Archive for 31 julio 2013

No 445 “En mi opinión” Julio 31, 2013 ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

julio 31, 2013

No 445  “En mi opinión” Julio 31, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

Para comentar o enviar artículos lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com,

 

“El individuo ha luchado siempre para no ser absorbido por la tribu. Si lo intentas, a menudo estarás solo, y a veces asustado. Pero ningún precio es demasiado alto por el privilegio de ser uno mismo.

Friedrich Nietzsche

 

Socialismo: el gran embuste del último siglo

 

 

 

El socialismo es el sistema alimentado  con la mentira y el embuste, con la promesa para con el pueblo de un futuro mejor, de negar las diferencias naturales entre los hombres, de confundir al artista con el bufón, al trabajador con el gandul, al hábil con el torpe, al inteligente con el necio. El socialismo tiene su base en la asociación obrera, aquella que, aprovechándose del principio de igualdad entre los hombres, busca revelarse contra el patrón inteligente y hábil, capaz de valerse de sus artes para producir una riqueza sin igual. La degeneración, no obstante, es inherente al movimiento obrero, y como tal, al socialismo en su conjunto. ¿Qué mejor manera existe de elevarse a uno mismo, que igualando a todos los semejantes? El dirigente socialista y el dirigente liberal, ambos buscan elevarse. No obstante, mientras el primero propugna la libertad de los hombres para superarse a sí mismos, y de esa manera hacer patentes las diferencias naturales entre los individuos, el segundo pretende igualar a todos los hombres a la miseria del más ínfimo, elevando así a la propia persona. El socialismo responde, como tal, a los instintos de bajeza del hombre necio. El socialismo nace del sentimiento del autorrechazo, del sentirse-inferior. El socialismo nace del complejo de inferioridad.

Es cierto que los dirigentes socialistas buscan la igualdad. Pero atiéndase a esto: buscan la igualdad entre los hombres, siempre y cuando ésta no les incluya a ellos mismos. No hay más que ver a los líderes socialistas de hoy en día: defienden férreamente la educación pública, al mismo tiempo que sus hijos estudian en los mejores colegios privados de Europa; dicen defender al pobre y desprotegido, al mismo tiempo que habitan sus lujosas mansiones o apartamentos de varios centenares de metros cuadrados en las calles céntricas de los mejores barrios de las ciudades.

El dirigente socialista es como un falso doctor: precisa de la enfermedad para llevar a cabo su trabajo. La diferencia entre un doctor y un socialista, no obstante, es muy clara: mientras el primero se dedica noblemente a su profesión con más o menos éxito, el segundo no tiene intención alguna de curar, sino más bien de agravar la enfermedad, pues necesita de ésta para mantener su puesto. Si la enfermedad no existiese, ¿para qué querríamos doctores?

El problema que surge a la hora de hablar del socialista, es que éste no es sino un hombre pérfido que dice ser doctor, pero cuya única fuerza motora es el aprovecharse del paciente ignorante. Y cuando nombro a la enfermedad que el socialista dice curar, no me refiero a otra que la pobreza: el malestar social, las penurias económicas, los desastres, la desigualdad. Lejos de intentar superar estas facetas, el socialista busca agravarlas. ¿Qué sería del movimiento socialista si todos los hombres a los que dicen proteger viviesen privilegiadamente? La respuesta es sencilla: el socialismo desaparecería.

Pero el socialismo no quiere desaparecer: quiere perdurar. Quiere hacerse eco en una sociedad que no necesita de su veneno. El socialismo se alimenta del malestar, de la indignación popular, de la desigualdad. ¿Qué interés puede tener un movimiento político en hacer desaparecer la mano que lo alimenta? Desde luego, todo lo que el socialismo dice combatir, no son sino embustes, burdas mentiras, excusas, máscaras tras las que ocultar la verdad del socialismo. ¿Y cuál es esa verdad? La verdad de sus dirigentes.

Cuando nombro las mentiras del socialismo, no hablo de sus miembros más básicos y sencillos, sino precisamente de sus dirigentes. No es que aquellos que sustentan el socialismo desde la base sean más verdaderos que los que se sitúan a la cabeza, solo que su mentira es distinta. Mientras la de sus dirigentes es una mentira pensada, concienciada, manipulada y calculada fríamente para envenenar, la mentira del socialista de la base piramidal es una mentira en la que él mismo cree: es un embuste ficticio, impuesto a golpe de hierro candente. Es, en definitiva, un error intelectual, un problema de aceptación y de complejos, una mentira infundada, introducida a base de la mentira en las mentes simples de quienes han visto succionadas sus ideas por una idea muy común: el socialismo. Ya tendremos tiempo de analizar esta mentira en otro momento.

Pero la mentira del dirigente socialista es muy distinta a esta otra mentira. La mentira del dirigente socialista es una mentira diseñada para manipular, para chupar la sangre a la vida de todo lo noble. Con la promesa de un mundo mejor, este colectivo, este populacho,  ha conseguido envenenar las mentes simples y huecas de todos sus seguidores. ¿Qué es lo que buscan desesperadamente? Poder.

Efectivamente, poder es lo que buscan. Un movimiento político basado en el liberalismo no busca sino ceder poder, repartirlo entre los ciudadanos para que éstos, haciendo uso de su libertad, compitan por él en la medida de sus capacidades. Pero el líder socialista busca poder, y lo quiere para él. Y la única forma de conseguir un poder suficiente para cumplir sus ambiciones no es sino robándolo. ¿Y qué mejor forma de arrebatar poder que aquella en la cual todo hombre ciudadano de un país pierde toda su capacidad de decisión, en favor de un Estado invencible, fuerte y todopoderoso que administra todos y cada uno de los recursos a su disposición, le niega el derecho a la propiedad privada, impide satisfacer sus ambiciones personales, y niega todo derecho a la iniciativa personal? ¿Qué sangre puede quedarle en las venas a un hombre avasallado de tal forma que, sin importar su trabajo, su rendimiento, su capacidad, su inteligencia o su astucia, recibirá lo mismo que el gandul, el torpe, necio, ignorante y carente de espíritu de ambición? El hombre es libre en el mundo, y ningún Estado es legítimo para anular la propiedad. ¿Por qué toda iniciativa debe quedar reducida a nada si no es producida a través de un Estado omnipotente y controlador, por qué el hombre noble creador debe vivir sometido a un control, y efectuar toda acción de su vida a favor de un colectivo? No es el Estado legítimo para privar de tal libertad al hombre, pero la sociedad pueblo engañada y creída poseedora de la verdad, se ha creído también poseedora de la facultad para legitimarlo. Mas, ¿qué determina que el hecho de que un poder sea atribuido a una persona o institución determinada de manera populista y por la mayoría de los miembros de una sociedad, sea, en definitiva, legítimo? Pues atiéndase al error de considerar todo lo elegido popularmente y por mayoría como legítimo. El socialismo parte del apoyo recibido por una mayoría de las masas populares, mas, ¿significa eso que sea legítimo o verdadero? Los seguidores del socialismo parecen disfrutar con la esclavitud que sus dirigentes imponen. Pero, ¿es justo o razonable que la mayoría de las voces populares, oponiéndose a la principal razón de ser del Estado, deban esclavizar a la minoría que quiera ser libre? Más justo es, sin duda, que si resultase forzoso, los menos obliguen a los más a permanecer libres, lo cual no puede traerles daño, y no que los más, para satisfacción de su vileza y su instinto de bajeza, fuercen perniciosamente a los menos a ser sus compañeros de esclavitud. Los que no pretenden sino su propia y justa libertad tienen siempre el derecho a ganarla, cuando quiera que tengan poder, por numerosas que sean las voces que se les opongan.

Para ejemplificar esta gran mentira universal, no tenemos más que retroceder la vista hasta la organización de la antigua URSS. Mientras toda iniciativa privada y toda libertad ciudadana habían sido erradicadas, y mientras el pueblo, muerto de hambre, se repartía igualitariamente su propia miseria, sus dirigentes, líderes comunistas, tan favorables a la igualdad, nunca abandonaron las lujosas estancias del Palacio del Kremlin, nunca renunciaron a sus privilegios, a su inmunidad ante la ley, a su plato caliente en la mesa todos los días. He aquí una muestra de la hipérbole de la hipocresía.

Por añadir otro ejemplo, dirijamos la vista ahora a nuestro lejano prójimo de Corea del Norte, un país tipo del comunismo (socialismo) más extremo. Mientras cerca del 30% del Producto Interior Bruto del país surge de la carrera militar, mientras cerca del 40% de la población se dedica a labores del ejército, mientras la miseria se acumula en las calles en forma de ciudadanos moribundos, mientras los ciudadanos tienen un nivel de vida mediocre y el PIB per cápita ronda los 1.800 dólares anuales, mientras la mayor parte de los ciudadanos debe desplazarse en bicicleta o a pie por carecer de medios para un transporte más eficiente, mientras rigen leyes tan estrictas que penalizan el hecho de que se dé la espalda al retrato de un dirigente, mientras la igualdad –esa idea tan socialista- prima en la vida cotidiana de sus desangrados habitantes y brilla no precisamente por su presencia, mientras todo esto ocurre, los “Audis”, “Porsches” “BMWs” y “Mercedes” se acumulan en los aparcamientos de las oficinas del Gobierno.

Ese es, señoras y señores el socialismo. Esta es la gran mentira universal de los dirigentes socialistas: “Amamos la igualdad, mientras solo se aplique en los demás. Amamos el respeto, mientras nosotros no tengamos que considerarlo. Amamos la vida, mientras sea nuestra vida. Amamos la libertad, mientras se haga uso de ella para apoyarnos. Para todo aquel que no opine como nosotros, no existe la igualdad, ni el respeto, ni el derecho a la vida, ni la libertad”.

Cuba ha perdido a uno de sus mejores hijos

Falleció Guillermo Álvarez Guedes el “Humorista de América”

 

Por María Argelia Vizcaíno

www.mariaargeliavizcaino.com

 

 

MAV, Alvarez Guedes, Elsy, Rogelio Vizcaino y Gisela Del Monte

 

Guillermo Álvarez Guedes.- Actor, compositor, cantante, comediante de radio, televisión, teatro y cine, productor, empresario, escritor de comedias, presentador de programas de TV y de radio. El innovador de la comedia moderna a través de grabaciones de discos de larga duración y casetes de sus chistes, salpicados de humor político, populares en toda Hispanoamérica, que rompieron la cortina de hierro impuesta por el régimen comunista a los cubanos.

Nació el 8 de junio de 1927, en Unión de Reyes, Matanzas y llegó a ser el más importante humorista cubano del siglo XX, ya que con sus chistes es el único que ha unido por más de cincuenta años, a todos los cubanos, los de adentro y los de afuera, y de cualquier edad. Comenzó a la edad de 5 años en el teatro de su pueblo, fue cantante de tangos y empresario circense, llegando a ser figura principal de CMQ-TV, y junto a Rita Montaner, la más importante artista cubana de la época, conduciendo junto a ella uno de los programas de mayor audiencia llamado “Rita y Willy”.

Su papel de borracho en el popular programa Cabaret Regalías, lo consagró. En 1953 hizo temporada en el cabaret Montmartre de La Habana, junto a Beny Moré, Olga Guillot y Carlos Pous, con coreografía de Alberto Alonso. Fundó en 1957 el sello discográfico Producciones Gemas, junto a su hermano Rafael y el músico Ernesto Duarte, lo primero que grabó fueron dos números de él “Recordando a Malanga”, canción de su hermano Rafael y “Pon la otra”, continuando grabando a grandes artistas como Rolando Laserie, Elena Burke, Miguelito Cuní, Pacho Alonso, René Cabel, Joaquín Codina, Chico O’Farrill, Bebo Valdés, Celeste Mendoza y Fernando Álvarez.

Salió definitivamente de Cuba el 23 de octubre de 1960 con destino a Nueva York, en el mismo vuelo junto a Celia Cruz y Pedro Knight. En la Isla del Encanto fundó la compañía Gema Records, que lanzó internacionalmente al Gran Combo de Puerto Rico, grupo musical salsero puertorriqueño que lleva este nombre por sugerencia del propio Álvarez Guedes, bajo su tutela se lanzaron discográficamente los cantantes Danny Rivera y Luisa María Güell. Trabajó en el cine en las películas La Chica del alacrán de oro, (1990); A mí qué me importa que explote Miami (1976); Dios te salve, psiquiatra (1966); The Big Boodle (1957); Thief in Silk (1953). Entre sus canciones ha compuesto Malta India, 1994; Como yo disfruto hablando español, 1996; Chupa Cabra, 1996, entre otras.

En la década de 1980 condujo su propio programa de TV desde Puerto Rico (programa que levantó celos entre los mediocres y cuando se transmitió en EE.UU., fue sacado del aire porque decían que los mexicanos – que son la mayoría de los hispanos hablantes – no entendían el humor cubano). En 1993 produjo, escribió y dirigió el documental “Que todo quede entre cubanos”, recomendado por casi todos los que lo hemos visto, demostrando una vez más que nadie conoce mejor la idiosincrasia humorística de los cubanos.

Ha grabado 32 discos de chistes y vendido millones de copias desde 1973. Sin necesidad de cambiar su acento típico cubano ha sido capaz de hacer reír a casi todos los hispanohablantes incluyendo público norteamericano.

En el siglo XXI empezó a conducir un programa radial de tres horas, que salía al aire de lunes a viernes por la emisora de Miami Clásica 92.3 FM, de la que gozaba de gran sintonía cuando inexplicablemente 15 años después (en el 2011) la gerencia determinó un buen día terminar su contrato, lo que trajo muchos disgustos entre sus oyentes. Publicó en el 2001 un libro de sus memorias titulado Cadillac 59.

Para el 11 de agosto de 2007 celebró su cumpleaños número 80 bajo el título de “Más de medio siglo haciendo reír”, en el Miami-Dade County Auditorium, con lleno total. Desde 1954 está casado con la ex modelo de CMQ Elsy, y siempre juntos radicaron finalmente en Miami. Hermano de otra gran figura de la televisión cubana la actriz y comediante Eloisa Álvarez Guedes, y tío de la reconocida locutora y actriz Hilda Rabilero.

Ha sido ganador de innumerables reconocimientos como el Premio Especial por Trayectoria Profesional, entregado por ACE en 1984, y otros reconocimientos de gran importancia. Posee el récord de 2 horas con 55 minutos de chistes sin parar durante un espectáculo en el año 1987 en el Carnegie Hall de Nueva York. Es considerado con razón “El Humorista de América”, el único que logró que los cubanos en el exilio y dentro de Cuba, a pesar de la represión, siguieran riéndose de sus problemas, orgullosos de su herencia cultural. El único que los castristas no pudieron borrar de la mente de su pueblo, como hicieron con otros comediantes de fama (Pototo y Filomeno, Chicharito y Sopeira, Echegoyen, Tito Hernández, Manela Bustamante, etc.) Muchos surgieron después imitándolo, nadie ha podido superarlo, ni en humor, sagacidad y conocimiento de la cubanidad y nuestra historia verdadera. Algunos han pretendido minimizar su éxito, por no conocer y reconocer todo su talento, pero siempre se recordará como una verdadera institución del humor y cubanidad, para orgullo de todos los cubanos.

Lamentablemente ha fallecido en Miami el martes, 30 de julio de 2013, después de varios días hospitalizado por una dolencia estomacal. Nuestro sentido pésame a todos sus familiares y a todos sus admiradores, el humor de América está de luto, y Cuba ha perdido a uno de sus mejores hijos que siempre defendió su cubania y nuestra democracia, haciéndonos reír para olvidar los que nos han hecho llorar.

Sería muy grato poder escuchar que los humoristas cubanos que quedan en Miami, especialmente los que tienen espacios en la televisión, le dedicaran un homenaje póstumo a quien ellos con seguridad han tenido que seguir como maestro, y ha sido un ejemplo digno por su intransigencia ante la tiranía que jamás dejó de combatir como mejor solía hacerlo, con su inigualable humor.

Recopilación de María Argelia Vizcaíno, especial para esta páginawww.mariaargeliavizcaino.com

“En mi opinión” Enviamos a todos los cubanos nuestro más sentido pésame por la muerte de Guillermo Alvarez Guedes, siempre fue un cubanazo que disfrutaba hacernos reír. Que Dios lo acoja en su seno. Lázaro R González Miño y mi esposa Lili Samways.

 

Me dijeron  Viejo por Alberto Pérez.

Durante una conversación controversial, al llegar al punto de la porfía en que no parecía tener nada mejor que decir, un joven con la intención de obtener una posición mejor en el debate hizo el comentario de que “los viejos no se adaptaban a las realidades modernas”

Mi respuesta fue preguntarle la edad, que me dijo que tenía 35 años. 

Le dije que él era más viejo que yo, lo cual como es claro despertó una sonrisa. 

Pero le expliqué que la edad las ideas de mi persuasión sociopolítica  se confirmaron en los años noventa, con la caída del muro de Berlín y el fracaso del socialismo como doctrina a nivel mundial.   

O sea, que soy más joven porque mis ideas son más modernas que las de él, porque el Marxismo-Leninismo que es una doctrina del siglo pasado. Su pensamiento es mucho más geriátrico que el mío.

Cuando una palabra, en este caso “viejo”, posee tan variados conceptos, significa que el criterio 

cambia de formas,ideas o aspecto, algo inasible o de larga historia.

Tanto en un individuo como en un objeto, el tiempo y la edad trae información, y la información es parte esencial del entendimiento.

Podemos ver cada día más con la llegada a la vejez de los miembros del “baby boom”  queactualmente casi todas las firmas industriales que llevaron adelante etapas con tecnologías que hoy han resultado reemplazadas o superadas ponen en manos de “gerontes” (gerentes geriátricos)  la atención de consultas de clientes al respecto.
Realmente no es tan importante la edad sino la integración con el esquema productivo, financiero o comercial, e incluso , en muchos casos el educativo.
Muchos viejos que son activos en su vejez están haciendo cosas que no eran las usuales en sus “años activos”.   Los jóvenes no tienen la exclusividad de los adelantos modernos, muchos viejos manejan los dispositivos modernos tan eficientemente como los jóvenes, todo es la integración de la persona en el esquema, no la edad.

En el caso de este joven, no quise profundizar, no quise hacer lo mismo que él de llevar la discusión a un tema generacional y me limité al tema de la conversación, que era la política.  

Pero pudiera haberle dicho que si los viejos éramos inferiores intelectualmente, como podía explicar el hecho de que un viejo, trabajando,  recibiera ingresos por  el doble de lo que el recibía en su trabajo. 

O estaba equivocado en su percepción de los “viejos” o él era una persona de un intelecto muy bajo.

Alguien dijo “Cuando me dicen que soy demasiado viejo para hacer una cosa, procuro hacerlo enseguida”  Todo depende del individuo, la edad no debe de ser un impedimento o una barrera. 

Y no me vengan con chistes sobre la impotencia en la vejez, porque esta es otra falacia,

En realidad no hay una edad límite y de hecho muchos hombres mantienen su capacidad eréctil hasta la muerte. (Está bien…… es verdad que muchos mueren jóvenes)

Pero también es una verdad que sólo la depresión o trastornos neurológicos o factores producto de enfermedades físicas y medicamentes pueden interrumpir la actividad procreativa del hombre.  

Miren el caso de Charlie Chaplin que tuvo un hijo a los 75 años de edad. 

El hecho de que el hijo se parecía al lechero, es una coincidencia y no tiene nada que ver con el caso. 

El dueño de la vaca, es el dueño del ternero.

Claro que no podemos tener todos los placeres de la juventud, pero  también la vejez es bueno por esto, porque nos sirve de excusa para decir que si no hacemos algo bien o que nos olvidamos de algo, es porque  estamos viejos.

Voy a terminar con otro dicho de la vejez, que dice:

“Nadie se vuelve viejo porque vive muchos años. Nos volvemos viejos si abandonamos nuestros principios. Los años pueden arrugar la piel pero la pérdida de los valores, arrugan el alma”

“En mi opinión” Entonces Alberto, yo soy un niño coño… Lázaro R González Miño.

 

IMAGEN SOBRE SUBSTANCIA  por Alberto Perez.

El socialismo progresa porque sin lugar a dudas es el sistema que se ha especializado en presentar la mentira como si fuera una verdad agradable y buena.Las noticias dicen algo que hay veces que parece lógico porque la imagen parece real, pero cuando vamos a la realidad de la noticia la presentación no tiene substancia.

Todos deben de haber visto los conos de algodón de azúcar en las verbenas y eventos deportivos, son lindos y grandes. Pero si han visto como se hacen, la substancia es una cantidad de azúcar que cabe en la palma de su mano, y que por agitación presenta una imagen mayor, un espejismo virtual. Pero cuando se la come se disuelve en su boca,porque la substancia siempre es lo real.

El Obamacare es algo aberrante, no hay manera de implantarlo sin resquebrajar la economía y sin perjudicar los servicios de salud de las personas.

Por esto en su búsqueda de tiempo para poder implantarlo, y para no levantar olas antes de las elecciones parciales del 2014, Obama dilató la implantación del mandato a las empresas hasta después de las elecciones. 

La imagen es que es consecuente con los negocios, la substancia es que es un movimiento político.

Ahora el CEO de la oficina del presupuesto del congreso, dice que esto le costará a la nación millones de pesos en ingresos.  Cuando se trata de Washington, ingresos (Revenues) es un sofisma que quiere decir impuestos. 

La imagen es que se afectaran los ingresos del gobierno, la substancia es que el dinero quedará en manos de su dueños por el momento.

Pero esas noticias que son como un espejismo, una imagen sin substancia en el desierto en que se encuentra la propiedad privada en esta administración 

 La imagen que quieren presentar lde Obama es que quiere ayudar a la clase media y a los negocios, cuando la substancia del objetivo es que quiere partirles los colchones a ambos. 

El Papa Francisco y los Homosexuales por Alberto Pérez.

Veo mucho “revolú” por lo que dijo el Papa Francisco de que él no era nadie para condenar a los homosexuales.

Algunos lo alaban porque son militantes políticos de izquierdas o son homosexuales, otros lo critican porque dice que se aparta de la línea cristiana sobre los homosexuales

Creo en el cristianismo porque lo creo la única alternativa del ser humano para el perdón de los pecados, pero precisamente por esto, creo que el Papa no se aparta del cristianismo con sus palabras.

Esto lo digo, no como profesante de la denominación Católica Romana, porque no lo soy, creo que en el Catolicismo Romano como en las otras instituciones religiosas, nos “ensalchichan” con “pecados” inventados con interpretaciones arbitrarias de la Biblia, que son realmente regulaciones para mantener a las personas cautivas en la institución.

Pero en este caso el Papa, con sus palabras, no se aparta del hecho de que el homosexualismo es probablemente el pecado más definido en la Biblia, pero lo que dice es que el pecador merece el perdón igual que cualquiera de nosotros. 

El punto es que Dios condena el pecado, pero ama a su creación, que es la persona pecadora y por eso dio su vida para que los pecados pudieran ser perdonados y pudieran reconciliarse con su creador.

Hay como seis lugares en el antiguo testamento y el nuevo testamento donde se condena el homosexualismo por su nombre.

Pero hay algo en uno de esos lugares, en Corintios, que es lo que establece la base para lo que dice el Papa.

1 Corintios 6:9-10: ¿No sabéis que los injustos no heredarán el reino de Dios? No erréis; ni los fornicarios, ni los idólatras, ni los adúlteros, ni los afeminados, ni los que se echan con varones, ni los ladrones, ni los avaros, ni los borrachos, ni los maldicientes, ni los estafadores, heredarán el reino de Dios”. 

Pero después entonces dice,

6:11 Y esto erais algunos; mas ya habéis sido lavados, ya habéis sido santificados, ya habéis sido justificados en el nombre del Señor Jesús, y por el Espíritu de nuestro Dios.

Si analizamos la lista de los que dice Pablo y en la que condena la práctica del homosexualismo, también condena otras cosas con la que quizás como dice Pablo eso éramos y seguimos siendo en parte. 

Esto es lo que quiere decir el Papa es que él es un hombre y como hombre pecador, que ¿Quién es él para condenar a un homosexual cuando él es también culpable de otros agravios?

El papa nos dice que hay que ser consecuente con los homosexuales, lo cual es correcto, porque aunque la homosexualidad no es el plan de Dios para la sexualidad humana, pero un pecado y una aberración, la salvación obrada por Jesús está al alcance de todos.

Eso es lo que dijo el Papa, que si quieren acercarse a Dios y alejarse del pecado, hay que recibirlos.

Decir que el Papa está aceptando la homosexualidad es una interpretación incorrecta, con buena intención o más probable con mala intención.

El problema aquí no es de condenar al homosexual por su preferencia, eso es su problema personal que tiene que resolver con Dios y nosotros no tenemos que meternos en la relación de un individuo con Dios..

El problema surge cuando el homosexual establece una militancia que quiere establecer el homosexualismo como algo que no es un pecado, lo practica abiertamente y se violenta cuando se le recuerda que es un pecado- Esta persona  no sólo no debe de ser un sacerdote pero sin lugar a dudas no puede ni siquiera considerarse un cristiano..  Porque la práctica del pecado sin arrepentimiento no tiene perdón ni aceptación en el cristianismo.

Pero van más lejos, quieren imponer su estilo de pecado en los demás y nos combaten porque no queremos que lo hagan. 

Son los homosexuales militantes, son los que practican sin arrepentimiento y como un estilo de vida el homosexualismo, son los que quieren expandir su pecado a toda la humanidad, los que dice Pablo que no heredará el Reino de Dios. 
No son a estos a los que se refiere el Papa

Dice esto pero esto no es esto… es lo otro

Ahí está el detalle, por Alberto Pérez.

¿Para qué vamos a negar la realidad?

El engaño del socialismo es “sostenible”, es decir que el socialismo es capaz, como por obra de algún extraño conjuro, de engañar a la gente,

Es la madre de todos los engaños, el engaño que sobrevive pese al cúmulo de evidencias de que el resultado de esta ideología donde quiera que se implanta trae la igualdad de la miseria.

El socialismo no sólo se sostiene pero avanza. Diecisiete años después de la caída del Muro de Berlín, es impresionante e indiscutible el éxito logrado por los socialistas en América Latina, confundiendo y engañando a la gente.

Los Estados Unidos han tenido por casi seis años un presidente con ideas socialistas y Hillary Clinton que tiene ideas socialistas más definidas que su esposo Bill, aspira a continuar la marcha del socialismo.

La primera de las ideas que los socialistas nos venden es que la libre competencia y el libre mercado favorecen a los empresarios en perjuicio de los pobres; la otra es que los gobernantes y burócratas siempre saben lo que más conviene a todos los ciudadanos.

Esto es lo que nos dice Obama en sus discursos. El problema es que el discurso socialista de Obama viene disfrazado, usa palabras claves que significan lo contrario a lo que quiere decir y confunde a los que se quieran dejar confundir.

Los discursos de Obama se pueden describir con una palabra que la real academia de la lengua española  ha aceptado en el idioma castellano -“Cantinflesco”- que es el hablar intencionalmente de una manera ambigua para confundir al oyente. Esto es algo que Mario Moreno, Cantinflas, usaba en sus películas como un arte de hablar sin que se entendiera lo que estaba diciendo para confundir a los interlocutores.

Cuando Obama dice que “el libre mercado es uno de los factores más importante del progreso en la historia de la humanidad, es el motor de crecimiento y por lo tanto, los que asumen riesgos y los innovadores, deben ser recompensados

Se nos cae la baba, esto es lo que decimos nosotros, esto es lo que pensamos,

¿Estará cambiando Obama? 

Pero después sigue en su discurso, “pero también, en su mejor momento, el libre mercado nunca ha sido una licencia para obtener cualquier cosa que uno quiera. Estados Unidos sólo prospera si el espíritu emprendedor y el individualismo se encuentran con las obligaciones que se deben los unos a los otros y a las generaciones venideras”.

Queda al descubierto después de despejada la cortina de humo de la primera frase que el libre mercado y el individualismo no son del gusto del Presidente Obama.

Cuando él considera que el individuo tiene obligaciones hacia terceros está negando la individualidad, cuando dice que el libre mercado es uno de los factores importantes del progreso, pero no es una licencia para obtener lo que se quiere, está negando el progreso. 

Podemos observar el engaño cuando describe hipócritamente al libre mercado como padre del progreso, para luego encontrar un lado negativo del mismo, describiéndolo como un posible camino “para conseguir lo que se quiera”.

Cuando escuchamos las palabras de Barack Hussein. Obama, hay que tener en cuenta que cada frase, párrafo e incluso el lenguaje corporal a la hora de dar un discurso, están estudiados en los detalles más mínimos dirigidas por un grupo de expertos. (¿Quiénes serán estos “expertos”?)

Basta con leer los periodicos  y oir los otros medios de información cada día, para entender que este presidente, quién nunca ejerció la actividad privada, tiene pasión por las regulaciones y los impuestos altos.

Él considera que los empresarios destruyen la economía, y por lo tanto, deben transferir sus ganancias al Estado, para que los burócratas jueguen a ser CEOs  Esto es lo que quiere decir con las “obligaciones del libre mercado” este es el primer escalón del socialismo, la destrucción de la propiedad individual.

Por supuesto, la demagogia de un político socialista no está completa con tan sólo culpar a los empresarios por los malos resultados de su administración, sino que además, debe apelar al miedo de quienes dependen de dádivas estatales-. Por eso, Obama advierte que no va a permitir que los ricos no paguen los impuestos que él considera necesarios para  pagar por el Obamacare y otros programas que mantienen cautivos a un grupo de ciudadanos.

Todos vamos a tener el mismo seguro de salud, lo que pasa es que el seguro de salud será para la mala salud de los pacientes. –Se completará la distribución justa de la riqueza, pero si destruye a los que crean la riqueza, entonces ¿qué queda para distribuir?  ¿Déjà Vu Fidel?

Un gobernante que aumenta impuestos evita que el dinero quede en manos de sus dueños, de aquellos que supieron leer las señales del mercado y se arriesgaron para crear más bienes, facilitar la vida de las personas y crear empleos

Para el socialista, el individuo no existe sino que forma parte de una masa amorfa y no-pensante a quien el gobierno tiene la misión cuasi-divina de controlar y limitar la vida de los ciudadanos….¿subditos?.

El socialismo es la nueva monarquía medieval, con la corte y su nobleza y sus plebeyos.

La plebe tiene que depender de la bondad del monarca y trabajar para él.

No es la economía lo es realmente lo más importante, ni las amenazas internacionales, aunque ambas cosas sean importantes.

La mayor amenaza se encuentra en la Casa Blanca. Nos quieren hacer olvidar que los Estados unidos no son sólo un país es un  sistema socioeconómico que ha creado la nación más próspera y con la sociedad más libre del mundo. Un sistema que hay que destruir para poder implantar el socialismo.

 

 

RICARDO SAMITIER: Todos Sabemos Que La Policía Tiene “Cuotas” De Poner Multas…

Muchas veces SALEN en PANDILLA a poner multas Para cumplir las cuotas… Ese día… 4 o 5 policías Recaudan $25,000.00 con multas mínimas de $125.00 Pero que pueden elevarlas sumándoles otras como Conducir sin el cinturón… etc.  

 

Cuotas de las multas son una de esas cosas que todo el mundo sabe existe, pero nadie se supone que hablar. ¿Has hablado con la mayoría de los policías acerca de ellos, y ellos te niegas es que existen. Te dirán que todo es un mito.

 

La dependencia de las cuotas de multas aseguran una cierta cantidad de ingresos para el departamento, la ciudad y / o condado…

 

Hay ciudades como la policía de Nueva York que tienen cuotas mucho más duras

con las promociones y bonificaciones para los policías más agresivos que cumplen

o superan constantemente las cuotas establecidas. Uno de los problemas obvios

que tiene un sistema de cuotas es lo fácil que es, incluso lo necesario que es, para

abusar de ella. Muchas veces, las altas cuotas son completamente irreales e

inalcanzables a menos que el policía sea creativo con lo que se entiende como “criminal” o el comportamiento “delito menor”. Bajan su camino hacia abajo hasta que arrestan gente por nada.  

Pero al menos ese tipo de  policía recibirá el reconocimiento de su jefe y tal vez incluso una cena para dos tarjetas de regalo a su restaurante favorito.

Todavía Hay Quienes No Saben Porque Castro Se Ha Mantenido En El Poder…54 años…

En 1912 Cogieron el Poder En USA Los comunistas… (logrando que sus agentes

Dividieran el partido republicano) Llegando

Wilson a la presidencia…

Consolidaron El Control Con Roosevelt

En 1933…

La Primera Traición de Roosevelt (El nieto del traficante

Mas grande de Opio de China) al Mundo Capitalista…

Fue el DERRIBÓ del Presidente Machado en Cuba… solo

4 meses después de electo… Entonces financió el golpe del

4 de Septiembre entregándole A Batista UN MILLÓN DE DÓLARES

para que pagará el ejército que hacía 2 meses que no cobraba…

Ese PAGÓ que fue lo que CONSOLIDÓ  AL DESCONOCIDO BATISTA

y a partir de ese Momento Cuba fue un país SOCIALISTA

 

Reconozcámoslo o NO… la constitución del 1940 no fue

100% Socialista gracias a FERRARA y a los delegados del

partido LIBERAL…

 

En el acuerdo de Yalta; Roosevelt le entregó el “Este Europeo”

A cambio de la creación la aceptación de un Gobierno Mundial…

En la ONU con un ejército para mantener la “PAZ”

 

Cuando Stalin “TRAICIONA EL ACUERDO” y se crea lo que

Churchill llamó la “Cortina de Hierro” y comienza la “Guerra Fría”

Los comunistas norte americanos nos hicieron creer que

Era un guerra entre COMUNISMO y CAPITALISMO… cuando en

Realidad fue entre DOS BANDOS COMUNISTAS  el bando RUSO y el

Bando AMERICANO… 

 

Antes había habido otra LUCHA entre los comunistas por el poder

La de  STALIN contra TROSKY…

 

Fidel Castro y Cuba fueron una pieza de los COMUNISTAS AMERICANOS

en la guerra para Vencer a la URSS… ya en 1953… la CIA trabajo para

entregarle Guatemala a la URSS en América… FRACASARON… y tuvieron

que esperar… entonces Castro SE CONVIRTIÓ EN LA FICHA… Y la CIA lo

Aprovechó

1.     Fue la mejor ayuda para quebrar a la URSS…

2.     Además le dieron permiso para llevar a cabo la sud versión en toda la

América y después a África…

3.     La prueba es que cada vez que Castro está en problemas lo han ayudado…

 

Solo hay que ver que la mayoría de los países de las Américas, incluyendo

A USA… hoy son gobernados por los socialistas revolucionarios de la década

de los 60…  Acaso CLINTON, Kerry hoy ministro de estado… Obama Y SUS AMIGOS

NO ERAN REVOLUCIONARIOS… como lo son los actuales presidentes de varios países

Latino americanos…

 

En la celebración del 26 de Julio en Cuba… Los gobernantes de Latino

América dijeron lo siguiente:

Tras la intervención de Raúl, cada uno de los presidentes de la Alianza Bolivariana para

las Américas subieron al podio para ofrecer un discurso. “Cuba nos ha enseñado el valor

de la vergüenza y la dignidad de ser nosotros”, fueron algunas de las palabras de José

Mujica. “Siento que la Revolución cubana es la madre de las revoluciones antiimperialistas

en América Latina y en el mundo”, afirmó el boliviano Evo Morales. “Qué dignidad le

entregaron ustedes a los pueblos de América Latina, ustedes son los que hicieron posible

el ALBA, la CELAC, de que haya esperanza en nuestros pueblos”, ha dicho Nicolás Maduro.

“El (asalto al cuartel) Moncada allanó el camino a la libertad”, sostuvo el antiguano Baldwin

Spencer. Y así sucesivamente, cada uno halagó la firmeza con que los hermanos Castro se

han mantenido durante 54 años, sin interrupciones, y agradeció la ayuda que, desde entonces,

ha prestado Cuba a los países de América Latina y el Caribe, en forma de asistencia médica

y educativa… (Omitieron decir en entrenamiento, logística, dinero y armamentos)

Dime Con Quién Andas Y Te Diré Quién Eres…

El Papa FRANCISCO… Aparentemente Negándose A Seguir La Doctrina De La Iglesia Católica De 2,013 Años… Al Decir:

¿Quién Soy Yo Para Juzgar A Los Homosexuales?

¡Se RINDIÓ!

La persecución de los homosexuales en la Historia del mundo… nunca se realizó por Ser homosexuales… fueron condenados y Perseguidos… por sus actos… 

Siempre han sido “PEDÓFILOS” nunca un niño Convenció a un adulto a ealizar sexo aberrante… 

Siempre Ha Sido Al Revés… y eso ha sido el motivo De su RECHAZO y  PERSECUCIÓN…

Los defensores de los homosexuales lo son hasta El momento que le VIOLAN A UNO DE SUS HIJOS…

Políticamente; Siempre fueron inexplicablemente la mayoría de los espías y traidores…  

Las DOS ANTERIORES RAZONES… SON IRREFUTABLES

Ni La Oficialidad Del Ejército Se Atreve A Condenar A Los Espías… ¡Que Vergüenza!!!

El militar Homosexual…Bradley Manning que declaró Que decidió pasar los DOCUMENTOS SECRETOS a WIKI-LEAKS… Porque le pusieron un compañero de Cuarto que no quería “FORNICAR” con el…  Su “TRAICIÓN” No fue por dinero… Lo hizo por falta De “SEXO ANAL” una aberración… pero eso se prohibió Decirlo en el juicio…y la Prensa Socialista y Pro Homosexual NO LO MENCIONA… para que no se sepa que la mayoría De los espías en la historia del mundo han sido homosexuales Razón por la cual hasta los años 60 no se les permitía a los Homosexuales trabajar en lugares donde se maneja secretos De estado… Ayer los “Oficiales Graduados De West Point”  les tembló La mano y lo absolvieron de la acusación de “Ayudar Al Enemigo De EE.UU.” Por dar secretos clasificados a la Publicidad… PUES ALEGARON… QUE NO LOS DIO A UN PAÍS EN PARTICULAR…   No Entiendo Como Ayudar A Desprestigiar a USA… No Es Simultáneamente Una Ayuda A Todos Los Enemigos…

La Verdad Que No Se COMENTA…

Todos Los Dueños De Viviendas… Perdieron El 50% De Su Valor… En El 2008… La “Recuperación De Omaba” No Llega… Ayer todos los MEDIOS NOTICIOSOS dijeron que Hubo una recuperación económica de un 12% De los precios de las viviendas… Pero Que Aun las Perdidas Son Del 41% Lo cual es una “SOBERANA MENTIRA” pues no Toma en consideración la devaluación del Dólar… La cual NO SE ANUNCIA… NADIE COMENTA Pero todos lo comprobamos cuando vamos a hacer Las compras de VIVIERES… cada día todo cuesta mas…  

Los Ciudadanos “CARNEROS” Lo Aceptan “TODO EN SILENCIO”

SIGILOSAMENTE… La conspiración de los homosexuales dio órdenes a sus agentes y lo han estado haciendo en los últimos 30 años poner en todas las“APLICACIONES” la palabra:

“Género” En Vez De “Sexo”

Explicación por la Dra. Judy Meissner *

Para Irnos Lavando El Cerebro

He Aquí La Diferencia Entre SEXO y GÉNERO 

¿Por qué los partidarios de la ideología que empujan la normalización de la homosexualidad  comportamiento sexual moralmente desviada y aberrante sexual ismo, insiste en usar la palabra ambigua “GÉNERO” en lugar de la más precisa,palabra científica sexo?

¿Qué Hay Detrás De Esta Manipulación Del Lenguaje? 

He aquí por qué. El sexo es la expresión objetiva, científica que se refiere a la categoría biológica de hombre y mujer. Por el contrario, el GÉNERO es el eufemismo ideológico utilizado para referirse a la “creencia” de un individuo de su sentimiento o percepción del sexo al que desean pertenecer.

El sexo se basa en las características fisiológicas y genéticas biológicamente demostrables a SIMPLE VISTA. Mientras que género se basa en la opinión de un individuo personal, percepción, creencias y actitudes. Los partidarios de la ideología Aberro SEXUALISTA EQUIPARAN cada vez que pueden el término género porque es artificial para legitimar la elección personal de un individuo. Sin embargo, según el Diccionario Inglés de Oxford, el GÉNERO se define como un ” SIMULACIÓN” destinada a que una persona pueda escoger en oposición al verdadero SEXO biológico en el momento de su nacimiento. 

CIENCIA vs SIMULACIÓN 

En su más reciente FOLLETO titulado “Guía A Usar De Medios De Referencia” que no es otra cosa que un  “Manual De RECOMENDACIONES De cómo Tienen Que Actuar” la Alianza Gay y Lésbica Contra la Difamación (GLAAD) insiste en que la palabra “SEXO” es “La Clasificación De Las Personas Como Hombre O Mujer” en el nacimiento, basado en las características  corporales como cromosomas, hormonas, órganos reproductores internos y los genitales. Mientras que la palabra“GÉNERO” respeta el sentimiento personal de ser un hombre o una mujer (o un niño o una niña).”

 

Para justificar sus prejuicios ideológicos, prejuicios y supersticiones, feministas e ideólogos aberro-sexuales desvergonzadamente afirman que “GÉNERO” es totalmente indeterminada por y no tiene absolutamente nada que ver con el sexo de nacimiento. Véase, por ejemplo, La dialéctica del sexo: Todos los libros que proclaman la revolución feminista, que son todos un texto aberro-sexuales / feminista muy importantes e influyentes insisten en el uso de genero…

 

La distinción sexo / género recibió la aprobación aberro sexualista y feministas, ya que les permite imponer su creencia de que la identidad sexual no depende de, las características biológicas científicamente demostrables, genéticamente demostrables y características, pero en su deseo personal de ser lo que el sexo se quiere ser o se siente que uno es. 

La distinción permite convenientemente aberro sexualistas y feministas a aceptar las diferencias sexuales naturales, mientras que ilógicamente atacar las llamadas“desigualdades de Sexo.” 

La Disyuntiva Que Ellos Presentan A La Sociedad Es Anti-Natural Proponen

Desechar La “Realidad Biológica” Por Elección Del Comportamiento…

Lo cual resulta ilógico, pero muy especialmente cuando entran a UN HOSPITAL… Donde necesariamente van a ser TRATADOS de acuerdo a su SEXO BIOLÓGICO… aunque su SIMULADO COMPORTAMIENTO sea otro…

 

El psicólogo evolucionista Michael E. Mills es uno de los muchos científicos que han condenado abiertamente el uso de la palabra “género” que es una SIMULACIÓN en lugar de sexo. Mills sugirió en 2011 que la distinción sexo / género es inadecuada, errónea y contraproducente, ya que sugiere que el comportamiento de un individuo puede ser dividido en, por un lado, los factores objetivos, biológicos, y, por otro, las opciones de comportamiento y subjetivos dictámenes psicológicos.

EN POCAS PALABRAS 

Cada vez que encuentres en UNA APLICACIÓN la palabra “Genero” debes de saber que ha sido puesta en ese lugar… siguiendo las “Sigilosas Instrucciones”por elementos radicales pro homosexuales…   

“Género” es el politización, de la SIMULACIÓN deseando hacer lucir científica, la elección de los aberro / feministas ideólogos, “SEXO” es la palabra objetivo, científica que determina las personas normales, de habla normal. 

* Judy Meissner, Ph.D., MPH, es profesora de la psicología, experto en salud pública de bienestar y social y defensor de derechos humanos. Es directora del Centro Internacional para el Estudio de la Aberro-sexuales (ICSA), unaorganización de profesionales de salud mental dedicados a la investigación de conductas y prácticas sexuales biológicamente aberrante o aberro-sexualistas y otros Fenómenos psico-sexuales. Puede ponerse en contacto con ella en judymeissner@aol.com

España sigue siendo víctima del cáncer que son los comunistas Escrito por Roberto Cazorla

Se negaron a que el Ayuntamiento de Madrid dedicara una calle a Margaret Thatcher. Están rabiando porque la derecha tiene mayoría. Nunca un comunista ha protestado por los monumentos a comunistas tiñosos como el Che, La Pasionaria, Pablo Neruda, etc. Les fastidia que la señora aplastara al Partido Laborista (comunistas), e impusiera su política de derecha. Con ella Inglaterra recuperó su puesto de potencia mundial. Fue adorada por su pueblo, exceptuando los comunistas.

 

Si algún día (no creo en la Justicia Divina) en Cuba se derrumbara el muro de palmas, como el muro de Berlín, los comunistas supervivientes harán lo mismo que están haciendo los españoles desde que perdieron la guerra en 1939. El comunismo, allí donde se imponga, es peor que un cáncer con metástasis. Sus ramificaciones son imposibles de erradicar. Ellos, los comunistas cubanos, que desde 1959, presumen de amantes de la paz y de los derechos humanos, sacarán al terrorista que llevan en cada uno de sus glóbulos, y en cada esquina estallará una bomba, como hacían cuando gobernaba Batistas. Ya Cuba se había adelantado al terrorismo mundial, pues contaba con su “líder”, el genocida en potencia que resultó Fidel Castro.

 

El estercolero que es España, es obra de los socialistas-comunistas que irrumpieron con el desgobierno de Felipe González (batió récords en cuanto a corrupción y crímenes de Estado en el continente) y resurgió con el cretino José Luís Rodríguez Zapatero, que nos torturó durante 7 años y medio.

 

En España jamás volveremos a vivir la Paz con mayúscula. ¿Culpables? ¡Los comunistas! Cuando escribo este artículo (uno de los seres más despreciables y cínicos de la política española, Alfredo Rubalcaba, que con Felipe González y Zapatero, participó en sus desgobiernos, ocupando diferentes ministerios e incluso, la  vicepresidencia con Bambi (Zapatero), se ha atrevido a pedir una moción de censura para el presidente Mariano Rajoy, de derecha. (Rajoy ha traicionado a la mayoría que obtuvo en las elecciones, es un sinvergüenza, arrastrado y un “bájame los pantalones”. No es santo de mi devoción tras haber sacado las pezuñas de mono mezcla de ratón y cucaracha). Pero está haciendo lo mismo que hicieron los corruptos de González y Zapatero. El menos indicado para censurarlo, se llama Rubalcaba. Tampoco ninguno de los cómplices de ambos desgobiernos socialistas-comunistas.

 

Precisamente los comunistas españoles están ardiendo, echan fuego como dragones que son. La razón que los ha sublevado ha sido que el Ayuntamiento de Madrid, en manos de la alcaldesa Ana Botella (esposa del único político con vergüenza, José María Aznar), apoyada por todos los que la rodean, aprobó dedicarle una calle a la ex primera ministra británica Margaret Thatcher. Una chancleta de la señora, vale más que el batallón de comunistas que están ladrando y condenando la decisión del Ayuntamiento. La señora Thatcher, desde que obtuvo el poder, arrasó con los laboristas que eran los socialistas-comunistas como los de España. Levantó el país. Le dio preferencia a la empresa privada. Gracias a ella, El Reino Unido recuperó el puesto de potencia mundial que había perdido. Merece miles de calles, de monumentos y millones de plazas en el mundo democrático. Margaret Thatcher fue admirada por sus compatriotas, exceptuando los comunistas que eran y son otro cáncer en el partido que llaman Laborista. El mismo perro con diferente collar. Rastreros y enemigos de la paz.

 

Los socialistas-comunistas jamás han criticado que en España se le hayan levantado estatuas a comunistas traidores como La Pasionaria, Pablo Neruda, Che Guevara, Largo Caballero (el Lenin español), y un largo etc. Basta que se le rinda homenaje a alguien de derecha, como la señora Thatcher, para que arda Roma.

 

“No entiendo que haya propuesto dedicar en Madrid una calle a Margarte Thatcher el mismo grupo político que reclama, incesantemente y anacrónicamente, la devolución del Peñón de Gibraltar. Esa señora ni conocía a los madrileños ni le importaban los españoles (si es que no nos despreciaba directamente)”, dicen los comunistas españoles. Pero combatió el comunismo y la miseria que impone, lo que ustedes, malévolos, no le perdonan ni a la señora que los parió.

 

Confunden el trasero con las témporas. Ellos, que no cesan de exigirle al Reino Unido la devolución del Peñón de Gibraltar. Donde sus habitantes se sienten ingleses, viven a la inglesa, tanto cultural como económicamente, por lo que España tiene que aprender mucho de ellos. 

 

“¿Verdad creen que merece una sola calle, ni cualquier otro homenaje, en España? ¿No estamos los madrileños y los españoles en general ya bastante humillados?”, continúan los comunistas con su asquerosa verborrea que huele a fosa desbordada de sus propias heces ¿Dónde hay un documento que testifique que la señora Thatcher firmó alguna sentencia de muerte como el Ché que firmó centenares y, sin embargo, aplauden el monumento que tiene en Madrid?

 

A la bien llamada Dama de Hierro (para hacerle frente a los tiñosos comunistas, hay que ser de hierro o acero), le acusan de haberle declarado la guerra a Argentina en las Islas  Malvinas. ¿Por qué no les pregunta a los habitantes de dichas islas, si quieren ser argentino? Argentina, uno de los países más corruptos e inseguros del mundo, que tiene una presidenta que ni quemándola como a Juan de Arco (¡Pobre Juana, si era todo un poema a la locura!), le pagaría al pueblo. Un blúmers usado de la señora Thatcher, vale más que la corrompida Cristina Kirchner.

 

“Como madrileño de pro, que paga sus impuestos, sus multas y participa de todas las obligaciones y derechos que supone ser habitante de la capital de España, quisiera manifestar mi repulsa ante esta medida. ¿Qué ha hecho Margaret Thatcher por Madrid? (¿Qué hizo el Che por Madrid, imbécil?). ¿Ha vivido aquí? ¿Es de aquí? ¿Tiene algún vínculo con la ciudad?”, gritó otro comunista de los que están empecinados en cargarse España y su historia.

 

El pasado abril, el Partido Popular impuso su mayoría para ponerle a una calle el nombre de la dirigente inglesa. Los comunistas se opusieron, pero como los Populares no los necesitan, Thatcher tendrá su calle.

Por si fuera poco la actitud de los comunistas españoles, también los del Reino Unido (tanto monta, monta tanto) han censurado la decisión del Ayuntamiento de Madrid.

 

Lady Thatcher, ¡Ojalá que el mundo contara con centenares como usted!

 

 

WND EXCLUSIVE

Devious election plot bypasses Constitution

Strategy takes 36 states out of voting decision Published: 3 hours ago Aaron Klein About

Aaron Klein is WND’s senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.    

The National Popular Vote effort, which could see only 14 states – those with the largest populations – decide the presidency for voters in all 50 states, is fully partnered with a George Soros-funded election group.

The group, the Center for Voting and Democracy, received original seed money in 1997 from the Joyce Foundation, a non-profit that boasted President Obama served on its board at the time of the grant. Obama was a board member from July 1994 until December 2002.      

The National Popular Vote, or NPV, is run by individuals with a history of support for the Democratic Party, WND found.

Last week, the Washington Post reported NPV is “now halfway to its goal of electing future presidents via the popular vote, after Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee (D) made his state the latest to sign on.”

The Post story described NPV as a campaign seeking to “get states that comprise a majority of the 538 votes in the Electoral College –270, to be precise – to agree to award their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote.”

The states will not be required to award their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner until NPV has signed up enough states to garner 270 electoral votes.

The Founding Fathers firmly rejected a purely popular vote to elect the president because they wanted to balance the power of the larger states against the smaller.

The Electoral College was fashioned as a compromise between an election of the president by direct popular vote and election by Congress.

Now the NPV effort could change the way Americans vote without amending the U.S. Constitution. The plan simply requires that enough states sign up by voting in their own legislatures and then having their governors approve.

It takes two-thirds of both the House and Senate to pass a constitutional amendment to repeal the Electoral College.

To bypass the constitutional amendment process, NPV minimizes the number of states that would need to agree. Instead, once enough states agree to allot their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner, the Electoral College becomes irrelevant.

With the addition of Rhode Island to the NPV effort, the pact now has nine states plus the District of Columbia for a total of 136 of the 270 electoral votes needed. The other states signed up are Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington, Vermont and California.

NPV is partnered with FairVote, a project of the Soros-funded Center for Voting and Democracy.

FairVote’s website expounds on its relationship with NVP:

FairVote advocates for a national popular vote for president, and has nurtured and supported the National Popular Vote plan to ensure that every vote for president is equally valued no matter where it is cast.

FairVote’s executive director Rob Richie co-authored Every Vote Equal, a book explaining how the National Popular Vote plan would work and why the United States desperately needs it, and Fairvote regularly works with advocacy leaders at the National Popular Vote organization to assist in getting to important legislation passed.

Richie, executive director of FairVote since he co-founded it in 1992, is also a member of the civil society committee of the Soros-led Bretton Woods Committee, which openly seeks to remake the world economy.

Richie’s book “Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote” was co-authored with the NPV’s founder, John R. Koza.

In a Dec. 15, 2008, Wall Street Journal opinion piece, Jonathan Soros, son of George Soros, wrote that it was time to junk the Electoral College.

Soros’s Open Society Institute funds the Center for Voting and Democracy, where FairVote is based.

The center’s website notes the group was kick-started in 1997 with two grants – one from the Open Society and another from the Joyce Foundation.

With Obama on its board, the Joyce Foundation also funded the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; the AFL-CIO Working for America Institute; the National Council of La Raza and Physicians for Social Responsibility, among numerous other radical groups.

Meanwhile, the NPV leadership is comprised of Democratic Party supporters.

The organization’s chairman and major funder is John R. Koza. He was the co-founder, chairman and CEO of Scientific Games Inc., where he co-invented the rub-off instant lottery ticket used by state lotteries.

Koza, who has reportedly pledged $12 million to NPV, previously gave tens of thousands of dollars to various Democratic Party committees and liberal candidates and was an Al Gore elector in 2000, the Weekly Standard reported.

Another pledged NPV leader is Tom Golisano, founder and chairman of Paychex, the nation’s second largest payroll and human resource company. He co-founded the Independence Party of New York in 1994 and ran as the party’s gubernatorial candidate.

Golisano is a registered Republican, even though he supported John Kerry and gave $1 million to the Democratic National Convention in 2008.

NPV’s secretary, Chris Pearson, served in the Vermont House of Representatives in 2006. In 2005, he was director of the Presidential Election Reform program at the Soros-funded FairVote.

With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/devious-election-plot-bypasses-constitution/#miTcdAZTtoqe6teS.99

Why is Joshua Chellew less important than Trayvon Martin? ENVIADO POR Enrique Enriquez.

WARNING: THIS POST IS RACIST

Who’s Joshua Chellew? The fact that you don’t know his name is the whole point. But that’s not your fault.

Marietta Daily Journal, 7/3/13:

Four south Cobb teenagers are in custody in connection with the beating death of a 36-year-old Mableton man on Mableton Parkway early Sunday morning…

They have been accused in the beating death of Joshua Heath Chellew, 36…

According to the warrant, the four teenagers are accused of starting a fight with Chellew at a Chevron gas station in the 6200 block of Mableton Parkway near Community Drive at about 1:20 a.m. Sunday. They repeatedly punched and kicked him, according to police.

While attempting to escape, Chellew backed into the center five-lane highway and was pushed to the ground and knocked unconscious, the warrant states.

They then walked away from Chellew, “leaving him helpless,” and he was eventually hit by a car, the warrant states.

A horrible, senseless murder. Why hasn’t it received wider attention?

This might be why. Joshua Chellew:

The men who murdered him:

If Obama had four more sons…

Courtesy of Top Conservative News, which notes:

If the races had been reversed, this would be the biggest news story in the United States . It would have knocked the Zimmerman trial out of the news.

Yep. Or, if Chellew had been able to defend himself against one or all of them, he’d be the new George Zimmerman. We’d be seeing baby pictures of his attackers. Al Sharpton would be marching. Jay Carney would be filibustering away all questions about Obama’s latest race-baiting. MSNBC would be on full alert.

But Chellew wasn’t able to defend himself. He probably deserved it, right? I mean, just look at him. You can’t get any whiter than that.

Just another creepy-ass cracker.

 

 Four times in 69 years!! Enviado por Olga Griñan.

SHAME ON AMERICA FOR ELECTING A NON-VETERAN PRESIDENT WHO DOES NOT DESERVE TO BE THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF:

HE IS ABSOLUTELY A DISGRACE TO ALL WHO FOUGHT FOR THIS NATION AND GAVE THEIR LIVES.

VETERANS – PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO YOUR VETERAN FRIENDS AND CONTACTS!!!!!!

June 6, 2013, the 69th anniversary of “D-Day”, the largest invasion ever attempted, where 200,000 Americans stormed the beaches at Normandy to begin the final push to defeat Nazi Germany in WWII. D-Day marked the turning point in WWII in Europe, where the Nazis were engaged in mass murder of Jews and minorities by the thousands.
Today, European heads of state make it a point to recall and honor the sacrifices of those who landed in Normandy , as do our Presidents….
well, most of them….
In the 69 years since D-Day, there are four occasions when the President of the United States chose not to visit the D-Day Monument that honors the soldiers killed during the Invasion.
The occasions were:
1. Barack Obama, 2010
2. Barack Obama, 2011
3. Barack Obama, 2012
4. Barack Obama, 2013

For the past 69 years, every American Presidentexcept Obama have taken the time to honor the memory and sacrifices of the 6,000 American soldiers killed on D-Day. …
Except Obama!
June 6 2010, Obama had no events scheduled.
June 6, 2011, Obama met with the National Security team and was interviewed by WEWS Cleveland and WDIV in Detroit about the auto industry – FAR too busy to visit the D-Day memorial.
June 6, 2012, instead of honoring our fallen soldiers, Obama made a campaign trip to California on Air Force 1 (at our expense) to raise funds for (his) upcoming election.
June 6, 2013, Obama was doing ANOTHER fund raiser with the multimillionaires in the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in Palo Alto CA, once again at our expense.
America – Aren’t you proud?

 

 

The Architect of Destruction
By Maureen Scott ENVIADO POR Enrique Enriquez.
Barack Obama appears to be a tormented man filled with resentment, anger, and disdain for anyone of an opinion or view other than his. He acts in the most hateful, spiteful, malevolent, vindictive ways in order to manipulate and maintain power and control over others. Perhaps, because, as a child, he grew up harboring an abiding bitterness toward the U.S. that was instilled in him by his family and mentors…it seems to have never left him.

It is not the color of his skin that is a problem in America .
Rather it is the blackness that fills his soul and the hollowness in his heart where there should be abiding pride and love for this country.
Think: Have we ever heard Obama speak lovingly of the U.S. or its people, with deep appreciation and genuine respect for our history, our customs, our sufferings and our blessings? Has he ever revealed that, like most patriotic Americans, he gets “goose bumps” when a band plays “The Star Spangled Banner,” or sheds a tear when he hears a beautiful rendition of ” America the Beautiful?” Does his heart burst with pride when millions of American flags wave on a National holiday – or someone plays “taps” on a trumpet? Has he ever shared the admiration of the military, as we as lovers of those who keep us free, feel when soldiers march by? It is doubtful because Obama did not grow up sharing our experiences or our values. He did not sit at the knee of a Grandfather or Uncle who showed us his medals and told us about the bravery of his fellow troops as they tramped through foreign lands to keep us free. He didn’t have grandparents who told stories of suffering and then coming to America, penniless, and the opportunities they had for building a business and life for their children.
Away from this country as a young child, Obama didn’t delight in being part of America and its greatness. He wasn’t singing our patriotic songs in kindergarten, or standing on the roadside for a holiday parade and eating a hot dog, or lighting sparklers around a campfire on July 4th as fireworks exploded over head, or placing flags on the grave sites of fallen and beloved American heroes.
Rather he was separated from all of these experiences and doesn’t really understand us and what it means to be an American. He is void of the basic emotions that most feel regarding this country and insensitive to the instinctive pride we have in our national heritage. His opinions were formed by those who either envied us or wanted him to devalue the United States and the traditions and patriotism that unites us. 
He has never given a speech that is filled with calm, reassuring, complimentary, heartfelt statements about all the people in the U.S. Or one that inspires us to be better and grateful and proud that in a short time our country became a leader, and a protector of many. Quite the contrary, his speeches always degenerate into mocking, ridiculing tirades as he faults our achievements as well as any critics or opposition for the sake of a laugh, or to bolster his ego. He uses his Office to threaten and create fear while demeaning and degrading any American who opposes his policies and actions. A secure leader, who has noble self-esteem and not false confidence, refrains from showing such dread of critics and displaying a cocky, haughty attitude.
Mostly, his time seems to be spent causing dissension, unrest, and anxiety among the people of America, rather than uniting us (even though he was presented to us as the “Great Uniter”). He creates chaos for the sake of keeping people separated, envious, aggrieved and ready to argue. Under his leadership Americans have been kept on edge, rather than in a state of comfort and security. He incites people to be aggressive toward, and disrespectful of, those of differing opinions. And through such behavior, Obama has lowered the standards for self-control and mature restraint to the level of street-fighting gangs, when he should be raising the bar for people to strive toward becoming more considerate, tolerant, self-disciplined, self-sustaining, and self-assured.
Not a day goes by that he is not attempting to defy our laws, remove our rights, over-ride established procedures, install controversial appointees, enact divisive mandates, and assert a dictatorial form of power.
· Never has there been a leader of this great land who used such tactics to harm and hurt the people and this country.
· Never have we had a President who spoke with a caustic, evil tongue against the citizenry rather than present himself as a soothing, calming and trustworthy force.
· Never, in this country, have we experienced how much stress one man can cause a nation of people – on a daily basis!
Obama has promoted the degeneration of peace, civility, and quality of cooperation between us. He thrives on tearing us down, rather than building us up. He is the Architect of the decline of America , and the epitome of a Demagogue.
© Maureen Scott

Obama Executive Order Utilizes the CDC to Attempt Gun Confiscation

29 July 2013 / 313 Comments This past January – thanks to the ever-present Executive Order – Obama made a move that continued what Bill Clinton started. You’ve probably noticed it occurring in society without even really understanding why it’s happening.

It’s an interesting situation:

“On January 26th, Obama issued Exec Order #14, a ‘Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to research the causes and prevention of gun violence‘.” (emphasis added)

Though this specific EO is new, the truth is that since the 1980s the CDC has been trying to use “scientific” studies to show that guns were a risk to public health. Sadly, our tax dollars are spent on these types of “studies” based on leftist agendas. Obama is simply keeping things going.

The question of course, is why did Obama do that? Well, aside from the fact that his bosses in the global elite told him to do it, he did it for one very important reason. In essence, he wants to do to guns what the medical profession has done with cigarettes. He wants guns to be seen as so repulsive (backed by official “studies” from the CDC) that through direct peer pressure, people will come to see guns as being truly dirty and despicable. Having a gun then would make that individual who owns it appear the same way.

Nicholas Johnson (in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine) wrote, “Anything that unnecessarily contributes to human disease, injury, or death is a proper concern of public health, including firearm deaths…Public health’s role is to reduce these firearm injuries and deaths.”

In one swell swoop (or signature), Obama has created a situation where guns and resultant gun violence is now being seen under the scrutiny of public health concerns. He is obviously hoping to move it away from the 2nd Amendment and make it a health-related issue. If he can successfully accomplish this, then it may well be that he will gain much more support for obliterating the “gun culture.”

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/

Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/07/executive-order-continues-to-utilize-the-cdc-to-attempt-gun-confiscation/#ixzz2adOSwOu1

 

 

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/no-445-en-mi-opinion-julio-31-2013-in-god-we-trust/

Anuncios

“eN MI OPINION” No 444 Julio 30, 2013

julio 30, 2013

No 444  “En mi opinión” Julio 30, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

 

Para comentar o enviar artículos lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com,

 

Ricardo Samitier. Con Gran Disimuló Los Politiqueros Celebraron El 26 De Julio En Miami…

Mientras Raúl Castro Lo hacía Con Los Presidentes “Bolivarianos” En Cuba…

El 28 de Julio… es aniversario de la fundación de Miami… con

DISIMULÓ  Los “POLITIQUEROS” acordaron cambiar la fecha

de la FIESTA PARA EL DÍA 26 DE JULIO… alegando que es mejor…

hacerlo un VIERNES en vez de un DOMINGO…

 

Lo cierto es que a BOMBO Y PLATILLO DIERON UNA FIESTA EL

DÍA 26 DE JULIO… y coincidieron con las celebraciones que se

Realizaron en Cuba donde acudieron entre otros los mandatarios

José Mujica, Nicolás Maduro Y Daniel Ortega para Conmemorar El SEXAGÉSIMO

Aniversario Del Asalto Al Cuartel Moncada..

 

Alberto Perez. Vivir para trabajar, trabajar para vivir y vivir sin trabajar.

Todos hemos oído en el extranjero o en los recién llegados a los Estados Unidos, que los Americanos no saben vivir, que viven para trabajar, que en otros países la gente trabaja para vivir pero se toman el tiempo para divertirse.

Pero vemos que en la mayoría de esos países lo que hace la mayoría

no es trabajar para vivir pero es vivir sin trabajar.

 

Vamos a razonar sobre esto de que los americanos viven para trabajar.

La mayoría de los conceptos equivocados sobre el pueblo americano están basados en la falta de razonamiento. 

El turismo americano por años ha sido el mayor del mundo, todos los países se disputan el turismo americano. 

Así que los americanos pasean más que las personas de otros países.

En la mayoría de los países se practican uno o dos deportes, soccer y básquetbol en algunos. En los Estados Unidos se practica el Béisbol y el Básquetbol, en el verano, y en el invierno el fútbol americano y el jockey de hielo, además de otros deportes.  Desde jóvenes las escuelas promueven la práctica del deporte. 

Así que a los americanos toman su tiempo para practicar deportes y asistir a eventos deportivos.

En las fiestas y los fines de semana largos los americanos tienen tradiciones de descanso y celebraciones.

Así que los Americanos descansan y celebran las fiestas.

En sus tiempos libre los americanos tienen entretenimientos  y espectáculos de cine, teatro, conciertos y bailes.

La industria del entretenimiento de los Estados Unidos es la mayor del mundo. Los artistas de otros países tienen como meca los Estados Unidos.

Así que los americanos se toman su tiempo asistir y participar del entretenimiento.

 

¿Por qué entonces dicen que sólo viven para trabajar?  ¿Es este concepto razonable?

La diferencia es que lo tradicional en la cultura american es practicar el ocio en sus momentos de descanso después de cumplir con su trabajo. 

No dejan de trabajar para practicar el ocio. La cultura no era sólo vivir para trabajar era no vivir sin trabajar-

Esto es lo que se conoce como la ética de trabajo americano, esta ética es la que ha creado la nación más rica y poderosa del mundo

En la cultura americana se consideraba impúdico el vivir sin trabajar. La vagancia era condenada por la ley.

Habían leyes conta la vagancia, todavía existen, pero los militantes liberales entorpecen su cumplimiento. Vagrancy Law & Legal Definition

Lo triste es que después de la revolución hippie de los 60s parte del pueblo americano se ha contaminado con el sistema de vida de otros países, quizás por la influencia migratoria o por la influencia de doctrinas políticas foráneas que quieren destruir el sueño americano.

La cultura de vivir sin trabajar dependiendo del Papá-gobierno cada día de arraiga más en el país que inventó la mejor ética de trabajo de la civilización moderna.

Pero todavía el remanente de los empresarios y trabajadores con la ética tradicional mantiene la economía de los Estados Unidos en primer lugar en el mundo.

Para darse cuenta de la cultura de no trabajar en otros países sólo hay que ver el periódico o la televisión para poder ver las manifestaciones multitudinarias de Egipto, típicas de estos paises sub-desarrollados por su falta de ética de trabajo.

Por meses millones de personas se han dedicado tiempo completo a salir a las calles a protestar unos contra los otros.

Esto es algo inconcebible en un país con una ética de trabajo elemental.

¿Quién trabaja?¿de que viven estas personas?¿cómo se pueden mantener una infraestructura si no hay trabajadores y se vandalizan las empresas?

La principal industria de Egipto era el turismo, y la mayor parte de los turistas eran los vacacionistas americanos que se dedicaban a pasear en sus días de ocio.

La otra industria en Egipto, todavía existe.

Es el recibir subsidios con los impuestos de los trabajadores americanos- 

Destruyeron la primera industria y quizás pierdan la segunda.

¿Trabajarán entonces? ¿O la cultura del ocio está tan arraigada que se morirán de hambre?

¿Podrá el pueblo americano aceptar permanentemente la cultura de grupos de personas viviendo sin trabajar en los Estados Unidos?

 LA LUCHA DE CLASES

De todos es conocido que el socialismo se basa en un sistema económico, demostrado ya que es un fracaso. No ha fracasado por los ineptos que lo han adoptado, sino que desde su base ha sido ineficiente. El socialismo en su dialéctica promete justicia social y derechos para las clases humildes, pero su respuesta ha sido la esclavitud y el terror, además de crear una sociedad en la que se anulan por completo el deseo de progreso al hombre y la competencia por mejorar la calidad en cada producto. Del socialismo pudieras  decir que crea un estado paternalista que le prohíbe al hombre hacer uso de su individualidad.

El socialismo proclama que la religión es el opio de los pueblos, haciendo del hombre nuevo un cascaron sin alma, es decir, ateo y sin una gota de sentimientos.

Su principal discurso es la lucha de clases, desposeyendo  al que pueda  proporcionar la utilización de la riqueza creando fuentes de trabajo, con la falsa promesa de  repartirla, es decir, aumentando la pobreza  y creando odio y la eliminación de todo sentimiento de unidad. En realidad, el estado socialista se apodera de la industria, comercio, todo tipo de empresa y capital privado, convirtiéndose en los explotadores oficiales.  Es un estado dirigido por proxenetas de su mismo pueblo.

Eso  sucedió  en Cuba. Un pueblo que fue engañado mediante un discurso cargado de promesas incumplidas, una dialéctica que enarbolo la bandera del odio y el veneno de la envidia, una palabrería liberal que a través de la maldad, dividió la familia y la enluto con la sangre de sus mejores hijos,  una tiranía que lleva más de cinco décadas de injusticias. La elite que la dirige,  ha destruido a la Nación moralmente, llevándola a la más espantosa miseria, mientras ellos disfrutan de una vida holgada y placentera, una vida elevada al más alto nivel del que los comunistas definen como burguesía y la que critican cuando no son ellos los que la disfrutan.

La experiencia nos enseña a ser más cautelosos al escuchar un discurso, la lucha de clases ha traído muchos males a la sociedad, así como también en la democracia, la nueva moda en muchos casos ha sido destruir al adversario con ataques calumniosos  y utilizar la palabra como medio desmoralizador, esto  lo consideramos  un chantaje que atenta contra la libre decisión de la persona.  Ahí está el ejemplo de Cuba. La izquierda liberal, con ataques histéricos y maliciosos, a través de la prensa acabo con una Republica que en 56 años había escalado a la cima Política-Educacional y Económica.

 Hoy, el sufrido pueblo de Cuba,  desarmado   y sin respaldo internacional, se enfrenta a la brutal represión de la tiranía comunista,  rebelándose en pequeñas manifestaciones callejeras. La Bandera la han puesto en alto  las Damas de Blanco y los opositores declarados. Los sicarios del tiránico régimen,  atacan con sadismo a los manifestantes,  sin distinción de sexo ni edad. Este es el hombre nuevo del comunismo: un cobarde que actúa por migajas, defendiendo una causa injusta y fracasada,  hecho a imagen y semejanza de los Castro y el Che Guevara, un cobarde convertido en una máquina para matar con el apodo de revolucionario, emprendiéndola contra sus propios compatriotas. El socialismo rompe todo vínculo de fraternidad y solidaridad humana.

Actualmente estamos siendo testigos de la  misma palabrería liberal y engañosa en algunas democracias del Continente, incluyendo la democracia norteamericana.

Palabras Bíblicas: “el que tenga oídos, que escuche”.

                            “al tibio lo vomitare de mi boca”

Diego Quirós, Sr.

 

 

 

McCain crosses aisle to stand with Obama.

By Associated Press July 29, 2013 6:55 am

WASHINGTON – There was no conciliatory phone call, no heart-to-heart talk to soothe the tensions. No one knows exactly when President Barack Obama and Republican Sen. John McCain went from bitter rivals in the 2008 presidential campaign and foes over health care and national security to bipartisan partners.

Yet in recent months, an alignment on high-profile domestic issues – not to mention an eye on their respective legacies – has transformed Obama and McCain into Washington’s most unexpected odd couple. The Arizona senator is a regular visitor to the West Wing and in near-daily contact with senior White House officials.

McCain, in an Associated Press interview, said that he and Obama “trust each other.” White House chief of staff Denis McDonough, among the Obama advisers who speak regularly with McCain, praised the lawmaker as a “refreshing” partner who “welcomes a debate and welcomes action.”

Like any good business arrangement in the nation’s capital, the secret to the new Obama-McCain alliance ultimately comes down to this: Both sides believe that working together is mutually beneficial and carries little political risk.

For Obama, the senator has become a rare Republican backer of important elements on the president’s second term agenda, including immigration overhaul, stricter background checks for gun buyers, and perhaps a fall budget deal.

In return, McCain has secured increased access to the White House and an opportunity to redeem his reputation as a Capitol Hill “maverick.” That image was tainted when McCain tacked to the right during his failed 2008 presidential run against Obama.

“I’ve told the people of Arizona, I will work with any president if there are ways I can better serve Arizona and the country,” McCain said. “That seems to be an old-fashioned notion but it’s the case.”

Indeed, the level of attention lavished on a functional working relationship between the Democratic president and the Republican senator underscores how rare such partnerships have been during Obama’s tenure.

Lawmakers, including some Democrats, long have chafed at Obama’s distant dealings with Capitol Hill and his supposed lack of understanding about how Congress operates.

It’s unlikely that Obama and McCain’s partnership will lead to a larger detente between the White House and congressional Republicans. While McCain may have sway over some like-minded members of the Senate Republican caucus, he has considerably less influence with his party’s more conservative wing, particularly in the GOP-controlled House.

Still, the White House is hopeful that forging policy breakthroughs with McCain and other Senate Republicans will isolate the House GOP and perhaps persuade them to act.

The first test of that strategy probably will be the White House-backed immigration overhaul. McCain helped write and shepherd the bill through the Senate last month. Its future in the House is deeply uncertain.

The administration also will try to work with McCain ahead of impending budget battles, McDonough said, given that the senator and the White House agree there is a negative impact from across-the-board federal budget cuts, particularly on the military and defense industry.

McDonough said it’s not just a shared view on policy that has made McCain an attractive partner to Obama on these and other issues. It’s their mutual disdain for Washington meetings that never move beyond the standard talking points.

“Part of what’s great to work with him is his impatience with that,” McDonough said. “You can kind of get into the meat of the matter very quickly”

Obama and McCain were never close during the president’s brief tenure in the Senate. While McCain is a creature of Capitol Hill, Obama largely saw Congress as a stepping stone to bigger things. The relationship deteriorated during frequent clashes in the 2008 presidential campaign, and it often appeared during Obama’s first term like it would never recover.

In 2010, the two sparred during a televised negotiating session on health care. McCain chastised Obama for brokering deals behind closed doors, to which the president snapped, “We’re not campaigning anymore. The election is over.”

McCain replied: “I’m reminded of that every day.”

White House advisers still bristle over McCain’s accusations that the administration covered up details of last year’s deadly attacks on Americans in Benghazi, Libya, as well as his relentless criticism of former U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s role in that alleged effort.

McCain’s criticism contributed to Rice’s decision to withdraw from consideration as Obama’s secretary of state. She now serves as White House national security adviser, a post that does not require Senate confirmation.

McDonough acknowledged that McCain’s role in keeping the Benghazi controversy alive has been a source of frustration. But he credited the senator with largely shelving his criticism of Rice once she joined the White House staff.

“The way he’s worked with her since she became national security adviser speaks to his interest in making sure that even where we disagree, we’re finding a way to work together when we can,” McDonough said. “I know the president has appreciated that.”

McCain said his stronger ties with the president on domestic issues won’t keep him from challenging the president on national security issues, including Syria, where McCain backs a more aggressive U.S. response than does the administration. But he said there’s a way to strike an appropriate balance.

“He is the president of the United States,” McCain said. “You can strongly disagree and still be respectful.”

Obama comments on Keystone spark ire, more concerns about project’s future

By Joseph Weber Published July 29, 2013 FoxNews.com

President Obama’s latest comments on the Keystone XL oil pipeline — including an attempt to downplay the number of jobs it would create — are re-igniting concerns that the administration may not approve the project.

The proposed Canada-to-Texas pipeline has been one of the most divisive political issues of the past four years, essentially pitting Republicans and other pro-business groups including unions against environmentalists and their Democratic allies. 

The president, in an interview Saturday with the New York Times , repeated his position that the administration’s decision will be “based on whether or not this is going to significantly contribute to carbon in our atmosphere.”

However, he also took a swipe at what he described as the Republicans’ argument that Keystone would be a “big jobs generator.”

“There is no evidence that that’s true,” Obama said, arguing the best estimate is 2,000 initial construction jobs followed by no more than an additional 100 jobs. The newspaper’s transcript of the interview showed Obama chuckling as he made the point. 

“That is a blip relative to the need,” he said. 

His estimate is significantly lower than his own State Department’s projection of 42,000 constructions jobs and way smaller than the 118,935 that project developer TransCanada expects. 

Regardless of the accuracy of the numbers, the comments only fueled concern that the administration is viewing the pipeline with increasing skepticism, after sidelining the decision during the presidential election year.

Republicans blasted Obama on Monday for his comments and for apparently chuckling while discussing the controversial issue while at his own jobs rally Wednesday.

“A president disparaging private-sector jobs while backstage at a jobs rally is beyond belief,” Michigan Republican Rep. Fred Upton, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, told FoxNews.com. “In this economy, any source of private job creation should be welcomed with open arms. After nearly five years … there is no reason to delay these jobs another day. Republicans, Democrats, leading unions, and job creators all agree, it’s time to start building.” 

The Republican National Committee said in a statement Monday: “President Obama joked about the potential job creating power of the Keystone XL pipeline. With our economy lagging, the president should be jumping at any opportunity to create jobs instead of bending to the will of special (interests) at the expense of out of work Americans.” 

U.S. Chamber of Commerce spokesman Matt Letourneau told FoxNews.com the president’s comments indeed raised concerns but that the group “was not terribly surprised.”

“The president has had ample opportunity to approve this, and he has repeatedly found ways not to,” Letourneau said.

The White House did not respond to a question about where the president got his estimate — after Obama challenged reporters in the interview to confirm the jobs projections.

Letourneau pointed to a 2011 Cornell University study with similar numbers, while adding the president “should probably stick with his own administration’s numbers.”

He also argued the non-controversial southern leg of the pipeline has already created 4,000 jobs.

The 1,179-mile-long pipeline is expected to transport as much as 830,000 barrels of crude oil daily from the Canadian oil sands (which will result in much of the additional carbon output) and the Bakken shale formation in North Dakota and Montana to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast.

Supporters say the estimated $5.3 billion project also will lower the price of gasoline and reduce the country’s dependency on foreign oil.

However, the president also downplayed those expectations, beyond the “potential benefit” of bolstering our energy-relations with a “reliable ally to the north.”

“That oil is going to be sold on the world oil markets, so it does not bring down gas prices here in the United States,” Obama told The Times. “In fact, it might actually cause some gas prices in the Midwest to go up where currently they can’t ship some of that oil to world markets.”

The final decision will be made by Secretary of State John Kerry and is not expected until the end of the year or early 2014.

Kerry will base the decision on a second and final State Department environmental report scheduled for a fall 2013 release and a so-called “national interest” report.

The second one, which is expected to be complete in late 2013, is being compiled by eight federal agencies and focuses on such issues as Keystone’s potential impact on transportation and the overall U.S. economy.

Letourneau said Obama in his major climate change speech last month also hinted at another possible layer of review.

Upton has repeatedly argued that Keystone has already been subject to 15,500 pages of environmental study and that the time is now to approve the project.

“After more than four years of regulatory delay, the administration has run out of excuses,” he said several weeks ago.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/29/obama-comments-on-keystone-sparks-ire-more-concerns-about-projects-future/#ixzz2aUuMOxeS

$444 Million Hockey Stadium To Be Built In Bankrupt Detroit

Posted 11 Hours Ago by Chris Graham 

 CNN comes the news that the once-great city of Detroit, which recently filed for the largest municipal bankruptcy in American history because of President George W. Bush’s economy (he’s still president, right?), is moving forward with its plan to build a nearly half-billion-dollar hockey stadium for the city’s home team, the Red Wings.

Detroit’s unemployment rate for June was 9.4 percent. The argument that managed to convince Michigan’s Republican governor, Rick Snyder, not to halt the construction plans is that building an arena for the whitest sport in America in one of the blackest cities in America will supposedly help boost Detroit’s economy and create jobs. Never mind that most of those will be temporary construction jobs. Gov. Snyder’s cognitive functions seem to have been adversely affected by being surrounded by Democrats.

There is one Democrat, State Senator Gretchen Whitmer, who, not realizing what political party she is a member of, actually argued something mostly sensible: “If you want people to live in the city, and not just visit to go to games, you have to invest in schools, in having the police to respond to calls.” (Remember, it takes an average of about an hour for police to respond to emergency calls.) “There are so many investments that should trump a sports stadium.”

Now, while I wouldn’t leave it to a Democrat to appropriate funds responsibly, at least Whitmer sees the absurdity of asking taxpayers to put up $444 million to prop up a city that is only a few technicalities away from being a literal fecal mound, just so that people can watch an occasional hockey game. The citizens of Detroit don’t have the disposable income to spend on such frivolous entertainment. Furthermore, the people from outside of Detroit are not going to want to visit Detroit when such an outing would probably result in their being the victims of a mugging or a drive-by shooting.

Could it be that Michigan’s government realizes there is no hope for Detroit, and so this will be their last big hurrah before abandoning the city altogether? Or could it be something even more conspiratorial? Let’s see—blowing exorbitant sums on a project that you don’t need and that will see no significant return? I think the real story here is that Gov. Rick Snyder is just a figurehead; the true governor of Michigan is actually President Obama.

 http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/07/444-million-hockey-stadium-to-be-built-in-bankrupt-detroit/#ixzz2aRzFIGtI

 

LIGNET Exclusive: Pope Faces War with Vatican Bureaucracy

When Pope Francis returns to Rome on Monday, he will face a starkly different landscape than the one he left in Brazil. The pope’s recent visit to Rio de Janeiro underscores how wildly popular he is among the faithful. But an inside Vatican source says Francis will face a continuation of his war with the Holy See’s curia — and he has ambitious plans to expose corruption and dramatically change the Church’s image. Our source gives one of the most riveting accounts of the behind-the-scenes power struggle.

Read the Full LIGNET Analysis — Go Here Now

Become a member of LIGNET and see the full analysis! 

When you join LIGNET, you immediately become part of an exclusive network of global readers who are seeking the best available, actionable intelligence from some of the best-informed people on the planet.

LIGNET provides 24/7 coverage of world events, giving in-depth reports with unbiased analyses — written by seasoned intelligence and security experts including former CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden, other senior CIA officials and operatives, presidential advisers, ambassadors, international intelligence veterans and other experts.

Fmr. CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden, a LIGNET adviser, says:

“LIGNET is a powerful tool for decision-makers and others who need to understand our world, as it is today and how it will be in the future. LIGNET provides you expert intelligence, insight and forecasting for today’s rapidly changing world.”

LIGNET offers members exclusive access to behind-the-scenes information that empowers individuals, investors, corporations and governments who want the tools and information to make better decisions in their global activities.

LIGNET’s core areas of expertise include:

Security 
First-hand knowledge of international incident reports, tactical analyses, geopolitical and security issues, and breaking developments in strategically important regions, from insiders in the know

Finance 
Proprietary financial analyses of significant geopolitical trends and accurate forecasts of global economies that can impact various levels of policy, corporate decision-makers, and individual interests

Energy 
Exclusive access to developing energy policy straight from Washington, covering everything from climate change and renewable resources to natural gas and offshore drilling updates

Whether you’re the CEO of a global corporation or a savvy investor with an interest in foreign markets or just a person who wants to be informed, you can tap into the power of LIGNET.

Benjamin Fulford – July 29, 2013: Actual encounters with female spies and agents

Notice to readers. This month I will be on sabbatical away from the internet and so have prepared the next few newsletters based on topics that are not time sensitive.

Female agents have long been a key source of power. The Jews celebrate Purim based on the tale of the wife of a king who saved her people by persuading him not to persecute them. The ruling bloodlines of Europe claim descent from Kind David of Judea. According to their legend, when Judea fell to the Babylonians all of David’s male descendants were killed. To protect the bloodline of David, his elite guards began to protect his female descendants. Their modus operandi was simple, marry on of the female descendants to a king and have her educate his children and heirs. In this manner, female agents secretly usurped power in the West from traditional kingly bloodlines. This tale, told to me in person by representatives of the current ruling bloodlines of the West illustrates, just how important female operatives can be.

In Asia as well female agents can have a decisive impact. In Japan, for example, it was recently discovered that a very large percentage of graduates from Japan’s elite military academies had married Chinese agents. Then of course there is the well-known story about former Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto and his Chinese spy girlfriend. I actually met her once and can say she seemed charming and attractive. Of course Hashimoto died from a poison that was inserted into his anus, although it is not believed his Chinese girlfriend was the one who administered it.

That is not the case, however, with Kim Jong Il, who was killed, according to several different sources, by a stroke inducing poison administered to him anally by a Swedish female agent. In any case, all I can say is that when dealing in bed with such agents, is to watch your ass.

My personal encounters with female agents have been very educational, to say the least.

First of all, I must admit that for much of my reporting career, the thought of female agents never really crossed my mind as something that really existed. However, now that I think about it, when I was working with Forbes one of my scoops was to report that North Korea had an atomic bomb. Shortly after writing about this, a former Miss North Korea began approaching me and tried to become my lover. It never occurred to me at the time that our encounter may not have been a coincidence.

By now, though, I have learned to be thoroughly suspicious of rare beauties who throw themselves upon me.

Once my colleagues started being murdered and I became involved in secret societies who offered me protection, I started to wise up about female agents too.

In one case, after making a lecture in Japan, a man with a beautiful woman at his side approached me telling me he was friends with Adnan Khashoggi, the arms dealer. He gave me a book in French called “The Egyptian Origin of the Jews.”

In any case, his gorgeous female companion started making moves on me. Once she lured me into an apartment where she got totally naked in front of me. Now, I am not so naïve as to believe a beautiful woman associated with a major arms dealer suddenly fell in love with me and got her dressed again by telling her that I had herpes and do not use condoms. In any case, she told me an unusual tale that I will pass on here without judgement. She claims to have been kidnapped by giants who carried out experiments on her womb. Her descriptions of these giants were very close to descriptions of the Annunaki reported on occult web sites.

In another case, the daughter of Masaru Takumi, the former number 2 boss and head of financial affairs for the Yamaguchi Gumi yakuza syndicate approached me, also after a public speaking engagement. She had knowledge of my sexual preferences that could only have been gleaned by somebody eavesdropping on my most intimate moments. I declined her offers of intimacy but, curious, I spent time with her socially. What stands out the most about my meeting with her is the fact that she insisted on meeting with me on the evening of March 10th, 2011. She said she wanted to take me to a special Japanese style chiropractor. The man we went to see was not the one she expected. He introduced himself as a ninja and wrapped a long piece of cloth covered in black powder around my lower back, telling me it was a herbal preparation and that I was to leave it on all night. It felt bad and I took it off as soon as I got home. Also that evening, Takumi’s daughter told me that she had to set the alarm on my mobile phone to ring at 11 AM on March 11. That was the day of the nuclear and tsunami terror attack against Japan. I am pretty sure she was hired by J. Rockefeller.

The most memorable of all the female agents, however, has to be the North Korean woman I will refer to as T. She also showed up at my speaking engagements on multiple occasions and we became friends after I sat beside her on a train on my way home from such an engagement (it turns out she was sent to live at the next stop from mine to make such a train ride possible).

T was a remarkable but troubled young woman. She had been beaten so badly by an uncle during her childhood that she required reconstructive plastic surgery on her face twice. Her former lover was a professional killer who had killed over 80 people and she told me enough inside detail (which I passed on to the police) about famous unsolved murders for me to believe this was true. She ended up telling me a lot about the people who were operating against me. She says she had been shown a file about me that was as thick as a phone book that tried to portray me as a drug addled, insane pervert (if only my private life were so interesting). According to her, after the cabal failed to murder me, they had planned to bankrupt me and drive me into suicide. Her job had been to chase away all my close associates and then abandon me, leaving me friendless.

She also introduced me to a supposed family of hers that turns out to have been a bunch of actors playing the role of her family.

One time I got her pregnant and we were planning to marry and have the child. She was 5 months pregnant when she was called suddenly to Nepal to stay at the house of a close associate of the Dalai Lama. There she was drugged, started bleeding intensely from her womb and woke up in a hospital after being unconscious for 24 hours. She was no longer pregnant. There is a whole book to be written about this young lady but suffice it to say I realized we would both remain in danger if we kept seeing each other. When this is all over, I will find her again. I will also personally seek out the Dalai Lama and seek a full explanation for why his thugs in Nepal did what they did. The man is a criminal pretending to be a great religious figure. He will get his justice.

All I can say is that love and international intrigue do not mix well.

http://hipknowsys.blogspot.com/2013/07/benjamin-fulford-july-29-2013-actual.html

 

MUSLIM MY ASS

Here’s a good one:  
Have you ever seen a Muslim hospital? 
Have you heard a Muslim orchestra? 
Have you seen a Muslim band march in a parade? 
Have you witnessed a Muslim charity? 
Have you shaken hands with a Muslim Girl Scout? 
Have you seen a Muslim Candy Striper? 
The answer is no, you have not.  Just ask yourself WHY ???
 
 
Barack Obama, 
during his Cairo speech, said: 
“I know, too, that Islam has always been a part
of America ‘s history.”

AN AMERICAN  CITIZEN’S RESPONSE
 
Dear Mr.. Obama:
Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed?
Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.
Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day?
Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and 
Native American Indians.
Can you show me one Muslim signature on the: United States Constitution?
Declaration of Independence ?
Bill of  Rights?
Didn’t think so.
 
Did Muslims fight for this country’s freedom from England ?
No.
 
Did  Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America?
No, they did not.
In fact, Muslims to this day are 
still the largest traffickers in human slavery.
Your own half-brother, a devout 
Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even 
though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as “pug nosed slaves.”
Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family’s “rich Islamic heritage,” doesn’t it Mr.. Obama?
 
Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country?
Not present.
There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr.
or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.
 
Where were Muslims during this country’s
Woman’s Suffrage era?
Again, not present.
In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture.
So much so, that often they are beaten for
not wearing the ‘hajib’ or
for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. 
Yep, the Muslims are all for women’s rights, 
aren’t they?
 
Where were Muslims during World War II?
They were aligned with Adolf Hitler.
The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and
accepted support from the Nazis in killing Jews.
 
Finally, Mr.. Obama,
where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001?
If they weren’t flying planes into 
the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or
a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000
people on our own soil, they were rejoicing
in the Middle East.
No one can dispute the pictures 
shown from all parts of the Muslim world 
celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news network’s that day.
Strangely, the very “moderate” Muslims
who’s asses you bent over backwards to kiss in
Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were
stone cold silent post 9-11.
To many Americans,
their silence has meant approval 
for the acts of that day.
 
And THAT, Mr.. Obama,
is the “rich heritage” Muslims have here 
in America …
 
Oh, I’m sorry, I 
forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. 
They were Muslims.
 
And now we can add November 5, 2009 –
the slaughter of American soldiers at
Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor
and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be 
counseling soldiers returning from battle in 
Iraq and Afghanistan.
 
Also, don’t forget the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15.2013 was done by 2 Muslim Brothers.
 
That, Mr.. Obama 
is the “Muslim heritage” in America

 

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

No 443 “EN MI OPINION” Julio 29, 2013

julio 29, 2013

No 443  “En mi opinión” Julio 29, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

Lázaro R González Miño Editor    lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com,

Según las informaciones.  Las cámaras de control de tráfico (Debía decir Cámaras de ingresos fáciles a los gobiernos y las compañía s rapiñas, dueñas del invento de las camritas)  ha sido reactivada y ya sus flashes funcionan activamente haciendo llenar las arcas de expoliar dineros para ciudades y el condado. Esto me parece un descaro atroz. Según la opinión de expertos y la mía también porque veo, oigo y leo  los noticieros de TV, radio y periódicos y veo que realmente los accidentes bajo los semáforos han aumentado. “LOS ACCIDENTES HAN AUMENTADO DESPUES DE QUE SE COLOCARON LAS CAMARAS” Como es posible si eso es para evitar accidentes… Personas allegadas me aseguran que una de las causas es que el tiempo de la luz amarilla le han disminuido el tiempo de 15 segundos a 5 segundos para que al menos atrapen desde el segundo auto después del cambio de luz del semáforo. Yo no quiero pensar que esto es cierto porque es un descaro atroz y además criminal, más; pero gigantesco, que si es cierto ha costado ya varios cadáveres debajo de los semáforos. ¿Es que nuestros políticos son más miserables de lo que yo pensaba? ¿Es que no les importa la vida de las personas, solo obtener dinero? Si esto es así ya esto rebasa todo lo imaginable. A veces pienso que en la edad media estaban en lo correcto de la aplicación de la guillotina, ahí varios polítiqueros que la merecen… Lázaro R González Miño.

Columna de Alberto Pérez.

Cita con actualidad que tiene 2060 años: El verdadero destructor de las libertades de las personas, es el que se prolonga, propagándoles recompensas, donaciones y beneficios…  Plutarco

El artículo de Diego Quirós Sr.

INTIMIDACION ES UNA MALA POLITICA 

Tengo 76 años, a mi edad las ambiciones materiales que no se realizaron, ya están fuera de tiempo, pero hay otros intereses que ocupan un espacio muy importante para el civismo y la dignidad de la persona.

En mi tiempo, la palabra tenía más valor que cualquier documento firmado  y hoy nos preguntamos: ¿Qué ha hecho cambiar esa actitud?

Nos referimos a la campaña política por la presidencia. Aun no entendemos ¿Por qué la administración Obama-Biden intimido a las personas de la tercera edad propagando que iban a disminuir sus beneficios e incrementar el costo de la atención medica en caso de triunfar los republicanos?

 ¿Por qué acusaron de terroristas al Movimiento Tea Party? y ¿Por qué intimidaron alegando que de triunfar Mitt Romney, volverián a ser esclavos, ¿a quienes se referían?

¿Fue esto una campaña limpia?… No, para nada. El binomio que aspiro a la re-elección no presento una agenda clara y concisa expresando como solucionarar la situación que ha agravado social y económicamente a la Nación. ¿Por qué no crear empleos para no seguir manteniendo a tantos millones de personas con el subsidio gubernamental sin límites de tiempo?.

Esta situación se asemeja al estado partenalista que ha mantenido a la tiranía marxista cubana de corte económico, social y ateo, al soviético, cuyo resultado es de todos conocido. FRACASO TOTAL.

La primera dama en su visita a la Florida, al referirse a las mujeres, expreso que con el triunfo republicano, ellas perderían sus derechos.

El aborto, la esterilización o el contraceptivo no son problemas de salud,  por lo tanto los contribuyentes no tienen por qué tener esa carga.

A  los retirados no se le regala nada, los retirados disfrutamos de lo que estuvimos contribuyendo con nuestro trabajo por muchos años, por lo tanto no hay que temer quien ocupe la Casa Blanca mientras vivamos en Democracia. La presente administración ha tratado de manipular a los sectores más vulnerables de nuestra sociedad.

Una campaña de ataques y desprestigio, como la que utilizaron los ocupantes de la Casa Blanca, es una campaña sin agendas. Y ¿Qué se puede esperar de ello? Solo mas desempleo, pobreza y crimen.

Miro hacia el futuro, aspiro a una Administracion que no establezca luchas sociales, que respete los Derechos que a cada uno le otorga la Constitución y que aporte seguridad económica a la familia americana creando fuentes de trabajo. Quiero ver realizado el sentimiento de Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln y todos aquellos que de una manera u otra han cooperado a hacer de Estados Unidos una Nación bajo Dios.

DIOS BENDIGA A AMERICA.  Diego Quirós, Sr

COLUMNA DE Ricardo Samitier.

·         Airliner Defense Israel does it again!!!!!!!‏ Ojala sea cierto… una compañía Israelí desarrolla un sistema contra los COHETES ANTIAÉREOS…

Todos estos GASTOS PARA MANTENER NUESTRA VIDA… Hay que agradecerlos a los MUSULMANES…  a los que les estamos PERMITIENDO PREDICAR en el OCCIDENTE CRISTIANO… Lo cual ellos NO PERMITEN EN SUS TERRITORIOS…

Hasta Cuando…  

Para ver el sistema contra los cohetes… haga clic en el enlace…  http://www.youtube.com/embed/uVlERTFVSpo?rel=0

 

Porque el fondillo de los NEGROS…‏

Todas las razas tenían los MISMO TIPOS DE HOMBRES… los hay altos, bajitos, anchos de pecho, flacos, gordos, culones etc. …

La EXOGAMIA practicada especialmente por la raza blanca… gracias a los

Medios de LOCOMOCIÓN que siempre dispuso fue UNIFICANDO LA ESTÉTICA de los Blancos…   

Los Negros sin medios de LOCOMOCIÓN (ÁFRICA no tiene animales domesticables como el caballo) quedó  atrapada en la ENDOGAMIA TRIBAL… manteniéndose las características de cada

Raza NEGRA… de ahí la existencia todavía de PIGMEOS… y que las características de las tribus se mantenga… 

En América es el ÚNICO LUGAR que  GRACIAS A LA ESCLAVITUD los negros han practicado la EXOGAMIA… casándose negros originalmente de una tribu con miembros de otra… produciéndose negros mejor formados y más hermosos que en ÁFRICA… COSA que TAMPOCO SE HABLA…

La raza negra NÓMADA… tiene un almacén de grasa en las NALGAS… ÚNICO LUGAR QUE AL CAMINAR no se ejercita y es el mejor lugar para ALMACENAR LAS RESERVA DE GRASAS…

Dicho almacén… luce bonito durante la juventud…  

Como existieron también BLANCOS NÓMADAS… TRIBUS que fueron las primeras en desaparecer por la EXOGAMIA… hace miles de años… hay algunos blancos que dan UN PASO ATRÁS y también tienen NALGAS GRANDES Y ALTAS…

 

Porque atacan a Arizona y No a Missouri????‏

Missouri Tiene Leyes Contra Los Ilegales Iguales o PEORES Que Arizona… Entonces ¿Por Que Se Ataca A Arizona Y No A Missouri?

SMARTEST STATE IN THE USA – VERY INTERESTING:

Missouri has no illegals, go figure…shouldn’t the other states do the same?

Missouri’s approach to the problem of illegal immigration appears to be more advanced, sophisticated, strict and effective than anything to date in Arizona. Does the White House appreciate what Missouri has done? So, why doesn’t Missouri receive attention? Answer: There are no illegals in Missouri to demonstrate.

The “Show Me” state has again shown us how it should be done. There needs to be more publicity and exposure regarding what Missouri has done. Please pass this around.

In 2007, Missouri placed on the ballot a proposed constitutional amendment designating English as the official language of Missouri. In November, 2008, nearly 90% voted in favor! Thus, English became the official language for ALL governmental activity in Missouri. No individual has the right to demand government services in a language OTHER than English.

In 2008, a measure was passed that required the Missouri Highway Patrol and other law enforcement officials to verify the immigration status of any person arrested, and inform federal authorities if the person is found to be in Missouri illegally. Missouri law enforcement officers receive specific training with respect to enforcement of federal immigration laws.

In Missouri, illegal immigrants do NOT have access to taxpayer benefits such as food stamps or health care through Missouri Health NET.

In 2009, a measure was passed that ensures Missouri’s public institutions of higher education do NOT award financial aid to individuals who are illegally in the United States.

In Missouri, all post-secondary institutions of higher education to annually certify to the Missouri Dept. of Higher Education that they have NOT knowingly awarded financial aid to students who are unlawfully present in the United States.

So, while Arizona has made national news for its new law, it is important to remember Missouri has been far more proactive in addressing this horrific problem. Missouri has made it clear that illegal immigrants are NOT welcome in the state, and they will certainly NOT receive public benefits at the expense of Missouri taxpayers.

DON’T DELETE THIS AMERICA. KEEP IT GOING UNTIL WE GET ALL 50 STATES TO COMPLY!!!

Los Empleados Del IRS Están “Muy Preocupados” De Ser Obligados A Inscribirse En El Obamacare Y Perder Su Seguro Médico Privado…

Former acting Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Steve Miller (R) and Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, J. Russell George are sworn in before testifying before a full House Ways and Means committee hearing on ‘Internal Revenue Service Targeting Conservative Groups’ on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on May 17, 2013. (Image credit: AFP/Getty Images via @daylife)

In the private sector, many workers are concerned about losing their employer-sponsored health insurance coverage, and being dumped into Obamacare’s subsidized insurance exchanges. Two weeks ago, representatives of three large labor unions fired off a harsh letter to Democratic leaders in Congress, complaining that Obamacare would “shatter…our hard-earned health benefits” and create “nightmare scenarios” for their members. Today, we learn that the National Treasury Employees Union—the union that includes employees of the Internal Revenue Service—is asking its members to write letters to their Congressmen, stating that they are “very concerned” about legislative efforts requiring IRS and Treasury employees to enroll in the Obamacare exchanges.

“I am a federal employee and one of your constituents,” the letter begins. “I am very concerned about legislation that has been introduced by Congressman Dave Camp to push federal employees out of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) and into the insurance exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).”

Rep. Dave Camp (R., Mich.), the representative referred to in the letter, is chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, the committee in the House that is responsible for tax legislation. (Obamacare’s insurance subsidies are technically tax credits.) In April, Camp introduced legislation to put all federal employees on the exchanges, in response to reports that members of Congress and their staff were seeking an exemption from the provision in Obamacare that requires them to enroll in the exchanges.

“If the ObamaCare exchanges are good enough for the hardworking Americans and small businesses the law claims to help, then they should be good enough for the president, vice president, Congress, and federal employees,” said Camp’s spokeswoman in a statement at the time.

There is one legitimate issue regarding members of Congress and their staff enrolling in the exchanges. Today, federal employees are offered subsidies, or vouchers, which they can use to shop for insurance on the popular federal employees’ exchange, called the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program. Because Obamacare was drafted so hastily, it’s not clear whether the law allows similar subsidies to flow to federal employees on the Obamacare exchanges.

We’re still awaiting a ruling from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management on that front. For inexplicable reasons, OPM has not clarified whether or not the government will be allowed to funnel subsidies through the Obamacare exchanges.

Nonetheless, it would be a very good thing for some federal employees to eat their own cooking, especially those who work for Congress, the IRS and the Department of Health and Human Services. They’re the ones who are writing the Obamacare regulations; they’re the ones who, in many cases, wrote the law itself. The IRS enforces Obamacare’s individual mandate and eligibility for the exchange subsidies, among other provisions.

They should be required to enroll in the same Obamacare exchanges that tens of millions of private citizens will have to. They should have to experience the same premium increases and limited flexibility that other Americans will endure there. Maybe then, we’ll start to build a constituency for market-based reform.

Taken from: “The Ozarks Sentinel” Editorial.

Palin Blasts Obama for Calling Scandals ‘Phony’

Posted on July 28, 2013 by Cowboy Byte

On Friday, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin blasted President Barack Obama for calling his administration’s scandals “phony,” saying that was an “atrocious” thing to do.

Appearing on Fox News’s On The Record, Palin referred to scandals like Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the IRS’s targeting of conservatives, and the National Security Agency’s domestic spying.

She then asked, “Which one is a phony scandal?”

Palin asked if Benghazi, where “200-plus years of honorable military ethos was thrown out the window when we left our own to be slaughtered by Muslims,” was a phony scandal.

She said the government “spies and lies,” and once again asked if all of these scandals were phony.

“Americans are smarter than the lamestream media give them credit,” Palin said, noting regular Americans are figuring out the “hypocrisies” and “lies” coming from the Obama administration by doing their own homework.

Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/23377/palin-blasts-cowardly-obama-for-calling-admins-scandals-phony/#ixzz2aRESIEYz

 

Food Stamp Recipients Shipping Groceries Overseas Enrique Enriquez.

Some food stamp recipients are using their electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards to buy groceries in the United States and sending them to relatives in several Caribbean countries.

According to the New York Post, New Yorkers in largely Caribbean neighborhoods are using their EBT cards, which provide government benefits like food stamps and cash assistance, to buy the items and sending them overseas in large barrels.

Michael Tanner, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, called the practice another example of welfare abuse.

“The purpose of this program is to help Americans who don’t have enough to eat,” he told the Post. “This is not intended as a form of foreign aid.”

In those largely Caribbean New York neighborhoods, supermarkets offer hundreds of 45- to 55-gallon barrels for shipping.

Customers buy the barrels for about $40 each, and use their food stamps to fill them over time with up to $2,000 worth of rice, beans, pasta, canned milk, and sausages, the Post reports.

They then call a shipping company to pick up the barrels and send them mostly to Jamaica, Haiti, and the Dominican Republican for about $70.

“Everybody does it,” a worker at a Brooklyn supermarket told the paper. “A lot of people pay with EBT.”

New York is likely not the only place EBT cards are being abused. The Boston Herald reported that similar barrels are available in Boston, as are the shipping companies.

“If it’s happening in one state, it’s happening in many other states,” Massachusetts Republican state Sen. Shaunna O’Connell told The Boston Herald. “It’s just one of countless scams happening through the food stamp program.”

In fiscal 2012, the government spent $74.6 billion on food assistance, and last September, 47.7 million Americans were receiving benefits.

Probablemente no solo NY está haciendo esta movida; puede ser algo ya nacional y con más razón observaría la Florida.  Qué hacen nuestros politicos para hacerse los de la vista gorda y vean que el país que ellos reperesentan se destruye minuto a minuto.  Recordemos las palabras de nuestro compatriota Eduardo R. Chibás:  “Vergüenza contra dinero”

Por favor, pongamos a nuestros representantes políticos a tomar cartas en este asunto tan serio y vergonzoso.

Necesitamos enmendar las leyes al paso del tiempo Siglo XXI porque los habitantes de este Siglo o son mas astutos que los del tiempo pasado o son delinquentes. 

Un patriótico abrazo.

Georgina López

 

SMARTEST STATE IN THE USA – VERY INTERESTING:
Missouri has no illegals, go figure…shouldn’t the other states do the same?

Missouri’s approach to the problem of illegal immigration appears to
be more advanced, sophisticated, strict and effective than anything to
date in Arizona. Does the White House appreciate what Missouri has
done? So, why doesn’t Missouri receive attention? Answer: There are no
illegals in Missouri to demonstrate.

The “Show Me” state has again shown us how it should be done. There
needs to be more publicity and exposure regarding what Missouri has
done. Please pass this around.

In 2007, Missouri placed on the ballot a proposed constitutional
amendment designating English as the official language of Missouri. In
November, 2008, nearly 90% voted in favor! Thus, English became the
official language for ALL governmental activity in Missouri. No
individual has the right to demand government services in a language
OTHER than English.

In 2008, a measure was passed that required the Missouri Highway
Patrol and other law enforcement officials to verify the immigration
status of any person arrested, and inform federal authorities if the
person is found to be in Missouri illegally. Missouri law enforcement
officers receive specific training with respect to enforcement of
federal immigration laws.

In Missouri, illegal immigrants do NOT have access to taxpayer
benefits such as food stamps or health care through Missouri Health
NET.

In 2009, a measure was passed that ensures Missouri’s public
institutions of higher education do NOT award financial aid to
individuals who are illegally in the United States.

In Missouri, all post-secondary institutions of higher education to
annually certify to the Missouri Dept. of Higher Education that they
have NOT knowingly awarded financial aid to students who are
unlawfully present in the United States.

So, while Arizona has made national news for its new law, it is
important to remember Missouri has been far more proactive in
addressing this horrific problem. Missouri has made it clear that
illegal immigrants are NOT welcome in the state, and they will
certainly NOT receive public benefits at the expense of Missouri
taxpayers.

DON’T DELETE THIS AMERICA. KEEP IT GOING UNTIL WE GET ALL 50 STATES TO COMPLY!!!

Taken from: “The Ozarks Sentinel” Editorial.

 

Why Detroit’s Bankruptcy Could Detonate a $3.7-Trillion Muni Bond Bomb

Published Wed, Jul 24th, 2013   Louis Basenese, Chief Investment Strategist

Don’t sweat it. That’s what municipal bond investors are being told by “respected” financial pundits in the aftermath of Detroit’s $18.5-billion bankruptcy filing – the largest in U.S. history.

“We view Detroit’s default and subsequent bankruptcy filing as idiosyncratic, and not as a symptom of a wider issue in the municipal market,” says Jane Hudson Ridley, a credit analyst with Standard & Poor’s.

Are you kidding me?

I get that all of the largest municipal bond ETFs – like the iShares S&P National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and the Market Vectors High-Yield Muni ETF (HYD) – carry very little exposure to Michigan. So thanks to the powers of diversification, the underlying values of the funds won’t take a big hit.

But this isn’t about diversification. It’s about a $3.7-trillion muni bond market that’s anything but healthy – and a potentially disastrous precedent being set that promises to undermine 201 years’ worth of trust.

Sorry, but that’s a pretty big deal, and it’s certainly worth sweating over. So consider today’s article a super-sized dose of truth serum.

From Moral Obligation to Moral Hazard

Before we get to the current situation at hand, it’s important that we have a historical understanding of municipal bonds. Don’t worry. I’ll keep it to a couple paragraphs…

The first officially recorded municipal bond was issued by the City of New York for a canal in 1812. It was a general obligation bond, meaning the city pledged every available resource – most notably, tax revenue – to repay the debt. So, in theory, unless the city lost its legal ability to levy taxes, which it never would, investors would be repaid.

That’s key because every single general obligation muni bond issued since that time has carried the same level of implied safety. Apparently, though, Detroit’s emergency manager, Kevyn D. Orr, wants to do away with 201 years’ worth of trust established with investors.

His restructuring proposal calls for bondholders to be repaid as little as $0.10 on the dollar.

As Jim Colby, Senior Municipal Strategist at Market Vectors ETFs, says, the unprecedented move “begins to challenge what has been the foundation for nearly 70% of all financings done in the municipal bond market: the ‘moral obligation’ on the part of the issuer of bonds to adhere to the promise to set the ‘full faith and credit’ and taxing power of the entity… to repay the owners of those bonds.”

If Orr succeeds, look for all hell to break loose. Just like we witnessed during the real estate collapse when homeowners started walking away from their mortgage obligations without any recourse, other cash-strapped municipalities are destined to follow Detroit’s lead and try to renege, too.

“If the outcome is that [Detroit reduces] some liabilities, that could be an incentive” for bankruptcy filings by other cities, says Timothy Blake, Managing Director of Moody’s Investors Service.

The end result?

Instead of a moral obligation propping up muni bond prices like it has for two centuries, a moral hazard will undermine them. In a New York second, no less.

As Colby notes, “There would be damage done to untold numbers of portfolios as confidence disappears and valuations drop.”

But we shouldn’t sweat the situation, right?

Stay tuned for tomorrow, when I’ll reveal two major U.S. cities that might be on the brink of a collapse. I’ll also share three more reasons to be wary of muni bonds and, most importantly, specific actions we can take to protect our portfolios and potentially profit from the situation.

Ahead of the tape,

Louis Basenese

 

Newsmax wow I am amazed at these article, Obama economics at it’s best

Four in 5 Americans Face Near-poverty, No Work Under Obama

Sunday, July 28, 2013 02:57 PM

By: HOPE YEN

Four out of 5 U.S. adults struggle with joblessness, near-poverty or reliance on welfare for at least parts of their lives, a sign of deteriorating economic security and an elusive American dream.

Survey data exclusive to The Associated Press points to an increasingly globalized U.S. economy, the widening gap between rich and poor, and the loss of good-paying manufacturing jobs as reasons for the trend.

The findings come as President Barack Obama tries to renew his administration’s emphasis on the economy, saying in recent speeches that his highest priority is to “rebuild ladders of opportunity” and reverse income inequality.

As nonwhites approach a numerical majority in the U.S., one question is how public programs to lift the disadvantaged should be best focused — on the affirmative action that historically has tried to eliminate the racial barriers seen as the major impediment to economic equality, or simply on improving socioeconomic status for all, regardless of race.

Hardship is particularly growing among whites, based on several measures. Pessimism among that racial group about their families’ economic futures has climbed to the highest point since at least 1987. In the most recent AP-GfK poll, 63 percent of whites called the economy “poor.”

“I think it’s going to get worse,” said Irene Salyers, 52, of Buchanan County, Va., a declining coal region in Appalachia. Married and divorced three times, Salyers now helps run a fruit and vegetable stand with her boyfriend but it doesn’t generate much income. They live mostly off government disability checks.

“If you do try to go apply for a job, they’re not hiring people, and they’re not paying that much to even go to work,” she said. Children, she said, have “nothing better to do than to get on drugs.”

While racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to live in poverty, race disparities in the poverty rate have narrowed substantially since the 1970s, census data show. Economic insecurity among whites also is more pervasive than is shown in the government’s poverty data, engulfing more than 76 percent of white adults by the time they turn 60, according to a new economic gauge being published next year by the Oxford University Press.

The gauge defines “economic insecurity” as a year or more of periodic joblessness, reliance on government aid such as food stamps or income below 150 percent of the poverty line. Measured across all races, the risk of economic insecurity rises to 79 percent.

Marriage rates are in decline across all races, and the number of white mother-headed households living in poverty has risen to the level of black ones.

“It’s time that America comes to understand that many of the nation’s biggest disparities, from education and life expectancy to poverty, are increasingly due to economic class position,” said William Julius Wilson, a Harvard professor who specializes in race and poverty. He noted that despite continuing economic difficulties, minorities have more optimism about the future after Obama’s election, while struggling whites do not.

“There is the real possibility that white alienation will increase if steps are not taken to highlight and address inequality on a broad front,” Wilson said.

Nationwide, the count of America’s poor remains stuck at a record number: 46.2 million, or 15 percent of the population, due in part to lingering high unemployment following the recession. While poverty rates for blacks and Hispanics are nearly three times higher, by absolute numbers the predominant face of the poor is white.

More than 19 million whites fall below the poverty line of $23,021 for a family of four, accounting for more than 41 percent of the nation’s destitute, nearly double the number of poor blacks.

Sometimes termed “the invisible poor” by demographers, lower-income whites generally are dispersed in suburbs as well as small rural towns, where more than 60 percent of the poor are white. Concentrated in Appalachia in the East, they are numerous in the industrial Midwest and spread across America’s heartland, from Missouri, Arkansas and Oklahoma up through the Great Plains.

Buchanan County, in southwest Virginia, is among the nation’s most destitute based on median income, with poverty hovering at 24 percent. The county is mostly white, as are 99 percent of its poor.

More than 90 percent of Buchanan County’s inhabitants are working-class whites who lack a college degree. Higher education long has been seen there as nonessential to land a job because well-paying mining and related jobs were once in plentiful supply. These days many residents get by on odd jobs and government checks.

Salyers’ daughter, Renee Adams, 28, who grew up in the region, has two children. A jobless single mother, she relies on her live-in boyfriend’s disability checks to get by. Salyers says it was tough raising her own children as it is for her daughter now, and doesn’t even try to speculate what awaits her grandchildren, ages 4 and 5.

Smoking a cigarette in front of the produce stand, Adams later expresses a wish that employers will look past her conviction a few years ago for distributing prescription painkillers, so she can get a job and have money to “buy the kids everything they need.”

“It’s pretty hard,” she said. “Once the bills are paid, we might have $10 to our name.”

___

Census figures provide an official measure of poverty, but they’re only a temporary snapshot that doesn’t capture the makeup of those who cycle in and out of poverty at different points in their lives. They may be suburbanites, for example, or the working poor or the laid off.

In 2011 that snapshot showed 12.6 percent of adults in their prime working-age years of 25-60 lived in poverty. But measured in terms of a person’s lifetime risk, a much higher number — 4 in 10 adults — falls into poverty for at least a year of their lives.

The risks of poverty also have been increasing in recent decades, particularly among people ages 35-55, coinciding with widening income inequality. For instance, people ages 35-45 had a 17 percent risk of encountering poverty during the 1969-1989 time period; that risk increased to 23 percent during the 1989-2009 period. For those ages 45-55, the risk of poverty jumped from 11.8 percent to 17.7 percent.

Higher recent rates of unemployment mean the lifetime risk of experiencing economic insecurity now runs even higher: 79 percent, or 4 in 5 adults, by the time they turn 60.

By race, nonwhites still have a higher risk of being economically insecure, at 90 percent. But compared with the official poverty rate, some of the biggest jumps under the newer measure are among whites, with more than 76 percent enduring periods of joblessness, life on welfare or near-poverty.

By 2030, based on the current trend of widening income inequality, close to 85 percent of all working-age adults in the U.S. will experience bouts of economic insecurity.

“Poverty is no longer an issue of ‘them’, it’s an issue of ‘us’,” says Mark Rank, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis who calculated the numbers. “Only when poverty is thought of as a mainstream event, rather than a fringe experience that just affects blacks and Hispanics, can we really begin to build broader support for programs that lift people in need.”

The numbers come from Rank’s analysis being published by the Oxford University Press. They are supplemented with interviews and figures provided to the AP by Tom Hirschl, a professor at Cornell University; John Iceland, a sociology professor at Penn State University; the University of New Hampshire’s Carsey Institute; the Census Bureau; and the Population Reference Bureau.

Among the findings:

—For the first time since 1975, the number of white single-mother households living in poverty with children surpassed or equaled black ones in the past decade, spurred by job losses and faster rates of out-of-wedlock births among whites. White single-mother families in poverty stood at nearly 1.5 million in 2011, comparable to the number for blacks. Hispanic single-mother families in poverty trailed at 1.2 million.

—Since 2000, the poverty rate among working-class whites has grown faster than among working-class nonwhites, rising 3 percentage points to 11 percent as the recession took a bigger toll among lower-wage workers. Still, poverty among working-class nonwhites remains higher, at 23 percent.

—The share of children living in high-poverty neighborhoods — those with poverty rates of 30 percent or more — has increased to 1 in 10, putting them at higher risk of teenage pregnancy or dropping out of school. Non-Hispanic whites accounted for 17 percent of the child population in such neighborhoods, compared with 13 percent in 2000, even though the overall proportion of white children in the U.S. has been declining.

The share of black children in high-poverty neighborhoods dropped from 43 percent to 37 percent, while the share of Latino children went from 38 percent to 39 percent.

—Race disparities in health and education have narrowed generally since the 1960s. While residential segregation remains high, a typical black person now lives in a no majority black neighborhood for the first time. Previous studies have shown that wealth is a greater predictor of standardized test scores than race; the test-score gap between rich and low-income students is now nearly double the gap between blacks and whites.

Going back to the 1980s, never have whites been so pessimistic about their futures, according to the General Social Survey, a biannual survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago. Just 45 percent say their family will have a good chance of improving their economic position based on the way things are in America.

The divide is especially evident among those whites who self-identify as working class. Forty-nine percent say they think their children will do better than them, compared with 67 percent of nonwhites who consider themselves working class, even though the economic plight of minorities tends to be worse.

Although they are a shrinking group, working-class whites — defined as those lacking a college degree — remain the biggest demographic bloc of the working-age population. In 2012, Election Day exit polls conducted for the AP and the television networks showed working-class whites made up 36 percent of the electorate, even with a notable drop in white voter turnout.

Last November, Obama won the votes of just 36 percent of those noncollege whites, the worst performance of any Democratic nominee among that group since Republican Ronald Reagan’s 1984 landslide victory over Walter Mondale.

Some Democratic analysts have urged renewed efforts to bring working-class whites into the political fold, calling them a potential “decisive swing voter group” if minority and youth turnout level off in future elections. “In 2016 GOP messaging will be far more focused on expressing concern for ‘the middle class’ and ‘average Americans,'” Andrew Levison and Ruy Teixeira wrote recently in The New Republic.

“They don’t trust big government, but it doesn’t mean they want no government,” says Republican pollster Ed Goeas, who agrees that working-class whites will remain an important electoral group. His research found that many of them would support anti-poverty programs if focused broadly on job training and infrastructure investment. This past week, Obama pledged anew to help manufacturers bring jobs back to America and to create jobs in the energy sectors of wind, solar and natural gas.

“They feel that politicians are giving attention to other people and not them,” Goeas said.

 

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/no-443-en-mi-opinion-julio-29-2013/

No 442 “EN MI OPINION” Julio 28, 2013

julio 28, 2013

No 442  “En mi opinión” Julio 28, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

Lázaro R González Miño Editor    ,

NO OBSTANTE ESTE REPORTE NEGATIVO SOBRE MIAMI, DESPUES DE VIVIR EN ELLA POR MAS DE 50 AÑOS, SIGUE SIENDO LA CIUDAD QUE MAS ME GUSTA PARA VIVIR. ADEMAS POR SU GRAN FUTURO PARA EL QUE QUIERA PROGRESAR EN LA VIDA.

APLICANDO LA LEY Y PROGRAMAS A TRAVES DE LOS MEDIOS EN INGLES Y ESPAÑOL MEJORARIAN ESOS DATOS.

JESÚS ANGULO

 

27 julio 2013

Miami tiene a los peores conductores de Estados Unidos, según reporte

 

Un escritor de Slate ha reunido números para sacar a la luz algo que muchos de nosotros ya sabíamos:Miami tiene a los peores conductores del país.

Brian Palmer, del Slate, examinó los reportes de seguros, de kilometraje y de accidentes y encontró que Miami califica como “primero en muertes por accidentes automovilísticos, atropellamientos de peatones y enfrentamientos verbales de auto a auto”.

Y peor aún, los conductores de Philadelphia ni siquiera se acercaron a lo mal que está Miami, según el Slate.

Los conductores en el suburbio de Hialeah fueron los terceros peores, con lo que Palmer describe como“una terrible tendencia de atropellar a los peatones”.

 

Aquí se ubicaron las muertes de peatones en Hialeah entre 2001-2009, según Transportation For America:

 

Un estudio de 2012 realizado por Allstate, empleado para las métricas de Palmer, halló que los conductores de Hialeah tienen 77 por ciento más probabilidades de involucrarse en un accidente –sobre el promedio nacional de una “colisión de auto” cada 10 años– mientras que los conductores de Miami tiene 58.4 por ciento más probabilidades de ello.

Y ahí no queda la historia. Otra ciudad de Florida se ubica en cuarto lugar en el reporte de Palmer.Mira la historia completa aquí (en inglés).

Pero Palmer no es el único en señalar a Florida.

Transportation for America recientemente clasificó a las áreas más peligrosas para los peatones y halló que cuatro ciudades de Florida fueron las cuatro peores del país.

Las cosas son peores en Florida del Sur.

La Florida Highway Patrol recientemente lanzó números que muestran que Miami-Dade tuvo la mayor cantidad de atropellamientos y huídas (hit-and-runs) del estado en 2012—con la impresionante cantidad de 35 por día, lo que equivale a casi 13,000 al año.

Muy peligroso andar por las calles en Miami, ¿no?

Vía HuffPost Miami.

Relacionado en HuffPost Voce

 

COLUMNA DE Ricardo Samitier.

La Falsa CONTINUA… No importa que el jurado lo declaró inocente‏¿Quiénes Están Interesados…

En Que Continué la Falsa… Del “Negrito Trayvon Martin” No Pueden Perder El Trabajo Hecho Y “La Cara” De Obama…

¿Cuanto Le Habrán Pagado A La Jurado Y A Su Abogado?

Para Que Dijera Que Ella Creía Que Fue Asesinato…

Y Pedirle Perdón A La Mamá De Trayvon… 

La Jurado Tenia Tanto Miedo A Incriminarse Que Fue Con Su Abogado a la Entrevista… Para “Garantizarse” Que No Iba  INCRIMINARSE Mientras “COBRABA DINERO” Por Poder CONTRADECIRSE… Y decir Que Zimmerman es “CULPABLE… Pero la ley lo protegió…”

 

He Aquí Lo que No Se Dice En La Entrevista:

  1. 1.       La Gran Mayoría del Pueblo Norte Americano… No Sabe que las NOTICIAS DE LA

TV…  Están controladas por HOMOSEXUALES y COMUNISTAS que ODIAN A USA.

  1. Ese es el motivo por el cual la ESCOGIDA para hacer esta noticia es la CONOCIDA LESBIANA Robin  Roberts… Quien como todos los ABERRADAS SEXUALES son Socialistas a morirse…
  2. Toda la entrevista es para demostrar que el sistema judicial NO ES JUSTO… miren La cara de satisfacción (en la foto debajo) de la Lesbiana Roberts cuando escucho que Zimmerman es Culpable pero la ley lo salvo…
  3. 4.       Esta entrevista fue anunciada como “El Primer Jurado De Zimmerman Que Habla” eso Vale MUCHO DINERO… pues aumenta la audiencia…
  4. 5.       ABC debía de declarar CUANTO LE PAGARON a la Jurado Y a Su abogado… y quien Fue el investigador que la visito para hacerle la OFERTA…

  

  Satisfecha Que Cumplió Su Misión            Entrevista Con Abogado… ¿Para Qué?  

Esta Noticia Esta En La RED… Pero ABC… Aun No Lo Ha RECONOCIDO

Robin Roberts y su ESPOSA / ESPOSO (Nunca se sabe pues ambas para satisfacerse hacen Lo MISMO) Storm Sahara se casaron en junio 1 del 2013 en el salón de FIESTA del condominio donde viven, con unos pocos amigos cercanos y familiares.

La pareja está discutiendo actualmente una adición a su familia. Existen serias conversaciones sobre una adopción.  A pesar de que Storm tiene una hija de 13 años que parece ser esta tan feliz y igual de emocionada que la pareja… 

La pareja también está hablando de hacer un libro de contar todo acerca de los detalles de su relación en los últimos 5 años. No hay fecha para la publicación… quizás ese libro salga después de la nueva adición a la familia… 

http://www.mstarz.com/articles/14788/20130620/storm-sahara-photos-robin-roberts-marries-girlfriend-secret-wedding-wife-tweets-about-love-acceptance-happiness-on-day-of-ceremony.htm

 

El artículo de Diego Quirós Sr.

COMERCIO  Y  VIAJES  A  CUBA

 

Me pregunto si algun cubano que haya salido  en busca de Libertad ha podido olvidar las humillaciones, los desmanes, la miseria y las violaciones sufridas a todos sus Derechos durante el poco o mucho tiempo que haya vivido bajo la tirania marxista de Castro.

 

¿ Es que acaso, ese cubano dispuesto a visitar la Isla donde el verdugo que mantiene esclavizado a todo un pueblo, solo trajo a tierras de Libertad el estomago para llenarlo y el cuerpo para vestirlo, pero dejo en la Isla cautiva: sus convicciones ?

 

¿ Puede llegar el grado de masoquismo a ese extremo ?

 

No, no, no, mientras dure esa tirania en la que un dia hicieron alianza la crapula y los ineptos, nosotros no podemos entrar de rodillas. Mientras sigan dirigiendo los destinos de nuestra Patria los asesinos de tantos hermanos. Si fueramos, seria para reclamar  justicia, pero no para disfrutar junto a ellos,  las bellezas de nuestro Pais.

 

Esa belleza que hoy se confunde con la trizteza y el sufrimiento, esa belleza que se opaca con la miseria y la discriminacion a los  mas humildes,  esa belleza que se convierte en dolor al ver a los jovenes vendiendo lo unico que poseen: Su Cuerpo, para poder comer. Esa belleza se pierde al saber que son muchos los que tratan de escapar de la realidad, unos por medio del suicidio y otros a traves del alcohol porque han perdido la ilusion y la esperanza.

 

Vas a visitar una nacion  que condecora con grados de coronel a asesinos que lo unico que aprendieron fue a matar y regocijarse viendo caer al indefenso. Vas a visitar una nacion que ha creado un hombre nuevo sin dignidad, sin sentimientos y sin valores. Ese hombre nuevo es la clonacion de Castro y compañia. Vas a visitar una Isla ( que aunque nacistes alli ), esta gobernada por un tirano que un dia te convirtio en apatrida. Pudiera recordarte todo el dolor que ha causado el tirano en esa Isla a la que yo tambien amo tanto…..

 

A Cuba nada, a Cuba no hay que ir mientras esos bastardos esten en el poder.

Negociar con Cuba o visitarla es ser complice y colaborador de la opresion.

 

Diego Quiros, Sr.

 

 

 LA  AUSENCIA

 

Cuba…aquel adios, no fue una despedida,

alli deje mi juventd y deje mi infancia,

estan mis sueños, y a pesar de la distancia

alli quedan  ilusiones que  deje escondidas.

 

 Deje a mis padres,  mis hermanos y mis amigos,

deje a mi pueblo que sufre latigazos y  miseria,

y sufre de la chusma y del marxismo y de la histeria.

Cuba…abandone la tierra, pero te lleve conmigo.

 

Y a pesar de la ausencia en aquella despedida,

y a pesar de los años, del cansancio y la espera

en mi brazo sigue en alto, la antorcha encendida

 

para un nuevo amanecer en mi pueblo inmortal

sin la hoz ni el martillo,  una sola Bandera

y como unico himno,… el Himno Nacional.

 

 

 

Diego Quiros,Sr.

20 de Mayo,2001

 

 

WND NEWS ANALYSIS

MORE RACIAL VIOLENCE ERUPTS IN GREENSBORO

‘This is incredible, the rate at which things are escalating’

Published: 14 hours ago

 COLIN FLAHERTY  Will You Boldly Proclaim“I am a Christian”? Sign the pledge now!billygraham.org/I-am-a-Christian (Editor’s note: Colin Flaherty has done more reporting than any other journalist on what appears to be a nationwide trend of skyrocketing black-on-white crime, violence and abuse. WND features these reports to counterbalance the virtual blackout by the rest of the media due to their concerns that reporting such incidents would be inflammatory or even racist. WND considers it racist not to report racial abuse solely because of the skin color of the perpetrators or victims.) Videos linked or embedded may contain foul language and violence.

I get a lot of tips on black mob violence from WND readers around the country. Some I know about. Some I do not. Some are true. Some are not.

Ads by Google

Many are from cops. Lots and lots of cops. Here’s a message this morning from a Texas cop, a 20-year veteran and a regular correspondent on the topic of black mob violence:

“This is incredible, the rate at which things are escalating. On the streets, out here, the attitude is one of entitlement which i haven’t seen.”

I get that from cops all over the country. Even Greensboro, N.C.

This morning, my email and twitter streams were full of information about Greensboro. The conversations kind of went like this:

“Did you hear about the black mob violence in Greensboro?” asked one reader.

“You mean the Fourth of July where hundreds of black people filled the downtown both before and after the fireworks? Fighting. Destroying property. Defying police. Violating curfew? Where it got so bad they had to use pepper spray?”

“No, not that one.”

“Oh you mean the run up to the Fourth of July?” I asked. “When in the weeks prior to fireworks they had several incidents including one where 400 black people were in the streets fighting. On video. Destroying property. Defying police. Where it got so bad they had to use pepper spray and stun guns?”

“No, not that one either.”

Those were so bad the city council met in an emergency meeting the day before the Fourth of July to impose a curfew in the downtown. Maybe the WND readers were referring to last year.

“Are you talking about the Fourth of July last year?” I asked. “Where 1,000 black people filled the downtown after the fireworks. Fighting. Destroying property. Assaulting people. Defying police. Where it got so bad they had to use pepper spray and stun guns?”

“No, not that either.”

I still had a lot of material to work with. Much of it from “White Girl Bleed a Lot: The return of racial violence and how the media ignore it.” (New and improved edition soon out on WND Books.)

I use Greensboro as an example of a small, nice place with lots of black mob violence that few people know about. I pressed on:

“You mean before that, where a local TV station reported that “every weekend” in June leading up the Fourth of July last year featured large-scale black mob violence downtown? Fighting. Destroying property. Assaulting people. Defying police. Where it got so bad they had to use pepper spray and stun guns?”

“No. Not those either.”

I wasn’t going to ask about the Greensboro concerts, parties and other public events that also feature large scale black mob violence. So much so that city council considered banning them.

But the city council did not. Even the 11 p.m. curfew the city council imposed in a near panic for this year’s Fourth of July almost did not make it. At least one city council member said the curfew was not fair because it targeted black people.

That council member ended up supporting the curfew. But no one knows what would have happened had she decided to make a bigger deal out of it. But she assured them she would not be playing “the race card.”

Only one speaker belled the cat and identified the rioters as “black kids.” The other council members said the large scale violence was not really the fault of the people involved anyway. They placed the blame variously on jobs, housing, poverty, lack of recreation, lousy parents. All the usual.

They did have a midnight basketball program, several council members said. And that seemed to be working just fine. But their idea to hold a free movie downtown, and invite all the disaffected youths, as they did a month ago?

Let’s just say they won’t be doing that again.

Finally I Googled it and looked it up on Twitter: “Large fight Greensboro.”

There it was. Thursday night. More than 200 black people at a party. Fighting. Destroying property. Firing guns. Assaulting people. Fighting cops.

All about half a mile outside of the downtown curfew zone. Six people were arrested.

Some in Greensboro took to the message boards to register their disgust with the lawlessness and anarchy that flourishes in their town on a regular basis.

“Keep up and Greensboro will be just another Detroit,” said one poster called OneLonesomeDove at the WXII TV news site.

“Was this black mob violence?” asked another. “If it was, you need to say so, and not be afraid of the repercussions.”

It was, said several people both in an out of the Greensboro police department. Whatever the repercussions may be of talking about black mob violence , Greensboro is seeing what happens when people do not talk about it.

None of the comments was posted at the local daily paper, the News & Record.

“Comments have been disabled,” is all the paper had to say about that.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/more-racial-violence-erupts-in-greensboro/#ieLHE5ElCY2TwECP.99 

Obama Administration Considering Government Shut-Down Strategy

Carol Platt Liebau | Jul 26, 2013

The Washington Post reports that some Obama administration officials are pushing for a confrontational budget strategy that would likely result in a government shut-down.  In one scenario, the president would refuse to sign any funding measure that didn’t roll back the sequester.

No doubt the administration officials advocating such a course are remembering the heady days of the Clinton administration, when the GOP’s decision to shut down the government effectively resulted in their losing control of the narrative that had swept them to power.

But there are reasons for Democrats to be cautious; history may not repeat itself.  For one thing, Newt Gingrich’s shoot-from-the-lip tendencies allowed the 1995 shut down to be portrayed as the result of his personal pique for having to deplane from the back of Air Force One. For another, Bill Clinton hadn’t taken the country on a massive spending spree, or proposed budgets that do nothing more than impose hitherto unimaginable (and dangerous) levels of debt on our country for years to come.

Finally, President Obama has hurt his own credibility with specious Chicken Little claims that the sky would fall if the sequester went into effect.  What’s more, don’t forget that in 2011, Obama threatened to vet any attempts to undo sequester cuts(yes, of course, that was before the election!) — and no doubt we’d hear more about that hypocrisy.

Perhaps the President intends to force a shut-down anyway, figuring that, as always, his friends in the press will deem it another “good idea” and spin it his way, thus firing up low-information voters before the the 2014 elections.  But he should bear in mind that, like the sequester (and so much else) this spring, things may not work out exactly as he hoped. http://townhall.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2013/07/26/obama-administration-considering-government-shutdown-n1650158

 

Robert A. Hall is an actor. He plays the coroner on CSI if you watch that show. He also is a Marine Vietnam War veteran, but does not mention that he had his legs blown off in that war.  Enviado por Enrique Enriquez.

“I’m 63 and I’m Tired”by Robert A. Hall

I’m 63
. Except for one semester in college when jobs were scarce and a six-month period when I was between jobs, but job-hunting every day, I’ve worked hard since I was 18. Despite some health challenges, I still put in 50-hour weeks, and haven’t called in sick in seven or eight years. I make a good salary, but I didn’t inherit my job or my income, and I worked to get where I am. Given the economy, there’s no retirement in sight, and I’m tired. Very tired. 

I’m tired
 of being told that I have to “spread the wealth” to people who don’t have my work ethic. I’m tired of being told the government will take the money I earned, by force if necessary, and give it to people too lazy to earn it. 

I’m tired
 of being told that I have to pay more taxes to “keep people in their homes.” Sure, if they lost their jobs or got sick, I’m willing to help. But if they bought Mc Mansions at three times the price of our paid-off, $250,000 condo, on one-third of my salary, then let the left-wing Congress-critters who passed Fannie and Freddie and the Community Reinvestment Act that created the bubble use their own money to help them.

I’m tired
 of being told how bad America is by left-wing millionaires like Michael Moore, George Soros and Hollywood Entertainers who live in luxury because of the opportunities America provided to them. In thirty years, if they get their way, the United States will have:

1. the economy of Zimbabwe ,

2. the freedom of the press of China

3. the crime and violence of Mexico ,

4. the tolerance for Christian people of Iran

5. the freedom of speech of Venezuela ..

I’m tired
 of being told that Islam is a “Religion of Peace,” when every day I can read stories of Muslim men killing their sisters, wives and daughters for their family “honor”; of Muslims rioting over some slight offense; of Muslims murdering Christian and Jews because they aren’t “believers”; of Muslims burning schools for girls; of Muslims stoning teenage rape victims to death for “adultery”; of Muslims mutilating the genitals of little girls; all in the name of Allah, because the Qur’an and Sharia’s law tells them to. 

I’m tired
 of being told that “race doesn’t matter” in the post-racial world of Obama, when it’s all that matters in affirmative action jobs, lower college admission and graduation standards for minorities (harming them the most), government contract set-asides, tolerance for the ghetto culture of violence and fatherless children that hurts minorities more than anyone, and in the appointment of U.S. Senators from Illinois. 

I think
 it’s very cool that we have a black president and that a black child is doing her homework at the desk where Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation. I just wish the black president was Condi Rice, or someone who believes more in freedom and the individual and less arrogantly in an all-knowing government. 

I’m tired
 of being told that out of “tolerance for other cultures” we must not complain when Saudi Arabia uses the money we pay for their oil to fund mosques and madras Islamic schools to preach hate in America, while no American group is allowed to fund a church, synagogue or religious school in Saudi Arabia to teach love and tolerance. 

I’m tired
 of being told I must lower my living standard to fight global warming, which no one is allowed to debate. My wife and I live in a two-bedroom apartment and carpool together five miles to our jobs. We also own a three-bedroom condo where our daughter and granddaughter live. Our carbon footprint is about 5% of Al Gore’s, and if you’re greener than Gore, you’re green enough. 

I’m tired
 of being told that drug addicts have a disease, and I must help support and treat them, and pay for the damage they do. Did a giant germ rush out of a dark alley, grab them, and stuff white powder up their noses while they tried to fight it off? I don’t think gay people choose to be gay, but I #@*# sure think druggies chose to take drugs. And I’m tired of harassment from “cool” people treating me like a freak when I tell them I never tried marijuana. 

I’m tired
 of illegal aliens being called “undocumented workers,” especially those who aren’t working, but living on welfare or crime. What’s next? Calling drug dealers, “Undocumented Pharmacists”? And, no, I’m not against Hispanics. Most of them are Catholic, and it’s been a few hundred years since Catholics wanted to kill me for my religion. I’m willing to fast track citizenship for any Hispanic who can speak English, doesn’t have a criminal record and who is self-supporting without family on welfare, or who serves honorably for three years in our military. Those are the kind of citizens we need. 

I’m tired
 of the trashing of our military by latte liberals and journalists, who would never wear the uniform of the Republic themselves, or let their entitlement-handicapped kids near a recruiting station. They and their kids can sit at home, never having to make split-second decisions under life and death circumstances, and bad mouth better people than themselves. Do bad things happen in war? You bet. Do our troops sometimes misbehave? Sure. Does this compare with the atrocities that were the policy of our enemies for the last fifty years and still are? Not even close. So here’s a deal for those folks. I’ll let myself be subjected to all the humiliation and abuse that was heaped on terrorists at Abu Ghraib or Gitmo, while the critics of our military can be subject to captivity by the Muslims, who tortured and beheaded Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, or the Muslims who tortured and murdered Marine Lt. Col. William Higgins in Lebanon, or the Muslims who ran the blood-spattered Al Qaeda torture rooms our troops found in Iraq, or the Muslims who cut off the heads of schoolgirls in Indonesia because the girls were Christian — then we’ll compare notes. British and American soldiers are the only troops in history that civilians came to for help and handouts, instead of hiding from in fear. 

I’m tired
 of people telling me that their party has a corner on virtue and the other party has a corner on corruption. Read the papers; bums are bipartisan. And I’m tired of people telling me we need bipartisanship. I live in Illinois , where the “Illinois Combine” of Democrats has looted the public treasury for years. Not to mention the tax cheats in Obama’s cabinet. 

I’m tired
 of hearing wealthy athletes, entertainers and politicians of both parties talking about “innocent” mistakes, “stupid” mistakes or “youthful” mistakes, when all of us know they think their only mistake was getting caught. 

Speaking of poor, I’m tired 
of people with a sense of entitlement who have air-conditioned homes, color TVs and two cars called poor. The majority of Americans didn’t have that in 1970, but we didn’t know we were “poor.” The poverty pimps have to keep changing the definition of poor to keep the dollars flowing. 

I’m real tired
 of people, rich or poor, who don’t take responsibility for their lives and actions. I’m tired of hearing them blame the government, or discrimination or big-whatever for their problems. 

Yes, I’m tired, b
ut I’m also glad to be 63, mostly because I’m not going to have to see the world these people are making. I’m just sorry for my granddaughter.

Robert A. Hall is a Marine Vietnam veteran who served five terms in the Massachusetts State Senate.


There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

 

 

学习阅读中国语言。阅读这坐着以免跌倒

UPDATE: China Will Trade Debt for US Land…

January 21, 2013

tags: China DebtGlobal EconomyNew World OrderUS Jobs,US Land

CHINA POISED TO PLAY DEBT CARD – FOR U.S. LAND
Communist nation could control American land as ‘development zones’

by JEROME R. CORSI

EDITOR’S NOTE: Barack Obama’s involvement in the DeMar Second Amendment case was previously reported in Chapter 7 of Jerome R. Corsi’s “America for Sale: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty.”

 

NEW YORK – Could real estate on American soil owned by China be set up as “development zones” in which the communist nation could establish Chinese-owned businesses and bring in its citizens to the U.S. to work?

That’s part of an evolving proposal Beijing has been developing quietly since 2009 to convert more than $1 trillion of U.S debt it owns into equity.

Under the plan, China would own U.S. businesses, U.S. infrastructure and U.S. high-value land, all with a U.S. government guarantee against loss.

Yu Qiao, a professor of economics in the School of Public Policy and Management at Tsighua University in Beijing, proposed in 2009 a plan for the U.S. government to guarantee foreign investments in the United States.

WND has reliable information that the Bank of China, China’s central bank, has continued to advance the plan to convert China’s holdings of U.S. debt into equity owned by China in the U.S.

The Obama administration, under the plan, would grant a financial guarantee as an inducement for China to convert U.S. debt into Chinese direct equity investment. China would take ownership of successful U.S. corporations, potentially profitable infrastructure projects and high-value U.S. real estate.

Jerome Corsi exposes the globalists’ plan to put America on the chopping block in “America for Sale: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty,” available at WND’s Superstore.

The plan would be designed to induce China to resume lending to the U.S. on a nearly zero-interest basis.

However, converting Chinese debt to equity investments in the United States could easily add another $1 trillion to outstanding Obama administration guarantees issued in the current economic crisis.

As of November 2012, China owned $1.17 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, according to U.S. Department of Treasury and Federal Reserve Board calculations published Jan. 16.

Concerned about the unrestrained growth in U.S. debt under the Obama administration, China has reduced by 97 percent its holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury bills. China’s holding of $573.7 billion in August 2008, prior to the massive bank bailouts and stimulus programs triggered by the collapse in the U.S. mortgage market, dwindled to $5.96 billion by March 2011.

Treasury bills are short-term debt that matures in one year or less, sold to finance U.S. debt. Holdings of Treasury bills are included in the $1.17 trillion of total Treasury securities owned by China as of November 2012.

In addition to a national debt in excess of $16 trillion, the U.S. government in 2010 faced over $70 trillion in unfunded obligations, including Social Security and Medicare benefits scheduled to be paid retiring baby boomer retirees in the coming decades, with unfunded obligations showing no sign of being reduced with Congress at a deadlock over reducing federal government spending.

Yu Qiao observed that if the U.S. dollar collapsed under the weight of proposed Obama administration trillion-dollar budget deficits into the foreseeable future, holders of U.S. debt would face substantial losses that the Financial Times estimated “would devastate Asians’ hard-earned wealth and terminate economic globalization.”

“The basic idea is to turn Asian savings, China’s in particular, into real business interests rather than let them be used to support U.S. over-consumption,” Yu Qiao wrote, reflecting themes commonly suggested by Chinese government officials. “While fixed-income securities are vulnerable to any fall in the value of the dollar, equity claims on sound corporations and infrastructure projects are at less risk from a currency default,” he continued.

The problem is that, in a struggling U.S. economy, China does not want to trade its investment in U.S. Treasury debt securities, with their inherent risk of dollar devaluation, for equally risky investments in U.S. corporations and infrastructure projects.

“But Asians do not want to bear the risk of this investment because of market turbulence and a lack of knowledge of cultural, legal and regulatory issues in U.S. businesses,” he stressed. “However if a guarantee scheme were created, Asian savers could be willing to invest directly in capital-hungry U.S. industries.”

Yu Qiao’s plan included four components:

China would negotiate with the U.S. government to create a “crisis relief facility,” or CRF. The CRF “would be used alongside U.S. federal efforts to stabilize the banking system and to invest in capital-intensive infrastructure projects such as high-speed railroad from Boston to Washington, D.C.
China would pool a portion of its holdings of Treasury bonds under the CFR umbrella to convert sovereign debt into equity. Any CFR funds that were designated for investment in U.S. corporations would still be owned and managed by U.S. equity holders, with the Asians holding minority equity shares “that would, like preferred stock, be convertible.”

The U.S. government would act as a guarantor, “providing a sovereign guarantee scheme to assure the investment principal of the CRF against possible default of targeted companies or projects”.

The Federal Reserve would set up a special account to supply the liquidity the CRF would require to swap sovereign debt into industrial investment in the United States.

“The CRF would lessen Asians’ concern about implicit default of sovereign debts caused by a collapsing dollar,” Yu Qiao concluded. “It would cost little and help the U.S. by channeling funds to business investment.”

Read more at:

http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/01/china-poised-to-play-debt-card-for-u-s-land/#5iOitOcSUEubZkEX.99

http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2013/01/21/china-will-trade-debt-for-us-land/

China boosts US investment to all-time high; seeks more

Although all the news about Chinese investment in the U.S. has focused on the deals that don’t get done, Chinese investment in the U.S. is at an all-time high.

The Chinese are making headlines around the word for hungrily acquiring energy and resource companies in countries such as Canada, Africa and Latin America.

In the United States, the single largest Chinese investment to date is far more mundane: movie theaters. And to a large extent, that type of acquisition explains the broader story about China’s strategy when it comes to U.S. investment.

AMC Theaters, previously owned by a group of U.S. private equity firms, is now a division of Dalian Wanda of China—a huge entertainment conglomerate that spent $2.6 billion in 2012 on the theater chain.

It’s no accident that the largest U.S. purchase so far is for a company as non-controversial as AMC. Chinese businesses—many of them government-owned—have repeatedly been rebuffed by the U.S. government when trying to buy American firms that control natural resources or advanced technology.

Despite all the negative headlines, Chinese investment in the U.S. hit an all-time record in 2012: $6.5 billion. It will likely surpass that level in 2013, according to Rhodium Group, which does detailed tracking of Chinese investment. The Heritage Foundation says the U.S. was the single biggest recipient of Chinese overseas investment last year, eclipsing Australia for the first time.

“We are in the midst of a structural growth story that will transform the China-U.S. investment relationship from a one-way street into a two-way street,” says Thilo Hanemann of Rhodium.

CNBC profiled three Chinese-owned companies in the U.S. in order to explore what kind of deals and investments are getting done, and the motivations behind them.AMC Theaters, International Vitamin Corporation, and China Construction of America represent a cross-section of Chinese-owned firms.

Jianlin Wang, chairman of Dalian Wanda, which bought AMC, wants his company to reach $100 billion in revenue by 2020, up from the current $30 billion. While his home market China is the fastest growing movie market in the world, he’ll still need overseas acquisitions to achieve his goal.

“The acquisition of AMC is just the start,” says Wang, and “probably before the end of the year we may complete one or two more deals.” He says he expects to spend another $7 billion in the U.S. by the end of this decade.

International Vitamin Corporation, of Freehold, N.J., came into being after a Chinese company bought the vitamin assets of Inverness Medical from private equity in 2010. CEO Steven Dai says the investors (he’s one of them) have pumped “upwards of hundred millions of dollars into the company,” since then—improving its IT backbone, expanding warehouse capacity, and increasing the number of employees from 280 to 400, all in the U.S.

(Read More: Will China Buy Up Greece’s Best Assets?)

Dai, the only Chinese employee, says buying an American company made the most sense because the U.S. has a highly developed, multi-billion dollar, nutritional market “which constantly grows every year.” Of the three companies that spoke to CNBC, the one with the longest history in the U.S. is China Construction of America, a wholly owned subsidiary of China State Construction Engineering Corporation (CSCEC) that had $500 million in revenue in 2012. Although publicly traded in Shanghai, CSCEC shares are majority owned by the Chinese government, making China Construction of America part of what’s known as a State-Owned Enterprise.

China Construction set up shop here in 1985 because the U.S. was the world’s largest construction market at the time. Why are they still doing business here, when China is now larger and growing faster? Geographic diversification, CEO Ning Yuan tells CNBC, in case the home market falters.

The company has been successful at bidding for state-level and municipal projects such as public schools in South Carolina and New York State transportation projects such as the $407 million Alexander Hamilton bridge rehabilitation.

But Yuan expressed frustration at not being able to qualify for larger federal projects—what are known as “P3s”—Public Private Partnerships. The U.S. Department of Transportation requires companies to become prequalified before bidding on P3s. Despite numerous attempts, Yuan says they’ve never been prequalified. “I think that’s happened not only to a Chinese company but also to some other foreign companies,” he said. “I would say that it is a little bit political.”

That may be true. Firms owned by the Chinese government are perceived as having unfair advantages, such as access to cheaper financing from Chinese banks, which are also government-owned. Yuan rejects the notion, saying Chinese banks charge them market rates that are comparable to any other multinational bank.

While there may be critics at the federal level, the mood is the opposite at the state level. New Jersey’s lieutenant governor has visited IVC’s headquarters, and has asked CEO Dai to speak to other visiting Chinese executives to convince them to invest in N.J. as well.

Chairman Wang says that while members of Congress may be worried, officials at the state, city and municipal level “are quite welcome to Chinese investment, because such investment can create job opportunities and boost economic development.”

To be sure, even though Chinese investment is at a record level, it is still relatively small compared to the size of the U.S. economy. According to the Heritage Foundation, total Chinese investment in the U.S. since 2005 stands at $54 billion, compared with an overall wealth stock in the U.S. of $60 trillion.

The Heritage Foundation marks the starting point of China’s overseas acquisitions with the 2005 purchase of IBM‘s computer business by Lenovo for $1.74 billion. Not only was it a transformational transaction for IBM, it heralded the arrival of the Chinese investor.

But 2005 also marks the year of the highest-profile rejection of a Chinese purchase—when CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Company) tried to purchase Unocal of California for $18.5 billion. The mere announcement of the deal created so much Congressional controversy that Unocal accepted a lower bid rather than risk U.S. government rejection of the CNOOC offer.

China has never again attempted such a large energy acquisition in the U.S. even though it has done numerous major energy deals elsewhere in the world.

In the U.S., Chinese energy investments have been limited to minority stakes and joint ventures, including Sinopec’s $2.2 billion investment last year in some of Devon Energy’s venture plays, and a $1 billion investment for part ownership of some of Chesapeake’s shale gas properties.

In 2012, President Obama rejected a Chinese purchase of four Oregon wind farms due to their proximity to a U.S. naval drone-testing site. Additionally, a congressional report last year eviscerated two Chinese telecom companies eager to do business in the United States, Huawei & ZTE; members of Congress came very close to accusing the two firms of spying on behalf of the Chinese government.

The next key moment comes when AIG, the insurance company, finds out if it will be allowed to sell most of its aircraft leasing arm to a Chinese consortium for $4.8 billion. The deal was announced in December, and if finalized, would eclipse the AMC theater purchase.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, the government agency that vets foreign deals for security concerns, has yet to sign off on it. 

http://www.nbcnews.com/business/china-boosts-us-investment-all-time-high-seeks-more-6C10018475

China Seeks To Use Tennessee Mountains, U.S. Land For Economic Gain

June 03, 2013   James Moreland

Every year, alarming amounts of U.S. dollars leave the ever-shrinking American economy and go to China. This huge transfer of wealth has resulted in dramatic effects for both the U.S. and China. For China, it’s brought about an economic boom. For the United States, an economic decline.

One thing that has contributed to this decline is the fact that China has loaned the U.S. government over a trillion dollars. This is just part of the $3.2 trillion in converted currency reserves China has hanging over our heads. Effectively, this debt has silently granted the Chinese government an alarming amount of leverage over our economy. In addition, China has also started to buy up businesses, real estate and natural resources all over the United States. In all actuality, one has to wonder if China’s end goal is to infiltrate the U.S.

The United States has stumbled into a rather vulnerable position due to the agreements we have with China. In the years since our relationship with the communist country began, the U.S. has witnessed an ever-growing Chinese presence in our states. Even more worrisome is the fact that the Chinese government is using their Favored Nation Status as an economic weapon against the United States to benefit their own economy at the expense of our own. A prime example of this is a recent move on China’s part to acquire the coal beneath Tennessee’s mountains. They aim to blow up Tennessee mountains for the coal it would result in.

A Wall Street Journal MarketWatch article from last May that revealed China-based Guizhou Gouchuang Energy Holdings Group said it had raised $616 million in a private placement to be used mainly to acquire and develop Triple H Coal Co. in Jacksboro, Tenn. “That would make Guizhou Gouchuang the first Chinese company to invest in coal in the U.S.”

China is not limiting their infiltration merely to Tennessee’s mountains and coal, though. The Chinese Central Bank also currently has a plan in the works that would set up other “development zones” on U.S. soil.

Richmond, a suburb in Vancouver, Canada, is North America’s most Asian city. Fifty percent of the residents there are Chinese. In Michigan, a group called “Sino-Michigan Properties LLC” has already bought 200 acres of land near the town of Milan to build what they call a “China City.” In Idaho, a Chinese company called “Sinomach” is interested in developing 50 square miles of self-sustaining technology zones south of the Boise airport. They are also looking at land in Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania to set up research and development bases and industrial parks.

In addition to buying up American land, Chinese shipping companies have also been purchasing important ports in Long Beach, California and Boston, Massachusetts.

 

If something isn’t done soon to take the U.S. off of the path we are on, we will continue to see Chinese companies infiltrating and purchasing U.S. land until eventually we find ourselves working for the Chinese government, instead of United States businesses. Spread the word and contact your congressmen and women. Demand a change from our leaders to restore America. Send this letter to your congressional representative and to five of your friends and ask them to do the same!

Weiner’s a Problem but Huma Abedin is a Bigger Problem

Posted 3 Hours Ago by Marilyn Assenheim filed under 2016 ElectionConstitutionCorruptionEmail FeaturedEthicsLiberalismMarriageMoralityPolitics

On Thursday, Huma Abedin had been flogged across the airwaves by the MSM as being “intelligent,” “delicate,” “brave” and was lauded for “standing by her man.” The degenerate Anthony Weiner had “made a mistake.” Several, actually. Why the deafening cacophony of praise? Because Abedin and the State Department are under Senate investigation and MSM is trying to deflect damaging public scrutiny of Abedin/Hillary/State Department wrongdoing.

If the investigation sinks Abedin, it might also derail a potential presidential run by Hillary Clinton in 2016. Abedin and Hillary are indiscrete in more ways than one.

 

 

 

For example, as a consultant for Teneo.

Teneo trades stocks and bonds. Abedin’s security clearance and access to insider trading information is at issue here, among other possible infractions. Such as keeping her nose in the government feeding trough at taxpayer expense while rooting for truffles in greener pastures. Abedin’s part-time consulting gig  with Teneo harvested an additional $355,000 annually. Bill Clinton is a board member of Teneo. According to a witness, Abedin was also employed, during that time, privately by no less than four entities: Hillary, the State Department, Teneo, and the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation. Heckuva gig for a stay-at-home mom.

The Senate investigation, headed by Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA), has, thus far, not received a single document requested from either the State Department or Abedin.  Grassley wrote to Abedin: “I am concerned that the ‘special government employee’ designation blurs the line between public and private sector employees, especially when employees receive full-time salaries for what appears to be part-time work…” Abedin responded with a letter denying any wrongdoing. Well, there it is; she says so, so it must be true…right?

 

Abedin staunchly declared to the press that she is in love with Weiner. Doubtful. What she is in love with, however, is power. She is following the lessons picked up while squatting at her mentor’s feet. Hillary has a long history of  pursuing criminal activity while clutching the coattails of men. She pleaded “no contest “to at least five fundraising schemes, was implicated in the Whitewater scandal, defrauded former clients while with the Rose Law Firm, pleaded a loss of memory no fewer than 250 times during Congressional hearings, and parlayed insider information of the stock market into a personal gain of hundreds of thousands of dollars, just to name a few.

She was the first FLOTUS to come under criminal investigation; a special prosecutor stated that she’d narrowly avoided indictment only because of her status as First Lady. She’s even sidestepping State Department ineptitude and the Benghazi disgrace successfully.

Hillary is the venal, incompetent tool the left is pitching as the first female president. Abedin must stand by Weiner as Hillary stood by her trouser-snake of a husband in order to replace criminality with loyalty in the public’s consciousness.

If that dodge continues to work, the jackass won’t be Democrat; it will be us.

 http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/07/weiners-a-problem-but-huma-abedin-is-a-bigger-problem/#ixzz2aGCZuqo8

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

No 442 “EN MI OPINION” Julio 28, 2013

julio 28, 2013

No 442  “En mi opinión” Julio 28, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

Lázaro R González Miño Editor    ,

NO OBSTANTE ESTE REPORTE NEGATIVO SOBRE MIAMI, DESPUES DE VIVIR EN ELLA POR MAS DE 50 AÑOS, SIGUE SIENDO LA CIUDAD QUE MAS ME GUSTA PARA VIVIR. ADEMAS POR SU GRAN FUTURO PARA EL QUE QUIERA PROGRESAR EN LA VIDA.

APLICANDO LA LEY Y PROGRAMAS A TRAVES DE LOS MEDIOS EN INGLES Y ESPAÑOL MEJORARIAN ESOS DATOS.

JESÚS ANGULO

 

27 julio 2013

Miami tiene a los peores conductores de Estados Unidos, según reporte

 

Un escritor de Slate ha reunido números para sacar a la luz algo que muchos de nosotros ya sabíamos:Miami tiene a los peores conductores del país.

Brian Palmer, del Slate, examinó los reportes de seguros, de kilometraje y de accidentes y encontró que Miami califica como “primero en muertes por accidentes automovilísticos, atropellamientos de peatones y enfrentamientos verbales de auto a auto”.

Y peor aún, los conductores de Philadelphia ni siquiera se acercaron a lo mal que está Miami, según el Slate.

Los conductores en el suburbio de Hialeah fueron los terceros peores, con lo que Palmer describe como“una terrible tendencia de atropellar a los peatones”.

 

Aquí se ubicaron las muertes de peatones en Hialeah entre 2001-2009, según Transportation For America:

 

Un estudio de 2012 realizado por Allstate, empleado para las métricas de Palmer, halló que los conductores de Hialeah tienen 77 por ciento más probabilidades de involucrarse en un accidente –sobre el promedio nacional de una “colisión de auto” cada 10 años– mientras que los conductores de Miami tiene 58.4 por ciento más probabilidades de ello.

Y ahí no queda la historia. Otra ciudad de Florida se ubica en cuarto lugar en el reporte de Palmer.Mira la historia completa aquí (en inglés).

Pero Palmer no es el único en señalar a Florida.

Transportation for America recientemente clasificó a las áreas más peligrosas para los peatones y halló que cuatro ciudades de Florida fueron las cuatro peores del país.

Las cosas son peores en Florida del Sur.

La Florida Highway Patrol recientemente lanzó números que muestran que Miami-Dade tuvo la mayor cantidad de atropellamientos y huídas (hit-and-runs) del estado en 2012—con la impresionante cantidad de 35 por día, lo que equivale a casi 13,000 al año.

Muy peligroso andar por las calles en Miami, ¿no?

Vía HuffPost Miami.

Relacionado en HuffPost Voce

 

COLUMNA DE Ricardo Samitier.

La Falsa CONTINUA… No importa que el jurado lo declaró inocente‏¿Quiénes Están Interesados…

En Que Continué la Falsa… Del “Negrito Trayvon Martin” No Pueden Perder El Trabajo Hecho Y “La Cara” De Obama…

¿Cuanto Le Habrán Pagado A La Jurado Y A Su Abogado?

Para Que Dijera Que Ella Creía Que Fue Asesinato…

Y Pedirle Perdón A La Mamá De Trayvon… 

La Jurado Tenia Tanto Miedo A Incriminarse Que Fue Con Su Abogado a la Entrevista… Para “Garantizarse” Que No Iba  INCRIMINARSE Mientras “COBRABA DINERO” Por Poder CONTRADECIRSE… Y decir Que Zimmerman es “CULPABLE… Pero la ley lo protegió…”

 

He Aquí Lo que No Se Dice En La Entrevista:

  1. 1.       La Gran Mayoría del Pueblo Norte Americano… No Sabe que las NOTICIAS DE LA

TV…  Están controladas por HOMOSEXUALES y COMUNISTAS que ODIAN A USA.

  1. Ese es el motivo por el cual la ESCOGIDA para hacer esta noticia es la CONOCIDA LESBIANA Robin  Roberts… Quien como todos los ABERRADAS SEXUALES son Socialistas a morirse…
  2. Toda la entrevista es para demostrar que el sistema judicial NO ES JUSTO… miren La cara de satisfacción (en la foto debajo) de la Lesbiana Roberts cuando escucho que Zimmerman es Culpable pero la ley lo salvo…
  3. 4.       Esta entrevista fue anunciada como “El Primer Jurado De Zimmerman Que Habla” eso Vale MUCHO DINERO… pues aumenta la audiencia…
  4. 5.       ABC debía de declarar CUANTO LE PAGARON a la Jurado Y a Su abogado… y quien Fue el investigador que la visito para hacerle la OFERTA…

  

  Satisfecha Que Cumplió Su Misión            Entrevista Con Abogado… ¿Para Qué?  

Esta Noticia Esta En La RED… Pero ABC… Aun No Lo Ha RECONOCIDO

Robin Roberts y su ESPOSA / ESPOSO (Nunca se sabe pues ambas para satisfacerse hacen Lo MISMO) Storm Sahara se casaron en junio 1 del 2013 en el salón de FIESTA del condominio donde viven, con unos pocos amigos cercanos y familiares.

La pareja está discutiendo actualmente una adición a su familia. Existen serias conversaciones sobre una adopción.  A pesar de que Storm tiene una hija de 13 años que parece ser esta tan feliz y igual de emocionada que la pareja… 

La pareja también está hablando de hacer un libro de contar todo acerca de los detalles de su relación en los últimos 5 años. No hay fecha para la publicación… quizás ese libro salga después de la nueva adición a la familia… 

http://www.mstarz.com/articles/14788/20130620/storm-sahara-photos-robin-roberts-marries-girlfriend-secret-wedding-wife-tweets-about-love-acceptance-happiness-on-day-of-ceremony.htm

 

El artículo de Diego Quirós Sr.

COMERCIO  Y  VIAJES  A  CUBA

 

Me pregunto si algun cubano que haya salido  en busca de Libertad ha podido olvidar las humillaciones, los desmanes, la miseria y las violaciones sufridas a todos sus Derechos durante el poco o mucho tiempo que haya vivido bajo la tirania marxista de Castro.

 

¿ Es que acaso, ese cubano dispuesto a visitar la Isla donde el verdugo que mantiene esclavizado a todo un pueblo, solo trajo a tierras de Libertad el estomago para llenarlo y el cuerpo para vestirlo, pero dejo en la Isla cautiva: sus convicciones ?

 

¿ Puede llegar el grado de masoquismo a ese extremo ?

 

No, no, no, mientras dure esa tirania en la que un dia hicieron alianza la crapula y los ineptos, nosotros no podemos entrar de rodillas. Mientras sigan dirigiendo los destinos de nuestra Patria los asesinos de tantos hermanos. Si fueramos, seria para reclamar  justicia, pero no para disfrutar junto a ellos,  las bellezas de nuestro Pais.

 

Esa belleza que hoy se confunde con la trizteza y el sufrimiento, esa belleza que se opaca con la miseria y la discriminacion a los  mas humildes,  esa belleza que se convierte en dolor al ver a los jovenes vendiendo lo unico que poseen: Su Cuerpo, para poder comer. Esa belleza se pierde al saber que son muchos los que tratan de escapar de la realidad, unos por medio del suicidio y otros a traves del alcohol porque han perdido la ilusion y la esperanza.

 

Vas a visitar una nacion  que condecora con grados de coronel a asesinos que lo unico que aprendieron fue a matar y regocijarse viendo caer al indefenso. Vas a visitar una nacion que ha creado un hombre nuevo sin dignidad, sin sentimientos y sin valores. Ese hombre nuevo es la clonacion de Castro y compañia. Vas a visitar una Isla ( que aunque nacistes alli ), esta gobernada por un tirano que un dia te convirtio en apatrida. Pudiera recordarte todo el dolor que ha causado el tirano en esa Isla a la que yo tambien amo tanto…..

 

A Cuba nada, a Cuba no hay que ir mientras esos bastardos esten en el poder.

Negociar con Cuba o visitarla es ser complice y colaborador de la opresion.

 

Diego Quiros, Sr.

 

 

 LA  AUSENCIA

 

Cuba…aquel adios, no fue una despedida,

alli deje mi juventd y deje mi infancia,

estan mis sueños, y a pesar de la distancia

alli quedan  ilusiones que  deje escondidas.

 

 Deje a mis padres,  mis hermanos y mis amigos,

deje a mi pueblo que sufre latigazos y  miseria,

y sufre de la chusma y del marxismo y de la histeria.

Cuba…abandone la tierra, pero te lleve conmigo.

 

Y a pesar de la ausencia en aquella despedida,

y a pesar de los años, del cansancio y la espera

en mi brazo sigue en alto, la antorcha encendida

 

para un nuevo amanecer en mi pueblo inmortal

sin la hoz ni el martillo,  una sola Bandera

y como unico himno,… el Himno Nacional.

 

 

 

Diego Quiros,Sr.

20 de Mayo,2001

 

 

WND NEWS ANALYSIS

MORE RACIAL VIOLENCE ERUPTS IN GREENSBORO

‘This is incredible, the rate at which things are escalating’

Published: 14 hours ago

 COLIN FLAHERTY  Will You Boldly Proclaim“I am a Christian”? Sign the pledge now!billygraham.org/I-am-a-Christian (Editor’s note: Colin Flaherty has done more reporting than any other journalist on what appears to be a nationwide trend of skyrocketing black-on-white crime, violence and abuse. WND features these reports to counterbalance the virtual blackout by the rest of the media due to their concerns that reporting such incidents would be inflammatory or even racist. WND considers it racist not to report racial abuse solely because of the skin color of the perpetrators or victims.) Videos linked or embedded may contain foul language and violence.

I get a lot of tips on black mob violence from WND readers around the country. Some I know about. Some I do not. Some are true. Some are not.

Ads by Google

Many are from cops. Lots and lots of cops. Here’s a message this morning from a Texas cop, a 20-year veteran and a regular correspondent on the topic of black mob violence:

“This is incredible, the rate at which things are escalating. On the streets, out here, the attitude is one of entitlement which i haven’t seen.”

I get that from cops all over the country. Even Greensboro, N.C.

This morning, my email and twitter streams were full of information about Greensboro. The conversations kind of went like this:

“Did you hear about the black mob violence in Greensboro?” asked one reader.

“You mean the Fourth of July where hundreds of black people filled the downtown both before and after the fireworks? Fighting. Destroying property. Defying police. Violating curfew? Where it got so bad they had to use pepper spray?”

“No, not that one.”

“Oh you mean the run up to the Fourth of July?” I asked. “When in the weeks prior to fireworks they had several incidents including one where 400 black people were in the streets fighting. On video. Destroying property. Defying police. Where it got so bad they had to use pepper spray and stun guns?”

“No, not that one either.”

Those were so bad the city council met in an emergency meeting the day before the Fourth of July to impose a curfew in the downtown. Maybe the WND readers were referring to last year.

“Are you talking about the Fourth of July last year?” I asked. “Where 1,000 black people filled the downtown after the fireworks. Fighting. Destroying property. Assaulting people. Defying police. Where it got so bad they had to use pepper spray and stun guns?”

“No, not that either.”

I still had a lot of material to work with. Much of it from “White Girl Bleed a Lot: The return of racial violence and how the media ignore it.” (New and improved edition soon out on WND Books.)

I use Greensboro as an example of a small, nice place with lots of black mob violence that few people know about. I pressed on:

“You mean before that, where a local TV station reported that “every weekend” in June leading up the Fourth of July last year featured large-scale black mob violence downtown? Fighting. Destroying property. Assaulting people. Defying police. Where it got so bad they had to use pepper spray and stun guns?”

“No. Not those either.”

I wasn’t going to ask about the Greensboro concerts, parties and other public events that also feature large scale black mob violence. So much so that city council considered banning them.

But the city council did not. Even the 11 p.m. curfew the city council imposed in a near panic for this year’s Fourth of July almost did not make it. At least one city council member said the curfew was not fair because it targeted black people.

That council member ended up supporting the curfew. But no one knows what would have happened had she decided to make a bigger deal out of it. But she assured them she would not be playing “the race card.”

Only one speaker belled the cat and identified the rioters as “black kids.” The other council members said the large scale violence was not really the fault of the people involved anyway. They placed the blame variously on jobs, housing, poverty, lack of recreation, lousy parents. All the usual.

They did have a midnight basketball program, several council members said. And that seemed to be working just fine. But their idea to hold a free movie downtown, and invite all the disaffected youths, as they did a month ago?

Let’s just say they won’t be doing that again.

Finally I Googled it and looked it up on Twitter: “Large fight Greensboro.”

There it was. Thursday night. More than 200 black people at a party. Fighting. Destroying property. Firing guns. Assaulting people. Fighting cops.

All about half a mile outside of the downtown curfew zone. Six people were arrested.

Some in Greensboro took to the message boards to register their disgust with the lawlessness and anarchy that flourishes in their town on a regular basis.

“Keep up and Greensboro will be just another Detroit,” said one poster called OneLonesomeDove at the WXII TV news site.

“Was this black mob violence?” asked another. “If it was, you need to say so, and not be afraid of the repercussions.”

It was, said several people both in an out of the Greensboro police department. Whatever the repercussions may be of talking about black mob violence , Greensboro is seeing what happens when people do not talk about it.

None of the comments was posted at the local daily paper, the News & Record.

“Comments have been disabled,” is all the paper had to say about that.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/more-racial-violence-erupts-in-greensboro/#ieLHE5ElCY2TwECP.99 

Obama Administration Considering Government Shut-Down Strategy

Carol Platt Liebau | Jul 26, 2013

The Washington Post reports that some Obama administration officials are pushing for a confrontational budget strategy that would likely result in a government shut-down.  In one scenario, the president would refuse to sign any funding measure that didn’t roll back the sequester.

No doubt the administration officials advocating such a course are remembering the heady days of the Clinton administration, when the GOP’s decision to shut down the government effectively resulted in their losing control of the narrative that had swept them to power.

But there are reasons for Democrats to be cautious; history may not repeat itself.  For one thing, Newt Gingrich’s shoot-from-the-lip tendencies allowed the 1995 shut down to be portrayed as the result of his personal pique for having to deplane from the back of Air Force One. For another, Bill Clinton hadn’t taken the country on a massive spending spree, or proposed budgets that do nothing more than impose hitherto unimaginable (and dangerous) levels of debt on our country for years to come.

Finally, President Obama has hurt his own credibility with specious Chicken Little claims that the sky would fall if the sequester went into effect.  What’s more, don’t forget that in 2011, Obama threatened to vet any attempts to undo sequester cuts(yes, of course, that was before the election!) — and no doubt we’d hear more about that hypocrisy.

Perhaps the President intends to force a shut-down anyway, figuring that, as always, his friends in the press will deem it another “good idea” and spin it his way, thus firing up low-information voters before the the 2014 elections.  But he should bear in mind that, like the sequester (and so much else) this spring, things may not work out exactly as he hoped. http://townhall.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2013/07/26/obama-administration-considering-government-shutdown-n1650158

 

Robert A. Hall is an actor. He plays the coroner on CSI if you watch that show. He also is a Marine Vietnam War veteran, but does not mention that he had his legs blown off in that war.  Enviado por Enrique Enriquez.

“I’m 63 and I’m Tired”by Robert A. Hall

I’m 63
. Except for one semester in college when jobs were scarce and a six-month period when I was between jobs, but job-hunting every day, I’ve worked hard since I was 18. Despite some health challenges, I still put in 50-hour weeks, and haven’t called in sick in seven or eight years. I make a good salary, but I didn’t inherit my job or my income, and I worked to get where I am. Given the economy, there’s no retirement in sight, and I’m tired. Very tired. 

I’m tired
 of being told that I have to “spread the wealth” to people who don’t have my work ethic. I’m tired of being told the government will take the money I earned, by force if necessary, and give it to people too lazy to earn it. 

I’m tired
 of being told that I have to pay more taxes to “keep people in their homes.” Sure, if they lost their jobs or got sick, I’m willing to help. But if they bought Mc Mansions at three times the price of our paid-off, $250,000 condo, on one-third of my salary, then let the left-wing Congress-critters who passed Fannie and Freddie and the Community Reinvestment Act that created the bubble use their own money to help them.

I’m tired
 of being told how bad America is by left-wing millionaires like Michael Moore, George Soros and Hollywood Entertainers who live in luxury because of the opportunities America provided to them. In thirty years, if they get their way, the United States will have:

1. the economy of Zimbabwe ,

2. the freedom of the press of China

3. the crime and violence of Mexico ,

4. the tolerance for Christian people of Iran

5. the freedom of speech of Venezuela ..

I’m tired
 of being told that Islam is a “Religion of Peace,” when every day I can read stories of Muslim men killing their sisters, wives and daughters for their family “honor”; of Muslims rioting over some slight offense; of Muslims murdering Christian and Jews because they aren’t “believers”; of Muslims burning schools for girls; of Muslims stoning teenage rape victims to death for “adultery”; of Muslims mutilating the genitals of little girls; all in the name of Allah, because the Qur’an and Sharia’s law tells them to. 

I’m tired
 of being told that “race doesn’t matter” in the post-racial world of Obama, when it’s all that matters in affirmative action jobs, lower college admission and graduation standards for minorities (harming them the most), government contract set-asides, tolerance for the ghetto culture of violence and fatherless children that hurts minorities more than anyone, and in the appointment of U.S. Senators from Illinois. 

I think
 it’s very cool that we have a black president and that a black child is doing her homework at the desk where Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation. I just wish the black president was Condi Rice, or someone who believes more in freedom and the individual and less arrogantly in an all-knowing government. 

I’m tired
 of being told that out of “tolerance for other cultures” we must not complain when Saudi Arabia uses the money we pay for their oil to fund mosques and madras Islamic schools to preach hate in America, while no American group is allowed to fund a church, synagogue or religious school in Saudi Arabia to teach love and tolerance. 

I’m tired
 of being told I must lower my living standard to fight global warming, which no one is allowed to debate. My wife and I live in a two-bedroom apartment and carpool together five miles to our jobs. We also own a three-bedroom condo where our daughter and granddaughter live. Our carbon footprint is about 5% of Al Gore’s, and if you’re greener than Gore, you’re green enough. 

I’m tired
 of being told that drug addicts have a disease, and I must help support and treat them, and pay for the damage they do. Did a giant germ rush out of a dark alley, grab them, and stuff white powder up their noses while they tried to fight it off? I don’t think gay people choose to be gay, but I #@*# sure think druggies chose to take drugs. And I’m tired of harassment from “cool” people treating me like a freak when I tell them I never tried marijuana. 

I’m tired
 of illegal aliens being called “undocumented workers,” especially those who aren’t working, but living on welfare or crime. What’s next? Calling drug dealers, “Undocumented Pharmacists”? And, no, I’m not against Hispanics. Most of them are Catholic, and it’s been a few hundred years since Catholics wanted to kill me for my religion. I’m willing to fast track citizenship for any Hispanic who can speak English, doesn’t have a criminal record and who is self-supporting without family on welfare, or who serves honorably for three years in our military. Those are the kind of citizens we need. 

I’m tired
 of the trashing of our military by latte liberals and journalists, who would never wear the uniform of the Republic themselves, or let their entitlement-handicapped kids near a recruiting station. They and their kids can sit at home, never having to make split-second decisions under life and death circumstances, and bad mouth better people than themselves. Do bad things happen in war? You bet. Do our troops sometimes misbehave? Sure. Does this compare with the atrocities that were the policy of our enemies for the last fifty years and still are? Not even close. So here’s a deal for those folks. I’ll let myself be subjected to all the humiliation and abuse that was heaped on terrorists at Abu Ghraib or Gitmo, while the critics of our military can be subject to captivity by the Muslims, who tortured and beheaded Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, or the Muslims who tortured and murdered Marine Lt. Col. William Higgins in Lebanon, or the Muslims who ran the blood-spattered Al Qaeda torture rooms our troops found in Iraq, or the Muslims who cut off the heads of schoolgirls in Indonesia because the girls were Christian — then we’ll compare notes. British and American soldiers are the only troops in history that civilians came to for help and handouts, instead of hiding from in fear. 

I’m tired
 of people telling me that their party has a corner on virtue and the other party has a corner on corruption. Read the papers; bums are bipartisan. And I’m tired of people telling me we need bipartisanship. I live in Illinois , where the “Illinois Combine” of Democrats has looted the public treasury for years. Not to mention the tax cheats in Obama’s cabinet. 

I’m tired
 of hearing wealthy athletes, entertainers and politicians of both parties talking about “innocent” mistakes, “stupid” mistakes or “youthful” mistakes, when all of us know they think their only mistake was getting caught. 

Speaking of poor, I’m tired 
of people with a sense of entitlement who have air-conditioned homes, color TVs and two cars called poor. The majority of Americans didn’t have that in 1970, but we didn’t know we were “poor.” The poverty pimps have to keep changing the definition of poor to keep the dollars flowing. 

I’m real tired
 of people, rich or poor, who don’t take responsibility for their lives and actions. I’m tired of hearing them blame the government, or discrimination or big-whatever for their problems. 

Yes, I’m tired, b
ut I’m also glad to be 63, mostly because I’m not going to have to see the world these people are making. I’m just sorry for my granddaughter.

Robert A. Hall is a Marine Vietnam veteran who served five terms in the Massachusetts State Senate.


There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

 

 

学习阅读中国语言。阅读这坐着以免跌倒

UPDATE: China Will Trade Debt for US Land…

January 21, 2013

tags: China DebtGlobal EconomyNew World OrderUS Jobs,US Land

CHINA POISED TO PLAY DEBT CARD – FOR U.S. LAND
Communist nation could control American land as ‘development zones’

by JEROME R. CORSI

EDITOR’S NOTE: Barack Obama’s involvement in the DeMar Second Amendment case was previously reported in Chapter 7 of Jerome R. Corsi’s “America for Sale: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty.”

 

NEW YORK – Could real estate on American soil owned by China be set up as “development zones” in which the communist nation could establish Chinese-owned businesses and bring in its citizens to the U.S. to work?

That’s part of an evolving proposal Beijing has been developing quietly since 2009 to convert more than $1 trillion of U.S debt it owns into equity.

Under the plan, China would own U.S. businesses, U.S. infrastructure and U.S. high-value land, all with a U.S. government guarantee against loss.

Yu Qiao, a professor of economics in the School of Public Policy and Management at Tsighua University in Beijing, proposed in 2009 a plan for the U.S. government to guarantee foreign investments in the United States.

WND has reliable information that the Bank of China, China’s central bank, has continued to advance the plan to convert China’s holdings of U.S. debt into equity owned by China in the U.S.

The Obama administration, under the plan, would grant a financial guarantee as an inducement for China to convert U.S. debt into Chinese direct equity investment. China would take ownership of successful U.S. corporations, potentially profitable infrastructure projects and high-value U.S. real estate.

Jerome Corsi exposes the globalists’ plan to put America on the chopping block in “America for Sale: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty,” available at WND’s Superstore.

The plan would be designed to induce China to resume lending to the U.S. on a nearly zero-interest basis.

However, converting Chinese debt to equity investments in the United States could easily add another $1 trillion to outstanding Obama administration guarantees issued in the current economic crisis.

As of November 2012, China owned $1.17 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, according to U.S. Department of Treasury and Federal Reserve Board calculations published Jan. 16.

Concerned about the unrestrained growth in U.S. debt under the Obama administration, China has reduced by 97 percent its holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury bills. China’s holding of $573.7 billion in August 2008, prior to the massive bank bailouts and stimulus programs triggered by the collapse in the U.S. mortgage market, dwindled to $5.96 billion by March 2011.

Treasury bills are short-term debt that matures in one year or less, sold to finance U.S. debt. Holdings of Treasury bills are included in the $1.17 trillion of total Treasury securities owned by China as of November 2012.

In addition to a national debt in excess of $16 trillion, the U.S. government in 2010 faced over $70 trillion in unfunded obligations, including Social Security and Medicare benefits scheduled to be paid retiring baby boomer retirees in the coming decades, with unfunded obligations showing no sign of being reduced with Congress at a deadlock over reducing federal government spending.

Yu Qiao observed that if the U.S. dollar collapsed under the weight of proposed Obama administration trillion-dollar budget deficits into the foreseeable future, holders of U.S. debt would face substantial losses that the Financial Times estimated “would devastate Asians’ hard-earned wealth and terminate economic globalization.”

“The basic idea is to turn Asian savings, China’s in particular, into real business interests rather than let them be used to support U.S. over-consumption,” Yu Qiao wrote, reflecting themes commonly suggested by Chinese government officials. “While fixed-income securities are vulnerable to any fall in the value of the dollar, equity claims on sound corporations and infrastructure projects are at less risk from a currency default,” he continued.

The problem is that, in a struggling U.S. economy, China does not want to trade its investment in U.S. Treasury debt securities, with their inherent risk of dollar devaluation, for equally risky investments in U.S. corporations and infrastructure projects.

“But Asians do not want to bear the risk of this investment because of market turbulence and a lack of knowledge of cultural, legal and regulatory issues in U.S. businesses,” he stressed. “However if a guarantee scheme were created, Asian savers could be willing to invest directly in capital-hungry U.S. industries.”

Yu Qiao’s plan included four components:

China would negotiate with the U.S. government to create a “crisis relief facility,” or CRF. The CRF “would be used alongside U.S. federal efforts to stabilize the banking system and to invest in capital-intensive infrastructure projects such as high-speed railroad from Boston to Washington, D.C.
China would pool a portion of its holdings of Treasury bonds under the CFR umbrella to convert sovereign debt into equity. Any CFR funds that were designated for investment in U.S. corporations would still be owned and managed by U.S. equity holders, with the Asians holding minority equity shares “that would, like preferred stock, be convertible.”

The U.S. government would act as a guarantor, “providing a sovereign guarantee scheme to assure the investment principal of the CRF against possible default of targeted companies or projects”.

The Federal Reserve would set up a special account to supply the liquidity the CRF would require to swap sovereign debt into industrial investment in the United States.

“The CRF would lessen Asians’ concern about implicit default of sovereign debts caused by a collapsing dollar,” Yu Qiao concluded. “It would cost little and help the U.S. by channeling funds to business investment.”

Read more at:

http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/01/china-poised-to-play-debt-card-for-u-s-land/#5iOitOcSUEubZkEX.99

http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2013/01/21/china-will-trade-debt-for-us-land/

China boosts US investment to all-time high; seeks more

Although all the news about Chinese investment in the U.S. has focused on the deals that don’t get done, Chinese investment in the U.S. is at an all-time high.

The Chinese are making headlines around the word for hungrily acquiring energy and resource companies in countries such as Canada, Africa and Latin America.

In the United States, the single largest Chinese investment to date is far more mundane: movie theaters. And to a large extent, that type of acquisition explains the broader story about China’s strategy when it comes to U.S. investment.

AMC Theaters, previously owned by a group of U.S. private equity firms, is now a division of Dalian Wanda of China—a huge entertainment conglomerate that spent $2.6 billion in 2012 on the theater chain.

It’s no accident that the largest U.S. purchase so far is for a company as non-controversial as AMC. Chinese businesses—many of them government-owned—have repeatedly been rebuffed by the U.S. government when trying to buy American firms that control natural resources or advanced technology.

Despite all the negative headlines, Chinese investment in the U.S. hit an all-time record in 2012: $6.5 billion. It will likely surpass that level in 2013, according to Rhodium Group, which does detailed tracking of Chinese investment. The Heritage Foundation says the U.S. was the single biggest recipient of Chinese overseas investment last year, eclipsing Australia for the first time.

“We are in the midst of a structural growth story that will transform the China-U.S. investment relationship from a one-way street into a two-way street,” says Thilo Hanemann of Rhodium.

CNBC profiled three Chinese-owned companies in the U.S. in order to explore what kind of deals and investments are getting done, and the motivations behind them.AMC Theaters, International Vitamin Corporation, and China Construction of America represent a cross-section of Chinese-owned firms.

Jianlin Wang, chairman of Dalian Wanda, which bought AMC, wants his company to reach $100 billion in revenue by 2020, up from the current $30 billion. While his home market China is the fastest growing movie market in the world, he’ll still need overseas acquisitions to achieve his goal.

“The acquisition of AMC is just the start,” says Wang, and “probably before the end of the year we may complete one or two more deals.” He says he expects to spend another $7 billion in the U.S. by the end of this decade.

International Vitamin Corporation, of Freehold, N.J., came into being after a Chinese company bought the vitamin assets of Inverness Medical from private equity in 2010. CEO Steven Dai says the investors (he’s one of them) have pumped “upwards of hundred millions of dollars into the company,” since then—improving its IT backbone, expanding warehouse capacity, and increasing the number of employees from 280 to 400, all in the U.S.

(Read More: Will China Buy Up Greece’s Best Assets?)

Dai, the only Chinese employee, says buying an American company made the most sense because the U.S. has a highly developed, multi-billion dollar, nutritional market “which constantly grows every year.” Of the three companies that spoke to CNBC, the one with the longest history in the U.S. is China Construction of America, a wholly owned subsidiary of China State Construction Engineering Corporation (CSCEC) that had $500 million in revenue in 2012. Although publicly traded in Shanghai, CSCEC shares are majority owned by the Chinese government, making China Construction of America part of what’s known as a State-Owned Enterprise.

China Construction set up shop here in 1985 because the U.S. was the world’s largest construction market at the time. Why are they still doing business here, when China is now larger and growing faster? Geographic diversification, CEO Ning Yuan tells CNBC, in case the home market falters.

The company has been successful at bidding for state-level and municipal projects such as public schools in South Carolina and New York State transportation projects such as the $407 million Alexander Hamilton bridge rehabilitation.

But Yuan expressed frustration at not being able to qualify for larger federal projects—what are known as “P3s”—Public Private Partnerships. The U.S. Department of Transportation requires companies to become prequalified before bidding on P3s. Despite numerous attempts, Yuan says they’ve never been prequalified. “I think that’s happened not only to a Chinese company but also to some other foreign companies,” he said. “I would say that it is a little bit political.”

That may be true. Firms owned by the Chinese government are perceived as having unfair advantages, such as access to cheaper financing from Chinese banks, which are also government-owned. Yuan rejects the notion, saying Chinese banks charge them market rates that are comparable to any other multinational bank.

While there may be critics at the federal level, the mood is the opposite at the state level. New Jersey’s lieutenant governor has visited IVC’s headquarters, and has asked CEO Dai to speak to other visiting Chinese executives to convince them to invest in N.J. as well.

Chairman Wang says that while members of Congress may be worried, officials at the state, city and municipal level “are quite welcome to Chinese investment, because such investment can create job opportunities and boost economic development.”

To be sure, even though Chinese investment is at a record level, it is still relatively small compared to the size of the U.S. economy. According to the Heritage Foundation, total Chinese investment in the U.S. since 2005 stands at $54 billion, compared with an overall wealth stock in the U.S. of $60 trillion.

The Heritage Foundation marks the starting point of China’s overseas acquisitions with the 2005 purchase of IBM‘s computer business by Lenovo for $1.74 billion. Not only was it a transformational transaction for IBM, it heralded the arrival of the Chinese investor.

But 2005 also marks the year of the highest-profile rejection of a Chinese purchase—when CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Company) tried to purchase Unocal of California for $18.5 billion. The mere announcement of the deal created so much Congressional controversy that Unocal accepted a lower bid rather than risk U.S. government rejection of the CNOOC offer.

China has never again attempted such a large energy acquisition in the U.S. even though it has done numerous major energy deals elsewhere in the world.

In the U.S., Chinese energy investments have been limited to minority stakes and joint ventures, including Sinopec’s $2.2 billion investment last year in some of Devon Energy’s venture plays, and a $1 billion investment for part ownership of some of Chesapeake’s shale gas properties.

In 2012, President Obama rejected a Chinese purchase of four Oregon wind farms due to their proximity to a U.S. naval drone-testing site. Additionally, a congressional report last year eviscerated two Chinese telecom companies eager to do business in the United States, Huawei & ZTE; members of Congress came very close to accusing the two firms of spying on behalf of the Chinese government.

The next key moment comes when AIG, the insurance company, finds out if it will be allowed to sell most of its aircraft leasing arm to a Chinese consortium for $4.8 billion. The deal was announced in December, and if finalized, would eclipse the AMC theater purchase.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, the government agency that vets foreign deals for security concerns, has yet to sign off on it. 

http://www.nbcnews.com/business/china-boosts-us-investment-all-time-high-seeks-more-6C10018475

China Seeks To Use Tennessee Mountains, U.S. Land For Economic Gain

June 03, 2013   James Moreland

Every year, alarming amounts of U.S. dollars leave the ever-shrinking American economy and go to China. This huge transfer of wealth has resulted in dramatic effects for both the U.S. and China. For China, it’s brought about an economic boom. For the United States, an economic decline.

One thing that has contributed to this decline is the fact that China has loaned the U.S. government over a trillion dollars. This is just part of the $3.2 trillion in converted currency reserves China has hanging over our heads. Effectively, this debt has silently granted the Chinese government an alarming amount of leverage over our economy. In addition, China has also started to buy up businesses, real estate and natural resources all over the United States. In all actuality, one has to wonder if China’s end goal is to infiltrate the U.S.

The United States has stumbled into a rather vulnerable position due to the agreements we have with China. In the years since our relationship with the communist country began, the U.S. has witnessed an ever-growing Chinese presence in our states. Even more worrisome is the fact that the Chinese government is using their Favored Nation Status as an economic weapon against the United States to benefit their own economy at the expense of our own. A prime example of this is a recent move on China’s part to acquire the coal beneath Tennessee’s mountains. They aim to blow up Tennessee mountains for the coal it would result in.

A Wall Street Journal MarketWatch article from last May that revealed China-based Guizhou Gouchuang Energy Holdings Group said it had raised $616 million in a private placement to be used mainly to acquire and develop Triple H Coal Co. in Jacksboro, Tenn. “That would make Guizhou Gouchuang the first Chinese company to invest in coal in the U.S.”

China is not limiting their infiltration merely to Tennessee’s mountains and coal, though. The Chinese Central Bank also currently has a plan in the works that would set up other “development zones” on U.S. soil.

Richmond, a suburb in Vancouver, Canada, is North America’s most Asian city. Fifty percent of the residents there are Chinese. In Michigan, a group called “Sino-Michigan Properties LLC” has already bought 200 acres of land near the town of Milan to build what they call a “China City.” In Idaho, a Chinese company called “Sinomach” is interested in developing 50 square miles of self-sustaining technology zones south of the Boise airport. They are also looking at land in Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania to set up research and development bases and industrial parks.

In addition to buying up American land, Chinese shipping companies have also been purchasing important ports in Long Beach, California and Boston, Massachusetts.

 

If something isn’t done soon to take the U.S. off of the path we are on, we will continue to see Chinese companies infiltrating and purchasing U.S. land until eventually we find ourselves working for the Chinese government, instead of United States businesses. Spread the word and contact your congressmen and women. Demand a change from our leaders to restore America. Send this letter to your congressional representative and to five of your friends and ask them to do the same!

Weiner’s a Problem but Huma Abedin is a Bigger Problem

Posted 3 Hours Ago by Marilyn Assenheim filed under 2016 ElectionConstitutionCorruptionEmail FeaturedEthicsLiberalismMarriageMoralityPolitics

On Thursday, Huma Abedin had been flogged across the airwaves by the MSM as being “intelligent,” “delicate,” “brave” and was lauded for “standing by her man.” The degenerate Anthony Weiner had “made a mistake.” Several, actually. Why the deafening cacophony of praise? Because Abedin and the State Department are under Senate investigation and MSM is trying to deflect damaging public scrutiny of Abedin/Hillary/State Department wrongdoing.

If the investigation sinks Abedin, it might also derail a potential presidential run by Hillary Clinton in 2016. Abedin and Hillary are indiscrete in more ways than one.

 

 

 

For example, as a consultant for Teneo.

Teneo trades stocks and bonds. Abedin’s security clearance and access to insider trading information is at issue here, among other possible infractions. Such as keeping her nose in the government feeding trough at taxpayer expense while rooting for truffles in greener pastures. Abedin’s part-time consulting gig  with Teneo harvested an additional $355,000 annually. Bill Clinton is a board member of Teneo. According to a witness, Abedin was also employed, during that time, privately by no less than four entities: Hillary, the State Department, Teneo, and the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation. Heckuva gig for a stay-at-home mom.

The Senate investigation, headed by Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA), has, thus far, not received a single document requested from either the State Department or Abedin.  Grassley wrote to Abedin: “I am concerned that the ‘special government employee’ designation blurs the line between public and private sector employees, especially when employees receive full-time salaries for what appears to be part-time work…” Abedin responded with a letter denying any wrongdoing. Well, there it is; she says so, so it must be true…right?

 

Abedin staunchly declared to the press that she is in love with Weiner. Doubtful. What she is in love with, however, is power. She is following the lessons picked up while squatting at her mentor’s feet. Hillary has a long history of  pursuing criminal activity while clutching the coattails of men. She pleaded “no contest “to at least five fundraising schemes, was implicated in the Whitewater scandal, defrauded former clients while with the Rose Law Firm, pleaded a loss of memory no fewer than 250 times during Congressional hearings, and parlayed insider information of the stock market into a personal gain of hundreds of thousands of dollars, just to name a few.

She was the first FLOTUS to come under criminal investigation; a special prosecutor stated that she’d narrowly avoided indictment only because of her status as First Lady. She’s even sidestepping State Department ineptitude and the Benghazi disgrace successfully.

Hillary is the venal, incompetent tool the left is pitching as the first female president. Abedin must stand by Weiner as Hillary stood by her trouser-snake of a husband in order to replace criminality with loyalty in the public’s consciousness.

If that dodge continues to work, the jackass won’t be Democrat; it will be us.

 http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/07/weiners-a-problem-but-huma-abedin-is-a-bigger-problem/#ixzz2aGCZuqo8

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

No 441 “EN MI OPINION” Julio 27, 2013

julio 27, 2013

No 441  “En mi opinión” Julio 27, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

Lázaro R González Miño Editor    lazaroronzalez@hotmail.com,

COLUMNA DE Ricardo Samitier.

Florida aumenta la BUROCRACIA con nueva ley ‏è El Gobernador Scott y Los Politiqueros Cumplen Con Su Gran Promesa De Campaña De Crear Empleos… Crearon Los Representantes y Senadores Entre 40 y 45,000 Nuevos Burócratas El Negocio De Los Políticos Es Nombrar Más Burócratas Cada Burócrata Trae Votos…

El estado de la Florida tiene 67 Counties y 411 ciudades… Para “Servir Mejor Al Pueblo” que han sido multados En los semáforos… por las CAMARITAS… las ciudades Tienen que crear MAS y NUEVAS CORTES… donde van a ser Nombrados los “AMIGOS” de los politiqueros… Poniendo EL MÍNIMO de 100 nuevos burócratas entre las ciudades Grandes y Pequeñas… 411 x 100 = 41,110

¡Hay que SALIR CORRIENDO de MIAMI!‏                                  Los Politiqueros Crean Más Puestos… Nos Concentramos En Las Cámaras… Mientras Aumentan La Burocracia…  La nueva ley estatal HECHA EN TALLAHASSEE… NADA QUE VER CON EL ALCALDE Y LOS COMISIONADOS…

Requiere que las ciudades tengan sus propias JUNTAS DE MAGISTRADOS que sirvan para ayudar a los residentes que sean multados; antes, los multados debían acudir a a las cortes del condado Miami-Dade para eliminarse esa multa…

Tallahassee Le ha dado a todos las ciudades de la Florida la oportunidad De CREAR MAS PUESTOS BUROCRÁTICOS… no van a parar hasta que QUIEBREN TODAS LAS CIUDADES…

En Miami hay 35 ciudades… ahora tendremos 35 NUEVAS CORTES… si solamente nombran 100 empleados extra por Corte… suman 3,500 NUEVOS BURÓCRATAS ADICIONALES… Viviendo De Nuestras Impuestos Y De las Multas Que Nos Pongan… ¿Hasta Cuándo?

“Una buena forma de defender a DIOS”‏                                     Un ateo estaba sentado al lado de una niña en un avión y se volvió a ella y le dijo: “¿Quieres hablar? Vuelos PARECEN más rápido si se  se conversa con su compañero de viaje “. 

La niña, que había empezado a leer su libro, respondió al total extraño, “¿qué te gustaría hablar?”

 

“Oh, no lo sé”, dijo el ateo. (como los ateos y comunistas NO PIERDEN OPORTUNIDADES… agregó “¿podríamos hablar de Si Dios Existe…, o que no hay cielo o el infierno, o vida después de la muerte? Y sonreían con aire de suficiencia.

“Está bien”, dijo la niña . “Podrían ser temas interesantes, pero déjame preguntarte primero. Un caballo, una vaca, y un chivo todos comen lo mismo HIERBA. Sin embargo, un chivo excreta bolitas, mientras que una vaca  excreta una empanada plana, pero un caballo produce moñigos. ¿Por qué crees que eso pasa? ” 

El ateo, visiblemente sorprendido por la inteligencia de la niña, lo piensa y dice:

“HMMM, NO TENGO NI IDEA.” a lo que las niña respondió “¿Realmente se siente calificado para discutir Dios, el Cielo, el Infierno, o la vida después de la muerte,  CUANDO NO SABES UNA MIERDA?”

 

Columna de Alberto Pérez.

Viejas y Obsoletas ideas

Obsoleto quiere decir anticuado, inadecuado a las circunstancias actuales.

Cuando nos llaman obsoletos y anticuados a los conservadores porque nos oponemos a las ideas socialistas, esto es algo que se debe razonar, no creo que se debe aceptar un concepto porque es popular si no se razona.

El socialismo ha fracasado en el pasado, y fracasa en el presente en todos los países donde se impone.

Si quieren discutir sobre los presentes países socialistas del siglo XXI pueden hacerlo, aunque es tapar el sol con un dedo, pero no pueden negar los fracasos del pasado. 

La Unión Soviética, cuna del socialismo cayó por su propio peso, no hubo que disparar un tiro para tumbarla, su ineficacia fue su autodestrucción.

El marxismo-leninismo no es una doctrina moderna, todo lo contrario, tiene más de un siglo.  Mucho más moderna es el neoliberalismo, que se parece más a la doctrina conservadora.

Pero no es el tiempo lo que hace una doctrina obsoleta o efectiva, es el resultado que produce la doctrina cuando se implanta como un modo de gobierno.

El modelo de gobierno de la economía de mercado que ha sido el modelo a seguir en los Estados Unidos, ha producido la nación de mayor riqueza económica en la historia del mundo.

El sistema americano,  es la envidia de las naciones y el destino deseado de los inmigrantes del mundo entero.

Decir que las ideas que hicieron grande a esta nación son obsoletas y que deben de sustituirse con las fracasadas ideas del socialismo, no tiene una explicación lógica, como no sea la aberración mental que produce la envidia.

Este concepto se debe a que sin lugar a dudas la juventud en nuestras universidades está siendo adoctrinada por los profesores que son producto de la academia liberal que no perdona que los empresarios que consideran intelectualmente inferiores puedan tener un status económico superior al de ellos. 

Con esta cultura de la envidia envenenan nuestra juventud con las obsoletas doctrinas socialistas

Me dicen que los sistemas políticos vienen por etapas, y que ahora estamos pasando una etapa socialista, como en el pasado siglo y que volveremos al reconocimiento de la realidad de la filosofía conservadora.

Pudiera ser, pero no debe de ser.  Una vez que una doctrina prueba que no es efectiva, no debiera de renacer, porque ya fracasó.  Si se tratara de sustituir el capitalismo por una doctrina diferente que no fuera el socialismo, se pudiera escuchar su razonamiento, pero tratar de vendernos algo que ya fracasó no tiene razón de ser.

El hombre es el único animal que tropieza dos veces con la misma piedra, y seguimos tropezando.

El tratar de implantar el socialismo en los Estados Unidos es tan obsoleto que no es posible, es como poner un caballo a tirar de un Mercedes Benz

LA TEOCRACIA

La teocracia o Estado Confesional, fue una forma de gobierno instituida en la que los líderes gubernamentales coinciden con los líderes de una institución religiosa dominante, y las políticas de gobierno son idénticas y están influidas por los principios de esta institución.  Normalmente el gobierno afirma gobernar en nombre de Dios, tal como especifica la institución religiosa. 

Las instituciones religiosas son organizaciones humanas y como tales tratan de crecer con el proselitismo, si no lo hacen desaparecen, por ende cada una se atribuye la verdad absoluta y la representación de Dios en la tierra.

Por esto es imposible la democracia en un país donde exista una teocracia total. 

En el cristianismo se supone que la iglesia es un organismo, no una organización, y que la iglesia es el cuerpo de Cristo, pero la necesidad de poder de la organización religiosa, olvida este principio cristiano. 

Las organizaciones humanas a través de los siglos han forzado sus interpretaciones y creencias particulares en los países con teocracia.

En Europa, tanto la denominación Católica como la protestante practicaron la inquisición, quemando en la hoguera a los que no pensaban como ellos, hasta en América, los puritanos que fueron perseguidos en Inglaterra, se convirtieron en perseguidores en Salem, quemando “brujas”

Nunca me explicado esa afición al barbecue humano de estas instituciones. 

Pero en occidente, como la civilización se desarrolló bajo los valores Judeo-cristianos, la substancia del cristianismo y sus valores, prevaleció sobre el poder material de las organizaciones religiosas, y la teocracia de hecho ha desaparecido. 

En los pocos  países en occidente con estados confesionales o sea que tienen una religión oficial del estado, la teocracia es simplemente simbólica.

En Europa hay estados confesionales luteranos en Dinamarca, anglicano en Inglaterra, Ortodoxo Griega en Grecia, Católico en Bélgica y Mónaco, y en américa Costa Rica es un estado confesional Católico. También, y es lógico, Israel es un estado confesional Judío y el Vaticano es un estado confesional Católico. 

Pero en estos países de la cultura Judeo-cristiana, la teocracia es simbólica y la libertad de culto es ley.

La religión oficial no fuerza a los ciudadanos a que practiquen la religión oficial. 

De hecho en Inglaterra donde por siglos está establecido que los ciudadanos paguen impuestos para la institución religiosa, cuya cabeza es el monarca, esta institución anglicana reparte los fondos de los impuestos proporcionalmente por el número de su membresía a las otras denominaciones.

Los que se han mantenido anacrónicamente como teocracias autoritarias, han sido las naciones musulmanas. 

Estos musulmanes, que cuando emigran al occidente demandan la libertad para ejercer la religión institucional de su preferencia, no aceptan que las personas que viven en sus países tengan otras creencias o un estilo de vida diferente al de su institución.

Vemos como ellos no tienen la afición al barbecue de las instituciones “cristianas” del pasado, pero les gusta el castigo por estrangulación y ahorcan a los que no piensan como ellos.

La transición de las teocracias en occidente no ocurrió en un día, tomó denuncias y protestas de los verdaderos cristianos el acabar con el poder institucional. 

Pero vemos que el denunciar o protestar contra la última teocracia asesina en el mundo, es incorrecto. 

Tenemos que callar para tener sensibilidad para con los criminales. 

No es ser insensible del denunciar un crimen, es insensible ser testigos de un crimen en silencio.

 

EL ESTADO SOCIALISTA

Por Diego Quirós, Sr.

 

Para implantar el Estado Socialista, Carlos Marx, autor y Vladimir I. Lenin ejecutor, no utilizaron medios persuasivos ni convincentes. El lenguaje fue  la fuerza y las decisiones no se consultaban, sino que se imponían. En uno de sus argumentos Marx  manifiesto: “la religión es el opio de los pueblos” y la revolución Bolchevique de 1917 tomando esas palabras como bandera, destruyo la Iglesia.

En España, la Segunda Republica en el año 1936, comenzó la cacería contra la Iglesia destruyendo templos y asesinando a cuanto religioso o laico comprometido encontrase a su paso. Tuvieron la estupidez  de ir a fusilar una  imagen de Jesucristo en el Cerro de los Angeles, que se encuentra en las afueras de Madrid. Ante tantas violaciones, persecuciones y crímenes cometidos es que comenzó  la guerra civil.

 

Fidel Castro a su llegada al poder, hizo lo mismo. Desato la persecución religiosa, expulsando sacerdotes y monjas, expropiando colegios religiosos y encarcelando y fusilando jóvenes cristianos. El marxismo y la democracia no pueden caminar en el mismo sentido. Por eso Castro, al igual que Lenin, Stalin y la segunda republica española, son culpables de tantos mártires.

 

Tenemos que ser muy sagaces y reconocer el significado de cada acción o palabra que se emplea hoy día en la conquista del voto. La táctica de los izquierdistas ha cambiado, ahora llegan al poder  a través de las elecciones con palabras engañosas.

Aunque  los medios sean diferentes, el resultado es el mismo. Primero se hace conciencia en la lucha de clases y se promete apoderarse de los bienes de todos aquellos que han logrado consolidar una holgada posición económica para repartirla entre los humildes, obligando a la clase pudiente a abandonar todo tipo de empresa. Así es el sistema económico marxista, el Estado es  el único empleador, que  al no existir competencia, todo pierde calidad, llegando a la absoluta miseria.

 

Se reparte el veneno de la discriminación racial, étnica o social, se le echa aire al fuego y se establece otro tema de división.

 

Con estas armas en función, solo falta eliminar la Iglesia, que como en tiempos anteriores no van a ir directamente matando sacerdotes y monjas, sino que los acosan conculcándoles sus Derechos y violando las Libertades  establecidas en la  Constitución  por los fundadores de esta gran Nación y cuyos derechos están establecidos en la Carta Magna de la Declaración de los Derechos Humanos.

 

Que el Señor Presidente Barack Hussein Obama diga que es cristiano, está faltando a la verdad. Ningún cristiano puede estar de acuerdo con la práctica del aborto ni de ningún otro medio que interrumpa la procreación ni sus formas naturales a través de la unión conyugal. Usar todo tipo de herramienta que vaya contra la creación y darle más valor al placer que al amor es convertir la dignidad de la mujer en “un objeto de placer”. (Encíclica Humanae Vitae) S.S. Pablo VI.

 

Es bueno que todo el que se confiese cristiano y se sienta todavía LIBRE, analice estos puntos para no coincidir con el sentimiento de los que enarbolan el trapo rojo de la  hoz y el martillo.

 

DIOS BENDIGA A AMERICA,

 

 

White House hosts radical cleric

Dear Lazaro R,
We have just one question about the IPT News story below:
What good could possibly come from welcoming a radical Muslim cleric to the White House who has exhorted Muslim countries to provide military aid to Palestinian terrorist groups?


Bin Bayyah Statements Underscore Support for Terrorism

by John Rossomando IPT News July 12, 2013
http://www.investigativeproject.org/4082/bin-bayyah-statements-underscore-support-for

The Investigative Project on Terrorism has uncovered evidence that radical Muslim cleric Sheik Abdullah Bin Bayyah, who met withtop White House officials last month, personally urged Muslim nations to aid the Palestinian terrorist groups in Gaza militarily.

“Muslim rulers are required to rescue their fellow Muslims in many ways, through financial, military and diplomatic support. Everything should be done to stop this terrible, ongoing massacre in Gaza,” Bin Bayyah wrote in April. The posting was removed following the release of IPT’s June 26 report about Bin Bayyah’s White House visit. “I also call upon our Palestinian brothers to unite all resistance movements in the same name and under the same banner. And it is the duty of all Arabs to help them in the name of Islam, logic, pan-Arabism and humanity.”

The comment lines up with the position of the International Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS), headed by Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi. Bin Bayyah has been its vice president for 9 years. The group notably issued a December 2012 communiqué praising Hamas’s “strategic victory … in the dignified Gaza” and calling for Israel’s destruction.

Bin Bayyah notably declared that Palestinian terrorists have the right to all “kinds of resistance, including the use of weapons.”

The sheikh issued a fatwa on January 19, 2012 stating that Muslims could satisfy their zakat obligations by giving their money to “fighters in the cause of Allah” (those undertaking a military jihad) to “buy weapons.”

“He … avoids any specifics at all, giving the reader the room to use his opinion to finance causes like Hamas, Hizballah, or other radical Islamists,” Zuhdi Jasser, president of theAmerican Islamic Forum for Democracy, said.

Islamic charities such as the Holy Land Foundation and others have notably been convicted of laundering zakat donations to fund Hamas or other terror groups.

Bin Bayyah also condemned the linking of Islamic charities with terrorism, calling it “sham propaganda.”

White House officials justified meeting with him on June 13 because he denounced al-Qaida in 2010 and because of work he did with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. After the IPT reported on his visit, a spokesperson told The Daily Caller that the White House invited him to tackle “a wide range of issues including poverty, global health efforts and Bin Bayyah’s efforts to counter the al Qaeda narrative.”

“Bin Bayyah may be anti-Al Qaida because he is against the targeting of what he defines as civilians. He simply detests ‘freelance jihadists’ or ‘jihadi-anarchists’ preferring more ordered Islamist statists within his Salafi circles,” Jasser said. “These quotes [about Palestinian terrorists] in essence reveal that he may disagree with the means and authority Al-Qaida may use but in fact the ends of a global neo-Caliphate and Islamist hegemony he clearly promotes.

“Here, he clearly endorses the adoption of all militant causes initiated by what he deems to be legitimate Islamist grievance movements from across the world.”

The White House did not respond to repeated IPT requests for comment.

Additionally, the administration has not addressed any questions related to Bin Bayyah’s support for Hamas. It has also been silent about criticism of its reaching out to the IUMS in the light of the group’s calls for Israel’s destruction, and its 2004 call for the killing of U.S. troops in Iraq. Qaradawi, the IUMS’s founder, is considered so radical he has been barred from entering the United States.

Hosting Bin Bayyah in the White House was a mistake, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told the IPT.

“The Obama administration sends a strong message whenever they accept or facilitate meetings with foreign leaders or officials,” McCaul said in an emailed statement. “The administration’s narrative of the terror threat decreasing does not mirror the reality that al Qaeda and Islamist extremism is still a growing threat to the homeland, and the actions of officials in the White House should reflect that reality.”

Inviting Bin Bayyah to the White House reveals an ideologically-motivated “tone deafness to what constitutes a radical,” Jasser said.

Although Bin Bayyah has stated his opposition to Al-Qaida’s tactics for creating a global Caliphate, his writings show that he supports the idea of Muslims being united under a single flag defended by a single army.

“[T]he basic principle is that the [Muslim people] ought to be under one banner and one ruler. This is the basic principle prescribed by Islam. But the status quo shows that the ummah has been disunited for a long time, its enemies have grown significantly, and its magnificence has declined,” Bin Bayyah wrote in a January 2012 fatwa on his website. “The ummah should have one army to protect it. It needs no foreign armies or interference in any form.”

Bin Bayyah suggests that the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) gives hope for pan-Islamic unity and a united federation. He blames a “fierce campaign launched by the enemies of the ummah” through colonialism, efforts to spread democracy and “regaining Jerusalem through crusade” efforts for lack of Muslim unity. The OIC Charter guarantees the Palestinians’ right to replace Israel with a state of their own that has Jerusalem as its capital.

“Bin Bayyah here obviously reveals that he not only believes in the dominance of the Islamic state but he thus through citizenship links every Muslim’s faith practice to the military obligations of jihad which scholars like him determine,” Jasser said. “Where does he differ from Sheik Awlaki? It is not clear. We are to assume that ‘scholars’ like him will not take Muslims across the planet into a collective war without ‘just cause’ to ‘rescue their fellow Muslims,’ ‘under one banner’ and thus ‘unite all resistance movements.”

Connecting Islam with terrorism involves a “deliberate negligence of the objective facts,” which stems from “ignorance,” according to Bin Bayyah.

If freedom and democracy on the Middle East was on the White House’s agenda when officials met with the cleric, then the administration should take a closer look at his writings, which show that he considers the Western approach to freedom and democracy un-Islamic.

Bin Bayyah’s view of democracy and free speech is scarcely any different from that shown by the recently deposed Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt that cracked down on dissidentsclaiming they had insulted Islam.

In Bin Bayyah’s view, free speech is subject to the limitations imposed by Islamic sharia law – particularly when it comes to speech and “harmful values in the society.”

And he seemed to criticize the United States in an essay last year when he wrote that “the most boastful countries in terms of democracy are the most aggressive and corrupt countries in the world.”

Bin Bayyah likely approved of the Brotherhood’s March arrest of comedian Bassem Youssef for “insulting Islam.” “Basically, it is definitely prohibited to criticize, mock at, or deride of the right religion and whoever does this bears enormous sin,” Bin Bayyah told the London-basedal-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper in January 2012.

Bin Bayyah rationalizes Palestinian terrorism, criticizes democracy, and supports blasphemy laws and other restrictions on free speech and other basic freedoms. But the White House appears unwilling to criticize or isolate those views. Instead, it ignored his call for Muslim rulers to give military assistance to Palestinian terrorist groups and opened the White House doors to Bin Bayyah and defended his invitation because he said bad things about al-Qaida.

 

Black Education Tragedy

WALTER WILLIAMS (2013.07.09 ) EDUCATION

As if more evidence were needed about the tragedy of black education, Rachel Jeantel, a witness for the prosecution in the George Zimmerman murder trial, put a face on it for the nation to see. Some of that evidence unfolded when Zimmerman’s defense attorney asked 19-year-old Jeantel to read a letter that she allegedly had written to Trayvon Martin’s mother. She responded that she doesn’t read cursive, and that’s in addition to her poor grammar, syntax and communication skills.

Jeantel is a senior at Miami Norland Senior High School. How in the world did she manage to become a 12th-grader without being able to read cursive writing? That’s a skill one would expect from a fourth-grader. Jeantel is by no means an exception at her school.

Here are a few achievement scores from her school:

  • Thirty-nine percent of the students score basic for reading, and
  • 38 percent score below basic.
  • In math, 37 percent score basic, and 50 percent score below basic.

Below basic is the score when a student is unable to demonstrate even partial mastery of knowledge and skills fundamental for proficient work at his grade level. Basic indicates only partial mastery.

Few Americans, particularly black Americans, have any idea of the true magnitude of the black education tragedy. The education establishment might claim that it’s not their fault. They’re not responsible for the devastation caused by female-headed families, drugs, violence and the culture of dependency. But they are totally responsible for committing gross educational fraud. It’s educators who graduated Jeantel from elementary and middle school and continued to pass her along in high school. It’s educators who will, in June 2014, confer upon her a high-school diploma.

It’s not just Florida’s schools. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, nationally most black 12th-graders test either basic or below basic in reading, writing, math and science.

Then there’s Morgan Polikoff, assistant professor of education at the University of Southern California, who says: “Cursive should be allowed to die. In fact, it’s already dying, despite having been taught for decades.” That’s the kind of educational philosophy that accounts for much of our nation’s educational decline.

The educational system and black family structure and culture have combined to make increasing numbers of young black people virtually useless in the increasingly high-tech world of the 21st century. Too many people believe that pouring more money into schools will help.

  • Someone must make the student do his homework, see to it that he gets a good night’s sleep, fix a breakfast, make sure he gets to school on time and make sure he respects and obeys his teachers.
  • Here are my questions: Which one of those requirements can be achieved through a higher school budget? Which can be achieved by politicians? If those minimal requirements aren’t met, whatever else is done is mostly for naught.

I hope Rachel Jeantel’s court performance is a wake-up call for black Americans about the devastation wrought by our educational system.

 

 

San Antonio Preparing to Arrest Christians Who Speak Out on the Bible

Posted by Dave Jolly in 1st AmendmentChristianityConstitutionEmail FeaturedEthicsGovernmentHomosexualityLawLiberal BullyingPolitics,Religion 126 Comments

 

 arrested for preaching the Bible or sharing their faith.  They are looking at passing some nondiscrimination ordinances that would make it a crime to exhibit or express any form of bias that could offend someone.  The proposed ordinance says:

“No person shall be appointed to a position if the city council finds that such person has, prior to such proposed appointment, engaged in discrimination or demonstrated a bias, by word or deed, against any person, group or organization on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, veteran status, age, or disability.”

Anyone found guilty of violating the new ordinance would be given a lifetime ban from being able to hold a city job, being involved with city government or even doing business with the city.

In other words, if a Christian works for the city as a garbage collector or street repair and they tell someone that the Bible says homosexuality is a sin, they could lose their job for expressing their bias.  Or, if you contracted with the city to provide a service, say computer maintenance or repair and you quoted what the Bible says about homosexuality, you could lose your contract with the city.

Any pastor who stands in the pulpit and reads from Leviticus 18, 20 or Romans 1, could be found guilty of violating the nondiscriminatory ordinance and face the consequences.  In fact, the ordinance would make it impossible for any good conservative Bible believing person, minister, church leader or lay person, to work for the city or run for any city office including the city council.

Clearly the ordinance violates the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and religion.  Opponents of the ordinance also point out that it violates Article VI, paragraph 3 of the US Constitution that states:

“No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

 Charles Flowers, Pastor of Faith Outreach International commented, saying:

“The ordinance … says that if you have at any point demonstrate[d] a bias – without defining what a bias is or who will determine whether or not one has been exercised – that you cannot get a city contract.  Neither can any of your subcontractors [who have demonstrated a bias] sign on to the contract.”

Joe Conger of KHOU TV in Houston commented:

“Ever have a Paula Deen moment – make an off-color joke or hold a religious belief?  [Pastor Steve] Branson [of Village Parkway Baptist Church] says keep it to yourself if you’re involved with San Antonio city government. Proposed changes to the anti-discrimination ordinance could get you fired.”

Seems to me that the people of San Antonio need to seriously consider who has been elected or appointed to the city council.  If the council approves the ordinance, the citizens of San Antonio should launch recalls against all who voted for it.  Conservatives and Christians need to start standing up for their rights and for their state and nation and stop allowing left-wing agenda oriented liberals from taking control.

 

Internet Sources: Government Agencies Demanding Passwords

Friday, 26 Jul 2013 01:23 PM By Sandy Fitzgerald

Government agencies are demanding that Internet companies release users’ passwords, according to industry sources who claim they are refusing the requests despite the pressure.

“I’ve certainly seen them ask for passwords,” one source told CNET.com, speaking on conditions of anonymity. “We push back.”

Passwords are usually stored in an encrypted form, but if the government got access them they could be use access confidential information, impersonate users, or even decipher other encrypted devices.

Another unidentified source, reportedly from a large company in the Silicon Valley, told CNET that it has received legal requests as well from the federal government for stored passwords. But this source said companies “really heavily scrutinize” the requests.

The government requests don’t ask just for passwords, but also encryption algorithms and the “salt,” which is a random string of letters or numbers that makes it more difficult to reverse encryptions and determine passwords. The requests also demand question codes associated with user accounts.

Officials at Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo declined to comment on whether they had been requested or ordered to turn over passwords. But all three insisted that they protect the private information of consumers who use their products.

“We take the privacy and security of our users very seriously,” said a Google official. 

A spokeswoman at Yahoo said, “If we receive a request from law enforcement for a user’s password, we deny such requests on the grounds that they would allow overly broad access to our users’ private information. 

“If we are required to provide information, we do so only in the strictest interpretation of what is required by law.”

Other companies, including Apple, Facebook, AOL, Verizon, AT&T, Time Warner Cable, and Comcast did not respond to inquiries about whether they had been pressured by the government to turn over password information.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/US/government-sources-demanding-passwords/2013/07/26/id/517276?s=al&promo_code=14525-1##ixzz2aBZ2bPz0 

ATF’s latest confiscation program

Posted on: July 26th, 2013

Agents from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, or ATF, have begun confiscating gun parts known as drop-in auto sears, or DIAS. A DIAS is a simple toggle device which, when installed in an AR-type rifle, along with several other critical fire-control parts, can convert a semi-auto AR into a full-auto assault rifle. The devices were originally unregulated, but in 1981 ATF declared them to be machine guns if possessed in conjunction with the other parts needed to make a conversion, but the agency made their new determination apply only to DIASes manufactured after Nov. 1, 1981. Now ATF is apparently using the records of a man who openly sold the devices for decades to track down purchasers and take their property as contraband – with the real possibility of then prosecuting those people.

One of the reasons gun owners tend to be completely opposed to the passage of any new gun laws – no matter how innocuous or reasonable seeming – is the erratic history of interpretation and enforcement of the current gun laws. This is also why I cringe every time I hear someone who supposedly supports gun rights – from politicians to the head of the NRA – calling for the feds to “enforce the laws already on the books.” The fact is, the gun laws that are already on the books are a labyrinth of confusion and booby-traps full of open-ended mandates, ambiguous definitions and unbridled bureaucratic discretion. Many innocent people have had their lives and livelihoods completely destroyed when federal agencies have decided to “enforce the laws already on the books.”

Read more: http://patriotoutdoornews.com/7096/atfs-latest-confiscation-program#ixzz2aBy92tNn

 

Special Message from 
Michael Reagan
Chairman, League of American Voters 

Dear Newsmax Reader:

The ObamaCare “train wreck” is closer than you think.

This year the first wave of ObamaCare regulations and taxes has already begun to hit.

And insurance policy holders like you and me are being whacked with massive premium increases.

Worse, Medicare recipients — folks who paid into the system — are beginning to suffer as their benefits are being diverted to help tens of millions of freeloaders.

Thought that was the worst?

Well, business owners all across the country are warning of massive layoffs and an economic slowdown.

The Congressional Budget Office, known for its fierce non-partisanship, now admits that 7 million Americans could lose their private insurance.

These are just some of the facts about ObamaCare that horrify me.

That’s why I believe the No. 1 priority for Congress is to stop ObamaCare!

Yes, stop it dead in its tracks.

And I have a plan to do just that.

Working with the League of American Voters, the powerful grass-roots organization I lead as national chairman, I know it can be done.

But I need your help today.

First, let me walk you through just how dangerous and radical this ObamaCare law really is.

Federal bureaucrats have already written more than 20,000 complicated regulations to go along with the 2,700-page law that Nancy Pelosi pushed through Congress — a law no one had time to read before they voted for it!

Now, this law will fundamentally change your healthcare for the worse.

Polls consistently show Americans don’t want ObamaCare — its taxes and fees, Medicare cuts, and other onerous demands.

I think you are among the majority of Americans who want ObamaCare stopped and are willing to help.

Even senators and congressmen who voted for this law are having second thoughts.

Sen. Max Baucus, a leading Democrat who backed ObamaCare, recently complained during a Senate hearing, “I just see a huge train wreck coming down.”

And he’s one of the senators who actually wrote the ObamaCare law!

Baucus is speaking honestly now because he is so panicked about the damage ObamaCare will do that he decided not to run for re-election!

Fortunately for him, Baucus can run from ObamaCare.

But you can’t. I can’t. The country can’t.

You Can Sign My Petition to Defund ObamaCare – Sign It Here Now

You Can Derail ObamaCare

The fact is it is too late to repeal ObamaCare.

The House of Representatives has passed bills fully repealing ObamaCare. But they have failed in the Senate.

And Obama will NEVER sign a law repealing ObamaCare.

But ObamaCare needs oxygen and that oxygen is money from Congress.

I believe we can defeat ObamaCare using the provisions in the Constitution itself that give Congress the power to stop the funding of ObamaCare.

Congress can simply defund ObamaCare without ever repealing the law.

The League of American Voters has developed a simple strategy to prevent the implementation of ObamaCare.

Until a future Congress comes to its senses and repeals it, the law remains on the books.

But here’s the rub.

Congress controls the funding of ObamaCare.

No funding … no ObamaCare.

If Congress doesn’t fund the implementation of the law … it won’t get implemented.

And that’s where you join the fight.

By signing the League’s petition urging Congress to cut off funding for ObamaCare, you will join me in the effort to stop this hideous law.

You will stop the massive Medicare cuts ObamaCare requires.

You will stop the empaneling of so-called Independent Payment Advisory Boards — what Sarah Palin called “Death Panels” — committees of faceless bureaucrats who will decide what medical services you get or don’t get.

You will stop the IRS from hiring 17,000 new enforcement agents to implement ObamaCare’s massive tax and mandate features.

You will stop the massive demands on insurance companies that are causing premiums to skyrocket.

By simply going online now and signing the Defund ObamaCare petition you will join literally hundreds of thousands of your fellow Americans urging Congress to listen to the public and stop ObamaCare dead in its tracks now!

Remember, the Constitution says Congress — not the president — provides for and devises all tax and spending bills.

The president can approve or veto those laws.

Members of the House and Senate can simply stop ObamaCare by not sending any budget bill to the president’s desk that includes any funding whatsoever for ObamaCare.

It’s that simple. Yes!

You may say this won’t work and that petitions are useless.

You are wrong.

The politicians of both parties are fearful of you.

When they see millions of Americans demanding this, they will act.

I have signed the petition.

Now I need you to.

One more thing: Once the petition drive is complete, as chairman of the League of American Voters, I will personally make sure that our Defund ObamaCare petition is hand-delivered to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Speaker of the House John Boehner.

I will make this special effort.

But I need your support to do it!

Sign My Petition to Defund ObamaCare – Sign It Here Now

Act Now Before You Lose Your Doctor

The Association of Medical Colleges predicts that by 2020 the U.S. will have a shortage of 90,000 doctors.

One of the missing could easily be yours.

This is an artificial shortage created by ObamaCare.

ObamaCare rules, red tape and payment limitations are already causing many doctors to either stop practicing, stop accepting Medicare patients or stop accepting insurance.

Combine that with the 30 million (yes, I said million!) new patients that ObamaCare adds to the rolls — all of whom will have access to “free” medical care — and you have a situation the term “train wreck” doesn’t begin to describe.

Guess what? Even this administration has figured out there may be a shortage of primary care doctors.

One of the solutions being considered is replacing doctors with nurses!

That’s right, some government officials think replacing a doctor — who has undergone 21,000 hours of training and direct clinical experience — with a nurse practitioner, who can have as little as 3,500 hours of experience, is a practical solution.

But it gets worse.

As I mentioned earlier, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that more than 7 million Americans will lose their current health insurance.

Here’s why: ObamaCare’s demands on business are so draconian that many business owners will stop health benefits for their employees and pay a fine.

It’s actually cheaper for businesses to pay the fine than buy expensive ObamaCare insurance!

Millions of working Americans will be forced to go to government-run exchanges to get healthcare for themselves and their families.

And guess who will pay for these folks if they don’t bother to get insurance? You got it — you and me!

And for those who stay on insurance, the nightmare has only just begun.

Since ObamaCare became law in 2010, insurance premiums have already been skyrocketing — up almost 30% and the law hasn’t even been implemented!

Under the ObamaCare law, every insurance company must provide insurance to even those who become sick and don’t have insurance!

This is the equivalent of getting homeowners insurance only after your home burns down!

Only government could think up such a crazy scheme.

Well, you’ve heard the saying that there is no such a thing as a free lunch.

Well, there’s no such thing as free medical care either.

Someone has to pay… and that someone is you!

You will pay in higher insurance premiums to cover the new 30 million people not currently insured.

You will pay in massive tax hikes — when all is said and done over the next 10 years you and I will be hit with more than $1 trillion in new taxes and costs!

Frankly, the full truth about ObamaCare has been laid out in a New York Times best-selling book called the “ObamaCare Survival Guide.”

Newsmax, my favorite online news source, says the “ObamaCare Survival Guide” is the “best guide to the new law — one every American family must have to protect themselves and their family.”

You Can Sign My Petition to Defund ObamaCare – Sign It Here Now

The Amazing ‘Cadillac’ Tax Set to Strike

One of the amazing things the “ObamaCare Survival Guide” reveals is the impact of Obama’s “Cadillac” tax.

The Cadillac tax is a 40% tax — yes, read that again, a 40% tax — on what was supposed to be luxury healthcare plans.

Today only a small fraction of those currently insured will be hit with this 40% tax.

But ObamaCare was very sneaky. It didn’t index current insurance plans for inflation.

So now experts are saying that within several years, as many as 70% of all Americans will be hit with this Cadillac tax — a whopping 40% tax added onto their healthcare premiums!

But remember — as the Supreme Court admitted — ObamaCare is one giant tax.

And you’re paying this tax in the form of insurance premiums, taxes on your income, taxes on capital gains, and other hidden fees and taxes.

In fact the “ObamaCare Survival Guide” reveals as many as 22 hidden tax schemes.

But the worst is going to be insurance premiums people pay.

Two House of Representative committees this year reported that private insurance premiums will rise by as much as 200% in the next several years.

Scary, isn’t it?

After reading that you should be asking “where is this petition” so you can sign right now!

But that’s not the worst of it.

I guarantee you will be paying more — in some instances much, much more — for crowded medical services from a doctor (or even worse, a nurse) who could be a complete a stranger to you and your family.

Sign My Petition to Defund ObamaCare – Sign It Here Now

If You Don’t Believe Me Read This

Recently the Society of Actuaries — experts paid to predict insurance costs — estimated the minimum increase in the cost for individual plans through ObamaCare health exchanges will be 32% and in some states the increase could be as much as 80%.

The cost for an individual plan under one BlueCross BlueShield program may increase 150% even before ObamaCare is fully implemented!

These crippling increases in insurance cost will be felt nationwide.

By 2017 the estimated increase in California is 62%, 80% in Ohio and over 20% in Florida.

The evidence is now overwhelming that the cost of healthcare is going to skyrocket as a result of ObamaCare.

But remember we were promised that ObamaCare would reduce healthcare costs, allow us to keep our health insurance and keep our doctors.

Those promises have turned out to be a complete lie.

ObamaCare was sold to gullible politicians as a way to reduce health insurance costs.

By forcing everyone to have coverage, the cost would be spread over a large pool of rate payers.

But that isn’t the way the law was written.

Responsible people like you, who have been paying for health insurance for years, will be paying for your insurance and covering the cost of freeloaders.

That’s reason enough to sign the petition to Defund ObamaCare — before you sign the check to pay for insurance premium increases.

Any law that encourages people to take advantage of the system is a law that should not have money to be enforced.

Welcome to the Third World

Henry Chao, deputy chief information officer at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, let the cat out of the bag when he warned healthcare executives to “make sure (ObamaCare) is not a third-world experience.”

Even the United Union of Roofers, part of the Obama administration collection of union bosses who have received ObamaCare waivers, called for a repeal or complete reform of ObamaCare.

They are not alone.

Millions of union members have generous health plans. These will be among the first to be hit with the so-called 40% Cadillac tax.

My point here is that there is growing and wide support to defund ObamaCare.

I know we can win this battle.

I just need your help with this petition and igniting the prairie fire of revolt against the funding of this law.

I must stop here and ask you: Which is easier?

Signing the League’s petition to defund ObamaCare and taking a positive step toward preventing this train wreck, or spending hours filling out government forms and then hoping federal insurance will accept your family doctor?

You Can Sign My Petition to Defund ObamaCare – Sign It Here Now

Turn Off the Spigot for ObamaCare

Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a good friend of my dad, Ronald Reagan, used to say the problem with socialism is eventually socialists run out of other people’s money.

The same is true for our healthcare socialists, but before they run out, they intend to take much of your money!

That’s what is so attractive about the League’s plan to shut off the money spigot now, before ObamaCare can get started.

Your signature on the petition won’t cost you a dime, but it could save you a fortune.

Congress can defund the federal health insurance exchanges.

Congress can defund the IRS enforcement mechanisms. Congress can shut ObamaCare down, if it feels the pressure from you and others like you.

Please take a minute to sign the League of American Voters’ Defund ObamaCare petition.

The Coming Medicare Meltdown

ObamaCare’s $1 trillion-plus cost has to be paid by someone and seniors have just been presented with the bill.

Over the next 10 years Medicare will be cut more than $700 billion to reduce the crippling financial impact of ObamaCare.

Your Medicare dollars will be going to people who never paid into the system like you did.

But that’s not the worst of it. These cuts will have a direct and obvious impact on you.

In fact it’s a dirty little secret: The expansion of prescription drug benefits — which politicians have been so proud of — in no way compensates for the potentially devastating impact of the billions of dollars in cuts to Medicare.

If you are on Medicare, you will experience the effect of these cuts personally.

Here’s another little secret. ObamaCare has created the so-called “Medicaid-Medicare Parity Rule.”

That means Medicaid patients get equal benefits to Medicare patients — people who paid into the system their whole lives.

Experts say this parity rule will hurt Medicare in two ways.

First, precious Medicare funds will be shared with Medicaid recipients. Everyone will get less care as doctors’ offices will be swamped!

And doctors will refuse to take Medicare patients due to cuts in what the government pays for services. (In fact they already are.)

Waiting rooms of the doctors that continue to accept Medicare will be jammed.

As a direct result you will wait longer for an appointment, a procedure, tests or even surgery.

Stop the Coming ‘Train Wreck!’

Everything I have said has been demonstrated by fact. There is no real dispute about the coming “train wreck” Sen. Baucus is predicting.

That’s why it’s vital you sign the League’s petition today and then get the rest of your family and friends to sign, too.

Defunding ObamaCare is the biggest fight possibly of our lifetime — it will define this country for generations to come.

Sure, the fight will be tough, but it’s winnable.

All we have to do is cut off the money spigot.

You Can Sign My Petition to Defund ObamaCare – Sign It Here Now

Are You Wondering About the Second Step?

During this letter I’ve stressed the importance of signing the League of American Voters’ Defund ObamaCare petition, but there is a second step.

I want to invite you to join me as a member of the League.

The League is one of the most influential grass-roots organizations in America.

It was the League that almost single-handedly stopped ObamaCare from pushing through the so-called “public option,” which would have resulted in a Soviet-style socialist healthcare system even worse than ObamaCare.

During the union bosses’ drive to recall Gov. Scott Walker after his courageous fight against public employee unions who were draining Wisconsin taxpayers dry, the League produced and aired commercials supporting the governor.

We won that battle too.

And in 2010 the League led the fight to retain the Bush tax cuts that were so beneficial to the middle class.

Our national efforts for retaining the Bush tax cuts were led by former Sen. Fred Thompson.

We have won battles before.

I believe we can win this one and Defund ObamaCare.

But this won’t happen overnight.

First, I need you to sign the petition.

I need you then to encourage other people on your email list and other friends to sign the petition.

Once that is done the League is going to use its full resources to demand that Congress pass no more funding that enables implementation of ObamaCare.

If President Obama doesn’t like it, too bad.

The Constitution says Congress provides the spending and budgets.

And Congress can decide to stop giving the funding!

When I was young my dad taught me a lesson I never forgot.

He told me to fight battles on principle — even when victory is not clear.

This time we not only have the right cause, we have a real chance of victory.

Please take a moment to sign the Defund ObamaCare petition today and join with me in ending ObamaCare once and for all.

You Can Sign My Petition to Defund ObamaCare – Sign It Here Now

Yours for America,

 

Michael Reagan

 

 

 

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

No.440 “EN MI OPINION” Julio 26, 2013

julio 26, 2013

No 440  “En mi opinión” Julio 26, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’   Lázaro R González Miño Editor    lazaroronzalez@hotmail.com,   26 de Julio, EL DIA MAS NEFASTO Y TRISTE EN LA HISTORIA DE CUBA.   Please take a laxative before you read the follow:   White House Washington.   Hello everybody — The basic bargain of this country says that if you work hard, you can get ahead — you can build a secure life for your family, and know that your kids will do even better someday. But for more than a decade, that bargain has frayed, and a devastating recession made it worse. Over the past four and a half years, America has fought its way back, laying a new foundation for more durable economic growth. But many of the challenges that faced the middle class before the recession remain. And Washington has taken its eye off the ball. Too many people in this town are focused on scoring political points or fanning phony scandals instead of finding ways to help grow our economy, create jobs, or roll back a 30-year trend of rising inequality. It’s time for that to stop. It’s time for all of us to focus on our top priority as a country, and that’s reigniting the engine of our prosperity: a rising, thriving middle class. That’s what I just said while speaking at Knox College, back home in Illinois, where I kicked off a series of speeches on what truly matters to the middle class. If building America from the middle out is an idea you share, I need you to stand with me. Add your voice to mine. This has been my North Star for as long as I’ve been in office, and it’s what will shape the time that I have left in the White House. In the weeks ahead, in towns across the country, I’ll be talking about my ideas for building on the cornerstones of middle-class security: Good jobs with good wages. An education that prepares our children and our workers for a new economy. A home to call your own. Affordable health care when you get sick. A secure retirement even if you’re not rich. A better bargain for the middle class, and for all who are striving to join it. This is the debate we need to have. And you can join me right now. Let the country know that you believe that America works best not when it grows from the top down, but when it grows from the middle out: http://www.whitehouse.gov/a-better-bargain/speak-out Thank you, President Barack Obama   Note: I told you few days ago that USA need an enema… here you have known why.  En mi opinion, Lázaro R González Miño   EN AQUELLA EPOCA…¡HABIA CLASE! Diego Quiros Sr. Richard Nixon nació el 19 de Enero de 1913 y murio el 22 de Abril de 1994. Se graduó de Abogado en 1937 en Duke University. Se alisto en la Marina en 1942 para servir en La Segunda Guerra Mundial y al terminar la guerra ostentaba el grado de Capitán de Corbeta. Su carrera política comenzó en 1947 habiendo sido elegido como Representante a la Cámara Estatal por el Partido Republicano, orador elocuente de firmes conceptos y prédica anti comunista. En 1952 fue elegido Vicepresidente y en 1968 triunfo en la elecciones presidenciales. Fue un político brillante y audaz, visito China y la Unión Soviética, tuvo mucho éxito en su discurso en el que anuncio que pondría fin a la Guerra de Viet Nam. En 1972 lo reeligen por una mayoría extraordinaria, sin embargo, unos meses antes se había producido un allanamiento a las oficinas del Partido Demócrata en sus oficinas del Edificio Watergate que consistía en métodos de escuchas ilegales llevado a cabo por personas que habían sido contratadas por colaboradores cercanos al Presidente. Richard Nixon renuncio a la Presidencia el 8 de Agosto de 1974.  (IMPEACH) Comparando estos hechos con los actuales: La investigación del IRS al Tea Party, los métodos denunciados por la A P de interceptar y escuchar las llamadas por teléfonos en sus Oficinas  y en los teléfonos personales de sus reporteros, los sucesos de la Embajada en Benghazi.  ¿Cuál  es la diferencia?  Pues hay diferencias sumamente graves: No aparecen los culpables, nadie sabe nada, otros no pueden hablar y otros renuncian a sus cargos. ¿Estamos jugando a los escondidos, estamos pasando por alto la Justicia o se están burlando  de los ciudadanos? Todos estos problemas corresponden a funcionarios del más alto nivel. Ningún subordinado puede actuar tan libremente y es deber de la Administración esclarecerle a la Nación tan delicados asuntos y condenar a los culpables, porque esconder la verdad es hacerse cómplice de los hechos. (¿IMPEACH?) Solamente se actúa burlando la opinión pública en los gobiernos totalitarios, en los que las renuncias y el silencio son órdenes recibidas, los suicidios y muertes misteriosas son ejecuciones. DIOS BENDIGA A AMERICA   Diego Quirós, Sr   PRIMERA BUENA NOTICIA EN EL CASO DE ZIMMERMAN-MARTIN Fue Procesada La Fiscal Del Caso Por Falsificar Pruebas Para Condenar A Zimmerman Y “Agradar A Obama”   ¡Aleluya…Aleluya…Aleluya!!!   La Fiscal Ángela Corey fue OFICIALMENTE acusado de falsificación de Orden de detención en contra de George Zimmerman… Fue el Gran Jurado De Ciudadanos, de Ocala, Florida,  fue quien ordenó de Detención por  ESCONDER PRUEBAS que condujeron al George Zimmerman a ser acusado del Asesinato en Segundo Grado del adolescente afroamericano Trayvon Martin en Sanford, Florida. La Acusación de Corey, fue Entregado La Semana Pasada. Ella pensó que eso la iba a ayudar en su aspiración a su Reelección… Al Comienzo de Este Caso, los Activistas negros Como Jesse Jackson y Al Sharpton, Quien fustigó ira contra Zimmerman, exigieron Que se le acusara de Asesinato, la Policía Local Hasta Ese Momento se habían negado a detenerlo  en espera del resultado de más Investigaciones.  Para complacer a los NEGROS Y A OBAMA… el gobernador de la Florida (como Poncio Pilatos para lavarse las MANOS y quedar bien con los negros) NOMBRÓ a Ángela Corey para que lo arrestara y condenara a Zimmerman, Todos los Expertos legales, entre ellos el famoso profesor de Derecho Alan Dershowitz de HARVARD… condenaron PÚBLICAMENTE la falta de justicia Del caso…  Y la firma de Una Orden de arresto, bajo juramento, Que sin duda INTENCIONALMENTE OMITE LAS PRUEBAS que EXONERABAN A ZIMMERMAN Como son esconder las FOTOGRAFÍAS Que muestran las Lesiones que sufrió Zimmerman, y acusándolo de Asesinato en Segundo Grado por INTERESES POLÍTICOS…  Para leer mas: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/07/florida-prosecutor-indicted-for-falsifying-arrest-warrant-against-george-zimmerman/#ixzz2a3tonINa

Black Teenagers in Connecticut By Clash Daily ClashDaily – I wonder if Jay-Z, Beyonce, Obama, Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will protest the beating of this poor white business man… A New Haven businessman was beaten so badly by rabid black animals that he doesn’t even remember the incident. Oh, but wait. The report doesn’t even mention that these were blacks – it just says ‘teens.’

According to a New Haven Police press release, witnesses said “between five and six black male teenagers rushed him, pushed him from the moving scooter, assaulted him, and fled with the scooter.” Read more: http://clashdaily.com/2013/07/savage-white-businessman-beaten-by-black-teenagers-in-connecticut/#ixzz2a5Vgvi95  Get more Clash on ClashDaily.comFacebookTwitter, and YouTube.

Obama rediscovers the economy

By Associated Press July 25, 2013 6:42 am GALESBURG, Illinois — President Barack Obama sought to build momentum for looming fiscal fights with Republicans in Congress, declaring in a speech that the economy would be the “highest priority” of his second term. The president’s remarks did not include new policy proposals or fresh solutions for addressing the partisan divide in Washington ahead of potential showdowns over raising the U.S. borrowing limit and curtailing across-the-board federal budget cuts. A day after he kicked off the tour in Illinois and Missouri, Obama was traveling Thursday to a seaport in Jacksonville, Florida, to yet again decry the wide gulf between his vision for a new American prosperity driven by a burgeoning middle class and the intense gridlock snarling Congress. The first six months of Obama’s second term largely have been consumed by social issues like gun control and immigration, as well as foreign policy crises including leaks about the National Security Agency’s domestic spying programs. The economy has been slowly but steadily improving. The housing market is recovering, the stock market is soaring and unemployment, while still high at 7.6 percent, is falling. But the White House fears that standoffs this year over the debt ceiling and the budget cuts could hurt that progress. The president has declared that he will not negotiate over the debt ceiling and expects Republicans to lift the borrowing limit without concessions. He’s also pushing to end the federal budget cuts before they extend into the next fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1. The president called the cuts a “meat cleaver” that has “cost jobs, hurt our military and gutted investments in American education.” Themes he outlined Wednesday included the need for the U.S. to be better prepared to compete in a global economy. The economy in Illinois, the setting for Obama’s first speech, reflects the problems facing many Americans. A manufacturing plant in the town closed in 2004, leaving hundreds of people unemployed. Today, the factory sits vacant. Galesburg’s unemployment rate is just under 8 percent, and nearly a quarter of its population lives in poverty. “Those old days aren’t coming back,” Obama said. He said the proposals he will outline in later speeches will be aimed at adapting the U.S. economy to an increasingly competitive and interconnected world. Obama also spoke about growing income inequality. “Even though our businesses are creating new jobs and have broken record profits, nearly all the income gains of the past 10 years have continued to flow to the top 1 percent,” Obama said to heavy applause. “The average CEO (chief executive officer) has gotten a raise of nearly 40% since 2009, but the average American earns less than he or she did in 1999. And companies continue to hold back on hiring those who have been out of work for some time.” Top Republicans in Washington issued withering criticism of the president’s return to economic issues. “Welcome to the conversation, Mr. President. We’ve never left it,” said House Speaker John Boehner. He suggested that approving the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast and delaying Obama’s health care overhaul would do more to create jobs than delivering speeches.

‘My son is dead. How could that be phony?’

Posted on July 26, 2013 by Cowboy Byte   The mother of a Benghazi victim is furious about the new White House strategy of calling the terrorist attack and many other scandals plaguing the Obama administration “fake” or “phony.” Patricia Smith, mother of Sean Smith, who was slain in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack, lashed out on “Your World” on the Fox News Channel about that terminology. President Obama has never revealed what, if anything, he was doing while workers at the Benghazi embassy were urgently requesting support, nor has the administration explained why no forces were sent to protect the embassy. The administration also denied the attack was a terrorist incident, claiming it was a spontaneous protest against an obscure YouTube trailer for a film that may or may not exist. Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/23305/my-son-is-dead-how-could-that-be-phony/#ixzz2a9ghvqtt A Real MEye Opener WHY is the USA BANKRUPT? Enviado por Alonso Francisco. Do you think the war in Iraq was costing us too much each year? Read this: We have been hammered with the propaganda that it was the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us. I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. I also have included the URL’s for verification of all the following facts. 1.  $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments. Verify  at: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8  2.  $22 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML  3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.  Verify at:  http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML  4.  $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English! Verify  at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt….0.HTML  5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML  6.  $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.  Verify at:  http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML 7.  30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.CNN..com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt…01.HTML  8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers. Verify  at: http://premium.cnn..com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01..HTML 9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI  13.  In 2006, Illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin. Verify  at:.<http://www/..rense.com/general75/niht.htm> 14. The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One million sex crimes committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States .. Verify  at:http: // www.drdsk.com/articleshtml M The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND IF YOU’RE LIKE ME, HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS $338,300,000,000.00 WHICH WOULD BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY. Are we THAT Stupid? YES, FOR ALLOWING THOSE IN THE U.S. CONGRESS TO GET AWAY WITH DOING THIS YEAR AFTER YEAR!!!!! If this doesn’t bother you, then just delete the message. If, on the other hand, it does raise the hair on the back of your neck, I hope you forward it to every legal resident in the United States.    

 Weiner’s al-Qaida Connection Thursday, July 25, 2013 With the news media now profiling New York City mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner’s wife, there is a glaring part of Huma Abedin’s personal story that is not being told – her ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic supremacists.

The connections not only extend to her mother and father, who are both deeply tied to al-Qaida fronts, but to Abedin herself, as WND previously reported in a series of exposes. Abedin’s purported forgiveness of Weiner’s extramarital sexting is regarded as central to the politician’s continued candidacy. The New York Times claimed Abedin was “eager to end a difficult period of social exile” and “a main architect of her husband’s rehabilitative journey, shaping his calculated comeback.” Abedin has played a visible role in Weiner’s campaign and has been instrumental the effort to portray her husband as rehabilitated, leading to significant backlash from critics. Some are claiming Abedin is trying to follow in the footsteps of Hillary Clinton, whose loyalty to her husband during the Monica Lewinsky scandal increased her popularity and was credited with helping to launch her political career. OPPENHEIMER: ¿El fin de la chino -dependencia latinoamericana? Andrés Oppenheimer  24 jul 2013 Después de más de una década de relaciones económicas cada vez más intensas entre China y Latinoamérica, los nuevos titulares sobre una posible crisis en China están empezando a causar nerviosismo en los países chino dependientes de América Latina. ¡Y tienen buenas razones para estar nerviosos! En los últimos días ha habido una seguidilla de informes alarmantes que pronostican lo que ya habíamos sugerido en esta columna el 1ro. de junio: que el explosivo crecimiento económico de China en las últimas tres décadas está llegando a su fin. Y eso perjudicará a Venezuela, Argentina, Chile, Perú y otros países que han crecido rápidamente en los últimos años en buena parte gracias a sus exportaciones de materias primas al gigante asiático. “Las señales ya son inequívocas: China tiene grandes problemas”,escribió el economista ganador del Nobel Paul Krugman en el New York Times del 18 de julio. “No estamos hablando de algún revés menor en el camino, sino de algo más fundamental… Podríamos decir que el modelo chino está a punto de chocar con su Gran Muralla, y la única pregunta ahora es cuan grave será ese choque”. George Friedman, el fundador del influyente boletín geopolítico Stratford, publicó un artículo el 23 de julio titulado “El fin del milagro económico chino”. Refiriéndose al súbito cambio de opinión en los medios internacionales sobre China, Friedman escribió que “ahora la conversación está pasando de los pronósticos sobre cuán rápidamente China alcanzará a Estados Unidos, a las consideraciones sobre cuáles serían las consecuencias de un colapso de China”. El crecimiento de China ha caído de tasas anuales de 10 por ciento en las últimas décadas a un crecimiento proyectado en 7.5 por ciento —o menos— en 2013. Y un reciente estudio conjunto del Banco Mundial y el Centro de Investigación del Desarrollo de China predijo una caída a tasas anuales del 5 por ciento en la próxima década. El miércoles, hasta la usualmente optimista Comisión Económica para Latinoamérica y el Caribe de las Naciones Unidas (CEPAL) redujo su cálculo de crecimiento para Latinoamérica en 2013 del 3.5 por ciento al 3 por ciento, en gran medida por la disminución de importaciones de China. Las exportaciones latinoamericanas a China —principalmente de materias primas— se habían disparado de casi $4,000 millones en el año 2000 a $71,000 millones en el 2012. Y muchos economistas habían pronosticado que para 2015 China superaría a Estados Unidos como principal socio comercial de Latinoamérica, algo que ahora parece improbable. El informe de la CEPAL advirtió que estamos ante “el probable fin del auge de precios de los productos básicos de exportación asociado a la expansión de China”. Entre los países latinoamericanos que se verán más perjudicados se cuentan los exportadores de metales como Perú, Chile y Surinam, los exportadores de petróleo como Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador y Colombia, y exportadores de alimentos como Argentina, dijo la CEPAL. México y Brasil se verán menos afectados, porque tienen economías más diversificadas, agregó. Mi opinión: la desaceleración económica de China puede señalar el fin del ciclo populista basado en el aumento de las materias primas que ha vivido Latinoamérica en la última década. Fue una década desperdiciada, en la que Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador y Argentina, entre otros, despilfarraron el mayor boom exportador de su historia reciente en subsidios pasajeros, en lugar de invertirlo en infraestructura y educación para crear prosperidad a largo plazo. Pan para hoy, hambre para mañana. Es cierto que los pronósticos sobre la inminente caída de China podrían resultar tan exagerados como los anteriores que pronosticaban que China pronto superará a Estados Unidos como la economía líder del mundo. Pero tal como lo percibí en una visita reciente a China, la economía china crecerá más lentamente, entre otras cosas por la caída de las exportaciones a Estados Unidos y Europa, y por el aumento de salarios chinos, que está haciendo que muchas empresas multinacionales muden sus fábricas a otros países. China ya no es un país de mano de obra barata, ni tampoco un país barato: pagué $10 por una taza de café en el aeropuerto de Xian, y $4.50 por un café en un Starbucks de Beijing. Además, hay serias dudas de que funcione el nuevo plan económico chino de pasar de una economía exportadora a una basada en el consumo interno. Los chinos no van a aumentar sus compras porque necesitan ahorrar para pagar sus planes de salud y los estudios de sus hijos, que no son gratuitos. Resumiendo, los países latinoamericanos que habían crecido rápidamente en la década pasada gracias a sus exportaciones a China tendrán que hacer lo que debieron haber hecho desde el principio: diversificar sus exportaciones. La desaceleración de China no va a acabar con la economía latinoamericana, pero la fiesta se ha terminado. Read more here: http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2013/07/24/v-fullstory/1529389/oppenheimer-el-fin-de-la-chino.html#storylink=cpy  

LA JUSTICIA DIVIDIDA DE OBAMA

Por Alfredo M. Cepero

Director de www.lanuevanacion.com

Sígame en: http://twitter.com/@AlfredoCepero

http://www.lanuevanacion.com/articles.aspx?art=3659

“Una casa dividida no puede sostenerse…No espero que la Unión se disuelva, no espero que la casa se derrumbe, lo que espero es que deje de estar dividida”, Abraham Lincoln en discurso pronunciado el 16 de junio de 1858, en el Capitolio del Estado de Illinois. Con aquel acto de compasión humana y de coraje político de demandar la abolición de la odiosa institución de la esclavitud, Lincoln no solo se proponía salvar a la Unión Norteamericana como nación sino dar el primer paso hacia una sociedad que, a pesar de ser heterogénea en razas, religiones y culturas, fuera capaz de vivir en armonía por medio del trato igualitario a todos sus miembros. Cinco años después, el 1 de enero de 1863, el ya Presidente Lincoln, fiel a su promesa y a sus principios, emitió su Proclama de Emancipación en que otorgaba la libertad a los esclavos. Andando el tiempo, otro político del Estado de Illinois parecía convertirse en la culminación del sueño de Abraham Lincoln. Cuarenta y tres presidentes y 145 años después de la Proclama de Emancipación, Barack Hussein Obama, un mestizo que actúa y se identifica como negro o como hombre por encima de las razas según las conveniencias del momento, se convirtió en el cuadragésimo cuarto presidente de los Estados Unidos el 4 de noviembre del 2008. La mayoría del pueblo norteamericano recibió con júbilo lo que fue sin dudas un acontecimiento histórico que parecía erradicar el estigma de racismo que había pesado por años sobre los Estados Unidos. Muchos voceros de la izquierda plañidera y demagógica llegaron a vaticinar que la elección de Obama traería consigo una mayor armonía en las relaciones entre negros y blancos. La realidad del último año y medio, que comenzó con la muerte de Trayvon Martin a manos de George Zimmerman en febrero del 2012 y culminó con la absolución del segundo el 13 de julio del 2013 en el pueblo de Sanford, en laFlorida, ha demostraron que se equivocaron y que la armonía racial en los Estados Unidos sigue siendo una quimera que demandará mucha tenacidad y coraje para convertirla en realidad. En una forma paradójica y de difícil explicación, los hechos posteriores a la absolución de Zimmernan han demostrado hasta la saciedad que la elección de Obama, en vez de reducirla, ha intensificado la animosidad entre las razas. Aunque en honor a la brevedad no entraremos en un análisis exhaustivo del juicio, consideramos oportuno apuntar que Zimmerman fue absuelto en un juicio que se prolongó durante cinco semanas en que 55 testigos prestaron declaraciones y un jurado de seis personas deliberó durante 16 horas. En ningún momento del juicio ni el juez, ni la fiscalía, ni la defensa y ni siquiera los familiares de la víctima hicieron referencia a la discriminación racial como motivación del acto del acusado. La discriminación racial fue incluso descartada por el Buró Federal de Investigaciones después de una investigación que se extendió por 16 meses. Sin embargo, como han demostrado con su conducta, ni la prensa dominada por la izquierda demagógica ni los mercaderes del racismo muestran el más mínimo respeto por la verdad. Esa oficina de prensa de Obama que es la NBC violó toda objetividad periodística cuando alteró el contenido de la grabación de la conversación de Zimmerman con la policía. En la grabación original el operador policial pregunta a Zimmerman si el sospechosos “es negro, blanco o hispano”, a lo que Zimmerman contesta: “es negro”. La NBC borra las referencias a blanco o hispano hechas por la policía y muestra solamente la respuesta de Zimmerman. La única inferencia que podía sacar el televidente era la de un blanco racista dando muerte a un joven negro. Un gran detonador para la confrontación racial y un infame recurso para ganar audiencia. Cuando sale a la luz la noticia de que Zimmerman era mitad hispano, tratan de arreglar el entuerto diciendo que el agresor era “un hispano blanco”. Ya no era solamente hispano sino hispano blanco, una categoría nunca usada por la gran prensa americana que se refiere a los hispanos como una raza marrón donde caben todos los colores y donde nadie es puramente blanco. Resultaría interesante ver si la NBC se atrevería a referirse a Obama como “un negro blanco o un blanco negro”. Ahí encontraron justificación y medios de diseminar su veneno los mercaderes que han hecho del racismo una forma lucrativa de vivir sin trabajar. Los más notorios Al Sharpton y Jesse Jackson, a quienes no doy tratamiento de reverendos para no denigrar a los verdaderos mensajeros del mensaje de Cristo. La misma carta racial fue utilizada con absoluto descaro y fines políticos por varios miembros del Concilio Negro del Congreso Norteamericano. Pero lo que literalmente le puso la tapa al pomo fueron las declaraciones inflamatorias de los dos funcionarios negros de más alta jerarquía en este país, el Procurador General Eric Holder y el Presidente Barack Obama. Este es el Eric Holder que dio la orden para que fuerzas especiales armadas hasta los dientes extrajeran por la fuerza de la casa de sus familiares al niño Elián González, que durante los últimos días del gobierno de Clinton redactó los documentos para el perdón presidencial de Marc Rich, un traficantes sin escrúpulos que vendió armamentos a enemigos de los Estados Unidos como Irán, Libia, Cuba y Sudáfrica y que se negó a procesar a los miembros de las Panteras Negras que intimidaron a votantes blancos en Filadelfia durante las elecciones del 2008. Este es el Eric Holder que invadió la privacidad del periodista de Fox News, James Rosen, para castigarlo por informaciones que le molestaban, que ha bloqueado las tarjetas de identificación de votantes en varios estados argumentando que recuerdan la discriminación contra negros a mediados del siglo pasado, que ha sido declarado en rebeldía al Congreso por su negativa a aclarar los hechos alrededor de la operación de ventas ilícitas de armas a traficantes mexicanos conocida como “Rápido y Furioso”. Y, dicho sea de paso, que a diferencia de la sensibilidad mostrada hacia la familia de Trayvon Martin, jamás se molestó en dar el pésame a los familiares de Brian Terry, el patrullero de fronteras asesinado con una de esas armas. Con esto, Holder ha demostrado que no es un abogado en busca de justicia sino un activista que utiliza la justicia para promover su agenda ideológica y su hostilidad hacia una sociedad blanca a la que sigue culpando de ancestrales injusticias cometidas contra los negros. Ahí está el cordón umbilical que une a Holder y a Obama en su misión de dividir a la sociedad norteamericana. Ahora bien, la máxima responsabilidad tiene que ser atribuida al actual residente de la Casa Blanca. Desde sus primeros meses como presidente, Obama mostró sus prejuicios raciales cuando, sin contar con suficiente información, se insertó en el arresto del profesor negro de la Universidad de Harvard Henry Gates, Jr. El presidente calificó la acción del policía blanco, James Crowley, como “una estupidez”. Los hechos posteriores demostraron que estaba equivocado y montó un circo de desagravio donde los actores del hecho bebieron cerveza en la Casa Blanca. Durante las elecciones del 2012 volvió a hacer despliegue de sus prejuicios. A raíz del incidente en Sanford, Obama declaró que si el hubiera tenido un hijo varón se habría parecido a Trayvon Martin. Y un día después del fallo en Sandford, Obama cayó en el melodrama cuando dijo que, 35 años antes, él pudo haber corrido la suerte de Trayvon Martin. Estas declaraciones inflamatorias son inconcebibles en un abogado graduado de Harvard que debía defender la santidad de la cosa juzgada por un jurado imparcial y debidamente seleccionado que aplicó las leyes de la Florida y las cláusulas de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos. Peor aún, son indignas de un presidente que no fue elegido solo por los negros sino por muchos ciudadanos de diferentes razas que integran una nación de diversidad étnica como los Estados Unidos. Y, una vez elegido, se convirtió en presidente de todos los norteamericanos, los que votaron por él y los que votamos en su contra. Fue elegido como el primer presidente negro para velar por el bienestar de los norteamericanos de todas las razas, pero está actuando como si hubiera sido elegido para velar solamente por el bienestar de los norteamericanos de raza negra. Esto no es solo deplorable sino intolerable. ¡Qué remordimiento deben de experimentar aquellos ingenuos que votaron por él! Y que mal nos sentimos todos los que albergábamos la esperanza de que la semilla sembrada por Lincoln con su Proclama de Emancipación hubiese conducido a una casa armoniosa, unida y próspera para todos sus hijos. Con su división de clases, religiones y razas, Obama se ha encargado de derrumbarla. Y con ello ha hecho un daño inmenso a los norteamericanos de todas las razas. La diferencia entre el líder y el agitador comunitario. La Nueva Nación es una publicación independiente cuyas metas son la defensa de la libertad, la preservación de la democracia y la promoción de la libre empresa. Visítenos en : http://www.lanuevanacion.com Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/2013/07/weiners-al-qaida-connection/#ixzz2a9wB9HDE http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/ http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/ http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/ https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/ http://contracandela.blogspot.com/ “THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE” “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

No.440 “EN MI OPINION” Julio 26, 2013

julio 26, 2013

No 440  “En mi opinión” Julio 26, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

Lázaro R González Miño Editor    lazaroronzalez@hotmail.com,

 

26 de Julio, EL DIA MAS NEFASTO Y TRISTE EN LA HISTORIA DE CUBA.

 

Please take a laxative before you read the follow:

 
White House

Washington.

 

Hello everybody —
The basic bargain of this country says that if you work hard, you can get ahead — you can build a secure life for your family, and know that your kids will do even better someday.
But for more than a decade, that bargain has frayed, and a devastating recession made it worse.
Over the past four and a half years, America has fought its way back, laying a new foundation for more durable economic growth. But many of the challenges that faced the middle class before the recession remain. And Washington has taken its eye off the ball.
Too many people in this town are focused on scoring political points or fanning phony scandals instead of finding ways to help grow our economy, create jobs, or roll back a 30-year trend of rising inequality.
It’s time for that to stop. It’s time for all of us to focus on our top priority as a country, and that’s reigniting the engine of our prosperity: a rising, thriving middle class.
That’s what I just said while speaking at Knox College, back home in Illinois, where I kicked off a series of speeches on what truly matters to the middle class.
If building America from the middle out is an idea you share, I need you to stand with me. Add your voice to mine.
This has been my North Star for as long as I’ve been in office, and it’s what will shape the time that I have left in the White House.
In the weeks ahead, in towns across the country, I’ll be talking about my ideas for building on the cornerstones of middle-class security: Good jobs with good wages. An education that prepares our children and our workers for a new economy. A home to call your own. Affordable health care when you get sick. A secure retirement even if you’re not rich. A better bargain for the middle class, and for all who are striving to join it.
This is the debate we need to have. And you can join me right now.
Let the country know that you believe that America works best not when it grows from the top down, but when it grows from the middle out:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/a-better-bargain/speak-out
Thank you,
President Barack Obama

 

Note: I told you few days ago that USA need an enema… here you have known why.  En mi opinion, Lázaro R González Miño

 

EN AQUELLA EPOCA…¡HABIA CLASE! Diego Quiros Sr.

Richard Nixon nació el 19 de Enero de 1913 y murio el 22 de Abril de 1994.

Se graduó de Abogado en 1937 en Duke University. Se alisto en la Marina en 1942 para servir en La Segunda Guerra Mundial y al terminar la guerra ostentaba el grado de Capitán de Corbeta.

Su carrera política comenzó en 1947 habiendo sido elegido como Representante a la Cámara Estatal por el Partido Republicano, orador elocuente de firmes conceptos y prédica anti comunista. En 1952 fue elegido Vicepresidente y en 1968 triunfo en la elecciones presidenciales.

Fue un político brillante y audaz, visito China y la Unión Soviética, tuvo mucho éxito en su discurso en el que anuncio que pondría fin a la Guerra de Viet Nam.

En 1972 lo reeligen por una mayoría extraordinaria, sin embargo, unos meses antes se había producido un allanamiento a las oficinas del Partido Demócrata en sus oficinas del Edificio Watergate que consistía en métodos de escuchas ilegales llevado a cabo por personas que habían sido contratadas por colaboradores cercanos al Presidente.

Richard Nixon renuncio a la Presidencia el 8 de Agosto de 1974.  (IMPEACH)

Comparando estos hechos con los actuales: La investigación del IRS al Tea Party, los métodos denunciados por la A P de interceptar y escuchar las llamadas por teléfonos en sus Oficinas  y en los teléfonos personales de sus reporteros, los sucesos de la Embajada en Benghazi.

 ¿Cuál  es la diferencia?  Pues hay diferencias sumamente graves:

No aparecen los culpables, nadie sabe nada, otros no pueden hablar y otros renuncian a sus cargos.

¿Estamos jugando a los escondidos, estamos pasando por alto la Justicia o se están burlando  de los ciudadanos?

Todos estos problemas corresponden a funcionarios del más alto nivel. Ningún subordinado puede actuar tan libremente y es deber de la Administración esclarecerle a la Nación tan delicados asuntos y condenar a los culpables, porque esconder la verdad es hacerse cómplice de los hechos. (¿IMPEACH?)

Solamente se actúa burlando la opinión pública en los gobiernos totalitarios, en los que las renuncias y el silencio son órdenes recibidas, los suicidios y muertes misteriosas son ejecuciones.

DIOS BENDIGA A AMERICA

 

Diego Quirós, Sr

 

PRIMERA BUENA NOTICIA EN EL CASO DE ZIMMERMAN-MARTIN

Fue Procesada La Fiscal Del Caso Por Falsificar Pruebas Para Condenar A Zimmerman Y “Agradar A Obama”

 

¡Aleluya…Aleluya…Aleluya!!!

 

La Fiscal Ángela Corey fue OFICIALMENTE acusado de falsificación

de Orden de detención en contra de George Zimmerman…

Fue el Gran Jurado De Ciudadanos, de Ocala, Florida,  fue quien

ordenó de Detención por  ESCONDER PRUEBAS que condujeron

al George Zimmerman a ser acusado del Asesinato en Segundo

Grado del adolescente afroamericano Trayvon Martin en Sanford,

Florida.

La Acusación de Corey, fue Entregado La Semana Pasada.

Ella pensó que eso la iba a ayudar en su aspiración a su Reelección…

Al Comienzo de Este Caso, los Activistas negros Como Jesse Jackson y

Al Sharpton, Quien fustigó ira contra Zimmerman, exigieron Que se le

acusara de Asesinato, la Policía Local Hasta Ese Momento se habían

negado a detenerlo  en espera del resultado de más Investigaciones. 

Para complacer a los NEGROS Y A OBAMA… el gobernador de la Florida

(como Poncio Pilatos para lavarse las MANOS y quedar bien con los negros) NOMBRÓ a Ángela Corey para que lo arrestara y condenara a Zimmerman,

Todos los Expertos legales, entre ellos el famoso profesor de Derecho Alan Dershowitz de HARVARD… condenaron PÚBLICAMENTE la falta de justicia Del caso…  Y la firma de Una Orden de arresto, bajo juramento, Que sin duda INTENCIONALMENTE OMITE LAS PRUEBAS que EXONERABAN A ZIMMERMAN

Como son esconder las FOTOGRAFÍAS Que muestran las Lesiones que sufrió Zimmerman, y acusándolo de Asesinato en Segundo Grado por INTERESES POLÍTICOS… 

Para leer mas:

http://conservativebyte.com/2013/07/florida-prosecutor-indicted-for-falsifying-arrest-warrant-against-george-zimmerman/#ixzz2a3tonINa

Black Teenagers in Connecticut By Clash Daily ClashDaily – I wonder if Jay-Z, Beyonce, Obama, Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will protest the beating of this poor white business man… A New Haven businessman was beaten so badly by rabid black animals that he doesn’t even remember the incident. Oh, but wait. The report doesn’t even mention that these were blacks – it just says ‘teens.’

According to a New Haven Police press release, witnesses said “between five and six black male teenagers rushed him, pushed him from the moving scooter, assaulted him, and fled with the scooter.”
Read more: http://clashdaily.com/2013/07/savage-white-businessman-beaten-by-black-teenagers-in-connecticut/#ixzz2a5Vgvi95 
Get more Clash on ClashDaily.comFacebookTwitter, and YouTube.

Obama rediscovers the economy

By Associated Press July 25, 2013 6:42 am

GALESBURG, Illinois — President Barack Obama sought to build momentum for looming fiscal fights with Republicans in Congress, declaring in a speech that the economy would be the “highest priority” of his second term.

The president’s remarks did not include new policy proposals or fresh solutions for addressing the partisan divide in Washington ahead of potential showdowns over raising the U.S. borrowing limit and curtailing across-the-board federal budget cuts.

A day after he kicked off the tour in Illinois and Missouri, Obama was traveling Thursday to a seaport in Jacksonville, Florida, to yet again decry the wide gulf between his vision for a new American prosperity driven by a burgeoning middle class and the intense gridlock snarling Congress.

The first six months of Obama’s second term largely have been consumed by social issues like gun control and immigration, as well as foreign policy crises including leaks about the National Security Agency’s domestic spying programs.

The economy has been slowly but steadily improving. The housing market is recovering, the stock market is soaring and unemployment, while still high at 7.6 percent, is falling.

But the White House fears that standoffs this year over the debt ceiling and the budget cuts could hurt that progress. The president has declared that he will not negotiate over the debt ceiling and expects Republicans to lift the borrowing limit without concessions. He’s also pushing to end the federal budget cuts before they extend into the next fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1.

The president called the cuts a “meat cleaver” that has “cost jobs, hurt our military and gutted investments in American education.”

Themes he outlined Wednesday included the need for the U.S. to be better prepared to compete in a global economy.

The economy in Illinois, the setting for Obama’s first speech, reflects the problems facing many Americans. A manufacturing plant in the town closed in 2004, leaving hundreds of people unemployed. Today, the factory sits vacant. Galesburg’s unemployment rate is just under 8 percent, and nearly a quarter of its population lives in poverty.

“Those old days aren’t coming back,” Obama said. He said the proposals he will outline in later speeches will be aimed at adapting the U.S. economy to an increasingly competitive and interconnected world.

Obama also spoke about growing income inequality.

“Even though our businesses are creating new jobs and have broken record profits, nearly all the income gains of the past 10 years have continued to flow to the top 1 percent,” Obama said to heavy applause. “The average CEO (chief executive officer) has gotten a raise of nearly 40% since 2009, but the average American earns less than he or she did in 1999. And companies continue to hold back on hiring those who have been out of work for some time.”

Top Republicans in Washington issued withering criticism of the president’s return to economic issues.

“Welcome to the conversation, Mr. President. We’ve never left it,” said House Speaker John Boehner. He suggested that approving the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast and delaying Obama’s health care overhaul would do more to create jobs than delivering speeches.

‘My son is dead. How could that be phony?’

Posted on July 26, 2013 by Cowboy Byte

 

The mother of a Benghazi victim is furious about the new White House strategy of calling the terrorist attack and many other scandals plaguing the Obama administration “fake” or “phony.”

Patricia Smith, mother of Sean Smith, who was slain in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack, lashed out on “Your World” on the Fox News Channel about that terminology.

President Obama has never revealed what, if anything, he was doing while workers at the Benghazi embassy were urgently requesting support, nor has the administration explained why no forces were sent to protect the embassy. The administration also denied the attack was a terrorist incident, claiming it was a spontaneous protest against an obscure YouTube trailer for a film that may or may not exist.
Read more:
 http://cowboybyte.com/23305/my-son-is-dead-how-could-that-be-phony/#ixzz2a9ghvqtt

A Real MEye Opener
WHY is the USA BANKRUPT? Enviado por Alonso Francisco.

Do you think the war in Iraq was costing us too much each year?

Read this:

We have been hammered with the propaganda that it was the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us.

I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until

they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. I also have included the URL’s for verification of all the following facts.

1. 
$11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments.

Verify 
at:
 http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8 

2. 
$22 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.

Verify

at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML 

3.
$2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.
 
Verify at: 
http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML 

4. 
$12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!
Verify
 
at:
 http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt….0.HTML 

5.
$17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born

children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
Verify
at
 http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML 

6. 
$3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to
incarcerate illegal aliens. 
Verify at: 
http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML

7. 
30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.
Verify at:

http://transcripts.CNN..com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt…01.HTML 

8.
$90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social

services by the American taxpayers.
Verify
 
at:
 http://premium.cnn..com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01..HTML

9.
$200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.
Verify
at:
 http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI 

13.
 
In 2006, Illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin.
Verify
 
at:.
<http://www/..rense.com/general75/niht.htm>

14.

The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration:

Nearly One million sex crimes committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States ..
Verify
 
at:http: //
 www.drdsk.com/articleshtml


M
The total cost is a whopping
$ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND IF YOU’RE LIKE ME, HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS

$338,300,000,000.00 WHICH WOULD BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE

THE ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.

Are we THAT Stupid?
YES,

FOR ALLOWING THOSE IN THE U.S. CONGRESS TO GET AWAY WITH DOING THIS YEAR AFTER YEAR!!!!!

If this doesn’t bother you, then just delete the message. If, on the other

hand, it does raise the hair on the back of your neck, I hope you forward it to every legal resident in the United States.

 

 

 Weiner’s al-Qaida Connection Thursday, July 25, 2013 With the news media now profiling New York City mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner’s wife, there is a glaring part of Huma Abedin’s personal story that is not being told – her ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic supremacists.

The connections not only extend to her mother and father, who are both deeply tied to al-Qaida fronts, but to Abedin herself, as WND previously reported in a series of exposes.

Abedin’s purported forgiveness of Weiner’s extramarital sexting is regarded as central to the politician’s continued candidacy.

The New York Times claimed Abedin was “eager to end a difficult period of social exile” and “a main architect of her husband’s rehabilitative journey, shaping his calculated comeback.”

Abedin has played a visible role in Weiner’s campaign and has been instrumental the effort to portray her husband as rehabilitated, leading to significant backlash from critics.

Some are claiming Abedin is trying to follow in the footsteps of Hillary Clinton, whose loyalty to her husband during the Monica Lewinsky scandal increased her popularity and was credited with helping to launch her political career.

OPPENHEIMER: ¿El fin de la chino -dependencia latinoamericana?

Andrés Oppenheimer  24 jul 2013

Después de más de una década de relaciones económicas cada vez más intensas entre China y Latinoamérica, los nuevos titulares sobre una posible crisis en China están empezando a causar nerviosismo en los países chino dependientes de América Latina. ¡Y tienen buenas razones para estar nerviosos!

En los últimos días ha habido una seguidilla de informes alarmantes que pronostican lo que ya habíamos sugerido en esta columna el 1ro. de junio: que el explosivo crecimiento económico de China en las últimas tres décadas está llegando a su fin. Y eso perjudicará a Venezuela, Argentina, Chile, Perú y otros países que han crecido rápidamente en los últimos años en buena parte gracias a sus exportaciones de materias primas al gigante asiático.

“Las señales ya son inequívocas: China tiene grandes problemas”,escribió el economista ganador del Nobel Paul Krugman en el New York Times del 18 de julio. “No estamos hablando de algún revés menor en el camino, sino de algo más fundamental… Podríamos decir que el modelo chino está a punto de chocar con su Gran Muralla, y la única pregunta ahora es cuan grave será ese choque”.

George Friedman, el fundador del influyente boletín geopolítico Stratford, publicó un artículo el 23 de julio titulado “El fin del milagro económico chino”.

Refiriéndose al súbito cambio de opinión en los medios internacionales sobre China, Friedman escribió que “ahora la conversación está pasando de los pronósticos sobre cuán rápidamente China alcanzará a Estados Unidos, a las consideraciones sobre cuáles serían las consecuencias de un colapso de China”.

El crecimiento de China ha caído de tasas anuales de 10 por ciento en las últimas décadas a un crecimiento proyectado en 7.5 por ciento —o menos— en 2013. Y un reciente estudio conjunto del Banco Mundial y el Centro de Investigación del Desarrollo de China predijo una caída a tasas anuales del 5 por ciento en la próxima década.

El miércoles, hasta la usualmente optimista Comisión Económica para Latinoamérica y el Caribe de las Naciones Unidas (CEPAL) redujo su cálculo de crecimiento para Latinoamérica en 2013 del 3.5 por ciento al 3 por ciento, en gran medida por la disminución de importaciones de China.

Las exportaciones latinoamericanas a China —principalmente de materias primas— se habían disparado de casi $4,000 millones en el año 2000 a $71,000 millones en el 2012. Y muchos economistas habían pronosticado que para 2015 China superaría a Estados Unidos como principal socio comercial de Latinoamérica, algo que ahora parece improbable.

El informe de la CEPAL advirtió que estamos ante “el probable fin del auge de precios de los productos básicos de exportación asociado a la expansión de China”.

Entre los países latinoamericanos que se verán más perjudicados se cuentan los exportadores de metales como Perú, Chile y Surinam, los exportadores de petróleo como Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador y Colombia, y exportadores de alimentos como Argentina, dijo la CEPAL.

México y Brasil se verán menos afectados, porque tienen economías más diversificadas, agregó.

Mi opinión: la desaceleración económica de China puede señalar el fin del ciclo populista basado en el aumento de las materias primas que ha vivido Latinoamérica en la última década.

Fue una década desperdiciada, en la que Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador y Argentina, entre otros, despilfarraron el mayor boom exportador de su historia reciente en subsidios pasajeros, en lugar de invertirlo en infraestructura y educación para crear prosperidad a largo plazo. Pan para hoy, hambre para mañana.

Es cierto que los pronósticos sobre la inminente caída de China podrían resultar tan exagerados como los anteriores que pronosticaban que China pronto superará a Estados Unidos como la economía líder del mundo.

Pero tal como lo percibí en una visita reciente a China, la economía china crecerá más lentamente, entre otras cosas por la caída de las exportaciones a Estados Unidos y Europa, y por el aumento de salarios chinos, que está haciendo que muchas empresas multinacionales muden sus fábricas a otros países.

China ya no es un país de mano de obra barata, ni tampoco un país barato: pagué $10 por una taza de café en el aeropuerto de Xian, y $4.50 por un café en un Starbucks de Beijing.

Además, hay serias dudas de que funcione el nuevo plan económico chino de pasar de una economía exportadora a una basada en el consumo interno. Los chinos no van a aumentar sus compras porque necesitan ahorrar para pagar sus planes de salud y los estudios de sus hijos, que no son gratuitos.

Resumiendo, los países latinoamericanos que habían crecido rápidamente en la década pasada gracias a sus exportaciones a China tendrán que hacer lo que debieron haber hecho desde el principio: diversificar sus exportaciones. La desaceleración de China no va a acabar con la economía latinoamericana, pero la fiesta se ha terminado.

Read more here: http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2013/07/24/v-fullstory/1529389/oppenheimer-el-fin-de-la-chino.html#storylink=cpy

 

LA JUSTICIA DIVIDIDA DE OBAMA

Por Alfredo M. Cepero

Director de www.lanuevanacion.com

Sígame en: http://twitter.com/@AlfredoCepero

http://www.lanuevanacion.com/articles.aspx?art=3659

“Una casa dividida no puede sostenerse…No espero que la Unión se disuelva, no espero que la casa se derrumbe, lo que espero es que deje de estar dividida”, Abraham Lincoln en discurso pronunciado el 16 de junio de 1858, en el Capitolio del Estado de Illinois.

Con aquel acto de compasión humana y de coraje político de demandar la abolición de la odiosa institución de la esclavitud, Lincoln no solo se proponía salvar a la Unión Norteamericana como nación sino dar el primer paso hacia una sociedad que, a pesar de ser heterogénea en razas, religiones y culturas, fuera capaz de vivir en armonía por medio del trato igualitario a todos sus miembros. Cinco años después, el 1 de enero de 1863, el ya Presidente Lincoln, fiel a su promesa y a sus principios, emitió su Proclama de Emancipación en que otorgaba la libertad a los esclavos.

Andando el tiempo, otro político del Estado de Illinois parecía convertirse en la culminación del sueño de Abraham Lincoln. Cuarenta y tres presidentes y 145 años después de la Proclama de Emancipación, Barack Hussein Obama, un mestizo que actúa y se identifica como negro o como hombre por encima de las razas según las conveniencias del momento, se convirtió en el cuadragésimo cuarto presidente de los Estados Unidos el 4 de noviembre del 2008. La mayoría del pueblo norteamericano recibió con júbilo lo que fue sin dudas un acontecimiento histórico que parecía erradicar el estigma de racismo que había pesado por años sobre los Estados Unidos. Muchos voceros de la izquierda plañidera y demagógica llegaron a vaticinar que la elección de Obama traería consigo una mayor armonía en las relaciones entre negros y blancos.

La realidad del último año y medio, que comenzó con la muerte de Trayvon Martin a manos de George Zimmerman en febrero del 2012 y culminó con la absolución del segundo el 13 de julio del 2013 en el pueblo de Sanford, en laFlorida, ha demostraron que se equivocaron y que la armonía racial en los Estados Unidos sigue siendo una quimera que demandará mucha tenacidad y coraje para convertirla en realidad. En una forma paradójica y de difícil explicación, los hechos posteriores a la absolución de Zimmernan han demostrado hasta la saciedad que la elección de Obama, en vez de reducirla, ha intensificado la animosidad entre las razas.

Aunque en honor a la brevedad no entraremos en un análisis exhaustivo del juicio, consideramos oportuno apuntar que Zimmerman fue absuelto en un juicio que se prolongó durante cinco semanas en que 55 testigos prestaron declaraciones y un jurado de seis personas deliberó durante 16 horas. En ningún momento del juicio ni el juez, ni la fiscalía, ni la defensa y ni siquiera los familiares de la víctima hicieron referencia a la discriminación racial como motivación del acto del acusado. La discriminación racial fue incluso descartada por el Buró Federal de Investigaciones después de una investigación que se extendió por 16 meses.

Sin embargo, como han demostrado con su conducta, ni la prensa dominada por la izquierda demagógica ni los mercaderes del racismo muestran el más mínimo respeto por la verdad. Esa oficina de prensa de Obama que es la NBC violó toda objetividad periodística cuando alteró el contenido de la grabación de la conversación de Zimmerman con la policía.

En la grabación original el operador policial pregunta a Zimmerman si el sospechosos “es negro, blanco o hispano”, a lo que Zimmerman contesta: “es negro”. La NBC borra las referencias a blanco o hispano hechas por la policía y muestra solamente la respuesta de Zimmerman. La única inferencia que podía sacar el televidente era la de un blanco racista dando muerte a un joven negro. Un gran detonador para la confrontación racial y un infame recurso para ganar audiencia.

Cuando sale a la luz la noticia de que Zimmerman era mitad hispano, tratan de arreglar el entuerto diciendo que el agresor era “un hispano blanco”. Ya no era solamente hispano sino hispano blanco, una categoría nunca usada por la gran prensa americana que se refiere a los hispanos como una raza marrón donde caben todos los colores y donde nadie es puramente blanco. Resultaría interesante ver si la NBC se atrevería a referirse a Obama como “un negro blanco o un blanco negro”.

Ahí encontraron justificación y medios de diseminar su veneno los mercaderes que han hecho del racismo una forma lucrativa de vivir sin trabajar. Los más notorios Al Sharpton y Jesse Jackson, a quienes no doy tratamiento de reverendos para no denigrar a los verdaderos mensajeros del mensaje de Cristo. La misma carta racial fue utilizada con absoluto descaro y fines políticos por varios miembros del Concilio Negro del Congreso Norteamericano.

Pero lo que literalmente le puso la tapa al pomo fueron las declaraciones inflamatorias de los dos funcionarios negros de más alta jerarquía en este país, el Procurador General Eric Holder y el Presidente Barack Obama. Este es el Eric Holder que dio la orden para que fuerzas especiales armadas hasta los dientes extrajeran por la fuerza de la casa de sus familiares al niño Elián González, que durante los últimos días del gobierno de Clinton redactó los documentos para el perdón presidencial de Marc Rich, un traficantes sin escrúpulos que vendió armamentos a enemigos de los Estados Unidos como Irán, Libia, Cuba y Sudáfrica y que se negó a procesar a los miembros de las Panteras Negras que intimidaron a votantes blancos en Filadelfia durante las elecciones del 2008.

Este es el Eric Holder que invadió la privacidad del periodista de Fox News, James Rosen, para castigarlo por informaciones que le molestaban, que ha bloqueado las tarjetas de identificación de votantes en varios estados argumentando que recuerdan la discriminación contra negros a mediados del siglo pasado, que ha sido declarado en rebeldía al Congreso por su negativa a aclarar los hechos alrededor de la operación de ventas ilícitas de armas a traficantes mexicanos conocida como “Rápido y Furioso”.

Y, dicho sea de paso, que a diferencia de la sensibilidad mostrada hacia la familia de Trayvon Martin, jamás se molestó en dar el pésame a los familiares de Brian Terry, el patrullero de fronteras asesinado con una de esas armas. Con esto, Holder ha demostrado que no es un abogado en busca de justicia sino un activista que utiliza la justicia para promover su agenda ideológica y su hostilidad hacia una sociedad blanca a la que sigue culpando de ancestrales injusticias cometidas contra los negros. Ahí está el cordón umbilical que une a Holder y a Obama en su misión de dividir a la sociedad norteamericana.

Ahora bien, la máxima responsabilidad tiene que ser atribuida al actual residente de la Casa Blanca. Desde sus primeros meses como presidente, Obama mostró sus prejuicios raciales cuando, sin contar con suficiente información, se insertó en el arresto del profesor negro de la Universidad de Harvard Henry Gates, Jr. El presidente calificó la acción del policía blanco, James Crowley, como “una estupidez”. Los hechos posteriores demostraron que estaba equivocado y montó un circo de desagravio donde los actores del hecho bebieron cerveza en la Casa Blanca.

Durante las elecciones del 2012 volvió a hacer despliegue de sus prejuicios. A raíz del incidente en Sanford, Obama declaró que si el hubiera tenido un hijo varón se habría parecido a Trayvon Martin. Y un día después del fallo en Sandford, Obama cayó en el melodrama cuando dijo que, 35 años antes, él pudo haber corrido la suerte de Trayvon Martin. Estas declaraciones inflamatorias son inconcebibles en un abogado graduado de Harvard que debía defender la santidad de la cosa juzgada por un jurado imparcial y debidamente seleccionado que aplicó las leyes de la Florida y las cláusulas de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos.

Peor aún, son indignas de un presidente que no fue elegido solo por los negros sino por muchos ciudadanos de diferentes razas que integran una nación de diversidad étnica como los Estados Unidos. Y, una vez elegido, se convirtió en presidente de todos los norteamericanos, los que votaron por él y los que votamos en su contra. Fue elegido como el primer presidente negro para velar por el bienestar de los norteamericanos de todas las razas, pero está actuando como si hubiera sido elegido para velar solamente por el bienestar de los norteamericanos de raza negra. Esto no es solo deplorable sino intolerable. ¡Qué remordimiento deben de experimentar aquellos ingenuos que votaron por él!

Y que mal nos sentimos todos los que albergábamos la esperanza de que la semilla sembrada por Lincoln con su Proclama de Emancipación hubiese conducido a una casa armoniosa, unida y próspera para todos sus hijos. Con su división de clases, religiones y razas, Obama se ha encargado de derrumbarla. Y con ello ha hecho un daño inmenso a los norteamericanos de todas las razas. La diferencia entre el líder y el agitador comunitario.

La Nueva Nación es una publicación independiente cuyas metas son la defensa de la libertad, la preservación de la democracia y la promoción de la libre empresa. Visítenos en : http://www.lanuevanacion.com

Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/2013/07/weiners-al-qaida-connection/#ixzz2a9wB9HDE

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

No 439 “EN MI OPINION” Julio 25, 2013

julio 25, 2013

No 439  “En mi opinión” Julio 25, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

Lázaro R González Miño Editor    lazaroronzalez@hotmail.com,

Este es el resultado de tener alcaldes como Carlos Gimenez y otros esperpentos que nos gastamos sentados en las sillas alcaldiciasè “Forbes” AMERICAS MOST MISERABLE CITIES.

#1 Miami, Fla.

The housing crisis has devastated Miami with 47% of homeowners sitting on underwater mortgages.  Foreclosures have been rampant with 364,000 properties in the Miami area entering the foreclosure process since 2008 according to RealtyTrac.

 

Florida Prosecutor Indicted For Falsifying Arrest Warrant against George Zimmerman

Florida State’s Attorney Angela Corey has been indicted by a citizens’ grand jury, convening in Ocala, Florida, over the alleged falsification of the arrest warrant and complaint that lead to George Zimmerman being charged with the second degree murder of African-American teenager Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida.

The indictment of Corey, which was handed down last week (see http://www.citizensgrandjury.com), charges Corey with intentionally withholding photographic evidence of the injuries to George Zimmerman’s head in the warrant she allegedly rushed to issue under oath, in an effort to boost her reelection prospects. At the outset of this case, black activists such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who whipped up wrath against Zimmerman, demanded that he be charged with murder, after local police had thus far declined to arrest him pending investigation.

Following Corey’s criminal complaint charging Zimmerman, legal experts such as Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz condemned her for falsely signing an arrest affidavit under oath, which intentionally omitted exculpatory evidence consisting of the photographs showing the injuries Zimmerman sustained, and rushing to charge him with second degree murder under political pressure.
Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/07/florida-prosecutor-indicted-for-falsifying-arrest-warrant-against-george-zimmerman/#ixzz2a3tonINa

 

Two People Added To Food Stamps For Every Job Created Under Obama

Michael Miller On July 24, 2013 http://mikesright.wordpress.com/

The good news: Jay Carney lied said this week that the Obama administration has created 7.2 million private-sector jobs since it took office. The bad news: 15 million more Americans are on food stamps (SNAP).

Gregory Gwyn-Williams, Jr. of CNS News summarized the statistics:

“And what is absolutely true is that we have come a long way since the depths of the Great Recession.  We’ve created over 7.2 million private sector jobs,” Carney told reporters at a press briefing.

Here’s what Mr. Carney didn’t say:

At the end of January 2009, 32,204,859 Americans received aid from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. As of April 2013, there were 47,548,694 Americans on food stamps. [SNAP: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]

There are 15 million more Americans on food stamps today than when Obama assumed office.

That means that more than two Americans have been added to the food stamp rolls for every one job the administration says it has created.

If you happened to be like vacationing IRS official Lois Lerner and are ‘not good at math‘, 15 million is more than twice as much as 7.2 million. Hence, the ‘two more people on food stamps’ than ‘found jobs’ stat.

In addition, 2.5 million of the ‘jobs created’ to which Carney referred are part-time; as a separate figure, 2.7 million of those ‘jobs created’ are temps, a 50% increase over Obama’s time in office.

Furthermore, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were 154,526,000 in the Civilian Labor Force in February 2009 and in June 2013 there were 155,835,000. That would be a net gain of 1.309 million more people working civilian jobs. The labor force participation rateof 63.5% is hovering at the lowest levels since late 1978.

 

SOCIEDAD A LA DERIVA Diego Quirós, Sr. Miami, Florida.

Un Sacerdote en España comento que dos leonas no hacen pareja ni dos gatos tampoco. Para ello tendrían que ser de distinto sexo y de la misma especie. Son cosas de la zoología.

Por supuesto no es invento de la Iglesia. Muchos siglos antes del nacimiento de Jesús en Belén, el Derecho Romano reconocía el matrimonio como la unión de un hombre con una mujer. Los animales no tienen leyes, pero sin embargo entre ellos no existe el intercambio de género.

En los Estados Unidos ya no necesitamos el Poder Legislativo. Nosotros estamos funcionando con dos poderes: el Poder Ejecutivo y el Poder Judicial.

El Presidente decide, ordena,  limita libertades inconstitucionalmente y hay que aceptarlas porque la mayoría en La Corte Suprema  lo complace.

¿Es que acaso La Corte Suprema está compuesta por políticos?

Desde hace seis o siete décadas la izquierda liberal comenzó su trabajo: destruir la familia, base de toda sociedad. Lo primero fue la suspensión de la oración en los Colegios con el argumento del Estado Laico. Detrás de todo estaba la mano atea, los comunistas, los liberales, los que no creen que este mundo y todo lo que nos rodea ha sido creado por un Ser Superior a todos nosotros.

El hombre ha negado a Dios y hemos dejado de ser hermanos. El hombre  está deshumanizado.

Después, continuaron con la legalización del aborto. En un principio con limitaciones, pero poco a poco fue aumentando, no solamente la práctica, sino los métodos. Hoy día un bebe puede ser abortado con muy pocas semanas antes de nacer, es el llamado Nacimiento Parcial.

A las mujeres le han hecho creer que esos son sus Derechos. Qué triste argumentos para “convertirlas en un objeto de placer”.S. S. Pablo VI.

La Constitucion de los Estados Unidos considera los mismos derechos para un hombre que para una mujer. ¿Por qué implantar leyes especiales para personas que usan su sexo en contra de la Naturaleza?

Señores, hay que ser más sensato, mas autentico y menos político. La complasesencia a veces se convierte en adulación y muchas decisiones son irreversibles. Jane Roe se ha arrepentido de haber sido la iniciadora del movimiento para  la legalización del Aborto, sin embargo solo un milagro lo haría reversible.

DIOS BENDIGA A AMERICA                                          UNA NACION BAJO DIOS.

 

Judge: State lawsuits cannot block Detroit bankruptcy filing  

Scott CohnCNBC

Protesters carry a sign outside the Levin Federal Courthouse in Detroit, Wednesday, July 24, 2013.

Federal courts will decide if Detroit is eligible for what would be the largest municipal bankruptcy ever, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, suspending challenges to the Chapter 9 filing in state court.

Detroit’s Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr—a bankruptcy expert appointed by Gov. Rick Snyder earlier this year to oversee Detroit’s finances—has said the federal bankruptcy filing is necessary to get the city out from under some $18 billion in liabilities.

But the city’s employee unions argued the bankruptcy is an end-run around the state constitution, which protects their pension benefits. The unions backed a series of lawsuits filed in Michigan courts to block the bankruptcy. Last week, Ingham County Circuit Judge Rosemarie Aquilina ruled the bankruptcy filing unconstitutional, but a state appeals court put her ruling on hold, and Orr argued the federal court should make that stay indefinite.

The emergency manager said bankruptcy is a federal matter. A bankruptcy filing normally puts all other litigation on hold, but Orr’s office asked the judge to extend that automatic stay to cover him and state officials, including the governor. Orr’s attorneys acknowledged the request was unusual, but said “recent events”—the lawsuits in state court—made it necessary.

“That kind of activity has got to stop,” city attorney Heather Lennox said. Lennox is a partner at Jones Day—Orr’s former law firm—which is collecting millions of dollars in legal fees from the city.

But attorney Sharon Levine, representing the local council of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, said the federal bankruptcy code “is not there to enforce rights that do not exist.”

The unions said framers of the Michigan constitution decided to guard public employee pensions because public pensions have no insurance protection, unlike private pensions, which are insured by the federal Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp.

“Here, there is no safety net,” Levine said. She said nonuniformed employee pensions in Detroit are below $19,000 per year.

Attorney Robert Gordon, representing the police and fire pension funds, argued that because of the constitutional provision, the governor had no right to authorize the bankruptcy filing in the first place. As a result, Gordon said, the filing is “void,” and it was premature to even be discussing it in federal court.

“The motions assume facts not in evidence,” Gordon said.

(Read moreWhat’s next for Detroit? Long court battle)

But the judge appeared unconvinced.

“How do you deal with the law that gives the bankruptcy court exclusive jurisdiction,” Rhodes asked.

Gordon responded that there was no need to deal with the provision, because there was no valid bankruptcy filing to begin with.

Because of the intense interest in the largest municipal bankruptcy filing in U.S. history, the hearing was moved from Rhodes’ normal courtroom to a much larger one across the street at the Theodore Levin Federal Courthouset. Many members of the public and the media were relegated to an overflow courtroom down the hall to view a video feed.

Outside the courthouse, a handful of protesters carried signs in support of the unions. One demonstrator played a recording of Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech through a megaphone.

City firefighter Mark Jackson.said he came to the courthouse because so much is at stake.

“I am scared. Scared that I will lose my retirement. I’m scared for all of us,” Jackson told CNBC.

(Read moreDetroit bankruptcy could hit millions of retirees)

But Orr and Snyder have repeatedly insisted that city pensions will not be cut entirely under a bankruptcy. In an interview before the hearing, Orr said the majority of the pensions are funded, but there remains a $3.5 billion shortfall—and the city has no way to make it up.

Special Ops Group of Over 1,000 Unroll 60-Foot Petitition Demanding Answers on Benghazi

 

Kyle Becker On July 24, 2013 https://twitter.com/kylenbecker

Special operations veterans unveiled a 60-foot petition demanding answers about the siege of a diplomatic compound and murder of four servicemen in Benghazi, Libya on the anniversary of 9/11 last year.

Special Operations Speaks PAC unveiled the petition with Representative Frank Wolf (R-VA) and other Congressmen near the Capitol Building in Washington D.C. late Tuesday afternoon. It bore the names of 1,000 special operations veterans seeking the truth about what happened the night of the Benghazi attack.

The pressure is building within the House of Representatives for Speaker Boehner to call a select committee to investigate a cover-up that veteran journalist Carl Woodward compared to Watergate. Newsmax relayed:

The Republican House leadership is under renewed pressure to allow a vote on legislation that would create a special committee to investigate the Benghazi, Lybia, terrorist attack in September that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

Rep. Steve Stockman is circulating a discharge petition that would force House Speaker John Boehner to allow a floor vote on forming a Benghazi select committee, according to The Hill.

While partisan Democrats may want the Benghazi investigation to close, and for America to “move on,” there are several remaining questions. Even though Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer claimed it was “irrelevant” where President Obama was the night of the attack, that is, in fact, a crucial question. As Commander-in-Chief, he bears direct responsibility for command decisions.

As former Ambassador Ann Wagner related, thepresident is responsible for ordering troops and other military assets to “stand down” during an attack on a diplomatic compound.

That is because it is protocol to attempt a rescue operation by launching an in extremis rescue force (as anyone who has worked in a bureaucracy knows, there are Standard Operating Procedures for everything; superiors dictate when not to follow SOPs).

Indeed, a disturbing comparison of the CIA and Pentagon timelines put together by Jennifer Griffin makes clear that CIA assets were ready for deployment and were told to wait before attempting a rescue operation… twice. The eventually slain CIA servicemen Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were told to stand down and not even attempt to rescue Ambassador Stevens, who had met with the Turkish consul earlier that night.

There is speculation that a buyback of military hardware that was in the possession of al Qaeda terrorist-connected groups was among the topics of discussion, as well as potential gun-running to Syrian rebels through Turkey.

Now removed General Carter Ham sent an unarmed drone to the Benghazi compound 17 minutes after he was notified of the attack; however, the ordering of armed military aircraft must come from the president, and the Libyan government unequivocally stated that it received no such flyover request that entire night.

This adds weight to the testimony of former former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta that reveals that no serious rescue operation was even attemptedPanetta’s testimony avers that the president was absent after his initial briefing on the situation, and cross-examination by Senator Lindsey Graham makes clear that no serious military assets were dispatched to Benghazi for over eight hours.

While there are some complacent-minded people who are used to waiting for the federal government to act in emergency situations, and thus cannot grasp why this is such a big deal, this is neither the American way, nor the military code to leave people to die this way. You do not leave men behind when you can act. And clearly, the Commander-in-Chief did not act.

By all accounts, President Obama took a briefing, departed for his evening sojourn, and awoke lithe and sprite for his Vegas fundraiser the next day. He even cancelled his attendance of a State Department announcement of the terrorist attack scheduled for the next day. Partisan Democrats can howl all they like, but this is flat-out unacceptable. The American people deserve, and many of them demand, serious answers.

The White House’s behavior shows that it is not interested in people getting the truth about the attack. It promoted disgraced U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to National Security Adviser, after either incompetently, or more likely, dishonestly telling the people repeatedly there was a demonstration in Benghazi over an offensive YouTube video the night of the Benghazi attack. State Department emails that were revealed in the mainstream media directly contradict the Obama administration’s absurd talking points after the obvious terrorist attack.

The State Department earlier had the hubris to state it may not comply with a Congressional subpoena for documents pertaining to a Benghazi investigation. And it was recently claimed by Congressman Frank Wolf that Benghazi witnesses were silenced by the State Department through their signing of NDAs — Non-Disclosure Agreements.

The media is absent on such matters; and this is not a partisan tiff. President Obama is being granted pass after pass — he has been found to be unaccountable for his policies at double the rate of previous presidents.The president should answer for being AWOL when he should have been fulfilling his prime directive — protecting the American people (not campaigning).

And for Jeb Bush to offer a “Liberty Medal” to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton one day before the upcoming anniversary of the Benghazi attack — that is a despicable mockery of Liberty and the American people. Due to Mrs. Clinton’s inaction, the diplomatic consul that came under siege was in dire need of more security in the former warzone (that would be the war that President Obama got America involved in without Congressional authorization). Stevens begged for more security, and was turned down by Clinton’s State Department (and yes, there were available funds for that).

As Townhall noted, “murdered US Ambassador Chris Stevens’ second in command, Gregory Hicks, was instructed not to speak with a Congressional investigator by State Department lawyers.” Hicks’ testimony before Congress indicates a clear attempt to silence him and he was then punished at the State Department for ostensibly no other reason than telling the American people his side of the story about what happened. More ‘sides of the story’ like Hicks’ need to come out for the public to get a fuller picture of what went down before, during and after the deadly terrorist attack at Benghazi.

But to quote Hillary Clinton and partisan Democrats: What difference, at this point, does it make? If one might be permitted to answer, it is the character of the United States government and the military’s commitment to its troops that are on the line. If you cannot grasp that, you are not fit for public service.

 

DEL PAPA FRANCISCO

Los santos que necesitamos Escrito en Testimonios 

“Necesitamos santos sin velo, sin sotana.
Necesitamos santos de jeans y zapatillas.
Necesitamos santos que vayan al cine, escuchen música y paseen con sus amigos.
Necesitamos santos que coloquen a Dios en primer lugar y que sobresalgan en la Universidad.
Necesitamos santos que busquen tiempo cada día para rezar y que sepan enamorar en la pureza y castidad, o que consagren su castidad.
Necesitamos santos modernos, santos del siglo XXI con una espiritualidad insertada en nuestro tiempo.
Necesitamos santos comprometidos con los pobres y los necesarios cambios sociales.
Necesitamos santos que vivan en el mundo, se santifiquen en el mundo y que no tengan miedo de vivir en el mundo.
Necesitamos santos que tomen Coca Cola y coman hot-dogs, que sean internautas, que escuchen iPod.
Necesitamos santos que amen la Eucaristía y  no tengan vergüenza de tomar una cerveza o comer pizza el fin de semana con los amigos.
Necesitamos santos a los que les guste el cine, el teatro, la música, la danza, el deporte.
Necesitamos santos sociables, abiertos, normales, amigos, alegres, compañeros.
Necesitamos santos que estén en el mundo y que sepan saborear las cosas puras y buenas del mundo, pero sin ser mundanos”. – See more at: http://www.reportecatolicolaico.com/2013/07/los-santos-que-necesitamos/#sthash.UcXIlgSV.dpuf

Igualdad y Derechos Alberto Perez.

El derecho como nos lo describen en las enciclopedias refiere al objeto de la relación jurídica, que puede ser un bien, o incluso una obligación, en la que además intervendrán personas, siendo éstas los sujetos de tal relación. El derecho es posible, se puede y se debe legislar porque es algo beneficioso para la sociedad civilizada.

La igualdad es algo diferente, es un concepto más abstracto, realmente no puede existir la igualdad.

Los seres humanos son diversos y siempre habrá diferencias, por ende no habrá igualdad, sobre todo cuando hablamos de igualdad económica.

Tratar de forzar la igualdad económica en la sociedad puede traer consecuencias fatales para una nación, como hemos lo hemos visto repetidamente en los ensayos comunistas.

Esta noción abstracta sobre la igualdad, ha sido utilizada por los políticos populistas y socialistas para provocar la agitación social.

Existen numerosos casos en que el concepto de la desigualdad social con referencia a la desigualdad económica en América ha creado estados de violencias, basado en nuestras nociones de justicia abstracta, pero debe existir el compromiso de intereses bajo las cuales toda sociedad civilizada, rinde este hecho inevitable

Si tenemos la civilización y el esfuerzo indispensable para su éxito, debemos tener la propiedad; Entonces si tenemos propiedad, la propiedad debe de tener sus derechos; si tenemos los derechos de propiedad, debemos tomar las consecuencias de los derechos de propiedad que son inseparables de los propios derechos. 

La igualdad de derechos en América, por lo tanto, después de tener en cuenta la indispensable excepción de la esclavitud doméstica, es sólo una extensión mayor del principio que no existe como una igualdad de condiciones.

Siempre existirán diferencias económicas entre las clases.

Existen en los países socialistas, donde los dirigentes como nos describió George Orwell en “La Rebelión en la Granja”, y Milovan Djilas en “La Nueva Clase”; la cúpula del poder, se convierte en la clase acomodada con privilegios denegados al ciudadano común.

Donde dicen que todos son iguales, pero donde algunos son más “iguales” que otros.

Es mucho mejor el sistema de propiedad privada, donde no hay igualdad, pero en que el ciudadano de abajo, tiene la esperanza y la oportunidad de alcanzar con su ingenio y su trabajo un escalón superior en la desigual sociedad.

The Inequality President Alberto Perez.

The rich have done fine under Obamanomics, not so the middle class.

President Obama made his fourth or fifth, or maybe it’s the seventh or eighth, pivot to the economy on Wednesday, and a revealing speech it was. We counted four mentions of “growth” but “inequality” got five. This goes a long way to explaining why Mr. Obama is still bemoaning the state of the economy five years into his Presidency.

The President summed up his economic priorities close to the top of his hour-long address. “This growing inequality isn’t just morally wrong; it’s bad economics,” he told his Galesburg, Illinois audience. “When middle-class families have less to spend, businesses have fewer customers. When wealth concentrates at the very top, it can inflate unstable bubbles that threaten the economy. When the rungs on the ladder of opportunity grow farther apart, it undermines the very essence of this country.”

Then the heart of the matter: “That’s why reversing these trends must be Washington’s highest priority. It’s certainly my highest priority.”

Which is the problem. For four and a half years, Mr. Obama has focused his policies on reducing inequality rather than increasing growth. The predictable result has been more inequality and less growth. As even Mr. Obama conceded in his speech, the rich have done well in the last few years thanks to a rising stock market, but the middle class and poor have not. The President called his speech “A Better Bargain for the Middle Class,” but no President has done worse by the middle class in modern times.

By now the lackluster growth figures are well known. The recovery that began four years ago has been one of the weakest on record, averaging a little more than 2%. And it has not gained speed. Growth in the fourth quarter of 2012 was 0.4%. It rose to a still anemic 1.8% in the first quarter but most economists are predicting even slower growth in the second quarter.

We hope the predictions of a faster growth in the second half will be right, but the Obama Treasury and Federal Reserve have been predicting for four years that takeoff was just around the corner. Stocks are doing great, and housing prices are rising, but job growth remains lackluster. What has never arrived is the 3%-4% growth spurt during typical expansions.

The official excuse is that recoveries coming out of recessions caused by financial crises are always slow. But then why have we been told every few months for five years that faster growth would soon be coming? Perhaps readers recall former Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s famous 2010 op-ed, “Welcome to the Recovery.” Mr. Obama wants it both ways: Take credit for recovering from recession, but blame that recession ad infinitum for the slow pace of the recovery.

 

What about the middle class that is the focus of Mr. Obama’s rhetoric? Each month the consultants at Sentier Research crunch the numbers from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey and estimate the trend in median annual household income adjusted for inflation. In its May 2013 report, Sentier put the figure at $51,500, essentially unchanged from $51,671 a year earlier.

And that’s the good news. The bad news is that median real household income is $2,718, or 5%, lower than the $54,218 median in June 2009 when the recession officially ended. Median incomes typically fall during recessions. But the striking fact of the Obama economy is that median real household income has fallen even during the recovery.

While the declines have stabilized over the last two years, incomes are still far below the previous peak located by Sentier of $56,280 in January 2008. No wonder Mr. Obama is now turning once again to his familiar political narrative assailing inequality and blaming everyone else for it. He wants to change the subject from the results on his watch.

The core problem has been Mr. Obama’s focus on spreading the wealth rather than creating it. ObamaCare will soon hook more Americans on government subsidies, but its mandates and taxes have hurt job creation, especially at small businesses. Mr. Obama’s record tax increases have grabbed a bigger chunk of affluent incomes, but they created uncertainty for business throughout 2012 and have dampened growth so far this year.

The food stamp and disability rolls have exploded, which reduces inequality but also reduces the incentive to work and rise on the economic ladder. This has contributed to a plunge in the share of Americans who are working—the labor participation rate—to 63.5% in June from 65.7% in June 2009. And don’t forget the Fed’s extraordinary monetary policy, which has done well by the rich who have assets but left the thrifty middle class and retirees earning pennies on their savings.

Mr. Obama would have done far better by the poor, the middle class and the wealthy if he had focused on growing the economy first. The difference between the Obama 2% recovery and the Reagan-Clinton 3%-4% growth rates is rising incomes for nearly everybody.

House Republicans have put a check on Mr. Obama’s most destructive economic policies, but the President could do more to help growth if he crossed party lines to pass tax reform the way Reagan did in his second term, or to work out a budget deal as Bill Clinton did in his fifth year.

Mr. Obama’s only pro-growth proposal is immigration reform, and we’re not sure he wants even that to pass. Judging by the partisan tenor of his Wednesday speech, he may be setting it up to use as a campaign wedge in 2014. If only Mr. Obama understood that before a government can redistribute wealth, the private economy has to create it

 

Preparando el Viaje por Alberto Perez

A través de los años por la insistencia de esos vendedores que te llaman en tus momentos más felices para recordarte que te vas a morir y tratar de venderte terrenos y arreglos funerales, he comprado terreno en el cementerio y encofrado de cemento que el cementerio luego trata de venderte. 

Pero me había resistido a comprar los últimos arreglos, como es la compra del ataúd.  Finalmente me convencieron y he comprado los últimos arreglos funerales y el ataúd…. “I´m ready to go”.

Escogimos el modelo Orion bronce Champagne con un acolchado interior de terciopelo.

El exterior es  de bronce cepillado, una aleación de materiales semiprecioso, es el más fuerte y más duradero de cualquier material de construcción del ataúd. Esta aleación de  Bronce es resistente a los elementos corrosivos y hace un ataúd elegante, exquisito, conocido por su asequibilidad y rendimiento de larga duración, es uno de los más populares de los ataúdes en el mercado.  

Como el viaje es largo y he engordado un poco, lo probé para ver si me quedaba cómodo, y la verdad es que da gusto, dan ganas de morirse.

Les recomiendo este modelo, como ya lo pagué y es mío, si quieren probarlo se los puedo prestar para que puedan reposar en el.

Con la firma de la Declaración de Independencia, los representantes de las 13 colonias en Norte América anunciaron su separación formal de Gran Bretaña y la creación de la autónoma Estados Unidos de América. El texto fue redactado por Thomas Jefferson y editado por Franklin, Adams y Jefferson antes de ser presentada ante el Segundo Congreso Continental de Filadelfia, donde fue cambiada de nuevo. La redacción final fue adoptada el 4 de julio de 1776.

Stop the Bull Alberto Perrez.

My sociopolitical persuasion has been conservative since I can remember.

Even during the 50’s in Cuba, with a political scenario where to be a conservative was an oddity, and all the parties were “populist” “revolutionary”and “progressive” boarding with socialist ideas, my ideas were always conservative.

So you may imagine what I think of all government regulatory agencies, they are a pain in my behind.

Specifically, I consider the Food and Drug administration. an agency responsible, with its over regulation, for the high price of drugs and the cause that many persons have died because they do not have access to new drugs which are not approved, buried in the bureaucratic jungle and red tape of the agency, that prevents the approval of the drug..

 

But I have to welcome the new regulations of the FDA regarding the industry of the so called “Natural Remedies” that are advertised like “Magical Cure Drugs” when they are just dietary supplements. 

The essential vitamins your body needs can all be found in readily-available foods, so a proper diet is all we need to supply our body of the necessary vitamins.

But we are all sinners when it comes to a proper diet.

So Dietary supplements and vitamins are necessary.

The problem is when these products are advertised as magic cures for major ailments, like Thyroid, Heart condition, Diabetes and others.

When the public self-medicate based on these misleading advertising, they procrastinate their visit to the doctor, don´t get the proper medications, and when they go to the doctor sometimes it is too late.

Because dietary supplements are basically harmless, the FDA has neglected the industry needed regulations.

It is necessary to regulate this industry and their false advertising.

It is necessary to stop the bullshit. (Excuse my French, but I couldn’t find another word)

 

This article by Thomas M. Burton in the Wall Street Journal, tells us about certain products that are illegally advertised as a “cure” for diabetes which are in some cases dangerous. 

FDA Moves Against Alternative Diabetes Treatments

Dietary Supplements, ‘Natural’ Remedies Are Targeted

THOMAS M. BURTON

WASHINGTON—The Food and Drug Administration is acting to stop U.S. sales of nearly two dozen products marketed as diabetes treatments that the agency said are illegal and can be ineffective, counterfeit or in some cases dangerous.

The FDA cracks down on 15 companies’ dietary supplements and “natural cures” for diabetes, saying the therapies don’t work, can be dangerous and, in some cases, include undisclosed and counterfeit prescription drugs. Tom Burton reports. .

The federal agency sent warning letters to the companies involved and said it could follow up by seizing the products, enjoining their sale and even criminally prosecuting firms whose officials fail to take corrective action.

The products include dietary supplements, self-styled “natural treatments,” and ayurvedic medicines, part of an alternative health system that evolved in India and includes herbs and special diets. The drugs involved also include unapproved versions of prescription diabetes medicines such as metformin and Januvia.

The products can be found both on the Internet and at retail outlets, and make claims such as being a “natural diabetes cure.”

“If you have diabetes, you should be getting treatment from a doctor,” said Howard Sklamberg, director of compliance at the FDA’s center for drug evaluation and research. He said that the FDA was taking actions to “protect consumers,” and that the agency recommends people not use the products in question.

One of the products involved, Anti-diabetic Pancreatic Capsule (known in the original Chinese as Jiang Tang Yi Huo Su Jiao Nang), included phenformin. It was removed from the U.S. market in 1978 because it was linked to lactic acidosis, a serious condition requiring immediate medical attention caused by an accumulation of lactic acid in the bloodstream. The FDA didn’t identify the company that makes this current diabetes product.

The FDA said the products covered in warning letters might not only be ineffective; they might be contaminated or cause people “to delay seeking proper, timely treatment, leading to an increased risk for developing serious health complications.”

FDA/Associated Press

Sugar Balancer is one of the products that was cited by the FDA.

Warning Letters

Companies and products that were singled out by the FDA:

Enhance Nutraceutical’s Diaberex

Glytain Internal Remedies’ Glytain

Health King Enterprise & Balanceuticals Group Inc.’s Sugar Balancer

Magni Co.’s MagniLife Diabetic Neuropathy Foot Cream

Nature’s Health Supply Diabetes Daily Care

Naturecast Products’ Eradicator

Source: Food and Drug Administration

Another significant issue is the lack of labels. Many prescription-drug labels disclose side effects, including some serious ones, and without them, consumers can’t fully understand the risk-benefit balance of the drugs involved.

Diabetes, which afflicts nearly 26 million Americans, can cause heart disease, blindness and kidney failure, and may lead to lower-extremity amputations if the malady isn’t kept under control. The products at issue include some aimed at treating those complications.

Many of them, the FDA said, are sold with such claims as “prevents and treats diabetes,” and “can replace medicine in the treatment of diabetes.” They also include ayurvedic medicines and prescription drugs for diabetes sold by online pharmacies without a prescription.

Among the products and companies in the warning letters were Sugar Balancer from Health King Enterprise & Balanceuticals Group Inc.; Diabetes Daily Care from Nature’s Health Supply Inc.; MagniLife Diabetic Neuropathy Foot Cream from Magni Co.; Diaberex from Enhance Nutraceutical; Glytain from Glytain Internal Remedies; and Eradicator from Naturecast Products.

Lindsay Rohnke, general manager of Magni, said the company was “looking into any potential marketing violations, and we will make any necessary changes to keep MagniLife Diabetic Neuropathy Foot Cream available to our customers.”

Health King didn’t respond to a request for comment. The Health King website on Monday said Sugar Balancer is formulated “in an effort to maintain healthy blood and urine sugar levels,” but that such statements haven’t been evaluated by the FDA, and that “this product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.”

Diabetes Daily Care was being sold Monday on Amazon.com as AMZN -0.70%a “natural diabetes cure.” A man who answered the phone at Nature’s Health Supply declined to comment.

Enhance Nutraceutical, Glytain Internal Remedies and Naturecast Products didn’t respond to requests for comment.

 

¿NOTA:  WASHINGTON.- El presidente de EE.UU., Barack Obama, pidió hoy a la clase política que se concentre en la recuperación económica, de la que dijo que seguirá siendo su mayor prioridad junto a la mejora de las condiciones de vida de la clase media, y en dejar atrás “falsos escándalos” y “distracciones”. ????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Interesante: Caso similar al de Zimmerman-Martin en febrero de 2012

• En esa oportunidad un hombre negro mató a un joven blanco de 16 años

MIAMI, 24 DE JULIO DE 2013, NHR.com—El caso de la muerte de Trayvon Martin por el vigilante de barrio voluntario George Zimmerman ha venido acaparado la atención nacional por muchos meses, más que nada gracias a la presión que líderes negros como Jessy Jackson y Al Sharpton y elementos de la prensa nacional han mantenido desde que ocurriera el desafortunado suceso.

Sin embargo, por simple curiosidad en NHR.com nos dimos a la tarea de buscar casos similares al ocurrido el 26 de febrero de 2012, y lo encontramos, y para sorpresa en este caso ocurrido en Nueva York el 4 de abril del 2009, fue un negro quien apretó el gatillo y dio muerte al jovencito blanco Christ Cervini de 16 años, estudiante con honores en la secundaria donde estudiaba. En esa ocasión, ni Jackson ni Sharpton acudieron a realizar masivas demostraciones, ni siquiera emitieron una declaración.  Es triste decirlo, pero para estos líderes aparentemente todo depende “del color con que se mira”.

El caso hallado por NHR.com ocurrió en el año 2009, meses después que el presidente Barack Obama tomara posesión de la presidencia. Roderick Scott, un hombre de la raza negra dormía en el sofá de su casa, cuando escuchó un ruido fuera de la casa, rápidamente tomó su pistola y le dijo a su novia que llamara al 911, en lo que él salía a ver qué pasaba, y una vez fuera confrontó a tres jóvenes que intentaban abrir un vehículo propiedad de un vecino.

Su intención fue tratar de detener a los tres, no quería disparar contra ellos, y mientras se acercaba a los tres vio que una pequeña luz dentro del auto estaba encendida y uno de los jóvenes se encontraba adentro.

En este punto Scott dijo que extrajo su pistola de su cintura y ya cerca de los jóvenes, éstos comenzaron a caminar, aunque dos de ellos se quedaron mirando entre las cosas dentro del vehículo.

“Yo no sabía a este punto si alguno de ellos estaba armado”, dijo Scott, quien afirmó que le gritó a los jóvenes para que pararan y les alertó que que su novia estaba llamando a la policía. A todas estas, Scott les apuntaba con la pistola, así pasaron algunos segundos y según Scott, los jóvenes hablaron entre si, y acto seguido, uno de ellos comenzó a correr, mientras otro corría hacia él, gritando. Scott gritaba, advirtiéndole que tenía una pistola, y le disparó dándole muerte al joven, que no se detuvo ante las advertencias de Scott.

Una historia muy parecida al caso Zimmerman-Martin, lo único diferente es que el que disparó, Roderick Scott, fue un hombre de la raza negra, quien al igual que Zimmerman, fue arrestado y acusado de asesinato. Un gran jurado recomendó que se bajara la acusación a asesinato impremeditado, lo que fue aceptado por la fiscalía.

Meses después se celebró el juicio y Scott fue declarado no culpable de la muerte de Cervini, un joven de solo 16 años y que estaba desarmado; era un joven estudiante con honores.

El padre de Cervini, Jim, escucho el veredicto y declaró poco después que “el mensaje es que podemos salir y conseguir armas y salir y decir que disparamos porque nos sentimos amenazados, mi hijo nunca amenazo a Scott, era un niño amable, su naturaleza era gentil. Era una buena persona y nunca fue detenido y nunca ha estado en problemas, tenia 16 años y cuatro meses y fue asesinado”.

Estas declaraciones distan mucho de las hechas por los que apoyan a Martin, desde el presidente Obama, hasta Jackson y Sharpton incluyendo los propios padres del joven muerto.

Existen grandes similitudes entre los dos casos, sin embargo los líderes negros han salido a crear problemas entre las comunidades en lugar de buscar paz, y en paz, tratar de buscar posibles soluciones que quizás puedan evitar consecuencias fatales como las ocurridas.

El presidente Obama recientemente declaró que si Trayvon fuera blanco el resultado podría haber sido diferente. Sin embargo, en NHR.com hemos expuesto los dos escenarios y el resultado no fue diferente; al comparar las dos situaciones y de acuerdo con lo expuesto en el juicio, Zimmerman llegó a ser atacado.

Xavier Suárez presenta fórmula para evitar cierre de bibliotecas públicas

• Envía la propuesta en carta al alcalde Giménez

MIAMI, 25 DE JULIO DE 2013, NHR.com—Con el propósito de evitar el cierre de bibliotecas públicas anunciado  por el alcalde de Miami-Dade, Carlos Giménez, el comisionado condal Xavier Suárez le envió una carta cuyo texto en español llegó a la redacción de NHR.com.

En la misiva al alcalde, Suárez dice lo siguiente: Existen unas cuatro <store-front libraries>, situadas en instalaciones pertenecientes a la Ciudad de Miami (Culmer, Lemon City, Shenandoah, y Virrick Park). Tomando como ejemplo a Virrick Park, localizada en mi distrito, cuyo alquiler ha sido exento por la Ciudad de Miami (bajo el acuerdo inter municipal de Junio 3, 2003), los costos de operación tienen un monto de unos $334,000 anuales. De esa cantidad, alrededor de $208,000 son destinados a personal; $15,000 gastos generales; $22,000 mantenimiento; y $80,000 de gastos misceláneos. En el caso de Virrick Park, estoy dispuesto a ofrecer  dos empleados a tiempo completo, más un supervisor part-time, para manejar la biblioteca durante el curso de un año fiscal.

Pienso que la Ciudad de Miami pudiera donar los gastos de mantenimiento, absorbiendo los gastos generales, disminuyendo considerablemente el costo de operaciones. Este sistema puede ser replicado en las instalaciones mencionadas anteriormente.

Con respecto a las bibliotecas <store-front> más típicas, como el caso de Lakes of the Meadow, pudiera convencerse al propietario que exonere el alquiler. De esa forma, solo habría que costear un personal esencial y gastos mínimos de operaciones y mantenimiento. El acceso al internet no debe ser reducido, más bien incrementado por el IT (Information Technology) Department del Condado, que prestaría sus servicios. Estamos hablando de un máximo de 20 empleados, que equivalen al 4% de su fuerza laboral”.

NHR.com estará al tanto de la consideración y respuesta que pueda darle el alcalde Giménez a la propuesta de Xavier Suárez.

 

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

No. 438 “EN MI OPINION” Julio 24, 2013

julio 24, 2013

No 438  “En mi opinión” Julio 24, 2013  ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’  

Lázaro R González Miño Editor    lazaroronzalez@hotmail.com,

Detroit, el Futuro de América por Alberto Perez.

La quiebra de Detroit no es nada nuevo, es algo que se veía venir desde los años sesenta.

Los que vivimos aquella época recordamos los motines de los negros pidiendo privilegios encima de los otorgados por el alcalde liberal Jerome Cavanagh.

Martin Luther King, es una figura que merece respeto, porque luchó por la reivindicación del negro como persona en una época en que el racismo y la discriminación a los negros era algo vergonzoso para el país.

Por esto hay que respetar a Martin Luther King, porque contribuyó a eliminar la vergüenza de la discriminación que caía sobre toda la nación, blancos y negros.

 Martin Luther King, era Republicano, porque los demócratas del sur, los dixiecrats eran los que apoyaban la segregación y los republicanos el partido de Abraham Lincoln eran los que defendían los derechos de los negros. 

Pero Martin Luther King a. pesar de ser republicano, sus ideas socio-económicas eran socialistas, y en algunas ocasiones mezcló la lucha por los derechos civiles de los negros con sus ideas sobre la economía del país y la política exterior.

Esto es algo que nadie quiere mencionar, porque Martin Luther King es un héroe nacional, pero los héroes también tienen sus defectos porque son seres humanos, no son perfectos.

Algunas veces las manifestaciones de King, eran más contra la guerra de Vietnam y la patronal, que a favor de los derechos civiles de los negros.

Las manifestaciones de Martin Luther King en Detroit en 1963 fueron  parte de las causas que crearon el caldo de cultivo que provocaron el estado de agitación que desembocó en 1967 en los motines de Detroit. 

La industria automovilista creaba riqueza y empleos a Detroit, y las leyes sociales eran de las mejores del país. 

Pero el socialismo es insaciable, sólo la destrucción de la sociedad establecida los complace.

Y esto fue lo que hicieron, destruyeron la infraestructura de Detroit creando una ciudad con ciudadanos dependientes del estado y con sindicatos que frenaban la industria, que no podía competir con Japón y Alemania.

Al perjudicar a la industria, se perjudicaron los trabajos y se creó un éxodo de habitantes.

Hoy Detroit tiene un millón de habitantes menos de los que tenía en los años sesenta y con un promedio de ingreso per cápita mucho menor de lo que tenían en aquella época.

Como es lógico, los ingresos de la ciudad son mucho menor al haber menos contribuyentes, con ingresos menores y con servicios sociales proporcionalmente mucho mayores y costosos.

Esto ha causado progresivamente el estado que desemboca en la quiebra fiscal.

Detroit representa lo que sucederá en el país si continúa por el camino del socialismo.

Aquí lo que Michael Barone escribe  en el Claremont Review of Books sobre el libro “Detroit: An American autopsia” de Charlie LeDuff que realmente es una autopsia de lo que ha traído los problemas actuales de Detroit.

Este es un libro que hay que leer para entender el origen de los problemas de Detroit, porque conociendo lo que pasó en Detroit se puede prever el futuro de la nación, porque Detroit es el futuro de América.

Aquí lo que dice LeDuff:

“Cuando me preguntan por qué me cambié de liberal a conservador, tengo la respuesta en una palabra: Detroit.

Yo crecí allí, en un barrio de clase media en el noroeste de Detroit en una calle en un suburbio adinerado. Conseguí un trabajo como interno en la oficina del alcalde en el verano de 1967 coincidiendo con los motines de Detroit de aquella época.

Estuve al lado del alcalde Jerome Cavanagh y ocasionalmente del gobernador George Romney durante los seis días y noches en que 43 personas, en su mayoría inocentes, murieron.

Escuchaba la radio en la oficina del Comisionado de la policía como comandantes anunciaban, poco después del anochecer, que ellos estaban abandonando una milla cuadrada tras otra. El motín terminó sólo después de que las tropas federales fueron llamadas y restauraron el orden.

Cavanagh era brillante, joven, liberal y encantador. Él había sido elegido en 1961, a los 33 años con el apoyo casi unánime de los negros y con el apoyo sustancial de los industriales y trabajadores blancos — los tres segmentos que componían entonces la mayoría de los votantes de Detroit — y él fue reelegido por un amplio margen en 1965.

Martin Luther King, Jr. y otros militantes negros condujeron una marcha derechos civiles de 100.000 personas por la Avenida Woodward en junio de 1963.

Cavanagh fue uno de los primeros alcaldes para establecer un programa antipobreza y creía que el gobierno de la ciudad podría proporcionar más servicios sociales, y podía ayudar a la gente, especialmente a los negros, salir de la pobreza y a llevar una vida productiva.

Las políticas liberales que implantó prometían algo como el paraíso.

En cambio estas produjeron algo muy parecido al infierno”.

Usted puede tener una idea de lo que sucedió a Detroit mirando algunos números. El censo arrojó 1.849.568 habitantes en Detroit en 1950, incluyéndome a mí.  Contó solamente 713.777 en 2010.

NSA unable to search own emails

Posted on July 24, 2013 by Cowboy Byte

Talk about awkward — the National Security Agency apparently cannot search its own emails.

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed last week, ProPublica reports, an NSA official confessed she was unable to fulfill the request due to the agency’s use of an email system that was “a little antiquated and archaic.”

“There’s no central method to search an email at this time with the way our records are set up, unfortunately,” NSA Freedom of Information Act officer

 http://cowboybyte.com/23264/report-nsa-unable-to-search-own-emails/#ixzz2ZyI2mOIJ

 

Columna de Ricardo Samitier.                                       Todas Las Semanas La Fiscal De Miami Con La “Excusa De Informar” Al Pueblo Sus Derechos Paga Con NUESTRO DINERO…Un “Programa Político” De Una Hora… En Radio Mambí…  

En el día de ayer… DEFENDIÓ A SUS COLEGAS FISCALES que acusaron A Zimmerman… diciendo “Que había salido absuelto por tener muy BUENOS ABOGADOS” ella que es DEMÓCRATA tiene que seguir la POLÍTICA DEL PARTIDO y de OBAMA… y sin decirlo… “APOYAR LA POLÍTICA RACISTA DIVISIONISTA” ordenada por OBAMA…  La “Eficiente Informadora Radial”  De Derechos No Ha Podido Solucionar El Caso De Las Boletas Ausentes… De Hialeah De Hace Mas de Un AÑO… SRA. FISCAL…no acaba de cerrar ese caso… y SOLO TIENE PRESOS a los pobres viejos RECOGEDORES DE LAS BOLETAS… Es un caso FÁCIL DE SOLUCIONAR… usando el Sistema que se usa DIARIAMENTE para APRESAR A LOS JEFES del tráfico de drogas…     ¿Por qué no les da INMUNIDAD a los pobres viejos a cambio de que CONFIESEN quienes son los POLÍTICOS que les pagan por RECOGER las boletas?  Ella es OTRA POLITIQUERA… y eso NO LE CONVIENE…

Para Los Cubanos Nacidos Y Criados Bajo La Dictadura Del Castro- Comunismo

SÍNTESIS De Lo Que La Revolución Comunista De Los Castro Destruyo…

 

1.    Cuba era el Primer Productor De Azúcar Del Mundo… Hoy importa azúcar para el consumo nacional y está incluido en la libreta de racionamiento.

2.    Cuba era el mayor Productor de Tabacos… Hoy está en tercer lugar los cubanos exiliados sembraron en la Republica Dominicana y la convirtieron en el PRIMER PRODUCTOR del mundo y lo mismo en Honduras… convirtiéndola en la SEGUNDA PRODUCTORA…

3.    Después de Argentina los cubanos eran los que más carne de res comían, había por cada cubano una res. Hoy la carne de res está sometida a la LIBRETA DE RACIONAMIENTO…

 

: QUE ERA CUBA ANTES DE 1959

 

Dr. Manuel Cereijo, P.E.
Desde Miami

 

“El progreso logrado por Cuba durante el periodo 1940-1958 constituyo un verdadero milagro económico”

“La ración de comida de los esclavos en 1842 era superior a la ración de la libreta de racionamiento de la Cuba 2012”

                    

 

  1. Régimen laboral y Legislación social

1.   Salario o sueldo mínimo, tanto para las empresas públicas como privadas. 

         Inembargabilidad de este salario mínimo.

  1. Pago solo en la moneda de curso legal 
  1. Seguro social obligatorio a favor de los trabajadores, comprendiendo invalidez, vejez, desempleo 
  1. Derecho de jubilación por antigüedad
  1. Seguro obligatorio por accidente de trabajo y enfermedad, a expensa de los patronos
  1. Jornada de 8 horas. Labor máxima semanal de 44 horas, equivalente a 48 horas en el pago del salario
  1. Descanso retribuido de 1 mes por cada 11 de trabajo y pago proporcional
  1. Protección a la maternidad obrera. Descanso forzoso con pago de salario a la mujer en estado, con 6 semanas antes del parto y 6 semanas después.
  1. Derecho de huelga
  1. Inamovilidad en los empleos

El salario promedio del trabajador agrícola cubano era de $3 pesos diarios, séptimo en el mundo, y segundo en el Hemisferio americano. El salario industrial era de $6 diarios, segundo en este Continente.

 

2. Economía 

El sistema bancario cubano estaba constituido, en su sector oficial, por el Banco Nacional, el Banco de Fomento Agrícola e Industrial, el Banco Cubano de Comercio Exterior,, el Banco de Desarrollo Económico y Social, la Financiera Nacional, y el Fondo de Hipotecas Aseguradas. 

Cuba contaba con un moderno y eficiente sistema de bancos comerciales. Existían 48 bancos comerciales con 273 sucursales y 8,035 empleados. También operaban 11 bancos de capitalización y ahorro. 

En el 1958 el total de depósitos fue superior a mil millones de pesos, de los cuales los bancos cubanos controlaron más del 60%. Los ahorros ascendieron a $443 millones, y los préstamos concedidos a $ 784,500,000 pesos.

El peso cubano se cotizaba a la par con el dólar. 

Cuba ocupaba el tercer lugar en América Latina en reservas de oro, dólares y valores convertibles en oro con $373 millones. El ingreso nacional bruto era de $2,834,000,000 pesos para una población de 6,630, 921 habitantes en 1958. Sexto lugar en rango latinoamericano y 40 en mundial, según la escala Ginsburg. El presupuesto era de $400,000,000 lo que colocaba a Cuba como el país del per cápita presupuestal más alto de América Latina. El ingreso per cápita era de $520

 

3. Alimentación

Un informe de la FAO de esa época, citado por Ginsburg fija la dieta en calorías, a saber:

Argentina                          3240

Cuba                                  2730

México                              2390

Chile                                  2370

Brasil                                 2360

Perú                                   2070

Venezuela                         2010

 
4. Fabricas y Comercios

En 1958 existían en Cuba un total de 38,384 fabricas y 65,872 establecimientos comerciales de todas clases y tamaños que representaban más de $4,778 millones de dólares, con $3,268 millones las industrias y $1,510 millones los comercios. Empleaban alrededor de 1,214,770 obreros y empleados.

 

5. Consumo de Energía

La energía es el indicador más preciso y útil del desarrollo general de una economía. Cada 200 kilovatios horas anuales de electricidad producida, equivalen a la capacidad de trabajo de un obrero. De acuerdo con la tabla de Ginsburg de 1958, que incluye a 124 países, Cuba ocupaba el sitio 25, con 11.8 Megavatios hora anuales per cápita. La media mundial era de 10 y sobre ella se encontraban solo 29 países. Cuba ocupaba el primer lugar en Latinoamérica. La Unión Soviética ocupaba el 22, México el 42.

 

  1. Agricultura en General (breve sumario) (VER ESTUDIO APARTE)

El territorio de Cuba tiene un área de 114,524 Kms cuadrados. En 1958, la tierra cubana estaba repartida, como sigue:

Cultivos                                   25.8%

Pastos                                      40.8%

Bosques                                   13.3%

Matorrales                               0.8%

Otros usos                               19.3% 

Las áreas cultivadas se dividían a saber:

Caña                                        61%

Viandas, frutos                      29.7%

Café                                        5%

Tabaco                                   2.3%

Otros                                      2%

Había un total de 159,958 fincas, con una superficie de 676,390 caballerías, o 9,083,918 hectáreas. El promedio de tamaño de las fincas era de 4.4 caballerías.

Cuba era la mayor productora de azúcar de caña del mundo, seguida por Brasil y Méjico. La zafra de 1958 fue de 5,613,332 millones de toneladas y como subproducto se obtuvieron 230,684,742 millones de galones de melaza. 

Los 161 centrales azucareros pertenecían a los siguientes dueños:

Cubanos                                              121      75%

Norteamericanos                                 36       22%

Españoles                                              3        2%

Franceses                                               1      1% 

Mas de las 2/5 partes de las fincas se destinaba a pastos. Sobre estos Vivían más de 6,000,000 de cabezas de ganado vacuno, o sea, 0.84 de res por habitante. El per cápita mundial era de 0.32. Debe agregarse que el precio de la carne de res era de 0.35 centavos/libra, el más bajo después de Argentina.

La industria lechera tenía una producción anual que en 1957 fue de 960 millones de litros, con un valor de $57,000,000. Alrededor de esta industria se habían  desarrollado toda una gama de industrias derivadas, tales como leche enlatada (7 plantas), queso, mantequilla, carne en conserva y tasajo, preparación de suelas y pieles. Unas 50 fabricas producían mantequilla y queso.

 

  1. Educación

En 1958 habían:

Kindergartens                                                                1864

Escuelas primarias oficiales                                         8900

Escuelas primarias particulares                                    1700

Primarias superiores                                                         240

Institutos de Segunda Enseñanza oficiales                      21

Institutos de Segunda Enseñanza particulares              150

Escuelas Normales para Maestros                                    14

Escuelas Normales de Kindergarten                                  7

Escuelas del Hogar                                                             14

Escuelas de Comercio                                                      168

Universidades Oficiales                                                       3

Universidades privadas                                                       5

Universidades oficializadas                                                4

Alfabetizacion                                                                   78%

Esto colocaba a Cuba en 3er lugar en América Latina

 

8.                Comunicaciones

 

El sistema de transporte y comunicaciones alcanzaba, en lo interno, a la totalidad de los núcleos de población y áreas industriales de importancia y, en lo exterior, garantizaba a Cuba conexiones regulares y suficientes con los demás países del mundo.

  1. Caminos, carreteras

 

En 1950 Cuba tenia, además de la Carretera Central, de 1,144 Kms. que atravesaba la Isla de Oeste a Este, 794 Kms. de carreteras secundarias, pavimentadas, en buenas condiciones. Tenía 1,619 kms. de carreteras de provincias y 1164kms de caminos vecinales. 

Estaba la Vía Blanca, una autopista magnifica y hermosa, de 4 vías,  empezando en el Mariel, bordeando la costa norte de La Habana, y después de Matanzas a Varadero. Continuaba después de la provincia de Matanzas a Sagua la Grande, y Caibarien. El Circuito Sur, de Güines a Cienfuegos, y de Cienfuegos a Trinidad. La Vía Mulata, de 202 Kms. que enlazaba a Baracoa con Santiago de Cuba.

 

  1. Ferrocarriles, camiones, ómnibus

 

Cuba era el país de este Hemisferio que poseía mayor longitud de vías férreas, sin excluir a EE.UU., 1 Km de vía por cada 8.08 Kms. cuadrados de superficie!. Cuba tenía 18,059 Kms. de vía férrea. De ellas, 6,000 Kms de servicio público y 12,059 eran líneas privadas de las compañías azucareras. 

En 1958 habían 303 empresas de ómnibus para el servicio público urbano e interurbano, que trabajaban con 4,459 unidades. También había 45,242 camiones, de los cuales 3,193 pertenecían a 72 empresas de servicios públicos y de alquiler por carretera 42,049 a firmas agrícolas, comerciales, e industriales.

 

  1. Automóviles, aviones

 

El numero de automóviles particulares en 1948 era de 140,267, uno por cada 27 habitantes, tercer lugar en el Hemisferio, según Ginsburg. 

En 1958 existían 100 aeropuertos públicos y privados, de los cuales 4-La Habana, Varadero, Camagüey, y Santiago de Cuba tenían tráfico internacional. La Compañía Cubana de Aviación inicio sus actividades en 1930 y en 1957 cubría veinte ciudades. Además existía Aerovías Q, también con servicio internacional

 

  1. Teléfonos, radio, televisión

 

En 1958 había instalados 191,414 teléfonos, o sea un 1 teléfono por cada 38 habitantes, segundo lugar en el Hemisferio. 

En ese año operaban en la Isla 160 estaciones de radio, tercer lugar de América Latina. Había un millón de radio receptores. La primera estación de televisión fue inaugurada en 1950 y 8 años más tarde se elevaba a 23, con dos en colores. Habían 400,000 televisores instalados, o sea un televisor por cada 17 habitantes, segundo en el Hemisferio 

 

9.                Turismo

 

En 1958 La Habana contaba con 42 hoteles con 5,438 habitaciones. En 1958 se encontraban en construcción 15 hoteles en la Isla con 2,900 habitaciones. En 1958 los turistas extranjeros, 6 25,000, gastaron $62.5 millones de pesos en Cuba, y los turistas cubanos en el exterior gastaron $37.5 millones de pesos.

 

10.            Sanidad

 

La atención medica se prestaba a través de; a) Hospitales del Estado, Provincia, o Municipio; b) Casas de Socorros; c) Clínicas Privadas. En los Hospitales y Casas de Socorro la asistencia era gratuita. Cuba tenía un sistema cooperativo que lo constituían los Centros Regionales, instituciones fundadas por españoles de las diferentes provincias, y más de 250 clínicas mutualistas que por una cuota mensual de $2.85 en unas y $3.00 en otras brindaban completa asistencia, incluyendo visitas domiciliarias, medicinas, rayos X, intervención quirúrgica, etc.

 

En 1958 más de 500,000 ciudadanos estaban acogidos a estos beneficios. La tasa de mortalidad infantil en 1958 fue de 37.6%, la más baja de América Latina, y clasificando entre los cuatro primeros países del mundo. La mortalidad general era de 5.8 muertes anuales por 1000 habitantes.

 

El numero de médicos en 1958 era de 6,500. Cuba contaba con 128.6 médicos y dentistas por cada 100,000 habitantes, tercer lugar en América Latina. De 122 países en el mundo, Cuba era el numero 22 , según Norton Ginsburg.

 

En 1958 Cuba tenía 100 instituciones hospitalarias y una cama por cada 170 habitantes, primer lugar en América Latina.

 

1.    Información general- Agricultura

 

1.        La riqueza azucarera paso gradualmente a manos cubanas. Así, los ingenios de propiedad cubana ascendieron de 65 en 1939 a 121 en 1958. En 1939 los centrales azucareros cubanos procesaron solo el 22% de la cosecha, en 1958, el 62%.

 

El azúcar represento y  57% de la riqueza nacional, y ocupaba en campos e industrias el 30% del territorio nacional.

 

De la riqueza agrícola correspondía 56.7% a la caña de azucar,6.6% al arroz, 5.4% al café, 2.5% al tabaco y 28.8% a otras cosechas, incluyendo piña, cítricos, yuca, malanga, banano, papa, tomates, pepinos, pimientos, quimbombó, y otros vegetales, así como frijoles y habichuelas, cebolla, ajo, papaya, guayaba, garbanzos, maní, ajonjolí, algodón, kenaf, ramie, millo.

 

Cuba tenia adelantada la explotación ganadera que cubría las necesidades del mercado interno, e iniciaba la exportación de reproductores, de carne congeladas y otros productos. Cuba contaba con 6 millones de cabeza de ganado vacuno y tenía la mejor ganadería tropical del mundo. Había reemplazado a Estados Unidos y Canadá en la exportación de sementales Cebú en el mercado de América Latina.

 

Cuba produjo en 1958 488 millones de libras de carne, y 785,000 toneladas métricas de leche.

 

Entre otras clases de ganado, Cuba en 1958, poseía:

 

400,000 caballos

32,000 mulos

3,000 asnos

210,000 ovejas

180,000 cabras

 

En 1958 hubo una producción de 1,800,000 pollos de 2.50 libras, equivalentes a 54 millones de libras al año, para un per cápita de 12 libras al año La producción de huevos fue de 25,000,000 docenas en 1958. El consumo fue de 316,000,000 unidades o sea, un per cápita de 47 huevos al año.

 

En 1958 el área dedicada a cultivos era de 174,019 caballerías, o sea, 2,335,215 Hectáreas. El área sembrada de caña era de 98,852 caballerías, o 1,326,414 hectáreas.

 

Les presentamos estos datos de interés general:

 

Provincia                                       Mayor zafra en sacos de 325 lb       Toneladas

                                                                  (miles de sacos)                     (2000lbs) 

Pinar del Rio                                                     1886                                    306.475 

La Habana                                                       3,891                                    632.287

Matanzas                                                          5,796                                   941850     Las Villas                                                         10150                                  1649.375 

Camagüey                                                       13.349                    2183.838             2183.838                                                                                               

Oriente                                                             14.134                    2296.776 

 

2.        ARROZ

En 1958 se produjo 256,000 toneladas métricas de arroz molinado. El consumo de arroz per cápita era de 110 libras/año. Cuba tenía 162,000 hectáreas dedicadas a este cultivo. Tercer productor de arroz de América Latina. 

 

3.        TABACO      

En 1958 Cuba ocupaba el lugar número 18 en la producción mundial, con una producción de 98.4 millones de libras Se exportaron 68.7 millones de libras

 

 

4.        CAFÉ

En 1958 se produjo 1,186.000  quintales de café, y Cuba exportaba café., en 1958 en 45,260 libras.               

5.        Legumbres   

En 1958 Cuba produjo 56,000 toneladas métricas de frijol. El tomate de ensalada, en 1958 la producción fue de 2millones 310 mil quintales, y 192,000 quintales del tipo llamado placero. Cuba exportaba zanahorias, tomates, quimbombó, pepinos, coles, etc. y le mostramos una tabla a continuación con estos datos de 1958.

 

Producto Exportado                                  Cantidad 

Zanahorias                                                       3,000 kilogramos

Tomates                                                           15,296,000 kilogramos 

Quimbombó                                                    676,300 kilogramos

Pepinos                                                            16,710,700 kilogramos 

Coles                                                               17,100 kilogramos

Calabaza                                                          1,176,700 kilogramos

Berenjena                                                         1.021,800 kilogramos.

Cuba exporto, en hortícolas, $1,806,000 en 1958.

 

6.        Minería

En 1958, Cuba tenía en operación 287 minas, a saber: 68 de manganeso, 9 de cobre, 12 de cromo, 6 de hierro, 4 de pirita,, 2 de plomo, 1 de plata, 1 de tungsteno,, 3 de zinc,2 de níquel, 1 de cobalto, 4 de baritina, 3 de oro, 3 de turba, 4 de mármol, 6 de caolín,  8 de yeso, 1 de lignito, 42 de arena silícea, 21 de nafta, 84 de exploración de petróleo, 2 de gas natural.

La exportación de minerales en 1958 fue de  $360 millones de dólares.

 

La Justicia En USA… Vea Cómo Se Hace… Lean Los Hechos… Lean la Excusa… y Juzgué… ¿Este Caso Tiene Ya 5 Años… Y Nada Pasa… Excepto el “Estatuto De Limitación De Tiempo” Que Va A Dejar “Libre A Los Culpables”… Hay Un Viejo Refrán Que Dice: “Justicia Demorada No Es Justicia…”                                                   Los Hechos Todo comenzó cuando los investigadores encontraron un correo Electrónico del 2008 remitido al Sr. Cohen (este Sr. Ha ganando $100 BILLONES) en el que un analista  de SAC expresamente envió a Cohen advirtiéndole la situación financiera de el fabricante de computadoras Dell, MINUTOS después de recibir el e-mail, el Sr. Cohen vendió la totalidad de sus acciones en Dell… Eso tiene un NOMBRE y una condena En un documento de 46 páginas en respuesta a las acusaciones… los abogados del Sr. Cohen dijo que hay UNA EXPLICACIÓN… para que se DESCARTE esa PRUEBA… El SR. Cohen NO LEYÓ.. el SOSPECHOSO  CORREO… y sus abogados dicen: “Cohen no tiene memoria de haber visto y ningún testigo testificará que discutieron con él la información en el correo electrónico”  

El Sr. Cohen, los abogados argumentaron, recibió una promedio de 1.000 e-mails cada día en 2008. En ese momento, al parecer abrió sólo el 11 por ciento de los e-mails, aunque los abogados no revelaron cómo llegaron a esa cifra…  

Lo que no explican los abogados es que al día siguiente… DESPUÉS QUE COHEN VENDIÓ SUS ACCIONES… LE envió un correo al que le pasó la CONFIDENCIA (que según Sus abogados NO LEYÓ diciéndole… “BUEN trabajo en Dell.” Ese buen trabajo… evitó que Cohen perdiera $ 1,7 millones…  

Todo eso son EVIDENCIAS CIRCUNSTANCIALES… Según los FISCALES insuficientes para PROCEDER… Hoy aparecen en el New York Time… con el Titular: Van A Procesar  CRIMINALMENTE a los “Asesores” de Cohen… No al MULTI-BILLONARIO COHEN que fue el BENEFICIADO… http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/23/case-against-sac-leader-hinges-on-e-mail-habits/?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130724

More than 100 dignitaries call on UN to investigate death of Cuban activist Oswaldo Payá

By Perry Chiaramonte enviado por Enrique Enriquez. Published July 23, 2013 FoxNews.com

Cuban dissident Oswaldo Payá died on July 22, 2012 in a car crash while traveling in eastern Granma province. Government officials say the driver lost control of the car and hit a tree, but witnesses and others in the car say that they were run off the road by another vehicle. (REUTERS/Desmond Boylan)

On the first anniversary of the suspicious deathof top Cuban dissident Oswaldo Payá., more than 100 world leaders, organizers, and activists are calling for the U.N. to open an investigation into how he died.

Lobbying group U.N. Watch announced on Monday that 125 leaders from around the world are calling on U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay, as well as all 193 member nations, to support an international investigation into Payá’s death in a July 2012 car crash in Granma Province.

The Cuban government’s International Press Center released a statement at the time saying that the driver of Payá’s car had lost control and hit a tree. But his family and other witnesses maintain that the car was rammed multiple times by another vehicle and deliberately driven off the road.

“Mounting and credible allegations that the Cuban government may have been complicit in the murder of its most prominent critic, a leading figure in the human rights world, cannot go ignored by the international community,” reads the letter signed by such world leaders as South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu, European Parliament VP Edward McMillan-Scott, and parliamentary members from numerous countries, including Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

“If they say it was an accident, then Cuba should have no objection.”

– Hillel Neuer, Executive Director, UN Watch

“The families of the victims, and the people of Cuba, have a right to know the truth, and they have a right to justice. This can only happen with the creation of an international and independent inquiry. We therefore respectfully urge you to support our call,” the statement adds.

Officials in the U.S. and elsewhere have previously called for an inquiry, but this is the first time that the issue will be placed on the U.N.’s agenda when the September session begins at the end of the summer.

“We would like to see High Commissioner Pillay call for an inquiry,” Hillel Neuer, Executive Director of U.N. Watch and one of the signers of the appeal, said to FoxNews.com. “If they say it was an accident, then Cuba should have no objection.”

Neuer added that Payá’s daughter, Rosa María Payá, spoke in front of the U.N. in March and was interrupted by the Cuban delegate and others in an apparent attempt to quell her plea for an international investigation.

Payá was a major political activist in Cuba who opposed the one-party rule of the Communist Party, which led to his founding the Christian Liberation Movement. He gained international attention in 1998 for starting the Varela Project, a non-violent movement for democratic reforms in Cuba. The projects initiative was to propose laws advocating such things as freedom of association and speech, free elections, and freedom to start private businesses.

Payá and the Varela Project had garnered at least 25,000 signatures in a petition but the Cuban National Assembly’s Constitution and Legal Affairs Committee suspended consideration and held a vote for a counter initiative.

“His movement was the first to make a popular appeal in respecting the Cuban constitution as it stands,” Cynthia Romero, a senior officer at the human rights group Freedom House, whose executive director also signed the appeal, told FoxNews.com. “It was also a movement that mobilized tens of thousands of people within the island.

“It’s a testament to his legacy to have so many come out in support of an investigation.”

Romero added that while the international community can launch an inquiry, there is not much they can do to force Cuba to comply with any findings.

“As far as they [Cuba] are concerned, the case is closed.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/07/23/over-100-dignitaries-call-upon-un-to-open-investigation-into-death-cuban/?test=latestnews#ixzz2ZvzBC5o4

 

 

 

Conservatives push limits on NSA spies and Egypt

By Associated Press July 23, 2013 6:50 am

WASHINGTON – Limits on secret U.S. surveillance programs and President Barack Obama’s push to help Syrian rebels were in dispute as the House weighed legislation to fund the nation’s military.

The House planned to begin debate Tuesday on the $598.3 billion defense spending bill for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, and late Monday the House Rules Committee voted to allow votes on the contentious issues.

Tea party conservatives and liberal Democrats insisted that debate on the bill include amendments changing the way the National Security Agency conducts its recently disclosed program of collecting phone records of millions of Americans. The same unusual coalition joined forces on amendments barring the administration from arming the Syrian rebels without congressional approval.

Republican leaders struggled to limit amendments on the overall bill, concerned about hampering the president’s national security and anti-terrorism efforts. The GOP also wanted to avoid the embarrassment of obstructionist rank-and-file Republicans joining forces with Democrats in rejecting the framework – known as the congressional “rule” – for considering the bill if their amendments were ignored.

Pleading with Rules Committee members Monday, Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., sponsor of an amendment on the NSA, asked his colleagues to “allow the voice of the people to be heard.”

Amash said his measure would allow the NSA to collect data and records, but only if the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court said in a statement that the collection of data pertains to an individual under investigation. Otherwise, the NSA would lose its funding.

Former NSA systems analyst Edward Snowden leaked documents last month that revealed that the NSA had collected phone records, while a second NSA program forced major Internet companies to turn over contents of communications to the government. Leaders in Congress, such as House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich., have strongly defended the programs, but libertarian lawmakers and liberals have expressed serious concerns about the government’s surveillance in a fierce debate over privacy and national security.

The overall defense spending bill drew an expected veto threat from the White House, which argued that it would force cuts to education, health research and other domestic programs to boost spending for the Pentagon.

The House also will consider an amendment that would bar funds for any military action in Syria if it violated the War Powers Resolution. Another amendment would prohibit money to fund military or paramilitary operations in Egypt.

Republicans and Democrats argued that Congress should have a say in what amounted to taking sides in a sectarian war.

The debate over Syria comes as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in a cautionary assessment of more aggressive American military action, said establishing a no-fly zone to protect Syrian rebels would require hundreds of U.S. aircraft at a cost of as much as $1 billion a month with no assurance it would change the momentum in the 2-year-old civil war.

In a letter to the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Gen. Martin Dempsey outlined the risks, costs and benefits of five potential steps as the Obama administration weighs its next move to help the opposition battling the forces of President Bashar Assad. The sectarian conflict has killed at least 93,000, according to United Nations estimates, and displaced millions, prompting more calls on Capitol Hill for greater American action.

Dempsey said the decision to use force in Syria is not one to be taken lightly.

“It is no less than an act of war,” he wrote. And once that decision is made, the U.S. has to be prepared for what may come next. “Deeper involvement is hard to avoid,” he said.

The United States has been providing humanitarian assistance to the opposition seeking to overthrow the Assad government. The administration has recently taken steps to arm rebels with weapons and ammunition, a move welcomed by some in Congress but troubling to other lawmakers.

Separately, members of the House Intelligence Committee who had balked weeks ago at the Obama administration’s first attempt to pay for lethal aid for the Syrian rebels said Monday that their concerns largely had been addressed.

“After much discussion and review, we got a consensus that we could move forward with what the administration’s plans and intentions are in Syria consistent with committee reservations,” Rogers said in a statement.

Dempsey spelled out costs, ranging from millions to billions of dollars, for options that included training and arming vetted rebel groups, conducting limited strikes on Syria’s air defenses, creating a no-fly zone, establishing a buffer zone and controlling Syria’s massive stockpile of chemical weapons.

The military leader said that while these steps would help the opposition and pressure Assad’s government, “We have learned from the past 10 years, however, that it is not enough to simply alter the balance of military power without careful consideration of what is necessary in order to preserve a functioning state.”

Dempsey’s reference was to the more than a decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Joint Chiefs chairman said creation of a no-fly zone would neutralize Syria’s air defenses. It would require “hundreds of ground and sea-based aircraft, intelligence and electronic warfare support, and enablers for refueling and communications. Estimated costs are $500 million initially, averaging as much as a billion dollars per month over the course of a year.”

An Urgent Message about Benghazi

 

Dear Member:

 

After ten months of stonewalling,  lies, and political manipulation, Benghazi is about to boil over onto John Boehner.

 

In the face of 161 House Republicans who are demanding the appointment of a House Select Committee on Benghazi,Speaker John Boehner has blocked a full and public investigation at every turn.

 

He offered this sorry excuse last April:

 

‘The reason I haven’t called for a select committee yet is that I don’t think it’s risen to that level,” Speaker Boehner told Fox News.  ‘The five committees that have jurisdiction over this matter are working closely together.  They’re getting the job done.’

 

Wrong, Speaker Boehner! 

 

Benghazi rose ‘to that level’ at the very moment of the terror attack.

 

It rose ‘to that level’ before the disgraceful ‘STAND DOWN’ order!

 

It rose ‘to that level’ before all of the lies, the State Department’s disgusting apologies, Obama’s cover-up, the presidential debates, and Obama’s disastrous re-election.

 

Since last November, Speaker John Boehner has unequivocally ruled-out the appointment of a House Select Committee to investigate Benghazi.

 

Why is it that 10 months after the 9/11-terror attack, not a single eyewitness to the attack has publicly testified before Congress?

 

The families of the fallen deserve nothing less than the truth.  So do millions of Americans, who’ve served, or sent their sons and daughters off to war.

 

Help Expose the Truth About Benghazi – Go Here Now 

 

Rep. Frank Wolf hit the nail on the head in a ‘Dear Colleague’ letter to House Members:

 

‘Two new books will be published in the months ahead based on the accounts of the Benghazi survivors.  Will the American people have to buy the books to learn the truth?’

 

Rep. Steve Stockman, who is sick and tired of the stonewalling from Speaker Boehner, has just started a ‘discharge petition’ to force a floor vote on the House Select Committee:

 

‘Congressman Wolf has fearlessly led the fight for justice on this issue.  The whole nation owes Congressman Wolf a deep debt of gratitude.  The only way we’re going to get a clean and thorough investigation is by forcing a vote with a discharge petition’.

 

Tomorrow at the U.S. CapitolRevive America USA will join Rep. Steve Stockman, former Rep. Allen West, and distinguished military veterans of the Special Operations Speaks PAC for an ‘all-out Benghazi blitz’ to force a vote on the House Select Committee. 

 

Revive America will join the event on the House Ceremonial Stairs, which will feature ‘the unrolling of a record setting 4-foot by 60-foot scroll/petition down the Capitol steps’. 

 

Over 1,000 Special Service veterans have signed the petition demanding a full investigation of the 9/11 Benghazi terror attack.

 

After the event, the scroll/petition will be featured in a district-by-district nationwide grassroots campaign urging House Republicans to sign the Discharge Petition to force a vote on the Benghazi committee.

 

Here’s what former Rep. Allen West, who’s speaking at the event, says about Benghazi:

 

‘We did something that is the most heinous thing that could ever happen.  We abandoned Americans while they were under attack’.

 

With your help, Revive America is going to deluge Congress with a flood of phone calls, emails, and personal visits to House Republicans on Capitol Hill.

 

We must also launch an intensive online advertising campaign to inform conservatives about where their Congressman stands on Benghazi.

 

Does your Congressman stand with the families of the four fallen men who Obama abandoned to slaughter in Benghazi, or does your Congressman fall-in-line behind Speaker Boehner and the Washington Establishment?

 

Conservatives everywhere need to know with whom their congressman stands.

 

Please help Revive America to force a floor vote on Benghazi with a gift of $25, $50, $100, $250, or $500. Unlike ‘Big Government’ regulated political campaigns, there are no limits on how much you’re allowed to contribute.

 

Go Here Now to Contribute 

 

Because of your generous support, we’ve piled-up 161 cosponsors in support of the Benghazi Committee.

 

In fact, over two-thirds of all House Republicans — in defiance of Speaker Boehner — refuse to ‘tow-the-party-line’ on Benghazi!

 

Now is the time to strike — to force a floor vote!

 

Help Revive America force the hand of Speaker Boehner with a floor vote on Benghazi.  Go Here Now 

 

Remember Benghazi!

Bob Adams

Founder & President

 

 

VOLVERIAMOS A SER  LO QUE FUIMOS por Diego Quirós

 

No somos  estadistas ni economistas, pero queremos  lo mejor  para la Nación, anhelamos volver a ser los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica, los mismos que fuimos hasta hace pocos años en que nuestros productos eran los más codiciados del  mundo, la Nación  ejemplo en disciplina,  respeto y  como siempre, la primera en auxiliar ante cualquier necesidad o catástrofe en donde quiera que ocurra. Ese país generoso en brindar  oportunidades  y  admirado   en todo el mundo libre.

Para llegar de nuevo, tendríamos que volver  a nuestras raíces restableciendo  el Servicio Militar Obligatorio para todos los jóvenes que no trabajen ni estudien. Esto  ayudaría a la economía, la disciplina, al respeto a la autoridad y  a entrenar  buenos  hombres; haciendo descender la  violencia, el consumo y expendio de drogas y la delincuencia en nuestras calles. El ocio siempre ha sido mal consejero.

Esta es una Nación con leyes que protege al trabajador, por lo tanto no necesitamos la protección sindical exigiendo  a los empresarios aumentos salariales con amenazas de huelgas, que dañan la producción y el consumo, y que al final sufre la economía.

Las grandes corporaciones: unas por codicia y otras  evadiendo las demandas sindicales  se marcharon a otros países a instalar sus empresas, adquiriendo mano de obra barata  de  inferior calidad, sin embargo su mayor consumidor continua siendo los Estados Unidos.

Para evitar una alta tasa arancelaria a los artículos de importación, se invitaría a  esas corporaciones a regresar  y emplear nuevamente a  los americanos. Una Nación donde todos sus habitantes tienen  trabajo: ES UNA NACION PROSPERA.

Entonces volveríamos a ser  aquella nación que fue  la líder exportando sus magníficos productos, aquella en que todos compraban sus artículos con la garantía de la etiqueta que decía: MADE IN USA.

No deseamos escuchar mas promesas, queremos acción para  ver  renacer a la América que  conocimos.

DIOS BENDIGA A AMERICA.

Diego Quirós, Sr

 

Obamacare’s Massive Database Will Be Accessible to Criminals

Posted by Marilyn Assenheim in ConstitutionCrimeEmail FeaturedHealth Care,Law EnforcementPolitics 31 Comments

Stephen T. Parente and Paul Howard, writing in USA Today, offered the following observation: “If you think identity theft is a problem now, wait until Uncle Sam serves up critical information on 300 million American citizens on a platter.”

We were warned, but almost nobody was listening.

This aspect of the Obamacare problem is the new Federal Data Hub. It is a central agency that collects every scrap of personal data about us from sources such as the IRS, Social Security Administration, Homeland Security, Department of Defense, and even the Veteran’s Administration. Not just some of us. All of us. Parente and Howard stated, “The federal government is planning to quietly enact what could be the largest consolidation of personal data in the history of the republic.” What they didn’t know at the time was who would have access to the database.

It is enough of a hair-raising concern that any one entity in the government can collect such data on 300 million people. According to John Fund in National Review Online, the Department of Health and Human Services is about to hire a legion of “patient navigators.” They will have access to every scrap of data the government has on file for every American. Unlike the IRS and Census Bureau, HHS will not require background checks for their “patient navigators.”

It would, therefore, be possible for someone who has committed a felony to have access to every sensitive facet of our lives, even someone who had previously been convicted of identity theft. Says HHS: “[D]despite the fact that navigators will have access to sensitive data such as Social Security numbers and tax returns, there will be no criminal background checks required for them.” HHS won’t even require their navigators to have a high school diploma.

HHS will only require that navigators take a “20–30 hour online course” on the 1,200-page Obamacare law. Mr. Fund put it in a nutshell:  “[That] is like giving someone a first-aid course and then making him a med-school professor.” He cited Marilyn Tavenner, head of the HHS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services promise:  “I want to assure you and all Americans that, when they fill out their [health-insurance] marketplace applications, they can trust the information they’re providing is protected.”

In the age of Wikileaks and IRS abuses, somehow that isn’t very comforting.” If Rachel Jeantel, say, is any example of the quality of non-high-school-diploma-navigator fitness, it’s much scarier than that.

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) seems to agree. He wrote the following to Kathleen Sebelius: “The standards proposed by your department could result in a convicted felon receiving federal dollars and gaining access to confidential taxpayer information.”

He added that Healthcare enrollment was more complex than registering to vote. Apparently, HHS had already thought of that. The two are inextricably combined. Thanks to the true purpose of Obamacare, to provide Democrats with a permanent voting base, voter registration is a function of the navigator’s job. A person cannot be offered Obamacare without a guided, voter registration harangue.

And now HHS is floating the notion that ACORN wannabees are going to be deployed before “training” is completed. These uneducated new federal employees will be earning $20–$48 per hour. Much more than their equals earn in the private sector.

Fund quoted Congressman Paul Ryan as having said “Giving community organizers access to the Federal Data Hub is bad policy and potentially a danger to civil liberties.” Congressman Ryan bypassed the obvious conclusion. Having a Federal Data Hub is, by itself, an unconscionable invasion of private liberty. Once upon a time, it would have been recognized as such.

 

The White Side of the Story of Negroes

This is the reason CNN has dropped Buchanan. It’s like Newt G. Said, “you’re not supposed to bring up uncomfortable Facts.” (verified on Buchanan’s website)

Finally………….It is Said Publicly. I have never seen the white side explained better! 
Pat Buchanan had the guts to say it. It isabout time!!

BUCHANAN TO OBAMA By Patrick J. Buchanan

Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America .. Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation.. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to…. This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And among them are these: 

First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.. Jeremiah Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the ’60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream. Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks — with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas — to advance black applicants over white applicants. Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated their time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks. 
We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude??

Barack talks about new ‘ladders of opportunity’ for blacks. Let him go to Altoona ? And Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for ‘deserving’ white kids…? Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America ? Is it really white America ‘s fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?

Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, a failure of the black community itself?

As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?

Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?

We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena . And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.

Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago. This needs to be passed around because, this is a message everyone needs to hear!!!

OK………..will you pass it on ?  YES. I did but will you? Because I’m for a better America 

 

 

Dhimmitude  

The word “Dhimmitude” is found in the new health care bill; so what does it

mean?

Thought this was interesting and worth passing on.

Obama used it in the health care bill.

Now isn’t this interesting?

It is also included in the health care law.

Dhimmitude — I had never heard the word  until now. I typed it into Google and started reading. Pretty interesting. It’s on page 107 of the healthcare bill. I looked this up on Google and yep, it exists.. It is a REAL word.

Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-Muslim populations conquered through jihad (Holy War). Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-Muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting      conquered remnants to Islam.

 

ObamaCare allows the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia Muslim diktat in the United States. Muslims are specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be “gambling”, “risk-taking”, and “usury” and is thus banned. Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on this.
How convenient. So I, as a Christian, will  have crippling IRS liens placed against all of my assets, including real estate, cattle, and even accounts receivable, and will face hard prison time because I refuse to buy insurance or pay the penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan will have no such penalty and will have 100% of his health insurance needs paid for by the de facto government insurance. Non-Muslims will be paying a tax to subsidize Muslims.

This is Dhimmitude.

I recommend sending this on to your contacts. American citizens need to know about it snopes.com: Health Insurance Exemptions

Apr 13, 2010 … Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-muslim populations … The ObamaCare bill is the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia …

www.snopes.com/politics/medical/exemptions.asp

Keep this going. Every non-Muslim in the United States of America needs to know about it!

 

IRS execs rack up big travel bills

By USA Today July 24, 2013 6:57 am

          

Text Size: A A A

Two high-ranking IRS employees may have traveled more days than they worked over the past two years, according to a Treasury inspector’s report released Tuesday.

And at least 15 executives traveled to another office — typically Washington — for more than half of their workdays, raising questions about whether they should have been assigned to IRS headquarters in the first place, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration said.

The inspectors are looking into whether the tax agency may have itself evaded taxes by failing to disclose the benefit of the travel on withholding statements for those employees. Under IRS regulations, travel expenses are taxable if the employee works at a site for more than a year.

The review is the latest in a string of reports critical of management failures at the tax agency, including the processing of tax-exempt applications for political groups and excessive conference spending.

The inspector general said the agency’s overall travel does not appear to be excessive. The 373 most senior executives spent $4.7 million on travel in fiscal year 2012, down slightly from the previous year. Most spent less than $10,000 on travel during the year. The report does not allege that executives claimed reimbursements above the government rates or took improper perks like suite upgrades.

A number of executives took repeated trips to the same cities. In many cases, the IRS recruited managers for jobs at the Washington headquarters but didn’t require them to move to D.C., Deputy Inspector General David Holmgren said.

“To us, that’s important,” Holmgren said in a conference call with reporters. “There’s nothing improper about staying the weekends and holidays, but when it was to the same location over and over again, it appeared those individuals may not have the proper or appropriate place of duty.”

One executive — identified only as “Executive D” — spent 413 days on the road in 2011 and 2012, spending $283,491 on travel, according to the report. Almost all of that travel was to Washington.

The IRS says executive travel is necessary in an organization with 90,000 employees in 620 locations. “The employees best prepared to handle these demanding and complex jobs may not always live where the position is located and may not be in a position to relocate, necessitating some additional travel,” IRS Chief Financial Officer Pamela LaRue said in a written response to inspectors. But she acknowledged that “long-term travel by a few executives represents an excessive expense we cannot sustain.”

Acting Commissioner Danny Werfel must now personally approve any executive’s traveling more than 75 days a year on business, she said.

Race Hustlers and Barack Obama’s Biggest Presidential Failure By William Pauwels / 23 July 2013 / 24 Comments

As one who fought for civil rights in the late 50s and early 60s, it is disappointing to see the race hustlers out in force – exploiting the acquittal of George Zimmerman for personal gain.  After five decades of lobbying for equal rights for all citizens – with a multi-racial family – I find the behavior of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Charles Rangel, Eric Holder and other race hustlers to be totally disgusting, irresponsible, and exploitative.

Little Al and Big Jesse claim Whites hate Blacks and that the White power structure is biased against Blacks.  This despite the fact that White America has twice elected a Black President, approved a Black Attorney General and many Black White House associates.  

Also, the hard data shows the majority of Blacks who are killed or injured are victimized by other Black criminals. For example, every weekend in Chicago, dozens of Blacks are killed or injured by African-Americans.  And over 6000 Blacks are killed by other Blacks in the United States each year.

So why is Al Sharpton – and for that matter the other race hustlers – using the George Zimmerman verdict to enhance their false claim of White racism?  Hard statistics tell us Blacks are far more preoccupied with race issues than Whites. 

Why are the Black race hustlers giving so much attention to the Zimmerman case – to this multiracial man who killed his attacker in self-defense.  And why is the mainstream media giving so much attention to this isolated and weak case – and not to the bigger picture problems facing Black communities around our country?

Obviously, the race hustlers must ferment racial discontent to sustain their seats of power in Black society and in the Democrat Party.  And the media cooperates with them – recognizing the audience appeal of a good racial story: “White guy shoots an attractive and innocent Black kid returning home after purchasing skittles and ice tea.” 

The media depiction of Trayvon Martin as an innocent kid with skittles and iced tea is highly deceptive.  He was expelled from school four times and at the time of the shooting, was a drug user, a fighter, possibly a jewelry thief, and a reverse racist.  He lost his cool  – slugged Zimmerman – took him to the ground – beat the hell out of him with deadly fists – and repeatedly bashed his head against the concrete walkway.

The media depiction of a 12 year old Trayvon was raw deception.  In fact, he was a powerfully built,
seventeen-year-old six-footer.  Also, Zimmerman wasn’t White in the traditional sense, but a short, light skinned Hispanic with some Black ancestry and a proactive and positive anti-racial history.  The media even invented “White Hispanic” to reinforce the appeal of their “White Adult Kills Black Child” headline.

Last, and certainly not least, the Zimmerman affair and trial served the interests of the Obama Administration by getting the Obama scandals and cover-ups out of the media spotlight  – in anticipation of the upcoming midterm elections.  The Dems “never let a good crisis go to waste” as Rahm Emanuel likes to say.  Everything is politics in the Obama camp.

 http://clashdaily.com/2013/07/race-hustlers-and-barack-obamas-biggest-presidential-failure/#ixzz2ZyJzVfwS  ClashDaily.com Facebook Twitter YouTube.

 

http://enmiopinionlrgm.wordpress.com/

http://mrlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

http://enmiopinionlazarorgonzalez.blogspot.com/

https://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/

http://contracandela.blogspot.com/

“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’