloomberg Business Week PDF).
Al parecer, EL SISTEMA ECONÓMICO DE USA HA CAMBIADO.  Ahora… es la Reserva Federal de EE.UU. (Fed), influenciada por la Casa Blanca… que cree que se puede sustituir al gasto de los consumidores mediante laIMPRESIÓN DE DINERO y tirarlo en la economía…
Los FED (El Gobierno )Está Haciendo Esto De Dos Formas:
(1) La FED está permitiendo al gobierno de EE.UU. imprimir $ 45 mil millones al mes en bonos del Tesoro de Estados Unidos (deuda emitida por el gobierno de los EE.UU.) para seguir gastando dinero (Fuente: Reuters).
(2) A continuación, la FED está también invirtiendo otros $ 40 mil millones al mes en la compra de hipotecas – presumiblemente por el gobierno de EE.UU. (Fannie Mae y Freddie Mac). El gobierno de EE.UU. se hizo cargo de las empresas de hipotecas fallidas en septiembre de 2008 (Fuente: Reuters). 
Así que lo que tenemos es la financiación de la deuda FED gobierno de los EE.UU., y la deuda hipotecaria EE.UU.. Esto es básicamente lo que se llama gobierno de la entidad “independiente” (la FED) la financiación del gobierno de los EE.UU..
Como hace ya más de un año que estamos imprimiendo $85 billones mensuales… es lógico… que algunos (los amigos de Obama y los bancos) estén CON LOS BOLSILLOS LLENOS… y algún dinero… se note circulando…
Pero Esta Noticia… Hay Que Compararla
CONTRA 85 BILLONES MENSUALES???
Si lo hacemos veremos que estamos PEOR QUE EN 2008…
Despierten!!!  O sigan viendo los programas donde AHORA
SIEMPRE APARECEN un homosexual vestido de mujer… 
He aquí la noticia del Herald…
Contracts for construction in South Florida rose 38 percent in July. BY MARTHA BRANNIGAN MBRANNIGAN@MIAMIHERALD.COM
Contracts for future construction in South Florida rose 38 percent in July to $597.3 million from $431.3 million a year earlier, according to McGraw Hill Construction.
Of that, new residential construction contracts rose 52 percent in July to $352.2 million from $232 million a year earlier for the metropolitan area encompassing Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties, McGraw Hill said. Nonresidential construction permits were up 23 percent to $245 million in July from $199.3 million a year earlier, the New York-based firm said.
For January through July, new construction contracts totaled $3.70 billion, up 24 percent $2.98 billion in the year-ago period.
Of that, new contracts for residential building jumped 45 percent to $2.19 billion from $1.51 billion during the first seven months of 2013, while new nonresidential construction contracts rose just 2 percent to $1.51 billion from $1.47 billion last year, McGraw Hill said.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/21/3576338/contracts-for-construction-in.html#emlnl=Business#storylink=cpy
El Espia Fue Premiado! La Condena a 35 años es un ENGAÑA BOBOS… Solo tiene que cumplir 9 años… como a él le gusta… RODEADO DE MACHOS…
La Justicia Militar En Vez de Fusilar Al Espía…
Primero: Permitió Que Se Le Eliminara la Acusación De “Ayudar Al Enemigo”
Alegando que no le pasó a una “Potencia Enemiga” la información… aunque TODOS
sus cables HAN SIDO USADOS POR TODOS LOS ENEMIGOS DE USA…   
 Lo Condenaron a 35 Años… de los que solamente tiene que cumplir 9 años…
Como todos recordaran… Este HOMOSEXUAL declaró que se decidió a espiar
Cuando el ejercito lo hizo dormir en una habitación con un soldado que seNEGÓ
A TENER RELACIONES SEXUALES CON EL…
 Ahora la jueza… lo “PREMIA…” condenándolo a vivir rodeado deMACHOS… y sin duda… VA A TRATAR DE CONSEGUIR OTRO ABERRO SEXUAL CON QUIEN TENER RELACIONES…
 Sin lugar a dudas…
la oficialidad del ejercito de USA esta DECADENTE yDESMORALIZADA vamos a ver que condena van a DARLE al asesino MUSULMÁN de 13 personas y 35 heridos…
Son Capaces De NO FUSILARLO…

Obama Y Sus Amigos Fallaron Otra Vez  Mas
A Favor Del Los Bancos… Contra el Publico
La noticia dice:
El gobierno ha tomado una posición que alargar el plazo para dejar de
Cobrar $0.21 a los comerciantes cada vez que un cliente paga con una
TARJETA DE DEBITO…
Esto obliga a los comerciantes a cobrar y sus clientes a pagar MILES DE
MILLONES de dólares en GASTOS INFLADOS por las transacciones casi
Instantáneas que cuestan centavos… produciendo daños a la
economía de EE.UU. y a los bolsillos de los usuarios… mientras que los
bancos siguen GANANDO DINERO…
Esto se debió a que la Reserva Federal de EE.UU. el miércoles apeló
la decisión del juez de rechazar la rebaja de los cargos por transacciones
de tarjetas de débito, que ordeno hace ya más de dos años el senado…
Para los que están DORMIDOS…  AQUÍ pueden leer la noticia completa:
http://www.csdecisions.com/2013/08/22/fed-appeals-swipe-fee-ruling/?utm_source=MadMimi&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Fed+Appeals+Swipe+Fee+Ruling&utm_campaign=20130822_m116986200_2013%2F08%2F22+%7C+Fed+Appeals+Swipe+Fee+Ruling&utm_term=Fed+Appeals+Swipe+Fee+Ruling

Obama Bankrolled Attack On The Benghazi Consulate. AUGUST 22, 2013 BY KRIS ZANE 33 COMMENTS
It has been widely reported in Egyptian media that one of the leaders in the attack against the Benghazi consulate on September 11, 2012 was Mohsen Al-Azazi.
“” style=”margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom;”
According to Ahmed Moussa, a former high ranking intelligence official with the Egyptian government and several other sources, Al-Azazi’s passport was found in the house of Khairat Al-Shater, the Number Two man in the Muslim Brotherhood hierarchy, now under house arrest in Egypt by the Egyptian military. Al-Azazi has been implicated as the actual assassin of Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
But this is only the beginning of a blockbuster story.
According to Khairat Al-Shater’s son, Saad Al-Shater, his father is in possession of information linking Obama with criminal activities tied to the Muslim Brotherhood.
As reported by at least six Arabic news sources:
In an interview with the Anatolia News Agency, Saad Al-Shater, the son of a Muslim Brotherhood leader, the detained Khairat Al-Shater said that his father had in his hand evidence that will land the head of United States of America, President Obama, in prison.
“” style=”margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom;”
Further, as reported by several Arabic news sources, citing a Libyan Intelligence document dated September 15, 2012, six Egyptians from the terrorist group Ansar al-Sharia based in Egypt were arrested for the Benghazi attacks and confessed that then-Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi was behind the attack. Additionally, Muslim Brotherhood researcher Walid Shoebat has obtained a copy of the Libyan Intelligence document and confirms Mohammed Morsi is named in the confession.
Per Shoebat’s translation of the document:
The most distinguished names that were obtained from the confessions by members of the cell, is the person, the President of Egypt, Mohammad Morsi…
The Libyan Intelligence document goes on to name five other co-conspirators, all members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
This is the same Mohammed Morsi who Barack Hussein Obama was fawning over and sent hundreds of millions of dollars to in foreign aid. The same Mohammed Morsi that Obama is stillsupporting, sending his minions to lobby for his release by the Egyptian military. This despite the fact that the Egyptian military has evidence that Morsi conspired with the terrorist group Hamasto murder thousands of Egyptian citizens.
There is even a video of Ansar al-Sharia, the group that attacked the Benghazi consulate,admitting that it was Morsi who was behind the attack. This was broadcast on Libyan TV!
But there’s more.
According to Arabic News Channel TV14 and reported on by Egypt Daily News, Obama sent aneight billion dollar secret bribe to the Muslim Brotherhood to guarantee that the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula be turned over to the terrorist group Hamas. Hamas, a Muslim Brotherhood sister group, works directly with Ansar al-Sharia in the Sinai Peninsula. Channel TV14 goes on to say that the agreement was signed by Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood’s second in command, Khairat Al-Shater, now under house arrest in Egypt, who says he has documents that will put Obama in prison!
But it gets worse: the eight billion dollars that Obama sent to the Muslim Brotherhood was shared with Ansar al-Sharia, the group that attacked our consulate and CIA Annex in Benghazi on September 11, 2012.
If all of this proves to be true, Barack Hussein Obama funded the attack on the Benghazi consulate and CIA Annex. Barack Hussein Obama funded the assassination of  U.S. ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. Barack Hussein Obama is therefore an accessory to murder, not to mention a traitor!

Charles Nenner to Moneynews: US Headed for Recession and It’s ‘Going to Be Bad’
Monday, 19 Aug 2013 05:01 PM By Glenn J. Kalinoski and Kathleen Walter

Technical analyst Charles Nenner didn’t mince words when asked about the United States facing another recession.
“It’s going to be bad,” Nenner told Newsmax TV in an exclusive interview. 
“It’s very scary because we didn’t have a lot of growth and when this economic expansion is over, we’re going to be in trouble,” the founder and president of the Charles Nenner Research Center said. 
Watch our exclusive video. Story continues below.
“We didn’t leverage enough. Cycles go up, go down, take three and a half, four, five years, but if you almost don’t jump up and then you’re jumping down, then you’ve jumped down from a much lower level.”
He said that “the economy is not going to do much this year. It’s going to pick up a little bit next year into the third quarter and then it’s going to be messy again.”
The economy will be fairly stable until the end of next year, “then we’re going back into recession,” said Nenner.
He also warned that the economy faces other problems as well, such as deflation, commonly defined as a decrease in the general price level of goods and services. Deflation occurs when the inflation rate falls below 0 percent. 
“Deflation is a very serious problem we can still have to deal with and that’s much worse than inflation,” he said. “So my fear is deflation, not inflation. Inflation will come, it will take another three years until it starts.”
He added that he doesn’t see much improvement when it comes to the nation’s unemployment level.
“The problem is structural,” he said. “There was a lot of outsourcing and then a lot of jobs … don’t need a lot of people anymore because of the Internet and IT and all of the technology. People have to think a little bit in a different way and it’s going to be very hard to get the unemployment down.”
The wide-ranging interview turned to the outlook for gold. “It’s a short term trade because it’s going to bounce around,” he said. 
“Until we really have inflation coming, I don’t see gold going back to the highs. It will go two and a half thousand. It’s just making a bottom slowly, and we are boost[ing] longer term on gold, but it will take time.”
He also discussed his outlook for stocks.
“We had a target of 1,720 on the S&P, so once we were [at] about 1,700 we sold all the stocks,” he said. “The sentiment [is] too extreme. The market is very risky, so we don’t go in anymore. We’ve been out now for the last three, four months and we’re just standing aside.”
Editor’s Note: Weird Trick Adds $1,000 to Your Social Security Checks
© 2013 Moneynews.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/charles-nenner-recession-economy-united-states/2013/08/19/id/521167?s=al&promo_code=149CB-1##ixzz2ckIpGv68 

Olga Griñan: OPINION DE UNA CUBANA CON DECORO?
OJALA QUE ALGUNA PERSONA DE RESPETO EN LA EMISORA “LA PODEROSA”  ABRA, LEA Y PASE ESTE MENSAJE QUE DEDICO AL “CUBANO DESHONRA DEL EXILIO”,EDDIE CALDERON.

USTED SABE BIEN QUE OLGA GUILLOT,CELIA CRUZ, BLANCA ROSA GIL, MEME SOLIS, ROLANDO LASERIE Y MUUUUCHOS OTROS NUNCA MAS PUDIERON OIRSE EN CUBA SIENDO TAN BUENOS O MEJORES QUEELENA BURKE, QUIEN OCUPO EL PRIMERLUGAR POR NO  TENER COMPETENCIA DE LOS QUE NO ERAN ACEPTADOS POR EL TIRANO.  LA HIJA Y NIETA DE ESTA COMUNISTADISFRUTARON DE PRIVILEGIOS PORQUE SU MADREERA MIMADA POR EL TIRANO.    LOS OTROS SUFRIERON LO INDECIBLE Y POR RESPETOA SU DECORO ME PARECE INMORAL QUE ESO SE OLVIDE Y LE DEMOS GLORIA A QUIEN NO LA MERECE.
CREIA QUE USTED ERA UN CUBANO INTELIGENTEQUE AMABA A CUBA. YA NO LO PARECE.LAMENTO MUCHO SU HORRIBLE VERBORREAPORQUE LO CUBRIO DE ESO MISMO QUE USTEDSABE DECIR!!!.
SINCERAMENTE,  OLGA GRINAN,UNA CUBANA CON DECORO!

_____________________________________
Para enviar Artículos, Criticas o Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/
http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/
http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/
https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/
http://contracandela.blogspot.com/
http://lamisinguillaperipendica.blogspot.com/
http://lazarorgonzalezformiamidademayor.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ 

No 464 “En mi opinion” Agosto 22, 2013

agosto 22, 2013

No 464  “En mi opinión” Agosto 22, 2013.  
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST” ,  
Enviar Artículos, Criticas y Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

Alegan que Giménez pudiera haber violado la carta constitutiva del condado. August 22nd, 2013
Es parte de las acusaciones resultantes del desmantelamiento de la unidad contra la corrupción pública
MIAMI 22 DE AGOSTO DE 2013, nhr.com—Indiscutiblemente este verano está resultando más que caliente para el alcalde de Miami-Dade, Carlos Giménez, pero al decir de muchos, está siendo él, con una tras otra acción equivocada o fuera de lugar, quien hace que el termómetro de la calle está a punto de explotar.
Entre los comentarios críticos al alcalde, lo que ha cobrado más atención y creado peor malestar es el desmantelamiento de la Unidad Anticorrupción de la Policía de Miami-Dade. Y entre las opiniones más arrasadoras figura una de una fuente muy conocedora de los trajines de la política local. “El alcalde Carlos Giménez podría ser sacado del cargo por violación de la carta constitutiva del Condado” nos dijo.
De acuerdo con esta fuente, el subdirector de la policía condal, Juan Pérez, le admitió a los medios de prensa que aunque el oficial Luis Rodríguez es un buen investigador, la decisión de transferirlo se debía en parte a su participación en la campaña política de Joe Martínez, quien aspiró sin éxito contra Giménez el pasado año 2012.
Luis Rodríguez, un veterano de 29 años con la Policía de Miami-Dade, fue repentinamente trasladado de la Unidad Anticorrupción Pública donde se había destacado por el volumen de casos que había manejado exitosamente, entonces el decidió retirarse.
Nuestra fuente indicó que “la carta constitutiva del condado señala que un empleado no puede ser rebajado de cargo, de rango o trasladado a un departamento inferior, por haber  apoyado a un candidato contrario al alcalde o comisionado”, y nos añadió que “eso es corrupción, no es ético y es una actitud inapropiada”.
El subdirector Juan Pérez refiriéndose al detective Luis Rodríguez le declaró al Miami Herald que Rodríguez no infringió normas departamentales pero que se trataba de una actividad “inapropiada” para un investigador de corrupción pública. “No podemos ser una unidad de corrupción pública, investigar a los políticos y también trabajar en sus campañas”, dijo Pérez.
Existen otros casos como este, que NHR.com está investigando;  agentes que han sido castigados por el solo hecho de haber apoyado al contrario de Giménez en las pasadas elecciones.
Giménez le declaró al periodista René Pedrosa, de América TeVe, que a él no le importaban las investigaciones, “que investiguen lo que quieran, que saquen lo que saquen”, dijo un Giménez irritado, calificando a John Rivera, que preside el sindicato de Policía de ser una persona que siempre está en su contra, y a Luis Rodríguez, uno que apoyó a su contrincante Joe Martínez.
Por su parte, el periodista Enrique Flor, hablando en el programa A Mano Limpia, en América TeVe, dijo que el vió a las boleteras de Hialeah varias veces junto con Giménez, y que era significante que al ser descubierto un fraude “masivo y grosero” de boletas ausentes, luego se haya desmantelado la unidad policiaca que investigaba precisamente la corrupción política.
Hablan agentes trasladados de la Unidad Anti-Corrupción Wednesday, August 21st, 2013
Se asegura que están al salir revelaciones interesantes relacionadas con el desmantelemiento de esa unidad policiaca de Miami-Dade
MIAMI, 21 DE AGOSTO DE 2013, NHR.com—Dándole seguimiento a la información ofrecida ayer sobre la desmantelacion de la Unidad Anti Corrupción (CCU) de la policía de Miami-Dade, creada para investigar la corrupción pública, podemos informar que agentes del Buro Federal de Investigaciones (FBI) están revisando los archivos que les entregaron detectives que han sido trasladados de CCU a otras unidades de la policía.
“Esta es la única opción que nos quedaba”, nos dijo uno de los agentes con el que conversamos y quien nos dijo que ellos comenzaron a sospechar que la Unidad seria desmantelada cuando se sorprendió a la boletera de Hialeah, Daisy Cabrera, vinculada a la campaña de Carlos Giménez, y ésta nos llevó a otros implicados, como es el caso de Jerry Ramos, empleado de Al Lorenzo, que a su vez asesoraba las campañas de Giménez y la fiscal Katherine Fernández Rundle.
Lorenzo se retiró de de la campaña de Giménez una semana después de que la boletera Daisy Cabrera fuera detenida por cargos de fraude de boleta de votante ausente, ella había trabajado con Lorenzo en campañas anteriores.
La fiscal Fernández Rundle se retiró de la investigación en medio de acusaciones de que Lorenzo tenía relación de trabajo con Cabrera. Lorenzo siempre a negado su vinculación a la boletera.
“Giménez no quiere que se investigue la corrupción” dice el presidente del sindicato de la policía John Rivera.
El agente con el que hablamos en NHR.com en las últimas horas nos dijo que sus funciones dentro de la Unidad Anti Corrupción ya se estaban haciendo prácticamente insostenibles. “Hacíamos tremendas investigaciones, con evidencias y hasta fotos, y cuando se las presentábamos a la fiscalía, nos las bloqueaban”.
Una de las víctimas del desmantelamiento de la Unidad Anticorrupción es el experimentado detective Luis Rodríguez, quien según nuestras fuentes fue castigado por el alcalde Carlos Giménez porque Rodríguez apoyó al excomisionado Joe Martínez, quien fue el contrario de Giménez en las elecciones por laalcaldía condal. Rodríguez decidió renunciar y está siendo asesorado por un conocido abogado de Miami.
Nuestras fuentes dentro de la disidencia policiaca de CCU, nos dicen que “son muchas la ataduras que existen entre la oficina del alcalde Carlos Giménez y la fiscal Fernández Rundle; son los mismos personajes los que corren sus campañas y ellos los protegen”, nos dicen.
En NHR.com seguiremos detrás de esta noticia. Esperamos en las próximas horas poder tener respuestas a muchas preguntas, tanto de la oficina del alcalde como de los detectives que se han visto separados de CCU.

RICARDO SAMITIER: Los sueldos de las asistentas de Michelle Obama
Just think,  
Mary Lincoln was taken to task for purchasing China for the White House during the Civil War. And Mamie Eisenhower had to paid out the salary for her personal secretary from her husband’s salary. 
Total Personal Staff members for other first ladies  
Mamie Eisenhower:—  One– paid for personally out of President’s salary.
Total number of Personal Staff Members paid by Tax Payers.
Jackie Kennedy:——- One 
Rosaline Carter:——– One 
Barbara Bush:     ——One 
Hilary Clinton:   ——–Three 
Laura Bush:  ———- One 
Michele Obama: ——-Twenty-two 
How things have changed!  If you’re one of the tens of millions of Americans facing certain destitution, earning less than subsistence wages stocking the shelves at Wal-Mart or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers, prepare to scream and then come to realize that the benefit package for these servants of Ms. Michelle are the same as members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for these assorted lackeys is paid by YOU, John Q.Public:
 
Michele Obama’s personal staff: 

One..               $172,200 – Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff) 

Two..               $140,000 – Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the
President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady) 

Three..             $113,000 – Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the
President and White House Social Secretary for Mrs. Obama) 

Four..               $102,000 – Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to
the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady) 

Five..               $100,000 – Winter, Melissa (Special Assistant to the
President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady) 

Six..                 $90,000  Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to
the First Lady) 

Seven..            $84,000 – Lilyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press
Secretary to the First Lady)
Eight..             $75,000 – Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling
and Advance for the First Lady)
Nine..              $70,000 – Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy
and Project for the First Lady)
Ten..                $65,000 – Burnough, Erinn (Deputy Director and Deputy
Social Secretary)
Eleven..           $64,000 – Reinstein, Joseph B.(Deputy Director and Deputy
Social Secretary)
Twelve..          $62,000 – Goodman,  Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of
Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)
Thirteen..         $60,000  Fitz, Alan O.(Deputy Director of Advance and
Trip Director for the First Lady)
Fourteen..        $57,500 – Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal
Aide to the First Lady)
Fifteen..           $52,500 – Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and
Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)
Sixteen..          $50,000 – Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for
Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)
Seventeen..      $45,000 – Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of
Correspondence For The First Lady)
Eighteen..        $43,000 – Tubman, Samantha a (Deputy Associate Director,
Social Office)
Nineteen..        $40,000 – Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the
Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
Twenty..          $36,000 – Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the
Social Secretary)
Twenty-One..  $35,000 – Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
Twenty-Two.. $35,000 – Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of
Correspondence for the First Lady)
 
Total $1,591,200 in annual salaries – all for someone we did
not vote for, and apparently have no control over.
 
There has NEVER been anyone in the White House at any time who has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady’s social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense.
Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and
“First Hairstylist” Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air
Force One to Europe …
Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press:
canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12652
Yes, I know, The Canadian Free Press had to publish this, perhaps because America no longer has a free press and the USA media is too scared that they might be considered racist or suffer at the hands of Obama.
La Estrategia… Del Nuevo Orden…
Es Centralizar Todo El Talento… En Las Manos De Sus MIEMBROS…
Ellos, No Quieren Gente Libre! Los inteligentes los quieren CÓMODAMENTE asalariados… en puestos del gobierno…
Al Pueblo Lo Quieren: Dependientes de un cheque electrónico mensual.
Esa Es La Esclavitud Moderna!!!
De Acuerdo A Los ÚLTIMOS INFORMES PUBLICADOS
La Deuda de Obama Subió a 2 TRILLONES…
Antes era de $476 BILLONES…
Antes eran muchos los que compraban BONOS DE USA… Hasta
Había quien regalaba en los BAUTIZOS un Bono Pagadero A 20 Años…
Esa costumbre se ha idos quedando atrás… NADIE TIENE CONFIANZA EN
USA dentro de 20 años…
La VERDAD De La Nueva Deuda De USA;
La Reserva Federal es la que está comprando toda la deuda de Obama!
¿Con que lo compra?  CON BILLETES NUEVOS, emitido contra la misma deuda 
a favor de los bancos privados, que forman la Reserva Federal.
Porque no sabemos, quienes son estos bancos privados y sus duenyos???
La Reserva Federal, no es una entidad pública!
¿Por qué El Gobierno Le Dio El Derecho Y El Poder A Estos Señores, de comprar
o no, la deuda del Gobierno?
Todo el mundo con esos poderes puede ser un SABIO ECONOMISTA…
Compra… Y Pagan Con Billetes Que Ellos IMPRIMEN…
Están Monetizando la deuda… Igual que cualquier republica bananera!
Cual es su plan?
Cuando un banco central imprime dinero, siempre beneficia a los grandes bancos!
El Más Perjudicado, Es Siempre El Trabajador!!
Es un ROBO SILENCIOSO, del poder adquisitivo del trabajador!!!
Eso, se llama fraude… en TODAS PARTES…
Los Dos Partidos, Son Cómplices, En Este Fraude.
No Importa que lo “Denuncien” en discurso… HAY QUE PARAR DE IMPRIMIR…
También…
Los Medios, (los periodistas) son cómplices, POR QUEDARSE CALLADOS.
Donde Está La Recuperación Económica Que Prometieron?
Fue mentira!  Para poder seguir robando!!
! Despierten!!!
Culpable Son Todos Los Que Trabajan Para El Gobierno

Lawless in the White House
Bob Beauprez – Monday, August 19, 2013
Article 2, Sec. 3 of the Constitution charges the President “shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It doesn’t say that he “should” execute the laws of the United States; it uses the imperative “shall.”
Nor, does the Constitution say that the President can pick and choose to enforce some of the laws, or just the ones he likes.
Nor, does the Constitution give the President the authority to create new laws.  Article 1, Sec. 1 is clear on that point; “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”
But for Barack Obama the limits of the Constitution matter very little; particularly so the separation of powers that the Founders crafted as a check-and-balance against an unhealthy concentration of power in one branch of the government.  In fact, Obama has publicly derided the Constitution as a “charter of negative liberties” and pledged to work to “break free from the essential constraints placed by the Founding Fathers.”
In a recent column Charles Krauthammer addressed the issue of a President who “writes his own laws.” Krauthammer affixes the title befitting of the President’s lawless nature: “Caudillo in Chief.” After a litany of grievances as examples document his assertions, Krauthammer concludes:
Such gross executive usurpation disdains the Constitution. It mocks the separation of powers. And most consequentially, it introduces a fatal instability into law itself. If the law is not what is plainly written, but is whatever the president and his agents decide, what’s left of the law?
What’s the point of the whole legislative process — of crafting various provisions through give-and-take negotiation — if you cannot rely on the fixity of the final product, on the assurance that the provisions bargained for by both sides will be carried out?
Consider immigration reform. The essence of any deal would be legalization in return for strict border enforcement. If some such legislative compromise is struck, what confidence can anyone have in it — if the president can unilaterally alter what he signs?
Yet this president is not only untroubled by what he’s doing, but open and rather proud. As he tells cheering crowds on his never-ending campaign-style tours: I am going to do X — and I’m not going to wait for Congress.
That’s caudillo talk. That’s banana republic stuff. In this country, the president is required to win the consent of Congress first.
At stake is not some constitutional curlicue. At stake is whether the laws are the law. And whether presidents get to write their own.
The editors at Investor’s Business Daily picked up on the issue, too.  Following is what they call “just a small sampling” of a “Lengthy Legacy of Lawlessness.”
 Aug. 14, 2013: The Obama administration delayed the provision in ObamaCare to cap out-of-pocket health care costs, picking and choosing parts of the law to enforce, which is to exceed its authority.
July 17, 2013: The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals joined the federal appeals courts in D.C. and Philadelphia in ruling President Obama’s National Labor Relations Board recess appointments — who by law must be approved by Congress — were unconstitutional. Thus far, the president has ignored the ruling.
July 1, 2013: The Obama administration unilaterally decided to delay the employer mandate provision of ObamaCare for a year, which is to provide information to the feds about the extent of an applicant’s insurance. Never mind that the law states the mandate must go into effect on Jan. 1, 2014 — they are now relying on the “honor system” from applicants to determine if they are qualified for subsidies.
 June 25, 2013: The Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. Eric Holder that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is “unconstitutional” and that “the formula can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdiction to preclearance.” Instead of complying with the ruling, Holder filed suit to order Texas to submit to preclearance, in defiance of Congress’ authority to legislate and the Supreme Court’s authority to rule on the constitutionality of the law.
June 15, 2012: The Obama administration announced it will stop deporting illegal immigrants under the age of 30 in a “deferred action” policy to circumvent immigration laws. This comes after Congress rejected a similar measure about a year ago. Since then, more than 500,000 illegals have received the deferment and only 20,000 have been rejected. As for the law-abiding applicants who have been waiting in line, well, that’s Obama’s idea of “lawfulness.”
May 20, 2013: A Washington Post article revealed that Fox News reporter James Rosen was investigated by the DOJ, which subpoenaed his phone records and emails in direct contravention of the First Amendment under the pretense of a leak investigation.
May 13, 2013: AP reported the DOJ secretly collected phone records of AP reporters and editors, a move completely outside the realm of law. Even the AP — which up until then had been pretty submissive to the Obama agenda — was appalled by the breach.
May 10, 2013: The IRS revealed it targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status beginning in March 2010, a direct targeting of political opponents through the tax laws. It’s one of the crimes that led Congress to impeach President Nixon.
May 3, 2011: When asked when he first heard of Operation Fast and Furious, Attorney General Eric Holder falsely testified, “I’m not sure of the exact date, but I probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks.” Head of the National Drug Intelligence Center Michael Walther told Holder about Fast and Furious in a July 2010 memo. Subsequent revelations showed he knew all along.
March 27, 2012: EPA issued final rules regulating greenhouse gas emissions on electric utilities that require power plants to use nonexisting carbon capture-and-control technology to meet new emission standards, in defiance of the Congress’ rejection of cap-and-trade legislation.
April 23, 2012: The administration postponed Medicare Advantage cuts by calling them a “demonstration project” and used funds not approved by Congress to delay effects of those cuts before the election.
March 1, 2011: Attorney General Holder lied to Congress, saying “decisions made in the New Black Panther Party case were made by career attorneys in the department.” Associate A.G. Thomas Perrelli, an Obama political appointee, overruled a unanimous recommendation for prosecution by DOJ attorneys.
Feb. 3, 2010: Judge Martin Feldman held the Obama administration in contempt for re-imposing an offshore drilling moratorium that was struck down by the courts.
RICARDO SAMITIER: Quien sabe algo de esta mujer?
Esta Es La SEÑORA… Que Fue Repuesta Con Otros 3 Empleados Considerados RESPONSABLES De La Muerte Del Embajador Y De Otros 3 Americanos
En Benghazi… Por El Titulo En La Foto MS. Lamb… ESTA SOLTERA
No He Podido Saber Si Es Una SOLTERONA, o ES UNA DIVORCIADA…  no encuentro su biografía en la internet… EXCEPTO que comenzó como Policía raso… y aplicó para un puesto en el departamento de estado… y fue escalando hasta llegar a ser la segunda jefe de la seguridad de todas las embajadas…
Pregunto:  ¿Con la cantidad de coroneles que han participado en guerras…
No sería mejor para ese puesto un CORONEL RETIRADO…???
Hay que IMPUGNAR a los jueces que LEGISLAN
Los Jueces Se Están Convirtiendo
En LEGISLADORES… Una Función
Que No Les Corresponde…
La Ley Aprobada en un referendo por el 70% de los
Ciudadanos en Oklahoma contra usar las leyes musulmanas
En las cortes de Estados Unidos…
Ha sido ANULADA POR UN JUEZ FEDERAL…
Hasta Cuando… Los Jueces son Para
Administrar las justicias del País…
No Para Decir Legislar…

Ing. Armando Lopez-Callejas: Los Tolls
Miami, 4 de Agosto del 2013
Alerta a los automovilistas que pasan por los T0LLS-GATE.
EXHORTAMOS; En primer lugar a todos los ciudadanos del CONDADO DE MIAMI DADE y en segundo lugar a todos automovilistas que también pasan por los TALLS de las autopistas 836 y 112, que le soliciten a los Alcaldes y Comisionados, no solo de este Condado, sino también a los de Miami Beach y de la ciudad de Miami, que le exijan a la comisión no electa y encargada, atender, controlar y recibir las recaudaciones de estos Talls, no permitirle que construyan nuevos Talls, ni aumentar el precio del peaje de los ya existentes.
Además la comisión no ha fundamentado económicamente, las razones que justifiquen, las construcciones de nuevos Talls ni el aumento del precio del Peaje, que respalden tales acciones que perjudican a tantas personas.
Además es necesario que se tengan en cuentan estos argumentos;
1.-Cual es la razón del aumento sistemático del cobro del Peaje y la construcción de
nuevos Talls.?.
2.-Yo pregunto; Donde están los $1,225.3 millones de dólares, recaudados en los
Últimos 3 años..?
3.-Recuerden que las ampliaciones actuales de las autopistas, se supone que son de las recaudación millonaria del ½ centavo a las compras, propuesto y aprobado durante el periodo en que fue Alcalde el Sr. Penelas.
4.-Exhortamos además, que la Prensa escrita, radial y Televisiva, así como las organizaciones de periodistas, respalden esta justa petición, para aclarar esta actitud de la comisión que administra y controla la recaudación del dinero del peaje, logre sus injustas
peticiones.
5.-También exhortamos a la Fiscalía , a que realice una investigación de los $3,902.3 millones de dólares, que fueron gastados por la comisión, en estos 3 últimos años.
6.-Summary of Statemente of net Assets.-(Hasta Junio del 2012)
Total Assets and Deferrals=$1,883’744,511–$1’799,952,057–$1,444’019,110
Total Liabilities. =$1,439’947,526–$1’391,121,545–$1’071,342,772
Total Net Assets =$ 443’796,985–$ 408’830,512–$ 372’676,338
Resumen; $5,127.6MM=Recaudación,-Gastos=3,902.3MM y Ganancia=1,225.3MM.
Ing. Armando López-Calleja.-Miembro del CNP de Cuba en el Exilio y de la UCP

Rep. Ros-Lehtinen: Administration’s Handling of Benghazi ‘Unconscionable’
Tuesday, 20 Aug 2013 05:42 PM
By Cathy Burke and Kathleen Walter The Obama administration’s callous handling of the 2012 attack on the embassy in Benghazi has been “unconscionable,” Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen tells Newsmax TV in an exclusive interview.

“It is unconscionable for this whole administration to have called that . . . a phony scandal,” the congresswoman said. “There’s nothing phony about the deaths of four innocent American lives.”

She said former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton merely “reshuffled the deck of chairs on the Titanic” with her demotion of four State employees in the wake of the tragedy.

“And now they’re back,” she said. “It is unbelievable. No one has paid a price at all for the terrorist attacks in Benghazi resulting in the deaths of four American citizens, including our ambassador.”

Ros-Lehtinen said she wholeheartedly supports the appointment of a select committee to investigate the Sept. 11, 2012 attack — and charged the administration’s “intimidation” has kept Congress from learning the truth.

“We have seen that they’ve kept witnesses away from us,” she said. “There’s a feeling of intimidation in the State Department and throughout the agencies. ‘Don’t come forward, don’t come testify, you will suffer, your career will suffer.'”

She charges it was the administration’s “false narrative,” that fostered the fear.

“They want to convince the people . . . that these radical Islamic terrorists are not out to destroy Israel and the United States,” she said. “That was a political agenda and it was a political response to a real security threat and that’s why this level of intimidation continues throughout this administration.”

The administration generally has no coherent anti-terrorism policy, she added.

“The Obama administration believes that having a drone policy is a solution,” she said. 

“That is not a military readiness capability and in 10 years, in 15 years down the road we’re going to be paying the price for not being . . . military ready in the way that we should be.

She also decried the Obama administration’s previous support of Egypt President Mohammed Morsi and said the U.S. should cut off aid and “stop pouring money down a rat hole.”

“This administration has tried to sell the American public on this philosophy that the Muslim Brotherhood, they’re made up of all kinds of people and individuals and there’s just not one guiding philosophy,” she said. ” Oh there is a guiding philosophy and it’s anti-US, it’s anti-democracy, it’s anti-Christian, and it’s anti-female, and it’s anti-everybody who doesn’t agree with their dogma. 

“So we should cut off the spigot. It’s time to stop the money drain that we’re just wasting our money giving it to governments that don’t support democracy.”

Ros-Lehtinen, chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on North Africa and Middle East, said as far as diplomacy goes, Kerry is clueless.

“His Department of State is concentrating on a peace treaty between Israelis and Palestinians at the expense of everything else,” she said. “The Israeli-Palestinian peace issue is an important issue but not when the whole Middle East and North Africa is blowing up.

On the contentious issue of immigration, Ros-Lehtinen said she’s “cautiously optimistic” for passage of a reform bill.

“If we do nothing, what we’re accepting is the status quo and the status quo is that we have over 11million people here who already are illegally here and that is a form of amnesty,” she said, adding that securing the nation’s borders are a “number one” priority.

But she said the nation must also respond to the “dreamers” who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children by creating a bill that would allow them to become citizens, serve in the military, and go to universities.

The congresswoman insisted Republicans are increasingly in support of immigration reform.

“We’ve seen the changing demographics of the United States and we see that the Republican Party can really be the home for this Hispanic community because we’re a family-centered community, we’re a faith-centered community, we believe in small businesses, we believe in limited government, and these are the kind of issues and values that the Hispanic community believes in and those are the values of the Republican Party,” she said.

On the healthcare front, Ros-Lehtinen said the Affordable Care  Act is sure to be “an economic disaster,” noting she voted “40 times to defund, dismantle Obamacare.” But she said she hoped Congress would find a way to stop the health law without a government shutdown.

“People don’t want the government to shut down but, at the same time, there’s a great sense of anxiety in our small business community and young people who are going to be paying a lot of money for their insurance premiums,” she said.

The Cuban native said she’s still hopeful Democracy will come to the island nation, but blasted the administration for the “windfall” they have allowed there.

“They don’t deserve the breaks that the Obama administration is giving them,” she said. 

“It’s been a windfall for the Castro regime these years that Obama has been president. What a shame. Democracy is going to come but it’s going to come because we’re going to get tough on the regime and help the Cuban people rid themselves of this dictatorship.”
© 2013 Newsmax. Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/benghazi-lehtinen-handling-unconscionable/2013/08/20/id/521392?s=al&promo_code=14978-1#ixzz2ceDMgnWx 
LOS COMUNISTAS MAS RICOS DE CUBA.   
COMUNISTAS MAS RICOS DE CUBA (1959-2006) Cortesía de Kenneth Rijock, Consultor de Crímenes Financieros COMPLINET Londes/ New YorkLa muerte de Castro puede tener lugar dentro de varios años, pero una política prudente de Los gerentes de Las grandes instituciones bancarias debería llevarlos a tomar esas decisiones acerca de Los depósitos cubanos, lo más rápido posible. Is no tuviesen temor alguno de la avalancha de pleitos legales que seguiría a la muerte del dictador, al menos podrían tomar una decisión bien pensada para estar tranquilos. Is temen a un futuro cargado de gravosos pleitos legales, debieran sacar de sus instituciones a estos clientes corruptos mientras aún tienen tiempo para poner distancia entre ellos y Los dineros malhabidos de Los jerarcas cubanos. Este es el momento para ellos de pesar sus propios riesgos.La corrupción es un fenómeno inherente a la sociedad socialista, la sustitución y la expropiación de la propiedad privada, el propietario, el dueño, es sustituido por el “administrador”.Desde Los primeros momentos del proceso revolucionario iniciado en Cuba en 1959 fue una característica la expropiación de todos Los vestigios de propiedad que existían en nuestro país, pero al mismo tiempo se tomaron medidas que legitimizaban la corrupción tales como la desaparición del Tribunal de Cuentas, del Ministerio de Hacienda, incluso hasta la carrera profesional de Contador Público. Fue una constante como Los llamados revolucionarios ocupaban Las viviendas, expropiaban Los automóviles, utilizaban el patrimonio nacional como una propiedad privada. Desde ese momento se borraron Las diferencias entre la propiedad social y la propiedad privada, todo el país pasó a ser propiedad de la clase dirigente.La corrupción como nuevo fenómeno se centraba en Los niveles más altos del poder, y poco a poco este fenómeno fue abarcando niveles intermedios del nivel de dirección, y, desgraciadamente hoy día prácticamente de una forma o de otra nadie está exento de la misma. Hasta el más simpletrabajador participa en esta filosofía bajo la premisa de que robar al Estado no es robar y hay que “sobrevivir”. Tristemente , Cuba hoy es un país de corruptos salvo muy honrosas excepciones.Durante estos 44 años ha surgido una nueva clase que en función de Los amplios e incontrolados poderes que ha ejercido y utilizado la riqueza nacional como su propio patrimonio ha venido forjando su propio capital.Seguidamente se relacionan aquellos “comunistas” que de una forma u otra han logrado construir su propia fortuna.Considerando, que en Buena técnica todas estas fortunas tienen un oscuro origen y son resultados de una continuada malversación, precisar su monto, así como el lugar exacto donde se atesoran es en extremo difícil.El origen de estas fortunas están dadas fundamentalmente por la venta de recursos pertenecientes al Estado, desde armas, marcas, patentes, fábricas, terrenos, petróleo, comisiones, lavado de dinero, drogas, etc.A través de un sofisticado sistema bancario diseñado por el Banco Financiero Internacional (BFI) y en otros por Los mismos extranjeros beneficiados se han ido enmascarando todas estas cuentas bancarias. Se conoce que Panamá, Brasil, México, Canadá, Inglaterra y España han sido Los lugares más utilizados por Los nuevos ricos comunistas para ocultar el fruto de Las malversaciones.La identificación de estos nuevos señores del comunismo, se ha efectuado con bastante rigor y en ellas han participado fuentes independientes radicadas en Cuba, funcionarios en activo del sistema empresarial y financiero del gobierno cubano, ex funcionarios y ex dirigentes radicados tanto en el exilio como en Cuba, información sobre volúmenes financieros operados y nivel de comisiones y pagos recibidos por Los funcionarios relacionados, así como estimaciones resultantes de todo este conjunto de elementos.MAS DE MIL MILLONES US DOLARESFidel Castro Ruz. Según estimados de la revista Forbes y fuentes que han estado trabajando en la ubicación de la fortuna de Castro se calcula que la misma asciende a unos 1,400 millones de US dólares.MAS DE CIEN MILLONES US DOLARESRaúl Castro Ruz. Ministro de Defensa. Su principal fuente de ingreso: Ventas de armas y petróleo, participación en empresas turísticas y cadenas de tiendas comercializadoras en dólares. Se estima que posee unos 400 millones de dólares.Ramiro Valdés Menéndez. Presidente del sistema empresarial Copextel. Controla toda la producción e importación de equipos electrónicos y su comercialización dentro y fuera de Cuba . Fortuna estimada en 150 millones US dólares.MAS DE 50 MILLONES US DOLARESVilma Espin. Presidenta de la Federación de Mujeres Cubanas. Durante muchos años fue depositaria de la fortuna de Fidel y Raúl Castro. Después de su divorcio con Raúl Castro su participación se ha limitado a depósitos a nombre de Ella en Suiza.Orlando Rodríguez Romay. Ex Ministro de la Pesca. Recientemente sustituido. De conjunto con sus dos hermanos que operaban desde posiciones claves en el Ministerio de la Pesca y Marina Mercante, ha logrado por la vía de venta de mariscos, venta de barcos y compra de barcos, construir una sólida fortuna. Fue el autor junto con el actual Ministro del Banco Nacional de Cuba, Soberón, de la desaparición de la Flota Mercante Cubana, más de 100 buques que han sido vendidos a empresas “fantasmas”.Osmany Cienfuegos Gorriarán. Ex Ministro de Turismo y ex de varios cargos, desde Vicepresidente del Consejo de Ministros hasta Ministro de Obras Públicas. Es depositario de etodo el capital de origen dudoso que ha sido invertido en Cuba .(BORRACHO Y DROGA ADICTO).
MAS DE 20 MILacciones al portador de todas Las cadenas turísticas, las cuales están depositadas en España, además ha obtenido jugosas comisiones en el desarrollo de toda la infraestructura turística en Cuba , y papel activo en el lavado de dinero dLONES US DOLARESHerederos de José Abrahantes ( ex Ministro del Interior). Se conoce que al morir en prisión Abrahantes tenía cuentas personales en Panamá por más de 20 millones UD dólares.Abraham Caciques. Fundador de la Empresa mixta Cubanacan S.A. Presidente del Palacio de las Convenciones y de CUBALSE(Cuba al Servicio del Extranjero). En 1996 le fue practicada una auditoria y faltaba en cash, más de 27 millones de US dólares. No fue sancionado y está limitado solamente al Palacio de las Convenciones. Hombre de extrema confianza de Castro.Alejandro Roca Iglesias. Ministro de la Industria Alimenticia. Ha obtenido jugosas comisiones en las operaciones vinculadas a la venta del ron Habana Club y su comercialización con la firma Pernaud-Ricard, además ha obtenido múltiples beneficios en la compra de cereales y en la adquisición de molinos de trigo y plantas elaboradoras de alimentos.José Luis Padrón. Ex Coronel ayudante del ex Ministro del Interior José Abrahantes, Presidente de la Corporación CIMEX, Banco Financiero Internacional y del Instituto Nacional de la Industria Turística(INTUR). Entre comisiones, lavado de dinero, etc, su fortuna asciende a más de 30 millones de dólares. Actualmente está radicado en Cuba , como consultor de varias corporaciones extranjeras.Marcos Portal. Ministro de Industria Básica, casado con Tania Fraga, una sobrina de Fidel Castro. Ex jefe del grupo de Coordinación y Apoyo de Fidel. Hombre clave en todas las operaciones de prospección y extracción de petróleo, contrapartida de la multinacional Sherritt, en Cuba . Fortuna en ascenso. Prácticamente el monto de su capital está depositado en bancos canadienses.Julio Casas Regueiro. Vice Ministro Primero del Ministerio de las Fuerzas Armadas. Controla prácticamente todos los negocios de las fuerzas armadas. Es el hombre de confianza de Raúl Castro y el contacto con el gran capital en el exterior.Eusebio Leal Spengler. Historiador de la Ciudad de La Habana y director de la empresa turística HABAGUANEX, que abarca todo el casco histórico de la capital. La empresa que dirige por instrucciones de Fidel Castro en su creación, está exenta de controles de ningún tipo por parte de los organismos de la economía nacional.Guillermo García Frías. Comandante de la Revolución. Responsable de la flora y la fauna en Cuba . Durante muchos años ha manejado de forma unipersonal y privada la exportación de animales y en especial la de gallos de pelea. Además posee embarcaciones y tiendas especializadas en artículos de western. Tiene también la renta de cotos de caza, para turismo internacional.Abelardo Colomé Ibarra. Ministro del Interior. Conjunto de actividades legales e ilegales realizadas por empresas subordinadas a su mando.MAS DE 10 MILLONES US DOLARESEduardo Bencomo Zurdo. Presidente del Banco Financiero Internacional y principal ejecutivo para las operaciones comerciales no convencionales desarrolladas por los funcionarios del gobierno cubano. Ex miembro del Grupo de Coordinación y Apoyo de Fidel Castro.Emilio Aragonés Navarro. Ex Ministro del gobierno, ex embajador y ex presidente del Banco Financiero Internacional. Participó en grandes negocios en la Argentina y en España en la compra de equipos.Roberto Robaina y Marilena García. Ex Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores y la esposa ex Directora de Relaciones Internacionales de la Corporación Rumbos. Conjunto de negocios con Raúl Villanueva, ex gobernador de Quintana Roo en México.Ricardo Cabrisas Ruiz. Ex Ministro de Comercio Exterior y actual Ministro del Gobierno. Participación en Comisiones en un conjunto muy grande de operaciones de importación.Herederos de Manuel Piñeiro. Fallecido. Ex jefe de los Servicios de Inteligencia y del Departamento América del Comité Central del Partido. Participación muy activa en el comercio de armas y drogas.Aldo Santamaría Cuadrado. Ex Jefe de la Marina de Guerra. Tráfico de Drogas.Ramón Díaz Vallina. Vice Ministro de Salud Pública. Principal negociador del gobierno cubano paOrlando Pérez Rodríguezra los equipos médicos, medicamentos, materias primas farmacéuticas y suministros médicos.. Ex Presidente del Banco Nacional y principal financiero de la corporación CIMEX. Se especializa como corredor de Bolsas.Héctor Rodríguez Llompart. Ex presidente del Banco Nacional y actualmente se desempeña en Cuba como representante de financistas de la Comunidad Económica Europea.Alicia Alonso. Directora del Ballet Nacional de Cuba. Ha operado el Ballet como una institución privada en beneficio propio, con autorización del gobierno.Miguel Brugueras del Valle. Ex embajador de Cuba en Panamá. Venta de visas a Panamá de conjunto con Noriega, lavado de dinero y operaciones de contrabando.Silvio Rodríguez Domínguez. Cantautor.Armando Hart Dávalos. Ex ministro de Cultura y ex de varios cargos, desde Vicepresidente del Consejo de Ministros hasta Ministro de Educación. Comisiones en el sector artístico y ventas de obras culturales del patrimonio nacional.Alfredo Guevara Valdés. Participación en negocios vinculados a la Industria Cinematográfica , venta de obras de arte y depositario de cuantiosas donaciones de organismos internacionales a Cuba .Lucindo del Rosal. Yerno de Ramiro Valdés. Participación en distintos negocios relacionados con la venta de armas.Rogelio Acevedo. Presidente de Cubana de Aviación. Comisiones relacionadas al sector que administra.Diocles Torralba. Durante su gestión como Ministro de Transporte y del Azúcar fue receptor de grandes comisiones por la compra de equipos.Juan Almeida Bosque. Capital limitado a unos 10 millones de US dólares, por una donación expresa en 1990 de Fidel Castro.Jesús Pérez Otón. Ministro de la Industria Ligera. Comisiones en la compra de materias primas para la industria ligera.

Ulises Rosales del Toro. Ministro del Azúcar y ex jefe del Estado Mayor de las Fuerzas Armadas. Operaciones comerciales vinculadas a la industria azucarera que han sido efectuadas en su beneficio propio.MAS DE 5 MILLONES DE US DOLARESPanchito Portela. Actual director de Cuba Tabacos. Comisiones en la venta de las marcas de tabaco de Cuba y en la comercialización del mismo.Javier Ardizones. Ex embajador de Cuba en Italia y ex presidente de la Cadena turística Gran Caribe. Se apropió de donaciones del gobierno italiano a Cuba , y mantiene relaciones comerciales con el Alcalde de Marbella , Jesús Martínez Gil.Ramón Cuenca. Coronel de la Inteligencia. Representante en Cuba de la firma suiza Andre que efectúa prestamos a corto plazo al gobierno cubano.Ramón Martínez Noa (Cuco). Principal negociador para la compra de equipos y materiales para el sector de las construcciones.

Jorge Lezcano Pérez. Embajador de Cuba en Brasil, ex miembro del Grupo de Coordinación y Apoyo. Tiene una participación muy activa en el control de los negocios de Fidel Castro con Nelson Mandela . Actualmente comercializa medicamentos elaborados en Cuba .Carlos Pérez. Ex Ministro de la Agricultura y actualmente Director del Grupo Nacional de Cítricos. Representa a Cuba ante los capitales de Israel y Chile que explotan las plantaciones de cítricos.Tomás Benítez Martínez. General de Brigada. Ex director de la empresa turística militar Gaviota y actualmente Presidente de la Corporación mixta cubano-panameña Cupet para la comercialización de la gasolina en dólares. Durante su permanencia como Presidente de Gaviota se conoce que recibió solamente en dos operaciones comerciales 4 millones de UD dólares y que fue sancionado por Julio Casas por ocultamiento de información. 

Fernando Fernández Cossio. Ex embajador de Cuba en México y presidente del Grupo Hotelero Horizontes. Ha recibido grandes comisiones por permitir la participación de capital mexicano de dudoso origen en la industria hotelera cubana.Enrique Luzón Battle. General de Brigada. Ex Ministro de Transporte y ex Director de corporaciones cubano angolanas para la comercialización de madera , petróleo, piedras preciosas, etc.Gumersindo González. Ex ministro de Transporte y Director de FINTUR (Banco para el Financiamiento del Turismo).

Alejandro Jorge. Teniente Coronel de la Inteligencia Cubana. Representante en Cuba de un conjunto de empresas europeas teniendo prioridad como suministrador para las empresas cubanas vinculadas al turismo.Silvino Colas Sánchez . General de Brigada, ex ministro de Comunicaciones, Director de Comunicaciones de las Fuerzas Armadas. A través de la firma internacional ETECSA, monopolio de las comunicaciones en Cuba , ha recibido grandes comisiones.Eduardo Delgado Izquierdo. General, Jefe de los Servicios de Inteligencia. Es depositario de sumas importantes de dinero (no controlado) en Panamá, México y España.General Santiago. Fue el depositario de todos los recursos incautados en la causa No, 1 y la causa No. 2 por narcotráfico. Posteriormente fue acusado de haberse apropiado de grandes cantidades de dinero. Actualmente se encuentra en un semi-retiro.Orlando Romero. Durante muchos años Director de la empresa importadora-exportadora Medicuba, teniendo participación personal en todas las operaciones comerciales vinculadas a la exportación e importación de medicamentos, materias primas farmacéuticas, equipos y suministros médicos.Juan José Vega. Como Presidente del Grupo Cubanacan ha recibido comisiones de los inversionistas en el sector hotelero.Conrado Martínez Corona. Presidente del Poder Popular de Ciudad Habana y ex Presidente del Instituto de Deportes y Educación Física(INDER) .Apropiación de distintos premios otorgados a los atletas cubanos y comisiones de los suministradores de artículos deportivos a Cuba.Pablo Milanes. Cantautor.Raúl Fraga. Director del Instituto de Medicina Veterinaria, sobrino de Fidel Castro. Comisiones en la venta de productos veterinarios, ganado y de animales de laboratorio.Manuel Vila Sosa. Presidente de la Cadena turística Rumbos S.A. Ex ministro de Comercio Interior. Durante muchos años, estuvo percibiendo comisiones fundamentales de suministradores de México y de Argentina .Leo Brower. Concertista de guitarra. Director de Orquesta, Compositor.Alberto Cárdenas. Ex vicepresidente de Cubanacan, socio del panameño Víctor Arráz, negocios varios en Panamá.José Ramón Fernández (el gallego). Vicepresidente del Consejo de Ministros, ex de varios cargos. Ha comprado varias propiedades en España y mantiene relaciones directas con el grupo de Monterrey en México.Francisco J. Soberón. Presidente del Banco Central de Cuba. De conjunto con Orlando Rodríguez Romay efectuaron operaciones fraudulentas de compraventa de la flota mercante cubana, en la cual obtuvo grandes beneficios económicos de orden personal.Tirso Luis Joanicot. Oficial de los Servicios de Inteligencia que ha estado operando con la cobertura de empresa de comercio exterior.Raúl de la Nuez. Ministro de Comercio Exterior. Hombre de confianza de Marcos Portal y operaba desde Canadá las cuentas personales del mismo.
Alberto Ríos Manzano. Sub-director comercial de la empresa importadora de alimentos (Alimport).Daniel Solana. Ex Director de Cubatabaco. Durante muchos años efectuó exportaciones clandestinas de tabaco a España.Eduardo Hernández. Presidente de la empresa Corporación Alimenticia S.A. (Coral) empresa fantasma para la comercialización internacional de alimentos producidos por la industria alimenticia.Eugenio George. Entrenador del equipo de voley-ball femenino.Javier Sotomayor. Deportista. Ganador de varios premios internacionalesJorge Perogurria. Artista de cine.Jorge Luis Prats. Concertista pianista.Adolfo Díaz Suárez. Ex vicepresidente del Consejo de Ministros. Responsable máximo de las importaciones de alimentos durante muchos años.Alfredo Hondal. Ex miembro del Buró Político y Director de la Industria azucarera en Ciego de Ávila.Manuel de Jesús Limonta. Ex Director del Centro de Ingeniería Genética y Biotecnología. Comisiones en la compra de equipos para los centros de investigación.Arístides Ruiz Vinajeras. Fundador de la empresa para la comercialización de joyas y prendas en el mundo entero.

Alfredo Oliveros. Ex coronel del Ministerio del Interior. Representante en Cuba de la firma mexicana La Costena.

Jorge Díaz Argüelles. Representante en Cuba del Grupo inversionista de México, Monterrey y representante de la cerveza Tecate.Alfredo López. Ministro de la Industria Pesquera y ex Director de la Empresa Nacional de Electricidad. Ha percibido grandes comisiones en la compra de equipos de generación de electricidad.Juan Formell. Director de la Orquesta de música popular Los Van Van.Adalberto Álvarez. Director de la Orquesta que lleva su nombre.
1.- Luis Alberto López Rodríguez Callejas, 2.-Gral. Albin Ruíz, 3.- José Ramón MachadoVentura, 4.- Alvaro López Meira, 5.- Julio Casas Regueiro, 6.- Carlos Fernández Godín,7.- Leopoldo Cintas Frías y 8.- Abelardo Colomé Ibarra LOS MAS PELIGROSOS Y SANGUINARIOS DESPUES DE LOS CASTRO ,
Fuentes:
Fuentes independientes radicadas en Cuba . Funcionarios en activo del sistema empresarial y financiero del gobierno cubano. Ex funcionarios y ex dirigentes radicados tanto en el exilio como en Cuba . Informaciones sobre volúmenes financieros operados y nivel de comisiones y pagos recibidos por los funcionarios relacionados. Financiero Internacional (BFI) y en otros por los mismos extranjeros.

3 members of 1972 Dolphins skip White House event over differences with Obama?
Three members of the undefeated 1972 Miami Dolphins decided not to attend an event Tuesday honoring the team at the White House due to political differences with the president.The Sun-Sentinel reported that Hall of Fame center Jim Langer, defensive tackle Manny Fernandez and guard Bob Kuechenberg skipped the event, which made up for the time the team did not get the chance to go to the White House because, in part, President Richard Nixon was embroiled in the Watergate scandal.The three players spoke with the paper and kept their comments brief, but direct.”We’ve got some real moral compass issues in Washington,” Langer said. “I don’t want to be in a room with those people and pretend I’m having a good time. I can’t do that. If that [angers] people, so be it.”Daily politics news delivered to your inbox: sign up for our newsletter Fernandez, for his part, told the paper that his views are “dramatically opposed to the President’s.””Enough said. Let’s leave it at that. I hope everyone enjoys the trip who goes.”Kuechenberg said it would be hypocritical for him to be there, the paper reported.”I don’t want to do that. I just don’t believe in this administration at all. So I don’t belong. Anyone on the left or the right has to respect one man’s opinion,” he said.Obama welcomed the former players to the East Room, a periodic occurrence at the White House these days for current sports champions. Four decades ago, however, saluting athletes was not an established tradition. So the men of that historic Dolphins team had not received their due.Nearly three dozen members of the team received their White House moment, 40 years after they made history by winning 17 games and losing none — an undefeated NFL feat that still stands today.The faces were still recognizable: Hall of Famers Larry Csonka, the team’s star fullback; quarterback Bob Griese; offensive lineman Larry Little; linebacker Nick Buoniconti; and of course their leader, coach Don Shula.”I know that some people may be asking why we are doing this after all these years,” Obama said. “My answer is simple: I wanted to be the young guy up here for once.”Though relatively rare, athletes have been known to take political stands and not attend White House ceremonies. This year, Matt Birk, a center for the Baltimore Ravens who is opposed to same-sex marriage, did not join his team when they met Obama.Little and Griese, spoke to reporters after the event.”I don’t have any thoughts about those guys. I’m just sorry that they weren’t here,” Griese said. “We had a great day. The White House treated us greatly. Everybody who was here was happy they were here.”The Associated Press contributed to this report

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/21/3-members-172-dolphins-decline-invite-to-white-house-over-political-differences/?test=latestnews#ixzz2cdZvchqH

Social Security: CNBC Explains
   Text Size   Published: Thursday, 25 Aug 2011 | 3:08 PM ETBy: Mark Koba | Senior Editor,
Born out of the Great Depression, Social Security is a\) a socialist-styled government giveaway costing billions, or b\) a well-thought-out retirement plan for aging citizens, paid mostly with their contributions.
Either way, the program has been a source of controversy since the beginning.
But what is the truth behind Social Security? What was it meant to do and how has it changed over the years? CNBC explains.
What is Social Security?
Social Security is a mandatory retirement system established in 1935 as part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal. It is run by the Social Security Administration, or SSA, based in Woodlawn, Maryland, just outside Baltimore.
The agency includes 10 regional offices, eight processing centers, some 1,300 field offices, and 37 Teleservice Centers. About 62,000 people work for the SSA.
The Social Security Act—as it is formally known—was created out of the devastating effects from the Great Depression. Millions of Americans lost their jobs, savings disappeared and the elderly were often left without a source of income.
The SSA provides benefits to retirees and disabled workers.
It is a “pay-as-you-go” program in which current workers fund benefits for current retirees and disabled Americans. In most cases, a worker must have 10 years of covered employment to be eligible for retirement benefits.
In 2011, there are an estimated 56 million people receiving Social Security benefitsand 158 million workers paying into the system.
The act has expanded over the years, as we’ll see later. It also gives money to states to provide assistance to Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Maternal and Child Welfare, public health services, and the blind.
How is Social Security funded?
Workers and employers pay for Social Security—in fact, both are required to pay Social Security taxes.
In 1935, the amount employers and workers paid was a combined 2 percent payroll tax on the first $3,000 of a worker’s income.
As of 2011, workers paid 6.2 percent of their earnings into Social Security—up to an income of $106,800 a year. After workers hit that income level, taxes are no longer deducted.
Employers pay a matching amount, for a combined contribution of 12.4 percent of earnings.
Self-employed persons have to pay both the employee and employer share—for a total 12.4 percent.
Another source of funds comes from higher-income Social Security beneficiaries, who pay federal income taxes on their benefit income.
One important note: Social Security is not technically part of the federal budget. It never has been. In 1968, President Lyndon Johnson included Social Security for the first time in a “unified federal budget” as part of an effort to end confusion over budgetary procedures.
It was taken ‘off budget’ by 1986—meaning its balance sheet is not technically part of the overall federal budget.
However, those involved in federal budget matters often produce two sets of numbers, one without Social Security included in the budget totals and one with it included.
How are benefits calculated?
This is not the easiest of math problems to solve, as even the SSA admits.
Social Security benefits are based on a worker’s lifetime earnings. Out of entire earnings from age 22 to 62, the highest 35 years of indexed earnings are used in the computation.
Actual earnings are adjusted or “indexed” to account for changes in wages since the first year of work.
The purpose for indexing earnings is to make sure benefits reflect the rise in the standard of living that took place during a worker’s lifetime. Benefit increases are based on annual cost of living allowances—what’s referred to as a COLA.
The average monthly Social Security benefit for a retired worker was about $1,177 at the beginning of 2011, according to the SSA.
The SSA had send out by mail twice a year estimated benefits recipients would get. However, in a recent cost cutting move, that mailing has stopped.
The SSA has an online benefit calculator.
Are Social Security benefits taxed?
Yes. Until 1984, Social Security benefits were exempt from taxes. But in 1983, Congress made up to 50% of Social Security benefits taxable for higher-income beneficiaries; and in 1993, up to 85% was made taxable.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, about 40% of beneficiaries are impacted by the tax.
But the taxes collected are credited to the Social Security Trust Funds and the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund and not used for the Federal budget.
What is the Social Security Trust Fund?
Actually, there are twotrust funds to handle surpluses in the program. Both were started in 1939.
The Social Security Trust Funds are: the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and the Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Funds. These funds are accounts managed by the Department of the Treasury.
They serve two purposes: they provide an accounting mechanism for tracking all income to and out of the trust funds—and most importantly, they hold the accumulated assets.
Social Security surpluses are, by law, invested in U.S. Treasury securities. When payroll taxes exceed benefits in a particular year, the surpluses are used to buy securities which are held by the Trust Funds.
The Trust Funds earn interest, which is set at the average market yield on long-term Treasury securities. Interest earnings on the invested assets of the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds were $2.6 trillion by 2010.
So far, there have been 11 years in which the Social Security program did not take in enough FICA taxes to pay the current year’s benefits.During that time, Trust Fund bonds in the amount of about $24 billion made up the difference.
Social Security’s costs will grow in coming years as the large Baby Boom generation— those born between 1946 and 1964—move into their retirement years. The trust funds would then be exhausted by 2037 without changes to the system.
What age do you have to be to collect Social Security?
The first checks went to those who reached age 65, though early retirement at 62 would bring limited benefits, with a permanent reduction to 80 percent of the full benefit amount.
But the age has increased. In 2010, the full benefit age became 66 for people born in 1943-1954, and it will gradually rise to 67 for those born in 1960 or later.
Early retirement benefits will continue to be available at age 62, but they will be reduced more.
When the full-benefit age reaches 67, benefits taken at age 62 will be reduced to 70 percent of the full benefit and benefits first taken at age 65 will be reduced to 86.7 percent of the full benefit.
What are the origins of Social Security in the U.S.?
The U.S. created several pension plans for soldiers and sailors through its early history. But fast forward to the Civil War, and we find the first true government relief program that could be called a social security system, according to the SSA.
The Civil War Pension Program was signed into law in 1862 and provided funds to U.S. soldiers who were disabled in battle. Widows and orphans could receive pensions equal in amount to what would have been paid to a surviving veteran.
By 1890, the law changed so that any disability—from battle or not—would qualify a vet for funds. In 1906, old age was made a sufficient qualification for benefits. One note: pensioners did not have to pay into the system to receive funds.
Leaping into the 20th century and again to the Great Depression, we come to Social Security’s true start. What’s interesting to note is that several states at that time, such as New York and Massachusetts, passed limited pension plans for the elderly before the federal government did.
In June 1934, FDR announced his intention to provide a social security program. He created the Committee on Economic Security to come up with the exact plans for the system.
FDR submitted a bill with the recommendations, and it eventually passed both houses of Congress and was signed into law on Aug. 14, 1935.
How has Social Security expanded?
Initially, the SSA was charged with providing benefits only to retirees and some unemployed people.
The benefits for retirees was not supposed to be permanent. It was to be a temporary “relief” program that would eventually disappear as more people were able to obtain retirement income. And there were limits on the unemployed. Job categories not covered by the initial act included workers in agriculture, domestic service, government employees, and many teachers, nurses, hospital employees, librarians, and social workers.
A 1939 change in the law added survivors’ benefits and benefits for the retiree’s spouse and children.
By 1950, Social Security laws expanded coverage to all non-government workers, including the self-employed. It wasn’t until 1983 that civilian federal workers—such as the President of the United States—were eligible for Social Security benefits.
Another change to Social Security was the addition of Disability Insurance program in 1956. This provides monthly cash benefits for disabled workers and their dependents who have paid into the system, and met minimum work requirements.
An important note of change involves Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare is the nation’s health insurance program for people age 65 or older; Medicaid is a health and medical services program for low income individuals and families. Both were established in 1965 under a Social Security reform law.
But they are not a direct part of Social Security. Like Social Security, Medicare is financed by a portion of the payroll taxes paid by workers and their employers. ButMedicare is also financed in part by monthly premiums deducted from Social Security checks.
What is the basis of your Social Security number?
Ever wonder why the Social Security numbers are the way they are?The numbers are designed to make sure benefits are accurate.
The first three digits are assigned by the geographical region in which the person was residing at the time they obtained a number.
Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.
The remaining six digits in the number are more or less randomly assigned and organized to ease bookkeeping procedures.
And by the way, no serial number 0000 has ever been assigned. Social Security numbers were first issued in November 1936. To date, 453.7 million different numbers have been send out.
When a Social Security card holder dies, that number is not reused.
What is the controversy surrounding Social Security?
Often called the “third rail” of American politics, Social Security has been attacked from both sides of the political spectrum.
Big business opposed Social Security from its beginning because it imposed new taxes, new bookkeeping requirements, and”undermined the absolute dependence of the employees on the company.”
Many on the left said it didn’t go far enough to help citizens and was discriminatory—nearly two-thirds of all African Americans in the labor force and just over half of all women employed were not covered by Social Security at its inception.
There have been calls for many changes over the years: raise the retirement age, reduce benefits, and privatize the SSA by transferring the funds held by the government to Wall Street investment firms.
The impact of Social Security may be underlined by the fact that 8 percent of the elderly receiving Social Security benefits are poor, according to U.S. government standards. Meanwhile, forty-eight percent of Americans would be below the poverty line if they didn’t receive a monthly Social Security check, according to government statistics.

_________________________________________
Enviar Artículos, Criticas y Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/
http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/
http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/
https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/
http://contracandela.blogspot.com/
http://lamisinguillaperipendica.blogspot.com/
http://lazarorgonzalezformiamidademayor.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ 

No 463 “En mi opinion” Agosto 21, 2013

agosto 21, 2013

No 463  “En mi opinión” Agosto 21, 2013.  

Editor Lázaro R González Miño  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST” ,  

Enviar Artículos, Criticas y Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

WHO SAID THIS:

1-   I BUGGED TWO BUILDING AND I GOT IMPEACHED
2-   I BUGGED THE ENTIRE NATION AND A LOT IDIOTS STILL LOVE ME

 “En mi opinión” Al fin el altarito se le está derrumbando al “alcalde de goma” carlos gimenez con el asunto de la Unidad Anticorrupción y la intromisión ilegal al Departamento de recaudación de impuesto sobre la propiedad. Y esto es solo un pequeño pedazo de todo lo que esta corrupto en el condado Miami Dade. Por ejemplo el desprestigiado Departamento de Niños y Familia informa que entre los meses de abril y agosto se han reportado 20 niños muertos bajo  “su protección” Otro que bien baila es el Jefe Departamento que decide los Tolls aumentados que se cobraran, Maurice Ferre dijo que el que no quiera pagar los tolls que se cobran en la I95 que no lo usen. Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

 

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

Property appraiser sues Miami-Dade County over office’s independence

Carlos Lopez Cantera, seen here on Dec. 6, 2012, outside the Stephen P. Clark building in downtown Miami, filed a suit against Miami-Dade County on Tuesday, Aug. 20, 2013, to gain more independent control over his office. 

ROBERTO KOLTUN / EL NUEVO HERALD

Related Content

·         Read Carlos Lopez-Cantera’s legal filing 

·         Miami-Dade property appraiser plans to sue county over office powers

·         Commission denies Miami-Dade property appraiser’s request to hire outside attorn

BY PATRICIA MAZZEI

PMAZZEI@MIAMIHERALD.COM

Property Appraiser Carlos Lopez-Cantera sued Miami-Dade County on Tuesday to gain more independent control over his office.

Lopez-Cantera asked the Miami-Dade Circuit Court to rule on how much control, if any, county commissioners and Mayor Carlos Gimenez’s administration have over the property appraiser’s powers.

“The county attorney has refused to recognize the will of the voters when, in 2008, they overwhelmingly voted to make the county property appraiser an independent, constitutional officer,” Lopez-Cantera said. “That is why today I have filed an action with the circuit court to remove any doubts regarding the nature and independence of the office.”

County Attorney Robert Cuevas has opined that the property appraiser is essentially an elected department head with some extra powers — but not as many as those awarded to constitutional officers named in the Florida Constitution.

According to Cuevas, the matter was settled in a 2008 lawsuit in which Circuit Judge Gisela Cardonne Ely ruled that the property appraiser was a local — not a constitutional — position under Miami-Dade’s home-rule charter. That ruling was never appealed.

But because Miami-Dade voters did not expressly vote on whether the property appraiser would be a constitutional officer or an elected department head, Lopez-Cantera contends the court must still weigh in on that ambiguity.

The ballot question asked if the property appraiser should be “elected and subject to recall by the voters” rather than “appointed and supervised” by the mayor.

In the court filing, Lopez-Cantera’s lawyers, Dan Gelber and Jerry Greenberg, argue that voters intended for an independent property appraiser “who would derive authority not from the whims of politicians or administrators, but directly from the people of Miami-Dade County.”

“The position taken by the County casts a serious doubt over the Property Appraiser’s ability to be truly independent and free from political influence,” the request for declaratory judgment says.

Lopez-Cantera, who was elected last year and took office in January, revealed in June that he planned to take the question to court.

But he could not sue immediately because both he and the government are represented by Cuevas. Last month, commissioners rejected Lopez-Cantera’s request for permission to spend $50,000 from his office’s roughly $30 million budget to hire an outside attorney to sue the board.

Instead, Lopez-Cantera formed a nonprofit corporation, Common Sense for Miami-Dade, to pay for the legal retainer with private funds, he said.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/20/3575332/property-appraiser-sues-miami.html#storylink=cpy

Hablan agentes trasladados de la Unidad Anti-Corrupción

• Se asegura que están al salir revelaciones interesantes relacionadas con el desmantelamiento de esa unidad policiaca de Miami-Dade

MIAMI, 21 DE AGOSTO DE 2013, NHR.com—Dándole seguimiento a la información ofrecida ayer sobre la desmantelacion de la Unidad Anti Corrupción (CCU) de la policía de Miami-Dade, creada para investigar la corrupción pública, podemos informar que agentes del Buro Federal de Investigaciones (FBI) están revisando los archivos que les entregaron detectives que han sido trasladados de CCU a otras unidades de la policía.

“Esta es la única opción que nos quedaba”, nos dijo uno de los agentes con el que conversamos y quien nos dijo que ellos comenzaron a sospechar que la Unidad seria desmantelada cuando se sorprendió a la boletera de Hialeah, Daisy Cabrera, vinculada a la campaña de Carlos Giménez, y ésta nos llevó a otros implicados, como es el caso de Jerry Ramos, empleado de Al Lorenzo, que a su vez asesoraba las campañas de Giménez y la fiscal Katherine Fernández Rundle.

Lorenzo se retiró de de la campaña de Giménez una semana después de que la boletera Daisy Cabrera fuera detenida por cargos de fraude de boleta de votante ausente, ella había trabajado con Lorenzo en campañas anteriores.

La fiscal Fernández Rundle se retiró de la investigación en medio de acusaciones de que Lorenzo tenía relación de trabajo con Cabrera. Lorenzo siempre a negado su vinculación a la boletera.

“Giménez no quiere que se investigue la corrupción” dice el presidente del sindicato de la policía John Rivera.

El agente con el que hablamos en NHR.com en las últimas horas nos dijo que sus funciones dentro de la Unidad Anti Corrupción ya se estaban haciendo prácticamente insostenibles. “Hacíamos tremendas investigaciones, con evidencias y hasta fotos, y cuando se las presentábamos a la fiscalía, nos las bloqueaban”.

Una de las víctimas del desmantelamiento de la Unidad Anticorrupción es el experimentado detective Luis Rodríguez, quien según nuestras fuentes fue castigado por el alcalde Carlos Giménez porque Rodríguez apoyó al ex comisionado Joe Martínez, quien fue el contrario de Giménez en las elecciones por la alcaldía condal. Rodríguez decidió renunciar y está siendo asesorado por un conocido abogado de Miami.

Nuestras fuentes dentro de la disidencia policiaca de CCU, nos dicen que “son muchas la ataduras que existen entre la oficina del alcalde Carlos Giménez y la fiscal Fernández Rundle; son los mismos personajes los que corren sus campañas y ellos los protegen”, nos dicen.

En NHR.com seguiremos detrás de esta noticia. Esperamos en las próximas horas poder tener respuestas a muchas preguntas, tanto de la oficina del alcalde como de los detectives que se han visto separados de CCU.

Autoridad de carreteras rechaza bajar peaje en la autopista 836

Contenido Relacionado

·         SunPass funcionará en Carolina del Norte

·         Miami-Dade acepta plan para detener la matanza de perros y gatos adoptables en el refugio del condado

·         Opositores al alza de peajes piden apoyo del público

·         MDX proyecta eventos públicos para dar a conocer propuesta de peaje

ALFONSO CHARDY ACHARDY@ELNUEVOHERALD.COM

Un intento por bajar el peaje en la carretera estatal 836 fracasó el martes por la noche cuando la junta directiva de la Autoridad de Autopistas de Miami-Dade (MDX) votó 7-5 en favor de mantener una tarifa más alta aprobada en marzo.

A pesar de las súplicas de seis funcionarios electos y 17 activistas comunitarios, la junta votó en contra de una moción que hubiera reducido la tasa de peaje a 60 centavos en lugar de los 70 centavos aprobados el 19 de marzo.

Durante una reunión que duró más de tres horas, alcaldes, legisladores estatales y miembros de la comunidad exhortaron a los miembros de la junta de MDX a eliminar la tasa de 70 centavos y adoptar en su lugar la tarifa de 60 centavos más baja.

Pero a pesar de las exhortaciones de la comunidad, los miembros de la junta rechazaron la opción de 60 centavos y se negaron a dejar sin efecto la tasa de 70 centavos.

El miembro de la junta Robert Holland, minutos antes de la votación, resumió las razones para mantener la tarifa de peaje más alta, que se utilizará para mejorar la congestionada autopista 836.

“Tenemos que mover bienes y servicios”, dijo, señalando además que muchas empresas probablemente no querido reubicarse en Miami debido a sus carreteras congestionadas.

“Tenemos que mejorar este sistema”, apuntó.

La nueva tasa de 70 centavos no entrará en vigor sino hasta probablemente agosto del 2014.

Actualmente el peaje en la 836 es variable, yendo de 25 centavos en el extremo occidental de la carretera a $1 cerca del Estadio de los Miami Marlins.

Pero muchos conductores no pagan peaje, ya que salen de la 836 antes de la caseta de cobro. El 19 de marzo, la junta directiva de MDX votó 7-6 para establecer la tasa de 70 centavos por cada portal de cobro electrónico, en sí un aumento en los peajes porque cuando la nueva tarifa entre en vigor el cobro será solamente electrónico y dinero en efectivo ya no será aceptado porque las casetas de cobro serán eliminadas..

En ese momento, todos los conductores tendrán que pagar peaje no importa donde entren a la autopista.

El personal de MDX proyecta llevar a cabo cerca de $800 millones en mejoras en la 836 y otras vías de peaje de la agencia bajo la tarifa de peaje más alta aprobada el 19 de marzo.

Dentro del marco de la tarifa más alta, MDX planea reconstruir los distribuidores viales de la 836 desde la avenida 87 hacia el este hasta donde la carretera se conecta con la carretera interestatal 95, así como prolongar la autopista Gratigny Parkway hacia el oeste desde el Palmetto Expressway hasta el Turnpike de la Florida.

En la reunión de la MDX del 30 de abril, la vicepresidenta de la junta, Shelly Smith Fano, presentó la moción proponiendo reducir la tasa a 60 centavos, una cantidad propuesta originalmente por la miembro del consejo Maritza Gutiérrez.  
Read more here: http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2013/06/19/1503160/autoridad-de-carreteras-rechaza.html#storylink=cpy

 

WND EXCLUSIVE

MOVEMENT TO IMPEACH OBAMA SNOWBALLING

‘Energy is crazy high’ as groups explode in all 50 states

 GARTH KANT  FIU Online MBA – No GMAT100% online AACSB accredited Scholarships of $10k availablecmba.FIU.edu

·         WASHINGTON – The “Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment” movement is suddenly sweeping the nation.

WND first reported on the booming movement in July, and now the group claims it has mushroomed to 40,000 members across America to become “the largest grassroots movement in the nation” in the few weeks since it was launched in June.

The group’s national website has links to Facebook pages of groups in all 50 states, plus Washington, D.C.

And it is on those Facebook pages that organizers recruit and inform, while fellow members share their experiences and bond, as the group’s Internet-age version of grassroots democracy takes root and flourishes in cyberspace and on the streets.

Visit WND’s online Impeachment Store to see all the products related to ousting Obama.

The clout of “Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment” is growing so fast, Press Secretary Jennifer Hitt told WND, “We would like to get to the point we can help fund a 2016 candidate. The movement started with the main Facebook page, grew to the state Facebook pages, and now we are trying to get most people to register on our state forums on the website, Overpasses.org.”

Hitt said the buzz isn’t limited to one area: “It’s nationwide. The energy is crazy high.”

·          we have an influx of new members from all over the state. In order to keep everyone in their area, I have created pages for each area group. Please join the group closest to you.

·         “Me (pictured) at the Hwy 280 Birmingham Rally. Met some wonderful people whom are now friends! Many cars honked for us, a few middle-finger salutes, but, we will continue until we drop!”

·         “Guys [please] go to the Jasper Daily Mountain Eagle page and like it. They’re attempting to reach 10,000 likes by the end of the month. They did an excellent article for our movement, and I’ve gotten a fantastic response. Let’s return the kindness. Thx!”

·         “Tina has stepped up to lead and organize Dothan and surrounding areas. Tina came to the Birmingham rally and was very excited. She drove from Dothan to Birmingham to attend then drove home alone in horrible weather. Now Tina wants to lead her area. Please comment below if you live in Dothan and surrounding areas and can attend rallies or help Tina. UNITED WE STAND.”

·         “[K]idding around with the Memphis local boys and girls in blue as they frequently check in on our safety! She hugged me before they left and the rest just shook my hand! Way to go, Blue!”

·         “Excellent write up in Daily Mountain Eagle this morning on Jasper protest. Started on front page and continued on another page. Lonnie, I was especially proud of your comments. Excellent!”

·         “My husband and I have been so frustrated for the past 5 years and felt so helpless to really do anything. Thank God somebody finally got the guts to really stand up. We cannot be nice and expect results. If we ever needed something to give ourselves to, this is it. We can be strong and make America strong again by demanding that the people be heard and not just heard, but action taken to stop this train wreck. We will not be intimidated by their bullying and socialist agenda; it’s now or never people. Thank you, Ann. I know you are a true patriot.”

There’s even advice on how to make a quick do-it-yourself sign.

“Signs are here: https://www.box.com/impeachobamasigns. Just copy to a flash drive and take to Staples or other print store. A 2′ x 3′ is only $3.25.”

Members of Congress may think impeaching Obama is an impossible dream, but sentiment to oust the president appears to be rapidly gaining momentum across the nation.

As WND reported, just a little more than a week ago, Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, said he believes there are enough votes in the House to impeach President Obama, but he fears such an effort would be futile because of the Democratic Party’s grip on the Senate.

However, the mood of the country may be shifting after a relentless parade of Obama administration scandals, a number of severe setbacks to a Obama’s signature health care law that is now more unpopular than ever, an economy still refusing to recover after five years and a foreign policy that has a good portion of the Middle East either in turmoil or at war.

That mood could be evidenced in the great interest in, and huge advance sales for, WND’s latest book, “Impeachable Offenses: The Case for Removing Barack Obama from Office.

Buzzfeed Politics declared, “It’s not just overpasses anymore,” and the “book ushers in the Obama Impeachment movement.”

“Impeachable Offenses,” to be published by WND Books on Aug. 27, has already gone into its third printing, co-author Aaron Klein said, “due to unexpected demand from bookstores.”

“Clearly a large segment of the population is concerned Obama has overstepped his executive authority and has used his office to circumvent Congress to change, ignore, or at times perhaps invent de facto law,” he added.

WND Books CEO Joseph Fara told Buzzfeed, “We knew this was going to be a popular book. What we didn’t realize is that retailers would recognize it in advance and place large orders before the public weighed in.”

The impeachment passion has been evident in growing numbers on the streets of America in recent weeks.

“Overpasses to Impeach Obama” has gone from local protests to nationwide events. The first “National Patriot Wave” was held Aug. 6, with rallies in more than 300 American cities and towns. “National Patriot Wave II” on Aug. 17 had planned for rallies in all 50 states.

Hitt said, “We refer to our national rallies as the Patriot Wave because it starts early on the east coast and spreads west (like a wave).”

She said up until then, cities held their own local rallies.

James Neighbors started the movement in Oklahoma after seeing footage of police shut down an anti-Obama overpass rally in San Diego.

In addition to the national website and the state Facebook pages, the group also has a national Twitter account @OverpassesUSA.

“I am also encouraging every member to give their info to two or three other people to make sure we can all keep in touch,” said Hitt, concerned what would happen should their social media accounts close for some reason.

There have been a few challenges already.

“We had a couple incidents in Missouri and California. The police showed up and arrested some of our patriots. You can watch the videos on YouTube and decide for yourself if it was legit,” noted Hitt.

What the protesters do is simple but effective. They merely gather on highway overpasses and wave signs calling for the impeachment of Obama or urging drivers to “honk to impeach.” The tactics attract attention, both from drivers and the media.

Their national website’s mission statement says “Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment has a simple goal. The removal of the corrupt and criminal President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama.”

It lists 12 reasons for his removal, including abdicating “his responsibility to enforce the laws of the United States against illegal immigration,”  failing to enforce and defend laws adopted by Congress such as the Defense of Marriage Act and for taking the nation to war against Libya “without the consent of the Congress of the United States.”

The “Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment” movement has taken off by itself without much input from established groups such as the many tea parties around the country.

WND contacted a number of tea-party groups around the nation. Their reaction was typified by Chris Lawton of the tea party in Spartanburg, S.C., who said the movement “kind of snuck up on us,” but now members are becoming involved.

Hitt said, “Most people I encounter are all for our movement. Then again, I live in the country. Our goal is to wake people up, and we are doing just that. Waves, honks and thumbs up way outnumber middle fingers.”

She said enthusiasm, already high, just keeps growing.

“Comments from attendees consist mostly of, ‘I can’t wait to get back out there,’ and, ‘I am going to make sure I recruit more people for next time,” or, “Can we do this more than once or twice a month?’”

Many conservatives may feel the mainstream media has forgotten the Benghazi scandal, but Main Street hasn’t.

“My town in North Carolina holds a Benghazi Corner every Saturday. Signs are limited to Benghazi verbiage and we get lots of attention,” said Hitt.

She also insists the president’s race has nothing to do with the group’s call for impeachment, citing the example of Jaison Sheppard, “a black conservative who joins us for every event along with his entire family” and points to his YouTube video.

According to Hitt, “He voted for Obama in ’08 and basically says, ‘It’s not about color. It’s about right and wrong. Obama has to go.’

“And he does have to go. He is the most corrupt POTUS America has ever had. A couple larger groups are supporting us in our efforts: ALIPAC (Americans for Legal Immigration) and Guns Across America and we support them in their efforts,” she adds.

WND has reported Watergate investigator Bob Woodward of the Washington Post compares Obama to Richard Nixon. Members of Congress say it’s about time to consider impeachment. And even Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin has called for Obama’s removal.

There’s also a national petition that calls on Congress to immediately investigate the “unconstitutional and impeachable offenses” of Obama.

It is addressed to Congress and cites a number of scandals in just the last few weeks and months.

Among them are the “lethal and prolonged terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, and the subsequent ‘Watergate-era cover-up.’” And then there’s the big – and getting bigger – scandal involving the federal government’s use of the Internal Revenue Service to harass and attack conservative groups.

There’s also the spying and harassment of journalists.

“Top constitutional attorneys from across the political spectrum now agree that Obama has committed certain specific offenses that unquestionably rise to the level of impeachable ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,” the petition explains.

Sign the petition right away!

And that’s even before the issue of “Obama’s policy of targeted assassinations of U.S. citizens without any constitutionally required due process – including the drone assassination of an American-born 16-year-old as he was eating dinner.”

There’s also the “disastrous ‘Fast and Furious’ operation in which approximately 2,000 firearms were directed from U.S. gun shops across the U.S.-Mexico border and into the hands of members of Mexican drug cartels.”

The petition also cites Obama’s refusal to fulfill his obligation to defend the Defense of Marriage Act.

That’s all in addition to the alleged illegal “recess” appointments of several officials as well as the Obama Justice Department’s refusal to prosecute voter intimidation, his appointment of 30 “czars” and general contempt for Congress and the American people.

The petition states: “Therefore, we the undersigned urge Congress to immediately undertake a full and impartial investigation into the many blatantly unconstitutional actions of Barack Obama. For members of Congress, each of whom has also sworn a solemn oath to uphold the Constitution, to allow a president to routinely flout the Supreme Law of the land without being held accountable is equally repugnant to a free country and a free press.”

Tens of thousands already are on board with the effort, which is just the latest in a long string of calls for impeachment or an investigation.

Impeachment has been brought up by several WND columnists recently.

Nat Hentoff wrote that Obama, “since taking office, has continually limited the First Amendment, the most singular and powerful right that distinctly identifies Americans from residents in all other countries on Earth.”

Columnist Bert Prelutsky took it further.

“I want Obama to go through the process because he has it coming. In totalitarian states, after all, the people have no other recourse except to take to the streets and spill blood. But we have available the process of impeachment, and Obama should be forced to defend his contemptible lies and actions,” he wrote. “If for no other reason than his unbearable arrogance, the schmuck should have to pay a penalty. For instance, when a White House reporter asked him to justify spying on the Associated Press, Obama said, ‘I’ve still got 60,000-plus troops in Afghanistan and I still have a bunch of intelligence officers around the world.’ No, sir, the United States has 60,000-plus troops in Afghanistan and a bunch of intelligence officers around the world.”

A panel of top constitutional experts convened by WND blasted Obama’s actions in office. Bruce Fein, the legal scholar who is best known for having drafted articles of impeachment against former President Clinton for perjury after he lied under oath, said Obama’s orders to drone-kill a terror suspect were “tantamount to murder.”

“You can’t have democracy and the rule of law if you never get to know what the facts are and you just have to accept what the government says they are. If you don’t have a trial, that’s the definition of tyranny.”

Louis Fisher, a scholar in residence at the Constitution Project, said of Obama’s appointment of “czars”: “That is a big deal. A lot of people say, ‘Well, that’s been going on a long time.’ In our form of government, citizens vote for representatives and representatives pass laws. You have people heading departments, and they’re confirmed. There’s an understanding that we will call you up whenever we need to. … Congress passed legislation saying there’d be no funds for three czars, and they were named in the bill. Obama signed it into the law, but in the signing statement, he said that’s unconstitutional because he has the ‘prerogative’ to get the advice he needs to implement statutes. Well, c’mon Obama. You don’t have a prerogative to bring into the White House anybody you want at any salary. It’s all done by law. It goes back to 1978 where Congress passed legislation saying you have this number of people and these are their salaries and Congress can increase or decrease that at any time.”

And Herbert Titus, counsel to the law firm William J. Olson who previously taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools, said Obama’s military actions in Libya are a strong argument for impeachment.

“That’s the one that stands out. It’s unprecedented. It doesn’t even fit within any of the precedents that have been set since Korea.”

Obama should have seen such a move coming. A recent poll earlier this year said half of Americans say he should be impeached.

“It may be early in the process for members of Congress to start planning for impeachment of Barack Obama, but the American public is building a serious appetite for it,” said Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies, which did the telephone poll.

Half or nearly half of those surveyed said they believed Obama should be impeached for the trifecta of scandals now consuming Washington.

On the issue of the Benghazi scandal, in which four Americans were killed after terror threats were ignored, 50.1 percent of Americans said Obama should be impeached. That included 27.6 percent of the responding Democrats.

All of America is buzzing about impeaching Obama. Now you can order Aaron Klein’s latest blockbuster, “Impeachable Offenses: The Case for removing Barack Obama from Office.”

On the IRS harassment of conservative and Christian organizations? Forty-nine percent said they agree that impeachment is appropriate, including 24.4 percent of the Democrats.

And on the fishing trip the Obama administration took into AP reporters’ telephone records in search of a security breach that may have been done by his own administration, 48.6 percent said impeachment is appropriate. That included 26.1 percent of the Democrats.

Sign the petition urging Congress to impeach Obama.

Former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan wrote that the country is in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate.

“The reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone from sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to dangerous,” she said. “No one likes what they’re seeing. The Justice Department assault on the Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the Internal Revenue Service have left the administration’s credibility deeply, probably irretrievably damaged. They don’t look jerky now, they look dirty. The patina of high-mindedness the president enjoyed is gone.”

Noonan said Obama, “as usual, acts as if all of this is totally unconnected to him.”

“He’s shocked, it’s unacceptable, he’ll get to the bottom of it. He read about it in the papers, just like you. But he is not unconnected, he is not a bystander. This is his administration. Those are his executive agencies. He runs the IRS and the Justice Department,” she continued. “A president sets a mood, a tone. He establishes an atmosphere. If he is arrogant, arrogance spreads. If he is too partisan, too disrespecting of political adversaries, that spreads too. Presidents always undo themselves and then blame it on the third guy in the last row in the sleepy agency across town.”

It’s even being compared to Watergate, the break-in that ultimately led to the resignation of President Nixon.

That was the assessment of no less than Woodward, whose reporting on Watergate eventually snared the sitting president.

Woodward said not long ago: “If you read through all these emails, you see that everyone in the government is saying, ‘Oh, let’s not tell the public that terrorists were involved, people connected to al Qaeda. Let’s not tell the public that there were warnings.’ And I have to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said, ‘Oh, let’s not tell this, let’s not show this.’ I would not dismiss Benghazi. It’s a very serious issue.”

A Republican congressman also brought up the subject.

“I would say yes. I’m not willing to take it [impeachment] off to take it off the table, but that’s certainly not what we’re striving for,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told CNN.

“We want truth, we want to bring the people who perpetrated the terrorism in Benghazi to be brought to justice, and we want to have the president do what he has said he would always do. And that is be open and transparent. Thus far, the White House has not done that.”

Earlier, Chaffetz, in an interview with the Salt Lake Tribune, was asked if impeachment was within the realm of possibility.

“It’s certainly a possibility,” he told the paper. “That’s not the goal but given the continued lies perpetrated by this administration, I don’t know where it’s going to go. … I’m not taking it off the table. I’m not out there touting that but I think this gets to the highest levels of our government and integrity and honesty are paramount.”

Chaffetz has been championing the call to probe the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the Benghazi compound that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., said last week impeachment was possible over the “most egregious cover-up in American history.

“People may be starting to use the I-word before too long,” Inhofe told radio host Rusty Humphries, according to the Hill.

“The I-word meaning impeachment?” Humphries asked.

“Yeah,” Inhofe responded.

Additionally, radio host Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor and one-time presidential candidate, predicted Obama won’t serve out his second term because of his complicity in a cover-up over Benghazi.

Other members of Congress who have suggested impeachment for a variety of reasons in recent years include Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla.; and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.

Others who have raised the subject include rock legend and gun-rights defender Ted Nugent, who said there’s “no question” Obama should be impeached.

He blasted “the criminality of this government, the unprecedented abuse of power, corruption, fraud and deceit by the Chicago gangster-scammer-ACORN-in-chief.”

“It’s so diabolical,” he sai

You asked for it! Sign the petition urging Congress to impeach President Barack Obama.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/movement-to-impeach-obama-snowballing/#CMRgbAOJsY86Xlag.99 

RICARDO SAMITIER: La Mejor Prueba de que Desde Roosevelt Gobiernan. Los Mismos Politiqueros Izquierdistas En USA…

Son Eisenhower Que Llegó A La Presidencia Como Republicano…

Y Carter Llegó Como Demócrata…

Pero La Política De USA… Siempre Fue Igual… En 1956… Egipto “NACIONALIZÓ” el Canal de Suez… Francia, Inglaterra y Los Israelitas invadieron y tomaron el Canal… El Presidente de USA Eisenhower… movilizó la 7 Flota en el Mediterráneo y EXIGIÓ que entregaran el

Canal a Egipto… alegando que era de los egipcios…  

Desde ese momento… USA estaba OBLIGADA por los mismos ARGUMENTOS… a entregar el Canal de Panamá… lo Cual no se Hizo hasta que Carter llegó a la presidencia… 21 años después En 1977…

El ANTECEDENTES creado por el IZQUIERDISTA Eisenhower Republicano al forzar a sus “ALIADOS” a entregar Suez… No Permitía continuar la ocupación del Canal de Panamá… lo cual lo hizo Carter un demócrata aún más IZQUIERDISTA… pero sin duda fue la “CONTINUACIÓN DE LA MISMA POLÍTICA”… 

No dejen de ver este video…

En Este Palacio Musulmán Existen Tantas

Riquezas Como En El Vaticano… Pero Nadie

Pide Que se Vendan Para Usarlas Contra La

Miseria Existente En El Mundo...¿Por Qué?

La realidad es que la mayoría de las riquezas acumuladas en los palacios…

Fueron Producto de que solamente los REYES y las Iglesias tenían el

Poder adquisitivo de financiar las OBRAS y esas obras fueron las que

Lograron crear el progreso y las industrias… 

Si los reyes y las iglesias no hubieran comprado los RELOJES… quienes

Hubieran podido comprar los relojes… que eventualmente desarrollaron

La industria… quien podía comprar una estatua o cuadro a Miguel Ángel

Que no fuera un Rey, Señor Feudal o una Iglesia… lo que creo el ARTE…

Las Lámparas de cristales… como esta que van a ver en este video…

Solo se podía poner en un palacio… eso facilitó la creación de la industria… 

Pero… ¿Porque solamente se ataca al VATICANO… DICIENDO QUE VENDAN

LAS OBRAS DE ARTE… MIENTRAS EL MUNDO está lleno de riquezas… que

Casi nadie puede o quiere comprar... en definitiva… todas esas antiguas

Riquezas están depositadas en lugares de acceso publico… que son verdaderos

MUSEOS… sean palacios o iglesias…

Quiebra La Estación De Radio Izquierdista Más Antigua de USA… Todo Lo Que Tocan Lo Destruyen… A pesar De Que Pagan Los Peores Salarios Y Reciben Contribuciones De Personas E Instituciones…Para leer mas…

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/21/business/media/democracy-may-prove-the-doom-of-wbai.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130821&_r=0

 

Mindblowing: 252 Well-Cited Examples of Obama Corruption, Cronyism, Lying & Lawbreaking.

 

Kyle Becker On August 19, 2013 http://kylenbecker.com

This is a mind-blowingly good compendium of all the outrageousness that the Obama administration has inflicted on the American people over its five disastrous years in one long, tidy, well-sourced list.

There are many reasons to believe this administration is the worst in American history; but without even getting into all that, this is a real slap upside the head for historians who are fantasizing about President Obama’s face being etched on Mt. Rushmore someday.

It also vindicates those citizens who oppose the president and have been called everything from hyper-partisan ignoramuses to foul-mouthed epithets that one cannot repeat even in impolite company. And, this list proves that those people who willfully disregard everything this president has done to damage this nation are the ones blinded by their ideology.

There’s a lot of intriguing information below, and after testing the links, it is well-sourced. Grab a cappuccino and browse this crazy list, because it has something new and outrageous for everybody. The first hundred entries in the list are copied in full with public permission from the blog Dan from Squirrel Hill:

1) Carried out military interventionism in Libya without Congressional approval

In June 2011, U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) said that Obama had violated the Constitution when he launched military operations in Libyawithout Congressional approval.

2) Gave a no-bid contract to Halliburton – just like Bush did

In May 2010, it was reported that the Obama administration had selected KBR, a former subsidiary of Halliburton, for a no-bid contract worth as much as $568 million through 2011, just hours after the Justice Department had said it would pursue a lawsuit accusing the Houston-based company of using kickbacks to get foreign contracts.

3) Has an administration full of lobbyists, after promising he wouldn’t have any

While running for President, Obama had promised that, unlike Bush, he would not have any lobbyists working in his administration. However, by February 2010, he had more than 40 lobbyists working in his administration.

4) Has close ties to Wall St., but pretends to support Occupy Wall St.

Although Obama claims to support the Occupy Wall St. movement, the truth is that he has raised more money from Wall St. than any other candidate during the last 20 years. In early 2012, Obama held a fundraiser where Wall St. investment bankers and hedge fund managers each paid $35,800 to attend. In October 2011, Obama hired Broderick Johnson, a longtime Wall Street lobbyist, to be his new senior campaign adviser. Johnson had worked as a lobbyist for JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Fannie Mae, Comcast, Microsoft, and the oil industry.

5) Broke his promise to close Guantanamo Bay

Obama broke his promise to close Guantanamo Bay.

6) Supported the $700 billion TARP corporate-welfare bailout just like Bush

While Senator, Obama voted for the $700 billion TARP bank bailout bill. The bailout rewarded irresponsible and illegal behavior. It redirected resources from more productive uses to less productive uses. It punished the hard working taxpayers who had played by the rules and obeyed the law. It created horrible incentives, and sent the wrong message. The bailout was evil because it rewarded the bad people and punished the good people. No society that does this can expect to remain free or prosperous. Instead of bailing out these corrupt corporations, we should have let them cease to exist, like we did with Enron.

7) Waged the biggest war against medical marijuana of any president, which was the opposite of what he had promised

In May 2008, Obama campaign spokesperson Ben LaBolt said that Obama would end DEA raids on medical marijuana in states where it’s legal. Also in 2008, Obama said that he supported the “basic concept of using medical marijuana for the same purposes and with the same controls as other drugs” and that he was “not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws.”

However, in February 2010, DEA agents raided a medical marijuana grower in Highlands Ranch in Colorado, a state where medical marijuana is legal. Also in February 2010, DEA agents raided a medical marijuana dispensary in Culver City in California, a state where medical marijuana is legal. In July 2010, the DEA raided at least four medical marijuana growers in San Diego, California. Also in July 2010, the DEA raided a medical marijuana facility in Covelo, California. Then in September 2010, the DEA conducted raids on at least five medical marijuana dispensaries in Las Vegas, Nevada, where medical marijuana is legal. In 2011, the DEA conducted raids on medical marijuana in Seattle, Washington, West Hollywood, California, and Helena, Montana, all places where it is legal. In April 2012, the DEA carried out several raids on medical marijuana in Oakland, California.

In February 2012, Rolling Stone magazine wrote that Obama’s war against medical marijuana went “far beyond anything undertaken by George W. Bush.” In April 2012, Mother Jones magazine wrote: “The president campaigned on the promise that he’d stop federal raids on medical marijuana operations that were in compliance with state laws, a vow that Attorney General Eric Holder repeated after the election. But then the Obama administration raided more than 100 dispensaries in its first three years and is now poised to outpace the Bush administration’s crackdown record.” In May 2012, the Washington Postwrote: “Obama has become more hostile to medical marijuana patients than any president in U.S. history.” In May 2012, U.S. Congressperson Nancy Pelosi (D-California) said she had “strong concerns” about Obama’s forced closure of five medical marijuana facilities in Pelosi’s congressional district. In April 2012, commenting on Obama’s crackdown on medical marijuana, U.S. Congressman Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts) said, “I’m very disappointed… They look more like the Bush administration than the Clinton administration.”

In July 2012, federal prosecutors filed civil forfeiture actions against  Harborside Health Center, a medical marijuana dispensary in Oakland, CA, which claims to be the world’s largest, and which claims to serve more than 100,000 medical marijuana patients. In April 2012, federal agents raidedOaksterdam University, an educational institution in Oakland, CA, which teaches people about medical marijuana. In April 2012, federal agents raided a medical marijuana facility which had been serving 1,500 patients near Lake Elsinore, CA. In June 2012, the Obama administration filed asset-forfeiture lawsuits against two landlords who rented their buildings to medical marijuana stores in Santa Fe Springs, CA. The Obama administration also sent warning letters which threatened similar legal action to dozens of other, nearby landlords. During the first seven months of 2012, the DEA shut down 40 medical marijuana dispensaries in Colorado, all of which had been operating in compliance with state and local law.

In July 2013, the DEA conducted multiple medical marijuana raids in Washington state, including the cities of Olympia, Tacoma, and Seattle.

In May 2012, ABC News reported that during Obama’s youth, he often smoked large quantities of recreational marijuana.  Obama’s marijuana smoking wasn’t even medical – it was recreational. And yet now, he is taking large scale, widespread action to prevent people with AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis, glaucoma, and other illnesses, who have prescriptions from their doctors, from using their prescription medicine – how cold hearted can a person be?

8) Nominated a six-time tax cheater to head the government agency that enforces the tax laws

Obama nominated Timothy Geithner, a repeat tax cheater, to head the government agency that enforces the tax laws.

Prior to his nomination, Geithner had:

1) Illegally failed to pay more than $34,000 in social security and medicare taxes

2) Illegally declared the cost of his children’s summer camp as a form of day care.

3) Illegally failed to pay the early withdrawal penalty when he took money out of his retirement plan

4) Illegally declared non-eligible items as a charitable deduction

5) Illegally declared something which was ineligible as a small businessdeduction

6) Illegally declared utility expenses which had actually been for his personal use

9) Gave tax dollars to AIG executives, then pretended to be outraged about it

Obama signed a stimulus bill that spent money on bonuses for AIG executives. Prior to signing this bill, Obama had said, “when I’m president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely.” However, after reading “line by line” and signing the stimulus bill that protected the AIG bonuses, Obama pretended to be shocked and outraged at the bonuses, and said, “Under these circumstances, it’s hard to understand how derivative traders at A.I.G. warranted any bonuses at all, much less $165 million in extra pay… How do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?” and also said that he would “pursue every single legal avenue to block these bonuses.”

10) Expanded Bush’s unconstitutional government faith based programs

Obama expanded the federal government’s faith based programs which had been started by President George W. Bush.

11) Supported Bush’s unconstitutional Patriot Act

In May 2011, Obama signed a renewal of the Patriot Act.

12) Increased the national debt more in one term than Bush did in two

The national debt increased more during Obama’s first three years and two months than it did during all eight years of George W. Bush’s presidency.

13) Agrees with Bush’s support of unconstitutional, indefinite detention of U.S. citizens without filing any charges

In December 2011, ACLU executive director Anthony D. Romero criticized Obama for signing a bill that gave the U.S. government the power toindefinitely detain U.S. citizens without any charges being filed or any trial taking place.

14) Agrees with Bush’s support of unconstitutional, warrantless wiretapping

President Obama has defended warrantless wiretapping.

15) Avoided prosecution of Wall. St criminals

Although Obama had promised to prosecute Wall St. criminals, during his entire first term, his administration did not file any criminal charges against any of the top financial executives.

16) Had four U.S. citizens killed without judicial process

Obama had four U.S. citizens killed without judicial process.

The ACLU accused Obama of violating the U.S. Constitution for doing this.

U.S. Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) said that Obama’s actions might be an impeachable offense.

17) Ordered private company to fire 1,000 employees

In 2011, after Boeing had hired 1,000 new employees to work at its new factory in South Carolina, the Obama administration ordered Boeing to shut down the factory, because the factory was non-union.

18) Stole money from retired teachers and police officers

During the Chrysler bankruptcy, Obama violated the Fifth Amendment and more than 150 years of bankruptcy law by illegally treating secured creditorsworse than unsecured creditors. Some of these secured creditors were retired teachers and police officers from Indiana. Richard A. Epstein, a law professor at New York University School of Law, wrote, “Upsetting this fixed hierarchy among creditors is just an illegal taking of property from one group of creditors for the benefit of another, which should be struck down on both statutory and constitutional grounds.” Todd Zywicki, Professor of Law at George Mason University School of Law, wrote that Obama’s treatment of secured creditors was “dangerous to the rule of law.” The Economist wrote that Obama’s actions could “establish a terrible precedent. Bankruptcy exists to sort legal claims on assets. If it becomes a tool of social policy, who will then lend to struggling firms in which the government has a political interest?” Francis Cianfrocca, the CEO of Bayshore Networks, wrote that Obama’s actions were “an astonishingly reckless abrogation of contract law that will introduce a new level of uncertainty into business transactions at all levels, and make wealth generation more difficult going forward… An extraordinary uncertainty has been created when the most powerful man in the world can rewrite contracts and choose winners and losers in private negotiations as he sees fit. Since this is an unquantifiable uncertainty, and not a quantifiable risk, its effect on business and investor confidence will be large and unpredictable. As in the 1930s, a time when government also cavalierly rewrote private contracts, the prudent approach for business will be to invest minimally and wait for another administration.”

19) Supported release of convicted mass murderer

In 2010, Obama  supported releasing Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi (who had been convicted of murdering 270 people) from prison.

20) Illegally put thousands of guns into hands of criminals

In Operation Fast and Furious, the Obama administration ordered gun storeowners to illegally sell thousands of guns to criminals.

21) Fired Inspector General for discovering that Obama’s friend had embezzled government funds

In June 2009, Obama fired Inspector General Gerald Walpin, after Walpin accused Sacramento mayor Kevin Johnson, an Obama supporter, of misuse of AmeriCorps funding to pay for school-board political activities. In a letter to Congress, the White House said that Walpin was fired because he was “confused, disoriented, unable to answer questions and exhibited other behavior that led the Board to question his capacity to serve.” A bipartisan group of 145 current and former public officials, attorneys, and legal scholarssigned a letter that was sent to the White House, which defended Walpin, said the criticisms of him were not true, and said that his firing was politically motivated. The letter can be read here.

22) Lied about putting health care negotiations on C-SPAN

Although Obama had made a campaign promise to have all of the health care reform negotiations broadcast on C-SPAN, he broke that promise after he was elected.

The secrecy of these negotiations was so strong that U.S. Congresswoman and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-California) said, “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”

23) Lied about letting people keep their health insurance

Before Obamacare was passed, Obama said:

“No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people… If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what.”Also before Obamacare was passed, Obama said:

“Here is a guarantee that I’ve made. If you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance.” However, after Obamacare was passed, the Congressional Budget Office said that the law would causeseven million people to lose their employer provided insurance.

After Obamacare was passed, 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East announced that it would drop health insurance for the children of more than 30,000 low-wage home attendants. Mitra Behroozi, executive director of benefit and pension funds for 1199SEIU stated

“… new federal health-care reform legislation requires plans with dependent coverage to expand that coverage up to age 26… meeting this new requirement would be financially impossible.” Also, after Obamacare was passed, the Franciscan University of Steubenville dropped its coverage in response to the law.

Universal Orlando dropped its coverage for part time employees in response to Obamacare.

In addition, after Obamacare was passed, Forbes reported

“The House Ways and Means Committee has released a new report that sheds light onto how Obamacare incentivizes companies to dump their workers onto the new law’s subsidized exchanges.” Also after Obamacare was passed, MSN reported

“The Affordable Care Act mandate most commonly known as Obamacare has some tight stipulations that, CNN says, are forcing health care companies to rip up most of their current plans and draft new ones that comply. According to a University of Chicago study, just about half of the individual health care plans currently on the market won’t cut it once key provisions of the Affordable Care Act kick in next year.” Furthermore, it was reported that Obamacare would cause 58,000 Aetna and UnitedHealth Group customers in California to lose their insurance.

In response to Obamacare, some employers have dropped coverage for their employees’ spouses.

The chain of Wegmans supermarkets cancelled the policies of its part time employees in response to Obamacare.

In July 2013, leaders of the Teamsters, UFCW, and UNITE-HERE sent a letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi which said that Obamacare

“will shatter not only our hard-earned health benefits… these restrictions will make non-profit plans like ours unsustainable… we can no longer stand silent in the face of elements of the Affordable Care Act that will destroy the very health and wellbeing of our members along with millions of other hardworking Americans”

24) Lied about the cost of Obamacare

Before Obamacare was passed, Obama promised

“I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits – either now or in the future. I will not sign it if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future, period. And to prove that I’m serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending cuts if the savings we promised don’t materialize.” However, after Obama signed it, the Washington Post reported that it would add more than $340 billion to the budget deficit over the next decade.

In March 2012, the Congressional Budget Office said that over the next decade, Obamacare would cost twice as much as what Obama had promised.

In May 2013, it was reported that Obamacare’s program for high risk patients was more expensive than what Obama had promised.

25) Gave tax dollars to campaign contributors and lobbyists, and falsely claimed the money was for “green energy”

In 2009 the Obama administration gave $535 million to Solyndra, claiming that it would create 4,000 new jobs. However, instead of creating those 4,000 new jobs, the company went bankrupt. It was later revealed that the company’s shareholders and executives had made substantial donations to Obama’s campaign, that the company had spent a large sum of money on lobbying, and that Solyndra executives had had many meetings with White House officials.

It was also revealed that the Obama administration had already been aware of Solyndra’s financial troubles. For example, according to the company’s security filings in 2009, the company had been selling its product for less than the cost of production. In 2010, Obama visited the Solyndra factory and cited it as a role model for his stimulus program, saying “It’s here that companies like Solyndra are leading the way toward a brighter and more prosperous future.” The Washington Post wrote of this, “Administration officials and outside advisers warned that President Obama should consider dropping plans to visit a solar startup company in 2010 because its mounting financial problems might ultimately embarrass the White House.” Solyndra was a private company, but had been planning to use its government loans as a means of going public – so when Obama knowingly overstated the company’s condition in order to help his friends at Solyndra, he broke the same law that Martha Stewart had been sent to prison for breaking.

In September 2011, federal agents visited the homes of Brian Harrison, the company’s CEO, and Chris Gronet, the company’s founder, to examine computer files and documents.  Also in September 2011, the U.S. Treasury Department launched an investigation.

On September 13, 2011, the Washington Post reported on emails which showed that the Obama administration had tried to rush federal reviewers to approve the loan so Vice President Joe Biden could announce it at a September 2009 groundbreaking for the company’s factory. The company was a hallmark of President Obama’s plan to support clean energy technologies.

The New York Times reported that government auditors and industry analysts had faulted the Obama administration for failing to properly evaluate the company’s business proposals, as well as for failing to take note of troubling signs which were already evident. In addition, Frank Rusco, a program director at the Government Accountability Office, had found that the preliminary loan approval had been granted before officials had completed the legally mandated evaluations of the company.

The New York Times quoted Shyam Mehta, a senior analyst at GTM Research, as saying “There was just too much misplaced zeal at the Department of Energy for this company.” Among 143 companies that had expressed an interest in getting a loan guarantee, Solyndra was the first one to get approval. During the period when Solyndra’s loan guarantee was under review, the company had spent nearly $1.8 million on lobbying. Tim Harris, the CEO of Solopower, a different solar panel company which had obtained a $197 million loan guarantee, told the New York Times that his company had never considered spending any money on lobbying, and that “It was made clear to us early in the process that that was clearly verboten… We were told that it was not only not helpful but it was not acceptable.”

The Washington Post reported that Solyndra had used some of the loan money to purchase new equipment which it never used, and then sold that new equipment, still in its plastic wrap, for pennies on the dollar. Former Solyndra engineer Lindsey Eastburn told the Washington Post, “After we got the loan guarantee, they were just spending money left and right… Because we were doing well, nobody cared. Because of that infusion of money, it made people sloppy.”

On September 29, 2011, the Washington Post reported that the Obama administration had continued to allow Solyndra to receive taxpayer money even after it had defaulted on its $535 million loan.

On October 7, 2011, The Washington Post reported that newly revealed emails showed that Energy Department officials had been warned that their plan to help Solyndra by restructuring the loan might be illegal, and should be cleared with the Justice Department first. However, Energy Department officials moved ahead with the restructuring anyway, with a new deal that would repay company investors before taxpayers if the company were to default. The emails showed concerns within the Obama administration about the legality of the Energy Department’s actions. In addition, an Energy Department stimulus adviser, Steve Spinner, had pushed for the loan, despite having recused himself because his wife’s law firm had done work for the company.

In January 2012, CBS News reported that Solyndra had thrown millions of dollars worth of brand new glass tubes into garbage dumpsters, where they ended up being shattered. Solyndra told CBS that it had conducted an exhaustive search for buyers of the glass tubes, and that no one had wanted them. However, CBS discovered that Solyndra had not offered the glass tubes for sale at either one of its two asset auctions that took place in 2011. In addition, David Lucky, a buyer and seller of such equipment, told CBS that he would have bought the tubes if he had had a chance to do so. Greg Smestad, a solar scientist who had consulted for the Department of Energy, also agreed that the tubes had value, and had asked Solyndra to donate any unwanted tubes to Santa Clara University. Smestad stated, “That really makes me sad… Those tubes represent intellectual investment. These could have had a better value to do public good. I think they owed the U.S. taxpayer that.”

In April 2012, CBS News reported that Solyndra had left a substantial amount of toxic waste at its abandoned facility in Milpitas, California.

Solyndra was not the only “green energy” company involved in this type of fraud. After Obama gave Raser Technologies $33 million to build a power plant, the company declared bankruptcy, and owed $1.5 million in back taxes. After Obama gave Abound Solar, Inc. a $400 million loan guarantee to build photovoltaic panel factories, the company halted production and laid off 180 employees. After Obama gave Beacon Power a $43 million loan guarantee to build green energy storage, the company filed for bankruptcy. After Obama approved $2.1 billion in loan guarantees for Solar Trust of America so it could build solar power plants, the company filed for bankruptcy.

Although Obama stated that all of the “green energy” companies that received taxpayer money were chosen “based solely on their merits,” the truth is that 71% of these grants and loans went to Obama donors and fundraisers, who raised $457,834 for his campaign, and were later approved for grants and loans totaling more than $11 billion. By November 2011, the Energy Department’s inspector general had begun more than 100 criminal investigations related to Obama’s stimulus. Although an “independent” review said that Obama had not done anything wrong, it was later reported that Herbert M. Allison Jr., the person who had conducted this “independent” review, donated $52,500 to Obama’s campaign.

26) Had “off the record” meetings with lobbyists

In June 2010, the New York Times reported that Obama administration officials had held hundreds of meetings with lobbyists at coffee houses near the White House, in order to avoid the disclosure requirements for White House visitors, and that these meetings “reveal a disconnect between the Obama administration’s public rhetoric — with Mr. Obama himself frequently thrashing big industries’ ‘battalions’ of lobbyists as enemies of reform — and the administration’s continuing, private dealings with them.”

27) Falsely claimed to believe in public education

Although Obama said, “We need to uphold the ideal of public education,” he expressed his true opinion of America’s public education system by sendinghis own children to private schools while living in Chicago and Washington D.C.

28) Had armed SWAT agents raid a law-abiding guitar factory because it was owned by a Republican

President Obama had armed SWAT agents raid the Gibson guitar factory, ordered the employees to leave, and seized guitars and other property from the factory – and all of this happened without any charges being filed.

It was later reported that Gibson had not broken any U.S. laws.

Obama’s so-called justification for the raid was that Gibson had broken environmental laws from India regarding the imported wood that Gibson had been using.

However, Gibson claimed that it had not broken any Indian laws – and no charges were filed against it.

In addition, it was also reported that Henry E. Juszkiewicz, the CEO of Gibson, was a Republican donor.

Meanwhile, C.F. Martin & Company, Gibsons’s competitor, had used the exact same imported wood, but had not gotten raided. Chris Martin IV, the CEO of Martin, was a Democratic donor.

29) Shut down Amish farm

In February 2012, Obama shut down an Amish farm for selling unpasteurized milk across state lines, even though the customers were happy with what they were buying.

30) Rewarded his fundraisers by giving them federal jobs

Although Obama had promised to have “the most sweeping ethics reform in history,” and had often criticized the role of money in politics, the truth is that after he was elected, he gave administration jobs to more than half of his 47 biggest fundraisers.

31) Ignored constitutional requirements for appointees

In February 2009, U.S. Senator Robert Byrd (D-West Virginia) expressedconcern that Obama’s dozens of czars might violate the U.S. Constitution, because they were not approved by the U.S. Senate. U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) expressed a similar concern in September 2009.

32) Gave tax dollars to corrupt private contractors

While Obama was a state Senator in Illinois, he used tax dollars to build 504 units of slum housing, which had mice and backed up sewage. Federal inspectors graded the condition of the housing so bad that the buildings faced demolition.

33) Used tax dollars to glorify murderers

The Obama administration spent $1.6 million to restore graffiti that glorifiedcommunist murderers Che Guevara and Fidel Castro.

34) Falsely claimed that the U.S. Supreme Court had never overturned any laws that had been passed by Congress

Despite having taught constitutional law at one of the most prestigious law schools in the country, in April 2012 Obama falsely claimed that the U.S. Supreme Court had never overturned any laws that had been passed by Congress.

35) Supported new bailouts for speculators who caused housing bubble

In March 2012, Obama announced a new set of bailouts for speculators who had caused the housing bubble.

36) Spent $205,075 of taxpayer money on a shrubbery which nurseries sell for $16

As part of his economic stimulus, Obama spent $205,075 of taxpayer money to relocate and care for a single specimen of Arctostaphylos franciscana, a shrubbery which nurseries sell for $16.

37) Spent taxpayer money to see if using cocaine helped rats to enjoy the music of Miles Davis

Obama’s administration funded a study to see whether or not rats’ enjoyment of the music of Miles Davis was increased when the rats were high on cocaine.

38) Tried to outlaw family farms

In April 2012, the Obama administration proposed new regulations which would prohibit farm children under 18 from working at grain elevators, silos, feed lots, stockyards, and livestock auctions, as well as from storing, marketing and transporting farm product raw materials. Critics claimed that this would prevent children from the common practice of working on their friends’ and relatives’ farms, and that farm children did not need “help” from a community organizer in Washington.

39) Auctioned off ambassadorship to the Netherlands

In April 2012, Obama nominated Timothy Broas, who had “bundled” more than $500,000 for Obama’s 2012 campaign, to be U.S. ambassador to the Netherlands.

40) Claimed that written tests are a form of “racial discrimination”

The Obama administration accused fire and police departments in Jacksonville, Florida, New York City, and Dayton, Ohio of “racial discrimination” because they required potential firefighters and police officers to take a written test. Ten real examples of these “racist” questions from the New York test can be read here.

41) Made the TSA even more abusive and ridiculous than it had been under Bush

The Obama administration gave a very invasive patdown to a three-year-oldboy in a wheelchair, which caused the boy to tremble in fear. The Obama administration gave an aggressive patdown to a seven-year-old girl with cerebral palsy. The Obama administration said that a four-year-old girl was a “high security threat.” The Obama administration placed an 18-month-old girl on its no fly list. The Obama administration gave a patdown to Henry Kissinger. The Obama administration forced a 95-year-old cancer patient to remove her adult diaper and fly without it. The Obama administration ripped open the urostomy bag of a 61-year-old bladder cancer survivor, and forced him to fly covered in his own urine.

42) Illegally demanded monetary payment for Freedom of Information Act request

The Obama administration demanded that the Goldwater Institute pay$78,935.80 before it would share public records which it had requested under the Freedom of Information Act.

43) Fined public school $15,000 for selling soda

The Obama administration fined a high school $15,000 for selling soda to students during lunch.

44) Conducted dangerous and illegal scientific experiments on people

From January 2010 through June 2011, the Obama administration conducted illegal scientific experiments which exposed 42 people to dangerous levels of toxins.

45) Gave middle finger to Vietnam veterans, their families, and their friends

On Memorial Day 2012, Obama prevented Vietnam veterans and their friends and families from visiting the Vietnam memorial for seven hours, so Obama could have his picture taken.

46) Had the government take 60.8% ownership of General Motors

In July 2009, Obama had the government take 60.8% ownership of General Motors, and fired the CEO.

47) Forced banks to give mortgages to people who could not afford to pay them back

While working as a “community organizer,” Obama filed lawsuits which forced banks to give mortgages to people with bad credit and low incomes. As a result, many of these people ended up defaulting on their mortgages. As their attorney, Obama collected $23,000 in legal fees for himself.

Then in April 2013, during Obama’s second term as President, the Washington Post reported that President Obama was still pressuring banks “to make home loans to people with weaker credit.”

48) Stole money from retired Delphi employees

In 2009, Obama eliminated the pensions of 20,000 retired Delphi employees.

49) Used taxpayer money to buy soda for $3.40 per can

During Obama’s presidency, the federal government repeatedly purchased soda for a cost of $3.40 per can. Obama did not express any desire to switch to a cheaper seller, such as Costco, amazon.com, or Wal-Mart – or to an even still cheaper seller such as a wholesaler. Instead, Obama repeatedly forced taxpayers to pay these outrageous prices for soda.

50) Paid $7 million per household to connect people to the internet

Obama’s stimulus paid to connect some households in Montana to the internet, at a cost of $7 million per household.

51) Had a double standard for Bain Capital

Although Obama criticized Mitt Romney for his involvement with Bain Capital, Obama hired Jeff Zients, a former consultant at Bain (and who had an estimated personal wealth of $200 million) to be his budget director.

52) Broke promise to teen campaign volunteers

Obama had promised to his teen campaign volunteers that if they each spent nine hours going door to door on Obama’s behalf, he would invite them to attend his speech of September 6, 2012. However, after the teens did the volunteer work, Obama broke his promise. One of these volunteers, Madeline Frank, age 16, of Charlotte, North Carolina, said of this “I’ve been looking forward to this for a really long time. I am just feeling really let down and like bummed. It was kind of my dream to see him speak, so definitely really sad.”

53) Falsely claimed to know more about Judaism than any other President

Obama falsely claimed to know more about Judaism than any other President.

54) Exempted wind farms from the penalties that other electric producers get for killing birds

In May 2013, NPR reported:

The Obama administration has charged oil companies for drowning birds in their waste pits, and power companies for electrocuting birds on power lines.

But the administration has never fined or prosecuted a wind-energy company, even those that flout the law repeatedly.

“What it boils down to is this: If you electrocute an eagle, that is bad, but if you chop it to pieces, that is OK,” said Tim Eicher, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service enforcement agent based in Cody.

More than 573,000 birds are killed by the country’s wind farms each year, including 83,000 hunting birds such as hawks, falcons and eagles, according to an estimate published in March in the peer-reviewed Wildlife Society Bulletin.

Nearly all the birds being killed are protected under federal environmental laws, which prosecutors have used to generate tens of millions of dollars in fines and settlements from businesses, including oil and gas companies, over the past five years.

Wind farms are clusters of turbines as tall as 30-story buildings, with spinning rotors as wide as a passenger jet’s wingspan. Though the blades appear to move slowly, they can reach speeds up to 170 mph at the tips, creating tornado-like vortexes.

Flying eagles behave like drivers texting on their cellphones; they don’t look up. As they scan for food, they don’t notice the industrial turbine blades until it’s too late.

The rehabilitation coordinator for the Rocky Mountain Raptor Program, Michael Tincher, said he euthanized two golden eagles found starving and near death near wind farms. Both had injuries he’d never seen before: One of their wings appeared to be twisted off.

“There is nothing in the evolution of eagles that would come near to describing a wind turbine. There has never been an opportunity to adapt to that sort of threat,” said Grainger Hunt, an eagle expert who researches the U.S. wind-power industry’s deadliest location, a northern California area known as Altamont Pass. Wind farms built there decades ago kill more than 60 per year.

Under both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the death of a single bird without a permit is illegal.

But under the Obama administration’s new guidelines, wind-energy companies — and only wind-energy companies — are held to a different standard.

Eagles take five years to reach the age when they can reproduce, and often they only produce one chick a year.

55) Falsely claimed that he had never belonged to the New Party

Obama falsely claimed that he had never belonged to the New Party, which is a third political party.

56) Supported punishing students based on their race instead of on their behavior

Obama expressed support for a proposal which would punish students based on their race instead of on their behavior.

57) Used “off the books” funding for military interventionism

In April 2009, antiwar activists who helped elect Obama accused him of using the same “off the books” funding as his predecessor George W. Bush when Obama requested an additional $83.4 billion from Congress for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan – a provision which Obama had voted against when he was a Senator.

58) Tried to silence criticism of auto-bailouts

The Obama administration pressured Ford Motor Company to stop airing a TV ad that criticized Obama’s bailouts of General Motors and Chrysler.

59)  Dismissed charges of voter intimidation, despite video evidence

In May 2009, the Obama administration dismissed charges that had been filed by the Bush administration against members of the New Black Panther Party who had been videotaped intimidating voters and brandishing a police-style baton at a Philadelphia polling station during the November 2008 election. In August 2009, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights demanded that the Justice Department explain why it dismissed the charges.  In July 2010, J. Christian Adams, a former lawyer for the Justice Department, testified before the Commission on Civil Rights that the case was dropped because the Justice Department did not want to protect the civil rights of white people.

60) Falsely claimed to support the second amendment

Although Obama stated, “I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms,” the National Rifle Associationgave Obama a rating of ‘F’ based on his voting record.

61) Nominated a communist who said 9-11 was an inside job

In September 2009, Obama’s green czar Van Jones resigned after it was reported that he was a self described “communist” and had blamed George W. Bush for the September 11 attacks.

62) Falsely said he would not raise taxes on the poor and middle class

On September 12, 2008, Obama promised, “I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.” However, less than three months into his Presidency, he broke that promise when he raised the cigarette tax. Studies show that poor people are more likely to smoke than rich people.

63) Falsely said he wanted to simplify the tax code, when he actually wanted to make it more complex

Although Obama said that he wanted to simplify the tax code, his proposals would actually add thousands of pages to the tax code.

64) Oversaw some of the world’s worst increases in corruption

In December 2010, Transparency International reported that corruption was increasing faster in the U.S. than anywhere else except Cuba, Dominica, and Burkina Faso.

65) Falsely said “This is the most transparent administration in history.”

In February 2013, Obama said, “This is the most transparent administration in history”

However, that same month, ABC News White House reporter Ann Compton, who covered Presidents Ford, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, both Bushes, and Obama, said “The president’s day-to-day policy development… is almost totally opaque to the reporters trying to do a responsible job of covering it. There are no readouts from big meetings he has with people from the outside, and many of them aren’t even on his schedule. This is different from every president I covered. This White House goes to extreme lengths to keep the press away.”

In July 2009, White House reporter Helen Thomas criticized the Obama administration for its lack of transparency.

Also, this list contains a huge number of things that Obama has done which contradict his statement.

66) Falsely claimed he would wait five days before signing bills

Although Obama had promised to wait five days before signing all non-emergency bills, he broke that promise at least 10 times during his first three months in office.

67) Falsely claimed stimulus spending would be transparent

Although Obama had promised that the website recovery.gov would list all stimulus spending in detail, a 400 page report issued by the Government Accountability Office stated that only 25% of the projects listed on the website provided clear and complete information regarding their cost, schedule, purpose, location and status.

68) Announced plans to send military to Australia

In November 2011, Obama announced that he would send 2,500 Marines toAustralia.

69) Falsely promised to accept public campaign financing and spending limits

During the 2008 campaign, Obama broke his promise to accept public campaign financing and the spending limits that came with it.

70) Tried to silence video on YouTube

In June 2011, Obama asked a Jewish singing group to remove its video from the internet.

71) Rejected international help to clean up BP oil spill

After the BP oil spill, Obama rejected offers of cleanup help from Canada, Croatia, France, Germany, Ireland, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Romania, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United Nations.

72) Falsely said he opposed government waste, when he actually loves it

On September 22, 2008, Obama said, “I am not a Democrat who believes that we can or should defend every government program just because it’s there… We will fire government managers who aren’t getting results, we will cut funding for programs that are wasting your money and we will use technology and lessons from the private sector to improve efficiency across every level of government… The only way we can do all this without leaving our children with an even larger debt is if Washington starts taking responsibility for every dime that it spends.” However, Citizens Against Government Waste gave Obama a 2007 rating of only 10%, and a lifetime rating of only 18%.

73) Nominated past frequent user of illegal drugs to keep illegal drugs out of schools

In September 2009, it was reported that Kevin Jennings, Obama’s Assistant Deputy Secretary for the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, had written about  Jenning’s own past frequent illegal drug use in his 2007 autobiography.

74) Avoids firing aides who owe back taxes

In January 2012, it was reported that 36 Obama aides owed a combined total of $833,000 in back taxes.

75) Used Abbott and Costello style economics as a basis for national policy

In 2010, Obama gave $16.3 million to First Solar, a company that manufactures solar panels, so the company could sell solar panels to itself.

76) Sent U.S. troops to Africa

Obama sent U.S. troops to Uganda, Congo, South Sudan and the Central African Republic.

77) Made secret plans for his second term

In March 2012, when Obama was talking to Russian President Dmitri Medvedev and did not know that the microphone was turned on, Obama stated, “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space… This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”

78) Holds double standard for people who use crude and vulgar language toward women

Concerned Women for America accused Obama of hypocrisy after Obama criticized Rush Limbaugh for using crude and vulgar language to describe Sandra Fluke, but Obama did not criticize Bill Maher (who had donated one million dollars to an Obama PAC) for using the same kind of crude and vulgar language to describe Sarah Palin.

79) Illegally gave Obamacare exemptions to unions that supported the passage of Obamacare

Obama gave some organizations an exemption from some of the requirements of Obamacare.  Many of these organizations were unions that had supported the passage of Obamacare, but now wanted exemptions from the very same law that they wanted to force everyone else to obey. This reveals an extreme level of hypocrisy among many of the supporters of Obamacare.

In addition, these exemptions are illegal, because the Constitution requires the law to treat everyone the same.

The Washington Times wrote of this:

“Selective enforcement of the law is the first sign of tyranny. A government empowered to determine arbitrarily who may operate outside the rule of law invariably embraces favoritism as friends, allies and those with the best-funded lobbyists are rewarded. Favoritism inevitably leads to corruption, and corruption invites extortion. Ultimately, the rule of law ceases to exist in any recognizable form, and what is left is tyranny.”

“The now-familiar monthly trickling down of new waivers is, at best, a tacit admission that Obamacare is a failure. So far, seven entire states and 1,372 businesses, unions and other institutions have received waivers from the law. The list includes the administration’s friends and allies and, of course, those who have the best lobbyists.”

“More than 50 percent of the Obamacare waiver beneficiaries are union members, which is striking because union members account for less than 12 percent of the American work force. The same unions that provided more than $120 million to Democrats in the last two elections and, in many cases, openly campaigned in favor of the government takeover of your health care, now celebrate that Obamacare is not their problem.”

80) Defended Bush administration’s unconstitutional, unwarranted use of GPS device

In January 2012, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration for having put a GPS tracking device on someone’s car without having a warrant, the Obama administration opposed the court ruling

81) Opposes newspapers reporting the news

Obama spokesman Jay Carney criticized the Los Angeles Times for publishing photographs of U.S. soldiers posing with corpses in Afghanistan.

82) Supported Bush administration for fining CBS for showing Janet Jackson’s breast

Obama came out in favor of the FCC’s fining of the CBS TV network $550,000 for showing Janet Jackson’s breast during the 2004 Super Bowl.

83) Allowed campaign contributors to bring lobbyists into White House

In April 2012, the New York Times reported, “Although Mr. Obama has made a point of not accepting contributions from registered lobbyists, a review of campaign donations and White House visitor logs shows that special interests have had little trouble making themselves heard. Many of the president’s biggest donors, while not lobbyists, took lobbyists with them to the White House…”

84) Falsely said that criminal background checks constituted “racial discrimination”

In 2012, the Obama administration accused Pepsico of “race discrimination” because it used criminal background checks to screen out job applicants.

85) Was cited by nine states for committing 21 illegal acts

Attorneys General from nine states issued a report, titled “A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law,” which cited 21 illegal acts which had been committed by the Obama administration.

86) Tried to seize hotel because some of its customers had used illegal drugs

The Obama administration tried to seize a mom-and-pop bed-and-breakfast because some if its guests had used illegal drugs.

87) Falsely said his campaign was not funded by large donors

Although Obama has received many large campaign donations from corporate executives and Hollywood celebrities, his spokesperson said that his campaign was funded “not from huge donors at all.”

88) Holds double standard for subsidizing solar power companies

Although Obama gave taxpayer money to numerous American solar power companies, he placed a 30% tariff on solar panels imported from China, because he was against the Chinese government giving subsidies to its own companies.

89) Tried to create an administration full of tax cheaters

Obama nominated tax cheater Tom Daschle to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. After Daschle said he didn’t want the job, Obama then nominated tax cheater Kathleen Sebelius for the same position. Obama nominated tax cheater Nancy Killefer to be his administration’s Chief Performance Officer. Obama nominated  tax cheater Hilda Solis to be the Secretary of Labor. Obama nominated tax cheater Ron Kirk be the White House Chief Trade Representative.

90) Hired a Communications Director who admires a mass murderer

Anita Dunn, Obama’s White House Communications Director, said that one of her favorite political philosophers was Mao Tse-tung, the Chinese dictator who murdered tens of millions of innocent civilians.

91) Tried to replace science with political correctness

In July 2010, Charles Bolden, the administrator of NASA, said that Obama had told him that the primary purpose of NASA was “to reach out to the Muslim world.”

92) Made recess appointments when Congress was not in recess

In January 2012, Obama violated the Constitution by making four recess appointments when Congress was not in recess. Recess appointments themselves are constitutional, but only if they are made when Congress is actually in recess.

In January 2013, a federal appeals court ruled that Obama’s appointments had violated the Constitution.

In May 2013, a second federal appeals court also ruled that Obama’s appointments had violated the Constitution.

In July 2013, a third federal appeals court also ruled that Obama’s appointments had violated the Constitution.

93) Said the health insurance mandate was not a tax, but later told the Supreme Court that it was

Before Obama’s health care reform was passed, he said that the mandate was not a tax. However, after it was passed, the Obama administration argued in front of the Supreme Court that the mandate really was a tax.

94 ) Lied about being his “brother’s keeper”

Although Barack Obama likes to cite  the Bible phrase “We are our brother’s keeper,” when his real life poverty stricken brother George Obama needed $1,000 for health care bills, Barack Obama refused to pay it, so conservative author Dinesh D’Souza paid it.

95) Punishes hospitals for saving the lives of patients with heart disease

Obama’s health care reform contains a provision that reduces  Medicare payments to hospitals with high 30-day readmission rates. Sunil Kripalani, MD, a professor with Vanderbilt University Medical Center, said of this, “Among patients with heart failure, hospitals that have higher readmission rates actually have lower mortality rates. So, which would we rather have — a hospital readmission or a death?”

96) Supports guns for himself and his wife, but opposes them for everyone else

On January 10, 2013, President Obama signed a bill that provides armed guards to himself and his wife for the rest of the lives.

However, in 2004, when Obama was an Illinois state Senator, he voted againstallowing people in their own homes to use guns to protect themselves and their families from rapists and murderers.

97) Falsely claimed that he  “cut spending by over a trillion dollars in 2011″

On “Meet the Press” on December 30, 2012, Obama said:

“I cut spending by over a trillion dollars in 2011″

In reality, spending during that time period was not cut at all, and was actuallyincreased by $147 billion.

98) Practices environmental hypocrisy

In May 2008, Obama said, “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK.”

However, just one week later, Obama was photographed exiting an SUV.

In addition, Obama keeps the White House thermostat turned up so high that David Axelrod, Obama’s senior adviser, said, “He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in there.”

Environmentalists criticized Obama for eating Wagyu beef, which was called “the Hummer of beef.”

Obama had a chef fly round trip from St. Louis to Washington D.C. so he could make Obama’s favorite pizza.

99) Pressured public schools to replace Catcher in the Rye  with a book on window insulation

The Huffington Post reported that Obama’s education policies “are increasingly worrying English-lovers and English teachers, who feel they must replace literary greats like The Great Gatsby and Catcher in the Rye with Common Core-suggested ‘exemplars,’ like the Environmental Protection Agency’sRecommended Levels of Insulation.”

100) Approved giving 20 F-16 fighter jets to a Sharia dictatorship

Obama approved giving 20 F-16 fighter jets to Egypt, which is a Sharia dictatorship.’

 

Enviar Artículos, Criticas y Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

http://lamisinguillaperipendica.blogspot.com/

http://lazarorgonzalezformiamidademayor.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

 

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

No 462 “En mi opinión” Agosto 20, 2013.

agosto 20, 2013

No 462  “En mi opinión” Agosto 20, 2013.  
Editor Lázaro R González Miño  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST” ,  
Enviar Artículos, Criticas y Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
Free promotion to The “Sir Scott’s Oasis Steakhouse” Montana Restaurant True Story…
This is great ! Aleluya! read it. You’ll see why.
Montana Restaurant True Story
In God We Trust – God Bless America, America – Love It Or Leave It!
  Montana Restaurant

> The radio station America FM was doing one of its ‘Is Anyone Listening?’
Bits this morning.
> The first question was; ‘Ever have a celebrity come up with the ‘  Do you Know who I am?  ‘ routine?’

> A woman called in and said that a few years ago, while visiting her
> cattle rancher uncle in Billings , MT , She had occasion to go to
> dinner at a restaurant  that does not take reservations  . The wait was
About 45 minutes; Many local ranchers and their wives were waiting.

> Ted Turner and his ex-wife Jane Fonda came in the restaurant and wanted a Table.
> The hostess informed them that they’d have to wait 45 minutes.

> Jane Fonda asked the hostess, ‘Do you know who I am?’
> The hostess answered, ‘Yes, but you’ll have to wait 45 minutes.’

> Then Jane asked if the manager was in. When the manager came out, he Asked, ‘May I help you?’
> ‘Do you know who we are?’ both Ted and Jane asked.
> Yes, but these folks have been waiting, and I can’t put you ahead of
Them.’

> Then Ted asked to speak to the owner. The owner came out, and Jane again
Asked, ‘Do you know who I am?’
The owner answered, ‘Yes, I do.
Do you know who I am?
I am the owner of this restaurant and I am a Vietnam Veteran.
Not only will you not get a table ahead of my friends and neighbors
who have been waiting here, But you also will not be eating in my
Restaurant tonight or any other night.
Good bye.’

Only in America , is this a great country or what?

To all who received this, this is a true story and the name of the steak House is:
Sir Scott’s Oasis Steakhouse
204 W. Main ,
Manhattan , MT 59741
(406) 284-6929 

If you ever get there, give this fellow a sharp salute, buy a steak, and
Tip the waitress.
They have ten steaks on their simple menu from 32 oz. To 12 oz.
Toothpicks on every table!
Keep passing this on. We should never forget our ”  national traitor  ” 

WND EXCLUSIVE
COMMUNISTS IN CONGRESS? JUST COUNT ‘EM Book names, details strategies to ‘transform’ U.S. Jerome R Corsi.

NEW YORK – New Zealander Trevor Loudon has just published an encyclopedic new 689-page volume, “The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress,” to accompany his 668-page 2011 book, “Barack Obama and the Enemies Within.”
In both volumes, Loudon has proved himself to be among the foremost experts in the world investigating and reporting the penetration of communists, socialists and the current group of “progressives” affiliated with Democratic Party politics who portray themselves as liberals.
“” style=”margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 14px; vertical-align: bottom; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;”Ads by Google
End of America Leave NowLearn How to Get a Dual Citizenship Today! Get Free Report Now:www.Sovereign-Investor.com
Windows XP Driver UpdatesWindows XP Drivers Latest Download. Microsoft Certified. (Recommended)Windows-XP.DriverUpdate.net
In his 2011 book, Loudon presented documented evidence that Barack Obama’s rise in politics was not an accident, but a conscious, decade-long effort by the radical left to promote a candidate with African roots. Obama, he said, was packaged as an engaging and seemingly harmless Trojan Horse radical, sent to Chicago to refine his skills running for office as a Democratic Party politician.
It is impossible to read “Barack Obama and the Enemies Within” without being convinced that Obama’s education in communist ideology stretches from the extracurricular education he received from Communist Party mentor Frank Marshall Davis in Honolulu to his recruitment as a New Party candidate in Chicago, with strong ties to the Democratic Socialists of America.
Loudon continues naming names in his current volume, “The Enemies Within,” which documents how extensively communists, socialists and progressives have penetrated the U.S. Congress, running on the Democratic Party ticket.
The goal of these radicals in Congress, Loudon demonstrates, is the same goal Obama announced when running for president in 2008, to transform the United States from the constitutional republic established by its Founding Fathers into a radical socialist state. The aim is to be achieved through passing extensive social welfare legislation designed to bankrupt a government adhering to concepts of private property and private enterprise.
In an insightful essay on the Democratic Socialists of America, Loudon emphasizes the impact on U.S. radicals of the late Italian Communist Party theoretician Antonio Gramsci, whose writings from prison declared that the “working class revolution” is a dead end, arguing instead that communism can best be achieved “by infiltrating civil society – political parties, churches, labor unions, universities, the media, community groups, etc., to turn them into revolutionary vehicles.”
Similarly, Loudon documents how the Communist Party of the USA itself has adopted a stealth plan to achieve revolutionary goals by decisions made in the 1970s to infiltrate and manipulate the Democratic Party. The plan is to form alliances with the radical elements in organized labor in conjunction with radicals in the African-American community and the feminist movement to establish a progressive coalition on the left that could dominate the national political agenda for decades to come.
His essay on the Institute for Policy Studies provides extensive evidence that the IPS, operating today with the distinction of being oldest – founded in 1963 – and most influential of the far left “think tanks” in Washington, D.C., “works closely with several U.S. Marxist groups, but is particularly close to the Democratic Socialists of America.”
The congressional profiles of current members of Congress provides extensive evidence of radical leftist ties in the backgrounds of top Democratic Party legislators, including Democratic Party Sens. Barbara Boxer, Dick Durbin, Tom Harkin, Barbara Mikulski, Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Debbie Stabenow, Al Franken, Sherrod Brown, Ron Wyden, Jeff Merkley, Patty Murray and Tammy Baldwin.
In the House of Representatives, Loudon profiles the radical left background of Democratic Party Reps. Nancy Pelosi, Louis Gutierrez, John Conyers, Charles Rangel, Marcy Kaptur, Peter DeFazio, Sheila Jackson Lee, Jim McDermott and dozens more.
Loudon’s profiles of the radical lawmakers is extensively footnoted, complete with photos, news clips, website screen captures and quotations from published sources that leave no doubt as to the authenticity and accuracy of his allegations.
In documenting the success with which the radical left has captured the politically correct core of Democratic Party politics since the 1970s and the end of the Vietnam War, Loudon joins bestselling author Paul Kengor, who published in 2010 “Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Conservatives for a Century,” followed in 2012 by “The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.”
What authors Loudon and Kengor show is that communism in America did not die with the fall of the Berlin Wall. It is alive and well, with ties that run deep today with Barack Obama in the White House and the radical leftist Democrats serving in the halls of Congress.
Loudon will be in Washington, D.C., at the National Press Club Aug. 20 to participate in the all day conference “The Crisis in American Journalism and the Conservative Response,” hosted by the public policy group America’s Survival Inc.
Joining Loudon, who is listed on the program to speak about his book “The Enemies Within,” will be Kengor, presenting his new book, “All the Dupes Fit to Print: Journalists Who Have Served as Tools of Communist Propaganda.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/communists-in-congress-just-count-em/#4eCW4BOTxifBEw04.99 

Sorprende el desmantelamiento de la Unidad Anti-Corrupción August 20th, 2013
El alcalde Giménez no ha dado explicación alguna sobre esta medida
Escapa a Washington con los Dolphins de 1972
MIAMI, 20 DE AGOSTO DE 2013, NHR.com—De sospechosa se está calificando el desmantelamiento de la Unidad Anti-corrupción (CCU) en el departamento de policía de Miami-Dade.
De acuerdo con detalles que NHR.com ha podido conocer, esta unidad fue creada en los años 90 por Frank Bonny, entonces asistente del director de la policía Carlos Álvarez, quien después se convirtió en alcalde de Miami-Dade.
Según nuestra investigación, CCU era parte de la Unidad de Seguridad Interna (Internal Affairs) de la policía de Miami-Dade, pero Frank Bonny convenció a su jefe Carlos Álvarez para convertirla en una unidad independiente con el fin de investigar la corrupción pública, siendo el oficial Luis Rodríguez uno de los detectives más exitosos en esa unidad, donde permaneció hasta que recientemente fuera trasladado arbitrariamente hacia otra unidad, según nos dice nuestra fuente.
La CCU ha tenido unos 25 detectives desde su creación, además de  un sargento y 1 teniente que actúan de supervisores.
Entre las investigaciones que ha llevado a cabo más recientemente se encuentra la relacionada con el escándalo de boletas ausentes que empañó las elecciones del pasado mes de agosto, creando una tremenda controversia en la campaña del  alcalde Carlos Giménez, cuando la boletera Daisy Cabrera, que trabajaba para esa campaña fue descubierta con decenas de boletas ausentes en su poder.
Precisamente hoy el alcalde Giménez  sale para Washington donde asistirá en la Casa Blanca a la conmemoración del 40 aniversario de la “temporada perfecta de 1972” de los Miami Dolphins, Giménez sospechosamente cancelo varias reuniones públicas que tenía pendiente, además de no dar la cara para explicar porque  desmantelaría de la Unidad Anti Corrupción.
Las reuniones publicas habían sembrado alguna esperanza entre los residentes que planeaban asistir masivamente muchos de ellos a protestar por el recorte en el cuerpo de bomberos y el cierre de las bibliotecas.
De acuerdo con Fernando Figueredo Director de Comunicaciones del condado, el alcalde fue invitado personalmente por la casa blanca”, y añadió, “Este es un honor que aunque Carlos no quería posponer la reunión pública sobre el presupuesto, él no pudo decir que no”.
Sin embargo nuestras fuentes nos dijeron que el alcalde no tenia que aceptar la invitación de “la casa blanca en fin de cuenta el no es jugador de los Dolphins.
Otra de las campañas bajo investigación de esta unidad ha sido la de Francis Suárez, también relacionada con boletas de votantes ausentes. Los agentes irrumpieran en la casa de uno de los ayudantes de Suárez, al que sorprendieron solicitando boletas ausentes en la página web del Departamento de Elecciones.
“Él no quiere que se investigue la corrupción pública”, dijo el presidente del sindicato de la policía, John Rivera, refiriéndose al alcalde Carlos Giménez, quien dio la orden de desmantelar la Unidad ante Corrupción
“La Unidad Anti-corrupción está en peligro”, según nuestra fuente. “De 25 detectives quedan menos de 10, y se cree que podría desaparecer”, nos dice.
A nuestras preguntas de quién dió  la orden de desmantelar CCU, nuestra fuente señala que “es de arriba”, y nada más.
La fuente nos informó además  que varios agentes que han estado asignados a CCU están secretamente entregándole al FBI los archivos de las investigaciones sobre corrupción que están pendientes y que no se completarían si se desmantela la Unidad Anti-Corrupción. “Son 10 detectives los que han entregado ya los archivos, ellos quieren que el FBI continúe las investigaciones”, nos dijo nuestra fuente.

Atty for Ft.Hood Jihad Massacre Victims: Obama and Army “Twisted Rules” to Avoid Admitting that Hasan is a Jihadist
By Clash Daily / 19 August 2013 / 
Robert Spencer, of JihadWatch.org, received this email today from Neal M. Sher, attorney for the victims of Nidal Hasan’s murderous jihad attack at Fort Hood on November 5, 2009.
As the attorney for the victims of the Ft. Hood massacre, and their families, I can say unequivocally that at every turn the Administration and the Army have twisted rules, regulation and common sense into pretzels to avoid acknowledging what Hasan himself has admitted prior to the attack and now in court: that he is a committed and devout jihadist who is fighting for an enemy. The question which needs an answer: in light of his admission why has he not been tried for treason, as was Bradley Manning? While his crimes are most serious, he’s not a mass murderer.
Read more: jihadwatch.org
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/atty-for-ft-hood-jihad-massacre-victims-obama-and-army-twisted-rules-to-avoid-admitting-that-hasan-is-a-jihadist/#W3acE3hYoGbiv5u4.99 

Ed Meese to Newsmax: ‘Butler’ Movie Wrong to Portray Reagan as Racist
Monday, 19 Aug 2013 10:08 PM By Andrea BillupsFormer Attorney General Edwin Meese III says the portrayal of President Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy as racially insensitive in the new movie “The Butler” is not accurate.

Meese has joined with other supporters of Reagan who have been angered with the film’s claim that Reagan was indifferent to South Africa’s apartheid and the producer’s decision to have liberal Jane Fonda offer an unflattering portrayal of Nancy Reagan. 

“Ronald Reagan did not have a racially discriminatory bone in his body from his very youngest days,” Meese told Newsmax. “He was opposed to any type of discrimination or mistreatment of anyone on the basis of race, or quite frankly any other innate characteristic.”

Meese said the true Ronald Reagan “treated everyone extremely well, including people who were in a position of assisting him in one way or other.”

“His whole administration was particularly loved by the people who worked in the White House and who served several administrations,” said Meese, who was a gubernatorial aide to Reagan in Sacramento before coming to the White House following the 1980 presidential election. “He was always very polite, very accommodating and very much interested in them personally.”

Meese, who currently serves as the Ronald Reagan Distinguished Fellow Emeritus at The Heritage Foundation, said he has not seen the film, but from what he has heard about the movie, the portrayal seems unfair.

“I think it is important for any president to be accurately portrayed, whether it is in books, in films or on TV. Any disparagement or unfair treatment by a film like this is unfortunate,” Meese said.

Director Lee Daniels’ new film is heating up the summer box office — opening this weekend at No. 1 and earning $25 million for the Weinstein Co.– but a growing number of Reagan supporters say they are hot over the film’s dishonest portrayal of the conservative president’s record on race.

Grove City College Professor Paul Kengor, a Reagan biographer, sparked a backlash last week against the film’s “ideologically driven fiction,” dubbing it “Hollywood malpractice,” even as others were mentioning the story of a White House butler who served eight presidents as a possible Oscar contender.

“The screenwriter and makers of this film better have some hard evidence for this. I hope they have at least some quotes somewhere from the butler saying he felt like a prop,” Kengor told the Hollywood Reporter. “If they don’t, then they should be ashamed of themselves.”

Since then, other Reagan book authors, associates and conservatives have stepped up to defend Reagan, calling the portrayal a cheap shot against a president they said consistently spoke out for equality.

Craig Shirley, a conservative public relations executive who wrote two Reagan books and is at work on several others, took issue with the film Monday saying it lacked context and  was inaccurate, particularly in its discussion of the apartheid debate.

Shirley said to Fox News that Reagan’s views on South Africa must be judged in the context of the Cold War.

“The sanctions would have hurt the least affluent among the South Africans at the time, who were the blacks there,” Shirley said. “The Zulu tribe, representing 6 million blacks, was vehemently opposed to the sanctions… When Mandela came to power, one of the first things he asked for were the sanctions to be lifted. So it’s a very complex issue and they present it [in the film] in a very simplistic fashion.”

Meese agreed.

“Certainly as president, in terms of dealing with apartheid, he was absolutely opposed to apartheid,” Meese told Newmax. “He had some concern about the sanctions that were in place because of what it would do generally in terms of our position on the Cold War. But also he was concerned about the impact economic sanctions would have on the people of South Africa, including those people who happen to be people of color.”

“The Butler” is based on the life of Eugene Allen, who worked at the White House from 1952 to 1986, serving eight presidents before his retirement.

The screenplay was written by Danny Strong, who wrote HBO’s 2008 TV film, “Recount,” as well as HBO’s “Game Change,” about the 2012 presidential campaign. That movie was drubbed by many on the right as a hit piece against former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Knowing the history of the film’s creators, “you have to go to motive,” Shirley said.

“The screenwriter for this movie did write ‘Game Change,’ which was grossly unfair to Sarah Palin. He also wrote ‘Recount,’ which again a lot of people thought was a retelling of the history of the recount that made the George Bush forces look very devious and the (Al) Gore forces look good,” said Shirley. “You do have to go motive with Hollywood and movies.”

Film critic Christian Toto, an assistant editor at Breitbart News, said Strong is “a dedicated liberal fellow, and he puts his politics into his work. Certainly this is not a surprise.”

The film’s cast would also not endear it to the right, Toto added. “Lee Daniels stocked his film with some very aggressively left figures, from Jane Fonda to John Cusack, which is like poking a hornet’s nest.”

The movie also stars Forest Whittaker in the title role of the butler and Oprah Winfrey in the memorable role of his boozy wife.

Prior to the Reagan flap, the movie earned the disdain of veterans with the casting of Fonda as Nancy Reagan.

Fonda defended that she was playing the first lady as a human being and said she knew Nancy Reagan was “not unhappy” with her casting, even as some military veterans recalled her criticism of the nation during the Vietnam War, which earned her the nickname “Hanoi Jane.” Some have planned protests against her and the film.

Toto said there is a need to set the factual record straight because “movies shape popular culture and popular culture shapes opinion.”

“The real life butler had a picture of Reagan in his living room, but the film portrays him as being disillusioned with Reagan and quitting that job because of the disillusionment,” which is totally at odds with the truth, Toto said.

That butler, Eugene Allen, also was the first to be invited to attend a White House state dinner with his wife, as a guest of Reagan, showing a relationship that seems at odds with the one the film depicts.

Toto says it’s a lot more than a fictional historical study, which is why friends of Reagan are rising up.

“It’s not sort of a policy debate but it’s capturing him in away that makes him appear if not racist, very insensitive to the suffering of people, and that is a thing people have been hammering those on the right about now for years,” he said.

Editor’s Note: Should ObamaCare Be Repealed? Vote in Urgent National Poll 

“It’s a cudgel the left uses against the right. When you critique someone as racist, it’s very powerful and it is effective, but it’s soul killing. I think that’s a theme that really rankles people on the right and deservedly so.”

The movie is unlikely to besmirch Reagan’s reputation as Meese noted that Reagan is one of America’s most-beloved figures.

“Ronald Reagan is actually beloved by most people, whether conservative or not. In poll after poll he has shown he is one of the most popular people in history across the political spectrum,” Meese said.
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/meese-reagan-racism-butler/2013/08/19/id/521209?s=al&promo_code=14948-1##ixzz2cWcSGvdW 
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

FOX NEWS FIRST: Diplomats punished for Benghazi back on job | Egypt crackdown continues | ObamaCare, the virus | Cruz: I’m an Am FOX News First: Aug. 20 By Chris Stirewalt
 
Buzz Cut:
·        Diplomats punished for Benghazi back on job 
·        Egypt crackdown continues 
·        ObamaCare, the virus
·        Cruz: I’m an American, eh!
·        Bravest of the brave 
 
CLEARED BY KERRY?
“Secretary of State John Kerry has determined that the four State Department officials placed on administrative leave by Hillary Clinton after the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi do not deserve any formal disciplinary action,” reports Daily Beast. The news site says Kerry, “has asked them to come back to work at the State Department starting [today.]”
 
Boehner, House Republicans pressed on Benghazi- The Hill: “A group of special forces veterans has spent $5,800 for three giant billboards scheduled to go up in Boehner’s district this week. And another conservative group plans to hold a day-long commemoration at the steps of the Capitol on Sept. 11. ‘If 4 Members of Congress were KILLED in Benghazi would we have a Watergate-style Select Committee today?’ the billboard asks.”
 
EGYPT CRACKDOWN CONTINUES 
Fox News: Egyptian security officials detained the supreme leader of the Muslim Brotherhood early Tuesday, state media reported. Officials said Mohammed Badie, 70, was captured in an apartment in the eastern Cairo district of Nasr City.
 
Ed Henry wants to know: “Which will we have more clarity on first: The president’s Egypt policy or the truth about NSA abuses?”
 
White House cagey on Egypt aid – While the White House maintains in a statement that no decision has been made concerning any aid cuts to Egypt, a spokesperson for Sen.Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., told the Daily Beast that military aid has been “temporarily cut off.”  Two administration officials told the web site that “…administration lawyers decided it was best to observe the law … as if there had been a coup … while at the same time deciding that the law did not require a public announcement on whether a coup took place.”  Fox News reports on the widening influence of Saudi oil money on the support of Egypt’s military by Gulf States.
 
Roger Cohen in the NYT: “The real lesson in Egypt is of America’s dwindling power under a wavering president whose hesitancy reflects that of most Americans after a decade of interventions.”
 
[Watch FOX:  Bret Stephens, WSJ Foreign affairs columnist, discusses his piece today on whether the US should support the Egyptian military in the 10 a.m. ET hour.]
 
OBAMACARE WANTS TO GO VIRAL
The Daily Mail reports that Deepak Bhargava, a former top- lobbyist for ACORN, will oversee a youth video contest that promotes ObamaCare sponsored by the federal government. Bhargava ought to be well acquainted with the concept. It was viral videos of the community organizing group where he previously worked counseling conservative activists posing as a pimp and a prostitute that led to the dismantling of ACORN.
 
Rick Perry rips Sebelius over ObamaCare Promotion – Fox News: “If ObamaCare were sound health care policy, Secretary Sebelius wouldn’t have to resort to video contests and prizes to tempt people to sign up,” Gov. Rick Perry, R-Texas,  in a statement.
 
IRS launches ObamaCare site – The IRS has debuted its online home for ObamaCare enforcement. The site also seeks to explain why the employer mandate was delayed by one year.
 
“I think, unfortunately, the decision [the Obama administration] made to push back the employer mandate was political and not policy-driven.  And I don’t see them that making that same change here.” – Gov. Scott Walker, R-Wisc., “On the Record with Greta Van Susteren” discussing a proposed delay on the ObamaCare mandate on individuals.  
 
[Watch FOX:  Brad Blakeman, former deputy assistant to President George W. Bushdiscusses the new ObamaCare video contest in the 9 a.m.  ET hour.]
 
LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT: “STAGGERINGLY LARGE”
Chief National Correspondent Jim Angle is looking ahead at a bombshell report on long-term on employment from The Urban Institute: “‘… the extent of the increase and its persistently high level since the start of the recovery are both troubling and unprecedented.’  Its research refers to the ‘staggeringly large’ number of people out of work that long, which is now about 40 percent of the total number of unemployed.” The report goes public at noon ET here.  

Why work? – Breitbart: A CATO institute study “finds that a New York mother of two is eligible for $38,004 in welfare benefits — a sum more than the annual salary of a New York entry-level school teacher.”
 
SIGNIFICANT JUMPS FOR STUDENT AID
The WSJ is reporting that more students are using federal student aid than ever before. Nearly 57 percent of undergraduate students are now using federal aid to help pay for school.
 
VAN HOLLEN SETS PRICE ON SEQUESTER
In an interview with Washington Post columnist Greg Sargent, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, the ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee, says that Democrats are ready to make Republicans pay if GOPers want to continue to insulate national defense from automatic reductions to federal spending. Calling it the “ace in the hole” for Democrats, Sargent explains that because Defense programs got a smaller trim this year, the scheduled cuts for next year could be particularly damaging to national security, thereby forcing Republicans to accept increased funding for domestic programs.  “If Republicans want to relieve the $20 billion cut to defense, we must increase non-defense spending by $20 billion,” Van Hollen said.
 
BLACK DEMOCRAT BLASTS PARTY 
A video offering a stinging indictment of the Democratic Party on race from Louisiana State Rep. Elbert Guillory is gaining traction online. Guillory announces his plans to switch parties in the clip, launching his Free At Last PAC. Guillory says, “Liberalism has nearly destroyed black America. And now it’s time for black America to return the favor.”
 
CHRISTIE SIGNS GAY CONVESRION THERAPY BAN
Washington Examiner: “New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie signed a bill … banning gay conversion therapy on minors in the state. … The bill he signed bars licensed therapists from trying to convert gay youths to a heterosexual lifestyle.”
 
MILBANK ROASTS OBAMA
WaPo’s Dana Milbank offers his thoughts on President Obama’s sinking summer approval numbers: “Since the earliest days of the republic, Washington has been a sleepy town in August … it no longer works to push the snooze button throughout the month.”
 
WITH YOUR SECOND CUP OF COFFEE…
Christina Hoff Sommers, author of “The War Against Boys” writes in Time Magazine:School Has Become Too Hostile to Boys – “Efforts to re-engineer the young-male imagination are doomed to fail, but they will succeed spectacularly in at least one way. They will send a clear and unmistakable message to millions of schoolboys: You are not welcome in school.”
 
CARBON PERVERTS 
The WSJ’s Editorial Page takes on the unintended consequences of green subsidies inPerverse Effects: “Take ethanol and other biofuel subsidies, which [the National Research Council] calls a ‘most striking’ example. The 45-cents-a-gallon ethanol tax credit expired in 2012, but before it died it was increasing carbon emissions by five million tons every year, at a cost of $5.26 billion. As they say, it’s not easy being green.”
 
Electric cars concentrated in blue America – According to Wired, over 52 percent of the nation’s electric vehicles are based in predominantly liberal cities: Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Seattle and Atlanta.
 
Got a TIP from the RIGHT or LEFT? Email FoxNewsFirst@FOXNEWS.COM
 
POLL CHECK
Real Clear Politics Averages
Obama Job Approval: Approve – 44.8 percent//Disapprove – 50.0 percent
Direction of Country: Right Direction – 29.6 percent Right Track//Wrong Track – 62.2 percent 
 
NO CANADA
Fox News – Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, says he will renounce Canadian citizenship after The Dallas Morning News suggested that Cruz holds dual citizenship because he was born in Calgary, Alberta to an American mother. In a statement, Cruz says he assumed since he never made an attempt to claim Canadian citizenship, he was only an American citizen.
 
OFF TO THE RACES
NC jumps line on 2016 primary – Washington Examiner: “North Carolina is shifting its 2016 presidential primary from May until just after South Carolina votes, becoming the latest in a string of states that are trying to increase their influence on the quadrennial nominating contest.”
 
Perry raising profile- The San Francisco Chronicle reports that Gov. Rick Perry, R-Texas, will be the keynote speaker at the California GOP’s convention this fall in Anaheim. 
 
Just poking around – Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, took to Twitter to signal he would be considering a presidential bid. King tweeted that he was “poking around the back roads” of New Hampshire and that he has future events scheduled in early primary state, South Carolina. The other Republican Congressman King, Peter of New York, has already been exploring a run. Tweet from @davecatanese: King-King 2016!
 
[Watch FOX:  Karl Rove discusses CNN’s plans to bring a producer of Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” aboard the network’s Hillary Clinton biopic  in the 10 a.m.  ET hour]
 
SCIENTIST  BLAMES BUNNY SLAUGHTER ON SEQUESTER 
National Journal : “The sequester has now killed bunnies. Yes, furry, innocent, blind, lab-test bunnies have been put to sleep because of a $1.7 billion cut in the budget for the National Institutes of Health. A research ophthalmologist writing to the Huffington Post in response to a story about science cuts says Congress is the reason why he killed the bunnies he petted, played with, and experimented on.”
 
SCALIA SOUNDS OFF ON THE SEPARATION OF POWERS
Breitbart: “The U.S. Supreme Court is making decisions that should be left to Congress or the people, from wiretapping to ‘inventing’ new classes of minorities, Justice Antonin Scalia said Monday. … ‘It’s not up to the courts to invent new minorities that get special protections,’  Scalia told a packed hotel ballroom in southwestern Montana.”
 
FINISHING NIXON’S JOB
President Obama will welcome the undefeated 1972 Super Bowl Champion Miami Dolphins to the White House for the first White House ceremony honoring their historic season Tuesday.
 
AL JAZEERA AMERICA DEBUTS
Al Jazeera, a network that many Americans still associate with Usama bin Laden videos, launches its American channel in about 50 million homes today. The new outfit is spending heavily on bold-face names like Soledad O’Brien. Today Howard Kurtz asks: Can it shake its reputation for bias and fulfill its promise of more serious news and less fluff?
 
DARK DAYS FOR WASHINGTON JOURNOS
The 2009 announcement of the first family’s acquisition of their Portuguese water dog, Bo, was a media sensation, filled with breathless speculation and lots of Internet click bait. Now, the Obamas just go straight to Twitter for livestock announcements, with the first lady heralding the arrival of another water dog, Sunny, on Tuesday.
 
HOME OF THE BRAVE
President Obama will award Staff Sgt. Ty M. Carter with the Medal of Honor. The Purple Heart recipient served as a cavalry scout in Afghanistan. According to the Army account of his heroism in one of the war’s deadliest firefights – a six-hour battle – Carter resupplied ammunition to fighting positions, provided first aid, killed enemy troops, and risked his life to save a fellow soldier who was injured and pinned down by overwhelming enemy fire.
 
Chris Stirewalt is digital politics editor for Fox News. Want FOX News First in your inbox every day? Sign up here. To catch Chris live online daily at 11:30amET, click here. 

Gatria – Namelatico – Cuba llora:
JANE FONDA MUJER DEL SIGLO.?America Wake Up.. QUIÉN DICE ESA ESTUPIDEZ O MEJOR IGNORANCIA.?

Quien c atreve a honorar a la TRAIDORA de Jane Fonda como La Mujer del Siglo.? Yo cambiaría el nombre y pondría “Mujer Gran Traidora de el Siglo a su País, Ciudadanos y Fuerzas Armadas”.Quien nuevamente es el primer H___de____  en dar el primer paso en honorar a la COMUNISTA DE JANE FONDA?ADIVINEN QUIEN SE PUEDEN IMAGINAR.? Nada mas y nada menos q otro COMUNISTA como es natural el Presidente de USA BARACK OBAMA QUE LINDO HOMENAJE ENTRE COMUNISTAS SE VA A LLEVAR A CABO

Enviado:ábado, 17 de agosto, 2013 5:13 P.M Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 2:37 PM To: Subject: FW: Como lo recibí… 

Estimados fa,iliares y amigos de GRUPO SELECTO. Después de un pequeño intervalo, nuevamente estoy en el aire y en el día de hoy os envío un correo, con el ruego que al término de su lectura y por el bien de nuestro país adoptivo, lo envíen a todos sus contactos. Es increíble que se le pueda galardonar a esta *&%#@+ con el premio “Mujer del Siglo”. Obviamente todo lo anterior al respecto del asombro, desaparece cuando el que le ha otorgado ese premio es nada más y nada menos el enemigo oculto número uno de nuestra civilización judeo cristiana. No , por favor, yo no he mencionado al presidente Obama, por si acaso. Seguiré en contacto con vosotros como habitualmente lo hacía. SHALOM……..Waldo

Sent: sábado, 17 de agosto de 2013 2:44 To: Dr. F. Dominguez Subject: Como lo recibí…va

JANE FONDA as NANCY REAGAN? She deserves to be in prison!!! BOYCOTT “THE BUTLER”AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THIS TRAITOR

BOYCOTT THIS MOVIE

What a disgrace to Mrs. Nancy Reagan! Boycott this movie!

Americawe must not forget !!!!!!!!!!!!!

This cannot go around too much. Those of us that were living in those years will never forget that she was a traitor and did a lot of damage to our boys.

She has now been chosen to play Nancy Reagan in her life story. I am sending this one out because so many do not know this truth…and also because she was on 3 times this week talking about her new book… And how good she feels in her 70’s. She still does not know what she did wrong. Her book just may not make the best seller list if more people knew… also… Barbara Walters said: Thank you all. Many died in Vietnam for our freedoms. I did not like Jane Fonda then and I don’t like her now.

She can lead her present life the way she wants and perhaps SHE can forget the past, but we DO NOT have to stand by without comment and see her “honored” as a “Woman of the Century.” (I remember this well) For those who served and/or died….

NEVER FORGIVE A TRAITOR. SHE REALLY WAS A TRAITOR!!

and now President OBAMA wants to honor her……!!!!

In Memory of Lt. C. Thomsen Wieland who spent 100 days at the Hanoi Hilton [Famous North Vietnam Prison]

IF YOU NEVER FORWARDED ANYTHING IN YOUR LIFE PLEASE FORWARD THIS SO THAT EVERYONE WILL KNOW!!!!!!

A TRAITOR IS ABOUT TO BE HONORED. KEEP THIS MOVING ACROSS AMERICA

This is for all the kids born in the 70’s and after who do not know and didn’t have to bear the burden that our fathers, mothers and older brothers and sisters had to bear.

Jane Fonda is being honored as one of the ‘100 Women of the Century.’

BARBARA WALTERS WRITES: Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country, but specific men who served and sacrificed during the Vietnam War.

The first part of this is from an F-4E pilot. The pilot’s name is Jerry Driscoll, a River Rat.

In 1968, the former Commandant of the USAF Survival School was a POW in Ho Lo Prison the ‘Hanoi Hilton.’

Dragged from a stinking cesspit of a cell, cleaned, fed, and dressed in clean PJ’s, he was ordered to describe for a visiting American ‘Peace Activist’ the ‘lenient and humane treatment’ he’d received.

He spat at Ms. Fonda, was clubbed, and was dragged away. During the subsequent beating, he fell forward on to the camp Commandant ‘s feet, which sent that officer berserk.

In 1978, the Air Force Colonel still suffered from double vision (which permanently ended his flying career) from the Commandant’s frenzied application of a wooden baton.

From 1963-65, Col. Larry Carrigan was in the 47FW/DO (F-4E’s). He spent 6 years in the ‘Hanoi Hilton’…the first three of which his family only knew he was ‘missing in action’.

His wife lived on faith that he was still alive. His group, too, got the cleaned-up, fed and clothed treatment in preparation for a ‘peace delegation’ visit.

They, however, had time and devised a plan to get word to the world that they were alive and still survived. Each man secreted a tiny piece of paper, with his Social Security Number on it, in the palm of his hand. When paraded before Ms. Fonda and a cameraman, she walked the line, shaking each man’s hand and asking little encouraging snippets like: ‘Aren’t you sorry you bombed babies?’ and ‘Are you grateful for the humane treatment from your benevolent captors?’

Believing this HAD to be an act, they each palmed her their sliver of paper. She took them all without missing a beat…At the end of the line and once the camera stopped rolling, to the shocked disbelief of the POW’s she turned to the officer in charge and handed him all the little pieces of paper…Three men died from the subsequent beatings.

Colonel Carrigan was almost number four but he survived, which is the only reason we know of her actions that day.

I was a civilian economic development adviser in Vietnam, and was captured by the North Vietnamese communists in South Vietnam in 1968, and held prisoner for over 5 years.

I spent 27 months in solitary confinement; one year in a cage in Cambodia; and one year in a ‘black box’ in Hanoi. My North Vietnamese captors deliberately poisoned and murdered a female missionary, a nurse in a leprosarium in Banme Thuot, South Vietnam, whom I buried in the jungle near the Cambodian border.

At one time, I weighed only about 90 lbs. (My normal weight is 170 lbs). We were Jane Fonda’s ‘war criminals…’

When Jane Fonda was in Hanoi, I was asked by the camp communist political officer if I would be willing to meet with her. I said yes, for I wanted to tell her about the real treatment we POWs received…and how different it was from the treatment purported by the North Vietnamese, and parroted by her as ‘humane and lenient.’

Because of this, I spent three days on a rocky floor on my knees, with my arms outstretched with a large steel weight placed on my hands, and beaten with a bamboo cane.

I had the opportunity to meet with Jane Fonda soon after I was released. I asked her if she would be willing to debate me on TV. She never did answer me.

These first-hand experiences do not exemplify someone who should be honored as part of ‘100 Years of Great Women.’ Lest we forget… ‘100 Years of Great Women’ should never include a traitor whose hands are covered with the blood of so many patriots.

There are few things I have strong visceral reactions to, but Hanoi Jane ‘s participation in blatant treason, is one of them.

Please take the time to forward to as many people as you possibly can. It will eventually end up on her computer and she needs to know that we will never forget.

RONALD D. SAMPSON, CM Sgt, USAF 716 Maintenance Squadron, Chief of Maintenance DSN: 875-6431 COMM: 883-6343

PLEASE HELP BY SENDING THIS TO EVERYONE IN YOUR ADDRESS BOOK. IF ENOUGH PEOPLE SEE THIS MAYBE HER STATUS WILL CHANGE.
Enviado desde mi Kyocera Hydro

MARTHA RUIZ: “ID”
President Obama walks into the Bank of America to cash a check. As he approaches the cashier he says, “Good morning Ma’am, could you please cash this check for me?”
Cashier:
“It would be my pleasure sir. Could you please show me your ID?”
Obama:
“Truthfully, I did not bring my ID with me as I didn’t think there was any need to.
I am President Barack Obama, the President of the United States of AMERICA !!!!”
Cashier:
“Yes sir, I know who you are, but with all the regulations and monitoring of the banks
because of impostors and forgers and requirements of the Dodd/Frank legislation,
etc., I must insist on seeing ID.”
Obama:
Just ask anyone here at the bank who I am and they will tell you. Everybody knows who I am.”
Cashier:
“I am sorry Mr. President but these are the bank rules and I must follow them.”
Obama: “I am ordering you, please, to cash this check.”
Cashier:
“Look Mr. President, here is an example of what we can do. One day, Tiger Woods
came into the bank without ID. To prove he was Tiger Woods he pulled out his putter
and made a beautiful shot across the bank into a cup. With that shot we knew him to be Tiger Woods and cashed his check.
Another time, Andre Agassi came in without ID. He pulled out his tennis racquet and
made fabulous shot whereas the tennis ball landed in my cup. With that shot we cashed his check.
So, Mr. President, what can you do to prove that it is you, and only you, as the President of the United States ?”

Obama: Obama stands there thinking, and thinking, and finally says, “Honestly, my mind is a total blank…there is nothing that comes to my mind. I can’t think of a single thing. I have absolutely no idea what to do and I don’t have a clue.

Cashier:
“Will that be large or small bills, Mr. President?

Your Deposition Required:
Larry Klayman and Class Members vs. Barack Hussein Obama

Fellow Patriot,
I have just filed the FIRST class action law suits against Barack Hussein Obama to stop his mad NSA spy scheme that’s targeting YOU and your family right now.
That’s right – while the others sit around and talk, I’m taking action and have already filed our groundbreaking class action suits in U.S. District Court in Washington DC to force Obama and hissocialist tyrannical comrades to end their unconstitutional attacks on your rights and liberty.
I’ve taken on and defeated Presidents in the past . . . in fact, I am the ONLY lawyer EVER to have a court rule that a sitting President – Bill Clinton – had committed a crime

And now I’m on the job again, targeting Obama for his glaring violations of law, especially his use of the National Security Agency (NSA) to illegally spy on you and millions of other loyal America citizens.
You see, America is under attack like never before, and unless we stand together and take decisive action today we run the risk of seeing our cherished nation collapse and become little more than a puppet socialist state controlled by tyrants.
But the enemy isn’t a foreign army waiting to invade . . . unbelievable as it sounds,the enemy is already deeply entrenched in our own government. The enemy carries U.S. passports, votes in our elections, and even rules over us from their devilish lair in Washington, D.C.
That enemy is Barack Hussein Obama.
What’s more, plans are now in place enabling the Obama regime to snap thechains of bondage around YOUR wrists unless you and I unite right now to stop this escalating attack on our constitutional rights and freedoms
And Freedom Watch – the legal watchdog group that’s shining the light of truth on the dirty deals and illegal activities of Democrats and Republicans alike – isready, willing, and able to fight back on your behalf. And that’s just what we’re doing . . .

The spies at the National Security Agency are snooping through billions of our emails, phone records, and other personal and confidential information like medical and credit card records.
Why? The answer is simple: to coerce or blackmail and intimidate the American people into silence about Obama’s attack against the very foundation of our Republic: the U.S. Constitution.
The Obama agents are going through your personal and private information seeking anything they can use against you, in court or out. Whatever they find, no matter how inconspicuous it may seem, will be used by the NSA to control you and force you to accept Obama’s anti-American agenda.
This NSA spy outrage is more than just Obama’s latest scandal . . . like his use of other government agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents. This scandal marks a critical turning point in our nation’s history, and Freedom Watch and I need your urgent support in our efforts to regain our lost rights as American citizens, God-ordained rights for which our Founding Fathers and the patriot forces fought and died.

So Freedom Watch has filed a series of class action suits against not just Barack Obama, but also his comrade-in-arms Eric Holder, the NSA, and telecommunications giant Verizon, the company that funneled all this private information to the government spies, as well as the other cell phone companies and internet providers like AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, Google, AOL, Facebook, Skype and others who have collaborated in this illegal intrusion into our privacy.
Our lawsuits will force Obama and company to end their outrageous domestic spying program in which they search YOUR emails, YOUR phone records, YOUR private information for any “evidence” they can find to use against you. We WILL win, but only with your help.
Freedom Watch’s lawsuits are expensive. We need funds for lawyers, legal staff, depositions, research and more. So I’m looking for millions of patriotic Americans like you to stand with Freedom Watch and me as we sue Barack Obama and the federal government, their corporate enablers, and the judge who went along with their power grab. We must do this to take back our God-ordained, constitutionally-protected rights that are disappearing each and every day at the hands of Obama.
Without your support, I fear our great country will pass the point of no return as Obama and his socialist allies in and out of government shove the U.S. Constitution into the White House paper shredder
But Freedom Watch’s class actions suits will stop Barack Obama’s anti-American plans dead in their tracks.
I’ve already proven this can work by successfully suing Bill and Hillary Clinton when they occupied the White House. But we’re up against a much greater foe this time, a man who isn’t legally even President. And he’s using the vast power of the government to maintain his illegitimate hold on the office.
These cases have ALREADY been filed and are moving along . . . Freedom Watch and I need YOU to join with us in the fight to regain our freedoms that are being stolen by the socialist anti-American forces that have infiltrated the White House and Congress.
Founding Father Benjamin Franklin warned his fellow patriots on the day the Declaration of Independence was signed, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”
What was true 237 years ago rings even truer today. Together, we must unite against Barack Obama’s egregious spy program that allows the NSA to sift through your personal emails and more without your consent or knowledge.
This is the critical, defining moment in U.S. history. Freedom Watch’s class action lawsuits against Obama, his corrupt attorney general Eric Holder, the NSA, Verizon, and other cell phone and internet provider companies, will unify Americans of all political stripes to wage a “Second American Revolution.” This new revolution is peaceful – but Freedom Watch is pursuing it with vast legal force.
The time has come for We the People to rise up and reclaim control of our nation. You can join with me in “manning the barricades of freedom” against the government despots and corporate enablers who seek to enslave the American people through their despicable actions.
We MUST say no to Obama’s “Orwellian” “1984” power grab. We MUST demand that our liberties be respected.
And the one way to do this is through Freedom Watch’s class action lawsuits that will end his attack against the Constitution and our God-ordained rights enshrined therein. And I need YOUR help to keep these lawsuits going and on to ultimate success
Don’t let this be the day America surrenders to Barack Obama and his socialist agenda. Surrender assures the destruction of the American republic. Join with Freedom Watch and me as we take on Obama in court and out, and end – once and for all – his government takeover of our lives! Stand with Freedom Watch and me as we take on – and defeat – this enemy of the American people.
The entire world now knows that Barack Obama and his comrades at the NSA are spying on American citizens with impunity. And they are prepared to use YOUR confidential and personal information to blackmail you into submission or target you as a political opponent, as we have seen many more times in the recent past with this administration.
This simply cannot be permitted and we must not stand for it
Freedom Watch’s class actions suits against Obama and his allies are your best chance at stopping his takeover of our once-free nation.
I’m asking you today to answer America’s call . . . your strong financial support will help Freedom Watch take on and legally defeat Barack Obama and his accomplices!
Any gift you can send — $50, $250, or $1000 or even more – gives Freedom Watch the needed resources to fight for America, fight for freedom, and fight for YOU.
Every dollar counts. With your support, Freedom Watch and I will immediately begin mobilizing millions of freedom-loving Americans across the country to join our “Second American Revolution” as we legally take on and defeat Barack Hussein Obama and his corporate enablers. Together we shall prove in court that Obama has violated his oath of office by illegally spying on you, me, and the rest of We the People.
I must count on your support today. Freedom Watch’s lawsuits are moving forward in the court system right now.
Your support of Freedom Watch and our lawsuits is urgently needed. Please take action immediately by selecting here to make your best possible gift to Freedom Watch today.
Don’t let Barack Obama win. Don’t let him steal YOUR freedom and make you little more than a “slave” of the state. Stand with Freedom Watch and me as we fight one of the most important battles our nation has ever faced. Together we can save America from tyranny
Thank you for fighting for freedom!
Larry Klayman
P.S. The NSA spy scandal has rocked the Obama administration. And Freedom Watch’s class action suits against Barack Obama and his co-conspirators in the NSA and elsewhere will bring him to justice. Your immediate financial support is urgently needed. Please select here to make a generous gift today to enable Freedom Watch to legally take down Barack Obama and his socialist agenda. And don’t forget to forward this email to as many people as you can. We must rally the American people to stand up and fight back against Obama’s tyranny. I must hear from you today.

 

Enviar Artículos, Criticas y Comentarios: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com,
http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/
http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/
http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/
https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/
http://contracandela.blogspot.com/
http://lamisinguillaperipendica.blogspot.com/
http://lazarorgonzalezformiamidademayor.blogspot.com/
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’