Archive for 31 mayo 2013

Is Obama deeply involve in the IRS targeting? No 399 5/30/13 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

mayo 31, 2013

No 399 5/30/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’Image

Dick Morris: Obama Must Have Been ‘Deeply Involved’ in IRS Targeting

Thursday, 30 May 2013 09:26 PM By Greg Richter

There’s no chance President Barack Obama knew nothing of the IRS targeting conservative groups, says political pundit Dick Morris. Why else would IRS Commissioner Douglas Schulman have visited the White House at least once a week? “The incredible frequency of the White House visits — essentially weekly — indicate that Obama must have been deeply involved with the inner workings of the audits and harassment of conservative groups,” Morris writes on his website, DickMorris.com.
Morris asks what other reason would have brought Schulman to the White House 157 times during the period that groups with “tea party,” “patriot” and other conservative buzzwords in their names were being targeted for extra scrutiny.
“Not ObamaCare. Not without having (Health and Human Services) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in attendance, you wouldn’t,” Morris says. “About Treasury issues? Deficit reduction? Not without Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner.”
The reason, Morris says, is that Obama was following the IRS actions with an “obsessive, personal involvement.”
The Citizens United ruling galvanized Obama into action, Morris says, and “tapped so deeply into his psyche that he was determined personally to supervise the castration of the wealthy people and groups whose access to the political system was opened wide by the (U.S. Supreme) Court.”

Schulman held a subordinate, non-policy making position, Morris said, so to have seen him 157 times, Obama had to have been “a president on a mission.”
The scandal is not one of a rogue agency, Morris says, but one of a rogue president using the agency for his personal purposes. “An instrument of vengeance, or self-defense, and of political influence.”
President Richard Nixon was doomed, Morris says, when the public realized that his own paranoia had infected his entire administration.
“When Chuck Colson led the plumbers unit to investigate leaks and to use the IRS to terrify and intimidate his enemies, we realized that he was operating as Nixon’s man doing Nixon’s bidding based on the needs of Nixon’s psyche,” he writes.

 The public now realizes that the IRS harassment went deeper than was initally admitted, he said.
“This scandal will destroy him.”
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/morris-obama-irs-scandal/2013/05/30/id/507260?s=al&promo_code=13AD1-1#ixzz2UsJKGXsB
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Ricardo Samitier. Lecciones HISTORICAS…‏ El Hombre Es El Único Animal Que No Aprende De Sus Propios Errores

Les Traigo 4 LECCIONES…  

La PRIMERA LECCIÓN COMIENZA en la Biblia cuando nos dicen que SIETE VACAS FLACAS SE COMIERON SIETE VACAS GORDAS… para los que NO SABEN LEER esa METÁFORA nos dice que EGIPTO entonces el País Más Rico Y Poderoso… hasta que el Faraón se le ocurrió hacer un ESTADO TOTALITARIO es decir un estado comunista… donde la biblia CLARAMENTE CUENTA que el pueblo le dijo al FARAÓN… “Danos de Comer y te obedeceremos toda la vida”  MAS CLARO NO SE PUEDE DECIR… después fue que se hizo la REVOLUCIÓN DE MOISÉS… La DERROTA y CONQUISTA DE EGIPTO por los griegos de Alejandro Magno es decir el hombre fue advertido contra el comunismo hace ya 4,000 AÑOS… y SEGUIMOS AUN HOY COMETIENDO EL MISMO ERROR…

La Segunda Lección

¿No Aprendimos La Lección De La Unión Soviética?

La creación de un Estado Comunista y una nueva CASTA GOBERNANTE Costo MILLONES DE ASESINATOS… esto EN LA ACTUALIDAD NADIE LO NIEGA… al fin… la URSS SE DESINTEGRO… SIN GUERRA después de 75 años y lo peor es que extrañamente… los profesores universitarios y los intelectuales NUNCA LO PREVIERON… la única que envió el mensaje de la desintegración de la URSS fue una NIÑA ANALFABETA… de Portugal… quien dijo: “La Señora me dijo que rezará para que Rusia se convierta nuevamente.” Fue la virgen de Fátima…  No Planificación Económica es la mejor política!

La Tercera Lección

El libro de mayor venta actualmente en Portugal, No es una novela de amor erótico… ni un plan de pérdida de grasa. La preocupación de los ciudadanos HOY un libro escrito por un profesor de economía… es decir un tema PESADO… que normalmente no le interesa al VULGO… ¿QUÉ DICE ESTE LIBRO?  Que Portugal, debe abandonar el euro e imprimir nuevamente su MONEDA…Que la economía de 11 millones de personas en Portugal no debe ser decidido en Frankfurt, Alemania…  AQUÍ TIENE EL ENLACE

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323336104578503253715866368.htmlLa La Cuarta Lección

La ISLA DE MACAO fue una colonia portuguesa durante 400 años. Una colonia POBRE de un IMPERIO COLONIAL que no tenía los medios navales ni militares para conservarla… Sus mejores años fue cuando era utilizada por los NORTE AMERICANOS como centro de operaciones para el TRÁFICO DE OPIO con China… Entre estos traficantes el más poderoso fue “DELANO” el abuelo de Franklin Delano Roosevelt quien llegó a Presidente de USA en 1933…  

Macao fue entregada a los Chinos comunistas en 1999 (ya eran capitalistas) quienes acordaron que la política para la ISLA iba a ser UN PAÍS CON DOS SISTEMAS es decir los chinos que desde 1948 controlaban china y por 51 años habían aprendido que el comunismo NO FUNCIONA… firmaron un tratado aceptando dejar la ISLA EN EL SISTEMA CAPITALISTA…

He Aquí los resultados de “UN PAÍS – DOS SISTEMAS”:

¿Cuál es el PIB per cápita de Macao hoy?   65.000 U $ D!

Comparémoslo con otros países:

Portugal: sólo $22.000!

España su vecino de al lado $32.000

Emiratos Árabes Unidos, país rico petrolero: $45.000

Singapur: $46.000

EE.UU. La Primera Potencia $48.000

Los datos arriba los pueden ver en este enlace:

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD

¿Qué Ha Pasado En La Pobre Isla De Macao En Solo 14 Años; Que Llegó A Ser Tan Rico, Tan Rápido, Sin Tener Recursos Naturales… Lo más SENCILLO y SIMPLE…

Los burócratas en Portugal y en Pekín, acordaron que iban a dejar a los ciudadanos de Macao LIBRES de hacer lo que les diera la gana… como resultado…

El PIB per cápita de China comunista sigue siendo sólo 5.500 US Dólares.

LA LECCIÓN ES CLARA! La planificación Central de la Económica es como volar un avión, desde el suelo!

Espero que estos ejemplos históricos y TODOS ELLOS VERDADEROS y comprobables… LES AYUDE A DESPERTAR de lo que están tramando los comunistas FABIANOS NORTE AMERICANOS… que instalaron en el poder a el NEGRO OBAMA… por si le salen las cosas mal… echarle la culpa a su falta de EXPERIENCIA… sus creencias musulmanas, etc.

RECUERDEN… que la recuperación del DESASTRE DE LA QUIEBRA DE LA URSS y la actual RECUPERACIÓN IDEOLÓGICA del comunismo… SE DEBE a que la CULPA del fracaso la tienen LENIN y STALIN… que no supieron aplicar las leyes de Marx…

Aquí… tienen preparado YA A QUIEN LE VAN A ECHAR LA CULPA… sin duda la mayoría BLANCA de USA y del mundo cristiano les va a ser mucho más fácil aceptar que el “NEGRO OBAMA” medio musulmán y sin experiencias  ES EL CULPABLE en vez de al sistema…

Los planificadores del “Nuevo Orden Mundial Comunista” son fantásticos planificadores y RACISTAS…

Rápido resumen de las crisis económicas mundiales‏ Ricardo Samitier.

Uno de los problemas de hoy es que no se enseña  en las escuelas y universidades que las RIQUEZAS  son ÚNICAMENTE creadas por el TRABAJO…  Cualquier revisión de como un negocio llegó a ser  Exitoso… lo primero que vemos es que tiene 20 años De continuo trabajo… Hay muy pocos negocios LEGALES donde se puede Ganar dinero rápidamente… Recomiendo que lean este RÁPIDO resumen de lasCrisis económicas mundiales… http://listverse.com/2012/12/26/10-fascinating-economic-collapses-through-history/

Después de la RARA MUERTE de un musulmán a manos del FBI Ricardo Samitier.‏ Ayer El FBI Tuvo Que Reconocer Que Mintió… Que El Musulmán Muerto NO Estaba Armado De Un Cuchillo…

Hace 20 Años… Acusé Al FBI y Al Entonces Fiscal De Miami de Encubrimiento Criminal… Mi Campaña Pública y PERSONAL Duro 5 años… Paralicé El Trafico en Miami 5 VECES… sin violar la ley… Los automovilistas se detenían ASOMBRADOS ante mi acusación  al FBI…

 

El Miami Herald En PRIMERA PLANA me acusó de ser “Terrorista Del Tráfico”  y pedían que las autoridades me llevaran preso… Lo que fue hecho también 5 veces… siempre fui absuelto… pues no violaba ninguna ley…

NINGÚN PERIODISTA se ATREVIÓ a pedir que investigaran mis acusaciones… La Prensa y los Periodista CALLARON… la verdad…

Posiblemente Fui El Primer Ciudadano En Estados Unidos en acusar Públicamente Al FBI Y A Un Fiscal…

Fui Visitado Por DOS AGENTES…

Siempre Andan En PAREJA… En realidad aun hoy, Sigo creyendo que fue una visita para METERME MIEDO… pues solamente la entrevista duro unos minutos…

y al FINAL…me dijeron: “Si a Usted Lo matan… Nosotros no vamos a investigar su muerte…”

Mi contesta fue: “No tengo duda de eso…”

 

Pero Al Siguiente Día Fui Al Nuevo Herald y compre una página entera… y arriba puse Un TITULAR A 1 PULGADA QUE DECÍA:

“Aunque Me Maten Acuso Al FBI”

Posiblemente Soy La Única Persona Que Ha Pagado ANUNCIOS Públicos acusando al FBI…

 

Los domingos en el Miami Herald y el Nuevo Herald… publicaba un anuncio ofreciendo $10,000.00 DE RECOMPENSA por cualquier información que me permitiera encausar por corrupto a un agente del FBI…

 

Los que deseen ver esos anuncios hechos por mi hace 20  años denunciando al FBI…solo tienen que ir a cualquier biblioteca y revisar los microfichas del esos dos periódicos… quizás para los que ignoraban mi campaña para ADECENTAR LA POLÍTICA EN MIAMI… ahora comprendan… el motivo de mi RUINA ECONÓMICA…

 

Aquí les envió la foto de mi “BARCO PROTESTA” el cual bauticé para HONRAR la constitución norte americana con el nombre de “PRIMERA ENMIENDA” pues  era la única forma que se pude llevar a cabo mi denuncia publica… pues antes de esta protesta… nunca se me había permitido por ningún medio de COMUNICACIÓN dar a conocer que era VICTIMA DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE JUSTICIA y del FBI

 

 

 

Gracias A Dios he podido SOBREVIVIR… Lo cual NO ES FÁCIL… después de ACUSAR A LOS PODEROSOS…

 

Pero no combatí en Cuba por una democracia para ver en MI PAÍS DE ASILO la democracia MANCILLADA POR POLÍTICOS LADRONES Y quedarme callado…

 

Cada cual ACTÚA CON SU CONCIENCIA… Pero de acuerdo con José Martí… “Los que ven en silencio un crimen SON CÓMPLICES…”

 

Los periodistas y los POLITIQUEROS LOCALES, (especialmente los cubanos) que SE QUEDARON CALLADO… ANTE MI ACUSACIÓN… y aun peor los que pidieron mi arresto por protestar… FUERON CÓMPLICES…  de acuerdo a Martí…

 

La verdad sobre el Islam por una Doctora que fue musulmana.‏ Maria Argelia Vizcaino

RECOMENDAMOS:La verdad sobre el Islam por una Doctora que fue musulmana. No deje de verlo en cuanto tenga tiempo. Es muy bueno estar documentados para cuando nos pretendan engañar, ya sea por odio a EE.UU. o a Israel o a los cristianos, para favorecer a los incivilizados y llevarnos a su mundo de horror. 
http://www.youtube.com/embed/qhN0u8uKE-M

Los niveles históricos de dióxido de carbono ponen en peligro al planeta

Por Elizabeth Landau

(CNN) — De cierta forma, es solo una cifra, pero es un número que tiene grandes consecuencias.

Los científicos registraron por primera vez una concentración promedio de dióxido de carbono en la atmósfera de 400 partes por millón en Mauna Loa, Hawaii, en donde se encuentra el observatorio de la Administración Nacional del Océano y la Atmósfera de Estados Unidos (NOAA).

“La mayoría de los expertos que estudian las concentraciones de CO2 calculan que no habíamos tenido esa concentración de CO2 en nuestra atmósfera desde hace unos tres millones de años”, dijo J. Marshall Shepherd, experto en cambio climático y profesor de la Universidad de Georgia.

En otras palabras, los humanos modernos nunca habían visto estas concentraciones de dióxido de carbono.

Los científicos dicen que al parecer la actividad humana —la combustión de carbón, petróleo y gas natural— ha provocado un rápido aumento de los niveles de dióxido de carbono en la atmósfera.

El dióxido de carbono cambia el clima y provoca la acidificación del océano.

“Una vez que se ha emitido, permanece en el sistema atmosférico del océano por miles de años y calienta al planeta. Cambia el clima y todo ese tiempo propicia la acidificación del océano”, dijo Jim Butler, científico sénior de la NOAA.

Entre los muchos riesgos que conlleva el incremento de la temperatura, se espera que la agricultura, la silvicultura, los ecosistemas y la salud humana, sufran a consecuencia de las tendencias del cambio climático.

La cantidad de dióxido de carbono varía diariamente y ha cumplido con los ciclos históricos, en concordancia con los cambios en la órbita terrestre, fenómeno conocido como ciclos de Milankovitch. Sin embargo, el incremento exponencial de los niveles de dióxido de carbono desde la Revolución Industrial está lejos de lo normal, dicen los expertos.

La concentración de dióxido de carbono simboliza lo que muchos expertos creen que es un inevitable aumento de la concentración de este gas en nuestra atmosfera, dijo Shepherd. Se esperaba que alcanzáramos estas concentraciones.

“También es una especie de señal de advertencia de que tenemos que abordar realmente este problema”, dijo. “Está ocurriendo justo ante nuestros ojos”.

En unos ocho o diez años, los niveles no bajarán de las 400 partes por millón, dijo Butler. Además, el ritmo al que se alcanzaron las 450 partes por millón será mayor, dadas las tendencias observadas, dijo Shepherd.

En comparación, la última vez que se registró una concentración anual de 350 partes por millón de CO2 fue en la década de 1980. Butler compara el fenómeno a una manta eléctrica. Cuando la enciendes, tarda un poco en calentarse. Es como si los humanos hubieran encendido el control de la manta de la Tierra y es cuestión de tiempo para que sintamos el calor.

“Aún si dejáramos de emitir CO2, las temperaturas seguirían subiendo durante una década o dos porque el sistema tiene que estabilizarse”, dijo Butler.

La mayor parte del dióxido de carbono se encuentra en el hemisferio norte, porque la mayor parte de la población del planeta está allí, dijo Butler.

En 2012, las estaciones de monitorización en el Ártico registraron 400 partes por millón, pero la concentración registrada en Mauna Loa es un nuevo récord. El promedio mundial se igualará en un año o dos, dijo.

Desde que los científicos empezaron a medir en Mauna Loa, en 1958, la concentración de dióxido de carbono se ha elevado cada año, señaló la NOAA. El ritmo de este incremento se ha acelerado: a finales de la década de 1950 se registraron 0.7 partes por millón (ppm) y durante la última década se registraron 2.1 ppm.

Antes de la Revolución Industrial del siglo XIX, la concentración promedio de dióxido de carbono a nivel mundial era de cerca de 280 partes por millón. Durante los últimos 800,000 años, según la NOAA, los niveles han oscilado entre las 180 y las 280 partes por millón.

Tal vez te preguntes cómo puede ser que el planeta se está calentando si este invierno fue relativamente frío.

Shepherd explica que el estado del tiempo es como el estado de ánimo, pero el clima es como la personalidad. El estado del tiempo cambia con frecuencia, pero el clima es más fundamental y determina los patrones generales.

En general, podría parecer que para empezar no hay mucho dióxido de carbono en nuestra atmósfera. El gas más abundante es el nitrógeno (78%), seguido del oxígeno (21%). Una pequeña parte de dióxido de carbono es esencial para nuestra supervivencia: sin él, el planeta sería demasiado frío.

Sin embargo, es malo que haya demasiado dióxido de carbono, ya que provoca un calentamiento general excesivo.

Aunque es imposible decir que un evento en particular es “consecuencia del calentamiento global”, dice Shepherd, el cambio climático colabora y aumenta las probabilidades de que ocurran eventos como la supertormenta Sandy del año pasado.

Estas tormentas se vuelven más destructivas conforme se eleva el nivel de los océanos. El nivel del mar cerca de la ciudad de Nueva York era 25 centímetros más elevado en 2012 que en 1900, dijo Shepherd.

La estación Mauna Loa fue la primera del mundo en la que se midió el dióxido de carbono.

“Hemos superado un indicador alarmante”, dijo Butler. “Mauna Loa, el sitio icónico de la medición del CO2, ha alcanzado las 400 por primera vez en un solo día. Eso es mucho”.

Obama’s ‘Chicago Way’

The scandals swirling around the Obama administration have many journalists scratching their heads as to how “hope and change” seem to have been supplanted by “arrogance and fear.” Perhaps it’s time they revisit one of their original premises about Barack Obama: that he wasn’t influenced by the Chicago Daley machine. You know: the machine that boosted his career and whose protégés — including Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel, and his wife, Michelle — he brought to Washington with him.

The liberal take on the president was best summed up by Slate magazine’s Jacob Weisberg, who wrote last year that Obama “somehow passed through Chicago politics without ever developing any real connection to it.” It’s true that Obama initially kept some distance from the machine. But by the time he ran for the Senate in 2004, his main political Sherpas were Axelrod, who was then the chief consultant to Mayor Richard M. Daley, and Jarrett, the mayor’s former deputy chief of staff. As Scott Simon of NPR noted: “While calling for historic change globally, [Obama] has never professed to be a reformer locally.” The Daley machine, which evolved over 60 years from a patronage-rich army of worker bees into a corporate state in which political pull and public-employee unions dominate, has left its imprint on Obama. The machine’s core principle, laid out in an illuminating Chicago Independent Examiner primer on “the Chicago Way,” is that at all times elections are too important to be left to chance. John Kass, the muckraking columnist for the Chicago Tribune who for years has warned that Obama was bringing “the Chicago way” to Washington, sums up his city like this: “Once there were old bosses. Now there are new bosses. And shopkeepers still keep their mouths shut. Tavern owners still keep their mouths shut. Even billionaires keep their mouths shut.”

Obama Must Know All

May 30, 2013 by Floyd Brown

It’s been over 1,000 years since Pope Gregory V was poisoned at just 27 years old. And in that time, there has never been a greater invasion of privacy compared to what Congress has in store for us.

You see, buried deep within the 800-page immigration bill facing Congress right now is a sinister plot. And it doesn’t just affect immigrants – it affects everyone. We can thank my sources for reading deep into the pending Senate bill to learn this.

As it turns out, the immigration bill will give the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the right to collect biometric data on every American. They will know the measurements of your face, the details of your iris, and the shape of your smile.

“It starts to change the relationship between the citizen and state, you do have to get permission to do things,” said Chris Calabrese, a congressional lobbyist. “More fundamentally, it could be the start of keeping a record of all things.”

Big Brother is Watching

Entombed in the 800 pages of immigration legislation is a mandate to create the innocently-named “photo tool.” In reality, this “photo tool” is a gigantic government database controlled by the DHS. It would assemble the names, ages, Social Security numbers, and photos of everybody in the nation with a driver’s license or any other government-issued photo ID.

It would essentially be a de facto national ID scheme.

The senators behind the bill want every employer in the United States to first ID a person using the “photo tool” before they can be considered for employment. Not in the database? Then you won’t be allowed to work.

David Bier, an analyst with the Competitive Enterprise Institute, believes, “The most worrying aspect is that this creates a principle of permission basically to do certain activities and it can be used to restrict activities… It’s like a national ID system without the card.”

And this isn’t the only information the Obama Administration is hoping to collect. Included in the Obamacare legislation is grounds for yet another national database. Through the Affordable Care Act, the government will be able to collect all of your medical records. And the plan is to have all of these databases communicate, sharing information about us in real-time with any government agency worker who wants your information.

What’s more, much of the Obamacare funding is being funneled to the IRS. In the near future, you’ll have to give the IRS details about your health coverage as part of your tax return. See where this is going?

Tax data will be matched with health records, which will be matched with biometric records. The holy grail of information management is connected databases. Have cancer or suffered a heart attack? The IRS will know. Applied for a job? The DHS will know. Forget to make an estimated tax payment? It could be matched with your hospital or employment records. In the end, no information will be private from the government.

Could you ever be refused a job because you are delinquent on a student loan? The answer is yes. I recently made acquaintance with a home healthcare practitioner who was not allowed to receive her license because of a student loan delinquency.

Could you be refused a driver’s license because you had cancer? Could you be denied surgery because you are delinquent on your taxes? The answers are all potentially yes… Scary thoughts, indeed.

When an all-powerful government knows everything about you, you’ve got no privacy left. And I‘d contend that when you have no privacy, you have no dignity left either. We’ll all be standing naked before Obama and his hirelings if the government has its way.

Major Announcement! Obama Fraud Case – Breaking!

Announcement Number ONE:

Mike Zullo, lead investigator, for the Sheriff Arpaio Cold Case Posse Obama Fraud case has revealed to PPSIMMONS News that he will be a featured speaker at the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association Convention St. Charles, Missouri – this coming weekend, May 31-June 1. Hundreds of Constitutional law enforcement officers from around the country will be in attendance as well as U.S. Congressmen.

This event is open to the public but will also contain breakout sessions designed only for sworn constitutional law enforcement officials. Mike Zullo will be a featured speaker at the public session where he says he will do a full public presentation of the CCP Obama Fraud case.

Zullo said, “This presentation will contain no new information concerning the case. However, the presentation will be monumentally important because of the overall main stream media news blackout there will be many there who will hear this important information and criminal evidence for the very first time. We are certain that once they hear the information they will be deeply concerned.”

However, Mike Zullo informed us that he also will be the featured speaker at two different 2-hour breakout sessions designed for law enforcement and congressmen only. Concerning these breakout sessions Mike Zullo said, “We will have official credential checks at the door. No one will be admitted except duly credentialed law enforcement officials and U.S. Congressmen. At this session, I will, upon the authority of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, be presenting the entire criminal case that we have in this matter. Never-before-seen evidence and information will be presented to these in attendance. We will be asking these attendees to support our efforts to move this entire matter forward to a full congressional investigation.”

IRS And MSNBC Team Up To Crush Conservatives As Preacher Is Caught In The Crosshairs

The IRS’s scandalous snooping into the inner workings of Tea Party groups has exposed an erie alliance between the government and big-media groups such as MSNBC.

As the American public reels from Congressional hearings about a KGB-style IRS that asks even what conservatives are praying about, the specter of a similar assault by the mainstream media is beginning to emerge. Case in point: MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow has accused one-time presidential candidate Michele Bachmann as well as preacher Bradlee Dean of calling for the “execution” of homosexuals. Neither has said this.

“I said no such thing, and now my life has been threatened,” says Dean, who has spoken to more than 300 schools on such subjects as drugs, the Constitution, America’s Biblical foundation, and the immorality of homosexuality. Maddow made the claim in a May 2011 broadcast; but on Dean’s Sons of Liberty radio show, he explained clearly that it is the Muslims who are calling for the execution of homosexuals in America. “I say this to my gay friends out there, the ones that continuously nitpick everything I say in their defense and for their eternal destination, Hollywood is promoting immorality and God of the Heavens in Jesus’ name is warning you to flee from the wrath to come, yet you have Muslims calling for your execution,“ Dean said on the show, discussed in his ministry’s article, “Explaining the Maddow Case.”

Bomb and Death Threats

After Maddow’s broadcast, Dean, his family, and his ministry began to receive death threats via emails and phone calls, threatening to bomb his headquarters. Other leftist blog and news sites posted Dean’s home address online while repeating Maddow’s false reporting.

“I took it on the chin at first,” said Dean. “But when I got death threats against my family, I knew I had to take action.” (Rachel Maddow gets served)

Dean is now having to take on a biased judge, Judge Joan Zeldon, along with Maddow, since his defamation lawsuit against Maddow and MSNBC is on appeal right now, based in part on Judge Zeldon’s prejudice in the matter, as seen in her glowing description of MSNBC attorneys as being “distinguished.”

Media watchers well know that every liberal journalist has his ear to the ground waiting to see which way this judgment will go. Loss is not an option!  Defeat will smell like blood, and every conservative’s neck will be on the chopping block.

Join the Fight, and recieve a special gift from Bradlee Dean!

Defending American Honor

Dean says that his lawsuit is not about just defending his work as a preacher, musician, and speaker to youth assemblies, but says, “I’m defending every conservative leader in America who boldly stands up for God’s country and the Constitution — everyone who publicly stands for our Constitution, which our Founding Fathers and brave soldiers have fought, bled and died for.”

Dean says, “Do you think it’s right that conservative leaders preach the truth about America and get death threats? I’m sure you don’t. This lawsuit will defend our American honor as a Christian nation.  It must go forward. ”

He adds, “I must continue to reach the next generation to counter the crazy leftist garbage that’s coming out of our TV stations and leftist newsrooms.”

Like contestants on “Survivor” gathered around the campfire, Obama’s leftist government has winked and nudged its big-media friends in an alliance designed to attack conservative leaders in America.

Obama’s SEAL Team 6 Coverup

May 30, 2013 by Kris Zane 17 Comments

inShare9

On August 6, 2011, a military helicopter— Extortion 17— carrying thirty-eight men (including twenty-five of the elite SEAL Team 6, five National Guard and Army Reserve, and eight Afghan commandos) was shot down over Taliban-controlled territory in eastern Afghanistan. They had been on a top secret mission to take out a high-value target.

It was the worst loss of life in a single day since the war in Afghanistan began. Per a 1250-page military report, it was simply the result of a “lucky shot” by Taliban soldiers perched on top of a building. Per families of those killed and military experts at a press conference held on May 9, 2013, this is a lie among a host of other lies.

After the families attended a several hour military briefing about this “lucky shot,” describing what happened and why their sons died, they smelled a rat and started digging around.

Billy and Karen Vaughn, parents of Navy SEAL Aaron C. Vaughn, started poking around at the “official” story and found not a rat, but a stinking swamp, a coverup that went all the way to the top.

When the Vaughns began trying to drain the swamp, they received what the Obama administration is famous for: the shakedown. None other than one of the highest ranking officers in the nation—Admiral William McRaven, commander at U.S. Special Operations Command—paid the Vaughns a little visit, in essence telling them to keep their mouths shut.

What exactly happened on August 6, 2011? What went wrong—or in this case went right that has the Obama administration dispatching high-ranking officers as thugs?

There are two possibilities, according to information revealed at the press conference:

1. The Obama administration sent American soldiers on a suicide mission, or

2. Someone set up our American heroes—that is, had them murdered—that may include the Afghan government—or shockingly may include Barack Hussein Obama himself.

We learned seven major facts at the press conference:

1.  Thirty SEAL Team 6, National Guard, and Army Reserve were packed into a decrepit 1960s era CH-47 helicopter (something, according to military experts, that was unheard of.) Per military experts, special operations were always conducted with the state-of-the-art MH-47 helicopter—the helicopter SEAL Team 6 exclusively trained in. Further, never—ever—were that many special operations personnel packed into a single helicopter. They were always split up into small groups with multiple MH-47s. 

2. Although the military could have easily taken out the Taliban positions with a drone strike prior to the operation, as the families were later told, this was not done because there were possible “friendlies” among the Taliban; the United States wanted to “win the minds and hearts of the enemy.”

Billy Vaughn, father of Navy SEAL Aaron Vaughn, speaking at the press conference with rage in his voice, blasted this ludicrousness:

Aaron did not become a Navy SEAL Team 6 Gold Squad to win the hearts and minds of the Islamic jihadists. He became a Navy SEAL to fight for this republic and defeat the enemy!

3. Although the military had intel that the Taliban were planning on firing on a helicopter, although an intense battle had been raging for several hours, and although normal protocol mandated that the CH-47 required at least one gunship escort, all normal rules of war were suspended.

But now for the real coverup by the Obama administration:

4. There were eight nameless Afghan commandos onboard the CH-47. Eight Afghan commandos were loaded onto the CH-47 along with their American counterparts; but at the last minute, they were replaced without changing the manifest. It was as if someone knew they were going on a suicide mission and pulled them out. The official in charge of the investigation (General Jeffrey Colt), in his 1250-page report, did not address this fact and did not even mention it. In fact, it is likely these original Afghan commandos contacted the Taliban, telling them the CH-47 was on its way. It appears the Taliban knew the exact time and route the CH-47 would be using; that the only way the “lucky shot” would have been possible with the helicopter thousands of feet in the air in cover of darkness would have been if the Taliban had been tipped off.

5. Everyone on Extortion 17 was immediately cremated without permission from the families, supposedly because the bodies were so badly burned in the crash. According to Charles Strange, father of Navy SEAL Michael Strange, this need to immediately cremate everyone aboard is a complete lie. Taliban on the ground in fact found the bodies of the crew. The Obama administration cremated everyone in order to cover up something.

6. The CH-47 black box was “lost” according to the military investigation—“washed away by an Afghan flood.” As most know, aircraft black boxes don’t get “lost”; they are virtually indestructible and carry a tracking device that makes them easy to locate. It was “lost” in order to cover up something the Obama administration wants to keep hidden.

7. Probably one of the most shocking revelations in the SEAL Team 6 coverup, something that was first brought out during the press conference that shows Obama is no Christian but is in fact a closet Muslim, is that Barack Hussein Obama disallowed the name of Jesus to be spoken during the initial military memorial service in Kabul and permitted a radical Islamic iman to curse our dead heroes.

Let every American demand that whatever Barack Obama is hiding, whatever the military brass is hiding, that it be revealed. America must demand that a Congressional investigation drain the swamp of the Obama administration in order to reveal exactly what sickening secret Barack Hussein Obama is covering up. Not next month. Not next week. Not tomorrow. But today.

Demand an investigation, America.

Hope & Stolen Elections: 20% of Ohio Voters Were Bogus.

By Clash Daily / 30 May 2013 /

Barack Obama defeated* Mitt Romney by 166,214 votes in Ohio in 2012. That’s out of 5,489,028 votes cast. So Obama’s victory margin was just 3 percent, 50 to 47 over Romney.

But 20% of Ohio’s voters should not be on the rolls at all, according to a story in the Columbus Dispatch.

More than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.

In two counties, the number of registered voters actually exceeds the voting-age population: Northwestern Ohio’s Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per 100 eligible.

Another 31 counties show registrations at more than 90 percent of those eligible, a rate regarded as unrealistic by most voting experts. The national average is a little more than 70 percent.

Ohio’s elections chief, Secretary of State Jon Husted, sought help from Attorney General Eric Holder to clean up the state’s roles. You may have guessed how that went, as Husted is a Republican. Read more: http://clashdaily.com/2013/05/hope-stolen-elections-20-of-ohio-voters-were-bogus/#ixzz2Uo5qbdkh
Get more Clash on ClashDaily.com, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.

State Dept: We May Not Comply With Congress’ Benghazi Subpoena Michael Miller On May 30, 2013 http://mikesright.wordpress.com/

Is the battle between the State Department and Congress over Benghazi about to escalate? It appears so, after a spokesperson for State suggested the Department may not comply with the Congressional subpoena.

As reported by Breitbart.com, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) sent a five-page letter to Sate Tuesday explaining why he as chair of the Oversight Committee issued the subpoena and what documents he expects to be delivered by June 7th.

Asked about the State Department’s response to the letter, Spokesperson Jen Psaki praised the “unprecedented degree of cooperation with Congress” on the issue of Benghazi. Psaki added that the Department is “taking stock” and “determining the next appropriate steps.”

“You haven’t yet decided whether or not the State Department will be providing the documents that are in the subpoena?” a reporter asked Psaki. “That’s correct,” she responded.

Partial transcript:

QUESTION: Yesterday, Chairman Issa sent a letter to Secretary Kerry and issued a subpoena for documents relating to the development of the talking points used by Susan Rice and communications between 10 current and former State officials. … Does the Department intend on complying with the … June 7th deadline for supplying these documents?

PSAKI: Well, let me just remind everyone … that we have demonstrated … an unprecedented degree of cooperation with Congress on the issue of Benghazi, engaging now in nearly 40 hearings, briefing members of staff and sharing over 25,000 pages of documents.

But of course, we remain committed, as we have consistently been, to working with Congress, and we are taking stock of this recent subpoena and determining the next appropriate steps.

QUESTION: Has the Secretary responded?

PSAKI: No. I just said we’re determining the next appropriate steps.

QUESTION: So just a quick follow-up to that just for clarity. So when you say you’re determining the next appropriate steps, you haven’t yet decided whether or not the State Department will be providing the documents that are in the subpoena?

MS. PSAKI: That’s correct. But we have provided, just as a reminder, of course, a hundred pages of documents on the talking points that this is regarding.

So, it looks like it could be game on! The State Department can hardly be blamed for its “monkey see, monkey do” mentality, can it? Isn’t it merely aping the antics of Barack Obama? If he sees a law he doesn’t like, he ignores it. (See: Defense of Marriage Act, federal immigration laws.) If he submits a bill to Congress and it doesn’t pass, he implements it anyway. (See: Dream Act.) And if Congress gets in his way on anything? He circumvents it via royal edict executive order.

Yes, it appears that the State Department is simply following the example set by the President of the United States. Go figure.

IRS Corruption: ‘How high up did it go?’

By Associated Press May 30, 2013 6:50 am

CINCINNATI – A Republican senator and a congressman from Ohio said Wednesday night that the key question about the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status is who in the Obama administration was involved.

Sen. Rob Portman and Rep. Steve Chabot spoke to a hundreds-strong gathering of tea party activists in near Cincinnati, which has been a focus, or “ground zero,” as one tea party leader called it, of the IRS probe following disclosures that agency employees there subjected conservative groups for additional, often burdensome scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status.

“The question is, `How high up did it go?'” Chabot said, adding: “And what’s going to be done about it?”

The Obama administration has said no senior officials were involved in targeting.

Chabot said investigations are still unfolding, and it’s important to follow the facts and not to overreach in drawing conclusions. Portman linked the IRS scandal to the Benghazi attack investigation, and both he and Chabot said the Obama administration must be more forthcoming.

Portman said he finds it hard to believe that a couple of “rogue agents” in Cincinnati were responsible for the conservative targeting and that it was done as an efficiency measure to handle a large number of applications, as was initially suggested. IRS employees in Cincinnati have declined requests for comment, but some former workers in the office have said it was nonpolitical and that they doubt there were any partisan motivations.

Portman said he hoped whistle-blowers would come forward to let people know what happened.

He reiterated that a special prosecutor could be needed to investigate the IRS case, although he’s not calling for it yet. He said the possibility of a criminal investigation should at least be used as leverage to push for answers from the Obama administration.

Otherwise, Portman said, “We’re going to have to go up to the next level.”

GOP U.S. Rep. Brad Wenstrup, a doctor, said the IRS targeting raises troubling questions about how the Obama health care law changes will be carried out, saying people’s access might be affected by their political or religious beliefs.

Tea party speakers recounted their experiences with the IRS in a meeting carried live on a website. Cincinnati leader George Brunemann said he and his wife were audited after she became a tea party group treasurer.

Former Ohio Liberty Coalition leader Tom Zawistowski of Kent said the IRS should be abolished, and he urged activists to tell their friends and neighbors that the IRS probe is important to all of them.

“We’re all tea partiers now, aren’t we?” Zawistowski said.

Russell Hudson, 69, a retired steelworker who came to the meeting from Trenton, about an hour’s drive away, said he was concerned about the IRS’ conduct.

“It’s crazy. It defies imagination,” he said.

Biden: Illegals get no ‘respect’ in U.S.

VP says ‘immigrants’ forced to ‘constantly live in fear’

(Washington ton Times) – Vice President Joseph R. Biden suggested to a crowd in Trinidad on Tuesday that it’s a shame the United States doesn’t give proper respect to nations of the world by allowing immigrants unfettered access to American citizenship.

“I believe in international relations, as in any relationship, it comes down to respect. Do we respect one another? And do we show respect? For my country, that means reforming our immigration system so the 11 million — 11 million — undocumented men, women and many children, who came through no choice of their own, can come out of the shadows and be full participants in American life because they are already in many cases participating and contributing to the growth and prosperity of my country, but required to constantly live in fear and live in the shadows,” he said, as posted on the White House Office of the Vice President’s website.

FAX BLAST SPECIAL: NO AMNESTY for Illegals!

Mr. Biden was at the diplomatic center in the Port of Spain, the capital of Trinidad and Tobago, to sign a trade agreement with Caribbean countries.

He also said: “It’s about time, and the president and I have been calling for this for a long time, even back in the days when he was a senator and I was in the Senate. It’s about time they’re afforded the dignity they deserve.”

Mr. Biden reiterated: “It’s about time — it’s abo

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/29/joe-biden-tells-trinidad-crowd-us-pushes-illegal-i/#ixzz2UinyLMw0

Obama to Pick James B. Comey, Former Bush Official, to Lead F.B.I.

President Obama plans to nominate James B. Comey, a hedge fund executive and a former senior Justice Department official under President George W. Bush, to replace Robert S. Mueller III as the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, according to a person with knowledge of the selection.

Mr. Comey, 52, was chosen for the position over the other finalist for the job, Lisa O. Monaco, who has served as the White House’s top counterterrorism adviser since January. By choosing Mr. Comey, a Republican, Mr. Obama made a strong statement about bipartisanship at a time when he faces renewed criticism from Republicans in Congress and has had difficulty confirming some important nominees.

As deputy attorney general in the Bush administration, Mr. Comey was a critical player in 2004 in the dramatic hospital room episode in which the White House counsel, Alberto Gonzales, and Mr. Bush’s chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., tried to persuade Attorney General John Ashcroft — who was ill and disoriented — to reauthorize a warrantless eavesdropping program.

“En mi opinion” Creo que el tipo es rosadito.. no nos sirve a nosotros sino a “o” LRGM.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/30/us/politics/obama-to-pick-james-b-comey-to-lead-fbi.html?emc=na

Obama Approval Drops; 76% Want Special Prosecutor for IRS Scandal


by John Nolte 30 May 2013, 5:50 AM PDT post a comment

While President Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, faces a possible perjury charge and increased calls for his resignation over the Justice Department’s outrageous spying on the media — elsewhere, another scandal is taking another kind of toll. A new Quinnpiac poll shows that the public is far from satisfied that the IRS matter is settled. A full 76% want a special prosecutor named; that includes 63% of Democrats.

Well, Obama did promise to bring us together. Let’s just hope he was wrong about the oceans rising.

Quinnipiac also shows that the confluence of three scandals (the two listed above and Benghazi) are starting to collectively erode the President’s approval rating. At the beginning of May, Obama enjoyed a 48% approval rating with 45% disapproving. A month later he is upside down at 45% – 49%.

The Real Clear Politics poll of polls shows almost no slide for Obama. May 1, Obama sat at 48% – 47%.  Today, Obama sits at 48% – 48%. Gallup has Obama at a relatively healthy 50% – 43%. Rasmussen is 49% – 51%. As of now, Quinnipiac is something of an outlier poll, but it is also the most recent. 

This erosion in the President’s approval rating might be coming from how the American people perceive Obama on the issue of trustworthiness. The last time Quinnipiac surveyed on this issue (September of 2011), 58% saw Obama as honest and trustworthy, with only 37% disagreeing. Today that number sits at 49% – 47%.  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/30/Obama-Approval-Drops-76-Want-IRS-Special-Prosecutor

Didn’t Obama pledge to help illegals???

Deportations of illegal immigrants in 2012 reach new US record

The Obama administration deported at least 400,000 illegal immigrants in fiscal year 2012, a new record. It emphasizes deporting ‘criminal aliens’ to protect public safety, but the high figure serves to remind Latinos of the president’s unfilled pledge to reform immigration policy.

A marker in the road at the San Ysidro border crossing shows the line between the US and Mexico. Deportations have been up in 2012, with more than 400,000 people removed from the United States.

The United States deported more than 400,000 illegal immigrants in 2012, the most of any year in the nation’s history, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reports.

The record number, released Friday, is also important for another reason: It is a stinging reminder to Latinos that President Obama failed during his first term to pursue the comprehensive immigration reform that they seek.

The Obama administration framed its 2012 work in immigration enforcement as focused mainly on criminals – 55 percent of deportations came from convicted criminals, a record high – rather than on indiscriminately rounding up illegal immigrants and sending them home. ICE on Friday also issued new detention guidelines intended to emphasize legal action against those who have committed crimes above and beyond immigration violations.

“While the [fiscal year] 2012 removals indicate that we continue to make progress in focusing resources on criminal and priority aliens, we are constantly looking for ways to ensure that we are doing everything we can to utilize our resources in a way that maximizes public safety,” ICE Director John Morton said in a statement.

In four years, the Obama administration has deported three-quarters of the number of people that President George W. Bush’s administration did in eight. And unlike Mr. Bush, Mr. Obama made no concerted effort to reform the US immigration system – a history that’s not lost on the president’s Latino supporters.

“This is nothing to be proud of,” said Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D) of Illinois, a leading lawmaker on immigration reform for a decade, in a statement on the deportation statistics.

While Representative Gutierrez lauded the crackdown on criminals as necessary, he said some 90,000 undocumented parents of American-born children continue to be deported each year.

“We must also realize that among these hundreds of thousands of deportations are parents and breadwinners and heads of American families that are assets to American communities and have committed no crimes,” the Gutierrez statement said. “Solving this problem in a humane and sensible way requires Congress to act on immigration reform and do what we have been unable to do for 25 or 30 years.”

The closest the Obama administration came to reshaping immigration policy was the summer 2012 implementation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, whereby some young unauthorized immigrants could gain a two-year deferral of deportation and access to work permits and driver’s licenses.

Some 355,000 people have applied under the program, and just over 100,000 have been approved through mid-December, according to the latest data from US Citizenship and Immigration Services. As many as 1.7 million undocumented immigrants could be eligible for the program over time, experts say.

 
 

While immigration advocates cheered the president’s DACA order, they also remember his unfulfilled promise at the start of his term in 2009 to take on immigration reform, as well as the record number of deportations under his watch.

“The credibility of the president is on the line,” says Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum. “The president has to lead. The president has to show Republicans and Democrats that he’s serious about this and that he’s not just going to use it as a political lightning rod.”

Obama has promised to tackle immigration reform early in 2013, and congressional discussions about potential legislation are under way between lawmakers from both parties in the House and Senate.

If Obama doesn’t, Republicans will be eager to point out that Democrats once again broke their promises to some of the left’s key voting blocs.

“I just want to remind all of you, though, that the Democrats had two years to do something about immigration reform,” said Rep. Raúl Labrador (R) of Idaho after a vote on a GOP-led bill that would kill the diversity visa lottery in favor of more visas for highly educated immigrants in the STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) fields.

“They had a White House. They had the House. They had the Senate. And they did nothing about immigration reform,” he said.

And that could make Latino and Asian voters, who sided overwhelmingly with Democrats in the 2012 election, susceptible to Republican overtures in the future.

“Everybody talks about the incredible turnout of the new American vote in 2012, but Latinos, Asians, and other voters are not die-hard Democrats,” Mr. Noorani says. “There’s a lot of space there for Republicans to step into.”

Until Obama and reform-minded members of Congress make good on their vows that 2013 will yield a comprehensive fix to America’s immigration system, however, Latino, Asian, and other pro-immigration forces will continue to feel uneasy about the high level of deportations under a Democratic president.

“We are the one country,” Gutierrez told the Monitor in a prior interview, “that orphans children who have parents.” http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/1224/Deportations-of-illegal-immigrants-in-2012-reach-new-US-record

Una Vez Mas MIENTE EL FBIRicardo Samitier.

No Estaba Armado De Un Cuchillo El Amigo  De Los Terroristas De Boston Que Mataron  En Orlando Mientras Era Interrogado…

 

Ahora Resulta Que Estaba DESARMADO… El Caso De Boston… cada vez Se Complica Un Poco Mas… y Demuestra Que Hay  Alguien Muy Importante Tapando La  Investigación…

Para los que no tienen tiempo… les voy a PONER LA MAYOR  CONTRADICCIÓN DE LA CAPTURA del terrorista de BOSTON… que la prensa APENAS HA SEÑALADO:

Primero: La Policía, Home Security y el FBI Fracasaron…

Pues después de tener 2 DÍAS a los ciudadanos bajo “LEY MARCIAL” SIN SALIR DE SUS CASAS… cuando la Policía se RETIRABA FRACASADA… y AUTORIZARON que los ciudadanos salieran de sus casa… un vecino vio rastros de sangre en su patio que conducían a su bote estacionando en su patio… y llamó a la policía…

La policía… con todos los equipos modernos pudieron observar que efectivamente había un hombre INMÓVIL ACOSTADO EN EL BARCO… El equipo de asalto de la Policía sin ninguna RESISTENCIA acribilló el barco con más de un centenar de balas, para detener al SUJETO, quien fue encontrado sin armas, con múltiples lesiones.

1.       Se nos dijo que estaba HERIDO… Nada se nos comunicó de que tenía una HERIDA EN LA GARGANTA DE CUCHILLO…

2.       Dicha herida NO SE LA PUDO HACER EL MISMO… pues estaba DESARMADO CUANDO FUE CAPTURADO…

3.       Hay que pensar que ALGUIEN después de capturado trato de cortarle la garganta lo cual el FBI NO EXPLICA…

Este Caso Se Complica Mas Todos Los Días!  ANALICEMOS FRÍAMENTE LOS HECHOS:

Supuestamente, tenemos 2 hermanos musulmanes inmigrantes. Uno de los cuales fue identificado por los rusos al FBI como un POI (Persona de Interés) en terrorismo.

Se supone que debemos estar en guerra con el Terror!

¿Eso lo sabemos todos… Verdad? Bueno, el chico fue entrevistado por el FBI, quien decidió que había poco riesgo.

Lo siguiente que sabemos, ya fue TARDE… los 2 hermanos son grabadas en video, de UNA TIENDA PRIVADA… llevaban mochilas en el maratón de Boston y COMIENZA La BÚSQUEDA.

Dentro de esas mochilas, supuestamente estaban las bombas ollas de presión. Estas bombas pesan alrededor de 30 libras cada uno cargadas con pólvora, clavos y balines.

Sin embargo, las mochilas en el video, parecen no pesar mucho… Un hermano (el que sobrevivió) cargaba la mochila sobre un solo hombro con facilidad, sin que se le arrugara el abrigo por el peso.

Luego, supuestamente detonaron las bombas y EN VEZ DE HUIR DEL PAÍS o ESCONDERSE, se ponen a caminar y conducen su carro alrededor de su vecindario. Lo cual NO TIENE SENTIDO…

Todo el que planea un atentado, también planea un escape… Entonces, roban un auto, dejan al conductor del coche con vida…quien informa a la policía, la que encontró el auto e iniciar una sesión de búsqueda, que termina en la muerte del hermano mayor y se les escapa el hermano menor.

Comienza los interrogatorios sin leerle los “DERECHO  MIRANDA…”

Entonces nos cuentan que un juez se da cuenta que se está cometiendo una IRREGULARIDAD y sin haber recibido instrucciones de nadie… se llega al hospital y DETIENE LOS INTERROGATORIOS… porque no se le han leído los “Derechos Miranda”…

Es sabido que en el caso de la BOMBA en el Zapato fue la Casa Blanca  y el ministro de Justicia Eric Holder los que impidieron el interrogatorio del terrorista… exigiendo que tenía el derecho a mantener silencio…

2 días después… las autoridades tienen que reconocer… por los rumores que han salido del hospital… y entonces la prensa lo publica… que la herida en la garganta, (que es la que imposibilita al detenido a hablar) y que a SIMPLE VISTA se puede DETERMINAR es una herida de cuchillo… NO por arma de fuego,

Entonces en plena calma… el FBI en Orlando, ha localizado a un “amigo” de los hermanos musulmanes. Se nos dice, que este hombre fue visitado por DOS AGENTES DEL FBI… les abrió la puerta y VOLUNTARIAMENTE  sostuvo una “CONVERSACIÓN” (oficialmente no fue un interrogatorio) que duro 3 horas… al final de las cuales DECIDE ATACAR al agente del FBI con un cuchillo y tuvo que ser matado.

Homicidio Justificado, De Acuerdo A La Ley De La Florida… (La misma que le niegan a Zimmerman)

Ahora 4 Días Después… el caso se parece mucho más al de Zimmerman… Ahora, se nos dice, NO TENÍA NINGÚN CUCHILLO.

Que el interrogatorio de 3 horas, terminó cuando el SUJETO SOLITARIO, decidió atacar a los 2 AGENTES ARMADOS DEL FBI y según ellos, estaba a punto de confesar???

Ahora, Este Cuento Es Mucho Mas Difícil De Creer!

Si los agentes creen que el sujeto iba a confesar, entonces deberían haberle dado SUS DERECHOS MIRANDA y llevarlo a la oficina, donde se puede grabar vídeo de toda la confesión.

Pero esos DOS AGENTES que iban a “Conversar” con una “Persona de Interés” en el caso de la Bomba de Boston… No llevaron una grabadora con ellos?

Durante años se nos ha LAVADO EL CEREBRO diciéndonos que los interrogatorios se llevan a cabo después de leerle los derechos Miranda… etc. Ahora EL GOBIERNO NOS DICE que debemos creer que estos 2 agentes, nunca han visto un espectáculo Policía en la  TV, que durante los últimos 40 años, le da a cada persona acusado de un delito, los derechos Miranda.

Cada niño de escuela sabe y ha aprendido de memoria. Usted tiene el derecho a permanecer en silencio…..

Todos lo hemos oído un millón de veces, pero NO esos DOS agentes DEL FBI???

Supuestamente, los agentes del FBI son los más altamente capacitados en el mundo! Si un interrogatorio, toma 3 horas, debe ser serio!  Al menos; lo suficientemente grave, para llevarla a cabo bajo supervisión y en un entorno controlado, donde el sospechoso, no tiene acceso a armas de fuego o cuchillos.

Especialmente, cuando estos agentes están llevando a cabo una investigación sobre el bomba de Boston!

El ataque más letal en Estados Unidos, desde el 911.

Entonces, el FBI OFICIALMENTE  ofrece la PRIMERA VERSIÓN de que lo tuvieron que matar porque el sospechoso, los atacó con un cuchillo.

Ahora, Se Nos Dice, No Había Ningún Cuchillo.

¿Qué era? Que dos agentes… contra uno… no pudieron dominar…

¿Cual Es La Verdad??

Nada, en este caso tiene sentido! Por lo tanto, vamos a revisar los errores que tiene toda esta investigación…

4.       El FBI fue notificado, antes por los rusos de que se pusieran las bombas, pero no hizo nada.

5.       El FBI interrogó al hermano sobreviviente, sin darle los Derechos Miranda.

6.       Se nos dijo que estaba HERIDO… Nada se nos comunicó de que tenía una HERIDA EN LA GARGANTA DE CUCHILLO…

7.       Dicha herida NO SE LA PUDO HACER EL MISMO… pues estaba DESARMADO CUANDO FUE CAPTURADO…

8.       Hay que pensar que ALGUIEN después de capturado trato de cortarle la garganta lo cual el FBI NO EXPLICA…

Semanas DESPUÉS… En Orlando…  

  • FBI interroga a un sospechoso en Orlando el cual VOLUNTARIAMENTE ESTA COOPERANDO… en este caso, durante 3 horas, sin darle los derechos Miranda.
  • Al final de las 3 horas… el individuo se violenta y ataca a dos FBI armado el cual mata al DESARMADO COOPERANTE  amigo del terrorista… que según el FBI no tenia conexión con el atentado terrorista… sino con otro asesinato cometido meses antes… aparentemente por droga…

4 Días Después… NO SABEMOS PORQUE RAZÓN…

  • El FBI corrige la declaración anterior. “EL Cooperante amigo del terrorista de Boston NO ESTABA ARMADO, pero sigue muerto y NO PUEDE HABLAR…
  • Si el COOPERANTE sospechoso no estaba armado, ES ESTE HOMICIDIO JUSTIFICABLE bajo la ley de la Florida… (Este caso es MUCHO PEOR QUE EL DE ZIMMERMAN)
  • Puede acaso TRATARSE DE UNA EJECUCIÓN EXTRA-JUDICIAL? No lo sé, pero algo no está bien! ALGO HUELE A PODRIDO!

Para los procedimientos más simples, como darle a sospechosos derechos Miranda, no se está haciendo, y otra vez, en el mismo caso.

¿El FBI, incapaz o no puede darnos la verdad? ¿Por qué el FBI miente repetidamente? ¿Qué está mal con el FBI?

¿O se supone que debemos creer que son incompetentes???

¿Dónde Está La Prensa???

Ningún Periodista Desea Ganarse Un Premio Pulitzer

 “Creo que trabaje en El INFIERNO CLINTON” 
Me alegro de que no son mis amigos, creo que tienen un pequeño cementerio para enterrar sus muertos…
Jue, 23 de mayo 2013 12:15:50 PM
 
Esto es sólo un rápido repaso “para que no olvidemos” lo que ha sucedido a muchos “amigos” de los Clinton.

Esta es la lista de las personas que murieron en circunstancias “extrañas” cuando trabajaban para Los Clinton, cuando estaban en la presidencia; espero que no se me olvide ninguno.

¿Casualidad o Causalidad?
1 – James McDougal – Clinton socio Whitewater condenado murió de un aparente ataque al corazón, mientras que en régimen de aislamiento. Él era un testigo clave en la investigación de Ken Starr.
2 – Mary Mahoney – Un ex becaria de la Casa Blanca fue asesinado de julio de 1997 de una cafetería Starbucks en Georgetown .. El asesinato ocurrió justo después de que ella iba a hacer pública su historia de acoso sexual en la Casa Blanca.
3 – Vince Foster – El ex consejero de la Casa Blanca, y su colega de Hillary Clinton en el Rose firma de la ley de Little Rock. Murió de un disparo en la cabeza, gobernó un suicidio.
4 – Ron Brown – El secretario de Comercio y ex Presidente del DNC. Informes, han muerto por el impacto en un accidente aéreo. Un patólogo cercana a la investigación informó de que había un agujero en la parte superior del cráneo de Brown se asemeja a una herida de bala. En el momento de su muerte, Brown estaba siendo investigado, y habló públicamente de su voluntad de llegar a un acuerdo con los fiscales. El resto de las personas en el avión también murió. Pocos días después, el controlador de tránsito aéreo se suicidó.
5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, un jugador importante en el fondo de la organización aumentando Clinton murió en un accidente de avión privado en julio de 1992.
6 – Paul tulley – Director del Comité Político Nacional del Partido Demócrata encontrado muerto en una habitación de hotel en Little Rock, septiembre de 1992. Descrito por Clinton como un “querido amigo y asesor de confianza”.
7 – Ed Willey – Clinton para recaudar fondos, encontrado muerto 11 1993 en el bosque de VA de una herida de bala en la cabeza. Gobernado un suicidio. Ed Willey murió el mismo día que su esposa Kathleen Willey afirma Bill Clinton le buscó en el despacho oval en la Casa Blanca. Ed Willey ha participado en varios eventos de recaudación de fondos de Clinton.
8 – Jerry Parks – Jefe de equipo de seguridad de la gobernación de Clinton en Little Rock .. Abatido a tiros en su automóvil en una intersección desierta fuera hijo de Little Rock Park dijo que su padre estaba construyendo un dossier sobre Clinton Al parecer amenazó con revelar esta información. Después de su muerte los archivos fueron retirados misteriosamente de su casa.
9 – James Bunch – muerto de un suicidio por arma de fuego. Se informó de que había un “Libro Negro” de las personas que contenían nombres de personas influyentes que visitaban prostitutas en Texas y Arkansas
10 – James Wilson – fue hallado muerto en mayo de 1993 un suicidio colgando aparente. Fue reportado que tienen vínculos con Whitewater ..
11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-esposa de Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, fue hallado muerto en mayo de 1994, en el salón de su casa con un disparo en la cabeza. Fue gobernada un suicidio, aunque había varias maletas preparadas, como si fuera a alguna parte. Danny Ferguson fue uno de los acusados, junto con Bill Clinton en el Paula Jones demanda Kathy Ferguson era un posible testigo que corrobora Paula Jones.
12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper y novio de Kathy Ferguson. Crítica de la sentencia suicidio de su novia, fue encontrado muerto en junio de 1994, de una herida de bala también gobernó un suicidio junto a la tumba de su prometida.
13 – Gandy Baugh – El Procurador de Clinton amigo Dan Lassater, murió al saltar por una ventana de un edificio alto y enero de 1994. Su cliente era un distribuidor de drogas convicto.
14 – Florence Martin – Contador y sub-contratista de la CIA, estaba relacionado con el Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, caso de contrabando de drogas aeropuerto. Murió de tres heridas de bala.
15 – Suzanne Coleman – Al parecer tuvo un romance con Clinton cuando era Procurador General de Arkansas. Murió de un disparo en la parte posterior de la cabeza, gobernó un suicidio. En el momento de su muerte estaba embarazada.
16 – Paula Grober – Intérprete discurso de Clinton para sordos desde 1978 hasta su muerte, 09 de diciembre 1992. Ella murió en un accidente de coche una.
17 – Danny Casolaro – El periodista de investigación. Investigando Aeropuerto Mena y Autoridad Financiera ArkansasDevelopment. Se cortó las venas, al parecer, en medio de su investigación.
18 – Paul Wilcher – El Procurador investigar la corrupción en el aeropuerto de Mena con Casolaro y la “sorpresa de octubre” 1980 fue encontrado muerto en un inodoro 22 de junio 1993, en su apartamento de Washington DC. Había entregado un informe a Janet Reno 3 semanas antes de su muerte.
19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigador Resolution Trust Corp. saltó a su muerte desde su Arlington, Virginia apartamento balcón de 15 agosto de 1993. Estaba investigando el escándalo de Garantía Morgan.
20 – Barbara Wise – Departamento de Comercio miembro del personal. Trabajó estrechamente con Ron Brown y John Huang. Causa de fallecimiento desconocida. Fallecido el 29 de noviembre de 1996. Su magullado cuerpo desnudo se encontró encerrado en su oficina en el Departamento de Comercio.
21 – Charles Meissner – Subsecretario de Comercio que le dio permiso de seguridad especial John Huang, murió poco después en un accidente de avioneta.
22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Presidente de la Comisión Nacional Chiropractic Health Care Advisory murió con su abogado Steve Dickson en un accidente de avioneta. Dr. Heard, además de servir en el consejo asesor de Clinton ‘s tratado personalmente a la madre de Clinton, su padrastro y su hermano.
23 – Barry Seal – Drogas corriendo TWA piloto de Mena Arkansas, la muerte no fue un accidente.
24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mecánico, encontró un cheque a nombre de Bill Clinton en el maletero de un coche a la izquierda en su taller de reparación. Fue encontrado muerto después de que su coche se había golpeado un poste de electricidad.
25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigado Madison Garantía. Su muerte fue un supuesto suicidio y su informe nunca fue lanzado.
26 – Hershell Viernes – Abogado y Clinton para recaudar fondos fallecido el 1 de marzo de 1994, cuando su avión explotó.
27 – Kevin Ives y Don Henry – Conocido como “Los chicos de la pista” caso. Los informes dicen que los chicos pueden haber tropezado con el Arkansas operación de drogas aeropuerto de Mena. Un caso de controversia, el informe inicial de la muerte, dijo, debido al quedarse dormido en las vías del ferrocarril. Informes posteriores afirman los 2 chicos habían sido asesinados antes de ser colocado en las vías. Muchos de ellos vinculados al caso murieron antes que su testimonio podría venir ante un Gran Jurado.
Las siguientes personas TENÍAN INFORMACIÓN SOBRE EL CASO IVES / HENRY:
28 – Keith Coney – murió cuando su motocicleta chocó contra la parte trasera de un camión, 7/88.
29 – Keith McMaskle – Murió, apuñaló 113 veces, noviembre de 1988
30 – Gregory Collins – Murió de una herida de bala en enero de 1989.
31 – Jeff Rodas – Fue asesinado, mutilado y quemado encontrado en un vertedero de basura en abril de 1989.
32 – James Milan – Encontrado decapitado. Sin embargo, el médico forense dictaminó que su muerte fue por causas naturales “.
33 – Jordania Kettleson – fue encontrado muerto a tiros en el asiento delantero de su camioneta en junio de 1990.
34 – Richard Winters – Un sospechoso de los Ives / Henry muertes. Fue asesinado en un robo de configuración julio de 1989.
LOS SIGUIENTES SON ESCOLTAS CLINTON QUE HAN MUERTO.
35 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.
36 – El capitán Scott J. Reynolds
37 – Sargento. Brian Hanley
38 – Sargento. Tim Sabel
39 – Mayor General William Robertson
40 – Col. William Densberger
41 – Col. Robert Kelly
42 – Spec. Gary Rhodes
43 – Steve Willis
44 – Robert Williams
45 – Conway Lebleu
46 – Todd McKeehan
Es una lista impresionante verdad!

¿Sera una coincidencia o una casualidad?

Esto es por si está tentado de ser amigo o empleado de Los Clinton, tenga cuidado porque parece que en algún momento “Se les puede modificar la salud”

Por mi parte ni siquiera consideraría estar en su nómina, ni siquiera ser conocido de ellos. Cuando estas cosas ocurren en Cuba dicen que “Tiene Yetatura”

“Solavalla”

¡Pa’lla, pa’lla!

THE POWER TO DESTROY

IRS agents carrying shotguns not a big deal?

Critics were mocked as ‘right-wing fear-mongers’

Aaron Klein is WND’s senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.

The issue of Internal Revenue Service agents carrying weapons may warrant further scrutiny amid the nationwide distrust of the agency for targeting conservative organizations.

The IRS is also the chief enforcer of Obamacare requirements.

Ads by Google

In 2010, the Federal Business Opportunities website posted an IRS request for a quote on the price of shotguns for the agency’s Criminal Investigation Division.

The site sought a quote for 60 Remington Model 870 Police 12-gauge pump-action shotguns, the only weapons authorized for IRS duty.

The IRS Criminal Division includes roughly 2,700 special agents who are required to carry a firearm.

According to the basic qualifications for a position as an IRS special agent for the criminal division, “applicants must carry and use a firearm.”

In October 2012, J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, released a report charging IRS agents need more thorough firearms training and must better report accidental firings of their guns.

“Special agents not properly trained in the use of firearms could endanger the public, as well as their fellow special agents, and expose the IRS to potential litigation over injuries or damages,” George said at the time.

George said IRS agents accidentally fired their weapons 11 times during fiscal years 2009 through fiscal 2011.

‘Right wing’ fear mongering?

When the IRS publicly sought the 60 shotguns in 2010, the progressive activist group Media Matters for America attacked what it labeled the “right-wing blogosphere” for “baselessly fear monger[ing]” over the IRS weapons issue.

Media Matters blasted the popular Drudge Report for its Feb. 3, 2010, headline “The IRS is buying shotguns!”

American Thinker blogger Ralph Alter said of the IRS weapons request: “It looks like the IRS under the Obama administration is getting serious about improving its ability to collect taxes and enforce the tax codes.”

Radio host Tammy Bruce was also spotlighted by Media Matters after she posted on her blog the IRS request for a quote on weapons and commented: “Nothing warms me up in the morning like the idea that the IRS is preparing a swat team equipped with pump-action shotguns. I guess [Obama] thinks they’re gonna have to start shooting at us to squeeze what we have left out of us?” She concluded: “Give us your money or we’ll shoot!”

Mark Levin gets a visit

Earlier this month, national radio host Mark Levin revealed on his show that he received a visit from armed Treasury Department agents after penning a March 2012 letter complaining the IRS was targeting tea party organizations.

Levin noted the two Treasury officials who visited him were “armed” and carrying weapons by claiming “we’re law enforcement.”

Earlier this month, Josh Margolin of ABC News reported that journalists touring the IRS offices in Cincinnati were “escorted” by an armed federal officer.

“The fact is the trust in the IRS is gone,” Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga, said at a speech yesterday. “The American people have lost trust in this organization and rightfully so.”

With additional research by Joshua Klein.

Are you concerned about the increasing use of firearms by non-military government personnel?

  • No, only right-wingers and fringe conspiracy theorists worry about it
  • No, I trust the government to do what’s right and best
  • No, I feel more secure knowing Americans are protected
  • No, government has an obligation to keep order. Sometimes guns are needed
  • No, if they’re investigating money laundering, narcotics and terrorism with other federal agencies, they’re very necessary
  • No, they are sworn federal agents who put their lives on the line in the performance of their duties every day
  • I wouldn’t be as concerned if the government weren’t – at the very same time – trying to take away MY guns and ammunition
  • Yes, our president kills American citizens with drones, and he sets the tone for federal agencies
  • Yes, it doesn’t make sense. If government officials need protection, they should call law-enforcement authorities
  • Yes, it’s difficult to imagine a scenario that would require shotgun-wielding IRS, EPA and Department of Education personnel
  • Yes, given the behavior of the IRS and DOJ, there’s no telling what they’ll do next
  • Yes, why haven’t we broken out the torches and pitchforks yet?
  • Yes, the federal government is clearly attempting to monopolize armed force in America
  • Other

View Results

 

 

 “THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’ 

Obama- ¿Ineptitud o Desfachatez? No 399 5/30/13 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

mayo 30, 2013

No 399 5/30/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

Obama- ¿Ineptitud o Desfachatez? AmenperImage

Esta administración es la única que está escapando a su final con la declaración de inocencia por inepto.

David Axelrod, director de la campaña de Obama y su apologista, declaró ayer que en la presidencia “hay tanto por debajo de la posición que el presidente no puede conocerlo todo, porque el gobierno es muy vasto”, esto es una declaración de incompetencia, es como decir que el presidente no tiene la capacidad para las demandas del cargo.  Un presidente no lo puede hacer todo, tiene que delegar, pero no puede delegar la responsabilidad del gobierno. Ronald Reagan fue quizás fue el presidente que más delegó en subordinados, pero siempre supo supervisar el trabajo y siempre fue responsable de todos los aspectos de su administración.

Lois Lerner y Steven Miller los chivos expiatorios del IRS así como Holder, y el propio presidente declaran que se enteraron de los problemas por los periódicos, que ellos no sabían lo que estaba pasando.

Esto es típico de los gobiernos socialistas en formación. ¿Recuerdan cuando los simpatizantes del gobierno de Cuba en sus principios decían que Fidel no era comunista, que no sabía lo que los comunistas de su gobierno estaban haciendo?

Claro que todos sabemos que el problema de esta administración, como en el caso de Fidel Castro, no es su ineptitud sino su desfachatez, la manera como se está burlando de la ciudadanía, incluyendo a sus seguidores.

Pero si aceptamos las excusas de ineptitud, entonces el Presidente Obama debiera seguir el ejemplo del Papa Emeritus Benedicto XVI que cuando consideró que su capacidad física y mental no le permitía cumplir sus funciones como cabeza de su organización, decidió abandonar el cargo.

Nota: “EN MI OPINION” El artículo de Alberto Pérez [amenper} es muy bueno como siempre, pero yo creo que no es un asunto de incompetencia, es un asunto de “hacer todo lo posible para que el gobierno fracase totalmente y el país se hunda, es el deseo de destruir toda la historia de éxitos del país y cambiarla por un presente de mariconeria, lesbianismo, incompetencia, complicidad, confusión, aplastamiento de las raíces patrióticas de los americanos, desfachatez e infiltración de los musulmanes en el gobierno y los puntos clave del país. Es increíble que todo esto esté ocurriendo delante de la cara de los cerebros más prominentes del mundo y la prensa que observan la destrucción de la nación americana, sin hacer nada, babeándose como comemierdas. Lázaro R González Miño.

Working for the Clintons HELL I FORGOT ALL THIS STUFF-IF TRUE‏ Irmende MENDEZ

Hell I’m glad they are not my friends, they have a small cemetery all of their own.
Thu, May 23, 2013 12:15:50 PM
Subject: Fwd: Working for the Clintons HELL I FORGOT ALL THIS STUFF-IF TRUE

 

Working for the Clintons HELL I FORGOT ALL THIS STUFF-IF TRUE

 

The “stuff” is coming out of the woodwork now.  

Just a quick refresher course ‘lest we forget’ what has happened to many “friends” of the Clintons.

1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.

3 – Vince Foster – Former White House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.

4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash.  A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.  The rest of the people on the plane also died.  A few days later the air Traffic controller commited suicide.

5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock , September 1992.  Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor”.

7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head.  Ruled a suicide.  Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the WhiteHouse.  Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock   Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton  He allegedly threatened to reveal this information.  After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide.  It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas

10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater..

11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head.  It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere.  Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit  Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson.  Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.

13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994.  His client was a convicted drug distributor.

14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case.  He died of three gunshot wounds.

15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General.  Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide.  Was pregnant at the time of her death.

16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992.  She died in a one car accident.

17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter.  Investigating Mena Airport and ArkansasDevelopment Finance Authority.  He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.

18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment.  Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.

19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp.  Jumped to his death from his Arlington , Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993.  He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.

20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer.  Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang.  Cause of death unknown.  Died November 29, 1996.  Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash.  Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton ‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.

23 – Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.

24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop.  He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.

25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty.  His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.

26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when his plane exploded.

27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case.  Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation.  A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks.  Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:

28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.

29 – Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.

32 – James Milan – Found decapitated.  However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes”.

33 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths.  He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD

35 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.

36 – Captain Scott J . Reynolds

37 – Sgt. Brian Hanley

38 – Sgt. Tim Sabel

39 – Major General William Robertson

40 – Col. William Densberger

41 – Col. Robert Kelly

42 – Spec. Gary Rhodes

43 – Steve Willis

44 – Robert Williams

45 – Conway LeBleu

46 – Todd McKeehan

Quite an impressive list!

Pass this on & let the public become aware of what happens to friends of the Clintons!

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT?

…SURELY YOU JEST!!

Who had Ambassador Stevens Killed  and How the Petraeus Affair Factors In

There is the reason for an event and there is the real reason behind the event. Sixty percent of all married men cheat on their spouse. The more money they make and the more power a man possesses, the more opportunity for cheating.

I have swamp land for sale, in Florida, for anyone to purchase if they are naive enough to believe that David Petraeus, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), resigned solely based upon having an extramarital affair with the biographer-turned-mistress, Colonel Paula Broadwell. How did the affair compromise Petraeus’ position as CIA director? The FBI has concluded that it did not.

The media has suggested that the affair began in 2006. So, the ignorant American public is supposed to believe that David Patraeus was vetted by the FBI, the Secret Service and the rest of the Obama goon squad and they did not discover the affair until AFTER Ambassador’s Steven’s murder? How convenient is that? This doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in the CIA’s and the FBI’s vetting practices now does it?  Let me be clear again about this outrageous set of facts. The most powerful and presumably thorough intelligence agency was unable to detect Patraeus’ affair during the vetting process?  America, this is what you are being asked to believe!

It is abundantly clear that the extramarital affair excuse is just one more piece of excrement piled upon a growing mountain of Oba-manure perpetrated by this administration in order to cover up the fact that they had Chris Stevens murdered by the very terrorists that Stevens was running guns to on behalf of the CIA.

Does Adultery Get One Fired?

Let’s examine this event through the lens of common sense. Adultery is indeed a violation of the Military Code of Justice and senior command officers have indeed lost their careers over their sexual indiscretions. However, David Patraeus is no longer a command officer in the military and would not be subject to these prohibitions. And the adultery prohibition is rarely enforced, even in the military, and when it is, it is used as a matter of political expediency in order to get rid of an undesirable.

As for the political “I did not have sex with the woman, Monica Lewinski,” crowd, adultery is not a career killer. And for the head of a federal agency, or for a cabinet member, unless the affair can be shown to compromise national security, it does not end the careers of unholy partakers of the forbidden fruit while serving in high government office. Petraeus decided to quit, though he was breaking no laws by having an affair, officials said.

Janet and David A Tale of Two Tails

Rumors persist that the way to get promoted in the Department of Homeland Security is to “provide services” to one’s superiors, especially for Homeland Security Director, Janet Napolitano. So if it is permissible for Janet to be serviced in exchange for a promotion, then why should David be any different when it comes to giving an exclusive to your mistresses’ journalistic desire to become his biographer? Yet Janet is on the verge of being promoted to Attorney General, despite her indiscretions and resulting law suit. Conversely, Patraeus is out of a job. But wait, the believability of this cover story gets worse!

According to New York Times best-selling author, Aaron Klein, whom I have interviewed on my talk show, Hillary Clinton is a lesbian who surrounded herself with lesbian aides and staffers when she was the First Lady and she continues to do so as the Secretary of State. And as the Mail Online points out, why did it not seem to matter to Hillary that her husband chased anything that wore a skirt? It is because she is a serial lesbian who has had multiple affairs.

Take Attorney General, Eric Holder, his actions, related to the topic of sex, are the most reprehensible of them all. Brandon Darby, previously an FBI informant, is speaking out on the Department of Justice’s hesitancy to assist victims of human trafficking, in particular they are refusing to help children who have been victims of sex crimes. The obvious question is, who is Holder protecting? This inaction on the part of Eric Holder is far more reprehensible, and represents a greater violation of the public trust than do the actions of Hillary Clinton and Janet Napolitano.

When one considers the fast and furious sexual life-styles of the senior cabinet members of the Obama administration, it is impossible to swallow the fact that Patraeus was sacked because of an affair.

The Patraeus dismissal based upon an extramarital affair is a cover story, plain and simple.

The Rats are Jumping Off the Ship

I do not care what people do in their private lives behind closed doors. I do not care if Clinton and Napolitano are lesbians. My feelings hold true for the President, the Director of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State or the director of the CIA. However, when a fake cover story is concocted to cover up the murder of an ambassador, as it was with Chris Stevens, then it is everyone’s business.

Many of the rats of the Obama administration are jumping ship in the aftermath of the murder of Ambassador Stevens and this explains why Patraeus was fired as CIA director. Patraeus is gone for the same reason that Hillary Clinton will soon be gone. Clinton is gone for the same reasons that Eric Holder is contemplating leaving.

Congressional Hearings Regarding the
Death of Stevens Begin Soon

If Petraeus was subpoenaed before Congress in his role as CIA director, he could not invoke the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. If Hillary Clinton is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, in her role as Secretary of State, she cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. And if members of the Obama administration begin to incriminate themselves for their dirty deeds which resulted in Stevens’ death, then they implicate Obama.

This is Obama’s potential Watergate moment. If Clinton reveals before Congress that, as the senior official that oversees diplomatic security, that she denied Stevens’ requests for extra security and that she, Holder, Patraeus and Obama watch drone footage for nearly seven hours as Stevens and his party were murdered and that these senior level Cabinet officials blocked AFRICOM Commander, General Hamm, and the Commander of Carrier Task Force 3, Admiral Gayouette from rescuing the Stevens contingent, and then had both men arrested when the tried to disobey orders and rescue Stevens in violation of these executive orders from Obama administration.

The gravity of these events are stunning!  All of these senior officials, including the President, are implicated as accomplices in Stevens murder. This is criminally negligent homocide. This is first degree murder! And why did Stevens have to be murdered? Stevens was murdered because he was running guns for the CIA to al-Qaeda operatives, first in Libya last year and in Syria this year.

Dead men tell no tales in this Middle East version of Fast and Furious. This also explains why Patraeus had to be sacked. He was the link between Stevens’ gun running and al-Qaeda since Stevens’ gun running was a CIA operation conducted under the purview of Petraeus. This account is partially confirmed by Council on Foreign Relations member, Dr Steve Pieczenik, as states that Stevens was running guns and missiles into Syria. You remember the missing hand held stinger missiles that went missing in the NATO invasion of Libya last year? Those would be the ones! Can you imagine the public’s further outcry when al-Qaeda operatives begin brining down American commercial airliners with these weapons. Even Biden would not be able to pardon this motley crew!

How Will the New World Order Spin This?

Only a month before the election, I thought Obama’s reign of terror was over. However, in the month before the election, the economic outcome appeared brighter for the first time in years. The housing market showed signs of rebounding. The stock market appeared stronger and the banks were actually talking about loosening credit.

The George Soros voting machines came into play. The military’s vote was compromised. All the stops were pulled out to extend the heinous tyranny of Obama by the global elite. Why? The very simple and obvious reason is that with Benghazi-Gate, the elite can pull Obama’s strings in any direction they want. If Obama gets out of line, the global elite will topple his presidency and the aforementioned Obamanites will go to prison for a very long time.

What will the next four years look like in America? Well, under the existing conditions, with Obama’s very freedom riding on the whims of the globalists, the future of America looks bleak as Obama is completely compromised.

I do not look for Obama to complete the four years of his term. I predict that the globalists will use Obama for all they can get and then they will implode his presidency. The resulting lack of confidence will destroy this country and we could very easily de-evolve into a civil war which fits nicely into the globalists agenda of totally destroying America.

17 thoughts on “Who had Ambassador Stevens Killed
and How the Petraeus Affair Factors In”

  1. Anonymous November 14, 2012 at 3:00 am

Guys,

“Stevens was murdered because he was running guns for the CIA to al-Qaeda operatives, first in Libya last year and in Syria this year”

This is still no explanation four a murder! For whom “Running guns for CIA” was a problem ? Certainly not for OBAMA.

  1. MorningStar November 14, 2012 at 5:43 am

First, the mainstream media is not going to give us anything truthful so we can stop reading their articles on what happened to our ambassador in Libya or the general(s).

It’s the Internet with websites (like this one) that will furnish the truth after we weed out the more unprofessional blogs that just speculate. Sadly, the Obama administration will focus it’s power at restricting the Internet to the point that truth on any issue will never be given out. Great article. Thanks.

  1. SophiaH November 14, 2012 at 8:04 am

The final stinky slinky hidden fact here is that Ambassador Stevens and many of those assigned to that CIA installation from where the gunrunning and ArabSpring staged events were directed
was Gay same as bammaO and Rahm and most of that whole Chi town thug crew.

This had to be kept secret and Gay agents were sent in as they were vulnerable
they would toe the line to protect careers and privileged positions where they ahd
free rein to play in a modicum of privacy at least away from American intolerance.

So the bammaO and his henchmen/people all went along with the agenda set up by
those banksters in “The City” in London who are hellbent on total global ownership
of all lands and peoples under an international martial law.

This whole thing is a part of the “uprisings” by “rebels” who arre paid mercenaries
hired by cia/mossad to pretend to be citizens of the targeted nation and ‘rebe; supplied with money,drugs and weapons by CIA/Mossad and the major HQ of those supplies came from the CIA installation at Benghazi.

many ME nations AND Russia all knew this and decided it was time to end the
fake “embassy’ front and stop the gunrunning into Syria which nation the banksters
plan to hand over to the Muslim Brotherhood while they suck it dry and have one more
nation near the borders of Russia from whereto send missles into Russia.

Now that bammaO is sooo compromised and all his admin cohorts he is scheduled to meet with PUTIN and he better bend over and grab ankles.

too funny to contemplate…!

`Pingback: Who had Ambassador Stevens Killed and How the Petraeus Affair Factors In [OBAMA’S WATERGATE MOMENT] | CounterPsyOps

  1. European American November 14, 2012 at 8:24 pm

I just want to see the lying Mulatto tarred and feathered then paraded (on a special tour) around all major cities starting in Chicago and ending in DC with a “pitchcapping” at Lincoln’s memorial.

  1. Howard T. Lewis III November 15, 2012 at 8:38 pm

This is too dirty to comment on. Hillary could have been busted for illegal procurement of a firearm which she took across state lines and it later was used to murder Vince Foster and compromise Hillary.This was over 15 years ago.The FBI told all of us witnesses to “keep our mouths shut” because there were many people around Bush41 and B Clinton being murdered and they could not protect us. The FBI needs to be disbanded along with the CIA. Too many thugs.The sons of bitches worshipping J Edgar Hoover pictured in his red nighty are the channels to the morale decay and resultant failure of the U.S.

  1. JeannieB November 16, 2012 at 9:37 am

If the internet gets shut-down, we might have to get back to the ham radio again! And we might have to start the “Voice of America” from out side America!

  1. geoffrey franklin November 17, 2012 at 7:12 pm

This is a very good piece. Something is up and it cannot be good. The American people seem to be completely brain dead. Cowardice reins supreme. Your ignorant neighbor is your real enemy. America is coming apart at the siems.

  1. Italosuave November 24, 2012 at 11:17 pm

No mention of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta? I had read that Panetta and David Petraeus were in consultation during the attack on the quasi-consular location of the traveling Ambassador Stevens & Company. They made their way to a “safe house” whose whereabouts were relayed by locals to the attacking persons almost immediately. Even so, folks might have been secure and safe within those confines, had the attackers not decided to pour diesel fuel into the grated windows and ignite a thickly smoking fire, as seen in the videos. The chaos and disorder of the leadership and authorities in the City of Benghazi due to the aftermath of the revolution, meant no fire trucks, no local police, and an all around lack of communication and coordination. American officials did not want to foment another Mogadishu, Somalia like “Black Hawk Down” incident, and so made the hard and fast determination not to send more Americans into the center of an urban center in turmoil, with no clear outlines. As it turned out, the City of Benghazi’s residents turned out in the following days, in dismay and in support of our Ambassador Stevens, to root out those militias who had partaken in the attack and demise of the four Americans, including the Ambassador. As for General Petraeus resigning as C.I.A. Lead, it might well be that coming from the professional military of high morale as he did, he was appalled at the immediate and continued sniping and partisanship in the wake of another American foreign policy tragedy, this being one of many. Alleging that the Obama Administration deliberately intended the death of the Ambassador or anyone else for political purposes is both silly and slanderous, and utterly reprehensible. The opportunistic conduct of those who use the gun running death on the Mexican border, or this Ambassador’s death, in a bid for political advantage, plays the American People for fools I think their conduct and choices show the poor character of Republican leaders. I am personally reminded of the way some people jump onto crime stories to promulgate their ill-advised legislative views and agendas. Such conduct dishonors the memory of the three Americans and Ambassador Stevens. They lost their lives in Libya serving our interests to bring order to a chaotic, changing situation much like the early days of our own United States and its founding.

  1. Pingback: Will American Troops Commit Genocide Against American Citizens? – Secrets of the Fed
  2. curmudgeon January 1, 2013 at 1:25 pm

Your analysis of Hamm and Gayouette taking military actions to intervene in the assassination of Stevens to cover his CIA operations is remarkable—along with BO and HC watching the download. I missed the MSM mention of it. It arouses flashbacks of the attack on the USS Liberty with the recall of airborne naval fighters to their ships to prevent aid to fellow sailors under attack.

Perhaps the compilation, and extrapolation, of alleged CIA nefarious actions at http://www.scribd.com/doc/49566880/CIA-ROGUE-AGENCY-RUN-AMUCK or the role of the CIA alleged in the New World Order at http://www.scribd.com/doc/115919607/FUNDING-OUR-OWN-SELF-DESTRUCTION may be of interest.

  1. fascinated observer January 10, 2013 at 3:57 pm

There’s been another rumor floating….that there was a ‘set-up’ arrangement for the muslim brotherhood to ‘kidnap’ the ambassador (himself) and then hold him (alive and well) for an ‘exchange’ involving release of the U.S. held ‘blind sikh’ who fathered and arranged the 9-11 highjackings and attacks on the WTC and Pentagon. No explanation in the rumor for a ‘motive’ behind this sikh release, other than perhaps placating the imams over there, allowing them to get a ‘buddy’ back. But the ex-Seals and the CIA folks on detail in Benghazi were the ones who realized this caper was crap and refused orders to ‘stand down’, deciding instead to protect themselves and try to defend the ambassador. They wound up taking 80 or so of the attacking brotherhood folks to meet their 77 virgins before heavier weapons were brought in to snuff the Americans. The brotherhood thought they’d been double-crossed because there was supposed to be NO defense. So they took it up a notch. Ditto a couple of weeks later, when Hilley supposedly was involved in a plane crash at an airfield just inside Iran, where she ‘may’ have been going to ‘recover’ the deal that went south — to release the blind sikh by negotiating directly with Ahmadinejad at that airfield site. But the brotherhood, still ticked about being ‘sold out’, instead shot at Hilley’s Beechcraft being driven by an Army Colonel, with six Seals on board as ‘security’, to get even with the Benghazi mess. The Colonel crash-landed and Hilley was badly injured and a couple of the Seals were killed. Hilley was triaged on-site, then airlifted home with head injuries and deposited in a hospital, where varying stories of bad colds, life-threatening blood clots, exhaustion, and other things forced her to resign and to avoid testifying at the Congressional hearings. Perhaps she came very close to getting snuffed on this little secret mission herself and now feels that ‘early retirement’ back to one of the Clinton residences in Arkansas might be a safer way to live longer. Or maybe the deal struck with BHO about letting him run in 2008 instead of her has timed out, and the Bill & Hillary duo now want to reposition themselves to start the inevitable 2016 campaign. It’s all very ‘black’ and the American people are totally unaware of the sick drama and intrigue that’s become a euphemism for U.S. ‘foreign policy’. Oh, for JUST a little sun to be shown in the dark places!!

  1. Pingback: Poster’s Paradise » From “the common sense show . com”
  2. Pingback: Bankers and Feds Going into Hiding | unifiedserenity
  3. Pingback: Hiram’s 1555 Blog » The fall has begun and the panic is on!
  4. Pingback: glass spigot
  5. Pingback: Chris Spivey » Blog Archive » North Korea to ‘launch missile TODAY’ as hundreds of ‘ELITES’ move to safety

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2012/11/14/who-had-ambassador-stevens-killed-and-how-the-petraeus-affair-factors-in/

House Judiciary Chairman to Newsmax: Holder Should Resign

Wednesday, 29 May 2013 12:52 PM By Jim Meyers and Kathleen Walter

Rep. Bob Goodlatte is leading a Judiciary Committee probe of Attorney General Eric Holder’s actions regarding the targeting of reporters. And he tells Newsmax he is “very concerned” about Justice Department efforts to “harass the news media.”

The Virginia Republican also reiterates his call for Holder to step down, a demand he first made two years ago during the Fast and Furious controversy.
Elected in 1992, Goodlatte has been chairman of the House Judiciary Committee since January.
Story continues below video.

Holder recently testified before the committee that targeting journalists was “not something I’ve even been involved in.” But it’s now been reported that Holder personally sanctioned a search warrant labeling Fox News correspondent James Rosen a co-conspirator in leaking  national-security secrets.
In an exclusive interview Wednesday with Newsmax TV, Goodlatte discusses his probe of Holder.
“We are sending a letter today– myself and the chairman of the Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations Subcommittee — asking him to explain how his answers to the committee conflict with the actions that he appears to have taken with regard to Mr. Rosen, and we will withhold judgment on what the attorney general’s actions constitute until we give an opportunity for him to explain himself.
“But it is quite concerning.”
The Judiciary Committee also has been investigating disclosures that the Justice Department secretly obtained telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press.
“Subpoenas were issued there which appear to have been overbroad both in terms of the number of reporters whose phone-call records were sought as well as the length of time, 60 days, that was involved in that,” Goodlatte says.
“[And we have] some questions about the attorney general’s involvement in that, where he said that he recused himself and turned over that responsibility to Deputy Attorney General James Cole.
“We have already sent a letter to Mr. Cole asking him a series of questions regarding how that matter took place. Now we are pursuing it further with regard to the Fox News matter with Mr. Rosen, and we have sent a letter to the attorney general asking him to explain how the information that we have regarding the search warrant with Mr. Rosen conflicts with his sworn testimony before the committee.
“We are very concerned about the Justice Department targeting reporters and using what could be overbroad investigative tools to harass the news media, and we want to make sure they are following the rules. But we are also concerned that Mr. Holder has again contradicted himself and we want to know why that is. We’ll wait for an answer to that before we decide what our next step is in terms of committee hearings.”
Sen. Lindsay Graham has called for an independent special counsel to investigate the IRS and Justice Department scandals.
But Goodlatte believes a select committee or independent special counsel would “sidetrack” the ongoing investigation.
“The fact of the matter is, if we find sufficient information to justify getting this off on the separate track and delaying the investigation while a special select committee or a special counsel is appointed, we will do that,” he says.
“But at this point in time it’s important that the committees involved — and it’s not just the Judiciary Committee, but with regard to the IRS, it’s also the Ways and Means Committee and the Oversight and Government Reform Committee — that we continue to pursue this investigation aggressively and look into the matter, and if we were to sidetrack to get to a select committee, that will slow down this process.
“There will be a decision made later on about whether or not we need to take a different course with regard to these investigations.”
Asked if Holder should resign, Goodlatte responds: “Last year in the last Congress I co-sponsored a resolution calling for him to step down, and he has still not complied with the subpoena that was given to him with regard to the investigation of Fast and Furious.
“The result of that is that his noncompliance, his having been held in contempt of the House of Representatives, all indicate to me his unwillingness to take responsibility for the actions in this Justice Department, his inability to provide leadership.
“Therefore it is very concerning to me, and I see nothing that would change my opinion from two years ago that he should step down.”
Goodlatte also is working on immigration-reform legislation in the House.
He tells Newsmax: “We are taking a step-by-step approach. We appreciate the effort that is ongoing in the Senate. We have a broken immigration system and it needs to be fixed, both in the sense of enforcing our immigration laws and in finding the appropriate legal status for those who are not lawfully present in the United States today.
“We also want to make sure that we’re doing everything possible to improve our legal immigration system because we think it could work much better from the standpoint of the national interest of the United States and American citizens in creating jobs and growing our economy.
“We are hard at work. We have introduced three bills in the House Judiciary Committee dealing with various aspects of immigration reform. The Homeland Security Committee has introduced and passed out of the committee a fourth bill dealing with border security.
“Next week we will introduce in the Judiciary Committee a fifth bill dealing with interior security, because the problem is not just at the border:  35 to 40 percent of the people who are not lawfully present in the United States entered the country legally on visitor visas, business visas, student visas, visa waivers, etc., and simply overstayed their visa.
“So fixing the issues on the border does not by any means completely solve the problem. In fact, some would argue that the biggest problem we have right now is the lack of enforcement in the interior of the country.
“We are also continuing to work on the issue of what the legal status of people not lawfully present in the United States should be. I do not support a special pathway to citizenship. That would give people who entered the country unlawfully an advantage over people who have been attempting — in some cases for many, many years, — to lawfully immigrate.
“Figuring out what the way forward is in terms of enforcing our immigration laws; adding new enforcement measures; making sure that no president of the United States, not just President Obama, but no president can flip a switch and determine not to enforce the immigration laws as they pertain to millions of people who are not here lawfully; and making sure we do not undertake something that will cost the taxpayers of this country huge sums of money, are all matters that we are working our way through, one step at a time.”
Regarding the immigration-reform bill in the Senate, Goodlatte says: “The biggest concern I have is that long before they ever give anybody a pathway to citizenship, they almost immediately give a legal status to people before they have in place the measures that would assure that we don’t have a repeat of what happened in 1986, when 3 million people were given an easy pathway to citizenship and the enforcement measures never were seriously implemented — employer sanctions and other things.
“Now we have new measures like E-Verify, which is a voluntary system we want to make mandatory for every employer. That would be implemented under the Senate rule after they’ve given legal status to millions of people.
“We’ve got to make sure that if we are going to change the legal status of millions of people, we don’t have another tidal wave of people coming into the country after them.”
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/eric-holder-Fox-News/2013/05/29/id/506914?s=al&promo_code=13A72-1#ixzz2UiLr05Vo
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Source: Slain ambassador Stevens said he was on al Qaeda list 8:15 AM, Sep 20, 2012

US ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens gives a speech on August 26, 2012 at the US embassy in Tripoli. Stevens was killed in an attack on a consulate building in the Libyan city of Benghazi on Sept. 12, 2012 (MAHMUD TURKIA/AFP/GettyImages)

 

WASHINGTON — In the months leading up to his death, U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, worried about what he called the never-ending security threats in Benghazi and mentioned his name was on an al Qaeda hit list, a source familiar with his thinking told CNN.

Stevens specifically mentioned a rise in Islamic extremism and al Qaeda’s growing presence in Libya, the source said.

American intelligence officials are investigating, but Matthew Olsen, the National Counterterrorism Center director, said Wednesday that it was unlikely that Stevens and his security team were killed by random protesters.

“I would say, yes, they were killed in course of terrorist attack on our embassy,” Olsen said at a Senate Homeland Security hearing.

Stevens and three other Americans were killed when protesters, angry over a film made in the United States that mocked the Muslim prophet Mohammed, attacked the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

 

Washington tried to distance itself from the uproar, making it clear that it did not sanction the film. But more than a week of protests have rippled from Morocco to Malaysia, spurring U.S. officials to increase security at diplomatic missions and demand other governments to take action.

On Thursday, Libyan and U.S. officials will attend a memorial service in Tripoli for the slain Americans.

Here are the latest key developments in the fallout from the anti-Islam film, and cartoons published in a French satirical magazine featuring a figure resembling Mohammed:

French magazine runs cartoons of Mohammed
The French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo added to the fiery debate between freedom of expression and offensive provocation on Wednesday.

The magazine, which is known for outrageous humor, published cartoons featuring a figure resembling the Prophet Mohammed.

Iranian students demonstrated in front of the French embassy in Tehran on Thursday, the semiofficial FARS news agency reported.

RELATED | French embassies on guard after prophet cartoon

But so far, there has been no violence reported as a result of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.

Still, France will close embassies and schools in about 20 countries on Friday, the main Muslim day of prayer, as a precaution, the French foreign ministry said Wednesday.

It is already boosting security in some locations, including its embassies, and police vehicles were parked outside the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo late Tuesday.

In the past, Muslims in many countries have taken to the streets after Friday prayers.

Any depiction of Islam’s prophet is considered blasphemy by many Muslims. France has the largest Muslim population in Western Europe, with an estimated 4.7 million followers of the faith.

The Charlie Hebdo cartoons are not labeled Mohammed, but several, including one that appears to show a man’s naked rear end, could easily be interpreted as being depictions of Islam’s prophet.

On Thursday, the Paris prosecutor’s office said a group called the Syrian Association of Freedom filed a complaint against the magazine for inciting hatred. The magazine itself turned to the prosecutor’s office, asking for an inquiry after its website was hacked.

Meanwhile, the German satirical magazine, “Titanic,” will publish an issue lampooning Islamaphobia next week, with a depiction on its cover that could be interpreted as being the prophet Mohammed.

Staffer Martina Werner said the Titanic issue will take on film and politicians making political capital on Islamaphobia, with a cover from an old movie poster.

Asked if it is supposed to depict the prophet Mohammed, Werner answered: “Well, that lies in the eye of the beholder.”

Capitol Hill briefings
The White House will roll out some of its top officials Thursday to brief members of the House and Senate about the past week’s violent developments across the Middle East and Afghanistan.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, intelligence chief James Clapper and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be on hand for the briefing.

“Innocence of Muslims” was an obscure Internet video until September 11, when rioters, seizing on it, breached the U.S. Embassy in Cairo. Protesters also attacked the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. The film mocks Mohammed as a womanizer, child molester and killer.

Libya has taken steps to arrest those responsible for the consulate attack, bringing in dozens for questioning over the weekend, Libyan officials have said.

The exact number of arrests was unclear. One Libyan official said those arrested included suspects from Mali and Algeria as well as al Qaeda sympathizers.

In recent days, protests against the film have been on the wane, but thousands turned out for a demonstration in Beirut, Lebanon, on Wednesday, waving Hezbollah flags and yelling, “America is an enemy of God.” The United States considers Hezbollah a terrorist organization.

On Thursday, Iranian demonstrators gathered in Tehran’s Palestinian Square to protest the film, shouting slogans against the United States and Israel and “those who insulted the holy prophet,” said the state-run Iranian news agency IRNA.

Rushdie bounty raised

In the midst of the unrest, an Iranian imam in a little-known organization has raised the bounty on British novelist Salmon Rushdie to $3.3 million — a half a million dollar increase.

“The death sentence issued against Salman Rushdi was meant to dry the roots of anti-Islamic plots, and now by carrying out that sentence the sequence of these anti-Islamic plots could be uprooted and these days are the best time to do that,” Hojatoleslam Hassan Sanei said, according to iran’s Mehr News Agency.

Rushdie has effectively been under an Islamic death sentence since 1989 when Iran’s then-leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini first issued a fatwa, after Rushdie’s book, “The Satanic Verses,” was declared blasphemous and sparked protests throughout the Muslim world.

His new book “Joseph Anton: A Memoir” is an account of the firestorm surrounding the book and the death threats against him.

Sanei’s organization, the 15th of Khordad Foundation, made news when it first offered a bounty for Rushdie, but in recent years had fallen out of the public eye.

Film Lawsuit

In Los Angeles, one of the actresses in “Innocence of Muslims” is suing the producer of the film, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, claiming she is a victim of fraud, invasion of privacy and misappropriation of her likeness.

Cindy Lee Garcia filed a 17-page complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court Wednesday, which also names YouTube, the video-sharing website on which the video is posted, and its parent company, Google.

Garcia says Google caused her irreparable harm by refusing to remove the content from their site.

Last week, Garcia told CNN she had been unaware that the filmmaker dubbed over the dialogue in the movie and inserted anti-Islam sentiments.

The producers’ representations that he “intended to make an ‘adventure film’ and that plaintiff would be depicted as a concerned mother, were false,” the suit claims.

“Defendant … made an anti-Islam propaganda film, in which plaintiff is falsely made to appear to accuse the founder of the Islamic religion of being a sexual deviant and child molester.”

“Ms. Garcia has lost her job, her privacy, and has suffered extreme distress over Nakoula’s acts,” according to the lawsuit.

According to the complaint, YouTube privately informed Garcia it will not voluntarily remove the content of the video. Attorney Armenta said that on Thursday, she will seek an emergency temporary restraining order against Nakoula and YouTube, asking that the content be removed permanently.

Garcia claims since the film’s backlash, she has received death threats and unable to visit her grandchildren out of fear that they will be harmed.

Calls to representatives of Nakoula were not immediately returned. YouTube responded to CNN inquiries, saying it was reviewing the complaint. http://www.11alive.com/news/article/257513/40/Source-Slain-ambassador-Stevens-said-he-was-on-al-Qaeda-list

Estados Unidos le pasa a Nueva Zelandia equipos de espiar a los ciudadanos‏

Ricardo Samitier

Ahora Que Se Habla De Espionaje De Los Periodistas… Y El IRS Esta realidad Es Mucho Peor… Sale la noticia que el departamento de “Seguridad Interna de USA” DIRIGIDA por una señora  “Pelada a lo BOY”  quienes acordaron pasarle a Nueva Zelandia la Tecnología De Espiar A Los Ciudadanos de una FORMA AUTOMÁTICA… INTERCEPTANDO  las llamadas, correos electrónicos y actividades en la internet…

 

He aquí la noticia… para los que creen que el GOBIERNO ES IGUAL A DIOS… que nunca se equivoca…

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10886031

 

Was Obama Involved in the IRS Targeting? Vote Here Now.

Home | Newsfront

Tags: Donald Trump | Trump | 2016 | Presidential | Bid

Attorney General Eric Holder Snubbed By New York Times and Associated Press

 

Following the Justice Department (DoJ) announcement this week that it intended to invite the Washington bureau chiefs of national news organizations to an off-the-record meeting, in order to discuss new guidelines for subpoenas of reporters, Attorney General Eric Holder finds himself snubbed by the New York Times and Associated Press (AP).

 

Both organizations are objecting to the closed-door arrangement, insisting that any such discussions should be on record.

 

Following revelations that the DoJ had obtained two months of phone records of AP reporters and editors, The Attorney General has initiated an outreach campaign, aimed at the national media. A Justice Department official told Politico’s “Playbook” ”The A.G. realizes that things might have gotten a little out of balance, and he wants to make changes to be sure the rules fully account for the balance between the First Amendment and law enforcement.” He went on to say  ”Attorney General Eric Holder will hold meetings with several Washington bureau chiefs of national news organizations in the next two days as part of the review of existing Justice Department guidelines governing investigations that involve reporters.

The series of  meetings, which was announced by President Obama last Thursday, are scheduled to take place over a number of weeks and will be attended by Attorney General Eric Holder himself. A wide variety of media outlets are being invited to attend; including print newspapers, wire services, radio and online news organizations. It appears, however, that the Attorney General has been turned down by both the New York Times and Associated Press.

 

Politico received a statement from AP spokesperson Erin Madigan which said ”We believe the meeting should be on the record and we have said that to the Attorney General’s office. If it is on the record, AP Executive Editor Kathleen Carroll will attend. If it is not on the record, AP will not attend and instead will offer our views on how the regulations should be updated in an open letter. We would expect AP attorneys to be included in any planned meetings between the Attorney General’s office and media lawyers on the legal specifics.”

 

The New York Times (NYT) had already rejected the idea of the meeting, due to its off-the-record nature. The NYT statement by executive editor Jill Abramson said ”We will not be attending the session at DOJ. It isn’t appropriate for us to attend an off the record meeting with the attorney general. Our Washington bureau is aggressively covering the department’s handling of leak investigations at this time.”

 

On the heels of the AP phone records scandal came the additional revelation that the Justice Department had also issued a warrant to search a personal email account of Fox New reporter James Rosen, as part of a separate investigation. When questioned by a congressional committee about his involvement with the seizure of AP phone records, Holder had stated “with regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something I’ve ever been involved in, heard of or would think would be wise policy.” The Justice Department later admitted, however, that the Attorney General had been directly involved in discussions regarding the warrant for James Rosen’s email account.

 

With questions still lingering over Operation Fast and Furious – which resulted in Holder being held in contempt of Congress – and the subsequent probes into the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attack, the IRS targeting of Conservative groups and now DoJ investigations of the press, the federal government finds itself in full damage-control mode. The New York Times and the Associated Press have both been very supportive of the current administration. For them now to snub the Attorney General will be perceived as an additional embarrassment for both Holder and President Obama. http://guardianlv.com/2013/05/attorney-general-eric-holder-snubbed-by-new-york-times-and-associated-press/

 

Trump: Americans ‘Desperate for Leadership’

By Todd Beamon

Donald Trump declined to say on Wednesday whether he was running for president in 2016 but said that “people in this country are desperate for leadership.”
The billionaire businessman told Neil Cavuto on Fox News: “Whether it’s me — or, frankly, let it be somebody — but somebody has to come along and straighten out this country. We’re in trouble.”
The New York Post reported on Monday that Trump has spent $1 million to research his political standing in certain states. He told the Oakland County Republican Party’s Lincoln Day Dinner in Michigan last week that it was “highly unlikely” that he would seek the White House in 2016.
“I’m looking at a lot of different things,” Trump told Cavuto. In particular, he said he wants to acquire more properties and upgrade his Doral Golf Resort in Florida.
Trump said he told the Michigan group that he hoped that President Barack Obama was more effective in leading the nation.
“I’d be very happy if the president did a great job,” Trump said. “Before I am a Republican, I am an American. I want this country to be great again. It’s not going to be great again.”
He said the research effort for 2016 grew out of concerns by “a group of people who hate seeing the United States being ripped off and taken advantage of by virtually every country in the world.
“We used to be the smart ones, and we’re no longer the smart ones,” Trump added. “We’re like the dummy — and it’s very sad.
“I have a large group of people who want to see this stop. We can’t just keep doing it. We’re a debtor nation. Our airports are falling apart. Our roads and bridges are falling apart.”
He declined to speculate on who might receive the Republican nomination for president in 2016, though he noted that oft-mentioned New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie was “a friend of mine, and I like Chris.”
When Cavuto asked whether Trump would not run if Christie did, the entrepreneur responded: “It’s just too early to see what happens. We have a have a long way to go. You’re talking about a long way out. I want to see this country be great again.”
Trump would not run as an independent, however.
“I’m a Republican. It’s a lot better to do it and keep the two-party system. It really seems to have worked, but it hasn’t been working so well lately.
“The two-party system is good,” he added. “It’s very, very tough running as an independent, extremely tough.”
On the international front, Trump cited the Obama administration’s failure to deal effectively with Syria, noting that Russia planned to send advanced air-defense missiles to Damascus to fend off a no-fly zone under consideration by the White House.
“Russia is putting all sorts of weapons there to shoot down our planes,” Trump said. “This is just crazy. What are we doing? What are we doing as a country? We don’t even know who we’re fighting for.”
Regarding China, Trump called America’s relationship with Beijing “a total disaster.”
Chinese President Xi Jinping is to visit the United States next month and meet with Obama in California.
“They’re not our friends,” Trump said. “I’m not knocking China. I’m saying I wish our people were smart so we can compete with China — because, right now, we are not competing with China.”
He cited how the country manipulates its currency by artificially strengthening the American dollar to make Beijing’s currency — and, thus, its exports — comparatively cheaper.
“What they do with the manipulation of their currency — though brilliant; nobody’s ever done it better — China is taking total advantage of the United States,” Trump said. “And they’re making us look like fools.”
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Trump-2016-Presidential-Bid/2013/05/29/id/507010?s=al&promo_code=13A8F-1#ixzz2UmQfzoRc
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Los mejores países donde vivir en el mundo Prof Orlando Chirino‏ enviado por Jesús Angulo

VEA EL VIDEO

Los mejores países donde vivir en el mundo

¿Qué factores se toman en cuenta cuando se compara este país con otros?
¿Cómo se mide la esperanza de vida?
¿Qué hay de la libertad política y la seguridad laboral?
¿Cuáles son los países que superan a Estados Unidos en estos factores?

 CLICK AQUI

http://www.youtube.com/user/TVparaCUBA/videos

Esta sección de vídeos que he titulado TV para CUBA, demuestra la gran labor educativa que realiza Friends of WLRN canal 17 de televisión y su programación en Español que se transmite todos los domingos de 3:00 PM a 7:00 PM. Aclaramos que WLRN TV 17 depende de las donaciones de sus televidentes a Amigos del Canal 17, WLRN-TV, P.O.Box 01-2500, Miami, Florida 33101-2500 o llamando a los teléfonos 305-350-7980 o 305-350-7976 y que tanto su Productor General como los Presentadores donamos nuestro tiempo.

Sus comentarios y sugerencias pueden hacerlo a través de mi correo electrónico jangulo22@aol.com

 

Falsa La Noticia Que Las Casas Han Aumentado Un 10% y Que Comenzó La Recuperación De La Construcción… Ricardo Samitier.

La Prensa, Que Apoya A Obama, y También A los Homosexuales y El Comunismo  Han venido anunciado Un Aumento De Un 10.2 %  del precio de las casas y han “ALEGREMENTE”  que la industria de la construcción de viviendas ha comenzado su RECUPERACIÓN…

Esa noticia la han dado para aumentar el apoyo a la DESASTROSA POLÍTICA DE Obama y los Demócratas pues

De Acuerdo a Los Expertos Esa Noticia es falsa… ya que el aumento se debe al siguiente FACTOR:

El 52 por ciento de las casas que se compraron en el primer trimestre de 2013 fueron comprados por INVERSIONISTAS DE WALL STREET y eran CASAS EMBARGADAS POR LOS BANCOS, NINGUNA DE ESAS CASAS FUERON INCLUSO ANUNCIAN EN EL MERCADO ABIERTO.   Es Decir fueron compradas por INVERSIONISTAS RICOS y muchas de esas casas compradas por los MISMOS BANCOS QUE LAS EMBARGARON… 

“Esto no es una recuperación natural. Mucho de lo que está impulsando la demanda no tiene nada que ver con un mercado normal de la vivienda. Es una ANOMALÍA CAUSADA POR GRANDES EMPRESAS DE INVERSIÓN. Esto ha mantenido a las familias fuera del mercado de la vivienda.”

“Así que más de la mitad del mercado ni siquiera fue visto por los agentes inmobiliarios y compradores normales”

El 35% de las oficinas de ventas de casas han cerrado después del 2008 y los agentes de bienes raíces están operando de sus casas.. 

Para leer la noticia completa haga clic en este enlace:   

http://www.moneynews.com/Economy/Housing-Price-Gains-Weakness/2013/05/28/id/506754?s=al&promo_code=13A5D-1

WND EXCLUSIVE

Historian: Obama helping resurrect Ottoman Empire?

Pattern seen in ‘Arab Spring’ interventions began in Balkans in 1990s

Jerome R. Corsi

Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers “The Obama Nation” and “Unfit for Command.” Corsi’s latest book is the forthcoming “What Went Wrong?: The Inside Story of the GOP Debacle of 2012 … And How It Can Be Avoided Next Time.”

NEW YORK – Is Obama helping advance a grand plan by Turkey, with the support of Germany, to restore the Ottoman Empire, the Islamic caliphate that controlled much of southeast Europe, Western Asia and North Africa for more than six centuries?

That is a question posed by historian Robert E. Kaplan in an article titled “The U.S. Helps Reconstruct the Ottoman Empire,” published this week by the international policy council and think tank Gatestone Institute.

Ads by Google

Kaplan, a historian with a doctorate from Cornell University, specializing in modern Europe, says history suggests a possible partnership between Turkey and Germany, which has seen influence over Turkey as a means of influencing Muslims worldwide for its own interests.

He asks why the U.S. government “would actively promote German aims,” including the destruction of Yugoslavia in the 1990s and the re-creation of the Ottoman Empire through the “Arab Spring.”

Kaplan points to Obama’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood, the ultimate victor in the “Arab Spring”; the U.S. backing of radical Islamic “rebel” groups in Libya with ties to al-Qaida; and current support for similarly constituted radical Islamic “rebel” groups in Syria aligned with al-Qaida.

Each of these U.S. military interventions occurred in areas that were under the Ottoman Empire.

Bring back the Ottoman Empire?

Kaplan sees a similarity between the Clinton-era attacks against the Serbs and the Obama administration hostility to well-established regimes in Libya and Syria.

He writes:

Since the mid-1990s the United States has intervened militarily in several internal armed conflicts in Europe and the Middle East: bombing Serbs and Serbia in support of Izetbegovic’s Moslem Regime in Bosnia in 1995, bombing Serbs and Serbia in support of KLA Moslems of Kosovo in 1999, bombing Libya’s Gaddafi regime in support of rebels in 2010. Each intervention was justified to Americans as motivated by humanitarian concerns: to protect Bosnian Moslems from genocidal Serbs, to protect Kosovo Moslems from genocidal Serbs, and to protect Libyans from their murderous dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

Kaplan observes that neither President Clinton nor President Obama ever mentioned the reconstitution of the Ottoman Empire as a justification for U.S. military intervention.

The U.S. offered other reasons for intervening in Serbia, including a desire to gain a strategic foothold in the Balkans, to defeat communism in Yugoslavia, to demonstrate to the world’s Muslims that the U.S. is not anti-Muslim, and to redefine the role of NATO in the post-Cold War era.

Recurring pattern

At its height in the 15th and 16th centuries, the Ottoman Empire stretched from its capital in Turkey, through the Muslim-populated areas of North Africa, Iraq, the costal regions of the Arabian Peninsula and parts of the Balkans.

Kaplan points out that since the 1990s, “each European and Middle Eastern country that experienced American military intervention in an internal military conflict or an ‘Arab Spring’ has ended up with a government dominated by Islamists of the Moslem Brotherhood or al-Qaida variety fits nicely with the idea that these events represent a return to Ottoman rule.”

In these conflicts, Kaplan sees recurring patterns employed by Clinton and Obama to justify U.S. military intervention:

Each U. S. military action in Europe and the Middle East since 1990, however, with the exception of Iraq, has followed an overt pattern: First there is an armed conflict within the country where the intervention will take place. American news media heavily report this conflict. The “good guys” in the story are the rebels. The “bad guys,” to be attacked by American military force, are brutally anti-democratic, and committers of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Prestigious public figures, NGOs, judicial and quasi-judicial bodies and international organizations call for supporting the rebels and attacking the regime. Next, the American president orders American logistical support and arms supplies for the rebels. Finally the American president orders military attack under the auspices of NATO in support of the rebels. The attack usually consists of aerial bombing, today’s equivalent of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’ gunboat which could attack coastal cities of militarily weak countries without fear of retaliation. The ultimate outcome of each American intervention is the replacement of a secular government with an Islamist regime in an area that had been part of the Ottoman Empire.

Kaplan cites a recent report published by John Rosenthal in the online Asian Times that discloses reports prepared by the German foreign intelligence service, the BND, attributing the massacre in the Syrian town of Houla on May 25, 2012, to the Syrian government.

Rosenthal linked the conclusions of the BND regarding the Houla massacre to the policy of the German government to support the Syrian rebellion and its political arm, the Syrian National Council.

Recalling that Germany invaded Serbia in both World Wars I and II and actively sought the destruction of Yugoslavia in the Cold War era, Kaplan wonders if the administration’s joining with Germany in the bombing of Libya, and possibly Syria as well, is an effort to help Germany fill its foreign policy objective of restoring the Ottoman Empire.

Kaplan notes that the Obama administration’s foreign policy requires it to downplay the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida terrorist threat to U.S. national security.

Al-Qaida defeated, or embraced?

In the 2012 presidential campaign, Obama spoke at a campaign event in Las Vegas one day after the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack, proclaiming, “A day after 9/11, we are reminded that a new tower rises above the New York skyline, but al-Qaeida is on the path to defeat and bin Laden is dead.”

On Nov. 1, 2012, CNSNews.com reported that Obama had described al-Qaida as having been “decimated,” “on the path to defeat,” or some other variation at least 32 times since the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. It was a theme Obama repeated last week in his counter-terrorism policy speech at the National Defense University at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C.

Obama also has advanced a narrative expressing U.S. acceptance of Islam.

In his foreign policy speech delivered at Cairo University June 4, 2009, Obama explained he had known Islam “on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed.”

In a joint press availability with Turkey’s President Gul at Cankaya Palace in Ankara, Turkey, on April 6, 2009, Obama repudiated U.S. history since George Washington, declaring the U.S. is not a Christian country: “And I’ve said before that one of the great strengths of the United States is – although as I mentioned, we have a very large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation; we consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.”

Yet, despite Obama’s attempt to establish a narrative in which Islamic terrorism is not a threat to U.S. national security, evidence abounds that the radical Islamic rebels responsible for opposing Gadhafi in Libya and Assad in Syria have extensive ties to al-Qaida.

In September 2012, WND also broke the story that the slain U.S. ambassador, Christopher Stevens, played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight the Syria regime, according to Egyptian security forces.

In December 2012, WND reported top level al-Qaida operatives are functioning with impunity in Libya under a NATO-established provisional government.

In February 2013, WND reported that the U.S. special mission in Benghazi was used to coordinate Arab arms shipments and other aid to rebels in Libya who are known to be saturated by al-Qaida and other Islamic terrorist groups.

On May 14, 2013, WND reported the attack that killed Stevens and three other Americans was an al-Qaida revenge killing that took place one day after al-Qaida chief Ayman al-Zawahiri called for retaliation for a U.S. drone strike that killed a top Libyan al-Qaida leader.

Formed by Osama bin Laden, al-Qaida is a Sunni Islamic organization, whereas the Assad regime in Syria has been arguably a client state of Iran, the only nation in the Middle East in which a majority of the Muslims are Shiites.

The conflict between Sunni and Shiite Muslims dates back to the founding of Islam when a split took place over who should succeed Muhammad, when he died in AD 632. Sunnis comprise about 75 to 90 percent of the world’s Muslims.

The Muslim Brotherhood that has come to power in the African Islamic states following the “Arab Spring” is a Sunni Islam-dominated organization that opposes the Shiites in Iran on religious grounds.

On Jan. 3, 2013, WND reported that the Muslim Brotherhood has penetrated the Obama White House, with several American Muslim leaders who work with the Obama administration identified as Muslim Brotherhood operatives who have significant influence on U.S. policy.

On Feb. 10, 2013, WND reported President Obama’s nominee to head the CIA, John Brennan, converted to Islam years ago in Saudi Arabia.

Arguably, the Obama administration’s policy of siding with the rebels in Libya and Syria may reflect the aim of isolating Shiite-dominated Iran from the rest of the Islamic world.

The logical expectation would be that a recreated Ottoman Empire headquartered in Turkey would be a Sunni organization, reflecting the Sunni-dominance in Turkey.

The Gatestone Institute website describes the organization as a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank dedicated “to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report.”

As the organization’s website explains, “Gatestone Institute conducts national and international conferences, briefings and events for its members and others, with world leaders, journalists and experts – analyzing, strategizing, and keeping them informed on current issues, and where possible recommending solutions.”

 

Los Empleados de los Politiqueros‏ Ricardo Samitier

Pierde $25 Millones Diarios… El Sistema De Correo…

 

Son Ineptos Y No Saben Administrar… Los “Burócratas” Nombrados Por Nuestros Políticos Electos…

La Historia Del Correo…

Benjamín Franklin, fundó el Servicio Postal de los EE.UU.. nunca fue a la escuela, pero se convirtió en periodista, científico,  fue el DESCUBRIDOR de la corriente del Golfo de Méjico… inventor, político, diplomático y un millonario que se hizo trabajando… sin ayuda del GOBIERNO para no quebrar… en otras palabras HECHO POR EL MISMO… logró que las cartas llegaran de Philadelphia a New York el mismo día…

 

Sin embargo, el grupo actual de “POLITIQUEROS” pues no se le puede llamar “POLÍTICOS” lo único que saben hacer es APROBAR PRESTAMOS para desarrollar negocios… o reducir los servicios NO PARA GANAR… SINO PARA REDUCIR LAS PERDIDAS…

 

No importa qué TIPO DE ACTIVIDAD desarrollan los “BURÓCRATAS” nombrados… Todos logran que lo que ellos administran sean sindicatos, universidades, recogida de basura, la distribución del agua, el transporte urbanos… TODOS PIERDAN DINERO…

 

Da VERGÜENZA… ver pasar guaguas que valen desde $450,000.00 HASTA $1.200,000.00 vacías… o pasar por el taller de reparaciones y ver más de $40 millones de dólares en el lote… esperando ser reparados…

 

Pero NO LE DAN LICENCIA A NADIE PARA ABRIR UNA RUTA DE GUAGUA…

 

Para leer la noticia

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0418/Losing-25M-a-day-Congress-shrugs-off-USPS-losses

 

Cultura vs Contracultura amenper.

. Las culturas son sistemas de símbolos compartidos que proporcionan sentido a nuestra vida, una orientación, una forma de ver el mundo y de interpretar la realidad. Cultura es, en este sentido, el conjunto de manifestaciones de una sociedad o un grupo humano que la distinguen y la hacen ser lo que ella es. Es decir, su arte, su manera de hablar, sus convenciones sociales, sus pautas morales, sus costumbres, etc.

La humanidad en su existencia cultural ha evolucionado a través de los años, es lógico, pero esta evolución es progresiva, va perfeccionado la cultura hacia una conducta mejor en la búsqueda de la felicidad, a lo que los filósofos griegos llamaban la búsqueda de la verdad y de la razón de existir del ser humano

Pero entonces llegó la “contracultura”, los hippies de los años sesenta.

El escritor Theodore Roszak en su libro “contracultura” acuñó el término en 1968 para referirse a la actividad rebelde de la juventud de los años 60 y sus mentores ideológicos. Los grandes iniciadores de la revolución contracultural fueron los beatniks , forjadores de la identidad inconformista y, a la postre, cimientos del movimiento hippie.

En ocasiones se ha señalado a las contraculturas como modas relativamente inofensivas y pasajeras pero la contracultura hippie se ha convertido en una subcultura subterránea que se ha infiltrado en la cultura del mundo imponiendo prácticas “contra convencionales” a la cultura dominante

Y llegamos a nuestros días, donde los hippies de los sesenta son los que ocupan los cargos de más importancia en la nación.  Hippie era Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Barack Hussein Obama hippies fueron la  mayoría de los periodistas que comunican las noticias en nuestros medios de información.

Esto ha causado que al estar las personas con mentalidad hippie en el poder, las ideas de la contracultura hippie adquieran validez.

¿Cuáles son las ideas hippies?

Básicamente es la contracultura, todo lo contrario a los valores morales de la cultura humana desde los principios de la civilización.

Valores establecido, como es la familia, cambia y lo contrario es exaltado. Es mejor una madre soltera que una madre tradicional, es mejor un matrimonio entre dos personas con los mismos órganos genitales que personas de órganos complementarios.

No hay principios morales, porque la moral es relativa, si yo pienso que mentir es bueno, pues es bueno mentir, si pienso que robar es aceptable, pues es aceptable robar, usar drogas es opcional y debe de ser permitido, matar un ser pre-nato es un derecho de la persona que lo lleva en su vientre, todo es permitido porque  la verdad es subjetiva.  Por eso vemos que este gobierno miente sin pudor al pueblo, porque es aceptable en su contracultura.

Esto implica que no se reconoce la existencia de una verdad, absoluta, definitiva, única, superior, objetiva. Todas “las verdades” son válidas juntamente, si le sirven a alguien. Es decir: yo creo esto, y tú puedes creer aquello, y si a ti te hace bien, entonces está bien. Mi verdad y tu verdad son igualmente aceptables.
Evidentemente, esto lleva al caos total, aunque pareciera que ser “moderno”, “civilizado”, “educado”, “inteligente”, inclinara a pensar de esta manera: si todas “las verdades” son igualmente válidas…¿Quién tiene razón? ¿Todos podemos tener razón? ¿Por cuál ley nos regiríamos? ¿Con qué parámetros aceptaríamos algunas cosas y desecharíamos otras? Como vemos, el panorama así planteado es por demás peligroso.
El mundo, con discursos de superación y respeto aparente, proclama el pluralismo como una virtud… Y los que creen diferente, muchas veces, se acomodan a este sentir, y aceptan cualquier cosa a fin de no ser tildados de antiguos y retrógrados

Si vamos al fondo de la contracultura, lo principal que es la base que crea todos los nuevos valores, es la negación de Dios.

El ateísmo es la base de la contracultura hippie, esta contracultura no acepta la realidad de Dios, y niega la verdad de Dios para sostener la relatividad de la verdad.

La verdad, así planteada y entendida, es una cosa subjetiva, que cada ser humano se arma, producto de sus pensamientos, gustos, placeres, saberes y pareceres.

Pero en el fondo, instintivamente, hasta los ateos,  todos conocemos la verdad de Dios, que es la única fuente de verdad y reconocemos que la verdad es externa al ser humano. No requiere de nosotros opiniones y cambios: demanda aceptación y obediencia

Si vemos la nueva religión hippie- que es el ateísmo-, y vemos las consecuencias que esto ha traído en nuestros cambios culturales, sociales y políticos, podemos comprender de donde surgen nuestros problemas, y lo que es más importante, como podemos resolver todos los problemas.

Hay que volver al principio de la cultura tradicional, al pensamiento de los primeros filósofos de la civilización.  Aristóteles veía la verdad como una “realidad” y como una “adecuación del intelecto a la cosa”. La verdad como realidad para él era “lo que permanece, lo inmutable, lo que siempre es de la misma manera”.

La verdad es Dios.

 

Dem: Ex-IRS chief lied to Congress

By Jordy Yager – 05/18/13 10:41 AM ET

Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.) said the former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commissioner appointed by President George W. Bush lied to Congress under oath when he told lawmakers last year that the agency did not give special attention to certain groups. Following the House’s opening investigative hearing into the IRS’s revelation that it gave extra scrutiny to conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, Crowley was asked if he believed Douglas Shulman lied to Congress.

“I think Mr. Shulman did,” said Crowley in an interview with Fox News. “My understanding is that it was common knowledge if they were going after political groups back then.”

Crowley was referencing a 2012 House Ways and Means Committee hearing in which Shulman, in response to questions from Rep. Charles Boustany (R-La.), held that the IRS was not targeting specific groups applying for tax-exempt status.

“There’s absolutely no targeting,” said Shulman at the time.

The encounter raised suspicions for Boustany as well, who recounted the incident during the same  interview with Crowley.

“He said, absolutely not. He categorically denied it,” recalled Boustany on Friday. “But he was aware of what was going on during this time frame because we know that [a] senior technical advisor had already been sent out to Cincinnati to investigate what was going on and to report back.”

Shulman completed his five-year term as IRS chief in November of last year. He was replaced by Steven Miller, whom President Obama asked to resign this week after the IRS scandal erupted.

Shulman is expected to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee next week.

Republicans have focused some of their attacks on Sarah Hall Ingram, the director of the Affordable Care Act’s office within the IRS. Ingram previously served as the head of the office in charge of facilitating applications from tax-exempt groups at the IRS during the time that has recently come under question.

But Crowley said Ingram was not in the IRS office overseeing the tax-exempt status applications, but actually left six months before anyone at the agency found out that the decisions were being made to focus on conservative groups.

Boustany objected to Crowley’s contention, however, saying that Congress needs to get more information about what Ingram did and did not know at the time.

“I have real concerns and we have to pinpoint and get more information about what her role was in all of this, there’s no question about it. Because this whole idea about the IRS getting expansive powers under Obama-care is deeply troubling in light of what we know now.”

Boustany said he also wants Congress to dig deeper into communication between the Treasury Department and the IRS commissioner from June, 2012, arguing that it could possibly link the White House to the agency’s actions, which appear at this time to be isolated within the IRS.

“We know communication was had with treasury and if so, and of course with the chief counsel, general counsel of Treasury,” said Boustany. “I have to wonder if it went higher than that. We don’t know that yet. That’s what we’re looking for.”

Crowley said that more hearings should be held and that the Obama administration should help ensure that every document Congress has asked for is retrieved.

But he also maintained that the IRS inspector general, another Bush appointee, determined that the White House was not aware of the agency’s taboo approach to the tax-exempt status applications.

The IRS’s inspector general told lawmakers on Friday that the Treasury Department was told about its audit of allegations of unfairly targeting conservative groups as early as June 2012. The White House holds that it did not learn about the mismanagement practices within the IRS until the IG report was released last week.


Read more:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/300573-dem-ex-irs-chief-lied-to-congress#ixzz2Ui6jvaES
Follow us:
@thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

WARNING TO THE GOVERNMENT, TO THE POLITICIANS, AND TO EVERY PUBLIC OFFICER‏

Alonso, Francisco 6:37 AM

To: Lazaro R Gonzalez (lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com)

From: jose fernandez [mailto:fernjose@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:30 PM
To: jose fernandez
Subject: WARNING TO THE GOVERNMENT, TO THE POLITICIANS, AND TO EVERY PUBLIC OFFICER

http://www.truthinaction.org/index.php/player/?p=TTT1316_F

To implement agenda 21 from the UN it is a treason to the USA constitution and to we the people, we know what you are doing.

Now to the people I encourage you to watch this 9 minute video so you can get an idea of what is coming to you, your family,

and you friends. If America wants to be free again we have to get rid of the UN. I will be in Washington with my freedom bell on July 4th to demand

our rights, our constitution, and our liberty from the government and back to the people.

 

jfernandez3333, warrior of the constitution.

·         THIS IS A STORY OF SHAME, HUMILIATION, AND TORTURE THAT I RECEIVED FROM DHS.‏ Alonso, Francisco To: Lazaro R Gonzalez (lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com) 

From: jose fernandez [mailto:fernjose@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:16 PM
To: jose fernandez
Subject: THIS IS A STORY OF SHAME, HUMILIATION, AND TORTURE THAT I RECEIVED FROM DHS.

On October 10th 2011, as I was coming to the states from another country, when I passed by immigration the DHS sent me to the place that we call the fish tank where they put everybody that they have to clear. In this place you become a sheep or a cow, you cannot speak, you cannot move, and you can be held there for hours, since I know my rights I started complaining, to make a long story short they took me to an office where one of the DHS very strong officers said I was going to be arrested, so I put my hands behind me and he grabbed my hands and he kneed me very hard in my lower back, Then he kept kicking me, by the second kick I shit my pants. As he was kicking me he shouted not to move as I was screaming to him “I’m shitting my pants from the pain.” The pain was horrendous and the humiliation was indescribable, Under these circumstances I had to eat my pride and stay calm or I would be beaten worse, they took me to a cell with glass walls, and they  tied my hands to a bench, while I still have shit in my pants, after a little while they came back, trying to apologize, the young guy who broke my back told me that he took it easy on me because I wasn’t resisting. Recently I found out I had a vertebrae broken, I have another dislocated vertebrae,  and a hernia pinching my two nerves, all of this courtesy of DHS department from the Miami airport, if anybody thinks that this is not torture, I challenge them to try this experience. Since that time I have became a handicap and a half-crippled man. That is what the DHS did to me, I ask DHS next time to give me water boarding, at least the next day I wont be a cripple, like I am now. The evidence is on the videos of the security cameras on October 10th 2011 from 3:00 PM to 8:00 PM. The other part of the evidence, is in my back, which I can hardly move and I haven’t been able to do anything without being under pain. If DHS have anything to re-approach on this you are welcome to put an investigation on this case, but remember that without any doubt I would take water boarding which is supposed to be torture instead of experiencing what happened to me again. I have not shared this story before and I did not share it for sympathy.

WHAT YOU DON’T FEAR, CAN’T HURT YOU. jfernandez3333

“THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’ 

None Dare Call It Treason! No 398 5/29/13 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

mayo 29, 2013

No 398 5/29/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

None Dare Call It Treason! May 28, 2013 by Susan HortonImage

 

The “mind” is the battlefield… where the mind goes the body follows.
To achieve world Government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism and religious dogma.

“Studies of human development indicate the modifiability of human behavior throughout life but especially during infancy, childhood and adolescence. Social institutions such as family and school impose their imprint early on. Thus prejudice, hostility or excessive nationalism may become deeply embedded in the developing personality… Change will be strongly resisted unless an attitude of acceptance has first been engendered”.

“What basic psychological distortion can be found in every civilization of what we know anything? The only force capable of producing these perversions is Morality…the concept of right and wrong. The eradication of the concept of right and wrong is the objective of most psychotherapy. The new leaders in this field propose to re-educate the world’s population using psychological procedures to create a “new breed of amoral men” who will accept a one-world socialistic government”.

“For the rare citizen who escapes indoctrination of the new social order in progressive schools for the Bible believing Christian who rejects that socialism is the new “kingdom of god on earth,” who hold to age old concepts of right and wrong and are vocal about it, the “progressives” have one final ultimate weapon. Declare them insane! Just as in the fields of education, religion, press, radio and TV the progressives have succeeded in infiltrating and “twisting” the psychological professions to their own ends”. Excerpts taken from, (None Dare call it Treason) by: John A. Stormer:

“The people who have been taught to believe what they were told by their parents or their “Bible believing” teachers are the people who are the menace to the world”. Source: Conf. on Educ. (Calif.) Sept. 11, 1954. George Brock Chisholm (1896-1971) the first head of the World Health Org. of the “United Nations” & Medical Practitioner.

Nations around the world are fast conforming to the pattern set in the 1940’s. Few notice its “tentacles” reaching into health programs, and civil society, in over 130 nations.
What prompted this research is twofold 1.) Why is the Christian, German family denied asylum now because they want the right to home school their values to their children? 2.) Recent proliferation of violent crimes among young people, teens to 30. Why now?

1.) The Russian Boston bombers came over on asylum and were given welfare, housing and education immediately. Their parents left and went back to the country of the impending danger they fled from. Not a true need for asylum. We let the kids stay and continued to feed and educate them ultimately to our own demise.
Now we have a “Christian” German family who was also granted asylum and to homeschool their children but the DOJ wants’ to deport them reasoning that home schooling is not a fundamental right. Neither is it a fundamental right for Mexican children non-citizens, to skip across the border to go to our schools and skip back home after class but it is done daily. The difference is that the bombers and the Mexican children both attended our public school system with the Leftist way of thinking being taught, not the Bible like the German family.

2.) Our kids are not just using hurtful words but crossing the line to physical force and death. There is no tangible objective or purpose, to the slaughter of innocent strangers in New Town or attacking family members, schoolmates and teachers. They show no remorse for the crime just the capture. Jodi Arias had to be coerced into saying I’m sorry for my crime. In speaking to the jury it was more important to sell her T-shirts and boast of her giving locks of hair to cancer patients. She appeared as if interviewing for a job, not pleading for her life.

This is the “real life” unfeeling, amoral human Mr. Chisholm spoke of creating. No concept of right and wrong leaves no remorse because you have no moral compass to guide you. Mr. Chisholm’s solution as President Obama’s is government to replace morality. They forgot one key detail in the human psyche, we all have a conscience. To deny the existence of the conscience does not make it go away or switch it off. This truth is not taught to our children in school anymore.

To live in a real state of being amoral is often times, to be constantly impartial. I believe this amoral teaching to our children has switched off the morals of good and made them think they are now amoral when in fact they are living in narcissism. While they seek to replace their undisciplined need to FEEL something with: anger, venting, stealing, hitting, hurting, killing, they are stepping on somebody else’s rights and feelings. There is no restraint. If you are a true amoral, centered, then there would have to be some level of restraint “to not” cross over the line…into wrong.

I believe we are seeing some sad results of Mr. Chisholm’s experiment. What I don’t know is if his hypothesis of natural progression on this road was meant to end like this or continue on to martial law when the govt. is forced to step in?

Pres. Obama at Columbus, Ohio graduation ceremony said this, ”Unfortunately you’ve grown up hearing voices that incisively warn of Govt. as nothing more than some separate sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems. Some of these same voices do their best to gum up the works. They’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices.” Is this the reason for no homeschooling?

Americans have always had instinctual tendencies to fear tyranny, which is a very good thing. That is the ingrained voices of your parents telling you the truth regardless what Mr. Chisholm and Obama tell you about the new wave thinking. At the Democrat Convention they opened with a video stating that govt. is the one thing we all belong too. To me this is an inversion of the constitution. Our founders said the govt. belongs to us not the other way around.

Yes, Government has its purpose but right now it’s focused on the explicit concentration to distort our children’s minds to their vision through power which begets control. Obama’s formula, “The Life of Julia”, picks up the teaching exactly of Mr. Chisholm in 1954 where govt. takes on the role of essentially providing all life’s functions: Civil Society, Church, and Family all under one roof. It is the only thing. There’s Govt. and there’s the Individual, nothing in between.

Mr. Obama warned of Tyranny but it first comes through Treason; violation of allegiance, betrayal of trust and confidence toward ones country or sovereign by waging War that first started on the Battlefield of the “young” mind.                                                                    Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/articles/none-dare-call-it-treason/#ixzz2Ugijnmah

Kerry Subpoenaed for Missing Emails

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Republican Rep. Darrell Issa issued subpoenas Tuesday for a host of State Department emails and other communications on the Benghazi terror attack, signaling that the Obama administration’s recent document dump would not satisfy congressional investigators.                  Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, claimed in a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry that the department is still “withholding documents.”                        He demanded the department release more on the administration’s behind-the-scenes discussions, in the days after the attack, on how they would describe the strike. These documents have since become known as the “Benghazi talking points.”                                             Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/2013/05/kerry-subpoenaed-for-missing-emails/#ixzz2Uggwdmib

Something to Hide? Obama Admin Won’t Answer CBS Reporter’s, Attkisson, Q’s About Scandals By Clash Daily / 28 May 2013

Sharyl Attkisson has problems.

The Obama administration won’t answer the CBS News correspondent’s questions because her investigations — into Benghazi, Fast and Furious, Solyndra — often reflect negatively on it. Some colleagues at CBS News, where she has worked for two decades and earned multiple Emmy awards, dismiss her work because they perceive a political agenda. And now, she says, someone may have hacked into her computers. Attkisson’s one piece of solace may come from finally gaining some like-minded colleagues in the media. For years, Attkisson has been one of the few mainstream reporters pursuing critical stories about the Obama administration. Today, as “scandal season” takes hold in Washington, she has seen her longstanding skepticism of the White House and the Justice Department become the conventional attitude among a formerly deferential Beltway press corps.
Read more: http://clashdaily.com/2013/05/something-to-hide-obama-admin-wont-answer-cbs-reporters-attkisson-qs-about-scandals/#ixzz2UgSV3Gpt
Get more Clash on ClashDaily.com, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.

Un llamado a COMBATIR A LOS MUSULMANES‏ Ricardo Samitier

Una Doctora Nacida En Siria Predica La Guerra Contra Los Musulmanes… Por Ser Una Religión De OdioY Explica Sus Más Grandes ABERRACIONES… 

Debe de verse… tiene subtítulos en Español…

http://www.youtube.com/embed/qhN0u8uKE-M

Was Obama Involved in the IRS Targeting? Vote Here Now.

Home | Newsfront

Tags: holder | king | perjury | rosen | investigation

Rep. Peter King: Holder May Be Guilty of Perjury

Tuesday, 28 May 2013 05:26 PM By Jim Meyers                                                                         Rep. Peter King says Attorney General Eric Holder’s initial denial of involvement in the targeting of Fox News reporter James Rosen “could be perjury.”
In an wide-ranging interview Tuesday with Newsmax TV’s “The Steve Malzberg Show,”  King also discussed:

  • President Barack Obama’s “moralizing” speech on the closing of Guantanamo Bay, saying the terror threat is more dangerous now than on 9/11;
  • The Obama administration should exercise “extreme caution” in evaluating the possible sale of Sprint Nextel Corp. to a foreign company.

King, a Republican from New York, was highly critical of Holder, who previously said he would never be part of targeting a reporter and didn’t think it was good policy, when he actually approved a search warrant on James Rosen. The House Judiciary Committee is reportedly looking into whether he perjured himself in steadfastly denying a role in the Rosen subpoena when he OK’d the seizure of the Fox reporter’s phone records.

King comments: “To me, on its face, that certainly could be perjury. And the reason I’m saying ‘could be’ — I know there’s always precise standards to meet — that certainly warrants a full investigation as to whether or not perjury was committed there. There’ve been other people over the years indicted for perjury or tried for perjury on a lot less evidence than that.”

Story continues below video:

King also insists that the closing of Gitmo can fuel more terror acts against the United States.

“In many ways the terror threat is more dangerous now than it was on Sept. 11, 2001, and for the president to be saying what he did last Thursday — somehow we can declare victory in this or we can phase it down — in many ways it’s more dangerous.

“What we saw in Boston we’ve seen in London, we’ve seen in Paris; that is the face of al-Qaida. That is the face of Islamic jihad. [We need to] face up to it and realize that’s going to be here for a long time, until we stop it, until we make sure that we have the strongest possible defenses and we’re going on offense. We have to go out on front, we have to be preemptive, we have to stop them before they get to us.”

Obama in his speech also said the Muslim community is cooperative and wanting to help. King doesn’t entirely agree.

“The overwhelming majority of Muslims are good Americans. The fact is we’ve had case after case where there are plots coming from within the Muslim community where we have not gotten the assistance from the Muslim community,” he says.
“For instance, it’s my understanding, and this is what I’ve been told by law enforcement people, that when the picture of the two jihadists in Boston was put up, not one person in the mosque in Boston came forward to identify them. It’s impossible to believe with the whole world knowing about what happened, the whole world looking at those faces, that not one person in that mosque recognized either one of those brothers.

“It’s the reason why police and law enforcement have to use so many undercovers, why they have to penetrate into the community, because we are not getting the level of cooperation that we should be getting.”

Finally, King is skeptical that a foreign company should own the third-largest cellphone provider in America. The Japanese conglomerate SoftBank Corp. announced in October that it was seeking approval from the United States for a $20 billion purchase of a 70-percent stake in Sprint.

SoftBank’s bid has raised concerns due to the firm’s close financial ties to the Chinese telecom company Huawei. In October 2012, the House Intelligence Committee, after an 11-month investigation, concluded that Huawei posed a major cybersecurity threat to U.S. intellectual property.

Last month Dish Network, an Englewood, Colo.-based satellite TV company, challenged SoftBank’s bid for Sprint, offering $25.5 billion for the entire company.

Asked if the administration should use “extreme caution” in this matter in light of the cyber-warfare threat, King responds: “Absolutely. There’s no doubt at all.

“This is a new form of warfare. It’s a warfare that we have to accept. We have to accept that it’s there and then go after it.

“What’s going to happen in this particular case I can’t say, but I can say we cannot allow corporate profits to come first. We have to make sure our national security, our homeland security is there and we have to do all we can to make sure that we are protecting our people against this type of cyberinvasion.”

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/holder-king-perjury-rosen/2013/05/28/id/506730?s=al&promo_code=13A58-1#ixzz2UgZVhQTJ
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Stop and read this one. No news reports have mentioned this information.

THIS PART YOU DON’T KNOW, BUT SHOULD.

AMERICAN VALOR, BENGHAZI , LIBYA :  

 

 

 

The stunning part of this story is that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force. Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

The news has been full of the attacks on our embassies throughout the Muslim world, and in particular, the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others in Benghazi , Libya . However, there’s a little known story of incredible bravery, heroics, and courage that should be the top story.

 

So what actually happened at the U.S. embassy in Libya ? We are learning more about this every day. Ambassador Stevens and Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, along with administrative staff, were working out of temporary quarters due to the fact that in the spring of 2011 during the so-called Arab Spring, the United States cut ties with then president Moammar Gadhafi. Our embassy was looted and ransacked, causing it to be unusable. It is still in a state of disrepair.

Security for embassies and their personnel is to be provided by the host nation. Since Libya has gone through a civil war of sorts in the past 18 months, the current government is very unstable, and therefore, unreliable

 

A well-organized attack by radical Muslims was planned specifically targeting the temporary U.S. embassy building. The Libyan security force that was in place to protect our people deserted their post, or joined the attacking force. Either way, our people were in a real fix. And it should be noted that Ambassador Stevens had mentioned on more than one occasion to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, that he was quite concerned for his personal safety and the welfare of his people. It is thought that Ambassador Stevens was on a “hit list.”

 

A short distance from the American compound, two Americans were sleeping. They were in Libya as independent contractors working an assignment totally unrelated to our embassy. They also happened to be former Navy Seal’s.

 

When they heard the noise coming from the attack on our embassy, as you would expect from highly trained warriors, they ran to the fight. Apparently, they had no weapons, but seeing the Libyan guards dropping their guns in their haste in fleeing the scene, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty snatched up several of these discarded weapons and prepared to defend the American compound.

 

Not knowing exactly what was taking place, the two Seal’s set up a defensive perimeter. Unfortunately Ambassador Stevens was already gravely injured, and Foreign Service officer, Sean Smith, was dead. However, due to their quick action and suppressive fire, twenty administrative personnel in the embassy were able to escape to safety. Eventually, these two courageous men were overwhelmed by the sheer numbers brought against them, an enemy force numbering between 100 to 200 attackers which came in two waves. But the stunning part of the story is that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force. Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

 

As it became apparent to these selfless heroes, they were definitely going to

lose their lives unless some reinforcements showed up in a hurry. As we know now, that was not to be. I’m fairly certain they knew they were going to die in this gun fight, but not before they took a whole lot of bad guys with them!

 

Consider these tenets of the Navy SEAL Code:

1) Loyalty to Country, Team and Teammate,

2) Serve with Honor and Integrity On and Off the Battlefield,

3) Ready to Lead, Ready to Follow, Never Quit,

4) Take responsibility for your actions and the actions of your teammates,

5) Excel as Warriors through Discipline and Innovation,

6) Train for War, Fight to Win, Defeat our Nation’s Enemies, and…

7) Earn your Trident every day

(http://www.navyseals.com/seal-code-warrior-creed).

 

Thank you, Tyrone and Glen. To the very last breath, you both lived up to the SEAL Code. You served all of us well. You were courageous in the face of certain death.

And Tyrone, even though you never got to hold your newborn son, he will grow up knowing the character and quality of his father, a man among men who sacrificed himself defending others.

 

Dr. Charles R. Roots

Senior Pastor

Former Staff Sergeant,

USMC Captain,

U. S. Navy Chaplain Corps (Ret.)

 

This should be passed on and on and on.

NO TRUE AMERICAN WOULD OBJECT TO RECEIVING THIS MORE THAN ONCE … SO PASS IT ON 

And Let us never forget the Hillary Clinton Comment 

“What Difference Does It Make?”

 

Eric Holder Investigated For Perjury!‏

5 Fast Facts You Need to Know.

To: Lazaro Gonzalez,  Just a few days after President Obama made a speech that proposed a media shield that would protect investigative journalists from espionage laws, Attorney General Eric Holder will be investigated for perjury over comments made while under oath regarding the legality of certain journalist practices.


1.The Comments Were Made During May 15th Testimony

Watch Now

Subscribe to the Heavy YouTube channel

On May 15, 2013, Attorney General Eric Holder gave testimony over the Justice Department’s alleged surveillance of reporters.


Share it!

Facebook Twitter Email Comment

2. Holder Answered “No” to Question About Espionage Act of 1917

In a conversation with Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) during the testimony, Johnson inquired whether the DOJ could use the Espionage Act of 1917 to prosecute journalists disseminating information. The Hill quotes Holder’s response as being:

In regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material – this is not something I’ve ever been involved in, heard of, or would think would be wise policy


3.Holder Personally Approved Search Warrant For FOX Reporter

 

The allegations of perjury come after information surfaced last week that Holder did, in fact, participate in government intervention of the press. Last week, NBC News confirmed that the highest levels of the DOJ, including Eric Holder, approved the surveillance of FOX reporter James Rosen’s emails.


4. DOJ Surveyed FOX’s Rosen as Investigation of Leak

The investigation began with the suspicion that former intelligence analyst Stephen Kim leaked Rosen confidential information about North Korea.


5. President Obama Just Proposed a Law to Protect Journalists

In last week’s speech on the current state the United States’ counter-terrorism activities, President Obama responded to public outrage that claimed his administration was inhibiting the freedom of the press. He proposed a new media shield law that would provide legal protection to investigative journalists. However, in the speech he specifically called on Attorney General Eric Holder to put the guidelines for the law together:

Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs. Our focus must be on those who break the law. That is why I have called on Congress to pass a media shield law to guard against government over-reach. I have raised these issues with the Attorney General, who shares my concern. So he has agreed to review existing Department of Justice guidelines governing investigations that involve reporters, and will convene a group of media organizations to hear their concerns as part of that review. And I have directed the Attorney General to report back to me by July 12th.

The Daily Beast reported earlier today that Eric Holder was beginning to feel “remorse” for the FOX probe. You can read the quote here:

http://www.heavy.com/news/2013/05/eric-holder-investigated-for-perjury/

Obama’s IRS Spies

May 28, 2013 by Kris Zane  

Floyd Brown, in his prescient exposé Obama’s Enemies List, shouted from the highest mountain, warning of a rogue Obama administration and its mammoth enemies list; but the Establishment refused to listen. Now that the IRS scandal and attack on the Press has proven him right, the mainstream media is playing catch up.

As long as it was just those so-called “extremist” Tea Party, pro-life, and Christian groups that were being attacked, no one seemed to care. But now that we know the Obama administration is an “equal opportunity” attacker, going after the Associated Press, Fox News, local reporters, Romney donors, Benghazi whistleblowers, etc., etc. (with more Obama enemies sure to surface), the country now seems to be taking notice.

But this is only the surface of how the Obama enemies list works. Everything, and I mean everything, is geared towards an enemies list, which is predicated on having an extensive surveillance state.

The communist Saul Alinsky, Barack Hussein Obama’s favorite community organizer, famously said, “The issue is never the issue.” Put a little more plainly: “Deception is our Modus Operandi.”

Case in point: ObamaCare.

Presumably, ObamaCare is about access to healthcare. But doctors are dropping out of the healthcare system in droves, healthcare is already being rationed, and healthcare costs are skyrocketing as much as four hundred percent.

The issue is never the issue. ObamaCare is not about access to healthcare; it’s about an elaborate system to support an enemies list.

Enter the IRS, now in charge of ObamaCare.

In order for the IRS to supposedly determine whether Americans are eligible for government subsidies to pay for mandated health insurance, they must collect a horrendous amount of information on every single American. The IRS is creating a database so vast that it makes George Orwell’s dystopian society in the book 1984 look like amateur hour. Called the Federal Data Services Hub, it will combine the IRS’s income and employment database with the Social Security, Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Health and Human Services databases. Combined with the proposed Immigration Bill creating a national ID system, this will be the mother of all databases—the mother of a complete and total surveillance state.

Does America really believe that the same woman behind the targeting of conservatives at the IRS, former commissioner of tax exempt and government entities Sarah Hall Ingram, now promoted to the head of the IRS’ Affordable Care Act office, was a coincidence? That the person in charge of sending hundreds of questionnaires to Tea Party, pro-life, and Christian groups asking for personal information was promoted to the ObamaCare office by some objective bureaucratic points system?

The issue is never the issue. ObamaCare is not about healthcare; it’s about surveillance. It’s about control. But most importantly, it’s about having access to the information of your enemies. And Obama specifically chose Sarah Hall Ingram to be in charge of this mammoth enemies list.

Conservative groups were prevented from obtaining tax-exempt status by the IRS, forcing them to divulge donor lists, intern lists, and political and family connections, Facebook posts, tweets, event records, transcripts of speeches, even the content of their prayers, all as part of an effort to collect data on their enemies.

Imagine you are a Tea Party member who needs hip replacement surgery. Sarah Hall Ingram, Obama’s chief ObamaCare enforcer, sees the request but also sees through her extensive database that you are part of a local Tea Party group that had opposed ObamaCare, the plan you are now locked into. Think you’ll get a hip replacement? Think again. First will come the endless questions. First will come the long wait. Only when you come around to Obama’s “common sense” approached to healthcare (that is, socialized medicine) and drop the whole perceived Tea Party nonsense will you get the healthcare you need.

The issue is never the issue. ObamaCare is not about healthcare; it’s about a surveillance state. It’s about Obama having access to information on his enemies.

If ObamaCare is allowed to continue—if the Obama administration is allowed to continue, we will no longer have a United States of America. It will be something else. A truly Orwellian nightmare with Barack Hussein Obama as Big Brother and the enemies of the state being conservatives.

The Impeachable Offense

May 28, 2013 by Gerald Todd

The Muslim Brotherhood in the White House! White House tours apparently compromised their free run of the place! Where is the impeachable offense?

Arif Alikhan – Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Mohammed Elibiary – Homeland Security Adviser.

Rashad Hussain – Special Envoy to the (OIC) Organization of the Islamic Conference.

Salam al-Marayati – Obama Advisor and founder Muslim Public Affairs Council (and its current executive director.)

Imam Mohamed Magid – Obama’s Sharia Czar – Islamic Society of North America

Eboo Patel – Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships

Some of these terrorists go back to the first month of BHO’s first reign of terror, er … first (mis)-administration … all very bad guys.

Let’s not forget Hillary’s significant other in the State Department – Huma Abedin and her ties to the Egyptian MB where Christians are being persecuted and murdered.

This is where the impeachable offense comes in. The man and his minions solemnly swore to protect and defend the Constitution. He has been actively enabling the imposition of Sharia Law to replace the Constitution that anchors our freedom. With Sharia must come conversion to Islam as the religion of the United States and the world.  Some already have an idea who would be the coveted Supreme Caliph.

Accompanying him to impeachment should be every judge that has ruled for the imposition of Sharia on a local basis, for every public, military, and diplomatic official who is actively forcing this other half of the culture of death on us. This should include any official who swore on an early version of the Constitution that preceded the Bill of Rights. They have spent American blood and treasure to remove “inconvenient” Muslim dictators who tolerated Christians and Jews while abandoning the people in the Middle East who looked to us to set them free.

The culture of death has two halves: Islam is a theocracy embracing imposed death or slavery for infidels, and “progressivism” with its complete disdain for the sanctity of human life at all stages, even to sexuality. These too are ultimately incompatible with a predictable outcome.

Statesmen in 1950 were taking into account that the temporal power of Islam may return on a broad scale (and with it, the menace that it may shake off a West that has ceased to be Christian and affirm itself as a great anti-Christian world power.)

I used to think Iran getting a nuclear weapon was the “100th egg.” Today, I’m almost convinced the “100th egg” is the United States of America under Islamic rule. Who else could lay waste to the world in the hands of evil men and women?

White House Prepares Lois Lerner For Burial In IRS Scandal

May 28, 2013 by Doug Book

On May 21st, leftist bloggers and columnists were summoned to the West Wing for the purpose of planning the summary execution of IRS Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner. Two of the three known to have attended the meeting—Josh Marshall and Ezra Klein–published scathing attacks against Lerner the very next day, just as the IRS fall-girl was butchering a well-publicized 5th Amendment pleading before Darrell Issa’s House Government Oversight Committee.

The call for Lerner’s scalp was immediately seconded by Democrat congressman and Committee ranking member Elijah Cummings, who stated that Lerner “…should be fired for her role in the scandal.” Massachusetts Democrat Stephen Lynch went so far as to compare Lerner’s targeting of conservative organizations with “…the practice of tyrannical regimes that enact human rights on paper but fail to honor them in practice.”

Let’s face it: Democrats don’t do this to dependable, fellow leftists unless under order by their superiors. In the late 1990’s, while at the Federal Election Commission, Lerner launched an investigation against the Christian Coalition. She undoubtedly won her current job as a result of that thoroughly corrupt action, it being known she would continue the same sort of unscrupulous targeting of conservative and Christian organizations at the IRS!

Yet now the left is turning on her. She received criminally incompetent legal advice for her 5th Amendment declaration, advice from a law firm with strong connections to Barack Obama and the Administration. Certainly, the Regime does not want Lerner to testify before Issa’s committee; so why did her attorney open the legal door, allowing committee Republicans to claim Lerner had waived her 5th Amendment privilege?

News of the IRS scandal was released by Lerner 2 weeks ago when she “suddenly” admitted that the Service had been targeting conservative groups for extra scrutiny. Does anyone think that a revelation so damaging to the Administration could have originated with Lerner (or with former Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, who claimed to have dreamed up the planted question scheme that made the corruption public)? Clearly, this well-publicized admission of guilt was arranged with the full knowledge and approval of the White House.

So Lerner was ordered (or at least agreed) to play the role of sacrificial lamb; admit to wrongdoing that violated IRS rules; and face, well, who knows what sort of future difficulties at the hands of congressional Republicans (or perhaps the federal courts.)

Would she not demand some guarantee of Executive Branch protection in return for such a public leap upon the sword?

On Friday, Lerner was asked to resign by new IRS acting commissioner Danny Werfel. She refused and was promptly placed on administrative leave (or as non-federal employees would call it, paid vacation.)  Lerner probably knows who originally orchestrated the corrupt IRS targeting of conservative groups (and perhaps a whole lot more), which could prove embarrassing at the very least to Barack Obama and the Regime. If she senses betrayal at the hands of her liberal friends, she might make a deal with Issa for immunity. That would be the last thing Barack Obama would want.

It’s difficult to imagine that Obama’s people could so completely botch a scheme whose only purpose was to get bad news out ahead of the Inspector General’s report on IRS corruption. But they have clearly plotted the demise of longtime liberal activist Lois Lerner. And that is usually the last resort of someone who finds he has bungled everything else along the way.

The Error At The Core Of Obamacare

May 28, 2013 by Michael D. Shaw

Although there are literally hundreds of things wrong with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act–aka “Obamacare,” the most fundamental error is the quite foolish notion that making insurance more available (albeit not necessarily more affordable) was somehow the biggest problem facing our failing health care system.

For the record, the biggest problem with our health care system is that we pay way too much (by far the most in the world) for generally poor to mediocre outcomes. That can be a subject for another day. For now, let’s destroy the insurance meme, with an analogy…

Imagine for a moment that there was a horrendous crisis involving house fires. Destruction and injury were rampant. The root causes were manifold, and many people were dying.

Imagine further that the brilliant political solution to this problem did not involve hiring more firefighters, nor even any efforts toward fire prevention. Rather, the Government decided that more fire insurance was the answer. To spread the burden, even if you did not own a house, you still had to obtain insurance or face a penalty (sorry, a tax). A massive bureaucracy would be put in place to ensure that any work done to fix your home had to be performed in accordance with certain guidelines and for a certain price. Don’t try asking for anything off the page.

Meanwhile, houses would continue to burn, people would continue to die, and the underlying situation would not be improved in any measurable way. Some home rebuilding “providers” would find ways to game the system, so the bureaucracy would have to expand to monitor the fraud while making it even more difficult to get your home rebuilt at an ever-increasing cost. Likewise, honest providers would simply gear their projects toward those home-rebuilding “procedures” that were more remunerative, rather than what might be best for the homeowner.

The only possible result of this madness is ever-increasing costs for ever-worsening outcomes.

Now, imagine you’re not imagining. Except that instead of a house fire crisis, we have ourselves a legitimate health care crisis that is being addressed in this same manner.

There is simply not enough money in the world—under any conceivable scheme—to support the prevailing disease care model (as used here and everywhere else) of health care. This model exists only because under the current rubrics, there is far more revenue in treating acute disease than there is in health maintenance and disease prevention. As such, elaborate chicanery and pettifoggery has to be put in place to at least give the illusion that a disease care model is sustainable. Thus…the huge tax increase—finally labeled as such by Johnnie Roberts—that is the PPACA.

Stop Gina‏ enviado por Alberto Pérez

Dear Conservative,

Gina McCarthy and the EPA want to destroy what has made America great and independent, and we need your help today to stop them.
Conservatives in Congress are finally stepping up to STOP the EPA’s assault on America. It’s time for all of us to act.
Republicans’ tough questioning of Gina McCarthy in her nomination fight for EPA Administrator was a strong move– it shows we won’t let the EPA destroy America without a fight — but we know in the end the EPA will continue its war against American industry.
So, we can never back down. We must FIGHT the EPA on EVERY issue and EVERY overreach.
This is your chance to fight an outrageous EPA power grab.
The EPA is trying to KILL the Pebble mine in a remote part of Alaska before they even file a permit application. This sets a horrible precedent – that they can say NO even before there is anything to consider.
This is part of EPA’s power grab to expand its authority.
Pebble would be the largest and most profitable mine in America- so of course, the EPA hates it.
This would be EPA first preemptive veto – if they do this then its game over for American resources, and that means game over for our economy, it’s game over for jobs, and the flood gates are open – and our economy will never recover.
Imagine the EPA with the power to stop any proposed project, anywhere, at any time, before it’s a project!
You can do something to stop it.
EPA is conducting an open comment period on their plan. Radical enviros are on the job stuffing the ballot box with anti-business comments.
EPA doesn’t think you will speak out.
Prove them wrong.
Fight the EPA – stand up for America – submit a comment today.
And please help us by forwarding this to all your friends right now.
Sincerely,

The Resourceful Earth Team
Resourceful Earth is a project of the
Competitive Enterprise Institute

A gallon of regular gasoline the day Obama was inaugurated was $1.79 on average in the U.S. Today that price is $3.59, a 100.6% increase. The number of food stamp recipients has risen since Obama took office from 31,983,716 to 43,200,878, a 35.1% jump. Long term unemployment soared 146.2% during the same 32 month period from 2,600,000 to 6,400,000. Staggering “hope and change” isn’t it?

American citizens living in poverty have risen 9.5% from 39,800,000 to 43,600,000, and the number of unemployed has jumped almost 25% from 11,616,000 to 14,485,000 as of August 31, 2011. The number of unemployed blacks has risen from 12.6% at the end of George Bush’s term to 15.8% today, a 25.4% increase, and finally, our national debt is up 34.4% from 10.627 trillion to 14,278 trillion *

Keep these figures in mind as we recount the number of “firsts” for this presidency

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit rating of the United States .

First President to violate the War Powers Act.

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in

the Gulf of Mexico .

First President to defy a Federal Judges court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.

First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on shovel-ready jobs and later admit there was no such thing as shovel-ready jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S. , including those with cr imi nal convictions.

First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

First President to terminate Americas ability to put a man in space.

First President to encourage racial discrimination and intimidation at polling places.

First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly speak-out on the reasons for their rate increases.

First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state they are allowed to locate a factory.

First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (Az, WI, OH, IN)

First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

First President to appoint 45 Czars to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office.

First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

First President to coddle American enemies while alienating Americas allies.

First President to publicly bow to Americas enemies while refusing to salute the U.S. Flag.

First President to go on multiple global apology tours.

First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends, paid for
by the taxpayer.

First President to refuse to wear the U.S. Flag lapel pin.

First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.

First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000.00 a year at taxpayer expense.

First President to repeat “the Holy Qur’an tells us,” and openly admit “the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.”

Remember that 32 months of Obama White House we the people have accumulated national debt at a rate more than 27 times as fast as during the rest of our nation’s entire history, as the Obama’s plan their next extravagant vacation to the Indonesian Island nation of Bali.

Obama’s Commerce Secretary Pick Failed to Disclose $80 Million in Earnings

28 May 2013 / 26 Comments

The Secretary of Commerce overseas virtually all of the business and industry that takes place in the US and with other countries.  He/she is responsible for trillions of dollars of business and sales.  That requires someone who not only has an extensive business background, but also someone who is trustworthy and beyond reproach.

Recently, President Barack Obama appointed Penny Pritzker to be the next Secretary of Commerce.  According to their website, the Mission Statement for the Department of Commerce states:

“The U.S. Department of Commerce promotes job creation, economic growth, sustainable development and improved standards of living for all Americans by working in partnership with businesses, universities, communities and our nation’s workers. The department touches the daily lives of the American people in many ways, with a wide range of responsibilities in the areas of trade, economic development, technology, entrepreneurship and business development, environmental stewardship, and statistical research and analysis.”

“To drive U.S. competitiveness in the global marketplace, the Commerce Department works to strengthen the international economic position of the United States and facilitates global trade by opening up new markets for U.S. goods and services. Here at home, the Commerce Department promotes progressive business policies that help America’s businesses and entrepreneurs and their communities grow and succeed. Cutting-edge science and technology at the department fosters innovation, and a focus on research and development that moves quickly from the lab to the marketplace generates progress and new 21st century opportunities. No matter where businesses are in their life cycle, whether just getting off the ground or looking to expand into overseas markets, the Commerce Department is singularly focused on making U.S. companies more innovative at home and more competitive abroad, so they can create jobs.”

“The Commerce Department also provides effective management and monitoring of our nation’s resources and assets to support both environmental and economic health. Through critical weather monitoring, weather forecasts and resource preservation, the department protects not only public safety and security but also our oceans, coasts and marine life while assisting their economic development. Other essential operations conducted by the Commerce Department include the constitutionally mandated decennial census, which serves as the basis of America’s representative democracy, as well as the system by which businesses and innovators secure intellectual property rights.”

The Secretary of Commerce oversees an annual budget of $7.5 billion and 47,000 employees located in the US and abroad.  Does Pritzker meet the qualifications needed to head the Commerce Department?

Pritzker is the founder, chairman and CEO of PSP Capital Partners along with the Pritzker Realty Group.  She is known as an entrepreneur and business executive.  In 2011, she was listed by Forbes 400 to be the 263rd wealthiest person in the United States with a net worth of $1.7 billion.  Pritzker also served as finance chairman for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign.

From that, it would seem that she is a successful and highly qualified business person who may just be a decent Secretary of Commerce.  However, there are other factors that need to weighed before she receives an approval.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/
Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/05/obamas-commerce-secretary-pick-failed-to-disclose-80-million-in-earnings/#ixzz2UcPo8iWA

Lo mejor para el final, como el postre…

WND EXCLUSIVE

Obama half-brother uses IRS status to fund polygamy?

No evidence of support for poor while wives live large at resort

Jerome R. Corsi

Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers “The Obama Nation” and “Unfit for Command.” Corsi’s latest book is the forthcoming “What Went Wrong?: The Inside Story of the GOP Debacle of 2012 … And How It Can Be Avoided Next Time.”

NEW YORK – Funds contributed in the United States to a 501(c)3 foundation run by President Obama’s older half-brother, Abongo “Roy” Malik Obama, have been diverted to support Malik’s multiple wives in Kenya, an expert on Islamic extremism has charged.

Walid Shoebat, an Arabic-speaking former Muslim Brotherhood member, has detailed his allegations in a 22-page investigative report titled “New IRS Scandal: Islamic Extremism and Sex Slaves: Report Reveals Obama’s Relatives Run Charities of Deceit,” published on his website

After a thorough examination of available evidence, Shoebat explained to WND his allegations against the Obama family tax-exempt foundations:

“When Malik Obama and Sarah Obama raised money in the United States as the respective heads of foundations claiming to be charities, not only did the Internal Revenue Service illegally grant one of them tax-deductible status retroactively, but these foundations have supported – to varying degrees – illegal operations that acquire funding for personal gain, philandering, polygamy and the promotion of Wahhabism, the brand of Islam practiced by Al-Qaeda.”

For the past two years, long before the current IRS scandals became public, WND has been reporting irregularities in two IRS-approved 501(c)3 organizations operated in the U.S. by Obama’s half-brother and step-grandmother in Kenya:

WND reported in September 2011 the Barack H. Obama Foundation apparently received IRS approval one month after an application was submitted in May 2011. The IRS determination letter June 11, 2011, granted a highly irregular retroactive tax-exempt approval only after the group came under fire for operating as a 501(c)3 foundation since 2008 without ever having applied to the IRS.

In October 2012, WND reported a separate foundation, the Mama Sarah Obama Foundation, created on behalf of Obama’s step-grandmother in Kenya, has transferred funds, 90 percent of which are raised from U.S. individuals and corporations, to send Kenyan students to the top three most radical Wahhabist madrassas in Saudi Arabia.

Since its founding in 2008, the Barack H. Obama Foundation, operating out of a commercial mail drop in Arlington, Va., has solicited tax-deductible contributions on the Internet, listing addresses and telephone numbers both in the U.S. and Kenya, without disclosing the group lacked an IRS determination letter.

In September 2011, the IRS confirmed to WND that the Barack H. Obama Foundation had received a determination letter in June 2011, awarding the group tax-exempt 501(c)3 status retro-actively to 2008

Tax-exempt polygamy?

On March 3, 2013, Andrew Malone, reporting for the London Daily Mail, documented that Malik’s youngest wife in Kenya, Sheila Anyano, 35 years his junior, had spent the past two years living with three of Malik’s other wives at the “Barack H Obama Foundation rest and relaxation center,” a restaurant complex that profits from visitors drawn by the family’s connection to the American president.

According to the Daily Mail, members of his extended family in Kenya have accused Malik, a practitioner of Islam and a polygamist, of being a wife-beater and philanderer. Malik is accused of seducing Sheila, the newest of his estimated 12 wives while she was a 17-year-old schoolgirl – a crime in Kenya where the legal age of consent is 18.

Malone tracked down Sheila’s mother, Mary, who explained to the reporter that Malik Obama had “secret trysts” with the girl after spotting her attending prayers at the mosque he has built in Kogelo, the family’s ancestral.

Sheila, now age 20, told Ambrose that marrying Malik, now age 55, was the “worst decision” of her life and confirmed that she and Malik kept their marriage “a secret” since she was 17.

“At first he was good, after he started speaking to me at the mosque,” Sheila told the Daily Mail. “But he has changed. Marrying him has been the biggest mistake of my life. He beats me, but mostly he’s just nasty and quarrelsome.”

Several sources report the “center” where Malik Obama houses his multiple wives is a “hotel” with a restaurant.

The Egyptian independent daily newspaper Al-Masry Al Youm, on Nov. 6, 2012, reported a meeting conducted in the only hotel in Kogelo, calling it the “Barack H. Obama Recreation and Rest Center.”

A Smithsonian Magazine article published in May 2011 distinguished the Barack H. Obama Recreation and Rest Center from then open and operating Kogelo Village Resort, a 40-bed hotel and conference center owned by Nicholas Rajula. The article noted Malik Obama, “the president’s half-brother and the oldest son of Barack Obama Sr., who had eight children with four wives,” had “invested a large sum in the soon-to-open Barack H. Obama Recreation Center and Rest Area in Nyag’oma Kugelo.”

On Jan. 18, 2013, the Christian Science Monitor noted Malik Obama was running for political office in Kenya. He lost running on a campaign slogan that played on his half-brother’s electoral success in the United States.

“Just as it is in the United States, I want it here,” he Malik told the Monitor.

The paper said he was speaking in his office in a recreation center he set up with the Barack H. Obama Foundation, described as “a charitable organization he founded to build houses for women and orphans.”

Shoebot charged that Malik Obama is abusing non-profit funds.

“There is no evidence to suggest that Malik is building any houses in Kogelo for widows and orphans as claimed,” Shoebat said.

Neither is there evidence that the Mama Sarah Foundation has built any homes for widows, orphans and HIV/AIDS victims.

“The only evidence where monies were spent involves the Barack H. Obama Recreation and Rest Center in Kenya, which housed Malik’s 12 wives in a facility that includes a restaurant and a mosque with a madrassa,” he said.

“While building mosques is legally considered charity, evidence shows the entire funding came directly from entities and individuals from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain,” Shoebat said. “There is nothing of charitable nature to show for all the funds Malik raises from the United States. To date, there is no evidence for any accomplishments toward building homes for orphans, widows and AIDS victims in Kogelo or anywhere else in Kenya.”

Limited financial reporting

An IRS Form 990-EZ required for tax-exempt organizations was filed on May 23, 2011, only days before the IRS determination letter was sent.

Barack H. Obama Foundation, Form 990-EZ, filed May 23, 2011, page 1

The Form 990-EZ appears to have been hand-written by Abongo Malik Obama himself, complete with an unorthodox page of calculations evidently included to back up the amounts entered into the form.

The Form 990 reported the foundation had received $24,250 total gross income for 2010, derived from contributions, gifts and grants.

“We were not very successful this year because of limited contributions,” Malik reported on the Form 990. “The Foundation sponsored a Youth Tournement (sic) and embarked on construction of community bridges.”

The Form 990 listed Samuel Andika Obiero of Arlington, Va., and Andrew Mboya of Hackensack, N.J., as directors, in addition to Abongo Malik Obama.

GuideStar.org, the private website that posts IRS documents of non-profit organizations, indicated that no audited financial statements were available for the Barack H. Obama Foundation.

 

GuideStar listing for Barack H. Obama Foundation, May 28, 2013

The website homepage of the Barack H. Obama Foundation prominently features a photograph of Barack H. Obama Sr. and a statement that the foundation is “a fully tax-exempt (501(c)(3) charitable organization.”

Homepage of the Barack H. Obama Foundation http://www.barackhobamafoundation.org/

Born in Kenya to Kezia

Born in Kenya, on March 15, 1958, Abongo Malik “Roy” Obama was the first child born to Barack Obama Sr.

The son of Kezia, Obama Sr.’s first wife, Malik was only 18 months old when Barack Obama Sr. arrived in New York Aug. 8, 1959, on a BOAC flight in transit from Kenya to begin his undergraduate studies at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu.

Having abandoned Kezia in Kenya, Obama Sr. subsequently married Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Obama Jr.’s mother, while in Honolulu.

In September 1962, Obama Sr. headed to Cambridge, Mass., without Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Jr. to begin graduate studies in economics at Harvard University.

Malik Obama, best man at the wedding of Barack H. Obama, Oct. 3, 1992

As WND previously reported, Barack Obama Sr., on Aug. 17, 1962, in an Immigration and Naturalization form to extend his time of temporary stay in the United States, listed Roy Obama as his only child, neglecting to list Dunham as his wife or Barack Obama Jr. as his son.

Convert to Islam

Malik is a major character in President Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My Father.”’

A key passage in the book concerns Obama’s reactions when Malik joins Barack to be the best man at his wedding to Michelle.

Noting that Malik had converted from Christianity to Islam, Obama wrote on page 441 that Malik had “sworn off pork and tobacco and alcohol.”

Obama continued: “Abongo’s new lifestyle has left him lean and clear-eyed, and at the wedding, he looked so dignified in his black African gown with white trim and matching cap that some of our guests mistook him for my father.”

Pointedly, Obama observed that Malik was “prone to make lengthy pronouncements on the need for the black man to liberate himself from the poisoning influences of European culture.”

Malik was featured in a family portrait taken in one of Obama’s earlier trips to Kenya, as U.S. senator, in 2006.

Obama family portrait taken in Kenya. Abongo “Roy” Malik Obama stands to Barack Obama Jr.’s immediate left

Malik surfaced during the 2008 presidential campaign, dressed in African garb and holding a photograph of Barack Obama in African garb.

Abongo “Roy” Malik Obama displays a 1980s-era photograph of Barack Obama in Kenya

WND has determined that he has a valid Social Security number, issued in Washington, D.C., between 1985 and 1987, and associated with both the names “Roy Obama” and “Abongo Malik Obama,” names that he appears to use interchangeably in the U.S.

A private investigative report commissioned by WND shows Malik Obama has been identified since 1988 with 22 different rental addresses in the Washington, D.C., area, including in Prince Georges County and Montgomery County, Maryland.

According to a recent report in the Los Angeles Times, Malik Obama, a frequent traveler between the U.S. and Kenya, has declared himself to be the “president” of Nyangoma-Kogelo, the family’s ancestral village in Kenya.

WND was not able to determine the legal status of Roy Obama to live and work in the U.S.

El Oro Cayo de Precio DE NUEVO‏

Ricardo Samitier

El Siglo XXI Trae Noticias Inexplicables El Oro Cae De Precio Y El Dólar Se Fortalece

Sin Que Exista Una Razón Económica… Lógica

 

¿Quién está MANIPULANDO LA ECONOMÍA? El precio del Oro físico en estos momentos ES MENOR, que en el FUTURO.  No hay que ser un EXPERTO PARA SABER ESO… En estas condiciones, es rentable comprar contratos de ORO EN Papel para el futuro… y vender a otro comprador. Por lo general, una entidad no-occidental.

 

El Jugador clave debe de ser JAPÓN  que es el país asiático con un grave problema económico. El Banco Central Japonés el “BCJ” está comprando el 70% de los bonos del Gobierno japonés y los bancos japoneses están comprando el resto.

PERO NO HAY COMPRADORES PRIVADOS! Así que el BCJ está subiendo el tipo de interés. Pero los bancos Japoneses, pueden pedir prestado el “Yen” a CERO% INTERÉS y comprar inmediatamente dólares, para especular en el creciente mercado de valores.

El efecto inmediato, FORTALECE EL DÓLAR y el yen se debilita, que reduce el precio del oro en dólares, pero no en Yen! Los compradores japoneses privados están viendo un aumento del precio del oro en yenes! 

La gente tiende a vender lo que baja y comprar lo que se va para arriba. Por lo tanto, los inversionistas japonesas están comprando oro también! 

Finalmente, el Banco Central Japonés tendrá que comprar el 100% de sus bonos. En ese momento, el yen se convertirá en una moneda casi sin valor internacional. Por lo tanto, el dólar seguirá fortaleciéndose frente de oro. El euro también se reforzará, lo que hará más deflación de los precios en la zona Euro y EE.UU.

Pero los objetivos de la Fed americano y el BCEuropeo son lograr el 2% de inflación y la deflación no le conviene! JAPÓN ESTÁ TORPEDEANDO, LA POLÍTICA DECLARADA “OFICIALMENTE” DE LAS DOS ECONOMÍAS MÁS GRANDES!

Que GANA JAPÓN… Debido a QUE EL YEN perdió valor… las exportaciones japonesas se abaratarán! Eso demuestra que estamos en la UNA GUERRA MUNDIAL DE MONEDAS… y los politiqueros, NO QUIEREN DECIRLO!  Porque el “NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL”  se va a ir como la TORRE DE BABEL… “AL CARAJO”

Finalmente, la FEDERALES de USA se verán obligado a DEVALUAR EL DÓLAR FRENTE AL ORO, porque el oro es el único PATRÓN UNIVERSAL aceptado por todos… en ese momento, Obama y sus asesores FED van a REPETIR LAS ACCIONES del socialista Franklin Delano Roosevelt en 1932, que REVALORIZA EL ORO, DESDE $24.00 POR ONZA A $36.00 ​​CON UNA PLUMA Y SU FIRMAEse día FDR… nieto del TRAFICANTE MAS GRANDE DE OPIO DE HONG KONG hizo más dinero en 24 horas que su abuelo en todos sus años de TRAFICANTE DE DROGA…

Si USA sigue siendo la PRIMERA POTENCIA MILITAR… es decir; si Obama no logra destruir las 1,000 bombas atómicas… que le ha prometido a PUTIN y a los Musulmanes… pues SIN EL EJERCITO y sin un dólar fuerte… USA DEJA DE SER EL LÍDER MUNDIAL… 

Si el congreso impide la destrucción del ejercito… entonces nuevamente USA y Europa darán  a conocer un NUEVO PRECIO DEL ORO EN $4,000.00 POR ONZA… y empezaran la compra en $3,995.00 Esto triplica el precio del oro, pero lo que realmente hace, ES DEVALUAR EL DÓLAR AL NIVEL DE LA CHINA! 

En ese momento, el mundo entero va a estar en un patrón oro. No porque los políticos quieren, pero debido a que se verán obligados… REPITO, ESTAMOS EN UNA GUERRA DE DIVISAS! Las guerras de CAÑONAZOS y disparo, comienzan más tarde!

Sobre Latino América:

Cada día está más claro… Fidel Castro… fue puesto en Cuba y utilizado POR LA GRAN CONSPIRACIÓN COMUNISTA FABIANA AMERICANA para llevar a todos los países de latino América a la DICTADURA DE UN SOLO PARTIDO… DEL GOBIERNO MUNDIAL… y esa es la razón POR LA CUAL los ex revolucionarios de los 60 y 70 son hoy los Presidentes y los generales ALIADOS DE USA que los persiguieron están en las CÁRCELES…

 “THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’ 

No 398 5/29/13 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

mayo 29, 2013

No 398 5/29/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

None Dare CImageall It Treason! May 28, 2013 by Susan Horton

 

The “mind” is the battlefield… where the mind goes the body follows.
To achieve world Government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism and religious dogma.

“Studies of human development indicate the modifiability of human behavior throughout life but especially during infancy, childhood and adolescence. Social institutions such as family and school impose their imprint early on. Thus prejudice, hostility or excessive nationalism may become deeply embedded in the developing personality… Change will be strongly resisted unless an attitude of acceptance has first been engendered”.

“What basic psychological distortion can be found in every civilization of what we know anything? The only force capable of producing these perversions is Morality…the concept of right and wrong. The eradication of the concept of right and wrong is the objective of most psychotherapy. The new leaders in this field propose to re-educate the world’s population using psychological procedures to create a “new breed of amoral men” who will accept a one-world socialistic government”.

“For the rare citizen who escapes indoctrination of the new social order in progressive schools for the Bible believing Christian who rejects that socialism is the new “kingdom of god on earth,” who hold to age old concepts of right and wrong and are vocal about it, the “progressives” have one final ultimate weapon. Declare them insane! Just as in the fields of education, religion, press, radio and TV the progressives have succeeded in infiltrating and “twisting” the psychological professions to their own ends”. Excerpts taken from, (None Dare call it Treason) by: John A. Stormer:

“The people who have been taught to believe what they were told by their parents or their “Bible believing” teachers are the people who are the menace to the world”. Source: Conf. on Educ. (Calif.) Sept. 11, 1954. George Brock Chisholm (1896-1971) the first head of the World Health Org. of the “United Nations” & Medical Practitioner.

Nations around the world are fast conforming to the pattern set in the 1940’s. Few notice its “tentacles” reaching into health programs, and civil society, in over 130 nations.
What prompted this research is twofold 1.) Why is the Christian, German family denied asylum now because they want the right to home school their values to their children? 2.) Recent proliferation of violent crimes among young people, teens to 30. Why now?

1.) The Russian Boston bombers came over on asylum and were given welfare, housing and education immediately. Their parents left and went back to the country of the impending danger they fled from. Not a true need for asylum. We let the kids stay and continued to feed and educate them ultimately to our own demise.
Now we have a “Christian” German family who was also granted asylum and to homeschool their children but the DOJ wants’ to deport them reasoning that home schooling is not a fundamental right. Neither is it a fundamental right for Mexican children non-citizens, to skip across the border to go to our schools and skip back home after class but it is done daily. The difference is that the bombers and the Mexican children both attended our public school system with the Leftist way of thinking being taught, not the Bible like the German family.

2.) Our kids are not just using hurtful words but crossing the line to physical force and death. There is no tangible objective or purpose, to the slaughter of innocent strangers in New Town or attacking family members, schoolmates and teachers. They show no remorse for the crime just the capture. Jodi Arias had to be coerced into saying I’m sorry for my crime. In speaking to the jury it was more important to sell her T-shirts and boast of her giving locks of hair to cancer patients. She appeared as if interviewing for a job, not pleading for her life.

This is the “real life” unfeeling, amoral human Mr. Chisholm spoke of creating. No concept of right and wrong leaves no remorse because you have no moral compass to guide you. Mr. Chisholm’s solution as President Obama’s is government to replace morality. They forgot one key detail in the human psyche, we all have a conscience. To deny the existence of the conscience does not make it go away or switch it off. This truth is not taught to our children in school anymore.

To live in a real state of being amoral is often times, to be constantly impartial. I believe this amoral teaching to our children has switched off the morals of good and made them think they are now amoral when in fact they are living in narcissism. While they seek to replace their undisciplined need to FEEL something with: anger, venting, stealing, hitting, hurting, killing, they are stepping on somebody else’s rights and feelings. There is no restraint. If you are a true amoral, centered, then there would have to be some level of restraint “to not” cross over the line…into wrong.

I believe we are seeing some sad results of Mr. Chisholm’s experiment. What I don’t know is if his hypothesis of natural progression on this road was meant to end like this or continue on to martial law when the govt. is forced to step in?

Pres. Obama at Columbus, Ohio graduation ceremony said this, ”Unfortunately you’ve grown up hearing voices that incisively warn of Govt. as nothing more than some separate sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems. Some of these same voices do their best to gum up the works. They’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices.” Is this the reason for no homeschooling?

Americans have always had instinctual tendencies to fear tyranny, which is a very good thing. That is the ingrained voices of your parents telling you the truth regardless what Mr. Chisholm and Obama tell you about the new wave thinking. At the Democrat Convention they opened with a video stating that govt. is the one thing we all belong too. To me this is an inversion of the constitution. Our founders said the govt. belongs to us not the other way around.

Yes, Government has its purpose but right now it’s focused on the explicit concentration to distort our children’s minds to their vision through power which begets control. Obama’s formula, “The Life of Julia”, picks up the teaching exactly of Mr. Chisholm in 1954 where govt. takes on the role of essentially providing all life’s functions: Civil Society, Church, and Family all under one roof. It is the only thing. There’s Govt. and there’s the Individual, nothing in between.

Mr. Obama warned of Tyranny but it first comes through Treason; violation of allegiance, betrayal of trust and confidence toward ones country or sovereign by waging War that first started on the Battlefield of the “young” mind.                                                                    Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/articles/none-dare-call-it-treason/#ixzz2Ugijnmah

Kerry Subpoenaed for Missing Emails

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Republican Rep. Darrell Issa issued subpoenas Tuesday for a host of State Department emails and other communications on the Benghazi terror attack, signaling that the Obama administration’s recent document dump would not satisfy congressional investigators.                  Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, claimed in a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry that the department is still “withholding documents.”                        He demanded the department release more on the administration’s behind-the-scenes discussions, in the days after the attack, on how they would describe the strike. These documents have since become known as the “Benghazi talking points.”                                             Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/2013/05/kerry-subpoenaed-for-missing-emails/#ixzz2Uggwdmib

Something to Hide? Obama Admin Won’t Answer CBS Reporter’s, Attkisson, Q’s About Scandals By Clash Daily / 28 May 2013

Sharyl Attkisson has problems.

The Obama administration won’t answer the CBS News correspondent’s questions because her investigations — into Benghazi, Fast and Furious, Solyndra — often reflect negatively on it. Some colleagues at CBS News, where she has worked for two decades and earned multiple Emmy awards, dismiss her work because they perceive a political agenda. And now, she says, someone may have hacked into her computers. Attkisson’s one piece of solace may come from finally gaining some like-minded colleagues in the media. For years, Attkisson has been one of the few mainstream reporters pursuing critical stories about the Obama administration. Today, as “scandal season” takes hold in Washington, she has seen her longstanding skepticism of the White House and the Justice Department become the conventional attitude among a formerly deferential Beltway press corps.
Read more: http://clashdaily.com/2013/05/something-to-hide-obama-admin-wont-answer-cbs-reporters-attkisson-qs-about-scandals/#ixzz2UgSV3Gpt
Get more Clash on ClashDaily.com, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.

Un llamado a COMBATIR A LOS MUSULMANES‏ Ricardo Samitier

Una Doctora Nacida En Siria Predica La Guerra Contra Los Musulmanes… Por Ser Una Religión De OdioY Explica Sus Más Grandes ABERRACIONES… 

Debe de verse… tiene subtítulos en Español…

http://www.youtube.com/embed/qhN0u8uKE-M

Was Obama Involved in the IRS Targeting? Vote Here Now.

Home | Newsfront

Tags: holder | king | perjury | rosen | investigation

Rep. Peter King: Holder May Be Guilty of Perjury

Tuesday, 28 May 2013 05:26 PM By Jim Meyers                                                                         Rep. Peter King says Attorney General Eric Holder’s initial denial of involvement in the targeting of Fox News reporter James Rosen “could be perjury.”
In an wide-ranging interview Tuesday with Newsmax TV’s “The Steve Malzberg Show,”  King also discussed:

  • President Barack Obama’s “moralizing” speech on the closing of Guantanamo Bay, saying the terror threat is more dangerous now than on 9/11;
  • The Obama administration should exercise “extreme caution” in evaluating the possible sale of Sprint Nextel Corp. to a foreign company.

King, a Republican from New York, was highly critical of Holder, who previously said he would never be part of targeting a reporter and didn’t think it was good policy, when he actually approved a search warrant on James Rosen. The House Judiciary Committee is reportedly looking into whether he perjured himself in steadfastly denying a role in the Rosen subpoena when he OK’d the seizure of the Fox reporter’s phone records.

King comments: “To me, on its face, that certainly could be perjury. And the reason I’m saying ‘could be’ — I know there’s always precise standards to meet — that certainly warrants a full investigation as to whether or not perjury was committed there. There’ve been other people over the years indicted for perjury or tried for perjury on a lot less evidence than that.”

Story continues below video:

King also insists that the closing of Gitmo can fuel more terror acts against the United States.

“In many ways the terror threat is more dangerous now than it was on Sept. 11, 2001, and for the president to be saying what he did last Thursday — somehow we can declare victory in this or we can phase it down — in many ways it’s more dangerous.

“What we saw in Boston we’ve seen in London, we’ve seen in Paris; that is the face of al-Qaida. That is the face of Islamic jihad. [We need to] face up to it and realize that’s going to be here for a long time, until we stop it, until we make sure that we have the strongest possible defenses and we’re going on offense. We have to go out on front, we have to be preemptive, we have to stop them before they get to us.”

Obama in his speech also said the Muslim community is cooperative and wanting to help. King doesn’t entirely agree.

“The overwhelming majority of Muslims are good Americans. The fact is we’ve had case after case where there are plots coming from within the Muslim community where we have not gotten the assistance from the Muslim community,” he says.
“For instance, it’s my understanding, and this is what I’ve been told by law enforcement people, that when the picture of the two jihadists in Boston was put up, not one person in the mosque in Boston came forward to identify them. It’s impossible to believe with the whole world knowing about what happened, the whole world looking at those faces, that not one person in that mosque recognized either one of those brothers.

“It’s the reason why police and law enforcement have to use so many undercovers, why they have to penetrate into the community, because we are not getting the level of cooperation that we should be getting.”

Finally, King is skeptical that a foreign company should own the third-largest cellphone provider in America. The Japanese conglomerate SoftBank Corp. announced in October that it was seeking approval from the United States for a $20 billion purchase of a 70-percent stake in Sprint.

SoftBank’s bid has raised concerns due to the firm’s close financial ties to the Chinese telecom company Huawei. In October 2012, the House Intelligence Committee, after an 11-month investigation, concluded that Huawei posed a major cybersecurity threat to U.S. intellectual property.

Last month Dish Network, an Englewood, Colo.-based satellite TV company, challenged SoftBank’s bid for Sprint, offering $25.5 billion for the entire company.

Asked if the administration should use “extreme caution” in this matter in light of the cyber-warfare threat, King responds: “Absolutely. There’s no doubt at all.

“This is a new form of warfare. It’s a warfare that we have to accept. We have to accept that it’s there and then go after it.

“What’s going to happen in this particular case I can’t say, but I can say we cannot allow corporate profits to come first. We have to make sure our national security, our homeland security is there and we have to do all we can to make sure that we are protecting our people against this type of cyberinvasion.”

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/holder-king-perjury-rosen/2013/05/28/id/506730?s=al&promo_code=13A58-1#ixzz2UgZVhQTJ
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Stop and read this one. No news reports have mentioned this information.

THIS PART YOU DON’T KNOW, BUT SHOULD.

AMERICAN VALOR, BENGHAZI , LIBYA :  

 

 

 

The stunning part of this story is that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force. Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

The news has been full of the attacks on our embassies throughout the Muslim world, and in particular, the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others in Benghazi , Libya . However, there’s a little known story of incredible bravery, heroics, and courage that should be the top story.

 

So what actually happened at the U.S. embassy in Libya ? We are learning more about this every day. Ambassador Stevens and Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, along with administrative staff, were working out of temporary quarters due to the fact that in the spring of 2011 during the so-called Arab Spring, the United States cut ties with then president Moammar Gadhafi. Our embassy was looted and ransacked, causing it to be unusable. It is still in a state of disrepair.

Security for embassies and their personnel is to be provided by the host nation. Since Libya has gone through a civil war of sorts in the past 18 months, the current government is very unstable, and therefore, unreliable

 

A well-organized attack by radical Muslims was planned specifically targeting the temporary U.S. embassy building. The Libyan security force that was in place to protect our people deserted their post, or joined the attacking force. Either way, our people were in a real fix. And it should be noted that Ambassador Stevens had mentioned on more than one occasion to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, that he was quite concerned for his personal safety and the welfare of his people. It is thought that Ambassador Stevens was on a “hit list.”

 

A short distance from the American compound, two Americans were sleeping. They were in Libya as independent contractors working an assignment totally unrelated to our embassy. They also happened to be former Navy Seal’s.

 

When they heard the noise coming from the attack on our embassy, as you would expect from highly trained warriors, they ran to the fight. Apparently, they had no weapons, but seeing the Libyan guards dropping their guns in their haste in fleeing the scene, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty snatched up several of these discarded weapons and prepared to defend the American compound.

 

Not knowing exactly what was taking place, the two Seal’s set up a defensive perimeter. Unfortunately Ambassador Stevens was already gravely injured, and Foreign Service officer, Sean Smith, was dead. However, due to their quick action and suppressive fire, twenty administrative personnel in the embassy were able to escape to safety. Eventually, these two courageous men were overwhelmed by the sheer numbers brought against them, an enemy force numbering between 100 to 200 attackers which came in two waves. But the stunning part of the story is that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force. Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

 

As it became apparent to these selfless heroes, they were definitely going to

lose their lives unless some reinforcements showed up in a hurry. As we know now, that was not to be. I’m fairly certain they knew they were going to die in this gun fight, but not before they took a whole lot of bad guys with them!

 

Consider these tenets of the Navy SEAL Code:

1) Loyalty to Country, Team and Teammate,

2) Serve with Honor and Integrity On and Off the Battlefield,

3) Ready to Lead, Ready to Follow, Never Quit,

4) Take responsibility for your actions and the actions of your teammates,

5) Excel as Warriors through Discipline and Innovation,

6) Train for War, Fight to Win, Defeat our Nation’s Enemies, and…

7) Earn your Trident every day

(http://www.navyseals.com/seal-code-warrior-creed).

 

Thank you, Tyrone and Glen. To the very last breath, you both lived up to the SEAL Code. You served all of us well. You were courageous in the face of certain death.

And Tyrone, even though you never got to hold your newborn son, he will grow up knowing the character and quality of his father, a man among men who sacrificed himself defending others.

 

Dr. Charles R. Roots

Senior Pastor

Former Staff Sergeant,

USMC Captain,

U. S. Navy Chaplain Corps (Ret.)

 

This should be passed on and on and on.

NO TRUE AMERICAN WOULD OBJECT TO RECEIVING THIS MORE THAN ONCE … SO PASS IT ON 

And Let us never forget the Hillary Clinton Comment 

“What Difference Does It Make?”

 

Eric Holder Investigated For Perjury!‏

5 Fast Facts You Need to Know.

To: Lazaro Gonzalez,  Just a few days after President Obama made a speech that proposed a media shield that would protect investigative journalists from espionage laws, Attorney General Eric Holder will be investigated for perjury over comments made while under oath regarding the legality of certain journalist practices.


1.The Comments Were Made During May 15th Testimony

Watch Now

Subscribe to the Heavy YouTube channel

On May 15, 2013, Attorney General Eric Holder gave testimony over the Justice Department’s alleged surveillance of reporters.


Share it!

Facebook Twitter Email Comment

2. Holder Answered “No” to Question About Espionage Act of 1917

In a conversation with Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) during the testimony, Johnson inquired whether the DOJ could use the Espionage Act of 1917 to prosecute journalists disseminating information. The Hill quotes Holder’s response as being:

In regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material – this is not something I’ve ever been involved in, heard of, or would think would be wise policy


3.Holder Personally Approved Search Warrant For FOX Reporter

 

The allegations of perjury come after information surfaced last week that Holder did, in fact, participate in government intervention of the press. Last week, NBC News confirmed that the highest levels of the DOJ, including Eric Holder, approved the surveillance of FOX reporter James Rosen’s emails.


4. DOJ Surveyed FOX’s Rosen as Investigation of Leak

The investigation began with the suspicion that former intelligence analyst Stephen Kim leaked Rosen confidential information about North Korea.


5. President Obama Just Proposed a Law to Protect Journalists

In last week’s speech on the current state the United States’ counter-terrorism activities, President Obama responded to public outrage that claimed his administration was inhibiting the freedom of the press. He proposed a new media shield law that would provide legal protection to investigative journalists. However, in the speech he specifically called on Attorney General Eric Holder to put the guidelines for the law together:

Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs. Our focus must be on those who break the law. That is why I have called on Congress to pass a media shield law to guard against government over-reach. I have raised these issues with the Attorney General, who shares my concern. So he has agreed to review existing Department of Justice guidelines governing investigations that involve reporters, and will convene a group of media organizations to hear their concerns as part of that review. And I have directed the Attorney General to report back to me by July 12th.

The Daily Beast reported earlier today that Eric Holder was beginning to feel “remorse” for the FOX probe. You can read the quote here:

http://www.heavy.com/news/2013/05/eric-holder-investigated-for-perjury/

Obama’s IRS Spies

May 28, 2013 by Kris Zane  

Floyd Brown, in his prescient exposé Obama’s Enemies List, shouted from the highest mountain, warning of a rogue Obama administration and its mammoth enemies list; but the Establishment refused to listen. Now that the IRS scandal and attack on the Press has proven him right, the mainstream media is playing catch up.

As long as it was just those so-called “extremist” Tea Party, pro-life, and Christian groups that were being attacked, no one seemed to care. But now that we know the Obama administration is an “equal opportunity” attacker, going after the Associated Press, Fox News, local reporters, Romney donors, Benghazi whistleblowers, etc., etc. (with more Obama enemies sure to surface), the country now seems to be taking notice.

But this is only the surface of how the Obama enemies list works. Everything, and I mean everything, is geared towards an enemies list, which is predicated on having an extensive surveillance state.

The communist Saul Alinsky, Barack Hussein Obama’s favorite community organizer, famously said, “The issue is never the issue.” Put a little more plainly: “Deception is our Modus Operandi.”

Case in point: ObamaCare.

Presumably, ObamaCare is about access to healthcare. But doctors are dropping out of the healthcare system in droves, healthcare is already being rationed, and healthcare costs are skyrocketing as much as four hundred percent.

The issue is never the issue. ObamaCare is not about access to healthcare; it’s about an elaborate system to support an enemies list.

Enter the IRS, now in charge of ObamaCare.

In order for the IRS to supposedly determine whether Americans are eligible for government subsidies to pay for mandated health insurance, they must collect a horrendous amount of information on every single American. The IRS is creating a database so vast that it makes George Orwell’s dystopian society in the book 1984 look like amateur hour. Called the Federal Data Services Hub, it will combine the IRS’s income and employment database with the Social Security, Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Health and Human Services databases. Combined with the proposed Immigration Bill creating a national ID system, this will be the mother of all databases—the mother of a complete and total surveillance state.

Does America really believe that the same woman behind the targeting of conservatives at the IRS, former commissioner of tax exempt and government entities Sarah Hall Ingram, now promoted to the head of the IRS’ Affordable Care Act office, was a coincidence? That the person in charge of sending hundreds of questionnaires to Tea Party, pro-life, and Christian groups asking for personal information was promoted to the ObamaCare office by some objective bureaucratic points system?

The issue is never the issue. ObamaCare is not about healthcare; it’s about surveillance. It’s about control. But most importantly, it’s about having access to the information of your enemies. And Obama specifically chose Sarah Hall Ingram to be in charge of this mammoth enemies list.

Conservative groups were prevented from obtaining tax-exempt status by the IRS, forcing them to divulge donor lists, intern lists, and political and family connections, Facebook posts, tweets, event records, transcripts of speeches, even the content of their prayers, all as part of an effort to collect data on their enemies.

Imagine you are a Tea Party member who needs hip replacement surgery. Sarah Hall Ingram, Obama’s chief ObamaCare enforcer, sees the request but also sees through her extensive database that you are part of a local Tea Party group that had opposed ObamaCare, the plan you are now locked into. Think you’ll get a hip replacement? Think again. First will come the endless questions. First will come the long wait. Only when you come around to Obama’s “common sense” approached to healthcare (that is, socialized medicine) and drop the whole perceived Tea Party nonsense will you get the healthcare you need.

The issue is never the issue. ObamaCare is not about healthcare; it’s about a surveillance state. It’s about Obama having access to information on his enemies.

If ObamaCare is allowed to continue—if the Obama administration is allowed to continue, we will no longer have a United States of America. It will be something else. A truly Orwellian nightmare with Barack Hussein Obama as Big Brother and the enemies of the state being conservatives.

The Impeachable Offense

May 28, 2013 by Gerald Todd

The Muslim Brotherhood in the White House! White House tours apparently compromised their free run of the place! Where is the impeachable offense?

Arif Alikhan – Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Mohammed Elibiary – Homeland Security Adviser.

Rashad Hussain – Special Envoy to the (OIC) Organization of the Islamic Conference.

Salam al-Marayati – Obama Advisor and founder Muslim Public Affairs Council (and its current executive director.)

Imam Mohamed Magid – Obama’s Sharia Czar – Islamic Society of North America

Eboo Patel – Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships

Some of these terrorists go back to the first month of BHO’s first reign of terror, er … first (mis)-administration … all very bad guys.

Let’s not forget Hillary’s significant other in the State Department – Huma Abedin and her ties to the Egyptian MB where Christians are being persecuted and murdered.

This is where the impeachable offense comes in. The man and his minions solemnly swore to protect and defend the Constitution. He has been actively enabling the imposition of Sharia Law to replace the Constitution that anchors our freedom. With Sharia must come conversion to Islam as the religion of the United States and the world.  Some already have an idea who would be the coveted Supreme Caliph.

Accompanying him to impeachment should be every judge that has ruled for the imposition of Sharia on a local basis, for every public, military, and diplomatic official who is actively forcing this other half of the culture of death on us. This should include any official who swore on an early version of the Constitution that preceded the Bill of Rights. They have spent American blood and treasure to remove “inconvenient” Muslim dictators who tolerated Christians and Jews while abandoning the people in the Middle East who looked to us to set them free.

The culture of death has two halves: Islam is a theocracy embracing imposed death or slavery for infidels, and “progressivism” with its complete disdain for the sanctity of human life at all stages, even to sexuality. These too are ultimately incompatible with a predictable outcome.

Statesmen in 1950 were taking into account that the temporal power of Islam may return on a broad scale (and with it, the menace that it may shake off a West that has ceased to be Christian and affirm itself as a great anti-Christian world power.)

I used to think Iran getting a nuclear weapon was the “100th egg.” Today, I’m almost convinced the “100th egg” is the United States of America under Islamic rule. Who else could lay waste to the world in the hands of evil men and women?

White House Prepares Lois Lerner For Burial In IRS Scandal

May 28, 2013 by Doug Book

On May 21st, leftist bloggers and columnists were summoned to the West Wing for the purpose of planning the summary execution of IRS Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner. Two of the three known to have attended the meeting—Josh Marshall and Ezra Klein–published scathing attacks against Lerner the very next day, just as the IRS fall-girl was butchering a well-publicized 5th Amendment pleading before Darrell Issa’s House Government Oversight Committee.

The call for Lerner’s scalp was immediately seconded by Democrat congressman and Committee ranking member Elijah Cummings, who stated that Lerner “…should be fired for her role in the scandal.” Massachusetts Democrat Stephen Lynch went so far as to compare Lerner’s targeting of conservative organizations with “…the practice of tyrannical regimes that enact human rights on paper but fail to honor them in practice.”

Let’s face it: Democrats don’t do this to dependable, fellow leftists unless under order by their superiors. In the late 1990’s, while at the Federal Election Commission, Lerner launched an investigation against the Christian Coalition. She undoubtedly won her current job as a result of that thoroughly corrupt action, it being known she would continue the same sort of unscrupulous targeting of conservative and Christian organizations at the IRS!

Yet now the left is turning on her. She received criminally incompetent legal advice for her 5th Amendment declaration, advice from a law firm with strong connections to Barack Obama and the Administration. Certainly, the Regime does not want Lerner to testify before Issa’s committee; so why did her attorney open the legal door, allowing committee Republicans to claim Lerner had waived her 5th Amendment privilege?

News of the IRS scandal was released by Lerner 2 weeks ago when she “suddenly” admitted that the Service had been targeting conservative groups for extra scrutiny. Does anyone think that a revelation so damaging to the Administration could have originated with Lerner (or with former Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, who claimed to have dreamed up the planted question scheme that made the corruption public)? Clearly, this well-publicized admission of guilt was arranged with the full knowledge and approval of the White House.

So Lerner was ordered (or at least agreed) to play the role of sacrificial lamb; admit to wrongdoing that violated IRS rules; and face, well, who knows what sort of future difficulties at the hands of congressional Republicans (or perhaps the federal courts.)

Would she not demand some guarantee of Executive Branch protection in return for such a public leap upon the sword?

On Friday, Lerner was asked to resign by new IRS acting commissioner Danny Werfel. She refused and was promptly placed on administrative leave (or as non-federal employees would call it, paid vacation.)  Lerner probably knows who originally orchestrated the corrupt IRS targeting of conservative groups (and perhaps a whole lot more), which could prove embarrassing at the very least to Barack Obama and the Regime. If she senses betrayal at the hands of her liberal friends, she might make a deal with Issa for immunity. That would be the last thing Barack Obama would want.

It’s difficult to imagine that Obama’s people could so completely botch a scheme whose only purpose was to get bad news out ahead of the Inspector General’s report on IRS corruption. But they have clearly plotted the demise of longtime liberal activist Lois Lerner. And that is usually the last resort of someone who finds he has bungled everything else along the way.

The Error At The Core Of Obamacare

May 28, 2013 by Michael D. Shaw

Although there are literally hundreds of things wrong with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act–aka “Obamacare,” the most fundamental error is the quite foolish notion that making insurance more available (albeit not necessarily more affordable) was somehow the biggest problem facing our failing health care system.

For the record, the biggest problem with our health care system is that we pay way too much (by far the most in the world) for generally poor to mediocre outcomes. That can be a subject for another day. For now, let’s destroy the insurance meme, with an analogy…

Imagine for a moment that there was a horrendous crisis involving house fires. Destruction and injury were rampant. The root causes were manifold, and many people were dying.

Imagine further that the brilliant political solution to this problem did not involve hiring more firefighters, nor even any efforts toward fire prevention. Rather, the Government decided that more fire insurance was the answer. To spread the burden, even if you did not own a house, you still had to obtain insurance or face a penalty (sorry, a tax). A massive bureaucracy would be put in place to ensure that any work done to fix your home had to be performed in accordance with certain guidelines and for a certain price. Don’t try asking for anything off the page.

Meanwhile, houses would continue to burn, people would continue to die, and the underlying situation would not be improved in any measurable way. Some home rebuilding “providers” would find ways to game the system, so the bureaucracy would have to expand to monitor the fraud while making it even more difficult to get your home rebuilt at an ever-increasing cost. Likewise, honest providers would simply gear their projects toward those home-rebuilding “procedures” that were more remunerative, rather than what might be best for the homeowner.

The only possible result of this madness is ever-increasing costs for ever-worsening outcomes.

Now, imagine you’re not imagining. Except that instead of a house fire crisis, we have ourselves a legitimate health care crisis that is being addressed in this same manner.

There is simply not enough money in the world—under any conceivable scheme—to support the prevailing disease care model (as used here and everywhere else) of health care. This model exists only because under the current rubrics, there is far more revenue in treating acute disease than there is in health maintenance and disease prevention. As such, elaborate chicanery and pettifoggery has to be put in place to at least give the illusion that a disease care model is sustainable. Thus…the huge tax increase—finally labeled as such by Johnnie Roberts—that is the PPACA.

Stop Gina‏ enviado por Alberto Pérez

Dear Conservative,

Gina McCarthy and the EPA want to destroy what has made America great and independent, and we need your help today to stop them.
Conservatives in Congress are finally stepping up to STOP the EPA’s assault on America. It’s time for all of us to act.
Republicans’ tough questioning of Gina McCarthy in her nomination fight for EPA Administrator was a strong move– it shows we won’t let the EPA destroy America without a fight — but we know in the end the EPA will continue its war against American industry.
So, we can never back down. We must FIGHT the EPA on EVERY issue and EVERY overreach.
This is your chance to fight an outrageous EPA power grab.
The EPA is trying to KILL the Pebble mine in a remote part of Alaska before they even file a permit application. This sets a horrible precedent – that they can say NO even before there is anything to consider.
This is part of EPA’s power grab to expand its authority.
Pebble would be the largest and most profitable mine in America- so of course, the EPA hates it.
This would be EPA first preemptive veto – if they do this then its game over for American resources, and that means game over for our economy, it’s game over for jobs, and the flood gates are open – and our economy will never recover.
Imagine the EPA with the power to stop any proposed project, anywhere, at any time, before it’s a project!
You can do something to stop it.
EPA is conducting an open comment period on their plan. Radical enviros are on the job stuffing the ballot box with anti-business comments.
EPA doesn’t think you will speak out.
Prove them wrong.
Fight the EPA – stand up for America – submit a comment today.
And please help us by forwarding this to all your friends right now.
Sincerely,

The Resourceful Earth Team
Resourceful Earth is a project of the
Competitive Enterprise Institute

A gallon of regular gasoline the day Obama was inaugurated was $1.79 on average in the U.S. Today that price is $3.59, a 100.6% increase. The number of food stamp recipients has risen since Obama took office from 31,983,716 to 43,200,878, a 35.1% jump. Long term unemployment soared 146.2% during the same 32 month period from 2,600,000 to 6,400,000. Staggering “hope and change” isn’t it?

American citizens living in poverty have risen 9.5% from 39,800,000 to 43,600,000, and the number of unemployed has jumped almost 25% from 11,616,000 to 14,485,000 as of August 31, 2011. The number of unemployed blacks has risen from 12.6% at the end of George Bush’s term to 15.8% today, a 25.4% increase, and finally, our national debt is up 34.4% from 10.627 trillion to 14,278 trillion *

Keep these figures in mind as we recount the number of “firsts” for this presidency

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit rating of the United States .

First President to violate the War Powers Act.

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in

the Gulf of Mexico .

First President to defy a Federal Judges court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.

First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on shovel-ready jobs and later admit there was no such thing as shovel-ready jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S. , including those with cr imi nal convictions.

First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

First President to terminate Americas ability to put a man in space.

First President to encourage racial discrimination and intimidation at polling places.

First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly speak-out on the reasons for their rate increases.

First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state they are allowed to locate a factory.

First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (Az, WI, OH, IN)

First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

First President to appoint 45 Czars to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office.

First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

First President to coddle American enemies while alienating Americas allies.

First President to publicly bow to Americas enemies while refusing to salute the U.S. Flag.

First President to go on multiple global apology tours.

First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends, paid for
by the taxpayer.

First President to refuse to wear the U.S. Flag lapel pin.

First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.

First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000.00 a year at taxpayer expense.

First President to repeat “the Holy Qur’an tells us,” and openly admit “the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.”

Remember that 32 months of Obama White House we the people have accumulated national debt at a rate more than 27 times as fast as during the rest of our nation’s entire history, as the Obama’s plan their next extravagant vacation to the Indonesian Island nation of Bali.

Obama’s Commerce Secretary Pick Failed to Disclose $80 Million in Earnings

28 May 2013 / 26 Comments

The Secretary of Commerce overseas virtually all of the business and industry that takes place in the US and with other countries.  He/she is responsible for trillions of dollars of business and sales.  That requires someone who not only has an extensive business background, but also someone who is trustworthy and beyond reproach.

Recently, President Barack Obama appointed Penny Pritzker to be the next Secretary of Commerce.  According to their website, the Mission Statement for the Department of Commerce states:

“The U.S. Department of Commerce promotes job creation, economic growth, sustainable development and improved standards of living for all Americans by working in partnership with businesses, universities, communities and our nation’s workers. The department touches the daily lives of the American people in many ways, with a wide range of responsibilities in the areas of trade, economic development, technology, entrepreneurship and business development, environmental stewardship, and statistical research and analysis.”

“To drive U.S. competitiveness in the global marketplace, the Commerce Department works to strengthen the international economic position of the United States and facilitates global trade by opening up new markets for U.S. goods and services. Here at home, the Commerce Department promotes progressive business policies that help America’s businesses and entrepreneurs and their communities grow and succeed. Cutting-edge science and technology at the department fosters innovation, and a focus on research and development that moves quickly from the lab to the marketplace generates progress and new 21st century opportunities. No matter where businesses are in their life cycle, whether just getting off the ground or looking to expand into overseas markets, the Commerce Department is singularly focused on making U.S. companies more innovative at home and more competitive abroad, so they can create jobs.”

“The Commerce Department also provides effective management and monitoring of our nation’s resources and assets to support both environmental and economic health. Through critical weather monitoring, weather forecasts and resource preservation, the department protects not only public safety and security but also our oceans, coasts and marine life while assisting their economic development. Other essential operations conducted by the Commerce Department include the constitutionally mandated decennial census, which serves as the basis of America’s representative democracy, as well as the system by which businesses and innovators secure intellectual property rights.”

The Secretary of Commerce oversees an annual budget of $7.5 billion and 47,000 employees located in the US and abroad.  Does Pritzker meet the qualifications needed to head the Commerce Department?

Pritzker is the founder, chairman and CEO of PSP Capital Partners along with the Pritzker Realty Group.  She is known as an entrepreneur and business executive.  In 2011, she was listed by Forbes 400 to be the 263rd wealthiest person in the United States with a net worth of $1.7 billion.  Pritzker also served as finance chairman for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign.

From that, it would seem that she is a successful and highly qualified business person who may just be a decent Secretary of Commerce.  However, there are other factors that need to weighed before she receives an approval.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/
Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/05/obamas-commerce-secretary-pick-failed-to-disclose-80-million-in-earnings/#ixzz2UcPo8iWA

Lo mejor para el final, como el postre…

WND EXCLUSIVE

Obama half-brother uses IRS status to fund polygamy?

No evidence of support for poor while wives live large at resort

Jerome R. Corsi

Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers “The Obama Nation” and “Unfit for Command.” Corsi’s latest book is the forthcoming “What Went Wrong?: The Inside Story of the GOP Debacle of 2012 … And How It Can Be Avoided Next Time.”

NEW YORK – Funds contributed in the United States to a 501(c)3 foundation run by President Obama’s older half-brother, Abongo “Roy” Malik Obama, have been diverted to support Malik’s multiple wives in Kenya, an expert on Islamic extremism has charged.

Walid Shoebat, an Arabic-speaking former Muslim Brotherhood member, has detailed his allegations in a 22-page investigative report titled “New IRS Scandal: Islamic Extremism and Sex Slaves: Report Reveals Obama’s Relatives Run Charities of Deceit,” published on his website

After a thorough examination of available evidence, Shoebat explained to WND his allegations against the Obama family tax-exempt foundations:

“When Malik Obama and Sarah Obama raised money in the United States as the respective heads of foundations claiming to be charities, not only did the Internal Revenue Service illegally grant one of them tax-deductible status retroactively, but these foundations have supported – to varying degrees – illegal operations that acquire funding for personal gain, philandering, polygamy and the promotion of Wahhabism, the brand of Islam practiced by Al-Qaeda.”

For the past two years, long before the current IRS scandals became public, WND has been reporting irregularities in two IRS-approved 501(c)3 organizations operated in the U.S. by Obama’s half-brother and step-grandmother in Kenya:

WND reported in September 2011 the Barack H. Obama Foundation apparently received IRS approval one month after an application was submitted in May 2011. The IRS determination letter June 11, 2011, granted a highly irregular retroactive tax-exempt approval only after the group came under fire for operating as a 501(c)3 foundation since 2008 without ever having applied to the IRS.

In October 2012, WND reported a separate foundation, the Mama Sarah Obama Foundation, created on behalf of Obama’s step-grandmother in Kenya, has transferred funds, 90 percent of which are raised from U.S. individuals and corporations, to send Kenyan students to the top three most radical Wahhabist madrassas in Saudi Arabia.

Since its founding in 2008, the Barack H. Obama Foundation, operating out of a commercial mail drop in Arlington, Va., has solicited tax-deductible contributions on the Internet, listing addresses and telephone numbers both in the U.S. and Kenya, without disclosing the group lacked an IRS determination letter.

In September 2011, the IRS confirmed to WND that the Barack H. Obama Foundation had received a determination letter in June 2011, awarding the group tax-exempt 501(c)3 status retro-actively to 2008

Tax-exempt polygamy?

On March 3, 2013, Andrew Malone, reporting for the London Daily Mail, documented that Malik’s youngest wife in Kenya, Sheila Anyano, 35 years his junior, had spent the past two years living with three of Malik’s other wives at the “Barack H Obama Foundation rest and relaxation center,” a restaurant complex that profits from visitors drawn by the family’s connection to the American president.

According to the Daily Mail, members of his extended family in Kenya have accused Malik, a practitioner of Islam and a polygamist, of being a wife-beater and philanderer. Malik is accused of seducing Sheila, the newest of his estimated 12 wives while she was a 17-year-old schoolgirl – a crime in Kenya where the legal age of consent is 18.

Malone tracked down Sheila’s mother, Mary, who explained to the reporter that Malik Obama had “secret trysts” with the girl after spotting her attending prayers at the mosque he has built in Kogelo, the family’s ancestral.

Sheila, now age 20, told Ambrose that marrying Malik, now age 55, was the “worst decision” of her life and confirmed that she and Malik kept their marriage “a secret” since she was 17.

“At first he was good, after he started speaking to me at the mosque,” Sheila told the Daily Mail. “But he has changed. Marrying him has been the biggest mistake of my life. He beats me, but mostly he’s just nasty and quarrelsome.”

Several sources report the “center” where Malik Obama houses his multiple wives is a “hotel” with a restaurant.

The Egyptian independent daily newspaper Al-Masry Al Youm, on Nov. 6, 2012, reported a meeting conducted in the only hotel in Kogelo, calling it the “Barack H. Obama Recreation and Rest Center.”

A Smithsonian Magazine article published in May 2011 distinguished the Barack H. Obama Recreation and Rest Center from then open and operating Kogelo Village Resort, a 40-bed hotel and conference center owned by Nicholas Rajula. The article noted Malik Obama, “the president’s half-brother and the oldest son of Barack Obama Sr., who had eight children with four wives,” had “invested a large sum in the soon-to-open Barack H. Obama Recreation Center and Rest Area in Nyag’oma Kugelo.”

On Jan. 18, 2013, the Christian Science Monitor noted Malik Obama was running for political office in Kenya. He lost running on a campaign slogan that played on his half-brother’s electoral success in the United States.

“Just as it is in the United States, I want it here,” he Malik told the Monitor.

The paper said he was speaking in his office in a recreation center he set up with the Barack H. Obama Foundation, described as “a charitable organization he founded to build houses for women and orphans.”

Shoebot charged that Malik Obama is abusing non-profit funds.

“There is no evidence to suggest that Malik is building any houses in Kogelo for widows and orphans as claimed,” Shoebat said.

Neither is there evidence that the Mama Sarah Foundation has built any homes for widows, orphans and HIV/AIDS victims.

“The only evidence where monies were spent involves the Barack H. Obama Recreation and Rest Center in Kenya, which housed Malik’s 12 wives in a facility that includes a restaurant and a mosque with a madrassa,” he said.

“While building mosques is legally considered charity, evidence shows the entire funding came directly from entities and individuals from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain,” Shoebat said. “There is nothing of charitable nature to show for all the funds Malik raises from the United States. To date, there is no evidence for any accomplishments toward building homes for orphans, widows and AIDS victims in Kogelo or anywhere else in Kenya.”

Limited financial reporting

An IRS Form 990-EZ required for tax-exempt organizations was filed on May 23, 2011, only days before the IRS determination letter was sent.

Barack H. Obama Foundation, Form 990-EZ, filed May 23, 2011, page 1

The Form 990-EZ appears to have been hand-written by Abongo Malik Obama himself, complete with an unorthodox page of calculations evidently included to back up the amounts entered into the form.

The Form 990 reported the foundation had received $24,250 total gross income for 2010, derived from contributions, gifts and grants.

“We were not very successful this year because of limited contributions,” Malik reported on the Form 990. “The Foundation sponsored a Youth Tournement (sic) and embarked on construction of community bridges.”

The Form 990 listed Samuel Andika Obiero of Arlington, Va., and Andrew Mboya of Hackensack, N.J., as directors, in addition to Abongo Malik Obama.

GuideStar.org, the private website that posts IRS documents of non-profit organizations, indicated that no audited financial statements were available for the Barack H. Obama Foundation.

 

GuideStar listing for Barack H. Obama Foundation, May 28, 2013

The website homepage of the Barack H. Obama Foundation prominently features a photograph of Barack H. Obama Sr. and a statement that the foundation is “a fully tax-exempt (501(c)(3) charitable organization.”

Homepage of the Barack H. Obama Foundation http://www.barackhobamafoundation.org/

Born in Kenya to Kezia

Born in Kenya, on March 15, 1958, Abongo Malik “Roy” Obama was the first child born to Barack Obama Sr.

The son of Kezia, Obama Sr.’s first wife, Malik was only 18 months old when Barack Obama Sr. arrived in New York Aug. 8, 1959, on a BOAC flight in transit from Kenya to begin his undergraduate studies at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu.

Having abandoned Kezia in Kenya, Obama Sr. subsequently married Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Obama Jr.’s mother, while in Honolulu.

In September 1962, Obama Sr. headed to Cambridge, Mass., without Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Jr. to begin graduate studies in economics at Harvard University.

Malik Obama, best man at the wedding of Barack H. Obama, Oct. 3, 1992

As WND previously reported, Barack Obama Sr., on Aug. 17, 1962, in an Immigration and Naturalization form to extend his time of temporary stay in the United States, listed Roy Obama as his only child, neglecting to list Dunham as his wife or Barack Obama Jr. as his son.

Convert to Islam

Malik is a major character in President Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My Father.”’

A key passage in the book concerns Obama’s reactions when Malik joins Barack to be the best man at his wedding to Michelle.

Noting that Malik had converted from Christianity to Islam, Obama wrote on page 441 that Malik had “sworn off pork and tobacco and alcohol.”

Obama continued: “Abongo’s new lifestyle has left him lean and clear-eyed, and at the wedding, he looked so dignified in his black African gown with white trim and matching cap that some of our guests mistook him for my father.”

Pointedly, Obama observed that Malik was “prone to make lengthy pronouncements on the need for the black man to liberate himself from the poisoning influences of European culture.”

Malik was featured in a family portrait taken in one of Obama’s earlier trips to Kenya, as U.S. senator, in 2006.

Obama family portrait taken in Kenya. Abongo “Roy” Malik Obama stands to Barack Obama Jr.’s immediate left

Malik surfaced during the 2008 presidential campaign, dressed in African garb and holding a photograph of Barack Obama in African garb.

Abongo “Roy” Malik Obama displays a 1980s-era photograph of Barack Obama in Kenya

WND has determined that he has a valid Social Security number, issued in Washington, D.C., between 1985 and 1987, and associated with both the names “Roy Obama” and “Abongo Malik Obama,” names that he appears to use interchangeably in the U.S.

A private investigative report commissioned by WND shows Malik Obama has been identified since 1988 with 22 different rental addresses in the Washington, D.C., area, including in Prince Georges County and Montgomery County, Maryland.

According to a recent report in the Los Angeles Times, Malik Obama, a frequent traveler between the U.S. and Kenya, has declared himself to be the “president” of Nyangoma-Kogelo, the family’s ancestral village in Kenya.

WND was not able to determine the legal status of Roy Obama to live and work in the U.S.

El Oro Cayo de Precio DE NUEVO‏

Ricardo Samitier

El Siglo XXI Trae Noticias Inexplicables El Oro Cae De Precio Y El Dólar Se Fortalece

Sin Que Exista Una Razón Económica… Lógica

 

¿Quién está MANIPULANDO LA ECONOMÍA? El precio del Oro físico en estos momentos ES MENOR, que en el FUTURO.  No hay que ser un EXPERTO PARA SABER ESO… En estas condiciones, es rentable comprar contratos de ORO EN Papel para el futuro… y vender a otro comprador. Por lo general, una entidad no-occidental.

 

El Jugador clave debe de ser JAPÓN  que es el país asiático con un grave problema económico. El Banco Central Japonés el “BCJ” está comprando el 70% de los bonos del Gobierno japonés y los bancos japoneses están comprando el resto.

PERO NO HAY COMPRADORES PRIVADOS! Así que el BCJ está subiendo el tipo de interés. Pero los bancos Japoneses, pueden pedir prestado el “Yen” a CERO% INTERÉS y comprar inmediatamente dólares, para especular en el creciente mercado de valores.

El efecto inmediato, FORTALECE EL DÓLAR y el yen se debilita, que reduce el precio del oro en dólares, pero no en Yen! Los compradores japoneses privados están viendo un aumento del precio del oro en yenes! 

La gente tiende a vender lo que baja y comprar lo que se va para arriba. Por lo tanto, los inversionistas japonesas están comprando oro también! 

Finalmente, el Banco Central Japonés tendrá que comprar el 100% de sus bonos. En ese momento, el yen se convertirá en una moneda casi sin valor internacional. Por lo tanto, el dólar seguirá fortaleciéndose frente de oro. El euro también se reforzará, lo que hará más deflación de los precios en la zona Euro y EE.UU.

Pero los objetivos de la Fed americano y el BCEuropeo son lograr el 2% de inflación y la deflación no le conviene! JAPÓN ESTÁ TORPEDEANDO, LA POLÍTICA DECLARADA “OFICIALMENTE” DE LAS DOS ECONOMÍAS MÁS GRANDES!

Que GANA JAPÓN… Debido a QUE EL YEN perdió valor… las exportaciones japonesas se abaratarán! Eso demuestra que estamos en la UNA GUERRA MUNDIAL DE MONEDAS… y los politiqueros, NO QUIEREN DECIRLO!  Porque el “NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL”  se va a ir como la TORRE DE BABEL… “AL CARAJO”

Finalmente, la FEDERALES de USA se verán obligado a DEVALUAR EL DÓLAR FRENTE AL ORO, porque el oro es el único PATRÓN UNIVERSAL aceptado por todos… en ese momento, Obama y sus asesores FED van a REPETIR LAS ACCIONES del socialista Franklin Delano Roosevelt en 1932, que REVALORIZA EL ORO, DESDE $24.00 POR ONZA A $36.00 ​​CON UNA PLUMA Y SU FIRMAEse día FDR… nieto del TRAFICANTE MAS GRANDE DE OPIO DE HONG KONG hizo más dinero en 24 horas que su abuelo en todos sus años de TRAFICANTE DE DROGA…

Si USA sigue siendo la PRIMERA POTENCIA MILITAR… es decir; si Obama no logra destruir las 1,000 bombas atómicas… que le ha prometido a PUTIN y a los Musulmanes… pues SIN EL EJERCITO y sin un dólar fuerte… USA DEJA DE SER EL LÍDER MUNDIAL… 

Si el congreso impide la destrucción del ejercito… entonces nuevamente USA y Europa darán  a conocer un NUEVO PRECIO DEL ORO EN $4,000.00 POR ONZA… y empezaran la compra en $3,995.00 Esto triplica el precio del oro, pero lo que realmente hace, ES DEVALUAR EL DÓLAR AL NIVEL DE LA CHINA! 

En ese momento, el mundo entero va a estar en un patrón oro. No porque los políticos quieren, pero debido a que se verán obligados… REPITO, ESTAMOS EN UNA GUERRA DE DIVISAS! Las guerras de CAÑONAZOS y disparo, comienzan más tarde!

Sobre Latino América:

Cada día está más claro… Fidel Castro… fue puesto en Cuba y utilizado POR LA GRAN CONSPIRACIÓN COMUNISTA FABIANA AMERICANA para llevar a todos los países de latino América a la DICTADURA DE UN SOLO PARTIDO… DEL GOBIERNO MUNDIAL… y esa es la razón POR LA CUAL los ex revolucionarios de los 60 y 70 son hoy los Presidentes y los generales ALIADOS DE USA que los persiguieron están en las CÁRCELES…

 “THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’ 

No 397 5/28/13 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

mayo 28, 2013

No 397 5/28/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

My question isn’t about who’s going to resign. My question is who is going to jail…?”                                      –House Speaker John Boehner

 Image

A Government Against Liberty

May 25, 2013 by Ralph R. Reiland

Let’s say you’re like most people and believe the federal government has become too large, too wasteful, too crooked, and too intrusive. Now imagine the morning mail arrives from the money-bleeding U.S. Postal Service ($16 billion in the hole last year) and there’s a letter from the Internal Revenue Service with a stern warning about “penalties for perjury” and a long list of questions and probes about your friends, associates, ideas, and political activities.

Here’s an example, directed from the IRS to the Linchpins of Liberty in Franklin, Tennessee:

“Provide details regarding all training you have provided or will provide. Indicate who has received or will receive the training and submit copies of the training material.”

“Liberty,” it seems, unless it’s a 19th century gift from France standing quietly in New York Harbor, has become a concept that’s now viewed by D.C.’s central planners and tax collectors as a bit too messy, subversive, uncontrolled and individualistic.

Following its review of IRS letters to 11 tea party groups and conservative organizations applying for tax-exempt status, Politico reported that the agency “wanted to know everything — in some cases, it even seemed curious about what members were thinking.”

In fact, it went beyond what people were thinking with the IRS summoning a pro-life group in Iowa to reveal detailed information regarding the content of their prayers.

“Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,” the IRS asked the Coalition for Life in Iowa. Additionally, the IRS office in Cincinnati asked all board members of the Iowa group to sign a sworn declaration promising not to picket Planned Parenthood.

And from ABC News, listed below is a sample of the questions and requests that ABC News found in roughly half a dozen IRS questionnaires sent to tea party groups” from 2010 to 2012:

“Provide copies of the agendas and minutes of your Board meetings and, if applicable, membership meetings, including a description of legislative and electoral issues discussed, and whether candidates for political office were invited to address the meeting.”

“Submit the following information relating to your past and present directors, officers and key employees: (a) Provide a resume for each.”

“The names of donors, contributors and grantors. The amount of each of the donations, contributions, and grants and the dates you received them.”

“Fully describe your youth outreach program with the local school.”

“Provide a list of all issues that are important to your organization. Indicate your position regarding each issue.”

“Please explain in detail your organization’s involvement with the Tea Party.”

“Provide copies of handbills you distributed at your monthly meetings.”

“The names of persons from your organization and the amount of time they spent on the event or program, or events.” The IRS also asked for “copies of all your current web pages, including blog posts” and “copies of all your newsletters, bulletins, flyers or any other media or literature you have disseminated to your members or others,” plus copies of related information on “Facebook and other social networking sites,” and “copies of stories or articles that have been published about you.”

And this: “Do you have a close relationship with any candidate for political office or political party? If so, describe fully the nature of that relationship.”

On June 29, 2011, IRS staffers told senior agency official Lois Lerner that they were giving special scrutiny to “statements in the case file” by groups that “criticize how the country is being run.” Also targeted were groups that focused on government spending, deficits, government debt, and educating people on ways to “make America a better place to live.”

On Jan. 15, 2012, the IRS widened its target list to include “political action type organizations” involved in education on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

In his recent column, “In AP, Rosen investigations, government makes criminals of reporters” (May 22, 2013), Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank pointed to the fundamental threats to freedom in the Obama administration’s “broad snooping into Associated Press phone records,” along with the administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen at Fox News and the administration’s identification of Rosen in a search warrant as a “possible co-conspirator” in violation of the Espionage Act.

“To treat a reporter as a criminal for doing his job — seeking out information the government doesn’t want made public — deprives Americans of the First Amendment freedom on which all other constitutional rights are based,” warned Milbank. “Guns? Privacy? Due Process? Equal protection? If you can’t speak out, you can’t defend those rights, either.”

And while White House Press Secretary Jay Carney says that President Obama is “a fierce defender of the First Amendment” and doesn’t think “journalists should be prosecuted for doing their jobs,” Milbank points out that the Obama administration “has launched more leak prosecutions than all previous administrations combined.”

On what’s next, Milbank posted a warning: “If the administration is spying on reporters and accusing them of criminality just for asking questions — well, who knows what else this crowd is capable of doing?”

It’s “a culture of cover-ups and intimidation that is giving the administration so much trouble,” recently asserted Sen. John Cornyn, a member of the Judiciary Committee, referring to the Justice Department’s covert seizure of phone records at The Associated Press.

Charging that “our constitutional rights have been violated,” the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Associated Press, Gary Pruitt, said the government’s surreptitious monitoring of reporters has already had a chilling effect on news-gathering operations.

News sources, understandably, are more likely to be reluctant to call reporters if they think the government is on the line — and that’s especially true if the disclosure is about government transgressions.

“Under their own rules, they are required to narrow this request as narrowly as possible so as to not tread upon the First Amendment,” explained Pruitt on CBS’s Face the Nation, referring to the Obama administration’s phone monitoring.

“And yet they had a broad, sweeping collection, and they did it secretly,” explained Pruitt. “Their rules require them to come to us first, but in this case they didn’t, claiming an exception, saying that would have posed a substantial threat to their investigation. But they have not explained why it would and we can’t understand why it would.”

The end product of this increased monitoring and harassment of the press, this increased threat to reporters and to sources who come forward with information, is that the government is likely to become even more insulated from public scrutiny, more heavy-handed and inept, and more shielded from reform.

Once the government is successful in restricting the news-gathering operations of the press, warned Pruitt, “the people of the United States will only know what the government wants them to know and that’s not what the framers of the Constitution had in mind when they wrote the First Amendment.”

Pruitt has it right about the philosophy of the nation’s Founders, as demonstrated in the letters of Thomas Jefferson.

“Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost,” asserted Jefferson in a January 28, 1786, letter to James Currie (1745-1807), a Virginia physician and frequent correspondent during Jefferson’s residence in France.

“Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter,” wrote Jefferson in 1787 to Edward Carrington, a Lieutenant Colonel in the Continental Army and a Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress from 1786 to 1788.

“Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe,” stated Jefferson in 1816 in a letter to Colonel Charles Yancey, a commanding officer in Virginia Militia during the War of 1812.

And regarding those who seek to restrict the freedom of the press, Jefferson wrote this in 1804 to Judge John Tyler on the U.S. Circuit Court in Richmond: “No experiment can be more interesting than that we are now trying, and which we trust will end in establishing the fact, that man may be governed by reason and truth. Our first object should therefore be, to leave open to him all avenues of truth. The most effectual hitherto found, is the freedom of the press. It is, therefore, the first shut up by those who fear the investigation of their actions.”

Nikita Khrushchev, First Secretary of the Communist Party, 1953 to 1964, also understood the importance of the press. “The press,” he proclaimed, “is our chief ideological weapon.” http://www.westernjournalism.com/a-government-against-liberty/

More On IRS: Americans Audited After Donating To Romney

Several Republicans say their constituents have come to them with examples of Internal Revenue Service intimidation that goes beyond the agency’s targeting of conservative organizations applying for tax-exempt status.

Lawmakers in the House and Senate say they’ve been told of other examples of bullying since the IRS apologized for targeting Tea Party groups.

“Oh, there’s a slew of them,” said Rep. Patrick Tiberi (R-Ohio), a member of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee. He said several lawmakers on the panel had been given tips about over-aggressive actions by the IRS.

Tiberi is one of several lawmakers who went public this week with allegations of wider abuses by the IRS. He and the other officials acknowledged the complaints from their constituents could be true or false, and said that they intended to look into the matters.

“I’m certainly going to spend a lot of time looking into it,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, who heard complaints from constituents who claimed they were audited by the IRS after making substantial donations to Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign.

Read More at The Hill . By Daniel Strauss. http://www.westernjournalism.com/republican-lawmakers-hear-complaints-about-wider-abuses-from-irs/

 “La Paz del Islam” amenper.

Omar Barki un Iman Británico que se encuentra en Libia hizo las siguientes declaraciones con respecto al musulmán que asesinó con un cuchillo a un soldado inglés:

El profeta dijo que un infiel y su verdugo no se encontrarán en el infierno. Este es un pensamiento bello. Que Alá recompense a Adebolajo (el asesino) por sus acciones. No veo esto como un crimen de acuerdo con el Islam

Adebolajo fue un alumno de Omar Barki hace diez años en Inglaterra.

Pero no importa lo que los imanes prediquen o digan, siempre todo se filtra en la prensa liberal con sus diferencias entre los musulmanes militantes y la religión islámicas, sin tomar en consideración cuáles fueron las enseñanzas de Mahoma.

Omar Barki es un buen musulmán, un buen religioso, un profesante del Islam, negar esto es tratar de ocultarr lo evidente.

La misma raíz del Islam está en la conquista militar, y el fruto que vemos hoy viene de esta raíz. El Islam, desde su mismo principio, fue propagado por “el filo de la espada”. La historia del Islam está repleta de violencia y guerra, desde su nacimiento hasta el día presente. Cuando los musulmanes invadieron España, se necesitaron siete siglos para sacarlos. Los turcos otomanos masacraron a un millón y medio de ármenos entre los años 1915-1916 (un hecho todavía ignorado por mucho del mundo occidental). En el Sudán, más de dos millones de cristianos han sido masacrados y muchos más vendidos como esclavos, todo bajo la dirección del General Umar Bashir (musulmán). En Indonesia, los musulmanes han matado a más de 300.000 católicos desde 1975. El genocidio y la persecución actual de los cristianos existe en Irak, Irán, Egipto, Pakistán, Nigeria…en el nombre del Islam y los musulmanes

Siempre hay personas que usan las religiones, incluyendo el cristianismo para crear instituciones para la sus propósitos, incluyendo la guerra, Pero la conquista por la espada como el modus operandi estándar del cristianismo es diferente al de Mahoma. Jesús y sus seguidores no iniciaron la propagación de su fe por la fuerza militar.La guerra no es una doctrina del cristianismo.

Cuando Benedicto XVI usó la siguiente cita del emperador bizantino Manuel II Paleólogo:

Muéstrame también aquello que Mahoma ha traído de nuevo, y encontrarás solamente cosas malvadas e inhumanas, como su directiva de difundir por medio de la espada la fe que él predicaba.

El papa tuvo que retractarse por la presión de los liberales, pero la verdad de lo que dijo queda, porque no es más que la verdad, y la verdad puede ocultarse pero no desaparece.

 Gun Companies Refuse Sales to State Governments with Strict Gun Laws

by Kerry Picket 15 Feb 2013 972 post a comment

Six gun companies have announced plans to stop selling any of their products to any government agency in states that severely limit the rights of private gun ownership.

Disappointed with New York State lawmakers and other jurisdictions around the country who have passed strict gun control legislation, the companies—composed of firearm manufacturers, gunsmiths, and sporting goods retailers—have announced these policies in the past week. 

Their various statements emphasize that such laws create a class of government employees with rights and and a class of citizens without rights. Thus, they refuse to aid the enforcement of such inequality.

The announcements read:

Effective today, in an effort to see that no legal mistakes are made by LaRue Tactical and/or its employees, we will apply all current State and Local Laws (as applied to civilians) to state and local law enforcement / government agencies. In other words, LaRue Tactical will limit all sales to what law-abiding citizens residing in their districts can purchase or possess.

Due the passing of this legislation, Olympic Arms would like to announce that the State of New York, any Law Enforcement Departments, Law Enforcement Officers, First Responders within the State of New York, or any New York State government entity or employee of such an entity – will no longer be served as customers. 

In short, Olympic Arms will no longer be doing business with the State of New York or any governmental entity or employee of such governmental entity within the State of New York – henceforth and until such legislation is repealed, and an apology made to the good people of the State of New York and the American people. 

The Federal Government and several states have enacted gun control laws that restrict the public from owning and possessing certain types of firearms. Law-enforcement agencies are typically exempt from these restrictions. EFI, LLC does not recognize law-enforcement exemptions to local, state, and federal gun control laws. If a product that we manufacture is not legal for a private citizen to own in a jurisdiction, we will not sell that product to a law-enforcement agency in that jurisdiction.

We will not sell arms to agents of the state of New York that hold themselves to be “more equal” than their citizens.

As long as the legislators of New York think they have the power to limit the rights of their citizens, in defiance of the Constitution, we at Templar will not sell them firearms to enforce their edicts.

Templar Custom is announcing that the State of New York, any Law Enforcement Departments, Law Enforcement Officers, First Responders within the State of New York, or any New York State government entity or employee will no longer be served as customers.

Based on the recent legislation in New York, we are prohibited from selling rifles and receivers to residents of New York. We have chosen to extend that prohibition to all governmental agencies associated with or located within New York. As a result we have halted sales of rifles, short barreled rifles, short barreled shotguns, machine guns, and silencers to New York governmental agencies.

Recently, companies such as LaRue Tactical and Olympic Arms have announced that they will no longer sell prohibited items to government agencies and personnel in states that deny the right to own those items to civilians. It has been and will continue to be Cheaper Than Dirt’s policy to not to sell prohibited items to government agencies and/or agents in states, counties, cities, and municipalities that have enacted restrictive gun control laws against their citizens. We support and encourage other companies that share in this policy.

Second Amendment activist groups Guns Save Life and Grass Roots North Carolina are currently urging big gun manufacturers Sig Sauer, Smith and Wesson, and Glock to halt their sales to government agencies within states that have clamped down on their residents’ right to bear arms. 

La Inhumanidad de la Burocracia.  amenper.

La burocracia, como el socialismo, son sistemas que se crearon bajo una base teórica que no tuvo en consideración el factor humano. Son actualmente parodias de las organizaciones y gobiernos eficientes.

Tanto Max Weber, en la teoría del modelo burocrático, como Karl Marx en la teoría del sistema socialista no tuvieron en consideración la capacidad del individuo y su derecho a la legítima ambición para la búsqueda de la felicidad.

Hoy en días tanto el socialismo como la burocracia se han convertidos en dinosaurios organizacionales irremediablemente creando formas de administración indeseables desarrolladas en el seno de una organización autoritaria y legalista que es incompatible con sociedades individualistas y dinámicas.

Cuando una empresa privada crece en tamaño, puede seguir su sistema organizativo eficientemente manteniéndose dentro de los parámetros de la competencia dentro del libre mercado o puede sucumbir a las ideas teóricas y las observaciones empíricas que se asocian con la burocracia terminando en el final de la vida de una empresa, que es la bancarrota.

Pero en la administración pública, la lucha ideológica acerca de cuáles son las formas deseables de administración y de gobierno, es decir en el debate respecto al control de su tamaño y de su agenda, siempre la burocracia como parodia de la eficiencia crea un sistema ineficiente, dirigido por burócratas incapacitados. Como en el caso de una empresa privada, el final es la bancarrota. La diferencia es que no es el dinero del gobierno, pues el gobierno no produce ingresos, pero lo que se pierde es el dinero de los contribuyentes, el dinero del pueblo.

Cualquier validez que pudiera haber tenido la burocracia weberiana, ha desaparecido ante la aberración de las burocracias institucionales de los sistemas socialistas.

La actual administración del presidente Obama, refleja los resultados de la burocracia.  La burocracia imita a la eficiencia, llenando el vacío de su incapacidad con  las perversiones y  la extensión ilegítima del poder de los burócratas.

Los que vivimos en Cuba, la transición de un sistema burocrático, típico de cualquier gobierno, a la burocracia como un instrumento o como una institución,  concebida en sí como un “tipo ideal” o como aproximaciones empíricas, pudimos observar la conversión de la democracia con el uso de la burocracia a una institución socialista.

La organización burocrática puede producir múltiples y contradictorios resultados y el comportamiento basado en la autoridad pero las consecuencias siempre son desastrosas.  La burocracia es un monstruo nacido de un modelo excesivamente centralizado y vertical, organizado de tal forma que siempre se hace lo que dicen “los de arriba”, sin que nadie se atreva a cuestionar las directrices del “jefe”.

Lo que dice el “jefe” en un discurso, tiene que ser puesto en acción por los burócratas del gobierno.

Por eso aunque la orden no venga directamente del “jefe” nació y es responsabilidad del “jefe”.

Alguien hizo una definición de la burocracia que la define como un gigantesco mecanismo manejado por pigmeos. Para la creación de una organización burocrática, hacen falta burócratas. El burócrata es corrupto y no confiable, es incompetente, ineficiente,  rígido e incapaz de responder a las demandas, preocupado sólo por sí mismo e incontrolable. Los administradores hacen mal uso de su posición y del poder que ella les otorga. Las leyes no son ejecutadas de manera justa y competente, no son responsables o no responden a los valores establecidos o a la constitución.

Por eso vemos que se violan los derechos de los ciudadanos, y se cubren las violaciones bajo el manto de la semántica burocrática que imita a la democracia, con discursos llenos de frases grandilocuentes y tergiversando el sentido de la ley.

El sistema de zares y la formación de una agencia para la seguridad nacional bajo la administración de Bush, para encarar el peligro del terrorismo, ha evolucionado bajo la nueva organización burócrata-socialista, en instituciones que usan su poder para atacar a los ciudadanos, mientras se muestran complacientes con los enemigos de la nación.  Esta administración es una parodia de un sistema democrático es el modelo típico de la perversión de la burocracia. 

Ha desaparecido la antigua demanda de reducción del Estado paternalista por una “teoría más adecuada y realista sobre el rol y los límites de la intervención del gobierno” se ha enfatizado la participación más que la libertad en el proceso de toma de decisiones, su implementación y ejecución. La administración pública tiene el deber de permitir el empoderamiento de los ciudadanos y la participación social. 

Las elecciones populares y los gobiernos de mayoría no constituyen las únicas fuentes de legitimidad. Las demandas y los apoyos  se canalizan sólo por la vía de las instituciones de la democracia representativa, y la condición de ciudadano implica algo mucho más amplio que votar. Se necesita una nueva visión moral institucionalizada que sintetice los principios y estándares éticos públicos y privados, dada “la charada de responsabilidad democrática que proporciona el actual sistema electoral

El sistema caudillista en contraste con la separación de poderes siempre ha sido el modelo americano.

 

ARQUIDIÓCESIS DE LA HABANA Y CASTRISMO SIN CASTRO

(5-27-13-5:00PM)

 Por Armando F. Valladares *

La arquidiócesis de La Habana, a través de su revista “Espacio Laical” (No. 230, mayo de 2013), asumió como pocas veces la defensa del régimen cubano y de su nefasto “modelo” comunista, en momentos en que el mundo oye horrorizado las denuncias que figuras, tanto cubanas como extranjeras, están haciendo en el exterior, consiguiendo romper el “bloqueo” de silencio sobre la trágica realidad cubana. 

El reciente editorial de “Espacio Laical” coincide con el viaje al exterior de opositores cubanos que fueron perseguidos, amordazados y humillados durante décadas por el régimen comunista. La publicación de la arquidiócesis caricaturiza a los cubanos y extranjeros que están criticando a la dictadura alegando que  ellos “insisten” en solicitar “a importantes centros de poder en el mundo” que “desestabilicen al gobierno cubano” y que tomen medidas que supuestamente, según “Espacio Laical”, podrían “dañar fundamentalmente al pueblo de la isla”. 

En lo que dice respecto a los opositores cubanos, en sus recientes viajes por países de las Américas y Europa ellos simplemente describen de una manera clara y didáctica, el panorama de injusticia, miseria y opresión que desde hace más de cincuenta años oprime a 11 millones de hermanos cubanos, ante un público que incluye a los habitantes los países visitados, entre los cuales, autoridades, líderes y medios de prensa que quieran oírlos. No obstante, esa acción pacífica de quitar escamas de los ojos, sensibilizando a naciones enteras con relación al drama cubano, según “Espacio Laical” contribuiría a “dañar” a los cubanos de la isla.  

Es increíble hasta dónde puede llegar la parcialidad de una publicación arquidiocesana. Exactamente lo contrario es lo verdadero. En efecto, las denuncias de esos opositores cubanos son un medio valiosísimo para hacer sentir a los carceleros que ya no tienen más impunidad, que están siendo observados por el mundo entero y, en consecuencia, es una manera de  proteger a los cubanos esclavizados, no de dañarlos. La tergiversación procastrista demostrada por “Espacio Laical” difícilmente podría ser mayor. 

Como si fuera poco, “Espacio Laical” (foto de una de sus portadas) llama a “cincelar el presente modelo social” (o sea, el modelo comunista de sociedad) para evitar que “otros” logren “imponer un nuevo modelo” y lleguen a “secuestrar” a Cuba.  ¡Como si los cubanos, y los católicos en particular, no estuviesen secuestrados y amordazados por el régimen comunista desde hace más de cinco décadas! Palabras censurables, si hubieran sido publicadas por el periódico comunista “Granma”. Palabras inimaginables si se considera que fueron publicadas en la propia revista de la arquidiócesis de La Habana. 

Después de atacar de esa manera a los opositores y de defender el “modelo social” comunista, “Espacio Laical”, con su pro castrismo a ultranza, llega a justificar la represión estatal, calificándola eufemísticamente como meras “inflexibilidades” del régimen castrista. Y pasa a dar un consejo de amigo “al gobierno y al Partido Comunista”, para eviten una “hipertrofia”  de “rigideces” que puedan “precipitar al país hacia el abismo”. 

¿Cuál sería el “abismo” que “Espacio Laical” quiere evitar? La revista explica a continuación que la catástrofe que debe evitarse es lo “ocurrido en muchísimos países de Europa del Este”… O sea, el “abismo” temido por la revista arquidiocesana es ni más ni menos que la liberación de la isla del yugo comunista. Sería mucha ingenuidad pensar que el cardenal Jaime Ortega y Alamino, colaboracionista arzobispo de La Habana, no haya estado al par de ese nefasto editorial de “Espacio Laical” antes de ser publicado. Delante del creciente deterioro del régimen, desde la arquidiócesis de La Habana se le lanza un salvavidas. Y, en caso de naufragio, se tratará de salvar, en la medida de lo posible, los restos del nefasto “modelo social” cubano, promoviendo, directa o indirectamente, un castrismo sin Castro. 

Según “Espacio Laical”, “todo indica” que “la generalidad de los cubanos” no desea “un cambio al estilo del ocurrido en muchísimos países de Europa del Este”. ¿En qué datos se basará “Espacio Laical” para hacer esa increíble afirmación de que los cubanos no anhelan el pronto y total naufragio del régimen comunista? Sería importante saberlo.  

Es doloroso constatar finalmente que el editorial de la revista arquidiocesana omite la más mínima alusión a Dios, a los principios de la religión católica y a la vida sobrenatural. En ese sentido, el referido editorial es un ejemplo trágico de la destrucción espiritual lograda por el comunismo en ambientes católicos cubanos, en más de medio siglo de opresión.  

En 1995 se entregó en la secretaría de Estado de la Santa Sede una histórica petición a Juan Pablo II, firmada por destacadas figuras del destierro cubano, titulada “Los cubanos desterrados apelan a Juan Pablo II: ¡Santidad, protegednos de la actuación del Cardenal Ortega!” (Diario Las Américas, Miami, 24 de octubre de 1995). En esa filial carta, se mostraba preocupación ante el colaboracionismo procomunista del cardenal Ortega y del episcopado cubano; se imploraba  la intercesión del Pontífice para que a ese juego colaboracionista no se prestase en lo sucesivo ninguna autoridad eclesiástica; y se manifestaba la esperanza de que, por el contrario, esas autoridades pasasen a denunciar ante el mundo el drama de nuestros hermanos esclavizados, mostrando a los fieles católicos la necesidad de una cruzada de oraciones, sacrificios y enérgicas denuncias para la pronta liberación del pueblo cubano de las garras de ese régimen ateo y neopagano. 18 años después, en el comienzo del pontificado de Francisco, esa histórica petición cobra enorme actualidad. 

*Armando Valladares, escritor, pintor y poeta. Pasó 22 años en las cárceles políticas de Cuba. Es autor del best-seller “Contra toda esperanza”, donde narra el horror de las prisiones castristas. Fue embajador de los Estados Unidos ante la Comisión de Derechos Humanos de la ONU bajo las administraciones Reagan y Bush. Recibió la Medalla Presidencial del Ciudadano y el Superior Award del Departamento de Estado. Ha escrito numerosos artículos sobre la colaboración eclesiástica con el comunismo cubano y sobre la “ostpolitik” vaticana hacia Cuba.

President Obama’s competitive, boastful nature and condescending advice rubs even loyal Democrats the wrong way, a new profile alleges.

The New York Times‘ Jodi Kantor airs complaints from “loyal” Obama associates — not as a buried lead but explicitly in her introduction:

He has mentioned more than once in recent weeks that he cooks “a really mean chili.” He has impressive musical pitch, he told an Iowa audience. He is “a surprisingly good pool player,” he informed an interviewer — not to mention (though he does) a doodler of unusual skill.

The article reports Obama’s associates characterize this bluster and political zeal as “cockiness.” Further, Washington Democrats say he is all too eager to offer unsolicited advice — on handshakes, writing, and parenting, among other topics.

For those activities at which he feels inadequate, Obama reportedly dedicates considerable time to practice, no matter how trivial the pastime:

He has played golf 104 times since becoming president, according to Mark Knoller of CBS News, who monitors his outings, and he asks superior players for tips that have helped lower his scores. He decompresses with card games on Air Force One, but players who do not concentrate risk a reprimand (“You’re not playing, you’re just gambling,” he once told Arun Chaudhary, his former videographer).

His idea of birthday relaxation is competing in an Olympic-style athletic tournament with friends, keeping close score. The 2009 version ended with a bowling event. Guess who won, despite his history of embarrassingly low scores? The president, it turned out, had been practicing in the White House alley.

Kantor’s piece carries a long-running theme that Obama easily — perhaps even uncontrollably — rates and ranks others around him. A 2008 debate gaffe found him flippantly calling Hillary Clinton “likable enough.” Of Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign, he asserted, “We’re the Miami Heat, and he’s Jeremy Lin.” Even his own staff are subject to criticism:

“I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters,” Mr. Obama told Patrick Gaspard, his political director, at the start of the 2008 campaign, according to The New Yorker. “I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m going to think I’m a better political director than my political director.”

Despite a strong push to negatively define Mitt Romney, Obama finds himself neck and neck with the Republican presidential candidate two months before the election — even falling behind in some polls. As the November ballot draws nearer, he will need to rely heavily on his personal likability to draw independent voters. The New York Times and allied Democrats airing these grievances, which may reinforce Republicans’ charges against Obama as vain and out of touch, is a serious problem for the embattled incumbent. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/03/Democrats-Air-Frustrations-with-Obama-Cockiness-Narcissism

Up to 75% of all you, Could Be Hit by Obamacare Tax

Monday, 27 May 2013 04:27 PM By Greg Richter

The so-called “Cadillac Tax” facing employers who offer premium healthcare plans to their workers already is affecting employees, even though it doesn’t kick in until 2018.

Employers say they have to get started bringing down costs now, The New York Times reports, so employees who are used to $20 co-pays at the doctor’s office and $500 deductibles are learning a new reality. Many now are looking at deductibles as high as $6,000 for families.

That’s exactly how Obamacare planners designed it, the Times story says. The intent of what is officially known as the Affordable Care Act all along was to get companies to drop plans that protect workers from the high cost of healthcare, which can lead to unnecessary tests and procedures.

“The consumer should continue to expect that their plan is going to be more expensive, and they will have less benefits,” Cynthia Weidner of the benefits consultant HighRoads told the Times.

Still, the tax is one of the most controversial parts of the healthcare law. It imposes a 40 percent tax on the portion of a health plan’s cost that exceeds $10,200 for an individual and $27,500 for a family. That cost includes what both the employer and employee pay.

Some employees are feeling the pinch already. The Times talked to a nursing assistant who had to drop out of school and get extra jobs to pay for medicine for her husband, who has cystic fibrosis.

“My husband didn’t choose to be born this way,” said Abbey Bruce.

“The reality is it is going to hit more and more people over time, at least as currently written in law, ” said Bradley Herring, a health economist at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Herring estimated that as many as 75 percent of plans could be affected by the tax over the next decade — unless employers manage to significantly rein in their costs.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/US/cadillac-tax-obamacare-plans/2013/05/27/id/506527?s=al&promo_code=13A2A-1#ixzz2UafO4TJn
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Drug-induced Murder: What Caused the Connecticut School Shootings?

The Internet is rife with details about the firearms Adam Lanza used to kill 20 children and six adults before turning a handgun on himself at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on December 14. But information about Lanza’s medical history is scarce, feeding speculation that he may fit the profile of school shooters under the influence of psychotherapeutic medication.

“In virtually every mass school shooting during the past 15 years, the shooter has been on or in withdrawal from psychiatric drugs,” writes Lawrence Hunter of the Social Security Institute. “Yet, federal and state governments continue to ignore the connection between psychiatric drugs and murderous violence, preferring instead to exploit these tragedies in an oppressive and unconstitutional power grab to snatch guns away from innocent, law-abiding people.”

School shooters on psychotropic drugs include:

• Eric Harris, one of the assailants at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, in 1999, whose autopsy revealed he had a therapeutic level of the antidepressant Luvox in his system;

• Steve Kazmierczak, who killed six including himself at Northern Illinois University in 2008 while in withdrawal from the antidepressant Prozac;

• Jeffrey Weise, a student at Red Lake High School in Minnesota, who killed ten and wounded seven in 2005 while on Prozac;

• Kip Kinkel, an Oregon teen who murdered his parents and proceeded on a shooting spree at his high school in 1998, killing two and wounding 25, while in Prozac withdrawal;

• Toby Sincino, a 15-year-old who shot two teachers and himself in 1995 at his South Carolina school while on the antidepressant Zoloft.

The list of criminals on psychotropic drugs includes such infamous names as Ted Kaczinski, John Hinckley, Jr., and the Amish school killer Charles Carl Roberts IV. While committing their violent acts they were all taking antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI).

“One of the things in the past that we’ve known about depression is that it very, very rarely leads to violence,” observed psychiatrist Peter Breggin in a Fox News report. “It’s only been since the advent of these new SSRI drugs that we have murderers, sometimes even mass murderers, taking antidepressant drugs.” The Physicians’ Desk Reference, an authoritative source of all FDA-approved drug-labeling information, identifies hazardous side effects of psychiatric drugs, including suicidal and homicidal ideation.

Despite the abundance of such evidence and a glut of scientific studies proving real danger, “there has yet to be a federal investigation on the link between psychiatric drugs and acts of senseless violence,” according to the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR). In the face of the Obama administration’s knee-jerk agitation for gun control, Hunter suggests, “It is pharmaceutical makers, not law-abiding gun owners or gun manufacturers, who should be held to account for the series of ‘lone-wolf’ mass shootings that have occurred since the widespread use of psychiatric drugs began.”

Fox News reported after an initial search of Lanza’s home investigators found no indication the 20-year-old was taking prescriptions. Other evidence suggests he was. Louise Tambascio, a friend Lanza’s mother, told CBS News’ Scott Pelley on 60 Minutes, “I know he was on medication and everything.” ABC News also interviewed Tambascio, who repeated, “I knew he was on medication.”

Connecticut’s chief medical examiner is currently conducting toxicology exams to determine if Lanza was using any behavior-modifying drugs, according to CT Post. It will be several weeks before the medical examiner’s drug tests are complete.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/14335-drug-induced-murder-what-caused-the-connecticut-school-shootings

Los que cobra el IRS a Los que NO PUEDEN PAGAR‏Ricardo Samitier

 

Ayer mientras buscaba una información TROPECÉ con la pagina del IRS donde explica lo que le cobran a una persona que NO TIENE  DINERO y le debe dinero al IRS y quiere pagar…  ellos ofrecen las siguientes opciones… pagando los siguientes cargos ADICIONALES A LA DEUDA

Cobran Mas Que Las Tarjetas De Crédito! 

Por abrirle una cuenta contra su TARJETA DE DEBITO:

·         $52 for a direct debit agreement;

·         $105 for a standard agreement or payroll deduction agreement; or

·         $43 if your income is below a certain level.

There may be a reinstatement fee if your agreement goes into default. Penalties and interest

continue to accrue until your balance is paid in full. If you are in danger of defaulting on your

payment agreement for any reason, contact the IRS immediately.

 

He  aquí lo que cobran DE INTERESES:

 

Por lo general, se cobran intereses sobre cualquier impuesto no pagado a la fecha de vencimiento de la declaración hasta la fecha de pago. La tasa de interés se determina trimestralmente y la tasa de corto plazo federal más el 3 por ciento. El interés se capitaliza diariamente. Si usted presenta una declaración, pero no paga todas las cantidades que se muestran como adeudada a tiempo, por lo general, tiene que pagar una multa por retraso en el pago de la mitad del uno por ciento del impuesto adeudado por cada mes o fracción de mes, que el impuesto sigue pendiente de pago a partir de la fecha de vencimiento, hasta que el impuesto se paga en su totalidad o se alcanza la pena máxima de 25%. La mitad de uno por ciento la tasa aumenta al uno por ciento si el impuesto sigue pendiente de pago 10 días después de la IRS emite un aviso de intención de imponer. Para las personas que presenten en la fecha de regreso, la mitad de uno por ciento de tasa disminuye a un cuarto del uno por ciento de los meses en que un acuerdo de pago es, en efecto. 

Si usted debe impuestos y no presenta a tiempo, el fracaso total para presentar sanción suele ser de cinco por ciento del impuesto adeudado por cada mes o fracción de mes que su declaración es tardía, hasta cinco meses. Si su declaración es de más de 60 días de retraso, la pena mínima para la presentación fuera de plazo es el porcentaje menor entre $ 135 o 100 % del impuesto adeudado.

Washington launches four different investigations into IRS scandal

10:14 PM 05/27/2013 Patrick Howley

Capitol Hill aides spent their Memorial Day weekend scanning hundreds of pages of documents related to the IRS scandal in order to prepare their bosses for what will inevitably be a frantic month of June involving multiple simultaneous investigations into government wrongdoing. By the time lawmakers return to session next week, at least four different investigations will be underway.

As The Daily Caller has reported, at least five different IRS offices including Cincinnati, Ohio; Baltimore, Maryland; Chicago, Illinois and El Monte and Laguna Niguel, California improperly targeted conservative nonprofit groups for extra scrutiny between 2010 and 2012.

The IRS’ shenanigans, chronicled in a damning report by Treasury Inspector General J. Russell George, started when a “team of [IRS] specialists” came together in April 2010 to process the tax-exempt nonprofit status of conservative groups that might be “potential political operations” (page 13 of the IG report). The IRS added “additional specialists” to this effort in December 2011.

The IRS also launched audits of existing conservative nonprofit groups including the Virginia-based Leadership Institute, demanding to see training materials and personal information about the organization’s 2008 college interns.

So for those of you keeping score at home (this reporter is still waiting for Ken Starr to send in his bracket picks) The Daily Caller presents a list of some of our favorite investigations into potential IRS wrongdoing. Which one will come up with the “Alexander Butterfield” quote?

1. The House Ways and Means Committee – Oversight Subcommittee

As head of the House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee, Republican Louisiana Rep. Charles Boustany has conducted the toughest probe into the IRS scandal so far. Boustany managed to acquire “all communications containing the word ‘tea party,’ ‘patriot,’ or ‘conservative,’” from recently-resigned IRS acting director Steven T. Miller. He also got the names of everyone involved with the improper targeting.

Republican Ways and Means chairman Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan also raised awareness of the issue by reaching out to the public, asking Americans to write in with their own stories of IRS harassment. “Your story is critical to moving the investigation forward,” according to a form created on the Ways and Means’ Committee’s website asking for users’ stories, which also includes a two-year timeline of the scandal beginning in August 2010.

Boustany was in prime position to jump on the IRS scandal. Back in September, long before the current scandal, his subcommittee grilled Steven T. Miller with concerns about the IRS’ implementation of Obamacare.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/27/washington-launches-four-different-investigations-into-irs-scandal/#ixzz2UanCJjdb

Former NSA official: ‘This administration is exhibiting narcissistic tendencies’

9:35 PM 05/27/2013 Josh Peterson

The Obama administration’s targeting of journalists and their sources is an assault on the First Amendment, a former National Security Agency official and prominent whistleblower says.

“[R]eporters have shared with me privately that some of their most trusted sources within government are increasingly afraid to speak with them, even off-the-record, for fear that they will be monitored and surveilled,” Thomas Drake, a former senior executive of the National Security Agency and a whistleblower who was prosecuted by the Obama administration, told The Daily Caller in an exclusive interview.

“That’s self-censorship,” he said.

Drake explained to TheDC that he sees a “soft tyranny” enveloping the United States through the federal government’s targeting of journalists and their sources.

Such a fear of speaking to the press, he said, interferes with the freedom of association —  recognized in the First Amendment as an essential component of free speech.

Reporters are then left with talking points and privileged access to government officials, he explained, all amounting to government propaganda.

Drake was first caught up in the whistleblower investigations of the second Bush administration, but was indicted and prosecuted under the Espionage Act by the Obama administration in 2010.

Drake passed along unclassified information about wasteful spending on the development of the National Security Agency’s post-9/11 secret surveillance program. For that, he was singled out by the Obama administration for indictment and prosecution.

“We were the canaries in the coal mine,” Drake said.

Drake fought the charges leveled against him, which were ultimately dropped in 2011 in exchange for a guilty plea to a misdemeanor, but the damage was done.

“I became a criminal and was labeled an enemy of the state because I was calling out government wrongdoing and illegality,” he said.

When the Associated Press revealed that the Department of Justice was engaging in the secret surveillance of its journalists to find a source that leaked classified information about a confidential foreign espionage operation, Drake took to his Twitter account in a fury.

4all hypertwitterlating abt gov’t spying on AP. Wake up Amerika! Welcome 2 NatSec surveillance state! Just the tip. Whereya been past 10yrs?

— Thomas Drake (@Thomas_Drake1) May 14, 2013

The prosecution or targeting of journalists has been central to the government’s expanding investigations against leakers and whistleblowers who have disclosed embarrassing or confidential national security and foreign policy information.

Tags: First Amendment, NSA, Surveillance, The Associated Press, Thomas Drake, Whistleblower
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/27/former-nsa-official-this-administration-is-exhibiting-narcissistic-tendencies/#ixzz2UaoPXcgx

Estamos viviendo ATERRORIZADOS‏ Ricardo Samitier 5/27/13  

Qué Vergüenza Para Estados Unidos

Tenemos una Prensa Acobardada o complice Hoy El New York Time Reporta La Quema De Dos Escuelas En Suecia Pero No Dicen Quienes La Quemaron

Porque Fueron Musulmanes… Lea la información por usted mismo clic aquí. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/world/europe/swedens-riots-put-its-identity-in-question.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130527

 

Barack Brain-child Obama Demands Justice! Tells Holder To Investigate Holder President Barack Obama has asked his friend Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate Holder’s unprecedented investigation of a Fox News reporter. Holder approved the Justice Department’s extraordinary 2010 investigation of … READ MORE

Los Franceses TAMBIÉN ESTÁN CANSADOS DE LOS HOMOSEXUALES‏ Ricardo Samitier

Los Rusos Le Suspendieron El Permiso A LosHomosexuales A Marchar En El Día Que Ellos Llaman “Orgullo Gay”…  Los Rusos Son El primer País Cansado… Ayer Por Primera Vez Mas De 150,000 Franceses Marcharon En Contra De Los Homosexuales En París…

El Mundo Se Está Cansando De Tanta

MARICONERIA

Marriage by Gays Is Protested in France Huge anti-gay marriage protest march in Paris

There were some skirmishes between police and activists, which led to 100 arrests

Tens of thousands of people have rallied in Paris against a new French law allowing same-sex marriage.

Police estimate that up to 150,000 people joined marches that converged on the city centre, but organisers put the figure close to one million.

Clashes erupted after the rally finished between far-right activists and riot police. The authorities said nearly 100 people were arrested.

On Saturday 50 people were detained for blocking the Champs-Elysees.

Saudi voice calls Obama a failure Blames ‘hesitant’ leadership for disaster in Syria

A columnist for a London-based Saudi daily newspaper is calling President Obama a failure and blaming his “hesitant” leadership for the catastrophic situation in Syria, where tens of thousands are dead as a result of the civil war.

The report comes from the Middle East Media Research Institute, which monitors and reports on media in the Middle East.

“The problem of U.S. President Barack Obama can be summed up in a single word: hesitation. The man is short-sighted, confused and diffident,” wrote Mashari al-Zaydi, a columnist for the daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat.

MEMRI reported the column called Obama out as the weakest president in U.S. history and blamed him for allowing the crisis in Syria to escalate.

He warned that Obama’s failures in the Middle East have set the foundation for an extremism and sectarian violence that will be greater than al-Qaida.

MEMRI said it’s just the latest in a series of reports from Saudi press members who have attacked America on its Syrian position. The criticism has come since Secretary of State John Kerry met in Moscow with Russians to set a meeting date to talk about the situation in Syria.

For example, the report said, the Saudi government daily Al-Yawm said, “The Syrian opposition did not welcome the outcome of the meetings that U.S. State Secretary John Kerry held in Moscow [on May 6, 2013], because [this outcome] is a clear American retreat towards the position of the Russian-Iranian alliance. Considering the crimes of ethnic cleansing that have been perpetrated by Iran’s and Assad’s killing machine in Baniyas [in early May 2013], the American position is a clear [act of] capitulation to this killing machine at the expense of human rights and America’s claims that it supports the freedom of the peoples…”

And Baina Al-Mulhim, a columnist for the government daily Al-Riyadh, asked whether the U.S. had “sold out the Syrian revolution.”

Al-Zaydi’s commentary noted that the prevailing assessment of Obama comes not just from his political foes.

It also comes from “proponents of his own school of thought, like the well-known American author David Ignatius, who recently wrote a critique of the Obama administration’s policy that was not confined to foreign [policy] affairs … Summarizing the problematic aspects of Obama’s conduct, he said that the public is more afraid of a weak administration than a strong one!”

Al-Zaydi noted Lebanese-American writer Fuad ‘Ajami slammed Obama for his feebleness, his lack of leadership, and his inability to take bold decisions under difficult circumstances.

“Evidence of Obama’s narrow approach to the Syrian crisis can be found in statements he made to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in their meeting several days ago. [He said that] there was no ‘magic solution’ to the escalating Syrian crisis and that a realistic solution was needed, [namely] a non-ideal political solution,” al-Zaydi wrote.

“[But Obama] is the one who complicated the Syrian problem and caused the wound to grow deeper, the bloodshed [to continue] … the voices to grow louder and the thugs to interfere, from Hassan Nasrallah’s militia … to the young men who come from all over [the world] to fight jihad in [the ranks of the Al-Qaeda-affiliated organization] Jabhat Al-Nusra.”

He continued, “The U.S. is currently living under one of the weakest leaders in its [history] … while Russia has a firm and determined leader. This becomes even sadder when you realize that the U.S. is believed to be supporting the Syrian rebels while Russia [is considered] a supporter of the [Syrian] regime. In this situation, the alliance [between the U.S. and the rebels] is a liability more than an asset. …”

The writer charged that Obama’s “policy of wholesale retreat” ultimately will cause more problems.

“[We must conclude that] this is not a skilled statesman and politician with creative solutions, but an ordinary academic who repeats meaningless slogans and does not possess the political sensitivity to give each factor the weight it deserves, to take bold [action] when necessary and to refrain [from action] when necessary.”

http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/saudi-voice-calls-obama-a-failure/

La falsa teoria de Darwin‏ Ricardo Samitier

Basta Mencionar El Fraude Mas Grande Del Siglo XX Para Justificar A Darwin… Que Debía De Enseñarse en Todas las Escuelas…

Hace ya un siglo en 1912… Se perpetró el más famoso fraude en la historia de la paleontología. El crimen fue un cráneo con una singular combinación de rasgos humanos y simiescos. Fue llamado por la PRENSA el Perfecto Eslabón Perdido,

El Fraude se inició en un cementerio abandonando del sureste de Inglaterra, en Piltdown, el engaño duró cuatro décadas y aún no se ha descubierto al autor.  

El fraude salió a la luz con las nuevas técnicas de datación química que se aplicaron a los restos de Piltdown: en 1950 quedó claro que la mandíbula no tenía más de 50.000 años, y los análisis posteriores desvelaron no solo que eran de un orangután moderno, sino que habían sido manipuladas para que encajaran; todas las piezas estaban teñidas con óxido de hierro; los fragmentos del cráneo humano eran de pocos años de antigüedad y los restos de animales mucho más antiguos. Pero a esa altura, casi todos los protagonistas de la historia habían muerto y ninguno de los que estaban vivos aún se  confesó culpable…

El enlace para leer sobre el caso está al final

La Verdad Que No Se Puede Ocultar Es Que Nunca Se Ha Encontrado Un Fósil “MEDIO HUMANO”…

Tampoco un fósil de MONOS MEDIO HUMANOS, nunca se han descubierto los famosos llamados ESLABONES PERDIDOS después de años e incluso décadas de búsqueda, aún no hay rastro de un ESLABÓN PERDIDO!

Todos los fósiles encontrados, SON TOTALMENTE HUMANO o fósiles de algunas otras especies de primates desaparecidas ANTES DE LA APARICIÓN DEL HOMBRE…

La Falta De Evidencia Fósil, Es Suficiente Para Desacreditar A Darwin, Pero NO… Eso Nunca…

 

Hay Que Seguir Escribiendo MENTIRAS… Para Anular La Creación Del Hombre Por Dios…  

La Verdad Hoy Es Conocida… Pero Nadie la Menciona…

LA EVOLUCIÓN DE LOS MONOS NO SE PRODUJO…

Esta prueba ESTA CIENTÍFICAMENTE COMPROBADA Por Los Verdaderos CIENTÍFICOS DE LABORATORIOS… No por los Pseudo Científicos Que Salen en la TV y Los Medios de Publicidad…  

La Verdad Es Que La Teoría De Darwin Esta Desacreditada…Pero Los Politiqueros No Se Atreven A Dar Marcha Atrás… Y Se Continúa Enseñando Esa Falsa Teoría En Las Escuelas…

El descubrimiento en 1956 del ADN…  demuestra CLARAMENTE que el hombre no puede mutarse… SE PUEDE COPIAR y hacer uno EXACTAMENTE IGUAL… pero no se puede cambiar…

Piense en esto!

Una de las cosas más INTERESANTES que he aprendido es que para poder abrir un ADN se requiere tener un ARN…

Para ponerlo a la altura de mis conocimientos el ARN es la llave que abre el ADN.  Para comenzar a entender… es como cuando se te queda la llave dentro de tu carro… como se abre…

Dios aparentemente OLVIDO LA LLAVE DENTRO… No hay manera, de mutar… los organismos vivos, los virus y las plantas a los seres humanos, no mutan tienen y usan un MECANISMO CONOCIDOS por todos… La REPRODUCCIÓN CELULAR comienza en el momento que UN ÓVULO ES FECUNDADO y no se detiene hasta que morimos.

Las Únicas Mutaciones Conocidas:

Hasta el día de HOY ningún COMUNISTA DARWINISTA se ha atrevido a decir que los NIÑOS QUE NACEN CON DEFECTOS FÍSICOS son MUTACIONES… o un INTENTO DE MUTACIÓN QUE SALIÓ MAL…

Pues un niño que nace con un defecto ES LO MAS PARECIDO o lo ÚNICO que se pudiera considerar  una MUTACIÓN FALLIDA…

Esta Probado Que La Mutación En El Humano Lo Mata O Lo Degenera

Cuando hay una mutación grave, la célula o el individuo GENERALMENTE MUERE o SE TORNA SEVERAMENTE ENFERMO. Por ejemplo Mongolismo, síndrome de Down o trisomía y otros.

He Aquí Algunas Pruebas Contra La Teoría De Darwin Que Las Puedes Reconocer Porque Las Puedes Observar Diariamente En Tu Persona:

Para comenzar de acuerdo a Darwin… las mutaciones se realizaban para asegurarle a la PRÓXIMA GENERACIÓN UN BENEFICIO… cuando se daban cuenta que sufrían o carecían de algo… y lo remediaban mejorándose mutando… veamos:

Hay 220 especies de Monos en la Tierra;

Pero sólo el hombre tiene “Escleral” Lo que significa que la parte blanca del ojo es visible.

¿Cómo el hombre pudo obtener ese BENEFICIO, si como nos quieren hacer creer venimos de los monos, que no lo tienen???

No puede ser una mutación… eso fue UN BENEFICIO que se le dio SOLO A LOS HOMBRES.

¿Cómo es posible, si la teoría de Darwin es correcta?

¿Por qué la hembra humana TIENE SENOS todos los días de su vida…?

Mientras que todos los otros primates, y todos los mamíferos TIENEN PECHOS, sólo cuando tienen que amamantar su cría?

Una vez más, ¿dónde está la VENTAJA BIOLÓGICA de transportar grandes senos pesados ​​para la mujer?

Es otra equivocación BIOLÓGICA de Darwin…

¿Cómo es que la hembra humana es el único primate que debe CARGAR a su bebé?

Todos los otros bebés primates, naturalmente, se aferran a la madre!

¿Que BENEFICIA LA MADRE tener que cargar a su bebe? Es otra equivocación de Darwin!

Así que la próxima vez que un Darwinista (comunista) trata de venderle la historia,.. de que Dios No existe…

Simplemente pídele que explique, como es posible que la LLAVE PARA ABRIR EL ADN… este DENTRO…

Desafortunadamente, la mayoría de las personas no exigen a los políticos… y luego envían a sus hijos a las escuelas, donde los maestros han RECIBIDO LAS ORDENES de enseñar la Teoría de Darwin y DE NO MENCIONAR A DIOS los niños creen que los maestros saben lo que dicen….

Hemos permitido que en las escuelas se enseñe la TEORÍA FALSA de Darwin y que descendemos del los monos…

Mira como EXPLICAN a los niños como los hombres  aprendimos a Caminar…

Como piensas que vas a CONTROLAR a tus hijos para que no practiquen la HOMOSEXUALIDAD cuando en los colegios dicen ahora que es NORMAL… “PREFERENCIA SEXUAL…

Enlaces para leer la estafa del “Eslabón Perdido”

http://sociedad.elpais.com/sociedad/2012/12/12/actualidad/1355334597_348157.html

Sen. Vitter: “Offensive for Washington to Make Taxpayers Pay for Free Cellphones for Others” 26 May 2013 /

Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) and TracFone Wireless, a pre-paid cellphone carrier, are hurling accusations at each other over a federal phone subsidy program for the poor.

The company has claimed that Vitter is trying to gut a program that was “born out of” Hurricane Katrina, while Vitter has accused TracFone of profiting from a wasteful government hand-out.

The program, called “Lifeline,” has been pejoratively referred to as the “Obama phone” program, although it began long before Obama took office. It had its genesis as a subsidy for landline phones in 1985 and expanded to cover cellphones in 2008, during the George W. Bush administration.

The spat began when Vitter and other GOP senators introduced a bill earlier this month to end a provision that relates to the cellphones portion of the fund.

“This phone program has expanded far beyond its original intent, and as so many middle class Americans struggle underneath this economy, it is really offensive for Washington to make taxpayers pay for free cellphones for others,” Vitter said in a statement when he offered the bill.

The program, which is managed by the Federal Communications Commission, subsidizes phone service, not the phones themselves. But many companies that receive funding through the program offer free and low-cost phones to their subscribers. The program is funded through fees that the telephone companies pass on to consumers on their monthly bills, not taxes.
Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/05/sen-vitter-it-is-really-offensive-for-washington-to-make-taxpayers-pay-for-free-cellphones-for-others/#ixzz2Ub49Etpi

Why Do They Slaughter Their Victims?

May 25, 2013 by Mordechai Kedar

What is common to Daniel Perl, Nick Berg, a British soldier on London street, the Jews of Hebron in 1929 and the Fogel family in Itamar? They all were butchered. They were not simply stabbed to death, but were killed by an act designed to decapitate them or to cause fatal bleeding by severing their carotid artery. Another common denominator: all were slaughtered by Moslems. An endless list of Moslem girls and women can be added to them, those who were similarly slaughtered by their brothers, fathers or other relatives for “violating the family honor”. A question that arises automatically is where does this Moslem tendency to this kind of slaughter come from?

The answer is simple: Slaughter is a routine, widespread practice among many Moslem families. Many children see how their fathers slaughter sheep when celebrating an important event, and the whole family is present at the sacrificial slaughter during Eid al-Adha, the Festival of Sacrifice, when the slaughter is part of the holiday ritual.

In modern societies, the slaughter of animals for meat consumption takes place in slaughterhouses, far from the eyes of the public and children, who generally get their meat free of blood and hair and ready for cooking or eating. This sterile arrangement spares the public the sight of the slaughter, the blood and the accompanying cries. In the West, many of those who witnessed animal slaughter become vegetarian.

In many Islamic societies, slaughter generally occurs at home, in front of the children, and is part of the routine of life. They are immunized against the sight of slaughter, are not moved by the blood dripping from the animal’s neck and are not frightened by its snorts and struggles. In many cases, the children hold the legs of the lamb in order to immobilize it during slaughter; they sense very well its frantic reactions as the knife so painfully slices through its neck. The presence and participation of the children in the act of slaughter immunizes them emotionally against its influence; when they are older they perform the custom of sacrifice with their own hands and knives, and in front of their own children.

Read full article here

Sheriffs plan to put feds back in their place

‘Restoring liberty in America is not only possible, but already underway’

Sheriffs and peace officers from across the country will be meeting with likeminded supporters for a national convention focused on one goal: restoring constitutional rule in the United States of America.

From May 31-June 1, the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, or CSPOA, will be meeting in St. Charles, Mo., for its Heartland of America Conference.

The purpose of the conference is to equip sheriffs, peace officers and public officials with information and public support to carry out their oaths of office – specifically, to uphold the U.S. Constitution – recognizing that in the case of federal overreach, the county sheriff may be the last line of defense in protecting Americans’ constitutional rights.

“We are going to train and vette them all, state by state, to understand and enforce the constitutionally protected rights of the people they serve, with an emphasis on state sovereignty and local autonomy,” explains CSPOA Founder and Executive Director Sheriff Richard Mack. “Then these local governments will issue our new Declaration to the Federal Government regarding the abuses that we will no longer tolerate or accept. Said declaration will be enforced by our Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers.

“In short,” Mack says, “the CSPOA will be the army to set our nation free.”

Mack is more than familiar with fighting federal overreach. The former sheriff of Graham County, Ariz., in 1994 Mack joined six other sheriffs in challenging a provision of the federal Brady Bill placing the burden of its background checks on local sheriffs. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to strike down the provision.

Police Chief Larry Kirk of Old Monroe, Mo., told WND, “In the past few years we have seen many of the citizens of this country become concerned over the direction it has taken. We have watched personal rights being eroded and a disconnect developing between citizens and officers working in law enforcement.

“I wanted to find other officers that shared my concerns,” he continued. “I wanted to be able to work with our sheriffs and other peace officers in educating the citizens and others in our career field on the powers of the sheriff’s office and what is needed for us to stand on guard to protect our rights and those of our fellow citizens. The CSPOA is the organization at the front of this movement.

“The people of my state are seeing the overreach of government at the federal level and want to know where their sheriffs will stand,” he concluded. “The people of this state need to hear this message, and the sheriffs of this state need to hear it. Sheriffs and officers need the support of their communities, and we need to support them. This is the organization that can help educate us all on the proper roles that we should play and what we can do to stop the encroachment on our liberties and unalienable rights.”

Sheriff Mack further told WND, “In view of the culture of corruption, which seems so prevalent in Washington, many Americans are searching for hope and solutions that are both effective and peaceful. The purpose of the CSPOA convention is to offer absolute evidence that both indeed exist. Each attendee will leave with this evidence and a renewed hope that restoring liberty in America is not only possible, but already underway!”

The convention, to be held at the Ameristar Hotel in St. Charles, Mo., is free to all public officials and open to the public at large.

Register to attend the Heartland of America Conference at the CSPOA website now!

The trailer for a video featuring previous convention speakers can be seen below:

“We already have hundreds of police, sheriffs and other officials who have expressed a desire to be a part of this holy cause of liberty,” Mack explains.

In fact, CSPOA maintains a growing list of – at last count – 18 state sheriffs associations and over 450 sheriffs across the country already taking a stand against what they perceive as attempts by the Obama administration to enact unconstitutional gun-control measures.

As WND reported, Maricopa County Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio is among those after telling a local radio host the federal government is “going to have a problem” if they expect him to confiscate guns from private citizens.

“I took [multiple] oaths of office, and they all say I will defend the Constitution of the United States,” Arpaio told Mike Broomhead of KFYI Radio in Phoenix, Ariz. “Now if they’re going to tell the sheriff that he’s going to go around picking up guns from everybody, they’re going to have a problem. I may not enforce that federal law.”

Broomhead pushed the man sometimes called “America’s toughest sheriff” even further, asking Arpaio if the feds passed a law banning ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, would his deputies confiscate such magazines?

“No,” Arpaio said. “My deputies, I said before, I’m going to arm all my deputies – a month ago I said before this – with automatic weapons and semi-automatic weapons. We’re going to be able to fight back. … I don’t care what they say from Washington.”

Larry Pratt, president of Gun Owners of America, told WND he supports sheriffs taking a tough stand.

“The county sheriffs need to act and make new deputies to stop federal authority in the counties,” Pratt said. “There is a misconception in our time that the court somehow is the arbiter of what is constitutional; that’s not true! Every official that raises their right hand and says they’re going to adhere to the constitution, seek to protect it to the best of their ability, ‘so help me God’ – that’s something that they’re all obligated to do.”

http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/sheriffs-plan-to-put-feds-back-in-their-place/

DOJ Begged Judge to Keep Fox Reporter in Dark About Monitoring

Friday, 24 May 2013 09:19 PM By Todd Beamon

The Justice Department begged a federal judge to not tell Fox News reporter James Rosen that it was tracking his telephone calls and emails in a probe regarding a national security leak.

U.S. Attorney Ron Machen argued in 2010 that the traditional 30-day notice period did not apply to Rosen as Justice secretly monitored his Gmail account, according to new exhibits unsealed this week and disclosed by The Hill.

Related: Holder Personally OK’d Fox Reporter’s Warrant

“Where, as here, the government seeks such contents through a search warrant, no notice to the subscriber or customer of the e-mail account is statutorily required or necessary,” Machen wrote in a June 2010 motion. “Thus, this court’s indication on the face of the warrant that delayed notice of 30 days to the customer and subscriber was permissible was unnecessary.”

Machen, through another request granted by the court, stopped Google from telling Rosen that Justice was spying on his e-mail account, the Hill reports.

The prosecutor had demanded to see all of Rosen’s emails — including deleted messages, emails in his trash folder and all attachments sent to and from him.

The original warrant in the Rosen case was signed personally by Attorney General Eric Holder, NBC News reported this week.

Meanwhile, Fox News President Roger Ailes on Thursday blasted Justice for targeting journalists as if they were criminals and said the government’s seizure of reporters’ emails and phone records would not stand “the test of law.”

“The administration’s attempt to intimidate Fox News and its employees will not succeed and their excuses will stand neither the test of law, the test of decency, nor the test of time,” Ailes said. “We will not allow a climate of press intimidation, unseen since the McCarthy era, to frighten any of us away from the truth.”

President Barack Obama on Thursday asked Holder to review Justice’s guidelines on leak investigations and news organizations. Holder promised a report by July 12, the Hill reports.

Reports of the FBI’s tracking of Rosen’s movements, phone, and email conversations with a former State Department contractor — Stephen Jin-Woo Kim — followed the disclosure last week that phone records of editors and reporters at The Associated Press had been secretly seized by Justice in another probe of leaked government information.

But unlike the AP reporters, Rosen was named as a “co-conspirator” by FBI officials in the warrant signed by Holder.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/doj-fox-monitoring/2013/05/24/id/506349?s=al&promo_code=139FF-1#ixzz2UbIOcsPY
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

 “THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’ 

No 396 “EN MI OPINIO” =MEMORIAL DAY=

mayo 27, 2013

No 396 5/27/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

“MEMORIAL DAY – GOD PROTECT AMERICA” THANK YOU

For serving our country and protect our freedom.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/never-forget-those-whove-paid-the-ultimate-price-for-your-liberty/

In honor of those who have given their lives in order that others may live free, I want to recall the words of President Ronald Reagan from remarks that he gave at Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day, 1986. I want to say thank you to our veterans, who heeded the call and have served honorably to protect and defend the Constitution which protects our freedoms.

“Today is the day we put aside to remember fallen heroes and to pray that no heroes will ever have to die for us again. It’s a day of thanks for the valor of others, a day to remember the splendor of America and those of her children who rest in this cemetery and others. It’s a day to be with the family and remember.

I was thinking this morning that across the country children and their parents will be going to the town parade and the young ones will sit on the sidewalks and wave their flags as the band goes by. Later, maybe, they’ll have a cookout or a day at the beach. And that’s good, because today is a day to be with the family and to remember.

Arlington, this place of so many memories, is a fitting place for some remembering. So many wonderful men and women rest here, men and women who led colorful, vivid, and passionate lives. There are the greats of the military: Bull Halsey and the Admirals Leahy, father and son; Black Jack Pershing; and the GI’s general, Omar Bradley. Great men all, military men. But there are others here known for other things.

Here in Arlington rests a sharecropper’s son who became a hero to a lonely people. Joe Louis came from nowhere, but he knew how to fight. And he galvanized a nation in the days after Pearl Harbor when he put on the uniform of his country and said, “I know we’ll win because we’re on God’s side.” Audie Murphy is here, Audie Murphy of the wild, wild courage. For what else would you call it when a man bounds to the top of a disabled tank, stops an enemy advance, saves lives, and rallies his men, and all of it single-handedly. When he radioed for artillery support and was asked how close the enemy was to his position, he said, “Wait a minute and I’ll let you speak to them.” [Laughter]

Michael Smith is here, and Dick Scobee, both of the space shuttle Challenger. Their courage wasn’t wild, but thoughtful, the mature and measured courage of career professionals who took prudent risks for great reward—in their case, to advance the sum total of knowledge in the world. They’re only the latest to rest here; they join other great explorers with names like Grissom and Chaffee.

Oliver Wendell Holmes is here, the great jurist and fighter for the right. A poet searching for an image of true majesty could not rest until he seized on “Holmes dissenting in a sordid age.” Young Holmes served in the Civil War. He might have been thinking of the crosses and stars of Arlington when he wrote: “At the grave of a hero we end, not with sorrow at the inevitable loss, but with the contagion of his courage; and with a kind of desperate joy we go back to the fight.”

All of these men were different, but they shared this in common: They loved America very much. There was nothing they wouldn’t do for her. And they loved with the sureness of the young. It’s hard not to think of the young in a place like this, for it’s the young who do the fighting and dying when a peace fails and a war begins. Not far from here is the statue of the three servicemen—the three fighting boys of Vietnam. It, too, has majesty and more. Perhaps you’ve seen it—three rough boys walking together, looking ahead with a steady gaze. There’s something wounded about them, a kind of resigned toughness. But there’s an unexpected tenderness, too. At first you don’t really notice, but then you see it. The three are touching each other, as if they’re supporting each other, helping each other on
Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/05/thank-you-veterans/#ixzz2UW37qDGA

http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2013/05/27/1485649/la-mayoria-de-estadounidenses.html

DHS Caught Spying On Veterans

May 27, 2013 by Breaking News

In 2009, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security began a program to monitor white supremacists and “militia/sovereign-citizen extremist groups” for terrorist activities.

Included among the suspected terrorists were Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

At the time it was revealed, the program called “Operation Vigilant Eagle” caused some controversy but was quickly forgotten and buried by the media.

For the DHS, Vigilant Eagle was the expression of the misdirected paranoia that exists at the agency’s highest levels, which since President Obama stepped into office have issued multiple reports about a supposed wave of terrorism by American conservatives of various stripes, from Tea Party members to off-duty cops.

At the time, Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security secretary and chief conspiracy theorist, told NBC that, “This is an assessment of things just to be wary of, not to infringe on constitutional rights, certainly not to malign our veterans.”

No End To Scandals In Sight For Embattled Obama White House

May 27, 2013 by Niall Stanage

Batten down the hatches and wait for the storm to clear.

That’s the advice veteran Washington Democrats  are urging on a White House that has been embattled for a full two weeks by the  triad of controversies revolving around the IRS, Benghazi and the Justice  Department’s seizure of reporters’ phone records. No-one expects the pressure to  let up anytime soon.

“There is blood in the water and the sharks are circling,” said Jim Manley,  who spent years as the top communications aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry  Reid (D-Nev.) before moving on to a career at a lobbying firm.

“The last thing the White House needs to do is to make any unnecessary quick  moves — by making dramatic personnel changes, for example.”

Mike McCurry, who labored as White House Press Secretary for President Bill  Clinton during the feverish early days of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, opted for  a different marine metaphor.

“The temptation, when you have some variety of these feeding frenzies, is  only to worry about the churning water and not the longer-term horizon,” he  said. “The critical thing is to not lose sight of the larger agenda that the  president got elected to execute.”

The advice from the likes of Manley and McCurry is finding a receptive  audience at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. McCurry recently spoke with White House  chief of staff Denis McDonough, and came away impressed with the discipline  McDonough was instilling in the rest of the staff.

La mayoría de estadounidenses no apoya la reforma sanitaria, según encuesta

EFE

27 de mayo de 2013

Washington — – Un 54 % de los estadounidenses sigue sin apoyar la reforma sanitaria aprobada en 2010 por el presidente de EE.UU., Barack Obama, mientras que un 43 % sí la respalda, según una encuesta publicada hoy por la cadena CNN.

Los porcentajes son similares a los reflejados en otras encuestas realizadas en los tres años que han pasado desde la aprobación de la ley, a la que se opone buena parte del ala republicana en el Congreso.

Dentro del 54 % de encuestados que aseguraron estar en contra de la reforma, un 35 % argumentó que la ley es demasiado liberal, mientras que otro 16 % afirmó oponerse por todo lo contrario, al considerar que la legislación no va lo suficientemente lejos.

Entre los demócratas, casi un 75 % dicen apoyar la reforma sanitaria, mientras que en el caso de los republicanos sólo lo hace un 16 %.

Sólo un tercio de los estadounidenses blancos apoyan la ley, mientras que en el resto de grupos raciales la proporción se eleva a seis de cada diez, según la encuesta.

Por edades, quienes más simpatizan con la ley son los jóvenes, de los que la mayoría la apoya, mientras que sólo un 31 % de los mayores de 65 años lo hace.

La encuesta se llevó a cabo el 17 y 18 de mayo, justo después de que la Cámara de Representantes de Estados Unidos aprobara de nuevo la derogación de la reforma sanitaria, en su votación número 37 sobre esa legislación.

No se prevé que esa votación tenga mayores efectos políticos, porque los demócratas cuentan con la mayoría en el Senado.

Desde su promulgación, la ley sanitaria se ha aplicado de forma paulatina y la parte más controvertida entrará en vigor en enero próximo, cuando se exigirá que casi todos los estadounidenses tengan un plan médico y que las grandes empresas lo ofrezcan como beneficio, o afronten fuertes multas.

La encuesta se realizó por teléfono, sobre una muestra de 923 adultos y con un margen de error de más menos tres puntos porcentuales.

Obama’s Commerce Secretary Pick Failed to Disclose $80 Million in Earnings

Posted 4 hours ago by Dave Jolly  EMO. More “S” to the pile… LRGM

 

The Secretary of Commerce overseas virtually all of the business and industry that takes place in the US and with other countries.  He/she is responsible for trillions of dollars of business and sales.  That requires someone who not only has an extensive business background, but also someone who is trustworthy and beyond reproach.

Recently, President Barack Obama appointed Penny Pritzker to be the next Secretary of Commerce.  According to their website, the Mission Statement for the Department of Commerce states:

“The U.S. Department of Commerce promotes job creation, economic growth, sustainable development and improved standards of living for all Americans by working in partnership with businesses, universities, communities and our nation’s workers. The department touches the daily lives of the American people in many ways, with a wide range of responsibilities in the areas of trade, economic development, technology, entrepreneurship and business development, environmental stewardship, and statistical research and analysis.”

“To drive U.S. competitiveness in the global marketplace, the Commerce Department works to strengthen the international economic position of the United States and facilitates global trade by opening up new markets for U.S. goods and services. Here at home, the Commerce Department promotes progressive business policies that help America’s businesses and entrepreneurs and their communities grow and succeed. Cutting-edge science and technology at the department fosters innovation, and a focus on research and development that moves quickly from the lab to the marketplace generates progress and new 21st century opportunities. No matter where businesses are in their life cycle, whether just getting off the ground or looking to expand into overseas markets, the Commerce Department is singularly focused on making U.S. companies more innovative at home and more competitive abroad, so they can create jobs.”

“The Commerce Department also provides effective management and monitoring of our nation’s resources and assets to support both environmental and economic health. Through critical weather monitoring, weather forecasts and resource preservation, the department protects not only public safety and security but also our oceans, coasts and marine life while assisting their economic development. Other essential operations conducted by the Commerce Department include the constitutionally mandated decennial census, which serves as the basis of America’s representative democracy, as well as the system by which businesses and innovators secure intellectual property rights.”

The Secretary of Commerce oversees an annual budget of $7.5 billion and 47,000 employees located in the US and abroad.  Does Pritzker meet the qualifications needed to head the Commerce Department?

Pritzker is the founder, chairman and CEO of PSP Capital Partners along with the Pritzker Realty Group.  She is known as an entrepreneur and business executive.  In 2011, she was listed by Forbes 400 to be the 263rd wealthiest person in the United States with a net worth of $1.7 billion.  Pritzker also served as finance chairman for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign.

From that, it would seem that she is a successful and highly qualified business person who may just be a decent Secretary of Commerce.  However, there are other factors that need to weighed before she receives an approval.

To start with, it has been discovered that she failed to report $80 million in earnings on her disclosure report.  According to reports, the $80 million was earned from consulting on more than 400 domestic trusts involving an intergenerational family feud.  The restructuring involved the Hyatt Hotels, Hyatt Center, Conwood Company, Marmon Corp and Union Tank Car and evidently a number of people were not pleased with Pritzker’s advice and counsel.  She claims it was an oversight that is being corrected.  Gee, I wish I was able to consider $80 million worth of earnings as just an oversight, don’t you?

The national hotel and workers union has expressed opposition to Pritzker’s nomination citing her dealing with the Hyatt Hotel chain.  In a phone interview, Donald Taylor, president of UNITE HERE, the hotel and restaurant workers’ union with 270,000 members said:

“We are opposed to the nomination of Penny Pritzker based on what has taken place at Hyatt.”

Taylor said he has not yet been in contact with AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka concerning their support or opposition to the Pritzker appointment.  The AFL-CIO, one of the largest and most powerful unions in the country has been boycotting the Hyatt Hotel chain ever since the Pritzker assisted restructuring.

It’s interesting that I haven’t heard of any Republicans coming out against the appointment, while strongly Democratic unions are.  Perhaps that should be taken as a positive sign that she may do well if confirmed.  At the moment, I’m not sure which way to vote on her appointment.


Read more:
http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/05/obamas-commerce-secretary-pick-failed-to-disclose-80-million-in-earnings/#ixzz2UW5E5tt0

Suspende el gobierno de Obama reportar la deuda‏ Ricardo Samitier

Los que no ha podido Leer los Periódicos Por estar Gozando El Weekend Largo…

Fue Suspendido el Informe Sobre el monto de la Deuda…

El Gobierno anuncio que Seguirá imprimiendo dólares Para cubrir sus gastos…

El Ministro del TESORO de Obama anuncio en Washington que el

Gobierno decidió suspender el techo de la deuda, y continuará

Imprimiendo dólares para cubrí sus gastos (igual que lo hizo LUIS XVI

Por lo tanto, el tesorero de Obama, seguirá IMPRIMIENDO DÓLARES

HASTA QUE REVIENTE LA VERDADERA REVOLUCIÓN… 

Ese es el motivo de que el gobierno ha comprado millones de BALAS Y 3,800 TANQUES LIGEROS DE GUERRA URBANA…

Aquí tiene el enlace para leer la SUSPENSIÓN DE LA DEUDA…

http://rt.com/business/us-debt-ceiling-suspended–510/

Special prosecutor needed for IRS misdeeds

By United Press International May 27, 2013 6:50 am

The call for a special prosecutor to probe the IRS and press-monitoring scandals is growing, with U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R.-S.C.) telling Fox News Sunday that a special counsel is necessary because he believes the White House is too entwined.

“This did not accidentally happen,” Graham said of the IRS’ decision to apply extra scrutiny to conservative groups. “I think it comes from the top.”

About news that the Department of Justice aggressively has searched phone records and emails of reporters who wrote on national security matters, Graham said, “We are beginning to criminalize journalism, and I think that should worry us all.”

In Massachusetts, U.S. Rep. Edward J. Markey, who is running for U.S. Senate, countered in a prepared statement, “Congress is engaged in a top-to-bottom review to make sure those who engaged in this outrageous activity at the IRS are found and fired. More firings may be necessary and additional action should be driven by the findings of this congressional review, but I do not believe a special prosecutor is warranted at this point.”

GOP rival Gabriel Gomez said, “If getting to the bottom of this abuse of power by the IRS requires a special prosecutor, so be it.”

Markey’s Democratic colleague U.S. Rep. Stephen F. Lynch warned last week that if IRS brass continue to dodge authorities’ questions, demands for an independent probe would heighten.

“If that’s the approach they’re going to take, to refuse to cooperate, there may be no real alternative but for Congress to ask for a special counsel,” Lynch said last week.

He said yesterday, however, “I think it’s premature right now … I wouldn’t want to abdicate our responsibility. We have a job to do first.”

Was Obama Involved in the IRS Targeting? Vote Here Now

Home | Newsfront

Tags: rand | paul | obama | moral | authority

Rand Paul: Obama ‘Losing Moral Authority’

Sunday, 26 May 2013 04:23 PM By Greg Richter

President Barack Obama is in danger of losing his moral authority to lead the nation, Rep. Rand Paul, R-Ky., says.
Appearing on ABC’s “This Week,” Paul said the three controversies currently swirling around the administration weaken his leadership ability.
“Nobody questions his legal authority, but I think he’s really losing the moral authority,” Paul said. “I don’t care whether you’re a Republican or Democrat, nobody likes to see the opposite party punishing you for your political beliefs.”
Paul was referring to IRS agents targeting conservative groups for additional scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status prior the previous election cycle. Some have charged that agents wanted to suppress Republican voter turnout, though administration officials say the agents simply used bad judgment.
Asked whether he was aware of anyone at the IRS breaking the law, Paul responded that he didn’t know. But he noted that Lois Lerner, the head of tax-exempt organizations at the agency, took her Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate herself when asked to testify before Congress last week.
“The president did respond to that, and he has suspended her,” Paul noted. “However, he’s still paying her and I don’t want that to go on forever.”
Paul called for a speedy resolution to the IRS scandal.
Obama “says he’s going to listen to his new IRS commissioner in 30 days. Well, the investigation’s been going on over a year now, so I would think it wouldn’t take very long,” Paul said. “If he goes beyond 30 days, and if no one is fired over this, I really think it’s going to be trouble for him trying to lead in the next four years.”
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rand-paul-obama-moral/2013/05/26/id/506448?s=al&promo_code=13A14-1#ixzz2UW9EEK6S
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Ronald Reagan’s Speech On Memorial Day 1984

May 27, 2013 by Ronald Reagan

Memorial Day is a day of ceremonies and speeches. Throughout America today, we honor the dead of our wars. We recall their valor and their sacrifices. We remember they gave their lives so that others might live.

We’re also gathered here for a special event — the national funeral for an unknown soldier who will today join the heroes of three other wars.

When he spoke at a ceremony at Gettysburg in 1863, President Lincoln reminded us that through their deeds, the dead had spoken more eloquently for themselves than any of the living ever could, and that we living could only honor them by rededicating ourselves to the cause for which they so willingly gave a last full measure of devotion.

Well, this is especially so today, for in our minds and hearts is the memory of Vietnam and all that that conflict meant for those who sacrificed on the field of battle and for their loved ones who suffered here at home.

Not long ago, when a memorial was dedicated here in Washington to our Vietnam veterans, the events surrounding that dedication were a stirring reminder of America’s resilience, of how our nation could learn and grow and transcend the tragedies of the past.

During the dedication ceremonies, the rolls of those who died and are still missing were read for 3 days in a candlelight ceremony at the National Cathedral. And the veterans of Vietnam who were never welcomed home with speeches and bands, but who were never defeated in battle and were heroes as surely as any who have ever fought in a noble cause, staged their own parade on Constitution Avenue. As America watched them — some in wheelchairs, all of them proud — there was a feeling that this nation — that as a nation we were coming together again and that we had, at long last, welcomed the boys home.

“A lot of healing went on,” said one combat veteran who helped organize support for the memorial. And then there was this newspaper account that appeared after the ceremonies. I’d like to read it to you. “Yesterday, crowds returned to the Memorial. Among them was Herbie Petit, a machinist and former marine from New Orleans. `Last night,’ he said, standing near the wall, `I went out to dinner with some other ex-marines. There was also a group of college students in the restaurant. We started talking to each other. And before we left, they stood up and cheered us. The whole week,’ Petit said, his eyes red, `it was worth it just for that.”’

It has been worth it. We Americans have learned to listen to each other and to trust each other again. We’ve learned that government owes the people an explanation and needs their support for its actions at home and abroad. And we have learned, and I pray this time for good, the most valuable lesson of all — the preciousness of human freedom.

It has been a lesson relearned not just by Americans but by all the people of the world. Yet, while the experience of Vietnam has given us a stark lesson that ultimately must move the conscience of the world, we must remember that we cannot today, as much as some might want to, close this chapter in our history, for the war in Southeast Asia still haunts a small but brave group of Americans — the families of those still missing in the Vietnam conflict.

They live day and night with uncertainty, with an emptiness, with a void that we cannot fathom. Today some sit among you. Their feelings are a mixture of pride and fear. They’re proud of their sons or husbands, fathers or brothers who bravely and nobly answered the call of their country. But some of them fear that this ceremony writes a final chapter, leaving those they love forgotten.

Well, today then, one way to honor those who served or may still be serving in Vietnam is to gather here and rededicate ourselves to securing the answers for the families of those missing in action. I ask the Members of Congress, the leaders of veterans groups, and the citizens of an entire nation present or listening, to give these families your help and your support, for they still sacrifice and suffer.

Vietnam is not over for them. They cannot rest until they know the fate of those they loved and watched march off to serve their country. Our dedication to their cause must be strengthened with these events today. We write no last chapters. We close no books. We put away no final memories. An end to America’s involvement in Vietnam cannot come before we’ve achieved the fullest possible accounting of those missing in action.

This can only happen when their families know with certainty that this nation discharged her duty to those who served nobly and well. Today a united people call upon Hanoi with one voice: Heal the sorest wound of this conflict. Return our sons to America. End the grief of those who are innocent and undeserving of any retribution.

The Unknown Soldier who is returned to us today and whom we lay to rest is symbolic of all our missing sons, and we will present him with the Congressional Medal of Honor, the highest military decoration that we can bestow.

About him we may well wonder, as others have: As a child, did he play on some street in a great American city? Or did he work beside his father on a farm out in America’s heartland? Did he marry? Did he have children? Did he look expectantly to return to a bride?

We’ll never know the answers to these questions about his life. We do know, though, why he died. He saw the horrors of war but bravely faced them, certain his own cause and his country’s cause was a noble one; that he was fighting for human dignity, for free men everywhere. Today we pause to embrace him and all who served us so well in a war whose end offered no parades, no flags, and so little thanks. We can be worthy of the values and ideals for which our sons sacrificed — worthy of their courage in the face of a fear that few of us will ever experience — by honoring their commitment and devotion to duty and country.

Many veterans of Vietnam still serve in the Armed Forces, work in our offices, on our farms, and in our factories. Most have kept their experiences private, but most have been strengthened by their call to duty. A grateful nation opens her heart today in gratitude for their sacrifice, for their courage, and for their noble service. Let us, if we must, debate the lessons learned at some other time. Today, we simply say with pride, “Thank you, dear son. May God cradle you in His loving arms.”

We present to you our nation’s highest award, the Congressional Medal of Honor, for service above and beyond the call of duty in action with the enemy during the Vietnam era.

Sen. Coburn: Holder Investigating DOJ A ‘total Conflict Of Interest’

May 27, 2013 by Breaking News

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) on Sunday said that Attorney General Eric Holder should not be in charge of investigating the Justice Department’s (DOJ) seizure of communication records of journalists who reported on classified information.

“You cannot investigate yourself,” said Coburn on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “I think it’s a total conflict of interest.”

President Obama has stated that Holder is investigating claims that the DOJ overreached in its efforts to tamp down on leaks of confidential information.

Coburn stopped short of calling for special prosecutor to look into the claims that the DOJ breach reporters’ rights to privacy, as some Republicans lawmakers have done, however. But he insisted that someone other than Holder should lead the review.

“It doesn’t mean you shouldn’t investigate it,” Coburn said. “And it shouldn’t mean we shouldn’t be tough on that. But allowing the very person that authorized the two things that we are aware today to investigate whether or not he did that appropriately is inappropriate.

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

May 27, 2013 by Daniel Greenfield

There is a characteristic feature to tyranny. It isn’t the scowling faces of armed guards or the rusting metal of barbed wire fences. It isn’t the black cars of the secret police or the prison camps surrounded by wastelands of snow.

The defining characteristic of tyranny is the diversion of power from the people to the unelected elite. The elite can claim to be inspired by Allah or Marx; it can act in the name of racial purity or universal workers compensation or both. The details don’t matter, because in all instances, tyranny derives its justification from the superiority of the rulers and the inferiority of the people.

The left launched two revolutions. One was the hard revolution of bombs and assassinations by those who did not have the time or patience to wait for the long march through the institutions of the state. This revolution was born quickly and died quickly. It killed millions and choking on their blood it died by stages, losing its ideas and then its power, until there were only a few old men and women in shawls clinging to red velvet portraits of Stalin.

But there was also the soft revolution that was slow and subtle. It was a revolution of laws, rather than bombs. It did not concern itself with 5-year-plans but with 50-year-plans. It proceeded by increments, raising the temperature so very gradually that the free world did not realize it was cooked until it could smell its own burning flesh.

The revolutions of the east failed. They rose quickly in fire and fury and only ashes and statues remain. But the revolutions of the west have been underway for generations in countries where millions of men and women go about their business without realizing what is taking place around them.

When H.G. Wells met with Lenin in 1920, he wrote, “Our essential difference, the difference of the Collectivist and Marxist, the question whether the social revolution is, in its extremity, necessary, whether it is necessary to overthrow one social and economic system completely before the new one can begin.”

 

 

 

 “THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’  Image

No 395 5/26/13 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

mayo 26, 2013

No 395 5/26/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’

 Image

Es difícil imaginar una forma más estúpida y peligrosa, que poner en manos de una persona, decisiones fundamentales por las cuales no pagara ningún precio por sus equivocaciones.             Thomas Sowell

 

REPEAL OBAMACARE Before It Causes Irreversible Damage to Hard-Working Americans and Small Businesses

Obamacare will not accomplish what it originally set out to do.

We the People demand that President Obama retract the Affordable Care Act in its entirety. The law will cause irreversible damage to families and businesses.

Obamacare has an aggressively low approval rating because citizens are being forced to accept lesser-quality coverage. Coverage costs for employers are skyrocketing, causing people to lose work hours or flat-out lose their jobs.

Worst of all, politicians want to be exempt from Obamacare, including its chief authors and endorsers. If the President wants to shove legislation down our throats, the law must be required for elected officials, too.

Let’s repeal this “train wreck” before it’s too late. Sign now If you believe in personal liberty, free markets & small gov

Created: May 09, 2013

Issues: Civil Rights and Liberties, Health Care, Small Business

Learn about Petition Thresholds

Signatures needed by June 08, 2013 to reach goal of 100,000

95,586

Total signatures on this petition

4,414

Sign this Petition

A whitehouse.gov account is required to sign Petitions.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/repeal-obamacare-it-causes-irreversible-damage-hard-working-americans-and-small-businesses/6DDx6LNR

Lo que NO NOS ENSENAN EN LAS ESCUELAS‏

Ricardo Samitier

La Historia Que Debemos Conocer Los Musulmanes Históricamente Son Una Religión De Odio…

 

Los Reyes Católicos Expulsaron a Los Moros De España En 1492…El Acuerdo de Rendición

Exigía SE VAN o SE HACEN CRISTIANOS…  Cuando La Guerra Termino el 90 % de Los

Ciudadanos De Las Zonas Recién Conquistadas NO HABLABAN EL CASTELLANO…y Le

Rezaban a “ALAH” Las Mezquitas Se Hicieron Iglesias… Se oficializo  El Castellano PERO NO SE ACABO con el  PROBLEMA que realizaban los llamados… “MORISCOS”  habían transcurrido 118 años

Cuando en 1610 se logró reducir la resistencia Y la expulsión… de los rebeldes moriscos de

Valencia…  Hubo Moriscos que no fueron expulsados a África

Este grupo considerado menos agresivos fueron Relocalizados dentro de España a territorios que

Nunca fueron gobernados por los musulmanes  Como Asturias, Aragón, etc.

 

Hay que notar que los judíos también fueron Expulsados por los Reyes Católicos… por haberse Declarado “Neutrales” durante la guerra de 700 años… y dedicarse al negocio del

“intercambio de Prisioneros” en aquel entonces No existían la consideración de “Prisioneros de

Guerra”  los que caían prisioneros eran  Considerados y Vendidos como ESCLAVOS…

 

En ambos bandos… ALGUNOS judíos se dedicaron A cómpralos y a Vendérselos a sus familiares… Cuando el familiar no lo compraba lo vendían a los Africanos… lo que aumento el ODIO contra ellos…  

 

A los Judíos y Musulmanes que se convertían se les Hacia la prueba de que comieran “Cerdo” que en España se le llamaba MARRANO… los judíos que Decidieron exiliarse… se les permitió salir en familia Y llevarse sus pertenecías… y estos judíos fueron los Que le dieron el nombre de “Marranos” a los que se Convirtieron… pues les decían: TE VOLVISTE LO QUE COMISTE…eres un MARRANO.

 

Hay que reconocer… que los judíos “Marranos”… Quizás también continuaron en SECRETO rezándole a Jehová… Pero si lo hacían… lo hacían en privado  Sin ofender…y alterar la SEGURIDAD de la nación…

 

¿Por qué desechamos las enseñanzas de la Historia? Tenemos LAS PRUEBAS de lo que son Capaces la  RELIGIÓN DE ODIO y SANGRE de los MUSULMANES… Antes de ayer los musulmanes ingleses asesinaron un soldado en Londres y ayer intentaron Asesinar a  uno FRANCÉS en PARIS…

Los musulmanes son una religión de ODIO… mientras que El CRISTIANISMO es de AMOR AL PRÓJIMO…

Una religión fundada por un ANALFABETO 600 años Después de CRISTO… cuando la doctrina cristiana hacia 300 años era OFICIAL en lo que fue el IMPERIO ROMANO…

 

Hay dos LEYES MUSULMANAS que me llaman la atención… dos personas le dijeron a Mahoma… tu mujer es infiel y se acuesta con otro… Tienes que condenarla a muerte…

Mahoma entonces estableció Que Para Que Una Infiel Fuera CONDENADA… se requerían 3 TESTIGOS…

 

La Otra…

 

Los MUSULMANES… se pueden dejar las barbas… pero se tienen Que afeitar el cuerpo… principalmente debajo del Brazo y los bellos De la PELVIS… porque MAHOMA LO ORDENO… aparentemente le Gustaban los cuerpos DEPILADOS…

Aquí tienen la noticia del ataque TERRORISTA al soldado en Paris…Noticia que NO HE VISTO… en la TV de USA…

 http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/25/us-france-stabbing-idUSBRE94O09420130525

DOJ Begged Judge to Keep Fox Reporter in Dark About Monitoring

Friday, 24 May 2013 09:19 PM By Todd Beamon

The Justice Department begged a federal judge to not tell Fox News reporter James Rosen that it was tracking his telephone calls and emails in a probe regarding a national security leak.

U.S. Attorney Ron Machen argued in 2010 that the traditional 30-day notice period did not apply to Rosen as Justice secretly monitored his Gmail account, according to new exhibits unsealed this week and disclosed by The Hill.

Related: Holder Personally OK’d Fox Reporter’s Warrant

“Where, as here, the government seeks such contents through a search warrant, no notice to the subscriber or customer of the e-mail account is statutorily required or necessary,” Machen wrote in a June 2010 motion. “Thus, this court’s indication on the face of the warrant that delayed notice of 30 days to the customer and subscriber was permissible was unnecessary.”

Machen, through another request granted by the court, stopped Google from telling Rosen that Justice was spying on his e-mail account, the Hill reports.

The prosecutor had demanded to see all of Rosen’s emails — including deleted messages, emails in his trash folder and all attachments sent to and from him.

The original warrant in the Rosen case was signed personally by Attorney General Eric Holder, NBC News reported this week.

Meanwhile, Fox News President Roger Ailes on Thursday blasted Justice for targeting journalists as if they were criminals and said the government’s seizure of reporters’ emails and phone records would not stand “the test of law.”

“The administration’s attempt to intimidate Fox News and its employees will not succeed and their excuses will stand neither the test of law, the test of decency, nor the test of time,” Ailes said. “We will not allow a climate of press intimidation, unseen since the McCarthy era, to frighten any of us away from the truth.”

President Barack Obama on Thursday asked Holder to review Justice’s guidelines on leak investigations and news organizations. Holder promised a report by July 12, the Hill reports.

Reports of the FBI’s tracking of Rosen’s movements, phone, and email conversations with a former State Department contractor — Stephen Jin-Woo Kim — followed the disclosure last week that phone records of editors and reporters at The Associated Press had been secretly seized by Justice in another probe of leaked government information.

But unlike the AP reporters, Rosen was named as a “co-conspirator” by FBI officials in the warrant signed by Holder.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/doj-fox-monitoring/2013/05/24/id/506349?s=al&promo_code=13A01-1#ixzz2UL5qtS4s
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Hasta el Día de Hoy Ninguna Protesta del T PARTY A SIDO VIOLENTA‏ Ricardo Samitier

A Pesar De Que Las Protestas Del T Party Nunca Han Sido Violentas… Home Security Envió Refuerzos A La Policía Durante La Protesta Ante Las Oficinas Del IRS En St Louis.

Como Todos Sabemos HomeLand Security Ha Comprado Millones de Balas… No creo que Haga Falta Decir ¿Para Qué?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/woah-armed-dhs-guards-outside-irs-in-st-louis/

Rusia de PONE a la Cabeza del Mundo Civilizado‏ Ricardo Samitier

Rusia Prohíbe Las Marchas De Homosexuales

Por 8 Años Los Homosexuales Rusos Han Celebrado Con

Marchas EL DÍA DEL ORGULLO De Los “ABERRO SEXUALES”

Este Año… Las Autoridades Suspendieron La Celebración…

Después de Experimentar por 8 años La degradación Que

Producen En la Ciudad…

Aquí Esta la Noticia…

http://www.christiantelegraph.com/issue19711.html

Politica contra REALIDADES‏ Ricardo Samitier

Hay Que SER ó NO SER

Marco Rubio Cada  Vez Que Sale  En Las Noticias… Está En La “Cerca”  Ni Chicha – Ni Limonada

Todos Estamos Cansados De LaPolitiquería… Tiene Que Decidirse Por El “T Party”  y   Servir Al Pueblo Que lo eligió  venciendo a la Vieja Y Decadente Maquinaria Del Partido Republicano…  El Partido Ya lo TRAICIONÓ… Cuando Lo ENCASILLARON en “La Pandilla De  Los 8…” La Que No Va A Resolver El Problema De La Emigración ILEGAL… Ya Veremos Como Marco Rubio Sale  De Esa Trampa La Mejor Salida Es Renunciar y Denunciar La Pandilla Como Ineficiente… Y Proponer Una Solución Propia…

“EMO”. Marco sacúdete de esas ladillas… Son una mierda no dejes que te jodan el futuro. LRGM

La BATALLA ESA FUERTE… he aquí una prueba de jalono‏Ricardo Samitier

Gracias a OBAMA  el ciudadano Norte Americano

Están DESPERTANDO del “Sueño” en que fueron

Sumidos por Los “Demócratas y Republicanos

Comunistas…

Este video es una orquesta JAPONESA formada

Por mujeres que apenas Tocan tres NOTAS…

Pero CONTRIBUYEN no solo a la Destrucción de

Japón… sino del mundo entero…

 

Véanla… verán que no son buenas TOCANDO…

Tampoco sus cuerpos SIRVEN PARA PUTAS…

http://mibrujula.com/la-orquesta-femenina-que-toca-en-pelotas/?fb_action_ids=10201132613779907&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%7B%2210201132613779907%22%3A524320944293254%7D&action_type_map=%7B%2210201132613779907%22%3A%22og.likes%22%7D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D

Los Homosexuales Van A organizar otro show internacionales‏ Ricardo Samitier

El Caso de La Lesbiana de 18 Años Que ENGATUSO a Una Nina de 14 Años Para Que Tuviera Relaciones Sexuales…  Va a Ser Un Show Mediático Que durará Meses…Los Homosexuales Van A Gastar Millones Y Ese Juicio Van Costar Millones A Los Que Pagamos Impuestos… TODO porque quieren Eliminar de Las Leyes Criminales… La Violación De Niños…

¿Qué DEFENSA se puede alegar en la VIOLACIÓN SEXUAL De Un Menor de Edad?

No hay defensa posible… EN ESTE CASO: El Padre, La Madre y La LESBIANA han aceptado que es verdad que tuvieron SEXO…

La Verdad es que TODOS LOS HOMOSEXUALES SON PEDÓFILOS… pues tienen siempre que convencer A un niño o una persona inmadura para sus Actos de PERVERSIÓN y aberro sexualismo…

Lo peor de todo es que pueden pasar estas cosas:

  1. 1.       Le pueden asignar UN JUEZ HOMOSEXUAL que incline la balanza a su favor. Los Hay a MONTONES… aquí en Miami (que yo sepa) Hay dos CASADOS…
  2. 2.       Lo más probable que logren un JURADO con 2 o 3 HOMOSEXUALES…
  3. 3.       El juicio está BIEN CALCULADO… los homosexuales tienen mucho que ganar… y SI PIERDEN... van a pedir un NUEVO JUICIO alegando que la muchachita fue mal aconsejada…

En definitiva… la CIUDADANÍA no REACCIONA hasta que uno de esos ENFERMOS Y ABERRADOS SEXUALES NO VIOLE A UN HIJO O UN NIETO… y le destruya la vida…

Roger Ailes: Fox Won’t Be Intimidated by Attempts to ‘Criminalize’ Reporting Friday, 24 May 2013 10:46 AM By Courtney Coren

Fox News President Roger Ailes blasted the Justice Department Thursday for targeting journalists as if they were criminals and said the government’s seizure of reporters’ emails and phone records would not stand “the test of law.”

“The recent news about the FBI’s seizure of the phone and email records of Fox News employees, including James Rosen, calls into question whether the federal government is meeting its constitutional obligation to preserve and protect a free press in the United States,” Ailes, a former media and political consultant to President Ronald Reagan, wrote in a “memo of support” to Fox News employees.

Urgent: Is Obama Telling the Truth on IRS, Benghazi Scandals?

“We reject the government’s efforts to criminalize the pursuit of investigative journalism and falsely characterize a Fox News reporter to a federal judge as a ‘co-conspirator’ in a crime,” he added, referring to the FBI’s tracking of James Rosen in connection with a leak investigation.

Reports of the FBI’s tracking of Rosen’s movements, phone, and email conversations with a government source followed the disclosure last week that phone records of Associated Press reporters had been seized as part of another Justice Department probe of leaked government information. But unlike the AP reporters, Rosen was named as a “co-conspirator” by FBI officials in a warrant authorization request approved by Attorney General Eric Holder that allowed the search of Rosen’s emails.

In his memo, Ailes referred to the Justice Department’s actions as an Obama administration “attempt to intimidate Fox news and its employees.” He said it would not succeed and that their excuses for targeting reporters would “stand neither the test of law, the test of decency, nor the test of time.

“We will not allow a climate of press intimidation, unseen since the McCarthy era, to frighten any of us away from the truth,” he wrote.

Ailes expressed his pride in the Fox News operation and thanked employees for what he called their “tireless effort to report the news.”

“I stand with you, I support you and I thank you for your reporting with courageous optimism. Too many Americans fought and died to protect our unique right of press freedom,” he continued. “We can’t and won’t forget that. To be an American journalist is not only a great responsibility, but also a great honor. To be a Fox journalist is a high honor, not a high crime.”

© 2013 Newsmax. Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ailes-fox-reporting-intimidation/2013/05/24/id/506249?s=al&promo_code=139EC-1#ixzz2UKirEErk
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Mario Vargas Llosa escribió: ¿Cómo es eso posible?  SÍ, LLORO POR TI ARGENTINA.

Durísimo artículo de Mario Vargas Llosa.

 

Argentina, un país que era democrático cuando tres cuartas partes de Europa no lo eran, un país que era uno de los más prósperos de la Tierra cuando América Latina era un continente de hambrientos, de atrasados.

 

El primer país del mundo que acabó con el analfabetismo no fue Estados Unidos, no fue Francia, fue la Argentina con un sistema educativo que era un ejemplo para todo el mundo. Ese país que era un país de vanguardia ¿Como puede ser que sea el país empobrecido, caótico, subdesarrollado que es hoy? ¿Qué pasó? ¿Alguien lo invadió? ¿Estuvieron enfrascados en alguna guerra terrible?

No, los argentinos se hicieron eso ellos mismos. Los argentinos eligieron a lo largo de medio siglo las peores opciones.

 

¿Cómo se entiende eso? Un país con gentes cultas, absolutamente privilegiado, una minoría de habitantes en un enorme territorio que concentra todos los recursos naturales. ¿Por qué no son el primer país de la Tierra? ¿Por qué no tienen el mismo nivel de vida que Suecia, que Suiza que Chile?

 

Porque los argentinos no han querido. Han querido en cambio ser pobres. Seguir a “caudillos” de pacotilla, “salvadores” de porquería, locos, desquiciados por su mismo odio a todo lo que sea diferente a su locura. Han querido vivir bajo dictaduras, han querido vivir dentro del mercantilismo más espantoso. Hay en esto una responsabilidad del pueblo argentino.

Para mí es espantoso lo que ha ocurrido en Argentina. La primera vez que fui allí quedé maravillado. Un país de clases medias, donde no había pobres en el sentido latinoamericano de la pobreza. ¿Cómo pudo llegar a la presidencia una pareja tan diabólica, manipuladora, populistas en grado extremo, corruptos de calle como los Kirchner gobernando ese país?. Al menos ya uno no está!.

Esperemos que la que queda no pueda seguir hundiendo a ese otrora gran país argentino!

 

Sin embargo, a juzgar por sus diabólicas relaciones estrechísimas con el desquiciado, paria, bestia troglodita, de la extinta y queridísima República de Venezuela, todo parece indicar que ahora “Cristinita” se apegará aún más a ese escoria, aprendiz de dictadorzuelo, quien ya bastante le ha financiado su mandato a costa del noble pero incomprensiblemente inerte pueblo Venezolano.

 

¡Qué degradación política, qué degradación intelectual! Argentina y Venezuela, dos países extraordinarios vueltos pedazos por una sarta de demoníacos desquiciados!!! Por eso me pregunto ¿Cómo es eso posible?

 

Mario Vargas Llosa

Madrid, España

 

 

Conozca Mas sobre el IRS‏ ricardo samitier

He Traducido en Google Este Artículo Sobre la Historia Del IRS Usado Por Los Presidentes y El Gobierno Para Silenciar A La Oposición… 

Al final está el link para ir al artículo en ingles…

El IRS: Ha Estado Destruyendo Las Libertades Desde Que Fue Organizado… Pero Fue Franklin “Delano” Roosevelt El Que Lo Utilizó Con Mayor Eficiencia…

 

En las consecuencias de las recientes revelaciones sobre el Servicio de Impuestos Internos persecución sistemática grupos políticos conservadores y otros enemigos del presidente Obama, el establecimiento está poniendo un buen espectáculo de ser sorprendido por el comportamiento. La realidad es que el IRS es y siempre ha sido una herramienta de opresión y se utiliza de forma rutinaria por aquellos en el poder para destruir a sus oponentes.

Una vez que el impuesto sobre la renta se expandió para incluir a casi todos asalariado y de la empresa en el país, fue capturado inmediatamente después como una potente arma de los peores tiranos de la historia americana. Franklin Roosevelt le encantó el IRS y la utilizó también para silenciar a sus oponentes. Cuando no estaba miembros ilegal de escuchas telefónicas del Congreso u otros enemigos, estaba despachando agentes de rentas de inventar cargos contra cualquiera que se atreviera a oponerse a él. El propio hijo de Roosevelt, Elliot, dijo de su padre: “[Él] puede haber sido el creador del concepto de emplear el IRS como arma de venganza política.” Roosevelt envió a sus secuaces para destruir el senador Huey Long, comentarista de radio Boake Carter, el congresista Hamilton Fish, ex secretario del Tesoro, Andrew Mellon, editores de periódicos William Randolph Hearst y Moisés Annenberg, y docenas de otros. FDR también intervino para frustrar las investigaciones del IRS en la corrupta ciudad de Jersey demócrata Frank La Haya y el entonces congresista Lyndon Johnson.

Mississippi editor de periódicos Hodding Carter fue auditado en varias ocasiones durante la década de 1950 cuando se tomó la decisión de apoyar las decisiones impopulares contra la segregación de la Corte Suprema. Asimismo, el Dr. Martin Luther King y varios abogados de la Conferencia de Liderazgo Cristiano del Sur fueron auditados a finales de 1950 y comienzos de 1960.

John Kennedy y su hermano Bobby encontraron el IRS valiosa para la intimidación, el lanzamiento de una sonda de impuestos masiva de directivos de la empresa de acero que se negaron a fijar sus precios en niveles aceptables para Jack y Bobby. Como el propio Robert Kennedy dijo más tarde, “[w] e mirado sobre todos ellos como individuos … que íbamos a por todas … sus cuentas de gastos y de dónde habían estado y lo que estaban haciendo [.] … Recogí todos sus registros [.] … Todos ellos fueron citados para sus archivos personales. “

A mediados de la década de 1960, Missouri senador Edward desde hace mucho tiempo audiencias sobre la corrupción generalizada dentro del IRS. En represalia, el IRS filtró información a un editor de la revista Life sobre los vínculos de largo al infame jefe sindical Jimmy Hoffa. El resultado fue la derrota de largo en las primarias demócratas de 1968. El editor de la vida, William Lambert, dijo que después de Senador Long fue derrotado, recibió una llamada telefónica personal del Comisionado del IRS Sheldon Cohen ofrece felicitaciones.

El presidente Richard Nixon sabía el impresionante poder del IRS para infundir miedo y silenciar a la oposición. Como Nixon dijo una vez sobre su elección al frente de la agencia, “Quiero estar seguro de que es un hijo despiadada de ab ****, que va a hacer lo que se le dice, que toda declaración de la renta quiero ver que veo , que va a ir tras nuestros enemigos y no nuestros amigos. Ahora, es tan simple como eso. Si no lo es, no hacer el trabajo “.

En 1996, el senador William Roth inició la primera investigación exhaustiva y audiencias de control en 70 años en la táctica del Servicio de Impuestos Internos. En sus 1.999 book1 detalle lo que el Comité de Finanzas del Senado descubrió que presenta una historia impactante de la arrogancia, la corrupción, la mala gestión, mala conducta, el acoso y la actividad criminal. Senador Roth describe los ciudadanos respetuosos de la ley, acosados ​​durante años por rouge agentes del IRS, en última instancia, ser llevados al suicidio, y sus familiares siguen siendo hostigados y avergonzado públicamente mucho después de enterrar a sus seres queridos.

No sólo el poder casi ilimitado de la IRS lo convierten en un arma irresistible para los presidentes autoritarios, pero su autoridad ilimitada para espiar, acosar y destruir vidas corrompe inevitablemente su personal. Es una máxima universalmente reconocido que el poder corrompe – y el IRS tiene más de lo que cualquier otra persona en nuestro país. La agencia de empleo tres veces más personal que el FBI y tiene los expedientes detallados de todos los contribuyentes de la nación – incluyendo su número de Seguro Social y las de sus hijos, cada lugar se trabaja, cuánto gana, lo que invierten, con que se hace negocios, el costo de su hipoteca, y los números de sus cuentas financieras. Y las respuestas del IRS a nadie.

La arrogancia del poder pero en su lugar se remontan a 1925, cuando el senador James Couzens de Michigan estaba tratando de llevar a cabo una investigación2 en la corrupción dentro de la Oficina de Rentas Internas (IRS Como se conocía anteriormente). Durante una audiencia, el senador Couzens se llama fuera de los trabajos del Comité de nada menos que de Rentas Internas Comisionado David Blair, quien descaradamente le sirvió con cargos que le debía $ 11 millones en impuestos atrasados. Después de una batalla legal costosa y prolongada, se determinó finalmente que el senador Couzens fue, de hecho, le debe un reembolso de un millón de dólares.

Esa arrogancia y abuso de poder es de esperar de una organización que tiene la autoridad para acusar a nadie de la actividad criminal sin ningún requisito de la prueba, si te acusan de un crimen, usted lleva la carga de probar que eres inocente.

Una revisión de los propios informes del Inspector General del Departamento del Tesoro de los dos últimos años revela el carácter generalizado de la actividad criminal en el IRS. Sólo durante ese período, hubo más de 17.000 denuncias presentadas ante la oficina del inspector general de la participación de agentes del IRS que participan en “el soborno, el robo, la suplantación, las violaciones de los contribuyentes, y declaraciones falsas.”

Lo que este último escándalo – y, de hecho, toda la historia del IRS – demuestra claramente el hecho de que el impuesto sobre la renta es del todo incompatible con una sociedad libre. La idea de que el gobierno tiene derecho a una cierta porción de su salario incluso antes de recibir su cheque de pago es una contradicción directa del principio más básico de la libertad: la propiedad privada. No es exagerado decir que una vez que el Congreso le concedió el poder de imponer un impuesto sobre los ingresos ilimitados, sus miembros asumieron el poder para hacer que todos los estadounidenses bajo la tiranía absoluta. La 16 ª Enmienda no impone límites en el impuesto sobre la renta, literalmente, el Congreso podría votar mañana, que los estadounidenses deben pagar la totalidad de sus ingresos directamente al gobierno, y sería legal y constitucional para que lo hagan.

El efecto práctico de todo esto ha sido la supresión total de los derechos de propiedad privada en los Estados Unidos. Si los ingresos de todos los estadounidenses es esencialmente propiedad estatal, por lo que significa que una persona puede obtener cualquier otra propiedad privada? El impuesto sobre la renta ha hecho todo asalariado en un esclavo del gobierno federal, en la medida de su libertad depende totalmente del capricho del Congreso.

En 1871, en vísperas de la derogación de la medida de impuesto sobre la renta Guerra Civil de Abraham Lincoln, el Comisionado de Rentas Internas describió el impuesto sobre la renta como “la de todos los demás más desagradables para el genio de nuestro pueblo, de ser inquisitivo en su naturaleza, y arrastrando a la luz pública una exposición de los asuntos pecuniarios más privadas de los ciudadanos “. Esta es una descripción muy acertada, los ingresos de una persona es un asunto muy privado, que ahora el gobierno ejerce una vigilancia constante sobre. Su empleador informa al gobierno hasta el último centavo que usted hace. Su banco y el agente, bajo amenaza de multas o prisión, informan cada centavo de los intereses o beneficios que se acumulan. Asimismo, se le requiere, bajo pena de ley a presentar una declaración de impuestos cada año para conciliar su deuda con el gobierno. Como se informó el ex secretario del Tesoro Albert Gallatin haber dicho acerca de los impuestos al consumo “, una severa Inquisición debe tener lugar … y poderes extraordinarios y peligrosos debe ser dada a los coleccionistas.”

A menos y hasta que se derogue la reforma de impuestos y 98.000 secuaces del IRS son enviados embalaje, los abusos continuarán, como lo han hecho durante casi un siglo. Sólo cuando el gobierno ya no tiene derecho a mantener una vigilancia constante sobre los asuntos financieros personales de todos los ciudadanos podemos comenzar a restaurar los estadounidenses la libertad que antes se disfrutaban. Como todos los hombres de todas las edades, los que recibieron extraordinaria y peligrosa energía se utilizan para tiranizar a los demás, y como tal, este poder especial no tiene lugar en una tierra libre.

Todd Keister es un ex comandante de la policía estatal, un especialista en inteligencia naval y un escritor y columnista publicados.

1Roth, William V. y William Nixon. El poder de destruir. New York: Atlantic Monthly, 1999.

¿QUIEN ES EL JUEZ U.S. District Judge Murray Snow in Ph‏ Ricardo Samitier

¿Quien Es Murray Snow?

Hasta Hoy  Era Un Desconocido…

Aunque debe de haber tenido Buenas Amistades “POLÍTICAS REPUBLICANAS” Para Lograr Que El Presidente W Bush Lo Nombrara Juez Federal En Arizona… Puesto de “POR VIDA” Que se consigue por CONEXIONES… Y ahora; ha resultado tan “Buen Republicano”  Que acaba de condenar al Sheriff Republicano Joe Arpaio… Quien es acusado por todos los Demócratas… comenzando por OBAMA… 

Hoy Es Noticia y Toda La Prensa Socialista y Homosexual Esta Aplaudiendo Al Juez…

Porque Condenó al más CONOCIDO y POPULAR sheriff de los ESTADOS UNIDOS…Joe Arpaio QUIEN HA SALIDO ELECTO 6 VECES CON UNA MAYORÍA ABRUMADORA POR SUS CONCIUDADANOS…

 

Lo declaró CULPABLE de que su departamento… que tiene el MEJOR RECORD de arrestos de los Estados Unidos… Cumple Con Su Deber… pero HACE ARRESTOS BASADOS EN EL COLOR DE LA PIEL…

La Pregunta LÓGICA… Que No se Hace

En Arizona… El 31% de la población es de ORIGEN MEJICANO es un Estado Fronterizo con Méjico por donde pasa el 65% de todos los Ilegales que entran en ESTADOS UNIDOS…  

¿Cuantos PERSONA RUBIAS DE OJOS AZULES pueden ser arrestados sospechosos de ser  ILEGALES en Arizona???

Los Conciudadanos de Joe Arpaio Lo han RE-ELEGIDO 6 VECES a pesar de que la Prensa Nacional y OBAMA han hecho campaña en su contra… Todos  Los Ciudadanos De USA Debemos apoyarlo… contra el Fallo… de este JUEZ supuestamente REPUBLICANO…

Leer más: Síguenos en: @ AmericanThinker en Twitter | AmericanThinker en Facebook

 

Obama: Serial Liar

May 21, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield Comments (99)

Will Rogers, the great humorist, once said, “If you ever injected truth into politics, you would have no politics.”  If you injected truth into the teleprompter during one of Obama’s speeches, there would be nothing left but an empty chair.

Fourteen days after the September 11, 2012 attacks, Obama appeared at the United Nations to deliver a eulogy for the man he had not troubled to save and to declare that the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.

 

Obama denounced the “crude and disgusting video” that had “sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world” and explained that it couldn’t be banned only because of the pesky Constitution. Two days later, the man behind the video, a Coptic Christian protesting the Muslim persecution of Christians in Egypt, had been arrested. The actual perpetrators of the attack still walk the streets of Benghazi.

 

That lopsided injustice appeared to have been the plan all along. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had told Charles Woods, the father of murdered Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods, that the administration was going to arrest and prosecute the man who made the video.

It was the only promise that Obama and Clinton made about Benghazi which they faithfully kept. Everything else was a lie. Doubletalk had become an administration habit. Obama would say one thing and do another. Or he would loudly tell a lie and quietly speak some version of the truth in order to hedge his bets.

On May 13, 2013, standing alongside British Prime Minister David Cameron, Obama said, “The day after it happened, I acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism.” The phrasing suggested an admission, rather than an assertion. A thing that had to be dragged out of him. But even that much was not true.

At the United Nations, Obama had not used the word, terrorism. On 60 Minutes, he carefully avoided calling it a terrorist attack. There and on The View, he took refuge in delaying tactics about a developing investigation that was doomed from the start because the FBI had no power to take any action in a city run by the same terrorist militias that had carried out the attacks.

 

In campaign speeches, Obama mentioned acts of terror, plural and unspecified, while administration proxies like Susan Rice blamed a YouTube movie trailer for the carnage and Obama and Clinton spent $70,000 on an apology commercial denouncing the video in Pakistan.

 

There was no question that the dominant message coming out of the White House after the attacks was that the trailer for The Innocence of Muslims was to blame. The infamous talking points trimmed away any mention of terrorism and reduced a heavily armed attack to a spontaneous protest over an online movie trailer.

 

This Sunday, Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer was sent to do a tour of the morning shows where he declared that Obama’s whereabouts during the attack were irrelevant and that the process by which the talking points were altered was likewise irrelevant.

 

At his joint press conference with Cameron, Obama had taken the same line, declaring the investigation a “sideshow” and insisting that there was nothing there and that no one had known what was going on. Gregory Hicks, the lead diplomatic figure in Libya, however had testified that everyone there knew that it was a terrorist attack and that it had nothing to do with the video.

 

At 2 AM, local time, Hicks had briefed Clinton. Despite everything the one man in the position to know what was happening was saying, the administration chose a disastrous and dishonest narrative instead.

 

The dishonesty isn’t ending any time soon.

 

At a joint press conference with Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan, a known supporter of terrorism, Obama once again shifted the blame to Congress for a lack of security and the failure to intervene.

 

The myth that the State Department lacked the funds to provide security in Benghazi was the defense against accusations of administration malfeasance. But it’s a myth that fell apart when Charlene Lamb, the deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, testified in Congress that budget issues had not prevented the hiring of more security personnel.

 

The Washington Post had pointed out that Congress would have provided supplemental security funding if it had been requested. Despite pleas from diplomats on the ground, it was not. Instead the State Department’s bureaucrats and donor diplomats were busy squandering money on all sorts of wasteful vanity projects.

The State Department had plenty of money. It just chose to use it in the wrong ways. It had millions to spend on embassy art, ridiculously overpriced Kindles and even on an Afghan YouTube channel.

 

At the press conference, Obama went so far as say, “We’re going to need Congress’s help in terms of increasing the number of our Marine Corps Guard who protect our embassies” when under him, not only were 20,000 Marines being fired, but at the presidential debate, Obama had mocked Romney’s objections to his drastic naval cuts by saying that we no longer needed outdated horses and bayonets.

 

The real reason that the Marines had not been there protecting Benghazi was the same reason that no military forces came to the rescue once the attack began. It was the same reason that Obama blamed the video and used the United Nations as a forum for denouncing that video, instead of denouncing terrorism.

The issue was never the budget. It was appeasement.

 

The United States was not incapable of using armed force over Benghazi. Obama’s first Libya lie, the one that led to the war, was the claim that Gaddafi forces were about to carry out a massacre in Benghazi. No such massacre had occurred anywhere or was going to occur, but it was enough for Obama to go to war, without ever admitting that he was at war.

 

Was the military power that was leveraged to defend Benghazi incapable of being leveraged to defend the mission in Benghazi? Was overthrowing Gaddafi really easier than protecting American diplomats and security personnel under siege?

 

Benghazi was, from beginning to end, a story of appeasement gone bad. The serial lies by a serial liar have covered up the ugly truth that American lives were sacrificed on the altar of appeasement. Four men are dead and a fifth has been locked up to keep the lie alive.

 

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-serial-liar/

 

The 16th amendment, is total evil:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/05/the_irs_destroying_liberty_since_before_you_were_born.html

Koch lawyer says Obama administration has tried intimidation By Wichita Eagle (KS) May 25, 2013 6:49 am

The chief lawyer for Koch Industries said Friday that government targeting of conservative political groups is nothing new to the Wichita-based company.

Chief legal counsel Mark Holden said the White House, as early as August 2010, was deliberately trying to politically intimidate Koch Industries.

Holden said that although he had no direct evidence that the White House had any involvement in targeting Koch for IRS tax scrutiny, he pointed to what he described as a “disturbing” comment about taxes and Koch Industries made by one of President Obama’s political advisers, Austan Goolsbee, at a White House briefing in August 2010.

Because the IRS is admitting that it deliberately targeted conservative political groups for extra tax scrutiny, it is worth raising questions about whether the events are connected, Holden said.

Holden has publicly criticized the Goolsbee comments before.

“Some of what I do here reminds me sometimes of the movie ‘Groundhog Day,’ where I have to do the same things over and over,” Holden joked.

But Holden said he isn’t joking in bringing up the Goolsbee situation again. He said that when he looks at what Goolsbee said in 2010 and puts it alongside what President Obama was saying about the Kochs in the same month, and puts that alongside the fact that the IRS recently admitted it targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny, he sees, at minimum, a “disturbing” pattern of government intimidation.

The Eagle called the White House for comment about Holden’s comments on Friday. The White House press office asked that the newspaper’s request for a response be outlined in writing, which it was.

By early evening, the White House had not responded.

“I am not suggesting anyone broke the law,” Holden said, and he pointed out that the White House later said that no one had tried to access tax information.

But he said the Obama administration used the Kochs to scare their own supporters into donating more to the campaign. And he said what they did went further than that. He said he and Koch Industries officials believe that “everyone, whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal or independent or agnostic,” should be concerned at the pattern of behavior exhibited by the national government in how it handled not only the Kochs but the conservative groups it targeted for extra scrutiny. At minimum, he said, the government used scare tactics to intimidate White House opponents.

Many Americans believe many of the same things the Kochs do about politics and government, Holden said.

“They go after the Kochs, who have resources,” Holden said. “We’re not asking for empathy or sympathy — we’re big boys and we can take it. But you’ve got people who are small business owners, common citizens, who also want their grievances redressed by the government. It sends a message (of intimidation) to them as well.”

The Goolsbee situation, which Holden brought up again on Friday, was first reported in September 2010 by the Weekly Standard.

A few days before, in August, Goolsbee, a senior economic adviser to President Obama, was reported to have said the following:

“So in this country we have partnerships, we have S corps, we have LLCs, we have a series of entities that do not pay corporate income tax. Some of which are really giant firms, you know Koch Industries is a multibillion dollar business. So that creates a narrower base because we’ve literally got something like 50 percent of the business income in the U.S. is going to businesses that don’t pay any corporate income tax. They point out (in the report) you could review the boundary between corporate and non-corporate taxation as a way to broaden the base.”

First of all, Holden said Friday, Koch Industries follows federal law and pays a great deal of money in taxes. Koch Industries earns billions of dollars a year and employs 48,000 people in the U.S. (and another 12,000 people in 60 other countries). “We pay the taxes we are obligated to pay,” he said.

But Holden said one reason he became concerned about what Goolsbee was reported to have said is that by law, tax records are confidential. Goolsbee’s comments raised the thought that Goolsbee or the White House had broken that confidentiality illegally, and reviewed the tax records.

In light of what is now being revealed about the IRS scrutiny of other political opponents of President Obama, Holden said, it makes him wonder whether these events are part of a pattern of behavior by a national government unhappy with criticism.

Goolsbee’s comments did prompt an investigation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Holden said. Several Republican senators demanded that it be done, and it was done, Holden said.

But the results of that investigation are not known, Holden said.

He used the Freedom of Information Act to ask for the file.

But the federal government refused his request. A service of YellowBrix, Inc.

Obama promotes Benghazi talking points editor to assistant secretary of state Vince Coglianese

The woman responsible for completely removing references to terrorism from the Benghazi talking points has been nominated by President Obama to become an assistant secretary of state.

Victoria Nuland — the State Department spokeswoman who famously altered the talking points regarding the Sept. 11, 2012 attack — will become assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs if the nomination clears the Senate.

It’s a toxic nomination for the president to put forward, particularly as congressional Republicans hammer the administration for failures in readiness and response to the attacks in Benghazi, Libya.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/24/obama-promotes-benghazi-talking-points-editor-to-assistant-secretary-of-state/#ixzz2UEK3RRQJ

 

ME PARECE QUE EN ESTO SE LES FUE LA MANO. PADRES ALERTA PORQUE SI ESTO ES CIERTO… POR GATRIA

MILWAUKEE – Deidri Hernandez’s seven-year-old son won’t be in school today, after officials at Tippecanoe School for the Arts and Humanities confirmed they’re still holding “Switch It Up Day” – a time for students to come dressed as members of the opposite sex.

Hernandez tells EAGnews the day was originally billed as “Gender Bender Day,” but Tippecanoe officials made the name change after she called Principal Jeffrey Krupar to complain.The Milwaukee mother was not impressed.“I didn’t have a problem with the title. I had a problem with the activity taking place,” Hernandez says.  She says it’s “ridiculous” and “creepy” to ask elementary boys to come to school dressed as girls, and vice versa, and predicts that having students dress as “transvestites” will distract from the learning process. Hernandez knows of at least one other parent who shares her concerns and plans to hold her child out of class, too.

But it’s the motivation behind “Switch It Up Day” that has Hernandez most concerned.

She wonders if it is being done to promote the acceptance of homosexuality to students in school, which runs from pre-kindergarten through eighth grade. Hernandez thinks it’s inappropriate to expose young children to these issues, even in a light-hearted manner. Read More:  http://eagnews.org

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama was interrupted three times by a woman who shouted about drones and detainees in Cuba as he delivered a speech on national security. ENVIADO POR “GATRIA”

The woman was identified as Medea Benjamin from the anti-war group Code Pink. Benjamin yelled from behind a bank of cameras before security removed her from the hall at National Defense University in Washington.

Obama at one point said he was willing to “cut the young lady some slack” because the issues he was addressing are worth being passionate about.

Benjamin shouted, quote, “86 were cleared already. Release them today!”

That appears to be a reference to detainees who remain in Cuba despite being cleared for transfer from the facility.

Vivió en Cuba la que interrumpió discurso de Obama

• Extrañó que la conocida activista izquierdista no fuera sacada del salón http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Woman+interrupts+obama&mid=4D5DA8FB4BCC0471FF784D5DA8FB4BCC0471FF78&view=detail&FORM=VIRE8

MIAMI 24 DE MAYO DE 2013, NHR.com—La mujer que interrumpió al presidente Barack Obama en su discurso la tarde de ayer jueves, en Washington, es una conocida activista política de izquierda que vivió cuatro años en Cuba, según NHR.com ha podido conocer.
Como muchos saben, cuando ayer el presidente Obama ofrecía un discurso sobre la seguridad nacional en la National Defense University y hablaba sobre la posibilidad de cerrar las prisiones de Guantánamo en Cuba, una mujer comenzó a interrumpirlo. gritándole que dejara en libertad a los detenidos sospechosos de actos terroristas.
La mujer junto con Jody Evans son fundadoras de la organización izquierdista Code Pink, en la foto aparece el presidente Obama junto a la activista Evans.
Obama se vio obligado a detener tres veces su alocución,  interrumpiendo el cierre del discurso, dirigiéndose directamente a la mujer. “Estoy a punto de abordar ese punto señora, pero tiene que dejarme hablar,” decía Obama como regañando a la mujer. “¿Por qué no se sienta y déjenme decirles exactamente lo que yo haría.”
De acuerdo con las fuentes contactadas anoche por NHR.com, “todo estaba preparado, la mujer es una izquierdista conocida”. Y eso podría ser verídico, pues en otras ocasiones cuando una persona interrumpe un discurso del presidente es inmediatamente sacada del lugar, sin embargo esta mujer se quedó en el salón donde hablaba Obama.
¿Y quién es esa mujer? Se nombra Medea Benjamin, alias Susan Benjamin, tiene 61 años de edad, es una activista política estadounidense, cofundadora de la organización Code Pink (Código Rosado) y, su esposo, también activista y autor, es Kevin Danaher, que preside el grupo de promoción del comercio justo Global Exchange. Benjamin fue también una candidata del partido verde en el año 2000 para el Senado de Estados Unidos.

Benjamin creció en Nueva York. Recibió su maestría en salud pública de la Universidad de Columbia y de economía de la New School. Benjamin trabajó durante 10 años como economista y nutricionista en América Latina y África para los alimentos de las Naciones Unidas, FAO, la Organización Mundial de la salud, la Agencia Sueca de desarrollo internacional y el Institute for Food and Development Policy. Vivió cuatro años en Cuba y ha escrito tres libros. En noviembre de 2003, en Miami, Medea Benjamin protagonizo una protesta contra la propuesta de la creación de un área de libre comercio de las Américas (ALCA). Benjamin ha sido criticada por su apoyo a Hugo Chávez y sus ataques a la permanencia del embargo de Estados Unidos al gobierno cubano.

Biden Slips and Reveals True Aim of Government “Studies”

Saturday, May 25, 2013

Occasionally, a politician makes an off-the-cuff remark that reveals more about Washington than thousands of speeches ever could. With one sentence, Joe Biden recently let the cat out of the bag and affirmed the true intentions of the flurry of proposals for government studies on violent media that have propagated in the time since Newtown shootings: that is that they are purely political studies with a purely political intent to create pseudoscientific cover for a brazenly unconstitutional agenda.

At a recent meeting at the White House between Biden and faith-based leaders Billy Graham’s son Franklin proposed the idea of taxing violence and funneling proceeds to “help victims.” To which Biden replied that there was “no reason why they couldn’t do that.” Now the unconstitutionality of this has sparked no small amount outrage among those who value the First Amendment. But what he says next should alarm them even more. Biden continued by saying, “They really need a good scientific study, which they’ve done on things like smoking.”

Ah, yes. The Study. When it comes to Washington lobbying and public relations, nothing ads credibility to your position like a study confirming the validity of your position. Never mind that your position is in direct violation of the Constitution. Get the results you want from a study, publish it, run a PR campaign, get the media on board and eventually weak-kneed politicians will succumb to your “scientific evidence”.

Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/2013/05/biden-slips-and-reveals-true-aim-of-government-studies/#ixzz2UPRgcjCH

“THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’ 

No 394 5/25/13 ‘EN MI OPINION”

mayo 25, 2013

No 394 5/25/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’

 

EN AQUELLA EPOCA… ¡HABIA CLASE!

Richard Nixon nació el 19 de Enero de 1913 y murió el 22 de Abril de 1994.

Se gradúo de Abogado en 1937 en Duke University. Se alisto en la Marina en 1942 para servir en La Segunda Guerra Mundial y al terminar la guerra ostentaba el grado de Capitán de Corbeta.

Su carrera política comenzó en 1947 habiendo sido elegido como Representante a la Cámara Estatal por el Partido Republicano, orador elocuente de firmes conceptos y prédica anti comunista. En 1952 fue elegido Vicepresidente y en 1968 triunfo en la elecciones presidenciales. Fue un político brillante y audaz, visito China y la Unión Soviética, tuvo mucho éxito en su discurso en el que anuncio que pondría fin a la Guerra de Viet Nam. En 1972 lo reeligen por una mayoría extraordinaria, sin embargo, unos meses antes se había producido un allanamiento a las oficinas del Partido Demócrata en sus oficinas del Edificio Watergate que consistía en métodos de escuchas ilegales llevado a cabo por personas que habían sido contratadas por colaboradores cercanos al Presidente.

Richard Nixon renuncio a la Presidencia el 8 de Agosto de 1974.

Comparando estos hechos con los actuales: La investigación del IRS al Tea Party, los métodos denunciados por la A P de interceptar y escuchar las llamadas por teléfonos en sus Oficinas  y en los teléfonos personales de sus reporteros, los sucesos de la Embajada en Benghazi.

¿Cuál  es la diferencia?  Pues hay diferencias sumamente graves:

No aparecen los culpables, nadie sabe nada, otros no pueden hablar y otros renuncian a sus cargos.

¿Estamos jugando a los escondidos o estamos pasando por alto la Justicia?

Todos estos problemas corresponden a funcionarios del más alto nivel. Ningún subordinado puede actuar tan libremente y es deber de la Administración esclarecerle a la Nación tan delicados asuntos y condenar a los culpables, porque esconder la verdad es hacerse cómplice de los hechos.

Solamente se actúa burlando la opinión pública en los gobiernos totalitarios, en los que las renuncias y el silencio son órdenes recibidas, los suicidios y muertes misteriosas son ejecuciones.

DIOS BENDIGA A AMERICA

SOY LIBERAL amenper

El verdadero liberal es todo lo contrario al significado de la palabra” liberal” acuñado por Franklin D. Roosevelt, cuando alguien lo llamó “socialista” y contestó que él no era un socialista pero un “liberal”.

Un liberal como se entiende en Europa y en la mayor parte del mundo, es una palabra más afín a un conservador porque es un librepensador, alguien que no se aferra a una versión política sino a la idea conservadora con sus variaciones según el momento histórico o geográfico, porque para eso tiene libre el pensamiento.

Lo que aquí se llama en los Estados Unidos el “Liberalismo” es realmente el socialismo, porque el que le dijo socialista a Roosevelt estaba en lo correcto.

El Socialismo está basado en el principio de la fe absoluta en el estado, el cual es considerado  como más juicioso, responsable, y compasivo que cualquier empresa privada, motivada simplemente por la ambición.

Cuando se implanta el sistema socialista, desde su principio, como estamos viendo en esta administración; se comienzan a ver lo equivocado del concepto socialista

El socialismo no es juicioso, ni responsable ni compasivo.   Es irreflexivo, insensato y no tiene compasión con sus enemigos. 

Lo estamos viendo con los escándalos de esta administración, que opera con individuos de antecedentes socialistas en sus más altas posiciones..

Lo hemos visto, una y otra vez, en todos los países cuando se implanta el socialismo.

Lo que los socialistas no comprenden es que, aunque la libre empresa tiene como su objetivo final la ambición, esta ambición no es más que el estímulo que crea una economía de mercado en crecimiento constante, que beneficia a la sociedad en general.   La empresa privada en su búsqueda de la riqueza, crea la riqueza, crea empleos y crea una economía saludable.

La incompetencia del comunismo para crear riquezas es un hecho probado en todos los países en que se ha implantado.

Margaret Thatcher dijo  “El socialismo fracasa cuando se les acaba el dinero… de los demás”.

Esto es una verdad absoluta, porque el socialismo sólo reparte la riqueza, no la crea.

Nosotros los cubanos vivimos esa verdad. Salí de Cuba en el 1961, después de Bahía de Cochinos.  Nunca sufrí escases ni necesidad económica durante los dos años que pasé en Cuba al principio del triunfo del socialismo.  No conocí en esos primeros años del socialismo, ni la libreta de racionamiento, ni las colas para comprar ningún artículo.

 No pasé necesidad porque el socialismo no había enseñado su fracaso económico porque al gobierno socialista todavía no se le había acabado el dinero del capitalismo. 

Lo que sufrí fue la pérdida de mis libertades como ciudadano de mente liberal y sufrí la perdida de mi patria.

Quería ser liberal, siempre he querido ser liberal, soy LIBERAL con mayúsculas y hasta la médula, soy más liberal que Republicano, que conservador.

Mi partido político es el Liberal, no un partido tradicional,  como creencia espiritual soy un Cristiano Liberal, no con creencias de una institución religiosa en particular.

Los que se han adjudicado el nombre de liberal, no son liberales, son esclavos de una idea arcaica que ha fracasado en todos lados, y que está destinada al fracaso donde se implante.

Obama’s ‘Iron Curtain’ Descends On America

May 23, 2013 by Judi McLeod

Under the Marxist rule of President Barack Hussein Obama, Uncle Sam morphs day by day into ‘Uncle Satan’.  Ironic when contemplating that Iran has long called America “the great Satan”.

Far more wily than Uncle Sam or Uncle Sugar, ‘Uncle Satan’ lures scores of U.S. citizens motivated by entitlement mentality with food stamps,  free cell phones and unquestioned access to social security,  into a trap from which they will never escape.

Comfortable with the guarantee the government will look after them from cradle to grave, few see the walls going up around them.   Alan Beckler shares interesting but chilling thoughts about the walls going up around American citizens today.

“While doing some Cold War research today, I ran across a most interesting article on the Berlin Wall history. Attached is an excerpt. What is so chilling is that one could change the German names to present administration names and with our current IRS and DOJ ‘scandals’, it is really chilling.

Dire warnings from this excerpt from ‘The Rise and Fall of the Berlin Wall’ will be lost on low information voters dependent on government handouts but will send chills down the spines of the millions who see that the IRS and Justice Department scandals mark the beginning of the ultimate capture of the U.S. citizenry.

Continue Reading Full Story

IRS official on leave refused to resign, GOP senator says

Published May 24, 2013 FoxNews.com

WASHINGTON –  First she refused to testify. Now Lois Lerner, the IRS official at the center of the tax agency scandal, is refusing to resign, according to a top Republican senator.

Sources confirmed to Fox News earlier Thursday that Lerner, the head of the IRS division that oversaw the unit targeting conservative groups, had been placed on administrative leave, with pay.

But Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, claimed she was only put in that status after refusing to step down.

He said the commissioner was in his right to demand her resignation, and said taxpayers should not continue to pay her salary indefinitely.

“My understanding is the new acting IRS commissioner asked for Ms. Lerner’s resignation, and she refused to resign.  She was then put on administrative leave instead,” Grassley said in a statement. “The IRS owes it to taxpayers to resolve her situation quickly.  The agency needs to move on to fix the conditions that led to the targeting debacle.”

Capitol Hill sources said Lerner, the director of exempt organizations, was placed on paid leave Thursday, amid calls from some lawmakers for her to be suspended or fired. In her absence, Ken Corbin, the current deputy director of the submission processing, wage and investment division, will take over her duties, according to an internal IRS memo obtained by Fox News.

Lerner, the official who first acknowledged the controversial IRS practice earlier this month, asserted her innocence at a House hearing on Wednesday. She then refused to testify, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination. The move angered many who say she should have been forced to answer why the tax agency targeted conservative groups applying for tax exempt status.

Republican leaders of that committee, though, now say she waived that right by giving a statement and want to haul her back to testify.

Pressure has been mounting on the administration to take tough action against Lerner, after two other IRS officials were pushed out in the wake of the scandal.

In a letter earlier Thursday to IRS Acting Commissioner Daniel Werfel, Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and John McCain, R-Ariz., asked the agency to remove Lerner from office and said they had “lost confidence in her ability to fulfill her duties.”

It’s unclear whether Republicans will succeed in trying to recall her before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the panel, said through an aide Thursday that her Fifth Amendment assertion is “no longer valid,” since she delivered remarks at the start of Wednesday’s hearing. 

That hearing was never technically adjourned, and Republicans hope to bring her back.

Others, though, say she was in her right to defend herself and subsequently invoke the right to remain silent.

The IRS has had a series of missteps that have not only publicly marred the reputation of the IRS, but also called into question what the White House knew about the scandal and when they knew it.

Separately, Tea Party-related groups who claim they were targeted by the tax agency have started filing lawsuits this week against the IRS. In some cases they are asking for the IRS to admit wrongdoing. In others, they are seeking monetary claims.

“It’s extremely troubling that it has taken this long for Lois Lerner to removed from the top exempt position at the IRS,” Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, the group suing on behalf of some Tea Party groups, said in a statement to FoxNews.com.

Sekulow said instead of putting Lerner on administrative leave, his group is calling for her to be fired.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram contributed to this report

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/24/irs-official-who-refused-to-testify-placed-on-administrative-leave/?cmpid=prn_aol&icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing9%7Cdl3%7Csec1_lnk1%26pLid%3D317919#ixzz2UEEbr55n

Escándalos y Tapes Amenper

Lo peor de los escándalos que estamos viendo en esta administración son los tapes.

Los chivos expiatorios son arrogantes al máximo, porque saben que están protegidos por la administración que tiene que presentarlos como “culpables” para que los verdaderos culpables aparezcan inocentes,y que ellos se tienen que sacrificar por la causa, pero no tienen miedo.   Saben que por lo que saben, van a salir forrados en oro.

Steven Miller, se iba a retirar de todos modos. El despido por parte de Obama fue una obra de teatro para la galería.  Miller se retira con un paracaídas de oro con el dinero de los contribuyentes.

Lois Lerner, llega en su arrogancia a negarse a declarar acogiéndose a la quinta enmienda.  Si eso hubiera sido con un oficial de la administración de Bush la hubieran colgado del monumento de Washington.  Pero simplemente la suspendieron con pago, provisionalmente, para durante este fin de semana, quizás despedirla con un paracaídas de oro con el dinero de los contribuyentes.

Sara Hall Ingram, que era la persona que estaba encargada de dar la aprobación a las instituciones que pedían status de non-profit y que fueron los atacados en el caso, fue trasladada de puesto antes de que empezara el escándalo y ahora es nada menos que directora del Obamacare en el IRS.

Eric Holder está buscando chivos en el caso de los periodistas, y los encontrará porque con dinero se compra todo en esta administración.  De momento está ya preparando la defensa basado en que la censura fue para la seguridad nacional.  Esto es exactamente la excusa que estamos acostumbrado a oir en los países latinos para la censura de prensa. 

Ya estamos a fondo en una República Bananera del socialismo del siglo XXI.

Mientras tanto Obama y Holder están bien cobijados, no hay problema, Obama no sabe nada de nada es completamente inocente. 

Pero para los poetas Inocente rima con incompetente y con delincuente, y estamos viviendo un poema.

You Can Solve Obamacare’s Biggest Problem

May 23, 2013 by Judy Lloyd

Do You Know How To Deal With Long-term Care Under Obamacare?

We face some dire changes in the world of health care. I want to share with you what to do to insulate yourself against the effects of Obamacare. I’m going to explain the Achilles Heel of Obamacare and why preparing for long-term care should be your top health care priority right now. Originally, we were told Obamacare would solve our long-term care problems. Then – in the shadows of the night – Congress passed and Barack Obama signed a complete repeal of the provisions in Obamacare intended to help families with long-term care.

The message from Washington is clear: You are on your own.

They don’t want to help and they have gone back on their pledge to help with long-term care.

In addition, Obamacare slashed funding to Medicare, a program passed with bipartisan support to help the elderly secure medical insurance. That’s bad news for all Medicare participants.

Congress has proposed many changes to the program, the worst of which is lower reimbursements to doctors for their services. This means more everyday care will be administered by nurses and practitioners – not doctors.

Look, Medicare reimbursements are already shamefully low. They barely cover doctor’s costs.

If payments are cut further, doctors could actually lose money when they treat some Medicare patients.

The next logical step is that doctors will refuse to treat Medicare patients at all.

I don’t mean to scare you. I know you’re probably already afraid of losing coverage or struggling to find participating physicians.

But this isn’t even the worst crisis of Obamacare.

Within the next year, practically all of the elements of Obamacare will have taken effect.

Former IRS Head: I Don’t Know Anything About The Constitution

Posted 14 hours ago by Philip Hodges

It’s not surprising at all that the former head of the Internal Revenue Service doesn’t know anything about the Constitution. IRS agents routinely violate the Constitution as part of their jobs.

In their internal documents, they say they can read anyone’s emails or place GPS tracking devices on anyone’s car, and that that’s not a violation of the Constitution. They claim that people’s emails are not protected by the 4th Amendment, because “Internet users do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such communications.” That’s irrelevant. Snooping around people’s emails and other electronic communications without a warrant is a plain violation of the 4th Amendment.

We know they don’t care what the Constitution says, but maybe it’s also that they don’t know what it says. That’s the impression I got when I listened to former IRS chief Doug Shulman respond to Congressman Kerry Bentivolio, a Republican from Michigan, during their second IRS hearing:

BentivolioDid you study the Constitution?

ShulmanI went to law school.

BentivolioYou went to law school. Did you study the Constitution?

ShulmanI believe I took Constitutional law, but I’m not prepared to take an exam at this time. [chuckles] Meaning I’ll answer any of your question but I can’t promise that I’m an expert.

BentivolioWell, you know the First, Second Amendment and one of my favorites, the 19th, right? You know those?

ShulmanExcuse me?

BentivolioYou know those amendments. The Constitutional amendments. You know the First, you know the Second, and you know the 19th.

ShulmanI don’t necessarily have the Constitution memorized, sir.

BentivolioOkay, well, they’re pretty general in what each one is. Like the First Amendment is the freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom to petition the government for a redress of grievances. First Amendment, right?

ShulmanI really can’t recite the Constitution, sir.

For some reason, Bentivolio brought up the 19th Amendment, women’s suffrage.

He didn’t have time to get to that point, but I think a larger point was made than he intended. How can the IRS be expected to follow the law, when they don’t even know what the most basic laws are? Come on, 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment? Shulman was acting confused.

It seems the only Amendment they’re familiar with is the 5th, and they don’t even know how to invoke that. If you’re going to use the 5th Amendment like Lois Lerner, you can’t keep opening your mouth and saying things like:

“I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws, I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”

It’s self-evident that the IRS needs more than additional ethics training. They need training in and respect for the Constitution. Of course, if they had either of those, they’d see that their own agency is unconstitutional.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/10968/former-irs-head-i-dont-know-anything-about-the-constitution/#ixzz2UEvCrDAt

Ft. Hood Terrorist Still Drawing Full Pay Thanks To Obama

May 23, 2013 by Breaking News  On Nov. 5, 2009, Army Major Nidal Hasan went on a shooting spree at Fort Hood, Texas where he was stationed. Witnesses said he was making Islamic statements as he shot one serviceman/woman after another. By the time Hasan was taken into custody, he had killed 13 people and wounded 32 others.

His guilt is not a question as he was caught in the act. Those at the scene believed Hasan’s attack was an act of Islamic terrorism. Subsequent investigations revealed that he was against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Instead of treating him like the terrorist he was, the Obama administration pushed the Pentagon to declare Hasan’s shootings were an act of workplace violence and not a terrorist act. He was arrested and treated like any other person accused of murder.

Three and half years later, he still has not been tried for his murderous rampage. As an active military personnel who has not yet been found guilty of a crime, Hasan continues to collect his full salary as an Army major. Since the shooting, he has earned $278,000.

If Hasan had been charged with an act of terrorism, he would certainly have been tried and convicted long ago, ending the collection of his pay, and saving taxpayers thousands of dollars.

IRS Scandal Reaches The White House

May 23, 2013 by Roger Aronoff

The Washington Post narrative surrounding the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups is that it began as a scandal involving low-level employees at a Cincinnati office, the “Determinations Unit,” a natural outgrowth of an increase in political activity by these groups. This belies other reporting by the Post’s Fact-Checker, which indicates that there was little growth in the number of groups applying for tax-exempt status at the time the targeting occurred.

As more details come to light, responsibility for the IRS actions keeps moving up the ladder and has landed, at least in part, at the White House. Top-level White House staffers knew about the scandal before a manufactured apology was made to the public on May 10.

“The White House on Monday once again added to the list of people who knew about the IRS investigation into its targeting of conservative groups—saying White House chief of staff Denis McDonough had been informed about a month ago,” reported Reid J. Epstein for Politico on May 20. White House Chief Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler said she learned about the IRS scandal the week of April 22, but didn’t tell the President.

A public relations storm was brewing, but the public is supposed to believe that the President himself was kept in the dark. “Press secretary Jay Carney said again that no one had told President Barack Obama ahead of the first news reports: not his top aide McDonough, nor his chief counsel Kathy Ruemmler, nor anyone from the Treasury Department,” wrote Epstein. “Monday’s revelation amounts to the fifth iteration of the Obama administration’s account of events, after initially saying that the White House had first learned of the controversy from the press.” Epstein called this the White House’s “shifting” account.

When Politico and the Post’s Fact-Checker, Glenn Kessler, note that the President’s story doesn’t quite add up, you know there’s trouble.

Obama Meets In Oval Office With Illegal Aliens

May 23, 2013 by Breaking News

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden met with three people at the White House Tuesday who are in the country illegally but received “deferred action” that allowed them to stay in the country under a memorandum issued by administration unilaterally last June in a memorandum issued by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

While conceding that she had no legal authority to change the “immigration status” of illegal aliens or provide them with a “pathway to citizenship,” Naoplitano said in a June 15, 2012 memo to the top officials at Customs and Border Patrol, Citizenship and Immigration Services, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, that she was directing them to use “prosecutorial discretion” in not enforcing the immigration laws against certain classes of immigration lawbreakers.

In all, Obama and Biden met with eight people advocating for comprehensive immigration reform on Tuesday, according to White House readout of the meeting. The White House readout of the meeting listed three of those as having received “deferred action.” Most others were legally in the United States with relatives who were illegal aliens.

“At the meeting, the president reiterated his commitment to passing a bipartisan, commonsense immigration reform bill this year,” the White House readout of the meeting said. “He made clear that while the current bill is not perfect, it does represent an important step towards the broad principles that need to be part of any immigration reform package.”

On Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a reform bill to the full Senate. Supporters of the legislation call it a “pathway to citizenship.” Opponents call it “amnesty.”
Read More at CNS News . By Fred Lucas.

Estudio dice que la Homosexualidad NO ES DE NACIMIENTO‏ Ricardo Samitier

Se Les Acabo El Cuento…

Un Estudio Realizado En Gemelos Idénticos Demuestra Que La Homosexualidad No Es De Nacimiento Es Una Perversión Inducida

En la mayoría de los casos por un ADULTO a un niño…

 

OJO… PADRES…Vigilen a esos tipos RAROS… Que prefieren

andar con niños y gente más joven… EN VEZ De personas de

su edad y del sexo opuesto…

 

Dr. Neil Whitehead

 

Ocho grandes estudios de gemelos idénticos en Australia, los EE.UU. y los países escandinavos durante las dos últimas décadas en todo llegaron a la misma conclusión: los llamados GAYS no nacieron de esa manera.

 

Los gemelos idénticos tienen LOS MISMOS GENES O EL ADN. Ellos se nutren de las condiciones prenatales iguales. Si la homosexualidad es causada por la genética o las condiciones prenatales y de uno de los gemelos es homosexual, el co-gemelo también debe ser homosexual…

 

“Debido a que tienen un ADN idéntico, que debe ser del 100%”, señala el Dr. Whitehead. Pero los estudios revelan otra cosa. “Si un gemelo idéntico tiene atracción por el mismo sexo la posibilidad de que su-gemelo idéntico lo sea tiene sólo alrededor de 11% para los hombres y 14% para las mujeres.”

 

Como los gemelos idénticos siempre son genéticamente idénticos, la homosexualidad no puede ser dictada genéticamente. “NADIE NACE HOMOSEXUAL”, señalan todos los estudios. “Las influencias que causaron la homosexualidad en uno de los gemelos idénticos y no en el otro TIENEN QUE SER FACTORES POST-PARTO“.

 

Dr. Whitehead cree que la atracción hacia el mismo sexo (SSA) es causada por “FACTORES NO COMPARTIDOS”, las cosas que le han sucedido a uno de los gemelos, pero no al otro… es la respuesta personal a un evento que sucedió a uno de los gemelos y no al otro…

 

Por ejemplo, uno de los gemelos puede haber tenido exposición a la pornografía o al abuso sexual, pero no el otro. Uno de los gemelos puede interpretar y responder a su entorno familiar o clase diferente a la otra. “Estas respuestas individuales e idiosincrásicas a eventos aleatorios y predominan los factores comunes del medio ambiente.”

 

El primer estudio muy grande, fiable hecho a los gemelos idénticos se llevó a cabo en Australia en 1991, seguido por un gran estudio de los EE.UU. en  1997. A continuación, Australia y los EE.UU. llevaron a cabo estudios en conjunto sobre más gemelos idénticos en 2000, seguido de varios estudios en los países escandinavos, según el Dr. Whitehead.

 

“Registros individuales son la base de los estudios de gemelos idénticos. Ahora existen records de gemelos idénticos en muchos países. Un gigantesco registro de gemelos idénticos en Europa, con más de 600.000 miembros se está organizando, pero uno de los más grandes de está en Australia, con más de 25.000 gemelos en los libros “.

 

Un estudio doble significativa entre los adolescentes muestra una correlación genética aún más débil. En 2002 Bearman y Brueckner estudiaron decenas de miles de estudiantes adolescentes en los EE.UU. La atracción entre personas del mismo sexo concordancia entre gemelos idénticos era sólo el 7,7% para los hombres y 5,3% para las mujeres-por debajo del 11% y el 14% en el estudio realizado en Australia por Bailey et al realizaron en 2000.

 

Otra Estudio Sorprendente Que No Ha Recibido Suficiente Publicidad

“Estudios académicos neutrales muestran que hay cambios sustanciales. Alrededor de la mitad de la población homosexual / bisexual (en un entorno no terapéutico) se desplaza hacia la heterosexualidad durante toda la vida. Alrededor del 3% de la actual población heterosexual en su juventud creyó firmemente que eran homosexuales o bisexuales “.

 

Aún más notable, la mayoría de los cambios de sexualidad se producen sin el asesoramiento o terapia. “Estos cambios no son terapéuticamente inducidos, pero suceden “naturalmente” durante la vida, algunos muy rápidamente”, observa el Dr. Whitehead. “La mayoría de los cambios en la orientación sexual es de homosexuales hacia la heterosexualidad exclusiva.”

 

El número de personas homosexuales que han cambiado hacia la heterosexualidad exclusiva es mayor que los números actuales de los bisexuales y homosexuales combinados. En otras palabras, los EX-GAYS superan a los GAYS reales.

 

La fluidez es aún más pronunciada entre los adolescentes, como el estudio de Bearman y Brueckner demostrada. “Ellos se confundieron entre los 16 y 17 años de edad, si una persona tenía una atracción romántica hacia el mismo sexo, casi todos habían cambiado un año después.”

 

“Los autores dicen que la estabilidad sexual radica solo entre los heterosexuales, que se lo son año tras año. Los adolescentes son unos casos especiales, por lo general cambian de año en año “.

 

Sin embargo, muchos conceptos erróneos persisten en la cultura popular. Es decir; que la homosexualidad es genética – y que es difícil de ser cambiada.

 

“Los académicos que trabajan en estos estudios no están contentos con las representaciones de los medios de comunicación sobre el tema”, señala el Dr. Whitehead. “Pero ellos prefieren seguir con su investigación académica y no involucrarse en el lado activista A FAVOR O CONTRA LA HOMOSEXUALIDAD.”

 

Desafortunadamente la PRENSA en GENERAL y la TV en particular están controladas por los HOMOSEXUALES… que están empecinados en crear UNA MODERNA SODOMA… donde practicar todo tipo de aberraciones sexuales PRÁCTICAMENTE masoquistas para los que hacen de mujer y SADISTAS EN LOS QUE SE IMPONEN…

 

Aquí el enlace con la información… 

http://www.hollanddavis.com/?p=3647

 

 

“THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’  Image

No. 394 5/25/13 “EN MI OPINION”

mayo 25, 2013

No 394 5/25/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’

 

EN AQUELLA EPOCA… ¡HABIA CLASE!

Richard Nixon nació el 19 de Enero de 1913 y murió el 22 de Abril de 1994.

Se gradúo de Abogado en 1937 en Duke University. Se alisto en la Marina en 1942 para servir en La Segunda Guerra Mundial y al terminar la guerra ostentaba el grado de Capitán de Corbeta.

Su carrera política comenzó en 1947 habiendo sido elegido como Representante a la Cámara Estatal por el Partido Republicano, orador elocuente de firmes conceptos y prédica anti comunista. En 1952 fue elegido Vicepresidente y en 1968 triunfo en la elecciones presidenciales. Fue un político brillante y audaz, visito China y la Unión Soviética, tuvo mucho éxito en su discurso en el que anuncio que pondría fin a la Guerra de Viet Nam. En 1972 lo reeligen por una mayoría extraordinaria, sin embargo, unos meses antes se había producido un allanamiento a las oficinas del Partido Demócrata en sus oficinas del Edificio Watergate que consistía en métodos de escuchas ilegales llevado a cabo por personas que habían sido contratadas por colaboradores cercanos al Presidente.

Richard Nixon renuncio a la Presidencia el 8 de Agosto de 1974.

Comparando estos hechos con los actuales: La investigación del IRS al Tea Party, los métodos denunciados por la A P de interceptar y escuchar las llamadas por teléfonos en sus Oficinas  y en los teléfonos personales de sus reporteros, los sucesos de la Embajada en Benghazi.

¿Cuál  es la diferencia?  Pues hay diferencias sumamente graves:

No aparecen los culpables, nadie sabe nada, otros no pueden hablar y otros renuncian a sus cargos.

¿Estamos jugando a los escondidos o estamos pasando por alto la Justicia?

Todos estos problemas corresponden a funcionarios del más alto nivel. Ningún subordinado puede actuar tan libremente y es deber de la Administración esclarecerle a la Nación tan delicados asuntos y condenar a los culpables, porque esconder la verdad es hacerse cómplice de los hechos.

Solamente se actúa burlando la opinión pública en los gobiernos totalitarios, en los que las renuncias y el silencio son órdenes recibidas, los suicidios y muertes misteriosas son ejecuciones.

DIOS BENDIGA A AMERICA

SOY LIBERAL amenper

El verdadero liberal es todo lo contrario al significado de la palabra” liberal” acuñado por Franklin D. Roosevelt, cuando alguien lo llamó “socialista” y contestó que él no era un socialista pero un “liberal”.

Un liberal como se entiende en Europa y en la mayor parte del mundo, es una palabra más afín a un conservador porque es un librepensador, alguien que no se aferra a una versión política sino a la idea conservadora con sus variaciones según el momento histórico o geográfico, porque para eso tiene libre el pensamiento.

Lo que aquí se llama en los Estados Unidos el “Liberalismo” es realmente el socialismo, porque el que le dijo socialista a Roosevelt estaba en lo correcto.

El Socialismo está basado en el principio de la fe absoluta en el estado, el cual es considerado  como más juicioso, responsable, y compasivo que cualquier empresa privada, motivada simplemente por la ambición.

Cuando se implanta el sistema socialista, desde su principio, como estamos viendo en esta administración; se comienzan a ver lo equivocado del concepto socialista

El socialismo no es juicioso, ni responsable ni compasivo.   Es irreflexivo, insensato y no tiene compasión con sus enemigos. 

Lo estamos viendo con los escándalos de esta administración, que opera con individuos de antecedentes socialistas en sus más altas posiciones..

Lo hemos visto, una y otra vez, en todos los países cuando se implanta el socialismo.

Lo que los socialistas no comprenden es que, aunque la libre empresa tiene como su objetivo final la ambición, esta ambición no es más que el estímulo que crea una economía de mercado en crecimiento constante, que beneficia a la sociedad en general.   La empresa privada en su búsqueda de la riqueza, crea la riqueza, crea empleos y crea una economía saludable.

La incompetencia del comunismo para crear riquezas es un hecho probado en todos los países en que se ha implantado.

Margaret Thatcher dijo  “El socialismo fracasa cuando se les acaba el dinero… de los demás”.

Esto es una verdad absoluta, porque el socialismo sólo reparte la riqueza, no la crea.

Nosotros los cubanos vivimos esa verdad. Salí de Cuba en el 1961, después de Bahía de Cochinos.  Nunca sufrí escases ni necesidad económica durante los dos años que pasé en Cuba al principio del triunfo del socialismo.  No conocí en esos primeros años del socialismo, ni la libreta de racionamiento, ni las colas para comprar ningún artículo.

 No pasé necesidad porque el socialismo no había enseñado su fracaso económico porque al gobierno socialista todavía no se le había acabado el dinero del capitalismo. 

Lo que sufrí fue la pérdida de mis libertades como ciudadano de mente liberal y sufrí la perdida de mi patria.

Quería ser liberal, siempre he querido ser liberal, soy LIBERAL con mayúsculas y hasta la médula, soy más liberal que Republicano, que conservador.

Mi partido político es el Liberal, no un partido tradicional,  como creencia espiritual soy un Cristiano Liberal, no con creencias de una institución religiosa en particular.

Los que se han adjudicado el nombre de liberal, no son liberales, son esclavos de una idea arcaica que ha fracasado en todos lados, y que está destinada al fracaso donde se implante.

Obama’s ‘Iron Curtain’ Descends On America

May 23, 2013 by Judi McLeod

Under the Marxist rule of President Barack Hussein Obama, Uncle Sam morphs day by day into ‘Uncle Satan’.  Ironic when contemplating that Iran has long called America “the great Satan”.

Far more wily than Uncle Sam or Uncle Sugar, ‘Uncle Satan’ lures scores of U.S. citizens motivated by entitlement mentality with food stamps,  free cell phones and unquestioned access to social security,  into a trap from which they will never escape.

Comfortable with the guarantee the government will look after them from cradle to grave, few see the walls going up around them.   Alan Beckler shares interesting but chilling thoughts about the walls going up around American citizens today.

“While doing some Cold War research today, I ran across a most interesting article on the Berlin Wall history. Attached is an excerpt. What is so chilling is that one could change the German names to present administration names and with our current IRS and DOJ ‘scandals’, it is really chilling.

Dire warnings from this excerpt from ‘The Rise and Fall of the Berlin Wall’ will be lost on low information voters dependent on government handouts but will send chills down the spines of the millions who see that the IRS and Justice Department scandals mark the beginning of the ultimate capture of the U.S. citizenry.

Continue Reading Full Story

IRS official on leave refused to resign, GOP senator says

Published May 24, 2013 FoxNews.com

WASHINGTON –  First she refused to testify. Now Lois Lerner, the IRS official at the center of the tax agency scandal, is refusing to resign, according to a top Republican senator.

Sources confirmed to Fox News earlier Thursday that Lerner, the head of the IRS division that oversaw the unit targeting conservative groups, had been placed on administrative leave, with pay.

But Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, claimed she was only put in that status after refusing to step down.

He said the commissioner was in his right to demand her resignation, and said taxpayers should not continue to pay her salary indefinitely.

“My understanding is the new acting IRS commissioner asked for Ms. Lerner’s resignation, and she refused to resign.  She was then put on administrative leave instead,” Grassley said in a statement. “The IRS owes it to taxpayers to resolve her situation quickly.  The agency needs to move on to fix the conditions that led to the targeting debacle.”

Capitol Hill sources said Lerner, the director of exempt organizations, was placed on paid leave Thursday, amid calls from some lawmakers for her to be suspended or fired. In her absence, Ken Corbin, the current deputy director of the submission processing, wage and investment division, will take over her duties, according to an internal IRS memo obtained by Fox News.

Lerner, the official who first acknowledged the controversial IRS practice earlier this month, asserted her innocence at a House hearing on Wednesday. She then refused to testify, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination. The move angered many who say she should have been forced to answer why the tax agency targeted conservative groups applying for tax exempt status.

Republican leaders of that committee, though, now say she waived that right by giving a statement and want to haul her back to testify.

Pressure has been mounting on the administration to take tough action against Lerner, after two other IRS officials were pushed out in the wake of the scandal.

In a letter earlier Thursday to IRS Acting Commissioner Daniel Werfel, Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and John McCain, R-Ariz., asked the agency to remove Lerner from office and said they had “lost confidence in her ability to fulfill her duties.”

It’s unclear whether Republicans will succeed in trying to recall her before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the panel, said through an aide Thursday that her Fifth Amendment assertion is “no longer valid,” since she delivered remarks at the start of Wednesday’s hearing. 

That hearing was never technically adjourned, and Republicans hope to bring her back.

Others, though, say she was in her right to defend herself and subsequently invoke the right to remain silent.

The IRS has had a series of missteps that have not only publicly marred the reputation of the IRS, but also called into question what the White House knew about the scandal and when they knew it.

Separately, Tea Party-related groups who claim they were targeted by the tax agency have started filing lawsuits this week against the IRS. In some cases they are asking for the IRS to admit wrongdoing. In others, they are seeking monetary claims.

“It’s extremely troubling that it has taken this long for Lois Lerner to removed from the top exempt position at the IRS,” Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, the group suing on behalf of some Tea Party groups, said in a statement to FoxNews.com.

Sekulow said instead of putting Lerner on administrative leave, his group is calling for her to be fired.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram contributed to this report

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/24/irs-official-who-refused-to-testify-placed-on-administrative-leave/?cmpid=prn_aol&icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing9%7Cdl3%7Csec1_lnk1%26pLid%3D317919#ixzz2UEEbr55n

Escándalos y Tapes Amenper

Lo peor de los escándalos que estamos viendo en esta administración son los tapes.

Los chivos expiatorios son arrogantes al máximo, porque saben que están protegidos por la administración que tiene que presentarlos como “culpables” para que los verdaderos culpables aparezcan inocentes,y que ellos se tienen que sacrificar por la causa, pero no tienen miedo.   Saben que por lo que saben, van a salir forrados en oro.

Steven Miller, se iba a retirar de todos modos. El despido por parte de Obama fue una obra de teatro para la galería.  Miller se retira con un paracaídas de oro con el dinero de los contribuyentes.

Lois Lerner, llega en su arrogancia a negarse a declarar acogiéndose a la quinta enmienda.  Si eso hubiera sido con un oficial de la administración de Bush la hubieran colgado del monumento de Washington.  Pero simplemente la suspendieron con pago, provisionalmente, para durante este fin de semana, quizás despedirla con un paracaídas de oro con el dinero de los contribuyentes.

Sara Hall Ingram, que era la persona que estaba encargada de dar la aprobación a las instituciones que pedían status de non-profit y que fueron los atacados en el caso, fue trasladada de puesto antes de que empezara el escándalo y ahora es nada menos que directora del Obamacare en el IRS.

Eric Holder está buscando chivos en el caso de los periodistas, y los encontrará porque con dinero se compra todo en esta administración.  De momento está ya preparando la defensa basado en que la censura fue para la seguridad nacional.  Esto es exactamente la excusa que estamos acostumbrado a oir en los países latinos para la censura de prensa. 

Ya estamos a fondo en una República Bananera del socialismo del siglo XXI.

Mientras tanto Obama y Holder están bien cobijados, no hay problema, Obama no sabe nada de nada es completamente inocente. 

Pero para los poetas Inocente rima con incompetente y con delincuente, y estamos viviendo un poema.

You Can Solve Obamacare’s Biggest Problem

May 23, 2013 by Judy Lloyd

Do You Know How To Deal With Long-term Care Under Obamacare?

We face some dire changes in the world of health care. I want to share with you what to do to insulate yourself against the effects of Obamacare. I’m going to explain the Achilles Heel of Obamacare and why preparing for long-term care should be your top health care priority right now. Originally, we were told Obamacare would solve our long-term care problems. Then – in the shadows of the night – Congress passed and Barack Obama signed a complete repeal of the provisions in Obamacare intended to help families with long-term care.

The message from Washington is clear: You are on your own.

They don’t want to help and they have gone back on their pledge to help with long-term care.

In addition, Obamacare slashed funding to Medicare, a program passed with bipartisan support to help the elderly secure medical insurance. That’s bad news for all Medicare participants.

Congress has proposed many changes to the program, the worst of which is lower reimbursements to doctors for their services. This means more everyday care will be administered by nurses and practitioners – not doctors.

Look, Medicare reimbursements are already shamefully low. They barely cover doctor’s costs.

If payments are cut further, doctors could actually lose money when they treat some Medicare patients.

The next logical step is that doctors will refuse to treat Medicare patients at all.

I don’t mean to scare you. I know you’re probably already afraid of losing coverage or struggling to find participating physicians.

But this isn’t even the worst crisis of Obamacare.

Within the next year, practically all of the elements of Obamacare will have taken effect.

Former IRS Head: I Don’t Know Anything About The Constitution

Posted 14 hours ago by Philip Hodges

It’s not surprising at all that the former head of the Internal Revenue Service doesn’t know anything about the Constitution. IRS agents routinely violate the Constitution as part of their jobs.

In their internal documents, they say they can read anyone’s emails or place GPS tracking devices on anyone’s car, and that that’s not a violation of the Constitution. They claim that people’s emails are not protected by the 4th Amendment, because “Internet users do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in such communications.” That’s irrelevant. Snooping around people’s emails and other electronic communications without a warrant is a plain violation of the 4th Amendment.

We know they don’t care what the Constitution says, but maybe it’s also that they don’t know what it says. That’s the impression I got when I listened to former IRS chief Doug Shulman respond to Congressman Kerry Bentivolio, a Republican from Michigan, during their second IRS hearing:

BentivolioDid you study the Constitution?

ShulmanI went to law school.

BentivolioYou went to law school. Did you study the Constitution?

ShulmanI believe I took Constitutional law, but I’m not prepared to take an exam at this time. [chuckles] Meaning I’ll answer any of your question but I can’t promise that I’m an expert.

BentivolioWell, you know the First, Second Amendment and one of my favorites, the 19th, right? You know those?

ShulmanExcuse me?

BentivolioYou know those amendments. The Constitutional amendments. You know the First, you know the Second, and you know the 19th.

ShulmanI don’t necessarily have the Constitution memorized, sir.

BentivolioOkay, well, they’re pretty general in what each one is. Like the First Amendment is the freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom to petition the government for a redress of grievances. First Amendment, right?

ShulmanI really can’t recite the Constitution, sir.

For some reason, Bentivolio brought up the 19th Amendment, women’s suffrage.

He didn’t have time to get to that point, but I think a larger point was made than he intended. How can the IRS be expected to follow the law, when they don’t even know what the most basic laws are? Come on, 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment? Shulman was acting confused.

It seems the only Amendment they’re familiar with is the 5th, and they don’t even know how to invoke that. If you’re going to use the 5th Amendment like Lois Lerner, you can’t keep opening your mouth and saying things like:

“I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws, I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”

It’s self-evident that the IRS needs more than additional ethics training. They need training in and respect for the Constitution. Of course, if they had either of those, they’d see that their own agency is unconstitutional.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/10968/former-irs-head-i-dont-know-anything-about-the-constitution/#ixzz2UEvCrDAt

Ft. Hood Terrorist Still Drawing Full Pay Thanks To Obama

May 23, 2013 by Breaking News  On Nov. 5, 2009, Army Major Nidal Hasan went on a shooting spree at Fort Hood, Texas where he was stationed. Witnesses said he was making Islamic statements as he shot one serviceman/woman after another. By the time Hasan was taken into custody, he had killed 13 people and wounded 32 others.

His guilt is not a question as he was caught in the act. Those at the scene believed Hasan’s attack was an act of Islamic terrorism. Subsequent investigations revealed that he was against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Instead of treating him like the terrorist he was, the Obama administration pushed the Pentagon to declare Hasan’s shootings were an act of workplace violence and not a terrorist act. He was arrested and treated like any other person accused of murder.

Three and half years later, he still has not been tried for his murderous rampage. As an active military personnel who has not yet been found guilty of a crime, Hasan continues to collect his full salary as an Army major. Since the shooting, he has earned $278,000.

If Hasan had been charged with an act of terrorism, he would certainly have been tried and convicted long ago, ending the collection of his pay, and saving taxpayers thousands of dollars.

IRS Scandal Reaches The White House

May 23, 2013 by Roger Aronoff

The Washington Post narrative surrounding the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups is that it began as a scandal involving low-level employees at a Cincinnati office, the “Determinations Unit,” a natural outgrowth of an increase in political activity by these groups. This belies other reporting by the Post’s Fact-Checker, which indicates that there was little growth in the number of groups applying for tax-exempt status at the time the targeting occurred.

As more details come to light, responsibility for the IRS actions keeps moving up the ladder and has landed, at least in part, at the White House. Top-level White House staffers knew about the scandal before a manufactured apology was made to the public on May 10.

“The White House on Monday once again added to the list of people who knew about the IRS investigation into its targeting of conservative groups—saying White House chief of staff Denis McDonough had been informed about a month ago,” reported Reid J. Epstein for Politico on May 20. White House Chief Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler said she learned about the IRS scandal the week of April 22, but didn’t tell the President.

A public relations storm was brewing, but the public is supposed to believe that the President himself was kept in the dark. “Press secretary Jay Carney said again that no one had told President Barack Obama ahead of the first news reports: not his top aide McDonough, nor his chief counsel Kathy Ruemmler, nor anyone from the Treasury Department,” wrote Epstein. “Monday’s revelation amounts to the fifth iteration of the Obama administration’s account of events, after initially saying that the White House had first learned of the controversy from the press.” Epstein called this the White House’s “shifting” account.

When Politico and the Post’s Fact-Checker, Glenn Kessler, note that the President’s story doesn’t quite add up, you know there’s trouble.

Obama Meets In Oval Office With Illegal Aliens

May 23, 2013 by Breaking News

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden met with three people at the White House Tuesday who are in the country illegally but received “deferred action” that allowed them to stay in the country under a memorandum issued by administration unilaterally last June in a memorandum issued by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

While conceding that she had no legal authority to change the “immigration status” of illegal aliens or provide them with a “pathway to citizenship,” Naoplitano said in a June 15, 2012 memo to the top officials at Customs and Border Patrol, Citizenship and Immigration Services, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, that she was directing them to use “prosecutorial discretion” in not enforcing the immigration laws against certain classes of immigration lawbreakers.

In all, Obama and Biden met with eight people advocating for comprehensive immigration reform on Tuesday, according to White House readout of the meeting. The White House readout of the meeting listed three of those as having received “deferred action.” Most others were legally in the United States with relatives who were illegal aliens.

“At the meeting, the president reiterated his commitment to passing a bipartisan, commonsense immigration reform bill this year,” the White House readout of the meeting said. “He made clear that while the current bill is not perfect, it does represent an important step towards the broad principles that need to be part of any immigration reform package.”

On Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a reform bill to the full Senate. Supporters of the legislation call it a “pathway to citizenship.” Opponents call it “amnesty.”
Read More at CNS News . By Fred Lucas.

Estudio dice que la Homosexualidad NO ES DE NACIMIENTO‏ Ricardo Samitier

Se Les Acabo El Cuento…

Un Estudio Realizado En Gemelos Idénticos Demuestra Que La Homosexualidad No Es De Nacimiento Es Una Perversión Inducida

En la mayoría de los casos por un ADULTO a un niño…

 

OJO… PADRES…Vigilen a esos tipos RAROS… Que prefieren

andar con niños y gente más joven… EN VEZ De personas de

su edad y del sexo opuesto…

 

Dr. Neil Whitehead

 

Ocho grandes estudios de gemelos idénticos en Australia, los EE.UU. y los países escandinavos durante las dos últimas décadas en todo llegaron a la misma conclusión: los llamados GAYS no nacieron de esa manera.

 

Los gemelos idénticos tienen LOS MISMOS GENES O EL ADN. Ellos se nutren de las condiciones prenatales iguales. Si la homosexualidad es causada por la genética o las condiciones prenatales y de uno de los gemelos es homosexual, el co-gemelo también debe ser homosexual…

 

“Debido a que tienen un ADN idéntico, que debe ser del 100%”, señala el Dr. Whitehead. Pero los estudios revelan otra cosa. “Si un gemelo idéntico tiene atracción por el mismo sexo la posibilidad de que su-gemelo idéntico lo sea tiene sólo alrededor de 11% para los hombres y 14% para las mujeres.”

 

Como los gemelos idénticos siempre son genéticamente idénticos, la homosexualidad no puede ser dictada genéticamente. “NADIE NACE HOMOSEXUAL”, señalan todos los estudios. “Las influencias que causaron la homosexualidad en uno de los gemelos idénticos y no en el otro TIENEN QUE SER FACTORES POST-PARTO“.

 

Dr. Whitehead cree que la atracción hacia el mismo sexo (SSA) es causada por “FACTORES NO COMPARTIDOS”, las cosas que le han sucedido a uno de los gemelos, pero no al otro… es la respuesta personal a un evento que sucedió a uno de los gemelos y no al otro…

 

Por ejemplo, uno de los gemelos puede haber tenido exposición a la pornografía o al abuso sexual, pero no el otro. Uno de los gemelos puede interpretar y responder a su entorno familiar o clase diferente a la otra. “Estas respuestas individuales e idiosincrásicas a eventos aleatorios y predominan los factores comunes del medio ambiente.”

 

El primer estudio muy grande, fiable hecho a los gemelos idénticos se llevó a cabo en Australia en 1991, seguido por un gran estudio de los EE.UU. en  1997. A continuación, Australia y los EE.UU. llevaron a cabo estudios en conjunto sobre más gemelos idénticos en 2000, seguido de varios estudios en los países escandinavos, según el Dr. Whitehead.

 

“Registros individuales son la base de los estudios de gemelos idénticos. Ahora existen records de gemelos idénticos en muchos países. Un gigantesco registro de gemelos idénticos en Europa, con más de 600.000 miembros se está organizando, pero uno de los más grandes de está en Australia, con más de 25.000 gemelos en los libros “.

 

Un estudio doble significativa entre los adolescentes muestra una correlación genética aún más débil. En 2002 Bearman y Brueckner estudiaron decenas de miles de estudiantes adolescentes en los EE.UU. La atracción entre personas del mismo sexo concordancia entre gemelos idénticos era sólo el 7,7% para los hombres y 5,3% para las mujeres-por debajo del 11% y el 14% en el estudio realizado en Australia por Bailey et al realizaron en 2000.

 

Otra Estudio Sorprendente Que No Ha Recibido Suficiente Publicidad

“Estudios académicos neutrales muestran que hay cambios sustanciales. Alrededor de la mitad de la población homosexual / bisexual (en un entorno no terapéutico) se desplaza hacia la heterosexualidad durante toda la vida. Alrededor del 3% de la actual población heterosexual en su juventud creyó firmemente que eran homosexuales o bisexuales “.

 

Aún más notable, la mayoría de los cambios de sexualidad se producen sin el asesoramiento o terapia. “Estos cambios no son terapéuticamente inducidos, pero suceden “naturalmente” durante la vida, algunos muy rápidamente”, observa el Dr. Whitehead. “La mayoría de los cambios en la orientación sexual es de homosexuales hacia la heterosexualidad exclusiva.”

 

El número de personas homosexuales que han cambiado hacia la heterosexualidad exclusiva es mayor que los números actuales de los bisexuales y homosexuales combinados. En otras palabras, los EX-GAYS superan a los GAYS reales.

 

La fluidez es aún más pronunciada entre los adolescentes, como el estudio de Bearman y Brueckner demostrada. “Ellos se confundieron entre los 16 y 17 años de edad, si una persona tenía una atracción romántica hacia el mismo sexo, casi todos habían cambiado un año después.”

 

“Los autores dicen que la estabilidad sexual radica solo entre los heterosexuales, que se lo son año tras año. Los adolescentes son unos casos especiales, por lo general cambian de año en año “.

 

Sin embargo, muchos conceptos erróneos persisten en la cultura popular. Es decir; que la homosexualidad es genética – y que es difícil de ser cambiada.

 

“Los académicos que trabajan en estos estudios no están contentos con las representaciones de los medios de comunicación sobre el tema”, señala el Dr. Whitehead. “Pero ellos prefieren seguir con su investigación académica y no involucrarse en el lado activista A FAVOR O CONTRA LA HOMOSEXUALIDAD.”

 

Desafortunadamente la PRENSA en GENERAL y la TV en particular están controladas por los HOMOSEXUALES… que están empecinados en crear UNA MODERNA SODOMA… donde practicar todo tipo de aberraciones sexuales PRÁCTICAMENTE masoquistas para los que hacen de mujer y SADISTAS EN LOS QUE SE IMPONEN…

 

Aquí el enlace con la información… 

http://www.hollanddavis.com/?p=3647

 

 

“THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”  

“En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’  Image

No 393 5/24/13 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’

mayo 24, 2013

No 393 5/24/13 “En mi opiniónLázaro R González Miño Editor ‘In GOD we trust’

¿YO QUImageIERO SABER PORQUE ESTA NOTICIA IMPORTANTE DE UNA MUJER INTERRUNPIENDO A OBAMA EN SU COMPARECENCIA DE AYER, NO SALEE PUBLICAMENTE EN NINGUN MEDIO DE TV, RADIO, O PERIODICO? ¿ES QUE TIENEN MIEDO?

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Woman+interrupts+obama&mid=4D5DA8FB4BCC0471FF784D5DA8FB4BCC0471FF78&view=detail&FORM=VIRE8

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama was interrupted three times by a woman who shouted about drones and detainees in Cuba as he delivered a speech on national security.

The woman was identified as Medea Benjamin from the anti-war group Code Pink. Benjamin yelled from behind a bank of cameras before security removed her from the hall at National Defense University in Washington.

Obama at one point said he was willing to “cut the young lady some slack” because the issues he was addressing are worth being passionate about.

Benjamin shouted, quote, “86 were cleared already. Release them today!”

That appears to be a reference to detainees who remain in Cuba despite being cleared for transfer from the facility.

Vivió en Cuba la que interrumpió discurso de Obama

• Extrañó que la conocida activista izquierdista no fuera sacada del salón

MIAMI 24 DE MAYO DE 2013, NHR.com—La mujer que interrumpió al presidente Barack Obama en su discurso la tarde de ayer jueves, en Washington, es una conocida activista política de izquierda que vivió cuatro años en Cuba, según NHR.com ha podido conocer.

Como muchos saben, cuando ayer el presidente Obama ofrecía un discurso sobre la seguridad nacional en la National Defense University y hablaba sobre la posibilidad de cerrar las prisiones de Guantánamo en Cuba, una mujer comenzó a interrumpirlo. gritándole que dejara en libertad a los detenidos sospechosos de actos terroristas.

La mujer junto con Jody Evans son fundadoras de la organización izquierdista Code Pink, en la foto aparece el presidente Obama junto a la activista Evans.

Obama se vio obligado a detener tres veces su alocución,  interrumpiendo el cierre del discurso, dirigiéndose directamente a la mujer. “Estoy a punto de abordar ese punto señora, pero tiene que dejarme hablar,” decía Obama como regañando a la mujer. “¿Por qué no se sienta y déjenme decirles exactamente lo que yo haría.”

De acuerdo con las fuentes contactadas anoche por NHR.com, “todo estaba preparado, la mujer es una izquierdista conocida”. Y eso podría ser verídico, pues en otras ocasiones cuando una persona interrumpe un discurso del presidente es inmediatamente sacada del lugar, sin embargo esta mujer se quedó en el salón donde hablaba Obama.

¿Y quién es esa mujer? Se nombra Medea Benjamin, alias Susan Benjamin, tiene 61 años de edad, es una activista política estadounidense, cofundadora de la organización Code Pink (Código Rosado) y, su esposo, también activista y autor, es Kevin Danaher, que preside el grupo de promoción del comercio justo Global Exchange. Benjamin fue también una candidata del partido verde en el año 2000 para el Senado de Estados Unidos.

Benjamin creció en Nueva York. Recibió su maestría en salud pública de la Universidad de Columbia y de economía de la New School. Benjamin trabajó durante 10 años como economista y nutricionista en América Latina y África para los alimentos de las Naciones Unidas, FAO, la Organización Mundial de la salud, la Agencia Sueca de desarrollo internacional y el Institute for Food and Development Policy. Vivió cuatro años en Cuba y ha escrito tres libros. En noviembre de 2003, en Miami, Medea Benjamin protagonizo una protesta contra la propuesta de la creación de un área de libre comercio de las Américas (ALCA). Benjamin ha sido criticada por su apoyo a Hugo Chávez y sus ataques a la permanencia del embargo de Estados Unidos al gobierno cubano.

IRS official on leave refused to resign, GOP senator says

Published May 24, 2013 FoxNews.com

WASHINGTON –  First she refused to testify. Now Lois Lerner, the IRS official at the center of the tax agency scandal, is refusing to resign, according to a top Republican senator.

Sources confirmed to Fox News earlier Thursday that Lerner, the head of the IRS division that oversaw the unit targeting conservative groups, had been placed on administrative leave, with pay.

But Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, claimed she was only put in that status after refusing to step down.

He said the commissioner was in his right to demand her resignation, and said taxpayers should not continue to pay her salary indefinitely.

“My understanding is the new acting IRS commissioner asked for Ms. Lerner’s resignation, and she refused to resign.  She was then put on administrative leave instead,” Grassley said in a statement. “The IRS owes it to taxpayers to resolve her situation quickly.  The agency needs to move on to fix the conditions that led to the targeting debacle.”

Capitol Hill sources said Lerner, the director of exempt organizations, was placed on paid leave Thursday, amid calls from some lawmakers for her to be suspended or fired. In her absence, Ken Corbin, the current deputy director of the submission processing, wage and investment division, will take over her duties, according to an internal IRS memo obtained by Fox News.

Lerner, the official who first acknowledged the controversial IRS practice earlier this month, asserted her innocence at a House hearing on Wednesday. She then refused to testify, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination. The move angered many who say she should have been forced to answer why the tax agency targeted conservative groups applying for tax exempt status.

Republican leaders of that committee, though, now say she waived that right by giving a statement and want to haul her back to testify.

Pressure has been mounting on the administration to take tough action against Lerner, after two other IRS officials were pushed out in the wake of the scandal.

In a letter earlier Thursday to IRS Acting Commissioner Daniel Werfel, Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and John McCain, R-Ariz., asked the agency to remove Lerner from office and said they had “lost confidence in her ability to fulfill her duties.”

It’s unclear whether Republicans will succeed in trying to recall her before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the panel, said through an aide Thursday that her Fifth Amendment assertion is “no longer valid,” since she delivered remarks at the start of Wednesday’s hearing. 

That hearing was never technically adjourned, and Republicans hope to bring her back.

Others, though, say she was in her right to defend herself and subsequently invoke the right to remain silent.

The IRS has had a series of missteps that have not only publicly marred the reputation of the IRS, but also called into question what the White House knew about the scandal and when they knew it.

Separately, Tea Party-related groups who claim they were targeted by the tax agency have started filing lawsuits this week against the IRS. In some cases they are asking for the IRS to admit wrongdoing. In others, they are seeking monetary claims.

“It’s extremely troubling that it has taken this long for Lois Lerner to removed from the top exempt position at the IRS,” Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, the group suing on behalf of some Tea Party groups, said in a statement to FoxNews.com.

Sekulow said instead of putting Lerner on administrative leave, his group is calling for her to be fired.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram contributed to this report.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/24/irs-official-who-refused-to-testify-placed-on-administrative-leave/?cmpid=prn_aol&icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing9%7Cdl3%7Csec1_lnk1%26pLid%3D317919#ixzz2UDtU8xtj

 Destruyeron los Niños SCOUTS…‏ Ricardo Samitier.

GRAN TRIUNFO DE LOS HOMOSEXUALES…

Lograron La Destrucción De Una Institución  De 102 Años De Existencia, Conocida como Los Boy Scouts — Jóvenes Exploradores…

Pues Ningún Padre Va A Enviar A Su Hijo A Formar Parte De Esa Institución….

 Los “Lideres” de esa institución que se PLEGARON por DINERO

A admitir a los homosexuales… PASARAN A LA HISTORIA COMO

TRAIDORES… no solo a la INSTITUCIÓN sino al mundo CIVILIZADO…

 Que desvergüenza…

 Para leer el origen de esa institución que a partir de HOY deja de ser

IMPORTANTE  puede hacerlo en este enlace… 

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escultismo

La Noticia de Hoy En Florida… Prueba…Una Vez Más Que La Homosexualidad Es Comienza Siempre Cuando Una Persona De Mayor Edad Engatusa A Una De Menor… Nunca Es A La Inversa… Ricardo Samitier.

 

La Fiscalía de la Florida le Ofrece Una LESBIANA de 18 años una condena sin Cárcel por haber engatusado a una niña de 14 a hacer sexo…

Aquí está la Noticia…

Una mujer de 18 años de edad en la Florida ha sido expulsada de la escuela secundaria y se enfrenta a cargos penales por supuestamente tener relaciones sexuales con una niña de 14 años de edad.

Sus padres la defienden y dicen que está siendo castigada por su orientación sexual. Kerry Sanders de la NBC entrevisto a los padres…

Un joven de 18 años de edad, animadora de los juegos de futbol debe decidir el viernes si acepta un acuerdo con la fiscalía que le evitaría la pena de prisión por una relación sexual que tuvo con una compañera de clase menor de edad.

Si no acepta la oferta enfrenta hasta 15 años de prisión si es declarada culpable de los dos cargos que enfrenta de de agresión sexual a un menor. También tendría que registrarse como delincuente sexual por el resto de su vida….

El 90% de las personas no se dan cuenta del DAÑO DE POR VIDA que realizan los homosexuales cuando INDUCEN A UN NIÑO a realizar un acto SEXUAL ABERRANTE…que los deja MARCADO por el resto de sus vidas…

Los Padres de esta JOVEN LESBIANA… están acusando a la sociedad de PERSECUCIÓN… como si su hija NO HUBIERA HECHO NADA…debían de ponerse en el lugar de los padres de la menor “CONVENCIDA en su inmadurez” a realizar un acto sexual aberrante y ANTI-NATURAL… que a lo mejor la priva de fundar un hogar feliz en el futuro…

Siempre es la misma historia… un niño o un jovencito en su pubertad y sin experiencia es “ENGATUSADO” por uno mayor y le desgarran la vida…

La verdad es que todos los homosexuales HOMBRES o MUJERES son PEDÓFILOS ellos siempre andan a la casa de jovencitos…

Para leer toda la noticia…

http://www.today.com/news/florida-teen-charged-relationship-minor-mulls-plea-deal-6C10042725

 

IRS scandal symptom of intrusive government
Controversy indicative of a federal bureaucracy that has expanded beyond control by Sal Russo May 21, 2013

Our Founding Fathers were fearful of a powerful federal government because it was a threat to liberty. The recent Internal Revenue Service scandal is the foreseeable and inevitable consequence of a too powerful federal government, and the validation of the mission of the Tea Party movement that stands firmly for a limited national government.

When our Constitution was being written, our leaders were wise enough to know that concentrated power inevitably leads to abuse. So they constructed a system of government that greatly limited the function of Washington to enumerated powers, and they imposed a system of checks and balances to keep those powers under control. That the president’s former chief adviser, David Axelrod, recently used “the government is so vast” excuse is unwittingly an indictment of a bureaucracy run amok.

The Tea Party burst onto the political scene in 2009 in reaction to seeing both political parties succumbing to government expansion, excessive spending and an unsustainable national debt. Concentrating money and power is a recipe for national disaster, and the IRS scandal is a perfect example. And looming behind it all is ObamaCare — an epic disaster waiting to happen.

When the IRS story broke, it seemed immediately plausible to us. As the Tea Party Express conducted its national bus tours, we heard local Tea Party groups from all over the country complaining about IRS delays with inappropriate and intrusive questions. This unfairness was so pronounced that it was obvious that there was a deliberate attempt to suppress these groups. Unsurprisingly, the mainstream media ignored and dismissed these legitimate grievances as false conspiracy theories.

As the proverbial camel’s head gets under the IRS tent, the predictable collapse is starting to happen. While originally dismissed as the escapades of a couple of rogue agents in the Cincinnati IRS office, we know now that officials in Washington were at least aware of the scandal very early on, and maybe are even more culpable than that. It is clear that congressional inquiries about improper behavior were pushed aside and material facts were not disclosed. The cover-up had begun, which is always a sign that there is more bad news coming from the IRS.

This scandal is indicative of a federal government that has expanded beyond control. The only cure for an overgrown government is to reduce the size, cost and intrusiveness of the federal government. Since absolute power corrupts absolutely, it is the system, not the individual, which is to blame. It is an unavoidable consequence of human behavior for those with unchecked power who ultimately turn to abusing that power, regardless of whatever noble intentions they may have.

As Thomas Jefferson famously said, “Bad government results from too much government.” We cannot continue expanding the government without consequence. American freedoms and privacy are being violated to serve the whims of government bureaucrats who feel empowered by the system. If we are going to get serious about protecting ourselves from government overreach, we must be willing to temper the invasive power of government.

There is a very good way to reduce the necessity of a huge IRS, which has also been tasked with enforcing ObamaCare. The president is increasing the size of the IRS at a very time when people are less inclined to want them to look at their private health care records.

The solution to both problems is straightforward. We should repeal ObamaCare and use more market-driven solutions to improve our health care system. And, we must finally address the 800-pound gorilla in the room, comprehensive tax reform. Both actions would substantially reduce the size and power of the IRS and the first step in reining in the size, cost and intrusiveness of the federal government.

Sal Russo is chief strategist for Tea Party Express.

Read article on USA Today website

WND EXCLUSIVE Congressman: Time for special prosecutors ‘There’s just so much there … and it already stinks to high heaven’

Garth Kant

Garth Kant is a WND staff writer. Previously, he spent five years writing, copy-editing and producing at “CNN Headline News,” three years writing, copy-editing and training writers at MSNBC, and also served several local TV newsrooms as producer, executive producer and assistant news director. He is the author of the McGraw-Hill textbook, “How to Write Television News.”

Rep. Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, is now demanding a special prosecutor look into the Obama administration’s involvement in several scandals making national headlines.

Gohmert, a candid lawmaker who doesn’t mince words, has been in the spotlight recently for speaking boldly about the scandals in Washington.

On May 15, Gohmert got into a heated exchange with Attorney General Eric Holder during a House Judiciary Committee hearing. When Holder challenged the congressman’s truthfulness, Gohmert shot back, “You point out one thing that I said that was not true.”

The attorney general replied, “I know what the FBI did. You cannot know what I know,” but he didn’t cite any inaccuracies by Gohmert.

The next day at a Capitol Hill news conference in which tea-party members described abuse by the IRS, Gohmert inferred that the president is a tyrant.

The congressman thundered, “If the AP story has taught anything it should be, to the media, that when there is a tyrannical despot, the media will be one of the early victims – you will be used as helpful savants for awhile, and then when you’re no longer needed, you will be pressured and put out of business as well.”

WND asked Gohmert what Congress should be doing about the Obama scandals, beginning with abuses at the Justice Department.

“We’ve already found the attorney general in contempt, and that did nothing,” he said. “We have all kinds of issues we’ve asked the Justice Department about and they are not providing any answers.

“So, unless we have legislation that creates a special prosecutor to deal with an attorney general who is in contempt of Congress and who will not address the issues he’s created, we won’t get to the bottom of it.”

The House of Representatives found Holder in contempt last June for refusing to turn over documents in the Fast & Furious scandal.

The Justice Department’s latest scandals involve secretly obtaining a massive number of phone records from the Associated Press while pursuing a leak, naming a Fox News reporter an unindicted co-conspirator for gaining access to confidential information from the State Department and targeting another Fox News reporter and a producer pursuing the Fast & Furious gun-running scandal.

“The Justice Department misused the judicial process. To get a warrant to go after a Fox News reporter who was simply trying to get a scoop, there’s nothing illegal about that,” Gohmert said. “If people had known how wide and deep the Fast & Furious situation was, it certainly could have affected the last election. So, they go after a reporter who’s going to try to get to the bottom of it. The Justice Department is actually protecting itself there.

“Holder claims the AP leak was one of the most egregious he’s ever seen. Well, apparently every leak that makes the Obama administration look bad is egregious.”

He added, “Instead of just violating the Constitution so completely and so brashly and going after the AP, the more appropriate thing to do would be to say, ‘You know what, we’ve got only a handful of people in this administration who knew this information that was leaked. Let’s check just those folks’ phone lines. Let’s see who they were meeting with, and we’ll make the determination from there.’ But that’s not what they wanted to do. They didn’t want to catch the leaker in the administration. They would much rather intimidate the AP and go after all the other records that they could use to help intimidate them in the future. It’s just incredible.”

WND asked Gohmert what Congress should do about the IRS’ harassment of conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.

“Now that we have at least one IRS official (Lois Lerner, head of the tax-exempt organizations division) who has taken the Fifth Amendment, we’re not going to be able to get to the bottom of it without using the judiciary process, so it looks like we’ll have to pursue that ourselves,” indicating this scandal will also require a special prosecutor.

But Gohmert didn’t stop there.

“I think we need to be dismantling the IRS so this can never happen again. You can actually change the outcome of an election by intimidating those who won’t speak up and by preventing groups from obtaining legal status so they won’t raise money and hold gatherings,” he said. “We’ve created a system where, unless you get a certain tax status you can’t raise money and go out and speak your mind. You have to have IRS approval. They figured that out and intimidated people who could have affected the election.

“So, it is bad. We’ve got to dismantle the IRS to the point it can never do that again.”

Gohmert suggested a flat tax would help prevent IRS abuse of power, adding, “If we are going to have an IRS, it will have to be just a shadow of its current self and never have this kind of power to affect elections again, as it it appears it may have.”

Asked whether he believes the orders to harass conservatives came from the top, Gohmert replied, “That’s what we don’t know yet. They threw a heck of a firewall around the president. Maybe he doesn’t know. Maybe it’s one of those situations where everyone’s so desperate to keep this president in power that they would use and abuse the IRS to try to intimidate opponents of the president.”

Gohmert didn’t say whether he believes it’s time to have a special prosecutor look into all the serious questions about the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012. For starters, he’d like to know whose idea it was to blame the attack on an anti-Islamic video that has since been proven unrelated to events there.

“Apparently, there was a 10 p.m. call between [former Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton and the president and, gee, right after that call they start talking about a video. But at two in the morning, when [former deputy chief of mission in Libya] Greg Hicks says [U.S. Ambassador to Libya] Chris Stevens’ last, dying desperate words were, ‘We’re under attack,’ it is clear it was not about a video. Everybody knew it was not about a video. They knew it was an attack. [The attackers] knew exactly where to plant the mortars.

“Sending Susan Rice out (to push the video in the talk shows) – I feel quite sure she didn’t know she was not telling the truth. They sent her out because she wouldn’t know she was lying, and she was quite convincing.

As a former U.S. Army captain, Gohmert is shocked the military didn’t send forces to respond to the attack.

“What happened at Benghazi is just unthinkable,” he said. “We have an American tradition of protecting your fellow soldiers. You never want to be left hanging by yourself. If somebody is out there without enough help, then you try to go help them.

“Then you find out there was military personnel ready to go, but they were told to stand down. I’ve been trying to get in touch with some of those people, and it’s tough. Apparently they like to send these guys on training missions where they can’t use their cell phones, which means you have a heck of a time trying to talk to them about when they were ordered to stand down.

“There’s just so much there, we haven’t got nearly to the bottom, and it already stinks to high heaven.” http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/congressman-time-for-special-prosecutors/#sQ758mcuoTid6m1R.01

NBC: Holder Personally OK’d Fox Reporter’s Warrant

Thursday, 23 May 2013 10:23 PM

By Greg Richter

Attorney General Eric Holder personally signed off on the search warrant of Fox News reporter James Rosen’s emails, NBC reports.
The warrant named Rosen a “possible co-conspirator” in violation of the Espionage Act for obtaining leaked classified information from a Pentagon source. Rosen has not been charged.
The revelation came on the same day President Barack Obama said in a speech that he had ordered Holder to review the Justice Department’s standards for investigating cases that involve journalists.
“I am troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill the investigative journalism that holds government accountable,” Obama said in the speech. “Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs.”
A law enforcement official told NBC News of Holder’s personal involvement on Thursday. Holder has previously said that he recused himself from the AP phone records investigation since he had been a witness in the initial probe, but no one had previously indicated Holder’s role in the Rosen case.
“It was approved at the highest levels — and I mean the highest,” the law enforcement official told NBC, speaking on condition of anonymity. He told the news organization that he included Holder in that statement. © 2013 Newsmax.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/holder-involved-fox-warrant/2013/05/23/id/506161?s=al&promo_code=139B3-1#ixzz2UDXxDx00
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Tyranny around the corner — Team Obama trashes Constitution to pursue opponents

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano Published May 23, 2013 FoxNews.com

o    A few weeks ago, President Obama advised graduates at Ohio State University that they need not listen to voices warning about tyranny around the corner, because we have self-government in America. He argued that self-government is in and of itself an adequate safeguard against tyranny, because voters can be counted upon to elect democrats (lowercase “d”) not tyrants.

His argument defies logic and 20th-century history. It reveals an ignorance of the tyranny of the majority, which believes it can write any law, regulate any behavior, alter any procedure and tax any event so long as it can get away with it.

History has shown that the majority will not permit any higher law or logic or value — like fidelity to the natural law, a belief in the primacy of the individual or an acceptance of the supremacy of the Constitution — that prevents it from doing as it wishes.Reporters are protected by the First Amendment, and the Supreme Court has ruled that they can ask whatever questions they wish without fear of prosecution.

Under Obama’s watch, the majority has, by active vote or refusal to interfere, killed hundreds of innocents — including three Americans — by drone, permitted federal agents to write their own search warrants, bombed Libya into tribal lawlessness without a declaration of war so that a mob there killed our ambassador with impunity, attempted to force the Roman Catholic Church to purchase insurance policies that cover artificial birth control, euthanasia and abortion, ordered your doctor to ask you whether you own guns, used the IRS to intimidate outspoken conservatives, seized the telephone records of newspaper reporters without lawful authority and in violation of court rules, and obtained a search warrant against one of my Fox colleagues by misrepresenting his true status to a federal judge.

James Rosen, my colleague and friend, is a professional journalist. He covers the State Department for Fox News. In order to do his job, he has cultivated sources in the State Department — folks willing to speak from time to time off the record.

One of Rosen’s sources apparently was a former employee of a federal contractor who was on detail to the State Department, Stephen Jin-Woo Kim. Kim is an expert in arms control and national defense whose lawyers have stated that his job was to explain byzantine government behavior so we all can understand it.

When he was indicted for communicating top secret and sensitive information, presumably to Rosen, his lawyers replied by stating that the information he discussed was already in the public domain, and thus it wasn’t secret.

Prior to securing Kim’s indictment, the Department of Justice obtained a search warrant for Google’s records of Rosen’s personal emails by telling a federal judge that Rosen had committed the crime of conspiracy by undue flattery of Kim and appealing to Kim’s vanity until Kim told Rosen what he wanted to hear. In a word, that is rubbish. And the FBI agent who claimed that asking a source for information and the federal judge who found that the flattering questions alone constituted criminal behavior were gravely in error.

Reporters are protected in their craft by the First Amendment, and the Supreme Court has ruled that they can ask whatever questions they wish without fear of prosecution.

If Kim revealed classified information to Rosen — a charge Kim vigorously denies — that is Kim’s crime, not Rosen’s. The Supreme Court ruled in the Pentagon Papers case that it is not a crime for a journalist to seek secrets, to receive them, to possess them and to publish them so long as they affect a matter of material public interest.

The government’s behavior here is very troubling. Government lawyers and FBI agents are charged with knowing the law. They must have known that Rosen committed no crime, and they no doubt never intended to charge him, and they never have. They materially misled the judge, who saw the phrase “probable cause” of criminal activity (taken from the Fourth Amendment) in their affidavit in support of the search warrant they sought, and he signed. The judge should have seen this for the ruse it was. It is inconceivable that a person could conspire to commit a crime (release of classified information) that is impossible for that person to commit, particularly with a Supreme Court case directly on point.

This misuse of the search warrant mechanism by misrepresentation of the status of the target continues the radicalization of federal criminal procedure now typical of this Department of Justice. It has claimed that it can release military weapons to foreign criminal gangs just to see where the weapons end up, and that its agents cannot be prosecuted for harm caused by those who received the weapons. It has held that the serious consideration given in the White House by high-ranking government officials to the identity of persons the president wants to kill somehow is a constitutional substitute for due process and thus enables the president to use drones to kill people uncharged with federal crimes. It has extended the public safety exception to the Miranda rule from the few seconds at the scene of the crime spent securing the prisoner, where the Supreme Court has said it resides, to more than 72 hours.

And now this.

The reason we have the due process safeguards imposed upon the government by the Constitution is to keep tyranny from lurking anywhere here, much less around the corner. Due process is the intentionally created obstacle to government procedural shortcuts, which, if disregarded, will invite tyranny to knock at the front door and sneak in through the back. Justice Felix Frankfurter warned of this 70 years ago when he wrote, “The history of liberty has largely been the history of the observance of procedural safeguards.” That was true then, and it is true now.

Do you expect the Department of Justice to cut constitutional corners against you?

Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written seven books on the U.S. Constitution. His latest is “Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom.”         Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

 La verdad sobre los 8 senadores a cargo de la EMIGRACIÓN…‏ Ricardo Samitier

¿Quiénes Son La Pandilla De 8 Senadores Que Laboran La Ley De Emigración En La Que Colaron A Marco Rubio… Para “Controlarlo y Liquidarlo Políticamente”

Comencemos por SABER quiénes son los del Bando Republicano… Pues ya los Demócratas se han quitado la “CARETA” y todo lo que proponen es SOCIALISMO… Incluyendo el Cubano Americano MENÉNDEZ…

 

He aquí quienes son LOS REPUBLICANOS… John McCain  el “Nino Travieso” así lo llamaban en la Marina pues era el hijo del “ALMIRANTE” y hacia lo que le daba la gana… incluyendo causó casi la destrucción de un portaaviones… y NO LO DISCIPLINARON… hoy en día es un MILLONARIO POR MATRIMONIO se caso un una multi-billonaria… (Nunca ha trabajado en su vida)…

 

El NUMERO 2… Jeff Flake of Arizona, este republicano pero TAN DEMÓCRATA… que en las ultimas 3 elecciones el partido demócrata no ha postulado a NADIE CONTRA EL… prefieren que esté haciendo el “PAPEL DE REPUBLICANO” es además la voz en el CONGRESO A FAVOR DE FIDEL CASTRO y de LEVANTAR EL EMBARGO a Cuba…  es MORMÓN… pero la prensa no lo dice…

 

EL NUMERO 3… Lindsay Graham  es un SOLTERÓN  que NO SE LE CONOCE COMPAÑERA SENTIMENTAL… y entonces esos 3 señores… COLARON a MARCO RUBIO en esa PANDILLA… para PERJUDICARLO y OBLIGARLO A DOBLEGARSE…  Además para que el T PARTY  PENSARA QUE TENIA UNA VOZ en esa comisión…

Ahora Veamos Como Esta Pandilla De Los Ocho  Ha Complicado Las Cosas…

La verdad es que los 11 MILLONES DE ILEGALES… lo único que desean es LEGALIZAR SU SITUACIÓN… cosa que se puede hacer fácilmente diciendo solamente:

  1. 1.       Todos los que deseen legalizar su situación tienen 45 DÍAS PARA PRESÉNTENSE… y GARANTIZAMOS que todos recibirán un SALVO CONDUCTO para que sigan su vida dentro de las leyes de USA… Ninguno De Los Que Se Presenten Serán Deportados…
  2. 2.       El procesamiento de cada uno de los PRESENTADOS BAJO ESTA LEY tendrán que cumplir con las leyes y todos tendrán su DÍA EN CORTE… donde sí han cumplido con las leyes… su caso será revisado de acuerdo a su COMPORTAMIENTO SOCIAL por un juez de emigración…
  3. 3.       Los que no se PRESENTEN serán considerados AGENTES SABOTEADORES EN POTENCIA… y serán encarcelados y deportados después de cumplir la sentencia…
  4. 4.       Se ofrecerá una recompensa de $5,000.00 a los ciudadanos que denuncien la presencia de un ILEGAL EN CUALQUIER lugar después de esos 45 días… Los Estados Unidos Garantizamos QUE NO LE VAMOS A DAR TREGUA A LOS QUE NO SE PRESENTEN… 

Estoy seguro que todos los NO CRIMINALES… SE PRESENTARÍAN  EN FILA… y se someterían a la LEY… sin más promesas que dejarlos HACER SU VIDA NORMALMENTE…  mientras legalizan su situación…

Nada de lo arriba mencionando afecta la seguridad ni la economía del país… ¿Por qué no lo hacen??? 

Esta es la verdad de la PROPUESTA LEY DE EMIGRACIÓN…

De la Pandilla de los 8…

Léala PARA QUE ESTE INFORMADO DE LA TRAICIÓN 

La “Pandilla”  de los “OCHO” que están haciendo la ley de inmigración puede ser “Resumida Como La Amnistía Ahora”, para comenzar LA PRIMERA MENTIRA — REPETIDA MIL VECES — ESPECIALMENTE POR MARCOS RUBIO fue y sigue siendo que la ley no entraría en VIGOR hasta que las FRONTERAS NO FUERAN CERRADAS y ASEGURADAS… Ahora resulta que el cierre de fronteras NUNCA SE HARÁ. Ya no se requiere que el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional construya el muro (que fue ordenado por el Secure Fence Act firmada por el presidente George W. Bush) hace mas de 12 annos… AHORA sólo se requiere que PRESENTE UN PLAN…  Que tiene que ser juzgado efectivo por la LESBIANA Secretaria del DSN quien decidirá que si no ha alcanzado el 90 por ciento de la seguridad fronteriza, entonces y solamente entonces “automáticamente” entra en acción: la creación de una Comisión de Seguridad en la Frontera Sur con la facultad (¡FÍJENSE EN ESTO!) PARA HACER RECOMENDACIONES y DESPUÉS DE SEIS MESES DE HACER SU RECOMENDACIONES, la Comisión de forma AUTOMÁTICA SE AUTO-LIQUIDA, por lo que nunca habrá seguridad en la frontera…  PERO CON TODA ESTA MENTIRAS… NOS HA ENTRETENIDO DURANTE 8 MESES… y han creado la NECESIDAD… de que hay que realizar una ley de emigración…

¿AHORA Vamos A Ver Que Hace Marco Rubio?

Para Salirse De Esa Encerrona  Hecha Por Los

COMUNISTA Del Partido REPUBLICANO????

 

La Libertad‏: Conocerán la verdad, y la verdad los hará libres. Alberto Pérez

Frases sobe LA LIBERTAD

Si no quieres repetir el pasado, estúdialo.Baruch Benedict Spinoza

Las cadenas de la esclavitud solamente atan las manos: es la mente lo que hace al hombre libre o esclavo. Franz Grillparzer (1791-1872) Dramaturgo austriaco

La libertad, Sancho, es uno de los más preciosos dones que a los hombres dieron los cielos; con ella no pueden igualarse los tesoros que encierran la tierra y el mar: por la libertad, así como por la honra, se puede y debe aventurar la vida.Miguel de Cervantes (1547-1616) Escritor español.

Pueblos libres, recordad esta máxima: Podemos adquirir la libertad, pero nunca se recupera una vez que se pierde.

Jean Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) Filósofo francés.

 

No existe la libertad, sino la búsqueda de la libertad, y esa búsqueda es la que nos hace libres. Carlos Fuentes (1929-2012) Periodista y escritor mexicano

 

La libertad no es simplemente un privilegio que se otorga; es un hábito que ha de adquirirse. David Lloyd George (1863-1945) Político británico

 

La verdadera libertad consiste en el dominio absoluto de sí mismo.

Michel Eyquem de Montaigne (1533-1592) Escritor y filósofo francés

 

¿Preguntas qué es la libertad? No ser esclavo de nada, de ninguna necesidad, de ningún accidente y conservar la fortuna al alcance de la mano. Séneca (2 AC-65) Filósofo latino.

 

Para libertad fue que Cristo nos hizo libres; por tanto, permaneced firmes, y no os sometáis otra vez al yugo de esclavitud. PALABRA DE DIOS, Gálatas 5:1

 

Los Comunistas Son Los Mejores Planificando Shows Mediáticos…

Los Cubanos Nunca Olvidaremos Las Palomas Que Soltaron Cuando Fidel Castro Habló En La Habana… Ricardo Samitier.

 

La Prensa NO QUISO DESCUBRIR entonces que todo fue un BURDO show… primero no existían palomas en el área, las palomas no vuela de noche… y la mayoría de los cubanos lo tiraron a choteo cuando una de las palomas cagó a Fidel… pero de todas forma el mensaje de las palomas representando LA PAZ… fue enviando al GRAN PUBLICO… sin que NADIE CRITICARA LA MANIOBRA… 

Obama y su gente… AYER prepararon otro show mediático usando a una comunista para PEDIR LA LIBERTAD DE LOS MUSULMANES TERRORISTAS de Guantánamo… ¿Porque SABEMOS QUE FUE UN SHOW…? FÁCIL… cuando cualquier persona INTERRUMPE al presidente… es arrestado y sacado del lugar… LO CUAL no sucedió ayer… permitiendo NO UNA SINO TRES INTERRUPCIONES… 

La noticia fue difundida por Nelson Horta en su block de internet… el cual se distribuye de GRATIS… y lo pueden pedir a http://www.nelsonhortareporta.com/

He aquí la noticia:

 Extrañó que la conocida activista izquierdista no fuera sacada del salón

MIAMI 24 DE MAYO DE 2013, NHR.com—La mujer que interrumpió al presidente Barack Obama en su discurso la tarde de ayer jueves, en Washington, es una conocida activista política de izquierda que vivió cuatro años en Cuba, según NHR.com ha podido conocer.

Como muchos saben, cuando ayer el presidente Obama ofrecía un discurso sobre la seguridad nacional en laNational Defense University y hablaba sobre la posibilidad de cerrar las prisiones de Guantánamo en Cuba, una mujer comenzó a interrumpirlo. Gritándole que dejara en libertad a los detenidos sospechosos de actos terroristas.

La mujer junto con Jody Evans son fundadoras de la organización izquierdista Code Pink, en la foto aparece el presidente Obama junto a la activista Evans.

Obama se vio obligado a detener tres veces su alocución,  interrumpiendo el cierre del discurso, dirigiéndose directamente a la mujer. “Estoy a punto de abordar ese punto señora, pero tiene que dejarme hablar,” decía Obama como regañando a la mujer. “¿Por qué no se sienta y déjenme decirles exactamente lo que yo haría.”

De acuerdo con las fuentes contactadas anoche por NHR.com, “todo estaba preparado, la mujer es una izquierdista conocida”. Y eso podría ser verídico, pues en otras ocasiones cuando una persona interrumpe un discurso del presidente es inmediatamente sacada del lugar, sin embargo esta mujer se quedó en el salón donde hablaba Obama.

¿Y quién es esa mujer? Se nombra Medea Benjamin, alias Susan Benjamin, tiene 61 años de edad, es una activista política estadounidense, cofundadora de la organización Code Pink (Código Rosado) y, su esposo, también activista y autor, es Kevin Danaher, que preside el grupo de promoción del comercio justo Global Exchange. Benjamin fue también una candidata del partido verde en el año 2000 para el Senado de Estados Unidos.

Benjamin creció en Nueva York. Recibió su maestría en salud pública de la Universidad de Columbia y de economía de la New School. Benjamin trabajó durante 10 años como economista y nutricionista en América Latina y África para los alimentos de las Naciones Unidas, FAO, la Organización Mundial de la salud, la Agencia Sueca de desarrollo internacional y el Institute for Food and Development Policía. Vivió cuatro años en Cuba y ha escrito tres libros. En noviembre de 2003, en Miami, Medea Benjamín protagonizo una protesta contra la propuesta de la creación de un área de libre comercio de las Américas (ALCA).

Benjamín ha sido criticada por su apoyo a Hugo Chávez y sus ataques a la permanencia del embargo de Estados Unidos al gobierno cubano.

 

Rove: Obama ‘Directly’ Involved in Benghazi Lie; Scandals ‘Corrosive’

Wednesday, 22 May 2013 07:34 PM

By Todd Beamon and Kathleen Walter

The scandals facing the White House — particularly the Benghazi attack of last Sept. 11 — will be corrosive to Barack Obama’s presidency, Republican strategist Karl Rove tells Newsmax TV in an exclusive interview.

“These things will be corrosive,” Rove, who helped George W. Bush twice win the White House, tells Newsmax. “They’ll eat away at the president’s rating. We’ll see it over time and, particularly, as Congress asks more questions in the weeks ahead.

Latest: Is Benghazi a Cover Up? Is Obama at the Heart of It? Vote Here

“This stuff is only starting to seep in,” Rove adds. “It will take a while for these things to sort of sink in. I am not surprised that it hasn’t begun to impact his job approval just yet.”

Rove, who also served as deputy chief of staff in the Bush White House, is a Fox News analyst. His latest book is ‘Courage and Consequence: My Life as a Conservative in the Fight.”

Story continues below the video:

Most troubling for Rove is how the Obama administration has grossly mismanaged the information — before and after — surrounding the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Libya, which killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

“The West Wing was complicit in the Benghazi lie,” Rove declares to Newsmax. “And, look, I believe that, ultimately, the president is responsible for setting the tone.”

He noted how U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice went on five Sunday morning talks shows five days after the attacks — working from talking points that were heavily edited largely at the request of the State Department — and said that the assaults began as a peaceful protest against an anti-Muslim film that was later “hijacked” by militants.

“You don’t send out Susan Rice to go on five Sunday morning talk programs unless somebody in the West Wing has said, ‘Let’s send her out’ — and somebody in the West Wing has said this is what she needs to say or said, ‘O.K., that’s an interesting idea. You ought to go ahead and say that.’”

He says that the controversies — which also include the targeting of tea party and conservative groups by the Internal Revenue Service and the recent secret seizure of telephone records of editors and reporters at The Associated Press — point to a haughty commander in chief.

“I do see an arrogance, a belief that the rules somehow don’t apply to him — that the norms that other presidents have abided by should not be respected and that he is free to do something that he would criticize in others,” Rove said.

“Do you believe that if the Bush administration had gone after The New York Times in the same fashion that President Obama went after the AP and Fox News that then-Senator Obama would not have been on the floor of the Senate raising hell? Of course he would have.
“There’s lots of things that he has done that are inappropriate.”

But the most egregious will always be Benghazi, Rove says.

“This involves the president himself,” he declares to Newsmax. “He is the commander in chief, and at 4:08 p.m. on the afternoon on Sept. 11 in Washington, our government received word that attack was underway on our diplomatic facility in Benghazi.

“At 5 p.m., the president was told about this by the Secretary of Defense [Leon Panetta] and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff [Gen. Martin Dempsey], who were in the office for a half-hour meeting on another subject.

Alert: Obama Movie Exposes Frightening Agenda. Get the DVD Here.

“The president ordered them to deploy whatever forces were necessary,” Rove adds. “They later testified that was the last contact they had with the president that night — and we now know that no forces were deployed.

“The president didn’t say: ‘I’m going to pick up the phone and call the president of Libya and say: Our facility’s under attack. You have an international responsibility to protect our people. What are you doing?’ He talks to him for the first time ever the next morning to say thank you for returning the body of our dead ambassador.

“This is unacceptable,” Rove continues. “Where was the president? What was he doing? Who concocted this lie that was told to the American people? We know that it’s a total, complete fabrication, a lie — and we still don’t know who was the person who authored that and told her to go say that?

“It’s somebody sitting in the West Wing of the White House — and their motivation was to protect the president against criticism that the war on terror was not over and that this was a terrorist attack.”

In his wide-ranging exclusive Newsmax interview, Rove also says:

  •  His American Crossroads super PAC has applied to the Internal Revenue Service for nonprofit status “and three years later, that process has not ended for us.”
  •  The Justice Department “picked James Rosen out and tried to make an example of him” when it obtained a warrant to gain access to the Fox News reporter’s telephone records and emails in a 2009 probe of a former State Department contractor who later was charged with disclosing national defense information.
  • Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will be “a serious contender” should she run for president in 2016. But “my head says she runs; my gut says she doesn’t.”

Editor’s Note: See Excerpts from Karl Rove’s Interview with Newsmax

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rove-obama-scandals-corrosive/2013/05/22/id/505929?s=al&promo_code=1395F-1#ixzz2U8PbHOMf
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

How JFK Secretly ADMIRED Hitler Thursday, May 23, 2013

A new book out in Germany reveals how President Kennedy was a secret admirer of the Nazis.

President Kennedy’s travelogues and letters chronicling his wanderings through Germany before WWII, when Adolf Hitler was in power, have been unearthed and show him generally in favor of the movement that was to plunge the world into the greatest war in history.

‘Fascism?’ wrote the youthful president-to-be in one. ‘The right thing for Germany.’

In another; ‘What are the evils of fascism compared to communism?’ 

And on August 21, 1937 – two years before the war that would claim 50 million lives broke out – he wrote: ‘The Germans really are too good – therefore people have ganged up on them to protect themselves.’

Other musings concern how great the autobahns were – ‘the best roads in the world’ – and how, having visited Hitler’s Bavarian holiday home in Berchtesgaden and the tea house built on top of the mountain for him.

He declared: ‘Who has visited these two places can easily imagine how Hitler will emerge from the hatred currently surrounding him to emerge in a few years as one of the most important personalities that ever lived.’

 

Post Continues on www.dailymail.co.uk
Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/2013/05/how-jfk-secretly-admired-hitler/#ixzz2UDqOYTqC

John Fund: Conservative Vote Suppressed by IRS Targeting

The IRS could be directly to blame for lower voter turnout during the 2012 election after conservative groups were left sidelined by the IRS decision to target them, according to John Fund, national-affairs columnist for National Review Online.

In his Thursday column, Fund said there is little evidence to substantiate claims that turnout was lower because voters, particularly minorities, were thwarted from casting their ballots due to tighter state laws requiring photo-ID at polling stations.

“All of this proved to be twaddle,” wrote Fund, pointing to an August 2012 Washington Post poll that showed nearly two-thirds of African Americans and Hispanics backed photo ID. Moreover, the Census Bureau, he said, has since reported the voter turnout rate for blacks exceeded that of whites for the first time.

“But it now turns out there may have [been] suppression of the vote after all,” he wrote, pointing to a conversation he had with Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who said, “It looks like a lot of tea-party groups were less active or never got off the ground because of the IRS actions. Sure seems like people were discouraged by it.”

Fund said he had also spoken to several conservative groups that were directly impacted by having their nonprofit status delayed by “either IRS inaction or burdensome and intrusive questioning.

“At least two donors told me they didn’t contribute to True the Vote, a group formed to combat voter fraud, because after three years of waiting, the group still didn’t have its status granted at the time of the 2012 election,” Fund wrote.

“The IRS claims that all the delays and information demands were rooted in mere mismanagement and misjudgment, a stance that began to look even shakier [Wednesday] when Lois Lerner, the director of the IRS’ exempt-organization division, took the Fifth Amendment before a House committee,” wrote Fund.

He concluded, “It won’t be easy to discover whether the ‘voter suppression’ engaged in by the IRS was malicious and political. But we have to make every effort to find out before the American people start losing confidence in the integrity of our elections.”

© 2013 Newsmax.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/john-fund-conservative-vote/2013/05/23/id/506062?s=al&promo_code=139A6-1#ixzz2UDrz03Id
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

“THE  FREEDON  NEVER  IS  FREE”